Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
118570146
label
Hoover Institute
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
118570146
contentType
document
title
Hoover Institute
identifierLocal
137
collections
Records of the White House Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff (Reagan Administration)
Michael Deaver's Subject Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
118570146
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1985-12-31
year
1985
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1981-01-01
year
1981
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
e1e56372aebbcbda
ocrText
Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Deaver, Michael Folder Title: Hoover Institute Box: 43 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ FYIsoa. 8/16/83 THE WHITE HOUSE washington August 15, 1983 Dear Mr. Green: Reference is made to your letter to me dated August 10, 1983, with enclosures, which sets forth the Subcommittee S request to review additional files located at the Hoover Institution, pursuant to the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding between the Subcommittee on Human Resources and the Trustees of the Reagan-Bush Campaign materials located at the Hoover Institution dated July 29, 1983. In regard to the requested files denominated "Edwin Meese transition files", I must express the Trustees' and my concern as to this request. The Memorandum of Understanding between Mr. Albosta and the Trustees clearly relates to campaign files, not transition files. You have asserted in our l'ecent conversation that Mr. Meese's campaign files are mixed with his transition files at Hoover. Assuming that to be a fact, the real question is how can you determine which documents or files are, in fact, from the campaign as well as being relevant? Obviously, during the transition there was a great deal of exchanging of information and documents between the Carter Administration and the Presidential Transition, all perfectly proper on the part of both parties. Likewise, a reference to a file labeled with a title such as "briefing books" is not inconsistent with transition activity which necessarily included briefings of the President-elect and the Vice President-elect. We are not trying to inhibit any legitimate and relevant file review, but feel this request raises a serious problem. Pre- mature disclosure of the possible existence of such files before appropriate evaluation can be done, as occurred this past weekend, underlines the concern. In an attempt to resolve this issue, however, I would recommend the following procedure: 1. The Archivist will examine each file requested to determine whether it contains any pre-election materials that fall within the proper scope of inquiry as set forth in paragraphs 2 and 4 of the Memorandum of Understanding. If it does not, obviously there will be no purpose to any further review of that file. -2- 2. If the Archivist finds material in a particular file that appears to be pre-election material that falls within the scope of inquiry, and there is no indication that it was supplied after the election, that file may be reviewed in accordance with paragraph 5 of the Memorandum of Understanding, which provides for an initial review by the GAO investigators which is limited to the areas of relevancy as set forth in paragraphs 2 and 4 of that Memorandum. The Subcommittee investigators would limit their review to the product of the GAO search. The rules for relevancy and for the copying and release of information would all remain consistent with the Memorandum of Understanding. In regard to the remaining files which you have requested to review -- that is, the files of Messrs. Garrick, Hopkins/Bandow, Carmen and Ms. Maddox -- I assume these are campaign files, since there is no indicia to the contrary in your requst. If that assumption is correct, the Trustees would agree to a review of these files in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Memorandum cf Understanding, particularly paragraph 5. In regard to boxes marked "Truth Squad", these are not files of individuals. As described, it would appear that the files and material contained in these boxes have already been covered by paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 of the Memorandum of Understanding. Beyond that, however, given the nature of any campaign's "Truth Squad", it is difficult to see how these files would have appropriate relevancy to the scope of your investigation. If, upon reflection, you still feel that this is an item of inquiry we should discuss further, please let me know. I will await word from you regarding all the foregoing. Sincerely, Orig. signed by VFF Fred F. Fielding Counsel to the President Mr. Micah S. Green Staff Director U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Post Office and Civil Service Subcommittee on Human Resources 511 House Office Building Annex 1 Washington, D.C. 20515 