Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
118564880
label
Issues - Traffic Safety
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
118564880
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1975-12-31
year
1975
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1967-01-01
year
1967
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
ebb34363be465619
ocrText
Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Reagan, Ronald: Gubernatorial Papers, 1966-74: Press Unit Folder Title: Issues - Traffic Safety Box: P32 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ State of California Memorandum To Paul Beck : Date: January 30, 1968 Press Secretary Governor's Office Subject: Background Information on Traffic Safety From : Business and Transportation Agency Office of the Secretary 1120 N Street, Sacramento, (916) 445-1331 Attached is background information on California's traffic safety program. Should you want further information or if you want to discuss any of this, call me at 5-4417. Sm VAN T. BURCH Assistant Director Alcohol and Traffic Safety Attachments BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON TRAFFIC SAFETY California's long time role as the leader in the field of highway transportation and safety has not happened by chance. The wisdom of the Legislature in enacting progressive, far-sighted statutes, the desire of the people of California for the best type of highway transportation, the dedicated services of the private sector, including automobile clubs, local safety councils, safety foundations, and professional associations; and the sincere dedication of state and local governmental employees in carrying out established policies have all contributed to this acknowledged leadership. We shall continue to exercise this leadership role; we shall continue programs designed to educate the driver, to engineer the safest highway possible, and to enforce the laws relating to highway safety. At my request, legislation has been introduced in this, the 1968 Legislative Session, which would establish a presumption that any automobile driver whose blood alcohol level is in excess of a certain percentage is "under the influence of alcohol". This presumption will apply to all drivers whose blood alcohol content is at .10 or higher. At .05, the presumption will be that there is no impairment caused by alcohol. Between .05 and .10, other evidences will be necessary to substantiate a finding of "under the influence of alcohol". This Administration strongly supports that legis- lation. This Administration will seek legislation that will: - Require postmortem blood alcohol tests on all drivers and adult pedestrians killed in traffic accidents. The tests are current practice in most California counties; these tests should be required in all counties, to provide uniformity and better data relating to the causes of traffic accidents. - Require special licensing procedures and special protective equipment for motorcyclists. Operators of motorcycles will be required to be licensed automobile drivers before a motorcycle operator's permit will be issued. Protective clothing to include boots, safety goggles or glasses, and crash helmets will be required of all motorcycle operators. - Establish a Center for Traffic Safety Research. Such a Center would provide exhaustive and conclusive information regarding traffic acci- dents. This data can come only from a systematized collection and evaluation of accident causes, frequency, location, and magnitude. The Center should be a joint venture of governmental, private, and independent sectors -- a public, non-profit institution dedicated to seeking not only the causes but the cures for highway accidents and determining the most effective way of saving human lives. - Continue and expand the survey of emergency medical facilities and services available to our motoring public -- county by county. This survey was authorized by Assembly Bill 2196, 1967 Regular Session. Included in the survey will be the licensing and certification of laboratories, and the establishing of guidelines based on medical data for identification, evaluation, and regulation of medical and other high risk groups of drivers. - Continue the Study on Drunken Driving (that was initiated by Assembly Bill 2538) to devise a system to reduce accidents and injuries caused by drunk drivers. This Study is being conducted by the University of Southern California and will provide recommen- dations to the courts, to the Department of Motor Vehicles, and to the Legislature on means of controlling drunk drivers. - Require certification as to safety of used cars prior to resale. Brakes, lights, steering mechanisms, and safety equipment would have to be certified to be in good working condition by the used car dealer or by a private owner who sells his car. - Establish a test facility which will develop the most sophisticated automobile inspection system possible. In addition to testing the vehicle for mechanical worthiness, protection for the driver and other occupants, safety devices and design features will be tested for function and potential improvement. At the same time, legislation will be sought that will continue the three and one-half