Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
383248744
label
"American Rehabilitation" [Department of Health, Education, and Welfare] [1978]
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
383248744
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
c7f80f96ef10a3a0
ocrText
Originally Processed With FOIA(s): FOIA Number: S S FOIA MARKER This is not a textual record. This is used as an administrative marker by the George Bush Presidential Library Staff. Record Group/Collection: Donated Historical Materials Collection/Office of Origin: Frieden, Lex, Collection Series: Government Records Subseries: Printed Material OA/ID Number: 52018 Folder ID Number: 52018-004 Folder Title: "American Rehabilitation" [Department of Health, Education, and Welfare] [1978] Stack: Row: Section: Shelf: Position: G 5 2 3 4 JULY-AUGUST 1978 AMERICAN REHABILITATION "Putting IT All Together" COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS Putting It All Together Robert R. Humphreys Although the term "independent In terms of federal program activ- living" is relatively new, its concept ity, independent living means services has been evolving for a number of to disabled people without an im- years. As it is with most new ideas, it mediate vocational goal, and services germinated in small pockets of con- over and above those traditionally sciousness at various levels and in provided through vocational rehabili- various locations in the nation. It was tation to improve the quality of life. It generated as a result of unfulfilled also means alternative living needs of severely disabled people, arrangements. which needs developed in a variety of This issue of American Rehabilita- areas, such as a desire for better de- tion presents a variety of historical vices, accessible housing and trans- and "state of the art'' articles about portation, personal care assistance, the concept of independent living. and improved access to agencies. The messages are given from differ- In another, but not unrelated area ing perspectives. It is particularly fit- of activity, groups of handicapped ting to dedicate this issue to inde- people formed to engage in self-help pendent living, for it is an idea, truly, efforts as a result of the need for bet- whose time has come. For the first ter information about service prob- time, the idea is supported by HEW, lems and deficiencies. These groups by the Congress, and, yes, by the found that their unity could be benefi- President. cial to themselves and to other dis- A vibrant concept of indepen- abled people. Such movements offer dence-building is underway that was several different messages. Most im- initiated mainly by the people who portant is a maturity expressed in will benefit directly from the effort self-confidence that disabled people expended and who will as a result can guide their own destinies, a con- contribute to the society in which they The editor acknowledges with cept that disabled people themselves live. All of society will share posi- warm thanks the invaluable help of too long ignored or even feared and tively in their accomplishments. John Driscoll, Ph.D., of HEW Re- that society for too long denied them. The front cover and the headline gion I, Herbert Leibowitz, Ph.D., They also express the idea that dis- above express the concept of inde- of HEW Region IX, and Leonard abled people are in no way different pendent living: Putting It All To- Green, Ph.D., of RSA for the con- from "TABS" (temporarily able gether. That is, achievement at the cept of this special edition and bodied) whole beings whose needs highest level possible. That has been their practical help in its planning. range from vocational to social, a noble purpose in every civilized so- Additionally, Dr. Green and Lee spiritual, educational, and recrea- ciety, and it is in this context worthy H. Coleman, Ph.D., of RSA re- tional. They reflect the disabled citi- of our best support and dedicated viewed all of the articles carried in zen's right to share fully in commu- cooperation. On behalf of RSA, I this issue. nity life and the responsibility to pledge that full support and coopera- contribute to that community. tion. AMERICAN REHABILITATION Volume 3, Number 6 The weakest ink is better than the strongest memory. July-August 1978 2 Independent Living: Concept and Programs Susan Stoddard 6 IL: Movement And Programs Lex Frieden 10 Barrier-Free Communities Catherine Hillard 16 The Illinois Approach James S. Jeffers 17 Second Generation: New England John V. Driscoll, Ph.D. Bruce Marquis, Paul J. Corcoran, M.D., and Frederick A. Fay, Ph.D. 22 IL In Massachusetts Elmer C. Bartels 23 Second Generation: West Coast Bruce M. Brown 31 IL: A Legislative View Kathaleen Arneson U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary Rehabilitation Services Administration Robert R. Humphreys, Commissioner Ron Bourgea, Acting Director Public Affairs Ron Bourgea, Editor Margaret Cauthorne, Editorial Assistant Barbara Pegram, Admin. Assistance PHOTO CREDITS: Christopher Springmann, Black Star, Cover I (art adaptation by Antoinette Reynolds); Christopher Springmann, Black Star, page 5; New Options transitional living project, Texas Institute for Rehabilitation and Research, page 8; Ivan Massar, Black Star, pages 19 and 20; Fred Kaplan, Black Star, pages 25 and 29. American Rehabilitation is the official, Opinions expressed are those of their S.W., Washington, D.C. 20201. bimonthly publication of the Rehabili- authors and do not necessarily reflect the Paid subscriptions are accepted (see tation Services Administration. Use of views of the Department and Agency. Cover IV for blank). Correspondence con- funds for printing was approved by the Manuscript and article suggestions are cerning paid subscriptions should be sent Office of Management and Budget on welcome. Write to Editor, Rehabilitation to Superintendent of Documents, P.O. June 23, 1975. Services Administration, 330 C Street Box 1533, Washington, D.C. 20402. Independent Living: Susan Stoddard Concept And Programs "To us, independence does not mean with insufficient knowledge and re- one of the pioneers in the task of or- doing things physically alone. It sources. The solution to the problem ganizing and integrating existing serv- means being able to make independ- of service gaps and insufficient coor- ices, creating new services, and re- ent decisions. It is a mind process not dination is a comprehensive service moving barriers to assist people with contingent upon a "normal" body. delivery system that combines finan- severe disability. CIL services and Judy Heumann, Center for Inde- cial support, physical modification clients illustrate the concept of inde- pendent Living, Berkeley, California. services, rehabilitation, and consumer pendent living programs. rights. The goal is a network that pro- In its 6 years of operation, CIL has When those active in the disabled vides a continuum of services had a major effect on the accessibility movement use the term "independent throughout the person's lifetime. A and responsiveness of the Bay Area living,' they are referring to their great many people who now live in community and the ability of that ability to participate in society-to group living arrangements could live community's residents to live more work, have a home, raise a family, in the community if the appropriate independently. CIL was started by a and generally share in the joys and re- services were available to them. group of people with severe disabil- sponsibilities of community life. "In- A diagram of the comprehensive ities who came from an experiential dependent living" means freedom service concept was developed for base and felt a strong dissatisfaction from isolation or from the institution; the first National Conference on with the institutional network that so- it means the ability to choose where Independent Living in Berkeley, ciety had set up to help them. Today, to live and how; it means the person's California, in October of 1975. The CIL has 5,000 active clients in its ability to carry out activities of daily conference was sponsored by the Re- caseload. A breakdown of new clients living that nondisabled people often habilitation Services Administration served by CIL in January 1978 shows take for granted. (RSA) and the Center for Independent how CIL clients vary widely in terms In order for a person with severe Living (CIL) in Berkeley. The diag- of disability, age, and time from disability to live independently, a ram was created by Ed Roberts, then onset of disability (see Tables 1 and wide range of services may be neces- Executive Director of CIL, his staff, 2). sary. Each severely disabled person and Dr. Herb Leibowitz of RSA, Re- For these clients, CIL offers a wide has unique service needs and re- gion IX. The diagram (Figure 1) illus- range of services: quirements; no one single service pre- trates the relationship between the Guidance to Service System. In- scription or housing situation is the persons with disability, the family formation, referral, and follow-along answer for everyone. Individual centers for Independent Living, estab- to insure that the person gains the choice is critically important. lished service systems such as state services that can help him. One of the problems that people rehabilitation agencies, and the many Assistance Referral. Attendant, with severe disability have faced in distinct "independent living" serv- reader, interpreter referral; respite this country has been the existence of ices that make up the comprehensive, care referral for families. gaps in our human service systems independent living service package. Role Modeling and Counseling and and the lack of alternatives from The diagram shows the end to the family counseling to help the person which to choose. The Comprehensive individual's process as "point of full identify needs and aspirations and to Needs Study reviewed the many pro- participation This does not neces- assist him in meeting goals. grams within HEW that provide ser- sarily mean the end of independent Independent Living Skills Assis- vices and financial assistance to hand- living services. Such services as at- tance. 1) Identifying equipment icapped people. Its writers found that tendant care and peer counseling may needed; 2) working with the person to the programs serving the severely always be important as support ser- ensure that modifications to environ- handicapped are inequitable, contain vices for the severely disabled. ment are accomplished, and 3) assist- severe gaps in services, suffer from The Center for Independent Living ing the person and his family in iden- inadequate control, and are operated (CIL) in Berkeley, California, was tifying training needs. 2 AMERICAN REHABILITATION Community and Legal Advocacy. Advocating for the development of an peer counseling accessible and supportive environ- ment. education Health Maintenance Assistance. " clinics recreat Housing Referral and Assistance in / Housing Modifications. advocacy HABILITATION Job Development and Other Serv- ices. Rehabilitation These CIL services are designed to State stabilize the environment of a person with severe disability, thereby Tehab / Independent minimizing the handicapping aspects Family CRISTS Centers for REHABILITATION Living employment career development fully accessible communities Family of disability and helping him gain equal opportunity. POINT OF DISABLILITY CIL is not a residential center, but FULL PARTICIPATION IN SOCIETY does assist a person to locate accessi- ble housing. In addition to these services, CIL FIGURE I considers itself a training institution for people with disabilities; every job is a training job leading to employ- ment in the primary labor market. Table 1 Currently, CIL employs 105 persons, 83 New Clients Served by Center for Independent Living in One Month half of whom are severely disabled. (January 1978) There are training programs in com- puter programing and paralegal services and a university degree pro- Age Range New Clients Percentage gram coordinated with Antioch College/West. Many people with dis- 0-19 5 06.0% abilties work as volunteers within the 20-29 33 39.8 organization. All major executive of- 30-39 19 22.9 fices and the majority of executive 40-49 3 3.6 board seats are held by severely dis- 50-59 5 6.0 60+ abled people. 18 21.7 — Most independent living programs 83 and centers (ILPs) developed 100.0% throughout this country are modeled after key features of the program at Length of Time New Clients Percentage CIL. They differ in organizational Disabled form and range of services but tend to share the following basic characteris- 0-2 yrs 11 13.3% tics: 3-5 yrs 7 8.4 6-10 yrs 13 15.7 1. They share a basic philosophy. 11-19 yrs 6 7.2 These centers are based on the be- 20-48 yrs 12 14.5 lief that the disabled themselves must entire life 26 31.3 be involved in the development of undetermined 8 9.6 services that are provided to meet the - needs of disabled people; that the 83 100% needs of the disabled can be met most 3 effectively by comprehensive pro- grams which combine self-help and Table 2 professional expertise in the provision Disability of 83 New Clients (includes primary disability and some sec- of services; and that disabled people ondary disability, so some clients appear twice) can be more integrated into their community. Type of Disability Disabilities of 2. They focus on individual need. 83 New Clients Focus is on the person with disabil- ity and making the most of that per- Developmental disability 13 son's opportunity for participation in Sensory loss 16 society. Service is not restricted to a Metabolic disorder 3 specific disability group (e.g., spinal Circulatory disorder 7 cord injured) or to people eligible for Progressive disability 8 a particular program (e.g., SSI). Orthopedic disability 5 3. They have major consumer Arthritis 4 involvement. Chronic pain 3 Most programs are managed or di- Cancer/leukemia 3 rected by the people with severe dis- Paralysis 20 ability and many of the staff members Old age 4 are disabled. Other 12 Total 98* 4. They focus on advocacy and peer support. Independent living centers and pro- Tables 1 & 2 were prepared by Jeff Moyer and Linda Perotti of CIL, grams work as advocates and role Berkeley. models to develop a public awareness * Includes some clients for whom both primary and secondary disabilities of the needs and capabilities of people were recorded. with severe disabilities as well as an awareness within the disabled person egory of disability. (However, the Independent living programs have of his potential for life of greater par- ability to provide various services is started all over the country. Their restricted by eligibility requirements popularity is due to their responsive- ticipation and involvement. associated with various public pro- ness to the needs of the severely dis- 5. They provide a range of services. grams.) abled person. In addition to this They focus on services needed to grass-roots development, other nota- move people into the mainstream. In 6. Service provision throughout the ble events provide landmarks in the California, ILPs vary in the number rehabilitation process. rapid change in independent living Services are not limited to one and kinds of services provided, de- from an idea to a more and more pending on the needs of their com- phase of rehabilitation, but are pro- clearly defined expression of need for munities. All of them, however, do vided, as needed, for life. services, legislation, and resources. provide certain core services, includ- 7. They provide new training and These landmarks, in the articulation ing: community development; peer employment opportunities for people and development of independent liv- support and counseling; attendant, with severe disabilities. ing, include: reader, and interpreter referral; and Peer counseling positions and other The comprehensive Needs Study personal and financial advocacy. employment within the organization and its five ongoing demonstration They provide services needed by a provide employment and on-the-job projects, based in hospitals, state vo- person, either through integration of training. cational rehabilitation programs, and public and private services available 8. They represent and serve a broad in a consumer-run organization. in the community or through direct range of disabilities. The first national Conference on provision of services not available These programs are open to all who Independent Living, sponsored by elsewhere. Service is provided ac- need their assistance, including dis- RSA and held at the Clarement Hotel cording to need, not according to cat- abled people and their families. in Berkeley, in October 1975. 4 The inclusion of independent liv- ing topics in important national re- habilitation planning conferences, such as the National CSAVR confer- ence, Washington D.C., May, 1977. The use of state innovation and expansion money by several state re- habilitation agencies. Development of peer counseling, where disabled people counsel other disabled people on activities of daily living, disability experience, and provide role models for independent living. The inclusion, in the White House Conference on the Handi- capped, of papers on housing and service needs for independent living and the economics of disability. The recènt opening, within HUD, of an Office of Independent Living. The recent, successful demon- stration of disabled people nationally, in San Francisco, and then Washing- ton, D.C. to accomplish the long- delayed signing of the Section 504 regulations of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. RSA funding of a second national Independent Living Conference, to be held in 1978 in Texas. The development of 36 inde- pendent living programs throughout the country. (The list of these centers (Top) Edward Roberts, Director, California Department of Rehabilitation, has been compiled by HUD's Inde- takes an office lunch break but manages some business also. Mr. Roberts was pendent Living. office.) an original member of the Berkeley CIL. (Bottom) Impromptu CIL meeting Federal legislation proposals: At features (l to r) Barry Ryan, project director, comprehensive needs study; the time of the writing of this review, author Stoddard; Jeff Mayer, CIL blind services; and Janice Krones, CIL bills to extend the Rehabilitation Act peer counselor. of 1973 are being drafted and debated These landmarks in independent American Rehabilitation are only the in both the House and the Senate. living mark the development of the beginning of development of the These bills include differing recom- concept. We are still a long way from comprehensive delivery system mendations for independent living making independent living services necessary to assure all people with services and/or programs. The admin- available to all who need them. To disability of the rights, joys, and re- istration's recommended proposals to accomplish that end, we need a com- sponsibilities of full, productive, and amend and extend the Rehabilitation mitment to a comprehensive service independent lives. Act included the establishment of in- program in which ILPs will play a dependent living rehabilitation ser- major part. vices on a limited scale through The programs and projects which Ms. Stoddard is a senior analyst with project grants. are described in this special issue of Berkeley Associates. 