Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
118570362
label
Personnel 1981 (2)
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
118570362
contentType
document
title
Personnel 1981 (2)
citationUrl
identifierLocal
137
collections
Records of the White House Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff (Reagan Administration)
Michael Deaver's Subject Files
thumbnailUrl
largeImageUrl
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
118570362
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1985-12-31
year
1985
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1981-01-01
year
1981
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
9f029b434bb3ecdd
ocrText
Ronald Reagan Presidential Library
Digital Library Collections
This is a PDF of a folder from our textual
collections.
Collection: Deaver, Michael
Folder Title: Personnel 1981 (2)
Box: 49
To see more digitized collections
visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library
To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories
visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection
Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected]
Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing
National Archives
Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/
WITHDRAWAL SHEET
Ronald Reagan Library
Collection: Deaver, Michael K.: Files
Archivist: mjd/bcb
File Folder: Personnel - 1981[2 of 4]
OA 7624/0868
Date: 4/7/98
Ghm 3/11/11
DOCUMENT
SUBJECT/TITLE
DATE
RESTRICTION
NO. AND TYPE
1. memo
Craig L.Fuller to Mike Deaver re Rehiring James
10/2/81
P5, P6 B6
Mayo, 1p.
2. memo
"Missy" to C.L.F. re Dr.James Mayo/DOE/National
7/29/81
P5, P6 B6
Science Foundation, 1p.
3. memo
Kenneth Cribb, Jr. to Craig Fuller re Rehiring of
7/29/81.
P5, P6- B6
James W.Mayo at Energy, 1p.
4. memo
Michael Deaver to Craig Fuller re Dr. Mayo, 1p.
6/19/81
P5- open
5. memo
Michael Deaver to Jay Moorland re Hewitt, 1p.
n.d.
P5 open
(OZ 10/27/00
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P-1 National security classified information [(a)(1) of the PRA].
F-1 National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA].
P-2 Relating to appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA].
F-2 Release could disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of
P-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA].
FOIA].
P-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information
F-3 Release would violate a Federal statue [(b)(3) of the FOIA].
[(a)(4) of the PRA].
F-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial informa
P-5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President and his advisors, or
[(b)(4) of the FOIA].
between such advisors [(a)(5) of the PRA].
F-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of
P-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy [(a)(6) of
FOIA].
the PRA].
F-7 Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) o
the FOIA].
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed of gift.
F-8 Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions
[(b)(8) of the FOIA].
F-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(
the FOIA].
From the desk of:
VERNON CRISTINA
tile
Mike:
The applicant Mark Urdahl is very desirous
of participating in some non-paying meaning-
ful work in Washington D. C.
He, of course, is not looking for remuneration
and is capable of paying his own way.
He is presently enrolled at University of
California - Santa Barbara and will enroll
in Stanford Law School shortly after graduation.
His only available time is Jan, Feb, & March
of 1982.
He is a super kid and I hope you can find
something for him.
BEST REGARDS to you and the President.
Sincerely,
Vern
I
JESS,
HERE'S All THE INFORMATION ON
THE CAPITOL HILL PROGRAM. THIS is
WHAT THEY SEND TO my POTENTIAL
EMPLOYER.
I HAVE ACSO INCLUDED 2
ZEROX COPIES of SPECIFIC
INTERNSHIPS I would LIKE TO
DO: THE WHITE HOUSE INTERNSHIP
AND THE JUDICIAL INTERNSHIP.
THE WHITE HOUSE INTERNSHIP
is WHAT I REALLY WANT TO Do -
SERVE AS A SPECIAL ASSISTANT To
CABINET interisers OR SENIOR STAFF
MEMBERS. THE PRIMARY SKILL is
HIGHLY MOTIVATED - I WILL WORK
my BUT OFF FOR WHOEVER a WORK
FOR. IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE FOR A
YEAR, BUT 4 THINK IT IS POSSIBLE
TO WORK FOR A QUARTER < JANUARY 1-
MARCH 20 ). I Am Aeso WORKING FOR
FREE.
I Am ALSO INTERESTED IN WORKING
FOR JACK KEMP (REAGANOMES). INFORMATION
, 5 INCLUDED. ALSO BOTH GOLDWATERS.
I APPRECIATE EVERY THING you
ARE DOING. THANKS
Amak
REPRESENTATIVE JACK KEMP
ADMINISTRATIVE ASST:
DAVID SWICK
(202) 225-5265
RED. BARRY GOLDWATER
-JANE HAVILCEK
(202) 225-4461
Jess
CAPITOL HILL PROGRAM
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA 93107
CAPITOL HILL PROGRAM - GENERAL INFORMATION
PLEASE READ BEFORE FILLING OUT APPLICATION
The UCSB Capitol Hill Program is a student-run internship program open to UCSB under-
graduates who have exhibited exceptional ability in politically oriented activities
and have expressed a desire to further these interests by serving in the office of a
congressperson, senator, federal agency, interest group or private organization.
The program is designed to serve as a liason between participating office holders in
Washington, D.C./Sacramento and interested students at UCSB. We relieve the potential
employers of the burdensome selection process by endorsing qualified applicants who
have been screened by the CHP's committee. And we assist students by offering advice
on the availability and desirability of certain internship positions and by having ex-
interns conduct evening seminars to prepare the applicant for his Washington/Sacramento
experience.
The internship spaces available to CHP applicants are among the most substantive in
Washington/Sacramento. Every effort has been made to eliminate from our portfolio
those offices that have a reputation for using interns to perform only menial tasks.
Offices with which we continue to be in touch indicate that the responsibilities delegated
to interns include, of course, running errands, etc., but consist primarily of answering
mail, monitoring the House and Senate floors, researching, composing legislation,
writing speeches and floor statements, etc.
Internships usually last for one quarter during the school year and eight weeks in the
summer. Most offices request that students arrive before or during the first week of
classes for that particular quarter.
Academic credit is available to interns. Usually this consists of 12 units from a
particular department for a quarter-long internship during which time the student
is expected to write a detailed research paper. Credit arrangements must be cleared
with that department.
been done?
INSTRUCTIONS: Please fill out the attached application form, request a copy of your
transcripts from the registrar's office, and have two faculty members (or T.A.'s) submit
brief letters of recommendation to the CHP. These will be used in conjunction with
personal interviews to select qualified students for spaces in Washington/Sacramento.
If you are selected by the CHP, a portion of the application material will be forwarded
(with our recommendation) to prospective employers who will then determine if they
have the need and space for someone with your background.
Please submit the following: 3 copies of the application form, questions 3-10 and your
?,
writing sample (details inside); 1 copy of questions 1 & 2, and your transcripts; and
2 recommendations from faculty.
Submit your application, by the deadline specified, to the Capitol Hill Office, or leave
it in the Capitol Hill mailbox (#29) located in the Student Resource Room #3137. Both
rooms are located on the third floor of the UCEN. When you bring it in, please sign
up to an interview. A sign-up sheet will be posted on the door of the CHP office.
CAPITOL HILL PROGRAM
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
.
SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA 93107
Quarter desired: Fall
Alpha number 77165879
Winter X
Home Cong. District 13th
Spring
Representative's Name Norman Mineta
Summer
Expected date of Graduation
June,
1983
Full Name Mark Richard Urdahl
Age 21
Campus Address 807 Embarcadero Del Norte, #14
Phone 968-4880
268-
Address Between Quarters 6518 Crystal Springs Dr. San Jose, CA 95120
Phone (408)
0383
Class Rank Junior
MajorBus. Economics Overall GPA. 3.0
Major GPA 2.9
Education: Please list all high schools and colleges in order of attendance, and
indicate any period of military service.
School
Place
Dates
Degree
Leland High School
San Jose
9/75-6/78
H.S. Diploma
University of California, Santa Barbara
9/79-present
Scholarships, Awards, Honors
University Dean's List
Extracurricular: Offices held, group memberships, community projects, etc.
List three ranked in order of importance to you.
University 1. Sigma Chi Fraternity- Interfraternity Council, Alumni & P.R. Representative
2, College Republicans- Vice-President 3. Omicron Delta Epsilon-National Economic Honor
Society
High school 1. Varsity Water Polo-All League Team Member 2. Varsity Swimming
3. Varsity Track & Field
Tell us why the extracurricular University activity you listed first is most important
to you. I have gained a great deal of insight and knowledge about working
cooperatively with others who may have views different than myself.
Likewise, I have learned a lot about myself.
A fraternity is, in a sense, a small-scale government with all the emotion,
opinion, politicking, organization, and law-making of larger government. A
Fraternity álso has the same financial, ethical, and moral obligations and
responsibilities to meet both individually and as an organization.
List any office skills you have, i.e., typing, dictaphone, etc.
I type (35 w.p.m.), take notes well, and think in an organized and efficient
manner. I also work well in public rebations positions.
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA
DEPARTMENT
OF
BERKELEY
DAVIS
IRVINE
LOS ANGELES
RIVERSIDE
SAN DIEGO
SAN FRANCISCO
THE
IFORNIA
SANTA BARBARA
SANTA CRUZ
VIA:
1868
DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE
SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA 93106
October 29, 1981
Capitol Hill Program
University of California
Santa Barbara, CA 93107
To whom it may concern:
Mark Urdahl has been a student of mine during this
Fall quarter. He has shown not only great interest and
enthusiasm, but also an exceptional capability of reasoning
and analysis.
His participation in class has been remarkable; his
points are always coherent and worthwile.
I really believe that he is an excellent candidate
for an internship in Washington, D. C., and I am sure he
will do a superior job if given the opportunity.
Sincerely
Fernando X Lopez
Political Science Dept.
Capitol Hill Program
Mark Richard Urdahl
1. Do you feel you can work effectively for a legislator or organization
whose political views are different than yours?
I can work effectively and responsibly for a legislator or
organization whose views are different than mine; I enjoy dialectic
and opposing opinion as a way to learn and expose myself to new and
different ideas. This is my primary reason for applying to the Capitol
Hill Program- to learn. I am, however, interested in working with a
legislator whose interests are economic efficiency, a balanced budget,
and smaller Federal and State goverment.
