Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
323152129
label
Knights of Columbus 8/5/92 [OA 5811]
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
323152129
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
9070af64bc575786
ocrText
Originally Processed With FOIA(s): FOIA Number: S S FOIA MARKER This is not a textual record. This is used as an administrative marker by the George Bush Presidential Library Staff. Record Group/Collection: George H.W. Bush Presidential Records Collection/Office of Origin: Speechwriting, White House Office of Series: Speech File Draft Files Subseries: Chron File, 1989-1993 OA/ID Number: 13634 Folder ID Number: 13634-006 Folder Title: Knights of Columbus 8/5/92 [OA 5811] Stack: Row: Section: Shelf: Position: G 26 18 3 7 se Bush, 1992 Administration of George Bush, 1992 / Aug. 5 1381 es as Acting Executive Order 12813-President's AID, procure temporary and intermittent r the Bureau ent of State, Commission on Management of the services. Agency for International Sec. 4. General Provisions. (a) Notwith- veral positions Development (AID) Programs standing any other Executive order, the func- ding Chief of the Office of August 4, 1992 tions of the President under the Federal Ad- visory Committee Act, as amended, that are ignments, Bu- By the authority vested in me as President applicable to the Commission, shall be per- Deputy Chief by the Constitution and the laws of the Unit- formed by the Administrator of AID in ac- 1 Embassy in ed States of America, and in order to estab- cordance with the guidelines and procedures ); Deputy Di- lish in accordance with the provisions of the established by the Administrator of General e Office of East Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amend- Services. fairs, 1983-86; ed (5 U.S.C. App. 2), an advisory commission (b) The Commission shall terminate not the American on the management of the Agency for Inter- later than September 30, 1992. gary, 1980-83; national Development (AID) programs, it is George Bush tical Section at hereby ordered as follows: me, Italy, 1976- Section 1. Establishment. There is estab- The White House, lished the "President's Commission on Man- August 4, 1992. from Princeton agement of the Agency for International De- was born March velopment (AID) Programs" ("Commis- [Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, Kuchel is mar- sion"). The Commission shall comprise five 4:30 p.m., August 5, 1992] resides in Wash- members from the private sector appointed Note: This Executive order was released by by the President. The President shall des- the Office of the Press Secretary on August ignate the Chairman of the Commission from 5, and it was published in the Federal Reg- among its members. ister on August 7. Sec. 2. Functions. The Commission shall advise the Administrator of AID in the re- E. Wallace To view and implementation of recommenda- ry of Labor tions provided in the report to the President Remarks to the Knights of Columbus issued by the previous commission on man- Supreme Council Convention in New agement of AID programs (which was estab- York City ounced his inten- lished by Public Law 101-513 and which ter- August 5, 1992 Wallace, of New minated on May 16, 1992). The Commission retary of Labor for shall also report to the Deputy Secretary of Thank you very, very much for that warm State on the progress made in implementing welcome. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. and Training. He the recommendations. Collins III. Please be seated, and thank you all. May I Sec. 3. Administration. (a) To the extent salute Virgil Dechant, my friend of long : has served as the permitted by law, the Administrator of AID standing, and thank him for that most gener- Veterans of For- shall provide funding for the Commission. ous welcome here. Your Eminence, Cardinal ie served as senior (b) Members of the Commission shall O'Connor, it is a great pleasure, an honor, in 1990 and junior serve without any compensation for their sir, to see you again. May I salute Cardinal a 1989. In addition, work on the Commission. While engaged in Baum, Cardinal Gagnon, Bishop Daily; an- d by Gov. Thomas the work of the Commission, they shall be other old friend, Ambassador Tom Melady, puty commissioner allowed travel expenses, including per diem who is doing a superb job for our country, rans affairs in New in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by law representing us at the Vatican; and the cler- for persons serving intermittently in the Gov- gy; and ladies and gentlemen. May I salute from Rutgers Uni- ernment service (5 U.S.C. 5701-5707). a man who used to be-whose house made Fairleigh Dickinson (c) The Administrator of AID shall provide him a neighbor, Archbishop Cacciavillan, on a reimbursable basis such administrative Mr. Wallace served from Washington, the Nuncio there, a good services as the Chairman of the Commission 1967-69, and was man, a good friend. Nice to see you. I'm glad Hearts. He was may request and the Administrator of AID you're here, sir. deems appropriate. Wallace is married, I have only one regret, Virgil. My timing (d) To the extent permitted by law, the was such that I did not hear the fitting and in Milton, NJ. Chairman may, through the Administrator of warm and wonderful ovation that you gave 1382 Aug. 5 / Administration of George Bush, 1992 Mother Teresa yesterday. I understand it was only recently in America have we seen the really fantastic. rise of legal theories and practices that reject A report came across my desk the other our Judeo-Christian tradition. Cardinal day. It stated that most people in the West- O'Connor eloquently describes this as an "in- ern world "felt exceedingly gloomy about the vasion of values." It's a deeply disturbing future." It said that "institutions were decay- trend, and it is diametrically opposed to my ing, well-meaning people were growing cyni- idea of the kind of change that's good for cal." These are exact quotes. our great country. My first thought was that's what happens Last month, just 12 blocks from here, when people spend too much time watching there was another convention. Now, I was the evening news. [Laughter] I'm going to very lucky, I did not-and this is the honest pay for that one tonight on that first 20 sec- truth—I didn't hear any of the speeches. I onds. [Laughter] Just kidding, Dan. [Laugh- was out fishing in Wyoming with Jim Baker. ter] But I understand one of the speakers, known No, but what I was reading was not a re- for his florid language, called me "the captain port about 1992. It was a history of public of the ship of state." I'm not sure he meant attitudes in Europe in 1492. Public moods it as a compliment, but believe me, as a Navy are prone to change, of course. We know that man at a Knights of Columbus convention, the gloom of 1492 was not to last for long. the term suits me just fine. [Laughter] It was dispelled by the achievement of a man I look at this office that you've entrusted of humble birth, a man of vision, of courage, with me as a lot of things, as more than man- a man named Christopher Columbus. aging the