Ask the Scholar

Page 2 of 2
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 2

OCR

329 TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATE March 12, 1941 TO Secretary Morgenthan FROM Mr. Cochran confidential Registered sterling transactions of the reporting banks were as follower Sold to commercial concerns £48,000 Purchased from commercial concerns £12,000 Open market sterling held steady at 4.03-1/2. Transactions of the reporting banks were as follows: Sold to commercial concerns E 5,000 Purchased from commercial concerns & The Argentine free peso had an easier tendency today. It closed at .2296, as compared with yesterday's final rate of .2303. In New York, the closing rates for the foreign currencies listed below were 11 follows: Canadian dollar 15-1/16% discount Swies franc (commercial) .2322-1/2 Swedish kross .2384-1/2 Reichemark .4005 Lira .0505 Brasilian milreis (free) .0505 Mexican peso .2066 Cuban peco 6-1/2% discount We sold $998,000 in gold to the Central Bank of the Uruguayan Republic, which was added to its sarmarked account. No new gold engagements were reported. In London, the prices fixed for spot and forward silver were both 1/16d higher, at 23-7/16d and 23-3/8d respectively. The U. 3. equivalents were 42.56# and 42.444. Handy and Harman's settlement price for foreign silver was unchanged at 34-3/44. The Treasury's purchase price for foreign silver was also unchanged at 35#. We made three purchases of silver totaling 150,000 ounces under the Silver Purchase Act, all of which consisted of now production from foreign countries, for "orward delivery. Regraded Uclassified 330 -2- the Federal Reserve Bank's report of March 5. listing deposits of banks in Asia with the New York agencies of Japanese banks, showed that such deposits totaled $101,960,000. an increase of $458,000 since February 26. Also reported were the Tokohama Specie Bank Agency's dollar liabilities to and dollar claims on Japanese banks in Asia, which stood as follows on March 5: Change from March 5 February 26 Liabilities: Deposits for Japan and Manchuria $56,812,000 + $440,000 Deposits for China 35,855,000 + 267,000 . : U.S. Treas. Bills, comm. paper, etc.... 23,655,000 - 75,000 Claims : Loans $60,753.000 +$6,206,000 # : Other - mainly Jap. import bills 9,991,000 + 346,000 Nost of the $6,206,000 additional funds received from Agency loans (made primarily to Japanese banks in Japan and Manchuria) were used for Japanese commitments in this country, it was reported. pms. CONFIDENTIAL 331 BRITISH EMBASSY, WASHINGTON, D.C. Personal and March 10th, 1941. Secret Dear Mr. Secretary, I enclose herein for your personnal and secret information copies of the latest reports received from London on the military situation. Believe me, Dear Mr. Secretary, Very sincerely your, Harifax The Honourable Henry Morgenthau, Jr., United States Treasury, Washington, D. C. Telegram from London dated March Btb, 1941, 332 1. Reval. horwegies loaded tanker (3000 tone) was Bank off the set coast yesterday and a Dritish ship (6,400 tone) outward bound in convey, with general cargo, was torpodned in the North Western approaches early Harch 7the 2. Hilitary. British Somaliland. Perfer 210 miles morth of Megadishu OD Harer road has been occupied and Belet Uen serodrome 1s fit for use; the roads and bridges are intact, water plentiful and large quantities of petrol and oil have been esptured. Patrols have been sent forward to Oddur and Dolo (North West of Lugh Perrendi). Among material ceptured at and on the way to Mogadiscio are 348,000 gellone of R/T petrol and 0,000 gollone of evietion petrol. 3. Bulgaria. German reconnaissance detachments reached the vicinity of the Speek frontier OD March 3rd and by March 5th the main concentrations were developing in Sliveno Yambol area, where heavy tanks are reported and 10 the Strome Valley near Gorna Djumeya and Petrich. Estimated that B divisions of Germen troops are in Bulgerian territory. : Bulgarian divisiomeppear to be disposed as follows: Yugoslev frontier 1 motorised, 2 infestry, 2 FOSOFVO infentry forming ...... Turkish frontier, 2 motorised, 7 infantry, Macedonian frontier 4 lofestry, Southern Dobrudje 1 infentry. Bolhoris general heade quarters to reported et Store lagora. 5. R.A.V./ Regraded Uclassified 333 a I I 5. R.A.P. Earch 6th 1 medium bomber attacked railway targets at Obent. Sight of March 6th/7tb. Operations can- celled. Be G.A.F. Night of Merch 6th/7th. 40 air- craft were operating over this country but only 5 came inland, the reminder were mine-laying. 7. Melts. Melta was attacked March 5th as reported yesterday by about 100 aircraft including 60 bombers. Damage was slight at one aerodrome but at Hal For barracks and bangers considerably damaged; 4 aircraft were destroyed on the ground and all remaining aircraft on the serodrome were rendered temporarily unserviceable. 11 of our fighters intercepted and shot down 7 enemy circraft probably so eighth and damaged four more. Anti- aircraft destroyed a further nine and damaged four. One of our fighters 10 missing. 0. Aircraft ensualties to operations ver end from British Islos, German destroyed one, damaged once British nil. : Home Security. March 7the Two R.A.F. aero- dromes were attacked by ........) some damage to buildings but no serious casualtion. Regraded Uclassified Telegrom received from London dated arch 0, 1941. 1. Noval. In the Sues Canal divers have located mines which were counter-mined, Believed 3 mines remain to be dealtwith, expected Canal will be open March 7th. Twenty-three mines were exe ploded at verious home porte on March 7th. 2. One enemy aircraft loid mines off llayers Pelle of Earch 7th. L.L. sweepers detonated these the same efternoon. Between 14.30 and 16.30 hours March 7th six aircraft laid mines in the Humber outrance, fifteen were seen to drop. 3. on March 7th convoye were attacked by De boat in the Seatern approsches and off the Rest Coast by aircraft, and during the night of March 7th-Sth by E-boats. of the nine ships torpedoed or damaged by aircraft four sinking or suck. One sircraft shot down one damaged. 4. On March 7th off the Book of Holland a 2500 ton merchant vessel we bombed and left sinking by coastal aircraft. 5. Ethiopia. In Cojjem area patriot operations continue against retreating garrison of Burye. 300 prisoners and four guas have been emptured and 80 seroplane shot down. 1,700 desertors have surren- dered. 6. Kenya Colony. Heavy rain has fallen on Sthiopien border end may roads ere under water. 7. R.A.F. March 7th. During the day aircroft from the Coastal Command bombed SD aerodrome in Tolland hitting hangers also navel dockyard at Renhelder and left 9 2,500 ton merchant vessel in 9 sink Regraded Uclassified 335 - 2 - sinking condition off the Dutch Coast. 8. Night of March 7th-Werch 8th. Operations cancelled. : German Air Force, March 7th about fifty enemy aircraft were operating overland in wide localities and forty more were working off East coast. One enemy circraft was destroyed by enti- aircraft shore battery and one by a Sevd trawler, a third hit the mot of a ship and crashed. 10. light March 7-March 8th. Activity negligible. 11. Belts. Night of Narch 6th/March 7:h. Twelve enemy sircraft made individual attacks on various objectives without causing serious damage OF casualties. 12. March 7the Four bombers escorted by 10 MR 109's damaged a Sunderland by machine-gun fire, shot down a Glen Martin and also one Hurricase out of seven which intercepted. Pilot saved. Two enemy circraft were probably destroyed by enti-sireroft fire. 13, Aircraft casualties to operations over and from Aritish Isles. German, three destroyed. Britleh nile 14. Home Security "arch 7th. A bell-bearing factory was hit and seriously damged. hirty-six persons wro killed and forty-seven seriously injured: production has heen stogied probably for DOV M days. 1 Regraded Uclassified 336 8 15. Six Royal AIr Foree stations, a balloon barrage centre and an Infentry training centre were attacked. Little damage and few casualties. CONFIDENTIAL 337 Purephrase of Code Indiagram Beceived at the Mar Department at 10:06, March 20, 1941. London, filed 15:00, March 20, 1941. 1. On Sunday, March 9, adverse wather enused the cancellation of all flights of British planse. During the proceding night occupied cirfields in northern Frease were benbed w British Bristel Bloubeins bat there were as planse of the Benber Command over the Constrant because of the bad weather. 2. Buring the might of March 9-10 German raide - carried out over the Midlends, Pertomonth, Liverpool Bay ml Suffelk. 2a addition, there was a Large smle atteck on Inim. the extent of the damage 40mg has not boon determined. During the proceding day - aircraft patrols were mintained over the Bover Straits and only eight them planse penstrated boyand the coast line of England. British fighter please www is the air during this day and the following night but were unsble w intercept my of the attachers. Buring the night of March 6-9 tea Games planse planted nines along the British east. A total of 190 other - planon - pletted am each- east Britain, Portemouth, Horfelk ml Suffelk. Buring the - night Lendon was attached W 60 - Gorman planse. Private property in Landon auttered havey and the vaterfrust area was damged - a - Backington Palace gremis a Ledge - a - basto fall a - restures) in which s6 individuals was billed and - then 80 wro injured. British antiniveraft fire brought term three of the - planse and damaged two others. Buring daylight hears of March 7 a British Informary tradaing emior, & ballom barrage center and six Mayal Air Terse stations www banked w Greena planse. A mall number of casmalties and - - resulted. CONFIDENTIAL Regraded Uclassified 338 CONFIDENTIAL Daring the - day 36 Inberers vere billed and n - injured suriously during a - attack an a British ball bearing manifacturing plack. Production at this plant will have to be surpended for a portod of - week. 3. British air activities in Middle Instem themboro - as follows: the Albasian city of Toyaleni we bended w British planse baned in in the Eritreen theater the area was attashed w Salan-based British benbern; in the Likynn thester British benters attacked the Tripeli burber and dropped bonks on the sirfield at - (Treet Banson). It is I that planse of the - Air Perso - based at this latter place which is about 25 miles valid of Sixte. 4. - air activities in the middle Bast consisted of a raid w five planse against Malta. British installations suffered as - and - of the Gurman planse - abot dom. 5. the Baes Genal will probably be respons& to traffic w Harsh 11. British divers have send all of the state planted is the (naml w - planes and only three - are to be exploied before the emal 10 completely cleared. 6. A call has hours mis w the Ministry of Labor for 100,000 - to volunteer for service in munition ml w infestry factories. These volunteers will be used primarily is filling artillery shalls. 7. During the day and might of March 1 a British merchant - make up of sine ressels - benied or torpoñood. in the Horth Sen. - of the were benched and three others mis. During the only meating hears of March s a - education attached a British - - 4 of 54 vessels 180 miles week of Cape Bimes, a the West - of Africa. Five of the - teste vere look. CONFIDENTIAL Regraded Uclassified CONFIDENTIAL 339 8. Zate in the afternoon of March s cirplense from British sevel write located the two Cumman 26,000-tem bettlechips, - use - half-way between the Cape Verio Islands and the - Islands. I Distribution: Secretary of Ver State Department Secretary of Treasury Asst. Secretary of Ver thief of Staff Mar Plane Division Office of Navel Intelligence Air Corps 0-3 + CONFIDENTIAL Regraded Uclassified 340 RESTRICTED G-2/2657-220 M.I.D., W.D. No, 335 March 10, 1941 12:00 M. SITUATION REPORT I. Western Theater of War. Air: German. During daylight of the 8th and 9th there were normal operations against shipping at sea and scattering attacks over Great Britain. During the night of the 8th-9th a strong attack was launched against the London area. This was apparently the heaviest German night raid of 1941. Last night the attack was re- newed in less force and Portsmouth also was systematically bombed. British. Apparently no night operations. On the 9th fairly heavy daylight attacks were made over northern France. II. Balkan Theater of War- Ground: Bulgaria. No change. Albania. The Greeks report their offensive continues and new positions in the Tepelini sector were occupied despite strong Italian counter-attacks. The Italians admit Greek attacks in the sector of the Eleventh Army (southwest sector) but claim they were repulsed by counter-attacks. Air: Albania. Considerable air activity on both sides in close support of the ground operations. III. Mediterranean and African Theaters of War. Ground: Italian Somaliland. British troops have occupied Gabredarre which is about 165 miles by road northwest Ferfer which was captured March 5, 1941. Libya. The Italians report another attack on Giarabub Oasis by the British has been repulsed. Eritrea. A successful counter-attack is claimed by the Italians in the Cheren sector. Air: Axis. Pressure maintained in Libya. Malta was bombed again on the 9th. British. No reports of activity. Note: This military situation report is issued by the Military 1n- In- General Staff. In view of the occasional as telligence clusion of Division, political information and of opinion it is classified Restricted. RESTRICTED Regraded Uclassified 341 TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATE March 11, 1941. TO Secretary Morgenthau FROM Mr. Hear AMA In accordance with your request of March 10, we are preparing a written analysis of the Gano Dunn report on steel capacity, which we expect to complete and submit to you on Thursday afternoon of this week. We disagree with the con- clusions of Mr. Dunn's report and it has taken a little time to assemble and organize our refutation. 342 See entry of 6/5/41 which states that a copy of the President's memo of 3/10/41 was given to Mr. Hopkins by HM,Jr. 343 This is referred to in H Jr's report e luncheon meeting with the President on 5/10 which is filed in President's folder. 344 Hmr. Bremse of The general financial picture Oher your harry up (a) RFC taking uses % British payments made for plants (6) Was Dept. taking me, of material payments made by the British 1.b at Runch march 10th 1941. 345 MAR 11 1941 Dear Josse: For your information I all transmitting here- with photostat copy of a memorandum which the President gave no yesterday at lunch, concerning the British financial picture. As I as nov giving careful considers- ties to the British financial requirements for each month from sev until the end of this calendar year, I would appreciate 10 if you vill furnish Under Secretary Doll, at the carliest possible mement, the amount of funds that the Reconstruction Finance Corporation esa make available each month during this period for payments on account of plant facilities which 10 may take ever from the British. Sincerely yours, Homesable Jesse 1. James, Administrator, Replied to by m Federal Lean Agency, Jones 3/19/41 Vashington, D. 0. DEBIELS March 11, 1941 Imp Regraded Uclassified STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL 346 MAR 1 1 1941 My dear Mr. Secretary: For your information I an transmitting here- with photostat copy of a semorandum which the President gave - yesterday at lunch, concerning the British financial picture. 4a I as nov giving careful consider- ation to the British financial requirements for each month from nov until the end of this calendar year, I would appreciate 10 if you will furnish Under Secretary Bell, at the earliest possible moment, the amount of funds that the Mar Department can make available each month during this period for payments on account of contracts which 10 my take over from the British. Sincerely yours, (Signed) E Marganthau, Jr. Secretary of the Treasury The Honorable, Replud to by The Secretary of War. may. me cloy DVBINLE 3/17/41 March 11, 1941 web Copy to them Edelin By Memeenger 230 Regraded Uclassified 347 TREASURY DEPARTMENT For Miss Chancey INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATE March 11, 1941 TO Secretary Morgenthau FROM Mr. Cochran Mr. Ganson Purcell telephoned me from the Securities and Exchange Commission at 12:35 yesterday noon. He told me that Chairman Frank had discussed with the other Commissioners the question of giving publicity to the meeting which was taking place at the Securities and Exchange Commission yesterday afternoon with representatives from the investment associations in New York to study a plan for liquidating British investments in this country. It had been the opinion of the Commissioners that no publicity should be given to this meeting, considering the exploratory character thereof. Chairman Frank desired this information to reach Secretary Morgenthau before the latter's press conference. I gave the Secretary the substance of this message at 3 o'clock yesterday afternoon. J.M.P. Regraded Uclassified 348 March 11, 1941 Some time during the night I woke up and got the idea that if we were going to refund the $500,000,000 June notes, we also ought to, at the same time, raise five or six hundred million cash, and make an issue of sufficient size and do it all at one time. Strangely enough, I still remembered it when I woke up this morning, and I sent for Bell and gave him this idea, and asked him to speak to the people in New York and find out whether they have finished digesting the last issue. 349 March 11, 1941 10:20 a.m. RE AID TO BRITAIN Present: Mr. Foley Mr. Bell Mr. Cochran Mr. Bernstein Mr. White Mr. Acheson Foley: They wanted the same control you had over the four million eight hundred eighty million. Bell: They will get around now to blaming me. Foley: No, but you remember. Bell: Sure. Well, that is the Budget's job. I am smypathetic. It is absolutely budgetary con- trol. (Laughter) Foley: Sure, there he comes. H.M.Jr: All right. Now, Merle, will you state the case again, please? Cochran: On Saturday morning we considered the memorandum which had been submitted by Mr. Pinsent on March 7. It was decided that we needed more data with respect to the paragraph headed "Final Result" on page four of this memorandum. This paragraph reads as follows: Regraded Uclassified 350 - 2 - "To cover our shortage up to August 1941 and to provide a cash balance on lines proposed in assumption six, we need assistance before the end of August to the extent of three hundred sixty-five millions on the basis of the first alternative and one hundred eighty- five millions on the basis of the second alternative, subject to the fundamental point raised on assumption three. It is hoped that such assistance can be provided in the form of the taking over after the passage of the bill of our existing con- tracts by the United States Government to the extent necessary to cover the above amounts. The taking over of capital assets by the RFC will, of course, provide part of this assistance. For the rest, it should not be difficult to select suitable contracts up to the amount required. Speed of action is very desirable as deliveries are constantly reducing the outstanding value of existing contracts. Even after August, our deficit will still rise for & time. This should be automatically taken care of, since many of the contracts to be taken over are bound to have payments due after August as well as before, of which we shall be relieved. The months to August are the most difficult ones. The deficit of the early months will in part. be currently met from gold borrowed by the U. K. Government; but, as this is only a tempo- rary expedient and leaves a responsibility to repay in gold, no account has been taken of it in the calculations above." H.M.Jr: Let me approach this thing in my own peculiar manner. As of January 1, their outstanding contracts were approximately a billion four? Bell: That is given in Table 1. Regraded Uclassified 351 - 3 - H.M.Jr: Just for my purposes, you see. Bell: A billion three thirty. H.M.Jr: All right, & billion three thirty. Now, this is the eleventh of March. We can use February 28. Bell: Yes. H.M.Jr: Now, from January 1 to February 28, I want two figures, I want, one, how many contracts have they paid for, you see. You can get that from - how much have they paid for during the month of January. That subtracted from a billion three thirty would give us the figure on March 1. Has anybody got the figure? Bell: The billion three thirty, Mr. Secretary, is a February 28 figure. H.M.Jr: No, I want the January 1 figure. White: I haven't got the payments on those earlier contracts, but we have got the payments which are due on the first of each month. H.M.Jr: Just let me put it this way. Let's say it is a billion four. This is the way I want to approach this thing. A billion four, January 1. Then so many contracts, so much - - they took delivery of so much stuff during January. Let's just say for argument's sake they took care of three hundred million, which left them on the first of March outstanding one billion one of the contracts which were in existence prior to January 1, not the ones that they have written since. Now, of that three hundred million dollars that they have paid for during the month of January, where did that money come from? In other words, how much of it came 352 - 4 - from the sale of securities to the stock exchange, how much of it from gold, how did they pay for it? In other words, what I am groping for is this: I had mentally earmarked & billion four hundred million as of January 1 when I testified, you see. Now, I have said toward that there is nine hundred million of direct investments, there is six hundred million listed securities, and there is four hundred million dollars annual output of gold from South Africa, or a total of nine and six are fifteen and four are 8. billion nine. Now, what I want to know is, of this three hundred million how much of it came from those three sources. Now, is that assumption correct, Dan? Bell: Your figures are about correct. It is a bil- lion eleven, as I understood it, instead of a billion nine. H.M.Jr: But my assumptions. So then we carry this thing along and I will tell you why I ex- plained it. Is there any other place that they can get this - have it pledged to me and I in turn to Congress - the billion four hundred million contracts outstanding and then that their listed securities, their direct in- vestments and their gold or anything else that we counted in should go toward payment. Now, for argument's sake they paid three hundred million dollars out. Now, where the hell did it come from? Cochran: Well, they had gold which was sold on January 2 of a hundred and seventy-six million; Jan- uary 30, twenty-six million; and on February - twenty-six million. That wouldn't count. You have a hundred million of gold there, a hundred ten of their securities and then some taken from the balances which they had on hand Regraded Uclassified 353 - 5 - the first of January. H.M.Jr: Well, do you see what I want, Harry? White: I see what you want, yes. I am not sure that that-- H.M.Jr: You mean where it is going to? White: No, those first three questions are fine. You want to know, A, they owed you a certain amount on commitments on January 1. How much did they pay on those commitments? You knew their assets. Where did that money come from? Presumably it came from those assets. If it did, then their present assets ought to be just the difference be- tween the two as compared to their January 1 assets. H.M.Jr: Then on the first of March - - I mean, I don't know just how we will handle it. I am groping. I don't know just how we will handle the con- tracts they have signed since then, you see. I don't know what I am going to do with them. Let me just think out loud a minute. Now, they come in and say, between now and the first of August they need three hundred sixty million dollars. Is that what you have got? Cochran: That is, if they pay Canada gold. H.M.Jr: Well, they are going to pay that to us. Cochran: Then it is only a hundred and eighty-five. H.M.Jr: All right. They need a hundred and eighty- five million dollars. Now, I say before I am interested, see, "Gentlemen, I want to know where are you getting the cash to pay your bills today. In other words, are you taking Regraded Uclassified 354 - 6 - some of the fat off the bone that we said we didn't want? Where is it coming from? You say you need a hundred and eighty million dollars. If Now, let me just give you this picture. Then they take on more contracts. I mean, it is like & going concern. They have got so much to pay out and they have 80 much of their assets. Which of their assets did they use and what is their position as of March 1? Cochran: They have given us that. White: They have given us that. H.M.Jr: What? Cochran: They have given you a statement of their credit position and debt position for the month of March to show how much they expect to use in gold, how much they expect to get from market- able securities. H.M.Jr: This is for March? Cochran: Yes, sir. H.M.Jr: But I - - I will come to that in a minute, but I want to know what happened in January. How did they finance themselves in January? Now, they ought to know now. I mean, I want - what did they do in January? Through the Federal Reserve we can quickly check up what did they pay out. Cochran: That is just what I was reading. H.M.Jr: Do you know how much they paid out in January? Cochran: Yes. Regraded Uclassified 355 - 7 - H.M.Jr: You told me how much gold. How much did they pay out in January? Cochran: It isn't broken down by months here. H.M.Jr: Well, it should be. Cochran: Well, this comes in weekly, but I can figure it out. H.M.Jr: Well, give it to me rough. Can you give it to me roughly? Take your time. Cochran: January 2 to 29, total debits were a hundred and ninety-seven million, four, paid out of the account with the Federal. H.M.Jr: Well, that is roughly two hundred million dollars. Cochran: And that was raised by gold, one hundred mil- lion, securities about seventy-five, and the rest came out of the balance. H.M.Jr: Well, did it? Then they only ate into their balance by twenty-five million. Cochran: I mean, I can make it accurate but that is roughly. H.M.Jr: Well, I want it accurately now. What did they forecast for March? Cochran: For March they count their official dollar balances as eighty-two as of March 1. H.M.Jr: Read it, I will listen to it. Cochran: The official dollar balances as of March 1, eighty-two million dollars. Gold as of March 1, one hundred two million. Regraded Uclassified 356 - 8 - H.M.Jr: That is & hundred and eighty-four. Cochran: Newly mined African gold to come in during the month, forty million. H.M.Jr: That is two hundred twenty. Cochran: Sales of marketable securities and direct investments, seventy-five. H.M.Jr: Well, that is two ninety-five. Cochran: Two ninety-nine. That is forty in marketable securities and they just guess thirty-five for direct investments. That is the first time they have carried any item there. So that is two ninety-nine and ten under debits is an expenditure by British Purchasing Commission, two hundred fifteen million dollars. Now, the breakdown on contracts placed by March 1, one hundred seventy-five million; B, con- tracts to be placed in March, forty million; and second entry, balance of all other gold and dollar items, twenty-four million. Esti- mated balance at March 31, sixty million. H.M.Jr: Let me just see if I have got it. Roughly, they figure that expenditures for March will be three hundred million? Two hundred mil- lion? Cochran: Two hundred forty. H.M.Jr: Their total expenditures. Cochran: Two hundred forty. H.M.Jr: Two hundred forty and they figure they can pick up how much money? Cochran: Well, they would have a balance left of sixty 357 - 9 - million. H.M.Jr: And they started the month with eighty-two? Cochran: Eighty-two. H.M.Jr: Well, I think we ought to take 8. careful look at what happened in January. What? White: We ought to be able to go over the figures and see how close we can come to what you want. I didn't know the figures were avail- able that would give us that monthly payment, but are those later figures than what we got last week? Cochran: What do you mean? White: Those that you are reading from. Cochran: These aren't complete because it is just what is paid out of the Federal, you see. White: Well, if you give us both a chance at that, we can come-- H.M.Jr: I am going to give you a chance and I will tell you why I am in no hurry. In the first place, they have got plenty of money for this month and in the second place, very much in this room, I can't overemphasize the confi- dential nature of it, I saw Lord Halifax last night after I got the President's approval and I said if by the end of this week they didn't show concrete evidence that they wanted to sell some of their factories, I suggested that they put somebody else in charge of these sales. Well, he was very much disturbed and Sir Edward Peacock is a great friend of the head of the Bank of England and the thing which always riles me in these times, he has Regraded Uclassified 358 - 10 - got strong political backing, you see, so it would be a great to-do, to use his language, to sack Sir Edward Peacock. So he said he thought he would have after dinner - I don't know whether he said Purvis and Phillips or Purvis and Pinsent. So I said, "Well, you know, Mr. Ambassador, through Merle Cochran and Phillips and Pinsent I am sure you heard last week how I was distrubed about this, 80 this doesn't come like a bolt out of the blue," and I said, "I cannot go on the Hill and try to explain on this appropriation bill why the English Government has not been able to sell one of its many hundreds of factories in this country. I can't explain it! So he tried every way possible to make be back down. "Do you think it is wise to tell this to Purvis and the others?" I said, "I cer- tainly do." I didn't give one single inch. Now, we will continue our studies, but until this English industrial crowd permits its government to sell some of these factories, I am not interested in their financial pic- ture end I am not going to do a damn thing about it. Now, as I told Halifax last night, I said, "I don't have to tell you that I am friendly to the English cause. I even demon- strated it in the past," and he said that - could he come and see me at the house if he had something to say, and I said, "Yes." And I want you to know, Merle, because you are my mouthpiece on this thing, as far as I am concerned you can listen, see, but until these fellows come in and demonstrate con- clusively to me that they are going to sell some factories, I am not going to see them any more. I am not going to see Phillips or any- body. I am not available and I just want you to know that, because I am not going to go up on the Hill and the first thing - "Well, Mr. 359 - 12 Morgenthau, give us the report on what has happened, and the first thing they are going to ask is, "How many properties have they sold, and I say, "Zero. "Well, why?" I can't give any answer. I told Halifax last night - it was all very quiet but he used all his English tradition to getme to swerve. Make a partial sale - not a partial sale, I mean a sale with partial payment. I said, "There are lots of things that you can do." I read last night what they sent over to Hopkins on this Lend-Lease to hurry the thing up. We signed a contract to lend-lease them some cutters and then we decide afterward what the price is in order not to hold them up. That is our attitude. But I want a complete - I mean, it is one thing for Cochran when he gets his orders - whether he believes in them or not, he carries them out. He demonstrated that. As my representative with these people, I want you (Cochran) to know until they move, anything further on their financial problem just doesn't interest me, and I want you please to take that front because I have cleared it with the President, and you are representing the President and me on this, you understand, Merle. Cochran: This is new as of today, because Saturday we asked them for this and last night Phillips was in talking to me about this. H.M.Jr: No, you can see them. You listen. No, this is the follow-up of my time when I asked you to send for Phillips. How long ago was that? Cochran: That was Friday evening. H.M.Jr: Not last Friday? Cochran: Last Friday, yes. Regraded Uclassified 360 - 13 - H.M.Jr: Oh, no, it must have been Friday a week ago that you put the heat on. Cochran: Yes, I guess that was Friday the week before. H.M.Jr: It is Friday a week ago. Do you want to check me? Cochran: I will have to on that. H.M.Jr: Do you mind, right now? I would like to know. Cochran: They asked - that was when I had Playfair. H.M.Jr: Just take a minute. I will wait until you come in. I told the Ambassador it was my impression that 10 days had passed. Cochran: I will get it. Bernstein: Is this it? Cochran: Yes, this was on February 28. H.M.Jr: I was right. Well, that is all right. It was over a week. Well, now we go ahead and get this stuff. Now, let me just get on this contract business S0 we understand that. The President - have you people seen this note that the President gave me to show the Army and-- Cochran: You read that little short memorandum yester- day. H.M.Jr: Well, we will put all the pressure on them, and I don't know whether you have those figures and the money that they get from there, I am more than willing that they segregate that to be used for - if they want to earmark it for strictly English standard stuff, you see. Regraded Uclassified 361 Foley: Well, suppose they want to use it to meet outstanding commitments? H.M.Jr: They can. Foley: Use it for any purpose they want? H.M.Jr: Any purpose that they want to, but that is why I want to study the January thing to find out exactly where they got the money from, you see, and more details of where it went to. I mean by classifications. I mean, how much of it went for food, how much of it went for armament, how much of it went for dividends. I don't know what, you see. Cochran: Do you want February, too? H.M.Jr: I think I would like to start with January. Of course, this is March. White: January and February. H.M.Jr: I am talking two months. Yes, I am confused. Yes, January and February. By classifications, I would like to get more familiar with how they spend it and raising it is the easy part. Yes, January and February. But, Dan-- Bell: You just want a total? When you say classi- fications, you don't mean classify expendi- tures? H.M.Jr: Well, I was thinking - yes. No, I will tell you what I meant. In one classification, let's say munitions, and in another classification maybe food. Another classification may be paying dividends. I don't know what. White: Shouldn't one of the classifications be what they paid on their past commitments? Regraded Uclassified 362 -18- - H.M.Jr: Yes. White: That should be one classification. H.M.Jr: I would like to play with this thing, you see, and get so we know really more about it. We have it, but we have never examined their checks that they paid through the Federal Reserve in New York. Bell: I take it, one item might very well be net on balance of payments. White: I think if we could just put the questions that we would like to ask, what they paid on past commitments, what they paid on other expenditures that weren't listed in the past commitments, and let them fill in the figures, rather than if we examine their - unless they have given recently data to Merle which would answer that, the data which we have up to now would not enable us to answer that. H.M.Jr: Well, keep after it. Cochran: Well, I have passed on everything I have here to Harry. White: Then W6 haven't got the data. H.M.Jr: Well, you see what I mean. White: I know. H.M.Jr: After all, if we are going to finance these people, I want to know how much goes to food, how much goes to non-essentials. White: I am wondering whether in order to enable you to know exactly each month what is happening, Regraded Uclassified 363 15 - 16 - if you want that continued-- H.M.Jr: Yes, I do. White: Whether we couldn't set up a statement - we will leave everything but the figures to be filled in, which they can fill in each month. You go over the statement to see that it contains everything that you want in the form in which you want it, and then each month they will fill in such figures as they have, and we will fill in such figures as we have and make it a current thing instead of having to come back and - we get the stuff in B. differ- ent form each time and it is impossible to compare their figures. H.M.Jr: You see, what I am thinking of, I am taking plenty of time. I have been operating dif- ferently. Yesterday, you know, we gave plenty of time to this thing. This morning I have got nothing but this, you see, this morning. I am practicing on you people, so you can practice on me. Up to this point, the President and I are together. He knows what we are doing. When they really run out of money I just don't know what we are going to do, but when we do, then all of this stuff that we are talking about now, why they run out of it, and what they have spent, it all helps, doesn't it? Now, of course what they are going to try to do is to put everything, including the kitchen stove, under the Lend- Lease and we have to be prepared to say yes or no, and it comes back always to two things, their question of their securities and the question of their direct investments and how much of that have they used up since the first of January. I ought to know so that the President - "Well, now, look, Henry, they say you are being awfully tough on them, and I Regraded Uclassified 364 just want to be sure that you are right. Now, can we take over some of these contracts, or can't we?" Which leads me to the thing - I mean, do you people know today how much the RFC has taken over and how much-- Bell: There is a memorandum here that they haven't taken over any, but there are only a couple of them that are even close. Cochran: Even then they couldn't make the funds avail- able until the latter half of the year, isn't that right? Bell: Yes. H.M.Jr: Do you have that picture? Bell: No, I haven't a very good picture on it. There is 8. memo here that isn't very good. H.M.Jr: From whom? Can't we go the other way around? Ask Jones and the Army for a memorandum? We will use the President's thing as a - you see? I will dictate a letter to the Secretary of War and Jones, with your help, you see, using the thing - saying, Would you please inform me how much money can we expect the English to get from your taking over their contracts?" you see. "We are making our estimates from now until September, and we would like to know during this period of the hundred and thirty-four million, how much can you do," and the Army, "How much can you do?" White: And approximately when it will be available. H.M.Jr: And approximately when it will be available. Cochran: That will leave out that one thirty-four. We 365 - can't identify that unless Ed can tell us just what it is. Foley: I have got a breakdown of it. Bell: You can identify a hundred and five million here, but there is a difference between a hundred and five and & hundred and sixty- seven million; and, I take it, they have taken these contracts of a million over in one case and ten million over-- H.M.Jr: Are you handling that or are these fellows? Bell: Well, we have all got it. H.M.Jr: Who can write a letter for me to sign to War and Commerce? Bell: We can, together. We can have it for you be- fore noon. H.M.Jr: All right. When I see Jesse I can hand it to him at lunch. Then one can go over to-- Bell: Yes, we will take care of it. H.M.Jr: Don't you think that is the way to do it? And ask them what they want, you see. Well, this is a perfect thing from the President. Simply say, "I have got to know, gentlemen, Mr. War and Mr. Commerce, how much money are you going to make available to the English and how soon. I think we are beginning to tie the thing in you see. Bell: I wonder if it would help you if you had eacy month a statement from the British just like our own giving cash position, giving the back figures-- 366 - 19. (Miss Chauncey entered the conference.) H.M.Jr: Two photostats of what the President gave me at lunchfor the Army and Navy. Mr. Bell needs them. He is going to prepare a letter for me to sign. Please. Chauncey: All right, sir. (Miss Chauncey left the conference.) White: I think in the coming months you are going to be so concerned with problems of how much they are using that I think that something - not half but a good deal of your problem is in knowing what the situation is, not in making the decision but in knowing the facts. H.M.Jr: Well, what we want is, first an analysis of what they have done through January and Feb- ruary and then a forecast like Bell makes through all the departments. I mean, our cash needs when we have a financing. Isn't that right, Dan? Bell: I think that would give a pretty good pic- ture. White: Then each month or every two weeks there ought to be a statement which will be of a character such as will be most helpful to you, and it ought to be the same statement, and it ought to be comprehensive. I think if we spend a little time drafting that up ahead of time, and then they can adjust their bookkeeping to meet that need if necessary. H.M.Jr: And you make up the forms. But what about the past stuff? The past stuff will have to con- from with the form. Will you take that? Uclassified 367 - - Bell: Yes. We will bring it from January 1. We don't need to go back of that, do we? White: No, but it will be a current form which - each month you will get a similar statement. H.M.Jr: Well, I think each week, Dan. Bell: That is & little difficult to change state- ments in the future on each week. You can get the actual figures up to date. H.M.Jr: I think once a month is all right. Bell: I think so, too. Cochran: Because we know their gold and security po- sition daily. H.M.Jr: This is a good meeting. Don't you think so, Ed? I mean, we are getting somewhere. What? Foley: Sure. H.M.Jr: And then all of this - having this, putting it back, shows them how seriously we are tak- ing the thing, and then as I say, I can go over and explain - now, I am just thinking of this. In order that I don't get the ground cut out from under me by the State Department, what would you think if I ask Dean Acheson if he could just drop over here for five minutes so I could tell him exactly what our position is? Bell: I don't get why they-- H.M.Jr: Why? So that when Halifax goes to complain to Mr. Hull about how ruthless I am, they will have the whole picture, and they will appreciate it, they won't give him any sympathy. 368 - er - This is important, high policy, and Hull ought to know about it, and I am going to try to work through Acheson. Bell: Well, he ought to know about it, then, don't you think? H.M.Jr: Don't you think so? Foley: I don't know how much good it will do. White: I am wondering whether you might not tell Hull directly. H.M.Jr: Oh-- Foley: Well, he could do both, Harry. I think if he is going to tell Hull directly he might better tell Acheson first and then tell Hull. Cochran: What is the alternative to Peacock, sending out some new man from London? H.M.Jr: I didn't make any suggestions. Cochran: It is a rather long process, we found out. H.M.Jr: I think I did drop a hint that they might let Gifford take it over. Cochran: Because he is working in there now. H.M.Jr: I did, I am quite sure. "Gifford has done well. Why not let him take this thing?" Cochran: Peacock should - now, I am not defending him, because I am not happy over his record any more than you are. He ought to know something about the security market here that Gifford doesn't. He was head of the Dominion Securi- ties up in Canada for years, you see. Regraded Uclassified 369 22 - H.M.Jr: How long ago? Cochran: Well, that was some time back, before he went to London, but there he was head of Baring Brothers and has been in the Bank of Eng- land. H.M.Jr: I said this. I said, "Peacock is inheriting the fact that the British Government didn't do anything with this beginning with last June. I said, "He is inheriting all of this, which is unfair to him, but the fact remains. that somebody has to crack this thing." Cochran: But with the pressure you have on Purvis and you have on Phillips now on holding this up, I think you may get some action. That is my guess. H.M.Jr: Holding what up? Cochran: I mean holding up any conversations with them on this matter of contracts, which concerns Phillips very much. I mean, he was in to see me last night? Cochran: Well, he asked about the gold first, and I said, "Well, we have made commitments up on the Hill that the gold from South Africa and Australia will be sold to us," and he says, "Well, we have just got to build up some sort of reserve in so that we can take care of immediate needs--" he said, with the war centering for the moment down in the Near East, they ought to have gold available in South Africa to send up to Egypt and around those parts. He said they don't want dollar balances, they want gold there, and he said, "If they give us every bit from South Africa," he said, we just haven't got it. We would like to build up a little reserve." He said, 370 22 - 28 - "We are going to be embarrassed now because I don't think we are getting the full pro- duction from the Bank of South Africa. I told him that Playfair had intimated that production had fallen off. He said, "I don't think it is that, I think South Africa isn't getting it." H.M.Jr: Merle, it is your job to repeat this to me, see? Now, you have done it. I am not im- pressed with what Phillips is saying. It is your job to repeat to me what he says. Cochran: That is right, because I can add to it. They are getting certain gold from Belgian Congo and Rhodesia and 80 on. H.M.Jr: I am just not impressed. Merle, I, personally, want a demonstration that the Bank of England and what they stand for, see, really want to sell these assets in this country. They have got to make me believe, see, and pick up today's Washington Herald and see the thing at the beginning - the story in the Washing- ton Herald about how the American taxpayer is going to have to pay through the nose in order to give England this stuff. The campaign is started. It is in the Washington Herald, the tip-off. And I forecast this thing several weeks ago, that that was what would happen. Now, before I take the gaff, publicly and privately, for these people, I want them to prove t hat they want to win this war and that they are willing to do everything possi- ble to make & billion dollars worth of assets - turn them into cash, and give up the control of the American thread business in this country, which they control, and the viscose, which they control, before we in turn turn over seven billion dollars to them. Now, I am not convinced. I am asking at this moment seven 371 - 34 - for one, and I don't know whether the Bank of England and that gang is running the British Government or whether Churchill is. I don't know. I told Berle last night - I didn't tell him much, but I told him a little of this. I didn't tell him about my conversation with Halifax. I said, "There is nobody in this town that has done more for the English than I have, and Berle says, "You are absolutely right." I need faith. Talk about Halifax being religious and all of that, I need faith, I need confidence. I think we are on the right track now, Dan, if you could get this thing up. I talked this way in this room, but what is going to happen when somebody from the Treasury goes up on the Hill? Bell: Is there some indication-- H.M.Jr: Do you think I am overemphasizing this, Dan? Bell: No, I don't think you are overemphasizing the importance of it. I am a little bit worried about his successor and the delay. Foley: Dan-- White: That is the way to handle it. Foley: Dan, if it isn't done, it is my judgment the first time you go before the committee and you tell the committee that not one damn cent has been realized from the sale of these assets, that the committee is going to force our hand and turn the whole works over to the RFC, lock, stock, and barrel, and that is what the Brit- ish are up against, so you are being a friend to the British when you are telling them that they have got to show some results and giving them another opportunity on their own to do Regraded Uclassified 372 - 25 - it, because it is the last call. Bell: Well, do you help the situation by forcing the man in there now out when it may take months to replace him, weeks anyway? Foley: But what other way, Dan, have you got of mak- ing them realize the significance of the situa- tion? Cochran: If we hold up on this contract business as the Secretary said, that is the thing that is worrying Phillips most; and I am convinced that Phillips has the idea of selling these and Purvis has the idea. H.M.Jr: True. Cochran: And I think that we can bring pressure on them to get that improved just as when you got Gif- ford here he admitted that he had instructions from the Treasury not to go ahead. You got that rectified. If you can get Gifford work- ing in there with Peacock-- H.M.Jr: May I interrupt you? It wasn't until I got Gifford and Phillips sitting next to each other that I smoked out the fact that the Treasury had not given them the instructions, see. Cochran: That is right. H.M.Jr: Well, the same condition, Merle, may be true here. Maybe Sir Edward Peacock hasn't got the instructions. Cochran: But my point is-- H.M.Jr: Maybe he hasn't got it. The two fellows sat there and I took my hat off to Gifford when he turned to this fellow and he said, "You 373 as - never told me to sell more than two to three million a week." Cochran: You remember we were pretty well fed up with Gifford, we hoped we would get someone in his place, and now he has turned out to be a good man when he has the proper instruc- tions. H.M.Jr: Instead of putting the pressure on Peacock, who is 69 years old and who has an expression- less face, I am putting the pressure on the representative of His Majesty, the King, who can take it. I am putting it - I asked you 10 days ago to do it on his two representa- tives and I got nowhere. I waited 10 days, and then I put it on the representative of the King instead of putting it on Peacock. Bell: I am not so sure that that isn't where the fault lies. It may not be Peacock. It may be just the other end, just like Gifford. Foley: There is only one way to find out. Bell: I agree to that, and I think the Secretary is right in putting the pressure on the Ambassador rather than Peacock. H.M.Jr: Just the way they sat here and kept telling us that they couldn't do it, they go back and - Merle, remind me. Then we developed that he never got the instructions. Now, how do I know that poor Peacock has got the instruc- tions to sell? Maybe his instructions are to stall. I don't know. Bell: Well, the instructions were given out and were rather vague, you remember. He said he came over to look into the situation, not to dis- pose of them. 370 White: Well, the Secretary cannot impute the good faith of the British Government and the only position he can take is that his man is apparently not carrying out your instruc- tions competently, and therefore he wants another man. That serves a dual purpose, it appears to me. In the first place, as he says, it smokes out the real orders; and, in the second place, I think, some publicity, both for the British public and to the Ameri- can public, is called for at this point; and, if the Secretary can take the position in the future, if necessary, that he demanded the recall of this man because he didn't show action, he is in a much better position if no action is taken. If action is taken, then the man can stay here. Bernstein: Well, if this man is as important as the Ambassador says he is and-- Foley: The pressure is on the Ambassador. Bernstein: They are not going to fire him. Cochran: They are not going to make a whipping boy out of Peacock. H.M.Jr: He is the second man in the Bank of England? Cochran: There is no ranking there. He is the man closest to the Governor. He is & senior. He hasn't any position other than-- H.M.Jr: If he is as close as that to Montague Norman, then this fellow Peacock is never going to make a sale unless we build 8. bonfire under him and put & couple of sticks of dynamite in it, but I don't have any confidence in Montague Norman wanting to give up anything and really win this war. He typifies everything to me that is the worst in England. Regraded Uclassified 375 Cochran: - Did Walter Stewart speak to you the other day, Mr. Secretary, about the idea of having these people? competitors in steel and 80 on approach these (Mr. Acheson entered the conference.) H.M.Jr: Dean, I want to tell you something that is important to us and I want Mr. Hull to know about it, but I would like it guarded as much as possible. Yesterday at lunch I had & chance to sketch to the President of the United States just what we were doing here in - in relation to the English financing, I mean how all of the English money is deposited with the Federal Reserve of New York as our fiscal agent and we know how much money they have put in and how much they have spent each week and how we have Phillips here representing the Treasury and how we are in constant touch with them and get the amount of their sales each day of their securities and now Sir Edward Peacock is here supposedly to sell their direct investments, 80 the thing all flows here. Now, the Army is supposed to be in & process of taking over English contracts where they have made down payments, you see, and the RFC is supposedly in the process of taking over their contracts where they have created plants. As far as we can find out, the RFC hasn't con- summated a single contract and if the Army has done anything, they have done five million dollars worth of it. We are trying to find out how much it all amounted to. The reason for this coming to a head is that Phillips, Sir Frederick Phillips came in last week and sat down and said, "What are you going to do about our financial situation?" and I said "What do you mean?" We have been trying to get a lot of information. Now, the situation 376 on the first of January, roughly, was that they had commitments for about a billion four hundred million dollars of contracts in this country, and we are going to analyze just how much of those were for munitions and how much for other things than muni- tions, also how did they raise the money. We think we know, but we want more informa- tion. Then Bell is going to prepare for them a sheet just like We have as to the future needs, how much they are going to spend and how they are going to raise it, going through to their war year, which is September 1. Now, in my testimony on the Mill I pointed out as of January 1 they had outstanding about E. billion four. To pay for this, they had somewhere around nine hundred million dollars worth of direct investments end six hundred million dollars worth of securities. We have been unable, or they have been unable, they claim, to sell a single factory in this country, although we have been after them since lest June. Friday a week ago I had Cochran send for Phillips and Finsent, the financial attache, and tell them that I was very much disturbed about this, it was most embarrass- ing, I might be asked any time on the Hill why they don't do it and 50 forth and 80 on, and that they just hed to get busy and make good on this thing and never mind all the reasons why. They just had to produce and show that they were willing to sell some of these investments. Well, yesterday I asked - told the President if he approved that I would like to tell Halifax that unless by the end of this week they demonstrated they were go- ing to sell some of their direct investments, they had better recall Sir Edward Peacock, who was in charge of these sales, and I got the President's approval to do it, and I told Regraded Uclassified 377 , - Halifax last night and he was very much disturbed and told me what great political backing Peacock has. It always irritates me when they talk about political backing but ask how they are going to win the war. Why am I 80 exercized? Well, somebody in the Treasury, when this appropriation goes up on the Hill, has to review the English financial situation before the Congress of the United States is going to vote "X" billions of dollars under the Lend-Lease Bill and particularly since the plan now is to put it all in one bill, and I pointed out this morning the campaign is open in the Washington Herald for all the increased taxes we are going to have to pay for what we are going to give to England. The posi- tion which I am taking is that until I get an answer from Halifax - I want to point out this. Several months ago I kept saying, "Why don't you sell more securities?" and they said they couldn't. They were selling from one to three million dollars. I got Gifford and Phillips sitting next to each other, and when I kept saying to Gifford, "I know you can sell more, that the American market will absorb it," he finally turned to Phillips with a flushed face - but he says, "My instructions from the British Treasury are not to sell any more," and then Phillips got flushed, as a result of which beginning with the next week they sold ten million dóllars a week and I think every week after that they have done 50. Cochran: They have kept it up. H.M.Jr: They have averaged ten million a week. Now, I don't know that Peacock has the instructions, really, to sell these businesses or not and until they do it, there is no reason, no 378 matter how much Purvis, whom I have the greatest confidence in, tells me that they are his instructions - but he doesn't know any more than - until I made it so unpleasant for Gifford that in anger he turned on Phillips and says, "Well, I haven't got the instructions from the British Treasury." Now, what I am preparing to do is to sit tight here and do nothing after my notice to Halifax with the British on their finan- cial situation until they make some move. Now, they are all right for the rest of the month. They admit they are all right, you see. They have got enough money. They are all right. So they are not going to default on any contracts. Nothing scandalous is go- ing to happen. But somebody from the Treasury is going to have to go up within three or four days on the Hill and one of the first things they are going to ask is, "Well, what about their financial condition?" Now, the financial crowd in New York has been per- fectly swell, because Peacock has treated them absolutely shamefully. Reputable people have gone in and said, "We would like to have & chance to figure on such and such a thing, If and he treats them like dogs. I get this from the SEC all the time. Differ- ent people call them up, and he either can't see them or won't see them, people that have got the cash and want to buy these different businesses, and I just wanted to get the picture. We have it from the British. The Army is supposed to buy - pick up the con- tracts where they have made down payments and the RFC is in the process of picking up any plants that they own in this country, but pending hearing from these people, in order that I keep faith with Congress and they keep faith with me, they have got to keep my morale up and say that they mean to 379 36 - 22 - do what they say, never mind the difficul- ties. The President - I have his complete backing. Now, why do I send for you? In case they go to do the baby act over there and complain about me, I would like to feel that the State Department will say, "Well, this is a Treasury matter, it is a hundred percent finance, and either hands off or if you - I mean, I am not asking you. If Mr. Hull or whoever sees the English would say, "Well, we think until you have complied with what the Treasury is asking, that the position that they take of going on a sit- down strike is right," but the least I would like to have is hands-off, you see, because I am sure that Halifax is going to run to the State Department and try to get sympathetic hearing for this - whatever kind of treatment he calls it, I am giving it. Now, you can ask me questions because I am full of this and you are not, but I wanted you to get it. Acheson: The Army is to pick up the contracts on which they have already made down payments? Foley: British supply contracts. Acheson: And the RFC is to take over the financing of their plant buildings? Foley: Well, they own certain plants all over the country, powder plants and ordnance plants and airplane plants, title to which is in corporations wholly owned by the British Government. Acheson: And the RFC is going to buy those from them? Foley: Yes. 380 32 - Acheson: Well now, what are the proceeds of these for? sales of private businesses going to be used H.M.Jr: Their own British standards, that was the understanding I had with Purvis. To be used for things of British specifications. White: He said - he wanted to know what the proceeds of the sale of the private businesses would be for. H.M.Jr: Let me go back first. The money that they get, I will come to that. The money that they get from the RFC and the Army would be, so to speak, free money that they could use for anything that they wished to. The thing that Peacock gets is pledged by me to the Congress against a billion four of contracts that they had outstanding on the first of January. Acheson: I see. The actual financing of the billion four is - so far as the American suppliers are concerned, is supposed to be taken care of, 1, by the Army, and 2, by what Jesse Jones produces, is that right? H.M.Jr: The billion four outstanding on the first of January, as I testified, would be taken care of, 1, by the six hundred million dollars worth of U.S. listed securities; 2, the nine hundred million of direct investments; and 3, the four hundred million dollars output of the South African gold mines. Acheson: Well, now, where do the Army and Jesse come in on this picture? H.M.Jr: The Army and Jesse come into the picture that they are in the process of picking up the factories that they have invested in, the 381 33 - 34 - advance payments in the case of the Army that they have made on contracts. Foley: That doesn't amount to so much. H.M.Jr: No, but anyway - and that money, my under- standing with Purvis was that they could feel free to use that for anything they wished to. Acheson: On new orders? H.M.Jr: Anything. Foley: Under the Lease-Lend Bill, stuff that we couldn't use. H.M.Jr: Anything that these - it was free for them to use any way that they wished to. It wasn't obligated. Acheson: I see. That is a backflow to them? H.M.Jr: Yes. Acheson: And when the Army reimburses them for down payment that they have made, is the Army going on with further payments or are the further payments part of the one billion four? Foley: The Army will assume those contracts. Acheson: But the one billion four are some wholly different contracts? Foley: Yes, they would be different contracts. H.M.Jr: No, they are part of the same thing. They overlap. White: There are a few of those contracts which 382 - -35 - apparently the Army will be able to take over, but it will not amount to a great deal. H.M.Jr: Fifty million dollars. Bell: Won't it be largely these new contracts that have been entered into since January l? H.M.Jr: Now, since January 1 the thing that we have tried to keep very, very secret here, because I have risked my neck, I told Congress that for all ostensible purposes all buying had stopped. Instead of that, I let them average thirty-five million dollars a week new pur- chases and if I ever had been called up on the Hill I just never could have explained it. Acheson: I think I have it clear. H.M.Jr: Do you want to go over it again? Acheson: The only thing I am not quite clear about is the Army and the RFC. Foley: Maybe we can give him the amounts. H.M.Jr: Give him everything. Acheson: I see that the British have commitments of & billion four. H.M.Jr: As of the first of January. Acheson: Which they have got to take care of by the sale of their six hundred million dollars of direct investments, the nine hundred million or privately owned plants and things of that sort in this country, and four hundred million dollars of African gold. Now, the six hundred million is going ahead all right. 