2. Please tell us candidly and explicitly why you would like to be an
intern in Washington D.C.
I visited Washington, D.C. for a week over the past summer; I
was extremely impressed, and for the first time in my life I felt
patriotic. Since then, I have had a burning desire to go back and
get involved in the entire political process, from the legislative
decision-making to casual political conversations over drinks in the
afternoon.
T want to expose myself to our nation's political system and
learn as much and do as much as possible.
3. What, in your opinion, are the two key contemporary socio-political
issues of today and, briefly, how do you feel about them?
Our Nation's economic policy is the most critical issue we face
today. The economy will effect more people, more immediately, than
any other single issue: the effects of Reagan's tax and budget programs
have already produced significant consequences not only in the public
and private sectors of the U.S. economy, but world-wide as well.
I support Reagan's economic program. I would, however, like to see
him utilize more expertise from private sector analysts who are immed-
iately involved in the dynamic result of his decisions.
Education of our people is the second most important issue because
it will have the greatest long-term effect on our country's future. It
is, perhaps, the most difficult to solve: the effects are not realized
in the short-term, thereby reducing legislative incentive to tackle the
problem; there is no widespread agreement on what the problems actually
are, and the direction we should take to correct them. We see only the
strife. More effective education of our people will only enhance the
quality of life, and help to reduce social problems for future generations.
I believe the first step we must take is to promote educational
competition in public schools. Educational vouchers have been proposed,
giving parents the choice between schools, thereby eliminating community
and district "monopolies" by area schools. There are difficulties, but
in the long-run, competion in public schools would reduce costs and
improve the quality of education. Perhaps public schools would become
competetive with private in terms of educational quality.
4. What are your strongest interest areas in terms of your educational
backround, previous work experience, and future plans?
Educationally, my forte is economics. I have also studied a great
deal of political science in specific interest areas such as Middle
Eastern politics and intellectual developement of political thought.
In this day and age, economics is politics, and politics, economics.
Previous work experience has always involved working with people through
sales, and in the last year through management and organization. My
future plans are not concrete, but will invariably involve business
and economic enterprise.
I am interested in learning how government influences people's lives
sociologically, politically, and economically. I am interested in
learning why decision-makers make their decisions. And I am interested
in learning how accurately their decisions reflect what is good for
the individual in society, because I believe that individual freedom
will help society gain.
5. Though specific requests are usually difficult to honor, in which special
interest area would you like to work most?
I would like to work on the Hill with either a Congressman or a
Senator on issues concerning the Federal budget, national economics,
foriegn policy (particularly Soviet and Middle Eastern policy), and
the U.S. role in international economics. In particular, I want to
get involved with legislators involved in supply-side economics such
as the Kemp-Roth team.
6. How do you feel about a job that is primarily political?
Campaign work and partisan politics in our political system both
intrigue me and lead me to question our election system. It is
unfortunate that Congressman must spend so much time and energy to
insure their re-election. I would, however, find this a valuable
learning experience. To be frank, I am interested in learning more what
good. government is than I am in learning what successful government is.
In campaign work, I would want to campaign for a person or cause that
I believe in. I have studied communications and advanced public speaking
analysis utilizing Aristotle's Rhetoric; I feel I would be an asset to
any organization involved with and speaking to the public.
7. How do you feel about a job that is primarily comprehensive research work?
I would find this extremely rewarding, particularly if I had a good
deal of responsibility, and the research work involved something in which
I have a working background knowledge. I would also prefer that this
research had some meaningful and realizable effect on my employer.
Research in economic or foriegn policy would be excellent. I also have
background knowledge in business law and our legal system.
8. How do you feel about a job that involves typing, writing, running errands
and phone work: Generally, a jack of all trades?
I write very well, can type (35 w.p.m.), speak well, and get things
done. I have worked in management and feel I would handle a job like
this very capably. I like to have a lot of responsibility and make
decisions; I also like to excel in whatever I do. I would enjoy any
position which would challenge me.
JUDICIAL INTERNSHIP PROGRAM
CONTACT: Dr. Mark Cannon
INTERNS/YEAR: 12
Supreme Court of the
United States
TIME PERIOD: Year-round
1 First Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20543
(202) 252-3400
PROGRAM DESIGN: The Judicial Internship Program offers an opportunity for
a small number of law, management, and/or social science students to gain
an appreciation for the field of judicial administration through firsthand
work experience in the Office of the Administrative Assistant to the Chief
Justice. Interns make important contributions through active exploration
and analysis of issues currently or potentially impacting the administra-
tion of justice in the U.S. They monitor past and on-going research on
means of modernizing the federal judicial system; collate and prepare
materials for memoranda, correspondence, articles for publication and
speeches; gather information to service a variety of needs; and conduct
original research.
SKILLS NEEDED: Intellectual development, creativity, writing ability and
a demonstrated capacity to absorb extensive information and analyze, sum-
marize and derive conclusions from it; trustworthiness, discretion, and a
non-doctrinaire approach to projects and issues; self-sustaining motiva-
tion and initiative; willingness and ability to undertake a variety of
tasks as assigned.
BENEFITS OF THIS EXPERIENCE: Will gain an understanding of and familiar-
ity with the way the Supreme Court functions as an institution.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES
CONTACT: Tim Mazanz
INTERNS/TERM: varies
Staff Associate
444 N. Capital Street, N.W.
TIME PERIOD: Year-round
Washington, D.C. 20001
(202) 624-5400
PROGRAM DESIGN: NCSL is a public interest group comprised of the nation's
7500 state legislators and their staffs. Its objectives are to improve the
quality and effectiveness of state legislatures; to assure a strong, cohe-
sive voice in the federal decision-making process; and to foster inter-
state communication and cooperation. Interns are assigned to a special
assistant in one of nine areas: transportation; criminal justice and con-
sumer affairs; energy; education; committee on law and justice; government
operations; rural and urban development committee; human resources sub-
committee on aging): and natural resources. The intern researches various
issues, attends meetings and hearings, contributes to NCSL publications,
and handles information requests.
(continued on next page)
65
THE PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION ON WHITE HOUSE FELLOWSHIPS
CONTACT: Gerry Newman or
INTERNS/YEAR: 14-19
Andre Ramseur
1900 E Street,
TIME PERIOD: Year-long
N.W., Room 1308
Washington, D.C. 20415
(202) 653-6263
PROGRAM DESIGN: This program seeks to draw exceptionally promising
young people from all sectors of national life: the professions, busi-
ness, state and local government, the arts, and the academic world. In-
terns serve for one year (September-August) as special assistants to
Cabinet members or to senior staff members on the President's or Vice
President's staff.
SKILLS NEEDED: Highly motivated.
BENEFITS OF THIS EXPERIENCE: Provides firsthand experience in the pro-
cess of governing the nation and a sense of personal involvement in the
leadership of the society.
PRESIDENT'S COMMITTEE ON MENTAL RETARDATION
CONTACT: Fred J. Krause
INTERNS/TERM: 1-2
Executive Director
GSA Building Room 2614
TIME PERIOD: Year-round
7th and D Streets, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201
(202) 245-7623
PROGRAM DESIGN: The Advisory Committee identifies and promotes public
awareness on policy issues, model programs and makes annual reports to
the President. Interns work in conjunction with the committee to research
literature, gather data, review legislative bills and state and national
organization reports, answer letters of inquiry and attend important pol-
icy meetings.
SKILLS NEEDED: Writing skills and an understanding of mental retardation
required; must be graduate students.
BENEFITS OF THIS EXPERIENCE: Will gain exposure to leaders in the field
of mental retardation in and out of government.
PRESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT INTERN PROGRAM
CONTACT: Andrew W. Boesel
INTERNS/YEAR: 250
Director
1900 E Street, N.W.
TIME PERIOD: Year-round
Washington, D.C. 20415
(202) 254-7316
PROGRAM DESIGN: This federal service program is geared toward men and
turin
THE WHITE HOUSE OFFICE
Personnel Ceilings
CURRENT LEVEL
PROPOSED LEVEL
Non
Non
OFFICE
White House
Permanent
White House
Reimbursable
Reimbursable
FOP
White House
Reimbursable
Reimbursable
FOP
Slots Allocated
Permanent
Details
Details
Support
Permanent
Details
Details
Support
COUNSELLOR
--
9
9
1
8
--
1
-- Immediate Office*
Minus 1 pe
--
--
--
--
-- Cabinet Admin. *
2
2
--
--
4
2
4
No change
-- Planning & Eval. *
1
1
--
1
5
1
--
1
4
Minus 1 in
5
40
3
--
-
36+2
5
(2 moved t
National Policy Dev.
--
--
support
National Security Affairs
2
2
--
1
64
2
--
1
59
8% cut in
CHIEF OF STAFF
6
--
--
--
--- Immediate Office
8
7
-
--
--
Minus 2 pe
-- Staff Coordination &
6
5
4
--
--
5
Management**
6
--
--
Minus 2 pe
Communications, Speech.
26
26
21
3
--
-
3
--
--
Minus 5 p
reorgani:
--
and Press Operations
22
23
1
--
20
1
--
Minus 3 C
--
reorgani
---
3
13
--
3
Intergovernmental Affairs
13
13
--
No change
--
Legal Counsel
17
17
4
2
--
15
4
2
--
Minus 2 p
Legislative Affairs
28
----
--
27
-
--
--
Minus 1 p
28
--
---
10
5
4
--
Minus 3 C
Political Affairs
7
8
-
--
reimburs
Presidential Personnel
10
10
4
32
--
9
0
36
--
Minus 1 p
reimburs
--
Public Liaison
17
17
17
--
17
17
--
--
No change
DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF
2
5
2
--
--
-- Immediate Office
6
6
--
--
Minus 1 p
--
- Office of the Pres.
2
--
--
--
3
3
Minus 1 p
--
--
--- Military Office
2
1
1
32
--
---
1
33
--
Change ac
3
17
0
3
-
Sched. (8) & Advance (11)
19
19
1
--
Minus 2 p
inate re
-
--
First Lady's Office
15
15
--
5
15
5
--
No change
TOTAL PRES. STAFF OFFICES
218
218
25
97
119
192
14
102
109+2
* Staff sup. from OPD
**Staff sup. from OA -
Op. units report here.
