Ask the Scholar
Page 1 of 1
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
Ronald Reagan Presidential Library
Digital Library Collections
This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections.
Collection: Reagan, Ronald: Gubernatorial Papers,
1966-74: Press Unit
Folder Title: Press Releases -
02/10/1972-02/29/1972
Box: P13
To see more digitized collections visit:
https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library
To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit:
https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection
Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected]
Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing
National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/
OFFICE OF THE GOVER R
RELEASE: : ediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-10-72
#87
Governor Ronald Reagan today endorsed a series of recommendations
by Agriculture and Services Agency Secretary Earl Coke aimed at
strengthening the management of the State Division of Industrial Safety
and insuring that the division continues to fulfill its responsibilities
to protect the safety of the working men and women of California.
Coke's recommendations (attached) were based on the findings of a
report by the Select Labor Management Fact Finding Committee on the
Division of Industrial Safety. The six-member committee included
Frank M. Farro, retired secretary-treasurer of Teamsters Local 853,
Pleasanton; Kenneth Larson, legislative representative of the Federated
Firefighters, Sacramento and chairman of the AFL-CIO statewide safety
committee; James S. Lee, president, State Building and Construction
Trades Council, Sacramento; Emmons McClung, of the California
Manufacturers Association, Warren R. Mendel, Engineering and Grading
Contractors Association; and Tom Richardson of the California Farm
Bureau Federation.
The committee's report is being turned over to Roy J. Bell, the
newly designated chief of the Division of Industrial Safety, to assist
him in his efforts to improve the operational effectiveness of the
division.
In endorsing Coke's recommendations, the governor pointed out that
they will provide the new teeth necessary to effectively enforce state
safety regulations.
"Protection of the safety of California workers is a major
governmental responsibility and we intend to see to it that this
obligation is met," the governor said.
"In 1970 there were fewer disabling work injuries per 1000 workers
in California than in any of the past 10 years and, according to the
latest information available, the injury rate was even lower in 1971
(first 7 months of 1971).
"This record speaks for itself," he said.
The governor said William Hern will continue to serve as director
of the Department of Industrial Relations.
He said he is "confident that under the leadership of Hern and
Roy Bell, the role of the Division of Industrial Safety will be
strengthened and its vital responsibilities met."
XXXXX
- 1 -
#87
Here are Coke's recommendations to the governor:
"MEMORANDUM
To:
The Honorable Ronald Reagan
Date: February 9, 1972
Governor
From: Earl Coke
Subject: Report of the Select Labor Management Fact Finding Committee
on the Division of Industrial Safety
"I am submitting to you the attached report of the Select Labor Management
Fact Finding Committee which has investigated the operations of the
Division of Industrial Safety. I have carefully reviewed this report
and offer the following recommendations.
1. That the committee's findings and recommendations be turned
over to Roy J. Bell, the newly designated chief of the Division of
Industrial Safety with the understanding that he will study the findings
and implement those recommendations which he deems appropriate.
2. That the Division of Industrial Safety and the Contractors'
State License Board jointly determine and implement whatever procedures
are necessary for suspending or revoking the licenses of contractors
who violate safety regulations.
3. That the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations
promptly confer with the State Attorney General and local district
attorneys in an effort to expedite the preparation and prosecution of
safety violation cases.
4. That the Department of General Services, Department of Public
Works, and other state contracting agencies disqualify from bidding on
state contracts any contractor whose safety record shows a pattern of
disregard for the safety of its employees.
5. That the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations
continue to vigorously pursue negotiations with the Department of Labor
in connection with the Federal Occupational Health and Safety Act in
order that the 1972-73 budget for the Division of Industrial Safety may
be augmented by the maximum amount of federal funds to become available
under that program.
6. That legislation be introduced to reimburse the division for
the costs of its inspections of pressure vessels and elevators.
7. That the Director of Finance and the Secretary of the
Agriculture and Services Agency immediately develop recommendations for
augmenting current (1971-72) budget for the division.
8. That you invite leaders of labor and management to discuss
with you the safety of California workers.
Earl Coke
Secretary"
######
EJG
- 2 -
REPORT O. THE SELECT LABOR-MANAGEMEL. FACT FINDING
COMMITTEE ON THE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY
On January 4, 1972, the Honorable Jack Fenton, Chairman of the
Assembly's Select Committee on Industrial Safety, announced that
on January 12th and 13th the Committee would conduct open hearings
on charges resulting from the Sylmar Tunnel hearings that the
Division of Industrial Safety has:
1. created a serious morale problem through administrative
indifference, lack of communication and failure to
support its men in the field;
2. maintained so few field inspectors as to make adequate
worker protection impossible in a state this size;
3. failed to establish or to seek new safety orders or
legislative changes in the Labor Code to cover new
developments in the field of construction;
4. shown a remarkable reluctance to prosecute unsafe
operators who fail to comply with orders to provide
a safe place to work; and
5. never developed nor sought legislative approval of an
adequate accident investigation team, despite repeated
indications that such a team is essential to enforcement
of most Labor Code and Safety Order requirements.
The Select Committee's hearing on January 13th recessed with an
understanding that the Department of Industrial Relations would
conduct its own investigation of the Division of Industrial Safety
and prepare a report for the Governor. A departmental fact-
finding-group was established for this purpose on January 14th
and met that day to plan its job of gathering preliminary data
and information. On the same date, a letter was sent by the
Director to each staff member of the Division of Industrial
Safety inviting their written comments on the strengths and
weaknesses of the division and their participation in individual
discussions.
The departmental group accumulated a large amount of material on
total Division of Industrial Safety operations. This was turned
over to the Select Labor-Management Fact Finding Committee
(hereinafter referred to as "The Committee") when it had its
first meeting on January 26th. As The Committee read through
the transcript of the legislative hearings of January 12th and
13th, it became evident that the Assembly Select Committee focused
its attention almost entirely to the Construction Section.
The written evidence accumulated by the departmental group and
reviewed by The Committee reflects that the other Sections were
not only performing in a relatively trouble-free manner, but, under
the present organizational structure and limitations of resources,
were doing a very creditable job. In reviewing the general material
about the Division prepared by the departmental group, The Committee
determined that many of the problems associated in the hearings
with the Construction Section had ramifications on the entire
Division - particularly with respect to organization and overall
operating procedures. Therefore, The Committee has concerned
itself with the entire Division in its report. The investigation
has uncovered important areas for potential improvement in organi-
zation and operations and the following report establishes the
unanimous position of this committee in regard to these problem
areas.
1. "The Division of Industrial Safety has created a serious morale
problem through administrative indifference, lack of communication
and failure to support its men in the field."
In considering this allegation, The Committee has determined
the following:
A. Analysis
1. Organization, Field and Headquarters:
At this time management authority within this division
is concentrated at divisional headquarters. This has
created, over a long period of time, a vacuum in direction
and supervision in the field. Generally speaking, the
field staff who responded to our request for comments
feel their operating problems are neither understood
nor appreciated.
2. Functional Structure:
The demands made upon the existing specialized sections
vary in kind and techniques for accomplishing their work
goals also vary markedly in form. The most distinctly
specialized units in the division are the Elevator and
Pressure Vessel Sections. Because of their mandated
work processes the staff in these sections have very
little discretionary time. This situation is quite
different from the other sections, which presently move
out in a "search and correct" manner. For almost a
decade the specialized by "type-of-industry" (construc-
tion versus industrial) and by "type-of-potential-
accident-agent" (electrical versus elevator versus
pressure vessel versus environmental) has been the
organizational structuring of the division. It is
clear that the organizational structure influences
individual attitudes as evidenced by the large number
of dissatisfied construction section employees in
Southern California. Their complaints indicate a
lack of coordination among inspecting engineers often
servicing the same work site.
3. Executive Organization:
(a) Assistant Chief, South:
It is apparent from interviews and tracing through
correspondence/case files that there is no decision-
making level in Southern California above Senior
Engineer. The presence there of an "Assistant Chief"
-1-
is misleading, in that it gives the impression of
there being a local "top-level authority". In fact,
delegation to the Assistant Chief position in the
South has been very limited and there is general
awareness of this among the divisional staff.
(b) Role of Assistant to the Chief:
The specifications describe this position as a
staff position with no line authority. It appears
from analysis of the divisional decision-making
processes that the position has acquired authority
in areas where it has no responsibility, and this
has obscured the "formal" lines of authority within
the division.
(c) Role of Assistant Chief:
Because of his location at divisional headquarters,
the Assistant Chief (North-San Francisco) functions
more in true line capacity than the Assistant Chief
(South-Los Angeles). As stated earlier, the position
of Assistant Chief (South), as presently utilized,
is merely a symbol of authority.
(d) Supervising Safety Engineers:
These positions have statewide jurisdiction and
authority in specialized functions. These individuals
are all located in the headquarters office of the
Division in San Francisco and operate in vertical
authority lines with no formal horizontal ties.
4. Prosecution & Enforcement Policies & Procedures:
Among the various sections, procedures vary for accomp-
lishing the same purpose, i.e. compliance with safety
laws and regulations. In the construction and industrial
sections "red tags" are used extensively; but the sections
organized by type-of-accident-agent, for example elevators
and pressure vessels, go directly to equipment shutdowns.
One very effective sanction infrequently used in the
past in construction was the force of the Contractor's
License Board in accordance with Business and Professional
Code Section number 7109.5.
5. Program Control:
(a) Records Management:
A serious problem needing immediate attention is the
better organization and control of divisional case
-2-
filts. Central files are the oficial documents
and are the property of the Division and are main-
tained on a North-South basis in San Francisco and
Los Angeles.
(b) Enforcement by Continual Construction & Industrial
Cases Review:
Whenever any new document now comes into a case,
it may or may not reach the official divisional
file. The file is not now automatically reviewed
and no decision is made as to what ought to be done
in each case. The case files in Los Angeles and
San Francisco are an historical accumulation of
requirements documents with some pencilled or
typewritten indication of which violations were
corrected. But it appears these documents are
not currently being utilized as a source for
enforcement proceedings.
6. Program Auxiliary Services:
Another area of concern in support of the safety program
is whether there exists a proper level of staffing in
the Division of Labor Statistics and Research.
Traditionally, the services of this Division were
supposed to be supportive of all departmental programs
to point up new and developing areas of employer/
employee interests - where they concurred and where
they may be moving apart. Paramount within this area
was the Accident Statistics Analysis Section, whose
staff has not expanded to keep pace with growing
technological problems in industry which could cause
accidents complex in nature.
7. Program Funding:
Presently pressure Vessel, elevator, amusement and
ski lifts inspections are partially self-supporting.
None of the other inspections or consultive services
of safety, except certain Industrial Hygiene activities,
are reimbursable at present. If consideration should
be given to making those services substantially for
public safety pay-their-way, there is a question whether
public agencies ought to be charged for services
rendered for them as well. A fee system of some kind
for the consulting that engineers do might certainly
be appropriate. However, care must be exercised so
as not to interfere with the pre-job planning service
currently provided by engineers, particularly in
construction.
-3-
B. Problems
1. Organization, Field and Headquarters:
The field staff wants and needs a local level of
authority to which problems can be taken for direct
resolution, rather than having to engage in time
consuming and inconclusive communications with
authorities in San Francisco. Parenthetically,
the field staff wants and deserves to see division
executives in the field periodically.
2. Functional Structure:
At field level the functional structuring by
"specialties" creates a serious problem of coordination.
Varying techniques among specialists following different
policy directions to the goal of industrial safety
causes confusion among divisional employees and firms.
3. Executive Organization:
Ineffective Assistant Division Chief, South, due to
isolation and lack of clearly defined responsibilities
and authorities. The Assistant-to-the-Chief at
Headquarters, which was intended as a staff function
only, was given line authority.
4. Prosecutions and Enforcement:
Presently orders and explanations are sent out to the
field in a haphazard manner without interrelation of
subject matter. This accumulation of technical
instructions is difficult to locate in the complex of
files, folders and loose-leaf manuals.
5. Program Control - Records Management:
The lack of uniformity of enforcement has its roots
in bad records management which leads to differing
policies and procedures. The Committee faced the
incredible task of assembling masses of data from
disparate sources to get a clear picture of what has
been happening. Case file records, intended to contain
vital information about what has been happening in
enforcement and prosecution, were empty of needed
documents.
6. Program Auxiliary Services:
Continued requests from field engineers and formerly
from the Division Chief were for hard information about
specific areas of high accident occurence. Without this
information the Chief and the field engineers in
-4-
Construction and Industrial Safety could not most
effectively schedule their time into the problem areas.
C. Solution
1. Organization, Field and Headquarters:
To meet the needs for more effective program activities
in the field, more decisive management authority is
needed at the local levels. Better training and
guidelines responsive to program compliance needs
would make the field engineer more effective. Addition-
ally, headquarters personnel and specialists should
schedule time to visit and confer with field engineers.
A visitation program should be initiated at once.
2. Functional Structure:
If specialty supervising engineers are retained,
regular meetings among this staff with the Chief
ought to be scheduled and schedules adhered to!
The Assistant to the Chief and Administrative Assistant
should also be involved, depending on the topics under
discussion. The formal "functional structure" is a
questionable method of organization. The top staff
are a valuable resource to aid in policy formulation
and orders initiation and revision. The possibility
of merging the Industrial, Construction and Electrical
Sections should be explored. This would not necessarily
require sacrificing specialized classifications, but
could provide for their improved utilization. Some
multiple visits to places of employment could be
eliminated.
Two alternative utilizations of the Supervising Engineer
specialty classes occur to the Committee:
a) A totally different concept would be to convert
these positions to area supervisors and transfer
them to different parts of the state. This would
create management ability at the local level and
in all parts of the state.
b) These positions would be assigned to the Education
and Research Section, devoting full time to developing
technical information for the field staff and working
engineers.
3. Executive Organization:
a) The Assistant Division Chief, South, should be held
accountable for all Southern California functions,
-5-
or tl. position should be abolis. ed.
b) If the Assistant to the Chief is retained, it
should be a staff function. Its primary utilization,
if retained, could be to provide management assistance
to the Chief.
c) Role of Industrial Safety Board:
As a possible solution to some of the many and varied
problems of compliance and the correlative problem of
"due process", The Committee believes that analysis
ought to be made of the possibility of increased and
broader usage of the Safety Board for an appeals
process from safety orders.
4. Prosecution and Enforcement Policies and Procedures:
More formalized policy and technical procedural manuals
for engineers, more training for field staff, coordin-
ation among specialties and standardized enforcement
statewide are needed. Whatever is needed to improve
the interval delay between requirements writing, show-
cause, red tag, yellow tag and prosecution should be
explored and implemented.
One "tag" only may provide the way out of the maze of
uncertainty, ambiguity and complexity that has historically
grown up with the elaborate processes for obtaining
compliance.
For continued construction violators the Contractor's
License Board may provide the leverage needed to get
compliance.
5. Program Control:
a) Records Management - There should be immediate
attention given to establish file integrity.
Comprehensive file control must be established.
b) Case Review - A safety compliance program should
include a review by someone in authority of what
has happened to each company's (1) violations
rate and (2) accident events.
6. Program Auxiliary Services:
There should be an ongoing program on the proper use
of Industrial Hygiene Technicians to support the line
sections of Industrial Safety. This unit could be
assigned greater responsibility for developing technical
-6-
information for the field staff and research the need for
improvements in existing safety orders and for new safety
orders. This unit could also play a vital role for
in-service training within the Division.
Needed are sufficient Safety Statistics Technicians to
provide proper backup and program data to evaluate
California's safety program.
7. Budgetary Support for Safety Services:
There is legislation now in process to make the pressure
vessel inspections, the elevator inspections, amusement
rides inspections and ski lifts inspections fully self-
supporting except when these services are provided to
other public agencies. The practice of using Electrical
Section Safety Engineers as consulting engineers could
be discontinued.
D. Recommendations
1. Organization, Field and Headquarters:
There should be scheduled meetings of the Chief,
Assistant Chiefs and, if retained, Section Supervisors.
Section Supervisors should meet regularly with first-
line supervisors who, in turn, should meet regularly
with field staff. This system of meetings should have
an interlocking feature so that genuine communication
occurs from the field engineer to the chief.
The Division should prepare formal training programs
for all new engineers and begin preparation of re-
training programs for all career employees. In
developing these programs the Education and Research
Section should be used as the focus for coordinating
among environmental safety and other staff specialists
within the Division. The department's staff services
units (Personnel, Management Analyst, Fiscal and Legal)
should be used, as well as Division of Labor Statistics
and Research staff, for available statistics and program
analyses. On a limited basis, the investigative staff
of the Division of Labor Law Enforcement might also be
used to advantage.
2. Functional Structure:
Consideration should be given to merging the Industrial,
Construction and Electrical Sections. If such a merger
is initiated, it is recommended that district area
supervisors with full-line authority over local staff
be established. Supervising Engineers made surplus
by such a merger should be used to provide a nucleus
for area supervisors or be assigned to the Education
-7-
and Rese rch Unit to develop technical instructional
materials and safety orders.
3. Executive Organization:
Because of the concentration of workload in Southern
California, an assistant chief position is needed there.
In order to relieve the Division Chief of responsibility
for day to day operations so that he can function as a
true program manager, the Assistant Chief-North position
is needed, too. However, both Assistant Chief positions
should have parallel responsibilities and authority.
The Assistant Chief-South should have the same resources
and authority to get things done as the Assistant Chief-
North.
If the Assistant to the Chief position is retained, it
should be used in a purely staff capacity except for
possible supervision of the Education and Research
Section, which is also a staff function.
4. Prosecution and Enforcement Policies and Procedures:
It is recommended that only one tag be used by all
sections and that it be applied in a similar manner.
Tags should be bilingual (English and Spanish) and
printed on 8½" X 11" cardboard stock (iridescent orange)
with "WORK PROHIBITED" prominently displayed across
the top. Tags must be picked up by the engineer and
filed in the central files when employers have complied
with requirements. An effective arrangement must be
made between the Division of Industrial Safety and the
Contractor's License Board so as to make available on
a current basis to the Board notice of violations of
State Safety Orders by contractors looking towards
appropriate Board action under their regulations
concerning suspensions or revocations of licenses.
5. Program Control:
a) Records Management:
It is recommended that an index of file contents by
document be appended to every case file. Every
engineer and supervisor must either 1) review the
file in the central file room, without the privilege
of taking documents out of the file unless done by
responsible file clerks, or 2) signing out for the
file and be responsible for all indexed documents
contained therein.
-8-
b) Case Review:
Whenever an addition to the central file arrives,
the entire file must be reviewed by a senior safety
engineer to determine what action should be taken and
whatever decision is reached, must be recorded in
the file.
c) Engineer's Operating Manual:
There must be a complete review, analysis and
updating of the engineers' manual with top priority
given to the prosecution section. There should be
subsidiary functional manuals and all instructions
made by the supervisors of each speciality should
be logically categorized and placed into the
subsidiary manual. The supervisor of Educational
and Research Section should be assigned the responsi-
bility for current review and revisions.
d) Productive Work Control:
The Division of Industrial Safety should give active
management consideration to immediately implementing
the inspection Value Index and to maintaining a
careful monitoring of its effectiveness in relation
to 1) better usage of engineers' time and 2) the
reduction of the occasion for accident in high
accident industries. This usage should be extended,
with proper adaptation work to improve the effective-
ness of the other sections.
e) Promoting and Developing Safety Programs for Industry's
Workers:
The Division should immediately start preparation of
training programs for workers and for foremen, with
maximum participation of management and labor, while
the program is actually being developed and when it
is ready for implementation.
6. Program Funding:
When the determination is reached as to program
organization and structure, then adequate funds must
be made available to implement that determination.
2. "The Division of Industrial Safety has maintained so few field
inspectors as to make adequate work protection impossible in
a state this size. "
A.
Analysis
The State should feel the fiscal impact of the Federal
Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) around the first
of the year 1973. The Division may then have about one
-9-
million dollars of Federal money available to the
California industrial safety program if the State program
is approved. If not, then Federal pre-emption will
substantially reduce State areas of responsibility and
leave State funds available for the remaining programs.
"Industrial Safety" is not wholly descriptive of the
Division's programs. While the Department of Industrial
Relations tends to regard the State's eight and one-half
million working people as its particular clientele, some
of the Division of Industrial Safety's program elements
involve accident prevention services to the entire public.
The Committee views, for instance, the work of the Elevator,
Pressure Vessel and, to a lesser extent, the Environmental
Engineering and Industrial Sections as key elements in
what could be considered a public safety program. By
way of illustration, the elaborate multi-purpose building
complexes associated with California's increasingly urbanized
life style have and will continue to place significant new
public safety demands upon both the Elevator and Pressure
Vessel Sections as will the increasing use of radiation
therapy techniques in the State's health centers effect
the work of the Environmental Engineering Section. Similarly,
the Elevator Section now has inspection and licensing re-
sponsibility for aerial tramways and ski-lifts while the
Industrial Section performs these public services in re-
lation to amusement rides.
Putting aside the question of where these important public
safety program elements belong organizationally in the
overall State Government, The Committee is doubtful that
the impact of these broad public responsibilities on the
Division's personnel requirements has ever been given full
consideration by the Department, the Administration in
power or the Legislature.
B. Problem
If the departmental structure is changed, or additional
technical resources added consistent with recommendations
contained elsewhere in this report, additional money may
be needed for program and staff.
C. Solutions
Section 5 of this report contains a discussion relative
to improving utilization of the present staff. In
addition, it is anticipated that OSHA funding will en-
able significant augmentation of field staff.
-10-
D.
Recommendations
1. Every agency of State government should cooperate
in securing approval of a State OSHA Plan.
2. The Federal monies derived from adoption of the
California State Occupational Safety and Health Plan
should be used to expand and improve the present
programs. The Division of Industrial Safety's budget
should not be diminished upon receipt of Federal
funding.
3. The Division's increasing public safety function
should be analyzed to determine whether this program
should remain in the Division of Industrial Safety.
3. "The Division of Industrial Safety has failed to establish
or seek new safety orders or legislative changes in the
Labor Code to cover new developments in the field of
construction."
In the consideration of this allegation, The Committee has
determined the following:
A. Analysis
The jurisdiction of the Industrial Safety Board is
limited to setting standards in the area of accident
prevention. When the need of safety orders is established,
the job of drafting them is assigned to staff members
qualified in the particular field to be covered. When
the first draft of the proposed safety orders is com-
pleted it is presented by the Division staff at committee
meetings, large or small, of interested groups. When
the preliminary discussion of the committees on the
proposed safety orders is completed, public hearings
are held before the INDUSTRIAL SAFETY BOARD, as required
by the Administrative Procedures Act. If the Board by
majority vote adopts them, a copy of the Safety Orders
is sent to each person who attended the public hearings
or who commented in writing at any stage of the prepara-
tion of the Orders. The Orders become automatically effec-
tive thirty days after filing with the Secretary of State.
The Division's activities with respect to safety orders
from 1959 through December of 1966 and from January 1967
through December 1971 is shown in attachments I and II
to this section.
As is apparent from Appendices I and II, updating of
safety orders has been a matter of continuing emphasis
-11-
during the past five years. During eignt years of the
prior administration twenty-two safety order revisions
were completed. During the past five years, twenty-one
safety order revisions have been completed, three more
are ready for filing with the Secretary of State, three
are ready for public hearing while four are ready for
Labor-Management committee review.
Similarly, judging from Appendix III to this section,
there appears to have been no real diminution of de-
partmental legislative activity in the past five years.
While the department historically follows and provides
input on an exceptionally large number of bills because
of the interest of the Legislature in matters affecting
employees, which is reflected in an ever-proliferating
number of bills in this area, the available record
suggests that the department neither is nor has been a
major initiator of such legislation.
Appendix III also reflects that the department has not
been notably successful in getting needed legislation
through the legislative process.
B. Problem
No comments.
C. Solutions
No comments
D. Recommendations
1. In assigning limited authority to the Industrial Safety
Board, the Legislature rightly recognized the facts
that the Board represents a community of interest be-
tween labor and management and has the benefit of a
great deal of safety engineering expertise available
to it. Accordingly, it is recommended that the
Legislature continue to respect its long-standing
delegation to the Industrial Safety Board insofar as
setting of safety standards is concerned.
-12-
APPENDIX I
REVISIONS TO SAFETY ORDERS - 1959 THROUGH 1966
NO. IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF ADOPTION
1. Petroleum Safety Orders
July 2, 1959
Drilling & Production
2. General Industry Safety Order
April 28, 1960
Article 23, Transportation of
Employees and Material
3. General Industry Safety Order
March 8, 1961
Ship and Boat Building
4. General Industry Safety Orders
November 3, 1961
Agricultural Operations
5. General Industry Safety Orders
December 5, 1961
Ladders
6. Electrical Safety Orders
January 18, 1962
7. Radiation Safety Orders
September 8, 1962
8. Tunnel Safety Orders
September 14, 1962
9. Noise Control Safety Orders
January 15, 1963
10. Unfired Pressure Vessels
February 6, 1964
11. Construction Safety Orders
March 4, 1965
12. Construction Safety Orders
June 30, 1965
13. Radiation Control Regulations
September 30, 1965
14. Boiler and Fired Pressure
November 3, 1965
Vessels
15. General Industry -
June 14, 1966
(a) Sections beginning with 3206
(b) Article 14.1, Lamp Scaffold
and Parallels
(c) Repeal Subchapter 9, Lamp
Scaffold and Parallels
(d) Repeal Section 3207
16. Pneumatic Loading Safety Orders
June 14, 1966
(Blasting)
17. Compressed Air
June 14, 1966
18. Construction - 1591 (h) -
August 5, 1966
Roll-Bar
-13-
NO. IDENTIFICATION
DAT OF ADOPTION
19. Boiler and Fired Pressure
October 4, 1966
Vessel
20. Unfired Pressure Vessel-Fees
October 4, 1966
21. General Industry - Lamp
October 4, 1966
Scaffolds and Parallels
22. General Industry - Sections
December 19, 1966
beginning with 3225
-14
APPENDIX II
REVISIONS TO SAFETY ORDERS - JANUARY 1967 THROUGH DECEMBER 1971
DATE FILED WITH
NO. IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF ADOPTION
SEC'Y OF STATE
1. General Industry -
January 16, 1967
February 8, 1967
New Safety Order 4106.1 -
Internal Combustion Engine
Exhaust
2. General Industry -
August 18, 1967
September 21, 1967
Standard Railings
3: Elevator -
October 30, 1967
April 4, 1968
Inspection Fees
4. Radiation Control Regulations October 30, 1967
Filed by Dept. of
(EEU)
Public Health
5. General Industry - Appendix May 8, 1968
May 28, 1968
A of Article 81, Dusts,
Fumes, Mists, Vapors and
Gases
6. Boiler and Fired, and
August 27, 1968
October 7, 1968
Unfired Pressure Vessels -
Fees
7. General Industry -
November 15, 1968
December 11, 1968
Sections 4148 and 6755
8. Logging and Sawmill
December 10, 1968
February 25, 1969
9. General Industry - Pulp
December 10, 1968
February 25, 1969
and Paper Mill Into GISO
10. Radiation Control Regula-
April 21, 1969
Filed by Dept. of
tions (EEU)
Public Health
11. General Industry -
November 12, 1969
January 7, 1969
Amusement Rides
12. Elevator
November 12, 1969
March 16, 1970
13. General Industry -
December 2, 1969
December 30, 1969
Longshore
14. Construction - Derricks,
May 13, 1970
June 15, 1970
Cranes, Boom-Type
Excavators, etc.
-15-
DATE FILED WITH
NO. IDENTIFICATION
DATE OF ADOPTION
SEC'Y OF STATE
15. Unfired Pressure Vessel
June 4, 1970
July 17, 1970
16. General Industry - Noise
July 28, 1970
August 20, 1970
Control and Threshold
Limit Values
17. Construction - Roll
September 1, 1970
October 2, 1970
Protection, Seat Belts,
etc.
18. General Industry -
December 1, 1970
April 14, 1971
Explosives
19. High-Voltage Electrical
June 1, 1971
Not yet filed
20. Radiation Control
June 1, 1971
Filed by Dept. of
Regulations (EEU)
Public Health
21. Aerial Passenger
September 7, 1971
Filed 1/11/72
Tramways in Fees
Effective 2/11/72
22. General Industry -
November 9, 1971
January 7, 1972
Article 22
Industrial Trucks,
Tractors, etc.
23. General Industry - Title
November 9, 1971
December 24, 1971
24 - Building Standards
Numbers
24. Construction - Access
December 7, 1971
Not yet filed.
and Demolition
25. Compressed and Liquefied
Prepared for public
Natural Gas - Unfired
hearings 1/14/72
Pressure Vessel
and 1/25/72
26. Mine Safety Orders
Prepared for public
hearings 1/13/72
and 1/24/72
27. Construction, Derricks,
Prepared for public
Cranes - Boom-Type
hearings
Excavators, etc.
28. General Industry - Tire
Prepared for committee
Inflation
work
29. Construction - Explosives
Prepared for committee
work
30. Construction - Hellcopters Prepared for committee work
31. Construction - Tunnel
Prepared for committee work
Safety Orders
-16-
APPENDIX III
LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITY IN AREA OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY INITIATED BY
DEPARTMENT SINCE 1962
1962 - Nothing. See note 1.
1963 - 1. AB 706 (Knox) Sought to amend Labor Code Section 6311
to give Division of Industrial Safety right to adopt
and enforce Safety Orders for control of hazardous in-
dustrial noise. Data available within the department
indicates that bill died but does not show its course
through the Legislature.
1964 - Nothing. See note 1.
1965 - 1. AB 1137 to amend Labor Code relating to fees chargeable
for boiler and tank inspection. Bill died.
2. AB 1295 (Now Chapter 1047, Statutes of 1965). Estab-
lished, Aerial Passenger Tramway Inspection Law requiring:
a) annual inspection of all devices defined as aerial
tramways;
b) certification and approval of design. Bill also
provided for and set limits on fees for annual
permits and inspection.
3. AB 1194 to amend Labor Code relating to fees chargeable
for elevator inspection. Bill died.
1966 - Nothing.
1967 - Nothing.
1968 - 1. AB 1010 originally introduced to exact penalties for
delinquent payment of pressure vessel fees. Bill was
amended and passed as a working hours for women bill.
References to penalties or safety matters were amended
out.
-17-
APPENDIX III
2. By Chapter 353, 1968 Statutes, inspection of tanks was
required every five years.
3. AB 1009 for increased fees on pressure vessels died in
Assembly Committee.
4. Chapter 352, 1968 Statutes raised maximum and minimum
fees for elevator inspection to present levels.
1969 - 1. SB 547 providing for increased fees for pressure vessels
died in Committee.
1970 - Nothing.
1971 - 1. AB 198 (Fenton) relating to fee schedules for inspections
of elevators, pressure vessels, tramways and amusement
rides died in Committee.
2. AB 2765 (Now Chapter 1431, Statutes of 1971). This bill
provided that contracts for public works in excess of
$25,000 which involve excavation of trench(es) 5 feet
or more in depth must show specified details for worker
protection from caving ground.
Notes: 1. Legislature met biennially until 1966.
2. Listing is based upon departmental records and is
presumed to be inclusive. However, early records
are skeletal because of periodic purging of out-
dated material.
-18-
4.
"The Division of Industrial Safety has shown a remarkable
reluctance to prosecute unsafe operators who fail to comply
with orders to provide a safe place to work."
A. Analysis
The area of prosecution has been a source of continuing
frustration within the Division. As mentioned earlier
in the report, The Committee has accumulated evidence
that often a local district attorney will decline a
request for prosecution by the Division. Obviously,
the Division has no ability to prosecute on its own.
In justice to local jurisdictions, one explanation for
this apparent neglect appears to be inadequately sub-
stantiated cases. Training and experience as a safety
engineer don't necessarily develop the skills needed
to give pertinent information for prosecutions. In
this assignment, the safety engineer often finds him-
self in an alien role.
The Committee takes recognition of the fact that Mr.
Roy J. Bell has abolished the single-level veto as it
has been applied to prosecution requests in the past
and commends him for it. The Committee understands
that an interim arrangement has been installed whereby
all requests for prosecution now go through an automatic
headquarter's review.
Between the inter-related factors of the single-level
veto and the inevitable question of what the local
district attorney may be willing to do, a general
feeling of inhibition has developed in the Division
with respect to initiating prosecutions. This may
partially reflect headquarter's feelings' that penalties
are too minimal to influence compliance. See Appendix IV.
The Committee reviewed the actions of Vincent White
and Cliff Farmer in the cases listed in the transcript
of the Fenton hearings and believe that the decisions
made by them in these matters were based on Division
policies concerning prosecutions and tag removals. Such
policies clearly indicate that the Division top staff
were reluctant to authorize prosecutions unless they were
certain that the prosecution would be successful. Their
actions in removal of tags were lawful insofar as they
met Labor Code requirements that only authorized Divisional
personnel could perform this action.
-19-
With the removal of the "single-level veto" such matters
will no doubt be handled on a more sensible basis but even
so, The Committee strongly recommends that there be a
prohibition against removal of tags unless the person
authorizing the tag removal makes a physical examination
of the work area.
B. Problem
Aside from the question of whether this technique has
been used with sufficient vigor, the fact is that local
district attorneys have not treated the Division's
prosecution requests with any sense of priority. Further,
review of cases prosecuted back to 1959 by the Division
reveals that in most part, the Courts do not seem to
velieve that the matters presented are of a grave nature
and so impose minimal penalties on the violators. More-
over, as has been seen, a somewhat defeatist attitude
has imbued some of the staff because of its feeling that
headquarters lacks enthusiasm for the prosecution approach.
C. Solutions
Provision of trained investigators to gather facts and
legal counsel to evaluate these facts in relation to
relevant safety orders would probably secure better
cooperation from local district attorneys simply by
giving them better material with which to work.
It is not proposed to establish these resources within
the division but to consolidate and expand, as needed,
upon resources already within the department. The
latter approach would be more economical because of
the avoidance of duplication and would also have the
long-range benefit of developing versatility within
the broad range of the Labor Code on the part of
present investigative and legal staff.
The Committee also believes that decentralization
of decision-making with respect to prosecutions is
indicated. This contemplates that a senior engineer
could refer a possible case for prosecution to an
investigative and legal unit and given appropriate
approvals could then proceed directly to prosecution.
If the investigative or legal staff expressed reservations
regarding the prosecution request, it would then be
referred to the next higher level within the Division
for consideration. This procedure would have the
advantages of being more direct, eliminating paper work
in connection with headquarters coordination and, hopefully,
would enhance the morale of field staff.
-20-
D. Recommendations
1. Investigative and legal assistance should be provided
to the Division to assist field staff in determining
whether prosecution is justified and, if so, to help
in preparing the case for transmittal to the local
district attorney.
2. While The Committee has no argument with Mr. Bell's
interim arrangement on review of prosecution requests,
it would encourage ultimate initiation of single-level
approval without referral to Division headquarters.
3. A complete review should be made of current sanctions
as to whether they meet the needs of safety in 1972
since these sanctions were instigated in 1937.
4. It is recommended that there be a prohibition against
the removal of a tag unless the person authorizing
such removal makes a physical examination of the work
area.
