Ask the Scholar
Page 2 of 2
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
Sept. 19, 1935.
Mr. E. A. Markley,
%Collins & Corbin,
#1 Exchange Pl.,
Jersey City, N.J.
Re: Burricelli vs. U.S. Radium Corp.
Dear Mr. Markley:
In response to your request of September 17th, enclos-
ing request from Mr. Emmerglick for photostatic copies of en-
ployment record of the above compalinant; we are herewith en-
closing two photostatic copies of same.
As you will note, the employment card in this case is
very indefinite and gives little or no information. In review-
ing our weekly payroll sheets for the period when Burricelli
was employed by us, 1 find that she appeared on our records com-
mencing November 14, 1918, and her name continuously appeared
thereon during 1919-1920, up until the second or third week of
January, 1921. Her name again appears for the period ending May
11th, 1921, and continues thereon until the early part of June
of the same year.
As you have been previously advised, we have no records
prior to the week ending November 14, 1918, and our records are
missing for the period January 14, 1921 to May 11, 1921. We there-
fore note that the above case was on our records as far back as
any that we have, and we may assume, I believe, that her employment
was continuous, with the exception of a few scattered weeks, until
the early part of June, 1921.
Her weekly salary during 1919 and the early part of 1920
was from $12.00 to $15.00 or $16.00 per week, and gradually tapered
off thereafter, until the last two weeks of her employment, which
were the first two weeks in January, when she received $5.00 and
$3.77.
Very truly yours,
HSBarker: DK.
Vice-President
enc.
Page data
- Page
- 2
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- document
- Media ID
- 98c279a4cf94ec0e
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75729097
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75729097",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729097",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Sent to E.A. Markley, September 19, 1935",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729097",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003263.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003263.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003263.jpg",
"imageCount": 2,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75729097",
"label": "Letters Sent to E.A. Markley, September 19, 1935",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729097"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75729097",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729097",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Sent to E.A. Markley, September 19, 1935",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729097",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003263.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003263.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003263.jpg",
"imageCount": 2,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729097",
"naId": 75729097,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 2,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "document",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003263.pdf",
"mediaId": "98c279a4cf94ec0e",
"ocrText": "Sept. 19, 1935.\nMr. E. A. Markley,\n%Collins & Corbin,\n#1 Exchange Pl.,\nJersey City, N.J.\nRe: Burricelli vs. U.S. Radium Corp.\nDear Mr. Markley:\nIn response to your request of September 17th, enclos-\ning request from Mr. Emmerglick for photostatic copies of en-\nployment record of the above compalinant; we are herewith en-\nclosing two photostatic copies of same.\nAs you will note, the employment card in this case is\nvery indefinite and gives little or no information. In review-\ning our weekly payroll sheets for the period when Burricelli\nwas employed by us, 1 find that she appeared on our records com-\nmencing November 14, 1918, and her name continuously appeared\nthereon during 1919-1920, up until the second or third week of\nJanuary, 1921. Her name again appears for the period ending May\n11th, 1921, and continues thereon until the early part of June\nof the same year.\nAs you have been previously advised, we have no records\nprior to the week ending November 14, 1918, and our records are\nmissing for the period January 14, 1921 to May 11, 1921. We there-\nfore note that the above case was on our records as far back as\nany that we have, and we may assume, I believe, that her employment\nwas continuous, with the exception of a few scattered weeks, until\nthe early part of June, 1921.\nHer weekly salary during 1919 and the early part of 1920\nwas from $12.00 to $15.00 or $16.00 per week, and gradually tapered\noff thereafter, until the last two weeks of her employment, which\nwere the first two weeks in January, when she received $5.00 and\n$3.77.\nVery truly yours,\nHSBarker: DK.\nVice-President\nenc."
}