CC: James Hamilton, Esquire bcc: Edwin Meese III, Michael K. Deaver file HOOVER INSTITUTION HOOVER 1885 1919 ON WAR, REVOLUTION AND PEACE STANFORD NIVERSITY Stanford, California 94305 March 31, 1983 Ms. Shirley Moore Office of the Assistant to The President Deputy Chief of Staff The White House Washington, DC 20500 no Dear Shirley: Day before yesterday I sent the enclosed letter to Mike. If it is possible for President Reagan to attend the dedication ceremonies at the Commerce Department on April 25 -- or if it is preferable that the first volume of the multi-volume biography of the late President Hoover be presented to President Reagan -- the following individ- uals would comprise the committee representing the Herbert Hoover Presidential Library Association in either case: Senator Barry Goldwater Senator Roger Jepsen Mr. Allan Hoover (son of former President Hoover) Mr. George Nash (author of the definitive biography) Mr. Jeremiah Milbank (originator of the idea to com- mission the biography and to fund its completion) Mr. Donald E. Johnson (President of the Herbert Hoover Presidential Library Association) Mr. John T. Fawcett (Executive Director of the Herbert Hoover Presidential Library Association) Dr. W. Glenn Campbell (Director, Hoover Institution) With my appreciation and very good wishes. Cordially, Dennis L. Bark Deputy Director DLB:jrd Enclosure HOOVER INSTITUTION ON WAR. REVOLUTION AND PEACE Stanford, California 94305 March 29, 1983 Dear Mike: We have been asked to bring to your attention a request of the Hoover Presidential Library in West Branch, Iowa. On April 25 the Department of Commerce Building in Washington, D.C. will be dedicated as the "Herbert C. Hoover Building." The dedication ceremonies are sponsored jointly by the Department of Commerce and the Hoover Presidential Library Association. Secretary Baldridge will make some remarks at the ceremonies as well as Senator Hatfield and a representative from the Presidential Library in Iowa. The Hoover Presidential Library Association hopes that President Reagan would be able to attend the dedication ceremonies between 6 and 6:30 p.m. on Monday, April 25. As I understand it there is a precedent for this: President Carter attended dedications of the Hubert Humphrey Building and of the Frances Perkins Labor Building. If this is not possible it is hoped that there might be an opportunity during the day of April 25 to present President Reagan with the first volume of a multi-volume biography of the late President Hoover. At the request of the Hoover Presidential Library Association, Glenn sent you a letter concerning this request on March 16 (enclosed). With my appreciation and very good wishes. Yours sincerely, Dennis L. Bark Deputy Director The Honorable Michael K. Deaver Assistant to the President Deputy Chief of Staff The White House Washington, DC 20500 HOOVER INSTITUTION THE >** sint ON WAR. REVOLUTION AND PEACE Stanford, California 94305 March 16, 1983 OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR The Honorable Michael K. Deaver Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff The White House Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear Mike: When you so generously saw me on such short notice last Wednesday, you suggested at the end of the meeting that I write you about the brief meeting that the Hoover Presidential Library Association people wish to have with President Reagan. George Nash, who is a protege of Bill Buckley, is writing a massive multi-volume and first rate biography of the late President Hoover. The first volume will be published on April 25. Donald E. Johnson, former Veterans Administration administrator under President Nixon, is the president of the Hoover Presidential Library Associa- tion in West Branch, Iowa. He wrote Frederick J. Ryan, who is in charge of presidential scheduling, on March 10 requesting a White House meeting with President Reagan, hopefully sometime during the day of April 25, in order to present him with the first copy of the special edition of the biography. Whatever you can do to make this meeting possible will be deeply appreciated. With best wishes, Sincerely yours, Her Glenn Campbell CC: John T. Fawcett Executive Director Hoover Presidential Library Association Hold, REGRET HOOVER INSTITUTION HOOVER 1885 1919 ON WAR, REVOLUTION AND PEACE STANFORD UNIVERSITY PEACE Stanford, California 94305 415 497-7754 2056 OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR The Honorable Michael K. Deaver Deputy Chief of Staff and Assistant what March 14, 1983 its to the President The White House Washington, D.C. 20500 talk tack to about to Dear Mike: Within the framework of our Domestic and International Studies programs at the Hoover Institution, the "Hoover Seminar" has been an occasion for prominent guests in the executive branch of govern- ment and our scholars to meet and exchange views on current policy matters. With this letter, I would like to invite you to participate