THE WHITE HOUSE OFFICE
Personnel Ceilings
CURRENT LEVEL
PROPOSED LEVEL
MEESE
Non
CHANGE
BAKER
louse
Non
White House
Reimbursable
Reimbursable
FOP
White House
Reimbursable
Reimbursable
FOP
DEAVER
ocated
Permanent
Details
Details
Support
Permanent
Details
Details
Support
(Decision)
9
1
8
1
Minus 1 permanent (11%)
2
4
2
4
No change
1
1
5
1
1
4
Minus 1 in EOP support
5
40
3
36+2
(2 moved to OPD) -8% cut in EOP
support
2
1
64
2
1
59
8% cut in EOP support
7
6
Minus 2 permanent (25%)
6
5
4
5
Minus 2 permanent (33%)
26
3
21
3
Minus 5 permanent (19%) -due to
reorganization)
23
1
20
1
Minus 3 current ( 9%) -due to
reorganization)
13
3
13
3
No change
17
4
2
15
4
2
Minus 2 permanent (12%)
28
27
Minus 1 permanent ( 4%)
8
10
5
4
Minus 3 current (eliminate 6
reimbursable detailees) (38%)
10
4
32
9
0
36
Minus 1 permanent (10%) (transfer
reimbursable detailees)
17
17
17
17
No change
6
2
5
2
Minus 1 permanent (17%)
3
2
Minus 1 permanent (33%)
1
1
32
1
33
Change accounting for 1 perm.
19
1
3
17
0
3
Minus 2 permanent (11%) (elim-
inate reimbursable detailees)
15
5
15
5
No change
218
25
97
119
192
14
102
109+2
THE WHITE HOUSE OFFICE
Personnel Ceilings
CURRENT LEVEL
PROPOSED LEVEL
OFFICE
White House
Non
Non
Permanent
White House
Reimbursable
Reimbursable
EOP
White House
Reimbursable
Reimbursable
EOP
Slots Allocated
Permanent
Details
Details
Support
Permanent
Details
Details
Support
OPERATING UNITS
3
4
3
---
--
--
Minus 1 from
--
--
Budget and Control
--
2
2
--
--
2
--
--
--
Purchasing & Procurement
--
No change (i:
4
--
--
--
Personnel Office
4
4
--
--
--
No change
17
17
--
--
Admin. Board Operators
17
--
--
--
No change (i:
Travel & Telegraph
8
--
--
8
--
----
--
8
--
No change
currently
-
60
--
--
Correspondence
60
61
--
Minus 1 from
--
--
-
5
--
--
--
Executive Clerk
5
5
--
No change
32
--
--
--
Central Records Manag.
33
34
Minus 2 from
--
--
--
(1 permanent
4
--
--
--
Special Pres. Messages
4
4
--
--
--
No change (i:
1
-
--
1
--
--
West Wing Receptionist
1
--
-
No change (i:
Dir., Visitors Office
1
1
6
--
--
1
6
--
--
No change (i:
1
9
1
--
9
--
Phot. to the President
1
-
--
No change
--
TOTAL OPERATING UNITS
139*
142
15
--
138*
15
--
--
TOTAL PRESIDENTIAL STAFF
218
218
25
97
119
192
14
102
109+2
357***
360
25
112
119
330
14
117
109+2
Approved FY1982 Budget
350
330
NOTE: Opera
* Operating units were at
cut at outse
153 on Jan. 20, 1981.
sion of Pres
offices -- C
further than
***Excess here due to
**Correspond
overpromises.
yet twice
THE WHITE HOUSE OFFICE
Personnel Ceilings
CURRENT LEVEL
PROPOSED LEVEL
MEESE
Non
CHANGE
BAKER
se
Non
White House
Reimbursable
Reimbursable
EOP
White House
Reimbursable
EOP
DEAVER
Reimbursable
ted
Permanent
Details
Details
Support
Permanent
Details
Details
Support
(Decision)
4
3
--
--
--
Minus 1 from current level
--
--
--
2
2
--
-
-
--
--
--
No change (irreducible min.)
4
--
--
4
--
--
--
No change
17
-
-
--
17
--
--
No change (irreducible min.)
--
8
8
--
-
-
--
--
No change (personnel changes
currently
61
60
--
--
---
Minus 1 from current level**
--
--
-
5
5
--
--
--
-
---
-
No change
34
--
--
32
--
--
--
Minus 2 from current level
--
(1 permanent)
4
-
--
--
4
--
--
--
No change (irreducible min.)
1
1
--
--
--
--
--
--
No change (irreducible min.)
1
--
6
--
1
6
-
--
No change (irreducible min.)
-
1
-
9
--
1
--
9
No change
142
--
15
--
138*
15
--
:
218
25
97
119
192
14
102
109+2
360
25
112
119
330
14
117
109+2
330
NOTE: Operating units were
cut at outset to allow expan-
sion of Presidential staff
offices --- cannot be cut
further than from here.
**Correspondence smaller staff,
yet twice Carter load.
BAKER, MANOCK & JENSEN
TELEPHONE
JOHN H. BAKER
AREA CODE 209
KENDALL L. MANOCK
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
442-0550
DOUGLAS B. JENSEN
DONALD R. FISCHBACH
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
JAMES M. PHILLIPS
SIXTH FLOOR SECURITY BANK BUILDING
ROBERT G. FISHMAN
HOWARD M. ZIDENBERG
1060 FULTON MALL
JOHN L. B. SMITH
GEORGE L. STRASSER
FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93721
HAL H. BOLEN II
RALPH W. TARR
KENNETH J. FRANSEN
JEFFREY A. JAECH
CATHERINE BONNAR
October 29, 1981
JOSEPH M. MARCHINI
STUART R. CHANDLER
CRAIG A. HOUGHTON
DIANA B. CONSTANTINO
Helene FWO TO
MICHAEL E. SMITH
ANDREW R. WEISS
J. Fielder 11/3
Mr. Michael K. Deaver
Deputy Chief of Staff and
Assistant to the President
The White House Office
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mike:
It was great seeing you again. Linda and I certainly
appreciate your taking so much time out of a very busy
schedule to visit with us. Needless to say, our visit to
the Oval Office was the highlight of our trip, for which
we cannot thank you enough.
Both Linda and I found Washington, D.C. a beautiful
city. You were right, now that we are back in California,
we miss the lush environs of the District.
I am still very interested in being a part of the
Reagan Administration, despite the fact that the position
Helene had in mind did not work out. The position did not
appear to permit me to utilize my skills and abilities
sufficiently to hold my interest for the one-year period
of commitment the Personnel Office required. You may be
assured, though, that this decision did not come easily.
I am still most interested in working on the White
House staff, and would appreciate your continuing consider-
ation. In this regard, I enjoyed very much my conversation
with Fred Fielding and would certainly appreciate being
considered should a position in his office become available.
Once again, please accept my sincerest thanks and deep
appreciation. At the same time, Linda and I extend our very
best wishes to you and Carolyn and your family. By all means,
keep up the good work.
Sincerely,
Rash
Ralph W. Tarr
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
October 26, 1981
Dear Vern:
Thanks for your letter and the offer of
assistance. I am passing along the list
of areas where your experience may be of
value to Presidential Personnel. You should
be hearing from them soon.
Your "leisurely chairmanship" sounds great
to me. That's retirement at its best.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL K. DEAVER
Assistant to the President
Deputy Chief of Staff
Mr. Vern W. Cartwright
Board Chairman
Cartwright Aerial Surveys Inc.
Executive Airport
Sacramento, CA 95822
CARTWRIGHT
AERIAL SURVEYS INC.
EXECUTIVE AIRPORT
SACRAMENTO, CA 95822
October 14, 1981
Mr. Michael K. Deaver
Assistant to the President
and Deputy Chief of Staff
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mike:
I recently stepped down as president of my company and, still owning all
the stock, serve as its leisurely chairman. With time on my hands I
again would like to help the Reagan team on some non-compensating board
or commission which might be appropriate.
Attached is a list of areas where my experience may be of value in
carrying on the Reagan philosophy. I have also enclosed a Beta II
video tape of my interest.
Please keep up the good work and let me know if I can help in any way.
Yours very truly,
CARTWRIGHT AERIAL SURVEYS, INC.
Verm
Vern W. Cartwright
Board Chairman
VWC:nb
OUR
Enclosures
35
ANNIVERSARY
EXECUTIVE AIRPORT / SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95822 / (916) 421-3465
BOARDS OR COMMISSIONS OF INTEREST
VERN W. CARTWRIGHT
1. Land Remote Sensing Satellite Advisory Committee
I have been informed that the Department of Commerce under the
NOAA/NESS group is forming this board. I understand that the
composition of this board will be members from federal agencies,
local government, data users, industry, academe, and the aero-
space industries.
I understand the main object of this board is to get government
out of some of the remote sensing business and turn it over to
industry. Frankly, this is where it belongs. It could save
millions if this concept is adopted.
2. Scientific Advisory Board
This is a high-technology board of the Air Force. I have contacted
Vern Orr and told him of my interest, and he is trying to find out
if a spot is available. Dr. Hans Mark suggested that I could really
help our government on this board over a year ago, but there appar-
ently has been no position open since that time.
3. Victims of Violent Crimes Task Force
As the public member of the State Board of Control for the eight
years of the Reagan administration, I was deeply involved in setting
up compensation for the victims of violent crimes. Possibly I could
help on the federal level for this most important project.
4. Overlapping Technologies
The Defense Mapping Agency, the U.S. Geological Survey, and other
agencies perform a considerable amount of duplication of effort.
If a task force is ever necessary in this area, I again may be able
to lend a hand. I have worked in top secret areas with the Defense
Intelligence Agency in their satellite projects.
CARTWRIGHT AERIAL SURVEYS INC.
BIOGRAPHY
VERN W. CARTWRIGHT
Vern Cartwright has been in the aerial survey business for over 35 years and is
registered in the State of California as a Consulting Engineer, Industrial Engineer
and as a Photogrammetric Surveyor. He has been instrumental in California in obtaining
recognition and licensing of photogrammetrists.