year Study by the California Highway Patrol of the effect and costs of random manda- tory motor vehicle inspections. Because of the number of motor vehicles registered in California, annual mandatory inspection costs of each automobile would be prohibitive. The random inspection currently conducted by the California Highway Patrol is a workable and effec- tive means of assuring safe vehicles on our roadways. We believe the random inspection to be a more practical and feasible way than that suggested by the Federal Government. This Administration is also considering legislation which would provide uniformity in statewide reporting and locating accidents and uniformity in accident reporting forms. Each locality has a different way of reporting traffic accidents and uses different forms for this reporting. The differences in form and methodology constitute an unmanageable method of compiling statistics on accidents. The differences in locating procedures unnecessarily delay the rendering of medical and emergency care to accident victims. Standard forms and procedures should be used statewide. Also under consideration is legislation which would grant immunity from future court action to accredited accident investigators and legislation which would allow the impounding of vehicles involved in fatal and serious injury accidents. Accredited accident investigators should not be submitted to civil or criminal action as a result of their involvement in investigations. Immunity similar to that granted to Communicable Disease Investigators should be given accident investigators. Vehicles involved in fatal and serious injury accidents should be studied for mechanical failure and vehicle contributions to the accidents. There is no authority, at the present time, by which these vehicles can be impounded. California, with the largest population, the most cars, and the most drivers, should have additional representation on the National Highway Safety Advisory Committee. While many states have two representatives, several have three, and Illinois has four, California has only one. A Joint Resolution from the Legislature should be directed to the President, asking that California be truly represented. REQUEST FOR A1 ROVAL OF PROPOSED DEPARTMENT... LEGISLATION artment: Agency: Bill Control No. Department of Motor Vehicles Business & Transportation Implied Consent escription: Change Sections 13353-13354 V.C. to require: 1. That the licensee submit to and complete the tests. Drivers are presently required only to submit to the tests. If the driver is unable to perform or complete the test of his choice he would be required under this proposal to select either of the two alternative tests that can be performed and completed. 2. That any person who is incapable of indicating a refusal by either words or actions shall be deemed not to have withdrawn consent. 3. That the four issues to be heard under the law also be covered by the officer's statement. Presently only two issues are required in the officer's statement. 4. That the reference to holding a hearing within 15 days be deleted. This time spm is usually impossible to meet. 5. That the reference to giving notice be changed to comply with Section 23. Need: 6. That the officer's statement be made on a form furnished or approved by the department and that it be admissible as evidence. 7. That hospitals as well as physicians, nurses and technicians be exempt from liability as a result of the proper administering of a blood test when requested in writing by a peace officer. Need: To overcome objections from courts, enforcement agencies, attorneys, hearing officers and hospitals. und BECH STudy Fiscal Impact: Those changes would produce some savings in the cost of administering the Implied Consent Lew. Legislative History: Suggested Author: Assemblyman V. Craig Biddle Gov. Off. Use United 1.10.68 Agency: Bill Control Ro. Business & Transportation e: Certified inspection and repair of safety equipment on used B108 cars by dealers prior to resale, ription: Legislation would require that used cars be inspected, repaird and rtified as safe as a condition of sale. Automobile dealers should be required to issue the buyer of every used car a rtificate of safety -- stating that certain specified equipment has been in- ected and is (a) either in safe operating condition or (b) has been replaced by fe components. The certificate would include a check list of items included in e safety inspection (lights, brakes, glass, windshield wiper and blades, etc. ); ese items to be determined by the California Highway Patrol. The certificate would be issued under penalty of loss of license should the aler make false or misleading statements regarding the safe condition of the hicle. If a buyer felt he had a complaint, he would bring it to the attention the Department of Motor Vehicles dealer licensing division for proper review d action. tires 3: The State should act to insure that, insofar as possible, unsafe vehicles kept off public streets and highways. Many older vehicles are not in safe chanical condition; quite a few of the older cars are traded in and resold and erated on our highways as used cars. This provides a key point for safety lecks. Impact: inlative Hotory: gented Gov. OTT. Une Into late G.C. huce Man Sandshin 12/25 Agency Date REQUEST FOR ALENOVED @ PROFOSED INCISTATION Agency: Bill Control No. Business & Transportation Creation of an advance (pilot) facility for development of on- 107 te passenger veh. inspection system (ref. Gov's address. before affic Safety Conference, Dec. 14, 1967. riglion: gislation be drafted and supported which would establish a pilot facility to velop the criteria for on-site inspection installations. These criteria would clude the various standards and types of tests and testing equipment which would recommended to the legislature for approval and enactment, including licensing quirements for those garages and stations which seek to qualify as official hicle inspection stations. The test facilities would be located at and operated by the Institute of Traffi d Transportation Engineering (ITTE), Richmond Field Station, U.C. (Berkeley). gislation would not only appropriate from the Motor Vehicle Fund certain funds fo e test facility but also permit the receipt of grants, contracts and other sistance from the private and independent sectors to help finance the project. The random mandatory vehicle inspection program, as presently being conducted the California Highway Patrol, would be continued pending the completion of the st project. a: Many of the vehicles on California's roads and highways are unsafe due to chanical deficiencies. The State has a responsibility to require that these chicles be put in safe condition or be removed from the public roads. This esponsibility becomes more imperative as speeds increase and traffic becomes )re congested. The Federal Government has made periodic vehicle inspection compulsory under federal highway safety standards it is promulgating. It has granted California temporary waiver so that we can continue our random, mandatory roadside vehicle nspection on the basis of a demonstration project. However, there is little estion that the federal government will not continue this waiver indefinitely; urthermore, it is doubtful that roadside inspection, of itself, is capable of ompleting the thorough safety analysis which is essential for today's complex itomobiles. There is, therefore, a need for California to develop a meaningful and phisticated on-site vehicle inspection system. Inspection systems in operation in ther states do not fill the need and leave much to be desired in terms of effectiv ficient inspection; many systems leave the motorist easy prey to the unscrupulous unqualified mechanic. We should move now to establish a test facility to develop a meaningful, soph- sticated inspection system utilizing all available technological knowledgeavail- le from the aero space and automotive industries, plus the sciences of electronic halysis and digital computers. (Cont'd next page) send Prof. Harmer Davis, ITTE, has been asked to present a prospectus on the project, including time and funds necessary. dolative Histovy: Gov. 051. Une mile Date G.C. MaraSmastin 12/26/67 -2- Need: (Cont'd) Such an innovative system would protect the California motorist from the harrassment of an expensive and relatively meaningless (and often misleading) vehicle inspection, would protect the motorist from the unscrupulous garage, reduce the amount of expense, time and inconvenience involved in vehicles inspection, and would also accomplish the primary aim which is to keep as many unsafe vehicles as possible off the road. By engaging now in the development of a sophisticated, meaningful inspection system we will be ready when the federal government cancels its waiver, and will provide our people with the most advanced and beneficial vehicle inspection program in the nation. REQUEST FOR ABTROVAL 08 PROFOSED DEPARTMENT NEWT, NACISIANCE: Himmt: Agency: Bill Combrol lic. BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION B106 T-MORTEM BLOOD EXAMINATION IN VEHICLE RELATED DEATHS ciption: [uires the coroner or his appointed deputy when notified of a death occurring le the deceased was driving or riding in a motor vehicle, or as a result the deceased being struck by a motor vehicle, to take a blood sample from the ly and to make chemical tests to determine the alcoholic content, if any, of è body. 1: counties conduct such tests now however unless all counties conduct such statistical validity of research is impaired. Improb: lolative History: oposed similar to Bear's AB 818 (1967) which is attached. justed Intion Gov. orr. U.S Date Gc.'wee Date 12/26 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE-1067 REGULAR SESSION ASSEMBLY BILL No. 818 Introduced by Assemblyman Bear February 28, 1967 REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC HEALTH An act to add Section 27401.25 to the Government Code and to add Section 7303 to the Health and Safety Code, relating to dead bodies. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 SECTION 1. Section 27491.25 is added to the Government 2 Code, to read: 3 27491.25. The coroner, or his appointed deputy, on being 4 notified of a death occurring while the deceased was driving LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL/S DIGEST AB 818, as introduced, Bear (Pub.II.). Dead bodies. Adds See. 27491.25, Gov.C., adds Sec. 7303, II. & S.C. Requires the coroner or his appointed deputy when notified of a death occurring while the deceased was driving 01 riding in a motor vehicle, or as a result of the deceased being struck by a motor vehicle, to take a blood sample from the body and to make chemical tests to determine the alcoholic content, if any, of the body. Makes provisions inapplicable to bodies of persons under the age of I5 years unless the surrounding circumstances indicate the possibility of alcoholic con- sumption, or when the death has occurred more than 24 hours after the accident. Requires the retention and preservation of the blood sample for a one-year period if the deceased has a history of drug usage or there is any indication of drug usage for the purpose of determining the presence of sedatives, tranquilizers, antihistamines. or stinulants. Prohibits an embalmer embalming a human body when he has in- formation reasonably indicating the death has occurred while the de- ceased was driving or riding in a motor vehicle. or as a result of the deceased being struck by a motor vehicle, until permission of the cor- oner, his appointed deputy, or a judge in the county, if there is no coroner, has been obtained. Vote-Majority; Appropriation-No; State Expense-No. AB 818 -2- - 1 or riding in a motor vehicle, or as a result of the deceased 2 being struck by a motor vehicle, shall take a blood sample 3 from the body of the deceased before it has been prepared for 4 burial and make appropriate related chemical tests to de- 5 termine the alcoholic content, if any, of the body. 6 The detailed medical findings, resulting from such an ex- 7 amination, shall either be reduced to writing or permanently 8 preserved on recording dises or other similar recording media 9 and shall include all positive and negative findings pertinent 10 to the presence or absence of any alcoholic content. 11 This section shall not apply to the testing of deceased per- 12 sons under the age of 15 years, unless the surrounding cir- 13 cumstances indicate the possibility of alcoholic consumption, 14 nor shall it apply when the death has occurred more than 21 15 hours after the accident. 16 The blood sample shall be retained and preserved for a one- 17 year period, if the deceased has a history of drug usage or 18 if there is any indication of drug usage for the purpose of 19 taking tests to determine the presence of sedatives, tranquil- 20 izers, antihistamines, or stimulants. 21 SEC. 2. Section 7303 is added to the Health and Safety 22 Code, to read: 23 7303. No embalmer shall embalm a dead human body when 24 he has information reasonably indicating the death has OC- 25 curred while the deceased was driving or riding in a motor 26 vehicle, or as a result of the deceased being struck by a motor 27 vehicle, until permission of the coroner; his appointed deputy 28 coroner, or a judge in the county, if there is no coroner, has 29 been obtained. 0 street: Agency: BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION 3: B105 PRESUMPTIVE LIMITS FOR DRUNKENESS ription: ;cablis 3S rebuttal presumption that a person with a 0.10 blood alcohol rating ; under the influence of an intoxicating liquor. Persons with rating of 0.05 or ess are presumed scher. Where the test results are between 0.05 and 0.10 no resumption arises and the rating is treated merely as evidentiary along with ther facts such as slurred speech, etc. d: lcohol - the "had been drinking driver" is involved in approximately 35% of all acal accidents in California. This means that between 1,500 and 2,000 people ied in automobile accidents because of alcohol affected drivers. More effective nforcement tools is one means of reducing this toll. lization of these nationally recognized standards will help provide an bjective standard for intoxication thereby assuring dismissals and convictions on II equal basis (i.e. we would not be as dependant upon the quality or whims of ury, court, prosectuion or defense). The accused's right to due process is rotected by his opportunity to rebut the presumption and show that a 0.10 rating id not mean drunkeness in his case. seed Inpued: NONE piolative Rictory: enator Collier's SB 41 (1965), which is attached, attempted to establish imilar presumption. Gov. orr. Une agented Date Date 12/26 Date Agency Head: Into AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 23, 1965 SENATE BILL No. 41 Introduced by Senator Collier January 7, 1965 REFERRED TO COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY An act to add Section 23126 to the Vehicle Code, relating to drunk driving. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 SECTION 1. Section 23126 is added to the Vehicle Code, to 2 read: 3 23125. (a) Upon the trial of any eivil 02 criminal action 4 or proceeding preliminary proceeding in a criminal detion 5 arising out of acts alleged to have been committed by any per- 6 son while driving 00 to actual physical of a vehicle 7 while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, the amount of S alcohol in the person's blood at the time alleged as shown by 9 chemical analysis of his blood, breath, or urine OF other bodily 10 substance shall give rise to the following presumptions: 11 (1) If there was at that time 0.05 percent or less by weight 12 of alcohol in the person's blood, it shall be presumed that 13 the person was not under the influence of intoxicating liquor. 