383 35 - 36 - The four hundred is presumably all right. But they are getting nowhere on the nine hundred. H.M.Jr: That is right. Acheson: And then I understand what you said about Peacock and that situation and what you would like the State Department to do. The thing that I am not quite clear about is where the RFC and the Army come in or whether it is important that they come in at all. H.M.Jr: It is only important in this way. When we were worried about the money, everybody got their heads together and there were to kinds of contracts. There was one where, for in- stance, they made a twenty-five percent down payment and McCloy, in order to try to help this thing out, said, "Well now, we will pick up those, you see. Acheson: That is, that our Army would take over those contracts? H.M.Jr: Assume them. The only one they have done is Kelsey Wheel. Acheson: That takes it right out of the billion four? H.M.Jr: Yes. Foley: If it was part of the billion four. Those contracts might be the ones that were entered into subsequent to January 1 in some instances. Acheson: I see. H.M.Jr: Now, the Army couldn't assume plants, so they went to the RFC and they said, "Jones, will you buy the powder plants that the English 384 - 87 - have built in this country?" and supposedly they amount to a hundred and thirty-four million dollars. If the information is cor- rect, to date, although he has been on it for weeks and weeks, he has been unable to consummate a single British contract. Acheson: That they could apply to the billion four? H.M.Jr: Yes, or to anything else that they needed. But you can see what an impossible position - I told this to Halifax - I would be in to go up on the Hill and they say, "Well, all right, now, Mr. Morgenthau, how about these English factories? What has happened to them?" "Well, I am terribly sorry, but the English just haven't sold any. Now, there is no danger in this thing, because they are all right, certainly for another month and maybe another couple of months, but certainly we can see daylight and they admit they are for the rest of this month, so by sitting still and saying I won't do anything until they move on the direct investments, I am no endangering anything, you see, other than our relations with them, but I thought it was important enough that you ought to know about it and Hull ought to know about it, so whoever re- ceives Halifax, if he brings it up, you would be posted, but it isn't the kind of thing that I would want to pick up in the papers and read, you know. Acheson: Yes. B.M.Jr: I needn't point that out. Acheson: No, I can understand that. And the British did come down and start talking with you about this and then you discovered that they are not moving forward on the nine hundred Regraded Uclassified 385 37 - 36 - million? H.M.Jr: Oh, yes. Acheson: And so in talking with the President you said what you wanted to say to Halifax, which was that if they don't make some headway by the end of the week they would have to recall Peacock? H.M.Jr: That is right. And mind you, Friday a week ago, Cochran told the English financial representative how upset I was about it and so they have had ten days' notice and they just had to do something. He told them this Friday a week ago. And since Friday a week ago to yesterday, nothing happened. Now, there is one other thing. In the course of my putting this pressure on them, they came through with this letter which - who helped us on that? Cochran: Livesey. H.M.Jr: Which they said this pressure goes back to about a month ago. It is about a month, isn't it, roughly? And I have been putting this pressure on them steadily so they came back and said, "Well, that is all right. We will assign all of these properties to the Presi- dent of the United States." Of course, I said the President didn't want to take this responsibility and I advised him not to. But we left the whole matter in suspense. We didn't turn it down and we didn't say yes. I want you to know that they have tried every way possible - I told Peacock it is very nice of him to give this to the President of the United States, but we have got to look to them to do this. We don't want the President of the United States to sell English holdings in 386 38 - DS. - this country. But the matter is so that we could always say, "All right, now we will take it over. You make out a deed to us and we will take over all of these properties." Acheson: I think I have got it straight, and I will go right over now and see Mr. Hull. H.M.Jr: If you want anything - Merle sees the finan- cial people, Merle Cochran, so if you want to refresh yourself, I think if you want to call him to come over and see you, he will be glad to do it. Acheson: All right, fine. H.M.Jr: Merle Cochran. Acheson: Yes. H.M.Jr: Because he is on the State Department payroll on a lease-loan to us and we are very glad to have him, 80 if you want something or Mr. Hull wanted to get it word of mouth what did I say to Pinsent or Phillips, Cochran has all of that. Acheson: I will speak to Mr. Hull right away and then if you want to say anything further, we will call Merle. H.M.Jr: All right, fine. I appreciate your coming over. But this is the kind of thing that you can be useful on. (Mr. Acheson left the conference.) Bell: Give the Secretary of War and Jesse Jones a copy of this? 387 39 - 10 - H.M.Jr: Yes. Well now, doesn't that finish that chapter? I think it is good to tell Dean. You know, he has come over here and he wants to help. Don't you think so? Bell: Dean is all right. H.M.Jr: Well, is there anything more on this? Cochran: There is just that one point, you asked for a letter on the gold. You remember, the British had raised the question of their negotiations with Canada? They had two points in there. One covered the lease-lend part, as far as parts and materials; and the other on the gold. H.M.Jr: Well, I want them to - excuse me, was it a letter to us about the gold? White: It was a memorandum. Cochran: It was & memorandum. Bell: You had asked for a reply, which Merle was preparing to go back. H.M.Jr: Where is that? Cochran: Have you one? White: We have three replies, one of which Bernie and I recommend. I haven't seen his, although we primarily recommend no written reply. Bernie and I definitely feel there should be no written reply, but we have written replies prepared. H.M.Jr: If I could go along with that and delegate Merle Cochran, the next time they come in, to simply say, "Gentlemen, we want the gold to come here rather than to Canada." 388 - 41 - White: I am wondering whether you would want to put it that way or maybe you would want to put it that you don't feel it appropriate for you to comment on what they do with their funds, indebtedness to foreign coun- tries. All our concern is that they make their commitments here, because I am wonder- ing whether they wouldn't use that informa- tion in Canada and make it a little diffi- cult for us. Put it the other way around, Merle. If you take a note, simply say that we have been counting on it and all they have got to do is read the Secretary's testimony. Cochran: I didn't get to talk with Harry and Bernie because they were working on it last night when Phillips was with me, so I have just drafted & note in which I quoted your testi- mony up on the Hill. H.M.Jr: May I see it? "Dear Sir Frederick: "By memorandum dated March 5, 1941, you raised two questions. The first was an inquiry as to whether I would see any objection to Great Britain paying Canada in gold to the extent that you may have gold available for that pur- pose in the future. You explained that this would not cover more than a fraction of the adverse balance with Canada, and that gold so utilized would reach United States eventu- ally in payment of Canada's adverse balance with the United States. "It will be recalled that in the data prepared with your assistance and submitted to Congress by me, we estimated for the current calendar year Australian gold exports to the United States at $75 millions and South African 389 41 - 42 - exports of gold at $480 millions. (see page 11 of Part 1 of "Hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, on S. 275.") "May I also invite your attention in this connection to the following extract from my testimony before the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, as reported on pages 64 and 65 of the volume of Lend-Lease Bill Hearings." I think this, unless there is some good reason, Merle, that you think otherwise, I would show them this part of my testimony, you see. I mean, just lift my testimony out of this letter. I wouldn't send them the letter. And simply say, "This is what Mr. Morgenthau says and he hasn't changed his mind any since he has testified." What do you think about that? Bell: That is all right. Is it in there that this data that the Secretary gave to the committee is with the approval of the British Govern- ment? Cochran: I said prepared with their assistance. H.M.Jr: And you could add on there, "approved." White: Well, they gave it to us. Bernstein: Well, there is a point in the testimony where you make it perfectly explicit that you were submitting the information with the approval of the British Government. H.M.Jr: Let's just rehearse. Let me say it and you people disagree, if you wish to. I would send Regraded Uclassified 390 42 - A3 - - for these people and say, "We have considered this and I would like to show you a copy of Mr. Morgenthau's testimony and the position he took in regard to the disposition of the Australian and South African gold and his position hasn't changed any. Is that enough? Cochran: I prefer it that way. H.M.Jr: You prefer it that way? Cochran: Yes. H.M.Jr: Ed? Foley: Yes. H.M.Jr: Bernie? Bernstein: Quite all right. H.M.Jr: Harry? White: All right. H.M.Jr: It is unanimous. Cochran: Just that last paragraph. You know they raised in a memo two questions and I say, "As to your second question with respect to the applica- tion of the Lend-Lease Bill to American parts and materials entering into Canadian-manufac- tured munitions for Great Britain, I beg to inform you that this question is having the attention of the Treasury during its study of the general problem of operating under the Lend-Lease plan." H.M.Jr: I don't think I would say that. Cochran: I mean, they have raised that question. 391 - 44 - White: I would just ignore that part of it. H.M.Jr: I would just answer him on the gold. White: There is just one question, in order not to make it possible for Canada to misunderstand or to raise any difficulties, if they do ask, "Well then, is it that the Secretary wants us to pay the gold to him?" I am wondering whether a statement to the effect that the question as to how the British Treasury shall meet its commitments to other countries is not a matter on which the Secretary feels he can appropriately express an opinion might not be made? Then they wouldn't be able to go to Canada and say-- H.M.Jr: If you fellows could only see each other be- fore you see me, you see. I don't know why it can't be done. White: Well, we were all tied up until the last minute. H.M.Jr: Well, just at this time - I am tired now and - I don't want to go any further just now. Show them that testimony. Cochran: All right, and I will tell them the considera- tion of anything else is deferred. H.M.Jr: But please, gentlemen, before you come in here, try to see each other and show each other your memoranda. White: It was just impossible. He (Cochran) was with Bell this morning and we were waiting in his office. H.M.Jr: He was what? Cochran: I was with Dan trying to get the corrections on Regraded Uclassified 392 - 45 - this thing. We were going over this because there were errors in it which-- White: There was a desire to get together. H.M.Jr: There was a desire? Cochran: Oh, yes, I should say SO. But last night I was seeing Phillips when they were working. H.M.Jr: Just so that the intentions are good. Cochran: The very best. White: Then Merle Cochran will not tell them that you want all the gold to come here, rather than to Canada? H.M.Jr: What he is going to say is, there is my testi- mony in which I say that the gold should come here. I mean, "Mr. Morgenthau's position is as he testified." Isn't that what you under- stand? Cochran: Yes. H.M.Jr: Does anybody object to him saying this is my testimony and my position is just what it was then? Now, from that they could only draw one conclusion, that we wanted it to come here. White: But they won't be able to tell the Canadian Government that you want all their surplus dol- lars to go to you and not to the Canadian Government, and that is the only thing I wanted to avoid. H.M.Jr: They will put me in the wrong light whatever way you do it. Cochran: You would rather have it in writing, Harry? Regraded Uclassified 393 45 - 46- - White: No, I think you should tell' it to them orally. 394 Dear Sir Frederick: By memorandum dated March 5, 1941, you raised two questions. The first was an inquiry as to whether I would see any objection to Great Britain paying Canada in gold to the extent that you may have gold available for that purpose in_ the future. You explained that this would not cover more than a fraction of the adverse balance with Canada, and that gold so utilized would reach United States eventually in payment of Canada's adverse balance with the United States. It will be recalled that in the data prepared with your assistance and submitted to Congress by me we estimated for the current calendar year Australian gold exports to the United States at $75 millions and South African exports of gold at $480 millions. (See page 11 of Part 1 of "Hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, on S. 275.") May I also invite your attention in this connection to the following extract from my testimony before the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, as reported on pages 64 and 65 of the volume of Lend- Lease Bill Hearings: Sir Frederick Phillips, K.C.M.C., Under Secretary of the British Treasury, Washington, D.C. 395 - 2 - "Mr. Tinkham. Every year Great Britain is receiving gold from South Africa where it is mined to an extent of $700,000,000 to $750,000,000. What reason is there, that you know of, why that gold in due course and under proper arrangements should not be transferred to us? I mean, of course, as security and collateral for what we may advance it which may be an unlimited amount. "Mr. Morgenthau. Mr. Tinkham, under that section B(3) it says South African exports of gold, $480,000,000, which they advise me is the amount which would flow to the United Kingdom. There is $480,000,000. We have also listed in Australian gold $75,000,000. "Mr. Tinkham. We will not dispute about the amount. I have seen seven hundred to seven hundred fifty million dollars repeatedly stated as the amount of gold produced in the Rand in English publications, which I could submit to you. If they are submitting a larger amount and we have notices of approxi- mately the amount of $450,000,000 or $750,000,000, or as I suggested, $700,000,000, why should not they transfer it to us as collateral against such loans as we are making so the American taxpayer does not have to meet their bills as is pro- posed in this legislation? "Mr. Morgenthau. You and I think alike on this point. I believe that any amount of South African gold that the United Kingdom receives during this year they should use to pay for merchandise which they buy in this country. "Mr. Tinkham. Now, have they been doing that, do you know? "Mr. Morgenthau. They have been paying their bills. "Mr. Tinkham. But you do not know whether they have used that or whether they are segregating that, cacheing it, as it were, in London? "Mr. Morgenthau. No. "Mr. Tinkham. Or even selling it to us, of course, at a very heavy profit at the present prices you are paying for gold? "Mr. Morgenthau. That is something else again. They have been selling us most of their South African gold and they propose to sell us all the South African gold that they produce. 396 - 3 - "Mr. Tinkham. Sell us! Yes; but do you not think that where we are to let them have an unlimited credit it should be given us as security and as collateral annually? "Mr. Morgenthau. I do not think you really mean that. "Mr. Tinkham. What did you say? "Mr. Morgenthau. I do not think you really mean that. "Mr. Tinkham. Certainly, I do, Mr. Morgenthau; I am always very serious. "Mr. Morgenthau. These figures which I presented here today include, I believe, all of the gold that will be mined in South Africa and Australia within this coming year and they need all of that gold and all of the securities of their citizens and they need all of the investments they have in this country to raise sufficient dollars to pay for the orders already placed here." The foregoing paragraphs indicate the commitments which I have given Congress insofar as current production of South African and Australian gold is concerned. As to your second question, with respect to the application of the Lend-Lease Bill to American parts and materials entering into Cnadian-manufactured munitions for Great Britain, I beg to inform you that this question is having the attention of the Treasury during its study of the general problem of operating under the Lend-Lease plan. Sincerely yours, Secretary of the Treasury. 397 TREASURY DEPARTMENT mot INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATE March 11, 1941 Secretary Morgenthau TO FROM Mr. Cochran STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL In accordance with the decision reached at this morning's group meeting on the British financial position, Under Secretary Bell, with a suggestion now and then on By part. drew up a list of forms which we contemplated submitting to the British Treasury representatives here with the view to obtaining from them regular and uniform monthly reports upon their financial position, both with respect to current assets and commitments and prospective receipts and disbursements. At 3:15 I telephoned Sir Frederick Phillips that we had this plan under vay and hoped that he would let his assistants meet with us this afternoon to see whether our forms were workable from the British standpoint, and to suggest any amendments. Phillips agreed with this and had Messrs. Playfair and Allen of his staff meet with Messrs. Bell, White and myself at 4:15 this afternoon. The forms which had been pre- pared in Mr. Bell's office were studied and some alight amendments thereto made. The British representatives took the forms away, with the understanding that they would study them and report back to us any new suggestions that might require consideration Before the system is set into operation. HMR Regraded Uclassified 398 March 11, 1941 3:00 p.m. RE TAX PROGRAM Present: Mr. Gaston Mr. Foley Mr. Bell Mr. Sullivan Mr. Blough Mr. Tarleau H.M.Jr: Well, I see Tarleau and Blough. It smells like taxes. Sullivan: Did you see the headlines in the afternoon paper? H.M.Jr: No. Sullivan: Seven billion for the Lend-Lease. Gaston: Gone up? Sullivan: Woodrum made the announcement coming out of the White House this morning. He said everybody in the conference except one was agreeable. Taber was there, and he spoke of his having been a severe administration critic, the inference being that he was the one who had protested. H.M.Jr: Well, what do you Coast Guard fellows want today? Sullivan: Well, we have a variety of schedules here, Regraded Uclassified 399 - 2 - starting in with invested taxes that would yield a billion six -- H.M.Jr: Excuse me. Coast Guard is life-saving, isn't it? Take it all back. Sullivan: Another schedule of two billion one, 8. third of two billion and a half, a fourth of three and a half and a fifth at just about four billion. H.M.Jr: Well, this is the Roosevelt-Bernie Baruch plan, you see. The President doesn't know whether these figures are correct, but he thought invested business on the present schedule would give us two billion more taxes. Yes? No? Sullivan: Well, there is an estimate in your report that an increase from - in national income from 90 to 100 million would give an increase in revenue of two billion two. H.M.Jr: My report? Sullivan: Yes, sir. H.M.Jr: Well, do you expect it to be a hundred on the average in the next fiscal year? It is 78.now. Sullivan: I think they are planning about 84. Foley: When? Bell: 1941. Foley: June 30, '41? Bell: Calendar year, which affects your 1942 reve- nues, materially. Sullivan: That is right. 400 - 3 - Bell: 1942 calendar year hasn't been estimated, but it is assumed that on the present upper 95. trend, it will go to 90 or better, possibly H.M.Jr: Calendar year, how much? Bell: Eighty-five, I think. It is close to 80 now. H.M.Jr: Seventy-eight was the last I heard. Foley: Well, that is a jump of five since when? Bell: Since last January. Foley: Since January 1, '41? Bell: 'Forty. Foley: Oh, you mean in fourteen months? Bell: No, the estimate in January, '41, was 79 and a half, and the estimate in January, 1940, was 74. H.M.Jr: What we are talking about, isn't it, is how much business for the calendar year - let's see, six months of '41, isn't it? Sullivan: Yes. H.M.Jr; And twelve months in '42? Sullivan: You mean on these taxes? H.M.Jr: Yes. Sullivan: Yes, except on the income taxes. They won't come in - there will be six months of fiscal '42. Regraded Uclassified 401 - 4 - H.M.Jr: Well, have you struck a kind of an average for the year that we are talking a bout? Sullivan: You mean -- H.M.Jr: In the calendar '40 year - how much will business be in the '42 calendar? Bell: Forty-two or '41? H.M.Jr: Forty-two. Bell: In the '41 calendar year, I think our estimates were based on 85. H.M.Jr: Yes, that is what you said, 84? Bell: I don't know. We have no estimates for '42, but there has been talk that it might go up to 90 or 95. I don't know whether the capacity is there or not. H.M.Jr: Let's just say we strike an average of 90. How much revenue will that produce on the present bill? Sullivan: It would be well toward two billion dollars. H.M.Jr: Then his figure of around two was right. You get two more. What he spoke about is two more and a billion and a half new taxes. Now, how much would that give us in revenue, gents? Sullivan: Well -- Bell: About 12. Sullivan: Not quite that. Bell: Well, 11.7. Regraded Uclassified 402 - 5 - Blough: You mean gross, or after Social Security is pulled out? Bell: Net. Eight, two plus three, five would be eleven, seven. Just a little under twelve billion. That is net. H.M.Jr: Twelve billion and how much are we going to spend? Sullivan: Eighteen. Bell: That is about right, 18 or 17. H.M.Jr: Well, that is two-thirds. Blough: That was before Lease-Lend. H.M.Jr: Well, I know, but it is two-thirds. That would be perfect. Bell: And if your capacity increases and your national income increases, your revenue will again go up to take care of the increased expenditures on the Lend-Lease Bill in 1943, if necessary. Sullivan: I think the country -- Tarleau: That is good. Sullivan: will take something more than that. I think you can take a lot more than that with- out in any way interfering with your borrow- ing plan. Bell: God, he is driving us! H.M.Jr: Well, what figure are you shooting for? Sullivan: I have got them all the way up to four. Regraded Uclassified 403 - 6 - H.M.Jr: Do it the way friend Willkie does, throw & dart, and pick one. Sullivan: We think we could take four without throwing in a monkey wrench. H.M.Jr: You mean four on top of the two? Sullivan: The two isn't anything that anybody is giving us. That is something we are giving them. H.M.Jr: That is a volunteer offering. Sullivan: No, I mean because business is better, they are earning that much more. That isn't an increase in taxes. Gaston: I think John is right. Sullivan: I don't think we ought to talk at all about any additional yield because of improvement of busi- ness conditions. H.M.Jr: All right, we will just gracefully accept two billion more -- Sullivan: When, as, and if we get it. H.M.Jr: And you want how many more taxes on top of that? Sullivan: I am willing to go the whole way, sir, and I think they will take it. H.M.Jr: I wondered why you invited Herbert. Gaston: I didn't know until now. I didn't know until now. H.M.Jr: You know what we call it up in Duchess County? It is 8. horse shedding. S-h-e-d, for some of you boys who haven't lived in the country. Regraded Uclassified 404 - 7 - Bell: What is wrong with taking that much? Foley: It all depends on how you do it. Bell: We will take it out of the lower brackets. (Laughter.) Foley: We are against that, aren't we, Dan? Bell: Yes, we certainly are. We have got to do something about the ones we have got on the books now. Gaston: It is a long time before we can foresee any reduction in Federal expenditures, a long time. If the war is suddenly over, we are going to have domestic expenditures on a much higher scale than we have ever had before. H.M.Jr: You are one of these spending boys, are you? Gaston: No, I am one of these -- Bell: Realistic. Gaston: Yes, one of these "balance the budget" fellows. (Laughter.) I am quite serious about it. I think we have got to get down to business. H.M.Jr: Well, what would four billion do to whom and where and how? Foley: Yes, with which and to whom? (Laughter.) H.M.Jr: I may like it, you know. Cheer up, Herbert. Regraded Uclassified 405 - 8 - You might just as well smile while we are all operated on. Gaston: I hardly can. Sullivan: Of that four, half would come from income taxes, 353 million from estate and gift taxes, 645 from corporation taxes, 350 from liquor, 200 from tobacco, 200 from increased taxes on automobiles and gasoline, 132 and a half million on the "Bell" tax -- Bell: Is that all? A nickel 8. bottle? H.M.Jr: We just fixed Pepsi-Cola up. Are you going to take it away from them? Bell: It did all right last year. It earned $24 a share. Sullivan: John Burns is counsel for them, and he says their only worry is that the water rates will go up in New York City. That is, it is a very important item in the cost. I had the mis- cellaneous tax outfit working on your (Bell's) tax, and of course, we have to tax the drinks that are sold at the soda fountains, the flavoring and the -- Bell: Sure. Sullivan: And the water, carbonated water, and in order to equalize the tax with the tax on bottled goods, we have to tax the goods three times as much as it sells for. H.M.Jr: O.K. Sullivan: Now, I have receipts for all of you of all of these different schedules. Regraded Uclassified 406 - 9 - R.M.Jr: All right. I don't like Herbert when he is so serious about this thing. This is a plan to raise additional -- Bell: Have you got anything here to raise income, salaries or anything? Gaston: That is what we are trying to raise, salaries. Bell: Or reduce our installment payments. M.M.Jr: I told you the joke about the President, didn't I? I think it is the best joke I have heard yet. You can't repeat it. He says, "Now, Henry, when you get down to line 31 on the income tax, it says - say your net income is about $5000. Then what I want you to do is -" I can't remember whether I did - but he says, "In line 32, we just add two per cent to he tax.' So I said, "Mr. President, have you made out your income tax yet?" He said, "No." And I said, "Well, when you get to line 32, you will find it is 10 per cent." He said, "Well, I haven't got down that far yet." Don't you love it? He had discovered something new. Sullivan: Baruch may want to do that same thing over again, and that doesn't solve any problems at all. H.M.Jp: That is what he wants. He wants line 32, you see -- Sullivan: Baruch has been giving Harrison 8 awful lot of stuff, and Harrison called me yesterday after- noon and wanted to know if I wanted to see him Regraded Uclassified 407 - 10 - on anything right away because he was leaving Wednesday for four or five weeks in Arkansas, and he sounded as though he was not at all well. H.M.Jr: Well, here is the thing that amused me. Bell and Jesse Jones and I had lunch together today, and I said, "How about the Baruch plan?" Jones said he spent the last two weeks here, not lobbying, just visiting. I said, "Have you heard about the Baruch plan?" He said, "Sure, it is all right for Bernie, he has only got tax-exempts. He likes to write the ticket. He has only got tax-exempts." I don't see anything in here on apples. Sullivan: No, we are saving that until after the war. H.M.Jr: You fellows are certainly full of pep and vinegar, aren't you? (The Secretary held a telephone conversation with Mr. Harold Smith.) Regraded Uclassified 408 - 11 - H.M.Jr: What you heard, gentlemen, is in the room, if you please. I was putting on a show for the benefit of Smith and not for you. Sullivan: Purvis was called down to the Embassy last night about 11:00 o'clock. H.M.Jr:- Was he? Sullivan: We were having dinner at Forrestal's, and I drove him down, I thought it must be important, or they wouldn t have called at that hour. H.M.Jr: He was sent for? Sullivan: Yes, he was. H.M.Jr: I happen to know what it was. It was as a result of a conversation that I had that they sent for him. He didn't know what it was, I know he didn't. Sullivan: Well, he wouldn't have told me anyway if he did. H.M.Jr: He didn't know what it was, but that is amusing, isn't it? Sullivan: We had a little game of poker in which he won most of the money, and Knudsen says, "This is Lease-Lend poker. H.M.Jr: Is Purvis a good poker player? Sullivan: He said he hadn't played. I hadn't played for fifteen years, and I was the only one who won any money, so I couldn't say. H.M.Jr: You and Knudsen and Forrestal, and who else? Sullivan: And Ralph Budd and Admiral Towers. Ingersoll was there and Blandy, the Speaker, and Vinson, Regraded Uclassified 409 - 12 - the Chairman of Naval Affairs. Dean Acheson was there. H.M.Jr: Was it fun? Sullivan: It was all right. H.M.Jr: Well now, look, I don't see why I should waste your time. This is all very clear, and I am going to take this home tonight and study it. Tomorrow is Wednesday, isn't it? Sullivan: That is right. H.M.Jr: And -- Sullivan: The last ones, 5A and 5B are just alternative choices. H.M.Jr: I will take this home and study it. Sullivan: We have felt that this Excess Profits Tax is pretty unsatisfactory, and we are not hopeful of working out a fair and equitable tax at all. I think we can get the Undistributed Profits Tax back up there on a tray, and I think we can get as much money as we are going to get out of Excess Profits and not nearly half the expense or half the grief, or half the casualties to concerns we shouldn't want to penalize. H.M.Jr: I am going to continue this discussion at 10:15 tomorrow morning. Sullivan: Yes, sir. H.M.Jr: You gentlemen are all invited. I would like to study this. Bell: You probably won't be able to sleep. Regraded Uclassified 410 - 13 - Tarleau: That is what I did. I didn't sleep. Now I feel a little better. When you assimilate it, you feel a little better. I feel much more cheerful today than at the first look at it. Sullivan: It only hurts for a little while. You will notice that there aren't any sales taxes. H.M.Jr: We gave - we had lunch with Jones. I said, "Well, Bell and I figured that before this show was through, we would have to spend 50 billion dollars for armament." Jones jumped back. That is what we figured. Gaston: I should say that the British will need pretty desperately around 12 billions, at a rate of 8. billion a month, as fast as we can get to it. Regraded Uclassified 411 1 2 992.3 3 1,140.7 4 1,700.0 11111 5 2,020.0 6 203.0 7 322.0 Regraded Uclassified 412 Fine to raise et edditional $1,650 million of MIN w fourse individual 1800mg tests . 904.0 Increase earber return by adopting (2/7/2) attached rate scholule letate ADÁ an will 103.0 (1) Increase the estate tes rates by admiting the strached rute scheduler and (2) increase the ein tax rates to three-guarkers the rates to (1/22/41) the attached subside Corporation twing 575.0 (1) Issues profits taxi Increase rutes and review base 300.0 (2) Normal taxt Increase mas on all corporations 15 75.0 (Not an official sen crining 132.5 Incose a 122 on bettled soft drinks at the rate of 1 cent per bettle with equivalent taxes on unbottled drinks and formain syrupe (1/31/42) Check tax 56.0 the 2-cent sheck tax which vos imposed by the Sevenue net of 1932 (1/22/41) Admissions tax 55.0 Reduce the complion under the adminisms tax from 20 cente to 9 combe (1/22/41) Automebiles 40.0 Impace 15 additional 2 persent tax on the Item covered in See. 3403(b) of the 1. 8. s. (1/2/41) Liques 192.2 Distilled spirite: Additional 81 per galles 135.0 7ermated milt liquers: Additional #1 per barrel 55.0 vines, cordials and liquears: Insurance of 16 2/3% 2.2 near stock taxes (first year only) Metilled spirits, $1 per calles (29.0) Ferusated mit liquers, $1 per barrol ( 3.0) (11/29/40) 1,657.7 1/ limites for individual Issue taxes are on basis of salendar year 1941 levels of Income all other estimates are at becluse levels actimbed for the fiscal year 1942. the date when the estimate - min to given in paranthesis after each - 37159a Regraded Uclassified Plan to relse MR. additional $2,150 addition of mass 3/ foures I - I (In income - a 992.3 Increase warter rates by adopting attached rate schedule, without defense tax (2/11/41) latate and an taxes 103.0 (1) Increase the estate tax return w addipting the rube scheduler and (2) increase the an las rules so three-quarters the rutes in (1/22/41) the attached schedule correration texas 575.0 (1) Excess profits taxes Increase rates and revise Inco 500.0 (2) Normal taxt Increase rate on all corporations 25 79.0 (Not as official cettinte) Saft drinks 132.5 Imposs a tax on bottled soft details as the rate of 1 cost per bottle with equivalent two on unbettled drinks and fountain cyrups (2/31/41) Chedr tax 56.0 the 2-seals chedr tax which vas Impost w the Revenue les of 1932 (1/22/41) Admissions 192 55.0 Reduce the exception under the advissions tax from 30 comic to 9 combe (1/22/41) 10.0 Automobiles Imposs - additional 2 percent tax on the Issue covered in section 3403(b) of the 1. R. c. (1/2/41) 192.2 liques Distilled spirite: Additional #1 per gallen 135.0 Termented malt liqueres Additional $1 per berrel 53.0 Vines, cerdials and liqueres: Increase of 16 2/35 2.2 Tlear stock - (first year only) (29.0) Distilled spirite, 61 per calles Permited malt liquore, 81 por barrel (3.0) (11/29/40) 2,146.0 V Extimates for individual income was are on basis of colonder your 19d levels of income all other octivates are at lovels astimated for the fiscal year 1942. The date when the astimate wis máil to given in parenthesis after each - Hire 3/12/19 Regraded Uclassified PLan to raise a additional $2,600 million of w - $2,120.7 1 after w adverting ettached she instating defense team (2/11/42) 196 - m.e for changes (1) Incluse ememption from $40,000 to $25,000 (2) adopt the abtached estate ten Pute schoduley (3) reduce emelusion from $40,000 to $25,000 no les charges (1) the excuption from $40,600 to $25,000; (2) Increase the ein - name to - fourthe the in the proposed (1/27/41) estate tax eshotule commission - 575-0 (1) facture profite taxt Insurance rubee and revice Insue 500.0 (2) Normal taxt Insurance rube - all 15 75.0 (Nos M official estimate) MA 132.5 Incose à Vax an bettled oft drinks at the rute of 1 and per bettle with equivalent teams an whettled trising and fountain eyrope (1/31/41) Park M 96.0 the 2-ml check the which - Expend w the Income 10% of 2952 (1/22/41) W 35.0 Redome the emergen under the addressions too from 20 cambe to 9 embs (1/22/01) who Impose as additional 2 persons tex on the Items required in esotion 3403(b) of the I. 2. c. (1/2/42) 198.2 Disailled spirites Additional 61 per gallen 135.0 Purchased mall liquires Additional 63 per - 93.0 Vines, and 15quirments Insurance of 16 2/36 2.2 FLOOR stock - (ftret year enty) Distilled spirite, 61 per milm (29.0) Termined malt liquire, 01 per barral 3.0) (11/29/40 Item 70.0 of cigare, tobacco and smith Dealso rates 2,982.4 (Not in official catimate) V Revientee for individual Income - are 8 basis of minder your 1901 Lovels of of Best- The all date other which estimates the assissio are of - bestages is lovels given applicated permissions the the first 3/22/18 Regraded Uclassified Plan to nis n additional $3,600 aillies of - w 415 I Michael Lease compliens to $500 the stagle potion and $1,000 insure $1,700.0 for a nurried persons and Increase Wis - by adopting attached mis asholule, without defense the (Date a efficial - 58.0 tex (1) Retmon specific emergéion from 140,000 to 225,000 (2) adopt the attached - vate (3) reduce insurance anstruction from $40,000 to $25,000 an w changes (1) the specific exemption from $40,000 to $25,000 (2) increase the are tar makes to the mail is the propered estate tax edents (1/27/41) - 573.0 profite tax: Insurence Febes and revise base 500.0 (2) formal texas Insurence rule a all experiations 15 75.0 (Not a efficial extimate) 350.0 Motilled spirits: Additional $2 per callen malt liquires Additional #2 your burrel Vince, certicle, and liquires 33 1/35 insurance (Not - official exhámate) I 200.0 Digurations Additional 75 ombe you 2,000 130. Mainfasture of edgars, tabacco and units Isside rates 70. (Not - efficial astimate) team, including guapline 800.0 Items covered is Som. 3403(b) end y403(a) of Codes Deahle reter á Geopline taxes Increase 1/2 cost per salles 120. (Not - official estimate) a drinks 132.5 Typece a be es bettled soft drinks of the rute of 1 - per bittle with equivalent - - mistled drinks and formish (1/31/4) to 56.0 - the 2-mmil check ton with - invoiced w the - in of 1932 (1/22/41) be 53.0 the complies unless the abtained tax from 20 - to 9 mate 3,509.5 (1/22/20) Stinates for Issue taxes are - hands of 1 191 Levels of - all other entimates are at Instruct Lovels critinated for the Road your 15th 1 1 & provided 2 5 I 2 1 de the a Life 1/12/92 Regraded Uclassified Plan to mine - additional a Williem of - 1/ 216 I I THE - will team $2,000.0 60 6500 the stagle persons and $1,000 too a narvice yearson and insurer - más to adming attached vote with defenses to (Ret - efficial 353.0 (1) specific complies from $40,000 to $25,000 (2) Adopt the attached estate tax vale athedule, with defense tax (3) - insurance enslusion from $40,000 to $25,000 (1) the specific emplishen from $40,000 to $25,000 (2) Increase the an too reles to the subse is the propert estate tue with defirmen 9am (Thes at official contrato) MM 635.0 (1) profise taxi Insurance rules and series base 500.0 (2) Form) tast Increase mis M all corporations 15 75.0 (3) Capital stock last fames rate to 01.90, including information for 60.0 (Not M efficial assignée) Most 350.0 Mattiled spirites Additional $2 per palles malt ligers Additional # per burrel Visas, certicle, mé liquires 33 2/32 improve (Not on official outimate) been 200.0 Additional 75 embe per 1,000 130 - of dan, totume and units Drable rules (Not a afficial estimate) TO instating positive 200.0 I'm arread is less. yes(b) and yhoy(e) of Code: Deable rules so Coceline taxt Insurence 1/2 out per gallen 120 (200 a official astimate) 132.5 Imposs & to e bettled coft drinks at the não of 1 - per bettle with equivalent - on unhobiled drinks and eyesys (1/32/49) she - the 8-seal check tax which - Impossible by the - of 1932 (1/22/41) 35.0 the examption valor the to them 20 - - be , - (1/22/42) 3,999.5 letimites for individual Endome - are - mm of your 1991 Levels of Income; all other estimates are at Instruct 100030 estimated to the flease year 1942. the date - the nations - más to given in parenthesis after and - 1/22/13 Regraded Uclassified Plan to reles - attivienal A William of - w 417 - - $2,000.0 w Least complete to 1800 the stagle your and $3,000 for a morted person and terresse our - w attended rube substale, with éther tax (Thes an afficial estimate) - 353.0 (1) Income specific exception from $40,000 to $35,000 (2) Mopt the attenhed estate tax take askedule, with defense tax (3) Income Insurance comination from $40,000 to $25,000 11) Yednes the specifie emerghten from $40,000 to $25,000 (2) Increase the an tax values to three-Courths the nim in the propesed cotato tax schedule, with deferme to (Nos is official estimate) Commission - Gus.0 (1) Capital stock - Insurance sube to $1.50, including issuess tax 60.0 (2) Terml taxi Insurance rute % 360.0 (3) Undistributed profite taxes Tenant the 1936 Law 225.0 & (Not - afficial estimate) Host 350.0 Motilled spirites Additional R per allm Femaled mill liquires Additional 42 per burrel Visa, certials, and liquires 33 2/35 Insurence (Yes an official catimate) M ! 200.0 Cigarettes: Additional 75 certe - 1,000 130 - of cigars, tobacco and saff: Dealth miss (Not as efficial catizate) TO Anterabile tesps, instating quality 200.0 Items covered is mee. 303(b) and 3403(e) of lew Intite Pates so Gasoline taxt 1/2 - pay failen 120 (Not M efficial catimate) left drinks 138.5 Seport a M on bottled ecft drive at the n/o of 2 - per bottle with equivalent Issues is whethin with and fundain agrego (2/31/12) 36.0 - the 3-ecut check tax which me Impossed w the - wh of 2932 (1/22/42) Malasters top 55.0 Todato the constion under the addissions tax from DD only to , cashs (1/22/41) 3,991.9 2/ Primates for individual 1 - are an basic of year 1941 levels of the indivent offert of the undictributed prodite tall to - Late 1 - 1942, the date who the estimate me más is gives is permitheris d'w to - all other cotinates we all business Legala cottinued w the flood each year 24158 the attates for the individual I - 3/12/21 Regraded Uclassified 418 1 Individual arter rate schodule 6504 million. vith defense tax (setimated calendar 1941 Issue levels) Suries not Income $ I (1a themseds I Indest rate I Total earlas of dollars) I (Pereant) I comminative $ o - 2 4 . 80 2 - h 6 200 4 - 6 8 360 6 - 8 10 560 E - 10 12 800 10 - 12 14 1,080 12 - 14 16 1,400 14 - 16 15 2,760 16 - 18 20 2,160 18 - 20 22 2,600 20 - 22 z 3,080 22 - 26 27 4,160 x - 32 30 5.960 32 - 38 33 7.940 38 - s 36 10,100 date . 50 40 12,500 50 - 60 16.900 60 - TO 47 21,600 TO - 80 50 26,600 80 - 90 53 31,900 90 . 100 % 37.500 100 - 150 58 66,500 150 - 200 60 96,500 200 - 250 6a 127,500 250 - 300 64 199,500 300 - 400 66 225,500 400 - 500 293,500 500 - 750 TO 468,500 750 - 1,000 72 245,500 1,000 - 2,000 73 1,378,500 2,000 - 5,000 ya 3,994,500 Over 5,000 75 - Title 3/12/41 Regraded Uclassified 419 1 Comparison of surber rate under present law and progoaal not - leaders rate - total verious Lacous 4 I letter (1000) NEW - I 0 - 2 - 4 - 8 SO 2 - 4 - 6 - 200 is - 6 4 a $ so 360 6 8 6 20 200 360 I - 10 # 12 360 800 10 - 12 20 24 560 1,080 12 - 2k 12 16 800 1,400 14 - 16 15 15 1,100 1,760 16 - 18 18 20 1,460 2,160 15 - 20 21 22 1,880 2.600 20 . 22 24 2,360 3.000 22 # x 27 3,440 4,160 26 - 32 30 30 5,240 5,960 32 - 38 33 7.280 7.940 38 - 54 36 9.300 10,100 - 90 40 11.780 12,500 50 - & 16,100 16,900 8 - TO 20,880 21,600 70 - 8 50 50 25,800 26,600 80 - 90 R 53 31,100 31,900 90 - 100 56 36,780 37.500 200 - 150 58 58 69.780 66,500 150 - 200 $ 95.780 96,500 200 - 250 62 126,700 127,500 250 - 300 158,700 159.500 300 - 400 224,780 225,500 400 500 192,780 293,500 500 750 467.780 468,500 750 - 1,000 047.780 648,500 1,000 - 2,000 1,377.780 1,378,500 2,000 - 5,000 3,597.780 3,998,900 Over 5,000 - . T:1bfa 3/12/41 Regraded Uclassified 120 1 Camparises present and prepaned individual Income taxes on not Incomes of colected sises w married person - as dependents E 1 I members of tax / I Fates I SERVICE before personal - Present 1 1 Present I avenythem 2/ I Proposal I I Proposal I law I Law Amount Percent - $ 2,500 $ 11 $ 33 .4% 1.3% $ 22 200.05 3,000 31 75 1.0 2.5 lake 141.9 4,000 R 158 1.8 4.0 as 125.7 5,000 110 264 2.2 5.3 154 140.0 6,000 150 370 2.5 6.2 220 146.7 5,000 327 625 4.0 7.5 306 97.2 10,000 528 924 5.3 9.2 396 75.0 12,500 058 1,364 6.9 10.9 506 39.0 15,000 1,258 1,874 8.4 12.5 616 49.0 20,000 2.336 3,106 11.7 15.5 no 33.0 25,000 3.643 4,635 15.4 18.5 792 20.6 50,000 14,128 14,920 28.3 29.8 792 5.6 75,000 27,768 28,560 37.0 36.1 792 2.9 100,000 43.476 44,268 43.5 40.3 792 1.8 500,000 330.156 330,504 66.0 66.2 648 .2 1,000,000 717.584 718.232 71.8 71.8 6kg .1 5,000,000 3,916,545 3.917.196 78.3 78.3 648 Under the proposal the attached vertax rate schedule is mistituted for present vehedule. cursed Income assumed, Includes 10% defense tax. Loss than .05 percent. has 1/12/41 Regraded Uclassified 421 a Individual oursex rate schedule 6 998.3 ailliem, without defense wa $1,075.9 million, with defense tax (Extinated calender 1641 issume levels) Bartax net income I Brachet rate I (ia thousands a I Total curtax of dollars) I (peresat) I cumulative 6 0 - 4 4 4 240 4 - 6 4 400 6 - 8 18 640 a - 10 15 240 10 - 12 ao 1,540 12 - 24 as 1,840 14 - 18 so 8,440 15 - 18 86 8,140 10 - to $ 5,940 20 - 22 45 4,840 st - 25 50 6,340 26 - 80 & 9,090 30 - 50 00 21,000 00 - 100 an 51,590 100 - 150 62 62,500 160 - 200 48 114,000 200 - 850 66 146,090 R50 - 500 " 179,090 $00 - 400 64 247,090 400 - 500 TO $17,000 500 - 1,000 78 677,090 1,000 - 2,000 78 1,407,000 2,000 - 5,000 74 3,687,000 Over 5,000 75 - That 5/11/41 Regraded Uclassified 122 1 Comparison of earter ashedules under present law and proposed Schedule a Sustem direcked rates (Peranch): Total mides selative net income I Present - Propess) . Present I ($000) I law I I law Propessi 8 0 - R - 6 - 180 2 - 6 - 6 - 640 4 6 $ B 40 400 6 - 6 6 18 BOD 640 a - 10 8 25 380 040 10 - 12 10 NO 500 1,360 12 - 14 12 is 000 1,040 14 - 10 15 so 1,100 2,440 16 - 10 28 as 1,460 5,140 16 - to a1 $ 1,060 8,040 to - It 24 45 2,350 4,840 at - RS BY so 5,170 0,540 25 - 20 27 E $,440 6,890 26 - so 20 46 4,840 9,000 so - SR DO w 8,240 10,200 82 - 38 IS 90 7,220 15,000 se - 44 N 60 9,380 17,480 44 - so 8 40 11,780 $1,000 50 - 60 44 B 18,180 27,190 60 - 70 47 61 20,850 $3,890 70 - 80 S 25,880 59,350 00 - 90 # $1,100 45,480 90 - 100 as 56,780 61,500 200 - 180 se 65,750 62,590 160 - 200 60 85,700 114,090 200 aso 64 106,760 146,000 250 300 44 150,700 170,000 500 - 400 £24,760 247,000 400 800 TO $17,060 500 750 TO 457,750 49Y,090 750 - 1,000 72 18 647,780 877,080 1,000 - 2,000 78 15 1,577,760 1,407,080 2,000 - 6,000 N % 8,567,780 5,627,050 Over 6,000 75 76 - - Times 5/11/41 Regraded Uclassified $ Comparism of present and propesed individual income taxes on net incoues of solected alsoe Married person - no dependents Bet income I Amount of tex I Effective retails I increase in tax before I I Proposal : 2 Process) I August : Percent personal a Present : Without E With Presentr@ithout: with 1 Framel 4 Properal examption # law : defense A defense : law réafense defense rithout de-sWith $ without deeWith w < I I tax : las t : tax : tax (fense tax tom " D 2,500 4 11 2 40 44 04% 1.6% 1.85 & 29 & 18 263.65 300.05 3,000 31 88 S 1.0 2.9 3.2 57 is 185.9 212.0 4,000 70 184 202 1.8 4.6 5.1 114 112 162.9 108.6 5,000 110 280 308 2.2 5.6 6.2 170 198 164.6 180.0 6,000 150 376 434 2.5 6.8 6.9 228 264 150.7 176.0 8,000 517 606 669 4.0 7.6 8.4 201 352 91.8 111.0 10,000 528 920 1,012 5.8 9.2 10.1 302 484 74.2 91.7 12,500 858 1,410 1,551 6.9 11.5 12.4 552 695 64.8 BO.B 16,000 1,250 2,054 2,259 8.4 13.7 15.1 796 1,001 63.3 79.6 50,000 2,550 3,804 4,194 11.7 19.0 20.9 1,468 1,840 62.8 79.1 25,000 3,845 6,206 5,824 15.4 24.8 27.3 2,561 2,981 61.4 77.6 50,000 14,128 21,754 23,925 20.2 48.5 47.9 7,625 9,801 54.0 69.4 75,000 27,766 37,984 41,585 37.0 50.6 55.6 10,218 18,218 36.8 60.1 100,000 45,476 54,234 $8,811 45.5 54.2 68.8 10,758 15,385 26.7 35.3 500,000 350,158 335,554 351,299 66.0 67.1 70-4 5,390 21,563 1.6 6.0 1,000,000 717,504 715,514 745,963 71.8 72.8 N.A - 2,070 26,379 . I - 3 8.7 $,000,000 $,916,548 5,825,474 8,962,927 78.5 76.5 78.0 -91,074 26,579 -2,3 .7 Vader the proposal, the attached surtax rate schedule b is substituted for the present socidule. fazion earned incous assumed. 15-or 8/12/41 Regraded Uclassified 424 , Individual arter take stabile million vitiment defines - million with information (Noblusbed calenter 1541 Insues Sevele) I I (is thresands of 6 note 8 Total current dellers) I 8 e . Total 3/12/41 Regraded Uclassified 3/12/41 Thided - - o (RESTED (to thousands of 5 Proposal $ I personal I I # Regraded Uclassified I # 3 425 - 14/57/8 Txided A 5,000,000 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< 500,000 050°00' 000°62 50,000 000°52 000°02 000°ST 12,500 10,000 5,000 000°9 IIII let I Nutro I 1 6 personal 1 E E I the metiodal E and 5 the for a "I - - 3,999.399 ################# 19.4 your Femiel If 8 ################# K I winsted street $ I of ################# present I Organization Lanes Sales I Individual of - - I $ ......................... . - Regraded Uclassified 5 981 127 - Individual rate schedule V $1,150.7 million, without defense tax $1,261.3 million, wish deforme tax (Zotimmied colender 1941 income levels) furtes not income I rate . (in thousands I Total surtes (Pareent) # of dollars) I cumbisive # # 0 - 2 10 8 200 2 - b 12 Who is - 6 14 720 6 - to 16 1,040 8 - 10 is 1,400 10 - 12 20 1,800 12 - 14 22 2,240 24 . 16 24 2.720 16 . 16 26 3,240 18 . 20 26 3,000 20 . 22 30 6,400 22 . 26 33 5.720 26 - X 36 7.850 32 - 38 R 10,220 y - at E 12,740 $ . 50 5 15,440 50 - B by 20,340 to - 70 52 25,540 70 - 80 55 31,040 80 - 90 50 36,840 90 - 100 61 42.940 100 - 130 62 73,940 150 . 200 63 105,440 200 - 250 a 137,440 250 - 300 " 170,440 you - 400 6s 238,440 400 - 500 70 308,440 500 . 1,000 TO 668,440 1,000 - 2,000 13 1,398,440 2,000 - 5,000 3,618,440 DAY 000% # 75 - 1/ Combined with reduced promptions of 0500 for a single person and $1,000 for a married person, 11 10 unefficially estimated that this schodule, without the defense laz, would yield approximately $1,700 million. 