5 IL: Movement And Programs Lex Frieden The implicit theory behind inde- the goals of total integration or operation as a research and demon- pendent living is that, given appro- mainstreaming in mind, the Center stration project, began working or priate supportive services, accessible provides several basic counseling going to school while they lived environments, and the information services (e.g. family counseling, per- there. The average number of resi- and skills necessary to benefit from sonal counseling, self-care counsel- dents in the program at any given them, severely disabled people can ing, etc), attendant referrals and train- time was 12. exercise self-determination and par- ing, mobility training, wheelchair Most people graduated from the ticipate in all aspects of society. The repair, transportation, and community Cooperative Living program in about theory is rather simply stated, but the advocacy. According to Pflueger, 15 months and moved to more inde- concept is not particularly compli- "these and other CIL services are de- pendent living arrangements in the cated. signed to stabilize the environment of community. Many of these people For many years, some severely an individual with severe disabilities, chose to continue sharing support handicapped people have lived com- thereby minimizing the handicapping services and formed their own corpo- paratively independent lives by find- aspects of disability and helping the rations to provide independent living ing or making barrier-free homes or person gain equal opportunity All services. These organizations like In- apartments and by securing attendant of the chief administrators at the Cen- dependent Life Styles and CLASP care, transportation, and other support- ter are severely disabled, as are a (Cluster Living and Shared Providers) ive services on an individualized majority of its 105 employees. A pri- exist in Houston today as independent basis. Sometimes these arrangements vate, nonprofit organization, CIL is entities. They provide and coordinate were very imaginative, sometimes supported by a variety of sources, in- attendant care and transportation in they were fortuitous, and most often cluding donations, project grants and specific residential settings such as they were circumstantial. In spite of contracts, and direct service fees. The apartment houses or condominium these self-styled arrangements, pro- facility where the Center is located projects. grammatic and broad-scale efforts to primarily provides office space and The Cooperative Living Project it- facilitate independent living were work space for various programs. self actually evolved into an inde- stifled by restrictive statutes and At about the same time the disabled pendent living skills training program regulations. students in Berkeley were organizing called New Options. New Options is The most widely known, and CIL, a group of severely handicapped designed to foster the integration of perhaps the first effort at independent people in Houston, who were former severely physically disabled people living for severely disabled people on patients at Texas Institute for Re- into their communities. The program, a broad scale began in California. In habilitation and Research, realized the a 6-week transitional experience, pro- the early 70's, a group of disabled potential benefits of sharing services vides information and skills required students who had lived together in the required to support independent living by handicapped people for them to Cowell Hospital Residence Hall at the and began to plan the Cooperative live independently.² University of California formed the Living Residential Project. Sponsored Modeling different aspects of both Center for Independent Living (CIL) by TIRR and RSA, the project opened the programs in California and Texas, in Berkeley. Incorporated in 1972, in 1972. Living in a barrier-free, a group of people in Massachusetts CIL was established as a self-help, dormitory-style building near established the Boston Center for In- outreach program designed to expand downtown Houston, the Cooperative dependent Living. The BCIL founders options and alternatives available to Living residents hired and managed envisioned "a consumer-run, self- disabled people throughout the com- their own attendants, arranged for help community integrated with the munity. their own transportation on a shared able-bodied where severely disabled CIL now serves approximately basis, and generally practiced the individuals could develop independ- 5,000 persons with many different skills required in order to live inde- ent living skills. 3 The project types of disabilities from Berkeley pendently. Most of the 40 people who opened in a theology building at Bos- and the surrounding community. With lived in the project in its 3 years of ton University which was adapted to 6 AMERICAN REHABILITATION be an accessible dormitory in 1974. themselves, although most programs maintenance. It should be emphasized Since then, more than 50 people have give preference to hiring qualified that every independent living program participated in its programs. handicapped people. Their budgets does not necessarily provide all pos- Today BCIL provides supportive are small-usually on the order of sible independent living services. The services for severely disabled people $20,000 to $100,000. Financial sup- focus, degree of involvement, or level living in three types of environments. port or funding usually comes from of commitment of a program depends, Some people whom the program grants or donations. Additionally, naturally, upon the availability of serves live in a transitional-type facil- some programs have begun to receive existing community services, the ity located in an apartment complex in direct income for services rendered. physical and social makeup of the a Boston suburb. Others live in clus- The universal service components community, the needs of the program ter housing-apartments adapted or of independent living programs seem participants, and the goals of the pro- modified for handicapped persons to be residential services, including gram itself. Six major dimensions where attendants are on call. A few attendant care and housing or infor- along which independent living pro- live independently in their own homes mation about them and the provision grams are likely to differ have been or apartments which they share with and exchange of information required outlined by Pflueger. 4 Each of these personal care assistants. by severely disabled people who are may be viewed as a continuum along Other programs, such as Creative trying to become more independent. which every independent living pro- Living in Ohio and Atlantis in Col- Other major services provided may be gram will fall. orado have been providing for some transportation, peer counseling, inde- Basically, the variables are: time services and coordinating com- pendent living skills training, political 1) Service setting (residential- munity resources in a manner similar advocacy, social and recreational nonresidential). The setting in which to those in California, Massachusetts, services, health maintenance counsel- services are provided will vary from and Texas. More recently, programs ing, legal advocacy and financial strictly residential to totally nonresi- supported by funding authorized in counseling, and equipment repair and dential. Services may be organized Section 130 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by innovation and expansion Figure 1 grants from state vocational rehabili- MULTI-DIMENSIONAL COMPARISION PROFILE OF tation agencies, by universities, and THREE INDEPENDENT LIVING PROJECTS by others have begun to expand op- portunities for severely disabled Cooperative CIL people in other communities. Living BCIL Berkeley Residential At this time, there are approxi- 0 Non-residential Service Setting Service Setting mately 35 programs which might eas- ily be classified as independent living programs. If one includes progressive Transitional Static Goal Goal Orientation group home projects, halfway houses, Orientation and other personal adjustment and mobility training programs in this Single Disability census, there may be as many as 100 Type Served 0 Many Disability Types Served to 200. Most of these programs are located in urban areas. They typically serve fewer than 50 people at any Direct Service Indirect Service given time. The primary client popu- Delivery Delivery lation is made up of persons with se- vere physical or developmental dis- abilities. They are most often private, Primary Vocational Emphasis 0 0 Incidental Vocational Emphasis nonprofit entities and are affiliated with various other voluntary and health service organizations. Their Paternal Helping staffs may or may not be disabled Style ф Ф Peer Helping Style 7 be seen as independent from, though not necessarily exclusive of, voca- tional involvement. 6) Goal orientation (transitional- static). Some programs are very goal oriented and transitional in nature. Their objective is to help people move from a level of dependence to one of independence. Other programs are de- signed to provide ongoing support for people who may already have reached a level of relative independence. By assessing programs on the basis of these aspects, it is possible to de- scribe quite clearly what may at first appear to be subtle differences be- tween programs. For example, Figure 1 shows how one might project the three programs described earlier. By this analysis, it becomes appar- ent that while all three of these pro- grams are similar in some respects, they also vary dramatically in some ways. They are much alike in terms of helping style, service delivery style, or methods, and vocational emphasis. In contrast, they function in different Attendant care is often crucial to independent functioning of severely disabled settings, their goal orientations di- person. verge, and their clientel or service constituencies differ. This is all in around specific housing projects or while others are less specialized and spite of the fact that they provide they may be provided in a nonresiden- serve people with a broader range of most of the same services. tial service center. disabilities. Although the key variables may be 2) Service delivery method (direct- 4) Helping style (paternal-peer). identified, it is virtually impossible to indirect). Services may either be de- The image and feel of programs will say what makes an independent living livered directly by an independent liv- vary from being paternalistic and au- program successful or not. There are, ing program or indirectly by referral thoritarian to being earthy and egalitar- however, several key themes which to other service providers. The latter ian. Programs which employ many seem to characterize the movement method is used mostly by programs disabled people and many nonprofes- and which may signal success. which aim to coordinate existing ser- sional or paraprofessional staff people Historically, the independent living vices in the community. Many pro- will obviously be more oriented to- movement has been characterized by grams use a combination of service wards self-help than those programs a great amount of consumer involve- delivery methods. which employ mainly nondisabled, ment and consumer control. This is 3) Range of disability type served professional people who adhere to more than likely due to the fact that (single disability type-many disability staunch, academic backgrounds. the movement began during the late types). Programs often vary as a re- 5) Vocational emphasis (primary- 60's-at the close of the Viet Nam sult of the personal characteristics of incidental). In some cases, programs era-when people all over America the people they are trying to serve. may be seen as adjunct to or prereq- were beginning to seek more control Some programs focus on serving uisite to vocational involvement and over decisions which affected their people with specific disability types training. On the other hand, they may lives. Also, the movement has been 8 associated with expanding noninstitu- pendent living on a wide-scale, pro- and live independently if they were tional residential alternatives for se- grammatic basis. The June 1975, Re- supplied with supportive services to verely disabled people. This emphasis port of the Comprehensive Needs enable them to live outside of institu- probably reflects ties to earlier Study suggests that the development tions. It is also evident that many philosophical concepts of deinstitu- of an Independent Living Rehabilita- severely disabled people, who are un- tionalization and normalization. tion Program is a most crucial deci- able to work, are capable of substan- Many independent living programs sion area. In October 1975, the first tial self-care and comparative social are descendents of former halfway National Conference on Independent and psychological independence. In- house projects or group homes. Living was held in Berkeley. This dependent living programs may help Finally, independent living pro- meeting, sponsored by RSA, brought severely disabled people make a grams have always been seen as together the leaders and developers in transition from a state of relative de- sources of specific information and the field of independent living for the pendency to one of comparative inde- referral. This is partly a result of the first time. It became clear, at this pendence. Independent living pro- fact that they usually do not have the point, that independent living was a grams may also provide the means by resources to provide direct services. unique concept, distinct in many ways which severely disabled people can However, and more importantly, this from more traditional approaches. participate to the fullest extent possi- presumably reflects a lack of coordi- Innovation and expansion grant ble in the normal day to day activities nation of services which already exist funds were first committed to sys- of life. in the community, as well as basic in- tematically establish independent liv- adequacies in those service systems ing projects by the California Mr. Frieden is New Options Research when it comes to meeting the wide Department of Rehabilitation in 1976. Director, Texas Institute for Rehabili- range and special needs of severely During 1977, the independent living tation and Research, Houston. disabled people. movement gained more recognition These historical precedents have and momentum. It was the major References not faded during the early develop- topic of many national meetings. The 1) Pflueger, Susan. Independent ment of the independent living White House Conference on Handi- Living. Institute for Research Utiliza- movement. Consumer control and capped Individuals recommended that tion, Washington, D.C. December consumer involvement remain the es- independent living become a national 1977. Page 21. sence of most successful independent priority. The United States Depart- 2) Cole, J. A., Halden, B. L., and living programs. With very few ex- ment of Housing and Urban De- Frieden, L. M. The New Options ceptions, all of the extant independent velopment formally created an Office Project: A Live-In Program to Foster living programs or centers provide of Independent Living. HUD also Social Adaptive Skills. Paper pre- residential services, including attend- promulgated regulations which sented at scientific sessions of 53rd ant care or information about them. legitimized support of centers for the Annual Session of the American Con- Information exchange and referral handicapped by community develop- gress of Rehabilitation Medicine and remain the basis of most programs ment block grants. the 38th Annual Assembly of the and frequently are among the first In July of this year, another Na- American Academy of Physical services provided by new independent tional Conference on Independent Medicine and Rehabilitation, living programs. Living will be held in Houston. It is November 7-12, 1976, in San Diego. Several noteworthy events or prog- part of a Research Utilization Project 3) Fay, Frederick, Bartels, Elmer, ress markers stand out in the evolu- (RSA-RD22-P-59106/6-01) designed Corcoran, Paul, and McHugh, Bob. tion of the independent living move- to produce educational material de- The BCIL Report. Peter Reich, ment in addition to aspects of the scribing the concept of independent editor. Regional Medical Rehabilita- founding of various programs. The living. tion Research and Training Center funding of the Comprehensive Service Despite a relatively brief history No. 7, Tufts, July 1977. Page 3. Needs Study and its five ongoing and comparatively little data, inde- 4) Pfleuger. Op. Cit. demonstration projects authorized by pendent living has established itself as 5) Wolfensberger, Wolf. The Ori- the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 was a valid, programmatic concept in re- gin and Nature of Our Institutional significant from the standpoint that habilitation. It is clear now that many Models. Human Policy Press, Syra- means were provided to study inde- severely disabled people could work cuse. 1975. 