in one of the Hoover Seminars, as your schedule may permit. We believe that the Hoover Seminar is playing a major role in the relationship between scholars and the nation's decision makers, whose dialogue is so crucial to responsible decisions in government today. Members of the administration who have participated in the Seminars thus far include, among others, Edwin Meese III, Attorney General William French Smith and Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. The Seminar's format of an informal morning or afternoon discussion with the Institution's scholars is deliberately flexible. It is designed to afford our guests the opportunity to become acquainted with the Hoover Institution and to be a stimulating and enjoyable occasion. Because the Hoover Institution is a non-profit organization, under Section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code, we understand that transportation here can be made at government expense. Alternatively, it may be made at our expense if our guest prefers. The Institution would pay all costs as needed for lodging and meals of our guest and spouse (and the spouse's transportation). We would be very pleased if you are able to accept our invitation. and it would be a pleasure to welcome you to the Hoover Institution. With best wishes, Sincerely yours, Sleen Glenn Campbell Warkzo THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON May 3, 1983 MEMORANDUM FOR MICHAEL DEAVER FROM: LANDON PARVIN JP SUBJECT: Hoover Institution Seminar I think these scholarly seminars are much easier than they sound. History and political science scholars are at heart gossips who love insights into the way power centers operate. Because of your position, your view of the presidency is enough to make them salivate no matter what you say. I think there are all many topics related to your responsibilities that would be of great interest to them: - difference between campaigning and governing --- importance of image in leadership - the education of a President, how does a President take up the reins of power -- perspectives on summitry - isolation of a President - constraints of time, security, etc. - modern demands on a President's time and their effects -- can modern presidency survive the media (I think Speakes has spoken about this) -- how much more can we demand of a President before presidency is too big for one individual - ways in which press affect decision-making There must be all kinds of fascinating insights here that could carry a seminar on for days, not simply for a couple of hours. HOOVER INSTITUTION HOOVER INSTITUTION ON WAR, REVOLUTION AND PEACE 1885 Stanford, California 94305 5.J.1983 (ken Shiles, Manuel thanks for you card - - good wishes do higher a disference. - Now all I have to L is take the doctor's orders - That's adding misult k injury Bark Surcevely, HOOVER INSTITUTION HOOVER ON WAR, REVOLUTION AND PEACE 1885 6161 STANFORD UNIVERSITY Stanford, California 94305 March file 29, 1982 Dear Mike: This is a note to let you know that we have mailed our check to Mr. Scouten for reimbursement of the expenses incurred with President and Mrs. Reagan's reception at The White House on January 11 in honor of the Board of Overseers of the Hoover Institution. On behalf of all of us I would like to thank you very warmly once again. The reception was thoroughly enjoyed by everyone who attended and it could not have been more nicely done. Enclosed is an editorial from the March 23 edition of the San Francisco Chronicle. It seems to me that there should be a few more editorials like this appearing in newspapers throughout the country and I am taking some steps to insure that they do--in such papers as The Detroit News, The Sacramento Union, The Daily Pantagraph (Bloomington, IL), and The Richmond-Times Dispatch. With warm regards and I hope that you will be able to attend the Grove in July. Condially, Dennis Jimi L. Bark Deputy Director The Honorable Michael K. Deaver Assistant to the President Deputy Chief of Staff The White House Washington, DC 20500 SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE March 23, 1982 Hold Firm on Reaganomics THE PRIMARY GOAL of the economic program of the Reagan administration was to cut and, if possible, halt a roaring rate of inflation which was hurting young and old, rich and poor alike, all of us with its silent theft of purchasing power and of savings. And, surely, now it is time to acknowledge that the rate has been cut and shows signs of being cut further. It is time to acknowledge this substantial achievement because doubts are being heard in Washington and on Wall Street about other aspects of Reaganomics even before their impact has been felt. The critics of what might be called Reaganomics II should temper their doubt somewhat in the face of solid achieve- ment. The wholesale price index, effects of which are soon reflected at local cash registers, was roaring along out of control at an annual rate of 11.8 percent