Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
75720626
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 281171825
February 16, 1926.
sus
Redire
RE: CARLOUGH VS U.S. RADIUM CORPORATION
Edward R. McGlynn, Esq.,
810 Broad St.,
Newark, N. J.
Dear Mr. McGlynn,
I have your letter of the 15th inst. I am surprised
to note that Mr. Kalisch's terms of settlement have gone up.
Why does he now demand $1500. for Mr. Kuzer when originally he
was willing to settle his claim for $500? Why does he de-
mand an extra $1500. in payment of his fee when originally he
contemplated securing that from the amounts paid his clients
in settlement?
It seems to me that Mr. Kalisch is bluffing.
I would be glad, however, to have your view as you have been
in direct touch with him.
How much will your client, the American Insurance
Company, be willing to increase its contribution if a settle-
ment is to be made on the terms suggested by Mr. Kalisch?
Yours very truly,
S
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to