9 Barrier-Free Communities Catherine Hillard This article is a followup to one disabled people, and how these needs physical performance needs of published in this magazine in July- can be met through planning and de- people. A barrier free community is August 1977. It presents the findings sign. Institutional, constraints, such as one in which all people, regardless of of a study funded by the Office of Pol- zoning and code restrictions, which age or physical condition, can live as icy Development and Research, U.S. have often precluded the provision of independently as possible and partici- Department of Housing and Urban accessibility, also reflect the lack of pate in and benefit from virtually all Development to describe the planning concern for disabled people. aspects of community life. process and identify the costs A recent study, called Barrier Free A useful description of the barrier involved in building barrier free Communities, may help to fill this free design concept comes from the communities. awareness gap. For the first time, the report: As the barrier free design entire planning process has been movement has developed over the Why are so many communities, thought through and documented, and years, accessibility has most often particularly newly-built ones, still in- a model of the design process neces- come to mean additions of ramps, accessible to disabled people? To put sary to generate communities that are provision of curb cuts, wider doors the problem in perspective, imagine if accessible to all has been developed. and other design features of buildings all curbs were so high that only The study has also produced a variety and site design. As these elements people 6'5" tall could step up them of technical assistance materials to aid have been provided in communities, comfortably; that doors to public others in creating barrier free envi- however, new needs have surfaced, buildings were so heavy only profes- ronments. and accessibility has come to mean sional athletes could open them; that The contractor for the study is much more than that. For example, to parking spaces were only wide Peoples Housing, Inc., an architec- the disabled person, it is not enough enough to park motorcyles; and that tural, planning, and research group to have an accessible building if that the interiors of all houses were de- located in Topanga, California. The building is located in a place that is signed for easy mobility only for per- major planning concepts that they de- difficult to reach, is unsafe, or is not sons who were 5' tall and extremely veloped and the work products the kind of place that he needs. And, slender-all others had to live in spe- created to assist planners, architects, access to facilities in a community is cial institutions. The obvious answer and developers, as well as students not much use if one cannot be mobile to the lack of accessibility to disabled and other researchers, should be of enough to reach those facilities. 1 people is the failure to design prop- widespread interest. The published Thus, community-wide barrier free erly for their needs. materials should be available in the design goes beyond simply providing While elderly and disabled people Summer of 1978 and will be in the accessibility to particular areas or face very real obstacles in their efforts public domain through the U.S. Gov- facilities and considers the ability of to find housing, to move about, and ernment Printing Office at nominal all people to perform ordinary living to participate in normal community cost. What follows here is a brief activities. It is a process, and how life, these restrictions are seldom overview of the study and some ob- one goes about that process plays an created on purpose. Few designers servations on its relevance. important role in the success of its have been trained to consider accessi- implementation. bility needs, and thus people who What Is Community-Wide Barrier make decisions in the development of Free Design? Conceptual Framework a community have little information Barrier free or accessible design re- Because the study involved how about the specific needs of older and lates the built environment to the land is developed, it deals with the 10 AMERICAN REHABILITATION basic activities of community de- and usability of all community sible, facilities should support use by velopment, such as initial program- facilities. persons with disabilities by eliminat- ing, land use planning, site design, Provision relates to the inclusion of ing hazards and obstacles, and mod- building entries, communications, accessible and usable facilities that ifying buildings and sites, as neces- transportation, and marketing. It adds are crucial for independent living. sary, to permit their use by people important new information to our These include housing, employment with reach, stamina, and sensory lim- basic understanding of how to de- opportunities, recreational programs, itations. velop barrier free communities, par- and community services. ticularly in the areas of programing, People with disabilities often have Methodology land use planning, and site design. limited mobility or stamina. Prox- Two neighborhoods, within two of For example, it is at the initial or pro- imity acknowledges that "the func- the HUD-sponsored new com- graming stage of development that tional distance between places must munities, were selected as the foci decisions are made concerning what be close, either physically through of research. Each study area was kind of community is to be built and distance, or functionally through in an early stage of development, and what values are to be demonstrated means of communication and trans- during the course of the study, each through its physical setting and in- portation. When applied to land was planned or replanned to be barrier stitutions. These basic decisions use planning, for example, these con- free. The two communities are Harbi- either allow or preclude many barrier siderations result in concepts such as son, planned for approximately free opportunities. mixed-use districts, where commer- 24,000 people 8 miles northwest of Land use planning involves such cial, recreational, residential, and oc- Columbia, South Carolina, and St. land use controls as zoning and co- cupational uses can be in close rela- Charles, Maryland, located 25 miles venant restrictions and the degree to tion to each other. southeast of Washington, D.C. and which they permit the most appro- Connection means that it is possible planned for close to 80,000 people.. priate assignments of uses to different to travel from one place to another. Both communities have been under- parts of the community. Such controls Implications of this principle for land way for several years, and between may require change in order to permit use planning relate to the conveni- them presently house more than mixed uses and mixed housing types ence, safety, and basic ability to move 10,000 people. in a barrier free community. around the community at will. An The research itself consisted of four Site design involves the placement example is pedestrian paths. To be stages: 1) programing; 2) orientation of particular physical facilities, as accessible, origins must be connected sessions and design workshops; 3) de- well as the interrelations between with destinations, without barriers sign process; and 4) impact assess- vehicular and pedestrian circulation such as steps or steeply-sloping areas. ment. Programing included early vis- systems. For example, housing for el- Normalization means that the op- its to the communities and discussions derly or disabled people can be portunities for independent living for with planning and development planned near community commercial disabled and elderly people are simi- teams, as well as local civic leaders or recreational facilities. This allows lar to those for the rest of the popula- and officials, to delineate the precise those with limited mobility to have tion. Some implications of this prin- scope of the planning and design more independence by reducing the ciple are the development of effort. need for walking or wheeling great noninstitutional forms of housing Orientation sessions and design distances or for transferring in and out such as group homes, congregate workshops followed. Many of the of vehicles. Similarly, such facilities facilities, and accessible housing same people participated in the sen- as transit stops, parking, and social units, as well as avoiding concentra- sitization sessions conducted in each gathering places can be more conve- tion or "ghettoization" of disabled community. This technique called for niently located. and elderly people by integrating participants to assume various handi- Five principles of accessibility these facilities into the community. caps for a day-long exercise and, shape and unify the study: provision Implementation of these concepts may under the supervision of the research- of appropriate facilities; proximity of involve special uses in residential ers, to take part in a planned program related uses; connection of commu- areas and flexible land use controls. of visits to local community places. nity elements; normalization through The fifth principle, usability, Participants encountered first hand the common and similar opportunities; means that to the greatest extent pos- physical barriers and frustrations that 11 disabled people face every day. De- larly, changes may be required to ners should find this information par- sign workshops helped to incorporate permit home industries, which allow ticularly useful. Detailed estimates of these experiences with existing plans people who are restricted in mobility the costs of making the two case- into a rethinking process where prob- to participate in the work force by study communities accessible are lems were discussed in detail with manufacturing or providing small- included. new community staff. scale services in their homes. This appendix also contains an The design process consisted of de- The chapter on site design is the analysis and recommendations for veloping solutions to design prob- 'most detailed and contains sections marketing the concept of accessibil- lems, including preparation of con- on pathways, interface between ity. Many sensitive issues involved in struction drawings of typical design pedestrian and vehicular circulation alerting the public to the existence elements which were then used to ob- systems; parking and passenger load- and advantages of barrier free design tain cost estimates from local cost es- ing; social meeting places; recreation features are addressed, such as how to timators. These estimates, along with opportunities; residential areas; and advertise without giving the impres- a marketing analysis, were then used signs and street furniture. Each sec- sion that the community is just for el- for the impact assessment phase to tion is further broken down into its derly or disabled people. A proposal develop projected costs and other more basic elements. for evaluating the effectiveness of issues. An outline of the actual planning barrier free design is also included. process is also contained in this vol- Appendix Two contains an Acces- Products ume. It describes what must be done sibility Checklist, for architects, This study has resulted in a. variety by whom and at what point in the planners and developers. The check- of products which should be very use- planning process. This outline makes list is a detailed working document in- ful to those attempting to design clear that the process of developing tended for use in actual design, re- communities that are accessible to all barrier free communities involves a view of designs, and inspection of people. The documents consist of a variety of people and organizations. sites buildings. main report, with findings and design Coordination must occur between de- Appendix Three, entitled "Living guidelines, and three appendices velopers and builders, local govern- with A Disability-An Empathic Ap- which deal with the more technical ments, and advocacy and social serv- proach Toward Understanding En- materials related to details of site de- ice-organizations. Local codes and vironmental Barriers, presents a sign and costs, an accessibility zone requirements must be ascer- method for sensitizing decisionmakers checklist, and guidelines for conduct- tained, and relations should be estab- to the need for removal and elimina- ing sensitization sessions. lished wherever possible with organi- tion of architectural barriers, as well The main volume presents findings. zations which administer appropriate as a description of how that method A chapter is directed to each major service delivery programs. Some was used in the two case-study com- community development activity, examples of groups to be involved are munities. It can be used by any group and, within the chapter, each element commissions on aging, health plan- wishing to go through the experience. appropriate to that part of the process ning agencies, planning commissions, It is prepared as a pamphlet, fully il- is addressed in terms of "issues" and transportation authorities, and school lustrated, and includes all necessary "guidelines. Each concept and de- boards, as well as voluntary agencies, details for conducting a sensitization sign element is fully illustrated with such as church and local advocacy program. drawings and photographs. groups. Planning and process costs For example, the chapter on land are also summarized. Costs use planning covers land use controls Appendix One is entitled, Initially, the imposition of any new and land use assignments. Each of "Sourcebook of Barrier-Free Site De- design requirement will entail some these topics is further broken down sign Details and Their Costs, Market- costs. Thereafter, such a requirement into its components, and problems ing and Evaluation. It presents de- becomes simply a normal cost of de- and examples are discussed. As an il- tailed cost estimates for common de- sign. The objective of the cost analy- lustration, existing land use controls sign elements used to make a commu- sis portion of this study wás to begin may require change in order not to nity accessible and provides typical to assess the nature and amounts of limit options to provide alternative construction drawings for each of costs that would be over and above housing, such as group homes. Simi- those elements. Developers and plan- "normal" costs to a developer at- 12 tempting for the first time to build a half of this amount. Remaining costs places; recreational opportunities; barrier free project. Since the concept were primarily accounted for by addi- residential areas; signs and street fur- was to identify all such costs, the re- tional staff time spent learning about niture, directional information, and searchers looked at planning costs as the planning process and community lighting. Separate costs were also de- well as actual development costs involvement meetings. In the future, veloped for public transportation and attributable to barrier free design the former should be resolved as pro- communications systems.4 elements. fessional education improves, and the Total additional costs to provide The assumption underlying the latter will be eliminated as general the minimum requirements of barrier analysis of planning costs was that knowledge of and standards for this free design in both Harbison and St. until such time as architects and plan- type of design become more wide- Charles were similar. The approxi- ners are provided training in their pro- spread. Thus, when architects and mately $120,000 required for Harbi- fessional schools in concepts of bar- planners become familiar with barrier son represents 2 percent of the $6 mil- rier free design, a developer might free planning, and it becomes com- lion total development cost for the have to provide the necessary train- mon practice, any such "planning study area. The approximately ing, perhaps including professional costs" should be eliminated. $142,000 required for St. Charles is assistance, to educate his staff. The attempt to compute develop- about 3 percent of a $5 million total Planning costs included not only all mental costs involved a special simu- development cost. developer staff time required, but also lation exercise. As such, the costs in- Initial design decisions made by the that of the research team. Costs in- curred are not necessarily those that developers for each project, as a cluded salary and overhead. The fig- would occur where barrier free re- whole, significantly affected later ures included costs of putting on the quirements are part of an integrated costs of providing accessibility. For sensitization sessions, time spent in development design. These costs were example, about 26 percent of the cost meetings, and work involved in de- assessed on three levels, in order to to make Harbison minimally accessi- sign and redesign of planning ele- provide a range of options: minimum, ble relates to the need for an addi- ments. One problem with this analysis preferred, and ideal. The minimum tional pathway system. A separate of planning costs is that the research- level represents the researchers' system is required because of the ers themselves, rather than the de- judgement of the minimum type, size, original planning decision not to have veloper's staffs, did much of the quality or quantity of elements which sidewalks along streets. St. Charles, actual planning work. Also, the tech- would allow elderly and handicapped while providing sidewalks, made an nical assistance materials which were people to get to and use all com- original decision not to have street developed from this work should munity facilities in their neighbor- lighting, in keeping with its rural facilitate the work of others going hoods, without limiting their safety or character. The addition of such light- through a similar process. As a result, security, or significantly decreasing ing,5 however, is the major cost fac- the researchers were forced to esti- the convenience of use. The preferred tor cited. Thus, if each community mate planning costs, given their abil- condition of barrier free development had planned all along for a pedestrian ity to analyze actual figures that includes the minimum priority ele- system with sidewalks along all might be applicable. ments in greater quantity or of better streets, and a complete lighting sys- Their estimates were that between quality, as well as additional pre- tem, these costs for accessibility $7,700 and $9,400 would be needed ferred elements which offer added would not have been required. to replicate the planning process. convenience for accessibility. The The other major cost for minimum These estimates excluded a compo- ideal condition of barrier free de- accessibility, in each case represent- nent for evaluation and included velopment includes provision of eve- ing 25-30% of the total, was for pub- costs of full technical assistance from rything helpful to the point where lic transportation. The community qualified consultants for orientation, accessibility for the handicapped is development costs for public transpor- programing, and review of plans. equal to able-bodied people in a con- tation in both Harbison and St. The researchers indicated that initial ventionally developed community.