5. "The Division of Industrial Safety has never developed nor
sought legislative approval of an adequate accident investi-
gation team, despite repeated indications that such a team
is essential to enforcement of most Labor Code and Safety
Order requirements."
In the consideration of this allegation, The Committee has
determined the following:
A. Analysis
The Committee found no evidence that legislative approval
had ever been sought for an adequate accident investigative
team by the Division of Industrial Safety. Further, it
was unable to find evidence that such a team is essential
to enforcement of most labor code and safety order
requirements. The Committee has suggested earlier that
investigative and legal assistance be made available to
safety engineers to assist them in relation to possible
prosecutions. Industrial hygienists are already available
within the Division's environmental engineering unit.
There is evidence that in addition to the referenced
specialized help, lower-level help might provide for
better utilization of present staff, also. At the
present time, the Division has only one working level
which consists of a journeyman class. Therefore, the
-21-
time of a full journeyman must be consumed regardless
of how routine a safety problem may be involved.
In some sections, it appears that field staff make
up their own priorities and itineraries with an unusual
degree of freedom from supervisory control. This is
particularly true where, because of sheer numbers, it is
impossible to cover all places of employment anyway. This
can result in misdirection of effort to the detriment
of the Division's objectives.
Apropos of manpower utilization again, The Committee
is not persuaded that sufficient attention is given to
the proper allocation of travel funds to the various
sections. The present restrictions on the budget make it
even more important than usual that this always difficult
management problem be approached from the standpoint
of making every dollar count toward achievement of
divisional goals.
B. Problem
The fact that there is only one working level of safety
engineer makes it necessary to use a full journeyman
on routine assignments such as reinspections. This
does not provide for optimum utilization of manpower.
There is evidence, too, that staff time and resources
such as State vehicles have not been managed with full
efficiency in all cases - particularly in those sections
characterized by large amounts of discretionary time.
C. Solutions
In addition to provision of specialized staff, the
possibility of establishing an entrance level class
of safety engineer should be explored. This would
make it possible to grade problems and focus the activity
of more experienced staff members in those areas where,
by superior training and experience, they could make the
greatest contribution. An important fringe benefit to
the cause of worker safety would be that the Division
would be in a position to develop its own journeymen
rather than to have to depend upon the vagaries of the
recruitment market.
Greater supervisory attention should be given to the
development of field itineraries by field staff to
assure optimum use of manpower and other resources.
-22-
This would make for a greater degree of accountability
on the part of the staff and this, in turn, would assist
headquarters staff in making realistic allocations of
travel money.
D. Recommendations
As noted in Recommendation 4-D-1, The Committee suggests
investigative and legal assistance for field staff in
relation to accident investigation and possible prosecutions.
1. A junior engineer class should be established to
perform the more routine work now done by journey-
men and to provide the division a future source of
well-trained safety engineers.
2. A thorough review of the use of monthly assigned
cars should be made to determine whether utiliza-
tion has been efficient. In this connection a
revision of the safety engineers' manual should be
made pointing up rules and regulations controlling
usage.
3. A method should be established to review itiner-
aries of all safety engineers to assure optimum
utilization of resources and so that division manage-
ment can properly allocate funds.
4. Careful analysis should be made by the OSHA
Advisory Committee to the Department of Industrial
Relations of the work of the Division of Industrial
Safety, the Bureau of Occupational Health and any
other county, city or community effort having to do
with occupational safety and health in California
to determine how the work of state government in this
area can be improved, particularly in its role as
a coodinating agency.
-23-
APPENDIX
IV
APPENDIX
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
A. Total fatalities a
811
832
1,023
967
726
710
723
669
730
759
750
711
Fatalities (adjusted to exclude compromise
settlements before 1964)
596
533
718
650
726
710
723
669
730
759
750
711
"Preventable" deaths (those occurring despite
well-sstablished standards and control--
detail below in Part. B)
388
376
375
370
355
336
346
336
340
340
333
320
Total prosecutions
13
30
24
22
18
18
21
3
6
6
51
5
Prosecutions in fatality cases
2
2
4
-
5
8
9
2
2
2
W
2
a
Beginning in 1964 the definition of a "work fatality" for statistical purposes was revised to exclude most fatalities settled by compromise agreements
approved by the Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board.
B. Total fatalities
811
832
1,023
967
726
710
723
669
730
759
750
711
Leas:
Cardie-vascular strain or disease
167
214
299
278
94
108
101
91
8/,
99
42
113
Moving highway-type motor vehicle
197
193
240
257
214
194
206
179
200
210
211
159
Flane crach
39
30
77
31
41
38
34
24
65
55
49
45
Shooting, assault
20
19
32
31
22
34
36
39
41
55
65
74
"Preventable deaths"
388
376
375
370
355
336
346
336
340
340
333
320
a Detail is not available on number of compromice agreements in years prior to 1964 classified by the factors shown, but the figures indicate now.
involved mettlements for alleged cardio-vascular strain or disease.
Total fabalities
811
832
1,023
967
726
710
723
669
730
759
700
711
Agriculture
80
73
83
111
87
73
88
58
69
66
71
60
Mineral extraction
29
23
29
30
14
19
16
19
23
11
21
26
Construction
166
193
220
197
153
135.
140
121
116
134
122
115
Musufacturing
165
145
203
187
143
112
139
133
162
102
146
111
Transportation, communication, utilities
113
99
1/2
97
92
105
82
102
104
105
107
02
Trade
104
109
122
117
71
95
78
64
80
110
S.
93
Finance, insurance, real estate
10
17
23
21
8
12
24
14
15
15
1/.
11
Service
54
60
77
'/8
37
57
53
52
52
84
57
61
Government, State and local
87
113
124
128
120
100
103
106
109
132
125
142
Industry not reported
3
8
-
1
1
2
9
0
-
1
-
-
D. Disabling injurles per 1,000 workers
32.1
32.1
31.5
31.7
32.2
31.2
31.6
30.8
30.9
31.9
30.5
n.a.
n.a.-Not yet, available.
Compiled by Division of Labor Statistics and Research
February 1972
SELECT LABOR-MANAGEMENT FACT FINDING COMMITTEE
ON THE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY
William C. Here
William C. Hern, Chairman
Director, Department of Industrial Relations
Frank M. Farro (Retired Secretary-Treasurer
of Teamsters Local 853) Pleasanton
Kenneth Larson, Legislative Representative
Federated Fire Fighters, Sacramento, and
June James Building S. Lee, President S. & Construction Lee Trades
Chairman of Statewide Safety Committee - AFL-CIO
State Council
of California, Sacramento
Emmons Staff
Emenors McClung, No Legislative aung
California Manufacturers Association, Sacramento
Warren R. Mendel, Executive Vice President
Engineering & Grading Contractors Association,
Los Angeles
Tom Richardsm
Tom Richardson, Secretary of Labor Committee
California Farm Bureau Federation, Berkeley
SEPERATE STATEMENTS ATTACHED.
Dated Februany 8 1972
SEPARATE STATEMENT
The Committee's investigation of the operation of
the Division of Industrial Safety revealed that most
of its employees were dedicated to and worked hard at
efforts to provide a safer place of employment for
California workers despite handicaps imposed by the
organization and structure of the Division.
To publicly castigate the entire division based
on the testimony of a few construction section personnel,
plus the inability to remember of certain top officials,
as was done by the Assembly Committee Chairman was at the
very best regrettable.
The undersigned urged that the other members of
the Committee join him in making the above finding, but
was unsuccessful in securing agreement.
It is my understanding that the Labor and
Management members of the Committee will submit
separate statements on this point.
William C.Hern C.
William C. Hern
Chairman, Select Labor-
Management Fact Finding
Committee on the Division
of Industrial Safety
A MINORITY REPORT
A series of events beginning last June 24th with the tragic explosion
in the Sylmar Tunnel which claimed the lives of 17 California workmen has
established a characterization of the California Division of Industrial Safety
which is dangerously erroneous. While the Sylmar accident remains unexplained
at this writing, due process is being implemented to reach that determination.
All or most of the allegations should be considered inconclusive until such
time as responsible methods have produced the correct answers. Because of the
magnitude of this accident, the California Assembly established a Select
Committee which held hearings in September to determine any contribution the
legislature might make. Those hearings provided a platform for the presenta-
tion of some deep seated problems of long standing with personnel of the
Division of Industrial Safety.
The innuendo established by the comment before the Committee led to a
concern that the Division was either not performing its function or was subject
to operations procedures influenced by outside pressures which diluted its
effectiveness and started a vicious campaign against the Division of Industrial
Safety by opportunistic labor leaders and cooperative legislators. A Select
Assembly Committee held hearings in January obstensibly to seek the truth of
these allegations. It is our strong opinion that the methodology utilized by
this Select Committee failed to provide means by which a dependable analysis
could be reached. It served mainly as an amplifier for the statements,
accusations, and opinions of disgruntled, frustrated employees of the Division.
Some of this testimony contained fact but a good portion of it was vague gossip
and the verbalization of personal resentment eminating from general low morale.
This led to members of the Committee jumping to conclusions which were
seriously premature. The resultant attitudes and actions of the media have
established a disfiguring portrayal of the Division and its people. On
December 31, 1971, the Los Angeles Citizen, official newspaper for the Los
Angeles County Labor Federation, in a page one story spread under a three
column head, reported:
"Labor's allegations of inadequacies in the
California Division of Industrial Safety during
the Reagan Administration will get their first
hearings in the new year."
The story went on to say:
"John A. Cinquemani, Executive-Secretary of the
Los Angeles Building and Construction Trades
Council, who has been in a continuous struggle
with the Division 'because of its inability to
carry out the industrial safety laws of
California', has already met with Committee
consultants."
A Minority Report
Page 2
We feel also that much of the portrayal is emphasized for the benefit of
politics and the desires of organized labor. We feel obligated to file
this additional statement in conjunction with the task force report in
order that the views contained herein can be expressed to authority. The
task force was properly composed of representatives of both organized labor
and management. Labor refused the inclusion of these remarks in the report.
The joint report contains analysis, identification of problems, solu-
tions, and recommendations which are unanimously agreed upon by the entire
task force. We believe serious acceptance of these recommendations and
implementation of them will greatly improve and strengthen the Division in
its most crucial and important role in serving the working citizens of our
state.
It must be noted that even with the identification of areas of needed
change, California displays an excellent record of improving the prevention
of industrial accidents. Please refer to the disabling accident table,
Appendix 1, at the end of this Minority Report.
This record established the fact that the California Division of
Industrial Safety, organized labor, employees and California management have
concerned themselves with providing a safe place to work with a commendable
degree of success. We feel extremely confident that the implementation of
our joint recommendations will produce even greater approach to the ultimate
safety of workers. There was a strong tendency in the Select Committee to
adopt the attitude that DIS is strictly and purely an enforcement agency and
its personnel should conduct itselves accordingly, from chief to inspector.
We feel that the most discernable and lasting effects to the beneficial
advantage of the worker is embodied in a program wherein the Division acts
as counselor, expert and enforcer in a cooperative posture with labor and
management. Safety is a state of mind and cannot be obtained through purely
"cops and robbers" attitudes. We do believe employers who blatantly disre-
gard safety regulations and practices should be sought out, identified, and
prosecuted to the fullest extent possible before their employees are injured
because of their non-compliance.
Finally, it appears that much of the thrust of present activity is
about to degenerate to an effort to vilify certain individuals of the Division
both in management and employee level. In short, public service needs to be
attractive to competent dedicated citizens and we believe this quality is pre-
sent in the personnel of the Division of Industrial Safety. While we do not
quarrel with the judgment exercised in the resignation of Mr. Jack Hatton,
the style of his departure leaves a cloud around a distinguished citizen who
was conscientiously attempting to make a contribution to the community. We
do not feel a "witch hunt" resulting in the irresponsible assignment of guilt
to satisfy personal animosity, politics, or the press should be permitted.
When the Division is operating under good structure, then both management and
A Minority Report
Page 3
employees should be judged on ability and performance and decisions made at
that time and on that criteria.
We hope the content of these reports contribute to the improvement
of the Division and express our desire that our selection and participation
on the task force proves beneficial.
Respectfully submitted,
EMMONS Emmases McCLUNG Mc Clung
California Manufacturers Association
WARREN R. MENDEL
Engineering and Grading Contractors
Association
Tom Richardson
TOM RICHARDSON
California Farm Bureau Federation
PPENDIX I TO MINORITY REPORT
Work Injuries
Disabling Work Injuries
Comparitive
Year
Per 1,000 Workers
Ranking
1960
32.1
9
1961
32.1
9
1962
31.5
6
1963
31.8
8
1964
32.2
10
1965
31.2
4
1966
31.6
7
1967
30.8
2
1968
30.9
3
1969
31.5
6
1970
30.5
1
1971*
*Frequency rate not available for 1971 but disabling work injuries for
first seven months of 1971 are below those for the same period in 1970.
SUBMITTED TO THE GOVERNOR BY THE LABOR MEMBERS
OF THE SELECT LABOR-MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
The following report is being submitted by the Labor members
of the Select Labor-Management Committee investigating the charges
recently leveled at the Division of Industrial Safety. While we
agree with the full report of the committee, we felt an obligation
to answer the definite charges in a more positive and objective
manner.
After much in-depth study of the Division, we are of the
opinion that there is a tremendous need for reorganization within
the Division to develop proper and workable procedures to implement
and enforce the safety orders of the State of California.
Today, there is a lack of "chain of command"; there is a lack
of authority and direction in the Division in southern California;
and there is a definite barrier between the southern California
office and the main office of the Division of Industrial Safety in
San Francisco.
In the past, the Division has been run as a one or two man show,
regardless of the rank of the other management level personnel. Many
are relegated to a "housekeeping" function only.
Our recommendations and remarks should be construed as con-
structive and in no way detrimental to the Division. We hope that
the final report submitted to the legislature by the Assembly
Select Committee will embody the recommendations made in the unani-
mous report of the Select Labor-Management Committee. We are also
in the hopes that the Governor will use his influential office to
provide the financing necessary to implement the recommendations of
the Select Labor-Management Committee.
It is unfortunate that it took 17 deaths to bring about an
investigation of this nature. This causes us to wonder exactly how
long such inefficiency would have continued had the Legislature not
decided to investigate. However, we do hope that the Legislature
will act swiftly to remedy the problem through financial augmenta-
tion of the budget to enact the recommendations by the select
committee.
IS THERE A SERIOUS MORALE PROBLEM WITHIN THE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL
SAFETY?
After an extensive review, which included reading written
statements made by the field safety engineers, interviewing top
management personnel and studying detailed information supplied to
the committee; we are of the opinion that there is a very serious
morale problem within the Division. We are also of the opinion that
this has jeopardized the workers of the State of California. Most
of the statements made in this report have been substantiated in the
Minority Report
2.
report submitted to the Governor by Director of Finance, Vern Orr.
Even though the men in the field have proven their willing-
ness to get the job done and create a safe working atmosphere,
they have not received the necessary support from top management
personnel. Knowing this, both the men and the Division have
become apathetic.
IS THE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY IN NEED OF MORE FIELD INSPECTORS
TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE WORK PROTECTION?
While the main thrust of our investigation dealt with the
construction section of the Division of Industrial Safety, we felt
that there certainly is a definite need to increase the amount of
safety engineers in the field. We feel that 48 construction safety
engineers covering an area as enormous as the State of California
cannot possibly provide a safe working place for the men and women
of the State.
HAS THE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ESTABLISHED NEW SAFETY ORDERS
OR SOUGHT LEGISLATIVE CHANGES IN THE FIELD OF CONSTRUCTION?
New safety orders have been enacted yearly; however, very little
legislation has been introduced. During two of the last six years,
no legislation was introduced.
HAS THE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY BEEN RELUCTANT TO PROSECUTE?
It was pointed out to us that in the past 2½ years, 10 requests
have been submitted from the field for prosecution. 40% of these
were turned down at the management level, and the safety engineer has
no place to appeal this decision.
We came across several contractors' files that were approximately
two inches thick with violations that had been filed against them and
yet they had never been reviewed or prosecuted. A prosecution
request can be denied by any supervisor of the field personnel at
any level, and the field engineer cannot appeal the decision.
HAS THE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY EVER SOUGHT LEGISLATIVE APPROVAL
OF AN ADEQUATE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION TEAM?
In the material that was furnished us, we were not able to
determine whether or not the Division has ever requested such an
investigation team. In the recommendations of the full committee
report, however, we do make this request.
There is a definite need to investigate the many hundreds of
industrial deaths in the State of California to determine what caused
them and whether or not there was a willful violation of the safety
orders by the employer or supervising employee.
Minority Report
3.
In our opinion the responsibility for the mismanagement of
the Division of Industrial Safety directly lies with the Director
of the Department of Industrial Relations, William Hern. He is
responsible for the direction of all the Divisions under his
authority as Director of the Department of Industrial Relations
and therefore we feel that when he assumes the authority of his
position he also assumes the responsibility, which causes us to
wonder as to what the organizational posture of the other Divisions
are today.
As we stated earlier we agree with the full committee report
that a full reorganization is needed but to do this will need new
and fresh leadership, therefore we suggest that Mr. Hern should
resign as Director of the Department of Industrial Relations.
Respectfully submitted,
Frank M. Farro, Retired
TEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 853
Kenneth D. Larson, Vice President
CALIFORNIA LABOR FEDERATION, AFL-CIO
James S. Lee, President
STATE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES
COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA
Signature page attached
Frank M. Farro (Retired Secretary-Treasurer
of Teamsters Local 853) Pleasanton
tennith R.Larson
Kenneth Larson, Legislative Representative
Federated Fire Fighters, Sacramento, and
Chairman of Statewide Safety Committee - AFL-CIO
Camer S.Lee
James S. Lee, President
State Building & Construction Trades Council
of California, Sacramento
OFFICE OF THE GOVE.
RELEASE:
diate
Sacramento, Califor.
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-10-72
#88
Governor Ronald Reagan today said the unprecedented success of
California's new welfare reform program means that a decision by HEW
in Washington to loan the states $1 billion in additional welfare funds
will not affect California.
In a statement the governor said:
"Unlike a number of other states which apparently have not taken
the steps necessary to sufficiently control rising welfare caseloads
and the skyrocketing costs they impose, California has been able to
significantly reduce the number of persons on welfare during the past
nine months.
"Even more important, we have been able to bring welfare expenditures
down to within the normal growth of state revenues
eliminating the need
for such a loan from the federal government.
"For a state to accept the kind of I.O.U. which HEW is proposing
can only hasten the day of reckoning when the taxpayers in those states
must repay the debt they incur through increased taxes.
"By bringing welfare back under control in California, we expect
to save the taxpayers of our state some $338 million in federal, state
and local welfare costs during the current fiscal year and nearly three
quarters of a billion dollars in fiscal 1972-73. If we had not reformed
welfare, California's taxpayers would have had to pay more than $1
billion more for welfare during these two years alone roughly the same
amount that HEW wants to loan all the states put together.
"Again we are happy to say California won't need it."
#######
EJG
OFFICE OF THE GOVEL JR
RELEASE: ...mediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-11-72
#89
Governor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Jarrold T. Davis of
Grass Valley and Henry E. Magonigal of Smartville to four-year terms
on the board of the 17th District Agricultural Association (Nevada
County District Fair).
Davis, a special supervisor for the Bureau of Agricultural
Education in Sacramento, has served on the board since 1968. His
address is P.O. Box 197, Grass Valley. He is a Democrat.
Magonigal, a cattle rancher, has served on the board since 1960.
He is a Republican. His address is Star Route, Smartville.
Board members receive necessary expenses.
#######
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVER
R
RELEASE:
1
mediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-11-72
#90
Governor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Dr. Dwight H. Murray, Jr.,
of Napa to a four-year term on the District Review Committee for the
First District on the Board of Medical Examiners in the Department of
Consumer Affairs.
Dr. Murray, who lives at 1084 Ross Circle, Napa, will represent
county medical associations on the board. He is a Republican.
Board members receive per diem and expenses.
#######
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVEI
)R
RELEASE:
mediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-11-72
#91
Governor Ronald Reagan today named Dr. Gregory C. Murray of
Los Angeles to the District Review Committee for the Second District
on the Board of Medical Examiners in the Department of Consumer Affairs.
Dr. Murray, a surgeon and clinical professor at the University of
Southern California Medical School, has served on the board since 1965,
representing medical associations. He lives at 4007 Hepburn Avenue,
Los Angeles. He is a Republican.
Board members receive per diem and expenses.
#######
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVEI
R
RELEASE:
mediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-11-72
#92
Governor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Virgil B. Kingsley, a
West Los Angeles funeral director, and Harold B. Wright, Loyalton
publisher, to four-year terms on the State Board of Funeral Directors
and Embalmers in the Department of Consumer Affairs.
Kingsley, operator of Gates, Kingsley and Gates Funeral Directors,
and Wright, publisher of the Sierra Booster, have served on the board
since 1968. Both are Republicans.
Kingsley lives at 222 - 22nd Street, Santa Monica.
Wright, whose address is Box 458 Loyalton, represents the public
on the board.
Board members receive $25 per diem while on official duty.
#######
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVER1
RELEASE: I. ediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-14-72
#93
Governor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Dr. Charles B. McElwee
of Duarte to a four-year term on the Physical Therapy Examining
Committee in the Department of Consumer Affairs.
Dr. McElwee, a Republican, has served on the board since 1968.
He lives at 2221 Rim Road, Duarte.
Board members receive $25 per diem while on official duty.
######
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVER
R
MEMO TO THE
.ESS
Sacramento, California
Contact: Paul Beck
445-4571
2-11-72
#94
GOVERNOR'S SCHEDULE
February 14, 1972
through
February 20, 1972
Monday, February 14
6:45 p.m.
Los Angeles Lincoln Club, California Club,
538 South Flower Street, Los Angeles. (Remarks)
Overnight - Los Angeles
Tuesday, February 15
No public appointments scheduled
Overnight - - Sacramento
Wednesday, February 16
10:30 a.m.
PRESS CONFERENCE
11:30 a.m.
Picture with Easter Seal Child, Governor's
Office
4:00 p.m.
Taping of segment of "The Advocates", KCRA
Studio
Overnight - Sacramento
Thursday, February 17
10:30 a.m.
Brief Press Conference
Friday, February 18
Noon
Regents Meeting, San Francisco
Evening
San Francisco Press Club "Gang Dinner",
San Francisco Press Club, 555 Post Street
Overnight - Los Angeles
Saturday, February 19 No appointments scheduled
Sunday, February 20
Overnight - Los Angeles
# # #
PB
OFFICE OF THE GOVER R
RELEASE: mediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-14-72
#95
Governor Ronald Reagan today reappointed one member and named two
new members to the State Board of Agriculture.
Reappointed to a four-year term was Dr. James B. Kendrick, Jr.,
Vice President-Agricultural Sciences, the University of California at
Berkeley. He has served on the board, representing the University,
since 1968. He is a Republican. He lives at 615 Spruce Street,
Berkeley.
The new members, also appointed to four-year terms, are Earl S.
Smittcamp, a Clovis fruit grower and agricultural leader, and James
R. Manassero, a Santa Ana vegetable grower.
Smittcamp, who lives at 8054 North Minniewawa Street, Clovis, was
recently appointed by President Nixon to the Farm Credit Board which
serves five western states. He is chairman of the Agricultural Advisory
Board at Fresno State College and a member of the Board of Governors.
He is also a member of the White House Conference on Food and Nutrition.
He succeeds John M. Garabedian of Fresno, whose term has expired.
Manassero, who lives at 12681 Culver Drive, Santa Ana, is a
director of the Irvine Growers Association and is active in the Orange
County Farm Bureau, the Tomato Growers Association and the Asparagus
Growers Association. He succeeds Carl Samuelson of Ojai, whose term
has expired.
Smittcamp and Manassero are Republicans.
Members of the board receive necessary expenses.
#######
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVE OR
RELEASE:
mediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-14-72
#96
Governor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Eugene L. Johnston,
New Cuyama rancher and conservationist, and Howard K. Nakae, a
Newcastle farmer, to four-year terms on the State Board of Forestry,
subject to Senate confirmation.
Johnston, a Republican, has represented livestock interests on
the board since 1971. His address is Box 263, New Cuyama.
Nakae, a Democrat, has represented agricultural interests on the
board since 1968. His address is Route 2, Box 2225, Newcastle.
Board members receive necessary expenses.
######
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVER1
RELEASE:
mediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-14-72
#97
Governor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Monsignor Thomas A. Kirby,
retired pastor of St. Basil's Church in Vallejo and Frederick E.
Llewellyn, president and general manager of Forest Lawn Memorial Park
in Glendale, to four-year terms on the Cemetery Board in the Department
of Consumer Affairs.
Monsignor Kirby, who lives at 27 Panorama Drive, Vallejo, and
Llewellyn, who lives at 1521 Virginia Road, San Marino, have served
on the board since 1968. Both are Republicans.
Board members receive $25 per diem while on official duty.
#######
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVER
R
RELEASE:
mediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-14-72
#98
Governor Ronald Reagan today reappointed threemembers to four-year
terms on the State Board of Registration for Geologists in the
Department of Consumer Affairs.
They are:
Ted L. Bear, a Los Angeles consulting geologist, who lives at
5385 Vista La Jana Lane, La Canada. He will represent District 5,
Petroleum Geologists.
John F. Curran, a Santa Barbara consulting geologist, who lives
at 1010 Mission Canyon Road, Santa Barbara. He represents District 4.
Wilferd W. Peak, Chief Geologist of the Division of Safety of Dams,
Department of Water Resources, Sacramento. He represents District 1,
Engineer Geologists. He lives at 8332 Willowdale, Fair Oaks.
All have served on the board since 1969. They are Republicans.
Board members receive per diem and expenses.
#####
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVER
R
RELEASE:
.nmediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-14-72
#99
Governor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Mrs. Mary K. "Mickey"
Shell, a Sacramento newspaper woman, and John R. Ross, a San Luis
Obispo architect, to four-year terms on the California State Board of
Architectural Examiners in the Department of Consumer Affairs.
Mrs. Shell, a columnist for the Capitol News Service and the
Bakersfield Californian, has served on the board since 1968, representing
the public. She lives at 400 Hopkins Road, Sacramento.
Ross, who heads a San Luis Obispo architectural firm, has also
served on the board since 1968, representing architects. He lives at
580 Serrano Drive, San Luis Obispo.
Both are Republicans.
Board members receive $25 per diem while on official duty.
######
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVERN
RELEASE: Immediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-15-72
#100
Governor Ronald Reagan today announced the appointment of David
L. Allen, an attorney and Visalia City Councilman, to the Visalia
Judicial District Municipal Court.
Allen, 41, a Republican, will receive an annual salary of $32,273.
He succeeds Judge Noel McDermott, who has retired.
A practicing attorney in Visalia since 1955, Allen served as a
Tulare County Deputy County Counsel from 1956 to 1958 and as a Tulare
County Deputy District Attorney from January, 1958 until September, 1959,
when he entered private practice.
He was elected to the Visalia City Council in 1967 and was
re-elected to a four-year term in 1971.
A native of Visalia, he is a graduate of the College of Sequoias
and Fresno State College and earned his law degree from the University
of California's Hastings College of Law.
He is a member of the State Bar of California, the Tulare County
Bar Association and the California Trial Lawyers Association.
He and his wife Fern make their home in Visalia.
#######
WAS
THE CALIFORNIA DELEGATION
TO THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONVENTION OF 1972
pledged to the re-election of President Richard M. Nixon
Governor Ronald Reagan, Chairman
Thomas C. Reed, Vice Chairman
February 17, 1972
Governor Ronald Reagan today read the following statement to the
press in Sacramento:
"I am pleased to announce the slate of candidates for delegate
to the Republican National Convention in San Diego. This group of
men and women have pledged themselves to the renomination and reelec-
tion of President Nixon to another term of office.
"Under California law the President as a candidate approves his
own slate of delegates. He has now done so and has asked me to serve
as chairman of his delegation.
"In assisting the President to form the delegation, we recommended
that it be broadly based within the party and that it include more
young people, women, and minority group representation than ever
before. This has been done. But in order to see that many of the
current leaders and supporters of the Republican Party were also
recognized, we have formed an honorary delegation which will be at
least as large as the regular delegation. They will be at the
convention too. They will meet with the delegation and will take part
fully in all matters except voting on the floor.
"At the June 6 presidential primary, those delegates whose names
you have today will be chosen when Republicans cast votes for Richard
Nixon as candidate for president. If successful, those delegates
will then go to San Diego for the convention beginning August 21.
"Last October 1 at the Republican State Central Committee meeting
in Los Angeles, I announced the organization committee for the
delegation. This committee has received hundreds of applications,
has evaluated them, and made its recommendations to the President.
Thomas C. Reed, the Republican National Committeeman, was chairman of
the committee and will be vice chairman of the delegation.
"There are literally thousands of California Republicans who
deserve the honor to go to a national convention. My only regret
is that we are limited in the number of delegates and alternates who
can be named and that all those deserving cannot be rewarded."
Following is a list of the delegates and alternates:
# # #
Post Office Box 371 - San Rafael, California 94902 - (415) 456-7310
HONORARY DELEGATION
Name and County
Name and County
Earl Adams, Los Angeles
Mrs. Elena Madison, San Francisco
Rex Allen, Los Angeles
William S. Mailliard, San
Floyd Andrews, San Diego
Francisco
Victor C. Andrews, Orange
David Margolis, Riverside
Jack L. Ashby, Napa
Mrs. Tom May, Los Angeles
O. L. Bane, Fresno
Mrs. Marquita M. Maytag, San Diego
Sydney R. Barlow, Los Angeles
Robert McClain, Los Angeles
Robert F. Bauer, Los Angeles
John A. McCone, Los Angeles
Arnold O. Beckman, Orange
Carl M. McConnell, Shasta
Clare Berryhill, Stanislaus
Ferd Mendenhall, Los Angeles
Ben Biaggini, San Francisco
Arch Monson, San Francisco
Alfred S. Bloomingdale,
George Murphy, Los Angeles
Los Angeles
Kenneth T. Norris, Sr., Los
John Bohn, Alameda
Angeles
Mrs. John D. Bowler, Jr.,
Dr. Gaylord Parkinson, San Diego
Los Angeles
William Pereira, Los Angeles
Mrs. Betsy Bromfield, Santa
Miss Emily Pike, San Francisco
Barbara
Thomas P. Pike, Los Angeles
Rodgers Broomhead, Marin
Burt Raynes, San Diego
Henry F. Budde, San Francisco
Charles Reed, Los Angeles
Fritz B. Burns, Los Angeles
Robert O. Reynolds, Los Angeles
Robert Burns, Los Angeles
Taft Schreiber, Los Angeles
Asa V. Call, Los Angeles
Edwin A. Seipp, Jr., San Mateo
Dennis E. Carpenter, Orange
William T. Sesnon, Jr., Los
Sherman Chickering, San
Angeles
Francisco
Forrest M. Shumway, Los Angeles
Mrs. Athalie R. Clarke, Orange
C. Arnholt Smith, San Diego
Charles Cook, Los Angeles
Emmett G. Solomon, San Mateo
Ransom M. Cook, San Francisco
Charles S. Thomas, Orange
Roy Crocker, Los Angeles
Charles B. Thornton, Los Angeles
Joseph M. Crosby, Los Angeles
Arthur R. Tirado, Fresno
Theodore Cummings, Los Angeles
Holmes Tuttle, Los Angeles
Justin Dart, Los Angeles
Max Eddy Utt, Los Angeles
Harold Dobbs, San Francisco
Julian Virtue, Los Angeles
Donald D. Doyle, San Francisco
Jack L. Warner, Los Angeles
Jack Drown, Los Angeles
John Wayne, Orange
Leonard K. Firestone, Los
Mel Wilson, Fresno
Angeles
Peter Wilson, San Diego
Mortimer Fleishhacker, Jr.,
William Wilson, Los Angeles
San Francisco
Wendell W. Witter, San Francisco
R. Gwin Follis, San Francisco
Roland Rich Wooley, Los Angeles
John Garabedian, Fresno
Jack Wrather, Los Angeles
E. H. Gauer, San Francisco
Paul D. Yager, Los Angeles
Mrs. Katherine H. Haley, Ventura
Soichi F. Ukui, Los Angeles
James W. Halley, San Francisco
Lloyd Harnish, Fresno
George D. Hart, Marin
Albert Harutunian, San Diego
Marco F. Hellman, San Francisco
Mrs. Dolores Hope, Los Angeles
Preston Hotchkiss, Sr., Los
Angeles
Jaquelin H. Hume, San Francisco
Edward L. Johnson, Los Angeles
Thomas V. Jones, Los Angeles
Earle Jorgensen, Los Angeles
Herbert Kalmbach, Orange
Darius Keaton, Monterey
Walter Knott, Orange
Victor J. Krehbiel, Los Angeles
Arthur Linkletter, Los Angeles
John Lusk, Orange
-2-
Congressional District
Delegate
Alternate
1
Mrs. Marjorie C. Boynton
Hon. Donald H. Clausen
711 Willow Avenue
Corner of Malone & Lake
Ukiah
Earl Drive
Crescent City
Roads Veale
Joseph Russ IV
4343 Wallace Road
Bunker Hill Ranch
Santa Rosa
Ferndale
2
Hon. Fred W. Marler, Jr.
Eugene A. Chappie
1352 Norman Drive
Cool
Redding
August J. Techeira, Jr.
