Ask the Scholar

Page 8 of 8
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 8

OCR

NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT ESSEX COUNTY CATHERINE CONNOLLY and # THOMAS CONNOLLY, her husband, I Plaintiffs, # vs. ACTION AT LAW # UNITED STATES RADIUM COMPLAINT CORPORATION (formerly Redium I Luminous Material Corp.), a corporation of the State of $ Delaware, : Defendant. $ Plaintiffs, Catherine Connolly and Thomas Connolly, her husband, residing in the City of Newark, County of Essex and State of New Jersey, complaining of the defendent, any that: FIRST COUNT 1. At the times hereinafter mentioned, the defendent was en- gaged in the business, among other things, of nanufacturing and distribut- ing redium and redium products and manufacturing and distributing radium and other luminous materials. 2. The plaintiff Catherine Connolly was employed by the de- fendant for a period of time from 1917 to 1924 at its plants in the Cities of Newark and Orange, New Jorsey. 3. At the time and place aforesaid, the said plaintiff was directed by the agents and servents of the defendent to aix certain lun- inous materials into paint and to apply the said paint to the surface of various cardboard and metal materials, principally used in the manufacture of watches, clocks and luminous signs. 4. The materials used in making said luminous paint and the implements employed in mixing and applying said paint were furnished by the defendant and the plaintiff was instructed in the nanner in which said materials were to be mixed and the said paint applied by the agents and servants of the defendant. 5. The said defendant know or should have known that the IS- terials furnished to the plaintiff in the performance of her duties as aforesaid contained substances which were dangerous, poisonous and dele- terious to the body and health of the plaintiff, and knew or should have known that the method and manner in which the defendant instructed the plaintiff to use and apply said materials and paint were 30 devised as to negligently expose the plaintiff to the dangerous, poisonous end deleter- ious properties of the ingredients of the said materials. G. It was the duty of the defendant to use reasonable care: (a) to furnish the plaintiff with & safe place in which to conduct or carry on the duties required of her by her employment; (b) to furnish her with safe implements with which to handle the said materials and to ap- ply the said paint; (c) to 80 instruct her in the use of the implements and the handling of said materials as to protect her from any injury by reason of the handling and applying of said materials and paint; (d) to vara the plaintiff of the dangerous, poisonous and deleterious properties of the materials used in the performance of her duties and the denger to her health and person incident to the handling of said materials and the application of said paint, all of which said defendant wholly failed to perform. 7. During the time of her employment with the defendent as aforessid, plaintiff followed the instructions given her as aforessid in sixing the ingredients of the said paint and applying the same to the ver- Lous surfaces as she TAB directed to do by the defendent, and during that time, she was ignorant of the nature, character and composition of the materials furnished her for the making of said luminous paint, and that the said materials were dangerous, poisonous and deleterious to the body and heelth of human beings. In fact, said materials did enter and impregnate her body to her permanent and serious hare. 8. On account of the negligence of the defendant as set forth herein-above, the said plaintiff has become permanently and seriously sick and disabled in her head, body, bones, limbs and nervous system and has be- come infected and poisoned; noroover, her various organs have been attacked so that their functions have been impaired and so that they will progress- ively deteriorate in the future; moreover, the said plaintiff has suffered and will in the future suffer great pain and mental enguish; and, noreover, said plaintiff has been prevented permanently from following any occupation or vocation. SECOND COUNT 1. Paragraphs 1 to 7 inclusive of the First Count are hereby repeated and made a part hereof. 8. As a result of the handling of the said materials by the plaintiff and the mixing and applying of the paint with the implements furnished by the said defendent, in accordance with the instructions given by the defendant, plaintiff's body became, still is, and during the re- mainder of her life will be impregnated with a dangerous, poisonous, harm- ful and deleterious substance. 9. The nature of the said substance which has become improg- nated in the body of the plaintiff 80 herein-above set forth is of such an insidious character that it did not produce the consequential injury to the health and body of the plaintiff 08 herein-sbove set forth until the year of 1931. 