After spending three years in the Navy as a photointerpreter during World War II,
he founded and presently directs the following companies:
CARTWRIGHT AERIAL SURVEYS, INC. He organized this firm in 1946. It provides
services in aerial photography, topographic mapping, computer cartography, remote
sensing and photointerpretation on a worldwide basis. He has experimented with every-
thing from World War II P-38's to jets as aerial platforms. In early 1974, he acquired
and merged Datamap Systems, Inc., a computergraphics corporation, with the aerial survey
company in order to enhance its capabilities in computer cartography and analytical
aerotriangulation, and to complement the entire interactive graphics department.
CARTWRIGHT RESEARCH CORPORATION. After obtaining a patent on an automatic film
numbering concept, he organized this subsidiary to develop, manufacture and market this
equipment. The corporation is also performing research on a number of airborne data
acquisition systems.
INTERNATIONAL REMOTE SENSING INSTITUTE. Cartwright established this non-profit
organization in 1966. It has published the Journal of Remote Sensing on a worldwide
basis and deals with the practical approach to data acquisition and photointerpretation
and its relationship to photogrammetry and data banks.
SERVICE ON BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. Vern served as national president of the
American Society of Photogrammetry in 1977 and 1978, an organization of over 8,000
scientists and engineers. He also served as president of the National Legislative
Council of Photogrammetry in 1971 and 1972. He has served two terms on the Board of
Directors of the American Congress of Surveying and Mapping, Northern California
Chapter.
In 1967, Governor Reagan appointed him to the California State Board of Control
on which he served for 8 years as the Public Member. Also in 1967, he was appointed by
Governor Reagan to the Engineers' Advisory Council to review and make recommendations
on all legislative matters pertaining to engineering. In 1968, he served on a task
force for aerospace education in the State of California. He was delegate-at-large at
the 29th National Republican Convention.
In 1978, he was invited by the Secretary of Defense to participate in the Joint
Civilian Orientation Conference to view, firsthand, the U.S. Armed Forces capabilities
and personnel.
Also in 1978, he was appointed to, and continues to serve on, the advisory board
at Harvard University's Graduate School of Design, which deals with computergraphics
and spatial analyses. In 1979, he was appointed by the President of Fresno State
University to serve a 3-year term on the Engineering Advisory Council.
Vern's aerial survey corporation is a sustaining member of the American Society
of Photogrammetry, American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, the Society of American
Military Engineers, and the California Land Surveyors Association.
VWC:be
1-30-81
CARTWRIGHT AERIAL SURVEYS INC.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
October 26, 1981
Dear Elaine:
Thanks for your nice letter about Mel
Bradley. I happen to be one of his biggest
fans as you know, and know what he has done
for Ronald Reagan over the years. He has been
unselfish and philosophically committed to the
President.
I passed your note on regarding his difficulty
in functioning in the White House to Ed Meese,
who has the responsibility for that particular
effort. You should be hearing from him soon.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL K. DEAVER
Assistant to the President
Deputy Chief of Staff
Mrs. Elaine B. Jenkins
3333 University Blvd. West
Apartment 1101
Kensington, MD 20795
Orig to El muse
Elaine B. Jenkins
3333 University Boulevard West. Apt. 1101
Kensington, Maryland 20795
Victale
O
September 28, 1981
Honorable Michael K. Deaver
Deputy Chief of Staff and
Assistant to the President
speel
THE WHITE HOUSE
Washington, D. C. 20500
Dear Mr. Deaver:
This year the Council of 100 Black Republicans has worked
hard to recruit people to work for the Administration.
In each instance we have offered the names of Black
Republicans. We have pushed and urged their appointment,
and we appreciate the recognition that has been given to
us.
We have received excellent cooperation from Melvin Bradley
and we all know of the need to strengthen his office.
Those of us who have been around awhile are well aware of
1
the need to keep a cohesiveness of purpose and planning on
all fronts in any Administration. We are the Blacks sup-
le
porting President Reagan. Support for our point of view
an
sends a message that no other can equal.
d
.O
Please give these letters your careful consideration in
it
recommendations to President Reagan.
S.
Sincerely,
Elame 13. Inhins
0.
Elaine B. Jenkins
to
Chairman, Personnel Committee
Council of 100 Black Republicans
g
(8
on
EBJ/cdd
Enclosure (s)
ase
1,
MK
October 26, 1981
TO:
JAY MOORHEAD
FROM:
MICHAEL K. DEAVER
SUBJECT: Re: Paul Shirley
I have asked numerous times to find something for
this cat. Have you come up with anything?
Please let me know.
DISTRICT CALENDAR
PENINSULA
shules
District Committee Meeting 7:00 a.m.
Seasider, Seaside
7 District Commissioners Meeting 7:30 pm
Roger's Office - Furniture Supply
Monterey
8 Roundtable - 7:00 p.m. Chapel Annex
Presidio of Monterey
10 Hike-A-Thon
12 Adult Leader Training - Session 2
7:00 p.m. Seaside Library
21 Hike-A-Thon turn-in - 6-8:00 p.m.
Monterey Youth Center
23-25 Peninsula Camp-out
Camp Pico Blanco
26 Adult Leader Training - Session 3
7:00 p.m. Home Savings, Seaside
17 Cub Leader Training - Chapel Annex
Presidio of Monterey
SAI INAS
6
District Commissioners and Cub Committee
7:30 p.m. - Louck's Home
1880 Pescadero, Salinas
10 Hike-A-Thon - 8:00 a.m. Parking lot
at Salinas Golf Course - Alisal
Blvd.
Coast
Medical
entals
P.O. Drawer 1003
116 Hubbard Street
Santa Cruz, California 95061
Telephone (408) 425-7755
distate
October 2, 1981
fay,
Mr. Michael K. Deaver
The White House
Washington, D.C.
Dear Mike:
I was reading the Scout's Newsletter last night,
and ran across a name from the distant past that made
me think of you
Karl van Christierson. I thought he
had gone to the big distillery in the sky a long time
ago so perhaps this is his son.
Our Mike is in Webelos this year, and I am helping
out, if you can believe that! It really looks like it
will be a lot of fun for both the kids and the fathers.
We are all going to the Coast Guard Station in Monterey
in a couple of weeks to learn about water safety and
check out the big cutter they have over there.
We had dinner at Penn Keller's cabin in Ben Lomond
a couple of weeks ago, and Frank was down with his new
girl friend, so I suppose he and Toni have finally split
the sheets. I'm going to Sacramento next Monday, and I
suppose we will have dinner and possibly play a little
gin rummy. I guess you don't have much time for the
finer things in life anymore!
Got to run, but thought you might get a kick out
of thinking back to the days of Carlo. Say hi to the
family.
Regards,
20dg
MICD
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
October 26, 1981
Dear Guy:
The procedure for appointment to the
U.S. District Court is through your
U.S. Senator from Alabama. I suggest
you get your recommendations to Senator
Jeremiah Denton. I hope this is helpful.
Many thanks.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL K. DEAVER
Assistant to the President
Deputy Chief of Staff
Mr. Guy Hunt
4321 Woodley Square, Apt. 239
Montgomery, AL 36116
MEMORANDUM
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
October 14, 1981
dictate
MEMORANDUM FOR MICHAEL K. DEAVER
FROM:
FRED F. FIELDING
SUBJECT:
Charles White-Spunner
Attached to refresh your memory is a telegram sent to
you by Guy Hunt of Alabama concerning Charles White-Spunner,
candidate for Judge on the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Alabama. You directed it to me
for comment. By the time your copy of Mr. Hunt's telegram
reached my office, I had already responded to a different
version of it.
The situation in the Southern District of Alabama is as
follows. Senator Denton submitted three proposed candidates
to the Department of Justice. Privately, however, he
informed the Department that Emmett Ripley Cox was his
candidate and should be selected. Senator Denton has not
made known his personal preference to the public. Mr.
Cox is being processed and was nominated October 14, 1981.
P.O.
WHA034(1520) (1-0219400244) PD 09/01/81 1519 AUG 11
ICS IPMWGWF WSH
03521 09-01 0418P EDT
PMS WHITE HOUSE DC
4-044104S244 09/01/81
ICS IPMBNGZ CSP
Reldy for response
2058327230 TDBN MONTGOMERY AL 271 09-01 0315P EST
PMS PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN RPT DLY MGM, DLR, DLR
WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON DC 20500
CHARLES WHITE-SPUNNER OF MOBILE IS A CANDIDATE FOR FEDERAL JUDGE,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. SOMEONE IN THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
THINKS CHARLES MADE A MISTAKE. WHEN I ASKED HIM TO BE A CO-CHAIRMAN F
OR THE 1980 REAGAN CAMPAIGN, HE ACCEPTED. HE DUG IN AND FOUGHT IN THE
TRENCHES WITH US. HE ALSO SERVED 8 YEARS AS FEDERAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY
IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. WHILE THERE HE SUCCESSFULLY
PROSECUTED A COUNTY COMMISSIONER FOR FRAUD IN THE CETA PROGRAM, TO
THE EMBARRASSMENT OF MANY LOCAL FOLKS, EVEN ATTORNEYS WHOSE CHILDREN
WERE DRAWING THESE POVERTY FUNDS. THESE PEOPLE OPPOSE HIM. CHARLES
WHITE-SPUNNER IS QUALIFIED, HONEST, CAPABLE AND HAS THE RIGHT
PHILOSOPHY. MR. PRESIDENT, I KNOW YOU WANT THE BEST. CHARLES
WHITE-SPUNNER IS THE BEST. MR. COX, THE PERSON THAT THE JUSTICE DEPAR
TMENT IS HAVING THE FBI CHECK ON HAS NEVER, TO MY KNOWLEDGE, TURNED
HIS HAND TO HELP IN ANY OF OUR BATTLES.
THE ALABAMA REPUBLICAN PARTY IS UNANIMOUS IN SUPPORT OF
WHITE-SPUNNER. AT THEIR MEETING IN JULY THE STATE REPUBLICAN
COMMITTEE, WHILE IN SESSION, VOTED WITHOUT A DISSENTING VOTE TO
SUPPORT HIM.
