Images (4)
Document
| id |
id
12060425
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 4STANDARD FORM NO 64
PRIVILEGED INFORMATION
nore - Budget
Office Memorandum
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
TO
:
G. B. Kistiakowsky
DATE: November 14, 1959
FROM
: Jesse L. Mitchell
A
SUBJECT: NASA 1961 Estimates and BOB Staff Proposal to BOB Director
DISCUSSION
1.
In a nutshell (not considering the as yet unresolved details
of ABMA-NASA), the situation is asfollows:
1960
1961
1961
NASA Program
NASA Request
BOB Staff Recommended
500.575
783.300
554.900
The difference of about 228 million between the NASA
request and BOB staff recommended represents a reduction of
about $113 million in the amount requested for scientific applica-
tions and supporting research, 86 million reduction in vehicle
and general technical development, 22 million in follow-on man in
space, and 6 million in supporting operations.
0.
At this level of overall thinking -
Doesn¹t the 10% increase recommended by BOB represent
3
too small a rate of growth for the 2nd full year of a major
National effort?
Isn't the almost 60% increase requested by NASA closer
to a reasonable initial rate of growth?
Is not 1961, considering the technological developments
in hand, the time to greatly increase our efforts to exploit
these developments for scientific applications
2.
In a little more detail -- BOB applied essentially the following
assumptions in arriving at the recommended level of funding.
a. Project Mercury as planned but defer follow-on
"Man in Space" beyond 1961.
b. Only one high thrust booster development, and
that the $140 million to be shifted from defense
K-9419
will be adequate to cover this development.
PRIVILEGED INFORMATION
Relations
belongs_to