10. Paragraph 8 of the First Count is hereby repeated and made & part hereof. THIRD COUNT 1. Paragraphs 1 to 7 inclusive of the First Count are hereby repeated and made a part hereof. 8. Paragraph 8 of the Second Count is hereby repeated and made a part hereof. 9. The said poisonous and deleterious substance and material So introduced into the body of the plaintiff continually attacked the said plaintiff's body internally and continually and progressively broke the same down. 10. The nature of said attacks was such that the consequences and effects did not become apparent, as is the usual course and order of such cases, 80 that the said plaintiff did not have knowledge of the nature of her ailment or that it USB due to the negligence of the said defendant or caused by her work for the defendent as eforessid, until the year of 1951. 11. The said attacks described above were of a continuing, in- sidious and progressive nature end did not culminate or crystallise so as to be susceptible to discovery or diagnosis until the year of 1951. This is all in accordance with the medical nature of such cases. FOURTH COUNT 1. The plaintiff Thomas Connolly is the husband of the plain- tiff Catherine Connolly. 2. Paragraphs 1 to 8 inclusive of the First Count are hereby repeated end made & part hereof. 10. On account of the injuries of his said wife 08 aforesaid, the plaintiff Thomas Connolly has been obliged and will, in the future, be obliged to expend large sump of money in endenvoring to cure his said wife of her ailmenta; moreover, said plaintiff has lost and will in the future lose the services, aid and consortium of his said wofe. FIFTH COUNT 1. The plaintiff Thomas Connolly is the husband of the plain- tiff Catherine Connolly. 2. Paragraphs 1 to 7 inclusive of the First Count are hereby repeated and made a part hersof. 9. Paragraphs 8, 9 and 10 of the Second Count are hereby PO- peated and made a part hereof. 12. On account of the injuries of his said wife as aforessid, the plaintiff Thomas Connolly has been obliged end will, in the future, be obliged to expend large sums of money in endeavoring to cure his said wife of her ailments; moreover, said plaintiff has lost and will in the future lose the services, aid and consortium of his said wife. SIXTH COUNT 1. The plaintiff, Thomas Connolly, is the husband of the plaintiff Catherine Connolly. 2. Paragraphs 1 to 7 inclusive of the First Count are hereby repented and made 8 part hereof. 9. Paragraph 8 of the Second Count is horeby repeated and made 8 part hersof. 10. Paragraphs 9, 10 and 11 of the Third Count are hereby re- posted and made 8 part hereof. 11. On account of the injuries of his said wife as aforessid, the plaintiff Thomas Cosmolly has been obliged and will in the future be obliged to expend large sums of money in endeavoring to cure his said wife of her ailments; moreover, said plaintiff has lost and will in the future lose the services, aid and consortium of his said wife. WHEREFORE, the plaintiff Catherine Connolly demands as damages of the defendant, the sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand ($150,000.00) Dollers on the First, Second and Third Counts. WHEREFORE, the plaintiff Thomas Connolly denands as dan- ages of the defendant, the sun of Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) Dollars on the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Counts. (Signed) Schnsider & Schneider Attorneys of Plaintiffs. NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT ESSEX COUNTY CATHER INE CONNOLLY and THOMAS CONNOLLY, her husband, Plaintiffs, VS. UNITED STATES RADIUM CORPORATION (formerly Radium Luminous Materia Corp.), a corporation of the State of Delaware, Served on Alfred F. McCabe, Defendants. Asst. Secy. at 11:10 A.M., March 11, 1933. SCHNEIDER & SCHNEIDER Atrorneys of Plaintiffs, Corporation Trust Co., Lefcourt Building Jersey City. Newark, New Jersey. A True Copy JOSEPH E. COLFORD, Sheriff

Page data

Page
8
Source index
0
Type
document
Media ID
3ea7034772f63de7
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
75727471
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "75727471",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75727471",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Copies of Court Documents, March 11, 1933",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75727471",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002764_Page_1.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002764_Page_1.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002764_Page_1.jpg",
    "imageCount": 8,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "75727471",
