Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
12009445
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2Memorandum for Legislative Meeting, Monday, March 30. 1953.
SUBJECT: St. Lawrence Seaway
The concensus of opinion at the Cabinet meeting on Friday was that
the Administration should take a stand in favor of the St. Lawrence
Seaway.
The principal reasons are:
a.
The Canadian Government intends to move in any event
and our interests could badly suffer if we did not take some
action to achieve cooperative control.
b.
Unless the United States cooperates, Canada will construct
the Seaway on Ganadian soil, at a cost substantially in es-
cess of the proposed United States location. This will
result in increased toll costs to United States shipping.
c.
The Canadians propose to construct the Seaway with a
27 foot channel, insufficient to accommodate United
States shipping.
The American proposal, as provided
in the Wiley Bill, contemplates the authorization of a
channel of greater depth, whie h from our point of view
a
is most desirable for both our commercial and defense
requirements.
d.
The provisions of the Wiley bill reduce the cost to the
United States below any other proposal so far submitted.
e.
This proposition will certainly be, sooner or later, an
economic necessity. We should move on it before some
emergency situation might require extraordinary expenditures.
i.
The adoption of the final bill depends first on authority given
to the State of New York for the construction of a power
facility in cooperation with the Province of Ontario. This
will probably be provided by a license granted by the
Federal Power Commission, a matter now pending.
If there is general concurrence with this attitude, I should like for
Senator Taft and Mr. Martin, upon leaving this conference, to announce
that the Administration definitely favms the general plan described in the
Wiley Bill and will support it.
D. D. E.
Relations
belongs_to