I REQUEST THE OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER WITH YOU, EITHER IN
PERSON OR BY TELEPHONE. OFFICE TELEPHONE (205)832-7230; APARTMENT
(205)284-5833; HOME WEEKENDS ONLY (205)796-2232.
THOSE ACTIONS OF WISDOM AND COURAGE PERSONALLY EXEMPLIFIED BY YOUR
DECISIONS BEFORE THE CONGRESS AND ON THE WORLD SCENE AND YOUR GRACE
IN PERSONAL CRISES LEAVE OUR NATION GRATIFIED AND MYSELF COMPLETED
VINDICATED FOR MY BELIEF IN YOU WHICH I HAVE SHOWN IN THE MANY HOURS
IT WAS MY PRIVILEGE TO WORK FOR YOUR ELECTION. MAY GOD GIVE YOU TO
OUR NATION FOR MANY YEARS.
GUY HUNT, ALABAMA (4321 WOODLEY SQ APT 239 MONTGOMERY AL 36116)
4321 WOODLEY SQ APT 239
MONTGOMERY AL 36116
1516 EST
NNNN
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
October 26, 1981
Dear Bob:
Thanks for your good note. We are continuing to see if
we can't put you together with something you would be
interested in.
As far as the 1984 Olympic Committee is concerned - I am
only a member. I will, however, let Pete Uberoth know of
your interest and perhaps he will be in touch.
As to your second question, I am sorry it would be in-
appropriate to do anything other than get the Navy Depart-
ment to review your requests. I have asked John Herrington
to do that. If they find an interest in it independent of
our interest, that's fine, and I am sure you understand
that all we can do is open the bureaucratic doors.
Thanks again.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL K. DEAVER
Assistant to the President
Deputy Chief of Staff
Mr. Robert F. Hatch
125 N. Layton Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90049
Bee: Pete Wereath
Robert F. Hatch
125 N. Layton Drive
Los Angeles, California 90049
(213) 476-3075
October 2, 1981
Mr. Michael K. Deaver
Assistant to the President
Deputy Chief of Staff
The White House
Washington, D. C. 20500
Dear Mike,
Thanks for your letter of September 21st. I regret that nothing happened
to my November letter, however, I do appreciate your interest then and now.
Lynn Wood was kind enough to call me in August after seeing my resume and
your letter. She asked if I still had an interest in being involved now. My answer
would normally be yes, but I have made commitments with an energy company in which
I am now involved, which will keep me tied up for awhile.
Two thoughts though first, Lynn asked if I was interested in a Commission.
I asked her about the 1984 Olympic Commission. She said I should ask you directly.
Therefore, I would very much like to be involved and would like to be considered for
such appointment.
Second, our company is trying to get the Navy Department to enter into an
agreement wherein we would place gas turbine equipment at the Miramar Naval Air
Station Sanitary Landfill, and convert the methane gas into electrical energy. We
are offering the Navy a royalty unique in the gas business which would be high
enough, among other things, to pay for the whole utility bill at Miramar. We tried
the bureaucratic route and got nowhere.
What we do is very consistent with the President's policy that the Govern-
ment should not fund synfuel and alternative fuel projects. Private Enterprise
should and can! We are under contract with Pacific Lighting to develop projects
for power generation and, therefore, the large capital expenditures of $9 - 27 mil-
lion can be adequately financed. I sent a package to Lynn for John Herrington's
review. Any help from you and/or The White House would be helpful and gratifying.
We are in the nice position of taking a wasted asset (garbage) and through tech-
nology - creating power. This power replaces foreign oil! What can be more timely?
Anyway, Mike, I appreciate your interest past and present, appreciate
what you and the President are trying to do generally for the country, and appre-
ciate your consideration of my two requests.
Best regards.
Cordially,
Bob
Robert F. Hatch
RFH:gbc
CC: Lynn R. Wood
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
October 19, 1981
Dear Lois:
Thank you for providing me with a copy of your August 10,
1981 letter to Senator Hayakawa recommending Jim Knapp for
appointment as U.S. Attorney for the Central District of
California.
I appreciate your bringing Mr. Knapp to our attention, and,
upon receipt, I forwarded your letter, together with Mr.
Knapp's resume, to Fred F. Fielding, Counsel to the President,
and to the Department of Justice for additional consid-
eration.
I particularly enjoyed hearing from you and assure you that
your views will be given careful attention.
With best regards,
Sincerely,
Michael K. Deaver
Assistant to the President
Deputy Chief of Staff
Ms. Lois Ann Lundberg
Chairman, Republican Party of Orange County
200 Town & Country
777 South Main Street
Orange, California 92668
MEMORANDUM
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
October 13, 1981
FOR:
MICHAEL K. DEAVER
FROM:
FRED F. FIELDING
SUBJECT: Jim Knapp, Proposed Candidate for U.S. Attorney
for the Central District of California (Los Angeles)
I have examined the material you forwarded to me concerning
Jim Knapp (Tab A) and have asked my staff to prepare a
response for your signature to Lois Lundberg's letter to you
of August 10, 1981. Stephen S. Trott, recommended by Senator
Hayakawa, was cleared for pre-nomination processing for this
position on September 15, 1981. Please let me know if you
think we should reexamine this decision.
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
October 17, 1981
que look
MEMORANDUM FOR:
MICHAEL K. DEAVER
FROM:
JOHN F. W. ROGERS
SPECIAL ASSISTANT PO THE PRESIDENT
FOR ADMINISTRATION
SUBJECT:
REVISED FY 1982 PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS
As you know, The President has directed that the White House reduce
its staff and budget as a symbol of his commitment to reducing the
federal budget and government employment.
His public commitment on the budgetary issue requires at least a
12% budget cut for FY 1982. Because the White House budget is
highly labor-intensive, the cut in White House staff will have to
be at least an 8% cut. And because earlier cuts came disproportion-
ately from the White House operating units, cuts this time will have
to come disproportionately (i.e., greater than 8%) from the political
and policy offices.
In order to implement The President's direction, revised staff
allocations have been developed for each department and staff office.
Attachment A provides you with the revised staffing allocation for
your department. Attachment B provides the names of your staff
members currently occupying permanent White House slots. The
reductions which are noted for your office must be taken as soon as
possible in order for the necessary budgetary savings to be achieved,
as any further delays will ultimately require larger actual cuts in
staffing to achieve the same amount of budgetary savings.
Will you please provide my office, by October 23, 1981, a specific
plan for achieving the specified staff reductions.
Attachments
ATTACHMENT A
THE WHITE HOUSE OFFICE
Personnel Ceilings
CURRENT LEVEL
NEW LEVEL
OFFICE
Original
Reim-
Non Reim-
Reim-
Non Reim-
CHANGE
WII Slots
WII
bursable
bursable
EOP
WH
bursable
bursable
EOP
Allocated
Permanent
Details
Details
Support
Permanent
Details
Details
Support
DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF
------ Immediate Office
6
6
2
--
-
5
2
-
--
Minus 1 permanent (17%)
Office of the President
3
3
--
--
--
2
-
--
--
Minus 1 permanent (33%)
Military Office
2
1
1
32
--
--
1
33
-
Change accounting for l
permanent to DOD
Scheduling (8) & Advance (11
19
19
l
3
--
17
0
4
-
Minus 2 permanent (11%) elim-
inate reimbursable detailees)
First Lady's Office
15
15
--
5
--
15
—
5
-
No change
Attachment B
DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF
Immediate Office
1.
Michael K. Deaver
2.
Joseph W. Canzeri
3.
Shirley Moore
4.
Patricia A. Bye
5.
Mamie McDonough Close
6.
Mark O. Hatfield Jr.
Office of the President
1.
David C. Fischer
2.
Kathy Osborne
3.
Vacant
Military Office
1.
Ed Hickey*
2.
Dennis LeBlanc
Scheduling
1.
Gregory Newell
2.
Helen Donaldson
3.
Mary Rawlins
4.
Patricia A.E. Rodgers
5.
Cristina Valentine
6.
Michael Castine
7.
Fan Snodgrass
Advance
1.
Stephen M. Studdert
2.
Hugh O'Neill
3.
Frederick Ahearn
4.
Robert Gubitosi
5.
Lanny Wiles
6.
Dan Morris
7.
James Kuhn
8.
Rocky Kuonen
9.
Cecile Kremer
10.
Marti Frucci
11.
Karen Roberts
First Lady's Office
1.
Peter McCoy
2.
Sheila Tate
3.
Mabel Brandon
4.
Ann Wrobleski
5.
Linda Faulkner
6.
Elaine Crispen
Page 2
First Lady's Office, cont.
7.
Christine Hathaway
8.
Barbara Cooke
9.
Nina Wormser
10.
Sheryl Eberly
11.
Ramona Smith
12.
Marcia Heimberger
13.
Catherine Fenton
14.
Betsy Koons
15.
Diane LaSalle
THE WHITE HOVE
WASHINGTO
October 13, 1981
Dear Mr. Brant:
Mike Deaver kindly provided me with your August 27, 1981
letter recommending Jim Vidal for United States Attorney
for the District of Montana. I apologize for the delay
in responding to your communication.
I appreciate your taking the time to provide us with your
views concerning this appointment. Please be assured that
your endorsement of Mr. Vidal will be carefully considered
during the selection process to fill this position.
Sincerely,
Orig. signed by FFF
Fred F. Fielding
Counsel to the President
Mr. Dave Brant
Ashley Creek Ranch
Kila, MT 59920
DAVE BRANT
Fide
ASHLEY CREEK RANCH
KILA. MONTANA 5992
(406) 257-0222 or 257-8888
August 27, 1981
Mr. Mike Deaver
Assistant to President Reagan
White House
District of Columbia, Washington
Dear Mike:
The local press here informs us that the administration in Washington
is in the process of selecting a new U.S. District Attorney for
Montana
Mentioned as contenders are Jim Vidal and Pete Dunbar.
Jim is a local attorney and a good friend of mine. We've played
tennis. His law firm is the best one in our little town and
handles all my difficult legal problems for my real estate business.
