Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 2
February 6th, 1929. Dr. Herman Schlundt, University of Missouri, Columbia, No. Dear Dr. Schlundt: Our plans for conducting the tests on the five girls have been changed, and at present February 19th, has been set as the day on which we will begin this work. There is still some question as to exactly when it would be possible to examine Mrs. Mae Cubberley Canfield. As I understand the situation Mr. Berry has requested that Mr. Markley and lr. Smith have authorization from the Court for a date, and that will come up for a hearing next Monday, February llth. We are hoping that the Judge will set either Friday the 15th or the next week as the time for this examination, so that you may complete both tasks while you are here. At present your presence will be required on the 19th of February, and I would suggest that you be available on the 18th, to discuss with Dr. Failla your plans. On Monday of next week we hope to have more information regarding Mrs. Canfield, and I will advise you immediately. I hope that this change will not materially inconvenience you. Referring to your letter of January 22nd and February lst, suggesting corrections on our paper: I must advise that I have not as yet received the proofs. I had hoped that the article would appear in the February issue, but apparently it will be March at the earliest, or possibly April. The article on the Examination of the Post lortem specimens of Leman appeared in the January issue. Very truly yours, HHBarker:RE Vice President.