14 (2) If there was at that time in excess of 0.05 percent but 15 less than 0.10 percent by weight of alcohol in the person's 16 blood, such fact shall not give rise to any presumption that 17 the person was or was not under the influence of intoxicating 18 liquor, but such fact may be considered with other compotent 19 evidence in determining whether the person was under the 20 influence of intoxicating liquor. 21 (3) If there was at that time 0.10 percent or more by weight 22 of alcohol in the person's blood, it shall be presumed that the 23 person was under the influence of intoxicating liquor. 24 (1) 25 (b) Percent by weight of alcohol in the blood shall be based 26 upon milligream grams of alcohol per 100 entie contimetors of 27 blood. SB 41 2 1 (5) 2 (c) The foregoing provisions shall not be construed as lim- 3 iting the introduction of any other competent evidence bear- 4 ing upon the question whether the person was under the in- 5 fluence of intoxicating liquor. 6 (b) 7 (d) Only a physician, registered nurse or qualified labora- 8 tory technician acting at the request of a peace officer may 9 withdraw blood for the purpose of determining the alcoholic 10 content therein. This limitation shall not apply to the taking 11 of breath or urine specimens. 12 (e) 13 (e) The person tested may, at his own expense, have a 14 physician, registered nurse OF, qualified laboratory technician, 15 or any other person of his own choosing administer a chemical 16 test test, in addition to any administered at the direction of 17 a peace officer, for the purpose of determining the amount of 18 alcohol in his blood at the time alleged as shown by chemical 19 analysis of his blood. breath or urine The failure or inability 20 to obtain an additional test by a person shall not preclude the 21 admission of the test taken at the direction of a peace officer. 22 (d) 23 (j) Upon the request of the person tested full information 24 concerning the test taken at the direction of the peace officer 25 shall be made available to him or his attorney. 26 (g) No physician. registered narse or qualified laboratory 27 technician shall incur any civil or criminal liability as a result 28 of the proper administering of it blood test when requested by a 29 peace officer to administer such a test. 0 RECONST FOR Agency: Bill Control No. Business & Transportation 0: Creation of a Calif. Center for Traffic Safety Research ref. B104 v's address before Traffic Safety Conference, Dec. 14, 1967 Legislation should be drafted and sponsored which would create 2 public, n-profit corporation to be known as the California Center for Traffic Safety search. The Center to be administered by a Board of Directors appointed by the vernor from specified areas of society and for specified terms. The directors the departments of Motor Vehicles, Public Works and the Highway Patrol should be mbers of the board, among others. The Governor, Secretary of Business and ansportation, and the chairmen of the Assembly Transportation and Commerce mmittee and the Senate Transportation Committee should be ex officio members of .e Board. The Center would be administered by a staff authorized by the Board and under e operational direction of a President or Executive Vice President and General nager as designated by the Board. The Center should acquire and operate certain physical facilities and equip- nt as determined by the Board and approved by the Legislature. These facilities uld include buildings, equipment, and sufficient ground to provide test tracks, ash pads, and road material testing lanes. (Cont'd next page) 6: The traffic accident is the number one killer of our citizens under 21 years of ;e; the number two killer of citizens between 21 and 25 years of age and the fourt tjor cause of death in the nation. Last year in California 4,830 citizens were illed and 230,000 injured on our highways. The figures for 1967 will be approxim- tely the same. Research in traffic safety is (a) woefully inadquate and (b) presently unco- rdinated and scattered. We are not getting the argest possible cost-benefit from research dollar. Much of the purpose and validity of the research now in pro- ress can be challenged and many of the serious (pressing) problems in traffic fety are not being professionally researched. We have spent much to catalogue uses, far too little to concieve the cures. We are not utilizing the latest indings in the various disciplines (medical and behavioral sciences, for example). If we are to have any measurable impact on traffic death and accident rates, we achieve a meaningful interaction between the various factors involved in raffic safety research; human factors (stress-reaction driver training, training motivation) mechanical factors (the vehicle, its components and equipment, ehicle trauma) ; roadway design and engineering (including furniture), and the tire area of communications. California, with more cars, more drivers, more roads -- and more traffic deaths than any other state, should take the lead in developing such a coordinated, teracting and sophisticated traffic research program. (Cont'd next page) Inpect: No firm estimate is available at present. No general fund would be used however, with state contribution coming from Motor Vehicle Fund. It anticipated that private and independent sectors will provide a significant share. vislative Ristory: mested And/or: Gov. OTH. Une Into late E.C. huce Mara Santstan 12/26 TTACHMENT #1 Description: (Cont'd) The Center should be affiliated with the University of California; however, the Center is not to be under the jurisdiction of the Board of Regents of the Iniversity, or any Chancellor; it must be kept free and apart from academia. 