3/12/41 Regraded Uclassified 428 Compartees of prosent and propered individual taxes on not incomes of solected since 2/ Warried person - se dependents Net incone I Amount of I Iffective I Increase fa tax before I las 3/ I rates I water proposal personal I Present I exemption 2/1 law Proposal I Presents E Proposal * : law Amount Percent 4 I - $ 1,500 $ - 8 TO . 4.75 I TO 2,000 - 145 - 1.3 105 2,500 11 220 .4% 8.8 209 1,900.05 3,000 32 295 1.0 9.6 254 $51.6 4,000 70 466 1.8 11.7 396 565.7 5,000 110 638 2.2 12.8 500 460.0 6,000 150 832 2.5 13.9 682 454.7 8,000 317 1,241 4.0 15.5 924 291.5 10,000 528 1,694 5.3 16.9 1,166 220.8 12,500 838 2,321 6.9 18.6 1,463 170.5 15,000 1,258 3,018 s.4 20.1 1,760 139.9 20,000 8,336 4,646 11.7 23.2 2,310 98.9 25,000 3,843 6,560 15.4 26.2 2,717 70.7 50,000 14,128 18,583 28.3 37.2 4,455 11.3 75,000 27.768 33,708 37.0 44.9 5,940 21.4 100,000 43,476 50,857 43.5 50.9 7.381 17.0 500,000 330,156 344,880 66.0 69.0 14.724 4.5 1,000,000 717.584 736,042 71.8 73.7 19,278 2.7 5,000,000 3,916,548 3,093,000 78.3 78.7 19,296 -5 w Under the proposal personal examptions are reduced from 1000 to 1900 for . single person and from $2,000 to $1,000 for a married person. and the attached VEPSAX rate schedule A is abstituted for present schedule. 3/ Marima earned issue assumed. y Includes 10 persent defense tax. T210b 1/12/41 Regraded Uclassified 129 Compartees of arw valor present law and proyeard Schodule A Suries I Branket rates (Percent) I 1010 earles regulative art iscome : Present I I law I Properal Present I ($000) I I law I Proposal : 0 - 2 - 105 $ - $ 200 2 - be - 12 - We à - b is 14 80 720 6 - # 6 16 200 1,040 I - 10 I if 360 1,400 10 - 12 10 20 560 1,800 12 - 14 12 22 $00 2,200 14 - 16 15 x 1,100 2.720 16 - 18 18 26 1,460 3,190 18 - 20 n as 1,880 3,000 20 - 22 % 30 2,360 4,400 22 - 25 27 33 3,170 5,390 25 - 26 27 3,440 5.720 26 - 30 30 4,640 7,160 30 - 32 yo 5,240 7.880 32 - 36 33 39 7,280 10,220 38 - as B 9,380 12,740 E - 50 40 45 11,750 15.440 50 - $ n 16,180 20,340 8 - 70 47 52 20,680 25,540 70 - so of 55 25,680 31,040 80 - 90 53 31,180 36,840 90 - 100 56 36,780 42,340 100 - 150 58 65,700 73.940 150 - 200 8 95,780 105,440 20 - 250 62 126,780 137,440 250 - 300 196,780 170,440 300 - 400 " 224,780 232,440 400 . 500 " 292,780 308,440 500 - 750 TO $67,750 408,440 750 - 1,000 72 647,700 668,440 1,000 - 2,000 1,377,780 1,398,440 2,000 - 5,000 3,997.700 3,618,440 - Over - 5,000 75 - T:10b 3/12/41 Regraded Uclassified 430 14/27/8 Thish 3/ Without 10 personal defense lax. 2/ lariam careed Issue assumed, 5,080,000 1,000,000 000°006 000'00T 75,000 80,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 12,500 10,000 5,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1 If I w - - $1,000 too a carried person, and the attached curter rate scholule "A" to mbstituted for present schetule. V Valor the proposal personal examptions are reduced free $800 to $500 for a single person and tree $2,000 to 727.50 330,156 27,768 14,128 3,003 2.336 1,25% . - $9 528 317 150 110 20 X IT I - 3,017.60 Annual of tax 119°10' 46,234 30,044 160°92 5,964 4,224 2.7% 2,110 1,500 1,125 95% 500 E 192 COR 132 s Present Proposal Present law $ Properal $ - 78.3 71.6 0'99 43.5 37.0 28.3 15.4 11.7 us 6.9 1-3 0°N 2.3 2.2 1.8 1.0 ser I I 76.4 70.8 65.5 2"94 6'04 33.8 23.9 21.1 18.3 6*9t 15.4 I'M 12.6 9"IT 9'OT Effective peties 4.9 4.0 99 4.55 1 1 departants Burried If I X I last of I 8 of rejected elses Despertion product properd 1 of intiridual $ W*26- -9,660 -2,512 2.750 2,676 2.766 2,121 1,658 SOU'T 1,252 1,012 all 909 air 350 237 189 132 - under proposal Increase or decrease is laz -2.5 E 800 59 10.4 19.6 55.2 80.8 118.1 145.9 191.7 253.8 404.0 427.3 505.7 700.5 12'01'1 Purcest Regraded Uclassified Individual surtex rate achedule METER not income I 1 Bracket rute (in thousands 5 Total surtex (pereent) - of dollars) 4 cumulative & o - 2 11 220 2 - 4 14 500 a - 6 16 BEO 6 - 6 19 1,200 B - 10 K1 1,820 10 - 22 22 2,080 12 - 14 25 2,580 14 - 16 27 3,120 16 - 10 29 5,700 16 - 20 31 4,820 20 - 22 33 4,980 22 - 26 36 6,420 26 - 32 39 8,760 82 - 88 of 11,280 88 - 44 45 13,980 44 - 50 40 16,880 50 - 60 51 21,960 60 - 70 54 27,360 70 - 80 69 53,060 80 - 90 69 $8,960 90 - 100 61 45,060 100 - 160 62 76,060 150 - 200 68 107,560 200 - 250 44 189,580 250 - 500 66 172,580 500 - 400 68 240,600 400 - 500 70 510,580 600 - 1,000 78 670,580 1,000 - 2,000 75 1,400,560 2,000 - 5,000 74 $,080,540 76 - Over 6,000 Treasury Department, division fax Neaworch March 11, 1941 Regraded Uclassified 132 y Desparison of Pate schedules under ,Pread Law and proposal Surtax not . rate 1 Total vartex income 1 (norgest) I publicative (1009) I law 1 I - I 5 0 - 2 - 11 - 1 220 2 - 4 - 14 - 500 4 - 6 les 16 I 80 520 É - 8 6 19 200 1,200 E - 10 8 21 360 1,620 LC - 12 10 23 560 2,080 12 - 14 L2 25 800 2,500 14 - 16 15 27 1.100 3.120 16 - 15 18 29 1,460 3,700 LE - 20 21 31 1,40 4,320 20 - 22 24 33 2.350 4,900 22 - 26 27 36 3,440 5,420 26 - 32 30 59 5.240 8,760 32 - 38 33 6 7.200 11,260 3€ - i 36 lang 9.340 13.950 hb - 50 M) is 11,740 16,860 X - 00 91 16,180 21.960 60 - 70 47 54 20,880 27.360 70 - 80 50 57 25,880 33.060 & - 90 53 29 31,180 38.960 90 + 100 56 61 36,780 45.060 100 - 150 58 62 65.700 76,060 150 - 200 60 63 95.780 107.560 200 - 250 62 64 126,780 139,560 230 - 300 A 66 158,780 172.560 300 - 400 66 68 224,780 240,560 400 - 500 68 70 292,780 310,560 500 - 750 2 72 467.780 490.560 750 - 1,000 72 72 647.780 670,560 1,000 - 2.000 73 T3 1,377.780 1,400,560 2.000 - 5,000 74 74 3,597.780 3,620,560 Over - 5,000 75 75 - - TIME 1/12/01 Regraded Uclassified 433 Compartaen of present and proposed individual Lncome taxes on not incomes of solected elses Married person - no dependente list income I Amount of tax V Effective rates Increase in LESS before * under proposal personal a Provent I I Properal iPresent: exemption 2/1 I 10v Amount Persont 10m I I 4 1,500 - $ 76 - 8.25 $ 76 - 2,000 - ase - 7.8 150 - 2,500 $ 11 257 AX 9.5 226 2054.85 8,000 81 517 1.0 10.8 286 902.6 4,000 70 520 1.0 12.8 440 623.6 5,000 110 704 1.2 14.1 594 540.0 6,000 180 380 2.5 16.5 170 515.8 6,000 517 1,184 4.0 17.8 1,087 336.8 10,000 ass 1,905 1.5 19.0 1,875 200.4 12,600 856 2,615 6.9 20.9 1,758 204.5 15,000 1,858 1,192 0.4 12.6 2,154 100.0 20,000 2,254 5,188 11.7 25.9 2,649 182.0 15,000 3,845 7,254 15.4 29.1 5,422 10.0 50,000 14,126 20,112 29.5 40.2 6,984 42.4 75,000 27,769 55,750 57.0 47.7 6,050 10.0 100,000 43,476 60,100 45.5 63.2 9,725 12.3 500,000 330,150 548,708 66.0 09.4 10,082 5.0 1,000,000 717,584 726,770 71.8 78.9 21,100 3.0 6,000,000 5,920,540 3,037,758 76.3 70.0 21,204 3 Treasury Department, Division of Tax lissourch V Under the proposal personal exemptions are reduced from $800 to 1500 for a single person and from 12,000 to $1,000 for a married person, and the attached ourles rate schedule is substituted for procest sobstule. Mazina earned Leases 1 Includes 10 peremat dafence Mr. JC-PIF 8/12/41 Regraded Uclassified 434 8 Datate and ein fax Tate Tabofule nos million combined effect, without tax, country gift - ratee are equal to three-quarters of catate the nine (estinated fineal 1948 bustasse Levels) Net estate after I specific exemption # Brasket rate I Comulative to 1 (perount) 1 ou higher (10 themende) 1 6 0 - B. $ # 200 5 - 10 e 400 10 - 20 9 1,200 20 - se 10 1,500 DO - $ 13 4,080 40 - so 18 5,850 60 - w an 7,550 60 - 100 35 17,100 100 - 280 25 54,650 aso - 800 189,180 860 - 980 194,850 YOU - 1,000 272,300 1,000 - 1,200 384,050 1,250 - 1,800 462,150 1,800 - 2,000 689,180 2,000 - 2,500 B 687,180 2,000 - 8,000 44 1,057,150 8,000 - 3,500 - 1,899,180 3,500 - 4,000 so 1,048,150 4,000 - 5,000 as 2,072,199 5,000 - 6,000 @@ 2,682,150 6,000 - 7,000 no 5,283,150 7,000 - 0,000 a 2,083,180 8,000 - 9,000 as 4,462,190 9,000 - 10,000 85 5,113,180 18,000 - 20,000 or 11,613,180 30,000 - 80,000 82,522,180 one 8 - 80,000 3/12/41 Regraded Uclassified 135 6 Troposed estate tax rates sie Substals I comparated vita yourself coints fax rates 301 solute ofter Transport min Present rates 1 specific cresptical Brasket rate I Curristive 1 I Commissive (In I 192 in Mahors rate of dellared (pareant) must (persent) Has as higher I o - 9 $ $ 100 a $ 100 5 - 20 4 400 3 - 10 - 20 9 1,200 4 600 20 - 20 12 2,50 6 1,200 80 - $ 10 4,000 0 3,000 40 - 60 18 5,000 20 3,000 80 - 60 n 7,150 12 4,200 60 - 100 R 17,100 10 - 14 9,000 100 - 200 m 54,000 17 - 20 00,000 200 - 200 F 132,180 20 - = 89,000 900 - TOO 20 104,000 25 - 25 151,000 TBO - 1,000 at 372,180 25 - 20 229,680 1,000 - 1,290 IS 204,800 22 300,000 1,200 - 1,800 so 442,150 a 383,600 1,500 - 2,000 = 852,150 55 557,600 2,000 - 2,800 41 897,150 a 767,600 3,500 - 3,000 $ 1,097,190 41 982,600 3,000 - 3,800 n 1,293,180 44 1,172,600 3,800 - 4,000 no 1,542,180 47 1,407,000 4,000 - 5,000 E 2,072,150 60 - - 1,929,680 8,000 - 6,000 $ 2,682,150 as 2,483,600 6,000 - 7,000 B 8,223,190 50 8,072,600 7,000 - 8,000 61 3,838,190 a 5,663,600 8,000 - 9,000 68 4,463,180 - 4,312,600 9,000 - 10,000 # 6,112,150 # 4,962,600 10,000 - 10,000 # 11,813,160 of 11,652,500 20,000 - 80,000 # 82,512,150 8 22,363,600 Over 80,000 a - a - 2/ Reducive of temparary defence M. 100% 3/12/41 Regraded Uclassified 136 6 Superism of proposed estate the - shobile 1 with present cotate - M not was (tefore of solected sises w 3rd estator of fax - 1 in for before I 1 1 I I exemption I Present 1 Proposal # Present I Preparal - 2/ t law I Schedule Is lw I I # Schedule It Persons I (000) I $ so $ 300 8 405 0.45 1.06 $ - 123.06 60 660 1,480 1.1 3.8 - 185.0 so 2,300 4,485 2.8 5.6 2,285 102.8 100 4,620 6,763 4.6 8.9 4,125 no.s 200 21,780 $5,365 10.9 17.7 13,285 62.4 400 64,400 $2,755 10.1 23.2 30,326 43.9 000 113,740 168,805 19.0 m.e 19,765 38.0 1,000 233,100 205,725 25.3 29.6 53,625 SS.1 2,000 597,960 678,648 20.9 m.s 60,000 15.8 4,000 1,527,690 1,674,363 30.8 41.9 140,000 0.6 6,000 2,708,220 2,870,725 45.1 47.8 104,505 6.1 10,000 5,430,250 6,594,785 64.8 56.0 164,505 8.0 20,000 13,799,380 12,963,000 64.0 64.0 104,805 1.3 40,000 27,778,500 26,142,000 00.0 70.3 164,500 s $0,000 43,288,080 45,422,000 93.1 72.4 164,305 A 100,000 74,068,080 74,252,045 74.1 N.S 164,806 .2 Treasury Department, Division of fax Basearch 2/ Their the proposal the attached rate schotule Le substituted for the present schedule. 2/ m specific exemption of $40,000 alloved use procent law to retained under the proposal. a/ Includes 10 percent defense bes. year 1 5/13/41 Regraded Uclassified 437 7 Satate and an the mis eshable 03m million assistant effect vitiest defunce - $258 million from estate too and 033 stillen free an too severing an tax rates ARE equal to three quarters of estate to rates, the specific exemption water both taxes 1a reinsed from $40,000 to 125,000 and that the Insurance anclusion valor the estste tos is reduced from $40,000 to $25,000 (istimated fiscal 19kg bealance levels) Net estate after I I specific complien I Inder sole 1 Completive (ta I (Perema) : to - Agen of dollars) 1 1 - $ 0 - 5 20 $ 200 5 e 10 8 600 10 - 20 18 1,800 20 - 30 16 3,400 30 - to 20 5,400 40 - 60 5 10,000 60 - so x 15,800 90 - 100 29 21,000 100 - 150 & 37,000 150 - 200 39 54,500 200 - 290 X 73,500 290 - 300 s 94,000 you - 500 $ 182,000 900 9 1,000 MP 417,000 1,000 - 2,000 by 907,000 2,000 - 3,000 52 1,417,000 3,000 - 4,000 53 1,947,000 4,000 - 5,000 59 2,497,000 5,000 - 6,000 57 3,067,000 6,000 . 7,000 59 3,657,000 7,00 - 6,000 61 4,267,000 8,000 - 9,000 63 4,697,000 9,000 - 10,000 63 5,947,000 10,000 - 20,000 67 12,847,000 20,000 - 50,000 69 32,947,000 70 - Over - 30,000 Thised 3/12/41 Regraded Uclassified 438 1 estate too min under II compared with present counts tax min Net estate ofter mines 1/ taketale u Present rubes 7 specific exemptions Dysckets Completive . Imdest rate Completive (In thousands 1 (pareat) - we n higher I (mereat) - we - Higher of dellars) I 1 1 I 1 0 - 5 4 I 6 200 2 I 100 5 - 10 e 600 2 200 10 - 20 12 1,800 1 600 20 - s 26 3,400 6 1,200 so - 5 20 5,400 8 2,000 to - $ 83 10,000 10 - 12 4,200 60 - 00 n 15,200 12 . 14 6,800 80 - 100 n 21,000 9.600 100 - 190 37,000 18,300 150 e 200 35 54,500 26,600 200 - 250 73,500 36,600 250 - 300 in 94,000 46,600 300 - 500 182,000 83,600 500 - 1,000 se 417,000 1,000 - 2,000 s 2,000 - 3,000 5 1,417,000 BERRER 20 - 23 - 507,000 x . X - SERVER 222,600 957,600 992,600 3,000 - 4,000 53 1,947,000 * of 1,407,600 4,000 - 5,000 99 2,497,000 , - 53 1,982,600 5,000 - 6,000 50 3,067,000 2,458,600 6,000 - 7,000 " 3,657,000 3,072,600 7,000 - 6,000 61 4,267,000 3,682,600 5,000 - 9,000 63 4,897,000 24 17 17 20 20 61 w 63 70 % 59 07 69 4,312,600 9,000 - 10,000 s 5,547,000 4,962,600 10,000 - 20,000 67 12,247,000 11,668,600 20,000 - 30,000 32,947,000 32,362,600 . Over 50,000 - 2/ Reglacive of temperary information tax valided 3/12/41 Regraded Uclassified 439 7 Comparison of proposal estate tax under Schobule II 4th present cetate tos on not estates (before - of selected store 2/ Set estates Amount of text V 1 Effective mts a Improve is for before # I I $ 1 I exemption I Present I Prepased I Present I Prepared 8 1 - Percent 2/ - Law t Schedule III law III , (000) 1 I . 2 1 1 90 $ 220 $ 660 and 1.3% $ to 200.0 S 660 1,980 1.1 303 1,300 200.0 80 2,200 5,940 2.8 7.6 3.740 170.0 100 4,680 11,000 4.6 11.0 6,380 136.1 200 21,750 44,550 10.9 22,3 22.770 204.5 400 64,460 132,440 16.2 33.2 67.990 105.5 500 123,740 231,220 19.0 38.5 117,400 203.3 1,000 232,100 438,020 23.2 43.8 205,980 55.7 2,000 597,960 976,140 29.9 48.8 376,200 63.2 4,000 1,527,660 2,118,300 ye,2 53.0 530,700 38,7 6,000 2,706,220 3,348,620 55.1 53.8 642,400 23.7 10,000 5,430,260 6,073,200 963 60.7 642,540 11.5 100,000 74,065,060 74,710,900 The 74.1 62,00 .9 1/ Under the proposal the attached rate schedule is addititated for the present schodule. 2/ The specifie examption of $40,000 allowed wher present law 10 retained under the proposal. 3/ Includes 10 percent defense the Tatited 3/12/41 Regraded Uclassified 440 March 11, 1941 3:17 p.m. H.M.Jr; Hello, Harold. Harold Smith: Yeah. H.M.Jr: How are you feeling today? S: Well, I don't know how I feel. I know we've got a job of putting all this stuff together. I just thought I'd give you a ring - you're probably away shead of me, but I just wanted H.M.Jr: No, I'm about a couple of blocks behind you today. No one tells me anything. S: Is that BO? H.M.Jr: I wasn't at the meeting this morning. Were you? 8: Yeah. I was late - I was up on the Hill and they gave me & ring to come down to the White House. I didn't know what it was about until I got there and I found about fifteen Senators and Congressmen in. H.M.Jr: I wasn't there BO you're ahead of me. I don't know what S: Now, here, he talked to you the other day, I understand, about the total amount, and he talked to me, and he talked to these people in terms of $7 billion straight cash appropriation. Now, I didn't know what he was going to say aside from that; he was sort of letting the Congressional people take the lead on it; and they agreed that there eughtn't to be any contract authorization in it and it would be be better if it were a straight out-and-out appropriation. But the President said - the thing that disturbed me was that he had been canvassing the situation around and that he was going to put it all in and instead of taking a couple of bites at the cherry, he was going to take one bite. Regraded Uclassified 441 - 2 - H.M.Jr: Yeah. S: Well, now, what I'm afraid of 18 here 18 the British request for about nine billion and they are being carried down by the Army and Navy to fit into the productive situation as best they can but this is really for 142. H.M.Jr: Yeah. is S: And it/not the whole bite ae I 800 it. Do you think it is? H.M.Jr: Well, I don't know. I'm out in the cold till - I really don't know. S: Well, you know more about it than I do. I mean I Just saw the nine billion dollar figure I think yesterday for the first time. Hello - H.M.Jr: Hello. 8: And there was another sheet, you know, that went well way beyond that - that I think you gave me. H.M.Jr: Well, that's - from that which is about a week or ten days old, Harold, I haven't seen a thing and the President hasn't told me a thing and I don't know as much about it as the cop on the corner. 8: Well - - H.M.Jr: The President said he wanted me at the meeting this morning and then I didn't get any word 80 I didn't call up or anything. 8: I didn't know about the meeting except I saw something in the paper and I was down before the Civil Service Commission in the House and I got a call from the White House to come down and I didn't know what the hell it was either. The story - then they got mixed up on the one billion three versus the total of seven billion - whether the one three was to be reimbursed by the seven or not. They finally decided that it was to be reimbursed by the seven billion dollar amount which set us scurrying around then to change the whole set up. I sent somebody down to see Burns to see if we can get that appropriation language changed to fit that picture. Regraded Uclassified 442 - 3 - H.M.Jr: Well, you had better know about it because I hear you're going up to testify on the bill. B: Where did you hear that? H.M.Jr: Oh, a little birdie. 8: Ah - (laughs). Listen, I hear you are too. H.M.Jr: Oh no. I don't know anything about it. B: I don't know why the Director of the Budget should testify on this. H.M.Jr: Well, he's doing it - it's the President's bill. It's written the way you and he want it. 8: Well - H.M.Jr: And I - they just dropped me at the first way station. I made all my offers about wanting to cooperate - what things are there - but I'm in no position to testify about anything. S: I don't think I an either because all the information we've got here is in the last 24 hours and very much second hand because this 16 the first time I've had anything to do with it - with this set up. H.M.Jr: Well, the last time I think was Saturday a week ago, and I sent you what I had. I haven't had anything on it since then. 3: No, no. H.M.Jr: I don't know how the seven billion 1s arrived at or anything. S: Well - the Army and Navy apparently have processed those military sections of the British requests and have said that, "Well, they can only end with Knudsen." Now that's what they brought to us last night and have said, "Well, this 16 all we can put in to our produc- tive machinery and probably more". H.M.Jr: Yeah. S: And the boss says, "You got to squeeze the whole thing down to seven billion". Well that meane paring off of several of these items. What would you think - what would you think about, after we get this thing tentatively set up, of talking to Purvis about it? Do you think that would be appropriate? You've got Regraded Uclassified 443 4 the background on that, maybe I ought to bring the thing over to both of you. H.M.Jr: Well, I don't know what Hopkins is doing. S: Well, I don't know either. I mean only once has he contacted me. H.M.Jr: Well, was he at the meeting this morning? S: No, no. And I just heard this afternoon that they're worrying over in Agriculture about what can be trans- ferred under the one billion three and somebody told me that the - well, Wickard said he understood the President was going to make an announcement tonight of what could be transferred. Well, I've never heard anything about that. I don't know whether - just what their problem is - whether it's a legal problem or what it 1s. H.M.Jr: Well, as far as I know, Hopkins is supposed to be contacting Purvis. You see I'm not doing it anymore. 8: I see. H.M.Jr: And I've asked to be relieved of that but I'd 800 him occasionally. Hello. 8: Yeah. H.M.Jr: But I know that Hopkins sees him and Hopkins has said that he expects to contact the British Purchasing Mission. And - well, I'm very serious, Harold, as far as I'm concerned I'm in no position to testify about anything because I don't know this stuff and you can't - I'm not going to go up and display my ignorance publicly. S: Well, I can't learn about it in 24 hours either. All I'm trying to do 18 to get an estimate together here for the boss which he says he wants to sign at by when he signs the bill and there are least, tomorrow apparently, two dozen people involved in the thing. H.M.Jr: Well, if you're trying to find out if I'm in on it, I'm not. S: (Laughs) H.M.Jr: So you can just - there's just 23 people. S: (Laughs) All right. 444 - 5 - H.M.Jr: And if I've got anything I'll give you a ring but the last I know is when I sent that sheet over to you. 8: Yeah. H.M.Jr: And with that exception and the time we were in Hull's Office when you were there I know less than nothing. S: Apparently, this sheet that we got there is not the one that they're working from. H.M.Jr: Well - S: Well, I just thought I'd give you a ring. I told you - H.M.Jr: Well, I appreciate it. I appreciate it. S: I know the boss mentioned the seven million. I suggested that he be sure and talk to you about that. H.M.Jr: Well, he told me it was seven billion. He told me the seven billion and that's all. He said, "That's the figure." S: Yeah. H.M.Jr: But, if I knew anything and if I had anything I'd give it to you but I'm only repeating. I know less than nothing. S: Well, then I'd better check with Hopkins on whether it's appropriate to raise some questions with Purvis. I suppose that we ought not to process entirely in & vacuum. I don't know what all the implications of it are. H.M.Jr: Well, I think if you want to Bee Purvis, I think you better talk to Hopkins. 8: Yeah. All right, sir, thank you. H.M.Jr: Thank you for calling. 8: You bet. Bye. 445 TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION Mar DATE March 11, 1941 Secretary Morgenthan TO FROM Mr. Cochran STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL At 3 o'clock this afternoon the Secretary called me to his office and asked that Mr. White, who ⑈1 with the Secretary, explain to me the result of the several neet- ingo which had been held at the Securities and Exchange Commission with the view to evalving suggestions to expedite the liquidation of British investments in this coun- try. Mr. White told me that the basic 1dea which had been discussed at the S. E. c. had been that of organizing a private corporation which would float & bond issue, pre- sumbly at a low rate of interest, to obtain funds which could be utilized in taking over the complete holdings of British vested securities. This plan was not considered feasible insofar as direct investments are concerned. The plan would be for this corporation to advance payment to the extent of 65 to 70 percent of the market value of the securities taken over. The percentage would be less if the securities were found to be below the average in marketability. It would be necessary that the British !isclose to this group their complete holdings, and the group would only consider the proposition as a whole. The group would proceed with the sale of securities and remit the balance of the proceeds obtained therefor, deducting only necessary expenses. If there should be any question of a difference between the group and the British Government as to the sale price, this should be settled by an arbiter. It VAS explained that the S. E. c. had studied this plan. and had then invited to Washington yesterday afternoon Messrs. For and Connely (*) representing investment associations in New York. The two representatives from New York had not insisted that they be drawn into any private corporation which might be set up. They were svailable, however, for consultation if the British may desire to look into the plan or desire recommendations as to possible concerns and individuals to constitute the suggested group. After receiving this explanation from Mr. White, I telephoned Mr. Gifford. I learned from his New York office that he was in Washington, and I reached him at the offices of the British Purchasing Commission at 3:15. He let no know that he had come to Washington this noon and added, confidentially for our ears, that he was here with Sir Edward Peacock. I told him that Mr. White had attended meetings at the S.E.C. and that the Secretary had authorised me to acquaint Mr. Gifford with the results thereof. I thereupon repeated Mr. White's recital to me. I added the word. of explans- the disposal of marketable securities. The plan which has been under study vas origi- tion that the Secretary desired in ne my to criticize Mr. Gifford's operations in sally conselved of possible assistance in liquidating direct investments. It had to now been considered as difficult of application to this field, but readily adaptable the markotable security field. I renewed the explanation made previously that the * President Emett P. Connely of the Investment Bankers Association of America. Regraded Uclassified 446 - 2 - Treasury naturally desires to look into every possible means for assisting in the orderly liquidation of British assets, and that I was confident Hr. Gifford shared our interest toward this md. Mr. Gifford thanked us for bringing the foregoing information to his attention. He stated that the proposal was beyond any instructions which he has. He is, however, taking note of our report and will think it over. He would require completely new instructions before he could accept such a proposal, which would completely rearrange the plan for disposing of marketable securities in this country. His first reaction was that he would not feel justified in submitting such a plan to London with recommendations unless the Treasury urged it. I told him that the Secretary desired to bring to his attention the results of the study which had been made, but to leave action to Hr. Gifford's judgment. 16.m.s. 447 TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATE March 11, 1941 Secretary Morgenthan TO FROM Mr. Cochran STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL Acting upon the Secretary's instructions, I saked Sir Frederick Phillips to come to ay office at 3:30 this afternoon. I recalled to Sir Frederick that when be had visited me yesterday evening he had emphasized his interest in learning the extent to which existing British contracts could be taken over under the Lend-Lease plan. Furthermore, I recalled our conversation on gold. I let Sir Frederick know that the Secretary had held a group meeting this fore- zoon at which the British position had been studied. The Secretary had saked me to give an oral reply to Sir Frederick's memorandum of March 5 in which inquiry vas made if to whether the Secretary would see any objection to Great Britain paying Canada in gold to the extent that it may have gold available for that purpose in the future. I permitted Phillips to note on page 11 of Part I of "Hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, on S. 275". the estimates which the Secretary had submitted to Congress (based upon figures supplied by the British Preasury) for the current calender year Australian and South African gold exports. I also invited his attention to the testimony which the Secretary gave before the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, as reported on pages 64 and 65 of the volume of Lend-Lease Bill Hearings. I told Phillips that the Secretary's attitude toward South African and Australian gold remained the same as presented in this testimony. Phillips took note of the two references to the published testimony described above. Phillips reminded no that the British had hoped to use certain of their gold in meeting payments due Canada, Re asked if he was free nov to tell the Canadians that the Treasury insisted upon all South African and Australian gold being sold for its benefit. He asked further if ve had been in touch with Mr. Clark on this subject. I told Phillips that we had had no conversation with the Canadian Deputy Minister of Finance since he left here a few days ago. There was no reason, however, why Phillips should not continue his discussions with Mr. Clark, bearing in mind the testimony which the Secretary has given. I told Phillips that a group of us had net with the Secretary on Saturday, Monday and Tuesday to study an operating plan for the Lend-Lease Bill, and that in these sestings the British position had been given particular attention. I let Phillips know that after receiving the British memorandum of yesterday which gave details as to outstanding contracts and negotiations with the R. F. 0. and the Army and Havy on possible taking over of some of these engagements, we had written both the R. P. C. and the War Department requesting date from their side as to prospects for consumna- positively no use of our attempting to discuss the question of contracts further at ties of their negotiations with the British is the premises. I added that there is present. I showed Phillips the ticker tape which reported the passing of the Bill and announced that the President anticipated asking for a $7,000,000,000 appropriation Regraded Uclassified 447 TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATE March 11. 1941 Secretary Morgenthan TO Mr. Cochran FROM STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL Acting upon the Secretary's instructions, I asked Sir Frederick Phillips to come to my office at 3:30 this afternoon. I recalled to Sir Frederick that when he had visited me yesterday evening he had emphasized his interest in learning the extent to which existing British contracts could be taken over under the Lend-Lease plan. Purthermore, I recalled our conversation on gold. I let Sir Frederick know that the Secretary had held a group meeting this fore- soon at which the British position had been studied. The Secretary had asked me to give an oral reply to Sir Frederick's memorandum of March 5 in which inquiry vale made M to whether the Secretary would ⑉ any objection to Great Britain paying Cenada in gold to the extent that it may have gold available for that purpose in the future. I cermitted Phillips to note on page 11 of Part I of "Hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, on S. 275". the estimates which the Secretary had submitted to Congress (based upon figures sumplied by the British Preasury) for the current calendar year Australian and South African gold exports. I also invited his attention to the testimony which the Secretary gave before the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, as reported on pages 64 and 65 of the volume of Lend-Lease Bill Hearings. I told Phillips that the Secretary's attitude toward South African and Australian gold remained the same as presented in this testimony. Phillips took note of the two references to the published testimony described above. Phillips reminded me that the British had hoped to use certain of their gold in seeting payments due Cenada. He asked if he was free nov to tell the Canadians that the Treasury insisted upon all South African and Australian gold being sold for its benefit. Re asked further if we had been in touch with Mr. Clark on this subject. I told Phillips that we had had no conversation with the Canadien Deputy Minister of Pinance since he left here a few days ago, There was no reason, however, vity Phillips should not continue his discussions with Mr. Clark, bearing in mind the testimony which the Secretary has given. I told Phillips that a. group of us had not with the Secretary on Saturday. Monday and Tuesday to study an operating plan for the Land-Lease Bill, and that in these seetings the British position had been given particular attention. I let Phillips know that after receiving the British memorandum of yesterday which gave details as to outstanding contracts and negotiations with the R. F. C. and the Army and Navy on possible taking over of some of these engagements. we had written both the R. P. C. and the War Department requesting data from their side as to prospects for consumer- tion of their negotiations with the British in the premises. I added that there 10 positively no use of our attempting to discuss the question of contracts further at present. I showed Phillips the ticker tape which reported the passing of the 3111 and announced that the President anticipated asking for a $7,000,000,000 appropriation Regraded Uclassified 448 - 2 - to complement the Act. I told him that Treasury representatives would have to appear before Congress to support the appropriation measure, I stressed the embarrassment which such representatives, and particularly the Secretary. would experience if obliged to report to Congress that there had not yet been accomplished any progress in liquidating British direct investments. I made the point that our progress depends importantly upon smething being accomplished along this line immediately. Phillips volunteered that Gifford and Peacock were in town for consultation. I should add that when we were discussing gold, I let Phillips know that I had reported to the Secretary the information which Phillips had given me last evening, namely. that it appeared that gold production in South Africa was not falling off, but that recently the Bank of South Africa evidently had not turned over all current production to the British authorities. Phillips had also made the point that the British required a certain stock of gold in South Africa, because of the necessity of having some of this metal available for hurried despatch to Egypt or other centers in the Near Eastern war area. In our talk today, Phillips minimized the amount of gold that could be counted upon to come from Belgian Congo, Rhodesia and other scattered areas of production. Hump. Regraded Uclassified 449 March 11, 1941 4:30 p.m. Present: Mr. Gaston Mrs. Klotz HM Jr: Herbert, please sit down. I thought that you could listen while I dictate this. Harry Hopkins called me about 4:15 and said the President was going to take some action this afternoon under the Lend-Lease Bill. He had spoken to the President about the Coast Guard cutters and asked for permission to speak to me. He asked me whether I knew what the President had in mind and if the President had discussed it with me. I said, "No," and then I told him that he ought to know better than I what the President has in mind. So he said that he didn't. I told Hopkins that if he asked me what I thought would be most useful to the British this Spring, it is the ten cutters that I wrote about in my first letter. Then I said that we could get them ready in two or three weeks if the English would tell us what kind of armaments they needed and if the Navy would equip them promptly. Hopkins asked me if we didn't usually get cooperation from the Navy, and I said, "No, not as far as the Coast Guard is concerned. Then Hopkins asked me some more questions, and I said I never felt that I knew less than what I did right now about what was going on. He said that nothing was going on at this time. I then said that the President told me yesterday he was going to hold a meeting this morning and wanted me to come, but I never got word as to when it was going to be held. He said that he wasn't at the meeting either so he did not know what went on. Hopkins told me then that Young was with him and had some message from the English saying how they wanted these ships equipped, but it was news to me. Regraded Uclassified 450 - 2 - Gaston: Waesche told me that the Navy had received word from the English that they would be very glad to have the cutters. That's all the message I got. HM Jr: Did you tell that to Phil? Gaston: No, I haven't seen Phil since I heard that. I haven't had a chance to tell him. HM Jr: I don't know whether you agreed with me on that. Gaston: That would be very useful - yes. If we are going to do anything, that's the thing to do. HM Jr: Well, I'm glad to hear you say that. Gaston: Yes, that's the thing to do. Just when you called me, I was talking to Oscar Cox, who was asking me a lot of questions. He said that Harry Hopkins had been asked to do something about it for the President. He didn't say that you had talked to Hopkins. Evidently Harry Hopkins wants to get some information, and he's trying to have Cox get it for him. HM Jr: Where was Cox when he called you? Gaston: Why I think he was in his office. I was talking to him when they said you wanted me so I excused myself and hung up. (At this point, HM Jr told the operator that she should find out whether Oscar Cox and Philip Young had returned to the Treasury.) Gaston: I really don't know. He may not have been in his office. HM Jr: How long ago was this, Herbert? Regraded Uclassified 451 - 3 - and came right in here. Gaston: Just before I walked in here. I hung up HM Jr: Well, my call was about 10 minutes ago, so he must have asked Oscar to get the information on it. (Operator reported that neither Oscar Cox nor Philip Young had returned to their offices.) HM Jr: Well, they haven't come back yet. I think that I will walk around the block and by that time they probably will be here. I 452 The British Supply Council in North America March 11, 1941 Philip Young, Esq. President's Liaison Committee, Treasury Department, Vashington, D. C. Dear Mr. Young, The British Naval Attache has just received a reply to a cable to the British Admiralty with regard to the ten coast guard cutters which we hope will be released to us by the U. 8. Treasury. The Admiralty advise as follows: 1. That an offer of ten cutters would be cordially welcomed, 2. That the vessels would be acceptable in present condition with low angle areament only, high angle armament to be fitted in the United Kingdom. 3. Ammunition for 5" guns would be required from United States, both outfit and reserve, including practice. 4. That the never type having a speed of 20 knots would be of considerably greater value than the older type which has a speed of 16-1/2 knots. As the Havy Department has been pressing for this infor- mation, the British Naval Attache, through whom it vas obtained, has given it to them direct. Yours very truly. (Sgd.) 0. 2. Ballantyne C 0 ? Y Regraded Uclassified 453 MAR 11 1941 By less Mr. President: I should like to being to your attention the steely increase is prices of imported materials that has been under my for a moth 07 mrs. the matract, as compared with the rather fist treat of domestic modify prices, to shows on the attached chart made from priors of the 12 imported materials and 17 demostic enterials is the 3 Beream of Labor Statistics daily price fales of X basic considities. the price inter of imported asterials has guinet 10 per cent since the est of Jenuary, as conpared with a 2 per and average gain is prices of demosite materials. Vidlo the increased prices are attributed in the proce to the tight - shipping situation, a insurence of eae-third in prices of - and shalles vitida tim weeks weld also suggest that speculative buying his been a factor. I mie that the name of truling in - futures increased sharyly last wesk. Increasing operalative activity to my - of consulties would test to affect other all would eld to the dif- flosity of helding a general price visa in check. Patthfully yours, (Signed) H. Morganihau, Jr. the Provident, the White lieus. Copy to mr. Thompson By 3 n also 3/10/41 FILE COPY Regraded Uclassified 454 MOVEMENT OF BASIC COMMODITY PRICES Domestic and Imported* AUGUST 1939-100 PER PER PER Weekly Average PER CENT CENT CENT Daily CENT 135 135 132 132 130 130 128 128 // Imported 125 125 Commodities // Imported 124 Commodities 124 120 120 120 120 115 115 /7 Domestic Commodities 116 17 Domestic 110 110 Commodities 116 105 105 112 112 100 100 108 m J F M A M J J A $ o N D J F M A M J 4 II is 25 , 8 is 22 I a 15 22 29 5 12 108 19 26 1940 1941 JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. 1941 Percentage Change for Individual Commodities, Jan.31,1941 to March 7,1941 PER PER Cocoo 15.6% CENT 17 Domestic Commodities CENT II Imported Commodities +30 +30 Shellac 30.3% +25 +25 +20 +20 +15 Burlap 16.2% Lard 11.7% +15 Print Cloth 9.8% Cottonweed Oil 6.5% +10 Leod 4.5% Rozin 3.0% +10 Rubber 8.8% Steel Scrap,dem. 26% Sugar 8.5% Carn 23% Coffee 6.2% +5 Cotton 2.0% Wheat 14% +5 Sile 5/% Tallon 0% 9ba/ 24% Steel Scrap,axp. ON Tin 22% 0 Autter 0% Copper 0% o Flasseed ox Zine OX Nides -/.9% Hage -2.5% -5 Banley -19% Steere -EX -5 Jan.31 Mar.7 Jan 31 Mar.7 B.L.S. Indexes Office of the Secretary of the Treasury - of - - - P-199-7 Seventy-seventh Congress of the United States of America: 455 fit the first besion Regraded Uclassif Bup and held at the City d Washington - Friday, the third day of Junuary, one thousand nine hundred and forty-one PUBLIC LAW [CHARTER AN ACT Further to promote the defense of the United States, and for other purposes. - MAR 11 1941 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of THE the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be cited as "An Act to Promote the Defense of the United States". Sac. 2. As used in this Act- (a) The term "defense article" means- (1) Any weapon, munition, aircraft, vessel, or boat; (2) Any machinery, facility, tool, material, or supply neces- H. R. 1776 sary for the manufacture, production, processing, repair, servic- ing, or operation of any article described in this subsection; (3) Any component material or part of or equipment for any article described in this subsection; (4) Any agricultural, industrial or other commodity or article for defense. Such term "defense article" includes any article described in this subsection: Manufactured or procured pursuant to section 3, or to which the United States or any foreign government has or hereafter acquires title, possession, or control. (b) The term "defense information" means any plan, specification, design, prototype, or information pertaining to any defense article. Sec. 3. (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law, the President may, from time to time, when be deems it in the interest of national defense, authorize the Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, or the head of any other department or agency of the Government- (1) To manufacture in arsenals, factories, and shipyards under their jurisdiction, or otherwise procure, to the extent to which funds are made available therefor, or contracts are author- ised from time to time by the Congress, or both, any defense article for the government of any country whose defense the President deems vital to the defense of the United States. (2) To all, transfer title to, exchange, lease, lend, or otherwise dispose of, to any such government any defense article, but no defense article not manufactured or procured under paragraph 456 H. R. 1776-2 Regraded Uc (1) shall in any way be disposed of under this paragraph, except after consultation with the Chief of Staf of the Army or the Chief of Naval Operations of the Navy, or both. The value of defense articles disposed of in any way under authority of this paragraph, and procured from funds heretofore appropriated, shall not exceed $1,300,000,000. The value of such defense articles shall be determined by the head of the department or agency con- cerned or such other department, agency or officer as shall be designated in the manner provided in the rules and regulations issued hereunder. Defense articles procured from funds hereafter appropriated to any department or agency of the Government, other than from funds authorized to be appropriated under this Act, shall not be disposed of in any way under authority of this paragraph except to the extent hereafter authorized by the Con- gress in the Acts appropriating such funds or otherwise. (8) To test, inspect, prove, repair, ontfit, recondition, or other- wise to place in good working order, to the extent to which funds are made available therefor, or contracts are authorized from time to time by the Congress, or both, any defense article for any such government, or to procure any or all such services by private contract. (4). To communicate to any such government any defense infor- mation, pertaining to any defense article furnished to such govern- ment under paragraph (2) of this subsection. (5) To release for export any defense article disposed of in any way under this subsection to any such government. (b) The terms and conditions upon which any such foreign govern- ment receives any aid authorized under subsection (a) shall be those which the President deems satisfactory, and the benefit to the United States may be payment or repayment in kind or property, or any other direct or indirect benefit which the President deems satisfactory. (c) After June 30, 1943, or after the passage of a concurrent resolution by the two Houses before June 30, 1943, which declares that the powers conferred by or pursuant to subsection (a) are no longer necessary to promote the defense of the United States, neither the President nor the head of any department or agency shall exer- ciso any of the powers conferred by or pursuant to subsection (a) except that until July 1, 1946, any of such powers may be exercised to the extent necessary to carry out & contract or agreement with such a foreign government made before July 1, 1943, or before the passage of such concurrent resolution, whichever is the earlier. 457 H. R. 1776-3 (d) Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or to permit the authorization of convoying vessels by naval vessels of the United States. (e) Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or to permit the authorization of the entry of any American veasel into a combat area in violation of section a of the Neutrality Act of 1939. Sec. 4. All contracts or agreements made for the disposition of any defense article or defense information pursuant to section 3 shall contain a clause by which the foreign government undertakes that it will not, without the consent of the President, transfer title to or possession of such defense article or defense information by gift, sale, or otherwise, or permit its use by anyone not an officer, employee, or agent of such foreign government. Sec. 5. (a) The Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, or the head of any other department or agency of the Government involved shall, when any such defense article or defense information is exported, immediately inform the department or agency designated by the President to administer section 6 of the Act of July 2, 1940 (54 Stat. 714). of the quantities, character, value, terms of disposi- tion, and destination of the article and information so exported. (b) The President from time to time, but not less frequently than once every ninety days, shall transmit to the Congress a report of operations under this Act except such information as he deems incompatible with the public interest to disclose. Reports provided for under this subsection shall be transmitted to the Secretary of the Senate or the Clerk of the House of Representatives, as the case may be, if the Senate or the House of Representatives, as the case may be, is not in session. Sec. 6. (a) There is hereby authorized to be appropriated from time to time, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated. such amounts as may be necessary to carry out the provisions and accomplish the purposes of this Act. (b) All money and all property which is converted into money received under section 3 from any government shall, with the approval of the Director of the Budget, revert to the respective appropriation or appropriations out of which funds were expended with respect to the defense article or defense information for which such consideration is received, and shall be available for expenditure for the purpose for which such expended funds were appropriated by law, during the fiscal year in which such funds are received and the ensuing fiscal year; but in no event shall any funds so received be available for expenditure after June 30, 1946. Regraded Uclassified 458 H. R. 1776-4 Sac. 7. The Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, and the head of the department or agency shall in all contracts or agreements for the disposition of any defense article or defense information fully protect the rights of all citizens of the United States who have patent rights in and to any such article or information which is hereby authorized to be disposed of and the payments collected for royalties on such patents shall be paid to the owners and holders of such patents. Sec. 8. The Secretaries of War and of the Navy are hereby authorized to purchase or otherwise acquire arms, ammunition, and implements of war produced within the jurisdiction of any country to which section 3 is applicable, whenever the President deems such purchase or acquisition to be necessary in the interests of the defense of the United States. Sec. 9. The President may, from time to time, promulgate such rules and regulations as may be necessary and proper to carry out any of the provisions of this Act; and he may exercise any power or authority conferred on him by this Act through such department, agency, or officer as he shall direct. Sac. 10. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to change existing law relating to the use of the land and naval forces of the United States, except insofar as such use relates to the manufacture, procure- ment, and repair of defense articles, the communication of informa- tion and other noncombatant purposes enumerated in this Act. Smo. 11. If any provision of this Act or the application of such provision to any circumstance shall be held invalid, the validity of the remainder of the Act and the applicability of such provision to other circumstances shall not be ascected thereby. Speaker of the House Representatives. Henry a Wallace Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate. Fine Preserely March 1941 459 [PUBLIC LAW 11-77m Congress] [CHAPTER 11-1st SESSION] [H. R. 1776) AN ACT Further to promote the defense of the United States, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be cited as "An Act to Promote the Defense of the United States". Sec. 2. As used in this Act- (a) The term "defense article" means- (1) Any weapon, munition, aircraft, vessel, or boat; (2) Any machinery, facility, tool, material, or supply neces- sary for the manufacture, production, processing, repair, servic- ing, or operation of any article described in this subsection; (3) Any component material or part of or equipment for any article described in this subsection; (4) Any agricultural, industrial or other commodity or article for defense. Such term "defense article" includes any article described in this subsection: Manufactured or procured pursuant to section 3, or to which the United States or any foreign government has or hereafter acquires title, possession, or control. (b) The term "defense information" means any plan, specification, design, prototype, or information pertaining to any defense article. Sec. 3. (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law, the President may, from time to time, when he deems it in the interest of national defense, authorize the Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, or the head of any other department or agency of the Government- (1) To manufacture in arsenals, factories, and shipyards under their jurisdiction, or otherwise procure, to the extent to which funds are made available therefor, or contracts are author- ized from time to time by the Congress, or both, any defense article for the government of any country whose defense the President deems vital to the defense of the United States. (2) To sell, transfer title to, exchange, lease, lend, or otherwise dispose of, to any such government any defense article, but no defense article not manufactured or procured under paragraph (1) shall in any way be disposed of under this paragraph, except after consultation with the Chief of Staff of the Army or the Chief of Naval Operations of the Navy, or both. The value of defense articles disposed of in any way under authority of this paragraph, and procured from funds heretofore appropriated, shall not exceed $1,800,000,000. The value of such defense articles 2 (Ive Laws (Pr. Life 11.1 8 shall certied be determined by the head of the department or Agency OF such other department, agency or officer as shall (in by the President to administer section 6 of the Act of July 2, 1940 issued designated in the matther provided in the rither and regulations be (54 Stat. 714), of the quantities, character, value, terms of disposi- other appropriated than to any department or agency of the Government, hereunder. Defense articles procured from funds horestter tion, and destination of the article and information so exported. (b) The President from time to time, but not less frequently than from funds authorized to be appropriated under this once every ninety days, shall transmit to the Congress H report of Act, shall not be disposed of in any way under authority of the operations under this Act except such information me he deema patagraph except to the extent herenfter authorized by the Con- incompatible with the public interest to disclose, Reports provided gress in the Acts appropriating such funds or otherwise, for under this subsection shall be transmitted to the Secretary of (3) To test, inspect, prove, repair, outfit, recondition, or other the Senate or the Clerk of the House of Representatives, as the case wise to place in good working order, to the extent to which funds may be, if the Senate or the House of Representatives, as the case are made available therefor, or contracts are authorized from time may be, is not in session. to time by the Congress, or both, any defense article for any such Sec. 6. (a) There is hereby authorized to be appropriated from contract. government, or to procure any or all such services by private time to time, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such amounts as may be Decessary to earry out the (4) To communicate to any such government any defense infor- provisions and accomplish the purposes of this Act. mation, pertaining to any defense article furnished to such givern- (b) All money and all property which is converted into money ment under paragraph (2) of this subsection, received under section a from any government shall, with the approval (5) To release for export any defense article disposed of in of the Director of the Budget, revert 10 the respective appropriation any way under this subsection to any such government, or appropriations out of which funds were expended with respect to (b) The terms and conditions upon which any such foreign govern- the defense article or defense information for which such consideration ruent receives any aid authorized under subsection (a) shall be those is received, and shall be available for expenditure for the purpose for which the President deems satisfactory, and the benefit to the United which such expended funds were appropriated by law, during the States may be payment or repayment in kind or property, or any other fiscal year in which such funds are received and the ensuing fiscal direct or indirect benefit which the President deems satisfactory. year: but in no event shall any funds so received be available for (c) After June 30, 1943, or after the passage of a concurrent expenditure after June 30, 1946. resolution by the two Houses before June 30, 1943, which declares SEC. 7. The Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, and the that the powers conferred by or pursuant to subsection (a) are THE bead of the department or agency shall in all contracts or agreements longer necessary to promote the defense of the United States, neither for the disposition of any defense article or defense information fully the President nor the head of any department or agency shall exer- protect the rights of all citizens of the United States who have patent time any of the powers conferred by or pursuant to subsection (a): rights in and to any anch article or information which is hereby except that until July 1, 1946, any of such powers may be exercised authorized to be disposed of and the payments collected for royalties to the extent necessary to carry out a contract or agreement with such on such patents shall be paid to the owners and holders of such patents, a foreign government made before July 1, 1943, or before the passage Sm. 8. The Secretaries of War and of the Navy are hereby of such concurrent resolution, whichever is the carlier. authorized to purchase or otherwise acquire arms, ammunition, and (d) Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or to implements of war produced within the jurisdiction of any country permit the authorization of convoying vessels by naval ressels of the to which section 3 is applicable, whenever the President deems such United States. purchase or acquisition to be necessary in the interests of the defense (e) Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or to permit of the United States. the authorization of the entry of any American vessel into 11. combat Sec. 9. The President may, from time to time, promulgate such area in violation of section 3 of the Neutrality Act of 1939. rules and regulations as may be necessary and proper to carry ont any Sec. 4. All contracts or agreements made for the disposition of of the provisions of this Act; and he may exercise any power or any defense article or defense information pursoant to section 3 shall authority conferred on him by this Act through such department, contain a clause by which the foreign government undertakes that agency, or officer ns he shall direct. it. will not, without the consent of the President, transfer title to Sec. 10. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to change existing or possession of such defense article or defense information by gift, law relating to the use of the land and naval forces of the United sale, or otherwise, or permit its use by anyone not an officer, employee. States, except insofar as such use relates lo the manufacture, procure- or agent of such foreign government. ment, and repair of defense articles, the communication of informa- Sec. 5. (a) The Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, or tion and other noncombatant purposes enumerated in this Act. the head of any other department or agency of the Government Sto. 11. If any provision of this Act or the application of such involved shall, when any such defense article or defense information provision to any circumstance shall be held invalid, the validity of is exported, immediately inform the department or agency designated the remainder of the Act and the applicability of such provision to other circumstances shall not be affected thereby. Approved, March 11, 1941. Jclassified MARCH 11, 1941 460 THE HOUSE APPROVED SENATE AMENDMENTS TO THE BRITISH AID BILL BY A VOTE OF 317 TO 71 AND SENT THE BILL TO THE PRESIDENT. ONE MEMBER VOTED PRESENT. SPEAKER SAN RAYBURN SIGNED THE BILL IMMEDIATELY. 3/11--RS44P FLASH PRESIDENT SIGNS BRITIS H AID BILL 3/11--M0351P PRESIDENT ROOSEVELT TODAY SIGNED THE LEND-LEASE BILL AND PREPARED TO ASK CONGRESS TO APPROPRIATE $7,000,000,000 TO CARRY OUT ITS PROVISIONS FOR GIVING MATERIAL WAR AID TO BRITAIN AND OTHER NATIONS FIGHTING AGAINST THE AXIS, 3/11--W0353P 461 March 11, 1941 Dear Senator George: Now that the Lend-Lease Bill is out of the may, I should like to send you my sincere thanks for all that you aid to ensure its passage. Looking back over the debate, I cannot help feel- ing that it was a good thing for our country that you were Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee at this particular time. It is to your great credit that serious mistakes were avoided and that, from first to last, the debate was kept on a high democratic level. It was & long, hard fight, and you gave it every ounce of your skill and energy, but I believe that the results will more than justify your efforts. Please let me thank you also, on personal grounds, for the unfailing courtesy you showed me during the hear- ings and on all other occasions when we discussed this Bill together. Sincerely yours, (Signed) E Mergenthau. ST. Honorable Walter F. George, United States Senate. FK:nme m Measureer 405 + Regraded Uclassified 462 March 11, 1941 Dear Senator George: I should like to send you my sincere thanks for all Now that the Lend-Lease Bill is out of the my, that you did to ensure its passage. Looking back over the debate, I cannot help feel- ing that it was a good thing for our country that you wore Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee at this particular time. It is to your great credit that serious mistakes were avoided and that, from first to last, the debate was kept on a high democratic level. It was a long, hard fight, and you gave it every ounce of your skill and energy, but I believe that the results will more than justify your efforts. Please let me thank you also, on personal grounds, for the unfailing courtesy you showed me during the hear- ings and on all other occasions when we discussed this Bill together. Sincerely yours, (Signed) a Mergenthati, VI, Honorable Walter F. George, United States Senate. FK:mme By Regraded Uclassified 463 March 11, 1941 Dear Senator George: I should like to send you my sincere thanks for all Now that the Lend-Lease Bill is out of the may, that you did to ensure its passage. Looking back over the debate, I cannot help feel- ing that it was a good thing for our country that you were Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee at this particular time. It is to your great credit that serious mistakes were avoided and that, from first to last, the debate was kept on a high democratic level, It was a long, hard fight, and you gave it every ounce of your skill and energy, but I believe that the results will more than justify your efforts. Please let me thank you also, on personal grounds, for the unfailing courtesy you showed me during the hear- ings and on all other occasions when we discussed this Bill together. Sincerely yours, (Signed) I Marganthau, Jr. Honorable Walter F. George, United States Senate. FK:nmc By Messonger Regraded Uclassified 464 March 11, 1941 Dear Alben: Now that the long debate is over, I think that sincere thanks are due to the pilot who brought the Lend-Lease Bill safely into port. You steered a straight course and you did a perfectly grand job. Sincerely yours, /s/ Henry Honorable Alben W. Barkley, United States Senate. 7K:nnc in By Measenger 4 Regraded Uclassified 465 March 11, 1941 Dear Alben: Now that the long debate is over, I think that sincere thanks are due to the pilot who brought the Lend-Lease Bill safely into port. You steered a straight course and you did a perfectly grand job. Sincerely yours, /s/ Henry Honorable Alben W. Barkley, United States Senate. 7 K: - By Measenser Regraded Uclassified 466 March 11, 1941 Dear Alben: Now that the long debate is over, I think that sincere thanks are due to the pilot who brought the Lend-Lease Bill safely into port. You steered a straight course and you did & perfectly grand job. Sincerely yours, (sgd) Henry Honorable Alben W. Barkley, United States Senate. tkime. By Regraded Uclassified 467 March 11, 1941. My dear Mr. Purvis: The President has today authorized the Secre- taries of War and Navy, pursuant to the Act of March 11, 1941, to dispose of the defense articles, set forth in the annexed schedules, to His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom. The President has also requested the Secretaries of War and Navy to communicate directly with you to arrange for the time, method, and other details of the disposition. Very sincerely yours, Harry L. Hopkins (sgd.) HARRY L. HOPKINS Honorable Arthur Purvis, British Purchasing Commission, Washington, D. C. Regraded Uclassified 468 DEFENSE ARTICLES AUTHORIZED FOR TRANSFER BY THE SECRETARY OF WAR TO THE UNITED KINGDOM 2322 Ground Signal Projectors 150 M 1916 - 75mm Gun, Hi speed American type 300 Field Howitzers - 155mm (not Hi speed) 435 Field Howitzers, 8" (no ammunition available) 500 Caissons, 75mm Howitzers 200 Limbers, 75mm Howitzers 116,100 Signal Cartridges 100,000 H. E. Shells, 75mm Normal Charge, Gun 60,000 H. E. Shells, 155mm Howitzers 15,000 W.P. Shells, 155mm Howitzers 60,000 Reduced Propelling Charges for 155mm Howitzers 15,000 Normal Propelling Charges for 155mm Howitzers 40 Tractors, Medium (track laying) 150 Scout Cars, M3A1 (less armament) 200 Scout Cars, Old Models MARCH 11, 1941 Regraded Uclassified 469 DEFENSE ARTICLES AUTHORIZED FOR TRANSFER BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY TO THE UNITED KINGDOM ORDNANCE 150 4"/50 L.A. Equipment - U. S. Type 300 3"/50 L.A. Equipment - U. S. Type 8000 4"/50 L.A. Projectiles 8000 4"/50 Complete Rounds - U. S. Type 18000 3"/50 Cal. Ammunition - U. S. Type, L.A. 1200 3"/23 Cal. Ammunition - U. S. Type 3000 Propelling Charges for "I" Guns - U. S. Type SHIPS 28 Motor Torpedo Boats March 11, 1941 Regraded Uclassified 470 DEFENSE ARTICLES AUTHORIZED FOR TRANSFER BY THE SECRETARY OF WAR TO THE ROYAL GREEK GOVERNMENT 50 M 1916 - 75mm Gun, Hi speed American type 150,000 H.E.Shells, 75mm Reduced Charge, Gun 30,000 H.E.Shells, 155mm Howitzers 30,000 Normal Propelling Charges for 155mm Howitzers March 11, 1941 Regraded Uclassified 471 March 11, 1941. My dear Mr. Secretary: Consultation having been had with the Chief of Staff of the Army, I find that: (1) The defense of the United Kingdom is vital to the defense of the United States; (2) Sections 4 and 7 of the Act of March 11, 1941 have been complied with by the necessary agree- ment on the part of His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom; (3) It would be in the interests of our national defense to transfer the defense articles set forth in the annexed schedule. I therefore authorize you immediately to make the transfer to His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom of the defense articles set forth in the annexed schedule. I would appreciate it if you would arrange with the Chairman of the British Supply Council in North America for the time, method, and other details of the disposition. Very sincerely yours, Franklin D. Roosevelt (sgd.) The Honorable The Secretary of War Regraded Uclassified 472 DEFENSE ARTICLES AUTHORIZED FOR TRANSFER BY THE SECRETARY OF WAR TO THE UNITED KINGDOM 2322 Ground Signal Projectors 150 M 1916 - 75mm Gun, Hi speed American type 300 Field Howitzers - 155mm (not Hi speed) 435 Field Howitzers, 8" (no ammunition available) 500 Caissons, 75mm Howitzers 200 Limbers, 75mm Howitzers 116,100 Signal Cartridges 100,000 H. E. Shells, 75mm Normal Charge, Gun 60,000 H. E. Shells, 155mm Howitzers 15,000 W.P. Shells, 155mm Howitzers 60,000 Reduced Propelling Charges for 155mm Howitzers 15,000 Normal Propelling Charges for 155mm Howitzers 40 Tractors, Medium (track laying) 150 Scout Cars, M3A1 (less armament) 200 Scout Cars, Old Models MARCH 11, 1941 Regraded Uclassified 473 March 11, 1941. My dear Mr. Secretary: Consultation having been had with the Chief of Naval Operations of the Navy, I find that: (1) The defense of the the United Kingdom is vital to the defense of the United States; (2) Sections 4 and 7 of the Act of March 11, 1941 have been complied with by the necessary agreement on the part of His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom; (3) It would be in the interests of our national defense to transfer the defense articles set forth in the annexed schedule. I therefore authorize you immediately to make the transfer to His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom of the defense articles set forth in the annexed schedule. I would appreciate it if you would arrange with the Chairman of the British Supply Council in North America for the time, method, and other details of the disposition. Very sincerely yours, (Signed) Franklin D. Roosevelt The Honorable The Secretary of the Navy. Regraded Uclassified 474 DEFENSE ARTICLES AUTHORIZED FOR TRANSFER BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY TO THE UNITED KINGDOM ORDNANCE 150 4"/50 L.A. Equipment - U. S. Type 300 3"/50 L.A. Equipment - U. S. Type 8000 4"/50 L.A. Projectiles 8000 4"/50 Complete Rounds - U. S. Type 18000 3"/50 Cal. Ammunition - U. S. Type, L.A. 1200 3"/23 Cal. Ammunition - U. S. Type 3000 Propelling Charges for "I" Guns - U. S. Type SHIPS 28 Motor Torpedo Boats March 11, 1941 Regraded Uclassified 475 March 11, 1941. My dear Mr. Secretary: Consultation having been had with the Chief of Staff of the Army, I find that: (1) The defense of the Royal Greek Government is vital to the defense of the United States; (2) Sections 4 and 7 of the Act of March 11, 1941 have been complied with by the necessary agreement on the part of the Royal Greek Government; (3) It would be in the interests of our national defense to transfer the defense articles set forth in the annexed schedule. I therefore authorize you immediately to make the transfer to the Royal Greek Government of the defense articles set forth in the annexed schedule. I would appreciate it if you would arrange with the Minister of Greece for the time, method, and other details of the disposition. Very sincerely yours, (Signed) Franklin D. Roosevelt The Honorable The Secretary of War. Regraded Uclassified 476 DEFENSE ARTICLES AUTHORIZED FOR TRANSFER BY THE SECRETARY OF WAR TO THE ROYAL GREEK GOVERNMENT 50 M 1916 - 75mm Gun, Hi speed American type 150,000 H.E.Shells, 75mm Reduced Charge, Gun 30,000 H.E.Shells, 155mm Howitzers 30,000 Normal Propelling Charges for 155mm Howitzers March 11, 1941 Regraded Uclassified THE BRITISH SUPPLY COUNCIL IN NORTH AMERICA TELEPHONE: REPUBLIC 7860 Box 680 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN STATION WASHINGTON D C March 11, 1941 My dear Mr. President: We represent on behalf of His Vajesty's Government in the United Kingdom, pursuant to Sections 4 and 7 of the Act of March 11, 1941, that: 1) Every contract or agreement for the disposition of any defense article or wefense information, pursuant to Section 3 of the Act of March 11, 1941, to His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom shall be decised to include a clause that His Majesty's Government will not, without your consent, or the consent of someone designated by you for that purpose, under the Act, transfer title to or possession of such defense article or defense information by fift, sale, or otherwise, or permit its 12SE by anyone not an officer, employee or agent of His Majesty!s Government; and 2) If, as a result of the transfer to 11s Majesty's Government of any défense articles or- defense information, it is necessary, ursuant to Section 7 of the Act of March 11, 1941, fully to protect the rights of any citizen of the United States, who has patent rights in 5% to any such defense article or information, flis (ajesty's Government will do so, vhen so re unsted by you or your designee for that purpose. Very truly yours, The President of the United States White House Director General of the British Purchasing Commission Approved: arthur RD anset Director General of the British AIr Commission Chairman of the British Supply Council in North America Regraded Uclassified ROYAL GREEK LEGATION WASHINGTON March 11, 1941. My dear Mr. President: I represent on behalf of the Royal Greek Government, pursuant to Sections 4 and 7 of the Act of March 11, 1941, that: 1) Every contract or agreement for the disposition of any defense article or defense information, pursuant to Section 3 of the Act of March 11, 1941, to the Royal Greek Government shall be deemed to include a clause that the Royal Greek Government will not, without your consant, or the consent of someone designated by you for that purpose, under the Act, transfer title to or possession of such defense article or defense information by gift, sale, or other- wise, or permit its use by anyone not an officer, employee or agent of the Royal Greek Government; and 2) If, as a result of the transfer to the Royal Greek Government of any defense articles or defense information, it is necessary, pursuant to Section 7 of the Act of March 11, 1941, fully to protect the rights of any citizen of the United States, who has patent rights in and to any such defense article or information, the Royal Greek Government will do so, when so requested by you or your designee for that purpose. Very truly yours, C. Dismentopoulos, Minister of Greece. The President of the United States, White House. Regraded Uclassified I, Viscount Halifax, His Britannic Majesty's Ambassador to the United States of America, hereby certify that the Director General of the British Purchasing Commission, the Director General of the British Air Commission, and the Chairman of the British Supply Council in North America have the power necessary to make the commitments required of His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom by Sections 4 and 7 of the Act of March 11th, 1941 88 set forth in the annexed letter dated March 11th, 1941, signed by these officers of the British Government. Done at Washington this 11th day of March, 1941. Halifax Regraded Uclassified PAT HARRISON, MISS., CHAIRMAN 480 BILTER F. GEORGE, GA ROBERT M. LAFELLETTE, Ja., wis, - 1. WALEN, MASS. ARTHUR CAPPER, KAMS, - w. BARKLEY, KY. ARTHUR H. VANDENBERG, MICH, # CORRIALLY, TEX, JAMES de DAVIE, PR. LAB w. BAILEY, N. c. HENRY CANGT LOOSE, - MASE, WHETT CHAMP CLARK, MO. JOHN A. DANAHER, CONN - FLOOD gran, VA. ROBERT 4. TAPT, GHIO United States Senate PETER 4. CERRY, n. L - F. CUPPLY, PA. COMMITTEE ON FINANCE PRENTIES M. MOWN, MICH. are L MERRING, IOWA, - c. colo. - L RADCLIFFE, MD. FELTON M. JOHNSTON, CLERR March 11, 1941. Dear Henry: It was good of you to write me as you did on the anniversary of my thirty years legis- lative service. One of the finest things about this job is the splendid associations I have on- joyed, and I am sure I need not tell you how much I appreciate your friendship and association. With best wishes always, I am Cardama Sincerely yours, Honorable Henry Morgenthau, Secretary of the Treasury, Washington, D. 0. INERAL OFFICES c. WASHINGTON ST. - CHICAGO ILL. WURREY BUILDING WARNINGTON, D.C. 481 TELEPHONE NATIONAL 3342 WASHINGTON, D.C. March 11, 1941 MEMORANDUM TO: SECRETARY MORGANTHAU The statement presented to you by Senator Bankhead concerning S.935 mentions the "parity price loan" feature of his plan but does not go into any explanation of this feature of this bill. Most of the mamo- randum deals with the problem of adjusting the supply of cotton to meet current demands. Briefly, Senator Bankhead's bill proposes: 1. A system of commodity loans at 100 per cent of parity for cotton, wheat, tobacco and rice conditioned on marketing quotas being in effect to control supplies. An 85 per cent loan rate on corn is provided because the representatives of the corn producers do not want a. loan higher than 85 per cent of parity. The American Farm Bureau Federation is recommending a loan rate of 85 per cent instead of 100 per cent for all five commodities. (See attached statement presented by President O'Neal to the Senate Committee on Agriculture for summary of Farm Bureau plan). The commodity loan plan has this great advantage,-that it gives the farmers parity or very close to parity in the markst-place. If a 100 per cent loan is made available, no appropriations are needed for parity payments; if an 85 per cent loan is made available, appropriations for parity payments would be needed to meet the 15 per cent deficiency. But careful estimates indicate that under this plan farmers could receive 100 per cent of parity with about the same appropriations as are now being made. Under the Bankheed proposal of 100 per cent loans, as already pointed out, there would be no parity payments to farmers, as the farmers would get parity prices in the market-place for their entire crop. The buyers of cotton, for example, would either have to pay the farmers parity price or the farmers could put the cotton under the loan. In order to prevent cotton from piling up in the loan, this plan proposes first to maintain our fair share of the world market for cotton by selling cotton for export at the world price and reimbursing the Commodity Credit Corporation for any losses incurred by reason of such sales. BIM port payments to exporters could be made if necessary to prevent cotton from going into the loan. In addition, the Bankhead bill proposes to bring about an adjustment of production of cotton down to approximately Regraded Uclassified 482 10,000,000 bales in 1941, which is the estimated amount needed for domestic consumption and exports. 2. A provision for payments to cotton farmers to reduce their production below their current allotments for the purpose of adjusting the supply of cotton to current requirements for comestic consumption and exports. In his memorandum Senator Bankhead suggested two methods of securing a voluntary reduction in production of 2 to 2 / million bales below the allotments for 1941, which have already been announced and which total about 12 million bales. One of these methods consists of a payment in kind at the rate of one-half bale for each bale taken out of production; the other method proposes a payment in cash at the rate of so much per pound to take cotton out of production, utilizing the $85,000,000 appropriated for parity payments for the purpose of making these payments for extra reduction in production. The Farm Bureau has recommended a payment in kind at the rate of one-half bale for each bale taken out of production below the present allotment. arregg R. Ogg Director of Research Regraded Uclassified Sun Bankhiel's glass march 7/41 S. 935 S. For the purpose of indicating the objective of this bill and its probable effect, I beg to present the following as it applies to cotton: Using round figures, the government owns 6,200,000 bales. It holds under loan 4,900,000 bales. There are two primary objectives involved; first is better income to farmers and second is better protection to the United States Treasury. Distribution. Domestic consumption next year may amount to 9,000,000 bales. The export market is practically eliminated. From August 1 last until March 1 last, only 504,000 bales were exported in the channels of trade. There were total exports of approximately 700,000 bales but the balance of the cotton was exported under the rubber exchange with Great Britain. Assuming the same exports next year and a slight increase in domestic consumption, there will be a distribution of approximately 9,500,000 bales. The cotton allotment, assuming normal weather, will produce 12,000,000 bales. To the cotton now under the government loan there will be added from next year's crop about 2,500,000 bales, thus increasing the government owned and loan cotton to 13,500,000 bales. It is evident that something must be done about the con- tinued surplus production. The bill, while accepting the announced Regraded Uclassified 484 -2- allotments for this year of 12,000,000 bales, provides two methods of securing voluntary reduction in production of from 2,000,000 to 2,500,000 bales, as follows: 1. To pay in kind with Commodity Credit cotton one-half bale for each bale taken out of production up to a certain limit. 2. Use the parity payment appropriation of about $86,000,000 allotted to cotton farmers to pay so much & pound to take cotton out of production. If the parity price loan plan is put into operation, the appropriations for parity payments will not be required for that purpose and can be used to protect the price of cotton and the Treasury by adjusting the supply to a quantity that must be bought by domestic consumers plus a nominal amount to be exported. The cotton under loan covers loans for the crop years '38-'39 and '40-'41. The bill provides that farmers who dispose of their equity in cotton loans after the day the bill was intro- duced cannot participate in the parity price loan. That is intended to enable the government to retire that cotton from the market and take it out of competition with this year's crop. The bill further provides that the farmers shall be paid the value of their equity in cotton the day the bill was introduced. There is no equity in the '38 loan because the loan price and the carrying charges exceed the present market value. There is a small equity Regraded Uclassified 485 -3- of from two to four dollars a bale on the '40 crop. The equity for that cotton can be paid with from five to seven or eight million dollars. With the loan cotton taken over by the government, as it must ultimately be done, and with the crop reduced to 9,500,000 to 10,000,000 bales, there will be practically no cotton going into the loan. Such amount as goes in must be taken out by the consumers before a new crop comes to market. This plan will increase the present totally inadequate income of cotton producers and will stop increasing the government stocks and may later be adjusted so as to gradually eliminate the government stocks. - TO: miss Chamsey 486 is mentioned the O' heal letter to him - he he a lanced at it - said he wouldn't need it Z From: LIEUT. STEPHENS 48 AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION 487 Munsey Building Washington, D. C. March 11, 1941 Honorable Franklin D. Roosevelt President of the United States The White House Washington, D. C. My dear Mr. President: We are all greatly distressed that Chester Davis is leaving the Federal Reserve Board. He has certainly been our good friend there. May I respectfully present for your consideration to fill his place the followings If you want someone from the midwest, I would suggest the name of Earl C. Smith, President, Illinois Agricultural Association and Vice President, American Farm Bureau Federation; if you want someone from the northeast, I would suggest W. I. Myers, Professor of Economics, Cornell University and former Governor, Farm Credit Administration; or if you want someone from Arkansas Farm Bureau Federation. I believe any of these man could the south, I would suggest the name of R. E. Short, President, ably fill this position and would have the confidence of our farmers. Farmers feel very strongly that agriculture should be represented on this important Board. Hoping these suggestions will have your earnest consideration and with warm personal regards, I an Sincerely yours, 154032 EAO'Nes E A EA e MA SI ЯАМ IAQI ТИЗМТЯАЛЗО TRU2A38T Edw. A. O'Neal - President YRUZA Regraded Uclassified 488 TREASURY department pry ip INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATE March 11, 1941 TO Secretary Morgenthau FROM Mr. Cochran STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL Official sales of British-owned dollar securities under the vesting order effective February 19, 1940: No. of Shares $ Proceeds of Nominal Value $ Proceeds of Sold Shares Sold of Bonds Sold Bonds Sold March 3 19,080 1,442,474 81,000 60,348 4 218,632 11,408,484 160,000 125,498 2 24,449 793,163 31,000 31,950 126,017 3,581,120 291,000 296,108 7 36,912 1,433,373 117,000 120,123 8 3,026 255,955 159,400 174,748 428,116 18,914,569 839,400 808,775 March 3 lift to Treasury 4 7 428,120 18,914,576 Sales from 2/22/40 to 3/1/41 5,595,088-1/2 172,222,599 19,483,700 18,664,818 TOTAL 2/22/40 TO 3/8/41 6,023,208-1/2 191,137,175 20,323,100 19,473,593 Miss Poate reported sales of non-vested securities for the week ended March 1 totaled $300,000. 75ml De 489 TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATE March 11, 1941 TO Secretary Morgenthau FROM Mr. Cochram CONFIDENTIAL Registered sterling transactions of the reporting banks were as follows: Sold to commercial concerns £56,000 Purchased from commercial concerns £22,000 The Federal Reserve Bank of New York sold £15,000 in registered sterling to the American Express Co., and purchased £2,000 from Thos. Cook & Son. Open market sterling remained at 4.03-1/2, and there were no reported trans- actions. In New York, the closing rates for the foreign currencies listed below were as follows: Canadian dollar 15% discount Swies franc (commercial) .2322-1/2 Swedish krona .2384-1/2 Reichsmark .4005 Lira .0505 Argentine peso (free) .2303 Brazilian milreis (free) .0505 Mexican peso .2066 Cuban peso 6-5/8% discount In Shanghai, the yuan in terms of our currency remained at 5-1/24. and sterling advanced 20 to 3.91. There were no gold transactions consummated by us today. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York reported that the Central Bank of the Colombian Republic shipped $2,921,000 in gold from Colombia to the Federal for its own account, disposition unknown. The prices fixed in London for spot and forward silver were unchanged at 23-3/8d and 23-5/16d, respectively. The U.S. equivalents were 42.444 and 42.334. 34-3/44. The Treasury's purchase price for foreign silver VAS also unchanged at 350- Handy and Harman's settlement price for foreign silver vas unchanged at Regraded Uclassified 490 - 2 - Ve made six purchases of silver totaling 500,000 ounces under the Silver Purchase Act, all of which consisted of new production from foreign countries, for forward delivery. The report of March 5 received from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York giving foreign exchange positions of banks and bankers in its district, revealed that the total position of all countries was short the equivalent of $7,286,000,a decrease of $322,000 in the short position. Net changes were as follows: Short Position Short Position February 26 Change in Country March 5 Short Position* England** $ 263,000 $ 515,000 + $252,000 Europe 3,292,000 3,207,000 - 85,000 Canada 109,000 (Long) 173,000 (Long) - 64,000 Latin America 211,000 126,000 - 85,000 Japan 2,559,000 2,316,000 - 243,000 Other Asia 1,352,000 1,329,000 - 23,000 All others 40,000 34,000 (Long) - 74,000 Total $7,608,000 $7,286,000 - $322,000 Plus sign (+) indicates increase in short position, or decrease in long position. Minus sign(-) indicates decrease in short position, or increase in long position. " Combined position in registered and open market sterling. N.M.R. confidential 491 TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION DATE March 11, 1941 TO FROM Mr. Secretary Haas SOA. Morgenthau Subject: Markets Current Developments in the High-grade Security SUMMARY (1) Treasury securities have regained since February 15 about one-third of the price declines suffered be- tween December 30, 1940 and February 15 (Charts I and II). (2) The increased issue of Treasury bills on March 5 was absorbed entirely by weekly reporting banks in the Chicago and St. Louis Federal Reserve districts. Bills are now in demand in these districts for the purpose of avoiding local property taxes. (3) High-grade corporate and municipal bonds have gained in price only moderately as compared with Treasury bonds during the past two weeks (Charts II and III). (4) Estimates of the yield differential between fully taxable and partially tax-exempt Treasury bonds vary from as low as 17 to as high as 57 basis points, de- pending upon the assumptions made with respect to the correct pricing of the new 2 percent Treasury bond (Chart IV). (5) The price of the new 2 percent bond offered on February 25 declined from an opening bid around 101-20/32 to & low of 100-21/32 at the close that books closed the following day. As the result day, but recovered somewhat, on balance, before of the the offering of & new note with the bond, the worth refund= at least below that of the note, rights would have bond been ing 100-16/32, and if the price of the bond was never in danger. The new note was had converted fell below the note, and when the books closed, fallen into the new note. As it was, the never it was substantially above it (Chart V). Regraded Uclassified 492 Secretary Morgenthau - 2 I. Price and Yield Movements of Government Securities Prices of long-term Treasury bonds have enjoyed a net increase of over 2 points since February 15, when they reached a low for the year. Intermediate bonds have gained about 1 point during this time, while Treasury notes have gained, on the average, between 1/4 and 1/2 of a point (Chart I). This rise represents an average recovery of about one-third of the net decline from December 30, 1940 through February 15. Long bonds have shown the greatest strength, recovering about 54 percent of their losses be- tween December 30 and February 15. The market for Govern- ment securities continues to be very thin, and hence sub- ject to rather considerable price fluctuations. Price changes since December 30, 1940 are shown in the following table: : Average price change : : Dec. 30, 1940-:Feb. 15, 1941- :Feb. 15, 1941 :Mar. 10, 1941 (Decimals are thirty-seconds) Notes 1 to 3 years - .25 +.09 3 to 5 years -1.00 +.11 Bonds 5 to 15 years to call -3.11 +1.02 15 years and over to call -4.09 +2.10 The average yield of long-term Treasury bonds, moving inversely to prices, which increased by 29 basis points from balance, by 15 basis points since February 15 (Chart II). December 30, 1940 through February 15, has decreased, on Regraded Uclassified 493 Secretary Morgenthau - 3 II. Absorption of New Treasury Bills The issue of Treasury bills on March 5 amounted about $200 millions -- an increase of $100 millions over to previous weeks. This entire increase and $20 millions more was absorbed by weekly reporting member banks in the Chicago and St. Louis Federal Reserve districts. Treas- ury bills are in demand in these districts at the present Illinois and Missouri. time for the purpose of avoiding local property taxes in The March 5 issue of bills was also the first issue of taxable bille. The increased size of the issue and the special demand mentioned above, however, tend to obscure the effect of the tax feature upon the rates of discount at which they were awarded. The average rate on the last issue of tax-exempt bills -- dated February 26 - was 0.043 percent, &s compared with & rate of 0.086 percent on the first issue of taxable bills. III. High-grade Corporate and Municipal Bonds Unlike prices of long-term Treasury bonds which have risen markedly since February 15, prices of high-grade corporate bonds have fluctuated within a fairly narrow range and have improved very slightly (Chart II). High- grade municipal bonds have gained moderately in the last two weeks (Chart III). New bond offerings to the public in the New York mar- ket were $22.8 millions last week 88 compared with $9.8 millions the week before. The largest of last week's of- ferings -- $16.0 millions of Public Service Company of Oklahoma 30-year, 3-1/4 percent bonde (priced to yield 3.07 percent ) -- 1s reported to be moving slowly. The principal demand is said to come from medium- and small- size insurance companies. The RFC took the entire $136 millions State of Arkansas refunding bonds on February 27 at 8. price to yield about 3.2 percent. A nation-wide banking group which had been prepared to bid for about two-thirds of the issue on about & 3-1/2 percent coupon basis withdrew at the last moment. Regraded Uclassified 103 Ameretary Morgenthau - 4 IV. Pricing and the Value of Tax Exemption 1948-50 1s still far from complete, and the market for Secondary distribution of the new 2 percent bonds of Government securities 8.0 a whole remains thin 8.8 it has been since the first of the year. It is thus difficult to draw any valid conclusions as to the yield differential being established in the market between fully taxable and partially tax-exempt Treasury bonds. Chart IV compares the yield of the new bonds with the yields of outstanding Treasury bonds. Two curves are shown for the outstanding issues: an opti- mistic one based on low coupon bonds with 2-year call periods, such as was used by Mr. Piser of the Board of Governors in pricing the new issue, and a very conservative one based on the bonds in this area with the highest yields, irrespective of coupon or call period, such 8.8 was used by the Division of Research and Statistics in pricing the issue. Inasmuch as the opinion is widely expressed in the market that the new bond should be regarded as a 1950 maturity (on the ground that partially tax-exempt bonds will be called before matu- rity, but that taxable bonds will be allowed to run their full term) yields both to earliest call date and to final maturity are shown for the new 2's. On the basis of yields to earliest call date the spread between the new bonds and partially tax-exempt bonds of com- parable term 18 about 57 basis points when the optimistic curve 1s used, and about 38 basis points measured from the conservative curve. On the assumption that the new bond should be figured to maturity (other issues continuing to be computed to call) the corresponding spreads are 35 and 17 basis points, respectively. The spread which may be attributed to the taxability of the new bond thus varies from as low 88 17 to as high 88 57 basis points, depending upon various assumptions which may be made - all with some authority - with respect to the proper pricing of the new bond BB a partially tax exempt security. It should be noted, however, that the supposed necessity for pricing the new issue to maturity rather than to call 1a itself attributed to the tax factor, and thus creates a sort of "quasi-tax-differential" consisting of pricing the new issue 6.8 8 9-year rather than as 8 7-year security. Regraded Uclassified 495 Secretary Morgenthau - 5 When these differentials are expressed as equivalents of a tax on the coupon they vary from a low of 8 percent (or only one-third of the corporation tax) to a high of 28 percent (or more than the whole amount of the corporation tax) as shown in the following table: Probable redemption date Curve used in pricing assumed for new bonds Optimistic Conservative (Percent of coupon) 1948 (Call) 28 19 1950 (Maturity) 17 8 The truth doubtless lies somewhere within these extremes, but the wide range makes it very difficult to say exactly how much allowance the market is now making for the taxability of the new bond, V. Refunding of the March Maturities The pricing of the new securities to be offered in ex- change for the maturing 1-1/2 percent note of March 1941, and the 3-3/8 percent bond called for redemption at the same time, presented a special problem because of the difficulty in estimating the allowance to be made for the taxability of the new issues. The problem was met by your offering an inter- mediate-term bond, and - as a "backstop" to insure the success of the refunding - a 2-year note. Opening bids on Tuesday, February 25, were about about 101-20/32 for the 2 percent, 7-9 year Treasury bond, and the 100-11/32 new for the new 3/4 percent 2 year note. From the price open- ing price rose. At the close on Tuesday the prices On the of the bond declined steadily, while of the of the note the new note were the same (Chart V). the new Wednesday bond and the new securities gained, on balance, bond Regraded Uclassified 496 Secretary Morgenthau - 6 the day its price fell back again to that of the note. showing the greater strength, although at one point during As a result of the offering of a note together with the bond, the refunding was at no time in danger. After the first two hours of trading, as the chart suggests, the note was always worth a minimum price of about 100-16/32. If the price of the bond had fallen below this price, rights would have been converted into the note rather than the bond. As it happened the price of the bond twice rico- cheted upward from the price of the note, but never fell below it (Chart V). Attachments 497 Chart I CHANGES IN THE PRIORS OF U.S. SHOURITING Potata Plotted Represent the Difference from Besember so, 1943 Price of Bach Materity Class 1941 JAR. MAIL 1942 1941 MY JULY SEPT. NOV, FEBRUARY POINTS JAM. BASCH TTT e APRIL IS 22 POINTS e 15 22 29 5 12 (NST CHANGE) = 26 (ART DIANG) POINTS Naturday Ometations Daily (ACT DIANE) : +1 +3 +3 +1 +1 +2 +2 = .. 0 0 *1 +1 1 + NOTES NOTES +3 Yes. 1-3 Yes. o + + o + T -1 -1 -1 of Norts NOTEST 3-5 Yes, 3-5 Yes, -16 11- -2 4 -12 -If & & -11 -If & Bonos, & 1 5-15 Yes TO CALL T -2% é Boups, Bonds, 5-15 Yes, TO CALL & OVER 15 Yes. 4 4 TO CALL & -26 428 9 -6 +3 -3 * -36 14 -7 & $ - 9 -34 -Id Boxos, OVER 15 Yes. TO CALL 1 T 9 & 7 7 7 & -10 -10 ₺ ± -11 -11 & -5 JAB. MAR. MAY JULY 101. NOV. JM. a 15 22 1 a 15 22 29 5 12 19 26 1941 1942 FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL 1941 Office of the Secretary of the Trumery F - 153 - C - of - - - 498 Chart II COMPARATIVE YIELDS OF AVERAGE OF ALL LONG TERM U.S. TREASURY AND AVERAGE OF HIGH GRADE CORPORATE BONDS 1940 JAN FIR MAR APR. MAY ANE JAY AUG. SEPT OCT. HGV. 1941 DEC 1940 - a JAN. , is FEB. MAR AML 1941 a If - = " BI - - MAY 4 - - JUNE - = ANY AUG SEPT. . El OCT 18 NOV. DEC. DEC JAN invert Sugle ⑉ - - FEB. e # N. RE 9 M 1 is - as . = " , Γ. - PER CENT inversed Scale Invers Scale PER CENT PER CENT WEEKLY. Saturday Quotations DA LY LE 1.5 La 20 2.0 20 . Long Term Treasury 2.2 . 2.2 Lt Long Term Treasury as years or more to earliest on del 2.4 24 24 26 26 24 Corporate 28 28 28 Corporate 10 3.0 80 32 3.2 12 14 3.4 14 36 36 3.6 PER PER PER CENT CENT CENT 1.00 100 100 Spread Between Long Term Treasury and Corporate 80 .80 80 60 60 60 Spread 40 40 40 20 20 20 o o o . - - as as 4 = = - # # = - # a . JAN. - FEB. If MAR - - APR. is - MAY 19 ARE JULY - AUG. " - SEPT. - - OCT. - NOV = DSC. JAM FEB. MAR - # APR. # . MAY - = JURE H . JULY - AUG. - - SEPT. 16 of OCT. # # NOV. - DEC DEC JAN FEB MAR 1940 1941 1940 1941 . Change in composition of Long Term Treasury average X el the Sentary di the Tradery of COMPARATIVE YIELDS OF AVERAGE OF ALL LONG TERM US TREASURY AND Dow-JONES AVERAGE OF MUNICIPAL BONDS Yields Based on Saturday Quotations 1940 1941 JAN FES. MAR. APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAM FEB MAR. APR. MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC - 17 . . se a = # " R 10 . or - M " , - , " , DI 4 is . 1 | is " 18 se is 14 7 BY . = I = ao 13 17 # 29 . es Inverted Scale Inverted Scale PER CENT PER CENT 1.8 Long Term Treasury" (12 years ar more to serviced call date) 18 2.0 2.0 2.2 t.z 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.6 Twenty 20-Year Municipal Bonds 1.5 2.8 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.2 PER PER CENT CENT 60 60 Differential 40 40 20 .20 o o 0 14 = 18 B - 28 11 . - 15 43 " 18 - 2 1 T III . # I # ⑉ e IF . If 8. = # 1 . as - e N $0 13 17 # " . == . 19 - - DEC JAM. FES MAR APR MAY AM JULY AUG NOT OCT NOV DEC JAIL FEB MAR APIL MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT: NOV 1941 1940 499 "Areat è - indicares change - comportion of Larg form Treasury average the of the Secretary of the Treasury F-124-5 - of - - - Regraded Uclassi Chart IV 500 COMPARISON 07 YIELD OF NEW 25 TREASURY BOND WITH YIELDS OF PARTIALLY TAX-EXEMPT TREASURY BONDS Based on Closing Bid Prices, March 10, 1941 1948 1949 PERCENT 1950 PERCENT NEW BOND YIELD TO NATURITY 1.9 1.9 Now BOND YIELD TO CALL 1.8 1.8 CONSERVATIVE CURVE 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 OPTIMISTIC CURVE 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1948 1949 1950 Office of the Secretary of the Treasury F - 203 Division of - and - Chart BID PRICES OF NEW TREASURY SECURITIES Hourly, February 25 and 26, 1941 DOLLARS DOLLARS 1014 1014 1011 1011 2% BONDS, MARCH 15, 1948-'50 1011 101 101 101 100 100) to NOTES, MARCH 15, 1943 100} 100} 100 100 100 100 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 FEBRUARY 25 FEBRUARY 26 TIME 501 Office of the Secretary of the Trusury of - and / F - 202 Regraded Uclas 502 Treasury Department Division of Monetary Research Date March 11 1941 To: Secretary Morgenthau From: Mr. White Subject: Financing of Argentine food shipments to Spain Cable advice from Buenos Aires indicates that the Spanish interest in the Argentine Electricity Company will be used as the security for the Argentine credit to Spain to finance "immediate shipments" of meat and wheat to & value of 35 to 40 million pesos (about $10 million). This is the first case which has come to our attention of Argentine acquisition (probably only as collateral) of foreign- owned enterprises. Possibly these securities can be resold in the Argentine capital market to acquire pesos to pay Argentine grain and meat producers. But apparently they are to be used only as collateral. MR. WHITE Branch 2058 - Room 208 503 KH PLAIN Calcutta Dated March 11, 1941 Rec'd 9:11 p.m. Secretary of State, Washington. Eleventh. Government notification March tenth requires British subjects holding twenty-four American securities surrender them within one month at fixed prices. Preferred stocks American power light fives electric bond share fives common stocks Telandtel Anaconda Bethlehem Chrysler electric bond share General Motors National City Bank Republic Socony National Power Light United States Steel Government bonds eleven issues. GROTH NPL Copy:alm 504 Peiping via N. R. JR Dated March 11, 1941 Rec'd 1:02 p.m. Secretary of State, Washington. 80, March 11, 2 p.m. As of March 1 the Federal Reserve Bank is reported to have refused to issue export permits covering articles made in whole or in part of silver, brass or other metals, including cloissonne, and costume jewelry. An official of the bank has stated informally that although no such restriction has been promulgated the matter is presently under consideration. The customs authorities state they have no instructions in the premises but refuse clearance without & permit from the bank. This restriction if universally applied will in effect eliminate the only remaining major export from this area. Sent to the Department, repeated to Chungking, Tientsin and Shanghai. By air mail to Tokyo. SMITH GV eh:copy 505 (CONFIDENTIAL) PARAPHRASE A confidential telegram dated March 11, 1941 from Consul Brady at Rangoon reads substantially as follows: Reliable figures show that during the two months from December 30, 1940 to February 28, 1940 there were shipped into China by the Southwest Transportation Company supplies of all kinds for the Chinese Government to the amount of 22,026 long tons. It is reported that there was reopened to traffic on March 3 the new bridge across the Mekong River which in December was badly damaged by bombing. For weeks a pontoon ferry has been used to handle traffic across the Mekong River and there is now being built & pontoon bridge. The old Mekong River suspension bridge is still in a wrecked condition. mg COPY 506 RESTRICTED 0-2/2657-220 M.I.D., W.D. No. 336 March 11, 1941 12:00 M. SITUATION REPORT I. Western Theater of War. Air: German. Daylight activity on the 10th was limited to attacks on shipping. Last night a heavy attack was made on Portsmouth. British. On the night of the 10th-11th Cologne was heavily attacked. Invasion ports, including Brest, Cherbourg and Boulogne, were also raided. II. Balkan Theater of War. Ground: Bulgaria. No change. Albania. The Italians report patrol action by the ninth army and artillery and local infantry action by the eleventh army in the Tepelini sector. The Greeks report they have repulsed strong Italian attacks along a widened front in the central sector (Tepeleni-Klisura). It would appear that the Italians are preparing for a general offensive. Air: Normal close support operations in Albania. III. Mediterranean and African Theaters of War. Ground: Abyssinia (Ethiopia). British forces have captured Dambacha and are threatening Debra Marcos 32 miles to the southeast on the road to Addis Ababa. Libya. Minor operations incident to the siege of Giarabub. Sea: The British report an Italian cruiser has been tor- pedoed and almost certainly sunk. Air: German. Harrassing attacks in the Bengazi area. British. A rather strong attack was made on Harrar, Ethiopia. Note: This military situation report is issued by the Military In- telligence Division, General Staff. In view of the occasional in- clusion of political information and of opinion it is classified as Restricted. RESTRICTED 507 CONFIDENTIAL Persphrase of Code Rediagram Received at the War Department at 10:38. March 11, 1941. London. filed March 11, 1941. 1. On Menday. March 10, British fighter planes flying at 30,000 feet carried out three offensive everys over the French coast between Calsie and Beulagne but encountered m German planes. During the preceding night no British planes vers over the Continent. 2. During the night of March 10-11 targets on Liverpeel Boy and the Betuary of the Threes were the objectives of secondary Gernea raids. The principal raid was a fairly severe German attack corried out against Porte- mouth. the extent of the damage done has not been determined. No British planes were lest. German looses were one plane which greshed. During deylight hours of March 10, 41 German please were on reconnaissance missions over the English Channel and the North Sea. Twenty-nine Germen please were platted ever Great Britein. One Germen plans was shot down and no British planes were lest. There was me damage to military installations. During the night of March 9-10 Reyal Nevy desk facilities and Army berreaks in the Portemonth agen suffered - damage. During the - night 120 German please took part in the attack en Leader. The Manston sirfield is southern Britein vis attended by 18 Garmen Messerechnidt dive beabers without ump in the early daylight hours of March 9. 3. Reyal Mr Torce operations in Middle Enstern theaters were as fellows: GOTER Italian please were shot down and 10 is probable that two ES others vere destroyed by British fighter planos over Keleyre (this my be CONFIDENTIAL Regraded Uclassified 508 CONFIDENTIAL Kersive which is the Creak seee for the island of Certa - 0-3)1 - Italian motor transport consentration and Italian forces in the visialty of Topoleni, Albenis. vere attacked w British please; Dritish bonbers mussi- fully cerried out a severe attack on the herber of the Albentes city of Durease: is the Britreen theater two Itelian please vere destroyed and the highway between Amere and Keren vis bombed: in the Libyen thester the sirfield at Trast (Tast Kessen) sad the city of Tripeli were attenked w British bombers. 4. Axis sir operations is the Middle Estera theaters ware as fellows: at Melta 18 derman planes attempted to carry out a raid but the British shot down one of the Gerara planes, demaged two others end drove off the rest; in Libya Germen bombers attacked the city of Agedabye without damage. 5. During the night of March 9-10 a British enrge beet in the Straite of Dever use sunk by Corner bombs. During the preceding day Germen benbers attecked two British norcheat convoys along the cost const of England but coused no damage. 6. During the night of Merch 7-8 Germen sirplance attacked and council minor damage to the 1,370-ten British destroyer IMPERIAL is the Nediterraness near Malte. SCANLON Distribution: Secretary of Yes State Department Secretary of Treasury Asst. Secretary of Var Chief of Staff Ver Please Division Office of Nevel Intelligence Mr Corps 0-8 CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL 509 Paraphrase of Code Radiogram Received at the War Department at 9147, March 11, 1941. Rome, filed March 11, 1941. The Italian Army now has the following divisions in Albania: 16 line infantry divisions, 5 Alpine Divisions, 2 armored divisions, 1 motorised division. In addition to these there are the corps and any troops for 6 corps and 2 armies. These figures include ass Colore groupment. At present the total strength of the any in effectives my be placed at 420,000. It is believed that an offensive is imponding. There is a report that Geleso has been given the command, but as yet there is no sufficient confirmation. FISKE Distribution: Secretary of War State Department Secretary of Treasury War Plans Division Office of Naval Intelligence CONFIDENTIAL ere

Page data

Page
2
Source index
0
Type
document
Media ID
9a8f46eb180f1792
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
28276639
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "28276639",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/28276639",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Volume 380, March 5 – March 11, 1941",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/28276639",
    "collections": [
        "Henry Morgenthau, Jr. Papers",
        "Diaries of Henry Morgenthau, Jr."
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/39/2766/28276639/content/presidential-libraries/roosevelt/FDR-MORGEN/589213/md0505.pdf",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/39/2766/28276639/content/presidential-libraries/roosevelt/FDR-MORGEN/589213/md0505.pdf",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/39/2766/28276639/content/presidential-libraries/roosevelt/FDR-MORGEN/589213/md0505.pdf",
    "imageCount": 2,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "28276639",
    "label": "Volume 380, March 5 – March 11, 1941",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/28276639"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "28276639",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/28276639",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Volume 380, March 5 – March 11, 1941",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/28276639",
    "collections": [
        "Henry Morgenthau, Jr. Papers",
        "Diaries of Henry Morgenthau, Jr."
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/39/2766/28276639/content/presidential-libraries/roosevelt/FDR-MORGEN/589213/md0505.pdf",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/39/2766/28276639/content/presidential-libraries/roosevelt/FDR-MORGEN/589213/md0505.pdf",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/39/2766/28276639/content/presidential-libraries/roosevelt/FDR-MORGEN/589213/md0505.pdf",
    "imageCount": 2,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/28276639",
    "naId": 28276639,
    "levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 2,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "document",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/39/2766/28276639/content/presidential-libraries/roosevelt/FDR-MORGEN/589213/md0506.pdf",
    "mediaId": "9a8f46eb180f1792",