economy, more even than being Now, I know that every speaker comes be- Commander in Chief. I stake my claim to fore you and says they identify with Colum- a simple belief: The President should set the bus. But I really mean it. Think about it. The moral tone for this Nation. guy was faced with questions at home about All around us, we see evidence that Ameri- whether his global efforts were worth a darn. ca's moral compass has gone awry. We seem Some critics wanted him to cut his voyage to be moving away from the enduring idea short. He even faced the threat of mutiny. of taking responsibility for our actions. Our [Laughter] And yet Columbus persevered city newspapers are filled with stories of and won; not a bad analogy in my view. So drive-by shootings, the taking of human life I know this isn't political. [Laughter] Now, made more horrible by the awful anonymity I admit, Columbus also had to worry at the through which it is accomplished. Recently time about a lack of wind. I don't have that I read a story of a kid from a good neighbor- problem with Congress. [Laughter] hood charged in a gun store robbery. He told This year, as in Columbus' time, we hear the police who caught him, "It's not like I'm a lot of talk about change. Sure, change is a criminal. I'm on the dean's list." natural. But maybe a better word for the What is happening to America? As a Na- United States of America is renewal because tion, we face enormous challenges in edu- the changes we need must be based on prin- cation, crime, drugs. Yet each of them come ciples that never change. back to the challenge of pointing our moral I think my parents were like yours: They compass in the right direction. So I believe brought me up to understand that our fun- that a central issue of this election year damental moral standards were established should be, who do you trust to renew Ameri- by Almighty God. They taught me that if you ca's moral purpose? Who do you trust to fight have something for yourself, you should give for the ideas that will help rebuild our fami- half to a friend. They taught me to take the lies and restore our fundamental values? blame when things go wrong and share the I believe, and I've tried hard on this, I be- credit when things go right. These ideas were lieve I've earned your trust. I am committed supported by society. to fighting for ideas that help repair this great Only recently-His Eminence and I were Nation's moral fiber. talking about, not in this detail, but talking Welfare is one example. We all know that about this subject just a few minutes ago- our welfare system has literally destroyed the Administration of George Bush, 1992 / Aug. 5 1383 7 of George Bush, 1992 concept of personal responsibility, tearing other private school parents have a fair share rica have we seen the families apart, with no incentives for people of education benefits. d practices that reject to work and save and improve. I want some- I believe that it's time to have the courage tradition. Cardinal thing different. I have fought for a new wel- to fight for a different approach. Right now, escribes this as an "in- fare system that says "yes" to human poten- if you want an alternative to public schools, a deeply disturbing tial. you have to pay twice, first for tuition and rically opposed to my Today, as we speak, we are granting waiv- again through taxes. A couple weeks ago I lange that's good for ers to States so they can change welfare rules, was in Philadelphia, hosted by Cardinal encourage families not to fall apart, not to Bevilacqua. And a group of parents told me, 2 blocks from here, vention. Now, I was live apart, but to stick together. States are "We want our kids to go to Catholic school, and this is the honest saying to recipients, either you get training, but we just can't afford it." So my solution y of the speeches. I or you don't get a check. Some States are is something called the "GI bill" for kids. even going so far as to make a very tough Like the original GI bill, my new approach ming with Jim Baker. the speakers, known call of saying to parents, if you can't afford offers scholarships or vouchers for students another child, don't expect the taxpayer to to take to any qualified school, not only pub- alled me "the captain n not sure he meant pick up the added costs. Now, these are lic schools but Bible schools, yeshivas, Catho- tough choices. These are very tough choices, lic parish schools. When it comes to schools, elieve me, as a Navy olumbus convention, but they're all intended by the States to pro- I say let the parents choose public, private, e. [Laughter] mote responsibility. or religious. What about promoting religion as a force hat you've entrusted The other side says they agree with the ideas. But if you look close, some argue that for good in our society? I'm reminded of the s, as more than man- story of a small boy who once began a prayer 're even than being ultimately the only solution to welfare is a this way: "God bless Mother and Daddy, my : stake my claim to guaranteed Government job for every recipi- brother, my sister. And God," he said, "do sident should set the ent. I ask, is this any way to promote respon- take care of yourself. If anything happens to 1. sibility? If we guarantee everyone a Govern- You, we're all sunk." [Laughter] Maybe vidence that Ameri- ment job, how can we reward initiative? Our there's some doubts, but America is still the (one awry. We seem reforms may sound tough, but not as tough most religious Nation on Earth. I want to 1 the enduring idea as a lifetime of despondency and despair, a strengthen our faith further. or our actions. Our lifetime that strips every recipient of his or Again, there are wide differences. Some ed with stories of her dignity. Let's give people hope. Let's give think it's okay to hand out condoms in king of human life them opportunity. schools, but oppose amending our Constitu- he awful anonymity Let's take a look at education. We know tion to allow our kids to put their hands to- mplished. Recently that to renew America, we literally must gether to say a prayer. I disagree. I call again m a good neighbor- renew our schools. I happen to believe that on the Congress to pass a constitutional re robbery. He told competition can be the greatest force for amendment restoring voluntary prayer to our m, "It's not like I'm change in our schools in an entire century. classrooms. The Senate opens its meeting n's list." The other side says they agree, almost. The with a prayer. The House of Representatives America? As a Na- "almost" is what troubles me. Remember opens its meeting with a prayer. Nobody challenges in edu- how old Henry Ford used to tell his cus- doubts that they both need it. [Laughter] But each of them come tomers they could have any color Model T let's allow the faith of our fathers back into pointing our moral that they wanted, so long as it was black. those schools. ction. So I believe [Laughter] Well, the other side says their And there's a national tragedy: More than this election year ideal is that parents could choose any school a half a million abortions in this country