³ Charles include transit stops and planning costs will be roughly the Development costs were estimated transit vehicles for a mini-tram and same, regardless of project size. for each of the following areas: path- demand-response system. If public The cost of using outside profes- ways; pedestrian-vehicular interface; transportation were furnished by an sional assistance took up more than parking and loading; social meeting areawide transit authority, the acces- 13 sibility requirements would have been design is considered in the initial de- disabled are more handicapped by bad substantially reduced. velopment phase, there should be no design than the able-bodied. Good Thus, even using the researcher's additional cost for providing curb cuts initial planning can allow for or pro- figures, by adjusting for costs specif- or ramps, crosswalks and pedestrian vide most of the elements needed by ically attributable to sidewalks and lane markers, and there may even be elderly and disabled people. They are transportation in Harbison, and light- cost savings by using less expensive part of any well-planned community. ing and transportation in St. Charles, curb designs. the additional development costs for Obviously, there are limitations in Summary And Conclusions barrier free design are reduced to the study's cost analysis as an effort The purpose of the research project about 1 percent of total costs. to isolate costs specifically attributa- was to identify and describe the proc- In addition to the costs already ble to barrier free design elements. ess of developing barrier free com- noted for sidewalks, lighting and Considerable judgement was involved munities and also to try to assess pos- transportation, costs were attributed in determining design elements neces- sible costs involved. The first of these to other items that seemingly would sary for even the minimum level of objectives has been fulfilled. The be part of any good design: a need to accessibility. For example, lighting study provides a model, along with provide ramps or other physical de- and sidewalks improve safety and technical assistance materials appro- sign elements where pedestrian paths convenience, but are not absolutely priate for each stage of the process have abrupt or severe changes of necessary to provide basic accessibil- from concept and sensitization grade; additional per-unit costs for ity. Thus, while the study presents a through design and implementation. larger parking spaces for the disabled comprehensive evaluation of design The concept of barrier free design has and for appropriate signs; access to elements necessary to provide an ac- been expanded from simply assuring recreational opportunities; and oné cessible, safe, and convenient commu- minimal accessibility, through provi- piece of accessible play equipment at nity, this attempt to categorize the sion of ramps, curb cuts, and wider each children's play area; and appro- quality of design requirements is, of doors, to provision of a process to priate signs throughout the commu- necessity, somewhat subjective and achieve a comprehensive view of nity, to meet the needs of the blind. also reflects the lack of any current community accessibility for everyone. Even these items should not-be cost concensus on applicable standards. The elements of accessibility have significant where there is careful A related limitation of the analysis been defined, and these in turn have planning at the initial stages of de- of development costs is that these been carefully examined with issues velopment. For example, better initial costs cannot be wholly assigned to and guidelines presented for each location and grading of pathways barrier free design considerations. element. should reduce the need to compensate Rather, they represent the additional While the process is enormously for severe grade changes. Parking costs that would be required to make complicated in terms of the number of spaces located at entry points will not two specific developments minimally details and skills required, it is con- always need to be larger, and al- accessible after important initial pro- ceptually simple. The products of this though it may be preferrable to have graming decisions, not reflective of study can be used by others to achieve signs at eye level to drivers, they can barrier free design requirements, had an understanding of barrier free de- also be painted on the ground with already been made. While they do sign requirements. Such requirements regular street markings. Swimming suggest additional costs for develop- are simply part of good planning, pools can have ramps instead of, or in ers of certain conventional projects, planning that takes into consideration addition to, steps, and spectator seat- they do not prove that similar de- the physical needs of all people, ing areas when carefully planned can velopments conceived from the be- whether young or old, physically fit normally accomodate the disabled. ginning as barrier free developments or temporarily or permanently dis- Where children's play areas are al- would necessarily be more costly. abled. This study confirmed this fact. ready accessible, handicapped chil- Plainly stated, it is hard to separate As part of good design, there seem to dren can generally adapt to regular out costs attributable specifically to be few, if any, costs that are specif- equipment, although play facilities barrier free design elements because ically incurred to meet accessibility planned specifically for the disabled most of these elements represent sim- needs. can be just as much fun for all the ply good design. Everyone benefits The benefits of barrier free de- children. Finally, when barrier free from good design, but the elderly and velopment are clear: They allow all 14 people to participate as fully as possi- cessfully developed projects which placement of community facilities, ble in the life of their community. are accepted and eventually demanded and appropriate locations for special Planning for accessible communities by the buying public. types of housing. Whether the project and, in particular, providing inde- To the extent that barrier free re- involves a completely new commu- pendent housing alternatives to in- quirements become more widespread, nity or inner city redevelopment and stitutionalization, enables the elderly they will eliminate this factor from rehabilitation attention to accessibility and disabled to stay in their com- competitive pricing. Thus, one way to requirements can help to create a bet- munities and to participate. The posi- encourage more barrier free develop- ter environment for everyone. tive results from such integration are ment is for state and local govern- Barrier free design is simply good both social and economic. Employed ments to adopt development codes design. We know how to do it. We persons support their community which not only encourage but require now need to see that it is done! through taxes and other activities. this factor as part of the necessary de- Those who are involved with their sign considerations. Many state and community help give it a sense of local governments are already ahead Ms. Hillard is Director of Policy, place and commitment, reducing of the federal government in setting Planning and Research for the Office apathy and crime. guidelines and standards for accessi- of Independent Living for the Dis- The study also highlights the need bility; California, Massachusetts, abled, U.S. Department of Housing to develop widespread expertise on New Jersey, North Carolina, and and Urban Development. The opin- such concepts among architects and Ohio are examples. Prince Georges ions expressed in this paper are her planners. Development of college and County, Maryland, recently passed a own and do not necessarily reflect graduate curriculums that include bar- model building code which estab- those of HUD or HEW. rier free concepts are needed, as well lishes different levels of accessibility. Notes and References as development of positive awareness Cites like Berkeley, California 1) Barrier Free Communities, through technical assistance ac- Champaign and Carbondale, Illinois, Peoples Housing, Inc., 1978. tivities, such as workshops, articles, have made meaningful strides in mak- 2) Ibid. and reports on new developments, ing their cities more accessible. 3) Ibid. Appendix I, "Sourcebook techniques, and approaches, including HUD has a variety of programs of Barrier Free Site Design Details widespread distribution of technical which can be useful in these efforts. and Their Costs, Marketing and assistance materials, such as the Community Development Block Evaluation." prodúcts of this study. Grant funds can be used for many 4) The cost of accessibility fea- Developers and builders must be community development activities in- tures in buildings, including convinced not simply that barrier free cluding the removal of architectural publicly-used facilities, places of design is "good design,' but that it barriers. Other programs, such as the employment, and a percentage of the will significantly increase the markets Section 202 Direct Loan Program for various housing types, was not in- available to them. 6 To the extent that Housing the Elderly and Handicapped cluded in determining the differential extra factors are involved, they can and the Section 8 Housing Assistance cost of barrier free elements because help provide a more competitive Payments Program, can be used to the study focused on site conditions product. "Good" planning or de- provide a variety of types of housing rather than individual buildings. velopment for a builder or developer, assistance. 5) Lighting was judged to be a however, is often considered in the A final point concerns the implica- necessary barrier free design element context of development costs relative tions of barrier free design research to allow easy identification of hazards to the sales prices of lots and houses. for existing development. HUD, for and directional and informational Features that are perceived to increase one, is putting increasing emphasis on signs, as well as to provide for secu- costs and thereby make a develop- redeveloping inner-city neighbor- rity at all community facilities and ment less competitive are not particu- hoods as a strategy for producing along paths of travel throughout the larly attractive to a developer without housing. In cases where a neighbor- community. offsetting advantages. In this regard, hood or city area is undergoing rede- 6) The elderly and handicapped studies such as this one are only be- velopment, these same concepts and population can conservatively be es- ginning to break new ground. The guidelines should be helpful in deter- timated at over 20 percent of the cur- proof of success will come with suc- mining transportation linkages, rent population. 15 The Illinois Approach sponsible to DVR to help us meet their needs and provide feedback. James S. Jeffers This give-and-take process provides the constant evaluation and monitor- ing our clients and the agency require The word independence is Urbana and Southern Illinois Univer- to work toward the total rehabilitation united to the ideas of dignity and vir- sity at Carbondale. Again, support concept. tue; the word dependence, to the was provided by consumer-based Activities within our VR agency ideas of inferiority and corruption. organizations-separate and distinct include: Jeremy Bentham activities from the state vocational re- 1. D.I.A.L.-The Disabled Indi- habilitation agency. viduals Assistance Line is a call col- This thought must have been in the Illinois is using the "total rehabili- lect system whereby persons can call minds of those who put in motion the tation" approach. We are attempting the Chicago-based D.I.A.L. office wheels toward independent living. to incorporate the Independent Living and obtain information on agencies The increased move toward imple- Rehabilitation (ILR) initiatives ad- (public and private) which serve menting this concept was spurred by junct with the state service delivery handicapped persons. The D.I.A.L. such actions as the Comprehensive system. From the perspective of the office also houses a resource library Needs Study, the Rehabilitation Act Illinois DVR, it is apparent that ILR of information on services, agency of 1973, and the expansion of the vo- is too important a service to ignore or contacts, DVR programs, and legal cational emphasis in rehabilitation to to "fit" into the traditional extended information affecting disabled enhance the ideas of virtue and evaluation category; a discrete VR persons. dignity. program initiative is clearly the pre- 2. Client Assistance Project The independent living concept has ferred option with the basic idea that (CAP)-This program, funded by a taken a sort of "of the people, by the consumerism can change things grant from RSA, insures consumer people, and for the people'' within instead of outside. input into DVR programs and approach-much needed input from Whereas many states may use one, policies. The mission of the Client consumers is being obtained for con- or a few, of the projects described be- Assistance Project is to assist DVR sumers. The move toward serving the low, Illinois is availing itself of all clients in their rehabilitation process. severely disabled has enabled them to these sources of consumer, public, It is a high priority to hire qualified voice their concerns, needs, and, and inter-agency input. We have ex-DVR clients for staff positions. more importantly, their choices. broadened the Illinois VR mission so The program goals are to: 1) provide Historically, the struggle for inde- that we are not just focusing on information to past, current and po- pendent living has been approached employment, but on all areas related tential DVR clients; 2) assist clients with the use of separate consumer- to the total participation of disabled in the DVR appeals process; 3) serve based organizations. Needs are iden- persons in society, individualizing the as a resource to clients and coun- tified and ultimately addressed with rehabilitation concept and processes. selors; and 4) identify gaps in services the help of fellow consumers iden- Recently we have established posi- that exist in the VR system. The proj- tified by their particular organization tions within the agency for an acces- ect will be located in Springfield, but or disability. -Such is the case in sibility coordinator and a housing will eventually serve clients and California's Center for Independent specialist. From the perspective of counselors state-wide. Living and Massachusetts' Boston total rehabilitation, we are seeking to 3. Consumer Advisory Coun- Center for Independent Living. Cam- advise property owners on their legal cils-Each of the five DVR regions pus services began with the disabled and moral responsibilities with re- has a Regional Consumer Advisory students working in their spare time spect to accessibility of their build- Council. The mission of these coun- toward alleviating the architectural ings and facilities. cils is to advise DVR regional staff on and social barriers they encountered. The DVR philosophy is that we programs and procedures within Illinois is proud to have two of its view clients as active, knowledgeable DVR. These councils also are con- largest state universities totally acces- and responsible people. We are re- cerned with ILR in each region, in- sible to its handicapped students-the sponsible to our clients to provide the University of Illinois at Champaign- best services possible; they are re- (Continued on Cover III.) 16 AMERICAN REHABILITATION Second Generation: New England John V. Driscoll, Ph.D, Bruce Marquis, Paul J. Corcoran, M.D., and Frederick A. Fay, Ph.D. Independent living programs are dedicated assistance of many rehabili- For several months, they met reg- riding a crest of popularity in the field tation professionals who are distres- ularly, brainstorming their idea, map- of health and rehabilitation, to serve sed by the limited futures of those for ping ways to make it reality, and the needs of people who have very whom the promise of America is visi- studying similar efforts in Berkeley, severe physical disabilities. More ble only on a flickering TV screen in Champaign, and Houston. Their goal than 15 states are developing such a back bedroom or hospital ward. was a base of operations-a program service components, and the Rehabili- rather than a facility-for disabled tation Services Administration is Boston Center For people to bridge the gap between total being urged to expand its services to Independent Living dependence on an institution and include independent living programs. Following the initiative of inde- independent living. BCIL envisioned This paper looks at three aspects of pendent living programs in Cham- a consumer-run, self-help commu- existing or developing independent paign, Illinois; Berkeley; and Hous- nity, integrated with the able-bodied, living programs in New England. ton; the project to establish a Boston where severely disabled people could First, the Boston Center for Inde- Center for Independent Living (BCIL) develop independence. pendent Living is highlighted as the was conceived in January 1974 and Enlisting the aid of state agencies forerunner of several programs. Sec- opened its doors that September. and Boston University (BU), the three ond, activities are summorized by the BCIL had its roots not only in the founders spent the 1974 spring and New England Spinal Cord Injury anger of disabled people "incarcer- summer gathering a board of direc- Foundation to facilitate development ated" in public and private institu- tors, arranging a contract with of programs in areas where none tions, but also in the frustration of re- Medicaid, and making final arrange- exist. Third, a Tufts Research and habilitation professionals who found ments with BU. In September, the Training Center (RT-7) research proj- the noninstitutional community inac- first resident rolled into modified ect is described which integrates in- cessible to clients and patients follow- quarters in BU's Theology