Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
118568136
label
JGR/Dozier, Gilbert (4 of 6)
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
118568136
contentType
document
title
JGR/Dozier, Gilbert (4 of 6)
citationUrl
identifierLocal
485
collections
Records of the Office of Counsel to the President (Reagan Administration)
John Roberts' Subject Files
thumbnailUrl
largeImageUrl
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
118568136
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1986-12-31
year
1986
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1982-01-01
year
1982
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
ad11ce8624911feb
ocrText
Ronald Reagan Presidential Library
Digital Library Collections
This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections.
Collection: Roberts, John G.: Files
Folder Title: JGR/Dozier, Gilbert (4 of 6)
Box: 18
To see more digitized collections visit:
https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library
To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit:
https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection
Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected]
Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing
National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
October 24, 1984
Dear Mr. Masters:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On
June 24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence
of from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. Burton J. Masters
6138 Del Canto
San Jose, CA 95119
RAH: JGR:aea 10/24/84
CC: FFFielding/RAHauser/JGRoberts/Subj/Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 5, 1984
Dear Mr. Bingham:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. William E. Bingham
Post Office Box 4
Baton Rouge, LA 70808
RAH: JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 6, 1984
Dear Mr. Martin:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. Caleb Martin
Martin Brothers, Incorporated
Post Office Box 630
Winnsboro, Louisiana 71295
RAH: JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 6, 1984
Dear Dr. Richards:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Dr. Darrell H. Richards
2730 N. Causeway Boulevard
Metairie, LA 70002
RAH: JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 6, 1984
Dear Mr. Jennings:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. R.D. Jennings
Capital Valve & Fitting Co., Inc.
9243 Interline Avenue
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
(
RAH:JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 6, 1984
Dear Ms. Hobart:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Ms. Sandra Hobart
P.O. Box 51983
Lafayette, LA 70505
RAH: JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 6, 1984
Dear Mr. Lombas:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. Herman J. Lombas, Jr.
4120 I Street
Metairie, LA 70001
RAH: JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 6, 1984
Dear Ms. Engelsman:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Ms. Margaret Engelsman
12619 Middlewood Drive
Baker, LA 70714
RAH: JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 6, 1984
Dear Mr. Knight:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. Thomas A. Knight
320 Austin Street
Bogalusa, LA 70487
RAH: JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 6, 1984
Dear Mr. Fox:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
H.C. Fox
4438 Orchid Street
Shreveport, LA 71105
RAH: JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 6, 1984
Dear Mrs. Murphy:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mrs. J.T. Murphy
986 Oak Hills Parkway
Baton Rouge, LA 70810
RAH: JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 6, 1984
Dear Mr. Treppendahl:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
David Treppendahl, C.C.I.M.
Real Estate Investment Services
5420 Corporate Boulevard, Suite 202
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808
RAH: JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 6, 1984
Dear Mr. Perry:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. Monte Perry
5106 Brightside View Drive
Baton Rouge, LA 70808
RAH: JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 6, 1984
Dear Mr. Spilmann:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. Joseph R. Spilmann, Jr.
6238 St. Anthony Avenue
New Orleans, LA 70122
RAH: JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 6, 1984
Dear Mr. Griffith:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. James M. Griffith
1414 Monterrey Boulevard
Baton Rouge, LA 70815
RAH: JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 6, 1984
Dear Dr. Johnson:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Charles D. Johnson, D.D.S.
3012 Ray Weiland Drive
Baker, LA 70714
RAH: JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 6, 1984
Dear Mr. Zeringue:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. Paul J. Zeringue
Route 3, Box 58CA
Vacherie, LA 70090
RAH: JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 6, 1984
Dear Mr. Dobson:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. Robert C. Dobson
1037 Dauphine Street
New Orleans, LA 70116
RAH: JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 6, 1984
Dear Mr. Nelson:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mr. Craig R. Nelson
Hulse, Nelson & Wanek
610 Baronne Street
New Orleans, LA 70113
RAH:JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 5, 1984
Dear Mrs. Sullins:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mrs. Roy S. Sullins
2071 Columbine Street
Baton Rouge, LA 70808
RAH:JGR:aea 9/6/84
CC: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
September 5, 1984
Dear Mrs. Bankston:
Thank you for your recent letter to the President concerning
the decision to commute the sentence of Gilbert L. Dozier to
six years imprisonment. In light of your expressed concerns
about that decision, you may be interested in more information
about the facts of the case and the procedures that were
followed.