    "ocrText": "329\nTREASURY DEPARTMENT\nINTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION\nDATE March 12, 1941\nTO\nSecretary Morgenthan\nFROM Mr. Cochran\nconfidential\nRegistered sterling transactions of the reporting banks were as follower\nSold to commercial concerns\n£48,000\nPurchased from commercial concerns\n£12,000\nOpen market sterling held steady at 4.03-1/2. Transactions of the reporting\nbanks were as follows:\nSold to commercial concerns\nE 5,000\nPurchased from commercial concerns\n&\nThe Argentine free peso had an easier tendency today. It closed at .2296,\nas compared with yesterday's final rate of .2303.\nIn New York, the closing rates for the foreign currencies listed below were\n11 follows:\nCanadian dollar\n15-1/16% discount\nSwies franc (commercial)\n.2322-1/2\nSwedish kross\n.2384-1/2\nReichemark\n.4005\nLira\n.0505\nBrasilian milreis (free)\n.0505\nMexican peso\n.2066\nCuban peco\n6-1/2% discount\nWe sold $998,000 in gold to the Central Bank of the Uruguayan Republic,\nwhich was added to its sarmarked account.\nNo new gold engagements were reported.\nIn London, the prices fixed for spot and forward silver were both 1/16d\nhigher, at 23-7/16d and 23-3/8d respectively. The U. 3. equivalents were 42.56# and\n42.444.\nHandy and Harman's settlement price for foreign silver was unchanged at\n34-3/44. The Treasury's purchase price for foreign silver was also unchanged at 35#.\nWe made three purchases of silver totaling 150,000 ounces under the Silver\nPurchase Act, all of which consisted of now production from foreign countries, for\n\"orward delivery.\nRegraded Uclassified\n330\n-2-\nthe Federal Reserve Bank's report of March 5. listing deposits of banks in\nAsia with the New York agencies of Japanese banks, showed that such deposits totaled\n$101,960,000. an increase of $458,000 since February 26. Also reported were the\nTokohama Specie Bank Agency's dollar liabilities to and dollar claims on Japanese\nbanks in Asia, which stood as follows on March 5:\nChange from\nMarch 5\nFebruary 26\nLiabilities:\nDeposits for Japan and Manchuria\n$56,812,000\n+ $440,000\nDeposits for China\n35,855,000\n+ 267,000\n.\n: U.S. Treas. Bills, comm. paper, etc....\n23,655,000\n- 75,000\nClaims\n: Loans\n$60,753.000\n+$6,206,000\n#\n: Other - mainly Jap. import bills\n9,991,000\n+ 346,000\nNost of the $6,206,000 additional funds received from Agency loans (made primarily\nto Japanese banks in Japan and Manchuria) were used for Japanese commitments in this\ncountry, it was reported.\npms.\nCONFIDENTIAL\n331\nBRITISH EMBASSY,\nWASHINGTON, D.C.\nPersonal and\nMarch 10th, 1941.\nSecret\nDear Mr. Secretary,\nI enclose herein for your\npersonnal and secret information copies\nof the latest reports received from\nLondon on the military situation.\nBelieve me,\nDear Mr. Secretary,\nVery sincerely your,\nHarifax\nThe Honourable\nHenry Morgenthau, Jr.,\nUnited States Treasury,\nWashington, D. C.\nTelegram from London dated March Btb, 1941, 332\n1.\nReval. horwegies loaded tanker (3000\ntone) was Bank off the set coast yesterday and a\nDritish ship (6,400 tone) outward bound in convey,\nwith general cargo, was torpodned in the North\nWestern approaches early Harch 7the\n2.\nHilitary. British Somaliland. Perfer 210\nmiles morth of Megadishu OD Harer road has been\noccupied and Belet Uen serodrome 1s fit for use;\nthe roads and bridges are intact, water plentiful\nand large quantities of petrol and oil have been\nesptured. Patrols have been sent forward to\nOddur and Dolo (North West of Lugh Perrendi). Among\nmaterial ceptured at and on the way to Mogadiscio\nare 348,000 gellone of R/T petrol and 0,000 gollone\nof evietion petrol.\n3.\nBulgaria. German reconnaissance detachments\nreached the vicinity of the Speek frontier OD March\n3rd and by March 5th the main concentrations were\ndeveloping in Sliveno Yambol area, where heavy tanks\nare reported and 10 the Strome Valley near Gorna\nDjumeya and Petrich. Estimated that B divisions of\nGermen troops are in Bulgerian territory.\n:\nBulgarian divisiomeppear to be disposed as\nfollows: Yugoslev frontier 1 motorised, 2 infestry,\n2 FOSOFVO infentry forming ...... Turkish frontier, 2\nmotorised, 7 infantry, Macedonian frontier 4 lofestry,\nSouthern Dobrudje 1 infentry. Bolhoris general heade\nquarters to reported et Store lagora.\n5. R.A.V./\nRegraded Uclassified\n333\na I I\n5.\nR.A.P. Earch 6th 1 medium bomber attacked\nrailway targets at Obent.\nSight of March 6th/7tb. Operations can-\ncelled.\nBe\nG.A.F. Night of Merch 6th/7th. 40 air-\ncraft were operating over this country but only 5\ncame inland, the reminder were mine-laying.\n7. Melts. Melta was attacked March 5th as\nreported yesterday by about 100 aircraft including\n60 bombers. Damage was slight at one aerodrome\nbut at Hal For barracks and bangers considerably\ndamaged; 4 aircraft were destroyed on the ground\nand all remaining aircraft on the serodrome were\nrendered temporarily unserviceable. 11 of our\nfighters intercepted and shot down 7 enemy circraft\nprobably so eighth and damaged four more. Anti-\naircraft destroyed a further nine and damaged four.\nOne of our fighters 10 missing.\n0.\nAircraft ensualties to operations ver end\nfrom British Islos,\nGerman destroyed one, damaged once British\nnil.\n:\nHome Security. March 7the Two R.A.F. aero-\ndromes were attacked by\n........)\nsome damage to\nbuildings but no serious casualtion.\nRegraded Uclassified\nTelegrom received from London dated arch 0, 1941.\n1.\nNoval. In the Sues Canal divers have\nlocated mines which were counter-mined, Believed\n3 mines remain to be dealtwith, expected Canal will\nbe open March 7th. Twenty-three mines were exe\nploded at verious home porte on March 7th.\n2.\nOne enemy aircraft loid mines off llayers\nPelle of Earch 7th. L.L. sweepers detonated these\nthe same efternoon. Between 14.30 and 16.30 hours\nMarch 7th six aircraft laid mines in the Humber\noutrance, fifteen were seen to drop.\n3.\non March 7th convoye were attacked by De\nboat in the Seatern approsches and off the Rest\nCoast by aircraft, and during the night of March\n7th-Sth by E-boats. of the nine ships torpedoed\nor damaged by aircraft four sinking or suck. One\nsircraft shot down one damaged.\n4.\nOn March 7th off the Book of Holland a 2500\nton merchant vessel we bombed and left sinking by\ncoastal aircraft.\n5.\nEthiopia. In Cojjem area patriot operations\ncontinue against retreating garrison of Burye. 300\nprisoners and four guas have been emptured and 80\nseroplane shot down. 1,700 desertors have surren-\ndered.\n6.\nKenya Colony. Heavy rain has fallen on\nSthiopien border end may roads ere under water.\n7.\nR.A.F. March 7th. During the day aircroft\nfrom the Coastal Command bombed SD aerodrome in\nTolland hitting hangers also navel dockyard at\nRenhelder and left 9 2,500 ton merchant vessel in 9\nsink Regraded Uclassified\n335\n- 2 -\nsinking condition off the Dutch Coast.\n8.\nNight of March 7th-Werch 8th. Operations\ncancelled.\n:\nGerman Air Force, March 7th about fifty\nenemy aircraft were operating overland in wide\nlocalities and forty more were working off East\ncoast. One enemy circraft was destroyed by enti-\naircraft shore battery and one by a Sevd trawler,\na third hit the mot of a ship and crashed.\n10. light March 7-March 8th. Activity\nnegligible.\n11. Belts. Night of Narch 6th/March 7:h.\nTwelve enemy sircraft made individual attacks on\nvarious objectives without causing serious damage\nOF casualties.\n12. March 7the Four bombers escorted by 10 MR\n109's damaged a Sunderland by machine-gun fire, shot\ndown a Glen Martin and also one Hurricase out of\nseven which intercepted. Pilot saved. Two enemy\ncircraft were probably destroyed by enti-sireroft\nfire.\n13,\nAircraft casualties to operations over and\nfrom Aritish Isles. German, three destroyed.\nBritleh nile\n14. Home Security \"arch 7th. A bell-bearing\nfactory was hit and seriously damged. hirty-six\npersons wro killed and forty-seven seriously injured:\nproduction has heen stogied probably for DOV M days.\n1\nRegraded Uclassified\n336\n8\n15. Six Royal AIr Foree stations, a balloon\nbarrage centre and an Infentry training centre were\nattacked.\nLittle damage and few casualties.\nCONFIDENTIAL\n337\nPurephrase of Code Indiagram\nBeceived at the Mar Department\nat 10:06, March 20, 1941.\nLondon, filed 15:00, March 20, 1941.\n1. On Sunday, March 9, adverse wather enused the cancellation of\nall flights of British planse. During the proceding night occupied cirfields\nin northern Frease were benbed w British Bristel Bloubeins bat there were\nas planse of the Benber Command over the Constrant because of the bad weather.\n2. Buring the might of March 9-10 German raide - carried out over\nthe Midlends, Pertomonth, Liverpool Bay ml Suffelk. 2a addition, there was\na Large smle atteck on Inim. the extent of the damage 40mg has not boon\ndetermined. During the proceding day - aircraft patrols were mintained\nover the Bover Straits and only eight them planse penstrated boyand the\ncoast line of England. British fighter please www is the air during this\nday and the following night but were unsble w intercept my of the attachers.\nBuring the night of March 6-9 tea Games planse planted nines along the\nBritish east. A total of 190 other - planon - pletted am each-\neast Britain, Portemouth, Horfelk ml Suffelk. Buring the - night Lendon\nwas attached W 60 - Gorman planse. Private property in Landon auttered\nhavey and the vaterfrust area was damged - a - Backington\nPalace gremis a Ledge - a - basto fall a - restures) in\nwhich s6 individuals was billed and - then 80 wro injured. British\nantiniveraft fire brought term three of the - planse and damaged two\nothers. Buring daylight hears of March 7 a British Informary tradaing emior,\n& ballom barrage center and six Mayal Air Terse stations www banked w\nGreena planse. A mall number of casmalties and - - resulted.\nCONFIDENTIAL\nRegraded Uclassified\n338\nCONFIDENTIAL\nDaring the - day 36 Inberers vere billed and n - injured suriously\nduring a - attack an a British ball bearing manifacturing plack.\nProduction at this plant will have to be surpended for a portod of - week.\n3. British air activities in Middle Instem themboro - as\nfollows: the Albasian city of Toyaleni we bended w British planse baned\nin in the Eritreen theater the area was attashed w\nSalan-based British benbern; in the Likynn thester British benters attacked\nthe Tripeli burber and dropped bonks on the sirfield at - (Treet Banson).\nIt is I that planse of the - Air Perso - based at this latter\nplace which is about 25 miles valid of Sixte.\n4. - air activities in the middle Bast consisted of a raid\nw five planse against Malta. British installations suffered as - and\n- of the Gurman planse - abot dom.\n5. the Baes Genal will probably be respons& to traffic w Harsh 11.\nBritish divers have send all of the state planted is the (naml w -\nplanes and only three - are to be exploied before the emal 10 completely\ncleared.\n6. A call has hours mis w the Ministry of Labor for 100,000 -\nto volunteer for service in munition ml w infestry factories. These\nvolunteers will be used primarily is filling artillery shalls.\n7. During the day and might of March 1 a British merchant -\nmake up of sine ressels - benied or torpoñood. in the Horth Sen. - of\nthe were benched and three others mis. During the only meating\nhears of March s a - education attached a British - -\n4 of 54 vessels 180 miles week of Cape Bimes, a the West - of Africa.\nFive of the - teste vere look.\nCONFIDENTIAL\nRegraded Uclassified\nCONFIDENTIAL\n339\n8. Zate in the afternoon of March s cirplense from British sevel\nwrite located the two Cumman 26,000-tem bettlechips, - use -\nhalf-way between the Cape Verio Islands and the - Islands.\nI\nDistribution:\nSecretary of Ver\nState Department\nSecretary of Treasury\nAsst. Secretary of Ver\nthief of Staff\nMar Plane Division\nOffice of Navel Intelligence\nAir Corps\n0-3\n+\nCONFIDENTIAL\nRegraded Uclassified\n340\nRESTRICTED\nG-2/2657-220\nM.I.D., W.D.\nNo, 335\nMarch 10, 1941\n12:00 M.\nSITUATION REPORT\nI. Western Theater of War.\nAir: German. During daylight of the 8th and 9th there\nwere normal operations against shipping at sea and scattering attacks\nover Great Britain. During the night of the 8th-9th a strong attack\nwas launched against the London area. This was apparently the\nheaviest German night raid of 1941. Last night the attack was re-\nnewed in less force and Portsmouth also was systematically bombed.\nBritish. Apparently no night operations. On the\n9th fairly heavy daylight attacks were made over northern France.\nII. Balkan Theater of War-\nGround: Bulgaria. No change.\nAlbania. The Greeks report their offensive\ncontinues and new positions in the Tepelini sector were occupied\ndespite strong Italian counter-attacks. The Italians admit Greek\nattacks in the sector of the Eleventh Army (southwest sector) but\nclaim they were repulsed by counter-attacks.\nAir: Albania. Considerable air activity on both sides\nin close support of the ground operations.\nIII. Mediterranean and African Theaters of War.\nGround: Italian Somaliland. British troops have\noccupied Gabredarre which is about 165 miles by road northwest\nFerfer which was captured March 5, 1941.\nLibya. The Italians report another attack on\nGiarabub Oasis by the British has been repulsed.\nEritrea. A successful counter-attack is claimed\nby the Italians in the Cheren sector.\nAir: Axis. Pressure maintained in Libya. Malta was\nbombed again on the 9th.\nBritish. No reports of activity.\nNote: This military situation report is issued by the Military 1n- In-\nGeneral Staff. In view of the occasional as\ntelligence clusion of Division, political information and of opinion it is classified\nRestricted.\nRESTRICTED\nRegraded Uclassified\n341\nTREASURY DEPARTMENT\nINTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION\nDATE March 11, 1941.\nTO\nSecretary Morgenthau\nFROM\nMr. Hear AMA\nIn accordance with your request of March 10, we are\npreparing a written analysis of the Gano Dunn report on steel\ncapacity, which we expect to complete and submit to you on\nThursday afternoon of this week. We disagree with the con-\nclusions of Mr. Dunn's report and it has taken a little time\nto assemble and organize our refutation.\n342\nSee entry of 6/5/41 which states that\na copy of the President's memo of 3/10/41\nwas given to Mr. Hopkins by HM,Jr.\n343\nThis is referred to in H Jr's report\ne luncheon meeting with the President on\n5/10 which is filed in President's folder.\n344\nHmr.\nBremse of The general\nfinancial picture Oher your\nharry up\n(a) RFC taking uses %\nBritish payments made\nfor plants\n(6) Was Dept. taking me,\nof material payments\nmade by the British\n1.b\nat Runch march 10th 1941.\n345\nMAR 11 1941\nDear Josse:\nFor your information I all transmitting here-\nwith photostat copy of a memorandum which the President\ngave no yesterday at lunch, concerning the British\nfinancial picture. As I as nov giving careful considers-\nties to the British financial requirements for each month\nfrom sev until the end of this calendar year, I would\nappreciate 10 if you vill furnish Under Secretary Doll,\nat the carliest possible mement, the amount of funds that\nthe Reconstruction Finance Corporation esa make available\neach month during this period for payments on account of\nplant facilities which 10 may take ever from the British.\nSincerely yours,\nHomesable Jesse 1. James,\nAdministrator,\nReplied to by m\nFederal Lean Agency,\nJones 3/19/41\nVashington, D. 0.\nDEBIELS\nMarch 11, 1941\nImp\nRegraded Uclassified\nSTRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL\n346\nMAR 1 1 1941\nMy dear Mr. Secretary:\nFor your information I an transmitting here-\nwith photostat copy of a semorandum which the President\ngave - yesterday at lunch, concerning the British\nfinancial picture. 4a I as nov giving careful consider-\nation to the British financial requirements for each\nmonth from nov until the end of this calendar year, I\nwould appreciate 10 if you will furnish Under Secretary\nBell, at the earliest possible moment, the amount of funds\nthat the Mar Department can make available each month\nduring this period for payments on account of contracts\nwhich 10 my take over from the British.\nSincerely yours,\n(Signed) E Marganthau, Jr.\nSecretary of the Treasury\nThe Honorable,\nReplud to by\nThe Secretary of War.\nmay. me cloy\nDVBINLE\n3/17/41\nMarch 11, 1941\nweb\nCopy to them Edelin\nBy Memeenger 230\nRegraded Uclassified\n347\nTREASURY DEPARTMENT\nFor Miss Chancey\nINTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION\nDATE March 11, 1941\nTO\nSecretary Morgenthau\nFROM Mr. Cochran\nMr. Ganson Purcell telephoned me from the Securities and Exchange Commission\nat 12:35 yesterday noon. He told me that Chairman Frank had discussed with the\nother Commissioners the question of giving publicity to the meeting which was\ntaking place at the Securities and Exchange Commission yesterday afternoon with\nrepresentatives from the investment associations in New York to study a plan for\nliquidating British investments in this country. It had been the opinion of the\nCommissioners that no publicity should be given to this meeting, considering the\nexploratory character thereof. Chairman Frank desired this information to reach\nSecretary Morgenthau before the latter's press conference. I gave the Secretary the\nsubstance of this message at 3 o'clock yesterday afternoon.\nJ.M.P.\nRegraded Uclassified\n348\nMarch 11, 1941\nSome time during the night I woke up and got the idea\nthat if we were going to refund the $500,000,000 June notes,\nwe also ought to, at the same time, raise five or six hundred\nmillion cash, and make an issue of sufficient size and do it\nall at one time.\nStrangely enough, I still remembered it when I woke up\nthis morning, and I sent for Bell and gave him this idea, and\nasked him to speak to the people in New York and find out\nwhether they have finished digesting the last issue.\n349\nMarch 11, 1941\n10:20 a.m.\nRE AID TO BRITAIN\nPresent:\nMr. Foley\nMr. Bell\nMr. Cochran\nMr. Bernstein\nMr. White\nMr. Acheson\nFoley:\nThey wanted the same control you had over the\nfour million eight hundred eighty million.\nBell:\nThey will get around now to blaming me.\nFoley:\nNo, but you remember.\nBell:\nSure. Well, that is the Budget's job. I am\nsmypathetic. It is absolutely budgetary con-\ntrol. (Laughter)\nFoley:\nSure, there he comes.\nH.M.Jr:\nAll right. Now, Merle, will you state the case\nagain, please?\nCochran:\nOn Saturday morning we considered the memorandum\nwhich had been submitted by Mr. Pinsent on\nMarch 7. It was decided that we needed more\ndata with respect to the paragraph headed\n\"Final Result\" on page four of this memorandum.\nThis paragraph reads as follows:\nRegraded Uclassified\n350\n- 2 -\n\"To cover our shortage up to August 1941 and\nto provide a cash balance on lines proposed\nin assumption six, we need assistance before\nthe end of August to the extent of three\nhundred sixty-five millions on the basis of\nthe first alternative and one hundred eighty-\nfive millions on the basis of the second\nalternative, subject to the fundamental\npoint raised on assumption three. It is\nhoped that such assistance can be provided\nin the form of the taking over after the\npassage of the bill of our existing con-\ntracts by the United States Government to\nthe extent necessary to cover the above\namounts. The taking over of capital assets by\nthe RFC will, of course, provide part of this\nassistance. For the rest, it should not be\ndifficult to select suitable contracts up to\nthe amount required. Speed of action is\nvery desirable as deliveries are constantly\nreducing the outstanding value of existing\ncontracts. Even after August, our deficit\nwill still rise for & time. This should be\nautomatically taken care of, since many of\nthe contracts to be taken over are bound to\nhave payments due after August as well as\nbefore, of which we shall be relieved. The\nmonths to August are the most difficult ones.\nThe deficit of the early months will in part.\nbe currently met from gold borrowed by the U.\nK. Government; but, as this is only a tempo-\nrary expedient and leaves a responsibility to\nrepay in gold, no account has been taken of\nit in the calculations above.\"\nH.M.Jr:\nLet me approach this thing in my own peculiar\nmanner. As of January 1, their outstanding\ncontracts were approximately a billion four?\nBell:\nThat is given in Table 1.\nRegraded Uclassified\n351\n- 3 -\nH.M.Jr:\nJust for my purposes, you see.\nBell:\nA billion three thirty.\nH.M.Jr:\nAll right, & billion three thirty. Now, this\nis the eleventh of March. We can use February\n28.\nBell:\nYes.\nH.M.Jr:\nNow, from January 1 to February 28, I want two\nfigures, I want, one, how many contracts have\nthey paid for, you see. You can get that from -\nhow much have they paid for during the month\nof January. That subtracted from a billion\nthree thirty would give us the figure on March\n1. Has anybody got the figure?\nBell:\nThe billion three thirty, Mr. Secretary, is a\nFebruary 28 figure.\nH.M.Jr:\nNo, I want the January 1 figure.\nWhite:\nI haven't got the payments on those earlier\ncontracts, but we have got the payments which\nare due on the first of each month.\nH.M.Jr:\nJust let me put it this way. Let's say it is\na billion four. This is the way I want to\napproach this thing. A billion four, January\n1. Then so many contracts, so much - - they took\ndelivery of so much stuff during January. Let's\njust say for argument's sake they took care of\nthree hundred million, which left them on the\nfirst of March outstanding one billion one of\nthe contracts which were in existence prior to\nJanuary 1, not the ones that they have written\nsince. Now, of that three hundred million\ndollars that they have paid for during the\nmonth of January, where did that money come\nfrom? In other words, how much of it came\n352\n- 4 -\nfrom the sale of securities to the stock\nexchange, how much of it from gold, how\ndid they pay for it? In other words, what\nI am groping for is this: I had mentally\nearmarked & billion four hundred million as\nof January 1 when I testified, you see. Now,\nI have said toward that there is nine hundred\nmillion of direct investments, there is six\nhundred million listed securities, and there\nis four hundred million dollars annual output\nof gold from South Africa, or a total of nine\nand six are fifteen and four are 8. billion\nnine. Now, what I want to know is, of this\nthree hundred million how much of it came from\nthose three sources. Now, is that assumption\ncorrect, Dan?\nBell:\nYour figures are about correct. It is a bil-\nlion eleven, as I understood it, instead of\na billion nine.\nH.M.Jr:\nBut my assumptions. So then we carry this\nthing along and I will tell you why I ex-\nplained it. Is there any other place that\nthey can get this - have it pledged to me\nand I in turn to Congress - the billion four\nhundred million contracts outstanding and then\nthat their listed securities, their direct in-\nvestments and their gold or anything else that\nwe counted in should go toward payment. Now,\nfor argument's sake they paid three hundred\nmillion dollars out. Now, where the hell did\nit come from?\nCochran:\nWell, they had gold which was sold on January\n2 of a hundred and seventy-six million; Jan-\nuary 30, twenty-six million; and on February -\ntwenty-six million. That wouldn't count.\nYou have a hundred million of gold there, a\nhundred ten of their securities and then some\ntaken from the balances which they had on hand\nRegraded Uclassified\n353\n- 5 -\nthe first of January.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, do you see what I want, Harry?\nWhite:\nI see what you want, yes. I am not sure that\nthat--\nH.M.Jr:\nYou mean where it is going to?\nWhite:\nNo, those first three questions are fine.\nYou want to know, A, they owed you a certain\namount on commitments on January 1. How\nmuch did they pay on those commitments? You\nknew their assets. Where did that money\ncome from? Presumably it came from those\nassets. If it did, then their present\nassets ought to be just the difference be-\ntween the two as compared to their January\n1 assets.\nH.M.Jr:\nThen on the first of March - - I mean, I don't\nknow just how we will handle it. I am groping.\nI don't know just how we will handle the con-\ntracts they have signed since then, you see.\nI don't know what I am going to do with them.\nLet me just think out loud a minute. Now,\nthey come in and say, between now and the\nfirst of August they need three hundred sixty\nmillion dollars. Is that what you have got?\nCochran:\nThat is, if they pay Canada gold.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, they are going to pay that to us.\nCochran:\nThen it is only a hundred and eighty-five.\nH.M.Jr:\nAll right. They need a hundred and eighty-\nfive million dollars. Now, I say before I am\ninterested, see, \"Gentlemen, I want to know\nwhere are you getting the cash to pay your\nbills today. In other words, are you taking\nRegraded Uclassified\n354\n- 6 -\nsome of the fat off the bone that we said we\ndidn't want? Where is it coming from? You\nsay you need a hundred and eighty million\ndollars. If Now, let me just give you this\npicture. Then they take on more contracts.\nI mean, it is like & going concern. They\nhave got so much to pay out and they have\n80 much of their assets. Which of their\nassets did they use and what is their position\nas of March 1?\nCochran:\nThey have given us that.\nWhite:\nThey have given us that.\nH.M.Jr:\nWhat?\nCochran:\nThey have given you a statement of their credit\nposition and debt position for the month of\nMarch to show how much they expect to use in\ngold, how much they expect to get from market-\nable securities.\nH.M.Jr:\nThis is for March?\nCochran:\nYes, sir.\nH.M.Jr:\nBut I - - I will come to that in a minute, but\nI want to know what happened in January. How\ndid they finance themselves in January? Now,\nthey ought to know now. I mean, I want - what\ndid they do in January? Through the Federal\nReserve we can quickly check up what did they\npay out.\nCochran:\nThat is just what I was reading.\nH.M.Jr:\nDo you know how much they paid out in January?\nCochran:\nYes.\nRegraded Uclassified\n355\n- 7 -\nH.M.Jr:\nYou told me how much gold. How much did they\npay out in January?\nCochran:\nIt isn't broken down by months here.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, it should be.\nCochran:\nWell, this comes in weekly, but I can figure\nit out.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, give it to me rough. Can you give it\nto me roughly? Take your time.\nCochran:\nJanuary 2 to 29, total debits were a hundred\nand ninety-seven million, four, paid out of\nthe account with the Federal.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, that is roughly two hundred million\ndollars.\nCochran:\nAnd that was raised by gold, one hundred mil-\nlion, securities about seventy-five, and the\nrest came out of the balance.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, did it? Then they only ate into their\nbalance by twenty-five million.\nCochran:\nI mean, I can make it accurate but that is\nroughly.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, I want it accurately now. What did they\nforecast for March?\nCochran:\nFor March they count their official dollar\nbalances as eighty-two as of March 1.\nH.M.Jr:\nRead it, I will listen to it.\nCochran:\nThe official dollar balances as of March 1,\neighty-two million dollars. Gold as of March\n1, one hundred two million.\nRegraded Uclassified\n356\n- 8 -\nH.M.Jr:\nThat is & hundred and eighty-four.\nCochran:\nNewly mined African gold to come in during the\nmonth, forty million.\nH.M.Jr:\nThat is two hundred twenty.\nCochran:\nSales of marketable securities and direct\ninvestments, seventy-five.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, that is two ninety-five.\nCochran:\nTwo ninety-nine. That is forty in marketable\nsecurities and they just guess thirty-five for\ndirect investments. That is the first time\nthey have carried any item there. So that is\ntwo ninety-nine and ten under debits is an\nexpenditure by British Purchasing Commission,\ntwo hundred fifteen million dollars. Now,\nthe breakdown on contracts placed by March\n1, one hundred seventy-five million; B, con-\ntracts to be placed in March, forty million;\nand second entry, balance of all other gold\nand dollar items, twenty-four million. Esti-\nmated balance at March 31, sixty million.\nH.M.Jr:\nLet me just see if I have got it. Roughly,\nthey figure that expenditures for March will\nbe three hundred million? Two hundred mil-\nlion?\nCochran:\nTwo hundred forty.\nH.M.Jr:\nTheir total expenditures.\nCochran:\nTwo hundred forty.\nH.M.Jr:\nTwo hundred forty and they figure they can\npick up how much money?\nCochran:\nWell, they would have a balance left of sixty\n357\n- 9 -\nmillion.\nH.M.Jr:\nAnd they started the month with eighty-two?\nCochran:\nEighty-two.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, I think we ought to take 8. careful\nlook at what happened in January. What?\nWhite:\nWe ought to be able to go over the figures\nand see how close we can come to what you\nwant. I didn't know the figures were avail-\nable that would give us that monthly payment,\nbut are those later figures than what we got\nlast week?\nCochran:\nWhat do you mean?\nWhite:\nThose that you are reading from.\nCochran:\nThese aren't complete because it is just what\nis paid out of the Federal, you see.\nWhite:\nWell, if you give us both a chance at that,\nwe can come--\nH.M.Jr:\nI am going to give you a chance and I will\ntell you why I am in no hurry. In the first\nplace, they have got plenty of money for this\nmonth and in the second place, very much in\nthis room, I can't overemphasize the confi-\ndential nature of it, I saw Lord Halifax\nlast night after I got the President's approval\nand I said if by the end of this week they\ndidn't show concrete evidence that they wanted\nto sell some of their factories, I suggested\nthat they put somebody else in charge of these\nsales. Well, he was very much disturbed and\nSir Edward Peacock is a great friend of the\nhead of the Bank of England and the thing\nwhich always riles me in these times, he has\nRegraded Uclassified\n358\n- 10 -\ngot strong political backing, you see, so it\nwould be a great to-do, to use his language,\nto sack Sir Edward Peacock. So he said he\nthought he would have after dinner - I don't\nknow whether he said Purvis and Phillips or\nPurvis and Pinsent. So I said, \"Well, you\nknow, Mr. Ambassador, through Merle Cochran\nand Phillips and Pinsent I am sure you heard\nlast week how I was distrubed about this, 80\nthis doesn't come like a bolt out of the blue,\"\nand I said, \"I cannot go on the Hill and try\nto explain on this appropriation bill why\nthe English Government has not been able to\nsell one of its many hundreds of factories\nin this country. I can't explain it! So\nhe tried every way possible to make be back\ndown. \"Do you think it is wise to tell this\nto Purvis and the others?\" I said, \"I cer-\ntainly do.\" I didn't give one single inch.\nNow, we will continue our studies, but until\nthis English industrial crowd permits its\ngovernment to sell some of these factories,\nI am not interested in their financial pic-\nture end I am not going to do a damn thing\nabout it. Now, as I told Halifax last night,\nI said, \"I don't have to tell you that I am\nfriendly to the English cause. I even demon-\nstrated it in the past,\" and he said that -\ncould he come and see me at the house if he\nhad something to say, and I said, \"Yes.\" And\nI want you to know, Merle, because you are\nmy mouthpiece on this thing, as far as I am\nconcerned you can listen, see, but until\nthese fellows come in and demonstrate con-\nclusively to me that they are going to sell\nsome factories, I am not going to see them any\nmore. I am not going to see Phillips or any-\nbody. I am not available and I just want you\nto know that, because I am not going to go up\non the Hill and the first thing - \"Well, Mr.\n359\n-\n12\nMorgenthau, give us the report on what has\nhappened, and the first thing they are going\nto ask is, \"How many properties have they\nsold, and I say, \"Zero. \"Well, why?\" I\ncan't give any answer. I told Halifax last\nnight - it was all very quiet but he used all\nhis English tradition to getme to swerve.\nMake a partial sale - not a partial sale, I\nmean a sale with partial payment. I said,\n\"There are lots of things that you can do.\"\nI read last night what they sent over to\nHopkins on this Lend-Lease to hurry the thing\nup. We signed a contract to lend-lease them\nsome cutters and then we decide afterward\nwhat the price is in order not to hold them\nup. That is our attitude. But I want a\ncomplete - I mean, it is one thing for\nCochran when he gets his orders - whether he\nbelieves in them or not, he carries them out.\nHe demonstrated that. As my representative\nwith these people, I want you (Cochran) to\nknow until they move, anything further on\ntheir financial problem just doesn't interest\nme, and I want you please to take that front\nbecause I have cleared it with the President,\nand you are representing the President and me\non this, you understand, Merle.\nCochran:\nThis is new as of today, because Saturday we\nasked them for this and last night Phillips\nwas in talking to me about this.\nH.M.Jr:\nNo, you can see them. You listen. No, this\nis the follow-up of my time when I asked you\nto send for Phillips. How long ago was that?\nCochran:\nThat was Friday evening.\nH.M.Jr:\nNot last Friday?\nCochran:\nLast Friday, yes.\nRegraded Uclassified\n360\n- 13 -\nH.M.Jr:\nOh, no, it must have been Friday a week ago\nthat you put the heat on.\nCochran:\nYes, I guess that was Friday the week before.\nH.M.Jr:\nIt is Friday a week ago. Do you want to check\nme?\nCochran:\nI will have to on that.\nH.M.Jr:\nDo you mind, right now? I would like to know.\nCochran:\nThey asked - that was when I had Playfair.\nH.M.Jr:\nJust take a minute. I will wait until you\ncome in. I told the Ambassador it was my\nimpression that 10 days had passed.\nCochran:\nI will get it.\nBernstein:\nIs this it?\nCochran:\nYes, this was on February 28.\nH.M.Jr:\nI was right. Well, that is all right. It was\nover a week. Well, now we go ahead and get\nthis stuff. Now, let me just get on this\ncontract business S0 we understand that. The\nPresident - have you people seen this note\nthat the President gave me to show the Army\nand--\nCochran:\nYou read that little short memorandum yester-\nday.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, we will put all the pressure on them,\nand I don't know whether you have those figures\nand the money that they get from there, I am\nmore than willing that they segregate that to\nbe used for - if they want to earmark it for\nstrictly English standard stuff, you see.\nRegraded Uclassified\n361\nFoley:\nWell, suppose they want to use it to meet\noutstanding commitments?\nH.M.Jr:\nThey can.\nFoley:\nUse it for any purpose they want?\nH.M.Jr:\nAny purpose that they want to, but that is why\nI want to study the January thing to find out\nexactly where they got the money from, you\nsee, and more details of where it went to. I\nmean by classifications. I mean, how much\nof it went for food, how much of it went for\narmament, how much of it went for dividends.\nI don't know what, you see.\nCochran:\nDo you want February, too?\nH.M.Jr:\nI think I would like to start with January.\nOf course, this is March.\nWhite:\nJanuary and February.\nH.M.Jr:\nI am talking two months. Yes, I am confused.\nYes, January and February. By classifications,\nI would like to get more familiar with how\nthey spend it and raising it is the easy part.\nYes, January and February. But, Dan--\nBell:\nYou just want a total? When you say classi-\nfications, you don't mean classify expendi-\ntures?\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, I was thinking - yes. No, I will tell\nyou what I meant. In one classification, let's\nsay munitions, and in another classification\nmaybe food. Another classification may be\npaying dividends. I don't know what.\nWhite:\nShouldn't one of the classifications be what\nthey paid on their past commitments?\nRegraded Uclassified\n362\n-18- -\nH.M.Jr:\nYes.\nWhite:\nThat should be one classification.\nH.M.Jr:\nI would like to play with this thing, you see,\nand get so we know really more about it. We\nhave it, but we have never examined their\nchecks that they paid through the Federal\nReserve in New York.\nBell:\nI take it, one item might very well be net\non balance of payments.\nWhite:\nI think if we could just put the questions\nthat we would like to ask, what they paid on\npast commitments, what they paid on other\nexpenditures that weren't listed in the past\ncommitments, and let them fill in the figures,\nrather than if we examine their - unless they\nhave given recently data to Merle which would\nanswer that, the data which we have up to now\nwould not enable us to answer that.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, keep after it.\nCochran:\nWell, I have passed on everything I have here\nto Harry.\nWhite:\nThen W6 haven't got the data.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, you see what I mean.\nWhite:\nI know.\nH.M.Jr:\nAfter all, if we are going to finance these\npeople, I want to know how much goes to food,\nhow much goes to non-essentials.\nWhite:\nI am wondering whether in order to enable you\nto know exactly each month what is happening,\nRegraded Uclassified\n363\n15\n- 16 -\nif you want that continued--\nH.M.Jr:\nYes, I do.\nWhite:\nWhether we couldn't set up a statement - we\nwill leave everything but the figures to be\nfilled in, which they can fill in each month.\nYou go over the statement to see that it\ncontains everything that you want in the form\nin which you want it, and then each month they\nwill fill in such figures as they have, and\nwe will fill in such figures as we have and\nmake it a current thing instead of having to\ncome back and - we get the stuff in B. differ-\nent form each time and it is impossible to\ncompare their figures.\nH.M.Jr:\nYou see, what I am thinking of, I am taking\nplenty of time. I have been operating dif-\nferently. Yesterday, you know, we gave\nplenty of time to this thing. This morning\nI have got nothing but this, you see, this\nmorning. I am practicing on you people, so\nyou can practice on me. Up to this point,\nthe President and I are together. He knows\nwhat we are doing. When they really run out\nof money I just don't know what we are going\nto do, but when we do, then all of this stuff\nthat we are talking about now, why they run\nout of it, and what they have spent, it all\nhelps, doesn't it? Now, of course what they\nare going to try to do is to put everything,\nincluding the kitchen stove, under the Lend-\nLease and we have to be prepared to say yes\nor no, and it comes back always to two things,\ntheir question of their securities and the\nquestion of their direct investments and how\nmuch of that have they used up since the first\nof January. I ought to know so that the\nPresident - \"Well, now, look, Henry, they say\nyou are being awfully tough on them, and I\nRegraded Uclassified\n364\njust want to be sure that you are right.\nNow, can we take over some of these contracts,\nor can't we?\" Which leads me to the thing -\nI mean, do you people know today how much\nthe RFC has taken over and how much--\nBell:\nThere is a memorandum here that they haven't\ntaken over any, but there are only a couple\nof them that are even close.\nCochran:\nEven then they couldn't make the funds avail-\nable until the latter half of the year, isn't\nthat right?\nBell:\nYes.\nH.M.Jr:\nDo you have that picture?\nBell:\nNo, I haven't a very good picture on it. There\nis 8. memo here that isn't very good.\nH.M.Jr:\nFrom whom? Can't we go the other way around?\nAsk Jones and the Army for a memorandum? We\nwill use the President's thing as a - you see?\nI will dictate a letter to the Secretary of\nWar and Jones, with your help, you see, using\nthe thing - saying, Would you please inform\nme how much money can we expect the English\nto get from your taking over their contracts?\"\nyou see. \"We are making our estimates from\nnow until September, and we would like to\nknow during this period of the hundred and\nthirty-four million, how much can you do,\"\nand the Army, \"How much can you do?\"\nWhite:\nAnd approximately when it will be available.\nH.M.Jr:\nAnd approximately when it will be available.\nCochran:\nThat will leave out that one thirty-four. We\n365\n-\ncan't identify that unless Ed can tell us\njust what it is.\nFoley:\nI have got a breakdown of it.\nBell:\nYou can identify a hundred and five million\nhere, but there is a difference between a\nhundred and five and & hundred and sixty-\nseven million; and, I take it, they have taken\nthese contracts of a million over in one case\nand ten million over--\nH.M.Jr:\nAre you handling that or are these fellows?\nBell:\nWell, we have all got it.\nH.M.Jr:\nWho can write a letter for me to sign to War\nand Commerce?\nBell:\nWe can, together. We can have it for you be-\nfore noon.\nH.M.Jr:\nAll right. When I see Jesse I can hand it to\nhim at lunch. Then one can go over to--\nBell:\nYes, we will take care of it.\nH.M.Jr:\nDon't you think that is the way to do it? And\nask them what they want, you see. Well, this\nis a perfect thing from the President. Simply\nsay, \"I have got to know, gentlemen, Mr. War\nand Mr. Commerce, how much money are you going\nto make available to the English and how soon.\nI think we are beginning to tie the thing in\nyou see.\nBell:\nI wonder if it would help you if you had eacy\nmonth a statement from the British just like\nour own giving cash position, giving the back\nfigures--\n366\n- 19.\n(Miss Chauncey entered the conference.)\nH.M.Jr:\nTwo photostats of what the President gave me\nat lunchfor the Army and Navy. Mr. Bell\nneeds them. He is going to prepare a letter\nfor me to sign. Please.\nChauncey:\nAll right, sir.\n(Miss Chauncey left the conference.)\nWhite:\nI think in the coming months you are going to\nbe so concerned with problems of how much\nthey are using that I think that something -\nnot half but a good deal of your problem is\nin knowing what the situation is, not in\nmaking the decision but in knowing the facts.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, what we want is, first an analysis of\nwhat they have done through January and Feb-\nruary and then a forecast like Bell makes\nthrough all the departments. I mean, our\ncash needs when we have a financing. Isn't\nthat right, Dan?\nBell:\nI think that would give a pretty good pic-\nture.\nWhite:\nThen each month or every two weeks there ought\nto be a statement which will be of a character\nsuch as will be most helpful to you, and it\nought to be the same statement, and it ought\nto be comprehensive. I think if we spend a\nlittle time drafting that up ahead of time,\nand then they can adjust their bookkeeping\nto meet that need if necessary.\nH.M.Jr:\nAnd you make up the forms. But what about the\npast stuff? The past stuff will have to con-\nfrom with the form. Will you take that?\nUclassified\n367\n-\n-\nBell:\nYes. We will bring it from January 1. We\ndon't need to go back of that, do we?\nWhite:\nNo, but it will be a current form which -\neach month you will get a similar statement.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, I think each week, Dan.\nBell:\nThat is & little difficult to change state-\nments in the future on each week. You can\nget the actual figures up to date.\nH.M.Jr:\nI think once a month is all right.\nBell:\nI think so, too.\nCochran:\nBecause we know their gold and security po-\nsition daily.\nH.M.Jr:\nThis is a good meeting. Don't you think so,\nEd? I mean, we are getting somewhere. What?\nFoley:\nSure.\nH.M.Jr:\nAnd then all of this - having this, putting\nit back, shows them how seriously we are tak-\ning the thing, and then as I say, I can go\nover and explain - now, I am just thinking\nof this. In order that I don't get the ground\ncut out from under me by the State Department,\nwhat would you think if I ask Dean Acheson if\nhe could just drop over here for five minutes\nso I could tell him exactly what our position\nis?\nBell:\nI don't get why they--\nH.M.Jr:\nWhy? So that when Halifax goes to complain\nto Mr. Hull about how ruthless I am, they\nwill have the whole picture, and they will\nappreciate it, they won't give him any sympathy.\n368\n- er -\nThis is important, high policy, and Hull\nought to know about it, and I am going to\ntry to work through Acheson.\nBell:\nWell, he ought to know about it, then, don't\nyou think?\nH.M.Jr:\nDon't you think so?\nFoley:\nI don't know how much good it will do.\nWhite:\nI am wondering whether you might not tell\nHull directly.\nH.M.Jr:\nOh--\nFoley:\nWell, he could do both, Harry. I think if\nhe is going to tell Hull directly he might\nbetter tell Acheson first and then tell Hull.\nCochran:\nWhat is the alternative to Peacock, sending\nout some new man from London?\nH.M.Jr:\nI didn't make any suggestions.\nCochran:\nIt is a rather long process, we found out.\nH.M.Jr:\nI think I did drop a hint that they might\nlet Gifford take it over.\nCochran:\nBecause he is working in there now.\nH.M.Jr:\nI did, I am quite sure. \"Gifford has done\nwell. Why not let him take this thing?\"\nCochran:\nPeacock should - now, I am not defending him,\nbecause I am not happy over his record any\nmore than you are. He ought to know something\nabout the security market here that Gifford\ndoesn't. He was head of the Dominion Securi-\nties up in Canada for years, you see.\nRegraded Uclassified\n369\n22\n-\nH.M.Jr:\nHow long ago?\nCochran:\nWell, that was some time back, before he went\nto London, but there he was head of Baring\nBrothers and has been in the Bank of Eng-\nland.\nH.M.Jr:\nI said this. I said, \"Peacock is inheriting\nthe fact that the British Government didn't\ndo anything with this beginning with last\nJune. I said, \"He is inheriting all of this,\nwhich is unfair to him, but the fact remains.\nthat somebody has to crack this thing.\"\nCochran:\nBut with the pressure you have on Purvis and\nyou have on Phillips now on holding this up,\nI think you may get some action. That is my\nguess.\nH.M.Jr:\nHolding what up?\nCochran:\nI mean holding up any conversations with them\non this matter of contracts, which concerns\nPhillips very much. I mean, he was in to see\nme last night?\nCochran:\nWell, he asked about the gold first, and I\nsaid, \"Well, we have made commitments up on\nthe Hill that the gold from South Africa and\nAustralia will be sold to us,\" and he says,\n\"Well, we have just got to build up some sort\nof reserve in so that we can take care of\nimmediate needs--\" he said, with the war\ncentering for the moment down in the Near\nEast, they ought to have gold available in\nSouth Africa to send up to Egypt and around\nthose parts. He said they don't want dollar\nbalances, they want gold there, and he said,\n\"If they give us every bit from South Africa,\"\nhe said, we just haven't got it. We would\nlike to build up a little reserve.\" He said,\n370\n22\n- 28 -\n\"We are going to be embarrassed now because\nI don't think we are getting the full pro-\nduction from the Bank of South Africa. I\ntold him that Playfair had intimated that\nproduction had fallen off. He said, \"I\ndon't think it is that, I think South Africa\nisn't getting it.\"\nH.M.Jr:\nMerle, it is your job to repeat this to me,\nsee? Now, you have done it. I am not im-\npressed with what Phillips is saying. It is\nyour job to repeat to me what he says.\nCochran:\nThat is right, because I can add to it. They\nare getting certain gold from Belgian Congo\nand Rhodesia and 80 on.\nH.M.Jr:\nI am just not impressed. Merle, I, personally,\nwant a demonstration that the Bank of England\nand what they stand for, see, really want to\nsell these assets in this country. They have\ngot to make me believe, see, and pick up\ntoday's Washington Herald and see the thing\nat the beginning - the story in the Washing-\nton Herald about how the American taxpayer\nis going to have to pay through the nose in\norder to give England this stuff. The campaign\nis started. It is in the Washington Herald,\nthe tip-off. And I forecast this thing\nseveral weeks ago, that that was what would\nhappen. Now, before I take the gaff, publicly\nand privately, for these people, I want them\nto prove t hat they want to win this war and\nthat they are willing to do everything possi-\nble to make & billion dollars worth of assets -\nturn them into cash, and give up the control\nof the American thread business in this country,\nwhich they control, and the viscose, which\nthey control, before we in turn turn over\nseven billion dollars to them. Now, I am not\nconvinced. I am asking at this moment seven\n371\n- 34 -\nfor one, and I don't know whether the Bank\nof England and that gang is running the\nBritish Government or whether Churchill is.\nI don't know. I told Berle last night - I\ndidn't tell him much, but I told him a\nlittle of this. I didn't tell him about my\nconversation with Halifax. I said, \"There\nis nobody in this town that has done more\nfor the English than I have, and Berle says,\n\"You are absolutely right.\" I need faith.\nTalk about Halifax being religious and all\nof that, I need faith, I need confidence.\nI think we are on the right track now, Dan,\nif you could get this thing up. I talked\nthis way in this room, but what is going to\nhappen when somebody from the Treasury goes\nup on the Hill?\nBell:\nIs there some indication--\nH.M.Jr:\nDo you think I am overemphasizing this, Dan?\nBell:\nNo, I don't think you are overemphasizing the\nimportance of it. I am a little bit worried\nabout his successor and the delay.\nFoley:\nDan--\nWhite:\nThat is the way to handle it.\nFoley:\nDan, if it isn't done, it is my judgment the\nfirst time you go before the committee and\nyou tell the committee that not one damn cent\nhas been realized from the sale of these assets,\nthat the committee is going to force our hand\nand turn the whole works over to the RFC, lock,\nstock, and barrel, and that is what the Brit-\nish are up against, so you are being a friend\nto the British when you are telling them that\nthey have got to show some results and giving\nthem another opportunity on their own to do\nRegraded Uclassified\n372\n- 25 -\nit, because it is the last call.\nBell:\nWell, do you help the situation by forcing the\nman in there now out when it may take months\nto replace him, weeks anyway?\nFoley:\nBut what other way, Dan, have you got of mak-\ning them realize the significance of the situa-\ntion?\nCochran:\nIf we hold up on this contract business as the\nSecretary said, that is the thing that is\nworrying Phillips most; and I am convinced that\nPhillips has the idea of selling these and\nPurvis has the idea.\nH.M.Jr:\nTrue.\nCochran:\nAnd I think that we can bring pressure on them\nto get that improved just as when you got Gif-\nford here he admitted that he had instructions\nfrom the Treasury not to go ahead. You got\nthat rectified. If you can get Gifford work-\ning in there with Peacock--\nH.M.Jr:\nMay I interrupt you? It wasn't until I got\nGifford and Phillips sitting next to each other\nthat I smoked out the fact that the Treasury\nhad not given them the instructions, see.\nCochran:\nThat is right.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, the same condition, Merle, may be true\nhere. Maybe Sir Edward Peacock hasn't got the\ninstructions.\nCochran:\nBut my point is--\nH.M.Jr:\nMaybe he hasn't got it. The two fellows sat\nthere and I took my hat off to Gifford when\nhe turned to this fellow and he said, \"You\n373\nas\n-\nnever told me to sell more than two to three\nmillion a week.\"\nCochran:\nYou remember we were pretty well fed up with\nGifford, we hoped we would get someone in\nhis place, and now he has turned out to be\na good man when he has the proper instruc-\ntions.\nH.M.Jr:\nInstead of putting the pressure on Peacock,\nwho is 69 years old and who has an expression-\nless face, I am putting the pressure on the\nrepresentative of His Majesty, the King, who\ncan take it. I am putting it - I asked you\n10 days ago to do it on his two representa-\ntives and I got nowhere. I waited 10 days,\nand then I put it on the representative of\nthe King instead of putting it on Peacock.\nBell:\nI am not so sure that that isn't where the\nfault lies. It may not be Peacock. It may\nbe just the other end, just like Gifford.\nFoley:\nThere is only one way to find out.\nBell:\nI agree to that, and I think the Secretary is\nright in putting the pressure on the Ambassador\nrather than Peacock.\nH.M.Jr:\nJust the way they sat here and kept telling\nus that they couldn't do it, they go back and -\nMerle, remind me. Then we developed that he\nnever got the instructions. Now, how do I\nknow that poor Peacock has got the instruc-\ntions to sell? Maybe his instructions are to\nstall. I don't know.\nBell:\nWell, the instructions were given out and were\nrather vague, you remember. He said he came\nover to look into the situation, not to dis-\npose of them.\n370\nWhite:\nWell, the Secretary cannot impute the good\nfaith of the British Government and the only\nposition he can take is that his man is\napparently not carrying out your instruc-\ntions competently, and therefore he wants\nanother man. That serves a dual purpose,\nit appears to me. In the first place, as he\nsays, it smokes out the real orders; and, in\nthe second place, I think, some publicity,\nboth for the British public and to the Ameri-\ncan public, is called for at this point;\nand, if the Secretary can take the position\nin the future, if necessary, that he demanded\nthe recall of this man because he didn't show\naction, he is in a much better position if no\naction is taken. If action is taken, then\nthe man can stay here.\nBernstein:\nWell, if this man is as important as the\nAmbassador says he is and--\nFoley:\nThe pressure is on the Ambassador.\nBernstein:\nThey are not going to fire him.\nCochran:\nThey are not going to make a whipping boy out\nof Peacock.\nH.M.Jr:\nHe is the second man in the Bank of England?\nCochran:\nThere is no ranking there. He is the man\nclosest to the Governor. He is & senior. He\nhasn't any position other than--\nH.M.Jr:\nIf he is as close as that to Montague Norman,\nthen this fellow Peacock is never going to\nmake a sale unless we build 8. bonfire under\nhim and put & couple of sticks of dynamite in\nit, but I don't have any confidence in Montague\nNorman wanting to give up anything and really\nwin this war. He typifies everything to me\nthat is the worst in England.\nRegraded Uclassified\n375\nCochran:\n- Did Walter Stewart speak to you the other day,\nMr. Secretary, about the idea of having these\npeople? competitors in steel and 80 on approach these\n(Mr. Acheson entered the conference.)\nH.M.Jr:\nDean, I want to tell you something that is\nimportant to us and I want Mr. Hull to know\nabout it, but I would like it guarded as much\nas possible. Yesterday at lunch I had &\nchance to sketch to the President of the United\nStates just what we were doing here in - in\nrelation to the English financing, I mean how\nall of the English money is deposited with the\nFederal Reserve of New York as our fiscal\nagent and we know how much money they have put\nin and how much they have spent each week and\nhow we have Phillips here representing the\nTreasury and how we are in constant touch with\nthem and get the amount of their sales each\nday of their securities and now Sir Edward\nPeacock is here supposedly to sell their\ndirect investments, 80 the thing all flows\nhere.\nNow, the Army is supposed to be in & process\nof taking over English contracts where they\nhave made down payments, you see, and the RFC\nis supposedly in the process of taking over\ntheir contracts where they have created plants.\nAs far as we can find out, the RFC hasn't con-\nsummated a single contract and if the Army\nhas done anything, they have done five million\ndollars worth of it. We are trying to find\nout how much it all amounted to. The reason\nfor this coming to a head is that Phillips,\nSir Frederick Phillips came in last week and\nsat down and said, \"What are you going to do\nabout our financial situation?\" and I said\n\"What do you mean?\" We have been trying to\nget a lot of information. Now, the situation\n376\non the first of January, roughly, was that\nthey had commitments for about a billion\nfour hundred million dollars of contracts\nin this country, and we are going to analyze\njust how much of those were for munitions\nand how much for other things than muni-\ntions, also how did they raise the money.\nWe think we know, but we want more informa-\ntion. Then Bell is going to prepare for\nthem a sheet just like We have as to the\nfuture needs, how much they are going to\nspend and how they are going to raise it,\ngoing through to their war year, which is\nSeptember 1. Now, in my testimony on the\nMill I pointed out as of January 1 they had\noutstanding about E. billion four. To pay\nfor this, they had somewhere around nine\nhundred million dollars worth of direct\ninvestments end six hundred million dollars\nworth of securities. We have been unable,\nor they have been unable, they claim, to\nsell a single factory in this country,\nalthough we have been after them since lest\nJune. Friday a week ago I had Cochran send\nfor Phillips and Finsent, the financial\nattache, and tell them that I was very much\ndisturbed about this, it was most embarrass-\ning, I might be asked any time on the Hill\nwhy they don't do it and 50 forth and 80 on,\nand that they just hed to get busy and make\ngood on this thing and never mind all the\nreasons why. They just had to produce and\nshow that they were willing to sell some of\nthese investments. Well, yesterday I asked -\ntold the President if he approved that I would\nlike to tell Halifax that unless by the end\nof this week they demonstrated they were go-\ning to sell some of their direct investments,\nthey had better recall Sir Edward Peacock, who\nwas in charge of these sales, and I got the\nPresident's approval to do it, and I told\nRegraded Uclassified\n377\n,\n-\nHalifax last night and he was very much\ndisturbed and told me what great political\nbacking Peacock has. It always irritates\nme when they talk about political backing\nbut ask how they are going to win the war.\nWhy am I 80 exercized? Well, somebody in\nthe Treasury, when this appropriation goes\nup on the Hill, has to review the English\nfinancial situation before the Congress of\nthe United States is going to vote \"X\"\nbillions of dollars under the Lend-Lease\nBill and particularly since the plan now is\nto put it all in one bill, and I pointed out\nthis morning the campaign is open in the\nWashington Herald for all the increased\ntaxes we are going to have to pay for what\nwe are going to give to England. The posi-\ntion which I am taking is that until I get\nan answer from Halifax - I want to point out\nthis. Several months ago I kept saying,\n\"Why don't you sell more securities?\" and\nthey said they couldn't. They were selling\nfrom one to three million dollars. I got\nGifford and Phillips sitting next to each\nother, and when I kept saying to Gifford,\n\"I know you can sell more, that the American\nmarket will absorb it,\" he finally turned to\nPhillips with a flushed face - but he says,\n\"My instructions from the British Treasury\nare not to sell any more,\" and then Phillips\ngot flushed, as a result of which beginning\nwith the next week they sold ten million\ndóllars a week and I think every week after\nthat they have done 50.\nCochran:\nThey have kept it up.\nH.M.Jr:\nThey have averaged ten million a week. Now,\nI don't know that Peacock has the instructions,\nreally, to sell these businesses or not and\nuntil they do it, there is no reason, no\n378\nmatter how much Purvis, whom I have the\ngreatest confidence in, tells me that they\nare his instructions - but he doesn't know\nany more than - until I made it so unpleasant\nfor Gifford that in anger he turned on\nPhillips and says, \"Well, I haven't got the\ninstructions from the British Treasury.\"\nNow, what I am preparing to do is to sit\ntight here and do nothing after my notice\nto Halifax with the British on their finan-\ncial situation until they make some move.\nNow, they are all right for the rest of the\nmonth. They admit they are all right, you\nsee. They have got enough money. They are\nall right. So they are not going to default\non any contracts. Nothing scandalous is go-\ning to happen. But somebody from the Treasury\nis going to have to go up within three or\nfour days on the Hill and one of the first\nthings they are going to ask is, \"Well, what\nabout their financial condition?