Mrs. Jeanne L. Dryden
West Legion Avenue
320 Bennett St., #10
Chico
Grass Valley
3
John V. Diepenbrock
Ms. Lola M. Brekke
3931 Wycombe Drive
7016 Trabert Court
Sacramento
Carmichael
Hon. Ed Reinecke
Thomas J. Bowlin
492 Crocker Road
3854 Bartley Drive
Sacramento
Sacramento
4
Ms. Loretta C. Ceasar
Miss Heidi Ann Ehrman
408 Lakeside Drive
412 F Street
Vallejo
Davis
Ms. Janet J. Johnston
Ronald R. Harrington
County Road 31-Rt. 1
9466 Broadway
Box 201
Live Oak
Winters
5
Steve M. Jeong
Miss Agnes I. Chan
754 Commercial Street
980 Sacramento
San Francisco
San Francisco
Putnam Livermore
Mrs. Jacquelyn W. Green
1023 Vallejo
66 Cleary Court, #708
San Francisco
San Francisco
6
Hon. William T. Bagley
*
Miss Cydney Buisson
1 Fawn Court
232 San Carlos Way
San Anselmo
Novato
Paul R. Haerle
John L. Molinari
450 E. Strawberry Drive
435 Magellan Avenue
Mill Valley
San Francisco
*
Thomas C. Reed
Frank J. Pagliaro
Pomeroy Road
20 Vidal
Ross
San Francisco
7
Frank P. Adams
Ms. Aura C. Edwards
781 Highland Avenue
6 Cricket Hill
Piedmont
Lafayette
Mrs. Susan C. Schwab
Miss Diane Williams
110 Waldo Avenue
1771 Highland Place, 205
Piedmont
Berkeley
8
Hugh S. Koford
Harlan S. Geldermann
18976 Sandy Road
19251 San Ramon Road
Castro Valley
San Ramon
Ms. Laura A. Wirt
Ms. Patricia Marie Weakley
16101 Selborne Drive
575 Pershing Drive
San Leandro
San Leandro
-3-
Congressional District
Delegate
Alternate
9
R. Robert Blackman
*
Hon. Clark L. Bradley
641 South 11th Street
156 Dana Avenue
San Jose
San Jose
Ms. Kathryn A. Coon
S. Guy Puccio
1640 Pajaro Court
22237 Main Street
Fremont
Hayward
Robert B. Suhr
14675 Horseshoe Drive
Saratoga
10
Halsey C. Burke
Mrs. Gail Urban Moore
6863 Castlerock Drive
670 Lola Lane
San Jose
Mountain View
Ms. Olivia Renee Delgado
Wilmot J. Nicholson
1837 Curtner Avenue
20091 Black Road
San Jose
Los Gatos
*
Mrs. Elsa Sandstrom
1191 Buckingham Drive
Los Altos
11
Lester Blake Baldwin
Louis P. Athas
922 Blandford
998 Flying Fish
Redwood City
Foster City
Robert W. Naylor
Robert R. Wood
134 West 43rd Avenue
1197 Trinity Drive
San Mateo
Menlo park
*
Clint Eastwood
12
Pebble Beach
Ms. Elizabeth Leitcher
Timothy John Morgan
642 Monterey Street
1046 Western Drive
San Luis Obispo
Santa Cruz
William H. Temple
Mark A. Schimbor
120 San Benancio Road
954 Mesa Road
Salinas
Monterey
13
W. Arvid Johnson
Mrs. Helen J. Cackley
125 East Victoria
1764 Overlook Lane
Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara
Cyrus Johnson
Randolph E. Siple
1595 Kirk Avenue
305 Mariposa Drive
Thousand Oaks
Ventura
14
Mrs. Nita Ashcraft
Miss Sue Jelonek
962 Janet Lane
2704 Glasgon Court
Lafayette
Richmond
Mrs. Kay Valory
William P. Moses
3812 Happy Valley Road
5691 San Pablo Dam Road
Lafayette
El Sobrante
15
J. Wilmar Jensen
Ms. Irenmarie Castillo
1138 Purdue Avenue
1158 West Elmwood
Modesto
Stockton
Hon. Robert T. Monagan
Fernando Moreno
1317 El Portal
2080 West Mendocino
Tracy
Stockton
-4-
Congressional District
Delegate
Alternate
16
Dennes Coombs
M. Michael Cardenas
1685 West Wrenwood Lane
1129 West Scott Avenue
Fresno
Fresno
Robert E. Stewart
Hon. Ernest N. Mobley
2166 Cedar Crest Drive
907 North Oliver
Merced
Sanger
*
Miss Theresa Speake
32 West National
Clovis
17
Bruce H. Hasenkamp
Ms. Imogene M. Hilbers
24 Linaria Way
1918 Middlefield Road
Menlo Park
Palo Alto
*
David Packard
Paul Rood
26580 Taaffe Road
1038 Pine Nut Court
Los Altos Hills
Sunnyvale
Frank O. Verlot
1540 Klamath Drive
Sunnyvale
18
Ralph E. Rosedale
Ms. Roberta E. Chase
10181 Avenue 416
Star Route, Bootjack Road
Dinuba
Mariposa
Mrs. Elsie Marie Solberg
Miss Donna Most
125 South Park Drive
2806 Tioga Avenue
Madera
Oakdale
23
Robert F. Beaver
George E. Delahanty
1235 Margarita Drive
2500 Coronado Drive
Fullerton
Fullerton
Ms. Rosemary F. Ferraro
Harry W. Lindsay
9504 Gallatin Road
9714 San Juan
Downey
Southgate
25
Mrs. Lois Ann Lundberg
Kenneth R. Manning
1341 Carmela Lane
14707 Mountain Spring
La Habra
Hacienda Heights
Mrs. Shirley C. Root
Ms. Meda Lorraine Sodoma
1420 Latchford Street
15563 Facilidad
Hacienda Heights
Hacienda Heights
27
Ms. Blanche M. Gomez
Gordon P. Del Faro
7062 Lurline Avenue
23529 Dolorosa
Canoga park
Woodland Hills
Charles R. McGrath
*
Ms. Marian W. LaFollette
5011 West Gonzales Road
15745 Royal Oak Road
Oxnard
Encino
Ms. Edith M. Lashley
1811 Sunburst Street
Northridge
32
Mrs. Elva W. De Lyre
Hon. George Deukmejian
1100 E1 Mirador Avenue
5366 East Braodway
Long Beach
Long Beach
Mrs. Elizabeth Sperline
Robert R. Ruchti, II
6660 Lime
1120 Ramillo Avenue
Long Beach
Long Beach
-5-
Congressional District
Delegate
Alternate
33
Hon. Houston I. Flournoy
Hon. William E. Coombs
755 West 10th
361 West Winchester, #1
Claremont
Rialto
Warren Reed Sprinkel
Ms. Elizabeth V. Luttrell
880 Orchid Court
919 N. University
Uplands
Redlands
34
John R. Bathe
David F. Ortiz
1521 West 5th
1914 South Parton
Santa Ana
Santa Ana
Ms. Jane H. Broughton
Mrs. Eileen E. Padberg
5422 Anthony Avenue
310 Country Club Lane
Garden Grove
Santa Ana
36
Mrs. William H. Brock
Mrs. Lorraine T. Mazzie
2917 Summit Circle
5263 Kent Drive
Bakersfield
Bakersfield
Ms. Virginia Rice
Frank Noreiga
408 Porter
115 Panorama Drive
Hanford
Bakersfield
38
Wesley Gene Beverlin
Ms. Ethel M. Silver
9568 Marion
5841 Grand Avenue
Montclair
Riverside
Miss Catherine M. Swajian
Miss Joann Mary Tortarolo
1747 7th Street, Apt. 10
3681 Cranford, Apt. 17
Riverside
Riverside
39
Mrs. Marjorie L. Fluor
Hon. Robert E. Badham
1920 Heliotrope Drive
1253 Rutland Road
Santa Ana
Newport Beach
William Teague
Hugh Mears Neighbour, III
305 Esperanza Drive
1227 W. Santa Clara
Newport Beach
Santa Ana
40,41
James H. Ashcraft
Ms. Chris Ellen Bibb
6712 Golfcrest Drive
1278 Essex
San Diego
San Diego
Kim Fletcher
Richard G. Capen, Jr.
5646 Dolphin Place
6104 Avenida Cresta
San Diego
La Jolla
Gordon C. Luce
Mrs. Ruth A. Green
3558 Via Flores
5415 Bonita Drive
San Diego
San Diego
*
Mrs. Eleanor R. Ring
John A. McColl
801 Tolita Avenue
5942 Henley
Coronado
San Diego
Hon. Jack Schrade
*
William Stephens, Jr.
2172 Plum Street
3635 Dupont
San Diego
San Diego
42
Admiral Leslie E. Gehres
Ms. Marcia Mae Bents
8001 Vista Drive
810 West Bag Avenue
La Mesa
Balboa
Edward Mills
Mrs. Ruth Flores Harper
3526 Riviera Drive
Solana Beach
Laguna Beach
*
Hon. John Stull
*
Rodney J. Sherman
460 Parkwood Lane
18672 Via Torino
Leucadia
Irvine
-6-
Congressional District
Delegate
Alternate
43
Alfred A. McCandless
Mrs. Mary Lou Carpenter
74-111 Mockingbird Trail
9303 Avenida Mira Villa
Indian Wells
Beaumont
Edgar L. McCounbrey
Darwin D. Cohee
1195 Manzanita Avenue
663 South Rio Vista
Palm Springs
Brawley
*
Mrs. Ivy Baker Priest
472 Santa Elena Road
Palm Springs
*
Hon. Victor V. Veysey
5203 Highway 111
Brawley
12 districts ( all
Charles G. Bakaly, Jr.
*
Clifford R. Anderson, Jr.
within Los Angeles
521 Michigan Blvd.
2046 Oak Knoll
county)
Pasadena
San Marino
William S. Banowsky, M.D.
Michael D. Antonovich
7851 South Budlong Avenue
3415 Lowry Road
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
Donald L. Bren
Hon. Robert G. Beverly
349 North Faring Road
2700 Highland Avenue
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
Mrs. Margaret M. Brock
Mrs. Virginia B. Braun
2220 Avenue of the Stars,
1585 Orlando Road
Apt. 1404
Pasadena
Los Angeles
Hon. Charles J. Conrad
Vernon E. Brown
13444 Moorpark Street
4223 Don Diablo Drive
Sherman Oaks
Los Angeles
Tirso Del Junco, M.D.
C. Timothy Corliss
1570 San Pasqual
1607 Carlyle
Pasadena
Santa Monica
Mrs. Lovelia J. Flournoy
James R. Dunn
4155 Mt. Vernon Drive
6300 Green Valley Cricle,
Los Angeles
Apt. #316
Culver City
Mark T. Gates, Jr.
George H. Ellis
340 North Cliffwood
219 North Norton Avenue
Los Angeles
Los Angeles
Miss Linda Gosden
Josh M. Fredricks
720 North Alpine Drive
1011 Tenth
Beverly Hills
Hermosa Beach
Riachrd E. Gulbranson
*
Dirk A. ten Grotenhuis
10071 Valley Spring Lane
1325 Milan Avenue
North Hollywood
South Pasadena
Hon. John L. Harmer
Mrs. Jackie Nugent Harker
401 N. Brand Blvd.
4500 Densmore Avenue
Glendale
Los Angeles
Roderick M. Hills
*
H. Thomas Hayden
2601 Aberdeen
15015 Parthenia, #46
Los Angeles
Sepulveda
Norman A. Hodges
Robert Hillman
628 Corlett
701 El Medico Avenue
Compton
Pacific Palisades
-7-
Congressional District
Delegate
Alternate
12 districts (all
David L. James
Thomas E. Inch
within Los Angeles
1075 Pine Oak Lane
12839 Marlboro
county)
Pasadena
Los Angeles
P. Louis Johnson
Mrs. Verna D. Mattox
13120 Spinning
22647-B Nadine Circle
Gardena
Torrance
Peter F. McAndrews
William M. C. Miller
12642 Moorpark
3575 Rambla Pacifico
Studio City
Malibu
Daniel Stephen McHargue II
Mrs. Alice N. Ogle
14231 Gain
720 South Bel Aire Drive
Los Angeles
Burbank
*
Ronald R. Reagan
J. Neil Reagan
1669 San Onofre Drive
1132 Chantilly Road
Pacific Palisades
Los Angeles
Henry Salvatori
Ms. Margaret P. Scott
457 Bel Air Road
850 Franklin
Los Angeles
Santa Monica
Hon. H. Allen Smith
Mrs. Julie Sommars (Erwin)
1245 Imperial Drive
16910 Magnolia Blvd.
Glendale
Encino
William French Smith
James T. Straw
1256 Oak Grove Avenue
3623 Ballina Canyon
San Marino
Encino
Ms. Oma S. Umhey
John A. Sturgeon
2639 N. Commonwealth Ave.
20 Chandler Place
Los Angeles
San Marino
Rafael E. Vega
*
Waller Taylor, II
4055 Stansbury Avenue
2605 Century Towers West
Sherman Oaks
2220 Avenue of the Stars
Los Angeles
chas. C. Reed
Robert H. Volk
Patrick D. Tobin
Qxford
Rd.
13 Eastfield Drive
3513 West 85th Street
San Marino
Rolling Hills
Inglewood
*
Hon. Evelle J. Younger
Mrs. Joyce R. Valdez
2461 Chislehurst Drive
1001 South Valencia Street
Los Angeles
Alhambra
Riachrd D. Zanuck
Mrs. Wallis Weingarten
546 Ocean Front
702 North Alpine Drive
Santa Monica
Beverly Hills
James M. Woods, Sr.
613 North Tajauta
Compton
Mrs. Toshiko Yamamoto
253 South Gerhart Avenue
Los Angeles
*
At large
-8-
and
alternate
pledged
to
the re-election of President Richard M. Nixon
Delegates
Alternates
Women
30%
41%
Youth (under 30)
14
22
Minorities
9
13
A=ALT DIST - BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES
4 PRES. PRES.VALLEJO F.W./AGE 26
5 RR HO WORK/AGE 28
.DVOLUNTEER NORKER
L.A. TEACHER/WIFE OF JAMES F.
" GREEN POWER PRESIDENT
BANKER =
11 INSUR. INSUR./COLUMNIST/ACE 28
" WATTS INDUSTRIES
L.A.BARBER
10 VOLUNTEER WORKER
15 ATTORNEY/AGE 27
15 PRES STOCKTON SCH BD
16 RR MEX-AMER. CHMN.
16 LEGAL SECRETARY/AGE 31
27 CHMN. L.A. HOUSING BD
34 BANKER & BONDSMAN
42 VOLUNTEER WORKER
L.A D. /RSCCC OFFICER
RESTAURANT OWNER
W
in
MINORITIES
STATUS
D=DEL COMG
D
A
A
R
D
A
H
a
A
H
HODGES/NORNAN TI
: PRI 0 (Oriental)
(Spanish surname)
0
H
H
a
0
8
H
A
a
PR: B (Black)
++++
NAME
CEASAR/LOR1A
GREEN/JACKIE
GREEN/RUTH
JOHNSON/LOUIS
BRONN/VERNON
WIC/SCOOM
JEONG/STEVE
YANAMOTO/T.
Field a 00
DELGADO/OLIVI
CASTILLO/IREN A
MORENO/FERN'O
CARDENAS/MIKE
SPEAKE/THER'A
GOMEZ/BLANCHE
ORTIZ/DAVID
HRPR/RTH FLRS
DEL JUNCO/T.
VEGA/RAY
#
*
A=ALT DIST BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES
2 CHICO STATE STDT. /AGE STDT./AGE 21
88 308/WWHO as 01363 E
4 PRES. VALLEJO F. F.W./AGE 26
4 UC DAVIS inst) AGE 21
82 308/>6011 OH as S
S 50
7 WHITE HSE INTERN/AGE 24
B ALAMEDA CTY YR'S/AGE 23
83 356/31613 3800 NBS 6
11 STANFORD STUDENT/AGE 20
11 STANFORD/SF ATTY/AGE 28
12 UCS.CR. /DAVIS UCS.CR./DAVIS LAW/AGE 24
12 UCB/STANFORD/ATTY/AGE 26
13 MACGILLIVRAY CHMN/AGE 28
14 STUDENT/UC BERIC/AGE 21
15 ATTORNEY/AGE 27
17 PRINCETON/AGE 18
18 UOP FRESHMAN FIGE 19
25 CAL POLY/CCR UP/AGE 19
34 BROKER/AGE 27
34 PUBLIC REL'NS/AGE 28
38 SAM MT.SAM COL. ANT.COL./AGE PAGE 19
38 UCLA LAW STUDENT/AGE 21
38 HIGH SCH. SCH.TEACHER/AGE 84
39 SNA HI SB PRES/AGE 18
42 OAK. RAIDERS/USC/AGE 26
ASSEMBLY CAND. PAGE 281
.D.UCSD UCSD LAW STUDENT/AGE 22
L.A. ANUCLA STUDENT/AGE 19
ad
REPPERDINE INSTR./AGE 26
INSUR. <COLUMNIST/AGE 28
ad USD =
OCLA STUDENT/AGE 21
=
=
=
YOUTH
STATUS
D=DEL CONG
D
H
=
A
is
b
H
A
D
D
D
H
A
D.
b
H
A
A
3
TI
19
a
=
H
H
a
D
H
D
a.
P.
B
H
H
MAME
TECHEIRR/AUG
BOWLIM/TOM
DEASAR/LORNA
2MAN/HEID]
GREEN/JACKIE
BUISSON/CYD
WILLIAMS/DIAN
WERKLEY
BLACKMAN/ROBT
BALBWIN/BLAKE
MAYLOR/R.W.
MORGAN/TIM
SCHIMBOR/MARK
JOHNSON/ARVID
JELONEK/SUE
CASTILLO/IREM
ROOD/PAUL
MOST/DONNA
MANHING/KEN
THE/JOHN R
BEVERLIN/WES
SWPLIIAN/CATHY
TORTAROLO/JO
SHERMANZ'ROD
ASHCRAFT/JIM
BIBB/CHRIS
GOSDEN/LINDA
MCANDRENS/P.
MCHARCUE/STE
BRONN/UERNON
FREDERICKS/JM
PAGE 1
DATE: 2/17 11:38
DATA BASE: DACN
REPORT FORM: DELEGATION
STATUS
D=DEL
#8
A=ALT NAME
BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES
SEX RACE
* DIST: 1
D
BOYNTON/M.C. CONG'L DIST CHMN
F W
D
VEALE/RHODES RR COUNTY CHMN
M W
A
CLAUSEN/DON
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
M W
A
RUSS/JOE
RANCHER/RR REGIONAL CHMN M
W
* DIST: 2
D
MARLER/FRED
SENATE MINORITY LDR
M W
D
TECHEIRA/AUG CHICO STATE STDT./AGE 21 M
W
A
CHAPPIE/GENE ASSEMBLYMAN
M W
A
DRYDEN/JEANNE COUNTY CENT.CTTE.CHMN
F W
* DIST: 3
D
DIEPENBROCK/J ATTORNEY
M W
D
REINECKE/ED LT. GOVERNOR
M W
A
BOWLIN/TOM
SACTO YR CHMN/AGE 28
M W
A
BREKKE/LOLA RR HQ CHMN 1970
F W
* DIST: 4
D
CEASAR/LOR'A
PRES. VALLEJO F.W./AGE 26 F
B
D
JOHNSTON/JNT
BUSINESSWOMAN/AGE 32
F
W
X
A
EHRMAN/HEIDI
UC DAVIS - AGE 21
F W
A
HARRINGTON/R. SEVERAL RR CAMPAIGNS
M W
* DIST: 5
D
JEONG/STEVE REALTOR
M
0
D
LIVERMORE/PUT CHAIRMAN RSCCC
M W
A
CHAN/AGNES I
TEACHER
F 0
A
GREEN/JACKIE RR HQ WORK/AGE 28
F
B
* DIST: 6
D
BAGLEY/WM.
ASSEMBLYMAN
M
W
D
HAERLE/PAUL
RSCCC SEC/RR N. CA. CH'70
M
W
D
REED/THOMAS
RR CHMN 70/R. NATL CTTE
M
W
A
BUISSON/CYD
MED. STUDENT/AGE 22
F
W
A
MOLINARI/JOHN COUNTY SUPERVISOR
M W
A
PAGLIARO/FJ
ASS'T DA/ASSY CAND/ 31
M
W
* DIST: 7
D
ADAMS/FRANK TREAS. RSCCC - ATTY
M W
D
SCHWAB/SUE
NO CALIF RR V. CHMN 70
F W
A
EDWARDS/AURA NO. DIV'N. CHMN. CFRW
F W
PAGE 2 2/17
STATUS
D=DEL
A=ALT NAME
BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES
SEX RACE
A
WILLIAMS/DIAN WHITE HSE INTERN/AGE 24 F W
* DIST: 8
D
KOFORD/HUGH 1971 CRA PRESIDENT
M W
D
WIRT/LAURA CTY CTTE PRECINCT CHMN F
W
A
GELDERMANN/H. REALTOR
M W
A
WEAKLEY/PAT ALAMEDA CTY YR'S/AGE 23 F
W
* DIST: 9
D
BLACKMAN/ROBT SAN JOSE STATE/AGE 23
M W
D
COON/KATHY
LOCAL PRECINCT CHMN
F W
A
BRADLEY/CLARK STATE SENATOR
M W
A
PUCCIO/S.GUY HAYWARD RR CH/REALTOR
M W
A
SUHR/ROBERT 1968 NIXON CHMN
M W
* DIST: 10
D
BURKE/HALSEY MFG BUSINESS/RR CHMN 70 M
W
D
DELGADO/OLIVI VOLUNTEER WORKER
F S
D
SANDSTROM/E.
IMMED. PAST PRES.CFRW
F W
A
MOORE/GAIL
PRES.MNTN.VIEW SCH.BD.
F W
A
NICHOLSON/WM FORMER MAYOR-SANTA CLARA M
W
* DIST: 11
D
BALDWIN/BLAKE STANFORD STUDENT/AGE 20 M W
D
NAYLOR/R.W. STANFORD/SF ATTY/AGE 28 M W
A
ATHAS/LOUIS P TITLE INSURANCE EXEC.
M W
A
WOOD/ROBERT COUNTY CENT.CTTE.CHMN. M W
* DIST: 12
D
EASTWOOD/CLNT ENTERTAINER
M W
D
LEITCHER/BETT RR COUNTY CHAIRMAN
F W
D
TEMPLE/W.H.
COUNTY CENT.CTTE.CHMN
M W
A
MORGAN/TIM
UCS.CR./DAVIS LAW/AGE 24 M
W
A
SCHIMBOR/MARK UCB/STANFORD/ATTY/AGE 26 M
W
* DIST: 13
D
JOHNSON/ARVID MACGILLIVRAY CHMN/AGE 28 M
W
D
JOHNSON/CY
INSURANCE/RSCCC PCT. CHMN M
W
A
CACKLEY/HELEN PRES.S.BARB.FED.WOMEN
F W
A
SIPLE/RANDY ASSY CAND/COUNTY CHMN
M W
* DIST: 14
D
ASHCRAFT/NITA V. CHMN RSCCC
F W
D
VALORY/KAY RR VICE CHMN 1966
F W
A
JELONEK/SUE STUDENT/UC BERK/AGE 21
F
W
PAGE 3 2/17
STATUS
D=DEL
A=ALT NAME
BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES
SEX RACE
A
MOSES/WM.P. # COUNTY CENT.CTTE.CHMN. M W
* DIST: 15
D
JENSEN/WILMAR RR COUNTY CHMN '70
M
W
D
MONAGAN/ROBT. ASS'Y MINORITY LDR
M W
A
CASTILLO/IREN ATTORNEY/AGE 27
F S
A
MORENO/FERN'O PRES STOCKTON SCH BD
M S
* DIST: 16
D
COOMBS/DENNIS RR COUNTY CHMN '70
M W
D
STEWART/ROBT WAS RR COUNTY CHMN '70
M
W
A
CARDENAS/MIKE RR MEX-AMER.CHMN.
M S
A
MOBLEY/ERNIE ASSEMBLYMAN
M W
A
SPEAKE/THER'A LEGAL SECRETARY/AGE 31
F
S
* DIST: 17
D
HASENKAMP/BR STANFORD ADMIN/CRL PRES M W
D
PACKARD/DAVID FORMER DEPUTY SEC. DEF. M
W
D
VERLOT/FRANK COUNTY CENT.CTTE.CHMN. M
W
A
HILBERS/IMOG. PALO ALTO FED. WOMEN
F W
A
ROOD/PAUL
PRINCETON/AGE 18
M W
* DIST: 18
D
ROSEDALE/R. CHMN/COUNTY CHMN'S ASSOC M
W
D
SOLBERG/MARIE MADERA CNTY CHMN
F W
A
CHASE/ROBERTA 70 RR CH/66 L.A. REG DIR F
W
A
MOST/DONNA
UOP FRESHMAN - AGE 19
F
W
* DIST: 23
D
BEAVER/ROBT RSCCC FINANCE CHMN
M W
D
FERRARO/ROSE VOLUNTEER WORKER
F W
A
DELAHANTY/GEO BANKER
M W
A
LINDSAY/HARRY CLAWSON CAMP'N TREAS.
M W
* DIST: 25
D
LUNDBERG/LOIS PRECINCT CHMN.
F W
D
ROOT/SHIRLEY 50TH AD WOMAN OF YR
F W
A
MANNING/KEN CAL POLY/CCR VP/AGE 19
M
W
A
SODOMA/LOR. FED. WOMEN
F W
* DIST: 27
D
GOMEZ/BLANCHE CHMN. L.A. HOUSING BD
F S
D
MCGRATH/CHAS ATTY/RR CTY CHMN '70
M W
A
DEL FARO/G. BUSINESSMAN
M W
A
LAFOLLETTE/M PRES.L.A.COMM'Y COLL.BD. F
W
PAGE 4 2/17
STATUS
D=DEL
A=ALT NAME
BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES
SEX RACE
A
LASHLEY/EDITH VOLUNTEER WORKER
F W
* DIST: 32
D
DE LYRE/ELVA
PRES LNG BCH CFRW
F
W
D
SPERLINE/LIZ
STATE YOUNG REP'N PRES.
F W
A
DEUKMEJIAN/G
STATE SENATOR
M W
A
RUCHTI/ROBT.
MEAT PACKER/RR CAMP'N
M W
* DIST: 33
D
FLOURNOY/H.I. STATE CONTROLLER
M W
D
SPRINKEL/REED CONTRACTOR/RR CAMP'NS.
M W
A
COOMBS/WM.
STATE SENATOR
M W
A
LUTTRELL/BETT FORMER TEACHER/CFRW
F W
* DIST: 34
D
BATHE/JOHN R BROKER/AGE 27
M W
D
BROUGHTON/JAN VOLUNTEER WORKER
F W
A
ORTIZ/DAVID BANKER & BONDSMAN
M S
A
PADBERG/EIL'N PUBLIC REL'NS/AGE 28
F W
* DIST: 36
D
BROCK/VIRG.
RSCCC WOM VICE CHMN
F W
D
RICE/VIRGINIA COUNTY CENT.CTTE.CHMN
F W
A
MAZZIE/LOR.
CHMN. VARIOUS CAMP'NS
F W
A
NOREIGA/FRANK BASQUE/RET'D JUDGE
M W
* DIST: 38
D
BEVERLIN/WES MT. SAN ANT.COL./AGE 19
M
W
D
SWAJIAN/CATHY
UCLA LAW STUDENT/AGE 21
F
W
A
SILVER/ETHEL
COUNTY CENT. CTTE.
F
W
A
TORTAROLO/JO HIGH SCH.TEACHER/AGE 24 F
W
* DIST: 39
D
FLUOR/MARGE
VOLUNTEER WORKER
F W
D
TEAGUE/WM.
BUSINESSMAN/CONG.CAND.
M W
A
BADHAM/ROBT
ASSEMBLYMAN
M W
A
NEIGHB'R/HUGH
SNA HI SB PRES/AGE18
M W
* DIST: 42
D
GEHRES/L.E.
COUNTY CENT.CTTE.CHMN
M
W
D
MILLS/ED
RR SO CAL $ CHMN '70
M W
D
STULL/JOHN
REP. CAUCAS CHMN. ASSY
M
W
A
BENTS/MARCIA COUNTY C.C. FINANCE CHMN
F
W
A
HRPR/RTH FLRS VOLUNTEER WORKER
F S
A
SHERMAN/ROD
OAK. RAIDERS/USC/AGE 26
M
W
PAGE 5 2/17
STATUS
D=DEL
A=ALT NAME
BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES
SEX RACE
* DIST: 43
#
D
MCCANDLESS/A COUNTY SUPERVISOR
M
W
D
MCCOUBREY/ED AUTO DEALER
M
W
D
PRIEST/IVY B. STATE TREASURER
F
W
D
VEYSEY/VIC
MEMBER OF CONGRESS
M
W
A
CARPENTER/ML VICE PRES - CFRW
F
W
A
COHEE/DARWIN COUNTY CENT.CTTE.CHMN.
M
W
* DIST: 98. (40th.&.41st.D's in,San Diego)
D
ASHCRAFT/JIM ASSEMBLY CAND./AGE 28
M
W
D
FLETCHER/KIM FINANCE
M
W
D
LUCE/GORDON VICE CHMN RSCCC
M
W
D
RING/ELEANOR R.N.COMMITTEEWOMAN
F
W
D
SCHRADE/JACK STATE SENATOR
M
W
A
BIBB/CHRIS
UCSD LAW STUDENT/AGE 22
F
W
A
CAPEN/RICHARD COPLEY PRESS
M
W
A
GREEN/RUTH
VOLUNTEER WORKER
F
B
A
MCCOLL/JOHN BROKER
M
W
A
STEPHENS/WM.
BANK TRUST OFCR/RR CHMN
M
W
* DIST: 99
(12 CD's entirely within L.A. county)
D
BAKALY/CHAS.
ATT'Y/EV YOUNGER CHMN.
M
W
D
BANOWSKY/WM
PEPPERDINE UNIV. PRES.
M
W
D
BREN/DONALD CONTRACTOR
M
W
D
BROCK/MARG. FINANCE
F
W
D
CONRAD/CHAS. ASSEMBLYMAN
M
W
D
DEL JUNCO/T.
M.D./RSCCC OFFICER
M
S
D
FLOUR'Y/LOV'A
TEACHER/WIFE OF JAMES F.
F
B
D
GATES/MARK
70 L.A. CNTY RR CHMN
M
W
D
GOSDEN/LINDA
UCLA STUDENT/AGE 19
F
W
D
GULBRANSON/R.
COUNTY CENT.CTTE.CHMN
M
W
D
HARMER/JOHN
SENATE REPUB CAUCAS CHMN M
W
D
HILLS/RODERIC
ATTY/LA H. FLOURNOY CHMN
M
W
D
HODGES/NORMAN GREEN POWER PRESIDENT
M
B
D
JAMES/DAVID
ACCOUNTANT/RR S. CAL CHMN M
W
D
JOHNSON/LOUIS BANKER
M
B
D
MCANDREWS/P. ATTORNEY/AGE 27
M
W
D
MCHARGUE/STE
PEPPERDINE INSTR./AGE 26
M
W
D
REAGAN/RONALD GOVERNOR
M
W
D
SALVATORI/H. GEOPHYSICS
M
W
D
SMITH/H.ALLEN MEMBER OF CONGRESS
M
W
D
SMITH/W.F.
ATT'Y
M W
D
UMHEY/OMA
STATE PRESIDENT CFRW
F
W
D
VEGA/RAY
RESTAURANT OWNER
M
S
D
VOLK/ROBT.
BANKER/CIT. FOR NIXON
M
W REED/Chas.
D
YOUNGER/EV.
CALIF. STATE ATTY GEN
M
W VP, mktna. mgr.
D
ZANUCK/RICH'D
ENTERTAINMENT
M
W
Great Western
A
ANDERSON/C.
ATTY/CAL PLAN CHMN 70
M
W
Finance Corp.
A
ANTONOVICH/M. H.S.TCHR/L.A.SCH.BD.
M W
PAGE 6 2/17
STATUS
D=DEL
A=ALT NAME
BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES
SEX RACE
A
BEVERLY/BOB
ASSEMBLYMAN
M W
A
BRAUN/VIRGINI
VOLUNTEER WORKER/FINANCE
F
W
A
BROWN/VERNON
INSUR./COLUMNIST/AGE 28
M
B
A
CORLISS/TIM
REALTOR/RR CHMN '70
M W
A
DUNN/JAMES
ATTORNEY/AGE 35
M W
A
ELLIS/GEORGE
ATTY/ASS'Y CAND/AGE 32
M
W
A
FREDERICKS/JM
USC STUDENT/AGE 22
M W
A
GROTENHUIS/DT
TITLE INSURANCE EXEC.
M W
A
HARKER/JACKIE
VOL.WORKER/RR CHMN '70
F
W
A
HAYDEN/TOM
RSCCC YOUTH CHMN/AGE 30
M
W
A
HILLMAN/ROBT.
CONTRACTOR/RR CAMP'N
M
W
A
INCH/TERRY
FURNITURE/RR CAMP'N
M
W
A
MATTOX/VIRNA
SECRETARY-L.A. CTY CTTE
F
W
A
MILLER/WM.
LOCKHEED/RR CAMP'N
M W
A
OGLE/ALICE
PRECINCT CHMN/RR CAMP'N
F
W
A
REAGAN/NEIL
ADVERTISING
M W
A
SCOTT/MARG'T
L.A.PRES.FED.REP.WOMEN
F
W
A
SOMMARS/JULIE
ENTERTAINER
F
W
A
STRAW/JAMES
UCLA STUDENT/AGE 21
M W
A
STURGEON/JOHN
ATTY/R.A.SPKRS BUREAU
M W
A
TAYLOR/WALLER ATTY/RMN L.A. CHMN '68
M
W
A
TOBIN/PAT
INGLEWOOD CITY CNCL/39
M
W
A
VALDEZ/JOYCE VOLUNTEER WORKER
F
W
A
WEINGARTEN/WA TRUSTEE/U.S.C.
F W
A
WOODS/JIM
WATTS INDUSTRIES
M B
A
YAMAMOTO/T. BARBER
F 0
NOTE: "CFRW",or"F.W.".stands for.Calif..Fed'n
of Republican.Women..
OFFICE OF THE GOVERN
RELEASE:
mediate
Sacramento, California
Contact: Paul Beck
445-4571
2-17-72
#101
Governor Ronald Reagan today released the following text of a
letter to President Nixon:
"The news reports of your meeting on Monday with several
Congressmen regarding mandatory bussing were very encouraging.
Attempting to achieve racial balance in our schools by such compulsory
bussing has proven to be counterproductive and has distressed the vast
majority of our citizens who strongly oppose racial discrimination.
"I am opposed vigorously to compulsory bussing. It shatters the
very concept of the neighborhood school which is the cornerstone of
our education system. Even the controversy on this issue already has
caused a great waste of time and public money which could seriously
hamper the quality of education our children need and deserve. I
commend you for taking action on this issue and am eagerly awaiting
the results of your Cabinet Committee recommendations.
"If there is anything that I or my administration can do to
assist in solving this problem, please be assured of our total and
enthusiastic cooperation.
"Sincerely,
"Ronald Reagan
"Governor"
# # #
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVERI
1
MEMO TO THE 1 ESS
Sacramento, California
Contact: Paul Beck
445-4571
2-18-72
#102
GOVERNOR'S SCHEDULE
February 21, 1972
through
February 27, 1972
Monday, February 21
Evening
Fundraiser for Senator Carl Curtis,
Lincoln, Nebraska
Overnight - Lincoln
Tuesday, February 22
Depart for Des Moines, Iowa
Evening
Fundraiser for Republican State Central
Committee of Iowa, Des Moines
Overnight - Washington, D.C.
Wednesday, February 23 -
Thursday, February 24 National Governors' Conference
Overnight - Washington, D.C.
Friday, February 25
Return to Los Angeles
Overnight - Los Angeles
Saturday, February 26
No appointments scheduled
Overnight - Los Angeles
Sunday, February 27
No appointments scheduled
Overnight - Sacramento
# # #
PB
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
MEMO TO THE 1 ESS
Sacramento, California
Contact: Paul Beck
445-4571
2-18-72
#103
Governor Ronald Reagan today announced that he has signed the
following bills:
AB 3 - Dent
Specifies that State School Building Aid and
(Chapter 6)
Earthquake Reconstruction and Replacement Bond
Law of 1972 shall appear as Proposition No. 2 when
submitted to the voters at the June primary.
AB 43 - Mobley
Reenacts provisions enacted at the 1971 legisla-
(Chapter 3)
tive session relating to the valuation of certain
distilled spirits for property tax purposes in
order that such provisions will be operative on
the 1972 lien date.