Gilbert L. Dozier was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in 1980 for
violations of Federal law involving extortion and bribery.
Dozier was convicted of soliciting money from individuals
and businesses that were, or might have been, affected by
actions of the Louisiana Department of Agriculture while he
was Commissioner of Agriculture. In 1982 Dozier was also
found to have committed additional criminal acts, including
obstruction of justice, and to have thereby violated the
conditions of a court ordered probationary term. On June
24, 1982, he commenced service of an aggregate sentence of
from 58 months to 18 years imprisonment, followed by five
years probation, and was fined $25,000.
In January 1983, Dozier filed an application for Executive
clemency with the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the
Department of Justice. In accordance with standard proce-
dures, the Office of the Pardon Attorney, headed and staffed
by experienced career attorneys, obtained and evaluated
pertinent information, reports, and advice concerning
Dozier's application. The office recommended that Dozier's
sentence be reduced, and on March 20, 1984, the Department
of Justice advised the President to modify the sentence of
imprisonment and probation to six years imprisonment.
The Department of Justice recommendation was based on the
disparity between Dozier's original sentence and sentences
imposed in similar circumstances on like offenders for
- 2 -
similar offenses. The disparity became evident through an
evaluation of relevant data compiled by the Administrative
Office of United States Courts on sentences imposed in
Federal courts. Not only was Dozier's sentence comparatively
long, but the convictions for racketeering and extortion
that made up the pertinent statistics generally involved
behavior even more severe than the acts of extortion com-
mitted by Dozier. Generally, they included offenders with
serious prior criminal records whose offenses involved
violence. Sentencing statistics pertaining to defendants
convicted of bribery suggest an even greater disparity of
sentence. In addition, sentences imposed in comparable
cases in recent years upon a number of public officials in
in the Federal criminal justice system were reviewed, and
this review again demonstrated the disparity of Dozier's
sentence.
The recommendation of the Department of Justice was also
based on Dozier's cooperation with law enforcement author-
ities after his conviction. Such cooperation provided with
respect to ongoing law enforcement efforts is, as I am
certain you will understand, a very important consideration
in matters of this kind. Also taken into account were the
guidelines of the United States Parole Commission, the
length of incarceration to date, the fact that Dozier paid
his fine, and the minimal additional deterrent effect to be
achieved by completion of the original sentence.
The President accepted the advice of the Department of
Justice and on June 22, 1984 reduced Dozier's sentence to
six years. While the recommended sentence of six years
imprisonment will permit Dozier to become eligible for
parole consideration after two years imprisonment, any
actual release date will be determined by the United States
Parole Commission in its discretion and in accordance with
its applicable guidelines. Unless the Parole Commission
releases him sooner, Dozier will remain incarcerated until
the expiration of his six-year sentence, subject to
statutory release procedures (including good time)
applicable to all Federal prisoners.
It is important to recognize that the President has not
pardoned Dozier for the very serious criminal conduct that
resulted in his conviction and incarceration. The reduction
of sentence, approved for the reasons outlined above, in no
way minimizes the seriousness of the crimes committed by
Dozier.
- 3 -
We appreciate your taking the time to share your views on
this matter with us. I hope the foregoing responds to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Original signed by RAH
Richard A. Hauser
Deputy Counsel to the President
Mrs. Cynthia Bankston
1482 Weinberger Road
Ponchatoula, LA 70454
RAH: JGR:aea 9/6/84
cc: RAHauser
JGRoberts
Subj
Chron