every st to renew Ameri- for their kids, so long as it's run by the gov- year. We know there's got to be a better way, 0 you trust to fight ernment. human alternatives like adoptions and absti- rebuild our fami- If you'll excuse one blatantly political com- nence. Seven times I have ignored the polls ental values? ment in which you'll have to concede has so and acted on what I believe is fundamental hard on this, I be- far been a nonpartisan, almost, speech- principle and vetoed, as Virgil very gener- I am committed [laughter]-my opponent won the teachers ously pointed out, abortion legislation. And ip repair this great union endorsement by saying he's "unalter- I promise you again today, no matter the po- ably opposed," those are his words, "unalter- litical price, and they tell me in this year that We all know that ably opposed" to letting Catholic parents and it's enormous, I am going to do what I think ally destroyed the 1384 Aug. 5 / Administration of George Bush, 1992 is right. I am going to stand on my conscience and Saudi Arabia. Now we've brought age- and let my conscience be my guide when it old adversaries to the peace table for the first comes to matters. of life. [Applause] Thank time. His Holiness Pope John Paul has spen you very much. many days and nights at work and in prayer Here's something else that bothers me. In for peace in the Middle East. As long as I some places, a 13-year-old girl cannot get her am President, I assure you I will do every- ears pierced without parental permission, thing I can to bring about that peace that without bringing her mother and father so many pray for. along. But some believe that the same girl And so, in conclusion, let me say this: This should be able to get an abortion without is the year of change, change, change. The parental consent. I think most Americans be- election will all be about change because lieve this idea is crazy, and I'm going to fight change really is the natural condition of our to see that that doesn't happen. land. This isn't something new. I believe that So these issues, they all come up in an now we've changed the world, we are poised election year. They'll be part of campaigns and ready to change America, to make Amer- in the fall all across the country. Today I ica even better. But we must keep something make the same appeal to you that I'll make important in mind. Now that our moral val- to every voter. Look beneath the rhetoric. ues are victorious around the globe, we can- Take a look at the ideas to determine who not and we will not abandon them at home. has the courage to stand up for changes that We didn't stand together to see coura- are morally right for America. I'm going to geous moral values rise in Russia only to be take my case to the American people. And ignored here at home. We did not sacrifice if you're looking to restore America's moral so that personal responsibility could triumph fiber, why buy synthetic when you can get in totalitarian regimes, only to become passé real cotton? [Laughter] here in this great Nation. But I do believe America needs a leader It's time to get back to some basic Amer willing to do what's right, not merely what ican values. So I am going to defend the prin- is politically popular at the moment. No- ciples for which you stand so firm. We will where is it more clear in the decisions a keep our sights on what's good in America. President must make every day to build real We will keep our focus on the potential in peace, to establish freedom and democracy, our families and, most of all, in our young not the mere, simple absence of war. people, in our kids. We'll keep a reliable Saint Ignatius said, "Work as though all compass. We'll put our ship of state in finest depended upon yourself, and pray as though sailing trim, and as this Nation has so many all depended on God." The practice of that times before, we will sail on to shining new motto conquered communism. Ceaseless horizons. prayer and tireless work halted the cold war Thank you. May God bless you and our and spared us from the catastrophe of a third beloved country, the United States of Amer- world war. Believers behind the Iron Curtain ica. Thank you very much. defied persecution; believers in the West de- fied indifference. Note: The President spoke at 11:04 a.m. at Over four decades, our servicemen the Marriott Marquis Hotel. In his remarks, trained, our taxpayers paid $4 trillion to keep he referred to Virgil C. Dechant, Supreme our defenses strong. As a consequence, the Knight, Knights of Columbus; John Cardinal Iron Curtain is no more, and our kids no O'Connor, Archbishop of New York; William longer go to bed at night worrying about that Cardinal Baum, Patrimony of the Holy See; dreadful specter of nuclear war. But while Edouard Cardinal Gagnon, president, Pon- the Soviet bear is no more, there are still tifical Committee for International Eucha- plenty of wolves in the woods. When we ristic Congresses; Thomas Daily, Bishop of faced our first big challenge after the cold Brooklyn; Archbishop Agostino Cacciavillan, war, we didn't shrink. We stood up to Papal Nuncio; Mother Teresa of Calcutta, Saddam's aggression and expelled him from founder and superior of the Missionaries of Kuwait. We protected the people of Israel Charity; Anthony Cardinal Bevilacqua, of George Bush, 1992 Administration of George Bush, 1992 / Aug. 5 1385 we've brought age- Archbishop of Philadelphia; and Dan Rather, The American vet deserves safe streets, a ace table for the first CBS News. sound economy, strong families, a world at 3 John Paul has spen peace. You believe, and I agree, America t work and in prayer should serve those who served their country. e East. As long as I That's why my administration has not you I will do every- Remarks to the Disabled American wavered in our commitment to you and your bout that peace that Veterans National Convention in families. We must change our health care Reno, Nevada system in this Nation, and we will. But let , let me say this: This August 5, 1992 me be clear: We will not change our commit- change, change. The ment to the integrity of veterans health care. out change because Let me tell you that it is a great pleasure No program is going to change that. ural condition of our to renew old ties, greet new friends. And of If, in all this talk about change, Congress ng new. I believe that course, I want to thank Cleveland Jordan for sends me legislation to dismantle the VA sys- world, we are poised the introduction. He said he persuaded me tem, I will whip out my veto pen and knock erica, to make Amer- to come. This man's tough; you get the arm down that incoming Scud missile, that Scud must keep something up behind the back, twist the elbow here, missile aimed right at your very well-being. V that our moral val- and here I am. And I am very, very pleased. If you ask how many VA hospitals I'll close, d the globe, we can- Sorry that I missed the other one, but de- I'll say not three, not two, not one. If anyone endon them at home. lighted to be at your side and congratulate again suggests taxing your benefits, I'll say gether to see