AB 59 - Wood
Reenacts provisions enacted at the 1971 legisla-
(Chapter 4)
tive session exempting pets from property taxation
in order that such provisions may be operative on
the 1972 lien date.
AB 63 - Z'berg
Extends from January 1, 1972, to February 29, 1972,
(Chapter 5)
the time for filing a statement and map or plat of
a newly created tax zone in a county service area,
to enable a board of supervisors to levy taxes in
the zone for the 1972-73 fiscal year.
SB 28 - Walsh
Repeals and reenacts provisions enacted at the
(Chapter 2)
1971 regular session providing for the manner in
which special construction equipment and special
mobile equipment shall be subject to the property
tax or the vehicle in-lieu tax in order that such
provisions may be operative on the lien date in
1972.
# # #
PB
OFFICE OF THE GOVER
R
RELEASE: munediate
Sacramento, California
Contact: Paul Beck
445-4571
2-18-72
#104
Governor Ronald Reagan today issued the following statement on the
California Supreme Court decision involving capital punishment:
"This decision makes a mockery of the constitutional process
involved in establishing the laws of California. If it goes
unchallenged, the judicial philosophy inherent in this ruling could
be an almost lethal blow to society's right to protect law-abiding
and their families
citizens/against violence and crime.
"It reinforces the widespread concern of our people that some
members of the judiciary inject their own philosophy into their
decisions rather than carrying out their constitutional duty to
interpret and enforce the law.
"I am deeply shocked and disappointed that a matter of such
critical importance to society has been decided on a one-word
technicality.
"As one who has personally agonized over this issue, I understand
and appreciate the humanitarian instincts of those who oppose capital
punishment.
"Yet I find it most ironic that those who benefit from this
decision--convicted murderers and assassins--do not share any respect
for the sanctity of human life. Nor did they display--in the violent
acts that caused their convictions--the slightest degree of humanitarian
concern or mercy for their victims.
deeply
"As an elected official/concerned about lawlessness, I can only
view the court's decision as one more step toward totally disarming
violence and
society in its fight against/crime.
"The legislature of California has had the issue of capital
punishment before it 25 times since 1933 and each time the elected
representatives of the people refused to abolish the death penalty.
"An overwhelming majority of our people believe that the death
penalty is a deterrent to crime and no body of evidence has proved them
to be wrong.
"If capital punishment is to be prohibited--even for the most
outrageous crimes--the people themselves should make that decision.
"In their action today, the court has placed itself above the
will of the people.
-1--
#104
"Because of my concern about the impact of this decision on
society's ability to protect the law-abiding, I am asking the Attorney
General to petition the State Supreme Court immediately for a rehearing
on this matter. If the court refuses to grant this request and refuses
to reconsider this issue, the people should express their opinion
through a constitutional amendment.
"I cannot believe the framers of the State Constitution, or the
people who gave them that responsibility, intended to protect a murderer
from the consequences of his crime.
"This decision may save 107 criminals who have been tried and
convicted after due process of law. But how many innocent lives will
it cost?"
# # #
EJG
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNO
RELEASE: I,....ediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-23-72
#105
Governor Ronald Reagan today announced the largest 10 month drop
in California's welfare rolls in 30 years.
He said in January there were 182,600 fewer Californians on welfare
than there were last March.
Governor Reagan made the announcement at a news conference in
Washington, D.C., where he is attending the National Governors' Conference
Citing the huge decline as "dramatic proof" that his bold reform
program "has brought welfare back under control in California,' Governor
Reagan also announced that last month, for the first time in nearly a
quarter of a century (since 1948), the state's January caseload fell
below the December level. The one-month decline totaled 8,300 persons
and brought the state's overall welfare caseload down to 2,110,926 in
January.
"These figures represent a tremendous accomplishment for California,
especially when one realizes that our welfare rolls were increasing at
the staggering rate of some 40,000 a month until our welfare reforms took
hold last March," the governor said.
Since then, the number of Californians on welfare has declined
steadily.
/Governor
"Had welfare gone unreformed in California, Reagan said, "State
Social Welfare Department projections show there would now be 538,000 more
persons on our welfare rolls than there actually are. The cost of the
increase in caseload would have amounted to an additional $148 million
(federal, state and local) burden on the taxpayers. During January alone,
California taxpayers would have had to pay $29.6 million more than they
actually did, had there been no reform.
He noted that between December and January the total cost of welfare
in California went down by $2,259,130 from $162,368,287 in December to
$160,109,157 in January.
Governor Reagan took issue "with some in and out of the federal
welfare bureaucracy who seem determined to try to rationalize away the
unprecedented success and proven effectiveness of our welfare reform
program.
"They would have us believe that the decline in California's welfare
rolls is the result of declining unemployment, not reform.
- 1 -
#105
"Yet, California's welfare caseload dropped steadily for six straight
months before the first significant drop in the unemployment rate occurred
"In fact, during six of the past 10 years when the unemployment
rate was low, California's welfare rolls were steadily increasing. That
is, up until our welfare reforms were implemented.
"Still, the welfare bureaucrats in Washington persist in fomenting
the myth that the unemployment rate in California is the primary reason
for our unprecedented caseload decline.
"It is these same federal officials who insist that welfare fraud
extends to only about one percent of all recipient cases. But, a blue-
ribbon task force found that in California fraud reached at least 14
percent of all welfare cases.
"And, only last week, figures provided by five county welfare
departments in California showed that 43 percent of those welfare
recipients whose outside earnings were checked against what the same
recipients had reported them to be---had not reported substantial amounts
of outside income. Many appear to be ineligible for welfare. Some are
being prosecuted for fraud.
"Nevertheless a judge has shut down the earnings check system which
made that information possible because it purportedly violates a recently
adopted HEW regulation.
"Despite the efforts of federal welfare officials in Washington to
delay or explain away the success of California's reform program we are
proving that welfare can be brought back under control---at the state
level without throwing in the towel and tossing the problem in the
lap of federal bureaucrats. A massive and costly federally controlled
program is not the solution to the welfare problem. It will only make it
worse," the governor said.
######
EJG
- 2 -
State of California
Department of Social Welfare
Human Relations Agency
agement Information Systems
February 23, 1972
PUBLIC ASSISTANCE CASELOADS AND EXPENDITURES
January 1972
Recipients
Payments
Program
Jan.P/
Dec.P
Jan.
Jan.P/
Dec.
p/
Jan.
1972
1971
1971
1972
1971
1971
Grand total
2,110,926
2,119,230
2,247,516
$160,109,157
$162,368,287
$160,197,491
Cash grant recipients
2,053,346
2,062,097
2,144,431
156,141,244
158,527,344
154,657,276
General home relief
57,580
57,133
103,085
3,967,913
3,840,943
5,540,215
CASH GRANT PROGRAMS
Average monthly payments
AGED PERSONS (OAS)
313,948
315,400
322,693
$109.63
$110.80
$114.91
BLIND PERSONS (AB/APSB)
13,910
13,854
13,985
157.42
156.64
157.58
DISABLED PERSONS (ATD)
192,990
191,201
186,413
132.32
132.99
131.65
FAMILIES WITH
DEPENDENT CHILDREN
Family groups (AFDC-FG):
children
905,375
906,514
905,147
83.31
84.22
76.22
cases
385,847
384,907
373,371
195.49
198.35
184.77
total persons
1,270,907
1,271,573
1,263,620
59.35
60.04
54.60
Unemployed cases (AFDC-U) :
children
136,986
142,385
195,711
87.29
84.12
75.20
cases
49,566
50,868
67,139
241.25
235.47
219.21
total persons
228,201
236,634
323,433
52.40
50.62
45.50
Boarding Homes and
Institutions (AFDC-BHI):
children
33,390
33,435
34,287
159.87
179.81
157.35
GENERAL HOME RELIEF
Total persons
57,580
57,133
103,085
68.91
67.23
53.74
Family cases
2,597
2,449
15,583
84.22
86.15
71.88
Persons in family cases
7,649
7,302
50,505
28.60
28.89
22.18
One-person cases
49,931
49,831
52,580
75.09
72.85
84.06
Unemployed in labor force (%)
6.8
6.1
8.0
XXX
XXX
XXX
(Seasonally adjusted)
(6.1)
(6.1)
(7.2)
XXX
XXX
XXX
Civilian population (excluding
military)
20,106,000
20,086,000
19,856,400
XXX
XXX
XXX
a/ Cash grant averages for adult aids computed from "net" person counts.
b/ Excludes U cases.
p/ Preliminary.
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
RELEASE: Immediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-24-72
#106
Acting Governor Ed Reinecke today announced the appointment of
Senator Gordon Cologne (R-Indio) as Associate Justice of the Fourth
Appellate District Court of Appeal, Division One.
Senator Cologne is an attorney by profession and was first elected
to the State Legislature in 1961 as an Assemblyman from the 71st District
He was reelected in 1963 from the 74th Assembly District and was first
elected as a State Senator in 1965 and presently serves as Senator from
the 36th District.
Governor Reinecke had high praise for Senator Cologne, saying
"Senator Cologne has established an enviable record in the legislature
especially as chairman of the committee on judiciary during 1970-71 and
more recently as chairman of the Senate Committee on Water Resources.
"His varied experience as a private attorney, as mayor of the City
of Indio, as a legislator, and as a member of legislative committees
concerned with water, the judiciary, business and professions, revenue
and taxation and natural resources and wildlife, will give him a special
insight into the problems which will come before him as an associate
justice.'
Reinecke noted that the Senator is an honors graduate of Southwester
University Law School of Los Angeles and was elected Mayor of Indio when
only 30 years old.
The 47-year-old Senator will replace Justice Martin J. Coughlin,
retired. He is presently the senior partner in Cologne, Erwin & Angle,
a law firm specializing in agricultural law, water, real estate, probate
and appellate practice in Indio.
He and his wife, Patricia, have two children. The salary of
associate justices is $40,076 per annum.
42,097
######
EJG
STATE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE
Contact: John Svahn
MEMO TO THE PRESS
445-2077
Robert B. Carleson, Director of the State Department of Social
Welfare, will discuss yesterday's decision by a three-judge federal
panel in San Francisco on welfare, today at 11:20 a.m., in Room 1190,
State Capitol.
######
STATE DEPARTMENT Or FINANCE
RELEASE: Immediate
Verne Orr, Director
February 25, 1972
State Finance Director Verne Orr announced today that the Reagan
administration is proposing a $49.5 million augmentation to the 1972-73
state budget for new capital outlay projects---including $30 million to
help bring public school buildings in California up to state earthquake
safety standards.
Orr said the other $20 million would be used to:
-Improve the state park system ($6,774,000).
-Build two new educational centers, on the San Diego and Santa
Barbara campuses of the University of California ($11,526,000).
--Help the State Department of Mental Hygiene to meet accreditation
standards and strengthen fire and safety protection in mental
institutions across the state ($1,000,000).
-Provide for initial site development, preliminary plans and
working drawings for a new governor's mansion in Sacramento ($150,000).
The mansion will not be available for occupancy until at least January 1,
1975.
In a letter to the chairmen of the Assembly Ways and Means Committee
and the Senate Finance Committee, Orr noted that Governor Reagan is
proposing virtually the maximum amount of capital outlay funds permitted
for fiscal 1972-73 under the provisions of AB-1 which was passed and
signed into law during last year's special session of the legislature.
The legislation specified that no more than 33-1/3 percent of the
$150 million provided in the bill for capital outlay purposes could be
allocated in any one budget year and limited the availability of these
funds to a four-year period, ending with the 1974-75 budget year.
Orr said the administration's proposed amendments to the budget bill
for capital outlay total $49,450,000.
The $30 million in new school earthquake protection funds will be
used for replacement and repair of local school district buildings in
compliance with provisions of the Field Act and will require the
introduction of ensbling legislation. The State Allocations Board will
determine specific school projects to be funded.
AB 1 specified that a maximum of $30 million out of the $150 million
was to be used for local schools' earthquake protection.
Orr emphasized that the administration is placing every available
dollar provided by the bill for local schools in the 1972-73 budget
the earliest possible period that it can be used.
"No project is more important than that which contributes to the
safety of our school children," he said. "It would be tragic to postpone
school repairs and suffer the loss of school children's lives in any
future earthquake when prompt utilization of these funds might well
prevent such a catastrophe."
Of the $11.5 million in new capital outlay monies for the University
of California, $5,226,000 would be used to build a Humanities Building
at the San Diego campus and $6,300,000 would fund the construction of a
second engineering unit on the Santa Barbara campus.
/the
Orr said $150 million will provide pay-as-you-go financing for
capital outlay projects, thus avoiding the necessity of placing the
burden on the taxpayers for what otherwise would result in paying increase
costs of bonded indebtedness.
######
- 2 -
PARKS AND RECREATION
Acquisition
Inholding purchases
$250,000
Morro Bay
350,000
Opportunity purchases
250,000
Sonoma
350,000
Mount Diablo
125,000
Little River
75,000
Rincon Point
65,000
Acquisition costs
75,000
$1,540,000
$1,540,000
Development
San Diego Museum
$200,000
Point Mugu State Park
924,100
Seacliff State Beach
979,200
Silver Strand State Beach
215,780
Sonoma Coast State Beach
200,000
Angel Island
173,100
Refugio State Beach
150,000
Pismo State Beach
150,000
Russian Gulch State Park
184,000
Carpinteria State Beach
500,000
MacKerricher State Park
133,000
Clear Lake State Park
341,000
Folsom
138,500
Minor program
709,232
$4,997,912
$4,997,912
Staff Costs
Design and development
$236,088
236,088
$6,774,000
PARKS AND RECREATION (EXPANDED)
Acquisition
Morro Bay
$350,000
The Heron Rookery adjacent to Morro Bay State Park. A very
important addition to the State Park System to complement the preserves
along the coastline.
Sonoma
$350,000
An addition adjacent to the Vallejo House in Sonoma State Historic
Park. This addition will protect the setting of the Vallejo Home against
adverse development and allow the department to properly display and
interpret the home of a great Californian during the Spanish-American
period.
- 1 -
Inholdings wit.in the State Park System
$840,000
This program allows the development to maximum capacity and
protection of existing resources of the State Park System.
Development
Point Muau
$924,100
(Matching Bond Fund)
This project consists of the development of initial public use
facilities including day use and overnight facilities, roads and parking,
trails, administration/orientation center, entrance station, maintenance
area and utilities.
The day use facilities will consist of 12 picnic facilities, a
comfort station, roads and parking. The overnight facilities will
consist of 110 tent camping spaces, 140 trailer camping spaces, 2 group
camps of 25 persons each, 5 restrooms, 4 combination buildings, roads
and parking.
Seacliff
$979,200
Development of day-use facilities at Rio Del Mar. Three comfort
stations, dressing rooms, parking for 180 cars, etc. This will provide
additional beach access in a heavily used area of this coastline.
Silver Strand
$215,780
Project comprises construction of a sewer collection system with
discharge to the City of Coronado sewer system and demolition of the
existing septic tanks and leaching fields. The work includes gravity
sewers, lift stations and force mains.
Old Town San Diego
$200,000
Development of working drawings and construction for a transportation
museum to accommodate a $1-1/2 million artifact and $50,000 cash donation
by R. E. Hazard of San Diego. This collection consists of Early Californi
horse drawn carriages and vehicles.
Sonoma Coast (Augmentation)
$200,000
This project initiates development in this area by constructing
facilities for camping. The facilities are:
1,
Park entrance, contact station, return loop, parking, and
trailer sanitation station,
2.
Campsites: 100 campsites, wooden tables with food lockers,
concrete stoves, campsite marker posts, wind screen fencing and refuse
units.
3.
Four comfort stations and 1 shower building, with septic tanks
and leach fields,
- 2 -
Angel Island
$173,100
Project consists of two separate units. One is upgrading of the
present sewer system at Ayala Cove to meet Regional Water Quality
Control Board standards, It includes construction of a new effluent
disposal pump station, installation of a new chlorinator, and deepening
the outfall pipe at Pt. Ione. The other is construction of a sewer
line, septic tank, and leach field to serve the service area, duplex,
and East Garrison.
Refugio
$150,000
This project consists of the development of one entrance station
with necessary utilities and telephone; furniture for 150 family camp-
sites, 200 person group camps and 35 picnic units; area lighting,
interpretive display shelter; and other items necessary for the
development and operation of these recreational facilities.
Pismo
$150,000
The development consists of constructing three comfort stations on
the beach with all needed utilities to adequately serve the public.
Russian Gulch
$184,000
Project consists of a sewage collection system, treatment plant,
storage ponds, effluent spray disposal field, and appurtenances.
Clear Lake
$341,000
The present disposal system is not functioning properly, consequently
the use of the park has had to be limited to below its design capacity.
The Regional Water Quality Control Board has told us to correct our
deficiencies by the end of 1972. This funding will correct the
deficiencies and allow full use of the existing facilities.
Carpinteria
$500,000
(Augmentation)
This project consists of completing the campground facility, site
razing and clearing, installing interprotive devices and constructing
a park office.
The development in the camping area includes:
Two combination buildings, a lifeguard stand, parking area, signs,
utilities such as water, gas, electricity and sewer, landscaping,
irrigation, and approximately 80-unit campground area and related
facilities.
- 3 -
Folsom
$138,500
(Brown's Ravine Marina)
The project consists of the construction of two 300 series sanitary
facilities; two manhold type lift stations; 3,000 feet of 4 inch
polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe force main; 2,250 feet of 3 inch PVC water
supply pipe; and connections to the adjacent Marine Village subdivision
water and sewer systems by the El Dorado Irrigation District. This
project will complete the facilities and fully develop the area.
MacKerricher
$133,000
This project consists of constructing approximately 13,500 l.f. of
6-inch pipeline between the City of Fort Bragg and the park. Appurtenant
valves and water meters are included. Treated water will be supplied by
the City of Fort Bragg.
- 4 -
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
MEMO TO THE PRESS
Sacramento, California
Contact: Paul Beck
445-4571
2-25-72
#107
GOVERNOR'S SCHEDULE
February 28, 1972
through
March 3, 1972
Monday, February 28
2:00 p.m.
Brief remarks to the Governor's Earthquake
Council, Governor's Council Room
Overnight - Sacramento
Tuesday, February 29
10:30 a.m.
PRESS CONFERENCE
Overnight - Sacramento
Wednesday, March 1
11:30 a.m.
Meeting with students from Encino Elementary
School, Governor's Office
Overnight - Sacramento
Thursday, March 2
11:30 a.m.
Presentation to Governor of Boy Scout Annual
Report, Governor's Office
Overnight - Sacramento
Friday, March 3
9:30 a.m.
Brief greetings to Consumer Education Confer-
ence, Sacramento Inn
10:30 a.m.
Meeting with State Colleges Academic Senate.
Remarks; Q & A. (El Rancho)
Overnight - Sacramento
Saturday, March 4
Sacramento Camellia Festival - Mrs. Nixon in
Sacramento
Overnight - Sacramento
Sunday, March 5
No appointments scheduled
Overnight - Sacramento
# # #
PB
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
RELEASE: Immediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-25-72
#108
Acting Governor Ed Reinecke today announced the appointment of
Eureka attorney Harold E. Neville, Jr., to be a judge of the Municipal
Court, Eureka Judicial District in Humboldt County.
Neville, a Republican, is a graduate of the University of California,
School of Criminology and School of Law, University of San Francisco
in 1960. He began practicing law in Humboldt County in 1961. He
served as Deputy District Attorney in Humboldt County 1963-65 and has
been in private law practice since.
In 1970 he was an unsuccessful candidate for district attorney.
He is a member of the American Bar Association, California State Bar
Association, Humboldt County Bar Association and the American Arbitration
Association.
The Humboldt County native is married and the father of two children.
Neville replaces the late Judge Robert Conners. Salary for
municipal court judge is $32,273 per annum. He resides in Rio Dell.
######
EJG
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
RELEASE: Immediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-25-72
#109
Acting Governor Ed Reinecke today announced the appointment of
Roy L. Wonder as a commissioner of the Workmen's Compensation Appeals
Board.
Wonder is assistant to the vice president of public relations for
Lockheed Aircraft Corporation in Burbank.
The Glendale public relations executive is a graduate of Georgetown
University and the University of Kansas. He has been an executive with
Lockheed since 1959 and is a member of the California Bar Association,
American Bar Association and the Los Angeles County Bar Association.
Wonder, 43, was named to the position as commissioner to replace
Warren D. Allen of Chatsworth who resigned. The appointment, for a
four-year term, requires Senate confirmation. Salary is $33,396 per
annum.
He is married and he and his wife, Barbara, are the parents of
four children. They reside in Glendale.
######
EJG
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
RELEASE: Immediate
Sacramento, California
Contact: Paul Beck
445-4571
2-28-72
#110
Governor Ronald Reagan today sent the following letter to Assembly
Speaker Moretti and Senate President pro tem Mills:
"I hereby respectfully request that the legislature enact--on an
interim basis--urgency controls on timber harvesting practices. This
need has been brought about by a recent court decision which voided
our state's forest practice regulatory program.
"Members of both houses of the legislature have announced plans
to sponsor legislation in this important field. However, an emergency
measure is needed to provide immediate safeguards for the public,
industry and affected state employees.
"I would hope that both houses of the legislature could move
expeditiously to insure that the priceless resource of our forests can
be protected from irresponsible practices which might exploit the
current lack of legal protection."
# # #
PB
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
RELEASE: Immediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-28-72
#111
Governor Ronald Reagan today reappointed George C. Vesey and
Mrs. Sally E. Semas, both of Auburn, to the 20th District Agricultural
Association board of directors (Auburn District Fair).
Vesey, a sales representative for the National Biscuit Company,
lives at 182 Valley View and Mrs. Semas, a horse breeder, lives at
Route 1, Box 1257.
Both are Republicans.
Board members serve four-year terms and receive necessary expenses.
######
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
RELEASE: Immediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-28-72
#112
Governor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Dr. John G. Fast of
Riverside to a four-year term on the District Review Committee for the
Fourth District of the Board of Medical Examiners in the Department of
Consumer Affairs.
Dr. Fast, who lives at 5675 Victoria Avenue, Riverside, has served
on the board since 1967. He is a Republican.
Members receive per diem and expenses.
######
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
RELEASE: Immediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-28-72
#113
Governor Ronald Reagan today reappointed two members of the State
Hospital Advisory Board to four-year terms.
They are Dr. John E. Affeldt, Medical Director of the Los Angeles
County Department of Hospitals, and Dr. Dudley S. Moore, Santa Rosa
oral surgeon.
Dr. Affeldt, who represents hospital administrators, has served on
the board since 1970. He lives at 9157 South Lindante Drive, Whittier.
Dr. Moore, who represents the public, has served on the board since
1967. He lives at 6255 Melita Road, Santa Rosa.
Both appointees are Republicans.
Board members receive expenses.
######
WAS
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
RELEASE: Immediate
Sacramento, California
Contact:
Paul Beck
445-4571
2-28-72
#114
Governor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Mrs. Kathryn H. Kaiser of
San Francisco and the Reverend Noel Francis Moholy, O.F.M., S.T.D.,
Vice Postulator for the Cause of Father Junipero Serra, to the Historical
Landmarks Advisory Committee.
Mrs. Kaiser, who lives at 1148 Vallejo Street, San Francisco, and
the Reverend Mr. Moholy, whose address is St. Mary's, P.O. Box 1028,
Lakeport, were named to four-year terms.
She has served on the committee since 1967 and he has served since
1962. Both are Republicans.
Committee members receive necessary expenses.
######
WAS
STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
MEMO TO THE PRESS
Verne Orr, Director
February 28, 1972
The attached audit report (Vol. I, Part I) on the library system
of the University of California is embargoed for use in Tuesday a.ms.
Please guard against premature release.
In a statement, Mr. Orr said:
"I am very proud of this document and I have high hopes that it
will prove extremely helpful to the office of the president of the
University, Mr. Hitch, in improving the management of the University's
libraries.
"The findings, conclusions and recommendations in this report hold
the promise of not only enabling the taxpayers to derive even greater
benefit from their continuing investment in the University, but also---
and just as important- it can, and hopefully will, result in improved
library services for students attending the University."
The document has been sent to President Hitch.
#######
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNO
MEMO TO THE
to
ESS
Sacramento, California
Contact: Paul Beck
445-4571
2-29-72
Press credentials will be issued all day
Friday, March 3, in the Governor's Press Office
for members of the Capitol Press Corps planning
to cover Mrs. Nixon's visit to Sacramento on
Saturday, March 4.
# # # # #
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
RELEASE: Immediate
Sacramento, California
Contact: Paul Beck
445-4571
2-29-72
#115
Governor Ronald Reagan today said all state-owned cars not used for
law enforcement purposes will soon carry traditional Diamond E license
plates.
He said installation of the plates is expected to be completed in
the next several weeks in view of a literal interpretation of the State
Vehicle Code by the State Auditor General in a report issued recently.
The governor noted that traditionally key members of any governor's
staff have been assigned unmarked state cars where their duties involve
law enforcement functions. These staff members are on 24-hour call and
their functions are related to such responsibilities as emergency planning
for civil disorders and other disasters. After consultation with the
Attorney General it has been determined that all such vehicles will have
exempt (diamond "E") plates to assure that the marking of these cars is
consistent with provisions of the code.
Stretching back into previous administrations, a number of key
department directors also have traditionally been assigned state
automobiles with regular series plates in line with the investigatory
functions of their office. However, the Auditor General's report
clarified what practices should be followed by such departmental personnel
in order to comply with the code.
Governor Reagan emphasized there never has been any question that
those employees who have had cars permanently assigned to them were not
authorized to use them. The only issue is whether the cars should have
carried a different type of license plate.
He said past requests for the regular series plates have been made
and granted in good faith, but that corrective action now appears to be
necessary in certain cases to assure that the precise requirements of the
code are met.
In announcing the action, the governor said he was ordering
publication in the State Administrative Manual of a new procedure.
Under the procedure, beginning March 1, all departments of the
Executive branch of state government will immediately submit to the
executive assistant to the governor a list of all cars owned by the state
which bear regular series license plates. The list will be reviewed by
the governor's office and, working with the departments concerned, all
unauthorized use of such plates will be eliminated.
######
EJG
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
RELEASE: Immediate
Sacramento, Califor ia
Contact:
Paul 1 ck
445-4571
2-29-72
#116
Governor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Dr. John H. Lawrence to a
sixteen-year term on the Board of Regents of the University of California.
"As he did during his many years as a member of the faculty,
Dr. Lawrence is continuing to contribute his knowledge and talents to
solving the problems faced by our University. I am grateful, as I know
all Californians are grateful for his dedicated service to this
institution," the governor said.
Dr. Lawrence, 68, a pioneer in the development of radiation
protection and the use of isotopes in medicine, has earned international
recognition for his contributions to medicine and medical research in
the biological effects of radiation and the study of cancer.
In 1970, he retired as Director of U.C.'s Donner Laboratory, which
he helped to organize, to accept an appointment as Regent.
He holds AB and DSC degrees from the University of South Dakota, a
medical degree from Harvard Medical School and numerous honorary degrees
from institutions throughout the world.
He is the brother of the late Ernest O. Lawrence, Nobel prize-winning
physicist.
Dr. Lawrence lives at 220 Glorietta Road, Orinda.