Jim has been very active in the Republican Party, both as Flathead
County Chairman and as a member of the Montana State Republican
Central Committee.
All I know about Pete Dunbar is that he didn't take down his campaign
posters which he put up on our ranch without permission in the first
place.
Let me encourage you to push for Jim for the position.
Miss your act at Rancheros.
4Q
Dave
MEMORANDUM
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
October 8, 1981
TO:
MR. RAY ARNETT
ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF INTERIOR
FOR FISH, WILDLIFE AND PARKS
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FROM:
MICHAEL K. DEAVER
ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT
DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF
SUBJECT:
Norman Roberts
It was with regret that President Reagan today reluctantly
withdrew his personal choice of Norman Roberts for Director
of Fish and Wildlife Service.
There is no question in my mind that this action was necessary
solely due to your vigorous negative campaign against Norm.
Sometime, I hope you'll find the time to drop a note of
apology to Norm and the President.
CC: James G. Watt
Norman Roberts
Ray Nesbitt
Edwin Meese III
RONALD W. REAGAN LIBRARY
THIS FORM MARKS THE FILE LOCATION OF ITEM NUMBER 1-3 LISTED ON THE
WITHDRAWAL SHEET AT THE FRONT OF THIS FOLDER.
JAMES W. MAYO
Immediately prior to DOE, served for almost 7 years on
an Excepted appointment at the National Science Foundation.
Positions held were in the field of science education.
Hired by DOE on April 9, 1978, without a break in service
as a Scientific Advisor to the Assistant Secretary for
Energy Technology. The appointment was Excepted to serve
at the pleasure of the Secretary.
The position of Scientific Advisor was no longer required
as a result of a reorganization that abolished the
Assistant Secretary for Energy Technology. On August 20,
1979, Mr. Mayo was detailed as acting Chief, Electrochemical
Systems Branch, under the Assistant Secretary for Conservation
and Solar Energy; a position that was not supportable at
the SES level.
During a review after the inauguration of all DOE employees
serving at the pleasure of the Secretary, went back 3 times
to verify that the Secretary really wanted us to let him go.
He was separated after 30-days notice on March 9, 1981, with
severance pay of $20,237.70.
He appealed to the Merit System Protection Board alleging:
he was reduced in grade;
improper separation;
harmful procedural error;
discrimination on the basis of race (Black)
reprisal for his actions as an EEO officer; and
improper political reasons.
The Merit System Protection Board presiding official found
it lacked jurisdiction over the alleged reduction in grade
and upheld the Department on all other counts, i.e., that
separation did not violate his rights under adverse action
or reduction in force law and regulation, and there was no
harmful procedural error, discrimination, reprisal, or
improper political motivation in the agency's separation
action.
The presiding officials' findings become the Merit System
Protection Board's decision on August 24, 1981, unless
Mr. Mayo's attorney files a petition for review or the
full Board reopens the case on its own motion.
Lost authorization to hire EES with CSC Reform.
Now only Career or Schedule C
(OPM problem)
130 people under RIF in Mayo area, Schedule C exempt from RIF.
018718CA
THE WHITE HOUSE
washington
July 17, 1981
NOTE FOR KEN CRIBB
FROM:
CRAIG L. FULLER
j
RE:
Dr. Mayo
You will note from the attached
package that Dr. Mayo was apparently
appointed by Nixon and held over by
Carter in the Department of Energy.
We let him go as part of our overall
policy toward Carter appointees;
however, interest has been expressed
by Mike Deaver in finding him another
place at the Department of Energy.
Could you pursue this matter at DOE
and keep me advised.
Attachment
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
July 8, 1981
NOTE TO CRAIG FULLER
FROM: MEL BRADLEY m
It's my understanding that Dr. Mayo was
appointed by President Nixon and was held
over by Carter.
While technically he may be a Carter holdover,
he was not recruited and appointed by Carter.
Dr. Mayo continues to hold interest in
returning to the Department of Energy.
MEMORANDUM
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
June 19, 1981
TO:
CRAIG FULLER
FROM:
MICHAEL K. DEAVER m
SUBJECT:
Dr. Mayo
I asked Jay to look into this. I would very much
like to see if we can't rescue Dr. Mayo, since he is
supposed to be a good scientist and is a political
and has been thrown out. Unless somebody has evidence
he campaigned against us, why don't we strike a blow
for freedom and reinstate him.
JUN 1 8
June 9, 1981
The Honorable Michael K. Deaver
Moorby
Deputy Chief of Staff and
Assistant to the President
The White House
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. Deaver:
My name is James W. Mayo. I was terminated at the Department of Energy, March
9, 1981. Prior to the termination, Melvin Bradley told me that you were
familiar with my case.
I am interested in continuing service under the Reagan administration and I am
writing to you to ask for your active involvement in making that possible.
My termination was connected with, among other things, an Energy Department
interpretation of a general directive from the White House. Also, my name
erroneously appears on a computer-generated list of black "appointees" who
served under the previous administration. In point of fact, however, I entered
Federal service at the National Science Foundation in June 1971 to initiate a
program manadated by President Nixon. I reached supergrade there in 1973 and
remained there until 1978 when I was invited to come to the Department of
Energy.
Because I am aware of the commitment of the President to maintain and increase
the number of qualified and competent blacks in this administration, I am
encouraged in seeking your assistance. Toward that end I will telephone your
office in the next few days for an appointment to discuss this matter.
I am looking forward to meeting you.
Sincerely yours,
James w. mayo
James W. Mayo
CC: The Honorable Melvin Bradley
The Honorable E. Pendleton James
THE WHITE HOUSE
JUN 1 8
WASHINGTON
June 12, 1981
NOTE TO SHIRLEY MOORE
FROM: MEL BRADLEY m
RE:
Dr. James W. Mayo
Per our conversation, attached is some
background information on Dr. Mayo.
JAY - where is the now?
Mike I looked into this for Bradley months ap
1) Mayo is a holdover
2) The Energy Dept was being pressured to remove
holdoves (ie coreorists He has worked an goit co yes
3) There was no descrimentary action have -ong
the following of normal powed
4) I recall, but can't confirm, that be is apditional
personal appeal to secretary Edwards - it will also
If you want Mayo retained it will require a
so against established procedurer of keeping careensts. HOUSEVER,
he does sound solid would help our relationing w/the black comments
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
June 11, 1981
Note to Mel Bradley
Issue: Personnel Problem of Dr. James W. Mayo
Only black scientist at the Department
of Energy
Several months ago, we received a call
from a Dr. Esteppe, Howard University
Development Office. (He works with Alice
Green Burnett)
Dr. ESteppe was requesting, on behalf of
a number of persons at Howard University,
including the President, that something
be done by the Administration and Presidential
Personnel about the apparent discriminatory
treatment toward Dr. James W. Mayo. According
to Dr. Esteppe, Dr. Mayo is the highest
qualified black scientist at the Department
of Energy; he has not been used in his field;
and he is being terminated.
We were asked to look into the matter and
consider Dr. Mayo for an appointment.
The matter was 4 turned over to Jay Morehead.
Dr. James W. Mayo
JUN 1 5
Background
Organization History
Initial recruitment was an affirmative action of the Assistant Secretary
for Energy Technology with goal of assigning to line R&D management.
Recruited into DOE in 1978 based on background and experience; only
Black Science/Technical EES (Energy Executive Service). But for non-
conversion, would be only Black Science/Technical SES (Senior Executive
Service) in DOE.
Experience
Academic: Twelve years science teaching - administration, 1955-71
Federal Service: Ten Years career-type; National Science Foundation,
Department of Energy; eight years total supergrade 1971-1981.
Interagency Service: Committee of Visitors, U.S. Army Intelligence
School, Fort Devens
Intramural Service: Designated EEO Officer for Administration/Personnel
Extramural Minority Organization Contacts:
Academic Carol Smith, National Advisory Committee on Black
Higher Education and Black Colleges and Universities
- Samuel Myers, NAFEOHE
- Richard Neblett, National Action Council for Minorities
in Engineering
Business - Robert Jones, AMAF, Industries
- Junius Hayes, PROGRESS
- Eugene Baker, NABM
Political - Louis Martin, Black Special Assistants
- Ron Langston, Hill Staffers
- Mary Stansel, Hill Staffers
Personnel Actions at DOE
-
Appointed to position of record - April 1978
-
Involuntary non-conversion to SES July 1979
-
Inaction on formal reassignment from position of record - October 1979
-
Inaction on SES reassignment from position of record - January 1980
I
Inaction on SES recruitment - April 1980
-
Inaction on GS-15 reassignment from position of record - January 1980
-
Demand for resignation from position of record January/ 1981
-
Termination of position of record and appointment February 1981
-
Amendment of termination to March 9, 1981 - February 1981
-
Action on request to OPM for certification as GS-15 but with deliberate
broadening of competitive coverage - March 1981
Issue:
Failing to take personnel actions, no attributable cause; termination, not for
cause.
HOWARD UNIVERSITY
HOMELAND MASHIPGTON. UTILITAS
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20059
March 3, 1981
1867
DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY
Mr. Melvin Bradley
Senior Advisor to the White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. Bradley,
Dr. Aris T. Allen suggested that I write to you about the most senior
Black science administrator in the Department of Energy, Dr. James
Mayo, who appears to be on the verge of losing his position. Dr. Mayo
has been in the Federal Service for ten years. He started at the
National Science Foundation, and since January of 1978, he has been
at the Department of Energy. His position of record at the
Department of Energy is Science Advisor to the Assistant Secretary
for Energy Technology, a position that was abolished a year and a
half ago. Since that time he has been the acting Director of
Electrochemical Systems, where he has consistently obtained fully
satisfactory ratings. His supervisors, up to the Assistant Secretary
level, during this time have filed papers to make his present
position permanent. These papers have been held up by the Personnel
Department. They are claiming that the White House is responsible
for their inability to complete the required paper work on Dr. Mayo,
but the enclosed legal description of the case suggest otherwise.
