Ask the Scholar
Page 2 of 2
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
July 20, 1935.
c & 0 1461 Anite J. Burricelli vs. United States
Radium Corp.
0 & C 1484 Harold J. Weber, Admr. ad pros. etc.
VS. United States Radium Corp.
Leonard J. Emmerglick, Esq.,
1172 Raymond Boulevard,
Newark, N. J.
Dear Mr. Emmerglick:
In the Burricelli case Mr. Milton M. Unger appears
for the plaintiff as attorney of record, while you appear in the
Weber case. I understand, however, from my telephonic talk
with you today that you are actually in charge of both cases.
Therefore I am directing my correspondence to you at this time
although I am writing to Mr. Unger that if it is agreeable to
him, the future correspondence will be directed to you solely.
I am sending him 8 copy of this letter for his information.
The summons and complaint in the Weber case was
served on July 9th while in the Burricelli case it was served
on July 10th. We therefore have considerable time in which to
proceed, although I understand from my talk with you that we
may have additional time if desired, the understanding being
that the case will be put at issue about the time the Fall term
opens, if practicable. AB soon as I get to it, I shall draft a
demand for particulars in each case and send It to you for
acknowledgment of service.
AB you know, Judge Forman has not yet decided the
case of La Porte V. U. 8. Radium Corp. and of course his decision
in that case, I presume, will have a considerable effect on these
cases assuming that it is adverse to you. It would therefore
seem to be unnecessary for us to go shead with physical examine-
tions, X-rays, blood tests, etc. in the case of Anita J. Burri-
celli. May 1t be understood that in that case we may have these
examinations after the decision by Judge Forman if we then deal TO
them?
Sincerely yours,
EAM:AG
E. A. MARKLEY
Page data
- Page
- 2
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- document
- Media ID
- c4ea2c619b2c2da6
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75728978
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75728978",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75728978",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Sent to Leonard J. Emmerglick, July 20, 1935",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75728978",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003233.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003233.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003233.jpg",
"imageCount": 2,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75728978",
"label": "Letters Sent to Leonard J. Emmerglick, July 20, 1935",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75728978"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75728978",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75728978",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Sent to Leonard J. Emmerglick, July 20, 1935",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75728978",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003233.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003233.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003233.jpg",
"imageCount": 2,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75728978",
"naId": 75728978,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 2,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "document",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003233.pdf",
"mediaId": "c4ea2c619b2c2da6",
"ocrText": "July 20, 1935.\nc & 0 1461 Anite J. Burricelli vs. United States\nRadium Corp.\n0 & C 1484 Harold J. Weber, Admr. ad pros. etc.\nVS. United States Radium Corp.\nLeonard J. Emmerglick, Esq.,\n1172 Raymond Boulevard,\nNewark, N. J.\nDear Mr. Emmerglick:\nIn the Burricelli case Mr. Milton M. Unger appears\nfor the plaintiff as attorney of record, while you appear in the\nWeber case. I understand, however, from my telephonic talk\nwith you today that you are actually in charge of both cases.\nTherefore I am directing my correspondence to you at this time\nalthough I am writing to Mr. Unger that if it is agreeable to\nhim, the future correspondence will be directed to you solely.\nI am sending him 8 copy of this letter for his information.\nThe summons and complaint in the Weber case was\nserved on July 9th while in the Burricelli case it was served\non July 10th. We therefore have considerable time in which to\nproceed, although I understand from my talk with you that we\nmay have additional time if desired, the understanding being\nthat the case will be put at issue about the time the Fall term\nopens, if practicable. AB soon as I get to it, I shall draft a\ndemand for particulars in each case and send It to you for\nacknowledgment of service.\nAB you know, Judge Forman has not yet decided the\ncase of La Porte V. U. 8. Radium Corp. and of course his decision\nin that case, I presume, will have a considerable effect on these\ncases assuming that it is adverse to you. It would therefore\nseem to be unnecessary for us to go shead with physical examine-\ntions, X-rays, blood tests, etc. in the case of Anita J. Burri-\ncelli. May 1t be understood that in that case we may have these\nexaminations after the decision by Judge Forman if we then deal TO\nthem?\nSincerely yours,\nEAM:AG\nE. A. MARKLEY"
}