'erhaps a member of the Board of Regents should be appointed to the Center's Board of Directors. The Board of Directors of the Center should be empowered to accept grants, ;ifts and bequests and authorized to enter into contracts with public, private ind independent agencies. The departments of the Center shall include but not be limited to: human factors (medical and behavioral and communications sciences) ; mechanical factors ( (the vehicle and its equipment), and roadway (design, engineering and testing). ATTACHMENT #2 Need: (Cont'd) Through the creation of a centralized and coordinated research center we can achieve new breakthroughs and at the same time acquire a greater cost- benefit ratio for our research dollar. Through a public, non-profit corporation, we can engage in accelerated research efforts at less cost and greater benefits to our citizens. Such a public, non-profit corporation -- affiliated with but not under the jurisdiction of the University of California -- would achieve great prestige and effectiveness and would attract sizeable contracts from the private and independent sectors (automobile and automobile parts manufacturers, insurance associations, etc. ) as well as governmental agencies. (This year, for example, we turned down several contracts offered to us by the Federal Highway Safety Administration -- one on driver licensing techniques and one on motorcycle safety. Governmental red-tape and intergovernmental contract problems made it impossible to complete the projects within the specified time. A public corporation, as suggested, could accept such contracts.) There is the possibliity of federal grants for the establishment of such a research center; however, the Center should be created with or without such funds. A meeting is being held on Jan. 11, with representativesof various agencies and the University of California and the ITTE to discuss the problems involved such as funding, facilities, staff, etc. Following that session we shall be in a better position to present suggestions as to necessary appropriations, funding, etc. ) REQUEST FOR API DVAL OF PROPOSED DEPARTMENT L LEGISLATION Department: Agency: Business Bill Control No. California Highway Patrol and Transportation Title: An act to amend Section 34500 of the Vehicle B-30 Code relating to vehicles subject to CHP regulation. Description: Provides for regulation of two-axle trucks coupled with a semitrailer, or pole or pipe dolly as well as two axle trucks coupled with a trailer. Adds subdivision (f) to allow the Department to regulate two-axle trucks transporting hazardous materials. RECEIVED DEC 1 9 1967 Transportation Agency Need: This amendment closes the gap which was inadvertently left in the original legislation. The existing section does not cover a two-axle truck when pulling a pole, pipe or logging dolly or when pulling a semitrailer which is very common in the transportation of automobiles. The addition of subdivision (f) will make two-axle trucks while trans- porting dangerous materials subject to the Depar tment of Transportation regulations for the transportation of subject material, and which applies now to all interstate traffic and all intrastate traffic except two-axle trucks. Fiscal Impact: Since both amendments can be covered with a single printing of an amended regulation, the cost to the Department should not exceed $400. Legislative History: There has been no previous bill amending this section in this manner. Suggested Author: Gov. Off. Use Any member of either Transportation Committee. APPROVED FOR 11-1-17 INTRODUCTION H. W. SULLIVAN, Commissioner Date W.L. California Highway Patrol Gov. Office Luce by Marc Sandstrom NOV 7 1987 Date: 12-14 GORDON C. LUCE, Secretary Date Business and Transportation Agency The following recommendations are made for 1968 Legislative Change: Amend Section 34500: 34500. The Department of the California Highway Patrol shall regulate the safe operation of the following vehicles: (a) Motor trucks of three or more axles. (b) Truck tractors. (c) Buses. (d) Trailers, semitrailers, pole or pipe dollies, auxiliary dollies and logging dollies used in combination with (a), (b), or (c) above. (e) Combinations e£ a twe-axle track and trailer er semitrailer equipped with aaxiliary delly; eoupled tegether, exeeeding a teal length 0 £ 40 feet- Two-axle trucks when coupled either with a trailer; or a semitrailer with or without an auxiliary dolly; or a pole, pipe, or logging dolly and exceeding a combined length of 40 feet. Add Section 34500: (f) Two-axle trucks transporting materials