#######
WAS
Page data
- Page
- 1
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- document
- Media ID
- a980b631e26b7972
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 118564326
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "118564326",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118564326",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Press Releases - 02/10/1972-02/29/1972",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118564326",
"identifierLocal": "840",
"collections": [
"Ronald Reagan's Governor's Papers of the Press Unit",
"Press Releases"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/7408623/40-840-7408623-P13-004-2017.pdf",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/7408623/40-840-7408623-P13-004-2017.pdf",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/7408623/40-840-7408623-P13-004-2017.pdf",
"imageCount": 1,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "118564326",
"label": "Press Releases - 02/10/1972-02/29/1972",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118564326"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "118564326",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118564326",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Press Releases - 02/10/1972-02/29/1972",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118564326",
"identifierLocal": "840",
"collections": [
"Ronald Reagan's Governor's Papers of the Press Unit",
"Press Releases"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/7408623/40-840-7408623-P13-004-2017.pdf",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/7408623/40-840-7408623-P13-004-2017.pdf",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/7408623/40-840-7408623-P13-004-2017.pdf",
"imageCount": 1,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/118564326",
"naId": 118564326,
"coverageEndDate": {
"logicalDate": "1975-12-31",
"year": 1975
},
"coverageStartDate": {
"logicalDate": "1967-01-01",
"year": 1967
},
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 1,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "document",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/reagan/7408623/40-840-7408623-P13-004-2017.pdf",
"mediaId": "a980b631e26b7972",
"ocrText": "Ronald Reagan Presidential Library\nDigital Library Collections\nThis is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections.\nCollection: Reagan, Ronald: Gubernatorial Papers,\n1966-74: Press Unit\nFolder Title: Press Releases -\n02/10/1972-02/29/1972\nBox: P13\nTo see more digitized collections visit:\nhttps://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library\nTo see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit:\nhttps://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection\nContact a reference archivist at: [email protected]\nCitation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing\nNational Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/\nOFFICE OF THE GOVER R\nRELEASE: : ediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-10-72\n#87\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today endorsed a series of recommendations\nby Agriculture and Services Agency Secretary Earl Coke aimed at\nstrengthening the management of the State Division of Industrial Safety\nand insuring that the division continues to fulfill its responsibilities\nto protect the safety of the working men and women of California.\nCoke's recommendations (attached) were based on the findings of a\nreport by the Select Labor Management Fact Finding Committee on the\nDivision of Industrial Safety. The six-member committee included\nFrank M. Farro, retired secretary-treasurer of Teamsters Local 853,\nPleasanton; Kenneth Larson, legislative representative of the Federated\nFirefighters, Sacramento and chairman of the AFL-CIO statewide safety\ncommittee; James S. Lee, president, State Building and Construction\nTrades Council, Sacramento; Emmons McClung, of the California\nManufacturers Association, Warren R. Mendel, Engineering and Grading\nContractors Association; and Tom Richardson of the California Farm\nBureau Federation.\nThe committee's report is being turned over to Roy J. Bell, the\nnewly designated chief of the Division of Industrial Safety, to assist\nhim in his efforts to improve the operational effectiveness of the\ndivision.\nIn endorsing Coke's recommendations, the governor pointed out that\nthey will provide the new teeth necessary to effectively enforce state\nsafety regulations.\n\"Protection of the safety of California workers is a major\ngovernmental responsibility and we intend to see to it that this\nobligation is met,\" the governor said.\n\"In 1970 there were fewer disabling work injuries per 1000 workers\nin California than in any of the past 10 years and, according to the\nlatest information available, the injury rate was even lower in 1971\n(first 7 months of 1971).\n\"This record speaks for itself,\" he said.\nThe governor said William Hern will continue to serve as director\nof the Department of Industrial Relations.\nHe said he is \"confident that under the leadership of Hern and\nRoy Bell, the role of the Division of Industrial Safety will be\nstrengthened and its vital responsibilities met.\"\nXXXXX\n- 1 -\n#87\nHere are Coke's recommendations to the governor:\n\"MEMORANDUM\nTo:\nThe Honorable Ronald Reagan\nDate: February 9, 1972\nGovernor\nFrom: Earl Coke\nSubject: Report of the Select Labor Management Fact Finding Committee\non the Division of Industrial Safety\n\"I am submitting to you the attached report of the Select Labor Management\nFact Finding Committee which has investigated the operations of the\nDivision of Industrial Safety. I have carefully reviewed this report\nand offer the following recommendations.\n1. That the committee's findings and recommendations be turned\nover to Roy J. Bell, the newly designated chief of the Division of\nIndustrial Safety with the understanding that he will study the findings\nand implement those recommendations which he deems appropriate.\n2. That the Division of Industrial Safety and the Contractors'\nState License Board jointly determine and implement whatever procedures\nare necessary for suspending or revoking the licenses of contractors\nwho violate safety regulations.\n3. That the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations\npromptly confer with the State Attorney General and local district\nattorneys in an effort to expedite the preparation and prosecution of\nsafety violation cases.\n4. That the Department of General Services, Department of Public\nWorks, and other state contracting agencies disqualify from bidding on\nstate contracts any contractor whose safety record shows a pattern of\ndisregard for the safety of its employees.\n5. That the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations\ncontinue to vigorously pursue negotiations with the Department of Labor\nin connection with the Federal Occupational Health and Safety Act in\norder that the 1972-73 budget for the Division of Industrial Safety may\nbe augmented by the maximum amount of federal funds to become available\nunder that program.\n6. That legislation be introduced to reimburse the division for\nthe costs of its inspections of pressure vessels and elevators.\n7. That the Director of Finance and the Secretary of the\nAgriculture and Services Agency immediately develop recommendations for\naugmenting current (1971-72) budget for the division.\n8. That you invite leaders of labor and management to discuss\nwith you the safety of California workers.\nEarl Coke\nSecretary\"\n######\nEJG\n- 2 -\nREPORT O. THE SELECT LABOR-MANAGEMEL. FACT FINDING\nCOMMITTEE ON THE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY\nOn January 4, 1972, the Honorable Jack Fenton, Chairman of the\nAssembly's Select Committee on Industrial Safety, announced that\non January 12th and 13th the Committee would conduct open hearings\non charges resulting from the Sylmar Tunnel hearings that the\nDivision of Industrial Safety has:\n1. created a serious morale problem through administrative\nindifference, lack of communication and failure to\nsupport its men in the field;\n2. maintained so few field inspectors as to make adequate\nworker protection impossible in a state this size;\n3. failed to establish or to seek new safety orders or\nlegislative changes in the Labor Code to cover new\ndevelopments in the field of construction;\n4. shown a remarkable reluctance to prosecute unsafe\noperators who fail to comply with orders to provide\na safe place to work; and\n5. never developed nor sought legislative approval of an\nadequate accident investigation team, despite repeated\nindications that such a team is essential to enforcement\nof most Labor Code and Safety Order requirements.\nThe Select Committee's hearing on January 13th recessed with an\nunderstanding that the Department of Industrial Relations would\nconduct its own investigation of the Division of Industrial Safety\nand prepare a report for the Governor. A departmental fact-\nfinding-group was established for this purpose on January 14th\nand met that day to plan its job of gathering preliminary data\nand information. On the same date, a letter was sent by the\nDirector to each staff member of the Division of Industrial\nSafety inviting their written comments on the strengths and\nweaknesses of the division and their participation in individual\ndiscussions.\nThe departmental group accumulated a large amount of material on\ntotal Division of Industrial Safety operations. This was turned\nover to the Select Labor-Management Fact Finding Committee\n(hereinafter referred to as \"The Committee\") when it had its\nfirst meeting on January 26th. As The Committee read through\nthe transcript of the legislative hearings of January 12th and\n13th, it became evident that the Assembly Select Committee focused\nits attention almost entirely to the Construction Section.\nThe written evidence accumulated by the departmental group and\nreviewed by The Committee reflects that the other Sections were\nnot only performing in a relatively trouble-free manner, but, under\nthe present organizational structure and limitations of resources,\nwere doing a very creditable job. In reviewing the general material\nabout the Division prepared by the departmental group, The Committee\ndetermined that many of the problems associated in the hearings\nwith the Construction Section had ramifications on the entire\nDivision - particularly with respect to organization and overall\noperating procedures. Therefore, The Committee has concerned\nitself with the entire Division in its report. The investigation\nhas uncovered important areas for potential improvement in organi-\nzation and operations and the following report establishes the\nunanimous position of this committee in regard to these problem\nareas.\n1. \"The Division of Industrial Safety has created a serious morale\nproblem through administrative indifference, lack of communication\nand failure to support its men in the field.\"\nIn considering this allegation, The Committee has determined\nthe following:\nA. Analysis\n1. Organization, Field and Headquarters:\nAt this time management authority within this division\nis concentrated at divisional headquarters. This has\ncreated, over a long period of time, a vacuum in direction\nand supervision in the field. Generally speaking, the\nfield staff who responded to our request for comments\nfeel their operating problems are neither understood\nnor appreciated.\n2. Functional Structure:\nThe demands made upon the existing specialized sections\nvary in kind and techniques for accomplishing their work\ngoals also vary markedly in form. The most distinctly\nspecialized units in the division are the Elevator and\nPressure Vessel Sections. Because of their mandated\nwork processes the staff in these sections have very\nlittle discretionary time. This situation is quite\ndifferent from the other sections, which presently move\nout in a \"search and correct\" manner. For almost a\ndecade the specialized by \"type-of-industry\" (construc-\ntion versus industrial) and by \"type-of-potential-\naccident-agent\" (electrical versus elevator versus\npressure vessel versus environmental) has been the\norganizational structuring of the division. It is\nclear that the organizational structure influences\nindividual attitudes as evidenced by the large number\nof dissatisfied construction section employees in\nSouthern California. Their complaints indicate a\nlack of coordination among inspecting engineers often\nservicing the same work site.\n3. Executive Organization:\n(a) Assistant Chief, South:\nIt is apparent from interviews and tracing through\ncorrespondence/case files that there is no decision-\nmaking level in Southern California above Senior\nEngineer. The presence there of an \"Assistant Chief\"\n-1-\nis misleading, in that it gives the impression of\nthere being a local \"top-level authority\". In fact,\ndelegation to the Assistant Chief position in the\nSouth has been very limited and there is general\nawareness of this among the divisional staff.\n(b) Role of Assistant to the Chief:\nThe specifications describe this position as a\nstaff position with no line authority. It appears\nfrom analysis of the divisional decision-making\nprocesses that the position has acquired authority\nin areas where it has no responsibility, and this\nhas obscured the \"formal\" lines of authority within\nthe division.\n(c) Role of Assistant Chief:\nBecause of his location at divisional headquarters,\nthe Assistant Chief (North-San Francisco) functions\nmore in true line capacity than the Assistant Chief\n(South-Los Angeles). As stated earlier, the position\nof Assistant Chief (South), as presently utilized,\nis merely a symbol of authority.\n(d) Supervising Safety Engineers:\nThese positions have statewide jurisdiction and\nauthority in specialized functions. These individuals\nare all located in the headquarters office of the\nDivision in San Francisco and operate in vertical\nauthority lines with no formal horizontal ties.\n4. Prosecution & Enforcement Policies & Procedures:\nAmong the various sections, procedures vary for accomp-\nlishing the same purpose, i.e. compliance with safety\nlaws and regulations. In the construction and industrial\nsections \"red tags\" are used extensively; but the sections\norganized by type-of-accident-agent, for example elevators\nand pressure vessels, go directly to equipment shutdowns.\nOne very effective sanction infrequently used in the\npast in construction was the force of the Contractor's\nLicense Board in accordance with Business and Professional\nCode Section number 7109.5.\n5. Program Control:\n(a) Records Management:\nA serious problem needing immediate attention is the\nbetter organization and control of divisional case\n-2-\nfilts. Central files are the oficial documents\nand are the property of the Division and are main-\ntained on a North-South basis in San Francisco and\nLos Angeles.\n(b) Enforcement by Continual Construction & Industrial\nCases Review:\nWhenever any new document now comes into a case,\nit may or may not reach the official divisional\nfile. The file is not now automatically reviewed\nand no decision is made as to what ought to be done\nin each case. The case files in Los Angeles and\nSan Francisco are an historical accumulation of\nrequirements documents with some pencilled or\ntypewritten indication of which violations were\ncorrected. But it appears these documents are\nnot currently being utilized as a source for\nenforcement proceedings.\n6. Program Auxiliary Services:\nAnother area of concern in support of the safety program\nis whether there exists a proper level of staffing in\nthe Division of Labor Statistics and Research.\nTraditionally, the services of this Division were\nsupposed to be supportive of all departmental programs\nto point up new and developing areas of employer/\nemployee interests - where they concurred and where\nthey may be moving apart. Paramount within this area\nwas the Accident Statistics Analysis Section, whose\nstaff has not expanded to keep pace with growing\ntechnological problems in industry which could cause\naccidents complex in nature.\n7. Program Funding:\nPresently pressure Vessel, elevator, amusement and\nski lifts inspections are partially self-supporting.\nNone of the other inspections or consultive services\nof safety, except certain Industrial Hygiene activities,\nare reimbursable at present. If consideration should\nbe given to making those services substantially for\npublic safety pay-their-way, there is a question whether\npublic agencies ought to be charged for services\nrendered for them as well. A fee system of some kind\nfor the consulting that engineers do might certainly\nbe appropriate. However, care must be exercised so\nas not to interfere with the pre-job planning service\ncurrently provided by engineers, particularly in\nconstruction.\n-3-\nB. Problems\n1. Organization, Field and Headquarters:\nThe field staff wants and needs a local level of\nauthority to which problems can be taken for direct\nresolution, rather than having to engage in time\nconsuming and inconclusive communications with\nauthorities in San Francisco. Parenthetically,\nthe field staff wants and deserves to see division\nexecutives in the field periodically.\n2. Functional Structure:\nAt field level the functional structuring by\n\"specialties\" creates a serious problem of coordination.\nVarying techniques among specialists following different\npolicy directions to the goal of industrial safety\ncauses confusion among divisional employees and firms.\n3. Executive Organization:\nIneffective Assistant Division Chief, South, due to\nisolation and lack of clearly defined responsibilities\nand authorities. The Assistant-to-the-Chief at\nHeadquarters, which was intended as a staff function\nonly, was given line authority.\n4. Prosecutions and Enforcement:\nPresently orders and explanations are sent out to the\nfield in a haphazard manner without interrelation of\nsubject matter. This accumulation of technical\ninstructions is difficult to locate in the complex of\nfiles, folders and loose-leaf manuals.\n5. Program Control - Records Management:\nThe lack of uniformity of enforcement has its roots\nin bad records management which leads to differing\npolicies and procedures. The Committee faced the\nincredible task of assembling masses of data from\ndisparate sources to get a clear picture of what has\nbeen happening. Case file records, intended to contain\nvital information about what has been happening in\nenforcement and prosecution, were empty of needed\ndocuments.\n6. Program Auxiliary Services:\nContinued requests from field engineers and formerly\nfrom the Division Chief were for hard information about\nspecific areas of high accident occurence. Without this\ninformation the Chief and the field engineers in\n-4-\nConstruction and Industrial Safety could not most\neffectively schedule their time into the problem areas.\nC. Solution\n1. Organization, Field and Headquarters:\nTo meet the needs for more effective program activities\nin the field, more decisive management authority is\nneeded at the local levels. Better training and\nguidelines responsive to program compliance needs\nwould make the field engineer more effective. Addition-\nally, headquarters personnel and specialists should\nschedule time to visit and confer with field engineers.\nA visitation program should be initiated at once.\n2. Functional Structure:\nIf specialty supervising engineers are retained,\nregular meetings among this staff with the Chief\nought to be scheduled and schedules adhered to!\nThe Assistant to the Chief and Administrative Assistant\nshould also be involved, depending on the topics under\ndiscussion. The formal \"functional structure\" is a\nquestionable method of organization. The top staff\nare a valuable resource to aid in policy formulation\nand orders initiation and revision. The possibility\nof merging the Industrial, Construction and Electrical\nSections should be explored. This would not necessarily\nrequire sacrificing specialized classifications, but\ncould provide for their improved utilization. Some\nmultiple visits to places of employment could be\neliminated.\nTwo alternative utilizations of the Supervising Engineer\nspecialty classes occur to the Committee:\na) A totally different concept would be to convert\nthese positions to area supervisors and transfer\nthem to different parts of the state. This would\ncreate management ability at the local level and\nin all parts of the state.\nb) These positions would be assigned to the Education\nand Research Section, devoting full time to developing\ntechnical information for the field staff and working\nengineers.\n3. Executive Organization:\na) The Assistant Division Chief, South, should be held\naccountable for all Southern California functions,\n-5-\nor tl. position should be abolis. ed.\nb) If the Assistant to the Chief is retained, it\nshould be a staff function. Its primary utilization,\nif retained, could be to provide management assistance\nto the Chief.\nc) Role of Industrial Safety Board:\nAs a possible solution to some of the many and varied\nproblems of compliance and the correlative problem of\n\"due process\", The Committee believes that analysis\nought to be made of the possibility of increased and\nbroader usage of the Safety Board for an appeals\nprocess from safety orders.\n4. Prosecution and Enforcement Policies and Procedures:\nMore formalized policy and technical procedural manuals\nfor engineers, more training for field staff, coordin-\nation among specialties and standardized enforcement\nstatewide are needed. Whatever is needed to improve\nthe interval delay between requirements writing, show-\ncause, red tag, yellow tag and prosecution should be\nexplored and implemented.\nOne \"tag\" only may provide the way out of the maze of\nuncertainty, ambiguity and complexity that has historically\ngrown up with the elaborate processes for obtaining\ncompliance.\nFor continued construction violators the Contractor's\nLicense Board may provide the leverage needed to get\ncompliance.\n5. Program Control:\na) Records Management - There should be immediate\nattention given to establish file integrity.\nComprehensive file control must be established.\nb) Case Review - A safety compliance program should\ninclude a review by someone in authority of what\nhas happened to each company's (1) violations\nrate and (2) accident events.\n6. Program Auxiliary Services:\nThere should be an ongoing program on the proper use\nof Industrial Hygiene Technicians to support the line\nsections of Industrial Safety. This unit could be\nassigned greater responsibility for developing technical\n-6-\ninformation for the field staff and research the need for\nimprovements in existing safety orders and for new safety\norders. This unit could also play a vital role for\nin-service training within the Division.\nNeeded are sufficient Safety Statistics Technicians to\nprovide proper backup and program data to evaluate\nCalifornia's safety program.\n7. Budgetary Support for Safety Services:\nThere is legislation now in process to make the pressure\nvessel inspections, the elevator inspections, amusement\nrides inspections and ski lifts inspections fully self-\nsupporting except when these services are provided to\nother public agencies. The practice of using Electrical\nSection Safety Engineers as consulting engineers could\nbe discontinued.\nD. Recommendations\n1. Organization, Field and Headquarters:\nThere should be scheduled meetings of the Chief,\nAssistant Chiefs and, if retained, Section Supervisors.\nSection Supervisors should meet regularly with first-\nline supervisors who, in turn, should meet regularly\nwith field staff. This system of meetings should have\nan interlocking feature so that genuine communication\noccurs from the field engineer to the chief.\nThe Division should prepare formal training programs\nfor all new engineers and begin preparation of re-\ntraining programs for all career employees. In\ndeveloping these programs the Education and Research\nSection should be used as the focus for coordinating\namong environmental safety and other staff specialists\nwithin the Division. The department's staff services\nunits (Personnel, Management Analyst, Fiscal and Legal)\nshould be used, as well as Division of Labor Statistics\nand Research staff, for available statistics and program\nanalyses. On a limited basis, the investigative staff\nof the Division of Labor Law Enforcement might also be\nused to advantage.\n2. Functional Structure:\nConsideration should be given to merging the Industrial,\nConstruction and Electrical Sections. If such a merger\nis initiated, it is recommended that district area\nsupervisors with full-line authority over local staff\nbe established. Supervising Engineers made surplus\nby such a merger should be used to provide a nucleus\nfor area supervisors or be assigned to the Education\n-7-\nand Rese rch Unit to develop technical instructional\nmaterials and safety orders.\n3. Executive Organization:\nBecause of the concentration of workload in Southern\nCalifornia, an assistant chief position is needed there.\nIn order to relieve the Division Chief of responsibility\nfor day to day operations so that he can function as a\ntrue program manager, the Assistant Chief-North position\nis needed, too. However, both Assistant Chief positions\nshould have parallel responsibilities and authority.\nThe Assistant Chief-South should have the same resources\nand authority to get things done as the Assistant Chief-\nNorth.\nIf the Assistant to the Chief position is retained, it\nshould be used in a purely staff capacity except for\npossible supervision of the Education and Research\nSection, which is also a staff function.\n4. Prosecution and Enforcement Policies and Procedures:\nIt is recommended that only one tag be used by all\nsections and that it be applied in a similar manner.\nTags should be bilingual (English and Spanish) and\nprinted on 8½\" X 11\" cardboard stock (iridescent orange)\nwith \"WORK PROHIBITED\" prominently displayed across\nthe top. Tags must be picked up by the engineer and\nfiled in the central files when employers have complied\nwith requirements. An effective arrangement must be\nmade between the Division of Industrial Safety and the\nContractor's License Board so as to make available on\na current basis to the Board notice of violations of\nState Safety Orders by contractors looking towards\nappropriate Board action under their regulations\nconcerning suspensions or revocations of licenses.\n5. Program Control:\na) Records Management:\nIt is recommended that an index of file contents by\ndocument be appended to every case file. Every\nengineer and supervisor must either 1) review the\nfile in the central file room, without the privilege\nof taking documents out of the file unless done by\nresponsible file clerks, or 2) signing out for the\nfile and be responsible for all indexed documents\ncontained therein.\n-8-\nb) Case Review:\nWhenever an addition to the central file arrives,\nthe entire file must be reviewed by a senior safety\nengineer to determine what action should be taken and\nwhatever decision is reached, must be recorded in\nthe file.\nc) Engineer's Operating Manual:\nThere must be a complete review, analysis and\nupdating of the engineers' manual with top priority\ngiven to the prosecution section. There should be\nsubsidiary functional manuals and all instructions\nmade by the supervisors of each speciality should\nbe logically categorized and placed into the\nsubsidiary manual. The supervisor of Educational\nand Research Section should be assigned the responsi-\nbility for current review and revisions.\nd) Productive Work Control:\nThe Division of Industrial Safety should give active\nmanagement consideration to immediately implementing\nthe inspection Value Index and to maintaining a\ncareful monitoring of its effectiveness in relation\nto 1) better usage of engineers' time and 2) the\nreduction of the occasion for accident in high\naccident industries. This usage should be extended,\nwith proper adaptation work to improve the effective-\nness of the other sections.\ne) Promoting and Developing Safety Programs for Industry's\nWorkers:\nThe Division should immediately start preparation of\ntraining programs for workers and for foremen, with\nmaximum participation of management and labor, while\nthe program is actually being developed and when it\nis ready for implementation.\n6. Program Funding:\nWhen the determination is reached as to program\norganization and structure, then adequate funds must\nbe made available to implement that determination.\n2. \"The Division of Industrial Safety has maintained so few field\ninspectors as to make adequate work protection impossible in\na state this size. \"\nA.\nAnalysis\nThe State should feel the fiscal impact of the Federal\nOccupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) around the first\nof the year 1973. The Division may then have about one\n-9-\nmillion dollars of Federal money available to the\nCalifornia industrial safety program if the State program\nis approved. If not, then Federal pre-emption will\nsubstantially reduce State areas of responsibility and\nleave State funds available for the remaining programs.\n\"Industrial Safety\" is not wholly descriptive of the\nDivision's programs. While the Department of Industrial\nRelations tends to regard the State's eight and one-half\nmillion working people as its particular clientele, some\nof the Division of Industrial Safety's program elements\ninvolve accident prevention services to the entire public.\nThe Committee views, for instance, the work of the Elevator,\nPressure Vessel and, to a lesser extent, the Environmental\nEngineering and Industrial Sections as key elements in\nwhat could be considered a public safety program. By\nway of illustration, the elaborate multi-purpose building\ncomplexes associated with California's increasingly urbanized\nlife style have and will continue to place significant new\npublic safety demands upon both the Elevator and Pressure\nVessel Sections as will the increasing use of radiation\ntherapy techniques in the State's health centers effect\nthe work of the Environmental Engineering Section. Similarly,\nthe Elevator Section now has inspection and licensing re-\nsponsibility for aerial tramways and ski-lifts while the\nIndustrial Section performs these public services in re-\nlation to amusement rides.\nPutting aside the question of where these important public\nsafety program elements belong organizationally in the\noverall State Government, The Committee is doubtful that\nthe impact of these broad public responsibilities on the\nDivision's personnel requirements has ever been given full\nconsideration by the Department, the Administration in\npower or the Legislature.\nB. Problem\nIf the departmental structure is changed, or additional\ntechnical resources added consistent with recommendations\ncontained elsewhere in this report, additional money may\nbe needed for program and staff.\nC. Solutions\nSection 5 of this report contains a discussion relative\nto improving utilization of the present staff. In\naddition, it is anticipated that OSHA funding will en-\nable significant augmentation of field staff.\n-10-\nD.\nRecommendations\n1. Every agency of State government should cooperate\nin securing approval of a State OSHA Plan.\n2. The Federal monies derived from adoption of the\nCalifornia State Occupational Safety and Health Plan\nshould be used to expand and improve the present\nprograms. The Division of Industrial Safety's budget\nshould not be diminished upon receipt of Federal\nfunding.\n3. The Division's increasing public safety function\nshould be analyzed to determine whether this program\nshould remain in the Division of Industrial Safety.\n3. \"The Division of Industrial Safety has failed to establish\nor seek new safety orders or legislative changes in the\nLabor Code to cover new developments in the field of\nconstruction.\"\nIn the consideration of this allegation, The Committee has\ndetermined the following:\nA. Analysis\nThe jurisdiction of the Industrial Safety Board is\nlimited to setting standards in the area of accident\nprevention. When the need of safety orders is established,\nthe job of drafting them is assigned to staff members\nqualified in the particular field to be covered. When\nthe first draft of the proposed safety orders is com-\npleted it is presented by the Division staff at committee\nmeetings, large or small, of interested groups. When\nthe preliminary discussion of the committees on the\nproposed safety orders is completed, public hearings\nare held before the INDUSTRIAL SAFETY BOARD, as required\nby the Administrative Procedures Act. If the Board by\nmajority vote adopts them, a copy of the Safety Orders\nis sent to each person who attended the public hearings\nor who commented in writing at any stage of the prepara-\ntion of the Orders. The Orders become automatically effec-\ntive thirty days after filing with the Secretary of State.\nThe Division's activities with respect to safety orders\nfrom 1959 through December of 1966 and from January 1967\nthrough December 1971 is shown in attachments I and II\nto this section.\nAs is apparent from Appendices I and II, updating of\nsafety orders has been a matter of continuing emphasis\n-11-\nduring the past five years. During eignt years of the\nprior administration twenty-two safety order revisions\nwere completed. During the past five years, twenty-one\nsafety order revisions have been completed, three more\nare ready for filing with the Secretary of State, three\nare ready for public hearing while four are ready for\nLabor-Management committee review.\nSimilarly, judging from Appendix III to this section,\nthere appears to have been no real diminution of de-\npartmental legislative activity in the past five years.\nWhile the department historically follows and provides\ninput on an exceptionally large number of bills because\nof the interest of the Legislature in matters affecting\nemployees, which is reflected in an ever-proliferating\nnumber of bills in this area, the available record\nsuggests that the department neither is nor has been a\nmajor initiator of such legislation.\nAppendix III also reflects that the department has not\nbeen notably successful in getting needed legislation\nthrough the legislative process.\nB. Problem\nNo comments.\nC. Solutions\nNo comments\nD. Recommendations\n1. In assigning limited authority to the Industrial Safety\nBoard, the Legislature rightly recognized the facts\nthat the Board represents a community of interest be-\ntween labor and management and has the benefit of a\ngreat deal of safety engineering expertise available\nto it. Accordingly, it is recommended that the\nLegislature continue to respect its long-standing\ndelegation to the Industrial Safety Board insofar as\nsetting of safety standards is concerned.