Images (3)
Document
| id |
id
75724277
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 3TREASURY DEPARTMENT
UNITED STATES
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
OFFICE OF
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE
WASHINGTON, D. C.
JUN 111929
AND SANITATION
Room 1-123, "C" Bldg.
16 Seventh St. , S. W.
June 10, 1929
Mr. H. H. Barker,
Vice President,
U. S. Radium Corpn.,
535 Pearl St.
New York, N. Y.
Dear Mr. Barker:
You will recall that in our studies on effect
of radium on workers in watch factories one of the things
we propose to do is to determine the radio active content
of the air in the workrooms. For this purpose we pre-
pose to suck the air through cotton wool and incinerate it
and place the residue inside an ionization chamber and de-
termine the amount of ionization due to it.
In
connec-
tion with this we have asked Dr. Curtis of the Bureau of
Standards to calibrate the ionization chamber for solids
which we propose to use for this purpose. Question has
arisen as to the best method of calibrating the chamber and
he proposes to colibrate it by placing a known quantity
of radium sulphate in the chamber and determining the
rate of deflection of the leaf for it.
Do
you
think
this would be a satisfactory method of calibrating the
chamber? The reason for using radium sulphate is that
Dr. Curtis says when the radium salts are mixed with the
paint they become converted into radium sulphate and that
this probably is the substance which is present in the dust
in the air. Do you think this is SO? It occurs to me
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to