defined and classified as hazardous by the United States Department of Transportation (49CFR, Parts 172 and 173) shall be subject only to those regulations relating to such materials which are adopted by the department in accordance 34501 with Section 35401 of this division. Traffic statety AUTOMOBILES AND TRUCKS IN CALIFORNIA There are 10,073,260 licensed vehicles in California (not including motorcycles or trailers) (This is more than any other State - and fifth in the world after the U.S., the United Kingdom, West Germany and Switzerland.) There are 8,650,200 passenger cars registered in California that's 88.4 cars for every mile of surfaced road in the State. (If all the cars in California were parked end to end, they would extend for more than 20,000 miles -- or, they would make the greatest traffic jam in history: eight lanes of bumper-to-bumper traffic stretching from New York to Los Angeles.) Incidentally, there are 4,550,000 licensed passenger cars in Los Angeles county, alone. That's 264 vehicles for every mile of surfaced road in the county and, if you've ever tried to drive in Los Angeles at five o'clock in the afternoon, you know what that means. THE AUTOMOBILE AND MODERN CALIFORNIA Obviously California, more than any other State, is a state of wheels. But, more importantly, modern California is -- in many ways - a creation of the automobile. The car - and the truck -- has permitted us to develop our "horizontal cities" -- our spread-out, far-flung suburbs. The tremendous out-reach of Los Angeles (a conglomeration of suburbs tied together by freeways) and the fingers of living that stretch north, east and south from San Francisco these would not be if it were not for the automobile. The automobile has enabled our people to pursue the California way of life - to break away from the old, cramped ways when city life was pretty much compressed into long strips along the railroad and major highway right-of-ways. Because of the automobile, we have substituted the suburbs for the warrens of imploded, high density, vertical cities. Thus, the automobile seems to be not only an extension of the individual, his self, his legs, his feet -- his vision; the automobile is in fact an extension of a growing, searching and vigorous society. EMPLOYMENT IN AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY, CALIFORNIA 5.3% of all employment in California is in some way directly related to the automotive industry. The wages and salaries paid to these individuals accounts for 5% of the total wages of all industries and, 10% of the total personal income in California in 1966. Manufacturing - 30,000 employees in 37 automobile plants, warehouses and laboratories in California with a total annual payroll of $203 million. (Approximately 10 percent of the motor vehicles in the U.S. are assembled in California.) Sales and Services (Automobiles, Trucks, Parts, etc.) One out of every six of our business firms in California is in the automotive business. We have 2,500 franchised automobile dealers employing 66,000 persons, 25,000 automotive retail establishments. The total auto sales and service employment in California is about 250,000 with an annual payroll of more than $700 million. -- 16% of all retail employment and 21% of all retail payroll is in this field. And, 22% of our total State revenues come from motor vehicle users taxes. HIGHWAY SAFETY Key Points in Governor Reagan's Safety Program All out campaign to rehabilitate or remove the chronic alcoholic driver from our highways (AB 2538, passed in 1967) Pace-setting demonstration project involving government agencies at all levels, and working with private sectors and medical and education professions. Presumptive limits law - part of Governor's 1968 safety program in legislature. Improved and expanded driver education and training program in secondary schools. (In cooperation with automotive and insurance industries, Governor's Committee on Traffic Safety sponsored the first Teenage Safety Drive in the nation -- 30 kids from all parts of the State, driving from Sacramento to Los Angeles. Perfect record; real success.) Improved and expanded first aid training for peace officers; in-depth survey of existing emergency medical services available to motorists; pilot study on use of helicopters for roadside emergency medical service. (Part of Governor's package in 1967) Accelerated program to improve safety design of highways and highway furniture -- turning hardware into software (new types of light posts, sign posts, etc., which bend, break or shatter more easily, thus reducing structural damage to driver, passengers and vehicle). 