Ask the Scholar
Page 4 of 4
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT.
ESSEX COUNTY.
MAE CUBBERLEY CANFIELD and
:
RAYMOND CANFIELD,
:
Plaintiffs,
:
Action-At-Law
-VS-
I
STIPULATION.
UNITED STATES RADIUM CORPORA-
TION, a corporation of the State:
of Delaware,
:
Defendant.
:
It is hereby stipulated at the request of plaintiff's
attorneys by and between Messrs. Potter & Berry, attorneys of
the plaintiffs, and Messrs. Collins & Corbin and Edwards &
Smith, attorneys for the defendant in the above entitled matter,
that the oral testimony of witnesses for the plaintiffs, namely,
Dr. E. B. Krumbhaar of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Dr. James
Ewing of New York, Dr. Lloyd F. Craver of New York, and Dr. 0.
Failla of New York, be taken in New York City, New York at two
o'clock in the afternoon, on Thursday, June 27, 1929, at the
office of Miller & Chevalier, #111 Broadway, New York City,
before Micholas Bindseil, a Supreme Court Commissioner and
Special Master of New Jersey, sitting as Special Master or
Officer, said oral testimony as given to be taken down end re-
ported by Nicholas Bindseil as stenographer, who shall make
three transcripts of such testimony to be subscribed and sworn
to by the witnesses as well as by him as the Officer designated
to take such testimony; one transcript of such testimony sub-
scribed and sworn to, to be delivered to each firm of attorneys,
pursuant to the statute in that case made an provided. Said
testimony is taken de bene esse, that is to say, that it is to
be used on the trial only in the event that the witnesses can
not be produced at the trial. The defendant is to have the
right of cross examination of said witnesses. If any of said
witnesses shall appear to testify at the trial his testimony can
not be read into the record by the plaintiff, but the defendant
shall have the right to use said testimony on cross examination
of said witnesses and may offer same in evidence to contradict
said witnesses. If any of said witnesses can not be produced at
the trial, then said testimony may be read into the record at
the instance of either the plaintiff or the defendant, said
testimony to be taken at the expense of plaintiff who will
furnish the defendant with two copies.
Dated: June 10, 1929.
POTTER & BEBRY
Attorneys of Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendant.
Attorneys for Defendant.
NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT.
ESSEX COUNTY.
MAE CUBBERLEY CANFIELD and
RAYMOND CANFIELD,
Plaintiffs,
-vs-
UNITED STATES RADIUM CORPORA-
TION, a corporation of the State
of Delaware,
Defendant.
Action-At-Law
STIPULATION.
Page data
- Page
- 4
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- document
- Media ID
- 71625ab8c0666e08
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75724272
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75724272",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75724272",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Copies of Court Documents, June 10, 1929",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75724272",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001777_Page_1.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001777_Page_1.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001777_Page_1.jpg",
"imageCount": 4,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75724272",
"label": "Copies of Court Documents, June 10, 1929",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75724272"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75724272",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75724272",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Copies of Court Documents, June 10, 1929",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75724272",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001777_Page_1.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001777_Page_1.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001777_Page_1.jpg",
"imageCount": 4,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75724272",
"naId": 75724272,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 4,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "document",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0001777.pdf",
"mediaId": "71625ab8c0666e08",
"ocrText": "NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT.\nESSEX COUNTY.\nMAE CUBBERLEY CANFIELD and\n:\nRAYMOND CANFIELD,\n:\nPlaintiffs,\n:\nAction-At-Law\n-VS-\nI\nSTIPULATION.\nUNITED STATES RADIUM CORPORA-\nTION, a corporation of the State:\nof Delaware,\n:\nDefendant.\n:\nIt is hereby stipulated at the request of plaintiff's\nattorneys by and between Messrs. Potter & Berry, attorneys of\nthe plaintiffs, and Messrs. Collins & Corbin and Edwards &\nSmith, attorneys for the defendant in the above entitled matter,\nthat the oral testimony of witnesses for the plaintiffs, namely,\nDr. E. B. Krumbhaar of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Dr. James\nEwing of New York, Dr. Lloyd F. Craver of New York, and Dr. 0.\nFailla of New York, be taken in New York City, New York at two\no'clock in the afternoon, on Thursday, June 27, 1929, at the\noffice of Miller & Chevalier, #111 Broadway, New York City,\nbefore Micholas Bindseil, a Supreme Court Commissioner and\nSpecial Master of New Jersey, sitting as Special Master or\nOfficer, said oral testimony as given to be taken down end re-\nported by Nicholas Bindseil as stenographer, who shall make\nthree transcripts of such testimony to be subscribed and sworn\nto by the witnesses as well as by him as the Officer designated\nto take such testimony; one transcript of such testimony sub-\nscribed and sworn to, to be delivered to each firm of attorneys,\npursuant to the statute in that case made an provided. Said\ntestimony is taken de bene esse, that is to say, that it is to\nbe used on the trial only in the event that the witnesses can\nnot be produced at the trial. The defendant is to have the\nright of cross examination of said witnesses. If any of said\nwitnesses shall appear to testify at the trial his testimony can\nnot be read into the record by the plaintiff, but the defendant\nshall have the right to use said testimony on cross examination\nof said witnesses and may offer same in evidence to contradict\nsaid witnesses. If any of said witnesses can not be produced at\nthe trial, then said testimony may be read into the record at\nthe instance of either the plaintiff or the defendant, said\ntestimony to be taken at the expense of plaintiff who will\nfurnish the defendant with two copies.\nDated: June 10, 1929.\nPOTTER & BEBRY\nAttorneys of Plaintiff\nAttorneys for Defendant.\nAttorneys for Defendant.\nNEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT.\nESSEX COUNTY.\nMAE CUBBERLEY CANFIELD and\nRAYMOND CANFIELD,\nPlaintiffs,\n-vs-\nUNITED STATES RADIUM CORPORA-\nTION, a corporation of the State\nof Delaware,\nDefendant.\nAction-At-Law\nSTIPULATION."
}