\n-12-\nAPPENDIX I\nREVISIONS TO SAFETY ORDERS - 1959 THROUGH 1966\nNO. IDENTIFICATION\nDATE OF ADOPTION\n1. Petroleum Safety Orders\nJuly 2, 1959\nDrilling & Production\n2. General Industry Safety Order\nApril 28, 1960\nArticle 23, Transportation of\nEmployees and Material\n3. General Industry Safety Order\nMarch 8, 1961\nShip and Boat Building\n4. General Industry Safety Orders\nNovember 3, 1961\nAgricultural Operations\n5. General Industry Safety Orders\nDecember 5, 1961\nLadders\n6. Electrical Safety Orders\nJanuary 18, 1962\n7. Radiation Safety Orders\nSeptember 8, 1962\n8. Tunnel Safety Orders\nSeptember 14, 1962\n9. Noise Control Safety Orders\nJanuary 15, 1963\n10. Unfired Pressure Vessels\nFebruary 6, 1964\n11. Construction Safety Orders\nMarch 4, 1965\n12. Construction Safety Orders\nJune 30, 1965\n13. Radiation Control Regulations\nSeptember 30, 1965\n14. Boiler and Fired Pressure\nNovember 3, 1965\nVessels\n15. General Industry -\nJune 14, 1966\n(a) Sections beginning with 3206\n(b) Article 14.1, Lamp Scaffold\nand Parallels\n(c) Repeal Subchapter 9, Lamp\nScaffold and Parallels\n(d) Repeal Section 3207\n16. Pneumatic Loading Safety Orders\nJune 14, 1966\n(Blasting)\n17. Compressed Air\nJune 14, 1966\n18. Construction - 1591 (h) -\nAugust 5, 1966\nRoll-Bar\n-13-\nNO. IDENTIFICATION\nDAT OF ADOPTION\n19. Boiler and Fired Pressure\nOctober 4, 1966\nVessel\n20. Unfired Pressure Vessel-Fees\nOctober 4, 1966\n21. General Industry - Lamp\nOctober 4, 1966\nScaffolds and Parallels\n22. General Industry - Sections\nDecember 19, 1966\nbeginning with 3225\n-14\nAPPENDIX II\nREVISIONS TO SAFETY ORDERS - JANUARY 1967 THROUGH DECEMBER 1971\nDATE FILED WITH\nNO. IDENTIFICATION\nDATE OF ADOPTION\nSEC'Y OF STATE\n1. General Industry -\nJanuary 16, 1967\nFebruary 8, 1967\nNew Safety Order 4106.1 -\nInternal Combustion Engine\nExhaust\n2. General Industry -\nAugust 18, 1967\nSeptember 21, 1967\nStandard Railings\n3: Elevator -\nOctober 30, 1967\nApril 4, 1968\nInspection Fees\n4. Radiation Control Regulations October 30, 1967\nFiled by Dept. of\n(EEU)\nPublic Health\n5. General Industry - Appendix May 8, 1968\nMay 28, 1968\nA of Article 81, Dusts,\nFumes, Mists, Vapors and\nGases\n6. Boiler and Fired, and\nAugust 27, 1968\nOctober 7, 1968\nUnfired Pressure Vessels -\nFees\n7. General Industry -\nNovember 15, 1968\nDecember 11, 1968\nSections 4148 and 6755\n8. Logging and Sawmill\nDecember 10, 1968\nFebruary 25, 1969\n9. General Industry - Pulp\nDecember 10, 1968\nFebruary 25, 1969\nand Paper Mill Into GISO\n10. Radiation Control Regula-\nApril 21, 1969\nFiled by Dept. of\ntions (EEU)\nPublic Health\n11. General Industry -\nNovember 12, 1969\nJanuary 7, 1969\nAmusement Rides\n12. Elevator\nNovember 12, 1969\nMarch 16, 1970\n13. General Industry -\nDecember 2, 1969\nDecember 30, 1969\nLongshore\n14. Construction - Derricks,\nMay 13, 1970\nJune 15, 1970\nCranes, Boom-Type\nExcavators, etc.\n-15-\nDATE FILED WITH\nNO. IDENTIFICATION\nDATE OF ADOPTION\nSEC'Y OF STATE\n15. Unfired Pressure Vessel\nJune 4, 1970\nJuly 17, 1970\n16. General Industry - Noise\nJuly 28, 1970\nAugust 20, 1970\nControl and Threshold\nLimit Values\n17. Construction - Roll\nSeptember 1, 1970\nOctober 2, 1970\nProtection, Seat Belts,\netc.\n18. General Industry -\nDecember 1, 1970\nApril 14, 1971\nExplosives\n19. High-Voltage Electrical\nJune 1, 1971\nNot yet filed\n20. Radiation Control\nJune 1, 1971\nFiled by Dept. of\nRegulations (EEU)\nPublic Health\n21. Aerial Passenger\nSeptember 7, 1971\nFiled 1/11/72\nTramways in Fees\nEffective 2/11/72\n22. General Industry -\nNovember 9, 1971\nJanuary 7, 1972\nArticle 22\nIndustrial Trucks,\nTractors, etc.\n23. General Industry - Title\nNovember 9, 1971\nDecember 24, 1971\n24 - Building Standards\nNumbers\n24. Construction - Access\nDecember 7, 1971\nNot yet filed.\nand Demolition\n25. Compressed and Liquefied\nPrepared for public\nNatural Gas - Unfired\nhearings 1/14/72\nPressure Vessel\nand 1/25/72\n26. Mine Safety Orders\nPrepared for public\nhearings 1/13/72\nand 1/24/72\n27. Construction, Derricks,\nPrepared for public\nCranes - Boom-Type\nhearings\nExcavators, etc.\n28. General Industry - Tire\nPrepared for committee\nInflation\nwork\n29. Construction - Explosives\nPrepared for committee\nwork\n30. Construction - Hellcopters Prepared for committee work\n31. Construction - Tunnel\nPrepared for committee work\nSafety Orders\n-16-\nAPPENDIX III\nLEGISLATIVE ACTIVITY IN AREA OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY INITIATED BY\nDEPARTMENT SINCE 1962\n1962 - Nothing. See note 1.\n1963 - 1. AB 706 (Knox) Sought to amend Labor Code Section 6311\nto give Division of Industrial Safety right to adopt\nand enforce Safety Orders for control of hazardous in-\ndustrial noise. Data available within the department\nindicates that bill died but does not show its course\nthrough the Legislature.\n1964 - Nothing. See note 1.\n1965 - 1. AB 1137 to amend Labor Code relating to fees chargeable\nfor boiler and tank inspection. Bill died.\n2. AB 1295 (Now Chapter 1047, Statutes of 1965). Estab-\nlished, Aerial Passenger Tramway Inspection Law requiring:\na) annual inspection of all devices defined as aerial\ntramways;\nb) certification and approval of design. Bill also\nprovided for and set limits on fees for annual\npermits and inspection.\n3. AB 1194 to amend Labor Code relating to fees chargeable\nfor elevator inspection. Bill died.\n1966 - Nothing.\n1967 - Nothing.\n1968 - 1. AB 1010 originally introduced to exact penalties for\ndelinquent payment of pressure vessel fees. Bill was\namended and passed as a working hours for women bill.\nReferences to penalties or safety matters were amended\nout.\n-17-\nAPPENDIX III\n2. By Chapter 353, 1968 Statutes, inspection of tanks was\nrequired every five years.\n3. AB 1009 for increased fees on pressure vessels died in\nAssembly Committee.\n4. Chapter 352, 1968 Statutes raised maximum and minimum\nfees for elevator inspection to present levels.\n1969 - 1. SB 547 providing for increased fees for pressure vessels\ndied in Committee.\n1970 - Nothing.\n1971 - 1. AB 198 (Fenton) relating to fee schedules for inspections\nof elevators, pressure vessels, tramways and amusement\nrides died in Committee.\n2. AB 2765 (Now Chapter 1431, Statutes of 1971). This bill\nprovided that contracts for public works in excess of\n$25,000 which involve excavation of trench(es) 5 feet\nor more in depth must show specified details for worker\nprotection from caving ground.\nNotes: 1. Legislature met biennially until 1966.\n2. Listing is based upon departmental records and is\npresumed to be inclusive. However, early records\nare skeletal because of periodic purging of out-\ndated material.\n-18-\n4.\n\"The Division of Industrial Safety has shown a remarkable\nreluctance to prosecute unsafe operators who fail to comply\nwith orders to provide a safe place to work.\"\nA. Analysis\nThe area of prosecution has been a source of continuing\nfrustration within the Division. As mentioned earlier\nin the report, The Committee has accumulated evidence\nthat often a local district attorney will decline a\nrequest for prosecution by the Division. Obviously,\nthe Division has no ability to prosecute on its own.\nIn justice to local jurisdictions, one explanation for\nthis apparent neglect appears to be inadequately sub-\nstantiated cases. Training and experience as a safety\nengineer don't necessarily develop the skills needed\nto give pertinent information for prosecutions. In\nthis assignment, the safety engineer often finds him-\nself in an alien role.\nThe Committee takes recognition of the fact that Mr.\nRoy J. Bell has abolished the single-level veto as it\nhas been applied to prosecution requests in the past\nand commends him for it. The Committee understands\nthat an interim arrangement has been installed whereby\nall requests for prosecution now go through an automatic\nheadquarter's review.\nBetween the inter-related factors of the single-level\nveto and the inevitable question of what the local\ndistrict attorney may be willing to do, a general\nfeeling of inhibition has developed in the Division\nwith respect to initiating prosecutions. This may\npartially reflect headquarter's feelings' that penalties\nare too minimal to influence compliance. See Appendix IV.\nThe Committee reviewed the actions of Vincent White\nand Cliff Farmer in the cases listed in the transcript\nof the Fenton hearings and believe that the decisions\nmade by them in these matters were based on Division\npolicies concerning prosecutions and tag removals. Such\npolicies clearly indicate that the Division top staff\nwere reluctant to authorize prosecutions unless they were\ncertain that the prosecution would be successful. Their\nactions in removal of tags were lawful insofar as they\nmet Labor Code requirements that only authorized Divisional\npersonnel could perform this action.\n-19-\nWith the removal of the \"single-level veto\" such matters\nwill no doubt be handled on a more sensible basis but even\nso, The Committee strongly recommends that there be a\nprohibition against removal of tags unless the person\nauthorizing the tag removal makes a physical examination\nof the work area.\nB. Problem\nAside from the question of whether this technique has\nbeen used with sufficient vigor, the fact is that local\ndistrict attorneys have not treated the Division's\nprosecution requests with any sense of priority. Further,\nreview of cases prosecuted back to 1959 by the Division\nreveals that in most part, the Courts do not seem to\nvelieve that the matters presented are of a grave nature\nand so impose minimal penalties on the violators. More-\nover, as has been seen, a somewhat defeatist attitude\nhas imbued some of the staff because of its feeling that\nheadquarters lacks enthusiasm for the prosecution approach.\nC. Solutions\nProvision of trained investigators to gather facts and\nlegal counsel to evaluate these facts in relation to\nrelevant safety orders would probably secure better\ncooperation from local district attorneys simply by\ngiving them better material with which to work.\nIt is not proposed to establish these resources within\nthe division but to consolidate and expand, as needed,\nupon resources already within the department. The\nlatter approach would be more economical because of\nthe avoidance of duplication and would also have the\nlong-range benefit of developing versatility within\nthe broad range of the Labor Code on the part of\npresent investigative and legal staff.\nThe Committee also believes that decentralization\nof decision-making with respect to prosecutions is\nindicated. This contemplates that a senior engineer\ncould refer a possible case for prosecution to an\ninvestigative and legal unit and given appropriate\napprovals could then proceed directly to prosecution.\nIf the investigative or legal staff expressed reservations\nregarding the prosecution request, it would then be\nreferred to the next higher level within the Division\nfor consideration. This procedure would have the\nadvantages of being more direct, eliminating paper work\nin connection with headquarters coordination and, hopefully,\nwould enhance the morale of field staff.\n-20-\nD. Recommendations\n1. Investigative and legal assistance should be provided\nto the Division to assist field staff in determining\nwhether prosecution is justified and, if so, to help\nin preparing the case for transmittal to the local\ndistrict attorney.\n2. While The Committee has no argument with Mr. Bell's\ninterim arrangement on review of prosecution requests,\nit would encourage ultimate initiation of single-level\napproval without referral to Division headquarters.\n3. A complete review should be made of current sanctions\nas to whether they meet the needs of safety in 1972\nsince these sanctions were instigated in 1937.\n4. It is recommended that there be a prohibition against\nthe removal of a tag unless the person authorizing\nsuch removal makes a physical examination of the work\narea.\n5. \"The Division of Industrial Safety has never developed nor\nsought legislative approval of an adequate accident investi-\ngation team, despite repeated indications that such a team\nis essential to enforcement of most Labor Code and Safety\nOrder requirements.\"\nIn the consideration of this allegation, The Committee has\ndetermined the following:\nA. Analysis\nThe Committee found no evidence that legislative approval\nhad ever been sought for an adequate accident investigative\nteam by the Division of Industrial Safety. Further, it\nwas unable to find evidence that such a team is essential\nto enforcement of most labor code and safety order\nrequirements. The Committee has suggested earlier that\ninvestigative and legal assistance be made available to\nsafety engineers to assist them in relation to possible\nprosecutions. Industrial hygienists are already available\nwithin the Division's environmental engineering unit.\nThere is evidence that in addition to the referenced\nspecialized help, lower-level help might provide for\nbetter utilization of present staff, also. At the\npresent time, the Division has only one working level\nwhich consists of a journeyman class. Therefore, the\n-21-\ntime of a full journeyman must be consumed regardless\nof how routine a safety problem may be involved.\nIn some sections, it appears that field staff make\nup their own priorities and itineraries with an unusual\ndegree of freedom from supervisory control. This is\nparticularly true where, because of sheer numbers, it is\nimpossible to cover all places of employment anyway. This\ncan result in misdirection of effort to the detriment\nof the Division's objectives.\nApropos of manpower utilization again, The Committee\nis not persuaded that sufficient attention is given to\nthe proper allocation of travel funds to the various\nsections. The present restrictions on the budget make it\neven more important than usual that this always difficult\nmanagement problem be approached from the standpoint\nof making every dollar count toward achievement of\ndivisional goals.\nB. Problem\nThe fact that there is only one working level of safety\nengineer makes it necessary to use a full journeyman\non routine assignments such as reinspections. This\ndoes not provide for optimum utilization of manpower.\nThere is evidence, too, that staff time and resources\nsuch as State vehicles have not been managed with full\nefficiency in all cases - particularly in those sections\ncharacterized by large amounts of discretionary time.\nC. Solutions\nIn addition to provision of specialized staff, the\npossibility of establishing an entrance level class\nof safety engineer should be explored. This would\nmake it possible to grade problems and focus the activity\nof more experienced staff members in those areas where,\nby superior training and experience, they could make the\ngreatest contribution. An important fringe benefit to\nthe cause of worker safety would be that the Division\nwould be in a position to develop its own journeymen\nrather than to have to depend upon the vagaries of the\nrecruitment market.\nGreater supervisory attention should be given to the\ndevelopment of field itineraries by field staff to\nassure optimum use of manpower and other resources.\n-22-\nThis would make for a greater degree of accountability\non the part of the staff and this, in turn, would assist\nheadquarters staff in making realistic allocations of\ntravel money.\nD. Recommendations\nAs noted in Recommendation 4-D-1, The Committee suggests\ninvestigative and legal assistance for field staff in\nrelation to accident investigation and possible prosecutions.\n1. A junior engineer class should be established to\nperform the more routine work now done by journey-\nmen and to provide the division a future source of\nwell-trained safety engineers.\n2. A thorough review of the use of monthly assigned\ncars should be made to determine whether utiliza-\ntion has been efficient. In this connection a\nrevision of the safety engineers' manual should be\nmade pointing up rules and regulations controlling\nusage.\n3. A method should be established to review itiner-\naries of all safety engineers to assure optimum\nutilization of resources and so that division manage-\nment can properly allocate funds.\n4. Careful analysis should be made by the OSHA\nAdvisory Committee to the Department of Industrial\nRelations of the work of the Division of Industrial\nSafety, the Bureau of Occupational Health and any\nother county, city or community effort having to do\nwith occupational safety and health in California\nto determine how the work of state government in this\narea can be improved, particularly in its role as\na coodinating agency.\n-23-\nAPPENDIX\nIV\nAPPENDIX\n1960\n1961\n1962\n1963\n1964\n1965\n1966\n1967\n1968\n1969\n1970\n1971\nA. Total fatalities a\n811\n832\n1,023\n967\n726\n710\n723\n669\n730\n759\n750\n711\nFatalities (adjusted to exclude compromise\nsettlements before 1964)\n596\n533\n718\n650\n726\n710\n723\n669\n730\n759\n750\n711\n\"Preventable\" deaths (those occurring despite\nwell-sstablished standards and control--\ndetail below in Part. B)\n388\n376\n375\n370\n355\n336\n346\n336\n340\n340\n333\n320\nTotal prosecutions\n13\n30\n24\n22\n18\n18\n21\n3\n6\n6\n51\n5\nProsecutions in fatality cases\n2\n2\n4\n-\n5\n8\n9\n2\n2\n2\nW\n2\na\nBeginning in 1964 the definition of a \"work fatality\" for statistical purposes was revised to exclude most fatalities settled by compromise agreements\napproved by the Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board.\nB. Total fatalities\n811\n832\n1,023\n967\n726\n710\n723\n669\n730\n759\n750\n711\nLeas:\nCardie-vascular strain or disease\n167\n214\n299\n278\n94\n108\n101\n91\n8/,\n99\n42\n113\nMoving highway-type motor vehicle\n197\n193\n240\n257\n214\n194\n206\n179\n200\n210\n211\n159\nFlane crach\n39\n30\n77\n31\n41\n38\n34\n24\n65\n55\n49\n45\nShooting, assault\n20\n19\n32\n31\n22\n34\n36\n39\n41\n55\n65\n74\n\"Preventable deaths\"\n388\n376\n375\n370\n355\n336\n346\n336\n340\n340\n333\n320\na Detail is not available on number of compromice agreements in years prior to 1964 classified by the factors shown, but the figures indicate now.\ninvolved mettlements for alleged cardio-vascular strain or disease.\nTotal fabalities\n811\n832\n1,023\n967\n726\n710\n723\n669\n730\n759\n700\n711\nAgriculture\n80\n73\n83\n111\n87\n73\n88\n58\n69\n66\n71\n60\nMineral extraction\n29\n23\n29\n30\n14\n19\n16\n19\n23\n11\n21\n26\nConstruction\n166\n193\n220\n197\n153\n135.\n140\n121\n116\n134\n122\n115\nMusufacturing\n165\n145\n203\n187\n143\n112\n139\n133\n162\n102\n146\n111\nTransportation, communication, utilities\n113\n99\n1/2\n97\n92\n105\n82\n102\n104\n105\n107\n02\nTrade\n104\n109\n122\n117\n71\n95\n78\n64\n80\n110\nS.\n93\nFinance, insurance, real estate\n10\n17\n23\n21\n8\n12\n24\n14\n15\n15\n1/.\n11\nService\n54\n60\n77\n'/8\n37\n57\n53\n52\n52\n84\n57\n61\nGovernment, State and local\n87\n113\n124\n128\n120\n100\n103\n106\n109\n132\n125\n142\nIndustry not reported\n3\n8\n-\n1\n1\n2\n9\n0\n-\n1\n-\n-\nD. Disabling injurles per 1,000 workers\n32.1\n32.1\n31.5\n31.7\n32.2\n31.2\n31.6\n30.8\n30.9\n31.9\n30.5\nn.a.\nn.a.-Not yet, available.\nCompiled by Division of Labor Statistics and Research\nFebruary 1972\nSELECT LABOR-MANAGEMENT FACT FINDING COMMITTEE\nON THE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY\nWilliam C. Here\nWilliam C. Hern, Chairman\nDirector, Department of Industrial Relations\nFrank M. Farro (Retired Secretary-Treasurer\nof Teamsters Local 853) Pleasanton\nKenneth Larson, Legislative Representative\nFederated Fire Fighters, Sacramento, and\nJune James Building S. Lee, President S. & Construction Lee Trades\nChairman of Statewide Safety Committee - AFL-CIO\nState Council\nof California, Sacramento\nEmmons Staff\nEmenors McClung, No Legislative aung\nCalifornia Manufacturers Association, Sacramento\nWarren R. Mendel, Executive Vice President\nEngineering & Grading Contractors Association,\nLos Angeles\nTom Richardsm\nTom Richardson, Secretary of Labor Committee\nCalifornia Farm Bureau Federation, Berkeley\nSEPERATE STATEMENTS ATTACHED.\nDated Februany 8 1972\nSEPARATE STATEMENT\nThe Committee's investigation of the operation of\nthe Division of Industrial Safety revealed that most\nof its employees were dedicated to and worked hard at\nefforts to provide a safer place of employment for\nCalifornia workers despite handicaps imposed by the\norganization and structure of the Division.\nTo publicly castigate the entire division based\non the testimony of a few construction section personnel,\nplus the inability to remember of certain top officials,\nas was done by the Assembly Committee Chairman was at the\nvery best regrettable.\nThe undersigned urged that the other members of\nthe Committee join him in making the above finding, but\nwas unsuccessful in securing agreement.\nIt is my understanding that the Labor and\nManagement members of the Committee will submit\nseparate statements on this point.\nWilliam C.Hern C.\nWilliam C. Hern\nChairman, Select Labor-\nManagement Fact Finding\nCommittee on the Division\nof Industrial Safety\nA MINORITY REPORT\nA series of events beginning last June 24th with the tragic explosion\nin the Sylmar Tunnel which claimed the lives of 17 California workmen has\nestablished a characterization of the California Division of Industrial Safety\nwhich is dangerously erroneous. While the Sylmar accident remains unexplained\nat this writing, due process is being implemented to reach that determination.\nAll or most of the allegations should be considered inconclusive until such\ntime as responsible methods have produced the correct answers. Because of the\nmagnitude of this accident, the California Assembly established a Select\nCommittee which held hearings in September to determine any contribution the\nlegislature might make. Those hearings provided a platform for the presenta-\ntion of some deep seated problems of long standing with personnel of the\nDivision of Industrial Safety.\nThe innuendo established by the comment before the Committee led to a\nconcern that the Division was either not performing its function or was subject\nto operations procedures influenced by outside pressures which diluted its\neffectiveness and started a vicious campaign against the Division of Industrial\nSafety by opportunistic labor leaders and cooperative legislators. A Select\nAssembly Committee held hearings in January obstensibly to seek the truth of\nthese allegations. It is our strong opinion that the methodology utilized by\nthis Select Committee failed to provide means by which a dependable analysis\ncould be reached. It served mainly as an amplifier for the statements,\naccusations, and opinions of disgruntled, frustrated employees of the Division.\nSome of this testimony contained fact but a good portion of it was vague gossip\nand the verbalization of personal resentment eminating from general low morale.\nThis led to members of the Committee jumping to conclusions which were\nseriously premature. The resultant attitudes and actions of the media have\nestablished a disfiguring portrayal of the Division and its people. On\nDecember 31, 1971, the Los Angeles Citizen, official newspaper for the Los\nAngeles County Labor Federation, in a page one story spread under a three\ncolumn head, reported:\n\"Labor's allegations of inadequacies in the\nCalifornia Division of Industrial Safety during\nthe Reagan Administration will get their first\nhearings in the new year.\"\nThe story went on to say:\n\"John A. Cinquemani, Executive-Secretary of the\nLos Angeles Building and Construction Trades\nCouncil, who has been in a continuous struggle\nwith the Division 'because of its inability to\ncarry out the industrial safety laws of\nCalifornia', has already met with Committee\nconsultants.\"\nA Minority Report\nPage 2\nWe feel also that much of the portrayal is emphasized for the benefit of\npolitics and the desires of organized labor. We feel obligated to file\nthis additional statement in conjunction with the task force report in\norder that the views contained herein can be expressed to authority. The\ntask force was properly composed of representatives of both organized labor\nand management. Labor refused the inclusion of these remarks in the report.\nThe joint report contains analysis, identification of problems, solu-\ntions, and recommendations which are unanimously agreed upon by the entire\ntask force. We believe serious acceptance of these recommendations and\nimplementation of them will greatly improve and strengthen the Division in\nits most crucial and important role in serving the working citizens of our\nstate.\nIt must be noted that even with the identification of areas of needed\nchange, California displays an excellent record of improving the prevention\nof industrial accidents. Please refer to the disabling accident table,\nAppendix 1, at the end of this Minority Report.\nThis record established the fact that the California Division of\nIndustrial Safety, organized labor, employees and California management have\nconcerned themselves with providing a safe place to work with a commendable\ndegree of success. We feel extremely confident that the implementation of\nour joint recommendations will produce even greater approach to the ultimate\nsafety of workers. There was a strong tendency in the Select Committee to\nadopt the attitude that DIS is strictly and purely an enforcement agency and\nits personnel should conduct itselves accordingly, from chief to inspector.\nWe feel that the most discernable and lasting effects to the beneficial\nadvantage of the worker is embodied in a program wherein the Division acts\nas counselor, expert and enforcer in a cooperative posture with labor and\nmanagement. Safety is a state of mind and cannot be obtained through purely\n\"cops and robbers\" attitudes. We do believe employers who blatantly disre-\ngard safety regulations and practices should be sought out, identified, and\nprosecuted to the fullest extent possible before their employees are injured\nbecause of their non-compliance.\nFinally, it appears that much of the thrust of present activity is\nabout to degenerate to an effort to vilify certain individuals of the Division\nboth in management and employee level. In short, public service needs to be\nattractive to competent dedicated citizens and we believe this quality is pre-\nsent in the personnel of the Division of Industrial Safety. While we do not\nquarrel with the judgment exercised in the resignation of Mr. Jack Hatton,\nthe style of his departure leaves a cloud around a distinguished citizen who\nwas conscientiously attempting to make a contribution to the community. We\ndo not feel a \"witch hunt\" resulting in the irresponsible assignment of guilt\nto satisfy personal animosity, politics, or the press should be permitted.\nWhen the Division is operating under good structure, then both management and\nA Minority Report\nPage 3\nemployees should be judged on ability and performance and decisions made at\nthat time and on that criteria.\nWe hope the content of these reports contribute to the improvement\nof the Division and express our desire that our selection and participation\non the task force proves beneficial.\nRespectfully submitted,\nEMMONS Emmases McCLUNG Mc Clung\nCalifornia Manufacturers Association\nWARREN R. MENDEL\nEngineering and Grading Contractors\nAssociation\nTom Richardson\nTOM RICHARDSON\nCalifornia Farm Bureau Federation\nPPENDIX I TO MINORITY REPORT\nWork Injuries\nDisabling Work Injuries\nComparitive\nYear\nPer 1,000 Workers\nRanking\n1960\n32.1\n9\n1961\n32.1\n9\n1962\n31.5\n6\n1963\n31.8\n8\n1964\n32.2\n10\n1965\n31.2\n4\n1966\n31.6\n7\n1967\n30.8\n2\n1968\n30.9\n3\n1969\n31.5\n6\n1970\n30.5\n1\n1971*\n*Frequency rate not available for 1971 but disabling work injuries for\nfirst seven months of 1971 are below those for the same period in 1970.\nSUBMITTED TO THE GOVERNOR BY THE LABOR MEMBERS\nOF THE SELECT LABOR-MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE\nThe following report is being submitted by the Labor members\nof the Select Labor-Management Committee investigating the charges\nrecently leveled at the Division of Industrial Safety. While we\nagree with the full report of the committee, we felt an obligation\nto answer the definite charges in a more positive and objective\nmanner.\nAfter much in-depth study of the Division, we are of the\nopinion that there is a tremendous need for reorganization within\nthe Division to develop proper and workable procedures to implement\nand enforce the safety orders of the State of California.\nToday, there is a lack of \"chain of command\"; there is a lack\nof authority and direction in the Division in southern California;\nand there is a definite barrier between the southern California\noffice and the main office of the Division of Industrial Safety in\nSan Francisco.\nIn the past, the Division has been run as a one or two man show,\nregardless of the rank of the other management level personnel. Many\nare relegated to a \"housekeeping\" function only.\nOur recommendations and remarks should be construed as con-\nstructive and in no way detrimental to the Division. We hope that\nthe final report submitted to the legislature by the Assembly\nSelect Committee will embody the recommendations made in the unani-\nmous report of the Select Labor-Management Committee. We are also\nin the hopes that the Governor will use his influential office to\nprovide the financing necessary to implement the recommendations of\nthe Select Labor-Management Committee.\nIt is unfortunate that it took 17 deaths to bring about an\ninvestigation of this nature. This causes us to wonder exactly how\nlong such inefficiency would have continued had the Legislature not\ndecided to investigate. However, we do hope that the Legislature\nwill act swiftly to remedy the problem through financial augmenta-\ntion of the budget to enact the recommendations by the select\ncommittee.\nIS THERE A SERIOUS MORALE PROBLEM WITHIN THE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL\nSAFETY?\nAfter an extensive review, which included reading written\nstatements made by the field safety engineers, interviewing top\nmanagement personnel and studying detailed information supplied to\nthe committee; we are of the opinion that there is a very serious\nmorale problem within the Division. We are also of the opinion that\nthis has jeopardized the workers of the State of California. Most\nof the statements made in this report have been substantiated in the\nMinority Report\n2.\nreport submitted to the Governor by Director of Finance, Vern Orr.\nEven though the men in the field have proven their willing-\nness to get the job done and create a safe working atmosphere,\nthey have not received the necessary support from top management\npersonnel. Knowing this, both the men and the Division have\nbecome apathetic.\nIS THE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY IN NEED OF MORE FIELD INSPECTORS\nTO PROVIDE ADEQUATE WORK PROTECTION?\nWhile the main thrust of our investigation dealt with the\nconstruction section of the Division of Industrial Safety, we felt\nthat there certainly is a definite need to increase the amount of\nsafety engineers in the field. We feel that 48 construction safety\nengineers covering an area as enormous as the State of California\ncannot possibly provide a safe working place for the men and women\nof the State.\nHAS THE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ESTABLISHED NEW SAFETY ORDERS\nOR SOUGHT LEGISLATIVE CHANGES IN THE FIELD OF CONSTRUCTION?\nNew safety orders have been enacted yearly; however, very little\nlegislation has been introduced. During two of the last six years,\nno legislation was introduced.\nHAS THE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY BEEN RELUCTANT TO PROSECUTE?\nIt was pointed out to us that in the past 2½ years, 10 requests\nhave been submitted from the field for prosecution. 40% of these\nwere turned down at the management level, and the safety engineer has\nno place to appeal this decision.\nWe came across several contractors' files that were approximately\ntwo inches thick with violations that had been filed against them and\nyet they had never been reviewed or prosecuted. A prosecution\nrequest can be denied by any supervisor of the field personnel at\nany level, and the field engineer cannot appeal the decision.\nHAS THE DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY EVER SOUGHT LEGISLATIVE APPROVAL\nOF AN ADEQUATE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION TEAM?\nIn the material that was furnished us, we were not able to\ndetermine whether or not the Division has ever requested such an\ninvestigation team. In the recommendations of the full committee\nreport, however, we do make this request.\nThere is a definite need to investigate the many hundreds of\nindustrial deaths in the State of California to determine what caused\nthem and whether or not there was a willful violation of the safety\norders by the employer or supervising employee.\nMinority Report\n3.\nIn our opinion the responsibility for the mismanagement of\nthe Division of Industrial Safety directly lies with the Director\nof the Department of Industrial Relations, William Hern. He is\nresponsible for the direction of all the Divisions under his\nauthority as Director of the Department of Industrial Relations\nand therefore we feel that when he assumes the authority of his\nposition he also assumes the responsibility, which causes us to\nwonder as to what the organizational posture of the other Divisions\nare today.\nAs we stated earlier we agree with the full committee report\nthat a full reorganization is needed but to do this will need new\nand fresh leadership, therefore we suggest that Mr. Hern should\nresign as Director of the Department of Industrial Relations.\nRespectfully submitted,\nFrank M. Farro, Retired\nTEAMSTERS UNION LOCAL 853\nKenneth D. Larson, Vice President\nCALIFORNIA LABOR FEDERATION, AFL-CIO\nJames S. Lee, President\nSTATE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES\nCOUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA\nSignature page attached\nFrank M. Farro (Retired Secretary-Treasurer\nof Teamsters Local 853) Pleasanton\ntennith R.Larson\nKenneth Larson, Legislative Representative\nFederated Fire Fighters, Sacramento, and\nChairman of Statewide Safety Committee - AFL-CIO\nCamer S.Lee\nJames S. Lee, President\nState Building & Construction Trades Council\nof California, Sacramento\nOFFICE OF THE GOVE.\nRELEASE:\ndiate\nSacramento, Califor.\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-10-72\n#88\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today said the unprecedented success of\nCalifornia's new welfare reform program means that a decision by HEW\nin Washington to loan the states $1 billion in additional welfare funds\nwill not affect California.\nIn a statement the governor said:\n\"Unlike a number of other states which apparently have not taken\nthe steps necessary to sufficiently control rising welfare caseloads\nand the skyrocketing costs they impose, California has been able to\nsignificantly reduce the number of persons on welfare during the past\nnine months.\n\"Even more important, we have been able to bring welfare expenditures\ndown to within the normal growth of state revenues\neliminating the need\nfor such a loan from the federal government.\n\"For a state to accept the kind of I.O.U. which HEW is proposing\ncan only hasten the day of reckoning when the taxpayers in those states\nmust repay the debt they incur through increased taxes.\n\"By bringing welfare back under control in California, we expect\nto save the taxpayers of our state some $338 million in federal, state\nand local welfare costs during the current fiscal year and nearly three\nquarters of a billion dollars in fiscal 1972-73. If we had not reformed\nwelfare, California's taxpayers would have had to pay more than $1\nbillion more for welfare during these two years alone roughly the same\namount that HEW wants to loan all the states put together.\n\"Again we are happy to say California won't need it.\"\n#######\nEJG\nOFFICE OF THE GOVEL JR\nRELEASE: ...mediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-11-72\n#89\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Jarrold T. Davis of\nGrass Valley and Henry E. Magonigal of Smartville to four-year terms\non the board of the 17th District Agricultural Association (Nevada\nCounty District Fair).\nDavis, a special supervisor for the Bureau of Agricultural\nEducation in Sacramento, has served on the board since 1968. His\naddress is P.O. Box 197, Grass Valley. He is a Democrat.\nMagonigal, a cattle rancher, has served on the board since 1960.\nHe is a Republican. His address is Star Route, Smartville.\nBoard members receive necessary expenses.\n#######\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVER\nR\nRELEASE:\n1\nmediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-11-72\n#90\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Dr. Dwight H. Murray, Jr.,\nof Napa to a four-year term on the District Review Committee for the\nFirst District on the Board of Medical Examiners in the Department of\nConsumer Affairs.