I am enclosing Dr. Mayo's resume which demonstrates that he is
well qualified for the position that he has been acting in. I
hope that you can do something about this case because it would be
a shame to lose one of the best Black science executives in the
Government.
Thanking you for your consideration in this matter, I remain,
Sincerely yours,
William M.Jackson
William M. Jackson
Professor of Chemistry
Phone (202) 636-6883
&
SENATE OF MARYLAND
ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND 21401
ANNE ARUNDEL OFFICE:
ARIS T. ALLEN, M. D.
404 JAMES SENATE OFFICE BUILDING
STATE SENATOR
ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND 21401
DISTRICT 30
BALTIMORE/ANNAPOLIS area
ANNE ARUNDEL AND CALVERT COUNTIES
841-3572
SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE
WASHINGTON, D. C. AREA:
SOUTH ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY
858-3572
March 4, 1981
267-8712, EXT. 3572
Mr. William S. Heffelfinger
Vice Chairman
Executive Personnel Board
Department of Energy
Washington, D.C. 20585
Dear Mr. Heffelfinger:
The name of Dr. James Mayo has been brought to my
attention. I have had the opportunity to discuss his abilities
with persons whose judgement I value and I have also had the
opportunity to review his resume. From these sources I am
impressed that he has excellent credentials. It is my impression
that termination of his position is being considered and based
on the information that I have, indicating his overall record,
I would strongly urge the continuance of Dr. Mayo in his
present position. I believe that he can render invaluable service
in his present position.
I am communicating with Mr. Melvin Bradley at the White
House expressing my sentiments to him as well.
Sincerely,
ARIS T. ALLEN, M.D.
Senator-District 30
CC: Mr. Melvin Bradley
Dr. James Mayo
Dr. Joseph Morris
Dr. William Jackson
ATA:cwk
LAW OFFICES
IRVING KATOR
CHARTERED
1220 NINETEENTH STREET, N. W.
SUITE 202
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20036
1202) 223-1497
February 20, 1981
Mr. William S. Heffelfinger
Vice Chairman
Executive Personnel Board
Department of Energy
Washington, D. C. 20585
Dear Mr. Heffelfinger:
Our firm has been retained by Dr. James W. Mayo to
represent him concerning your proposal to terminate his ser-
vices with the Department of Energy.
The following narrative describes our understanding
of the facts in this case. Dr. Mayo, who is a preference
eligible, was appointed to the Department under section 621
of the Department of Energy Organization Act (P.L. 95-91)
which authorizes the Secretary to appoint not more than 511
scientific, engineering, professional and administrative
personnel without regard to the civil service laws and to
fix the compensation of such personnel at levels not in excess
of the maximum rate payable for GS-18 of the General Schedule.
Dr. Mayo's position of record is Scientific Advisor
in the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Conservation and
Solar Energy. This is a nonconfidential, nonpolicy, career
type position which is or was in the Energy Executive Service.
The Energy Executive Service has no statutory basis, but was
established by the Department of Energy as a high level pro-
fessional and managerial corps similar in concept to the
Foreign Service and the military.
On April 5, 1979, Dr. Mayo was advised that his posi-
tion as Scientific Advisor did not meet the criteria for place-
ment in the Senior Executive Service and that he had a right to
Mr. William S. Heffelfinger
Page Two
February 20, 1981
appeal this decision. Dr. Mayo did not file an appeal because
he was led to believe that he would be reassioned to a position
which would permit his conversion to the Senior Executive Ser-
vice. Dr. Mayo was recommended as Program Manager for Electri-
cal Systems, but was not reassigned to this position and was
not appointed to the Senior Executive Service. The incumbent
of this position, however, was converted to Senior Executive
Service status and later reassigned to another position.
Dr. Mayo has been serving as Acting Director of the
Electrochemical Energy Storage Division since July 1979. This
is the same position, with a redesignated title, as the Program
Manager for Electrical Systems. Dr. Mayo's superiors have
attempted unsuccessfully to have him appointed to this position
as a career member of the Senior Executive Service. Notwith-
standing the fact that the position was designated as a Senior
Executive Service position, thus providing the vehicle for the
incumbent to become a member of the Senior Executive Service,
Dr. Mayo has been informed that the position only warrants a
GS-15 classification. Dr. Mayo offered to accept a GS-15 as an
interim measure until the status of the position which he has
been occupying is clarified.
By letter dated January 23, 1981, J. M. Schulman, Dir-
ector of Personnel, requested, on behalf of the Secretary, that
Dr. Mayo submit his resignation because of the change in admin-
istration. Dr. Mayo submitted his resignation, but Acting
Assistant Secretary, Frank DeGeorge, and others requested, in a
memorandum dated January 30, 1981, that the resignation not be
accepted. Nonetheless, the Secretary was prepared to accept
Dr. Mayo's resignation, had he not withdrawn it.
On February 5, 1981, you informed Dr. Mayo that his
position of Scientific Advisor was no longer required and that
his appointment would terminate on February 6, 1981. By letter
dated February 6, 1981, you advised Dr. Mayo that Interim Man-
agement Directive 3390 pertaining to the Energy Executive Ser-
vice expired on March 31, 1979 and that notification of its
expiration had been given in DOE Notice 1321.14 dated October 10,
1978. You also advised Dr. Mayo that he was being given 30 days
notice of separation and that his new separation date was March 9,
1981.
The Department of Energy is obviously acting under the
mísapprehension that it has authority to summarily dismiss all
employees hired under section 621 of P.L. 95-91. This is simply
Mr. William S. Heffelfinger
Page Three
February 20, 1981
not the case. Section 621 empowers the Secretary to appoint
certain personnel without regard to civil service laws and to
fix their compensation. The words "without regard to civil
service laws" apply only to the Secretary's appointment power
and mean that persons appointed pursuant to this authority are
in the excepted service.
The excepted service is defined at 5 U.S.C. 2103 as
consisting of those civil service positionswhich are not in
the competitive service or the Senior Executive Service. Posi-
tions may be excluded from the requirements of the Civil Service
Act or the competitive service by the Office of Personnel Man-
agement or by statute. 5 C.F.R. 1.4. Excepted service employees
in nonconfidential and nonpolicy making positions have a broad
array of rights including those made available to preference
eligibles by the Veterans Preference Act of 1944. Section 621
does not circumscribe these rights. There is nothing in the
language of the section which even suggests that Congress
intended to deny employees appointed under it the rights ordin-
arily associated with excepted service employees and most assur-
edly, the section cannot be read as abrogating, with respect to
these employees, the long-standing and well-defined protections
against arbitrary removal conferred on veterans by the Veterans
Preference Act of 1944.
The Act is partially codified at 5 U.S.C. 7511 which
defines those employees who are covered under Subchapter II of
Chapter 75, pertaining, inter-alia to removals. Preference
eligibles in the excepted service who have completed one year
of continuous service in the same or similar positions, such as
Dr. Mayo, are covered by virtue of subsection (a) (1) (B) of 5
U.S.C. 7511. A preference eligible is not covered, however, if
he or she falls within one of the classes of employees specific-
ally excluded from Chapter 75. These classes consist of employees
whose appointments are made by and with the advice and consent of
the Senate and employees whose positions have been determined to
be of a confidential, policy determining, policy making or policy
advocating character. 5 U.S.C. 7511 (b) (1) and (2). Since Dr.
Mayo is not a member of either of these classes of employees and
since he is not included in any of the exclusions listed at 5
C.F.R. 752.401 (c) it follows that Dr. Mayo can only be removed
1/ National Guard Technicians (exclusion 13) are explicitly ex-
cluded from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 7511 and 7512. See 32
U.S.C. 709 (f). Physicians and other employees in the Department
f Medicine and Surgery, Veterans Administration (exclusion 14)
are covered by a statutory disciplinary procedure which makes the
decision of the Administrator final. See 38 U.S.C. 4110.
Mr. William S. Heffelfinger
Page Four
February 20, 1981
for cause. Cause, of course means misconduct or unsatisfactory
performance on the part of an employee, not the mere desire of
an agency to dispense with his services. Moreover, an employee
who is removed for cause is entitled to certain procedural rights
including a due process hearing before the Merit Systems Protec-
tion Board. (5 U.S.C. 7513)
That an agency cannot circumvent these procedures was
made abundantly clear in the now famous case of Ernest Fitzgerald.
In that case, the Air Force, following Mr. Fitzgerald's testimony
before Congress on the cost overruns on the Air Force's C-5A car-
go plane, abolished Mr. Fitzgerald's position in a purported
reduction-in-force. Mr. Fitzgerald appealed to the Civil Service
Commission contending that his dismissal was in reality a retalia-
tion for his having testified before Congress. The Commission
found that the action taken against Mr. Fitzgerald was influenced
by and resulted from reasons personal to him and that, therefore,
it was improper and in violation of the Commission's regulations.
We recognize, of course, that persons employed under sec-
tion 621 may be released in a bona fide reduction-in-force. How-
ever, their release may only be effected in accordance with
statutory and regulatory law governing reductions-in-force. This
law, which derivès from the Veterans Preference Act of 1944, applies
to each employee in or under an Executive agency except an employee
whose appointment is required by Congress to be confirmed by or
made with the advice and consent of the Senate, members of the
Senior Executive Service and National Guard Technicians. 5 U.S.C.
3501; 5 C.F.R. 351.201 and 202. Thus, if Dr. Mayo's position is
being abolished as part of a reduction-in-force, he is entitled
to certain rights including the notice prescribed by 5 U.S.C.
351.802 and the appeal right set forth in 5 C.F.R. 351.901.
Very frankly, your letter of February 5, 1981 coming as
it does on the heels of the Department's request for Dr. Mayo's
resignation "in order to provide the administration the flexibility
it needs to carry out its policies" and in the face of the recom-
mendation of his immediate supervisors that he be retained, raises
a strong presumption that Dr. Mayo is being removed for political
reasons. As I'm sure you know, personnel actions based upon pol-
itical affiliation violate the merit system principles laid down
in 5 U.S.C. 2302 and may constitute a prohibited personnel prac-
tice under 5 U.S.C. 2302 (b) (1) (E).