coura- you on your service to this wonderful national what I have said before: Don't take it from in Russia only to be organization. our veterans. We did not sacrifice Butch Joeckel greeted me earlier, the na- Now, I know you're concerned about hav- sibility could triumph tional adjutant; Jesse Brown, the national ex- ing your voice heard as the Washington bu- only to become passé ecutive director of the DAV. And of course, reaucracy debates your health care future. So I want to single out and salute a man who's just yesterday I created a special panel there to some basic Amer helped me enormously, Ed Derwinski, our in the White House to guarantee your leader- ng to defend the prin- Secretary of Veterans Affairs. And may I also ship's involvement. We will listen, and we and so firm. We will mention Robin Higgins. Cleve most appro- will act to stand by those who stood up for it's good in America. priately mentioned Colonel Higgins, and I America. S on the potential in want to salute her here. And thanks to all I am very proud of the progress that we've of all, in our young of you who represent America's disabled vet- made together. Your leadership has sen- Ve'll keep a reliable erans, their families, their survivors; they're sitized all of us, brought the problems to us, ship of state in finest fully 1.4 million strong. worked cooperatively when there were dif- Nation has so many I was just asking Joe about the vintage of ficulties. I can't tell you how much coopera- ail on to shining new some of you all. And I must say, looking out tion we've had. But they've never held back, at the audience, and I don't want to put ev- saying we must do this, we must do that. od bless you and our erybody in this category, a lot come out of They've been strong leaders. nited States of Amer- the same war that I was in. And I don't want We have created specialized centers. We ch. to say that you're old guys or women, but funded new outpatient clinics and moved nevertheless-[laughter]-you kind of make more resources into VA medical care, too. oke at 11:04 a.m. at me feel at home here. So I'll leave it there. I also am proud of how we have built on Hotel. In his remarks, But I also want to bring you best wishes these beginnings. Two years ago we passed ). Dechant, Supreme from a great friend and fan of yours named the Americans with Disabilities Act. That is imbus; John Cardinal Barbara. She and I were talking about cool- the most sweeping civil rights legislation of New York; William ness under fire. I told her, the more I'm criti- since the sixties. And it will help the disabled wny of the Holy See; cized, the more I turn it into humor. You enter the mainstream, and it's just about time non, president, Pon- know her; she said, "The rate you're going, that this country did that. International Eucha- you'll soon be funnier than Johnny Carson." Three years ago, as Cleve mentioned, I was nas Daily, Bishop of [Laughter] on my way to address this convention, your \gostino Cacciavillan, Last September, I was very honored to be convention. You know what changed my Teresa of Calcutta, with many here, but honored to attend your plans. It concerned a husband, a father, an of the Missionaries of salute to the Persian Gulf veterans. Today, American hero. And again, with us today is Cardinal Bevilacqua, I'm proud to salute the American veteran. the wife of Colonel Rich Higgins, Major Document No. 34240155 WHITE HOUSE STAFFING MEMORANDUM DATE: AUGUST 4, 1992 ACTION/CONCURRENCE/COMMENT DUE BY: SUBJECT: PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, NEW YORK MARRIOTT MARQUIS, NEW YORK, NEW YORK, WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1992 ACTION FYI ACTION FYI VICE PRESIDENT HORNER SKINNER MCBRIDE SCOWCROFT MOORE DARMAN PETERSMEYER BRADY PORTER BROMLEY PROVOST CALIO SMITH DEMAREST YEUTTER FITZWATER FINDLAY GRAY KAUFMAN McGROARTY HOLIDAY REMARKS: The attached has been forwarded to the President. RESPONSE: PHILLIP D. BRADY Assistant to the President and Staff Secretary Ext. 2702 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON 4 P1:30 August 4, 1992 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT THROUGH: STEVE PROVOST FROM: JOSEPH P. DUGGAN ID SUBJECT: PROPOSED REMARKS TO KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS I. SUMMARY On Wednesday, August 5 at 11:00 a.m., you will deliver remarks to an audience of 2,200 members of the Knights of Columbus at their 110th Annual Supreme Council Convention at the Marriott Marquis in New York city. II. DISCUSSION Your remarks (approximately 15 minutes / teleprompter), follow the theme that change must be based on principles that never change, such as family and personal responsibility. This theme is tied to the issues of welfare, education, school prayer and abortion. The sound bite of the day is: when it comes. to restoring America's moral fiber, why choose synthetics when you can get real cotton? (Duggan/Bunton) August 4, 1992 Draft Eight Knights.2 PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS NEW YORK MARRIOTT MARQUIS NEW YORK, NEW YORK WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1992 11:00 a.m. Thank you, Virgil Dechant. Your Eminence, Cardinal 'Connor; reverend clergy; ladies and gentlemen: A report came across my desk the other day. It stated that most people in the Western world "felt exceedingly gloomy about the future." It said that "institutions were decaying, well- meaning people were growing cynical." My first thought was: That's what happens when people spend too much time watching the evening news. 11 But what I was reading was not a report about Nineteen ninety-two. It was a history of public attitudes in Europe in Fourteen ninety-two! 11 Public moods are prone to change, of course. We know the gloom of 1492 was not to last for long. It was dispelled by the achievement of a man of humble birth. a man of vision and courage. a man named Christopher Columbus. 11 Now I know that every speaker comes before you and says they identify with Columbus. But I really mean it. Think about it. The guy was faced with questions at home about whether his global efforts were worth a darn. Some critics 2 wanted him to cut his voyage short. He even faced the threat of mutiny. And yet Columbus perservered and won -- (not a bad analogy, huh?) Now I admit Columbus also had to combat food shortages and hurricanes -- which I don't face at all. But then again, did Columbus ever have to deal with Congress? This year, as in Columbus's time -- we hear a lot of talk about change. And sure, change is natural. But maybe a better word is renewal -- because the changes we need must be based on principles that never change. 