\" Now, the\nfinancial crowd in New York has been per-\nfectly swell, because Peacock has treated\nthem absolutely shamefully. Reputable\npeople have gone in and said, \"We would like\nto have & chance to figure on such and such\na thing, If and he treats them like dogs. I\nget this from the SEC all the time. Differ-\nent people call them up, and he either can't\nsee them or won't see them, people that have\ngot the cash and want to buy these different\nbusinesses, and I just wanted to get the\npicture. We have it from the British. The\nArmy is supposed to buy - pick up the con-\ntracts where they have made down payments\nand the RFC is in the process of picking up\nany plants that they own in this country,\nbut pending hearing from these people, in\norder that I keep faith with Congress and\nthey keep faith with me, they have got to\nkeep my morale up and say that they mean to\n379\n36\n- 22 -\ndo what they say, never mind the difficul-\nties. The President - I have his complete\nbacking. Now, why do I send for you? In\ncase they go to do the baby act over there\nand complain about me, I would like to feel\nthat the State Department will say, \"Well,\nthis is a Treasury matter, it is a hundred\npercent finance, and either hands off or\nif you - I mean, I am not asking you. If\nMr. Hull or whoever sees the English would\nsay, \"Well, we think until you have complied\nwith what the Treasury is asking, that the\nposition that they take of going on a sit-\ndown strike is right,\" but the least I would\nlike to have is hands-off, you see, because\nI am sure that Halifax is going to run to the\nState Department and try to get sympathetic\nhearing for this - whatever kind of treatment\nhe calls it, I am giving it. Now, you can\nask me questions because I am full of this\nand you are not, but I wanted you to get it.\nAcheson:\nThe Army is to pick up the contracts on which\nthey have already made down payments?\nFoley:\nBritish supply contracts.\nAcheson:\nAnd the RFC is to take over the financing of\ntheir plant buildings?\nFoley:\nWell, they own certain plants all over the\ncountry, powder plants and ordnance plants\nand airplane plants, title to which is in\ncorporations wholly owned by the British\nGovernment.\nAcheson:\nAnd the RFC is going to buy those from them?\nFoley:\nYes.\n380\n32\n-\nAcheson:\nWell now, what are the proceeds of these\nfor? sales of private businesses going to be used\nH.M.Jr:\nTheir own British standards, that was the\nunderstanding I had with Purvis. To be used\nfor things of British specifications.\nWhite:\nHe said - he wanted to know what the proceeds\nof the sale of the private businesses would\nbe for.\nH.M.Jr:\nLet me go back first. The money that they\nget, I will come to that. The money that they\nget from the RFC and the Army would be, so to\nspeak, free money that they could use for\nanything that they wished to. The thing that\nPeacock gets is pledged by me to the Congress\nagainst a billion four of contracts that they\nhad outstanding on the first of January.\nAcheson:\nI see. The actual financing of the billion\nfour is - so far as the American suppliers\nare concerned, is supposed to be taken care\nof, 1, by the Army, and 2, by what Jesse\nJones produces, is that right?\nH.M.Jr:\nThe billion four outstanding on the first of\nJanuary, as I testified, would be taken care\nof, 1, by the six hundred million dollars\nworth of U.S. listed securities; 2, the nine\nhundred million of direct investments; and\n3, the four hundred million dollars output\nof the South African gold mines.\nAcheson:\nWell, now, where do the Army and Jesse come\nin on this picture?\nH.M.Jr:\nThe Army and Jesse come into the picture that\nthey are in the process of picking up the\nfactories that they have invested in, the\n381\n33\n- 34 -\nadvance payments in the case of the Army\nthat they have made on contracts.\nFoley:\nThat doesn't amount to so much.\nH.M.Jr:\nNo, but anyway - and that money, my under-\nstanding with Purvis was that they could feel\nfree to use that for anything they wished to.\nAcheson:\nOn new orders?\nH.M.Jr:\nAnything.\nFoley:\nUnder the Lease-Lend Bill, stuff that we\ncouldn't use.\nH.M.Jr:\nAnything that these - it was free for them\nto use any way that they wished to. It wasn't\nobligated.\nAcheson:\nI see. That is a backflow to them?\nH.M.Jr:\nYes.\nAcheson:\nAnd when the Army reimburses them for down\npayment that they have made, is the Army going\non with further payments or are the further\npayments part of the one billion four?\nFoley:\nThe Army will assume those contracts.\nAcheson:\nBut the one billion four are some wholly\ndifferent contracts?\nFoley:\nYes, they would be different contracts.\nH.M.Jr:\nNo, they are part of the same thing. They\noverlap.\nWhite:\nThere are a few of those contracts which\n382\n- -35 -\napparently the Army will be able to take\nover, but it will not amount to a great deal.\nH.M.Jr:\nFifty million dollars.\nBell:\nWon't it be largely these new contracts that\nhave been entered into since January l?\nH.M.Jr:\nNow, since January 1 the thing that we have\ntried to keep very, very secret here, because\nI have risked my neck, I told Congress that\nfor all ostensible purposes all buying had\nstopped. Instead of that, I let them average\nthirty-five million dollars a week new pur-\nchases and if I ever had been called up on\nthe Hill I just never could have explained\nit.\nAcheson:\nI think I have it clear.\nH.M.Jr:\nDo you want to go over it again?\nAcheson:\nThe only thing I am not quite clear about is\nthe Army and the RFC.\nFoley:\nMaybe we can give him the amounts.\nH.M.Jr:\nGive him everything.\nAcheson:\nI see that the British have commitments of\n& billion four.\nH.M.Jr:\nAs of the first of January.\nAcheson:\nWhich they have got to take care of by the\nsale of their six hundred million dollars of\ndirect investments, the nine hundred million\nor privately owned plants and things of that\nsort in this country, and four hundred million\ndollars of African gold. Now, the six\nhundred million is going ahead all right.\n383\n35\n- 36 -\nThe four hundred is presumably all right.\nBut they are getting nowhere on the nine\nhundred.\nH.M.Jr:\nThat is right.\nAcheson:\nAnd then I understand what you said about\nPeacock and that situation and what you would\nlike the State Department to do. The thing\nthat I am not quite clear about is where the\nRFC and the Army come in or whether it is\nimportant that they come in at all.\nH.M.Jr:\nIt is only important in this way. When we\nwere worried about the money, everybody got\ntheir heads together and there were to kinds\nof contracts. There was one where, for in-\nstance, they made a twenty-five percent down\npayment and McCloy, in order to try to help\nthis thing out, said, \"Well now, we will\npick up those, you see.\nAcheson:\nThat is, that our Army would take over those\ncontracts?\nH.M.Jr:\nAssume them. The only one they have done is\nKelsey Wheel.\nAcheson:\nThat takes it right out of the billion four?\nH.M.Jr:\nYes.\nFoley:\nIf it was part of the billion four. Those\ncontracts might be the ones that were entered\ninto subsequent to January 1 in some instances.\nAcheson:\nI see.\nH.M.Jr:\nNow, the Army couldn't assume plants, so they\nwent to the RFC and they said, \"Jones, will\nyou buy the powder plants that the English\n384\n- 87 -\nhave built in this country?\" and supposedly\nthey amount to a hundred and thirty-four\nmillion dollars. If the information is cor-\nrect, to date, although he has been on it\nfor weeks and weeks, he has been unable to\nconsummate a single British contract.\nAcheson:\nThat they could apply to the billion four?\nH.M.Jr:\nYes, or to anything else that they needed.\nBut you can see what an impossible position -\nI told this to Halifax - I would be in to go\nup on the Hill and they say, \"Well, all right,\nnow, Mr. Morgenthau, how about these English\nfactories? What has happened to them?\"\n\"Well, I am terribly sorry, but the English\njust haven't sold any. Now, there is no\ndanger in this thing, because they are all\nright, certainly for another month and maybe\nanother couple of months, but certainly we\ncan see daylight and they admit they are for\nthe rest of this month, so by sitting still\nand saying I won't do anything until they move\non the direct investments, I am no endangering\nanything, you see, other than our relations\nwith them, but I thought it was important\nenough that you ought to know about it and\nHull ought to know about it, so whoever re-\nceives Halifax, if he brings it up, you would\nbe posted, but it isn't the kind of thing that\nI would want to pick up in the papers and\nread, you know.\nAcheson:\nYes.\nB.M.Jr:\nI needn't point that out.\nAcheson:\nNo, I can understand that. And the British\ndid come down and start talking with you\nabout this and then you discovered that they\nare not moving forward on the nine hundred\nRegraded Uclassified\n385\n37\n- 36 -\nmillion?\nH.M.Jr:\nOh, yes.\nAcheson:\nAnd so in talking with the President you said\nwhat you wanted to say to Halifax, which was\nthat if they don't make some headway by the\nend of the week they would have to recall\nPeacock?\nH.M.Jr:\nThat is right. And mind you, Friday a week\nago, Cochran told the English financial\nrepresentative how upset I was about it and\nso they have had ten days' notice and they\njust had to do something. He told them this\nFriday a week ago. And since Friday a week\nago to yesterday, nothing happened. Now,\nthere is one other thing. In the course of\nmy putting this pressure on them, they came\nthrough with this letter which - who helped\nus on that?\nCochran:\nLivesey.\nH.M.Jr:\nWhich they said this pressure goes back to\nabout a month ago. It is about a month, isn't\nit, roughly? And I have been putting this\npressure on them steadily so they came back\nand said, \"Well, that is all right. We will\nassign all of these properties to the Presi-\ndent of the United States.\" Of course, I\nsaid the President didn't want to take this\nresponsibility and I advised him not to. But\nwe left the whole matter in suspense. We\ndidn't turn it down and we didn't say yes.\nI want you to know that they have tried every\nway possible - I told Peacock it is very nice\nof him to give this to the President of the\nUnited States, but we have got to look to them\nto do this. We don't want the President of\nthe United States to sell English holdings in\n386\n38\n- DS. -\nthis country. But the matter is so that we\ncould always say, \"All right, now we will\ntake it over. You make out a deed to us and\nwe will take over all of these properties.\"\nAcheson:\nI think I have got it straight, and I will go\nright over now and see Mr. Hull.\nH.M.Jr:\nIf you want anything - Merle sees the finan-\ncial people, Merle Cochran, so if you want to\nrefresh yourself, I think if you want to call\nhim to come over and see you, he will be glad\nto do it.\nAcheson:\nAll right, fine.\nH.M.Jr:\nMerle Cochran.\nAcheson:\nYes.\nH.M.Jr:\nBecause he is on the State Department payroll\non a lease-loan to us and we are very glad\nto have him, 80 if you want something or Mr.\nHull wanted to get it word of mouth what did\nI say to Pinsent or Phillips, Cochran has all\nof that.\nAcheson:\nI will speak to Mr. Hull right away and then\nif you want to say anything further, we will\ncall Merle.\nH.M.Jr:\nAll right, fine. I appreciate your coming\nover. But this is the kind of thing that\nyou can be useful on.\n(Mr. Acheson left the conference.)\nBell:\nGive the Secretary of War and Jesse Jones a\ncopy of this?\n387\n39\n- 10 -\nH.M.Jr:\nYes. Well now, doesn't that finish that\nchapter? I think it is good to tell Dean.\nYou know, he has come over here and he wants\nto help. Don't you think so?\nBell:\nDean is all right.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, is there anything more on this?\nCochran:\nThere is just that one point, you asked for a\nletter on the gold. You remember, the British\nhad raised the question of their negotiations\nwith Canada? They had two points in there.\nOne covered the lease-lend part, as far as\nparts and materials; and the other on the gold.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, I want them to - excuse me, was it a\nletter to us about the gold?\nWhite:\nIt was a memorandum.\nCochran:\nIt was & memorandum.\nBell:\nYou had asked for a reply, which Merle was\npreparing to go back.\nH.M.Jr:\nWhere is that?\nCochran:\nHave you one?\nWhite:\nWe have three replies, one of which Bernie and\nI recommend. I haven't seen his, although we\nprimarily recommend no written reply. Bernie\nand I definitely feel there should be no\nwritten reply, but we have written replies\nprepared.\nH.M.Jr:\nIf I could go along with that and delegate\nMerle Cochran, the next time they come in,\nto simply say, \"Gentlemen, we want the gold\nto come here rather than to Canada.\"\n388\n- 41 -\nWhite:\nI am wondering whether you would want to\nput it that way or maybe you would want to\nput it that you don't feel it appropriate\nfor you to comment on what they do with\ntheir funds, indebtedness to foreign coun-\ntries. All our concern is that they make\ntheir commitments here, because I am wonder-\ning whether they wouldn't use that informa-\ntion in Canada and make it a little diffi-\ncult for us. Put it the other way around,\nMerle. If you take a note, simply say that\nwe have been counting on it and all they have\ngot to do is read the Secretary's testimony.\nCochran:\nI didn't get to talk with Harry and Bernie\nbecause they were working on it last night\nwhen Phillips was with me, so I have just\ndrafted & note in which I quoted your testi-\nmony up on the Hill.\nH.M.Jr:\nMay I see it?\n\"Dear Sir Frederick:\n\"By memorandum dated March 5, 1941, you raised\ntwo questions. The first was an inquiry as to\nwhether I would see any objection to Great\nBritain paying Canada in gold to the extent\nthat you may have gold available for that pur-\npose in the future. You explained that this\nwould not cover more than a fraction of the\nadverse balance with Canada, and that gold\nso utilized would reach United States eventu-\nally in payment of Canada's adverse balance\nwith the United States.\n\"It will be recalled that in the data prepared\nwith your assistance and submitted to Congress\nby me, we estimated for the current calendar\nyear Australian gold exports to the United\nStates at $75 millions and South African\n389\n41\n- 42 -\nexports of gold at $480 millions. (see\npage 11 of Part 1 of \"Hearings before the\nCommittee on Foreign Relations, United\nStates Senate, on S. 275.\")\n\"May I also invite your attention in this\nconnection to the following extract from\nmy testimony before the Committee on\nForeign Affairs, House of Representatives,\nas reported on pages 64 and 65 of the volume\nof Lend-Lease Bill Hearings.\"\nI think this, unless there is some good reason,\nMerle, that you think otherwise, I would show\nthem this part of my testimony, you see. I\nmean, just lift my testimony out of this\nletter. I wouldn't send them the letter.\nAnd simply say, \"This is what Mr. Morgenthau\nsays and he hasn't changed his mind any since\nhe has testified.\" What do you think about\nthat?\nBell:\nThat is all right. Is it in there that this\ndata that the Secretary gave to the committee\nis with the approval of the British Govern-\nment?\nCochran:\nI said prepared with their assistance.\nH.M.Jr:\nAnd you could add on there, \"approved.\"\nWhite:\nWell, they gave it to us.\nBernstein:\nWell, there is a point in the testimony where\nyou make it perfectly explicit that you were\nsubmitting the information with the approval\nof the British Government.\nH.M.Jr:\nLet's just rehearse. Let me say it and you\npeople disagree, if you wish to. I would send\nRegraded Uclassified\n390\n42\n- A3 -\n-\nfor these people and say, \"We have considered\nthis and I would like to show you a copy of\nMr. Morgenthau's testimony and the position\nhe took in regard to the disposition of the\nAustralian and South African gold and his\nposition hasn't changed any. Is that enough?\nCochran:\nI prefer it that way.\nH.M.Jr:\nYou prefer it that way?\nCochran:\nYes.\nH.M.Jr:\nEd?\nFoley:\nYes.\nH.M.Jr:\nBernie?\nBernstein:\nQuite all right.\nH.M.Jr:\nHarry?\nWhite:\nAll right.\nH.M.Jr:\nIt is unanimous.\nCochran:\nJust that last paragraph. You know they raised\nin a memo two questions and I say, \"As to your\nsecond question with respect to the applica-\ntion of the Lend-Lease Bill to American parts\nand materials entering into Canadian-manufac-\ntured munitions for Great Britain, I beg to\ninform you that this question is having the\nattention of the Treasury during its study of\nthe general problem of operating under the\nLend-Lease plan.\"\nH.M.Jr:\nI don't think I would say that.\nCochran:\nI mean, they have raised that question.\n391\n- 44 -\nWhite:\nI would just ignore that part of it.\nH.M.Jr:\nI would just answer him on the gold.\nWhite:\nThere is just one question, in order not to\nmake it possible for Canada to misunderstand\nor to raise any difficulties, if they do ask,\n\"Well then, is it that the Secretary wants\nus to pay the gold to him?\" I am wondering\nwhether a statement to the effect that the\nquestion as to how the British Treasury shall\nmeet its commitments to other countries is not\na matter on which the Secretary feels he can\nappropriately express an opinion might not be\nmade? Then they wouldn't be able to go to\nCanada and say--\nH.M.Jr:\nIf you fellows could only see each other be-\nfore you see me, you see. I don't know why\nit can't be done.\nWhite:\nWell, we were all tied up until the last minute.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, just at this time - I am tired now and -\nI don't want to go any further just now. Show\nthem that testimony.\nCochran:\nAll right, and I will tell them the considera-\ntion of anything else is deferred.\nH.M.Jr:\nBut please, gentlemen, before you come in\nhere, try to see each other and show each other\nyour memoranda.\nWhite:\nIt was just impossible. He (Cochran) was with\nBell this morning and we were waiting in his\noffice.\nH.M.Jr:\nHe was what?\nCochran:\nI was with Dan trying to get the corrections on\nRegraded Uclassified\n392\n- 45 -\nthis thing. We were going over this because\nthere were errors in it which--\nWhite:\nThere was a desire to get together.\nH.M.Jr:\nThere was a desire?\nCochran:\nOh, yes, I should say SO. But last night I\nwas seeing Phillips when they were working.\nH.M.Jr:\nJust so that the intentions are good.\nCochran:\nThe very best.\nWhite:\nThen Merle Cochran will not tell them that you\nwant all the gold to come here, rather than to\nCanada?\nH.M.Jr:\nWhat he is going to say is, there is my testi-\nmony in which I say that the gold should come\nhere. I mean, \"Mr. Morgenthau's position is\nas he testified.\" Isn't that what you under-\nstand?\nCochran:\nYes.\nH.M.Jr:\nDoes anybody object to him saying this is my\ntestimony and my position is just what it was\nthen? Now, from that they could only draw one\nconclusion, that we wanted it to come here.\nWhite:\nBut they won't be able to tell the Canadian\nGovernment that you want all their surplus dol-\nlars to go to you and not to the Canadian\nGovernment, and that is the only thing I\nwanted to avoid.\nH.M.Jr:\nThey will put me in the wrong light whatever\nway you do it.\nCochran:\nYou would rather have it in writing, Harry?\nRegraded Uclassified\n393\n45\n- 46- -\nWhite:\nNo, I think you should tell' it to them orally.\n394\nDear Sir Frederick:\nBy memorandum dated March 5, 1941, you raised two\nquestions. The first was an inquiry as to whether I\nwould see any objection to Great Britain paying Canada\nin gold to the extent that you may have gold available\nfor that purpose in_ the future. You explained that\nthis would not cover more than a fraction of the adverse\nbalance with Canada, and that gold so utilized would\nreach United States eventually in payment of Canada's\nadverse balance with the United States.\nIt will be recalled that in the data prepared with\nyour assistance and submitted to Congress by me we\nestimated for the current calendar year Australian gold\nexports to the United States at $75 millions and South\nAfrican exports of gold at $480 millions. (See page 11\nof Part 1 of \"Hearings before the Committee on Foreign\nRelations, United States Senate, on S. 275.\")\nMay I also invite your attention in this connection\nto the following extract from my testimony before the\nCommittee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives,\nas reported on pages 64 and 65 of the volume of Lend-\nLease Bill Hearings:\nSir Frederick Phillips, K.C.M.C.,\nUnder Secretary of the British Treasury,\nWashington, D.C.\n395\n- 2 -\n\"Mr. Tinkham. Every year Great Britain is receiving gold\nfrom South Africa where it is mined to an extent of $700,000,000\nto $750,000,000. What reason is there, that you know of, why\nthat gold in due course and under proper arrangements should\nnot be transferred to us? I mean, of course, as security and\ncollateral for what we may advance it which may be an unlimited\namount.\n\"Mr. Morgenthau. Mr. Tinkham, under that section B(3) it\nsays South African exports of gold, $480,000,000, which they\nadvise me is the amount which would flow to the United Kingdom.\nThere is $480,000,000. We have also listed in Australian gold\n$75,000,000.\n\"Mr. Tinkham. We will not dispute about the amount. I have\nseen seven hundred to seven hundred fifty million dollars\nrepeatedly stated as the amount of gold produced in the Rand\nin English publications, which I could submit to you. If they\nare submitting a larger amount and we have notices of approxi-\nmately the amount of $450,000,000 or $750,000,000, or as I\nsuggested, $700,000,000, why should not they transfer it to\nus as collateral against such loans as we are making so the\nAmerican taxpayer does not have to meet their bills as is pro-\nposed in this legislation?\n\"Mr. Morgenthau. You and I think alike on this point. I\nbelieve that any amount of South African gold that the United\nKingdom receives during this year they should use to pay for\nmerchandise which they buy in this country.\n\"Mr. Tinkham. Now, have they been doing that, do you know?\n\"Mr. Morgenthau. They have been paying their bills.\n\"Mr. Tinkham. But you do not know whether they have used\nthat or whether they are segregating that, cacheing it, as it\nwere, in London?\n\"Mr. Morgenthau. No.\n\"Mr. Tinkham. Or even selling it to us, of course, at a\nvery heavy profit at the present prices you are paying for gold?\n\"Mr. Morgenthau. That is something else again. They have\nbeen selling us most of their South African gold and they\npropose to sell us all the South African gold that they produce.\n396\n- 3 -\n\"Mr. Tinkham. Sell us! Yes; but do you not think that where\nwe are to let them have an unlimited credit it should be given\nus as security and as collateral annually?\n\"Mr. Morgenthau. I do not think you really mean that.\n\"Mr. Tinkham. What did you say?\n\"Mr. Morgenthau. I do not think you really mean that.\n\"Mr. Tinkham. Certainly, I do, Mr. Morgenthau; I am always\nvery serious.\n\"Mr. Morgenthau. These figures which I presented here today\ninclude, I believe, all of the gold that will be mined in South\nAfrica and Australia within this coming year and they need all\nof that gold and all of the securities of their citizens and\nthey need all of the investments they have in this country to\nraise sufficient dollars to pay for the orders already placed\nhere.\"\nThe foregoing paragraphs indicate the commitments which I have\ngiven Congress insofar as current production of South African\nand Australian gold is concerned.\nAs to your second question, with respect to the application\nof the Lend-Lease Bill to American parts and materials entering\ninto Cnadian-manufactured munitions for Great Britain, I beg\nto inform you that this question is having the attention of the\nTreasury during its study of the general problem of operating\nunder the Lend-Lease plan.\nSincerely yours,\nSecretary of the Treasury.\n397\nTREASURY DEPARTMENT\nmot\nINTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION\nDATE March 11, 1941\nSecretary Morgenthau\nTO\nFROM Mr. Cochran\nSTRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL\nIn accordance with the decision reached at this morning's group meeting on the\nBritish financial position, Under Secretary Bell, with a suggestion now and then on\nBy part. drew up a list of forms which we contemplated submitting to the British\nTreasury representatives here with the view to obtaining from them regular and uniform\nmonthly reports upon their financial position, both with respect to current assets and\ncommitments and prospective receipts and disbursements.\nAt 3:15 I telephoned Sir Frederick Phillips that we had this plan under vay and\nhoped that he would let his assistants meet with us this afternoon to see whether our\nforms were workable from the British standpoint, and to suggest any amendments.\nPhillips agreed with this and had Messrs. Playfair and Allen of his staff meet with\nMessrs. Bell, White and myself at 4:15 this afternoon. The forms which had been pre-\npared in Mr. Bell's office were studied and some alight amendments thereto made. The\nBritish representatives took the forms away, with the understanding that they would\nstudy them and report back to us any new suggestions that might require consideration\nBefore the system is set into operation.\nHMR\nRegraded Uclassified\n398\nMarch 11, 1941\n3:00 p.m.\nRE TAX PROGRAM\nPresent:\nMr. Gaston\nMr. Foley\nMr. Bell\nMr. Sullivan\nMr. Blough\nMr. Tarleau\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, I see Tarleau and Blough. It smells\nlike taxes.\nSullivan:\nDid you see the headlines in the afternoon\npaper?\nH.M.Jr:\nNo.\nSullivan:\nSeven billion for the Lend-Lease.\nGaston:\nGone up?\nSullivan:\nWoodrum made the announcement coming out of the\nWhite House this morning. He said everybody\nin the conference except one was agreeable.\nTaber was there, and he spoke of his having been\na severe administration critic, the inference\nbeing that he was the one who had protested.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, what do you Coast Guard fellows want\ntoday?\nSullivan:\nWell, we have a variety of schedules here,\nRegraded Uclassified\n399\n- 2 -\nstarting in with invested taxes that would\nyield a billion six --\nH.M.Jr:\nExcuse me. Coast Guard is life-saving, isn't\nit? Take it all back.\nSullivan:\nAnother schedule of two billion one, 8. third\nof two billion and a half, a fourth of three\nand a half and a fifth at just about four\nbillion.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, this is the Roosevelt-Bernie Baruch\nplan, you see. The President doesn't know\nwhether these figures are correct, but he\nthought invested business on the present\nschedule would give us two billion more\ntaxes. Yes? No?\nSullivan:\nWell, there is an estimate in your report that\nan increase from - in national income from 90\nto 100 million would give an increase in revenue\nof two billion two.\nH.M.Jr:\nMy report?\nSullivan:\nYes, sir.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, do you expect it to be a hundred on the\naverage in the next fiscal year? It is 78.now.\nSullivan:\nI think they are planning about 84.\nFoley:\nWhen?\nBell:\n1941.\nFoley:\nJune 30, '41?\nBell:\nCalendar year, which affects your 1942 reve-\nnues, materially.\nSullivan:\nThat is right.\n400\n- 3 -\nBell:\n1942 calendar year hasn't been estimated,\nbut it is assumed that on the present upper\n95. trend, it will go to 90 or better, possibly\nH.M.Jr:\nCalendar year, how much?\nBell:\nEighty-five, I think. It is close to 80 now.\nH.M.Jr:\nSeventy-eight was the last I heard.\nFoley:\nWell, that is a jump of five since when?\nBell:\nSince last January.\nFoley:\nSince January 1, '41?\nBell:\n'Forty.\nFoley:\nOh, you mean in fourteen months?\nBell:\nNo, the estimate in January, '41, was 79 and\na half, and the estimate in January, 1940, was\n74.\nH.M.Jr:\nWhat we are talking about, isn't it, is how\nmuch business for the calendar year - let's\nsee, six months of '41, isn't it?\nSullivan:\nYes.\nH.M.Jr;\nAnd twelve months in '42?\nSullivan:\nYou mean on these taxes?\nH.M.Jr:\nYes.\nSullivan:\nYes, except on the income taxes. They won't\ncome in - there will be six months of fiscal\n'42.\nRegraded Uclassified\n401\n- 4 -\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, have you struck a kind of an average\nfor the year that we are talking a bout?\nSullivan:\nYou mean --\nH.M.Jr:\nIn the calendar '40 year - how much will\nbusiness be in the '42 calendar?\nBell:\nForty-two or '41?\nH.M.Jr:\nForty-two.\nBell:\nIn the '41 calendar year, I think our estimates\nwere based on 85.\nH.M.Jr:\nYes, that is what you said, 84?\nBell:\nI don't know. We have no estimates for '42,\nbut there has been talk that it might go up\nto 90 or 95. I don't know whether the capacity\nis there or not.\nH.M.Jr:\nLet's just say we strike an average of 90.\nHow much revenue will that produce on the\npresent bill?\nSullivan:\nIt would be well toward two billion dollars.\nH.M.Jr:\nThen his figure of around two was right. You\nget two more. What he spoke about is two more\nand a billion and a half new taxes. Now, how\nmuch would that give us in revenue, gents?\nSullivan:\nWell --\nBell:\nAbout 12.\nSullivan:\nNot quite that.\nBell:\nWell, 11.7.\nRegraded Uclassified\n402\n- 5 -\nBlough:\nYou mean gross, or after Social Security\nis pulled out?\nBell:\nNet. Eight, two plus three, five would be\neleven, seven. Just a little under twelve\nbillion. That is net.\nH.M.Jr:\nTwelve billion and how much are we going to\nspend?\nSullivan:\nEighteen.\nBell:\nThat is about right, 18 or 17.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, that is two-thirds.\nBlough:\nThat was before Lease-Lend.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, I know, but it is two-thirds. That would\nbe perfect.\nBell:\nAnd if your capacity increases and your national\nincome increases, your revenue will again go up\nto take care of the increased expenditures on\nthe Lend-Lease Bill in 1943, if necessary.\nSullivan:\nI think the country --\nTarleau:\nThat is good.\nSullivan:\nwill take something more than that. I\nthink you can take a lot more than that with-\nout in any way interfering with your borrow-\ning plan.\nBell:\nGod, he is driving us!\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, what figure are you shooting for?\nSullivan:\nI have got them all the way up to four.\nRegraded Uclassified\n403\n- 6 -\nH.M.Jr:\nDo it the way friend Willkie does, throw &\ndart, and pick one.\nSullivan:\nWe think we could take four without throwing\nin a monkey wrench.\nH.M.Jr:\nYou mean four on top of the two?\nSullivan:\nThe two isn't anything that anybody is giving\nus. That is something we are giving them.\nH.M.Jr:\nThat is a volunteer offering.\nSullivan:\nNo, I mean because business is better, they are\nearning that much more. That isn't an increase\nin taxes.\nGaston:\nI think John is right.\nSullivan:\nI don't think we ought to talk at all about any\nadditional yield because of improvement of busi-\nness conditions.\nH.M.Jr:\nAll right, we will just gracefully accept two\nbillion more --\nSullivan:\nWhen, as, and if we get it.\nH.M.Jr:\nAnd you want how many more taxes on top of that?\nSullivan:\nI am willing to go the whole way, sir, and I\nthink they will take it.\nH.M.Jr:\nI wondered why you invited Herbert.\nGaston:\nI didn't know until now. I didn't know until\nnow.\nH.M.Jr:\nYou know what we call it up in Duchess County?\nIt is 8. horse shedding. S-h-e-d, for some of\nyou boys who haven't lived in the country.\nRegraded Uclassified\n404\n- 7 -\nBell:\nWhat is wrong with taking that much?\nFoley:\nIt all depends on how you do it.\nBell:\nWe will take it out of the lower brackets.\n(Laughter.)\nFoley:\nWe are against that, aren't we, Dan?\nBell:\nYes, we certainly are. We have got to do\nsomething about the ones we have got on the\nbooks now.\nGaston:\nIt is a long time before we can foresee any\nreduction in Federal expenditures, a long time.\nIf the war is suddenly over, we are going to\nhave domestic expenditures on a much higher\nscale than we have ever had before.\nH.M.Jr:\nYou are one of these spending boys, are you?\nGaston:\nNo, I am one of these --\nBell:\nRealistic.\nGaston:\nYes, one of these \"balance the budget\" fellows.\n(Laughter.)\nI am quite serious about it. I think we have\ngot to get down to business.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, what would four billion do to whom and\nwhere and how?\nFoley:\nYes, with which and to whom?\n(Laughter.)\nH.M.Jr:\nI may like it, you know. Cheer up, Herbert.\nRegraded Uclassified\n405\n- 8 -\nYou might just as well smile while we are\nall operated on.\nGaston:\nI hardly can.\nSullivan:\nOf that four, half would come from income\ntaxes, 353 million from estate and gift\ntaxes, 645 from corporation taxes, 350 from\nliquor, 200 from tobacco, 200 from increased\ntaxes on automobiles and gasoline, 132 and\na half million on the \"Bell\" tax --\nBell:\nIs that all? A nickel 8. bottle?\nH.M.Jr:\nWe just fixed Pepsi-Cola up. Are you going\nto take it away from them?\nBell:\nIt did all right last year. It earned $24 a\nshare.\nSullivan:\nJohn Burns is counsel for them, and he says\ntheir only worry is that the water rates will\ngo up in New York City. That is, it is a very\nimportant item in the cost. I had the mis-\ncellaneous tax outfit working on your (Bell's)\ntax, and of course, we have to tax the drinks\nthat are sold at the soda fountains, the\nflavoring and the --\nBell:\nSure.\nSullivan:\nAnd the water, carbonated water, and in order\nto equalize the tax with the tax on bottled\ngoods, we have to tax the goods three times as\nmuch as it sells for.\nH.M.Jr:\nO.K.\nSullivan:\nNow, I have receipts for all of you of all of\nthese different schedules.\nRegraded Uclassified\n406\n- 9 -\nR.M.Jr:\nAll right.\nI don't like Herbert when he is so serious\nabout this thing. This is a plan to raise\nadditional --\nBell:\nHave you got anything here to raise income,\nsalaries or anything?\nGaston:\nThat is what we are trying to raise, salaries.\nBell:\nOr reduce our installment payments.\nM.M.Jr:\nI told you the joke about the President,\ndidn't I? I think it is the best joke I have\nheard yet. You can't repeat it. He says,\n\"Now, Henry, when you get down to line 31 on\nthe income tax, it says - say your net income\nis about $5000. Then what I want you to do is -\"\nI can't remember whether I did - but he says,\n\"In line 32, we just add two per cent to he\ntax.' So I said, \"Mr. President, have you made\nout your income tax yet?\"\nHe said, \"No.\" And I said, \"Well, when you\nget to line 32, you will find it is 10 per cent.\"\nHe said, \"Well, I haven't got down that far yet.\"\nDon't you love it? He had discovered something\nnew.\nSullivan:\nBaruch may want to do that same thing over again,\nand that doesn't solve any problems at all.\nH.M.Jp:\nThat is what he wants. He wants line 32, you\nsee --\nSullivan:\nBaruch has been giving Harrison 8 awful lot of\nstuff, and Harrison called me yesterday after-\nnoon and wanted to know if I wanted to see him\nRegraded Uclassified\n407\n- 10 -\non anything right away because he was leaving\nWednesday for four or five weeks in Arkansas,\nand he sounded as though he was not at all well.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, here is the thing that amused me. Bell\nand Jesse Jones and I had lunch together today,\nand I said, \"How about the Baruch plan?\"\nJones said he spent the last two weeks here,\nnot lobbying, just visiting.\nI said, \"Have you heard about the Baruch plan?\"\nHe said, \"Sure, it is all right for Bernie,\nhe has only got tax-exempts. He likes to write\nthe ticket. He has only got tax-exempts.\"\nI don't see anything in here on apples.\nSullivan:\nNo, we are saving that until after the war.\nH.M.Jr:\nYou fellows are certainly full of pep and\nvinegar, aren't you?\n(The Secretary held a telephone conversation\nwith Mr. Harold Smith.)\nRegraded Uclassified\n408\n- 11 -\nH.M.Jr:\nWhat you heard, gentlemen, is in the room,\nif you please. I was putting on a show for\nthe benefit of Smith and not for you.\nSullivan:\nPurvis was called down to the Embassy last\nnight about 11:00 o'clock.\nH.M.Jr:-\nWas he?\nSullivan:\nWe were having dinner at Forrestal's, and I\ndrove him down, I thought it must be important,\nor they wouldn t have called at that hour.\nH.M.Jr:\nHe was sent for?\nSullivan:\nYes, he was.\nH.M.Jr:\nI happen to know what it was. It was as a\nresult of a conversation that I had that they\nsent for him. He didn't know what it was, I\nknow he didn't.\nSullivan:\nWell, he wouldn't have told me anyway if he did.\nH.M.Jr:\nHe didn't know what it was, but that is amusing,\nisn't it?\nSullivan:\nWe had a little game of poker in which he won\nmost of the money, and Knudsen says, \"This is\nLease-Lend poker.\nH.M.Jr:\nIs Purvis a good poker player?\nSullivan:\nHe said he hadn't played. I hadn't played for\nfifteen years, and I was the only one who won\nany money, so I couldn't say.\nH.M.Jr:\nYou and Knudsen and Forrestal, and who else?\nSullivan:\nAnd Ralph Budd and Admiral Towers. Ingersoll\nwas there and Blandy, the Speaker, and Vinson,\nRegraded Uclassified\n409\n- 12 -\nthe Chairman of Naval Affairs. Dean Acheson\nwas there.\nH.M.Jr:\nWas it fun?\nSullivan:\nIt was all right.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell now, look, I don't see why I should waste\nyour time. This is all very clear, and I am\ngoing to take this home tonight and study it.\nTomorrow is Wednesday, isn't it?\nSullivan:\nThat is right.\nH.M.Jr:\nAnd --\nSullivan:\nThe last ones, 5A and 5B are just alternative\nchoices.\nH.M.Jr:\nI will take this home and study it.\nSullivan:\nWe have felt that this Excess Profits Tax is\npretty unsatisfactory, and we are not hopeful\nof working out a fair and equitable tax at all.\nI think we can get the Undistributed Profits\nTax back up there on a tray, and I think we can\nget as much money as we are going to get out of\nExcess Profits and not nearly half the expense\nor half the grief, or half the casualties to\nconcerns we shouldn't want to penalize.\nH.M.Jr:\nI am going to continue this discussion at 10:15\ntomorrow morning.\nSullivan:\nYes, sir.\nH.M.Jr:\nYou gentlemen are all invited. I would like to\nstudy this.\nBell:\nYou probably won't be able to sleep.\nRegraded Uclassified\n410\n- 13 -\nTarleau:\nThat is what I did. I didn't sleep. Now I\nfeel a little better. When you assimilate\nit, you feel a little better. I feel much more\ncheerful today than at the first look at it.\nSullivan:\nIt only hurts for a little while. You will\nnotice that there aren't any sales taxes.\nH.M.Jr:\nWe gave - we had lunch with Jones. I said,\n\"Well, Bell and I figured that before this show\nwas through, we would have to spend 50 billion\ndollars for armament.\" Jones jumped back. That\nis what we figured.\nGaston:\nI should say that the British will need pretty\ndesperately around 12 billions, at a rate of 8.\nbillion a month, as fast as we can get to it.\nRegraded Uclassified\n411\n1\n2\n992.3\n3\n1,140.7\n4\n1,700.0\n11111\n5\n2,020.0\n6\n203.0\n7\n322.0\nRegraded Uclassified\n412\nFine to raise et edditional $1,650 million of MIN w\nfourse\nindividual 1800mg tests\n. 904.0\nIncrease earber return by adopting (2/7/2) attached rate scholule\nletate ADÁ an will\n103.0\n(1) Increase the estate tes rates by admiting the strached\nrute scheduler and (2) increase the ein tax rates to\nthree-guarkers the rates to (1/22/41) the attached subside\nCorporation twing\n575.0\n(1) Issues profits taxi Increase rutes and review base\n300.0\n(2) Normal taxt Increase mas on all corporations 15\n75.0\n(Not an official\nsen crining\n132.5\nIncose a 122 on bettled soft drinks at the rate of 1 cent\nper bettle with equivalent taxes on unbottled drinks and\nformain syrupe\n(1/31/42)\nCheck tax\n56.0\nthe 2-cent sheck tax which vos imposed by the\nSevenue net of 1932\n(1/22/41)\nAdmissions tax\n55.0\nReduce the complion under the adminisms tax from\n20 cente to 9 combe\n(1/22/41)\nAutomebiles\n40.0\nImpace 15 additional 2 persent tax on the Item\ncovered in See. 3403(b) of the 1. 8. s.\n(1/2/41)\nLiques\n192.2\nDistilled spirite: Additional 81 per galles\n135.0\n7ermated milt liquers: Additional #1 per barrel\n55.0\nvines, cordials and liquears: Insurance of 16 2/3%\n2.2\nnear stock taxes (first year only)\nMetilled spirits, $1 per calles\n(29.0)\nFerusated mit liquers, $1 per barrol\n( 3.0)\n(11/29/40)\n1,657.7\n1/ limites for individual Issue taxes are on basis of salendar year 1941\nlevels of Income all other estimates are at becluse levels actimbed\nfor the fiscal year 1942. the date when the estimate - min to given\nin paranthesis after each -\n37159a\nRegraded Uclassified\nPlan to relse MR. additional $2,150 addition of mass 3/\nfoures\nI -\nI\n(In\nincome -\na 992.3\nIncrease warter rates by adopting attached rate schedule,\nwithout defense tax\n(2/11/41)\nlatate and an taxes\n103.0\n(1) Increase the estate tax return w addipting the\nrube scheduler and (2) increase the an las rules so\nthree-quarters the rutes in (1/22/41) the attached schedule\ncorreration texas\n575.0\n(1) Excess profits taxes Increase rates and revise Inco\n500.0\n(2) Normal taxt Increase rate on all corporations 25\n79.0\n(Not as official cettinte)\nSaft drinks\n132.5\nImposs a tax on bottled soft details as the rate of\n1 cost per bottle with equivalent two on unbettled\ndrinks and fountain cyrups\n(2/31/41)\nChedr tax\n56.0\nthe 2-seals chedr tax which vas Impost w the\nRevenue les of 1932\n(1/22/41)\nAdmissions 192\n55.0\nReduce the exception under the advissions tax from\n30 comic to 9 combe\n(1/22/41)\n10.0\nAutomobiles\nImposs - additional 2 percent tax on the Issue\ncovered in section 3403(b) of the 1. R. c.\n(1/2/41)\n192.2\nliques\nDistilled spirite: Additional #1 per gallen\n135.0\nTermented malt liqueres Additional $1 per berrel\n53.0\nVines, cerdials and liqueres: Increase of 16 2/35\n2.2\nTlear stock - (first year only)\n(29.0)\nDistilled spirite, 61 per calles\nPermited malt liquore, 81 por barrel\n(3.0)\n(11/29/40)\n2,146.0\nV Extimates for individual income was are on basis of colonder your 19d\nlevels of income all other octivates are at lovels astimated\nfor the fiscal year 1942. The date when the astimate wis máil to given\nin parenthesis after each -\nHire\n3/12/19\nRegraded Uclassified\nPLan to raise a additional $2,600 million of w\n-\n$2,120.7\n1 after w adverting ettached she\ninstating defense team\n(2/11/42)\n196 -\nm.e\nfor changes (1) Incluse ememption from $40,000 to\n$25,000 (2) adopt the abtached estate ten Pute schoduley\n(3) reduce emelusion from $40,000 to $25,000\nno les charges (1) the excuption from $40,600\nto $25,000; (2) Increase the ein - name to -\nfourthe the in the proposed (1/27/41) estate tax eshotule\ncommission -\n575-0\n(1) facture profite taxt Insurance rubee and revice Insue\n500.0\n(2) Normal taxt Insurance rube - all 15\n75.0\n(Nos M official estimate)\nMA\n132.5\nIncose à Vax an bettled oft drinks at the rute of\n1 and per bettle with equivalent teams an whettled\ntrising and fountain eyrope\n(1/31/41)\nPark M\n96.0\nthe 2-ml check the which - Expend w the\nIncome 10% of 2952\n(1/22/41)\nW\n35.0\nRedome the emergen under the addressions too from\n20 cambe to 9 embs\n(1/22/01)\nwho\nImpose as additional 2 persons tex on the Items\nrequired in esotion 3403(b) of the I. 2. c.\n(1/2/42)\n198.2\nDisailled spirites Additional 61 per gallen\n135.0\nPurchased mall liquires Additional 63 per -\n93.0\nVines, and 15quirments Insurance of 16 2/36\n2.2\nFLOOR stock - (ftret year enty)\nDistilled spirite, 61 per milm\n(29.0)\nTermined malt liquire, 01 per barral\n3.0)\n(11/29/40\nItem\n70.0\nof cigare, tobacco and smith Dealso rates\n2,982.4\n(Not in official catimate)\nV Revientee for individual Income - are 8 basis of minder your 1901 Lovels of\nof\nBest- The all date other which estimates the assissio are of - bestages is lovels given applicated permissions the the first\n3/22/18\nRegraded Uclassified\nPlan to nis n additional $3,600 aillies of - w\n415\nI\nMichael Lease compliens to $500 the stagle potion and $1,000\ninsure\n$1,700.0\nfor a nurried persons and Increase Wis - by\nadopting attached mis asholule, without defense the\n(Date a efficial\n-\n58.0\ntex\n(1) Retmon specific emergéion from\n140,000 to 225,000 (2) adopt the attached - vate\n(3) reduce insurance anstruction from $40,000 to\n$25,000\nan w changes\n(1) the specific exemption from $40,000 to $25,000\n(2) increase the are tar makes to the mail\nis the propered estate tax edents\n(1/27/41)\n-\n573.0\nprofite tax: Insurence Febes and revise base\n500.0\n(2) formal texas Insurence rule a all experiations 15\n75.0\n(Not a efficial extimate)\n350.0\nMotilled spirits: Additional $2 per callen\nmalt liquires Additional #2 your burrel\nVince, certicle, and liquires 33 1/35 insurance\n(Not - official exhámate)\nI\n200.0\nDigurations Additional 75 ombe you 2,000\n130.\nMainfasture of edgars, tabacco and units\nIsside rates\n70.\n(Not - efficial astimate)\nteam, including guapline\n800.0\nItems covered is Som. 3403(b) end y403(a) of\nCodes Deahle reter\ná\nGeopline taxes Increase 1/2 cost per salles\n120.\n(Not - official estimate)\na drinks\n132.5\nTypece a be es bettled soft drinks of the rute\nof 1 - per bittle with equivalent - -\nmistled drinks and formish\n(1/31/4)\nto\n56.0\n- the 2-mmil check ton with - invoiced w\nthe - in of 1932\n(1/22/41)\nbe\n53.0\nthe complies unless the abtained tax from\n20 - to 9 mate\n3,509.5\n(1/22/20)\nStinates for Issue taxes are - hands of 1 191 Levels of\n- all other entimates are at Instruct Lovels critinated for the Road your 15th\n1 1 & provided 2 5 I 2 1 de the a\nLife\n1/12/92\nRegraded Uclassified\nPlan to mine - additional a Williem of - 1/\n216\nI\nI THE -\nwill\nteam\n$2,000.0\n60 6500 the stagle persons and $1,000\ntoo a narvice yearson and insurer - más to\nadming attached vote with defenses to\n(Ret - efficial\n353.0\n(1) specific complies from $40,000 to $25,000\n(2) Adopt the attached estate tax vale athedule,\nwith defense tax\n(3) - insurance enslusion from $40,000 to $25,000\n(1) the specific emplishen from $40,000 to $25,000\n(2) Increase the an too reles to the subse\nis the propert estate tue with defirmen 9am\n(Thes at official contrato)\nMM\n635.0\n(1) profise taxi Insurance rules and series base\n500.0\n(2) Form) tast Increase mis M all corporations 15\n75.0\n(3) Capital stock last fames rate to 01.90,\nincluding information for\n60.0\n(Not M efficial assignée)\nMost\n350.0\nMattiled spirites Additional $2 per palles\nmalt ligers Additional # per burrel\nVisas, certicle, mé liquires 33 2/32 improve\n(Not on official outimate)\nbeen\n200.0\nAdditional 75 embe per 1,000\n130\n- of dan, totume and units\nDrable rules\n(Not a afficial estimate)\nTO\ninstating positive\n200.0\nI'm arread is less. yes(b) and yhoy(e) of\nCode: Deable rules\nso\nCoceline taxt Insurence 1/2 out per gallen\n120\n(200 a official astimate)\n132.5\nImposs & to e bettled coft drinks at the não of\n1 - per bettle with equivalent - on unhobiled\ndrinks and eyesys\n(1/32/49)\nshe\n- the 8-seal check tax which - Impossible by the\n- of 1932\n(1/22/41)\n35.0\nthe examption valor the to them 20\n-\n- be , -\n(1/22/42)\n3,999.5\nletimites for individual Endome - are - mm of your 1991\nLevels of Income; all other estimates are at Instruct 100030 estimated to\nthe flease year 1942. the date - the nations - más to given in\nparenthesis after and -\n1/22/13\nRegraded Uclassified\nPlan to reles - attivienal A William of - w\n417\n-\n-\n$2,000.0 w\nLeast complete to 1800 the stagle your and $3,000\nfor a morted person and terresse our - w\nattended rube substale, with éther tax\n(Thes an afficial estimate)\n-\n353.0\n(1) Income specific exception from $40,000 to $35,000\n(2) Mopt the attenhed estate tax take askedule,\nwith defense tax\n(3) Income Insurance comination from $40,000 to $25,000\n11) Yednes the specifie emerghten from $40,000 to $25,000\n(2) Increase the an tax values to three-Courths the nim\nin the propesed cotato tax schedule, with deferme to\n(Nos is official estimate)\nCommission -\nGus.0\n(1) Capital stock - Insurance sube to $1.50,\nincluding issuess tax\n60.0\n(2) Terml taxi Insurance rute %\n360.0\n(3) Undistributed profite taxes Tenant the 1936 Law\n225.0 &\n(Not - afficial estimate)\nHost\n350.0\nMotilled spirites Additional R per allm\nFemaled mill liquires Additional 42 per burrel\nVisa, certials, and liquires 33 2/35 Insurence\n(Yes an official catimate)\nM\n!\n200.0\nCigarettes: Additional 75 certe - 1,000\n130\n- of cigars, tobacco and saff:\nDealth miss\n(Not as efficial catizate)\nTO\nAnterabile tesps, instating quality\n200.0\nItems covered is mee. 303(b) and 3403(e) of\nlew Intite Pates\nso\nGasoline taxt 1/2 - pay failen\n120\n(Not M efficial catimate)\nleft drinks\n138.5\nSeport a M on bottled ecft drive at the n/o of\n2 - per bottle with equivalent Issues is whethin\nwith and fundain agrego (2/31/12)\n36.0\n- the 3-ecut check tax which me Impossed w the\n- wh of 2932\n(1/22/42)\nMalasters top\n55.0\nTodato the constion under the addissions tax from\nDD only to , cashs\n(1/22/41)\n3,991.9\n2/ Primates for individual 1 - are an basic of year 1941 levels of\nthe indivent offert of the undictributed prodite tall to - Late 1\n- 1942, the date who the estimate me más is gives is permitheris d'w to -\nall other cotinates we all business Legala cottinued w the flood each year\n24158\nthe attates for the individual I -\n3/12/21\nRegraded Uclassified\n418\n1\nIndividual arter rate schodule\n6504 million. vith defense tax\n(setimated calendar 1941 Issue levels)\nSuries not Income $\nI\n(1a themseds\nI\nIndest rate\nI\nTotal earlas\nof dollars)\nI\n(Pereant)\nI\ncomminative\n$ o -\n2\n4\n.\n80\n2 -\nh\n6\n200\n4 -\n6\n8\n360\n6 -\n8\n10\n560\nE -\n10\n12\n800\n10 -\n12\n14\n1,080\n12 -\n14\n16\n1,400\n14 -\n16\n15\n2,760\n16 -\n18\n20\n2,160\n18 -\n20\n22\n2,600\n20 -\n22\nz\n3,080\n22 -\n26\n27\n4,160\nx -\n32\n30\n5.960\n32 -\n38\n33\n7.940\n38 -\ns\n36\n10,100\ndate .\n50\n40\n12,500\n50 -\n60\n16.900\n60 -\nTO\n47\n21,600\nTO -\n80\n50\n26,600\n80 -\n90\n53\n31,900\n90 .\n100\n%\n37.500\n100 -\n150\n58\n66,500\n150 -\n200\n60\n96,500\n200 -\n250\n6a\n127,500\n250 -\n300\n64\n199,500\n300 -\n400\n66\n225,500\n400 -\n500\n293,500\n500 -\n750\nTO\n468,500\n750 - 1,000\n72\n245,500\n1,000 - 2,000\n73\n1,378,500\n2,000 - 5,000\nya\n3,994,500\nOver 5,000\n75\n-\nTitle\n3/12/41\nRegraded Uclassified\n419\n1\nComparison of surber rate under present law and progoaal\nnot\n-\nleaders rate\n-\ntotal verious\nLacous\n4\nI\nletter\n(1000)\nNEW\n-\nI\n0 -\n2\n-\n4\n-\n8\nSO\n2 -\n4\n-\n6\n-\n200\nis -\n6\n4\na\n$\nso\n360\n6\n8\n6\n20\n200\n360\nI\n-\n10\n#\n12\n360\n800\n10\n-\n12\n20\n24\n560\n1,080\n12\n-\n2k\n12\n16\n800\n1,400\n14\n-\n16\n15\n15\n1,100\n1,760\n16\n-\n18\n18\n20\n1,460\n2,160\n15\n-\n20\n21\n22\n1,880\n2.600\n20\n.\n22\n24\n2,360\n3.000\n22\n#\nx\n27\n3,440\n4,160\n26\n-\n32\n30\n30\n5,240\n5,960\n32\n-\n38\n33\n7.280\n7.940\n38\n-\n54\n36\n9.300\n10,100\n-\n90\n40\n11.780\n12,500\n50\n-\n&\n16,100\n16,900\n8\n-\nTO\n20,880\n21,600\n70\n-\n8\n50\n50\n25,800\n26,600\n80\n-\n90\nR\n53\n31,100\n31,900\n90\n-\n100\n56\n36,780\n37.500\n200\n-\n150\n58\n58\n69.780\n66,500\n150\n-\n200\n$\n95.780\n96,500\n200\n-\n250\n62\n126,700\n127,500\n250\n-\n300\n158,700\n159.500\n300\n-\n400\n224,780\n225,500\n400\n500\n192,780\n293,500\n500\n750\n467.780\n468,500\n750 - 1,000\n047.780\n648,500\n1,000 - 2,000\n1,377.780\n1,378,500\n2,000 - 5,000\n3,597.780\n3,998,900\nOver 5,000\n-\n.\nT:1bfa\n3/12/41\nRegraded Uclassified\n120\n1\nCamparises present and prepaned individual Income taxes\non not Incomes of colected sises w\nmarried person - as dependents\nE 1\nI\nmembers of tax /\nI\nFates\nI SERVICE\nbefore personal\n-\nPresent\n1\n1\nPresent\nI\navenythem 2/\nI\nProposal\nI\nI\nProposal\nI\nlaw\nI\nLaw\nAmount\nPercent\n-\n$\n2,500\n$\n11\n$\n33\n.4%\n1.3%\n$ 22\n200.05\n3,000\n31\n75\n1.0\n2.5\nlake\n141.9\n4,000\nR\n158\n1.8\n4.0\nas\n125.7\n5,000\n110\n264\n2.2\n5.3\n154\n140.0\n6,000\n150\n370\n2.5\n6.2\n220\n146.7\n5,000\n327\n625\n4.0\n7.5\n306\n97.2\n10,000\n528\n924\n5.3\n9.2\n396\n75.0\n12,500\n058\n1,364\n6.9\n10.9\n506\n39.0\n15,000\n1,258\n1,874\n8.4\n12.5\n616\n49.0\n20,000\n2.336\n3,106\n11.7\n15.5\nno\n33.0\n25,000\n3.643\n4,635\n15.4\n18.5\n792\n20.6\n50,000\n14,128\n14,920\n28.3\n29.8\n792\n5.6\n75,000\n27,768\n28,560\n37.0\n36.1\n792\n2.9\n100,000\n43.476\n44,268\n43.5\n40.3\n792\n1.8\n500,000\n330.156\n330,504\n66.0\n66.2\n648\n.2\n1,000,000\n717.584\n718.232\n71.8\n71.8\n6kg\n.1\n5,000,000\n3,916,545\n3.917.196\n78.3\n78.3\n648\nUnder the proposal the attached vertax rate schedule is mistituted for present\nvehedule.\ncursed Income assumed,\nIncludes 10% defense tax.\nLoss than .05 percent.\nhas\n1/12/41\nRegraded Uclassified\n421\na\nIndividual oursex rate schedule\n6 998.3 ailliem, without defense wa\n$1,075.9 million, with defense tax\n(Extinated calender 1641 issume levels)\nBartax net income I\nBrachet rate\nI\n(ia thousands\na\nI\nTotal curtax\nof dollars)\nI\n(peresat)\nI\ncumulative\n6 0 -\n4\n4\n4\n240\n4 -\n6\n4\n400\n6 -\n8\n18\n640\na -\n10\n15\n240\n10 -\n12\nao\n1,540\n12 -\n24\nas\n1,840\n14 -\n18\nso\n8,440\n15 -\n18\n86\n8,140\n10 -\nto\n$\n5,940\n20 -\n22\n45\n4,840\nst -\n25\n50\n6,340\n26 -\n80\n&\n9,090\n30 -\n50\n00\n21,000\n00 -\n100\nan\n51,590\n100 -\n150\n62\n62,500\n160 - 200\n48\n114,000\n200 -\n850\n66\n146,090\nR50 - 500\n\"\n179,090\n$00 - 400\n64\n247,090\n400 - 500\nTO\n$17,000\n500 - 1,000\n78\n677,090\n1,000 - 2,000\n78\n1,407,000\n2,000 - 5,000\n74\n3,687,000\nOver 5,000\n75\n-\nThat\n5/11/41\nRegraded Uclassified\n122\n1\nComparison of earter ashedules\nunder present law and proposed Schedule a\nSustem\ndirecked rates (Peranch): Total mides selative\nnet income\nI Present\n-\nPropess)\n.\nPresent\nI\n($000)\nI\nlaw\nI\nI\nlaw\nPropessi\n8\n0\n-\nR\n-\n6\n-\n180\n2 -\n6\n-\n6\n-\n640\n4\n6\n$\nB\n40\n400\n6 -\n6\n6\n18\nBOD\n640\na -\n10\n8\n25\n380\n040\n10 -\n12\n10\nNO\n500\n1,360\n12\n-\n14\n12\nis\n000\n1,040\n14\n-\n10\n15\nso\n1,100\n2,440\n16\n-\n10\n28\nas\n1,460\n5,140\n16\n-\nto\na1\n$\n1,060\n8,040\nto\n-\nIt\n24\n45\n2,350\n4,840\nat\n-\nRS\nBY\nso\n5,170\n0,540\n25\n-\n20\n27\nE\n$,440\n6,890\n26\n-\nso\n20\n46\n4,840\n9,000\nso\n-\nSR\nDO\nw\n8,240\n10,200\n82\n-\n38\nIS\n90\n7,220\n15,000\nse\n-\n44\nN\n60\n9,380\n17,480\n44\n-\nso\n8\n40\n11,780\n$1,000\n50\n-\n60\n44\nB\n18,180\n27,190\n60\n-\n70\n47\n61\n20,850\n$3,890\n70\n-\n80\nS\n25,880\n59,350\n00\n-\n90\n#\n$1,100\n45,480\n90\n-\n100\nas\n56,780\n61,500\n200\n-\n180\nse\n65,750\n62,590\n160\n-\n200\n60\n85,700\n114,090\n200\naso\n64\n106,760\n146,000\n250\n300\n44\n150,700\n170,000\n500\n-\n400\n£24,760\n247,000\n400\n800\nTO\n$17,060\n500\n750\nTO\n457,750\n49Y,090\n750 - 1,000\n72\n18\n647,780\n877,080\n1,000 - 2,000\n78\n15\n1,577,760\n1,407,080\n2,000 - 6,000\nN\n%\n8,567,780\n5,627,050\nOver 6,000\n75\n76\n-\n-\nTimes\n5/11/41\nRegraded Uclassified\n$\nComparism of present and propesed individual income taxes on net incoues of solected alsoe\nMarried person - no dependents\nBet income I\nAmount of tex\nI\nEffective retails\nI\nincrease in tax\nbefore\nI\nI\nProposal\n:\n2\nProcess)\nI\nAugust\n:\nPercent\npersonal\na Present\n:\nWithout\nE\nWith\nPresentr@ithout: with\n1\nFramel\n4\nProperal\nexamption\n#\nlaw\n:\ndefense\nA\ndefense\n:\nlaw réafense defense rithout de-sWith $ without deeWith w\n<\nI\nI\ntax\n:\nlas\nt\n:\ntax\n:\ntax\n(fense tax\ntom\n\"\nD\n2,500\n4\n11\n2\n40\n44\n04%\n1.6%\n1.85\n&\n29\n&\n18\n263.65\n300.05\n3,000\n31\n88\nS\n1.0\n2.9\n3.2\n57\nis\n185.9\n212.0\n4,000\n70\n184\n202\n1.8\n4.6\n5.1\n114\n112\n162.9\n108.6\n5,000\n110\n280\n308\n2.2\n5.6\n6.2\n170\n198\n164.6\n180.0\n6,000\n150\n376\n434\n2.5\n6.8\n6.9\n228\n264\n150.7\n176.0\n8,000\n517\n606\n669\n4.0\n7.6\n8.4\n201\n352\n91.8\n111.0\n10,000\n528\n920\n1,012\n5.8\n9.2\n10.1\n302\n484\n74.2\n91.7\n12,500\n858\n1,410\n1,551\n6.9\n11.5\n12.4\n552\n695\n64.8\nBO.B\n16,000\n1,250\n2,054\n2,259\n8.4\n13.7\n15.1\n796\n1,001\n63.3\n79.6\n50,000\n2,550\n3,804\n4,194\n11.7\n19.0\n20.9\n1,468\n1,840\n62.8\n79.1\n25,000\n3,845\n6,206\n5,824\n15.4\n24.8\n27.3\n2,561\n2,981\n61.4\n77.6\n50,000\n14,128\n21,754\n23,925\n20.2\n48.5\n47.9\n7,625\n9,801\n54.0\n69.4\n75,000\n27,766\n37,984\n41,585\n37.0\n50.6\n55.6\n10,218\n18,218\n36.8\n60.1\n100,000\n45,476\n54,234\n$8,811\n45.5\n54.2\n68.8\n10,758\n15,385\n26.7\n35.3\n500,000\n350,158\n335,554\n351,299\n66.0\n67.1\n70-4\n5,390\n21,563\n1.6\n6.0\n1,000,000\n717,504\n715,514\n745,963\n71.8\n72.8\nN.A\n- 2,070\n26,379\n. I - 3\n8.7\n$,000,000\n$,916,548\n5,825,474\n8,962,927\n78.5\n76.5\n78.0\n-91,074\n26,579\n-2,3\n.7\nVader the proposal, the attached surtax rate schedule b is substituted for the present socidule.\nfazion earned incous assumed.\n15-or\n8/12/41\nRegraded Uclassified\n424\n,\nIndividual arter take stabile\nmillion vitiment defines -\nmillion with information\n(Noblusbed calenter 1541 Insues Sevele)\nI\nI\n(is thresands of\n6\nnote\n8\nTotal current\ndellers)\nI\n8 e\n.