    "label": "Copies of Court Documents, March 11, 1933",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75727471"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "75727471",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75727471",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Copies of Court Documents, March 11, 1933",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75727471",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002764_Page_1.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002764_Page_1.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002764_Page_1.jpg",
    "imageCount": 8,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75727471",
    "naId": 75727471,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 8,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "document",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002764.pdf",
    "mediaId": "3ea7034772f63de7",
    "ocrText": "NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT\nESSEX COUNTY\nCATHERINE CONNOLLY and\n#\nTHOMAS CONNOLLY, her husband,\nI\nPlaintiffs,\n#\nvs.\nACTION AT LAW\n#\nUNITED STATES RADIUM\nCOMPLAINT\nCORPORATION (formerly Redium\nI\nLuminous Material Corp.), a\ncorporation of the State of\n$\nDelaware,\n:\nDefendant.\n$\nPlaintiffs, Catherine Connolly and Thomas Connolly, her\nhusband, residing in the City of Newark, County of Essex and State of\nNew Jersey, complaining of the defendent, any that:\nFIRST COUNT\n1. At the times hereinafter mentioned, the defendent was en-\ngaged in the business, among other things, of nanufacturing and distribut-\ning redium and redium products and manufacturing and distributing radium\nand other luminous materials.\n2. The plaintiff Catherine Connolly was employed by the de-\nfendant for a period of time from 1917 to 1924 at its plants in the Cities\nof Newark and Orange, New Jorsey.\n3. At the time and place aforesaid, the said plaintiff was\ndirected by the agents and servents of the defendent to aix certain lun-\ninous materials into paint and to apply the said paint to the surface of\nvarious cardboard and metal materials, principally used in the manufacture\nof watches, clocks and luminous signs.\n4. The materials used in making said luminous paint and the\nimplements employed in mixing and applying said paint were furnished by\nthe defendant and the plaintiff was instructed in the nanner in which said\nmaterials were to be mixed and the said paint applied by the agents and\nservants of the defendant.\n5. The said defendant know or should have known that the IS-\nterials furnished to the plaintiff in the performance of her duties as\naforesaid contained substances which were dangerous, poisonous and dele-\nterious to the body and health of the plaintiff, and knew or should have\nknown that the method and manner in which the defendant instructed the\nplaintiff to use and apply said materials and paint were 30 devised as to\nnegligently expose the plaintiff to the dangerous, poisonous end deleter-\nious properties of the ingredients of the said materials.\nG. It was the duty of the defendant to use reasonable care:\n(a) to furnish the plaintiff with & safe place in which to conduct or\ncarry on the duties required of her by her employment; (b) to furnish\nher with safe implements with which to handle the said materials and to ap-\nply the said paint; (c) to 80 instruct her in the use of the implements\nand the handling of said materials as to protect her from any injury by\nreason of the handling and applying of said materials and paint; (d) to\nvara the plaintiff of the dangerous, poisonous and deleterious properties\nof the materials used in the performance of her duties and the denger to\nher health and person incident to the handling of said materials and the\napplication of said paint, all of which said defendant wholly failed to\nperform.\n7. During the time of her employment with the defendent as\naforessid, plaintiff followed the instructions given her as aforessid in\nsixing the ingredients of the said paint and applying the same to the ver-\nLous surfaces as she TAB directed to do by the defendent, and during that\ntime, she was ignorant of the nature, character and composition of the\nmaterials furnished her for the making of said luminous paint, and that the\nsaid materials were dangerous, poisonous and deleterious to the body and\nheelth of human beings. In fact, said materials did enter and impregnate\nher body to her permanent and serious hare.\n8. On account of the negligence of the defendant as set forth\nherein-above, the said plaintiff has become permanently and seriously sick\nand disabled in her head, body, bones, limbs and nervous system and has be-\ncome infected and poisoned; noroover, her various organs have been attacked\nso that their functions have been impaired and so that they will progress-\nively deteriorate in the future; moreover, the said plaintiff has suffered\nand will in the future suffer great pain and mental enguish; and, noreover,\nsaid plaintiff has been prevented permanently from following any occupation\nor vocation.