11 My parents were like yours: They brought me up to understand that our fundamental moral standards were established by Almighty God. They taught me that if you have something for yourself, you should give half to a friend. They taught me to take the blame when things go wrong and share the credit when things go right. These ideas were supported by society. Only recently in America have we seen the rise of legal theories and practices that reject our Judeo-Christian tradition. Cardinal O'Connor eloquently describes this as an "inversion of values." It's a deeply disturbing trend -- and it is diametrically opposed to my idea of the kind of change that's good for our country. Last month, just 12 blocks from here, there was another convention. Now, I didn't hear any of those speeches -- I was up in the mountains fishing. But I understand one of the speakers, known for his florid language, called me "the captain of the ship 3 of state. " I'm not sure the guy meant it as a compliment, but believe me: As a Navy man at a Knights of Columbus convention the term suits me just fine. 11 I look at this office you have entrusted me with as more than managing the economy -- more even than being Commander in Chief. I stake my claim to a simple belief -- the President should set the moral tone for this nation. All around us, we see evidence that America's moral compass has gone awry. We seem to be moving away from the enduring idea of taking responsibility for our actions. Our city newspapers are filled with stories of drive-by shootings -- the taking of human life made more horrible by the awful anonymity through which it is accomplished. And recently I read a story of a kid from a good neighborhood charged with gun- running. He told the police -- "it's not like I'm a criminal, I'm on the Dean's list. // What is happening to America? As a nation -- we face enormous challenges in education, crime, drugs -- yet each of them come back to the challenge of pointing our moral compass in the right direction. So I believe that a central issue of this election should be -- who do you trust to renew America's moral purpose? Who do you trust to fight for the ideas that will help rebuild our families and restore our fundamental values? On this -- as in so many other issues -- the other side is talking a good game, saying the right words -- and yet when you 4 get down to specifics, I wonder if their commitment is to do what's right to win an election, or to do what's right to win back America? Look at welfare. We all know that our welfare system has destroyed the concept of responsibility -- tearing families apart, with no incentives for people to work and save and improve. I want something different -- I have fought for a new welfare system that says yes to people's lives. Today, as we speak, states are changing welfare rules to encourage families to stick together, not fall apart. They are saying to recipients -- either you get training, or you don't get a check. They are even going so far as to make the tough call of saying to single mothers -- if you can't afford another child, don't expect the taxpayer to pick up the added costs. These are tough choices, but they are all intended to promote responsibility. The other side says they agree with us. But if you look close, they argue that the ultimate solution to welfare is to gaurantee a government job for every recipient. And I ask -- is this any way to promote responsibility? If we guarantee everyone a government job -- how can we reward initiative? -- how can we reward industry? -- how can we break the cycles of dependency and despair? 5 Look at education. We know that renewing education depends on giving parents real freedom and real responsibility to choose their kid's schools. The other side tries to posture on the side of parents, but I don't think anyone will be fooled. Remember how old Henry Ford used to tell his customers, they could have any color Model T they wanted -- so long as it's black? Well, the other side says their ideal is that parents could choose any school for their kids -- so long as it's run by the government. 11 My opponent won the teachers union endorsement by saying he's "unalterably opposed" -- those are his words, "unalterably opposed" -- to letting Catholic parents and other private school parents have a fair share of education benefits. My plan is different -- it's called the G.I. Bill for Kids. \ Right now, if you want an alternative to public schools, you have to pay twice -- first for tuition and again through taxes. A couple weeks ago, I was in Philadelphia. A group of parents told me, "we want our kids to go to Catholic school, but we just can't afford it. So my solution is the G.I. Bill. Like the original G.I. Bill, my new bill offers scholarships or vouchers for students to take to any qualified school -- not only public schools, but Bible schools, yeshivas, and Catholic parish schools. The principle is basic. When it comes to schools, let the parents choose! 11 What about promoting religion as a force for good in our society. I'm reminded of the story about a small boy who once began a prayer this way: "God bless mother and daddy, my brother 6 and sister. And, God, " he said, "do take care of yourself. If anything happens to you, we're all sunk." America is still the most religious nation on earth, and I want to strengthen our faith further. The other side gathered here in New York and crammed 10,000 letters into their party platform. I probably would have found room for three simple letters --- "G-O-D."/ The other side thinks it's fine to hand-out condoms in school but not to put your hands together to say a prayer. I disagree. I call again on Congress to pass a constitutional amendment restoring voluntary prayer to our classrooms. Let's allow the faith of our Fathers back into our schools. And there's a national tragedy: more than a million and a half abortions in this country every year. We know there must be a better way. The other side turns a deaf ear to humane and responsible alternatives -- like adoption; like abstinence. Six times I have ignored the polls and acted on principle -- and vetoed abortion legislation. And I promise again to you today, no matter the political price, I will stand on conscience, I will turn away any abortion-on demand legislation. // As you look at all these issues, a clear pattern emerges. Both sides talk about restoring values like personal responsibility, but only one side has the courage to take a stand. So the question is -- Who do you trust: those with the courage to stand for what may not be popular -- but is right? or 7 the side that talks a good game -- but whose record and example make a mockery of their words? Let me be clear to the American people. If you're looking to restore America's moral fiber, why buy synthetic, when you can get real cotton? This is the choice we face. Nowhere is it more clear in the decisions a President must make every day to build real peace: to establish freedom and democracy, not the mere absence of war. Saint Ignatius said, "Work as though all depended upon yourself, and pray as though all depended on God." The practice of that motto conquered Communism. Ceaseless prayer and tireless work halted the Cold War \ and spared us from the catastrophe of a third world war. Believers behind the Iron Curtain defied persecution; believers in the West defied indifference. Over four decades, our servicemen trained -- our taxpayers paid four trillion dollars -- to keep our defenses strong. And as a consequence, the Iron Curtain is no more -- and our kids no longer face the threat