in 1980. That rate was slowed to 7 percent last year. In January, the decline continued and the projected annual rate for that month was 5.3 percent. This is a very considerable slash in reining in inflation and it is a trend that can be maintained. THOSE WHO NOW demand changes in the president's economic program must give recognition to this fact. There is a group demanding that other aspects of the program, tax cuts, further budget cuts and general deregulation, be changed even though they have not been given a full test in the field. There are appeals, for instance, for no further budget cuts even though the full impact of those already made has not been felt. And some want taxes increased even though the president's tax proposals have yet to be fully implemented. The so-called tax cuts, it should be remembered are actually masquerading. Rather than cutting tax income to the federal government, they merely cut its planned rate of increases over the next few years. Critics must also recognize that today's economy is the end product of decades and decades of fiscal mismanagement; past errors simply are not subject to instant correction. It is easy to understand the widespread concern over the budget deficits projected over the next few years. But it seems to us to be program of the Reagan administration was to cut and, if possible, halt a roaring rate of inflation which was hurting young and old, rich and poor alike, all of us with its silent theft of purchasing power and of savings. And, surely, now it is time to acknowledge that the rate has been cut and shows signs of being cut further. It is time to acknowledge this substantial achievement because doubts are being heard in Washington and on Wall Street about other aspects of Reaganomics even before their impact has been felt. The critics of what might be called Reaganomics II should temper their doubt somewhat in the face of solid achieve- ment. The wholesale price index, effects of which are soon reflected at local cash registers, was roaring along out of control at an annual rate of 11.8 percent in 1980. That rate was slowed to 7 percent last year. In January, the decline continued and the projected annual rate for that month was 5.3 percent. This is a very considerable slash in reining in inflation and it is a trend that can be maintained. THOSE WHO NOW demand changes in the president's economic program must give recognition to this fact. There is a group demanding that other aspects of the program, tax cuts, further budget cuts and general deregulation, be changed even though they have not been given a full test in the field. There are appeals, for instance, for no further budget cuts even though the full impact of those already made has not been felt. And some want taxes increased even though the president's tax proposals have yet to be fully implemented. The so-called tax cuts, it should be remembered are actually masquerading. Rather than cutting tax income to the federal government, they merely cut its planned rate of increases over the next few years. Critics must also recognize that today's economy is the end product of decades and decades of fiscal mismanagement; past errors simply are not subject to instant correction. It is easy to understand the widespread concern over the budget deficits projected over the next few years. But it seems to us to be far too early to judge what the effect of. those deficits will be - particularly if the anticipated turnaround in the economy arrives within a reasonable time. And, while we are uncertain about the effects of the deficits. we remain certain about what the country's course should not be. The nation simply can not return to the wastrel ways of the past. We know, all too painfully that the old course has to be changed. The new course, of tightened budgets. lessened tax burdens. fewer bureaucratic controls and monetary restraints. must be given time to prove itself. HOOVER INSTITUTION HOOVER INSTITUTION ON WAR, REVOLUTION AND PEACE 1885 1919 Stanford, California 94305 STANFORD PROMOTE VIVERSITY June 12, 1981 jup Dear Mike: I have just returned after a fascinating, if somewhat exhausting weekend interviewing the national finalists for White House Fellowships. The results are interesting, and Frank Hodsoll is well aware of them. The main reason for this letter, however, is to tell you about the comment of one of the staff members of The White House Fellows Program, Ms. Beryl Hall, the Program's Public Affairs Coordinator. During the Vice President's reception, given the national finalists on Friday afternoon, June 6, she mentioned that she had been associated with the Program for eleven years, and that this reception was the most pleasant and most enjoyable she had ever experienced. They are very excited and very appreciative! With warm regards. Cordially, Dennis L. Bark Deputy Director The Honorable Michael K. Deaver Assistant to the President Deputy Chief of Staff The White House Washington, DC 