building, dependent living training into the ing rehabilitation. All three cofoun- and BCIL was underway. In the 4 medical rehabilitation process rather ders had firsthand knowledge of the years since its founding, BCIL and than tacking it onto the end. complexity of integrating people with the roughly 70 persons who have par- Cooperative efforts by rehabilita- severe disabilities into the larger ticipated have demonstrated that tion professionals and disabled community. Paul J. Corcoran, M.D., independent living is a realistic and consumers demonstrate that now RT-7 Project Director, contrib- preferred goal for many severely dis- community-based, independent living uted his knowledge of medically ac- abled persons. is a medically acceptable, cost- ceptable alternative living situations Today, BCIL is a small, nonprofit effective, and rewarding alternative to and links to university support. Fred- corporation coordinating three sepa- long term, institutional care. erick A. Fay, Ph.D., now RT-7 Re- rate phases of independence that have The groundswell of interest is the search and Training Director and a evolved over the years: result of determined efforts by dis- quadriplegic psychologist, brought Transitional living. Providing the abled people who have demonstrated energy and enthusiasm from firsthand first, basic steps in training social and a truly pioneering spirit in breaking knowledge of other centers. Rehabili- physical skills, transitional living away from institutions-sometimes in tation counselor Robert McHugh, began in modified dormitories at BU. defiance of health professionals. In so with his intimate knowledge of the As BCIL attracted disabled persons, doing, they have learned to care for state vocational rehabilitation system, not necessarily interested in a full- themselves, pursue educations, and was a link to cooperation and funding time education, this concept was ex- vie in the job market. They have the between agencies and the idea. panded, and in March 1977, the first AMERICAN REHABILITATION 17 residents moved into a second transi- tures, goals, and residents influence Although consumer involvement is tional facility in Brookline Village, the particular character of any organi- viewed as a key element in programs, an apartment complex in a Boston zation. However, at least two too many organizations await the de- suburb. philosophic tenets provide common velopment without activity on their Cluster Housing. For those who links between BCIL and other centers: part. When it doesn't develop, a vac- have mastered independent living 1) People with disabilities plan and uum is created. The New England skills, cluster housing offers greater implement the decisions that affect Spinal Cord Injury Foundation sub- independence. Located in East Bos- their lives; 2) the programs help scribes to consumer involvement as ton, this is an apartment building with people with disabilities live independ- paramount, but it also believes that a several apartments modified for hand- ently in the community rather than partnership between consumers and icapped people, with a pool of per- dependently in institutions. the agency can effectively bridge the sonal care assistants (PCAs) and a gap between dependent and demean- nighttime attendant. New England Spinal ing living and independent living. Cord Foundation Independent living. As facilities There are three independent living and funding for attendants became Nowhere is the issue of independ- programs in New England, the BCIL available to the greater Boston area, ent living programs more relevant (already described), the Bangor Cen- people began moving to accessible than in the area of spinal cord injury ter for Independent Living, and the apartments, usually shared with a and the systems that serve people who Worchester Area Transitional Hous- PCA, from which they now conduct experience such trauma. Although the ing program. They serve Greater Bos- lives as students and professionals. acute and rehabilitative stages are ton, the State of Maine, and Worces- Who are BCIL residents? They are, dramatic and well attended, the mean ter County, Massachusetts. In addi- for the most part, young, highly number of years lived by people who tion, the Stravros Foundation, based motivated people from the Greater survive these injuries is 33; thus, the in Amherst, Massachusetts, offers Boston area. They come to BCIL with need to enhance independent living most IL services, except attendant a variety of physical disabilities rang- opportunities is becoming more criti- care. It focuses on peer counseling, ing from muscular dystrophy to spinal cal. Add to this, the increased inci- resource assistance, and housing. A cord injury. Their responses to the dence of high-level spinal cord in- fifth model is developing in opportunities offered by BCIL are en- juries and the system is faced with a Bridgeport, Connecticut, under the thusiastic. As Walter Zarnowski, the larger number of quadriplegics than auspices of the Southern Connecticut first resident, put it: "The Center for ever before. Quadriplegia Association which has Independent Living, has obliterated For this reason and the fact that in- planned a facility to house 12 quad- the lock and knocked the cage door dependent living programs have been riplegics in a group setting. Funds are off its hinges. It has shown me that slow to develop, the New England being raised to support its construc- there is a fundamental difference be- Spinal Cord Injury Foundation began tion and program development. tween merely existing and living for a regional approach to the need during Because of these programs, New something brighter; the challenge of 1977. Its strategy supports existing England ranks second to California in being individually responsible for my independent living programs (centers independent living services. own actions. This is what I was pre- for independent living) and initiates Nevertheless New Hampshire, Rhode vented from doing before I came to new programs, where necessary. Island, Vermont, as well as the BCIL. In addition to spinal cord injured southeastern and northeastern portions Two lessons stand out as important people who can benefit from inde- of Massachusetts are unserved. To from the BCIL experience. First, pendent living programs, people with meet the need, the New England and BCIL has shown that it is possible to many other types of severe physical Spinal Cord Injury Foundation has develop a quality independent living disabilities are served by them, such been planning independent living rehabilitation program in a short as people with cerebral palsy, muscu- programs in these areas. period. Second, it is important to lar dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, mul- In addition to its expertise in think through every step of the cen- tiple amputees, and Friedrich's applied research and planning, the ter's development. No two centers are Ataxia. Many of them are now in Foundation gained a great deal of prac- alike. Differing funding sources, nursing homes, hospitals, or in de- tical experience in the area last year philosophies, organizational struc- pendent home situations. by providing 8 months of manage- 18 Regardless, the long-range outlook is encouraging. The various inde- pendent living programs in New Eng- land and elsewhere have made out- standing contributions in aiding those with severe physical disabilities to gain independent life styles. With more money, additional models of services, assistance with developing adequate housing resources, and the active involvement of consumers and providers, barriers to independent liv- ing can be surmounted. Tufts Research and Training Center The increasing severity of physical disabilities being seen in rehabilita- One of the authors, Dr. Frederick Fay, negotiates a curb cut on way to Boston tion centers and the consequential de- Center for Independent Living. velopment of independent living pro- ment services to BCIL. A full-time The advantages of the New Eng- grams have led the staff of the Tufts Director of Community Program- land Spinal Cord Injury Foundation's Rehabilitation Institute to focus more ing, Bruce McHugh, was employed management of these various efforts sharply on some of the long-standing in February 1978. include a coordinated approach to problems in medical rehabilitation A threefold strategy was developed common problems, sharing of staff, and to develop plans to integrate in- that would gain financial support for close ties with the divisions of voca- dependent living into the medical re- staffing (In all instances, such support tional rehabilitation, the view of an habilitation process. A research proj- has been provided by the state divi- organization which has consumers in- ect, begun this year with support from sion of vocational rehabilitation); volved at all levels of its operation, the New England Regional Rehabilita- create an advisory committee with and expertise in managing independ- tion Research and Training Center representation from consumers and ent living programs. In its efforts to (RT-7), will examine the cost- consumer groups, agency representa- foster the idea of cooperation in the effectiveness of providing independ- tive rehabilitation professionals, and area, the Foundation has assisted in ent living training throughout the other community leaders; and select a strengthening the Massachusetts medical rehabilitation process rather model of services to best serve the Interagency Committee on Independ- than at the end of it. needs of the people who live in the ent Living and has served as a foun- The first problem to be addressed community and use any resources that der of the Association of Independent is the institutionalization of the medi- already exist. Living Executives. cal rehabilitation process. The in- In building the advisory commit- Major problems that threaten the crease in severity of disabilities tees, the Foundation has focused on development and expansion of pro- means an increased amount of time developing consumer leadership. The grams are the lack of adequate fund- spent living in institutions. Lengths of long-range plan is to relinquish man- ing for attendant services; inadequate stay in acute hospitals and rehabilita- agement when programs are operating housing that is accessible and afford- tion centers may extend to many effectively and their advisory commit- able; and financial disincentives for months. Thousands of disabled people tees are prepared to assume manage- people who are disabled to seek work spend additional months or years in ment responsibility. Three of the five that is fitted to their needs, interests, nursing homes or chronic hospitals. advisory committees under develop- and abilities. Coordinated action at The harmful effects of prolonged ment are chaired by people who have national, state, and community levels institutional living have become well severe physical disabilities and two can overcome these impediments to known. Patients are encouraged to by consumers. expansion. follow instructions, rules, and regula- 19 daily basis, either by the patient re- turning to the Institute or by provid- ing daily services in the apartment. Patients will pay their own rent, and professional services will be reim bursed. at the home care or outpatient rates. The research component of the project will measure the effect on length of hospital stays, total costs of rehabilitation training, and improve- ment of independent living skills. The functional assessment scales in use will be augmented to measure such functional skills as outdoor mobility, use of transportation vehicles, written and verbal communication, manage- ment of business and financial affairs, social contacts, educational or voca- tional activities, amount of time spent up, amount of distance traveled, etc. Another problem to be addressed is the exclusive reliance on profession- als in medical rehabilitation and the barriers to consumer involvement within rehabilitation centers. Because of the high hourly and overhead costs of professional therapy and nursing BCIL member shows his specially equipped van which allows him the mobility services, the health care system can that he needs to function independently. afford to provide only a few hours per day of one-to-one services. Training tions. Compliance is highly valued, ronment of the institution can never in the home is rarely feasible due to and individualistic behavior is dis- accurately simulate the real world to the economies of group treatment and couraged. The "good" patient is the which the disabled person must re- the costs of travel time; yet the home person who respectfully follows in- turn, and in which he or she must is the setting where independent liv- structions and does not disagree with function independently. Added to ing skills must be practiced and the staff. On the other hand, the pa- these problems is the rising cost of in- "fine-tuned.' Frequently, success- tient who constantly asks for a dime stitutional care; currently a skilled fully rehabilitated disabled people for the pay phone, a postage stamp, nursing home bed in the Boston area take it upon themselves to train newly or a pass to leave the institution on -costs $25 to 40 per day; a. chronic or disabled people. While often very ef- personal business, tends to be treated rehabilitation hospital bed is $100 per fective, these efforts don't reach as a nuisance or "manipulative." day, and acute hospital rates are $200 every physically disabled person and Patients do not make their own ap- to 300 per day. are not- available early in the rehabili- pointments, keep their own medical The Independent Living Project tation process when the need may be records, or administer their own will promote the development of tran- greatest. These ad hoc rehabilitation medication. These responsibilities le- sitional apartments within two blocks efforts by disabled people or con- gally are vested in the institutions. of the Rehabilitation Institute, to sumer organizations cannot be Yet, on the day of discharge, the pa- which patients can be discharged after integrated with the professional re- tient is expected to suddenly assume a shorter-than-usual inpatient stay. habilitation process. There is little control of his own health care and life Rehabilitation and independent living opportunity for crossfertilization of decisionmaking. The artificial envi- services can still be provided on a rehabilitation professionals and these 20 experienced disabled people. In fact, grew out of the basic, traditional and perfecting independent living most rehabilitation professionals have health care system and still tends to skills. limited, off-duty contact with suc- be seen in terms of "units of service" Like most new ideas, the project cessful, independent physically dis- given by a professional to a disabled includes much that is old and famil- abled people in social or community person. Thus, it tends to be a one-way iar. Maximal efforts will be made to settings. As a result, the rehabilitation process, in the same sense as an injec- draw on the existing expertise and ex- professional may tend to over- tion or surgical operation. While perience of other rehabilitation cen- estimate the limitations of disabled every good medical rehabilitation cen- ters and the successful independent people and be unaware of a large va- ter places a heavy emphasis on patient living programs in Boston and riety of adaptive techniques and ar- education, little use is made of sev- Worcester. rangements of home environment eral well-known and powerful educa- Patients need not originate from which successful, physically disabled tional tools, such as defined, measur- within the Tufts-New England Medi- people use. able educational objectives; a speci- cal Center: referrals will be welcomed The Independent Living Project fied training curriculum for each cat- from any source. Project staff will will measure the cost-effectiveness of egory of disability; written training work closely with the Massachusetts consumer involvement in the rehabili- materials, such as textbooks and Interagency Committee on Independ- tation process in the role of "Inde- workbooks; practical laboratory ex- ent Living, the Boston Housing Au- pendent Living Trainers" (ILTs). perience to try out new skills under thority, and other groups who are Procedures will be developed to iden- supervision; and testing and certifica- promoting transitional housing and tify, recruit, screen, select, and train tion to determine that patients actually independent living in the Boston area. successfully rehabilitated disabled learn the new skills, knowledge, and Liaison will continue to be main- people to function as ILTs. Many attitudes which are the goal of tained with the successful Independ- ILTs will have a full-time job or busy rehabilitation. ent Living Programs in Berkeley, personal life, and will "moonlight" The Independent Living Project Houston, Columbus, and elsewhere. parttime in their ILT role, for which will measure the effectiveness and In summary, just 4 years after the they will be paid. The project will de- costs of an educational model for re- first planning meeting for the Boston velop and define a working relation- habilitation health care delivery. Center for Independent Living, we ship between ILTs and traditional Separate curricula will be developed find a variety of programs now de- members of the rehabilitation team for the common categories of disabil- veloping. Rehabilitation providers (nurses, therapists, social workers, ity, such as spinal cord injury, ampu- and several disabled consumers have physicians, psychologists, etc.), tation, arthritis, cerebral palsy, etc. cooperatively established programs which will allow each to learn from There will be written educational ob- that have enabled people to bridge the the other. The legal, insurance, and jectives which will be similar to the gap between institutional dependency regulatory aspects of the ILT role will Individual Written Rehabilitation Plan and community-based independence. be investigated, and plans for quality (IWRP) now in use in the VR system. Initiatives by disabled people, the control and accountability of their Written teaching materials and New England Spinal Cord Injury work will be developed. Attempt will audio-visual aids will be obtained or Foundation, and Tufts Research and be made to negotiate a pilot arrange- produced. The staff will study how Training Center are developing inde- ment to reimburse for the services of best to schedule and coordinate the pendent living programs in previously ILTs, through one or more of the educational component with the tradi- unserved areas. third-party health insurance agencies tional medical rehabilitation services. which pay for health care. The costs Optimum space and furnishings for Dr. Driscoll serves with HEW Region and effectiveness of the addition of the rehabilitation education program I. Mr. Marquist is a staff member of ILTs to the rehabilitation team will be will be determined and added to the the New England Spinal Cord Foun- compared with that of the traditional Rehabilitation Institute. Independent dation. Dr. Corcoran is a physician medical rehabilitation approach. Living Trainers (ILTs) will function and Project Director of the Tufts A third problem to be addressed is as "lab instructors," and maximum study described in this article and Dr. the limitations of the medical use will be made of the neighboring Fay is the Research and Training Di- framework in which rehabilitation apartments and surrounding commu- rector at Tufts Research and Training services are delivered. Rehabilitation nity as a "laboratory" for practicing Center. 