of nuclear war. But while the Russian bear is no more, there are still plenty of wolves in the woods. When we faced our first big challenge after the Cold War, we didn't shrink. We stood up to Saddam's aggression and expelled him from Kuwait. We protected the people of Israel and Saudi Arabia. Now we've brought age- old adversaries to the peace table for the first time. His Holiness, Pope John Paul, has spent many days and nights at work and in prayer for peace in the Middle East. As long as I am 8 President, I assure you I'll do everything I can to bring about that peace that so many pray for. 11 Here's the case I will be taking to the American people: Now that we have changed the world, we can change America. But we must keep something in mind. Now that our moral values are victorious around the globe -- we cannot and we will not abandon them at home! Let the other side traffic in trendy and transitory moral fashions, I'll stick to 100 percent family values. I'm going to defend the principles for which you stand so firm. \ We'll keep our sights on what's good in America. We'll keep our focus on the potential in our families and our kids. We'll keep a reliable compass. We'll put our ship of state in finest sailing trim. We'll navigate our way to shining new horizons. 11 Thank you. May God bless you and our beloved country. # # # THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON August 4, 1992 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT THROUGH: STEVE PROVOST FROM: JOSEPH P. DUGGAN DPD SUBJECT: PROPOSED REMARKS TO KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS I. SUMMARY On Wednesday, August 5 at 11:00 a.m., you will deliver remarks to an audience of 2,200 members of the Knights of Columbus at their 110th Annual Supreme Council Convention at the Marriott Marquis in New York City. II. DISCUSSION Your remarks (approximately 15 minutes / teleprompter), follow the theme that change must be based on principles that never change, such as family and personal responsibility. This theme is tied to the issues of welfare, education, school prayer and abortion. The sound bite of the day is: when it comes to restoring America's moral fiber, why choose synthetics when you can get real cotton? (Duggan/Bunton) August 4, 1992 Draft Eight Knights.2 PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS NEW YORK MARRIOTT MARQUIS NEW YORK, NEW YORK WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1992 11:00 a.m. Thank you, Virgil Dechant. Your Eminence, Cardinal O'Connor; reverend clergy; ladies and gentlemen: A report came across my desk the other day. It stated that most people in the Western world "felt exceedingly gloomy about the future." It said that "institutions were decaying, well- meaning people were growing cynical." My first thought was: That's what happens when people spend too much time watching the evening news. 11 But what I was reading was not a report about Nineteen ninety-two. It was a history of public attitudes in Europe in Fourteen ninety-two! 11 Public moods are prone to change, of course. We know the gloom of 1492 was not to last for long. It was dispelled by the achievement of a man of humble birth. a man of vision and courage. a man named Christopher Columbus. 11. Now I know that every speaker comes before you and says they identify with Columbus. But I really mean it. Think about it. The guy was faced with questions at home about whether his global efforts were worth a darn. Some critics 2 wanted him to cut his voyage short. He even faced the threat of mutiny. And yet Columbus perservered and won -- (not a bad analogy, huh?) Now I admit Columbus also had to combat food shortages and hurricanes -- which I don't face at all. But then again, did Columbus ever have to deal with Congress? This year, as in Columbus's time -- we hear a lot of talk about change. And sure, change is natural. But maybe a better word is renewal -- because the changes we need must be based on principles that never change. 11 My parents were like yours: They brought me up to understand that our fundamental moral standards were established by Almighty God. They taught me that if you have something for yourself, you should give half to a friend. They taught me to take the blame when things go wrong and share the credit when things 'go right. These ideas were supported by society. Only recently in America have we seen the rise of legal theories and practices that reject our Judeo-Christian tradition. Cardinal O'Connor eloquently describes this as an "inversion of values.' " It's a deeply disturbing trend -- and it is diametrically opposed to my idea of the kind of change that's good for our country. 11 Last month, just 12 blocks from here, there was another convention. Now, I didn't hear any of those speeches -- I was up in the mountains fishing. But I understand one of the speakers, known for his florid language, called me "the captain of the ship 3 of state. " I'm not sure the guy meant it as a compliment, but believe me: As a Navy man at a Knights of Columbus convention the term suits me just fine. 11 I look at this office you have entrusted me with as more than managing the economy -- more even than being Commander in Chief. I stake my claim to a simple belief -- the President should set the moral tone for this nation. All around us, we see evidence that America's moral compass has gone awry. We seem to be moving away from the enduring idea of taking responsibility for our actions. Our city newspapers are filled with stories of drive-by shootings -- the taking of human life made more horrible by the awful anonymity through which it is accomplished. And recently I read a story of a kid from a good neighborhood charged with gun- running. He told the police -- "it's not like I'm a criminal, I'm on the Dean's list. "// What is happening to America? As a nation -- we face enormous challenges in education, crime, drugs -- yet each of them come back to the challenge of pointing our moral compass in the right direction. So I believe that a central issue of this election should be -- who do you trust to renew America's moral purpose? Who do you trust to fight for the ideas that will help rebuild our families and restore our fundamental values? On this -- as in so many other issues -- the other side is talking a good game, saying the right words -- and yet when you 4 get down to specifics, I wonder if their commitment is to do what's right to win an election, or to do what's right to win back America? Look at welfare. We all know that our welfare system has destroyed the concept of responsibility -- tearing families apart, with no incentives for people to work and save and improve. I want something different -- I have fought for a new welfare system that says yes to people's lives. Today, as we speak, states are changing welfare rules to encourage families to stick together, not fall apart. They are saying to recipients -- either you get training, or you don't get a check. They are even going so far as to make the tough call of saying to single mothers -- if you can't afford another child, don't expect the taxpayer to pick up the added costs. These are tough choices, but they are all intended to promote responsibility. The other side says they agree with us. But if you look close, they argue that the ultimate solution to welfare is to gaurantee a government job for every recipient. And I ask -- is this any way to promote responsibility? If we guarantee everyone a government job -- how can we reward initiative? -- how can we reward industry? -- how can we break the cycles of dependency and despair? 