Ask the Scholar
Page 2 of 2
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
January 11, 1935.
Dr. S. C. Lind,
University of Minnesota,
Minneapolis, Minn.
Dear Dr. Lind:
This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of
January 2nd with bill for your trip to New Jersey enclosed.
lie are at present working on the adjustment of some financial
arrangements relative to the LaPorte case, and as soon as
these matters have been agreed upon, check will go forward,
which should be within the next two or three weeks.
The court proceedings in the LaPorte case were
concluded on Thursday, December 27th, at which time the Judge
requested that final briefs be submitted by February 16th,
after which of course he can review at his leisure and render
a decision. We are, however, hopeful that we will have a final
decision in the matter by June or July.
The expert testimony taken after you left went very
well indeed. Dr. Schlundt handled himself very ably, and Dr.
Failla made a very, very good impression upon the court. Due
to his connections, the court allowed him to qualify on the
medical as well as the physical aspect of the subject, and
therefore his testimony was of 8 broader nature. We are of the
opinion that the court was very well impressed with the testimony
adduced from Dr. Failla. As regards myself, I had no difficulty
with the exception that Mr. Emmerglick picked up your article on
the "solubility of radium sulphate and devoted most of his cross
examination to your paper. I,however, feel that the matter was
handled in such a way that it did not detract from other testimony
taken. Mr. Emmerglick tried to introduce the article in evidence,
but the court refused to allow him to do so inasmuch as I agreed
with the article, and certain extracts from the same had been read
in the record.
We again wish to thank you for your cooperation in
assisting us in this case. Fie know that the delay in setting the
date caused you considerable inconvenience, and we appreciate your
bearing with us in this matter.
With our very best wishes, we are,
Sincerely yours,
HHBarker:DK
Vice-President
Page data
- Page
- 2
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- document
- Media ID
- ab2ef02bf0f70f9c
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75728572
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75728572",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75728572",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Sent to Dr. Lind [Dr. S.C. Lind], January 11, 1935",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75728572",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003107.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003107.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003107.jpg",
"imageCount": 2,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75728572",
"label": "Letters Sent to Dr. Lind [Dr. S.C. Lind], January 11, 1935",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75728572"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75728572",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75728572",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Sent to Dr. Lind [Dr. S.C. Lind], January 11, 1935",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75728572",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003107.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003107.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003107.jpg",
"imageCount": 2,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75728572",
"naId": 75728572,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 2,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "document",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003107.pdf",
"mediaId": "ab2ef02bf0f70f9c",
"ocrText": "January 11, 1935.\nDr. S. C. Lind,\nUniversity of Minnesota,\nMinneapolis, Minn.\nDear Dr. Lind:\nThis will acknowledge receipt of your letter of\nJanuary 2nd with bill for your trip to New Jersey enclosed.\nlie are at present working on the adjustment of some financial\narrangements relative to the LaPorte case, and as soon as\nthese matters have been agreed upon, check will go forward,\nwhich should be within the next two or three weeks.\nThe court proceedings in the LaPorte case were\nconcluded on Thursday, December 27th, at which time the Judge\nrequested that final briefs be submitted by February 16th,\nafter which of course he can review at his leisure and render\na decision. We are, however, hopeful that we will have a final\ndecision in the matter by June or July.\nThe expert testimony taken after you left went very\nwell indeed. Dr. Schlundt handled himself very ably, and Dr.\nFailla made a very, very good impression upon the court. Due\nto his connections, the court allowed him to qualify on the\nmedical as well as the physical aspect of the subject, and\ntherefore his testimony was of 8 broader nature. We are of the\nopinion that the court was very well impressed with the testimony\nadduced from Dr. Failla. As regards myself, I had no difficulty\nwith the exception that Mr. Emmerglick picked up your article on\nthe \"solubility of radium sulphate and devoted most of his cross\nexamination to your paper. I,however, feel that the matter was\nhandled in such a way that it did not detract from other testimony\ntaken. Mr. Emmerglick tried to introduce the article in evidence,\nbut the court refused to allow him to do so inasmuch as I agreed\nwith the article, and certain extracts from the same had been read\nin the record.\nWe again wish to thank you for your cooperation in\nassisting us in this case. Fie know that the delay in setting the\ndate caused you considerable inconvenience, and we appreciate your\nbearing with us in this matter.\nWith our very best wishes, we are,\nSincerely yours,\nHHBarker:DK\nVice-President"
}