20500 Shulerspeep December 1980 HOOVER INSTITUTION ON WAR, REVOLUTION AND PEACE BOARD OF OVERSEERS Anne Armstrong Joseph Coors Armstrong Ranch President Armstrong, Texas 78338 Adolph Coors Co. Golden, Colorado 80401 Peter B. Bedford 41 Lafayette Circle Edwin L. Cox Lafayette, California 94549 3800 First National Bank Building Dallas, Texas 75261 Karl R. Bendetsen Chairman, Executive Committee Frederick C. Crawford Champion International F. C. Crawford Foundation 2918 Garfield Terrace, N.W. P.O. Box 17036 Washington, D.C. 20008 Cleveland, Ohio 44117 Peter S. Bing, M.D. Charles A. Dana, Jr. 9700 West Pico Boulevard President Los Angeles, California 90035 Cadan Corporation 505 Park Avenue James B. Black, Jr. New York, New York 10022 Partner Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb Inc. Paul L. Davies, Jr. One Bush Street Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro San Francisco, California 94104 225 Bush Street San Francisco, California 94104 Henry T. Bodman 46 Lake Shore Road Morris M. Doyle Grosse Pointe Farms, Michigan 48236 McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen 3 Embarcadero Center Alf E. Brandin San Francisco, California 94111 Senior Vice President Utah International Inc. Reinhold Dreher 550 California Street Trustee San Francisco, California 94104 The Louis Calder Foundation 10 Rockefeller Plaza David Tennant Bryan New York, New York 10020 Chairman and Publisher Media General Inc. Northcutt Ely 333 East Grace Street 915 Watergate 600 Building Richmond, Virginia 23213 Washington, D. C. 20037 William B. Coberly, Jr. Robert J. Feibusch President President and Chief Executive Office California Cotton Oil Corporation Impell Corporation 606 North Larchmont Blvd., Suite 4D 220 Montgomery Street Los Angeles, California 90004 San Francisco, California 94104 Paul F. Grady 700 South Ocean Boulevard Boca Raton, Florida 33432 2 Alan Greenspan A. Carl Kotchian President 256 S. Robertson Boulevard Townsend-Greenspan and Co., Inc. Beverly Hills, California 90211 One New York Plaza New York, New York 10004 J. Clayburn La Force, Jr. John R. Grey Dean, Graduate School of Manageme University of California President Los Angeles, California 90024 Standard Oil Company of California 225 Bush Street Peyton M. Lake add San Francisco, California 94104 Vice President George D. Hart Harold H. Helm 111 Sutter Street Lake Ronel Oil Company Tyler, Texas 75710 Honorary Director San Francisco, CA 94104 Chemical Bank Frederick C. Loomis 30 Rockefeller Plaza 3462 Rossmoor Parkway, #4 New York, New York 10020 Walnut Creek, California 94595 Allan Hoover Gordon C. Luce 25 Field Point Road President Greenwich, Connecticut 06830 San Diego Federal Savings and Loan Association Andrew Hoover 1600 B Street John T. Boyd Company San Diego, California 92100 430 Oliver Building Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222 William B. Macomber, Jr. President Herbert Hoover III The Metropolitan Museum of Art Suite 450 Fifth Avenue at 82nd Street 523 West Sixth Street New York, New York 10028 Los Angeles, California 90014 Jack K. Horton J. William Middendorf, II President and Chief Executive Offi Chairman of the Board Financial General Bankshares Inc. Southern California Edison Company P.O. Box 800 1701 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Rosemead, California 91770 Jaquelin Hume Frederick W. Mielke, Jr. Chairman of the Board Chairman of the Board Ampco Foods Inc. Pacific Gas and Electric Company 77 Beale Street 4600 Bank of America Center San Francisco, California 94105 San Francisco, California 94104 Jeremiah Milbank Marron Kendrick 60 East 42nd Street Chairman of the Board New York, New York 10017 Schlage Lock Company P.O. Box 3324 Edward E. Noble San Francisco, California 94119 President Donald Kennedy Lenox Square, Inc. President 3393 Peachtree Road, N.W. Stanford University Atlanta, Georgia 30326 Stanford, California 94305 3 David Packard Forrest N. Shumway Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer Hewlett-Packard Company The Signal Companies, Inc. 1501 Page Mill Road 9665 Wilshire Boulevard Palo Alto, California 94304 Beverly Hills, California 90212 Jack S. Parker William E. Simon Director Emeritus Blyth, Eastman, Dillon & Co., Inc. General Electric Company 1221 Avenue of the Americas Fairfield, Connecticut 06431 New York, New York 10020 Thomas P. Pike John K. Stewart Honorary Vice Chairman of the Board Stewart and Patten Company The Fluor Corporation, Ltd. 235 Montgomery Street 515 South Flower Street, Suite 2400 San Francisco, California 94104 Los Angeles, California 90071 Vice Admiral James B. Stockdale, Frank O. Prior USN (Ret.) 1564 South Ocean Boulevard 1 Cypress Street Palm Beach, Florida 33480 Newport, Rhode Island 02840 Robert O. Reynolds Willis A. Strauss Suite 306 Chairman and President 11661 San Vicente Boulevard Northern Natural Gas Company Los Angeles, California 90049 2223 Dodge Street Omaha, Nebraska 68102 Charles R. Rittenberry 1201 Petroleum