Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 141
mentald TEL: Oct 17,94 11:58 No.005 P.02 bays- intet 1 - October 17, 1994 SICE TALKING POINTS ON MEINHOLD Summary of Reasons Why: Rehearing Was Not Sought The government chose not to pursue the extraordinary step of seeking en banc review in Meinhold because it upholds the constitutionality of much of the old homosexual conduct policy. The narrow restriction on the old policy contained in the opinion has no legal effect on the new policy. Summary of Holding in Meinhold The Ninth Circuit held it is constitutional to discharge members for homosexual acts. The court recognized that it is constitutional to discharge members for statements demonstrating a propensity to engage in homosexual acts. -- The court specifically acknowledged the Department's argument that, because of the critical nature of the military mission. the military need not assume the risk that a person with homosexual propensity will act consistent with that propensity. The Ninth Circuit did not rule any aspect of the old or new policies unconstitutional. -- It vacated the district court's holding that the old policy is unconstitutional. : It interpreted the language of the old policy as not supporting the discharge in the narrow circumstances of Meinhold's case. -- It vacated those portions of the district court's injunction that would have interfered with enforcement of the policy with respect to other servicemembers.