Ask the Scholar

Page 13 of 34
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 13

OCR

-13- whether the Council would make the same or an opposite statement with respect to the male component. Another said that the sentence suggests that women workers reduce the number of jobs available to men. 22. In response to these observations it was pointed out that it is not possible to demonstrate that there would be a retardation in the economy if the proportion of women in paid employment remained stable. The Council was simply trying to indicate that the economy requires certain kinds of trained 4 D persons, but it cannot be argued that these persons must be women. It is true that almost all men who are able to work are in the labor force today, and, therefore, if additional persons are needed, they would most likely be women. However, the presence of so many other variables- a declining work week, the differential growth in automation, etc. --make it impossible to predict the shifts in employment or to determine accurately the need for additional workers, except on a very short-run basis. The concensus of the group, however, was that this point could be made in a less rejudicial way by emphasizing that there were no compelling reasons at the present time for urging an increase in the female or any other component of the labor force.

Page data

Page
13
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
35d74a420db16124
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
12005075
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "12005075",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/12005075",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Report on Womanpower Conference",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/12005075",
    "collections": [
        "Katherine G. Howard Papers",
        "Personal Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/eisenhower/623156/623156_001_Page_01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/eisenhower/623156/623156_001_Page_01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/eisenhower/623156/623156_001_Page_01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 34,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "12005075",
    "label": "Report on Womanpower Conference",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/12005075"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "12005075",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/12005075",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Report on Womanpower Conference",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/12005075",
    "collections": [
        "Katherine G. Howard Papers",
        "Personal Files"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/eisenhower/623156/623156_001_Page_01.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/eisenhower/623156/623156_001_Page_01.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/eisenhower/623156/623156_001_Page_01.jpg",
    "imageCount": 34,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/12005075",
    "naId": 12005075,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "day": 27,
            "logicalDate": "1956-01-27",
            "month": 1,
            "year": 1956
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 13,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/eisenhower/623156/623156_001_Page_13.jpg",
    "mediaId": "35d74a420db16124",
    "ocrText": "-13-\nwhether the Council would make the same or an opposite statement\nwith respect to the male component. Another said that the\nsentence suggests that women workers reduce the number of\njobs available to men.\n22. In response to these observations it was pointed out that\nit is not possible to demonstrate that there would be a\nretardation in the economy if the proportion of women in paid\nemployment remained stable. The Council was simply trying to\nindicate that the economy requires certain kinds of trained\n4 D\npersons, but it cannot be argued that these persons must be\nwomen. It is true that almost all men who are able to work\nare in the labor force today, and, therefore, if additional\npersons are needed, they would most likely be women. However,\nthe presence of so many other variables- a declining work week,\nthe differential growth in automation, etc. --make it impossible\nto predict the shifts in employment or to determine accurately\nthe need for additional workers, except on a very short-run\nbasis. The concensus of the group, however, was that this\npoint could be made in a less rejudicial way by emphasizing\nthat there were no compelling reasons at the present time for\nurging an increase in the female or any other component of the\nlabor force."
}