Ask the Scholar
Page 63 of 101
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
Feb- 16-98 04: I8P
P.06
We are pleased that the joint letter to Congress reflects our commitment
to evaluate any legislation in its entirety, including the legislation's impact on the
ability of the civil justice system to protect the public health. As public health
organizations, it is only right that we base our final position on any legislation on
its overall impact on the public health and its potential to reduce the number of
people who become addicted to tobacco, experience tobacco related disease,
and die from tobacco use.
We will only support strong, comprehensive legislation that addresses the
needs of the American public and the June 20, 1997 Agreement as negotiated
does not meet those criteria. We will oppose and urge the President to veto any
legislation that undercuts our public health goals now or the public health
community's ability to deal with unanticipated actions by the tobacco industry in
the future either as the result of weak public health provisions or as the result of
a broad grant of immunity to the tobacco industry
Despite this position, it is possible that we may very well be confronted
with legislation that meets our public health goals and the President's public
health criteria, that includes provisions that the public health community agrees
would save millions of lives by reducing tobacco use dramatically, but which also
addresses the tobacco industry's liability in some limited way that does not grant
the industry immunity or weaken the ability of the civil justice system to protect
the public health or defend fundamental rights. Given that possibility and our
commitment to the public health, we believe it would be wrong for us to take a
position that would prevent us from fully evaluating such a proposal in its entirety
at that time. As you are aware, we also believe it is important that we carefully
articulate our views because it would be unfair to our members and members of
Congress to take a position only to turn around at the end of the process and
support legislation that does not meet these criteria.
Just this past week, we evaluated a bill introduced by Senator Kent
Conrad by examining its overall impact on the public health. But, the bill also
includes provisions that will prevent the federal government from suing the
tobacco industry to recover Medicare (and Medicaid) costs associated with
tobacco-caused disease. These provisions provide a level of liability protection
for the tobacco industry. But, on balance, we believe the bill offered by Senator
Conrad has the potential to save millions of lives and would support its passage
We are concerned about sending a signal to the Congressional leadership that
even Senator Conrad's bill is unacceptable. We are also aware that bipartisan
legislation is being drafted that meets our public health criteria, but which may
never see the light of day if the message we deliver does not accurately reflect
our position
CLINTON LIBRARY PHOTOCOPY
PHOTOCOPY
PRESERVATION
Page data
- Page
- 63
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- bd98c66abc5f38b7
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 26413612
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "26413612",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413612",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Tobacco Liability [1]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413612",
"collections": [
"Records of the Domestic Policy Council (Clinton Administration)",
"Bruce Reed's Tobacco Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/12/4136/26413612/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_270/42-t-7367462-20110299S-270-013-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_270_013_2015_Page_001.JPG",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/12/4136/26413612/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_270/42-t-7367462-20110299S-270-013-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_270_013_2015_Page_001.JPG",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/12/4136/26413612/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_270/42-t-7367462-20110299S-270-013-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_270_013_2015_Page_001.JPG",
"imageCount": 101,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "26413612",
"label": "Tobacco Liability [1]",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413612"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "26413612",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413612",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Tobacco Liability [1]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413612",
"collections": [
"Records of the Domestic Policy Council (Clinton Administration)",
"Bruce Reed's Tobacco Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/12/4136/26413612/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_270/42-t-7367462-20110299S-270-013-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_270_013_2015_Page_001.JPG",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/12/4136/26413612/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_270/42-t-7367462-20110299S-270-013-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_270_013_2015_Page_001.JPG",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/12/4136/26413612/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_270/42-t-7367462-20110299S-270-013-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_270_013_2015_Page_001.JPG",
"imageCount": 101,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/26413612",
"naId": 26413612,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"otherTitles": [
"42-t-7367462-20110299S-270-013-2015"
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 63,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/12/4136/26413612/content/presidential-libraries/clinton/foia/2011-0299-S-Tobacco/2011-0299-S-Tobacco-JPG/Box_270/42-t-7367462-20110299S-270-013-2015/42_t_7367462_20110299S_270_013_2015_Page_063.JPG",
"mediaId": "bd98c66abc5f38b7",
"ocrText": "Feb- 16-98 04: I8P\nP.06\nWe are pleased that the joint letter to Congress reflects our commitment\nto evaluate any legislation in its entirety, including the legislation's impact on the\nability of the civil justice system to protect the public health. As public health\norganizations, it is only right that we base our final position on any legislation on\nits overall impact on the public health and its potential to reduce the number of\npeople who become addicted to tobacco, experience tobacco related disease,\nand die from tobacco use.\nWe will only support strong, comprehensive legislation that addresses the\nneeds of the American public and the June 20, 1997 Agreement as negotiated\ndoes not meet those criteria. We will oppose and urge the President to veto any\nlegislation that undercuts our public health goals now or the public health\ncommunity's ability to deal with unanticipated actions by the tobacco industry in\nthe future either as the result of weak public health provisions or as the result of\na broad grant of immunity to the tobacco industry\nDespite this position, it is possible that we may very well be confronted\nwith legislation that meets our public health goals and the President's public\nhealth criteria, that includes provisions that the public health community agrees\nwould save millions of lives by reducing tobacco use dramatically, but which also\naddresses the tobacco industry's liability in some limited way that does not grant\nthe industry immunity or weaken the ability of the civil justice system to protect\nthe public health or defend fundamental rights. Given that possibility and our\ncommitment to the public health, we believe it would be wrong for us to take a\nposition that would prevent us from fully evaluating such a proposal in its entirety\nat that time. As you are aware, we also believe it is important that we carefully\narticulate our views because it would be unfair to our members and members of\nCongress to take a position only to turn around at the end of the process and\nsupport legislation that does not meet these criteria.\nJust this past week, we evaluated a bill introduced by Senator Kent\nConrad by examining its overall impact on the public health. But, the bill also\nincludes provisions that will prevent the federal government from suing the\ntobacco industry to recover Medicare (and Medicaid) costs associated with\ntobacco-caused disease. These provisions provide a level of liability protection\nfor the tobacco industry. But, on balance, we believe the bill offered by Senator\nConrad has the potential to save millions of lives and would support its passage\nWe are concerned about sending a signal to the Congressional leadership that\neven Senator Conrad's bill is unacceptable. We are also aware that bipartisan\nlegislation is being drafted that meets our public health criteria, but which may\nnever see the light of day if the message we deliver does not accurately reflect\nour position\nCLINTON LIBRARY PHOTOCOPY\nPHOTOCOPY\nPRESERVATION"
}