21 IL: In Massachusetts (MRC). The rationale is that suitable living arrangements can be an essen- tial component of the vocational re- Elmer C. Bartels habilitation of severely disabled people. Grants were provided to es- Independent living, as a concept, is veloped. The helper is called a per- tablish the organizational structure not new. However, the philosophy is sonal care attendant (PCA); a Center and program to the point that enough now being applied to a population for Independent Living (CIL) is usu- people were in the program to obtain which previously had not been ally a facility where a number of dis- the fee payment rate from Medicaid. thought of in these terms, to the se- abled people live independently Just as in most other CIL develop- verely physically handicapped adult. within an organization and program ments around the country, disabled This new thrust has created a whole structure to meet their needs; an Inde- people were key contributors and new set of forces in social thinking pendent Living Program (ILP) de- managers in starting and continuing and the delivery of human services. notes a program spanning many phys- these programs. The purpose of independent living is ical locales, supporting people living More recently, a new program has to establish people in the community in the community; Transitional Living been funded on a pilot basis to pay for through a supportive service network (TL) is a program within one physical PCA costs for employed, disabled which improves the quality of life. facility housing a group of people people who, due to their employment Examination of de-institutionaliza- (this is most often the first step from status and income, are not Medicaid tion over the past 10 years reveals institutional or acute hospital setting); eligible. The program is administered that people with mental illness and Clustered living refers to a small by MRC through the CIL's who have mental retardation have been placed group of 2 or 3 living in a group set- expertise in running PCA programs. effectively into independent living ar- ting within the community; Commu- Eligibility for this program is deter- rangements in the community-at- nity Living refers to one person living mined on the basis of need for PCA large. Basic support systems such as in an apartment (or house) with PCA services (2-5 hours per day, and a halfway houses, community health services. These terms are used in night time attendant, if needed) and a centers, and residential group homes Massachusetts to reflect the state-of- sliding scale for income. Under this have been, and remain, the basic the-art concerning independent living. program, a person might receive an building blocks of this effort. State The main factor which has made average of $4,500 in support if in- funds, plus federal grant money, have independent living a realistic option come is less than $10,000 per year. been used to support the community in Massachusetts is a Medicaid fee PCA subsidy is gradually decreased development aspects of de- rate under Title XIX of the Social Se- as the income rises to $25,000 per institutionalization. The results show curity Act to pay for PCA's for year at which point the person is that this population is living inde- Medicaid-eligible young people to completely responsible for PCA pendently, essentially in the commu- live in transitional, clustered, or payment. nity, at a higher level of functioning, community living settings. Two non- In following the ILP development that the support systems are helping profit CIL's (Boston Center for Inde- in Massachusetts, the greatest need at people to achieve at a higher level of pendent Living and Worcester Area this point is accessible low and mod- community involvement, and that Transitional Housing) administer the erate income housing and Section 8 state agencies can work together to programs and serve as the fiscal con- certificates for subsidized units. As achieve a common goal. duits for paying PCA's. The philos- people prepare to leave transitional The most recent thrust into inde- ophy is that disabled people should living and look for community living pendent living involves severely phys- interview, hire, fire, and pay their opportunities, the lack of accessible ically disabled young adults who, own PCA's, thus making the PCA and affordable apartments is proving with the assistance of another person, fully responsible to, and responsive to be a crucial need. Housing money can live independently in the commu- to, the disabled person needing within the Department of Community nity. The unit of independence, then, such services. Also of key importance Affairs for housing for the handi- becomes the disabled person plus the to funding the CIL's has been innova- capped is just now being applied to helper. As part of this process, an en- tion and expansion grants from Mas- tirely new nomenclature has de- sachusetts Rehabilitation Commission (Continued on Cover III.) 22 AMERICAN REHABILITATION Second Generation: West Coast Bruce M. Brown Before CIL ever became recognized Department of Rehabilitation (DR) Gaps And Continuities as an "independent living program," and beneficiaries of Aid to Disabled Where generations exist so do gaps its founders experienced several years and Medicaid.³ By carefully studying which separate them and continuities of increasing group activity and or- and insistently using their entitle- which link them. Independent living ganization. No one knew what spe- ments, with support of their DR coun- (IL) organizations put a premium on cific result this would lead to, much selor, they were able to hire personal independence. They are not willing to less that a special, new kind of serv- attendants, reimburse the University work as shadows of any progenitor ice organization was being created. for a substantial part of their extra liv- organization, regardless of the debt These preparatory events took place ing and medical costs, pay their edu- they recognize or the appreciation in a closely knit group of severely cational expenses, and have a little they feel. Each will create its own in- disabled people on and near the Uni- spending money left. By learning to dividuality as a separate undertaking versity of California campus. The care for their own physical health and by new people in a new setting. New University, along with the California being mentally motivated to do it, groups are also conscious, however, Department of Rehabilitation, spon- they showed themselves physically that they are part of a movement and sored the group's coming into exist- less delicate than anyone had that they draw strength both from ence, but they had only the most imagined. their more solidly established precur- modest and indefinite expectations By 1970 there were 12 Cowell resi- sors and their contemporaries. about what their help would produce.. dents, as well as 5 ex-resident stu- Independent living for severely dents living off campus on their own. physically disabled people started in Roots Of The Movement At the end of the 1970 academic year, California with the new kind of social In 1962-63 two quadriplegic men, success came to the wildly mad no- organization and collective activity Edward Roberts and John Hessler, tion that disabled students could get a that disabled people created in Ber- were admitted to the University as federal Office of Education grant and keley over a period of about 10 years. part of an experiment that would become providers of official Univer- Now the products of this activity are allow them to live on campus, away sity services to disabled students. being transplanted or grown from from their homes. This unprecedented Thus, the UC Berkeley Physically seed in at least 18 new California lo- and risky step was based on their tak- Disabled Students Program (PDSP) cations.¹ The issues and questions we ing campus residence in a carefully came into being. have identified for our study of the controlled, medical setting at the California ILP experience are, "What Cowell Student Health Service Hospi- A New Social Invention does it take for success in a second tal. After 2 years, they were joined by Having no real precedents to guide generation of ILPs?" and "What is a third quadriplegic student, and in or limit them, the designers of PDSP success for ILPs?''2 the next year by five more equally relied on their own experience. They disabled persons. built things into the program which CIL Berkeley: The First It was the "carefully controlled" they had found they needed to make The organization that stands in his- aspect which most contributed to de- life liveable and hopeful enough to be tory as the only first generation velopments that followed. Hospital worth working and studying for. Get- California IL program, Berkeley Cen- regimen proved more of an incitement ting financial and medical benefits to ter for Independent Living, (CIL) to change than a protection to the survive on, finding dependable at- went through an experience that can project's beneficiaries. Disabled resi- tendants through a referral system, safely be termed unrepeatable, since dents began acting together to control getting power wheelchairs and keep- by definition there can be only one their lives, beginning in the hospital, ing them in operation, having help in first experience of a kind. So CIL's then in other situations. finding housing outside Cowell- beginnings had several important fea- The severely disabled people at these were the basic PDSP compo- tures that were unique. Cowell were clients of the California nents. Service program control by its AMERICAN REHABILITATION 23 consumers was another key concept, The new organization began with Essentials For Success made possible in, PDSP by the Cowell loaned office space in the house Project group's having brought the When the Center went into opera- where PDSP had its office near the tion in 1972, it concentrated on those grant to the University. One decision campus. Its only assets were the services considered indispensible to they made shaped the program's founders' spare time, a few volun- independent survival for the severely character significantly; they would teers' labor, and an amazing record of disabled: attendant/reader referral, not establish another large group liv- accomplishment since the Cowell housing referral, transportation, fi- ing facility off campus. Accessible, project began. With no more than nancial advocacy, and community private, off-campus rental housing this, the organizers boldly named action/public advocacy. But it was (with personal or shared attendants) their new creation: "The Center for not the services provided that made was the chosen alternative to living at Independent Living. CIL a new social invention. It was the Cowell. This alternative was becoming an The New Center concept which CIL inherited from PDSP of having such services in an earlier and earlier choice of many Independence from the University integrated system, controlled by the students who were being admitted to and a completely new start in the disabled themselves, and not tied to a Cowell in steadily increasing num- Berkeley community left CIL free to group residence. These concepts re- bers. The typical stay in hospital resi- choose any form of organization and main the essence of independent liv- dence, which had been 6 years at the any balance of politics and advocacy ing programs for the severely disabled beginning, by 1969 shortened to 1 in relation to direct services. Its first in California. year. year's support was largely from an RSA planning grant, which conferred Lean Years Going Off Campus the freedom to plan, rather than de- Despite the dramatic appeal of its Seeing the unique services offered manding immediate production of accomplishments and leaders, the or- to physically disabled students services and results. ganization was headed into financial through the University in PDSP, One of the first decisions was made hard times. It started with $50,000 of many nonstudent, disabled people in when CIL found that young blind RSA facilities planning money Berkeley began to seek PDSP serv- people in the University area wanted granted on the basis of its striking ices. Initially, the project took a re- independence and mobility in ways novelty and potential. But in an era laxed attitude toward these "outsid- similar to themselves and were will- when money appropriated to HEW ers," but the recurring thought of a ing to join forces as partners. Blind was being held back and stretched to grant audit made project personnel in- leaders and blind services were given its limits, there would be 2 years be- creasingly uncomfortable. a guaranteed place from that time on fore any more federal money came its An off-campus organization was and coalition became a policy. way. conceived as the logical solution. A After several months of planning, Survival was accomplished by piec- growing number of severely disabled CIL's proposal for an expanded sys- ing together small amounts of city UC alumni in Berkeley included many tem of IL services was drawn up to rent money, county client services people with leadership and organiza- provide: recruitment, training, and re- payments, University money, and tional abilities. This was also true of ferral services to help make good at- gifts. Staff and some other leaders some disabled people in Berkeley tendants (for orthopedics) and readers lived for months on a subsistence who had not been UC students. Direc- (for blind) more available; an level. At times prospects for funding tor John Hessler and others from accessible housing survey and referral looked so grim that moving back into PDSP brought some of them together service; wheelchair repair services; a shared office with PDSP seemed in late 1971. Out of this effort came mobility and independence training inevitable. the first community independent liv- for blind people; van transportation ing organization, with Larry Biscamp for people in wheelchairs; financial Right Time And Place and Philip Draper as its elected lead- aids counseling and advocacy; inde- ers, using "independent living" offi- pendent living skills (occupational Being in Berkeley, in 1972, CIL cially for the first time to describe the therapy training for personal care and was well located to benefit from the nature and purpose of the support living); and community action and collective gains of the equal rights services system put together in PDSP. other public advocacy efforts. and equal opportunity movements in 24 (Top) The several project directors of California independent living inia- tives meet to discuss common prob- lems and share solutions. The remain- ing photos show various activities that an independent living center or project might foster: (2nd row, left) a wheelchair occupant learns repair process by observation; (right) Proj- ect engineer works on power wheel- chair modifications. (3rd row, left) A van's electrical system is altered to allow modifications for power assists to disabled driver; (right) a course in computer card punch operation. 