Club Building Robert C. Swain Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119 60 Meadow Road Riverside, Connecticut 06878 Carroll J. Roush 220 Mapache Drive Robert J. Swain Portola Valley, California 94025 Vice President MAPCO Inc. Fred J. Russell 1800 South Baltimore Avenue Mira Loma Water Company Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119 P.O. Box 54228 Los Angeles, California 90054 John E. Swearingen Chairman of the Board Richard M. Scaife Publisher Standard Oil Company (Indiana) 200 East Randolph Drive Tribune Review Publishing Company Chicago, Illinois 60680 525 William Penn Place Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 William R. Timken, Jr. Chairman of the Board John I. Shaw The Timken Company 135 South LaSalle Street 1835 Dueber Avenue, S.W. Chicago, Illinois 60603 Canton, Ohio 44706 John C. Shepherd C.Y. Tung Shepherd, Sandberg & Phoenix Chairman One Mercantile Center Suite 3000 Orient Overseas Containers Holdings Lt St. Louis, Missouri 63101 12th Floor, Hutchison House 10 Harcourt Road Hong Kong 4 Dean A. Watkins J. Howard Wood Chairman of the Board Watkins-Johnson Company Tribune Company 333 Hillview Avenue 435 North Michigan Avenue, Room 12 Palo Alto, California 94304 Chicago, Illinois 60611 General Albert C. Wedemeyer James H. Zumberge President Friends Advice Boyds, Maryland 20720 University of Southern California Los Angeles, California 90007 OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS Chairman of the Board: Paul L. Davies, Jr. Vice Chairman of the Board: Dean A. Watkins Executive Committee: Paul L. Davies, Jr., Allan Hoover, Jeremiah Milbank, Jack S. Parker, Thomas P. Pike, John C. Shepherd, John E. Swearingen, Dean A. Watkins Finance Committee: Frederick C. Crawford, Herbert Hoover III, Jaquelin H. Hume, J. Clayburn La Force, Jr., Gordon C. Luce, Robert J. Swain, William R. Timken the Honorable LonaldW.Reagan eagan remarks on THE HOOVER INSTITUTION the Honorable RonaldW.Reagan remarks on THE HOOVER INSTITUTION JANUARY 6, 1981 WASHINGTON, D.C. STANFORD 1885 HOOVER TO PROMOTE INSTITUTION INSTITUTI UNIVERSITY ION 1919 Remarks by President-elect Ronald W. Reagan, January 6, 1981, before a dinner at the Sheraton-Carlton Hotel, Wash- ington, D.C., given by the Hoover Institution, Stanford Uni- versity, in honor of the Institution's Board of Overseers. Courtesy of The White House. D r. Glenn Campbell, my own teammate-as you all know- and you, Ladies and Gentlemen: I am delighted to be here. Hearing about my being the first honorary fellow of the Hoover Institution, it did frighten me a little bit, because I graduated from a small college in the Midwest with a degree in economics. Some years later, they called me back to give me an honorary degree, which com- pounded a feeling of guilt I had nursed for some time because I thought the first one had been honorary. And now, I am wait- ing for someone to tell me that what has most recently happened to me is honorary. I think my becoming an honorary member followed the results of an incident in which, after some of the things that had been happening on some of the campuses in California, I chose the Hoover Institution to be the recipient of some twenty- five tons of papers from my eight years as governor of California. When I arrived for the first time, there was a ceremony and I was taken down to the basement and shown a stack of boxes weighing some twenty-five tons. To show you that we didn't waste anything in California, with all the press and the cameras grinding, there in the midst of all those plain boxes, all stacked up, were two that said in large print on the side, "Whiskey." We had too many papers and too few boxes! It is a privilege to address you-the members of the Board of Overseers of the Hoover Institution, and your guests. It is also a pleasure to do so because of my association with both the In- stitution and its director, Glenn Campbell. This association has spanned many years. I have been privileged to have a great deal of advice and help from the Institution, and tonight I would like to talk to you about the Hoover Institution and Glenn Camp- bell's two decades of success. B ut, before I do, I think there is something that ought to be mentioned here tonight. George and Barbara Bush are serving above and beyond the call of duty, because this is their thirty-fifth wedding anniversary. I'll probably find out, after I leave-because I have to leave and go some place else this eve- ning-that someone else had something all planned and I blew it. Since its founding in 1919, the Hoover Institution has become a national and an international center for documenta- tion and research on social, political, and economic change in the twentieth century. It enjoys a reputation for excellence that is a direct reflection of the efforts of Glenn and his staff to main- tain the highest traditions of its distinguished founder, former United States President Herbert Hoover. Indeed, in 1978, the New