\nDr. Murray, who lives at 1084 Ross Circle, Napa, will represent\ncounty medical associations on the board. He is a Republican.\nBoard members receive per diem and expenses.\n#######\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVEI\n)R\nRELEASE:\nmediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-11-72\n#91\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today named Dr. Gregory C. Murray of\nLos Angeles to the District Review Committee for the Second District\non the Board of Medical Examiners in the Department of Consumer Affairs.\nDr. Murray, a surgeon and clinical professor at the University of\nSouthern California Medical School, has served on the board since 1965,\nrepresenting medical associations. He lives at 4007 Hepburn Avenue,\nLos Angeles. He is a Republican.\nBoard members receive per diem and expenses.\n#######\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVEI\nR\nRELEASE:\nmediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-11-72\n#92\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Virgil B. Kingsley, a\nWest Los Angeles funeral director, and Harold B. Wright, Loyalton\npublisher, to four-year terms on the State Board of Funeral Directors\nand Embalmers in the Department of Consumer Affairs.\nKingsley, operator of Gates, Kingsley and Gates Funeral Directors,\nand Wright, publisher of the Sierra Booster, have served on the board\nsince 1968. Both are Republicans.\nKingsley lives at 222 - 22nd Street, Santa Monica.\nWright, whose address is Box 458 Loyalton, represents the public\non the board.\nBoard members receive $25 per diem while on official duty.\n#######\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVER1\nRELEASE: I. ediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-14-72\n#93\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Dr. Charles B. McElwee\nof Duarte to a four-year term on the Physical Therapy Examining\nCommittee in the Department of Consumer Affairs.\nDr. McElwee, a Republican, has served on the board since 1968.\nHe lives at 2221 Rim Road, Duarte.\nBoard members receive $25 per diem while on official duty.\n######\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVER\nR\nMEMO TO THE\n.ESS\nSacramento, California\nContact: Paul Beck\n445-4571\n2-11-72\n#94\nGOVERNOR'S SCHEDULE\nFebruary 14, 1972\nthrough\nFebruary 20, 1972\nMonday, February 14\n6:45 p.m.\nLos Angeles Lincoln Club, California Club,\n538 South Flower Street, Los Angeles. (Remarks)\nOvernight - Los Angeles\nTuesday, February 15\nNo public appointments scheduled\nOvernight - - Sacramento\nWednesday, February 16\n10:30 a.m.\nPRESS CONFERENCE\n11:30 a.m.\nPicture with Easter Seal Child, Governor's\nOffice\n4:00 p.m.\nTaping of segment of \"The Advocates\", KCRA\nStudio\nOvernight - Sacramento\nThursday, February 17\n10:30 a.m.\nBrief Press Conference\nFriday, February 18\nNoon\nRegents Meeting, San Francisco\nEvening\nSan Francisco Press Club \"Gang Dinner\",\nSan Francisco Press Club, 555 Post Street\nOvernight - Los Angeles\nSaturday, February 19 No appointments scheduled\nSunday, February 20\nOvernight - Los Angeles\n# # #\nPB\nOFFICE OF THE GOVER R\nRELEASE: mediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-14-72\n#95\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today reappointed one member and named two\nnew members to the State Board of Agriculture.\nReappointed to a four-year term was Dr. James B. Kendrick, Jr.,\nVice President-Agricultural Sciences, the University of California at\nBerkeley. He has served on the board, representing the University,\nsince 1968. He is a Republican. He lives at 615 Spruce Street,\nBerkeley.\nThe new members, also appointed to four-year terms, are Earl S.\nSmittcamp, a Clovis fruit grower and agricultural leader, and James\nR. Manassero, a Santa Ana vegetable grower.\nSmittcamp, who lives at 8054 North Minniewawa Street, Clovis, was\nrecently appointed by President Nixon to the Farm Credit Board which\nserves five western states. He is chairman of the Agricultural Advisory\nBoard at Fresno State College and a member of the Board of Governors.\nHe is also a member of the White House Conference on Food and Nutrition.\nHe succeeds John M. Garabedian of Fresno, whose term has expired.\nManassero, who lives at 12681 Culver Drive, Santa Ana, is a\ndirector of the Irvine Growers Association and is active in the Orange\nCounty Farm Bureau, the Tomato Growers Association and the Asparagus\nGrowers Association. He succeeds Carl Samuelson of Ojai, whose term\nhas expired.\nSmittcamp and Manassero are Republicans.\nMembers of the board receive necessary expenses.\n#######\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVE OR\nRELEASE:\nmediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-14-72\n#96\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Eugene L. Johnston,\nNew Cuyama rancher and conservationist, and Howard K. Nakae, a\nNewcastle farmer, to four-year terms on the State Board of Forestry,\nsubject to Senate confirmation.\nJohnston, a Republican, has represented livestock interests on\nthe board since 1971. His address is Box 263, New Cuyama.\nNakae, a Democrat, has represented agricultural interests on the\nboard since 1968. His address is Route 2, Box 2225, Newcastle.\nBoard members receive necessary expenses.\n######\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVER1\nRELEASE:\nmediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-14-72\n#97\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Monsignor Thomas A. Kirby,\nretired pastor of St. Basil's Church in Vallejo and Frederick E.\nLlewellyn, president and general manager of Forest Lawn Memorial Park\nin Glendale, to four-year terms on the Cemetery Board in the Department\nof Consumer Affairs.\nMonsignor Kirby, who lives at 27 Panorama Drive, Vallejo, and\nLlewellyn, who lives at 1521 Virginia Road, San Marino, have served\non the board since 1968. Both are Republicans.\nBoard members receive $25 per diem while on official duty.\n#######\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVER\nR\nRELEASE:\nmediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-14-72\n#98\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today reappointed threemembers to four-year\nterms on the State Board of Registration for Geologists in the\nDepartment of Consumer Affairs.\nThey are:\nTed L. Bear, a Los Angeles consulting geologist, who lives at\n5385 Vista La Jana Lane, La Canada. He will represent District 5,\nPetroleum Geologists.\nJohn F. Curran, a Santa Barbara consulting geologist, who lives\nat 1010 Mission Canyon Road, Santa Barbara. He represents District 4.\nWilferd W. Peak, Chief Geologist of the Division of Safety of Dams,\nDepartment of Water Resources, Sacramento. He represents District 1,\nEngineer Geologists. He lives at 8332 Willowdale, Fair Oaks.\nAll have served on the board since 1969. They are Republicans.\nBoard members receive per diem and expenses.\n#####\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVER\nR\nRELEASE:\n.nmediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-14-72\n#99\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Mrs. Mary K. \"Mickey\"\nShell, a Sacramento newspaper woman, and John R. Ross, a San Luis\nObispo architect, to four-year terms on the California State Board of\nArchitectural Examiners in the Department of Consumer Affairs.\nMrs. Shell, a columnist for the Capitol News Service and the\nBakersfield Californian, has served on the board since 1968, representing\nthe public. She lives at 400 Hopkins Road, Sacramento.\nRoss, who heads a San Luis Obispo architectural firm, has also\nserved on the board since 1968, representing architects. He lives at\n580 Serrano Drive, San Luis Obispo.\nBoth are Republicans.\nBoard members receive $25 per diem while on official duty.\n######\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERN\nRELEASE: Immediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-15-72\n#100\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today announced the appointment of David\nL. Allen, an attorney and Visalia City Councilman, to the Visalia\nJudicial District Municipal Court.\nAllen, 41, a Republican, will receive an annual salary of $32,273.\nHe succeeds Judge Noel McDermott, who has retired.\nA practicing attorney in Visalia since 1955, Allen served as a\nTulare County Deputy County Counsel from 1956 to 1958 and as a Tulare\nCounty Deputy District Attorney from January, 1958 until September, 1959,\nwhen he entered private practice.\nHe was elected to the Visalia City Council in 1967 and was\nre-elected to a four-year term in 1971.\nA native of Visalia, he is a graduate of the College of Sequoias\nand Fresno State College and earned his law degree from the University\nof California's Hastings College of Law.\nHe is a member of the State Bar of California, the Tulare County\nBar Association and the California Trial Lawyers Association.\nHe and his wife Fern make their home in Visalia.\n#######\nWAS\nTHE CALIFORNIA DELEGATION\nTO THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONVENTION OF 1972\npledged to the re-election of President Richard M. Nixon\nGovernor Ronald Reagan, Chairman\nThomas C. Reed, Vice Chairman\nFebruary 17, 1972\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today read the following statement to the\npress in Sacramento:\n\"I am pleased to announce the slate of candidates for delegate\nto the Republican National Convention in San Diego. This group of\nmen and women have pledged themselves to the renomination and reelec-\ntion of President Nixon to another term of office.\n\"Under California law the President as a candidate approves his\nown slate of delegates. He has now done so and has asked me to serve\nas chairman of his delegation.\n\"In assisting the President to form the delegation, we recommended\nthat it be broadly based within the party and that it include more\nyoung people, women, and minority group representation than ever\nbefore. This has been done. But in order to see that many of the\ncurrent leaders and supporters of the Republican Party were also\nrecognized, we have formed an honorary delegation which will be at\nleast as large as the regular delegation. They will be at the\nconvention too. They will meet with the delegation and will take part\nfully in all matters except voting on the floor.\n\"At the June 6 presidential primary, those delegates whose names\nyou have today will be chosen when Republicans cast votes for Richard\nNixon as candidate for president. If successful, those delegates\nwill then go to San Diego for the convention beginning August 21.\n\"Last October 1 at the Republican State Central Committee meeting\nin Los Angeles, I announced the organization committee for the\ndelegation. This committee has received hundreds of applications,\nhas evaluated them, and made its recommendations to the President.\nThomas C. Reed, the Republican National Committeeman, was chairman of\nthe committee and will be vice chairman of the delegation.\n\"There are literally thousands of California Republicans who\ndeserve the honor to go to a national convention. My only regret\nis that we are limited in the number of delegates and alternates who\ncan be named and that all those deserving cannot be rewarded.\"\nFollowing is a list of the delegates and alternates:\n# # #\nPost Office Box 371 - San Rafael, California 94902 - (415) 456-7310\nHONORARY DELEGATION\nName and County\nName and County\nEarl Adams, Los Angeles\nMrs. Elena Madison, San Francisco\nRex Allen, Los Angeles\nWilliam S. Mailliard, San\nFloyd Andrews, San Diego\nFrancisco\nVictor C. Andrews, Orange\nDavid Margolis, Riverside\nJack L. Ashby, Napa\nMrs. Tom May, Los Angeles\nO. L. Bane, Fresno\nMrs. Marquita M. Maytag, San Diego\nSydney R. Barlow, Los Angeles\nRobert McClain, Los Angeles\nRobert F. Bauer, Los Angeles\nJohn A. McCone, Los Angeles\nArnold O. Beckman, Orange\nCarl M. McConnell, Shasta\nClare Berryhill, Stanislaus\nFerd Mendenhall, Los Angeles\nBen Biaggini, San Francisco\nArch Monson, San Francisco\nAlfred S. Bloomingdale,\nGeorge Murphy, Los Angeles\nLos Angeles\nKenneth T. Norris, Sr., Los\nJohn Bohn, Alameda\nAngeles\nMrs. John D. Bowler, Jr.,\nDr. Gaylord Parkinson, San Diego\nLos Angeles\nWilliam Pereira, Los Angeles\nMrs. Betsy Bromfield, Santa\nMiss Emily Pike, San Francisco\nBarbara\nThomas P. Pike, Los Angeles\nRodgers Broomhead, Marin\nBurt Raynes, San Diego\nHenry F. Budde, San Francisco\nCharles Reed, Los Angeles\nFritz B. Burns, Los Angeles\nRobert O. Reynolds, Los Angeles\nRobert Burns, Los Angeles\nTaft Schreiber, Los Angeles\nAsa V. Call, Los Angeles\nEdwin A. Seipp, Jr., San Mateo\nDennis E. Carpenter, Orange\nWilliam T. Sesnon, Jr., Los\nSherman Chickering, San\nAngeles\nFrancisco\nForrest M. Shumway, Los Angeles\nMrs. Athalie R. Clarke, Orange\nC. Arnholt Smith, San Diego\nCharles Cook, Los Angeles\nEmmett G. Solomon, San Mateo\nRansom M. Cook, San Francisco\nCharles S. Thomas, Orange\nRoy Crocker, Los Angeles\nCharles B. Thornton, Los Angeles\nJoseph M. Crosby, Los Angeles\nArthur R. Tirado, Fresno\nTheodore Cummings, Los Angeles\nHolmes Tuttle, Los Angeles\nJustin Dart, Los Angeles\nMax Eddy Utt, Los Angeles\nHarold Dobbs, San Francisco\nJulian Virtue, Los Angeles\nDonald D. Doyle, San Francisco\nJack L. Warner, Los Angeles\nJack Drown, Los Angeles\nJohn Wayne, Orange\nLeonard K. Firestone, Los\nMel Wilson, Fresno\nAngeles\nPeter Wilson, San Diego\nMortimer Fleishhacker, Jr.,\nWilliam Wilson, Los Angeles\nSan Francisco\nWendell W. Witter, San Francisco\nR. Gwin Follis, San Francisco\nRoland Rich Wooley, Los Angeles\nJohn Garabedian, Fresno\nJack Wrather, Los Angeles\nE. H. Gauer, San Francisco\nPaul D. Yager, Los Angeles\nMrs. Katherine H. Haley, Ventura\nSoichi F. Ukui, Los Angeles\nJames W. Halley, San Francisco\nLloyd Harnish, Fresno\nGeorge D. Hart, Marin\nAlbert Harutunian, San Diego\nMarco F. Hellman, San Francisco\nMrs. Dolores Hope, Los Angeles\nPreston Hotchkiss, Sr., Los\nAngeles\nJaquelin H. Hume, San Francisco\nEdward L. Johnson, Los Angeles\nThomas V. Jones, Los Angeles\nEarle Jorgensen, Los Angeles\nHerbert Kalmbach, Orange\nDarius Keaton, Monterey\nWalter Knott, Orange\nVictor J. Krehbiel, Los Angeles\nArthur Linkletter, Los Angeles\nJohn Lusk, Orange\n-2-\nCongressional District\nDelegate\nAlternate\n1\nMrs. Marjorie C. Boynton\nHon. Donald H. Clausen\n711 Willow Avenue\nCorner of Malone & Lake\nUkiah\nEarl Drive\nCrescent City\nRoads Veale\nJoseph Russ IV\n4343 Wallace Road\nBunker Hill Ranch\nSanta Rosa\nFerndale\n2\nHon. Fred W. Marler, Jr.\nEugene A. Chappie\n1352 Norman Drive\nCool\nRedding\nAugust J. Techeira, Jr.\nMrs. Jeanne L. Dryden\nWest Legion Avenue\n320 Bennett St., #10\nChico\nGrass Valley\n3\nJohn V. Diepenbrock\nMs. Lola M. Brekke\n3931 Wycombe Drive\n7016 Trabert Court\nSacramento\nCarmichael\nHon. Ed Reinecke\nThomas J. Bowlin\n492 Crocker Road\n3854 Bartley Drive\nSacramento\nSacramento\n4\nMs. Loretta C. Ceasar\nMiss Heidi Ann Ehrman\n408 Lakeside Drive\n412 F Street\nVallejo\nDavis\nMs. Janet J. Johnston\nRonald R. Harrington\nCounty Road 31-Rt. 1\n9466 Broadway\nBox 201\nLive Oak\nWinters\n5\nSteve M. Jeong\nMiss Agnes I. Chan\n754 Commercial Street\n980 Sacramento\nSan Francisco\nSan Francisco\nPutnam Livermore\nMrs. Jacquelyn W. Green\n1023 Vallejo\n66 Cleary Court, #708\nSan Francisco\nSan Francisco\n6\nHon. William T. Bagley\n*\nMiss Cydney Buisson\n1 Fawn Court\n232 San Carlos Way\nSan Anselmo\nNovato\nPaul R. Haerle\nJohn L. Molinari\n450 E. Strawberry Drive\n435 Magellan Avenue\nMill Valley\nSan Francisco\n*\nThomas C. Reed\nFrank J. Pagliaro\nPomeroy Road\n20 Vidal\nRoss\nSan Francisco\n7\nFrank P. Adams\nMs. Aura C. Edwards\n781 Highland Avenue\n6 Cricket Hill\nPiedmont\nLafayette\nMrs. Susan C. Schwab\nMiss Diane Williams\n110 Waldo Avenue\n1771 Highland Place, 205\nPiedmont\nBerkeley\n8\nHugh S. Koford\nHarlan S. Geldermann\n18976 Sandy Road\n19251 San Ramon Road\nCastro Valley\nSan Ramon\nMs. Laura A. Wirt\nMs. Patricia Marie Weakley\n16101 Selborne Drive\n575 Pershing Drive\nSan Leandro\nSan Leandro\n-3-\nCongressional District\nDelegate\nAlternate\n9\nR. Robert Blackman\n*\nHon. Clark L. Bradley\n641 South 11th Street\n156 Dana Avenue\nSan Jose\nSan Jose\nMs. Kathryn A. Coon\nS. Guy Puccio\n1640 Pajaro Court\n22237 Main Street\nFremont\nHayward\nRobert B. Suhr\n14675 Horseshoe Drive\nSaratoga\n10\nHalsey C. Burke\nMrs. Gail Urban Moore\n6863 Castlerock Drive\n670 Lola Lane\nSan Jose\nMountain View\nMs. Olivia Renee Delgado\nWilmot J. Nicholson\n1837 Curtner Avenue\n20091 Black Road\nSan Jose\nLos Gatos\n*\nMrs. Elsa Sandstrom\n1191 Buckingham Drive\nLos Altos\n11\nLester Blake Baldwin\nLouis P. Athas\n922 Blandford\n998 Flying Fish\nRedwood City\nFoster City\nRobert W. Naylor\nRobert R. Wood\n134 West 43rd Avenue\n1197 Trinity Drive\nSan Mateo\nMenlo park\n*\nClint Eastwood\n12\nPebble Beach\nMs. Elizabeth Leitcher\nTimothy John Morgan\n642 Monterey Street\n1046 Western Drive\nSan Luis Obispo\nSanta Cruz\nWilliam H. Temple\nMark A. Schimbor\n120 San Benancio Road\n954 Mesa Road\nSalinas\nMonterey\n13\nW. Arvid Johnson\nMrs. Helen J. Cackley\n125 East Victoria\n1764 Overlook Lane\nSanta Barbara\nSanta Barbara\nCyrus Johnson\nRandolph E. Siple\n1595 Kirk Avenue\n305 Mariposa Drive\nThousand Oaks\nVentura\n14\nMrs. Nita Ashcraft\nMiss Sue Jelonek\n962 Janet Lane\n2704 Glasgon Court\nLafayette\nRichmond\nMrs. Kay Valory\nWilliam P. Moses\n3812 Happy Valley Road\n5691 San Pablo Dam Road\nLafayette\nEl Sobrante\n15\nJ. Wilmar Jensen\nMs. Irenmarie Castillo\n1138 Purdue Avenue\n1158 West Elmwood\nModesto\nStockton\nHon. Robert T. Monagan\nFernando Moreno\n1317 El Portal\n2080 West Mendocino\nTracy\nStockton\n-4-\nCongressional District\nDelegate\nAlternate\n16\nDennes Coombs\nM. Michael Cardenas\n1685 West Wrenwood Lane\n1129 West Scott Avenue\nFresno\nFresno\nRobert E. Stewart\nHon. Ernest N. Mobley\n2166 Cedar Crest Drive\n907 North Oliver\nMerced\nSanger\n*\nMiss Theresa Speake\n32 West National\nClovis\n17\nBruce H. Hasenkamp\nMs. Imogene M. Hilbers\n24 Linaria Way\n1918 Middlefield Road\nMenlo Park\nPalo Alto\n*\nDavid Packard\nPaul Rood\n26580 Taaffe Road\n1038 Pine Nut Court\nLos Altos Hills\nSunnyvale\nFrank O. Verlot\n1540 Klamath Drive\nSunnyvale\n18\nRalph E. Rosedale\nMs. Roberta E. Chase\n10181 Avenue 416\nStar Route, Bootjack Road\nDinuba\nMariposa\nMrs. Elsie Marie Solberg\nMiss Donna Most\n125 South Park Drive\n2806 Tioga Avenue\nMadera\nOakdale\n23\nRobert F. Beaver\nGeorge E. Delahanty\n1235 Margarita Drive\n2500 Coronado Drive\nFullerton\nFullerton\nMs. Rosemary F. Ferraro\nHarry W. Lindsay\n9504 Gallatin Road\n9714 San Juan\nDowney\nSouthgate\n25\nMrs. Lois Ann Lundberg\nKenneth R. Manning\n1341 Carmela Lane\n14707 Mountain Spring\nLa Habra\nHacienda Heights\nMrs. Shirley C. Root\nMs. Meda Lorraine Sodoma\n1420 Latchford Street\n15563 Facilidad\nHacienda Heights\nHacienda Heights\n27\nMs. Blanche M. Gomez\nGordon P. Del Faro\n7062 Lurline Avenue\n23529 Dolorosa\nCanoga park\nWoodland Hills\nCharles R. McGrath\n*\nMs. Marian W. LaFollette\n5011 West Gonzales Road\n15745 Royal Oak Road\nOxnard\nEncino\nMs. Edith M. Lashley\n1811 Sunburst Street\nNorthridge\n32\nMrs. Elva W. De Lyre\nHon. George Deukmejian\n1100 E1 Mirador Avenue\n5366 East Braodway\nLong Beach\nLong Beach\nMrs. Elizabeth Sperline\nRobert R. Ruchti, II\n6660 Lime\n1120 Ramillo Avenue\nLong Beach\nLong Beach\n-5-\nCongressional District\nDelegate\nAlternate\n33\nHon. Houston I. Flournoy\nHon. William E. Coombs\n755 West 10th\n361 West Winchester, #1\nClaremont\nRialto\nWarren Reed Sprinkel\nMs. Elizabeth V. Luttrell\n880 Orchid Court\n919 N. University\nUplands\nRedlands\n34\nJohn R. Bathe\nDavid F. Ortiz\n1521 West 5th\n1914 South Parton\nSanta Ana\nSanta Ana\nMs. Jane H. Broughton\nMrs. Eileen E. Padberg\n5422 Anthony Avenue\n310 Country Club Lane\nGarden Grove\nSanta Ana\n36\nMrs. William H. Brock\nMrs. Lorraine T. Mazzie\n2917 Summit Circle\n5263 Kent Drive\nBakersfield\nBakersfield\nMs. Virginia Rice\nFrank Noreiga\n408 Porter\n115 Panorama Drive\nHanford\nBakersfield\n38\nWesley Gene Beverlin\nMs. Ethel M. Silver\n9568 Marion\n5841 Grand Avenue\nMontclair\nRiverside\nMiss Catherine M. Swajian\nMiss Joann Mary Tortarolo\n1747 7th Street, Apt. 10\n3681 Cranford, Apt. 17\nRiverside\nRiverside\n39\nMrs. Marjorie L. Fluor\nHon. Robert E. Badham\n1920 Heliotrope Drive\n1253 Rutland Road\nSanta Ana\nNewport Beach\nWilliam Teague\nHugh Mears Neighbour, III\n305 Esperanza Drive\n1227 W. Santa Clara\nNewport Beach\nSanta Ana\n40,41\nJames H. Ashcraft\nMs. Chris Ellen Bibb\n6712 Golfcrest Drive\n1278 Essex\nSan Diego\nSan Diego\nKim Fletcher\nRichard G. Capen, Jr.\n5646 Dolphin Place\n6104 Avenida Cresta\nSan Diego\nLa Jolla\nGordon C. Luce\nMrs. Ruth A. Green\n3558 Via Flores\n5415 Bonita Drive\nSan Diego\nSan Diego\n*\nMrs. Eleanor R. Ring\nJohn A. McColl\n801 Tolita Avenue\n5942 Henley\nCoronado\nSan Diego\nHon. Jack Schrade\n*\nWilliam Stephens, Jr.\n2172 Plum Street\n3635 Dupont\nSan Diego\nSan Diego\n42\nAdmiral Leslie E. Gehres\nMs. Marcia Mae Bents\n8001 Vista Drive\n810 West Bag Avenue\nLa Mesa\nBalboa\nEdward Mills\nMrs. Ruth Flores Harper\n3526 Riviera Drive\nSolana Beach\nLaguna Beach\n*\nHon. John Stull\n*\nRodney J. Sherman\n460 Parkwood Lane\n18672 Via Torino\nLeucadia\nIrvine\n-6-\nCongressional District\nDelegate\nAlternate\n43\nAlfred A. McCandless\nMrs. Mary Lou Carpenter\n74-111 Mockingbird Trail\n9303 Avenida Mira Villa\nIndian Wells\nBeaumont\nEdgar L. McCounbrey\nDarwin D. Cohee\n1195 Manzanita Avenue\n663 South Rio Vista\nPalm Springs\nBrawley\n*\nMrs. Ivy Baker Priest\n472 Santa Elena Road\nPalm Springs\n*\nHon. Victor V. Veysey\n5203 Highway 111\nBrawley\n12 districts ( all\nCharles G. Bakaly, Jr.\n*\nClifford R. Anderson, Jr.\nwithin Los Angeles\n521 Michigan Blvd.\n2046 Oak Knoll\ncounty)\nPasadena\nSan Marino\nWilliam S. Banowsky, M.D.\nMichael D. Antonovich\n7851 South Budlong Avenue\n3415 Lowry Road\nLos Angeles\nLos Angeles\nDonald L. Bren\nHon. Robert G. Beverly\n349 North Faring Road\n2700 Highland Avenue\nLos Angeles\nLos Angeles\nMrs. Margaret M. Brock\nMrs. Virginia B. Braun\n2220 Avenue of the Stars,\n1585 Orlando Road\nApt. 1404\nPasadena\nLos Angeles\nHon. Charles J. Conrad\nVernon E. Brown\n13444 Moorpark Street\n4223 Don Diablo Drive\nSherman Oaks\nLos Angeles\nTirso Del Junco, M.D.\nC. Timothy Corliss\n1570 San Pasqual\n1607 Carlyle\nPasadena\nSanta Monica\nMrs. Lovelia J. Flournoy\nJames R. Dunn\n4155 Mt. Vernon Drive\n6300 Green Valley Cricle,\nLos Angeles\nApt. #316\nCulver City\nMark T. Gates, Jr.\nGeorge H. Ellis\n340 North Cliffwood\n219 North Norton Avenue\nLos Angeles\nLos Angeles\nMiss Linda Gosden\nJosh M. Fredricks\n720 North Alpine Drive\n1011 Tenth\nBeverly Hills\nHermosa Beach\nRiachrd E. Gulbranson\n*\nDirk A. ten Grotenhuis\n10071 Valley Spring Lane\n1325 Milan Avenue\nNorth Hollywood\nSouth Pasadena\nHon. John L. Harmer\nMrs. Jackie Nugent Harker\n401 N. Brand Blvd.\n4500 Densmore Avenue\nGlendale\nLos Angeles\nRoderick M. Hills\n*\nH. Thomas Hayden\n2601 Aberdeen\n15015 Parthenia, #46\nLos Angeles\nSepulveda\nNorman A. Hodges\nRobert Hillman\n628 Corlett\n701 El Medico Avenue\nCompton\nPacific Palisades\n-7-\nCongressional District\nDelegate\nAlternate\n12 districts (all\nDavid L. James\nThomas E. Inch\nwithin Los Angeles\n1075 Pine Oak Lane\n12839 Marlboro\ncounty)\nPasadena\nLos Angeles\nP. Louis Johnson\nMrs. Verna D. Mattox\n13120 Spinning\n22647-B Nadine Circle\nGardena\nTorrance\nPeter F. McAndrews\nWilliam M. C. Miller\n12642 Moorpark\n3575 Rambla Pacifico\nStudio City\nMalibu\nDaniel Stephen McHargue II\nMrs. Alice N. Ogle\n14231 Gain\n720 South Bel Aire Drive\nLos Angeles\nBurbank\n*\nRonald R. Reagan\nJ. Neil Reagan\n1669 San Onofre Drive\n1132 Chantilly Road\nPacific Palisades\nLos Angeles\nHenry Salvatori\nMs. Margaret P. Scott\n457 Bel Air Road\n850 Franklin\nLos Angeles\nSanta Monica\nHon. H. Allen Smith\nMrs. Julie Sommars (Erwin)\n1245 Imperial Drive\n16910 Magnolia Blvd.\nGlendale\nEncino\nWilliam French Smith\nJames T. Straw\n1256 Oak Grove Avenue\n3623 Ballina Canyon\nSan Marino\nEncino\nMs. Oma S. Umhey\nJohn A. Sturgeon\n2639 N. Commonwealth Ave.\n20 Chandler Place\nLos Angeles\nSan Marino\nRafael E. Vega\n*\nWaller Taylor, II\n4055 Stansbury Avenue\n2605 Century Towers West\nSherman Oaks\n2220 Avenue of the Stars\nLos Angeles\nchas. C. Reed\nRobert H. Volk\nPatrick D. Tobin\nQxford\nRd.\n13 Eastfield Drive\n3513 West 85th Street\nSan Marino\nRolling Hills\nInglewood\n*\nHon. Evelle J. Younger\nMrs. Joyce R. Valdez\n2461 Chislehurst Drive\n1001 South Valencia Street\nLos Angeles\nAlhambra\nRiachrd D. Zanuck\nMrs. Wallis Weingarten\n546 Ocean Front\n702 North Alpine Drive\nSanta Monica\nBeverly Hills\nJames M. Woods, Sr.\n613 North Tajauta\nCompton\nMrs. Toshiko Yamamoto\n253 South Gerhart Avenue\nLos Angeles\n*\nAt large\n-8-\nand\nalternate\npledged\nto\nthe re-election of President Richard M. Nixon\nDelegates\nAlternates\nWomen\n30%\n41%\nYouth (under 30)\n14\n22\nMinorities\n9\n13\nA=ALT DIST - BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES\n4 PRES. PRES.VALLEJO F.W./AGE 26\n5 RR HO WORK/AGE 28\n.DVOLUNTEER NORKER\nL.A. TEACHER/WIFE OF JAMES F.\n\" GREEN POWER PRESIDENT\nBANKER =\n11 INSUR. INSUR./COLUMNIST/ACE 28\n\" WATTS INDUSTRIES\nL.A.BARBER\n10 VOLUNTEER WORKER\n15 ATTORNEY/AGE 27\n15 PRES STOCKTON SCH BD\n16 RR MEX-AMER. CHMN.\n16 LEGAL SECRETARY/AGE 31\n27 CHMN. L.A. HOUSING BD\n34 BANKER & BONDSMAN\n42 VOLUNTEER WORKER\nL.A D. /RSCCC OFFICER\nRESTAURANT OWNER\nW\nin\nMINORITIES\nSTATUS\nD=DEL COMG\nD\nA\nA\nR\nD\nA\nH\na\nA\nH\nHODGES/NORNAN TI\n: PRI 0 (Oriental)\n(Spanish surname)\n0\nH\nH\na\n0\n8\nH\nA\na\nPR: B (Black)\n++++\nNAME\nCEASAR/LOR1A\nGREEN/JACKIE\nGREEN/RUTH\nJOHNSON/LOUIS\nBRONN/VERNON\nWIC/SCOOM\nJEONG/STEVE\nYANAMOTO/T.\nField a 00\nDELGADO/OLIVI\nCASTILLO/IREN A\nMORENO/FERN'O\nCARDENAS/MIKE\nSPEAKE/THER'A\nGOMEZ/BLANCHE\nORTIZ/DAVID\nHRPR/RTH FLRS\nDEL JUNCO/T.\nVEGA/RAY\n#\n*\nA=ALT DIST BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES\n2 CHICO STATE STDT. /AGE STDT./AGE 21\n88 308/WWHO as 01363 E\n4 PRES. VALLEJO F. F.W./AGE 26\n4 UC DAVIS inst) AGE 21\n82 308/>6011 OH as S\nS 50\n7 WHITE HSE INTERN/AGE 24\nB ALAMEDA CTY YR'S/AGE 23\n83 356/31613 3800 NBS 6\n11 STANFORD STUDENT/AGE 20\n11 STANFORD/SF ATTY/AGE 28\n12 UCS.CR. /DAVIS UCS.CR./DAVIS LAW/AGE 24\n12 UCB/STANFORD/ATTY/AGE 26\n13 MACGILLIVRAY CHMN/AGE 28\n14 STUDENT/UC BERIC/AGE 21\n15 ATTORNEY/AGE 27\n17 PRINCETON/AGE 18\n18 UOP FRESHMAN FIGE 19\n25 CAL POLY/CCR UP/AGE 19\n34 BROKER/AGE 27\n34 PUBLIC REL'NS/AGE 28\n38 SAM MT.SAM COL. ANT.COL./AGE PAGE 19\n38 UCLA LAW STUDENT/AGE 21\n38 HIGH SCH. SCH.TEACHER/AGE 84\n39 SNA HI SB PRES/AGE 18\n42 OAK. RAIDERS/USC/AGE 26\nASSEMBLY CAND. PAGE 281\n.D.UCSD UCSD LAW STUDENT/AGE 22\nL.A. ANUCLA STUDENT/AGE 19\nad\nREPPERDINE INSTR./AGE 26\nINSUR. <COLUMNIST/AGE 28\nad USD =\nOCLA STUDENT/AGE 21\n=\n=\n=\nYOUTH\nSTATUS\nD=DEL CONG\nD\nH\n=\nA\nis\nb\nH\nA\nD\nD\nD\nH\nA\nD.\nb\nH\nA\nA\n3\nTI\n19\na\n=\nH\nH\na\nD\nH\nD\na.\nP.\nB\nH\nH\nMAME\nTECHEIRR/AUG\nBOWLIM/TOM\nDEASAR/LORNA\n2MAN/HEID]\nGREEN/JACKIE\nBUISSON/CYD\nWILLIAMS/DIAN\nWERKLEY\nBLACKMAN/ROBT\nBALBWIN/BLAKE\nMAYLOR/R.W.\nMORGAN/TIM\nSCHIMBOR/MARK\nJOHNSON/ARVID\nJELONEK/SUE\nCASTILLO/IREM\nROOD/PAUL\nMOST/DONNA\nMANHING/KEN\nTHE/JOHN R\nBEVERLIN/WES\nSWPLIIAN/CATHY\nTORTAROLO/JO\nSHERMANZ'ROD\nASHCRAFT/JIM\nBIBB/CHRIS\nGOSDEN/LINDA\nMCANDRENS/P.\nMCHARCUE/STE\nBRONN/UERNON\nFREDERICKS/JM\nPAGE 1\nDATE: 2/17 11:38\nDATA BASE: DACN\nREPORT FORM: DELEGATION\nSTATUS\nD=DEL\n#8\nA=ALT NAME\nBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES\nSEX RACE\n* DIST: 1\nD\nBOYNTON/M.C. CONG'L DIST CHMN\nF W\nD\nVEALE/RHODES RR COUNTY CHMN\nM W\nA\nCLAUSEN/DON\nMEMBER OF CONGRESS\nM W\nA\nRUSS/JOE\nRANCHER/RR REGIONAL CHMN M\nW\n* DIST: 2\nD\nMARLER/FRED\nSENATE MINORITY LDR\nM W\nD\nTECHEIRA/AUG CHICO STATE STDT./AGE 21 M\nW\nA\nCHAPPIE/GENE ASSEMBLYMAN\nM W\nA\nDRYDEN/JEANNE COUNTY CENT.CTTE.CHMN\nF W\n* DIST: 3\nD\nDIEPENBROCK/J ATTORNEY\nM W\nD\nREINECKE/ED LT. GOVERNOR\nM W\nA\nBOWLIN/TOM\nSACTO YR CHMN/AGE 28\nM W\nA\nBREKKE/LOLA RR HQ CHMN 1970\nF W\n* DIST: 4\nD\nCEASAR/LOR'A\nPRES. VALLEJO F.W./AGE 26 F\nB\nD\nJOHNSTON/JNT\nBUSINESSWOMAN/AGE 32\nF\nW\nX\nA\nEHRMAN/HEIDI\nUC DAVIS - AGE 21\nF W\nA\nHARRINGTON/R. SEVERAL RR CAMPAIGNS\nM W\n* DIST: 5\nD\nJEONG/STEVE REALTOR\nM\n0\nD\nLIVERMORE/PUT CHAIRMAN RSCCC\nM W\nA\nCHAN/AGNES I\nTEACHER\nF 0\nA\nGREEN/JACKIE RR HQ WORK/AGE 28\nF\nB\n* DIST: 6\nD\nBAGLEY/WM.\nASSEMBLYMAN\nM\nW\nD\nHAERLE/PAUL\nRSCCC SEC/RR N. CA. CH'70\nM\nW\nD\nREED/THOMAS\nRR CHMN 70/R. NATL CTTE\nM\nW\nA\nBUISSON/CYD\nMED. STUDENT/AGE 22\nF\nW\nA\nMOLINARI/JOHN COUNTY SUPERVISOR\nM W\nA\nPAGLIARO/FJ\nASS'T DA/ASSY CAND/ 31\nM\nW\n* DIST: 7\nD\nADAMS/FRANK TREAS. RSCCC - ATTY\nM W\nD\nSCHWAB/SUE\nNO CALIF RR V. CHMN 70\nF W\nA\nEDWARDS/AURA NO. DIV'N. CHMN. CFRW\nF W\nPAGE 2 2/17\nSTATUS\nD=DEL\nA=ALT NAME\nBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES\nSEX RACE\nA\nWILLIAMS/DIAN WHITE HSE INTERN/AGE 24 F W\n* DIST: 8\nD\nKOFORD/HUGH 1971 CRA PRESIDENT\nM W\nD\nWIRT/LAURA CTY CTTE PRECINCT CHMN F\nW\nA\nGELDERMANN/H. REALTOR\nM W\nA\nWEAKLEY/PAT ALAMEDA CTY YR'S/AGE 23 F\nW\n* DIST: 9\nD\nBLACKMAN/ROBT SAN JOSE STATE/AGE 23\nM W\nD\nCOON/KATHY\nLOCAL PRECINCT CHMN\nF W\nA\nBRADLEY/CLARK STATE SENATOR\nM W\nA\nPUCCIO/S.GUY HAYWARD RR CH/REALTOR\nM W\nA\nSUHR/ROBERT 1968 NIXON CHMN\nM W\n* DIST: 10\nD\nBURKE/HALSEY MFG BUSINESS/RR CHMN 70 M\nW\nD\nDELGADO/OLIVI VOLUNTEER WORKER\nF S\nD\nSANDSTROM/E.\nIMMED. PAST PRES.CFRW\nF W\nA\nMOORE/GAIL\nPRES.MNTN.VIEW SCH.BD.\nF W\nA\nNICHOLSON/WM FORMER MAYOR-SANTA CLARA M\nW\n* DIST: 11\nD\nBALDWIN/BLAKE STANFORD STUDENT/AGE 20 M W\nD\nNAYLOR/R.W. STANFORD/SF ATTY/AGE 28 M W\nA\nATHAS/LOUIS P TITLE INSURANCE EXEC.\nM W\nA\nWOOD/ROBERT COUNTY CENT.CTTE.CHMN. M W\n* DIST: 12\nD\nEASTWOOD/CLNT ENTERTAINER\nM W\nD\nLEITCHER/BETT RR COUNTY CHAIRMAN\nF W\nD\nTEMPLE/W.H.\nCOUNTY CENT.CTTE.CHMN\nM W\nA\nMORGAN/TIM\nUCS.CR./DAVIS LAW/AGE 24 M\nW\nA\nSCHIMBOR/MARK UCB/STANFORD/ATTY/AGE 26 M\nW\n* DIST: 13\nD\nJOHNSON/ARVID MACGILLIVRAY CHMN/AGE 28 M\nW\nD\nJOHNSON/CY\nINSURANCE/RSCCC PCT. CHMN M\nW\nA\nCACKLEY/HELEN PRES.S.BARB.FED.WOMEN\nF W\nA\nSIPLE/RANDY ASSY CAND/COUNTY CHMN\nM W\n* DIST: 14\nD\nASHCRAFT/NITA V. CHMN RSCCC\nF W\nD\nVALORY/KAY RR VICE CHMN 1966\nF W\nA\nJELONEK/SUE STUDENT/UC BERK/AGE 21\nF\nW\nPAGE 3 2/17\nSTATUS\nD=DEL\nA=ALT NAME\nBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES\nSEX RACE\nA\nMOSES/WM.P. # COUNTY CENT.CTTE.CHMN. M W\n* DIST: 15\nD\nJENSEN/WILMAR RR COUNTY CHMN '70\nM\nW\nD\nMONAGAN/ROBT. ASS'Y MINORITY LDR\nM W\nA\nCASTILLO/IREN ATTORNEY/AGE 27\nF S\nA\nMORENO/FERN'O PRES STOCKTON SCH BD\nM S\n* DIST: 16\nD\nCOOMBS/DENNIS RR COUNTY CHMN '70\nM W\nD\nSTEWART/ROBT WAS RR COUNTY CHMN '70\nM\nW\nA\nCARDENAS/MIKE RR MEX-AMER.CHMN.\nM S\nA\nMOBLEY/ERNIE ASSEMBLYMAN\nM W\nA\nSPEAKE/THER'A LEGAL SECRETARY/AGE 31\nF\nS\n* DIST: 17\nD\nHASENKAMP/BR STANFORD ADMIN/CRL PRES M W\nD\nPACKARD/DAVID FORMER DEPUTY SEC. DEF. M\nW\nD\nVERLOT/FRANK COUNTY CENT.CTTE.CHMN. M\nW\nA\nHILBERS/IMOG. PALO ALTO FED. WOMEN\nF W\nA\nROOD/PAUL\nPRINCETON/AGE 18\nM W\n* DIST: 18\nD\nROSEDALE/R. CHMN/COUNTY CHMN'S ASSOC M\nW\nD\nSOLBERG/MARIE MADERA CNTY CHMN\nF W\nA\nCHASE/ROBERTA 70 RR CH/66 L.A. REG DIR F\nW\nA\nMOST/DONNA\nUOP FRESHMAN - AGE 19\nF\nW\n* DIST: 23\nD\nBEAVER/ROBT RSCCC FINANCE CHMN\nM W\nD\nFERRARO/ROSE VOLUNTEER WORKER\nF W\nA\nDELAHANTY/GEO BANKER\nM W\nA\nLINDSAY/HARRY CLAWSON CAMP'N TREAS.\nM W\n* DIST: 25\nD\nLUNDBERG/LOIS PRECINCT CHMN.\nF W\nD\nROOT/SHIRLEY 50TH AD WOMAN OF YR\nF W\nA\nMANNING/KEN CAL POLY/CCR VP/AGE 19\nM\nW\nA\nSODOMA/LOR. FED. WOMEN\nF W\n* DIST: 27\nD\nGOMEZ/BLANCHE CHMN. L.A. HOUSING BD\nF S\nD\nMCGRATH/CHAS ATTY/RR CTY CHMN '70\nM W\nA\nDEL FARO/G. BUSINESSMAN\nM W\nA\nLAFOLLETTE/M PRES.L.A.COMM'Y COLL.BD. F\nW\nPAGE 4 2/17\nSTATUS\nD=DEL\nA=ALT NAME\nBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES\nSEX RACE\nA\nLASHLEY/EDITH VOLUNTEER WORKER\nF W\n* DIST: 32\nD\nDE LYRE/ELVA\nPRES LNG BCH CFRW\nF\nW\nD\nSPERLINE/LIZ\nSTATE YOUNG REP'N PRES.\nF W\nA\nDEUKMEJIAN/G\nSTATE SENATOR\nM W\nA\nRUCHTI/ROBT.\nMEAT PACKER/RR CAMP'N\nM W\n* DIST: 33\nD\nFLOURNOY/H.I. STATE CONTROLLER\nM W\nD\nSPRINKEL/REED CONTRACTOR/RR CAMP'NS.\nM W\nA\nCOOMBS/WM.\nSTATE SENATOR\nM W\nA\nLUTTRELL/BETT FORMER TEACHER/CFRW\nF W\n* DIST: 34\nD\nBATHE/JOHN R BROKER/AGE 27\nM W\nD\nBROUGHTON/JAN VOLUNTEER WORKER\nF W\nA\nORTIZ/DAVID BANKER & BONDSMAN\nM S\nA\nPADBERG/EIL'N PUBLIC REL'NS/AGE 28\nF W\n* DIST: 36\nD\nBROCK/VIRG.\nRSCCC WOM VICE CHMN\nF W\nD\nRICE/VIRGINIA COUNTY CENT.CTTE.CHMN\nF W\nA\nMAZZIE/LOR.\nCHMN. VARIOUS CAMP'NS\nF W\nA\nNOREIGA/FRANK BASQUE/RET'D JUDGE\nM W\n* DIST: 38\nD\nBEVERLIN/WES MT. SAN ANT.COL./AGE 19\nM\nW\nD\nSWAJIAN/CATHY\nUCLA LAW STUDENT/AGE 21\nF\nW\nA\nSILVER/ETHEL\nCOUNTY CENT. CTTE.\nF\nW\nA\nTORTAROLO/JO HIGH SCH.TEACHER/AGE 24 F\nW\n* DIST: 39\nD\nFLUOR/MARGE\nVOLUNTEER WORKER\nF W\nD\nTEAGUE/WM.\nBUSINESSMAN/CONG.CAND.\nM W\nA\nBADHAM/ROBT\nASSEMBLYMAN\nM W\nA\nNEIGHB'R/HUGH\nSNA HI SB PRES/AGE18\nM W\n* DIST: 42\nD\nGEHRES/L.E.\nCOUNTY CENT.CTTE.CHMN\nM\nW\nD\nMILLS/ED\nRR SO CAL $ CHMN '70\nM W\nD\nSTULL/JOHN\nREP. CAUCAS CHMN. ASSY\nM\nW\nA\nBENTS/MARCIA COUNTY C.C. FINANCE CHMN\nF\nW\nA\nHRPR/RTH FLRS VOLUNTEER WORKER\nF S\nA\nSHERMAN/ROD\nOAK. RAIDERS/USC/AGE 26\nM\nW\nPAGE 5 2/17\nSTATUS\nD=DEL\nA=ALT NAME\nBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES\nSEX RACE\n* DIST: 43\n#\nD\nMCCANDLESS/A COUNTY SUPERVISOR\nM\nW\nD\nMCCOUBREY/ED AUTO DEALER\nM\nW\nD\nPRIEST/IVY B. STATE TREASURER\nF\nW\nD\nVEYSEY/VIC\nMEMBER OF CONGRESS\nM\nW\nA\nCARPENTER/ML VICE PRES - CFRW\nF\nW\nA\nCOHEE/DARWIN COUNTY CENT.CTTE.CHMN.\nM\nW\n* DIST: 98. (40th.&.41st.D's in,San Diego)\nD\nASHCRAFT/JIM ASSEMBLY CAND./AGE 28\nM\nW\nD\nFLETCHER/KIM FINANCE\nM\nW\nD\nLUCE/GORDON VICE CHMN RSCCC\nM\nW\nD\nRING/ELEANOR R.N.COMMITTEEWOMAN\nF\nW\nD\nSCHRADE/JACK STATE SENATOR\nM\nW\nA\nBIBB/CHRIS\nUCSD LAW STUDENT/AGE 22\nF\nW\nA\nCAPEN/RICHARD COPLEY PRESS\nM\nW\nA\nGREEN/RUTH\nVOLUNTEER WORKER\nF\nB\nA\nMCCOLL/JOHN BROKER\nM\nW\nA\nSTEPHENS/WM.\nBANK TRUST OFCR/RR CHMN\nM\nW\n* DIST: 99\n(12 CD's entirely within L.A. county)\nD\nBAKALY/CHAS.\nATT'Y/EV YOUNGER CHMN.\nM\nW\nD\nBANOWSKY/WM\nPEPPERDINE UNIV. PRES.\nM\nW\nD\nBREN/DONALD CONTRACTOR\nM\nW\nD\nBROCK/MARG. FINANCE\nF\nW\nD\nCONRAD/CHAS. ASSEMBLYMAN\nM\nW\nD\nDEL JUNCO/T.\nM.D./RSCCC OFFICER\nM\nS\nD\nFLOUR'Y/LOV'A\nTEACHER/WIFE OF JAMES F.\nF\nB\nD\nGATES/MARK\n70 L.A. CNTY RR CHMN\nM\nW\nD\nGOSDEN/LINDA\nUCLA STUDENT/AGE 19\nF\nW\nD\nGULBRANSON/R.\nCOUNTY CENT.CTTE.CHMN\nM\nW\nD\nHARMER/JOHN\nSENATE REPUB CAUCAS CHMN M\nW\nD\nHILLS/RODERIC\nATTY/LA H. FLOURNOY CHMN\nM\nW\nD\nHODGES/NORMAN GREEN POWER PRESIDENT\nM\nB\nD\nJAMES/DAVID\nACCOUNTANT/RR S. CAL CHMN M\nW\nD\nJOHNSON/LOUIS BANKER\nM\nB\nD\nMCANDREWS/P. ATTORNEY/AGE 27\nM\nW\nD\nMCHARGUE/STE\nPEPPERDINE INSTR./AGE 26\nM\nW\nD\nREAGAN/RONALD GOVERNOR\nM\nW\nD\nSALVATORI/H. GEOPHYSICS\nM\nW\nD\nSMITH/H.ALLEN MEMBER OF CONGRESS\nM\nW\nD\nSMITH/W.F.\nATT'Y\nM W\nD\nUMHEY/OMA\nSTATE PRESIDENT CFRW\nF\nW\nD\nVEGA/RAY\nRESTAURANT OWNER\nM\nS\nD\nVOLK/ROBT.\nBANKER/CIT. FOR NIXON\nM\nW REED/Chas.\nD\nYOUNGER/EV.\nCALIF. STATE ATTY GEN\nM\nW VP, mktna. mgr.\nD\nZANUCK/RICH'D\nENTERTAINMENT\nM\nW\nGreat Western\nA\nANDERSON/C.\nATTY/CAL PLAN CHMN 70\nM\nW\nFinance Corp.\nA\nANTONOVICH/M. H.S.TCHR/L.A.SCH.BD.\nM W\nPAGE 6 2/17\nSTATUS\nD=DEL\nA=ALT NAME\nBIOGRAPHICAL NOTES\nSEX RACE\nA\nBEVERLY/BOB\nASSEMBLYMAN\nM W\nA\nBRAUN/VIRGINI\nVOLUNTEER WORKER/FINANCE\nF\nW\nA\nBROWN/VERNON\nINSUR./COLUMNIST/AGE 28\nM\nB\nA\nCORLISS/TIM\nREALTOR/RR CHMN '70\nM W\nA\nDUNN/JAMES\nATTORNEY/AGE 35\nM W\nA\nELLIS/GEORGE\nATTY/ASS'Y CAND/AGE 32\nM\nW\nA\nFREDERICKS/JM\nUSC STUDENT/AGE 22\nM W\nA\nGROTENHUIS/DT\nTITLE INSURANCE EXEC.\nM W\nA\nHARKER/JACKIE\nVOL.WORKER/RR CHMN '70\nF\nW\nA\nHAYDEN/TOM\nRSCCC YOUTH CHMN/AGE 30\nM\nW\nA\nHILLMAN/ROBT.\nCONTRACTOR/RR CAMP'N\nM\nW\nA\nINCH/TERRY\nFURNITURE/RR CAMP'N\nM\nW\nA\nMATTOX/VIRNA\nSECRETARY-L.A. CTY CTTE\nF\nW\nA\nMILLER/WM.