5 Look at education. We know that renewing education depends on giving parents real freedom and real responsibility to choose their kid's schools. The other side tries to posture on the side of parents, but I don't think anyone will be fooled. Remember how old Henry Ford used to tell his customers, they could have any color Model T they wanted -- so long as it's black? Well, the other side says their ideal is that parents could choose any school for their kids -- so long as it's run by the government. 11 My opponent won the teachers union endorsement by saying he's "unalterably opposed" -- those are his words, "unalterably opposed" -- to letting Catholic parents and other private school parents have a fair share of education benefits. 11 My plan is different -- it's called the G.I. Bill for Kids. \ Right now, if you want an alternative to public schools, you have to pay twice -- first for tuition and again through taxes. A couple weeks ago, I was in Philadelphia. A group of parents told me, "we want our kids to go to Catholic school, but we just can't afford it." So my solution is the G.I. Bill. Like the original G.I. Bill, my new bill offers scholarships or vouchers for students to take to any qualified school -- not only public schools, but Bible schools, yeshivas, and Catholic parish schools. The principle is basic. When it comes to schools, let the parents choose! 11 What about promoting religion as a force for good in our society. I'm reminded of the story about a small boy who once began a prayer this way: "God bless mother and daddy, my brother 6 and sister. And, God, " he said, "do take care of yourself. If anything happens to you, we're all sunk." America is still the most religious nation on earth, and I want to strengthen our faith further. The other side gathered here in New York and crammed 10,000 letters into their party platform. I probably would have found room for three simple letters -- "G-O-D."/ The other side thinks it's fine to hand-out condoms in school but not to put your hands together to say a prayer. I disagree. I call again on Congress to pass a constitutional amendment restoring voluntary prayer to our classrooms. Let's allow the faith of our Fathers back into our schools. 11 And there's a national tragedy: more than a million and a half abortions in this country every year. We know there must be a better way. The other side turns a deaf ear to humane and responsible alternatives -- like adoption; like abstinence. Six times I have ignored the polls and acted on principle -- and vetoed abortion legislation. And I promise again to you today, no matter the political price, I will stand on conscience, I will turn away any abortion-on demand legislation. // As you look at all these issues, a clear pattern emerges. Both sides talk about restoring values like personal responsibility, but only one side has the courage to take a stand. So the question is -- Who do you trust: those with the courage to stand for what may not be popular -- but is right? Or 7 the side that talks a good game -- but whose record and example make a mockery of their words? Let me be clear to the American people. If you're looking to restore America's moral fiber, why buy synthetic, when you can get real cotton? This is the choice we face. Nowhere is it more clear in the decisions a President must make every day to build real peace: to establish freedom and democracy, not the mere absence of war. Saint Ignatius said, "Work as though all depended upon yourself, and pray as though all depended on God." The practice of that motto conquered Communism. Ceaseless prayer and tireless work halted the Cold War \ and spared us from the catastrophe of a third world war. Believers behind the Iron Curtain defied persecution; believers in the West defied indifference. Over four decades, our servicemen trained -- our taxpayers paid four trillion dollars -- to keep our defenses strong. And as a consequence, the Iron Curtain is no more -- and our kids no longer face the threat of nuclear war. But while the Russian bear is no more, there are still plenty of wolves in the woods. When we faced our first big challenge after the Cold War, we didn't shrink. We stood up to Saddam's aggression and expelled him from Kuwait. We protected the people of Israel and Saudi Arabia. Now we've brought age- old adversaries to the peace table for the first time. His Holiness, Pope John Paul, has spent many days and nights at work and in prayer for peace in the Middle East. As long as I am 8 President, I assure you I'll do everything I can to bring about that peace that so many pray for. 11 Here's the case I will be taking to the American people: Now that we have changed the world, we can change America. But we must keep something in mind. Now that our moral values are victorious around the globe -- we cannot and we will not abandon them at home! Let the other side traffic in trendy and transitory moral fashions, I'll stick to 100 percent family values. I'm going to defend the principles for which you stand so firm. \ We'll keep our sights on what's good in America. We'll keep our focus on the potential in our families and our kids. We'll keep a reliable compass. We'll put our ship of state in finest sailing trim. We'll navigate our way to shining new horizons. 11 Thank you. May God bless you and our beloved country. # # # THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON August 4, 1992 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT THROUGH: STEVE PROVOST FROM: JOSEPH P. DUGGAN IPD SUBJECT: PROPOSED REMARKS TO KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS I. SUMMARY On Wednesday, August 5 at 11:00 a.m., you will deliver remarks to an audience of 2,200 members of the Knights of Columbus at their 110th Annual Supreme Council Convention at the Marriott Marquis in New York City. II. DISCUSSION Your remarks (approximately 15 minutes / teleprompter), follow the theme that change must be based on principles that never change, such as family and personal responsibility. This theme is tied to the issues of welfare, education, school prayer and abortion. as of 8:45 pm 4 Aug. 1992 JD *** w/ACKS (Duggan/Bunton) August 4, 1992 Draft Eight Knights.2 PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS NEW YORK MARRIOTT MARQUIS NEW YORK, NEW YORK WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1992 11:00 a.m. Thank you, Virgil Dechant [DECK-ant]. Your Eminence, Cardinal O'Connor; Cardinal Law; Cardinal Hickey; Ambassador Meladay; Attorney General Barr; Bishop Daily; reverend clergy; ladies and gentlemen: A report came across my desk the other day. It stated that most people in the Western world "felt exceedingly gloomy about the future." It said that "institutions were decaying, well- meaning people were growing cynical." My first thought was: That's what happens when people spend too much time watching the evening news. 11 But what I was reading was not a report about Nineteen ninety-two. It was a history of public attitudes in Europe in Fourteen ninety-two! 11 Public moods are prone to change, of course. We know the gloom of 1492 was not to last for long. It was dispelled by the achievement of a man of humble birth. a man of vision and courage. a man named Christopher Columbus. 