The Supreme Court, as well as Congress, has severely pro-
scribed the freedom of government officials to dismiss employees
based upon political affiliation. In Elrod V. Burns, 427 U.S. 347
Mr. William S. Heffelfinger
Page Five
February 20, 1981
(1976) and Branti V. Finkel, 445 U.S. 507 (1980) the Court was
confronted with county employees who admittedly had been employed
under the patronage system and who were subsequently threatened
with dismissal because of a change in administration. In both
cases, the Court held that the dismissals violated the Fourteenth
and First Amendments. The Court made it clear that what it termed
"patronage dismissals" would not be countenanced except where it
could be shown that the dismissals were justified by a paramount
and overriding governmental interest. The court acknowledged
that the discharge of persons holding policy making and confiden-
tial positions might meet this test, but cautioned that merely
labeling a position as policy making or confidential would not
suffice. Rather, it is necessary to examine the facts to deter-
mine if the position in question is indeed one in which the in-
cumbent has far reaching responsibility for planning and implemen-
ting the broad goals of the office. or agency, as opposed to
responsibility of a limited nature. These cases must be seen as
prohibiting the discharge of government employees, whether local
or federal, holding nonpolicy making and nonconfidential positions,
as defined by the Court, because of the desire of an incoming
administration to fill those positions with its own political
followers.
Finally, although it will hopefully be unnecessary to
ursue this issue further, I am concerned that race and particu-
arly Dr. Mayo's association with the Department's equal employ-
ment opportunity program may have been factors in your agency's
steadfast opposition to appointing him to a position which he
has occupied on an acting basis since 1979 and in terminating
his services in spite of a request by his immediate superiors
that he be retained on the basis of his performance record and
the needs of the agency.
I would appreciate your giving this matter your prompt
attention and advising me as to what course of action your agency
intends to take in this matter. I would also appreciate your
providing me with a copy of DOE Notice 1321.14 referred to in
your February 6, 1981 letter to Dr. Mayo.
Sincerely yours,
KATOR & SCOTT
Joseph B. Scott
JE/ka
MEMORANDUM
THE WHITE HOUSE
we should
WASHINGTON
call
TOM
September 30, 1981
TOMANS
TO:
JAY MOOREHEAD
FROM:
MICHAEL K. DEAVER MKD
SUBJECT: Keith Atkinson
Can you check for me on Keith Atkinson (FTC) and
Henry Folsom (Postal Rate Commission).
When will they be announced?
- -Atkinson was amounced M 6/26 Fielding
been sent to the Senate -and won't be-
has his nomination P in hold He has not
until the problems are probed out This
is confidential, but talk to Fielding for details.
Falson has not yet been approved by the
Bug Three therefore he is not yet a condidate
as in process Wednesday meeting should decide
the position Then it will be sex weeks
for amnouncement
MEMORANDUM
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 30, 1981
TO:
MAX FRIEDERSDORF
FROM:
MICHAEL K. DEAVER
SUBJECT: Tom Evans Requests
Tom Evans thinks its time to get the CORE group
down here again. You agree?
He also asked for support for Coastal Barrier
Resources Act which is his Bill in the House.
Can you advise me on these plans?
MEMORANDUM
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 30, 1981
TO:
FRANK HODSOLL
FROM:
MICHAEL K. DEAVER
RE:
Mary Paige Evans
Can we keep Mary Paige Evans in mind for one of the
Arts Boards? (Tom Evans wife)
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 24, 1981
MEMORANDUM FOR MICHAEL K. DEAVER
FROM:
MAMIE McDONOUGH m
SUBJECT:
SUE LONG
Art Quern has informed me that Sue Long has
taken a job as a Manpower Planner with the
Department of Commerce and Community Affairs
for the State of Illinois.
Her salary is in the $25,000 range.
Mamie
THE WHITE HOUSE
?
7/1/81
TO: Micheal Deaver
FR: Mamie m
RE: Update on Sue Long
Per your request to help Sue Long find
a job, here's where she stands now.
Art Quern of Gov. Thompson's Office
called this morning to say that she
has been to Springfield for a number
of interviews. She's been offered a
number of jobs, and she's thinking
about taking one.
Art indicated that she seems to be
"undazzled" by the White House and
Gubernatorial involvement. He thinks
she will be very appreciative once
all this sinks in.
Thanks.
Humbs
Neep we posted
m.
RR
Burte Ms. Sue Long
Joulvon
of
April 22,
2710 Sunset Drive
1981 law have of This RR one
Carbondale, Illinois 62901
caty
President Ronald Pegan
White House - Capitol Hill
Washington, D.C.
Dear President Regan:
Many people of this nation are quick to critize your decisions,
but I support you in the elimination of many CETA projects. I happen
to be an employee of a grant (CETA) funded through the Department
of Commerce and Community Affairs. There are three of us working at
a state hospital helping to find jobs for those leaving the institution.
I feel this is a worthwhile project yet one of us could handle the whole
operation. There is not enough work for three people to do to create
three full time positions.
The end of FY 80 I was told I had to spend X amount of dollars
so they would not cut spending for FY 81. I was told to order a
new desk, file cabinet, chair, and office supplies. I told my suporvisiors
I did not need all this and found it a waste of money and suggested they
send the excess money back to be used in another capacity. I had no
choice and was compelled to do so. I now sit at an executive size
desk with not enough to keep me busy more than 2-3 days a week. I
as a taxpayer feel so many of these programs are a waste of money
and even if it means I will loose my job I am glad you are doing something
about the unecessary jobs, programs and spending of money.
I SALUTE YOU!!!
Sincerely,
Sue Long
Sue Long
Manpower Plasser d Cc-orderator
Dept of Commerce of Community Affair
$25,000 K
Re:
THE
HEWITT washington WHITE HOUSE Holo
To Joy maarlead
FROM:
MICHAEL K. DEAVER
Assistant to the President
Deputy Chief of Staff
Information
Mike - This Action 11 your call
It I wore you I would simply
wrik back - say you are petting her
name into the system MN for Spain -
don't inteniew him unless JAB makes
personal pitch- As you know, not everyone
15 100 % behind him for a key post-
THIS ITEM IS STILL UNDER REVIEW
IN ACCORDANCE WITH E.O. 13233
THE WHITE HOUSE
washington
9/10
Dear Mike,
JAB would sincerely appreciate it if you would
agree to see this man. JAB can go into greater
deatail with you - attached is all the
written matter I have.
I have had this letter answered saying that
JAB has asked you to please see him.
NICE KNOW YOU LOVE HAVING THIS BALL IN YOUR
COURT !
Cheers,
bok
MDT
MKO
- 3 September 1981
WILLIAM A. HEWITT JOHN DEERE ROAD, MOLINE, ILLINOIS 61265
9/9 How handle?
Dear Jim,
&T was good To see you
in Chicago last night and I
was pleased by your suggestion
that l write to you, George Bush,
Mike I laver and al Haig to
tell of my interest in serving
in spain I'm mailing Those
letters Today. Incidentally,
Mike D eaver is the only key
individual who l have not
met in person Would it be desirable
and feasible for me to meet him sometime
Best Bill
DEERE & COMPANY
JOHN DEERE ROAD, MOLINE, ILLINOIS 61265
WILLIAM A. HEWITT
Chairman
3 September 1981
Mr. James A. Baker, III
Chief of Staff and Assistant to the President
The White House
Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Jim:
It is my understanding that my name was given serious considera-
tion in the selection process for a new United States Ambassador to
France. Naturally, I was deeply disappointed when I learned that another
candidate has been selected.
None-the-less, I continue to feel a strong desire to serve our
country in an overseas post. At the present time it would be my preference
to serve in Spain. I believe that my general qualifications apply just as
well to Spain as they did to France. More specifically, I have visited
Spain a great many times since 1952, both for business reasons and for
vacations with my family. My wife, our three adult children and I all feel
a deep admiration and respect for the people and the culture of Spain.
Several years ago it was my privilege to meet King Juan Carlos
while he was visiting New York. That meeting plus my general knowledge
of his leadership abilities cause me to believe that I could work well with
him and his government in representing our country and our current
administration in our relationships with Spain.
I would also like to mention that in 1970 the Spanish government
awarded me "La Orden Civil del Merito Agricola, con la categoria de
Comendador de Numero" (Agricultural Merit Order, with rank of
Commander, First Class.)
Page Two
Mr. James A. Baker, III
3 September 1981
I realize that the appointment of a new United States Ambassador
to Spain may not be made in the immediate future, but when that post
needs to be filled I will greatly appreciate it if I am considered as a
candidate.
Sincerely,
Bill
William A. Hewitt
WAH/hm
I
THE white house
washington
Mike:
This is everything we have in
our file on him.
MKD
MEMORANDUM
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
April 30, 1981
MEMORANDUM
TO:
JAY MOORHEAD
FROM:
MICHAEL K. DEAVER
SUBJECT:
Personnel Recommendations
Don't forget George Bush is very interested in William
Hewitt and is now recommending him for Paris.
Speaking of Paris, remember that Bill Brock is interested
in Dan Galbraith for that post.
Also, here are Bill Casey's nominations for Ambassadors.
In addition, Malcolm Baldridge's candidates.
HEW177
CMBRATH
MICD
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
June 9, 1981
Dear Chuck:
Thank you for your letter expressing your
endorsement of Mr. William Alexander Hewitt
as U.S. Ambassador to France. He is under
active consideration and we will keep your
thoughts in mind as we move thru the process.
Many thanks.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL K. DEAVER
Assistant to the President
Deputy Chief of Staff
The Honorable Charles E. Grassley
United States Senate
Washington, D. C.
20510
HEWITT, Wm ALEXANDER
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
July 14, 1981
Dear Senator Mathias:
Thank you for your letter and endorsement
of Mr. William Hewitt for the position of
U.S. Ambassador to France. I have taken
the liberty of forwarding your comments
to Mr. E. Pendleton James, Director of
Presidential Personnel. We will keep your
thoughts in mind as we move through the
process.
Many thanks.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL K. DEAVER
Assistant to the President
Deputy Chief of Staff
The Honorable Charles McC. Mathias, Jr.
United States Senate
Washington, D. C.