25 which other people, from blacks in disabled people as mandated by the some features which have remained the '50s to women in the '70s, had Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Then he generally continuous, as well as the won recognition and redress. used resources in his department to differences between their early ex- Minorities and stigmatized people of open the way for more government perience and the first years of CIL. Of many kinds were no longer ashamed support to IL programs. He began by characteristics common to ILPs and apologetic and were achieving a allocating more than $700,000 in fed- through both generations, the most sense of positive group identity. It eral innovation and expansion (I&E) significant involve campus contribu- was an era of "movements": mind- grant funds to ILPs. As his Assistant tions, private organizations, consumer expansion, self-realization, nonvio- Director, Roberts appointed John control, nonresidential orientation, lence, consumerism, and sexual free- Hessler, who had founded and di- and multidisability group coalitions. dom, among others. But an especially rected PDSP and was a founder of important influence came from the CIL. Hessler's main task for 6 months Contribution Of The Campus self-help therapy movements and was setting directions for grants and Jobs for university-trained, se- other organizations modeled after developmental work with ILPs. Only verely disabled people were created Alcoholics Anonymous, such as after this was administration of the IL when the college and university sys- self-help drug treatment groups. The grant program fully turned over to the tems in California funded and man- self-help concept spread to move- community resources specialists who dated positions of coordinator for dis- ments for sufferers from a multitude regularly managed grants to rehabili- abled services on each campus. of diseases, handicaps, and problems. tation facilities and workshops. Through these jobs, people trained in Thus the path for a self-help group of Berkeley's PDSP and CIL and also in severely physically disabled people in Second Generation the California Association of Physi- California, while not smooth, was Californians who were eager to cally Handicapped (CAPH) were well worn by predecessor groups. start ILPs began organizing and ap- seeded in communities throughout the plying for the I&E funds. Ten appli- state and given bases to work from in Boost From State Government cations were received and nine grants programs which usually included IL In .1974, campaigning on a platform were awarded averaging $72,000 each services for students. Community that promised more attention to for the 1st year. The organization interest and service requests from people on the bottom of the heap, which did not receive I&E grants, nonstudents usually followed. The Edmund G. Brown, Jr. was elected plus others which had begun activity campus coordinators and the student Governor of California. As Governor, but did not apply, or started too late groups they developed then often pro- Brown used his appointive powers to compete, all had to rely on other vided the initiative and the staff re- consistently with the spirit of his sources. Two of them were already cruits for later ILPs. campaign, and Edward Roberts, who receiving county grants and were able had become Director of CIL in 1974 to continue on that basis. They were All In Private Sector and put it on its financial and organi- later joined by one other similarly The idea of a government agency zational feet, was appointed to head funded project. operating IL projects in California the State Department of Rehabilita- The other six second generation was never considered. Starting with tion. Roberts had been impaired at California ILPs searched for assist- CIL, disabled people formed au- age 14 by polio, which all but totally ance through their municipalities. tonomous organizations of their own; destroyed his limb and hand function- They found Comprehensive Employ- or, if necessary, they joined forces ing and seriously hampered his ment and Training Act (CETA) public with a private organization to create breathing. As a leading supporter and service jobs, unused city-owned an ILP. Only then did they zero in on contributor to PDSP and CIL, he building space, and small appropria- government agencies for financial and strongly favored the IL concept. He tions of city money. The ad hoc ap- material support. was also a living example of what proach they used is reminiscent of Most ILPs in California are au- could be accomplished by a severely CIL's first years in that their growth tonomously incorporated. Existing disabled person. was more incremental than that of the private organizations, other than When he became DR Director, grant-funded organizations. CAPH chapters, have sponsored ILPs Roberts first took organizational steps Ten of these ILPs have now existed where an initial "grubstake" or to re-emphasize services to severely for 2 years. It is possible to identify matching money for a large grant was 26 needed. In these cases, relative or program energies which might go to- Initial Substitutes For Group total autonomy for the ILP is part of a ward IL services and advocacy; and Strength future plan. ILPs, which already provide a great deal of the social, political, and work Disabled In Driver's Seat In CIL's experience, formation of a life for many members, remain less of a total environment for them than if community ILP did not begin until a A board of directors and a top staff composed of severely disabled people cohesive group of severely disabled they lacked their own separate were part of CIL from the start. In the people had already existed in Ber- residences. second generation, this has continued, keley for several years. If anything, at least to the extent of there being a More Than Wheelchairs later development and success some- strong majority of severely disabled what eroded the initial group members on the board and/or a se- CIL broke some precedents when it strengths in CIL. ILPs in the second verely disabled director. In cases formed a joint organization of young generation, by contrast, were started where a larger sponsoring organiza- blind and orthopedic-motor disabled before their social underpinnings were tion with its own board and executive people. Later, deaf people and deaf firmly established. director is the recipient of an ILP groups were contacted and added their Existence and activity of California grant, the ILP's board with a disabled participation to CIL and to most other Association of Physically Handi- California ILPs. These actions estab- majority sometimes serves as an ad- capped chapters came before the visory body and its director as a pro- lished a principle of coalition rather growth of the ILP in several areas. gram manager. Thus a governing than competition among disability These were the strongest beginnings voice in these ILPs remains with groups which has been followed/gen- toward developing communities of people who live all day with problems erally in the California IL movement. severely disabled people in those of severe physical disability. Despite Differences Between Generations places at the time. There was also at the energy limitations which often go least one founder in several ILP sites with such disabilities, the inescapable Recent ILPs began in circum- who had significant personal experi- nature of the problems has engen- stances that more resemble the con- ences with Berkeley CIL and who dered a tenacity and a. high involve- temporary 1978 situation at Berkeley knew from this the kind of group base ment with solving them which ac- and CIL than they do CIL's situation and movement character they could count for much of the inventiveness in its first 2 years. aspire to. Though important, in the and creativity in ILP programs and From the start, the second genera- second generation, these assets did services. tion ILPs have had weaker group not begin to compare with the social bonds and less certain impetus as a substructure which CIL had at its Not A Place To Live movement than the first. Also, the beginning. California's ILP members do not new ILP organizations have necessar- There were at least three conse- depend on being provided special ily begun working, as CIL does to- quences of new ILPs having been or- group living facilities, although this day, with less select cross sections of ganized before their social group and might be an alternative when accessi- severely disabled people than those social movement bases became well ble housing is scarce. They have enti- found in Berkeley in the early 1970's. developed. First, in the absence of tlement, through various public aid And the new ILPs have certainly mis- these strengths, some other resources programs, to the means of arranging sed any chance to be "sleepers" and outside and inside the ILPs had to be their own living situations. Their need surprise the world with great results called on to carry their developmental centers on basic services, such as when little was expected. load. Second, the very fact of calling consumer advocacy, housing survey The new generation is cutting its on outside, local resources required, and referral services, and help with teeth on problems of maturity without at least temporarily, that ILPs accept attendants. Some advantages accruing having had the formative experience some accomodation to the views of from the nonresidential approach are which shaped the first generation. their local helpers. And third, formal that: conflicting interests of being The question now is whether it can program devices had to be added in- both tenant advocates and landlords maintain enough of the distinctive ternally to substitute for the informal are avoided; burdens and chores of features of ILPs to keep its special group resources which were not property management do not tie up value and effectiveness. developed. 27 services than the community advo- ous degrees for community and politi- Terms With Local Leadership cacy and political action that the cal advocacy, for help in getting fair Before an "independent living younger activists preferred. This has assistance from Welfare, Social Secu- movement" of severely physically probably been less true of those rity and Rehabilitation, and for disabled people ever existed, there nongrant-based ILPs which had an helping people find attendants and was a minority who were able not opportunity to develop more slowly apartments. only to survive but to make relatively and carefully and to be more selec- In Berkeley, group cohesion and independent lives for themselves. tive, choosing allies in line with their momentum of the movement at CIL's These people were often active in own inclinations. founding held off formal organization their communities as leaders, speak- For a few second generation ILPs, of many services and procedures until ing for other physically disabled the necessary organizational founda- size and increasing complexitites in people. They had not been centrally tions came from an established group CIL forced the issue. Second genera- involved in CIL, which had de- or agency which sponsored and gave tion ILPs which were set up rapidly veloped near a university campus and its name to the new venture, or ac- with I&E grants have had to assume was based on a much younger, self- tually made the ILP a unit within the the shape of formalized service pro- contained group of leaders. parent organization. This type of ar- grams much earlier in their existence. Many of the younger disabled rangement required an ability to work The most apparent generational dif- people had become conscious of under the sponsor's board and execu- ference that results is that a concen- themselves as "outsiders," removed tive director, to accept their adminis- trated effort to construct formal pro- from security and from full participa- tration and their management of grams and get them running tends to tion in life. They were inclined to be money, and to tolerate their often detract from the political advocacy activists, with at least a trace of nonmilitant approaches to program function of the projects. radicalism, and felt strongly about so- and politics. Enter Intake And Evaluation cial justice. Along with many other fair-minded Programed Substitutes As the ILP movement grew, so did people, however, some of the older, A closely knit group which par- applications for services. With the in- disabled leaders viewed the radical takes of a social movement, such as crease came a new problem-dealing style in Berkeley with unease and the movement for "disabled rights," with more people who were not really misgivings, mixed with unavoidable and which works closely on its mem- ready for ILP services. The first gen- admiration for its potency and suc- bers' individual and collective prob- eration started with a select popula- cess. The 1977 sit-ins to influence lems doesn't require much in the way tion of highly talented, severely dis- signing of the 504 regulations were of a special program or administrative abled people who were already not a comfortable time for many dis- structure. Members of such a close mobilized. They had been attracted to abled people who had come to rea- peer group can, for instance, advise, Berkeley from all over the state and sonably good terms with society as it counsel, support, and nurture one nation. Only after IL was well de- was. another; they can provide models, in- veloped did it have to deal with less- Organizers of many of the second spiration, and hope to one another ready applicants. generation ILPs in California have without a program called "peer coun- But second generation ILPs faced necessarily included pre-1975 dis- seling" and without a special peer the dilemma of "unready" applicants abled leaders. Once organized, the counseling coordinator and staff. from the beginning. Making judge- ILPs found they continued to need the What happens, happens "naturally" ments about "need and readiness" confidence, help, and support of the because of the group's closeness and and applying them to the requests of older disabled leadership. These "old the movement's clear direction. fellow severely disabled people does hands" were important as experi- On the other hand, an organization not come easily to an egalitarian ILP enced board members, knowledgeable which is set up without any strong staff member. However, to see one's and influential fund raisers, and preexisting group or close community work in lining up an apartment or an skilled volunteers in special of real peers does have a need to attendant repeatedly "blown" by a capacities. But there was a price to create formal programs from the be- person who is basically unready for pay for including them. Their ginning in order to accomplish these these experiences and responsibilities priorities leaned more toward direct same things. This is also true in vari- is also hard to take. Initially the social 28 agency idea of specialized "intake" It is the fact of the grant, however, assignments and a separate function its monitoring and renewal, and the of evaluating newcomers and their pressure imposed by its time and shar- needs seemed too "bureaucratic." ing limits which most affect the Yet it is a solution which most have grant-funded ILPs. I&E grants in had to adopt. California put the recipient on an im- The worst effect of "unready" ap- plied 3-year timetable to self- plicants is a preoccupation with crisis sufficiency, with support decreasing situations, leaving the ILP with few from 90 to 80 to 60 percent to noth- resources to support long term inde- ing. The clock ticks; the sponsor pendence goals. This problem is most watches and expects results. apt to be acute in urban core areas where severely disabled people fre- Search For Executive Ability quently get stuck without adequate The second generation ILPs were shelter, food, or attendant care. One started with expectations that they downtown ILP, using tough but would organize themselves promptly realistic intake and referral proce- and start efficiently to generate re- dures, saved itself from being pulled Special equipment allows this quad- portable results. Effective organiza- under by this problem through insist- riplegic man to answer telephone and tional leadership and administration ing that other crisis-meeting agencies make notes simultaneously. are essential under these circum- in the city serve the severely disabled stances, given their narrow margin of people who have the same problems appear to be necessary, so they were economic survival. Even member of transience and marginal existence not offered.) commitment, their greatest and most as their able-bodied counterparts. In the second generation ILPs, valuable asset, can be eroded through Ideally, an ILP has an array of people who would have been consid- inept management. Therefore, the services to fit a wide range of readi- ered "unready" in the early days are ILPs had to search out the most ex- ness. The experienced and perceptive now probably the typical ones being perienced and skilled managers and intake counselor can see that some worked with. Whether or not there executives. For the ILPs with grant services are more appropriate for the should be counseling is seldom ques- money, this may be both more possi- newcomer than the things which the tioned. The questions which do arise ble and more necessary. person may ask for. Such use of are, "What kind of counseling is The ideal is to find a highly capable superior knowledge and judgement needed most and which works best in administrator who is also severely does, however, depart from the peer an ILP?'' or "What differentiates disabled. However, it is not always group ideal of equality. Followup peer counseling from professional possible to combine these two qual- contacts to see if people carry through counseling?" and "How much emo- ities in one candidate; in such cases and don't get lost in the service sys- tional working-through should be in- preference has to be given to the tem are also effective, but may leave cluded, relative to a practical problem skilled manager. The only com- workers feeling more like parents or solving emphasis?" promise occurs when the job can be sheep dogs than peers. divided between two people, one of Living With A Timetable whom is disabled. But where neces- Upgrading IL Feasibility Structured, external expectations sity dictates hiring able-bodied direc- Second generation ILP programs have an important effect on those sec- tors, ongoing feelings of inconsis- give "counseling" an explicit and ond generation ILPs which get their tency and misgiving still result. prominent place. The most commonly main support from grants. Others may described unreadiness of applicants to be less affected because their finan- Conclusion: Success And Survival use ILP services is psychological- cial eggs are not so much in a one- Questions social unreadiness; counseling is the source basket, but they are still liable Answering the questions which most common corrective measure. (In for the resources they are given. This began this article requires a definition the early days of CIL, formally con- will increase as the ILP concept and of "success." Success for an ILP is stituted counseling services did not general expectations grow. surviving. That means at least paying 29 the rent and the staff. But it also seeing the whole ILP enterprise quently. The writer will supply a means effectively and dependably prosper, not become too "profes- California address list compiled from turning out the needed services. sionalized"? the most recent information upon However, success for an ILP also With their increasing knowledge request. means lasting as a movement and as a and responsibilities, how well can the Time has permitted only brief in- group. If their activity becomes too leaders keep from becoming removed quiry about developments in the other cautious about stepping on (or rolling from the sub-world of severely dis- West Coast states of Oregon and over) toes, or if they become too im- abled who are still deteriorating Washington. Rehabilitation leaders personal to allow participants to hopelessly and often ignorantly in most familiar with events in these spend time joking and sharing with outer darkness of convalescent hospi- places have offered the following ref- one another, then success in the ILPs' tals, "homes," and other confining, erences to active and developing pro- original sense will have eluded them. dependency centers? With all the grams with an IL purpose and charac- This may be harder to attain and re- urgency of legislation and politics and ter: E. W. Myers, President, Quads tain than organizational survival alone