Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
75727758
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2March 23, 1934.
Mr. Edwin F. Snith,
Edvards, Snith & Dawson,
#1 Exchange Place,
Jersey City, N.J.
Re: La Porte V. U. S. Badium Corp.
Desr Mr. Smith:
Tie have your letter of March 20th together
with enclosure of Answers to Interrogatories.
Interrogatory No. 3. Our records are quite
definite to the effect that nothing except radium was
used in our solf luminous material prior to May 1919,
after which both radium and mesothorium in varying
quantities were used for a pierod of years.
Interrogatory No. 6. We removed our operations
from Essex Avenue, Newark, on October lst, 1917, rather than
November lst, and on High Street, Orange, from October lst,
1917 thereafter.
Interrogatory No. 34. This point has probably
been covered about as well as it would be possible to do.
Thile we might speculate as to precautions given, particular-
ly from a sanitary standpoint, still we are not able to back
up such instructions unless through the testimony of in-
structors or people in charge of the application plant, some
of whom are on our list of possible witnesses to be inter-
viewed prior to the trial set for June 4th, 1934.
Very truly yours,
HHBarker: DK
Vice-President
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to