\nSECOND COUNT\n1. Paragraphs 1 to 7 inclusive of the First Count are hereby\nrepeated and made a part hereof.\n8. As a result of the handling of the said materials by the\nplaintiff and the mixing and applying of the paint with the implements\nfurnished by the said defendent, in accordance with the instructions given\nby the defendant, plaintiff's body became, still is, and during the re-\nmainder of her life will be impregnated with a dangerous, poisonous, harm-\nful and deleterious substance.\n9. The nature of the said substance which has become improg-\nnated in the body of the plaintiff 80 herein-above set forth is of such\nan insidious character that it did not produce the consequential injury\nto the health and body of the plaintiff 08 herein-sbove set forth until\nthe year of 1931.\n10. Paragraph 8 of the First Count is hereby repeated and made\n& part hereof.\nTHIRD COUNT\n1. Paragraphs 1 to 7 inclusive of the First Count are hereby\nrepeated and made a part hereof.\n8. Paragraph 8 of the Second Count is hereby repeated and\nmade a part hereof.\n9. The said poisonous and deleterious substance and material\nSo introduced into the body of the plaintiff continually attacked the\nsaid plaintiff's body internally and continually and progressively broke\nthe same down.\n10. The nature of said attacks was such that the consequences\nand effects did not become apparent, as is the usual course and order of\nsuch cases, 80 that the said plaintiff did not have knowledge of the nature\nof her ailment or that it USB due to the negligence of the said defendant\nor caused by her work for the defendent as eforessid, until the year of\n1951.\n11. The said attacks described above were of a continuing, in-\nsidious and progressive nature end did not culminate or crystallise so\nas to be susceptible to discovery or diagnosis until the year of 1951.\nThis is all in accordance with the medical nature of such cases.\nFOURTH COUNT\n1. The plaintiff Thomas Connolly is the husband of the plain-\ntiff Catherine Connolly.\n2. Paragraphs 1 to 8 inclusive of the First Count are hereby\nrepeated end made & part hereof.\n10. On account of the injuries of his said wife 08 aforesaid,\nthe plaintiff Thomas Connolly has been obliged and will, in the future,\nbe obliged to expend large sump of money in endenvoring to cure his said\nwife of her ailmenta; moreover, said plaintiff has lost and will in the\nfuture lose the services, aid and consortium of his said wofe.\nFIFTH COUNT\n1. The plaintiff Thomas Connolly is the husband of the plain-\ntiff Catherine Connolly.\n2. Paragraphs 1 to 7 inclusive of the First Count are hereby\nrepeated and made a part hersof.\n9. Paragraphs 8, 9 and 10 of the Second Count are hereby PO-\npeated and made a part hereof.\n12. On account of the injuries of his said wife as aforessid,\nthe plaintiff Thomas Connolly has been obliged end will, in the future,\nbe obliged to expend large sums of money in endeavoring to cure his said\nwife of her ailments; moreover, said plaintiff has lost and will in the\nfuture lose the services, aid and consortium of his said wife.\nSIXTH COUNT\n1. The plaintiff, Thomas Connolly, is the husband of the\nplaintiff Catherine Connolly.\n2. Paragraphs 1 to 7 inclusive of the First Count are hereby\nrepented and made 8 part hereof.\n9. Paragraph 8 of the Second Count is horeby repeated and made\n8 part hersof.\n10. Paragraphs 9, 10 and 11 of the Third Count are hereby re-\nposted and made 8 part hereof.\n11. On account of the injuries of his said wife as aforessid,\nthe plaintiff Thomas Cosmolly has been obliged and will in the future be\nobliged to expend large sums of money in endeavoring to cure his said wife\nof her ailments; moreover, said plaintiff has lost and will in the future\nlose the services, aid and consortium of his said wife.\nWHEREFORE, the plaintiff Catherine Connolly demands as\ndamages of the defendant, the sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand\n($150,000.00) Dollers on the First, Second and Third Counts.\nWHEREFORE, the plaintiff Thomas Connolly denands as dan-\nages of the defendant, the sun of Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) Dollars\non the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Counts.\n(Signed) Schnsider & Schneider\nAttorneys of Plaintiffs.\nNEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT\nESSEX COUNTY\nCATHER INE CONNOLLY and\nTHOMAS CONNOLLY, her husband,\nPlaintiffs,\nVS.\nUNITED STATES RADIUM CORPORATION\n(formerly Radium Luminous Materia\nCorp.), a corporation of the\nState of Delaware,\nServed on\nAlfred F. McCabe,\nDefendants.\nAsst. Secy.\nat 11:10 A.M.,\nMarch 11, 1933.\nSCHNEIDER & SCHNEIDER\nAtrorneys of Plaintiffs,\nCorporation Trust Co.,\nLefcourt Building\nJersey City.\nNewark, New Jersey.\nA True Copy\nJOSEPH E. COLFORD,\nSheriff"
}