Memo, Washburn to Jackson Regarding the President's Use of Television Broadcasts
Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
16567705
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2MEMORANDUM
TO:
C.D. Jackson
O.F.
FROM:
Abbott Washburn
101-2
RECEIVED
DATE:
March 20, 1953
MAR 3 1 1954
GENTRAL FILES
#
For a lot of good reasons, I very mich favor the idea of
television reports or chets by the President.
I'm pretty sure this should not be done regularly each month,
despite audience building arguments, etc. You play this thing by ear
and time it to the topic that is being most discussed across dinner
tables. FDR chose these moments with great skill. Announcement of
each chat was heralded on all front pages. A regular monthly program
would tend to become routine. It would also become a chore and place
an unrewarding and unnecessary burden on the President.
Skillful and careful choice of time and subject would produce
a tremendous national viewing audience for each such telecast.
I see no reason for doing the show "entirely on motion
picture film". You have more flexibility right up to the last
minute if the President goes on live but brings in parts of the
material on film the way Ed Murrow does. Also, there is a "canned"
quality to an all-film program that detracts from the immediateness
of the thing. FDR succeeded magnificently in giving the impression:
"Here is the President of the United States personally talking to me
right now at this noment--taking me into his confidence.' You never
heard an announcer say, "You will now hear President Roosevelt in a
fireside chat by transcription"!
I agree entirely that in each of these reports the President
would say, in effect "Here is the situation; let's look at it together. 11
This is good.
Of course the networks would donate the time as a public
service. Prints should be sent to Embassies and Information Centers
throughout the world
also to high schools and colleges in this
country.
Considerable thought should be given to the format. A
committee under Ben Duffy's direction might go into this. You will
recall how much more natural and effective DDE was during those latter
programs when he was talking informally with three or four people
(Mrs. Hobby, Mrs. LaGuardia, Lew Douglas, etc.) , instead of stiffly
facing the cold camera. For example, if he is talking about the
nation's health, you might want to make it a panel with Mrs. Hobby,
a couple of parents, a bright teen-ager, and the family doctor.
CROSS CARD FOR STAFF SECRETARY
Relations
belongs_to