\nTotal\n3/12/41\nRegraded Uclassified\n3/12/41\nThided\n- - o\n(RESTED\n(to thousands of\n5\nProposal\n$\nI personal I I\n#\nRegraded Uclassified\nI\n#\n3\n425\n-\n14/57/8\nTxided\nA\n5,000,000\n<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<\n500,000\n050°00'\n000°62\n50,000\n000°52\n000°02\n000°ST\n12,500\n10,000\n5,000\n000°9\nIIII let\nI Nutro I 1\n6\npersonal 1 E E I the metiodal E and 5 the for a\n\"I\n-\n-\n3,999.399\n#################\n19.4\nyour Femiel If 8\n#################\nK I winsted street $ I of\n#################\npresent I Organization Lanes Sales I Individual of\n-\n-\nI\n$\n.........................\n.\n-\nRegraded Uclassified\n5\n981\n127\n-\nIndividual rate schedule V\n$1,150.7 million, without defense tax\n$1,261.3 million, wish deforme tax\n(Zotimmied colender 1941 income levels)\nfurtes not income I\nrate\n.\n(in thousands\nI\nTotal surtes\n(Pareent)\n#\nof dollars)\nI\ncumbisive\n#\n# 0 -\n2\n10\n8\n200\n2 -\nb\n12\nWho\nis -\n6\n14\n720\n6 -\nto\n16\n1,040\n8 -\n10\nis\n1,400\n10 -\n12\n20\n1,800\n12 -\n14\n22\n2,240\n24 .\n16\n24\n2.720\n16 .\n16\n26\n3,240\n18 .\n20\n26\n3,000\n20 .\n22\n30\n6,400\n22 .\n26\n33\n5.720\n26 -\nX\n36\n7.850\n32\n-\n38\nR\n10,220\ny\n-\nat\nE\n12,740\n$\n.\n50\n5\n15,440\n50 -\nB\nby\n20,340\nto -\n70\n52\n25,540\n70 -\n80\n55\n31,040\n80\n-\n90\n50\n36,840\n90 -\n100\n61\n42.940\n100 -\n130\n62\n73,940\n150 .\n200\n63\n105,440\n200 -\n250\na\n137,440\n250\n-\n300\n\"\n170,440\nyou\n-\n400\n6s\n238,440\n400 - 500\n70\n308,440\n500 . 1,000\nTO\n668,440\n1,000 - 2,000\n13\n1,398,440\n2,000 - 5,000\n3,618,440\nDAY 000% #\n75\n-\n1/ Combined with reduced promptions of 0500 for a single person\nand $1,000 for a married person, 11 10 unefficially estimated\nthat this schodule, without the defense laz, would yield\napproximately $1,700 million.\n3/12/41\nRegraded Uclassified\n428\nCompartees of prosent and propered individual taxes\non not incomes of solected since 2/\nWarried person - se dependents\nNet incone I\nAmount of\nI\nIffective\nI Increase fa tax\nbefore\nI\nlas 3/\nI\nrates\nI\nwater proposal\npersonal\nI\nPresent\nI\nexemption 2/1\nlaw\nProposal\nI\nPresents\nE\nProposal\n*\n: law\nAmount\nPercent\n4\nI\n-\n$\n1,500\n$\n-\n8\nTO\n.\n4.75\nI\nTO\n2,000\n-\n145\n-\n1.3\n105\n2,500\n11\n220\n.4%\n8.8\n209\n1,900.05\n3,000\n32\n295\n1.0\n9.6\n254\n$51.6\n4,000\n70\n466\n1.8\n11.7\n396\n565.7\n5,000\n110\n638\n2.2\n12.8\n500\n460.0\n6,000\n150\n832\n2.5\n13.9\n682\n454.7\n8,000\n317\n1,241\n4.0\n15.5\n924\n291.5\n10,000\n528\n1,694\n5.3\n16.9\n1,166\n220.8\n12,500\n838\n2,321\n6.9\n18.6\n1,463\n170.5\n15,000\n1,258\n3,018\ns.4\n20.1\n1,760\n139.9\n20,000\n8,336\n4,646\n11.7\n23.2\n2,310\n98.9\n25,000\n3,843\n6,560\n15.4\n26.2\n2,717\n70.7\n50,000\n14,128\n18,583\n28.3\n37.2\n4,455\n11.3\n75,000\n27.768\n33,708\n37.0\n44.9\n5,940\n21.4\n100,000\n43,476\n50,857\n43.5\n50.9\n7.381\n17.0\n500,000\n330,156\n344,880\n66.0\n69.0\n14.724\n4.5\n1,000,000\n717.584\n736,042\n71.8\n73.7\n19,278\n2.7\n5,000,000\n3,916,548\n3,093,000\n78.3\n78.7\n19,296\n-5\nw Under the proposal personal examptions are reduced from 1000 to 1900\nfor . single person and from $2,000 to $1,000 for a married person.\nand the attached VEPSAX rate schedule A is abstituted for present\nschedule.\n3/ Marima earned issue assumed.\ny Includes 10 persent defense tax.\nT210b\n1/12/41\nRegraded Uclassified\n129\nCompartees of arw\nvalor present law and proyeard Schodule A\nSuries\nI\nBranket rates (Percent)\nI\n1010 earles regulative\nart iscome\n:\nPresent\nI\nI\nlaw\nI\nProperal\nPresent\nI\n($000)\nI\nI\nlaw\nI\nProposal\n:\n0 -\n2\n-\n105\n$\n-\n$\n200\n2 -\nbe\n-\n12\n-\nWe\nà -\nb\nis\n14\n80\n720\n6 -\n#\n6\n16\n200\n1,040\nI -\n10\nI\nif\n360\n1,400\n10 -\n12\n10\n20\n560\n1,800\n12 -\n14\n12\n22\n$00\n2,200\n14 -\n16\n15\nx\n1,100\n2.720\n16 -\n18\n18\n26\n1,460\n3,190\n18 -\n20\nn\nas\n1,880\n3,000\n20 -\n22\n%\n30\n2,360\n4,400\n22 -\n25\n27\n33\n3,170\n5,390\n25 -\n26\n27\n3,440\n5.720\n26 -\n30\n30\n4,640\n7,160\n30\n-\n32\nyo\n5,240\n7.880\n32\n-\n36\n33\n39\n7,280\n10,220\n38 -\nas\nB\n9,380\n12,740\nE\n-\n50\n40\n45\n11,750\n15.440\n50\n-\n$\nn\n16,180\n20,340\n8\n-\n70\n47\n52\n20,680\n25,540\n70 -\nso\nof\n55\n25,680\n31,040\n80 -\n90\n53\n31,180\n36,840\n90 - 100\n56\n36,780\n42,340\n100 - 150\n58\n65,700\n73.940\n150 - 200\n8\n95,780\n105,440\n20 - 250\n62\n126,780\n137,440\n250 - 300\n196,780\n170,440\n300 - 400\n\"\n224,780\n232,440\n400 . 500\n\"\n292,780\n308,440\n500 - 750\nTO\n$67,750\n408,440\n750 - 1,000\n72\n647,700\n668,440\n1,000 - 2,000\n1,377,780\n1,398,440\n2,000 - 5,000\n3,997.700\n3,618,440\n-\nOver - 5,000\n75\n-\nT:10b\n3/12/41\nRegraded Uclassified\n430\n14/27/8\nThish\n3/ Without 10 personal defense lax.\n2/ lariam careed Issue assumed,\n5,080,000\n1,000,000\n000°006\n000'00T\n75,000\n80,000\n25,000\n20,000\n15,000\n12,500\n10,000\n5,000\n6,000\n5,000\n4,000\n3,000\n2,500\n2,000\n1,500\n1\nIf I\nw\n-\n-\n$1,000 too a carried person, and the attached curter rate scholule \"A\" to mbstituted for present schetule.\nV Valor the proposal personal examptions are reduced free $800 to $500 for a single person and tree $2,000 to\n727.50\n330,156\n27,768\n14,128\n3,003\n2.336\n1,25%\n.\n-\n$9\n528\n317\n150\n110\n20\nX\nIT\nI\n-\n3,017.60\nAnnual of tax\n119°10'\n46,234\n30,044\n160°92\n5,964\n4,224\n2.7%\n2,110\n1,500\n1,125\n95%\n500\nE\n192\nCOR\n132\ns\nPresent Proposal Present law $ Properal $\n-\n78.3\n71.6\n0'99\n43.5\n37.0\n28.3\n15.4\n11.7\nus\n6.9\n1-3\n0°N\n2.3\n2.2\n1.8\n1.0\nser\nI\nI\n76.4\n70.8\n65.5\n2\"94\n6'04\n33.8\n23.9\n21.1\n18.3\n6*9t\n15.4\nI'M\n12.6\n9\"IT\n9'OT\nEffective peties\n4.9\n4.0\n99\n4.55\n1\n1 departants Burried If I\nX I last of I 8 of rejected elses\nDespertion product properd 1 of intiridual\n$\nW*26-\n-9,660\n-2,512\n2.750\n2,676\n2.766\n2,121\n1,658\nSOU'T\n1,252\n1,012\nall\n909\nair\n350\n237\n189\n132\n-\nunder proposal\nIncrease or decrease is laz\n-2.5\nE\n800\n59\n10.4\n19.6\n55.2\n80.8\n118.1\n145.9\n191.7\n253.8\n404.0\n427.3\n505.7\n700.5\n12'01'1\nPurcest\nRegraded Uclassified\nIndividual surtex rate achedule\nMETER not income I\n1\nBracket rute\n(in thousands\n5\nTotal surtex\n(pereent)\n-\nof dollars)\n4\ncumulative\n&\no -\n2\n11\n220\n2 -\n4\n14\n500\na -\n6\n16\nBEO\n6 -\n6\n19\n1,200\nB -\n10\nK1\n1,820\n10 -\n22\n22\n2,080\n12 -\n14\n25\n2,580\n14 -\n16\n27\n3,120\n16 -\n10\n29\n5,700\n16 -\n20\n31\n4,820\n20 -\n22\n33\n4,980\n22 -\n26\n36\n6,420\n26 -\n32\n39\n8,760\n82 -\n88\nof\n11,280\n88 -\n44\n45\n13,980\n44 -\n50\n40\n16,880\n50 -\n60\n51\n21,960\n60 -\n70\n54\n27,360\n70 -\n80\n69\n53,060\n80 -\n90\n69\n$8,960\n90 -\n100\n61\n45,060\n100 - 160\n62\n76,060\n150 - 200\n68\n107,560\n200 -\n250\n44\n189,580\n250 - 500\n66\n172,580\n500 - 400\n68\n240,600\n400 - 500\n70\n510,580\n600 - 1,000\n78\n670,580\n1,000 - 2,000\n75\n1,400,560\n2,000 - 5,000\n74\n$,080,540\n76\n-\nOver 6,000\nTreasury Department, division fax Neaworch\nMarch 11, 1941\nRegraded Uclassified\n132\ny\nDesparison of Pate schedules under ,Pread Law and proposal\nSurtax not .\nrate\n1\nTotal vartex\nincome\n1\n(norgest)\nI\npublicative\n(1009)\nI law 1\nI\n-\nI\n5 0 -\n2\n-\n11\n-\n1\n220\n2 -\n4\n-\n14\n-\n500\n4 -\n6\nles\n16\nI\n80\n520\nÉ -\n8\n6\n19\n200\n1,200\nE -\n10\n8\n21\n360\n1,620\nLC -\n12\n10\n23\n560\n2,080\n12 -\n14\nL2\n25\n800\n2,500\n14 -\n16\n15\n27\n1.100\n3.120\n16 -\n15\n18\n29\n1,460\n3,700\nLE -\n20\n21\n31\n1,40\n4,320\n20 -\n22\n24\n33\n2.350\n4,900\n22 -\n26\n27\n36\n3,440\n5,420\n26 -\n32\n30\n59\n5.240\n8,760\n32 -\n38\n33\n6\n7.200\n11,260\n3€ -\ni\n36\nlang\n9.340\n13.950\nhb -\n50\nM)\nis\n11,740\n16,860\nX\n-\n00\n91\n16,180\n21.960\n60 -\n70\n47\n54\n20,880\n27.360\n70 -\n80\n50\n57\n25,880\n33.060\n& -\n90\n53\n29\n31,180\n38.960\n90 +\n100\n56\n61\n36,780\n45.060\n100 - 150\n58\n62\n65.700\n76,060\n150 - 200\n60\n63\n95.780\n107.560\n200 -\n250\n62\n64\n126,780\n139,560\n230 -\n300\nA\n66\n158,780\n172.560\n300 -\n400\n66\n68\n224,780\n240,560\n400 - 500\n68\n70\n292,780\n310,560\n500 -\n750\n2\n72\n467.780\n490.560\n750 - 1,000\n72\n72\n647.780\n670,560\n1,000 - 2.000\n73\nT3\n1,377.780\n1,400,560\n2.000 - 5,000\n74\n74\n3,597.780\n3,620,560\nOver - 5,000\n75\n75\n-\n-\nTIME\n1/12/01\nRegraded Uclassified\n433\nCompartaen of present and proposed individual Lncome taxes\non not incomes of solected elses\nMarried person - no dependente\nlist income\nI\nAmount of tax V\nEffective rates\nIncrease in LESS\nbefore\n*\nunder proposal\npersonal\na\nProvent\nI I Properal\niPresent:\nexemption 2/1\nI 10v\nAmount\nPersont\n10m\nI\nI\n4 1,500\n-\n$\n76\n-\n8.25 $\n76\n-\n2,000\n-\nase\n-\n7.8\n150\n-\n2,500\n$\n11\n257\nAX\n9.5\n226\n2054.85\n8,000\n81\n517\n1.0\n10.8\n286\n902.6\n4,000\n70\n520\n1.0\n12.8\n440\n623.6\n5,000\n110\n704\n1.2\n14.1\n594\n540.0\n6,000\n180\n380\n2.5\n16.5\n170\n515.8\n6,000\n517\n1,184\n4.0\n17.8\n1,087\n336.8\n10,000\nass\n1,905\n1.5\n19.0\n1,875\n200.4\n12,600\n856\n2,615\n6.9\n20.9\n1,758\n204.5\n15,000\n1,858\n1,192\n0.4\n12.6\n2,154\n100.0\n20,000\n2,254\n5,188\n11.7\n25.9\n2,649\n182.0\n15,000\n3,845\n7,254\n15.4\n29.1\n5,422\n10.0\n50,000\n14,126\n20,112\n29.5\n40.2\n6,984\n42.4\n75,000\n27,769\n55,750\n57.0\n47.7\n6,050\n10.0\n100,000\n43,476\n60,100\n45.5\n63.2\n9,725\n12.3\n500,000\n330,150\n548,708\n66.0\n09.4\n10,082\n5.0\n1,000,000\n717,584\n726,770\n71.8\n78.9\n21,100\n3.0\n6,000,000\n5,920,540\n3,037,758\n76.3\n70.0\n21,204\n3\nTreasury Department, Division of Tax lissourch\nV\nUnder the proposal personal exemptions are reduced from $800 to 1500\nfor a single person and from 12,000 to $1,000 for a married person,\nand the attached ourles rate schedule is substituted for procest\nsobstule.\nMazina earned Leases 1\nIncludes 10 peremat dafence Mr.\nJC-PIF\n8/12/41\nRegraded Uclassified\n434\n8\nDatate and ein fax Tate Tabofule\nnos million combined effect, without tax, country gift -\nratee are equal to three-quarters of catate the nine\n(estinated fineal 1948 bustasse Levels)\nNet estate after\nI\nspecific exemption\n#\nBrasket rate\nI\nComulative to\n1\n(perount)\n1\nou higher\n(10 themende)\n1\n6 0 -\nB.\n$\n#\n200\n5 -\n10\ne\n400\n10 -\n20\n9\n1,200\n20 -\nse\n10\n1,500\nDO -\n$\n13\n4,080\n40 -\nso\n18\n5,850\n60 -\nw\nan\n7,550\n60 -\n100\n35\n17,100\n100 -\n280\n25\n54,650\naso -\n800\n189,180\n860 -\n980\n194,850\nYOU - 1,000\n272,300\n1,000 - 1,200\n384,050\n1,250 - 1,800\n462,150\n1,800 - 2,000\n689,180\n2,000 - 2,500\nB\n687,180\n2,000 - 8,000\n44\n1,057,150\n8,000 - 3,500\n-\n1,899,180\n3,500 - 4,000\nso\n1,048,150\n4,000 - 5,000\nas\n2,072,199\n5,000 - 6,000\n@@\n2,682,150\n6,000 - 7,000\nno\n5,283,150\n7,000 - 0,000\na\n2,083,180\n8,000 - 9,000\nas\n4,462,190\n9,000 - 10,000\n85\n5,113,180\n18,000 - 20,000\nor\n11,613,180\n30,000 - 80,000\n82,522,180\none\n8\n-\n80,000\n3/12/41\nRegraded Uclassified\n135\n6\nTroposed estate tax rates sie Substals I comparated\nvita yourself coints fax rates\n301 solute ofter Transport min\nPresent rates 1\nspecific cresptical\nBrasket rate\nI Curristive\n1\nI Commissive\n(In\nI\n192 in Mahors\nrate\nof dellared\n(pareant)\nmust\n(persent)\nHas as higher\nI\no -\n9\n$\n$\n100\na\n$\n100\n5 -\n20\n4\n400\n3\n-\n10 -\n20\n9\n1,200\n4\n600\n20 -\n20\n12\n2,50\n6\n1,200\n80 -\n$\n10\n4,000\n0\n3,000\n40 -\n60\n18\n5,000\n20\n3,000\n80 -\n60\nn\n7,150\n12\n4,200\n60 -\n100\nR\n17,100\n10 - 14\n9,000\n100 -\n200\nm\n54,000\n17 - 20\n00,000\n200 - 200\nF\n132,180\n20 - =\n89,000\n900 -\nTOO\n20\n104,000\n25 - 25\n151,000\nTBO - 1,000\nat\n372,180\n25 - 20\n229,680\n1,000 - 1,290\nIS\n204,800\n22\n300,000\n1,200 - 1,800\nso\n442,150\na\n383,600\n1,500 - 2,000\n=\n852,150\n55\n557,600\n2,000 - 2,800\n41\n897,150\na\n767,600\n3,500 - 3,000\n$\n1,097,190\n41\n982,600\n3,000 - 3,800\nn\n1,293,180\n44\n1,172,600\n3,800 - 4,000\nno\n1,542,180\n47\n1,407,000\n4,000 - 5,000\nE\n2,072,150\n60 - -\n1,929,680\n8,000 - 6,000\n$\n2,682,150\nas\n2,483,600\n6,000 - 7,000\nB\n8,223,190\n50\n8,072,600\n7,000 - 8,000\n61\n3,838,190\na\n5,663,600\n8,000 - 9,000\n68\n4,463,180\n-\n4,312,600\n9,000 - 10,000\n#\n6,112,150\n#\n4,962,600\n10,000 - 10,000\n#\n11,813,160\nof\n11,652,500\n20,000 - 80,000\n#\n82,512,150\n8\n22,363,600\nOver 80,000\na\n-\na\n-\n2/ Reducive of temparary defence M.\n100%\n3/12/41\nRegraded Uclassified\n136\n6\nSuperism of proposed estate the - shobile 1 with\npresent cotate - M not was (tefore\nof solected sises w\n3rd estator of fax\n-\n1\nin for\nbefore I\n1\n1\nI\nI\nexemption\nI\nPresent\n1\nProposal\n#\nPresent\nI\nPreparal\n-\n2/\nt\nlaw\nI Schedule Is\nlw\nI\nI\n#\nSchedule It\nPersons\nI\n(000)\nI\n$\nso\n$\n300 8\n405\n0.45\n1.06\n$\n-\n123.06\n60\n660\n1,480\n1.1\n3.8\n-\n185.0\nso\n2,300\n4,485\n2.8\n5.6\n2,285\n102.8\n100\n4,620\n6,763\n4.6\n8.9\n4,125\nno.s\n200\n21,780\n$5,365\n10.9\n17.7\n13,285\n62.4\n400\n64,400\n$2,755\n10.1\n23.2\n30,326\n43.9\n000\n113,740\n168,805\n19.0\nm.e\n19,765\n38.0\n1,000\n233,100\n205,725\n25.3\n29.6\n53,625\nSS.1\n2,000\n597,960\n678,648\n20.9\nm.s\n60,000\n15.8\n4,000\n1,527,690\n1,674,363\n30.8\n41.9\n140,000\n0.6\n6,000\n2,708,220\n2,870,725\n45.1\n47.8\n104,505\n6.1\n10,000\n5,430,250\n6,594,785\n64.8\n56.0\n164,505\n8.0\n20,000\n13,799,380\n12,963,000\n64.0\n64.0\n104,805\n1.3\n40,000\n27,778,500\n26,142,000\n00.0\n70.3\n164,500\ns\n$0,000\n43,288,080\n45,422,000\n93.1\n72.4\n164,305\nA\n100,000\n74,068,080\n74,252,045\n74.1\nN.S\n164,806\n.2\nTreasury Department, Division of fax Basearch\n2/ Their the proposal the attached rate schotule Le substituted for the\npresent schedule.\n2/ m specific exemption of $40,000 alloved use procent law to retained\nunder the proposal.\na/ Includes 10 percent defense bes.\nyear 1\n5/13/41\nRegraded Uclassified\n437\n7\nSatate and an the mis eshable\n03m million assistant effect vitiest defunce -\n$258 million from estate too and 033 stillen free\nan too severing an tax rates ARE equal to\nthree quarters of estate to rates, the specific\nexemption water both taxes 1a reinsed from $40,000\nto 125,000 and that the Insurance anclusion valor\nthe estste tos is reduced from $40,000 to $25,000\n(istimated fiscal 19kg bealance levels)\nNet estate after\nI\nI\nspecific complien\nI\nInder sole\n1\nCompletive\n(ta\nI\n(Perema)\n:\nto - Agen\nof dollars)\n1\n1\n-\n$\n0 -\n5\n20\n$\n200\n5 e\n10\n8\n600\n10 -\n20\n18\n1,800\n20 -\n30\n16\n3,400\n30 -\nto\n20\n5,400\n40 -\n60\n5\n10,000\n60 -\nso\nx\n15,800\n90 -\n100\n29\n21,000\n100 -\n150\n&\n37,000\n150 -\n200\n39\n54,500\n200 -\n290\nX\n73,500\n290 -\n300\ns\n94,000\nyou -\n500\n$\n182,000\n900 9 1,000\nMP\n417,000\n1,000 - 2,000\nby\n907,000\n2,000 - 3,000\n52\n1,417,000\n3,000 - 4,000\n53\n1,947,000\n4,000 - 5,000\n59\n2,497,000\n5,000 - 6,000\n57\n3,067,000\n6,000 . 7,000\n59\n3,657,000\n7,00 - 6,000\n61\n4,267,000\n8,000 - 9,000\n63\n4,697,000\n9,000 - 10,000\n63\n5,947,000\n10,000 - 20,000\n67\n12,847,000\n20,000 - 50,000\n69\n32,947,000\n70\n-\nOver - 30,000\nThised\n3/12/41\nRegraded Uclassified\n438\n1\nestate too min under II compared\nwith present counts tax min\nNet estate ofter mines 1/ taketale u\nPresent rubes 7\nspecific exemptions\nDysckets\nCompletive\n.\nImdest rate\nCompletive\n(In thousands\n1\n(pareat)\n-\nwe n higher\nI\n(mereat)\n-\nwe - Higher\nof dellars)\nI\n1\n1\nI\n1\n0 -\n5\n4\nI\n6\n200\n2\nI\n100\n5 -\n10\ne\n600\n2\n200\n10 -\n20\n12\n1,800\n1\n600\n20 -\ns\n26\n3,400\n6\n1,200\nso -\n5\n20\n5,400\n8\n2,000\nto -\n$\n83\n10,000\n10 - 12\n4,200\n60 -\n00\nn\n15,200\n12 . 14\n6,800\n80 -\n100\nn\n21,000\n9.600\n100 -\n190\n37,000\n18,300\n150 e\n200\n35\n54,500\n26,600\n200 -\n250\n73,500\n36,600\n250 -\n300\nin\n94,000\n46,600\n300 -\n500\n182,000\n83,600\n500 - 1,000\nse\n417,000\n1,000 - 2,000\ns\n2,000 - 3,000\n5\n1,417,000\nBERRER 20 -\n23 -\n507,000\nx .\nX - SERVER\n222,600\n957,600\n992,600\n3,000 - 4,000\n53\n1,947,000\n* of\n1,407,600\n4,000 - 5,000\n99\n2,497,000\n, - 53\n1,982,600\n5,000 - 6,000\n50\n3,067,000\n2,458,600\n6,000 - 7,000\n\"\n3,657,000\n3,072,600\n7,000 - 6,000\n61\n4,267,000\n3,682,600\n5,000 - 9,000\n63\n4,897,000\n24 17 17 20 20 61 w 63 70 % 59 07 69\n4,312,600\n9,000 - 10,000\ns\n5,547,000\n4,962,600\n10,000 - 20,000\n67\n12,247,000\n11,668,600\n20,000 - 30,000\n32,947,000\n32,362,600\n.\nOver 50,000\n-\n2/ Reglacive of temperary information tax\nvalided\n3/12/41\nRegraded Uclassified\n439\n7\nComparison of proposal estate tax under Schobule II 4th\npresent cetate tos on not estates (before -\nof selected store 2/\nSet estates\nAmount of text V\n1\nEffective mts\na\nImprove is for\nbefore #\nI\nI\n$\n1\nI\nexemption\nI\nPresent\nI Prepased I\nPresent\nI Prepared\n8\n1\n-\nPercent\n2/\n-\nLaw\nt Schedule III\nlaw\nIII\n,\n(000)\n1\nI\n.\n2\n1\n1\n90\n$\n220 $\n660\nand\n1.3%\n$\nto\n200.0\nS\n660\n1,980\n1.1\n303\n1,300\n200.0\n80\n2,200\n5,940\n2.8\n7.6\n3.740\n170.0\n100\n4,680\n11,000\n4.6\n11.0\n6,380\n136.1\n200\n21,750\n44,550\n10.9\n22,3\n22.770\n204.5\n400\n64,460\n132,440\n16.2\n33.2\n67.990\n105.5\n500\n123,740\n231,220\n19.0\n38.5\n117,400\n203.3\n1,000\n232,100\n438,020\n23.2\n43.8\n205,980\n55.7\n2,000\n597,960\n976,140\n29.9\n48.8\n376,200\n63.2\n4,000\n1,527,660\n2,118,300\nye,2\n53.0\n530,700\n38,7\n6,000\n2,706,220\n3,348,620\n55.1\n53.8\n642,400\n23.7\n10,000\n5,430,260\n6,073,200\n963\n60.7\n642,540\n11.5\n100,000\n74,065,060\n74,710,900\nThe\n74.1\n62,00\n.9\n1/ Under the proposal the attached rate schedule is addititated for the\npresent schodule.\n2/ The specifie examption of $40,000 allowed wher present law 10 retained\nunder the proposal.\n3/ Includes 10 percent defense the\nTatited\n3/12/41\nRegraded Uclassified\n440\nMarch 11, 1941\n3:17 p.m.\nH.M.Jr;\nHello, Harold.\nHarold\nSmith:\nYeah.\nH.M.Jr:\nHow are you feeling today?\nS:\nWell, I don't know how I feel. I know\nwe've got a job of putting all this stuff\ntogether. I just thought I'd give you a\nring - you're probably away shead of me, but\nI just wanted\nH.M.Jr:\nNo, I'm about a couple of blocks behind you\ntoday. No one tells me anything.\nS:\nIs that BO?\nH.M.Jr:\nI wasn't at the meeting this morning. Were\nyou?\n8:\nYeah. I was late - I was up on the Hill\nand they gave me & ring to come down to the\nWhite House. I didn't know what it was about\nuntil I got there and I found about fifteen\nSenators and Congressmen in.\nH.M.Jr:\nI wasn't there BO you're ahead of me. I don't\nknow what\nS:\nNow, here, he talked to you the other day, I\nunderstand, about the total amount, and he\ntalked to me, and he talked to these people in\nterms of $7 billion straight cash appropriation.\nNow, I didn't know what he was going to say\naside from that; he was sort of letting the\nCongressional people take the lead on it;\nand they agreed that there eughtn't to be any\ncontract authorization in it and it would be\nbe better if it were a straight out-and-out\nappropriation. But the President said - the\nthing that disturbed me was that he had been\ncanvassing the situation around and that he\nwas going to put it all in and instead of\ntaking a couple of bites at the cherry,\nhe was going to take one bite.\nRegraded Uclassified\n441\n- 2 -\nH.M.Jr:\nYeah.\nS:\nWell, now, what I'm afraid of 18 here 18 the British\nrequest for about nine billion and they are being\ncarried down by the Army and Navy to fit into the\nproductive situation as best they can but this is\nreally for 142.\nH.M.Jr:\nYeah.\nis\nS:\nAnd it/not the whole bite ae I 800 it. Do you think\nit is?\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, I don't know. I'm out in the cold till - I\nreally don't know.\nS:\nWell, you know more about it than I do. I mean I\nJust saw the nine billion dollar figure I think\nyesterday for the first time. Hello -\nH.M.Jr:\nHello.\n8:\nAnd there was another sheet, you know, that went well\nway beyond that - that I think you gave me.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, that's - from that which is about a week or ten\ndays old, Harold, I haven't seen a thing and the\nPresident hasn't told me a thing and I don't know as\nmuch about it as the cop on the corner.\n8:\nWell - -\nH.M.Jr:\nThe President said he wanted me at the meeting this\nmorning and then I didn't get any word 80 I didn't\ncall up or anything.\n8:\nI didn't know about the meeting except I saw something\nin the paper and I was down before the Civil Service\nCommission in the House and I got a call from the\nWhite House to come down and I didn't know what the\nhell it was either. The story - then they got mixed\nup on the one billion three versus the total of seven\nbillion - whether the one three was to be reimbursed\nby the seven or not. They finally decided that it was\nto be reimbursed by the seven billion dollar amount\nwhich set us scurrying around then to change the whole\nset up. I sent somebody down to see Burns to see if\nwe can get that appropriation language changed to fit\nthat picture.\nRegraded Uclassified\n442\n- 3 -\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, you had better know about it because I hear\nyou're going up to testify on the bill.\nB:\nWhere did you hear that?\nH.M.Jr:\nOh, a little birdie.\n8:\nAh - (laughs). Listen, I hear you are too.\nH.M.Jr:\nOh no. I don't know anything about it.\nB:\nI don't know why the Director of the Budget should\ntestify on this.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, he's doing it - it's the President's bill.\nIt's written the way you and he want it.\n8:\nWell -\nH.M.Jr:\nAnd I - they just dropped me at the first way station.\nI made all my offers about wanting to cooperate -\nwhat things are there - but I'm in no position to\ntestify about anything.\nS:\nI don't think I an either because all the information\nwe've got here is in the last 24 hours and very much\nsecond hand because this 16 the first time I've had\nanything to do with it - with this set up.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, the last time I think was Saturday a week ago,\nand I sent you what I had. I haven't had anything\non it since then.\n3:\nNo, no.\nH.M.Jr:\nI don't know how the seven billion 1s arrived at\nor anything.\nS:\nWell - the Army and Navy apparently have processed\nthose military sections of the British requests and\nhave said that, \"Well, they can only end with Knudsen.\"\nNow that's what they brought to us last night and have\nsaid, \"Well, this 16 all we can put in to our produc-\ntive machinery and probably more\".\nH.M.Jr:\nYeah.\nS:\nAnd the boss says, \"You got to squeeze the whole thing\ndown to seven billion\". Well that meane paring off\nof several of these items. What would you think -\nwhat would you think about, after we get this thing\ntentatively set up, of talking to Purvis about it?\nDo you think that would be appropriate? You've got\nRegraded Uclassified\n443\n4\nthe background on that, maybe I ought to bring the\nthing over to both of you.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, I don't know what Hopkins is doing.\nS:\nWell, I don't know either. I mean only once has he\ncontacted me.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, was he at the meeting this morning?\nS:\nNo, no. And I just heard this afternoon that they're\nworrying over in Agriculture about what can be trans-\nferred under the one billion three and somebody told\nme that the - well, Wickard said he understood the\nPresident was going to make an announcement tonight\nof what could be transferred. Well, I've never heard\nanything about that. I don't know whether - just\nwhat their problem is - whether it's a legal problem\nor what it 1s.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, as far as I know, Hopkins is supposed to be\ncontacting Purvis. You see I'm not doing it anymore.\n8:\nI see.\nH.M.Jr:\nAnd I've asked to be relieved of that but I'd 800\nhim occasionally. Hello.\n8:\nYeah.\nH.M.Jr:\nBut I know that Hopkins sees him and Hopkins has said\nthat he expects to contact the British Purchasing\nMission. And - well, I'm very serious, Harold, as\nfar as I'm concerned I'm in no position to testify\nabout anything because I don't know this stuff and\nyou can't - I'm not going to go up and display my\nignorance publicly.\nS:\nWell, I can't learn about it in 24 hours either.\nAll I'm trying to do 18 to get an estimate together\nhere for the boss which he says he wants to sign at by\nwhen he signs the bill and there are\nleast, tomorrow apparently, two dozen people involved in the\nthing.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, if you're trying to find out if I'm in on it,\nI'm not.\nS:\n(Laughs)\nH.M.Jr:\nSo you can just - there's just 23 people.\nS:\n(Laughs) All right.\n444\n- 5 -\nH.M.Jr:\nAnd if I've got anything I'll give you a ring but\nthe last I know is when I sent that sheet over to\nyou.\n8:\nYeah.\nH.M.Jr:\nAnd with that exception and the time we were in\nHull's Office when you were there I know less than\nnothing.\nS:\nApparently, this sheet that we got there is not the\none that they're working from.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell -\nS:\nWell, I just thought I'd give you a ring. I told you -\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, I appreciate it. I appreciate it.\nS:\nI know the boss mentioned the seven million. I suggested\nthat he be sure and talk to you about that.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, he told me it was seven billion. He told me the\nseven billion and that's all. He said, \"That's the\nfigure.\"\nS:\nYeah.\nH.M.Jr:\nBut, if I knew anything and if I had anything I'd give\nit to you but I'm only repeating. I know less than\nnothing.\nS:\nWell, then I'd better check with Hopkins on whether\nit's appropriate to raise some questions with Purvis.\nI suppose that we ought not to process entirely in\n& vacuum. I don't know what all the implications of\nit are.\nH.M.Jr:\nWell, I think if you want to Bee Purvis, I think you\nbetter talk to Hopkins.\n8:\nYeah. All right, sir, thank you.\nH.M.Jr:\nThank you for calling.\n8:\nYou bet. Bye.\n445\nTREASURY DEPARTMENT\nINTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION\nMar\nDATE March 11, 1941\nSecretary Morgenthan\nTO\nFROM\nMr. Cochran\nSTRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL\nAt 3 o'clock this afternoon the Secretary called me to his office and asked that\nMr. White, who ⑈1 with the Secretary, explain to me the result of the several neet-\ningo which had been held at the Securities and Exchange Commission with the view to\nevalving suggestions to expedite the liquidation of British investments in this coun-\ntry.\nMr. White told me that the basic 1dea which had been discussed at the S. E. c.\nhad been that of organizing a private corporation which would float & bond issue, pre-\nsumbly at a low rate of interest, to obtain funds which could be utilized in taking\nover the complete holdings of British vested securities. This plan was not considered\nfeasible insofar as direct investments are concerned. The plan would be for this\ncorporation to advance payment to the extent of 65 to 70 percent of the market value\nof the securities taken over. The percentage would be less if the securities were\nfound to be below the average in marketability. It would be necessary that the British\n!isclose to this group their complete holdings, and the group would only consider the\nproposition as a whole.\nThe group would proceed with the sale of securities and remit the balance of the\nproceeds obtained therefor, deducting only necessary expenses. If there should be any\nquestion of a difference between the group and the British Government as to the sale\nprice, this should be settled by an arbiter.\nIt VAS explained that the S. E. c. had studied this plan. and had then invited to\nWashington yesterday afternoon Messrs. For and Connely (*) representing investment\nassociations in New York. The two representatives from New York had not insisted that\nthey be drawn into any private corporation which might be set up. They were svailable,\nhowever, for consultation if the British may desire to look into the plan or desire\nrecommendations as to possible concerns and individuals to constitute the suggested\ngroup.\nAfter receiving this explanation from Mr. White, I telephoned Mr. Gifford. I\nlearned from his New York office that he was in Washington, and I reached him at the\noffices of the British Purchasing Commission at 3:15. He let no know that he had\ncome to Washington this noon and added, confidentially for our ears, that he was here\nwith Sir Edward Peacock. I told him that Mr. White had attended meetings at the S.E.C.\nand that the Secretary had authorised me to acquaint Mr. Gifford with the results\nthereof. I thereupon repeated Mr. White's recital to me. I added the word. of explans-\nthe disposal of marketable securities. The plan which has been under study vas origi-\ntion that the Secretary desired in ne my to criticize Mr. Gifford's operations in\nsally conselved of possible assistance in liquidating direct investments. It had to\nnow been considered as difficult of application to this field, but readily adaptable\nthe markotable security field. I renewed the explanation made previously that the\n* President Emett P. Connely of the Investment Bankers Association of America.\nRegraded Uclassified\n446\n- 2 -\nTreasury naturally desires to look into every possible means for assisting in the\norderly liquidation of British assets, and that I was confident Hr. Gifford shared\nour interest toward this md. Mr. Gifford thanked us for bringing the foregoing\ninformation to his attention. He stated that the proposal was beyond any instructions\nwhich he has. He is, however, taking note of our report and will think it over. He\nwould require completely new instructions before he could accept such a proposal,\nwhich would completely rearrange the plan for disposing of marketable securities in\nthis country. His first reaction was that he would not feel justified in submitting\nsuch a plan to London with recommendations unless the Treasury urged it. I told him\nthat the Secretary desired to bring to his attention the results of the study which\nhad been made, but to leave action to Hr. Gifford's judgment.\n16.m.s.\n447\nTREASURY DEPARTMENT\nINTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION\nDATE March 11, 1941\nSecretary Morgenthan\nTO\nFROM Mr. Cochran\nSTRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL\nActing upon the Secretary's instructions, I saked Sir Frederick Phillips to\ncome to ay office at 3:30 this afternoon. I recalled to Sir Frederick that when be\nhad visited me yesterday evening he had emphasized his interest in learning the extent\nto which existing British contracts could be taken over under the Lend-Lease plan.\nFurthermore, I recalled our conversation on gold.\nI let Sir Frederick know that the Secretary had held a group meeting this fore-\nzoon at which the British position had been studied. The Secretary had saked me to\ngive an oral reply to Sir Frederick's memorandum of March 5 in which inquiry vas made\nif to whether the Secretary would see any objection to Great Britain paying Canada in\ngold to the extent that it may have gold available for that purpose in the future.\nI permitted Phillips to note on page 11 of Part I of \"Hearings before the Committee on\nForeign Relations, United States Senate, on S. 275\". the estimates which the\nSecretary had submitted to Congress (based upon figures supplied by the British\nPreasury) for the current calender year Australian and South African gold exports. I\nalso invited his attention to the testimony which the Secretary gave before the\nCommittee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, as reported on pages 64 and 65\nof the volume of Lend-Lease Bill Hearings. I told Phillips that the Secretary's\nattitude toward South African and Australian gold remained the same as presented in\nthis testimony. Phillips took note of the two references to the published testimony\ndescribed above.\nPhillips reminded no that the British had hoped to use certain of their gold in\nmeeting payments due Canada, Re asked if he was free nov to tell the Canadians that\nthe Treasury insisted upon all South African and Australian gold being sold for its\nbenefit. He asked further if ve had been in touch with Mr. Clark on this subject. I\ntold Phillips that we had had no conversation with the Canadian Deputy Minister of\nFinance since he left here a few days ago. There was no reason, however, why Phillips\nshould not continue his discussions with Mr. Clark, bearing in mind the testimony which\nthe Secretary has given.\nI told Phillips that a group of us had net with the Secretary on Saturday, Monday\nand Tuesday to study an operating plan for the Lend-Lease Bill, and that in these\nsestings the British position had been given particular attention. I let Phillips\nknow that after receiving the British memorandum of yesterday which gave details as\nto outstanding contracts and negotiations with the R. F. 0. and the Army and Havy on\npossible taking over of some of these engagements, we had written both the R. P. C.\nand the War Department requesting date from their side as to prospects for consumna-\npositively no use of our attempting to discuss the question of contracts further at\nties of their negotiations with the British is the premises. I added that there is\npresent. I showed Phillips the ticker tape which reported the passing of the Bill and\nannounced that the President anticipated asking for a $7,000,000,000 appropriation\nRegraded Uclassified\n447\nTREASURY DEPARTMENT\nINTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION\nDATE March 11. 1941\nSecretary Morgenthan\nTO\nMr.\nCochran\nFROM\nSTRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL\nActing upon the Secretary's instructions, I asked Sir Frederick Phillips to\ncome to my office at 3:30 this afternoon. I recalled to Sir Frederick that when he\nhad visited me yesterday evening he had emphasized his interest in learning the extent\nto which existing British contracts could be taken over under the Lend-Lease plan.\nPurthermore, I recalled our conversation on gold.\nI let Sir Frederick know that the Secretary had held a group meeting this fore-\nsoon at which the British position had been studied. The Secretary had asked me to\ngive an oral reply to Sir Frederick's memorandum of March 5 in which inquiry vale made\nM to whether the Secretary would ⑉ any objection to Great Britain paying Cenada in\ngold to the extent that it may have gold available for that purpose in the future.\nI cermitted Phillips to note on page 11 of Part I of \"Hearings before the Committee on\nForeign Relations, United States Senate, on S. 275\". the estimates which the\nSecretary had submitted to Congress (based upon figures sumplied by the British\nPreasury) for the current calendar year Australian and South African gold exports. I\nalso invited his attention to the testimony which the Secretary gave before the\nCommittee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, as reported on pages 64 and 65\nof the volume of Lend-Lease Bill Hearings. I told Phillips that the Secretary's\nattitude toward South African and Australian gold remained the same as presented in\nthis testimony. Phillips took note of the two references to the published testimony\ndescribed above.\nPhillips reminded me that the British had hoped to use certain of their gold in\nseeting payments due Cenada. He asked if he was free nov to tell the Canadians that\nthe Treasury insisted upon all South African and Australian gold being sold for its\nbenefit. Re asked further if we had been in touch with Mr. Clark on this subject. I\ntold Phillips that we had had no conversation with the Canadien Deputy Minister of\nPinance since he left here a few days ago, There was no reason, however, vity Phillips\nshould not continue his discussions with Mr. Clark, bearing in mind the testimony which\nthe Secretary has given.\nI told Phillips that a. group of us had not with the Secretary on Saturday. Monday\nand Tuesday to study an operating plan for the Land-Lease Bill, and that in these\nseetings the British position had been given particular attention. I let Phillips\nknow that after receiving the British memorandum of yesterday which gave details as\nto outstanding contracts and negotiations with the R. F. C. and the Army and Navy on\npossible taking over of some of these engagements. we had written both the R. P. C.\nand the War Department requesting data from their side as to prospects for consumer-\ntion of their negotiations with the British in the premises. I added that there 10\npositively no use of our attempting to discuss the question of contracts further at\npresent. I showed Phillips the ticker tape which reported the passing of the 3111 and\nannounced that the President anticipated asking for a $7,000,000,000 appropriation\nRegraded Uclassified\n448\n- 2 -\nto complement the Act. I told him that Treasury representatives would have to appear\nbefore Congress to support the appropriation measure, I stressed the embarrassment\nwhich such representatives, and particularly the Secretary. would experience if\nobliged to report to Congress that there had not yet been accomplished any progress in\nliquidating British direct investments. I made the point that our progress depends\nimportantly upon smething being accomplished along this line immediately. Phillips\nvolunteered that Gifford and Peacock were in town for consultation.\nI should add that when we were discussing gold, I let Phillips know that I had\nreported to the Secretary the information which Phillips had given me last evening,\nnamely. that it appeared that gold production in South Africa was not falling off,\nbut that recently the Bank of South Africa evidently had not turned over all current\nproduction to the British authorities. Phillips had also made the point that the\nBritish required a certain stock of gold in South Africa, because of the necessity of\nhaving some of this metal available for hurried despatch to Egypt or other centers in\nthe Near Eastern war area. In our talk today, Phillips minimized the amount of gold\nthat could be counted upon to come from Belgian Congo, Rhodesia and other scattered\nareas of production.\nHump.\nRegraded Uclassified\n449\nMarch 11, 1941\n4:30 p.m.\nPresent:\nMr. Gaston\nMrs. Klotz\nHM Jr: Herbert, please sit down. I thought that\nyou could listen while I dictate this.\nHarry Hopkins called me about 4:15 and said the\nPresident was going to take some action this afternoon under\nthe Lend-Lease Bill. He had spoken to the President about the\nCoast Guard cutters and asked for permission to speak to me.\nHe asked me whether I knew what the President had in mind and\nif the President had discussed it with me. I said, \"No,\"\nand then I told him that he ought to know better than I what\nthe President has in mind. So he said that he didn't.\nI told Hopkins that if he asked me what I thought\nwould be most useful to the British this Spring, it is the ten\ncutters that I wrote about in my first letter. Then I said that\nwe could get them ready in two or three weeks if the English\nwould tell us what kind of armaments they needed and if the Navy\nwould equip them promptly. Hopkins asked me if we didn't usually\nget cooperation from the Navy, and I said, \"No, not as far as\nthe Coast Guard is concerned.\nThen Hopkins asked me some more questions, and I\nsaid I never felt that I knew less than what I did right now\nabout what was going on. He said that nothing was going on\nat this time. I then said that the President told me yesterday\nhe was going to hold a meeting this morning and wanted me to come,\nbut I never got word as to when it was going to be held. He\nsaid that he wasn't at the meeting either so he did not know\nwhat went on.\nHopkins told me then that Young was with him and\nhad some message from the English saying how they wanted these\nships equipped, but it was news to me.\nRegraded Uclassified\n450\n- 2 -\nGaston: Waesche told me that the Navy had received\nword from the English that they would be very glad to have the\ncutters. That's all the message I got.\nHM Jr: Did you tell that to Phil?\nGaston: No, I haven't seen Phil since I heard that.\nI haven't had a chance to tell him.\nHM Jr: I don't know whether you agreed with me on\nthat.\nGaston: That would be very useful - yes. If we\nare going to do anything, that's the thing to do.\nHM Jr: Well, I'm glad to hear you say that.\nGaston: Yes, that's the thing to do.\nJust when you called me, I was talking to Oscar Cox,\nwho was asking me a lot of questions. He said that Harry Hopkins\nhad been asked to do something about it for the President. He\ndidn't say that you had talked to Hopkins. Evidently Harry Hopkins\nwants to get some information, and he's trying to have Cox get it\nfor him.\nHM Jr: Where was Cox when he called you?\nGaston: Why I think he was in his office. I was\ntalking to him when they said you wanted me so I excused myself\nand hung up.\n(At this point, HM Jr told the operator that\nshe should find out whether Oscar Cox and\nPhilip Young had returned to the Treasury.)\nGaston: I really don't know. He may not have been\nin his office.\nHM Jr: How long ago was this, Herbert?\nRegraded Uclassified\n451\n- 3 -\nand came right in here.\nGaston: Just before I walked in here. I hung up\nHM Jr: Well, my call was about 10 minutes ago,\nso he must have asked Oscar to get the information on it.\n(Operator reported that neither Oscar Cox\nnor Philip Young had returned to their\noffices.)\nHM Jr: Well, they haven't come back yet. I think\nthat I will walk around the block and by that time they probably\nwill be here.\nI\n452\nThe British Supply Council in North America\nMarch 11, 1941\nPhilip Young, Esq.\nPresident's Liaison Committee,\nTreasury Department,\nVashington, D. C.\nDear Mr. Young,\nThe British Naval Attache has just received a reply\nto a cable to the British Admiralty with regard to the\nten coast guard cutters which we hope will be released\nto us by the U. 8. Treasury.\nThe Admiralty advise as follows:\n1. That an offer of ten cutters would be cordially\nwelcomed,\n2. That the vessels would be acceptable in present\ncondition with low angle areament only, high\nangle armament to be fitted in the United Kingdom.\n3. Ammunition for 5\" guns would be required from\nUnited States, both outfit and reserve, including\npractice.\n4. That the never type having a speed of 20 knots\nwould be of considerably greater value than the\nolder type which has a speed of 16-1/2 knots.\nAs the Havy Department has been pressing for this infor-\nmation, the British Naval Attache, through whom it vas obtained,\nhas given it to them direct.\nYours very truly.\n(Sgd.) 0. 2. Ballantyne\nC\n0\n?\nY\nRegraded Uclassified\n453\nMAR 11 1941\nBy less Mr. President:\nI should like to being to your attention the steely\nincrease is prices of imported materials that has been\nunder my for a moth 07 mrs. the matract, as compared\nwith the rather fist treat of domestic modify prices,\nto shows on the attached chart made from priors of the\n12 imported materials and 17 demostic enterials is the 3\nBeream of Labor Statistics daily price fales of X basic\nconsidities. the price inter of imported asterials has\nguinet 10 per cent since the est of Jenuary, as conpared\nwith a 2 per and average gain is prices of demosite\nmaterials.\nVidlo the increased prices are attributed in the\nproce to the tight - shipping situation, a insurence\nof eae-third in prices of - and shalles vitida tim\nweeks weld also suggest that speculative buying his\nbeen a factor. I mie that the name of truling in\n- futures increased sharyly last wesk. Increasing\noperalative activity to my - of consulties would\ntest to affect other all would eld to the dif-\nflosity of helding a general price visa in check.\nPatthfully yours,\n(Signed) H. Morganihau, Jr.\nthe Provident,\nthe White lieus.\nCopy to mr. Thompson\nBy 3 n\nalso 3/10/41 FILE COPY\nRegraded Uclassified\n454\nMOVEMENT OF BASIC COMMODITY PRICES\nDomestic and Imported*\nAUGUST 1939-100\nPER\nPER\nPER\nWeekly Average\nPER\nCENT\nCENT\nCENT\nDaily\nCENT\n135\n135\n132\n132\n130\n130\n128\n128\n// Imported\n125\n125\nCommodities\n// Imported\n124\nCommodities\n124\n120\n120\n120\n120\n115\n115\n/7 Domestic\nCommodities\n116\n17 Domestic\n110\n110\nCommodities\n116\n105\n105\n112\n112\n100\n100\n108\nm\nJ F M A M J J A $ o N D J F M A M J\n4\nII\nis\n25\n,\n8\nis\n22\nI\na\n15\n22\n29\n5\n12\n108\n19\n26\n1940\n1941\nJAN.\nFEB.\nMAR.\nAPR.\n1941\nPercentage Change for Individual Commodities, Jan.31,1941 to March 7,1941\nPER\nPER\nCocoo 15.6%\nCENT\n17 Domestic Commodities\nCENT\nII Imported Commodities\n+30\n+30\nShellac 30.3%\n+25\n+25\n+20\n+20\n+15\nBurlap 16.2%\nLard 11.7%\n+15\nPrint Cloth 9.8%\nCottonweed Oil 6.5%\n+10\nLeod 4.5%\nRozin 3.0%\n+10\nRubber 8.8%\nSteel Scrap,dem. 26%\nSugar 8.5%\nCarn 23%\nCoffee 6.2%\n+5\nCotton 2.0%\nWheat 14%\n+5\nSile 5/%\nTallon 0%\n9ba/ 24%\nSteel Scrap,axp. ON\nTin 22%\n0\nAutter 0%\nCopper 0%\no\nFlasseed ox\nZine OX\nNides -/.9%\nHage -2.5%\n-5\nBanley -19%\nSteere -EX\n-5\nJan.31\nMar.7\nJan 31\nMar.7\nB.L.S. Indexes\nOffice of the Secretary of the Treasury\n- of - - -\nP-199-7\nSeventy-seventh Congress of the United States of America:\n455\nfit the first besion\nRegraded Uclassif\nBup and held at the City d Washington - Friday, the third\nday of Junuary, one thousand nine hundred and forty-one\nPUBLIC LAW\n[CHARTER\nAN ACT\nFurther to promote the defense of the United States, and for other\npurposes.\n-\nMAR 11 1941\nBe it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of\nTHE\nthe United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act\nmay be cited as \"An Act to Promote the Defense of the United\nStates\".\nSac. 2. As used in this Act-\n(a) The term \"defense article\" means-\n(1) Any weapon, munition, aircraft, vessel, or boat;\n(2) Any machinery, facility, tool, material, or supply neces-\nH. R. 1776\nsary for the manufacture, production, processing, repair, servic-\ning, or operation of any article described in this subsection;\n(3) Any component material or part of or equipment for any\narticle described in this subsection;\n(4) Any agricultural, industrial or other commodity or article\nfor defense.\nSuch term \"defense article\" includes any article described in this\nsubsection: Manufactured or procured pursuant to section 3, or to\nwhich the United States or any foreign government has or hereafter\nacquires title, possession, or control.\n(b) The term \"defense information\" means any plan, specification,\ndesign, prototype, or information pertaining to any defense article.\nSec. 3. (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law, the\nPresident may, from time to time, when be deems it in the interest\nof national defense, authorize the Secretary of War, the Secretary\nof the Navy, or the head of any other department or agency of the\nGovernment-\n(1) To manufacture in arsenals, factories, and shipyards\nunder their jurisdiction, or otherwise procure, to the extent to\nwhich funds are made available therefor, or contracts are author-\nised from time to time by the Congress, or both, any defense\narticle for the government of any country whose defense the\nPresident deems vital to the defense of the United States.\n(2) To all, transfer title to, exchange, lease, lend, or otherwise\ndispose of, to any such government any defense article, but no\ndefense article not manufactured or procured under paragraph\n456\nH. R. 1776-2\nRegraded Uc\n(1) shall in any way be disposed of under this paragraph, except\nafter consultation with the Chief of Staf of the Army or the\nChief of Naval Operations of the Navy, or both. The value of\ndefense articles disposed of in any way under authority of this\nparagraph, and procured from funds heretofore appropriated,\nshall not exceed $1,300,000,000. The value of such defense articles\nshall be determined by the head of the department or agency con-\ncerned or such other department, agency or officer as shall be\ndesignated in the manner provided in the rules and regulations\nissued hereunder. Defense articles procured from funds hereafter\nappropriated to any department or agency of the Government,\nother than from funds authorized to be appropriated under this\nAct, shall not be disposed of in any way under authority of this\nparagraph except to the extent hereafter authorized by the Con-\ngress in the Acts appropriating such funds or otherwise.\n(8) To test, inspect, prove, repair, ontfit, recondition, or other-\nwise to place in good working order, to the extent to which funds\nare made available therefor, or contracts are authorized from time\nto time by the Congress, or both, any defense article for any such\ngovernment, or to procure any or all such services by private\ncontract.\n(4). To communicate to any such government any defense infor-\nmation, pertaining to any defense article furnished to such govern-\nment under paragraph (2) of this subsection.\n(5) To release for export any defense article disposed of in\nany way under this subsection to any such government.\n(b) The terms and conditions upon which any such foreign govern-\nment receives any aid authorized under subsection (a) shall be those\nwhich the President deems satisfactory, and the benefit to the United\nStates may be payment or repayment in kind or property, or any other\ndirect or indirect benefit which the President deems satisfactory.\n(c) After June 30, 1943, or after the passage of a concurrent\nresolution by the two Houses before June 30, 1943, which declares\nthat the powers conferred by or pursuant to subsection (a) are no\nlonger necessary to promote the defense of the United States, neither\nthe President nor the head of any department or agency shall exer-\nciso any of the powers conferred by or pursuant to subsection (a)\nexcept that until July 1, 1946, any of such powers may be exercised\nto the extent necessary to carry out & contract or agreement with such\na foreign government made before July 1, 1943, or before the passage\nof such concurrent resolution, whichever is the earlier.\n457\nH. R. 1776-3\n(d) Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or to\npermit the authorization of convoying vessels by naval vessels of the\nUnited States.\n(e) Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or to permit\nthe authorization of the entry of any American veasel into a combat\narea in violation of section a of the Neutrality Act of 1939.\nSec. 4. All contracts or agreements made for the disposition of\nany defense article or defense information pursuant to section 3 shall\ncontain a clause by which the foreign government undertakes that\nit will not, without the consent of the President, transfer title to\nor possession of such defense article or defense information by gift,\nsale, or otherwise, or permit its use by anyone not an officer, employee,\nor agent of such foreign government.\nSec. 5. (a) The Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, or\nthe head of any other department or agency of the Government\ninvolved shall, when any such defense article or defense information\nis exported, immediately inform the department or agency designated\nby the President to administer section 6 of the Act of July 2, 1940\n(54 Stat. 714). of the quantities, character, value, terms of disposi-\ntion, and destination of the article and information so exported.\n(b) The President from time to time, but not less frequently than\nonce every ninety days, shall transmit to the Congress a report of\noperations under this Act except such information as he deems\nincompatible with the public interest to disclose. Reports provided\nfor under this subsection shall be transmitted to the Secretary of\nthe Senate or the Clerk of the House of Representatives, as the case\nmay be, if the Senate or the House of Representatives, as the case\nmay be, is not in session.\nSec. 6. (a) There is hereby authorized to be appropriated from\ntime to time, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise\nappropriated. such amounts as may be necessary to carry out the\nprovisions and accomplish the purposes of this Act.\n(b) All money and all property which is converted into money\nreceived under section 3 from any government shall, with the approval\nof the Director of the Budget, revert to the respective appropriation\nor appropriations out of which funds were expended with respect to\nthe defense article or defense information for which such consideration\nis received, and shall be available for expenditure for the purpose for\nwhich such expended funds were appropriated by law, during the\nfiscal year in which such funds are received and the ensuing fiscal\nyear; but in no event shall any funds so received be available for\nexpenditure after June 30, 1946.\nRegraded Uclassified\n458\nH. R. 1776-4\nSac. 7. The Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, and the\nhead of the department or agency shall in all contracts or agreements\nfor the disposition of any defense article or defense information fully\nprotect the rights of all citizens of the United States who have patent\nrights in and to any such article or information which is hereby\nauthorized to be disposed of and the payments collected for royalties\non such patents shall be paid to the owners and holders of such patents.\nSec. 8. The Secretaries of War and of the Navy are hereby\nauthorized to purchase or otherwise acquire arms, ammunition, and\nimplements of war produced within the jurisdiction of any country\nto which section 3 is applicable, whenever the President deems such\npurchase or acquisition to be necessary in the interests of the defense\nof the United States.\nSec. 9. The President may, from time to time, promulgate such\nrules and regulations as may be necessary and proper to carry out any\nof the provisions of this Act; and he may exercise any power or\nauthority conferred on him by this Act through such department,\nagency, or officer as he shall direct.\nSac. 10. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to change existing\nlaw relating to the use of the land and naval forces of the United\nStates, except insofar as such use relates to the manufacture, procure-\nment, and repair of defense articles, the communication of informa-\ntion and other noncombatant purposes enumerated in this Act.\nSmo. 11. If any provision of this Act or the application of such\nprovision to any circumstance shall be held invalid, the validity of\nthe remainder of the Act and the applicability of such provision to\nother circumstances shall not be ascected thereby.\nSpeaker of the House Representatives.\nHenry a Wallace\nVice President of the United States and\nPresident of the Senate.\nFine Preserely\nMarch 1941\n459\n[PUBLIC LAW 11-77m Congress]\n[CHAPTER 11-1st SESSION]\n[H. R. 1776)\nAN ACT\nFurther to promote the defense of the United States, and for other purposes.\nBe it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of\nthe United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act\nmay be cited as \"An Act to Promote the Defense of the United\nStates\".\nSec. 2. As used in this Act-\n(a) The term \"defense article\" means-\n(1) Any weapon, munition, aircraft, vessel, or boat;\n(2) Any machinery, facility, tool, material, or supply neces-\nsary for the manufacture, production, processing, repair, servic-\ning, or operation of any article described in this subsection;\n(3) Any component material or part of or equipment for any\narticle described in this subsection;\n(4) Any agricultural, industrial or other commodity or article\nfor defense.\nSuch term \"defense article\" includes any article described in this\nsubsection: Manufactured or procured pursuant to section 3, or to\nwhich the United States or any foreign government has or hereafter\nacquires title, possession, or control.\n(b) The term \"defense information\" means any plan, specification,\ndesign, prototype, or information pertaining to any defense article.\nSec. 3. (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law, the\nPresident may, from time to time, when he deems it in the interest\nof national defense, authorize the Secretary of War, the Secretary\nof the Navy, or the head of any other department or agency of the\nGovernment-\n(1) To manufacture in arsenals, factories, and shipyards\nunder their jurisdiction, or otherwise procure, to the extent to\nwhich funds are made available therefor, or contracts are author-\nized from time to time by the Congress, or both, any defense\narticle for the government of any country whose defense the\nPresident deems vital to the defense of the United States.\n(2) To sell, transfer title to, exchange, lease, lend, or otherwise\ndispose of, to any such government any defense article, but no\ndefense article not manufactured or procured under paragraph\n(1) shall in any way be disposed of under this paragraph, except\nafter consultation with the Chief of Staff of the Army or the\nChief of Naval Operations of the Navy, or both. The value of\ndefense articles disposed of in any way under authority of this\nparagraph, and procured from funds heretofore appropriated,\nshall not exceed $1,800,000,000. The value of such defense articles\n2\n(Ive Laws\n(Pr. Life 11.1\n8\nshall certied be determined by the head of the department or Agency\nOF such other department, agency or officer as shall (in\nby the President to administer section 6 of the Act of July 2, 1940\nissued designated in the matther provided in the rither and regulations be\n(54 Stat. 714), of the quantities, character, value, terms of disposi-\nother appropriated than to any department or agency of the Government,\nhereunder. Defense articles procured from funds horestter\ntion, and destination of the article and information so exported.