NSDD 192 The Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty and the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) Program
Images (3)
Document
| id |
id
6879781
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3UNCLASSIFIED
2
All this being said, over the last two years and working
under the constraints as we interpreted them at the inception of
the program, our technical community met my guidance and has
designed our SDI research program to conform to a more
restrictive view of our ABM Treaty obligations. This has
entailed some price with respect to the speed of our progress,
the overall cost of the program, and the level of technical
uncertainty we face at each step in our research. But,
nonetheless, they have crafted a program which, if consistently
supported with the appropriate funding as requested, will permit
us to achieve the goals set for it. 08
s
I have carefully evaluated the price that the U.S. must pay
for keeping our SDI program within the bounds of our current
plans. I have weighed these costs against our overall national
security requirements. Based upon this I have decided that, as
long as the program receives the support needed to implement its
carefully crafted plan, it is not necessary to authorize the
restructuring of the U.S. SDI program towards the boundaries of
Treaty interpretation which the U.S. could observe. This being
the case, the issue of where exactly these boundaries should lie
is moot even though in my judgment a broader interpretation of
our authority is fully justified.
The U.S. SDI program will continue to pursue the course
currently set for it by my previous guidance. Under this course,
there can be absolutely no doubt of the U.S intention to fully
meet its treaty commitments. As we do so, we will continue to
demand that the Soviet Union correct its behavior and come into
full compliance with its obligations, especially in those cases
like the construction of the Krasnoyarsk radar and their
telemetry encryption, among others, in which there are no grounds
for doubt about their non-compliance. In sharp contrast to
Soviet behavior, our clear and principled restraint with respect
to our own SDI program, and the price we are prepared to pay in
exercising that restraint, demonstrates by our deeds, our
sincerity towards negotiated commitments. 100
I can envision that in the future the day will come when our
research will have answered the questions necessary to permit us
to consider going beyond the restrictions that we have and will
continue to observe under the current research program. At that
time, based upon the conditions that we and our allies face and
the behavior of the Soviet Union in the interim, the United
States will have the opportunity to reassess the guidance that I
have set forth in this document. At that time, in accordance
with long-standing U.S. policy and after consultation with our
allies, we will discuss and, as appropriate, negotiate with the
Soviet Union in accordance with the terms of the ABM Treaty.
NCLASSIFIED
Relations
belongs_to