Ask the Scholar
Page 14 of 20
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
Page 14 -
report before it received a copy of same from us. This is the only incident in
the whole affair where it may be considered we attempted to conceal. The Vice
Chencellor called this "defensive concealment", and no doubt the officials of the
Labor Department will substänhtate us on this point, insofar as it is possible
without placing themselves in a position to be criticized.
The La bor Department
was aware of the recommendations in the Drinker report, and that we had bought
all of such recommendations into force. Further they concurred with us that part
of these recomendations were impractical and gave their consent to our eliminating
such of these recommendations as were impractical
We had the fullest
cooperation of the Labor Department in this regard, and they at all times were
entirely aware of our actions. Upon the request of the Labor Department it
must be remembered that the complete report was sent to them, after which their
attitude was no different than prior to the time that such report TRS not in their
hands.
MeBride,Roadh,Roeder.
34. This answered in paragraph 33.
35.
Dr. Drinker's report was in no way misrepresented to the Labor Department, for
we never misquoted any statement made in his report. As preveously indicated
we did not supply the Labor Department with the entire report originally, but
that cannot be considered as misrepresentation, especially in view of the fact
that Dr. Drinker had supplied the Labor Department with such report. At the
time of the receipt 6f the Drinker report there were several suits pending against
us and we certainly were jusfified in endeavoring to protect our rights and
beliefs under such conditions. Dr. Drinker had been paid for his services, and
we would have been glad to have him continue his investigation and render us further
services so far as it were possible for him to do. We felt that his action was
most extraordinary, and from an professional standpoint quite unethical.
lfr. Roder
36. Statement in this paragraph admitted.
37. Dr. Flinn was brought into the picture in March 1925, by Dr. Gilbert Thompson
Page data
- Page
- 14
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 159b5031383b4959
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75730723
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75730723",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75730723",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Medical Record, no date",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75730723",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003698_Page_01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003698_Page_01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003698_Page_01.jpg",
"imageCount": 20,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75730723",
"label": "Medical Record, no date",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75730723"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75730723",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75730723",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Medical Record, no date",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75730723",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003698_Page_01.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003698_Page_01.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003698_Page_01.jpg",
"imageCount": 20,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75730723",
"naId": 75730723,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 14,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0003698_Page_14.jpg",
"mediaId": "159b5031383b4959",
"ocrText": "Page 14 -\nreport before it received a copy of same from us. This is the only incident in\nthe whole affair where it may be considered we attempted to conceal. The Vice\nChencellor called this \"defensive concealment\", and no doubt the officials of the\nLabor Department will substänhtate us on this point, insofar as it is possible\nwithout placing themselves in a position to be criticized.\nThe La bor Department\nwas aware of the recommendations in the Drinker report, and that we had bought\nall of such recommendations into force. Further they concurred with us that part\nof these recomendations were impractical and gave their consent to our eliminating\nsuch of these recommendations as were impractical\nWe had the fullest\ncooperation of the Labor Department in this regard, and they at all times were\nentirely aware of our actions. Upon the request of the Labor Department it\nmust be remembered that the complete report was sent to them, after which their\nattitude was no different than prior to the time that such report TRS not in their\nhands.\nMeBride,Roadh,Roeder.\n34. This answered in paragraph 33.\n35.\nDr. Drinker's report was in no way misrepresented to the Labor Department, for\nwe never misquoted any statement made in his report. As preveously indicated\nwe did not supply the Labor Department with the entire report originally, but\nthat cannot be considered as misrepresentation, especially in view of the fact\nthat Dr. Drinker had supplied the Labor Department with such report. At the\ntime of the receipt 6f the Drinker report there were several suits pending against\nus and we certainly were jusfified in endeavoring to protect our rights and\nbeliefs under such conditions. Dr. Drinker had been paid for his services, and\nwe would have been glad to have him continue his investigation and render us further\nservices so far as it were possible for him to do. We felt that his action was\nmost extraordinary, and from an professional standpoint quite unethical.\nlfr. Roder\n36. Statement in this paragraph admitted.\n37. Dr. Flinn was brought into the picture in March 1925, by Dr. Gilbert Thompson"
}