grants and appropriations and budgets United Against Dependency, Inc., and may even be endangered by over and meetings, how well can time be 5024 SW Slavin Rd., Portland 97201; concern for organizational solvency. made for seeing validity in these Bud Thoune, Adult Services Director, From the writer's location on the people's individual experiences, for United Cerebral Palsy Association of West Coast, at the start of a research listening to them, and for talking with Northwest Oregon, 7117 SE Harold study about ILPs, it seems likely that them outside of appointment hours to St., Portland 97206; Anne Waltz, important keys to this second part of get across the "fellow-human-being- President, Washington Coalition of success are hidden among some of the like-me" message? And how well can Citizens with Disabilities, % Seattle things they have in common. We have the rest of the world leave control and Department of Human Resources, 400 reviewed some of these and will look ownership of ILPs to the severely dis- Yesler Street, Seattle 98104; and at them more closely: at their affinity abled now that ILPs are accepted and Michael Clowers, Director, Inde- with the relatively unorthodox student sometimes famous? pendent Living Implementation Proj- world of the campus, at their organi- The answer to these questions is: ect, % Comprehensive Needs Study, zational autonomy, at their jealously Only partially, since everyone in- University of Washington, 1107 NE guarded consumer control, at their volved is human. The next question 45th St., Suite 225, Seattle 98105. avoidance as much as possible of the is: Will the outcomes be such as to 2) The new work on which this ar- cares and conflicts of landlordism, at permit ILPs to survive with their es- ticle is partially based was done for their openness to risk coalition with sentials intact? Our Independent Liv- an RSA Research Grant, 15-P- all disabled people in order to be ing Research Study will deal descrip- 59045/9, with Drs. Herbert Leibowitz strong in relation to the able-bodied, tively with these questions, and we and Leonard Green as Project Coor- sighted, hearing world, and other hope to find some clues and answers dinators for RSA. The author ac- commonalities yet unidentified. in time to help make a difference in knowledges the special help given by Another place our study will look the outcome. members of the California Coalition for answers is at solutions which ILPs of Independent Living Centers and by find to discontinuity and rapid growth California Department of Rehabilita- problems, such as those we have Mr. Brown is a Senior Analyst in the tion Assistant Director, John Hessler, pointed out in this article. How well Research Section of the California in assembling and evaluating informa- can government foster the start of ILP State Department of Rehabilitation. tion, and the editorial decisions pro- organizations on a large scale without He is currently serving as Director of vided by Harry N. Greenblatt, Chief, leaving them so lacking in social the Department's RSA-funded Inde- and Barbara L. Jones, Office Man- strength and determination of direc- pendent Living Projects Study. ager, of California Department of Re- tion that they are immediately unsta- habilitation's Research Section. ble and prone to cautious and for- 3) From February 1968 to June malistic answers to their survival Notes 1970, an Innovation Grant from RSA problems? How well can ILP leaders 1) In the rapidly developing world to the California Department of Re- and staffers who are gaining a world of independent living projects in habilitation paid, in part, for special of expertise in the work they do and California, organizations are being services to clients in the Cowell Hos- in the field they have invented, and added and addresses are changing fre- pital Project. 30 IL: A Legislative View or classes in hand controlled cars or vans. These examples reflect different Kathaleen C. Arneson concepts and views of "independent living" which have evolved over the past 20 to 25 years from the experi- ence of many different individuals and programs. Within my own perspective of years reviewing and helping to develop federal legislation on rehabilitation, I have seen the con- cept develop, take on a variety of elements, and move through various stages, at times being expressed in legislation. First-there was and is an em- About 25 million disabled people the next phases of national policy de- phasis upon aids to daily living. This are directly affected by P.L. 93-516 velopment and legislative action on is a "medical model'' that is (the 1974 Amendments to the Re- "Independent Living" for people exemplified by teaching impaired habilitation Act of 1973), legislation with disabilities. people to attend to their personal which established the White House As this paper is written, the 95th needs (bathing, dressing, moving Conference on Handicapped Individu- Congress, in the Spring of 1978, is about, using the bathroom, eating, als. In this Act, Congress took action considering proposed legislation to reading, going into and out of rooms to help people with disabilities authorize today's version of that ex- and buildings, Laccessing to wheel- minimize their dependence and en- citing and attractive (if somewhat elu- chairs, cars, buses, and the like.) hance their access to productive, par- sive) term "Independent Living," a The concept took form in legisla- ticipatory lives. It reiterated congres- term which conjures up visions of tion which emphasized "rehabilita- sional concern for removing barriers physically restored people throwing tion" as a legitimate objective of of all kinds that inhibit the life styles away their crutches and striding off health services legislation and in state of people with disabilities. purposefully to work. Other pictures architectural barriers legislation In one key provision, Congress come to mind-the formerly home- which had the objective of making stated that it was essential that rec- bound (perhaps a bed-ridden child public buildings more "accessible" ommendations be developed to assure with disabilities) now has been given to people with functional limitations. that all people with handicaps be ena- special tutoring, has been physically "Independent Living" bled to live their lives independently restored and trained to eat in socially then began to take the form of an em- and with dignity. Further, it was desirable ways, and is now being phasis upon help through the provi- stated that the complete integration of picked up every school day to go off sions, as needed, of services within all handicapped people into normal to special education and regular the familiar constellation of voca- community living, working, and serv- classes. The vision might be of a tional rehabilitation services to se- ice patterns be held as a prime na- newly blinded, older woman who is verely disabled people who had no tional objective. now able to bathe, dress, and other- clear vocational potential. The These clearly stated congressional wise care for herself without perma- rationale was that while an agency objectives can be used as a starting nent attendant care because she has provided services to assess employa- point in the further evaluation of a been taught the activities of daily liv- bility, it also would help the client National Policy on Disability for the ing and has learned to cook and serve gain facility in coping with the envi- 1980's. They also can serve as the meals in her newly modified kitchen. ronment and, perhaps, ultimately pre- basis for the development of new Or, in your mind's eye, it might be pare him for some level of vocational concepts and commitments for action the several young paraplegics who effort. on the part of government and other live together in a specially adapted The action legislation which au- sectors of society in working through house and who drive off to their jobs thorized this type of independent liv- AMERICAN REHABILITATION 31 ing came through the provision of ex- tion action programs, and general ad- services, nonvocational social de- tended evaluation services, such as vocacy functions. This concept was velopment assistance, and indi- those under the Vocational Rehabili- embodied in legislation introduced in vidualized case management. tation Act of 1965. The Congress also the 94th Congress by Congressman The next section of the proposal, gave legislative expression to this Koch of New York. No action has Part C, contains authorization to es- emphasis in the Federal Architectural been taken on the bill. tablish models. The independent liv- Barriers Act of 1968 and in the Urban Fifth-The stage of "comprehen- ing program encouraged by this sec- Mass Transit Act Amendments of sive services for the severely dis- tion is residential in character and in- 1970 which mandated rights of dis- abled" and models of independent volves the development and demon- abled people to use public transit. living. stration of a continuum of alternative Also, there were provisions in the Congressional Initiative. The most living arrangements (including group 1964 public housing legislation refer- significant legislation under consid- homes or other community living ar- ring to the need for housing for dis- eration by Congress is S. 2600, intro- rangements or facilities). abled people and the elderly. duced by Senators Randolph, Staf- The Administration's Initiative. Third-A new stage evolved in the ford, Pell, and Hathaway. The Administration's 1978 proposal early 1970's. It was the product of a According to its sponsors, Title II for independent living, testified to by coalescing of efforts to identify and of this proposed legislation would es- RSA Commissioner Robert Hum- advocate the rights of groups of se- tablish a new rehabilitation program. phreys, is an expansion of the inde- verely disabled people who needed Its thrust would be to deliver com- pendent living service projects pro- one or more of several comprehensive prehensive services to severely handi- gram initiated as part of the Com- rehabilitation services over an ex- capped people who are identified as prehensive Needs Study, undertaken tended period, sometimes for life. At needing multiple, continuing, and in 1975 under the requirement of Sec- this stage, the concept included the probably lifelong services and treat- tion 130 of the Rehabilitation Act of development of the person toward ment. They are also identified as 1973. goals short of employment. These perhaps having little or no vocational The Administration's proposal for goals might have been deinstitution- potential. 1979 is to double funds available and alization, lessened dependence on In contrast to other independent liv- expand the number of current projects family members or attendants for ing legislative proposals, this bill in- from 5 to 10. In 1980, this series of daily care, independence in cludes, in Part A, a "rights" concept projects would be greatly expanded in homemaking, or the establishment of drawn from the current Developmen- number evaluated, and, hopefully, mobility within the community tal Disabilities Act. Similarly, the in- replicated in greater numbers of areas through driving adapted cars, and dividualized plan of service has in 1981. other similar goals that led to a more become part of the concept and pro- A companion series of com- independent life style. The 1972 and gram. The protection and advocacy munity-based projects would improve the first 1973 Rehabilitation Act con- systems developed for the develop- local service delivery and modify ar- tained legislative proposals for com- mentally disabled are extended to the chitectural and attitudinal barriers. prehensive rehabilitation services to larger population. These are some of the main ideas express this concept. The two Acts Part B authorizes a grant program now being put forward in legislation were vetoed. to stimulate states to extend present under the "Independent Living" Fourth-Another stage or expres- services programs for the most se- rubric. sion of independent living involves verely disabled without vocational po- By September 1978 (about the time self-help in the concept of services in tential. States would have flexibility of issuance of this edition of Ameri- centers for independent living. This in service provision, but would have can Rehabilitation), we should know often is typified by a physical struc- to develop a detailed, long range plan whence we shall go for the next 3 to 5 ture (such as a rehabilitation center or that would strive toward the goal of years in perfecting the Independent residence) and a set of activities and comprehensive services for all se- Living Rehabilitation Services services, often developed and man- verely disabled people. concept. aged by disabled people. The program In developing new services, states involves peer group counseling, small would have to consider community Mrs. Arneson is Director of Policy business activity, community educa- living assistance, infant and preschool Research and Legislation, RSA. 32 Illinois Program currently in operation and make rec- agencies, such as: services offered, (Continued from page 16.) ommendations, where appropriate, to eligibility requirements, access to enhance the delivery of services to public transportation, to discuss cluding accessibility, transportation, disabled people. One of the ob- building accessibility, etc. Project housing, etc. Two representatives jectives of TAC is to insure that all of staff members are contacting realtors, from each regional council serve on the state's resources are available to landlords and providers of public the State Consumer Advisory Council handicapped people. In this regard, transportation to discuss accessibility to advise the DVR Board and Direc- although the Department of Conserva- issues and the special needs of dis- tor. The goal of the Regional Coun- tion is not participating actively in the abled and elderly people. There are cils is to receive consumer input into TAC Committee, for example, the three attendant-instructors on the every decision-making level within Committee is insuring that recreation staff who provide short term service DVR. They provide a resource for needs for the disabled are met. Also, directly to disabled and elderly peo- peer counseling for active DVR within the TAC Committee a Sub- ple and their families at home. Such clients. These councils also serve as a committee on Section 504 has been services may include self-care and resource for other committee ac- created. This Subcommittee is ad- hygiene, budgeting, community liv- tivities and public and private agen- dressing the concerns of 504 im- ing skills, and adapting the home to cies that impact upon DVR. plementation within all state agencies. individual needs. 4. Technical Advisory Committee 5. Independent Living Services Although these are just a few of the (TAC)-This Committee, organized Project-Developed and monitored by programs initiated toward total re- and developed by Governor James R. DVR and funded by the CETA habilitation for disabled people, Thompson and headed by the DVR Sangamon-Cass Consortium, this it is ambitious. We are attempting to Director, seeks to identify those state project began December 1, 1977. It take the VR model and program and services which are duplicated, under- has developed a Service Directory enhance it to include the ILR concept. utilized or nonexistent for serving containing information obtained from disabled people. Representatives 180 public and private social service Mr. Jeffers is Director, Illinois DVR. from the state's social service agen- cies are preparing a report for the Governor in which these programs will be described and recommenda- Massachusetts Program tional living and accessible apart- tions made to enhance service deliv- (Continued from page 22.) ments in the low to moderate income ery for the disabled citizens of Il- range. The challenge for Independent linois. Those agencies participating the needs of the physically handi- Living Programs in the future is ba- are: Departments of Public Aid, Ag- capped. Previously, this source of sically the same as for de-institution- ing, Labor, Children and Family funding had been applied to develop alization: to avoid creating many Services, Public Health, Mental community residences for other popu- mini-institutions throughout the Health and Developmental Disabil- lations. Also, a modernization and community where physically disabled ities, the Governor's office. Goals of rehabilitation section in the State people are isolated from life experi- the Committee are: a) to provide to Public Housing Statute, passed in late ences. Some of this is attitudinal by the Governor essential policy advice 1977, will make more housing the community and indeed by dis- and recommendations relating to re- available. abled people themselves. Independent habilitation services; b) to provide a In summary, successful independ- living training, which addresses sur- forum for the Governor and consum- ent living depends on three basic ele- vival in the community, both physi- ers to allow discussion and articula- ments: expertise in organizing the cally and psychologically, is the next tion of state policies and programs af- nonprofit agencies to meet the pro- step in developing the independent fecting handicapped persons; c) to grammatic need; funding for the indi- living program into a total program. develop interagency relationships to vidual PCA needs of severely physi- insure the effective coordination of cally disabled people (under state resources to programs affecting Medicaid, Title XX, or some other Mr. Bartels is Commissioner, Mas- handicapped people; and d) to re- state program); and finally, architec- sachusetts Rehabilitation Commis- view, analyze, and study programs turally accessible facilities for transi- sion. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE Washington, D.C. 20201 Postage and Fees Paid U.S. DEPARTMENT OF H.E.W. HEW- 391 Official Business U.S.MAIL FIRST CLASS Return this sheet to above address if you do not wish to receive this material or if change of address is needed (indicate change, including zip code) 99999 HAVE WE Subscription form for American Rehabilitation NAME-FIRST, LAST ORGANIZATION BEEN ADDRESS TO YOUR CITY STATE ZIP CODE REG. HOUSE? Send check, payable to SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS to the U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Yearly subscription: $11.75; Foreign: $14.70; per copy: $2.