Museado / NARA Collection slc — Collection slc
Recent Folios
Login Register
English español (Spanish) magyar (Hungarian)

Survos folio page chat

Letters Received to Mr. Lee [C.B. Lee], March 4, 1936

Ask the Scholar

Page 2 of 2
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 2

OCR

William D. Edwards Edwin F. Smith Edwards, Smith & Dawson MAR 5 1936 No.1. Exchange Place Raymond Dauson Forrest Smith Attorneys & Counsellors at Law Jersey City, N.J. Charles M. James Allen C. Mathias Bergen 4 -2035 George Echelman Edwards & Smith March 4, 1936. United States Radium Corp. 535 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y. Att: Mr. Lee. Re: LaPorte V. U.S. Radium Corp. My dear Mr. Lee: Confirming our talk of this morning, I write this letter. As you know, the Court of Errors and Appeals has decided that the policy of insurance carried by your company with the New Amsterdam Casualty Company (and also some of the other companies) did not cover occupational dis- eases, especially as set out in the case of Helen Tuck versus United States Radium Corporation. In the case of LaPorte versus United States Radium Corporation, you will remember that Judge Forman has decided the case in favor of your company. Application has been made by Mr. Emmerglick to have costs and counsel fees allowed to him, and he has served notice upon Messrs. Collins & Corbin and ourselves, who appeared of record as attorneys for the United States Radium Corporation. In view of the decision of the Court of Errors and Appeals upon the policy, the New Amsterdam (which retained this office to represent you under its policy some long time ago) feels that it should take no further action in the matter. It is willing, however, (provided you consent thereto), that we should acknowledge service, as attorneys of record of the United States Radium Corporation, on this notice of motion for allowance of counsel fees and costs, which has been served upon us by Mr. Emmerglick; it being distinctly understood that our doing so is without prejudice to any rights of the New Amsterdam Casualty Company, and without incurring any obligation upon its part to your company. The above matters were talked over between us over the telephone this morning, and you have agreed to the foregoing, but I write this letter so the matter may be of record. EFS:RH Edwin Very 7. truly Swith yours

Page data

Page
2
Source index
0
Type
document
Media ID
3b6ad905d4a177ef
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
75729266
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data 
{
    "id": "75729266",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729266",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letters Received to Mr. Lee [C.B. Lee], March 4, 1936",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729266",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003306.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003306.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003306.jpg",
    "imageCount": 2,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity 
{
    "localId": "75729266",
    "label": "Letters Received to Mr. Lee [C.B. Lee], March 4, 1936",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729266"
}
Document source metadata 
{
    "id": "75729266",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729266",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letters Received to Mr. Lee [C.B. Lee], March 4, 1936",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729266",
    "collections": [
        "Safety Light Collection",
        "Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003306.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003306.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003306.jpg",
    "imageCount": 2,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras 
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75729266",
    "naId": 75729266,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context 
{
    "seq": 2,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "document",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003306.pdf",
    "mediaId": "3b6ad905d4a177ef",
    "ocrText": "William D. Edwards\nEdwin F. Smith\nEdwards, Smith & Dawson\nMAR 5 1936\nNo.1. Exchange Place\nRaymond Dauson\nForrest Smith\nAttorneys & Counsellors at Law\nJersey City, N.J.\nCharles M. James\nAllen C. Mathias\nBergen 4 -2035\nGeorge Echelman\nEdwards & Smith\nMarch 4, 1936.\nUnited States Radium Corp.\n535 Pearl Street,\nNew York, N.Y.\nAtt: Mr. Lee.\nRe: LaPorte V. U.S. Radium Corp.\nMy dear Mr. Lee:\nConfirming our talk of this morning, I\nwrite this letter.\nAs you know, the Court of Errors and Appeals\nhas decided that the policy of insurance carried by your\ncompany with the New Amsterdam Casualty Company (and also\nsome of the other companies) did not cover occupational dis-\neases, especially as set out in the case of Helen Tuck versus\nUnited States Radium Corporation. In the case of LaPorte\nversus United States Radium Corporation, you will remember\nthat Judge Forman has decided the case in favor of your company.\nApplication has been made by Mr. Emmerglick to have costs and\ncounsel fees allowed to him, and he has served notice upon\nMessrs. Collins & Corbin and ourselves, who appeared of record\nas attorneys for the United States Radium Corporation.\nIn view of the decision of the Court of\nErrors and Appeals upon the policy, the New Amsterdam (which\nretained this office to represent you under its policy some\nlong time ago) feels that it should take no further action in\nthe matter. It is willing, however, (provided you consent\nthereto), that we should acknowledge service, as attorneys of\nrecord of the United States Radium Corporation, on this notice\nof motion for allowance of counsel fees and costs, which has\nbeen served upon us by Mr. Emmerglick; it being distinctly\nunderstood that our doing so is without prejudice to any rights\nof the New Amsterdam Casualty Company, and without incurring\nany obligation upon its part to your company.\nThe above matters were talked over between\nus over the telephone this morning, and you have agreed to the\nforegoing, but I write this letter so the matter may be of\nrecord.\nEFS:RH\nEdwin Very 7. truly Swith yours"
}