2 2 2 Highway Safety (cont.) Elimination of red tape and waste enabled California to up-date some $100 million in highway construction -- used these funds for concrete and steel instead of red tape and paper shuffling. Called for establishment of a California Center for Traffic Safety Research -- a joint effort by government and private sector to probe not only the causes but the cure of highway accidents. (1968 legislature). Call for a pilot facility to develop the most sophisticated and effective vehicle inspection system in America. (1968) *** VEHICLE INSPECTION SYSTEM California and the Federal Government In recent years, the Federal government has become increasingly concerned about highway safety. California, like many states, has been concerned and active in this field for many years. We welcome Federal participation as long as it is directed toward partnership -- and not pre-emption. We trust that the Federal government, like we, will base its activities on constructive effort, facts, and solid research. Hysteria and political expediency -- these are no answer to highway safety. One of the areas in which we -- and you - are greatly concerned is the matter of passenger vehicle inspection. In California, at the present time, we have what is known as the random mandatory inspection system. Through this program, our Highway Patrol conducts frequent and unannounced roadside vehicle inspections. Over a period of a year, these inspections check approximately 10 percent of our passenger cars. At the time the Federal government announced their highway safety standards -- including a standard for periodic vehicle inspection -- we requested, and received, approval to continue our random system on a demonstration project basis. We are continuing that program. At the same time, we are also embarked on a program to develop the most sophisticated, intelligent and effective vehicle inspection system in the nation. This year, if the legislature permits, we hope to start on a pilot inspection facility -- a model station which can lead the way to an honest, meaningful, practical and economical system. 222 Vehicle Inspection System (cont.) We will do this in cooperation with our own research agencies and in cooperation with the automotive industry. The system will utilize the wide experience of the automobile manufacturers in their installation of sophisticated quality control systems; and, the system will embrace the latest techniques in analytical equipment, electronic and computer sciences. Based on our work with the automotive industry to date -- we are confident that within a short period of time we can offer our motorists - your customers -- an inspection program that will be of real value ... saving lives, preventing accidents, avoiding property loss. We look forward to the day when cars will be equipped with built-in sensor components which will permit quick and comprehensive safety inspections. And, may I say that California's vehicle inspection system should be licensed and operated under the free, competitive enterprise philosophy. The State does have a responsibility to keep its highways as safe as possible - but, it should not be in the business of running garages. *** 1968 GOVERNOR'S GOALS file TRAFFIC SAFETY ALCOHOLIC DRIVERS Seek a "presumptive limits" law which would establish that blood-alcohol contents which exceed a certain level mean that the driver in question is presumed to be under the in- fluence of alcohol; all presumptions would be rebuttable in court. Amend the Coroner law to require, in all counties, post mortem blood-alcohol tests on all drivers and adult pedes- trains killed in traffic accidents so as to have information available for research. MOTORCYCLE SAFETY Endorse and support legislation requiring special licensing procedures and special protective equipment for motorcyclists. SCHOOL DRIVER EDUCATION TRAINING Oppose any attempts to weaken program; work to improve quality and extend of this program until every school district conducts a meaningful, well-directed and effective program. LICENSING PROCEDURES Study possibility of permitting schools to certify students as meeting the requirements for drivers' licenses. Study possibility of automatically renewing "good" drivers' licenses by mail while requiring poor" drivers to appear in person for written and driving tests. EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE Implement provisions of 1967 law increasing first aid training for sheriffs, deputies, policemen and firemen, Continue survey now in progress of emergency medical facilities and services currently available; implement survey recommendations to provide proper facilities throughout the state. TRAFFIC SAFETY-2 VEHICLE REGISTRATION STANDARDS Continue California Highway Patrol random mandatory inspection program. Develop an on-site vehicle inspection system. HIGHWAY PLANNING AND DESIGN Press for proper share of federal transportation funds to continue planning and design research. Continue making administrative economies in departments which operate on motor vehicle and gas tax funds so that money will be spent on concrete and steel instead of red tape. INVOLVEMENT OF PRIVATE AND INDEPENDENT SECTORS Press for establishment of the California Center for Traffic Safety Research, a joint government, private- and indepen- dent-sector venture. As a public, non-profit institution, this could be funded with monies already being spent in an uncoordinated way, plus monies from contracts and grants from private organizations and companies. It would seek not only the causes, but also the cures, for highway accidents and would promote studies of the vehicle, the road and the driver. Welcome federal participation in the area of increasing traffic safety as long as this effort was directed toward partnership and not pre-emption.