Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 3
RICHARD v. LINDABURY DEPUE & FAULKS frederic J. FAULKS J.EDWARD ASHMEAD JOSIAH stryKer PRUDENTIAL BUILDING TELEHONE MULBERRY1755 JOHN w. BISHOP, UR. WALTER D. BARKER 763 BROAD STREET, NEWARK, N.U. JAMES E.M. TAMS BURTIS S. HORNER July 9, 1925. United States Radium Corp , 30 Church Street, New York City, N. Y. RE: KUSER VS. UNITED STATES RADIUM CORP. Gentlemen: Attention: Mr. Lee. This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of the 8th inst., together with the enclosures referred to therein. It is our understanding that the complaint in this matter was served upon the Company of July 3rd, but that Mr. Roeder, who is named as a party defendant, has not yet been served. We have talked with Mr. McGlynn this morning about this new case, and it is perfectly agreeable to him to make an arrangement with Mr. Kalisch similar to that in the Carlough case, to the effect that no proceedings be taken for the removal of the case to the Federal Court if the case is discontinued as against Mr. Roeder. He does not, however, wish to take any steps in the matter until the papers come to him with instructions from the insurance company, but author- ized us to take up the matter with Mr. Kalisch. We have not yet been able to get in touch with Mr. Kalisch but will do so as soon as we can reach him. the / UNITED STATES RADIUM COAP.