Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
34429265
label
White, Ryan
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
34429265
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
otherTitles
42-t-7422560-20140536S-053-001-2016
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
88891e1c87df95d5
ocrText
SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 5- 1-96 :10:04AM ; 2026321096- 94562878:# 2 Talking Points on Ryan White CARE Act Today's New York Times story on the Ryan White CARE Act reauthorization is a misleading and incomplete account of the bipartisan agreement that has been I ached. Background Approximately 7,000 HIV-positive women give birth in the U.S. each year. 1 [istorically, an average of 25 percent of the infants born to those women are infected as well. In 1993, researchers at the NIH found that treatment of HIV-positive pregnant women with AZT during pregnancy and childbirth and treatment of the newborn with AZT for S X weeks can reduce the risk of perinatal infection by 67 percent. The Public Health Servic : issued guidelines recommending that all pregnant women be counseled on the benefit of HIV testing and AZT treatment and that they be offered voluntary HIV antibody te: ting. The CDC recently reported that the number of pediatric AIDS cases occurring in the U.S. in 1995 declined to 800 from a total of 900 in 1994. A separate study in North Carolina indicates that the rate of perinatal transmission declined from 21 percent of all infants born to HIV-positive mothers in 1993 to just 8.5 percent in 1994. Results from hospi als in major urban centers -- Miami, Atlanta, and New York -- show similar results. The Administration View The President has strongly supported reauthorization of the Ryan White CARI Act, as a vital source of medical care and support services to Americans living with HIV/AIDS. The Administration believes that the Public Health Service guidelines are the apprc priate approach to reducing the incidence of perinatal HIV infection. The conference agreement appears to give those guidelines an opportunity to prove their effectiveness. V'e have already seen evidence that they are working in communities with high rates of perinat: 1 transmission. We also believe that these guidelines will remain the standard of care in the U.S. The Conference Agreement The conference agreement calls for the following: Authorizes $10 million to assist states in implementing the Public Heal h Service guidelines, which call for voluntary counseling and testing for all pregr ant women. Within four months of enactment (Sept. 1996), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in consultation with the states, must develop and implemen a system for states to gather data related to perinatal transmission of HIV to docume nt reduction in such transmission. SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 5- 1-96 :10:04AM ; 2026321096- 94562878:# 3 The Secretary of HHS is directed to contract with the Institute of Medi ine to evaluate the extent to which state efforts have been effective in reducing perinat 1 transmission of HIV and to analyze existing barriers to further progress. Within two years of enactment (May 1998), the Secretary shall report t nese findings to Congress along with any recommendations made by the Institute of ] Medicine. After two years and four months (Sept. 1998), the Secretary of HHS W ill determine whether mandatory HIV testing of all infants born in the U.S. whose n others have not undergone prenatal HIV testing has become routine practice in the provision of health care in the U.S. This determination will be made in consultation with states and experts. If the Secretary of HHS determines such mandatory testing has become routine practice, after an additional 18 months (March 2000), a state will no lo ager receive Title 2 Ryan White funding unless it can demonstrate one of the follow ing: -- A 50 percent reduction in the rate of new AIDS cases resulting from perinatal transmission, comparing the most recent data to 1993 data (a comparat le measure is established for states with fewer than 10 cases); -- At least 95 percent of women who have received at least two prenats 1 visits prior to 34 weeks gestation have been tested for HIV; or, -- A program for mandatory testing of all newborns whose mothers hav e not undergone prenatal HIV testing. SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 5- 1-96 ; 5:18PM : 2026321096-> 94562878;# 5 HIV Testing of Newborns/Ryan White CARE Act Reauthorization May 1, 1996 The NY Times reported today that House and Senate conferees have reached I greement on a measure attached to the Ryan White CARE Act Reauthorization that would SV entually require states to begin mandatory testing of newborns for HIV, if voluntary counseling programs failed to adequately lower the rate of HIV infection in newborns. The conference agreement emphasizes the voluntary approach to couns ling and testing recommended by the Public Health Service, first and foremost, and we support that approach. Also, the agreement authorizes $10 million to assist states in implemen ting the Public Health Service Guidelines and provides two and a half years for states to demonstrate that the voluntary approach is working effectively to reduce the rate of HIV infection in newborns. Do you support the conference agreement? We have not yet seen the final bill. but barring any last minute surpris IS being added to the legislation. we are very pleased that this compromise was reache d. We believe it is vitally important to continue this program which offers medical care to hundreds of thousands of Americans living with HIV and AIDS. We also believe t] at voluntary testing of newborns is the best way to reduce their HIV-infection rate and we are pleased that this compromise will give states the opportunity to prove hat the Public Health Service Guidelines are working. It is possible that mandatory testing could kick-in in later years. What is your position? We believe that the Public Health Service Guidelines and voluntary te ting are the most effective way to reduce the number of babies born infected with HIV. We have been encouraged by recent studies which have shown a reduction in th : rate of infections since the developement and introduction of the Public Healt I Service Guidelines. This legislation provides ample opportunity for states to pt ove that these guidelines are working. We all have the same goal: to reduce the percentage of babies born in ected with HIV. If it is shown in coming years that our current approach has not work d, than we will have to try another strategy. This legislation indicates what that strateg y might be SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 5- 1-96 ; 5:19PM ; 2026321096- 94562878:# 6 Facts on HIV -- Public Health Service Guidelines: Approximately 7,000 HIV-positive women give birth in the U.S. each year. Historically, an average of 25 percent of the infants born to those wor en are infected as well. In 1993 researchers at the NIH found that treatment of HIV positive P 'egnant women with AZT during pregnancy and childbirth and treatment of the newbc rn with AZT for six weeks can reduce the risk of mother-child infection by 67 percent. Immediately, the CDC and others began informing doctors and women about the importance of early detection and began drafting guidelines. In Spring of 1995 the Public Health Service issued guidelines recommending that all pregnar t women be counseled on the benefits of HIV testing and AZT treatment and that t ley be offered voluntary HIV antibody testing. The Public Health Service Guidelines voluntary approach has showed 1 esults. The CDC recently reported that the number of babies diagnosed with AIDS in the U.S. declined from 900 in 1994 to 800 in 1995.