\n(b) The President from time to time, but not less frequently than\nfrom funds authorized to be appropriated under this\nonce every ninety days, shall transmit to the Congress H report of\nAct, shall not be disposed of in any way under authority of the\noperations under this Act except such information me he deema\npatagraph except to the extent herenfter authorized by the Con-\nincompatible with the public interest to disclose, Reports provided\ngress in the Acts appropriating such funds or otherwise,\nfor under this subsection shall be transmitted to the Secretary of\n(3) To test, inspect, prove, repair, outfit, recondition, or other\nthe Senate or the Clerk of the House of Representatives, as the case\nwise to place in good working order, to the extent to which funds\nmay be, if the Senate or the House of Representatives, as the case\nare made available therefor, or contracts are authorized from time\nmay be, is not in session.\nto time by the Congress, or both, any defense article for any such\nSec. 6. (a) There is hereby authorized to be appropriated from\ncontract. government, or to procure any or all such services by private\ntime to time, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise\nappropriated, such amounts as may be Decessary to earry out the\n(4) To communicate to any such government any defense infor-\nprovisions and accomplish the purposes of this Act.\nmation, pertaining to any defense article furnished to such givern-\n(b) All money and all property which is converted into money\nment under paragraph (2) of this subsection,\nreceived under section a from any government shall, with the approval\n(5) To release for export any defense article disposed of in\nof the Director of the Budget, revert 10 the respective appropriation\nany way under this subsection to any such government,\nor appropriations out of which funds were expended with respect to\n(b) The terms and conditions upon which any such foreign govern-\nthe defense article or defense information for which such consideration\nruent receives any aid authorized under subsection (a) shall be those\nis received, and shall be available for expenditure for the purpose for\nwhich the President deems satisfactory, and the benefit to the United\nwhich such expended funds were appropriated by law, during the\nStates may be payment or repayment in kind or property, or any other\nfiscal year in which such funds are received and the ensuing fiscal\ndirect or indirect benefit which the President deems satisfactory.\nyear: but in no event shall any funds so received be available for\n(c) After June 30, 1943, or after the passage of a concurrent\nexpenditure after June 30, 1946.\nresolution by the two Houses before June 30, 1943, which declares\nSEC. 7. The Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, and the\nthat the powers conferred by or pursuant to subsection (a) are THE\nbead of the department or agency shall in all contracts or agreements\nlonger necessary to promote the defense of the United States, neither\nfor the disposition of any defense article or defense information fully\nthe President nor the head of any department or agency shall exer-\nprotect the rights of all citizens of the United States who have patent\ntime any of the powers conferred by or pursuant to subsection (a):\nrights in and to any anch article or information which is hereby\nexcept that until July 1, 1946, any of such powers may be exercised\nauthorized to be disposed of and the payments collected for royalties\nto the extent necessary to carry out a contract or agreement with such\non such patents shall be paid to the owners and holders of such patents,\na foreign government made before July 1, 1943, or before the passage\nSm. 8. The Secretaries of War and of the Navy are hereby\nof such concurrent resolution, whichever is the carlier.\nauthorized to purchase or otherwise acquire arms, ammunition, and\n(d) Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or to\nimplements of war produced within the jurisdiction of any country\npermit the authorization of convoying vessels by naval ressels of the\nto which section 3 is applicable, whenever the President deems such\nUnited States.\npurchase or acquisition to be necessary in the interests of the defense\n(e) Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or to permit\nof the United States.\nthe authorization of the entry of any American vessel into 11. combat\nSec. 9. The President may, from time to time, promulgate such\narea in violation of section 3 of the Neutrality Act of 1939.\nrules and regulations as may be necessary and proper to carry ont any\nSec. 4. All contracts or agreements made for the disposition of\nof the provisions of this Act; and he may exercise any power or\nany defense article or defense information pursoant to section 3 shall\nauthority conferred on him by this Act through such department,\ncontain a clause by which the foreign government undertakes that\nagency, or officer ns he shall direct.\nit. will not, without the consent of the President, transfer title to\nSec. 10. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to change existing\nor possession of such defense article or defense information by gift,\nlaw relating to the use of the land and naval forces of the United\nsale, or otherwise, or permit its use by anyone not an officer, employee.\nStates, except insofar as such use relates lo the manufacture, procure-\nor agent of such foreign government.\nment, and repair of defense articles, the communication of informa-\nSec. 5. (a) The Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Navy, or\ntion and other noncombatant purposes enumerated in this Act.\nthe head of any other department or agency of the Government\nSto. 11. If any provision of this Act or the application of such\ninvolved shall, when any such defense article or defense information\nprovision to any circumstance shall be held invalid, the validity of\nis exported, immediately inform the department or agency designated\nthe remainder of the Act and the applicability of such provision to\nother circumstances shall not be affected thereby.\nApproved, March 11, 1941.\nJclassified\nMARCH 11, 1941\n460\nTHE HOUSE APPROVED SENATE AMENDMENTS TO THE BRITISH AID BILL BY A\nVOTE OF 317 TO 71 AND SENT THE BILL TO THE PRESIDENT. ONE MEMBER\nVOTED PRESENT.\nSPEAKER SAN RAYBURN SIGNED THE BILL IMMEDIATELY.\n3/11--RS44P\nFLASH\nPRESIDENT SIGNS BRITIS H AID BILL\n3/11--M0351P\nPRESIDENT ROOSEVELT TODAY SIGNED THE LEND-LEASE BILL AND PREPARED\nTO ASK CONGRESS TO APPROPRIATE $7,000,000,000 TO CARRY OUT ITS\nPROVISIONS FOR GIVING MATERIAL WAR AID TO BRITAIN AND OTHER NATIONS\nFIGHTING AGAINST THE AXIS,\n3/11--W0353P\n461\nMarch 11, 1941\nDear Senator George:\nNow that the Lend-Lease Bill is out of the may,\nI should like to send you my sincere thanks for all\nthat you aid to ensure its passage.\nLooking back over the debate, I cannot help feel-\ning that it was a good thing for our country that you\nwere Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee at this\nparticular time. It is to your great credit that serious\nmistakes were avoided and that, from first to last, the\ndebate was kept on a high democratic level.\nIt was & long, hard fight, and you gave it every\nounce of your skill and energy, but I believe that the\nresults will more than justify your efforts.\nPlease let me thank you also, on personal grounds,\nfor the unfailing courtesy you showed me during the hear-\nings and on all other occasions when we discussed this\nBill together.\nSincerely yours,\n(Signed) E Mergenthau. ST.\nHonorable Walter F. George,\nUnited States Senate.\nFK:nme\nm\nMeasureer\n405\n+\nRegraded Uclassified\n462\nMarch 11, 1941\nDear Senator George:\nI should like to send you my sincere thanks for all\nNow that the Lend-Lease Bill is out of the my,\nthat you did to ensure its passage.\nLooking back over the debate, I cannot help feel-\ning that it was a good thing for our country that you\nwore Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee at this\nparticular time. It is to your great credit that serious\nmistakes were avoided and that, from first to last, the\ndebate was kept on a high democratic level.\nIt was a long, hard fight, and you gave it every\nounce of your skill and energy, but I believe that the\nresults will more than justify your efforts.\nPlease let me thank you also, on personal grounds,\nfor the unfailing courtesy you showed me during the hear-\nings and on all other occasions when we discussed this\nBill together.\nSincerely yours,\n(Signed) a Mergenthati, VI,\nHonorable Walter F. George,\nUnited States Senate.\nFK:mme\nBy\nRegraded Uclassified\n463\nMarch 11, 1941\nDear Senator George:\nI should like to send you my sincere thanks for all\nNow that the Lend-Lease Bill is out of the may,\nthat you did to ensure its passage.\nLooking back over the debate, I cannot help feel-\ning that it was a good thing for our country that you\nwere Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee at this\nparticular time. It is to your great credit that serious\nmistakes were avoided and that, from first to last, the\ndebate was kept on a high democratic level,\nIt was a long, hard fight, and you gave it every\nounce of your skill and energy, but I believe that the\nresults will more than justify your efforts.\nPlease let me thank you also, on personal grounds,\nfor the unfailing courtesy you showed me during the hear-\nings and on all other occasions when we discussed this\nBill together.\nSincerely yours,\n(Signed) I Marganthau, Jr.\nHonorable Walter F. George,\nUnited States Senate.\nFK:nmc\nBy\nMessonger\nRegraded Uclassified\n464\nMarch 11, 1941\nDear Alben:\nNow that the long debate is over,\nI think that sincere thanks are due to\nthe pilot who brought the Lend-Lease Bill\nsafely into port.\nYou steered a straight course and\nyou did a perfectly grand job.\nSincerely yours,\n/s/ Henry\nHonorable Alben W. Barkley,\nUnited States Senate.\n7K:nnc\nin\nBy Measenger 4\nRegraded Uclassified\n465\nMarch 11, 1941\nDear Alben:\nNow that the long debate is over,\nI think that sincere thanks are due to\nthe pilot who brought the Lend-Lease Bill\nsafely into port.\nYou steered a straight course and\nyou did a perfectly grand job.\nSincerely yours,\n/s/ Henry\nHonorable Alben W. Barkley,\nUnited States Senate.\n7 K: -\nBy Measenser\nRegraded Uclassified\n466\nMarch 11, 1941\nDear Alben:\nNow that the long debate is over,\nI think that sincere thanks are due to\nthe pilot who brought the Lend-Lease Bill\nsafely into port.\nYou steered a straight course and\nyou did & perfectly grand job.\nSincerely yours,\n(sgd) Henry\nHonorable Alben W. Barkley,\nUnited States Senate.\ntkime.\nBy\nRegraded Uclassified\n467\nMarch 11, 1941.\nMy dear Mr. Purvis:\nThe President has today authorized the Secre-\ntaries of War and Navy, pursuant to the Act of March 11,\n1941, to dispose of the defense articles, set forth in\nthe annexed schedules, to His Majesty's Government in\nthe United Kingdom.\nThe President has also requested the Secretaries\nof War and Navy to communicate directly with you to\narrange for the time, method, and other details of the\ndisposition.\nVery sincerely yours,\nHarry L. Hopkins (sgd.)\nHARRY L. HOPKINS\nHonorable Arthur Purvis,\nBritish Purchasing Commission,\nWashington, D. C.\nRegraded Uclassified\n468\nDEFENSE ARTICLES AUTHORIZED FOR TRANSFER\nBY THE SECRETARY OF WAR TO THE\nUNITED KINGDOM\n2322 Ground Signal Projectors\n150 M 1916 - 75mm Gun, Hi speed American type\n300 Field Howitzers - 155mm (not Hi speed)\n435 Field Howitzers, 8\" (no ammunition available)\n500 Caissons, 75mm Howitzers\n200 Limbers, 75mm Howitzers\n116,100 Signal Cartridges\n100,000 H. E. Shells, 75mm Normal Charge, Gun\n60,000 H. E. Shells, 155mm Howitzers\n15,000 W.P. Shells, 155mm Howitzers\n60,000 Reduced Propelling Charges for 155mm Howitzers\n15,000 Normal Propelling Charges for 155mm Howitzers\n40 Tractors, Medium (track laying)\n150 Scout Cars, M3A1 (less armament)\n200 Scout Cars, Old Models\nMARCH 11, 1941\nRegraded Uclassified\n469\nDEFENSE ARTICLES AUTHORIZED FOR TRANSFER\nBY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY TO THE\nUNITED KINGDOM\nORDNANCE\n150 4\"/50 L.A. Equipment - U. S. Type\n300 3\"/50 L.A. Equipment - U. S. Type\n8000 4\"/50 L.A. Projectiles\n8000 4\"/50 Complete Rounds - U. S. Type\n18000 3\"/50 Cal. Ammunition - U. S. Type, L.A.\n1200 3\"/23 Cal. Ammunition - U. S. Type\n3000 Propelling Charges for \"I\" Guns - U. S. Type\nSHIPS\n28 Motor Torpedo Boats\nMarch 11, 1941\nRegraded Uclassified\n470\nDEFENSE ARTICLES AUTHORIZED FOR TRANSFER\nBY THE SECRETARY OF WAR TO THE\nROYAL GREEK GOVERNMENT\n50 M 1916 - 75mm Gun, Hi speed American type\n150,000 H.E.Shells, 75mm Reduced Charge, Gun\n30,000 H.E.Shells, 155mm Howitzers\n30,000 Normal Propelling Charges for 155mm Howitzers\nMarch 11, 1941\nRegraded Uclassified\n471\nMarch 11, 1941.\nMy dear Mr. Secretary:\nConsultation having been had with the Chief\nof Staff of the Army, I find that:\n(1) The defense of the United Kingdom is\nvital to the defense of the United States;\n(2) Sections 4 and 7 of the Act of March 11,\n1941 have been complied with by the necessary agree-\nment on the part of His Majesty's Government in the\nUnited Kingdom;\n(3) It would be in the interests of our\nnational defense to transfer the defense articles\nset forth in the annexed schedule.\nI therefore authorize you immediately to\nmake the transfer to His Majesty's Government in the\nUnited Kingdom of the defense articles set forth in\nthe annexed schedule.\nI would appreciate it if you would arrange\nwith the Chairman of the British Supply Council in\nNorth America for the time, method, and other details\nof the disposition.\nVery sincerely yours,\nFranklin D. Roosevelt (sgd.)\nThe Honorable\nThe Secretary of War\nRegraded Uclassified\n472\nDEFENSE ARTICLES AUTHORIZED FOR TRANSFER\nBY THE SECRETARY OF WAR TO THE\nUNITED KINGDOM\n2322 Ground Signal Projectors\n150 M 1916 - 75mm Gun, Hi speed American type\n300 Field Howitzers - 155mm (not Hi speed)\n435 Field Howitzers, 8\" (no ammunition available)\n500 Caissons, 75mm Howitzers\n200 Limbers, 75mm Howitzers\n116,100 Signal Cartridges\n100,000 H. E. Shells, 75mm Normal Charge, Gun\n60,000 H. E. Shells, 155mm Howitzers\n15,000 W.P. Shells, 155mm Howitzers\n60,000 Reduced Propelling Charges for 155mm Howitzers\n15,000 Normal Propelling Charges for 155mm Howitzers\n40 Tractors, Medium (track laying)\n150 Scout Cars, M3A1 (less armament)\n200 Scout Cars, Old Models\nMARCH 11, 1941\nRegraded Uclassified\n473\nMarch 11, 1941.\nMy dear Mr. Secretary:\nConsultation having been had with the Chief of\nNaval Operations of the Navy, I find that:\n(1) The defense of the the United Kingdom is vital\nto the defense of the United States;\n(2) Sections 4 and 7 of the Act of March 11, 1941\nhave been complied with by the necessary agreement on the\npart of His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom;\n(3) It would be in the interests of our national\ndefense to transfer the defense articles set forth in the\nannexed schedule.\nI therefore authorize you immediately to make the\ntransfer to His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom\nof the defense articles set forth in the annexed schedule.\nI would appreciate it if you would arrange with the\nChairman of the British Supply Council in North America for\nthe time, method, and other details of the disposition.\nVery sincerely yours,\n(Signed) Franklin D. Roosevelt\nThe Honorable\nThe Secretary of the Navy.\nRegraded Uclassified\n474\nDEFENSE ARTICLES AUTHORIZED FOR TRANSFER\nBY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY TO THE\nUNITED KINGDOM\nORDNANCE\n150 4\"/50 L.A. Equipment - U. S. Type\n300 3\"/50 L.A. Equipment - U. S. Type\n8000 4\"/50 L.A. Projectiles\n8000 4\"/50 Complete Rounds - U. S. Type\n18000 3\"/50 Cal. Ammunition - U. S. Type, L.A.\n1200 3\"/23 Cal. Ammunition - U. S. Type\n3000 Propelling Charges for \"I\" Guns - U. S. Type\nSHIPS\n28 Motor Torpedo Boats\nMarch 11, 1941\nRegraded Uclassified\n475\nMarch 11, 1941.\nMy dear Mr. Secretary:\nConsultation having been had with the Chief of\nStaff of the Army, I find that:\n(1) The defense of the Royal Greek Government\nis vital to the defense of the United States;\n(2) Sections 4 and 7 of the Act of March 11,\n1941 have been complied with by the necessary agreement\non the part of the Royal Greek Government;\n(3) It would be in the interests of our national\ndefense to transfer the defense articles set forth in the\nannexed schedule.\nI therefore authorize you immediately to make the\ntransfer to the Royal Greek Government of the defense\narticles set forth in the annexed schedule.\nI would appreciate it if you would arrange with the\nMinister of Greece for the time, method, and other details\nof the disposition.\nVery sincerely yours,\n(Signed) Franklin D. Roosevelt\nThe Honorable\nThe Secretary of War.\nRegraded Uclassified\n476\nDEFENSE ARTICLES AUTHORIZED FOR TRANSFER\nBY THE SECRETARY OF WAR TO THE\nROYAL GREEK GOVERNMENT\n50 M 1916 - 75mm Gun, Hi speed American type\n150,000 H.E.Shells, 75mm Reduced Charge, Gun\n30,000 H.E.Shells, 155mm Howitzers\n30,000 Normal Propelling Charges for 155mm Howitzers\nMarch 11, 1941\nRegraded Uclassified\nTHE BRITISH SUPPLY COUNCIL IN NORTH AMERICA\nTELEPHONE: REPUBLIC 7860\nBox 680\nBENJAMIN FRANKLIN STATION\nWASHINGTON D C\nMarch 11, 1941\nMy dear Mr. President:\nWe represent on behalf of His Vajesty's Government\nin the United Kingdom, pursuant to Sections 4 and 7 of the\nAct of March 11, 1941, that:\n1) Every contract or agreement for the\ndisposition of any defense article or wefense\ninformation, pursuant to Section 3 of the Act\nof March 11, 1941, to His Majesty's Government\nin the United Kingdom shall be decised to include\na clause that His Majesty's Government will not,\nwithout your consent, or the consent of someone\ndesignated by you for that purpose, under the\nAct, transfer title to or possession of such\ndefense article or defense information by fift,\nsale, or otherwise, or permit its 12SE by anyone\nnot an officer, employee or agent of His Majesty!s\nGovernment; and\n2) If, as a result of the transfer to 11s\nMajesty's Government of any défense articles or-\ndefense information, it is necessary, ursuant\nto Section 7 of the Act of March 11, 1941, fully\nto protect the rights of any citizen of the\nUnited States, who has patent rights in 5% to\nany such defense article or information, flis\n(ajesty's Government will do so, vhen so re unsted\nby you or your designee for that purpose.\nVery truly yours,\nThe President of the United States\nWhite House\nDirector General of the\nBritish Purchasing Commission\nApproved: arthur RD\nanset\nDirector General of the\nBritish AIr Commission\nChairman of the British\nSupply Council in North America\nRegraded Uclassified\nROYAL GREEK LEGATION\nWASHINGTON\nMarch 11, 1941.\nMy dear Mr. President:\nI represent on behalf of the Royal\nGreek Government, pursuant to Sections 4 and 7 of the Act\nof March 11, 1941, that:\n1)\nEvery contract or agreement for the\ndisposition of any defense article or defense\ninformation, pursuant to Section 3 of the Act\nof March 11, 1941, to the Royal Greek Government\nshall be deemed to include a clause that the\nRoyal Greek Government will not, without your\nconsant, or the consent of someone designated\nby you for that purpose, under the Act, transfer\ntitle to or possession of such defense article\nor defense information by gift, sale, or other-\nwise, or permit its use by anyone not an officer,\nemployee or agent of the Royal Greek Government;\nand\n2) If, as a result of the transfer to the\nRoyal Greek Government of any defense articles or\ndefense information, it is necessary, pursuant to\nSection 7 of the Act of March 11, 1941, fully to\nprotect the rights of any citizen of the United\nStates, who has patent rights in and to any such\ndefense article or information, the Royal Greek\nGovernment will do so, when so requested by you\nor your designee for that purpose.\nVery truly yours,\nC. Dismentopoulos,\nMinister of Greece.\nThe President of the United States,\nWhite House.\nRegraded Uclassified\nI, Viscount Halifax, His Britannic\nMajesty's Ambassador to the United States of\nAmerica, hereby certify that the Director\nGeneral of the British Purchasing Commission,\nthe Director General of the British Air Commission,\nand the Chairman of the British Supply Council\nin North America have the power necessary to\nmake the commitments required of His Majesty's\nGovernment in the United Kingdom by Sections 4\nand 7 of the Act of March 11th, 1941 88 set\nforth in the annexed letter dated March 11th,\n1941, signed by these officers of the British\nGovernment.\nDone at Washington this 11th day of March,\n1941.\nHalifax\nRegraded Uclassified\nPAT HARRISON, MISS., CHAIRMAN\n480\nBILTER F. GEORGE, GA\nROBERT M. LAFELLETTE, Ja., wis,\n- 1. WALEN, MASS.\nARTHUR CAPPER, KAMS,\n- w. BARKLEY, KY.\nARTHUR H. VANDENBERG, MICH,\n# CORRIALLY, TEX,\nJAMES de DAVIE, PR.\nLAB w. BAILEY, N. c.\nHENRY CANGT LOOSE, - MASE,\nWHETT CHAMP CLARK, MO.\nJOHN A. DANAHER, CONN\n- FLOOD gran, VA.\nROBERT 4. TAPT, GHIO\nUnited States Senate\nPETER 4. CERRY, n. L\n- F. CUPPLY, PA.\nCOMMITTEE ON FINANCE\nPRENTIES M. MOWN, MICH.\nare L MERRING, IOWA,\n- c. colo.\n- L RADCLIFFE, MD.\nFELTON M. JOHNSTON, CLERR\nMarch 11, 1941.\nDear Henry:\nIt was good of you to write me as you\ndid on the anniversary of my thirty years legis-\nlative service. One of the finest things about\nthis job is the splendid associations I have on-\njoyed, and I am sure I need not tell you how\nmuch I appreciate your friendship and association.\nWith best wishes always, I am\nCardama Sincerely yours,\nHonorable Henry Morgenthau,\nSecretary of the Treasury,\nWashington, D. 0.\nINERAL OFFICES\nc. WASHINGTON ST.\n-\nCHICAGO ILL.\nWURREY BUILDING\nWARNINGTON, D.C.\n481\nTELEPHONE NATIONAL 3342\nWASHINGTON, D.C.\nMarch 11, 1941\nMEMORANDUM TO: SECRETARY MORGANTHAU\nThe statement presented to you by Senator Bankhead concerning\nS.935 mentions the \"parity price loan\" feature of his plan but does not\ngo into any explanation of this feature of this bill. Most of the mamo-\nrandum deals with the problem of adjusting the supply of cotton to meet\ncurrent demands.\nBriefly, Senator Bankhead's bill proposes:\n1. A system of commodity loans at 100 per cent of parity for cotton,\nwheat, tobacco and rice conditioned on marketing quotas being in effect to\ncontrol supplies. An 85 per cent loan rate on corn is provided because\nthe representatives of the corn producers do not want a. loan higher than\n85 per cent of parity.\nThe American Farm Bureau Federation is recommending a loan rate of\n85 per cent instead of 100 per cent for all five commodities. (See\nattached statement presented by President O'Neal to the Senate Committee\non Agriculture for summary of Farm Bureau plan).\nThe commodity loan plan has this great advantage,-that it gives\nthe farmers parity or very close to parity in the markst-place. If a\n100 per cent loan is made available, no appropriations are needed for\nparity payments; if an 85 per cent loan is made available, appropriations\nfor parity payments would be needed to meet the 15 per cent deficiency.\nBut careful estimates indicate that under this plan farmers could receive\n100 per cent of parity with about the same appropriations as are now\nbeing made.\nUnder the Bankheed proposal of 100 per cent loans, as already\npointed out, there would be no parity payments to farmers, as the farmers\nwould get parity prices in the market-place for their entire crop. The\nbuyers of cotton, for example, would either have to pay the farmers\nparity price or the farmers could put the cotton under the loan. In\norder to prevent cotton from piling up in the loan, this plan proposes\nfirst to maintain our fair share of the world market for cotton by\nselling cotton for export at the world price and reimbursing the Commodity\nCredit Corporation for any losses incurred by reason of such sales. BIM\nport payments to exporters could be made if necessary to prevent cotton\nfrom going into the loan. In addition, the Bankhead bill proposes to\nbring about an adjustment of production of cotton down to approximately\nRegraded Uclassified\n482\n10,000,000 bales in 1941, which is the estimated amount needed for domestic\nconsumption and exports.\n2. A provision for payments to cotton farmers to reduce their production\nbelow their current allotments for the purpose of adjusting the supply of\ncotton to current requirements for comestic consumption and exports.\nIn his memorandum Senator Bankhead suggested two methods of securing\na voluntary reduction in production of 2 to 2 / million bales below the\nallotments for 1941, which have already been announced and which total about\n12 million bales. One of these methods consists of a payment in kind at the\nrate of one-half bale for each bale taken out of production; the other\nmethod proposes a payment in cash at the rate of so much per pound to take\ncotton out of production, utilizing the $85,000,000 appropriated for parity\npayments for the purpose of making these payments for extra reduction in\nproduction.\nThe Farm Bureau has recommended a payment in kind at the rate of\none-half bale for each bale taken out of production below the present\nallotment.\narregg R. Ogg\nDirector of Research\nRegraded Uclassified\nSun Bankhiel's glass\nmarch 7/41\nS. 935 S.\nFor the purpose of indicating the objective of this bill\nand its probable effect, I beg to present the following as it\napplies to cotton:\nUsing round figures, the government owns 6,200,000 bales.\nIt holds under loan 4,900,000 bales. There are two primary\nobjectives involved; first is better income to farmers and second\nis better protection to the United States Treasury.\nDistribution. Domestic consumption next year may amount\nto 9,000,000 bales. The export market is practically eliminated.\nFrom August 1 last until March 1 last, only 504,000 bales were\nexported in the channels of trade. There were total exports of\napproximately 700,000 bales but the balance of the cotton was\nexported under the rubber exchange with Great Britain. Assuming\nthe same exports next year and a slight increase in domestic\nconsumption, there will be a distribution of approximately 9,500,000\nbales.\nThe cotton allotment, assuming normal weather, will produce\n12,000,000 bales. To the cotton now under the government loan\nthere will be added from next year's crop about 2,500,000 bales,\nthus increasing the government owned and loan cotton to 13,500,000\nbales. It is evident that something must be done about the con-\ntinued surplus production. The bill, while accepting the announced\nRegraded Uclassified\n484\n-2-\nallotments for this year of 12,000,000 bales, provides two methods\nof securing voluntary reduction in production of from 2,000,000 to\n2,500,000 bales, as follows:\n1. To pay in kind with Commodity Credit cotton one-half\nbale for each bale taken out of production up to a certain limit.\n2. Use the parity payment appropriation of about\n$86,000,000 allotted to cotton farmers to pay so much & pound\nto take cotton out of production.\nIf the parity price loan plan is put into operation, the\nappropriations for parity payments will not be required for that\npurpose and can be used to protect the price of cotton and the\nTreasury by adjusting the supply to a quantity that must be bought\nby domestic consumers plus a nominal amount to be exported.\nThe cotton under loan covers loans for the crop years\n'38-'39 and '40-'41. The bill provides that farmers who dispose\nof their equity in cotton loans after the day the bill was intro-\nduced cannot participate in the parity price loan. That is intended\nto enable the government to retire that cotton from the market\nand take it out of competition with this year's crop. The bill\nfurther provides that the farmers shall be paid the value of their\nequity in cotton the day the bill was introduced. There is no\nequity in the '38 loan because the loan price and the carrying\ncharges exceed the present market value. There is a small equity\nRegraded Uclassified\n485\n-3-\nof from two to four dollars a bale on the '40 crop. The equity\nfor that cotton can be paid with from five to seven or eight\nmillion dollars. With the loan cotton taken over by the government,\nas it must ultimately be done, and with the crop reduced to\n9,500,000 to 10,000,000 bales, there will be practically no cotton\ngoing into the loan. Such amount as goes in must be taken out\nby the consumers before a new crop comes to market. This plan\nwill increase the present totally inadequate income of cotton\nproducers and will stop increasing the government stocks and may\nlater be adjusted so as to gradually eliminate the government\nstocks.\n- TO: miss Chamsey 486\nis mentioned the\nO' heal letter to\nhim - he he a lanced\nat it - said\nhe wouldn't need\nit\nZ\nFrom: LIEUT. STEPHENS\n48\nAMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION\n487\nMunsey Building\nWashington, D. C.\nMarch 11, 1941\nHonorable Franklin D. Roosevelt\nPresident of the United States\nThe White House\nWashington, D. C.\nMy dear Mr. President:\nWe are all greatly distressed that Chester Davis\nis leaving the Federal Reserve Board. He has certainly been our\ngood friend there.\nMay I respectfully present for your consideration\nto fill his place the followings\nIf you want someone from the midwest, I would\nsuggest the name of Earl C. Smith, President, Illinois Agricultural\nAssociation and Vice President, American Farm Bureau Federation;\nif you want someone from the northeast, I would suggest W. I.\nMyers, Professor of Economics, Cornell University and former\nGovernor, Farm Credit Administration; or if you want someone from\nArkansas Farm Bureau Federation. I believe any of these man could\nthe south, I would suggest the name of R. E. Short, President,\nably fill this position and would have the confidence of our\nfarmers.\nFarmers feel very strongly that agriculture\nshould be represented on this important Board.\nHoping these suggestions will have your earnest\nconsideration and with warm personal regards, I an\nSincerely yours,\n154032\nEAO'Nes\nE A EA e MA SI ЯАМ IAQI\nТИЗМТЯАЛЗО TRU2A38T\nEdw. A. O'Neal - President\nYRUZA\nRegraded Uclassified\n488\nTREASURY department\npry\nip\nINTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION\nDATE March 11, 1941\nTO\nSecretary Morgenthau\nFROM\nMr. Cochran\nSTRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL\nOfficial sales of British-owned dollar securities under the vesting order\neffective February 19, 1940:\nNo. of Shares\n$ Proceeds of\nNominal Value\n$ Proceeds of\nSold\nShares Sold\nof Bonds Sold\nBonds Sold\nMarch 3\n19,080\n1,442,474\n81,000\n60,348\n4\n218,632\n11,408,484\n160,000\n125,498\n2\n24,449\n793,163\n31,000\n31,950\n126,017\n3,581,120\n291,000\n296,108\n7\n36,912\n1,433,373\n117,000\n120,123\n8\n3,026\n255,955\n159,400\n174,748\n428,116\n18,914,569\n839,400\n808,775\nMarch 3\nlift to Treasury\n4\n7\n428,120\n18,914,576\nSales from\n2/22/40 to\n3/1/41\n5,595,088-1/2\n172,222,599\n19,483,700\n18,664,818\nTOTAL 2/22/40\nTO 3/8/41\n6,023,208-1/2\n191,137,175\n20,323,100\n19,473,593\nMiss Poate reported sales of non-vested securities for the week ended\nMarch 1 totaled $300,000.\n75ml\nDe\n489\nTREASURY DEPARTMENT\nINTER OFFICE COMMUNICATION\nDATE March 11, 1941\nTO\nSecretary Morgenthau\nFROM Mr. Cochram\nCONFIDENTIAL\nRegistered sterling transactions of the reporting banks were as follows:\nSold to commercial concerns\n£56,000\nPurchased from commercial concerns £22,000\nThe Federal Reserve Bank of New York sold £15,000 in registered sterling to\nthe American Express Co., and purchased £2,000 from Thos. Cook & Son.\nOpen market sterling remained at 4.03-1/2, and there were no reported trans-\nactions.\nIn New York, the closing rates for the foreign currencies listed below were\nas follows:\nCanadian dollar\n15% discount\nSwies franc (commercial)\n.2322-1/2\nSwedish krona\n.2384-1/2\nReichsmark\n.4005\nLira\n.0505\nArgentine peso (free)\n.2303\nBrazilian milreis (free)\n.0505\nMexican peso\n.2066\nCuban peso\n6-5/8% discount\nIn Shanghai, the yuan in terms of our currency remained at 5-1/24. and\nsterling advanced 20 to 3.91.\nThere were no gold transactions consummated by us today.\nThe Federal Reserve Bank of New York reported that the Central Bank of the\nColombian Republic shipped $2,921,000 in gold from Colombia to the Federal for its\nown account, disposition unknown.\nThe prices fixed in London for spot and forward silver were unchanged at\n23-3/8d and 23-5/16d, respectively. The U.S. equivalents were 42.444 and 42.334.\n34-3/44. The Treasury's purchase price for foreign silver VAS also unchanged at 350-\nHandy and Harman's settlement price for foreign silver vas unchanged at\nRegraded Uclassified\n490\n- 2 -\nVe made six purchases of silver totaling 500,000 ounces under the Silver\nPurchase Act, all of which consisted of new production from foreign countries,\nfor forward delivery.\nThe report of March 5 received from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York\ngiving foreign exchange positions of banks and bankers in its district, revealed\nthat the total position of all countries was short the equivalent of $7,286,000,a\ndecrease of $322,000 in the short position. Net changes were as follows:\nShort Position\nShort Position\nFebruary 26\nChange in\nCountry\nMarch 5\nShort Position*\nEngland**\n$ 263,000\n$ 515,000\n+ $252,000\nEurope\n3,292,000\n3,207,000\n- 85,000\nCanada\n109,000 (Long)\n173,000 (Long)\n- 64,000\nLatin America\n211,000\n126,000\n- 85,000\nJapan\n2,559,000\n2,316,000\n- 243,000\nOther Asia\n1,352,000\n1,329,000\n- 23,000\nAll others\n40,000\n34,000 (Long)\n- 74,000\nTotal\n$7,608,000\n$7,286,000\n- $322,000\nPlus sign (+) indicates increase in short position, or decrease in long position.\nMinus sign(-) indicates decrease in short position, or increase in long position.\n\" Combined position in registered and open market sterling.\nN.M.R.\nconfidential\n491\nTREASURY DEPARTMENT\nINTER-OFFICE COMMUNICATION\nDATE March 11, 1941\nTO\nFROM\nMr. Secretary Haas SOA.\nMorgenthau\nSubject: Markets Current Developments in the High-grade Security\nSUMMARY\n(1) Treasury securities have regained since February 15\nabout one-third of the price declines suffered be-\ntween December 30, 1940 and February 15 (Charts I\nand II).\n(2) The increased issue of Treasury bills on March 5 was\nabsorbed entirely by weekly reporting banks in the\nChicago and St. Louis Federal Reserve districts.\nBills are now in demand in these districts for the\npurpose of avoiding local property taxes.\n(3) High-grade corporate and municipal bonds have gained\nin price only moderately as compared with Treasury\nbonds during the past two weeks (Charts II and III).\n(4) Estimates of the yield differential between fully\ntaxable and partially tax-exempt Treasury bonds vary\nfrom as low as 17 to as high as 57 basis points, de-\npending upon the assumptions made with respect to\nthe correct pricing of the new 2 percent Treasury\nbond (Chart IV).\n(5) The price of the new 2 percent bond offered on\nFebruary 25 declined from an opening bid around\n101-20/32 to & low of 100-21/32 at the close that\nbooks closed the following day. As the result\nday, but recovered somewhat, on balance, before of the\nthe offering of & new note with the bond, the worth refund= at\nleast below that of the note, rights would have bond been\ning 100-16/32, and if the price of the bond\nwas never in danger. The new note was had\nconverted fell below the note, and when the books closed,\nfallen into the new note. As it was, the\nnever it was substantially above it (Chart V).\nRegraded Uclassified\n492\nSecretary Morgenthau - 2\nI. Price and Yield Movements of\nGovernment Securities\nPrices of long-term Treasury bonds have enjoyed a net\nincrease of over 2 points since February 15, when they\nreached a low for the year. Intermediate bonds have gained\nabout 1 point during this time, while Treasury notes have\ngained, on the average, between 1/4 and 1/2 of a point\n(Chart I). This rise represents an average recovery of\nabout one-third of the net decline from December 30, 1940\nthrough February 15. Long bonds have shown the greatest\nstrength, recovering about 54 percent of their losses be-\ntween December 30 and February 15. The market for Govern-\nment securities continues to be very thin, and hence sub-\nject to rather considerable price fluctuations. Price\nchanges since December 30, 1940 are shown in the following\ntable:\n:\nAverage price change\n:\n: Dec. 30, 1940-:Feb. 15, 1941-\n:Feb. 15, 1941 :Mar. 10, 1941\n(Decimals are thirty-seconds)\nNotes\n1 to 3 years\n- .25\n+.09\n3 to 5 years\n-1.00\n+.11\nBonds\n5 to 15 years to call\n-3.11\n+1.02\n15 years and over to call\n-4.09\n+2.10\nThe average yield of long-term Treasury bonds, moving\ninversely to prices, which increased by 29 basis points from\nbalance, by 15 basis points since February 15 (Chart II).\nDecember 30, 1940 through February 15, has decreased, on\nRegraded Uclassified\n493\nSecretary Morgenthau - 3\nII. Absorption of New Treasury Bills\nThe issue of Treasury bills on March 5 amounted\nabout $200 millions -- an increase of $100 millions over to\nprevious weeks. This entire increase and $20 millions\nmore was absorbed by weekly reporting member banks in the\nChicago and St. Louis Federal Reserve districts. Treas-\nury bills are in demand in these districts at the present\nIllinois and Missouri.\ntime for the purpose of avoiding local property taxes in\nThe March 5 issue of bills was also the first issue\nof taxable bille. The increased size of the issue and the\nspecial demand mentioned above, however, tend to obscure\nthe effect of the tax feature upon the rates of discount\nat which they were awarded. The average rate on the last\nissue of tax-exempt bills -- dated February 26 - was\n0.043 percent, &s compared with & rate of 0.086 percent\non the first issue of taxable bills.\nIII. High-grade Corporate and Municipal Bonds\nUnlike prices of long-term Treasury bonds which have\nrisen markedly since February 15, prices of high-grade\ncorporate bonds have fluctuated within a fairly narrow\nrange and have improved very slightly (Chart II). High-\ngrade municipal bonds have gained moderately in the last\ntwo weeks (Chart III).\nNew bond offerings to the public in the New York mar-\nket were $22.8 millions last week 88 compared with $9.8\nmillions the week before. The largest of last week's of-\nferings -- $16.0 millions of Public Service Company of\nOklahoma 30-year, 3-1/4 percent bonde (priced to yield\n3.07 percent ) -- 1s reported to be moving slowly. The\nprincipal demand is said to come from medium- and small-\nsize insurance companies.\nThe RFC took the entire $136 millions State of Arkansas\nrefunding bonds on February 27 at 8. price to yield about\n3.2 percent. A nation-wide banking group which had been\nprepared to bid for about two-thirds of the issue on about\n& 3-1/2 percent coupon basis withdrew at the last moment.\nRegraded Uclassified\n103\nAmeretary Morgenthau - 4\nIV. Pricing and the Value of\nTax Exemption\n1948-50 1s still far from complete, and the market for\nSecondary distribution of the new 2 percent bonds of\nGovernment securities 8.0 a whole remains thin 8.8 it has been\nsince the first of the year. It is thus difficult to draw\nany valid conclusions as to the yield differential being\nestablished in the market between fully taxable and partially\ntax-exempt Treasury bonds. Chart IV compares the yield of\nthe new bonds with the yields of outstanding Treasury bonds.\nTwo curves are shown for the outstanding issues: an opti-\nmistic one based on low coupon bonds with 2-year call periods,\nsuch as was used by Mr. Piser of the Board of Governors in\npricing the new issue, and a very conservative one based on\nthe bonds in this area with the highest yields, irrespective\nof coupon or call period, such 8.8 was used by the Division of\nResearch and Statistics in pricing the issue. Inasmuch as\nthe opinion is widely expressed in the market that the new\nbond should be regarded as a 1950 maturity (on the ground\nthat partially tax-exempt bonds will be called before matu-\nrity, but that taxable bonds will be allowed to run their\nfull term) yields both to earliest call date and to final\nmaturity are shown for the new 2's.\nOn the basis of yields to earliest call date the spread\nbetween the new bonds and partially tax-exempt bonds of com-\nparable term 18 about 57 basis points when the optimistic\ncurve 1s used, and about 38 basis points measured from the\nconservative curve. On the assumption that the new bond\nshould be figured to maturity (other issues continuing to\nbe computed to call) the corresponding spreads are 35 and\n17 basis points, respectively.\nThe spread which may be attributed to the taxability\nof the new bond thus varies from as low 88 17 to as high 88\n57 basis points, depending upon various assumptions which\nmay be made - all with some authority - with respect to\nthe proper pricing of the new bond BB a partially tax exempt\nsecurity.\nIt should be noted, however, that the supposed necessity\nfor pricing the new issue to maturity rather than to call\n1a itself attributed to the tax factor, and thus creates\na sort of \"quasi-tax-differential\" consisting of pricing\nthe new issue 6.8 8 9-year rather than as 8 7-year security.\nRegraded Uclassified\n495\nSecretary Morgenthau - 5\nWhen these differentials are expressed as equivalents\nof a tax on the coupon they vary from a low of 8 percent\n(or only one-third of the corporation tax) to a high of\n28 percent (or more than the whole amount of the corporation\ntax) as shown in the following table:\nProbable redemption date\nCurve used in pricing\nassumed for new bonds\nOptimistic\nConservative\n(Percent of coupon)\n1948 (Call)\n28\n19\n1950 (Maturity)\n17\n8\nThe truth doubtless lies somewhere within these extremes,\nbut the wide range makes it very difficult to say exactly how\nmuch allowance the market is now making for the taxability of\nthe new bond,\nV. Refunding of the March Maturities\nThe pricing of the new securities to be offered in ex-\nchange for the maturing 1-1/2 percent note of March 1941, and\nthe 3-3/8 percent bond called for redemption at the same time,\npresented a special problem because of the difficulty in\nestimating the allowance to be made for the taxability of the\nnew issues. The problem was met by your offering an inter-\nmediate-term bond, and - as a \"backstop\" to insure the success\nof the refunding - a 2-year note.\nOpening bids on Tuesday, February 25, were about about 101-20/32\nfor the 2 percent, 7-9 year Treasury bond, and the\n100-11/32 new for the new 3/4 percent 2 year note. From the price open-\ning price rose. At the close on Tuesday the prices On\nthe of the bond declined steadily, while of the\nof the note the new note were the same (Chart V). the\nnew Wednesday bond and the new securities gained, on balance, bond\nRegraded Uclassified\n496\nSecretary Morgenthau - 6\nthe day its price fell back again to that of the note.\nshowing the greater strength, although at one point during\nAs a result of the offering of a note together with the\nbond, the refunding was at no time in danger. After the\nfirst two hours of trading, as the chart suggests, the note\nwas always worth a minimum price of about 100-16/32. If\nthe price of the bond had fallen below this price, rights\nwould have been converted into the note rather than the\nbond. As it happened the price of the bond twice rico-\ncheted upward from the price of the note, but never fell\nbelow it (Chart V).\nAttachments\n497\nChart I\nCHANGES IN THE PRIORS OF U.S. SHOURITING\nPotata Plotted Represent the Difference from Besember so, 1943 Price of Bach Materity Class\n1941\nJAR.\nMAIL\n1942\n1941\nMY\nJULY\nSEPT.\nNOV,\nFEBRUARY\nPOINTS\nJAM.\nBASCH\nTTT\ne\nAPRIL\nIS\n22\nPOINTS\ne\n15\n22\n29\n5\n12\n(NST CHANGE)\n=\n26\n(ART DIANG)\nPOINTS\nNaturday Ometations\nDaily\n(ACT DIANE)\n:\n+1\n+3\n+3\n+1\n+1\n+2\n+2\n=\n..\n0\n0\n*1\n+1\n1\n+\nNOTES\nNOTES\n+3 Yes.\n1-3 Yes.\no\n+\n+\no\n+\nT\n-1\n-1\n-1\nof\nNorts\nNOTEST\n3-5 Yes,\n3-5 Yes,\n-16\n11-\n-2\n4\n-12\n-If\n&\n&\n-11\n-If\n&\nBonos,\n&\n1\n5-15 Yes\nTO CALL\nT\n-2%\né\nBoups,\nBonds,\n5-15 Yes, TO CALL\n&\nOVER 15 Yes.\n4\n4\nTO CALL\n&\n-26\n428\n9\n-6\n+3\n-3\n*\n-36\n14\n-7\n&\n$\n-\n9\n-34\n-Id\nBoxos,\nOVER 15 Yes. TO CALL\n1\nT\n9\n&\n7\n7\n7\n&\n-10\n-10\n₺\n±\n-11\n-11\n&\n-5\nJAB.\nMAR.\nMAY\nJULY\n101.\nNOV.\nJM.\na\n15\n22\n1\na\n15\n22\n29\n5\n12\n19\n26\n1941\n1942\nFEBRUARY\nMARCH\nAPRIL\n1941\nOffice of the Secretary of the Trumery\nF - 153 - C\n- of - - -\n498\nChart II\nCOMPARATIVE YIELDS OF AVERAGE OF ALL LONG TERM U.S. TREASURY\nAND AVERAGE OF HIGH GRADE CORPORATE BONDS\n1940\nJAN\nFIR\nMAR\nAPR.\nMAY\nANE\nJAY\nAUG.\nSEPT\nOCT.\nHGV.\n1941\nDEC\n1940\n-\na\nJAN.\n,\nis\nFEB.\nMAR\nAML\n1941\na\nIf\n-\n=\n\"\nBI\n-\n-\nMAY\n4\n-\n-\nJUNE\n-\n=\nANY\nAUG\nSEPT.\n.\nEl\nOCT\n18\nNOV.\nDEC.\nDEC\nJAN\ninvert Sugle\n⑉\n-\n-\nFEB.\ne\n#\nN.\nRE\n9\nM\n1\nis\n-\nas\n.\n=\n\"\n,\nΓ.\n-\nPER CENT\ninversed Scale\nInvers Scale\nPER CENT\nPER CENT\nWEEKLY. Saturday Quotations\nDA\nLY\nLE\n1.5\nLa\n20\n2.0\n20\n.\nLong Term\nTreasury\n2.2\n.\n2.2\nLt\nLong Term Treasury\nas years or more to earliest on del\n2.4\n24\n24\n26\n26\n24\nCorporate\n28\n28\n28\nCorporate\n10\n3.0\n80\n32\n3.2\n12\n14\n3.4\n14\n36\n36\n3.6\nPER\nPER\nPER\nCENT\nCENT\nCENT\n1.00\n100\n100\nSpread Between Long Term\nTreasury and Corporate\n80\n.80\n80\n60\n60\n60\nSpread\n40\n40\n40\n20\n20\n20\no\no\no\n.\n-\n-\nas\nas\n4\n=\n=\n-\n#\n#\n=\n-\n#\na\n.\nJAN. - FEB. If MAR - - APR. is - MAY 19 ARE JULY - AUG. \" - SEPT. - - OCT. - NOV = DSC. JAM FEB. MAR - # APR. # . MAY - = JURE H . JULY - AUG. - - SEPT. 16 of OCT. # # NOV. - DEC\nDEC\nJAN\nFEB\nMAR\n1940\n1941\n1940\n1941\n. Change in composition of Long Term Treasury average\nX el the Sentary di the Tradery\nof\nCOMPARATIVE YIELDS OF AVERAGE OF ALL LONG TERM US TREASURY\nAND Dow-JONES AVERAGE OF MUNICIPAL BONDS\nYields Based on Saturday Quotations\n1940\n1941\nJAN\nFES.\nMAR.\nAPR\nMAY\nJUNE\nJULY\nAUG\nSEPT\nOCT\nNOV\nDEC\nJAM\nFEB\nMAR.\nAPR.\nMAY\nJUNE\nJULY\nAUG\nSEPT\nOCT\nNOV\nDEC\n-\n17\n.\n.\nse\na\n=\n#\n\"\nR\n10\n.\nor\n-\nM\n\"\n,\n-\n,\n\"\n,\nDI\n4\nis\n.\n1\n|\nis\n\"\n18\nse\nis\n14\n7\nBY\n.\n=\nI\n=\nao\n13\n17\n#\n29\n.\nes\nInverted Scale\nInverted Scale\nPER CENT\nPER CENT\n1.8\nLong Term Treasury\" (12 years ar more to serviced call date)\n18\n2.0\n2.0\n2.2\nt.z\n2.4\n2.4\n2.6\n2.6\nTwenty 20-Year Municipal Bonds\n1.5\n2.8\n3.0\n3.0\n3.2\n3.2\nPER\nPER\nCENT\nCENT\n60\n60\nDifferential\n40\n40\n20\n.20\no\no\n0\n14\n=\n18\nB\n-\n28\n11\n.\n-\n15\n43\n\"\n18\n-\n2\n1\nT\nIII\n.\n#\nI\n#\n⑉\ne\nIF\n.\nIf\n8.\n=\n#\n1\n.\nas\n-\ne\nN\n$0\n13\n17\n#\n\"\n.\n==\n.\n19\n-\n-\nDEC\nJAM.\nFES\nMAR\nAPR\nMAY\nAM\nJULY\nAUG\nNOT\nOCT\nNOV\nDEC\nJAIL\nFEB\nMAR\nAPIL\nMAY\nJUNE\nJULY\nAUG.\nSEPT.\nOCT:\nNOV\n1941\n1940\n499\n\"Areat è - indicares change - comportion of Larg form Treasury average\nthe of the Secretary of the Treasury\nF-124-5\n- of - - -\nRegraded Uclassi\nChart IV\n500\nCOMPARISON 07 YIELD OF NEW 25 TREASURY BOND WITH\nYIELDS OF PARTIALLY TAX-EXEMPT TREASURY BONDS\nBased on Closing Bid Prices, March 10, 1941\n1948\n1949\nPERCENT\n1950\nPERCENT\nNEW BOND\nYIELD TO NATURITY\n1.9\n1.9\nNow BOND\nYIELD TO CALL\n1.8\n1.8\nCONSERVATIVE CURVE\n1.7\n1.7\n1.6\n1.6\n1.5\n1.5\n1.4\n1.4\nOPTIMISTIC CURVE\n1.3\n1.3\n1.2\n1.2\n1.1\n1.1\n1.0\n1.0\n1948\n1949\n1950\nOffice of the Secretary of the Treasury\nF - 203\nDivision of - and -\nChart\nBID PRICES OF NEW TREASURY SECURITIES\nHourly, February 25 and 26, 1941\nDOLLARS\nDOLLARS\n1014\n1014\n1011\n1011\n2% BONDS, MARCH 15, 1948-'50\n1011\n101\n101\n101\n100\n100)\nto NOTES, MARCH 15, 1943\n100}\n100}\n100\n100\n100\n100\n10\n11\n12\n1\n2\n3\n4\n10\n11\n12\n1\n2\n3\n4\nFEBRUARY 25\nFEBRUARY 26\nTIME\n501\nOffice of the Secretary of the Trusury\nof - and /\nF - 202\nRegraded Uclas\n502\nTreasury Department\nDivision of Monetary Research\nDate\nMarch 11\n1941\nTo:\nSecretary Morgenthau\nFrom:\nMr. White\nSubject:\nFinancing of Argentine food\nshipments to Spain\nCable advice from Buenos Aires indicates\nthat the Spanish interest in the Argentine\nElectricity Company will be used as the\nsecurity for the Argentine credit to Spain\nto finance \"immediate shipments\" of meat\nand wheat to & value of 35 to 40 million\npesos (about $10 million).\nThis is the first case which has come\nto our attention of Argentine acquisition\n(probably only as collateral) of foreign-\nowned enterprises. Possibly these securities\ncan be resold in the Argentine capital\nmarket to acquire pesos to pay Argentine\ngrain and meat producers. But apparently\nthey are to be used only as collateral.\nMR. WHITE\nBranch 2058 - Room 208\n503\nKH\nPLAIN\nCalcutta\nDated March 11, 1941\nRec'd 9:11 p.m.\nSecretary of State,\nWashington.\nEleventh.\nGovernment notification March tenth requires British subjects\nholding twenty-four American securities surrender them within one\nmonth at fixed prices. Preferred stocks American power light fives\nelectric bond share fives common stocks Telandtel Anaconda Bethlehem\nChrysler electric bond share General Motors National City Bank Republic\nSocony National Power Light United States Steel Government bonds eleven\nissues.\nGROTH\nNPL\nCopy:alm\n504\nPeiping via N. R.\nJR\nDated March 11, 1941\nRec'd 1:02 p.m.\nSecretary of State,\nWashington.\n80, March 11, 2 p.m.\nAs of March 1 the Federal Reserve Bank is reported\nto have refused to issue export permits covering articles\nmade in whole or in part of silver, brass or other metals,\nincluding cloissonne, and costume jewelry.\nAn official of the bank has stated informally that\nalthough no such restriction has been promulgated the\nmatter is presently under consideration. The customs\nauthorities state they have no instructions in the\npremises but refuse clearance without & permit from the\nbank.\nThis restriction if universally applied will in\neffect eliminate the only remaining major export from this\narea.\nSent to the Department, repeated to Chungking,\nTientsin and Shanghai. By air mail to Tokyo.\nSMITH\nGV\neh:copy\n505\n(CONFIDENTIAL)\nPARAPHRASE\nA confidential telegram dated March 11, 1941 from Consul\nBrady at Rangoon reads substantially as follows:\nReliable figures show that during the two months from\nDecember 30, 1940 to February 28, 1940 there were shipped into\nChina by the Southwest Transportation Company supplies of all\nkinds for the Chinese Government to the amount of 22,026 long\ntons. It is reported that there was reopened to traffic on\nMarch 3 the new bridge across the Mekong River which in\nDecember was badly damaged by bombing. For weeks a pontoon\nferry has been used to handle traffic across the Mekong River\nand there is now being built & pontoon bridge. The old Mekong\nRiver suspension bridge is still in a wrecked condition.\nmg\nCOPY\n506\nRESTRICTED\n0-2/2657-220\nM.I.D., W.D.\nNo. 336\nMarch 11, 1941\n12:00 M.\nSITUATION REPORT\nI. Western Theater of War.\nAir: German. Daylight activity on the 10th was limited\nto attacks on shipping. Last night a heavy attack was made on\nPortsmouth.\nBritish. On the night of the 10th-11th Cologne was\nheavily attacked. Invasion ports, including Brest, Cherbourg and\nBoulogne, were also raided.\nII. Balkan Theater of War.\nGround: Bulgaria. No change.\nAlbania. The Italians report patrol action by\nthe ninth army and artillery and local infantry action by the eleventh\narmy in the Tepelini sector. The Greeks report they have repulsed\nstrong Italian attacks along a widened front in the central sector\n(Tepeleni-Klisura). It would appear that the Italians are preparing\nfor a general offensive.\nAir: Normal close support operations in Albania.\nIII. Mediterranean and African Theaters of War.\nGround: Abyssinia (Ethiopia). British forces have captured\nDambacha and are threatening Debra Marcos 32 miles to the southeast\non the road to Addis Ababa.\nLibya. Minor operations incident to the siege\nof Giarabub.\nSea: The British report an Italian cruiser has been tor-\npedoed and almost certainly sunk.\nAir: German. Harrassing attacks in the Bengazi area.\nBritish. A rather strong attack was made on Harrar,\nEthiopia.\nNote: This military situation report is issued by the Military In-\ntelligence Division, General Staff. In view of the occasional in-\nclusion of political information and of opinion it is classified as\nRestricted.\nRESTRICTED\n507\nCONFIDENTIAL\nPersphrase of Code Rediagram\nReceived at the War Department\nat 10:38. March 11, 1941.\nLondon. filed March 11, 1941.\n1. On Menday. March 10, British fighter planes flying at 30,000 feet\ncarried out three offensive everys over the French coast between Calsie\nand Beulagne but encountered m German planes. During the preceding night\nno British planes vers over the Continent.\n2. During the night of March 10-11 targets on Liverpeel Boy and the\nBetuary of the Threes were the objectives of secondary Gernea raids. The\nprincipal raid was a fairly severe German attack corried out against Porte-\nmouth. the extent of the damage done has not been determined. No British\nplanes were lest. German looses were one plane which greshed. During\ndeylight hours of March 10, 41 German please were on reconnaissance missions\nover the English Channel and the North Sea. Twenty-nine Germen please were\nplatted ever Great Britein. One Germen plans was shot down and no British\nplanes were lest. There was me damage to military installations. During\nthe night of March 9-10 Reyal Nevy desk facilities and Army berreaks in\nthe Portemonth agen suffered - damage. During the - night 120 German\nplease took part in the attack en Leader. The Manston sirfield is southern\nBritein vis attended by 18 Garmen Messerechnidt dive beabers without ump\nin the early daylight hours of March 9.\n3. Reyal Mr Torce operations in Middle Enstern theaters were as\nfellows: GOTER Italian please were shot down and 10 is probable that two\nES\nothers vere destroyed by British fighter planos over Keleyre (this my be\nCONFIDENTIAL\nRegraded Uclassified\n508\nCONFIDENTIAL\nKersive which is the Creak seee for the island of Certa - 0-3)1 - Italian\nmotor transport consentration and Italian forces in the visialty of\nTopoleni, Albenis. vere attacked w British please; Dritish bonbers mussi-\nfully cerried out a severe attack on the herber of the Albentes city of\nDurease: is the Britreen theater two Itelian please vere destroyed and the\nhighway between Amere and Keren vis bombed: in the Libyen thester the\nsirfield at Trast (Tast Kessen) sad the city of Tripeli were attenked w\nBritish bombers.\n4. Axis sir operations is the Middle Estera theaters ware as fellows:\nat Melta 18 derman planes attempted to carry out a raid but the British\nshot down one of the Gerara planes, demaged two others end drove off the\nrest; in Libya Germen bombers attacked the city of Agedabye without damage.\n5. During the night of March 9-10 a British enrge beet in the Straite\nof Dever use sunk by Corner bombs. During the preceding day Germen benbers\nattecked two British norcheat convoys along the cost const of England but\ncoused no damage.\n6. During the night of Merch 7-8 Germen sirplance attacked and council\nminor damage to the 1,370-ten British destroyer IMPERIAL is the Nediterraness\nnear Malte.\nSCANLON\nDistribution:\nSecretary of Yes\nState Department\nSecretary of Treasury\nAsst. Secretary of Var\nChief of Staff\nVer Please Division\nOffice of Nevel Intelligence\nMr Corps\n0-8\nCONFIDENTIAL\nCONFIDENTIAL\n509\nParaphrase of Code Radiogram\nReceived at the War Department\nat 9147, March 11, 1941.\nRome, filed March 11, 1941.\nThe Italian Army now has the following divisions in Albania:\n16 line infantry divisions, 5 Alpine Divisions, 2 armored divisions,\n1 motorised division. In addition to these there are the corps and\nany troops for 6 corps and 2 armies. These figures include ass Colore\ngroupment. At present the total strength of the any in effectives my\nbe placed at 420,000. It is believed that an offensive is imponding.\nThere is a report that Geleso has been given the command, but as yet\nthere is no sufficient confirmation.\nFISKE\nDistribution:\nSecretary of War\nState Department\nSecretary of Treasury\nWar Plans Division\nOffice of Naval Intelligence\nCONFIDENTIAL\nere"
}