York Times Magazine called the Institution "the brightest star in a small constellation of con- servative think tanks operating from a base of honorable conservatism, first-rate scholarship, sharp wits, acute perceptions and clear reasoning." Well, I'm happy to say that, as I mentioned before, I've experienced this conservatism and scholarship, these wits and perceptions, and this reasoning personally through my associa- tion with the Institution as an honorary fellow. During my visits there, I have had the opportunity to discuss public policy issues with a staff made up of Nobel laureates, members of the Ameri- can Academy of Arts and Sciences, and other distinguished thinkers. M oreover, during the recent campaign, I called on more people from the Institution to help with my campaign than from any other institution. Some, such as Glenn and Rita Ricardo-Campbell, served on my policy task forces. Others, such as Martin Anderson, Darrell Trent, and former Senior Fellow Dick Allen, worked on my campaign staff. All are now assisting me in the transition to a new administration. That's why, when the press was having at me about my so-called gaffes, I wasn't frightened for one minute. I knew that everything I said was true! Hoover's excellence has emerged in large part because of Glenn Campbell. It is he who has worked SO hard and planned so well. It is he who has maintained such high stan- dards of academic excellence in finding the best scholars avail- able. It is he who has worked to provide a challenging and stimu- lating environment in which superior scholarship can take place. It is he who has raised the financial resources necessary to de- velop a fine research institution. And, it is he who has effectively and fairly administered this "brightest star" in the constellation of think tanks. I'm happy to report that Glenn's talents haven't gone un- noticed by others. In fact, his dedication to superior scholarship and his reputation as an effective and fair administrator led me to make him my first appointee to the University of California Board of Regents in 1968. And, there was no combat pay at that time. During the 1980 campaign, he chaired my Education Policy Task Force and was a member of my Inflation Policy Task Force and my International Economic Policy Task Force. He is now serving on the Personnel Advisory Committee, which is responsible for making cabinet and subcabinet-level recom- mendations. G lenn has also served on the Board of the National Science Foundation, as a member of President Ford's Committee on Science and Technology, and as a member of the President's Commission on White House Fellows. I am deeply grateful to Glenn and the Hoover Institu- tion staff for the support and the expertise that they provided me in the past and are providing now. And, I would say that I am looking forward to receiving such advice in the years ahead, for superior scholarship and research will be critically important in making the hard policy choices that are necessary to turn our country around. I would say that, except that lately I have found a new source of advice. The Des Moines Register and Tribune invited literally thousands of grade-school students in Iowa to write to a paper, and their papers would be printed with advice they would give to a president if they had the chance. They sent a stack of those letters to me, and I read them, and I was fascinated. I don't remember, when I was nine or ten years old, that I was interest- ed in the issues that make a campaign or national policy. But, I read letters about inflation and unemployment and national de- fense from these children. And, one of them in particular-an eleven-year-old boy-wrote, "When you get in there, don't look to the past-you won't have time. Look to the future." And, he said, "Be prepared that you will look older and feel older, and you will add some grey hairs to your wise old head." He said, "Surround yourself with good advisers." (As I have indicated here, that I have already done.) He said, "Take the counsel and advice and just be happy that you don't have to be God. You only have to be President." I'll take all this advice, including that of the nine-year-old girl who wrote to me and finished her letter by saying, "Now get over to the Oval Office and get down to work." I hope you will join me in this sincere tribute to an extraordi- nary man, who has led this Institution to its point of greatness for the last twenty years - Dr. Glenn Campbell. The Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace, founded at Stanford University in 1919 by the late President Herbert Hoover, is an interdisciplinary research center for advanced study on domestic and international affairs in the twentieth century. The views expressed in its publications are entirely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, officers, or Board of Overseers of the Hoover Institution. © 1981 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America