\nLOCKHEED/RR CAMP'N\nM W\nA\nOGLE/ALICE\nPRECINCT CHMN/RR CAMP'N\nF\nW\nA\nREAGAN/NEIL\nADVERTISING\nM W\nA\nSCOTT/MARG'T\nL.A.PRES.FED.REP.WOMEN\nF\nW\nA\nSOMMARS/JULIE\nENTERTAINER\nF\nW\nA\nSTRAW/JAMES\nUCLA STUDENT/AGE 21\nM W\nA\nSTURGEON/JOHN\nATTY/R.A.SPKRS BUREAU\nM W\nA\nTAYLOR/WALLER ATTY/RMN L.A. CHMN '68\nM\nW\nA\nTOBIN/PAT\nINGLEWOOD CITY CNCL/39\nM\nW\nA\nVALDEZ/JOYCE VOLUNTEER WORKER\nF\nW\nA\nWEINGARTEN/WA TRUSTEE/U.S.C.\nF W\nA\nWOODS/JIM\nWATTS INDUSTRIES\nM B\nA\nYAMAMOTO/T. BARBER\nF 0\nNOTE: \"CFRW\",or\"F.W.\".stands for.Calif..Fed'n\nof Republican.Women..\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERN\nRELEASE:\nmediate\nSacramento, California\nContact: Paul Beck\n445-4571\n2-17-72\n#101\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today released the following text of a\nletter to President Nixon:\n\"The news reports of your meeting on Monday with several\nCongressmen regarding mandatory bussing were very encouraging.\nAttempting to achieve racial balance in our schools by such compulsory\nbussing has proven to be counterproductive and has distressed the vast\nmajority of our citizens who strongly oppose racial discrimination.\n\"I am opposed vigorously to compulsory bussing. It shatters the\nvery concept of the neighborhood school which is the cornerstone of\nour education system. Even the controversy on this issue already has\ncaused a great waste of time and public money which could seriously\nhamper the quality of education our children need and deserve. I\ncommend you for taking action on this issue and am eagerly awaiting\nthe results of your Cabinet Committee recommendations.\n\"If there is anything that I or my administration can do to\nassist in solving this problem, please be assured of our total and\nenthusiastic cooperation.\n\"Sincerely,\n\"Ronald Reagan\n\"Governor\"\n# # #\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERI\n1\nMEMO TO THE 1 ESS\nSacramento, California\nContact: Paul Beck\n445-4571\n2-18-72\n#102\nGOVERNOR'S SCHEDULE\nFebruary 21, 1972\nthrough\nFebruary 27, 1972\nMonday, February 21\nEvening\nFundraiser for Senator Carl Curtis,\nLincoln, Nebraska\nOvernight - Lincoln\nTuesday, February 22\nDepart for Des Moines, Iowa\nEvening\nFundraiser for Republican State Central\nCommittee of Iowa, Des Moines\nOvernight - Washington, D.C.\nWednesday, February 23 -\nThursday, February 24 National Governors' Conference\nOvernight - Washington, D.C.\nFriday, February 25\nReturn to Los Angeles\nOvernight - Los Angeles\nSaturday, February 26\nNo appointments scheduled\nOvernight - Los Angeles\nSunday, February 27\nNo appointments scheduled\nOvernight - Sacramento\n# # #\nPB\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nMEMO TO THE 1 ESS\nSacramento, California\nContact: Paul Beck\n445-4571\n2-18-72\n#103\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today announced that he has signed the\nfollowing bills:\nAB 3 - Dent\nSpecifies that State School Building Aid and\n(Chapter 6)\nEarthquake Reconstruction and Replacement Bond\nLaw of 1972 shall appear as Proposition No. 2 when\nsubmitted to the voters at the June primary.\nAB 43 - Mobley\nReenacts provisions enacted at the 1971 legisla-\n(Chapter 3)\ntive session relating to the valuation of certain\ndistilled spirits for property tax purposes in\norder that such provisions will be operative on\nthe 1972 lien date.\nAB 59 - Wood\nReenacts provisions enacted at the 1971 legisla-\n(Chapter 4)\ntive session exempting pets from property taxation\nin order that such provisions may be operative on\nthe 1972 lien date.\nAB 63 - Z'berg\nExtends from January 1, 1972, to February 29, 1972,\n(Chapter 5)\nthe time for filing a statement and map or plat of\na newly created tax zone in a county service area,\nto enable a board of supervisors to levy taxes in\nthe zone for the 1972-73 fiscal year.\nSB 28 - Walsh\nRepeals and reenacts provisions enacted at the\n(Chapter 2)\n1971 regular session providing for the manner in\nwhich special construction equipment and special\nmobile equipment shall be subject to the property\ntax or the vehicle in-lieu tax in order that such\nprovisions may be operative on the lien date in\n1972.\n# # #\nPB\nOFFICE OF THE GOVER\nR\nRELEASE: munediate\nSacramento, California\nContact: Paul Beck\n445-4571\n2-18-72\n#104\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today issued the following statement on the\nCalifornia Supreme Court decision involving capital punishment:\n\"This decision makes a mockery of the constitutional process\ninvolved in establishing the laws of California. If it goes\nunchallenged, the judicial philosophy inherent in this ruling could\nbe an almost lethal blow to society's right to protect law-abiding\nand their families\ncitizens/against violence and crime.\n\"It reinforces the widespread concern of our people that some\nmembers of the judiciary inject their own philosophy into their\ndecisions rather than carrying out their constitutional duty to\ninterpret and enforce the law.\n\"I am deeply shocked and disappointed that a matter of such\ncritical importance to society has been decided on a one-word\ntechnicality.\n\"As one who has personally agonized over this issue, I understand\nand appreciate the humanitarian instincts of those who oppose capital\npunishment.\n\"Yet I find it most ironic that those who benefit from this\ndecision--convicted murderers and assassins--do not share any respect\nfor the sanctity of human life. Nor did they display--in the violent\nacts that caused their convictions--the slightest degree of humanitarian\nconcern or mercy for their victims.\ndeeply\n\"As an elected official/concerned about lawlessness, I can only\nview the court's decision as one more step toward totally disarming\nviolence and\nsociety in its fight against/crime.\n\"The legislature of California has had the issue of capital\npunishment before it 25 times since 1933 and each time the elected\nrepresentatives of the people refused to abolish the death penalty.\n\"An overwhelming majority of our people believe that the death\npenalty is a deterrent to crime and no body of evidence has proved them\nto be wrong.\n\"If capital punishment is to be prohibited--even for the most\noutrageous crimes--the people themselves should make that decision.\n\"In their action today, the court has placed itself above the\nwill of the people.\n-1--\n#104\n\"Because of my concern about the impact of this decision on\nsociety's ability to protect the law-abiding, I am asking the Attorney\nGeneral to petition the State Supreme Court immediately for a rehearing\non this matter. If the court refuses to grant this request and refuses\nto reconsider this issue, the people should express their opinion\nthrough a constitutional amendment.\n\"I cannot believe the framers of the State Constitution, or the\npeople who gave them that responsibility, intended to protect a murderer\nfrom the consequences of his crime.\n\"This decision may save 107 criminals who have been tried and\nconvicted after due process of law. But how many innocent lives will\nit cost?\"\n# # #\nEJG\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNO\nRELEASE: I,....ediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-23-72\n#105\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today announced the largest 10 month drop\nin California's welfare rolls in 30 years.\nHe said in January there were 182,600 fewer Californians on welfare\nthan there were last March.\nGovernor Reagan made the announcement at a news conference in\nWashington, D.C., where he is attending the National Governors' Conference\nCiting the huge decline as \"dramatic proof\" that his bold reform\nprogram \"has brought welfare back under control in California,' Governor\nReagan also announced that last month, for the first time in nearly a\nquarter of a century (since 1948), the state's January caseload fell\nbelow the December level. The one-month decline totaled 8,300 persons\nand brought the state's overall welfare caseload down to 2,110,926 in\nJanuary.\n\"These figures represent a tremendous accomplishment for California,\nespecially when one realizes that our welfare rolls were increasing at\nthe staggering rate of some 40,000 a month until our welfare reforms took\nhold last March,\" the governor said.\nSince then, the number of Californians on welfare has declined\nsteadily.\n/Governor\n\"Had welfare gone unreformed in California, Reagan said, \"State\nSocial Welfare Department projections show there would now be 538,000 more\npersons on our welfare rolls than there actually are. The cost of the\nincrease in caseload would have amounted to an additional $148 million\n(federal, state and local) burden on the taxpayers. During January alone,\nCalifornia taxpayers would have had to pay $29.6 million more than they\nactually did, had there been no reform.\nHe noted that between December and January the total cost of welfare\nin California went down by $2,259,130 from $162,368,287 in December to\n$160,109,157 in January.\nGovernor Reagan took issue \"with some in and out of the federal\nwelfare bureaucracy who seem determined to try to rationalize away the\nunprecedented success and proven effectiveness of our welfare reform\nprogram.\n\"They would have us believe that the decline in California's welfare\nrolls is the result of declining unemployment, not reform.\n- 1 -\n#105\n\"Yet, California's welfare caseload dropped steadily for six straight\nmonths before the first significant drop in the unemployment rate occurred\n\"In fact, during six of the past 10 years when the unemployment\nrate was low, California's welfare rolls were steadily increasing. That\nis, up until our welfare reforms were implemented.\n\"Still, the welfare bureaucrats in Washington persist in fomenting\nthe myth that the unemployment rate in California is the primary reason\nfor our unprecedented caseload decline.\n\"It is these same federal officials who insist that welfare fraud\nextends to only about one percent of all recipient cases. But, a blue-\nribbon task force found that in California fraud reached at least 14\npercent of all welfare cases.\n\"And, only last week, figures provided by five county welfare\ndepartments in California showed that 43 percent of those welfare\nrecipients whose outside earnings were checked against what the same\nrecipients had reported them to be---had not reported substantial amounts\nof outside income. Many appear to be ineligible for welfare. Some are\nbeing prosecuted for fraud.\n\"Nevertheless a judge has shut down the earnings check system which\nmade that information possible because it purportedly violates a recently\nadopted HEW regulation.\n\"Despite the efforts of federal welfare officials in Washington to\ndelay or explain away the success of California's reform program we are\nproving that welfare can be brought back under control---at the state\nlevel without throwing in the towel and tossing the problem in the\nlap of federal bureaucrats. A massive and costly federally controlled\nprogram is not the solution to the welfare problem. It will only make it\nworse,\" the governor said.\n######\nEJG\n- 2 -\nState of California\nDepartment of Social Welfare\nHuman Relations Agency\nagement Information Systems\nFebruary 23, 1972\nPUBLIC ASSISTANCE CASELOADS AND EXPENDITURES\nJanuary 1972\nRecipients\nPayments\nProgram\nJan.P/\nDec.P\nJan.\nJan.P/\nDec.\np/\nJan.\n1972\n1971\n1971\n1972\n1971\n1971\nGrand total\n2,110,926\n2,119,230\n2,247,516\n$160,109,157\n$162,368,287\n$160,197,491\nCash grant recipients\n2,053,346\n2,062,097\n2,144,431\n156,141,244\n158,527,344\n154,657,276\nGeneral home relief\n57,580\n57,133\n103,085\n3,967,913\n3,840,943\n5,540,215\nCASH GRANT PROGRAMS\nAverage monthly payments\nAGED PERSONS (OAS)\n313,948\n315,400\n322,693\n$109.63\n$110.80\n$114.91\nBLIND PERSONS (AB/APSB)\n13,910\n13,854\n13,985\n157.42\n156.64\n157.58\nDISABLED PERSONS (ATD)\n192,990\n191,201\n186,413\n132.32\n132.99\n131.65\nFAMILIES WITH\nDEPENDENT CHILDREN\nFamily groups (AFDC-FG):\nchildren\n905,375\n906,514\n905,147\n83.31\n84.22\n76.22\ncases\n385,847\n384,907\n373,371\n195.49\n198.35\n184.77\ntotal persons\n1,270,907\n1,271,573\n1,263,620\n59.35\n60.04\n54.60\nUnemployed cases (AFDC-U) :\nchildren\n136,986\n142,385\n195,711\n87.29\n84.12\n75.20\ncases\n49,566\n50,868\n67,139\n241.25\n235.47\n219.21\ntotal persons\n228,201\n236,634\n323,433\n52.40\n50.62\n45.50\nBoarding Homes and\nInstitutions (AFDC-BHI):\nchildren\n33,390\n33,435\n34,287\n159.87\n179.81\n157.35\nGENERAL HOME RELIEF\nTotal persons\n57,580\n57,133\n103,085\n68.91\n67.23\n53.74\nFamily cases\n2,597\n2,449\n15,583\n84.22\n86.15\n71.88\nPersons in family cases\n7,649\n7,302\n50,505\n28.60\n28.89\n22.18\nOne-person cases\n49,931\n49,831\n52,580\n75.09\n72.85\n84.06\nUnemployed in labor force (%)\n6.8\n6.1\n8.0\nXXX\nXXX\nXXX\n(Seasonally adjusted)\n(6.1)\n(6.1)\n(7.2)\nXXX\nXXX\nXXX\nCivilian population (excluding\nmilitary)\n20,106,000\n20,086,000\n19,856,400\nXXX\nXXX\nXXX\na/ Cash grant averages for adult aids computed from \"net\" person counts.\nb/ Excludes U cases.\np/ Preliminary.\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nRELEASE: Immediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-24-72\n#106\nActing Governor Ed Reinecke today announced the appointment of\nSenator Gordon Cologne (R-Indio) as Associate Justice of the Fourth\nAppellate District Court of Appeal, Division One.\nSenator Cologne is an attorney by profession and was first elected\nto the State Legislature in 1961 as an Assemblyman from the 71st District\nHe was reelected in 1963 from the 74th Assembly District and was first\nelected as a State Senator in 1965 and presently serves as Senator from\nthe 36th District.\nGovernor Reinecke had high praise for Senator Cologne, saying\n\"Senator Cologne has established an enviable record in the legislature\nespecially as chairman of the committee on judiciary during 1970-71 and\nmore recently as chairman of the Senate Committee on Water Resources.\n\"His varied experience as a private attorney, as mayor of the City\nof Indio, as a legislator, and as a member of legislative committees\nconcerned with water, the judiciary, business and professions, revenue\nand taxation and natural resources and wildlife, will give him a special\ninsight into the problems which will come before him as an associate\njustice.'\nReinecke noted that the Senator is an honors graduate of Southwester\nUniversity Law School of Los Angeles and was elected Mayor of Indio when\nonly 30 years old.\nThe 47-year-old Senator will replace Justice Martin J. Coughlin,\nretired. He is presently the senior partner in Cologne, Erwin & Angle,\na law firm specializing in agricultural law, water, real estate, probate\nand appellate practice in Indio.\nHe and his wife, Patricia, have two children. The salary of\nassociate justices is $40,076 per annum.\n42,097\n######\nEJG\nSTATE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE\nContact: John Svahn\nMEMO TO THE PRESS\n445-2077\nRobert B. Carleson, Director of the State Department of Social\nWelfare, will discuss yesterday's decision by a three-judge federal\npanel in San Francisco on welfare, today at 11:20 a.m., in Room 1190,\nState Capitol.\n######\nSTATE DEPARTMENT Or FINANCE\nRELEASE: Immediate\nVerne Orr, Director\nFebruary 25, 1972\nState Finance Director Verne Orr announced today that the Reagan\nadministration is proposing a $49.5 million augmentation to the 1972-73\nstate budget for new capital outlay projects---including $30 million to\nhelp bring public school buildings in California up to state earthquake\nsafety standards.\nOrr said the other $20 million would be used to:\n-Improve the state park system ($6,774,000).\n-Build two new educational centers, on the San Diego and Santa\nBarbara campuses of the University of California ($11,526,000).\n--Help the State Department of Mental Hygiene to meet accreditation\nstandards and strengthen fire and safety protection in mental\ninstitutions across the state ($1,000,000).\n-Provide for initial site development, preliminary plans and\nworking drawings for a new governor's mansion in Sacramento ($150,000).\nThe mansion will not be available for occupancy until at least January 1,\n1975.\nIn a letter to the chairmen of the Assembly Ways and Means Committee\nand the Senate Finance Committee, Orr noted that Governor Reagan is\nproposing virtually the maximum amount of capital outlay funds permitted\nfor fiscal 1972-73 under the provisions of AB-1 which was passed and\nsigned into law during last year's special session of the legislature.\nThe legislation specified that no more than 33-1/3 percent of the\n$150 million provided in the bill for capital outlay purposes could be\nallocated in any one budget year and limited the availability of these\nfunds to a four-year period, ending with the 1974-75 budget year.\nOrr said the administration's proposed amendments to the budget bill\nfor capital outlay total $49,450,000.\nThe $30 million in new school earthquake protection funds will be\nused for replacement and repair of local school district buildings in\ncompliance with provisions of the Field Act and will require the\nintroduction of ensbling legislation. The State Allocations Board will\ndetermine specific school projects to be funded.\nAB 1 specified that a maximum of $30 million out of the $150 million\nwas to be used for local schools' earthquake protection.\nOrr emphasized that the administration is placing every available\ndollar provided by the bill for local schools in the 1972-73 budget\nthe earliest possible period that it can be used.\n\"No project is more important than that which contributes to the\nsafety of our school children,\" he said. \"It would be tragic to postpone\nschool repairs and suffer the loss of school children's lives in any\nfuture earthquake when prompt utilization of these funds might well\nprevent such a catastrophe.\"\nOf the $11.5 million in new capital outlay monies for the University\nof California, $5,226,000 would be used to build a Humanities Building\nat the San Diego campus and $6,300,000 would fund the construction of a\nsecond engineering unit on the Santa Barbara campus.\n/the\nOrr said $150 million will provide pay-as-you-go financing for\ncapital outlay projects, thus avoiding the necessity of placing the\nburden on the taxpayers for what otherwise would result in paying increase\ncosts of bonded indebtedness.\n######\n- 2 -\nPARKS AND RECREATION\nAcquisition\nInholding purchases\n$250,000\nMorro Bay\n350,000\nOpportunity purchases\n250,000\nSonoma\n350,000\nMount Diablo\n125,000\nLittle River\n75,000\nRincon Point\n65,000\nAcquisition costs\n75,000\n$1,540,000\n$1,540,000\nDevelopment\nSan Diego Museum\n$200,000\nPoint Mugu State Park\n924,100\nSeacliff State Beach\n979,200\nSilver Strand State Beach\n215,780\nSonoma Coast State Beach\n200,000\nAngel Island\n173,100\nRefugio State Beach\n150,000\nPismo State Beach\n150,000\nRussian Gulch State Park\n184,000\nCarpinteria State Beach\n500,000\nMacKerricher State Park\n133,000\nClear Lake State Park\n341,000\nFolsom\n138,500\nMinor program\n709,232\n$4,997,912\n$4,997,912\nStaff Costs\nDesign and development\n$236,088\n236,088\n$6,774,000\nPARKS AND RECREATION (EXPANDED)\nAcquisition\nMorro Bay\n$350,000\nThe Heron Rookery adjacent to Morro Bay State Park. A very\nimportant addition to the State Park System to complement the preserves\nalong the coastline.\nSonoma\n$350,000\nAn addition adjacent to the Vallejo House in Sonoma State Historic\nPark. This addition will protect the setting of the Vallejo Home against\nadverse development and allow the department to properly display and\ninterpret the home of a great Californian during the Spanish-American\nperiod.\n- 1 -\nInholdings wit.in the State Park System\n$840,000\nThis program allows the development to maximum capacity and\nprotection of existing resources of the State Park System.\nDevelopment\nPoint Muau\n$924,100\n(Matching Bond Fund)\nThis project consists of the development of initial public use\nfacilities including day use and overnight facilities, roads and parking,\ntrails, administration/orientation center, entrance station, maintenance\narea and utilities.\nThe day use facilities will consist of 12 picnic facilities, a\ncomfort station, roads and parking. The overnight facilities will\nconsist of 110 tent camping spaces, 140 trailer camping spaces, 2 group\ncamps of 25 persons each, 5 restrooms, 4 combination buildings, roads\nand parking.\nSeacliff\n$979,200\nDevelopment of day-use facilities at Rio Del Mar. Three comfort\nstations, dressing rooms, parking for 180 cars, etc. This will provide\nadditional beach access in a heavily used area of this coastline.\nSilver Strand\n$215,780\nProject comprises construction of a sewer collection system with\ndischarge to the City of Coronado sewer system and demolition of the\nexisting septic tanks and leaching fields. The work includes gravity\nsewers, lift stations and force mains.\nOld Town San Diego\n$200,000\nDevelopment of working drawings and construction for a transportation\nmuseum to accommodate a $1-1/2 million artifact and $50,000 cash donation\nby R. E. Hazard of San Diego. This collection consists of Early Californi\nhorse drawn carriages and vehicles.\nSonoma Coast (Augmentation)\n$200,000\nThis project initiates development in this area by constructing\nfacilities for camping. The facilities are:\n1,\nPark entrance, contact station, return loop, parking, and\ntrailer sanitation station,\n2.\nCampsites: 100 campsites, wooden tables with food lockers,\nconcrete stoves, campsite marker posts, wind screen fencing and refuse\nunits.\n3.\nFour comfort stations and 1 shower building, with septic tanks\nand leach fields,\n- 2 -\nAngel Island\n$173,100\nProject consists of two separate units. One is upgrading of the\npresent sewer system at Ayala Cove to meet Regional Water Quality\nControl Board standards, It includes construction of a new effluent\ndisposal pump station, installation of a new chlorinator, and deepening\nthe outfall pipe at Pt. Ione. The other is construction of a sewer\nline, septic tank, and leach field to serve the service area, duplex,\nand East Garrison.\nRefugio\n$150,000\nThis project consists of the development of one entrance station\nwith necessary utilities and telephone; furniture for 150 family camp-\nsites, 200 person group camps and 35 picnic units; area lighting,\ninterpretive display shelter; and other items necessary for the\ndevelopment and operation of these recreational facilities.\nPismo\n$150,000\nThe development consists of constructing three comfort stations on\nthe beach with all needed utilities to adequately serve the public.\nRussian Gulch\n$184,000\nProject consists of a sewage collection system, treatment plant,\nstorage ponds, effluent spray disposal field, and appurtenances.\nClear Lake\n$341,000\nThe present disposal system is not functioning properly, consequently\nthe use of the park has had to be limited to below its design capacity.\nThe Regional Water Quality Control Board has told us to correct our\ndeficiencies by the end of 1972. This funding will correct the\ndeficiencies and allow full use of the existing facilities.\nCarpinteria\n$500,000\n(Augmentation)\nThis project consists of completing the campground facility, site\nrazing and clearing, installing interprotive devices and constructing\na park office.\nThe development in the camping area includes:\nTwo combination buildings, a lifeguard stand, parking area, signs,\nutilities such as water, gas, electricity and sewer, landscaping,\nirrigation, and approximately 80-unit campground area and related\nfacilities.\n- 3 -\nFolsom\n$138,500\n(Brown's Ravine Marina)\nThe project consists of the construction of two 300 series sanitary\nfacilities; two manhold type lift stations; 3,000 feet of 4 inch\npolyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe force main; 2,250 feet of 3 inch PVC water\nsupply pipe; and connections to the adjacent Marine Village subdivision\nwater and sewer systems by the El Dorado Irrigation District. This\nproject will complete the facilities and fully develop the area.\nMacKerricher\n$133,000\nThis project consists of constructing approximately 13,500 l.f. of\n6-inch pipeline between the City of Fort Bragg and the park. Appurtenant\nvalves and water meters are included. Treated water will be supplied by\nthe City of Fort Bragg.\n- 4 -\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nMEMO TO THE PRESS\nSacramento, California\nContact: Paul Beck\n445-4571\n2-25-72\n#107\nGOVERNOR'S SCHEDULE\nFebruary 28, 1972\nthrough\nMarch 3, 1972\nMonday, February 28\n2:00 p.m.\nBrief remarks to the Governor's Earthquake\nCouncil, Governor's Council Room\nOvernight - Sacramento\nTuesday, February 29\n10:30 a.m.\nPRESS CONFERENCE\nOvernight - Sacramento\nWednesday, March 1\n11:30 a.m.\nMeeting with students from Encino Elementary\nSchool, Governor's Office\nOvernight - Sacramento\nThursday, March 2\n11:30 a.m.\nPresentation to Governor of Boy Scout Annual\nReport, Governor's Office\nOvernight - Sacramento\nFriday, March 3\n9:30 a.m.\nBrief greetings to Consumer Education Confer-\nence, Sacramento Inn\n10:30 a.m.\nMeeting with State Colleges Academic Senate.\nRemarks; Q & A. (El Rancho)\nOvernight - Sacramento\nSaturday, March 4\nSacramento Camellia Festival - Mrs. Nixon in\nSacramento\nOvernight - Sacramento\nSunday, March 5\nNo appointments scheduled\nOvernight - Sacramento\n# # #\nPB\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nRELEASE: Immediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-25-72\n#108\nActing Governor Ed Reinecke today announced the appointment of\nEureka attorney Harold E. Neville, Jr., to be a judge of the Municipal\nCourt, Eureka Judicial District in Humboldt County.\nNeville, a Republican, is a graduate of the University of California,\nSchool of Criminology and School of Law, University of San Francisco\nin 1960. He began practicing law in Humboldt County in 1961. He\nserved as Deputy District Attorney in Humboldt County 1963-65 and has\nbeen in private law practice since.\nIn 1970 he was an unsuccessful candidate for district attorney.\nHe is a member of the American Bar Association, California State Bar\nAssociation, Humboldt County Bar Association and the American Arbitration\nAssociation.\nThe Humboldt County native is married and the father of two children.\nNeville replaces the late Judge Robert Conners. Salary for\nmunicipal court judge is $32,273 per annum. He resides in Rio Dell.\n######\nEJG\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nRELEASE: Immediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-25-72\n#109\nActing Governor Ed Reinecke today announced the appointment of\nRoy L. Wonder as a commissioner of the Workmen's Compensation Appeals\nBoard.\nWonder is assistant to the vice president of public relations for\nLockheed Aircraft Corporation in Burbank.\nThe Glendale public relations executive is a graduate of Georgetown\nUniversity and the University of Kansas. He has been an executive with\nLockheed since 1959 and is a member of the California Bar Association,\nAmerican Bar Association and the Los Angeles County Bar Association.\nWonder, 43, was named to the position as commissioner to replace\nWarren D. Allen of Chatsworth who resigned. The appointment, for a\nfour-year term, requires Senate confirmation. Salary is $33,396 per\nannum.\nHe is married and he and his wife, Barbara, are the parents of\nfour children. They reside in Glendale.\n######\nEJG\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nRELEASE: Immediate\nSacramento, California\nContact: Paul Beck\n445-4571\n2-28-72\n#110\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today sent the following letter to Assembly\nSpeaker Moretti and Senate President pro tem Mills:\n\"I hereby respectfully request that the legislature enact--on an\ninterim basis--urgency controls on timber harvesting practices. This\nneed has been brought about by a recent court decision which voided\nour state's forest practice regulatory program.\n\"Members of both houses of the legislature have announced plans\nto sponsor legislation in this important field. However, an emergency\nmeasure is needed to provide immediate safeguards for the public,\nindustry and affected state employees.\n\"I would hope that both houses of the legislature could move\nexpeditiously to insure that the priceless resource of our forests can\nbe protected from irresponsible practices which might exploit the\ncurrent lack of legal protection.\"\n# # #\nPB\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nRELEASE: Immediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-28-72\n#111\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today reappointed George C. Vesey and\nMrs. Sally E. Semas, both of Auburn, to the 20th District Agricultural\nAssociation board of directors (Auburn District Fair).\nVesey, a sales representative for the National Biscuit Company,\nlives at 182 Valley View and Mrs. Semas, a horse breeder, lives at\nRoute 1, Box 1257.\nBoth are Republicans.\nBoard members serve four-year terms and receive necessary expenses.\n######\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nRELEASE: Immediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-28-72\n#112\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Dr. John G. Fast of\nRiverside to a four-year term on the District Review Committee for the\nFourth District of the Board of Medical Examiners in the Department of\nConsumer Affairs.\nDr. Fast, who lives at 5675 Victoria Avenue, Riverside, has served\non the board since 1967. He is a Republican.\nMembers receive per diem and expenses.\n######\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nRELEASE: Immediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-28-72\n#113\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today reappointed two members of the State\nHospital Advisory Board to four-year terms.\nThey are Dr. John E. Affeldt, Medical Director of the Los Angeles\nCounty Department of Hospitals, and Dr. Dudley S. Moore, Santa Rosa\noral surgeon.\nDr. Affeldt, who represents hospital administrators, has served on\nthe board since 1970. He lives at 9157 South Lindante Drive, Whittier.\nDr. Moore, who represents the public, has served on the board since\n1967. He lives at 6255 Melita Road, Santa Rosa.\nBoth appointees are Republicans.\nBoard members receive expenses.\n######\nWAS\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nRELEASE: Immediate\nSacramento, California\nContact:\nPaul Beck\n445-4571\n2-28-72\n#114\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Mrs. Kathryn H. Kaiser of\nSan Francisco and the Reverend Noel Francis Moholy, O.F.M., S.T.D.,\nVice Postulator for the Cause of Father Junipero Serra, to the Historical\nLandmarks Advisory Committee.\nMrs. Kaiser, who lives at 1148 Vallejo Street, San Francisco, and\nthe Reverend Mr. Moholy, whose address is St. Mary's, P.O. Box 1028,\nLakeport, were named to four-year terms.\nShe has served on the committee since 1967 and he has served since\n1962. Both are Republicans.\nCommittee members receive necessary expenses.\n######\nWAS\nSTATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE\nMEMO TO THE PRESS\nVerne Orr, Director\nFebruary 28, 1972\nThe attached audit report (Vol. I, Part I) on the library system\nof the University of California is embargoed for use in Tuesday a.ms.\nPlease guard against premature release.\nIn a statement, Mr. Orr said:\n\"I am very proud of this document and I have high hopes that it\nwill prove extremely helpful to the office of the president of the\nUniversity, Mr. Hitch, in improving the management of the University's\nlibraries.\n\"The findings, conclusions and recommendations in this report hold\nthe promise of not only enabling the taxpayers to derive even greater\nbenefit from their continuing investment in the University, but also---\nand just as important- it can, and hopefully will, result in improved\nlibrary services for students attending the University.\"\nThe document has been sent to President Hitch.\n#######\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNO\nMEMO TO THE\nto\nESS\nSacramento, California\nContact: Paul Beck\n445-4571\n2-29-72\nPress credentials will be issued all day\nFriday, March 3, in the Governor's Press Office\nfor members of the Capitol Press Corps planning\nto cover Mrs. Nixon's visit to Sacramento on\nSaturday, March 4.\n# # # # #\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nRELEASE: Immediate\nSacramento, California\nContact: Paul Beck\n445-4571\n2-29-72\n#115\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today said all state-owned cars not used for\nlaw enforcement purposes will soon carry traditional Diamond E license\nplates.\nHe said installation of the plates is expected to be completed in\nthe next several weeks in view of a literal interpretation of the State\nVehicle Code by the State Auditor General in a report issued recently.\nThe governor noted that traditionally key members of any governor's\nstaff have been assigned unmarked state cars where their duties involve\nlaw enforcement functions. These staff members are on 24-hour call and\ntheir functions are related to such responsibilities as emergency planning\nfor civil disorders and other disasters. After consultation with the\nAttorney General it has been determined that all such vehicles will have\nexempt (diamond \"E\") plates to assure that the marking of these cars is\nconsistent with provisions of the code.\nStretching back into previous administrations, a number of key\ndepartment directors also have traditionally been assigned state\nautomobiles with regular series plates in line with the investigatory\nfunctions of their office. However, the Auditor General's report\nclarified what practices should be followed by such departmental personnel\nin order to comply with the code.\nGovernor Reagan emphasized there never has been any question that\nthose employees who have had cars permanently assigned to them were not\nauthorized to use them. The only issue is whether the cars should have\ncarried a different type of license plate.\nHe said past requests for the regular series plates have been made\nand granted in good faith, but that corrective action now appears to be\nnecessary in certain cases to assure that the precise requirements of the\ncode are met.\nIn announcing the action, the governor said he was ordering\npublication in the State Administrative Manual of a new procedure.\nUnder the procedure, beginning March 1, all departments of the\nExecutive branch of state government will immediately submit to the\nexecutive assistant to the governor a list of all cars owned by the state\nwhich bear regular series license plates. The list will be reviewed by\nthe governor's office and, working with the departments concerned, all\nunauthorized use of such plates will be eliminated.\n######\nEJG\nOFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR\nRELEASE: Immediate\nSacramento, Califor ia\nContact:\nPaul 1 ck\n445-4571\n2-29-72\n#116\nGovernor Ronald Reagan today reappointed Dr. John H. Lawrence to a\nsixteen-year term on the Board of Regents of the University of California.\n\"As he did during his many years as a member of the faculty,\nDr. Lawrence is continuing to contribute his knowledge and talents to\nsolving the problems faced by our University. I am grateful, as I know\nall Californians are grateful for his dedicated service to this\ninstitution,\" the governor said.\nDr. Lawrence, 68, a pioneer in the development of radiation\nprotection and the use of isotopes in medicine, has earned international\nrecognition for his contributions to medicine and medical research in\nthe biological effects of radiation and the study of cancer.\nIn 1970, he retired as Director of U.C.'s Donner Laboratory, which\nhe helped to organize, to accept an appointment as Regent.\nHe holds AB and DSC degrees from the University of South Dakota, a\nmedical degree from Harvard Medical School and numerous honorary degrees\nfrom institutions throughout the world.\nHe is the brother of the late Ernest O. Lawrence, Nobel prize-winning\nphysicist.\nDr. Lawrence lives at 220 Glorietta Road, Orinda.\n#######\nWAS"
}