11 Now I know that every speaker comes before you and says they identify with Columbus. But I really mean it. Think about it. The guy was faced with questions at home about whether his global efforts were worth a darn. Some critics wanted him to cut his voyage short. He even faced the threat of 2 mutiny. And yet Columbus persevered and won -- (not a bad analogy, huh?) Now I admit Columbus also had to worry about a lack of wind -- I don't have that problem. I have Congress. 11 This year, as in Columbus's time -- we hear a lot of talk about change. And sure, change is natural. But maybe a better word is renewal -- because the changes we need must be based on principles that never change. 11 My parents were like yours: They brought me up to understand that our fundamental moral standards were established by Almighty God. They taught me that if you have something for yourself, you should give half to a friend. They taught me to take the blame when things go wrong and share the credit when things go right. These ideas were supported by society. Only recently in America have we seen the rise of legal theories and practices that reject our Judeo-Christian tradition. Cardinal O'Connor eloquently describes this as an "inversion of values." It's a deeply disturbing trend -- and it is diametrically opposed to my idea of the kind of change that's good for our country. 11 Last month, just 12 blocks from here, there was another convention. Now, I didn't hear any of those speeches -- I was up in the mountains fishing. But I understand one of the speakers, known for his florid language, called me "the captain of the ship of state. " 11 I'm not sure the guy meant it as a compliment, but 3 believe me: As a Navy man at a Knights of Columbus convention the term suits me just fine. 11 I look at this office you have entrusted me with as more than managing the economy -- more even than being Commander in Chief. I stake my claim to a simple belief -- the President should set the moral tone for this nation. All around us, we see evidence that America's moral compass has gone awry. We seem to be moving away from the enduring idea of taking responsibility for our actions. Our city newspapers are filled with stories of drive-by shootings -- the taking of human life made more horrible by the awful anonymity through which it is accomplished. And recently I read a story of a kid from a good neighborhood charged in a gun store robbery. He told the police -- "it's not like I'm a criminal, I'm on the Dean's list."// What is happening to America? As a nation -- we face enormous challenges in education, crime, drugs -- yet each of them come back to the challenge of pointing our moral compass in the right direction. So I believe that a central issue of this election should be -- who do you trust to renew America's moral purpose? Who do you trust to fight for the ideas that will help rebuild our families and restore our fundamental values? On this -- as in so many other issues -- the other side is talking a good game, saying the right words -- and yet when you get down to specifics, I wonder if their commitment is to do 4 what's right to win an election, or to do what's right to win back America? Look at welfare. We all know that our welfare system has destroyed the concept of responsibility -- tearing families apart, with no incentives for people to work and save and improve. I want something different -- I have fought for a new welfare system that says yes to people's lives. Today, as we speak, states are changing welfare rules to encourage families to stick together, not fall apart. They are saying to recipients -- either you get training, or you don't get a check. They are even going so far as to make the tough call of saying to single mothers -- if you can't afford another child, don't expect the taxpayer to pick up the added costs. These are tough choices, but they are all intended to promote responsibility. The other side says they agree with us. But if you look close, they argue that the ultimate solution to welfare is to guarantee a government job for every recipient. And I ask -- is this any way to promote responsibility? If we guarantee everyone a government job -- how can we reward initiative? -- how can we reward industry? -- how can we break the cycles of dependency and despair? Look at education. We know that renewing education depends on giving parents real freedom and real responsibility to choose their kid's schools. The other side tries to posture on the side 5 of parents, but I don't think anyone will be fooled. Remember how old Henry Ford used to tell his customers, they could have any color Model T they wanted -- so long as it was black? Well, the other side says their ideal is that parents could choose any school for their kids -- so long as it's run by the government. 11 My opponent won the teachers union endorsement by saying he's "unalterably opposed" -- those are his words, "unalterably opposed" -- to letting Catholic parents and other private school parents have a fair share of education benefits. 11 My plan is different -- I call it the G.I. Bill for Kids. \ Right now, if you want an alternative to public schools, you have to pay twice -- first for tuition and again through taxes. A couple weeks ago, I was in Philadelphia. A group of parents told me, "we want our kids to go to Catholic school, but we just can't afford it." So my solution is the G.I. Bill. Like the original G.I. Bill, my new bill offers scholarships or vouchers for students to take to any qualified school -- not only public schools, but Bible schools, yeshivas, and Catholic parish schools. The principle is basic. When it comes to schools, let the parents choose! 11 What about promoting religion as a force for good in our society. I'm reminded of the story about a small boy who once began a prayer this way: "God bless mother and daddy, my brother and sister. And, God," he said, "do take care of yourself. If anything happens to you, we're all sunk." America is still the most religious nation on earth, and I want to strengthen our 6 faith further. The other side gathered here in New York and crammed 10,000 words into their party platform. I would have found room for three simple letters -- "G-O-D."/ The other side thinks it's fine to hand-out condoms in school but not to put your hands together to say a prayer. I disagree. I call again on Congress to pass a constitutional amendment restoring voluntary prayer to our classrooms. Let's allow the faith of our Fathers back into our schools. 11 And there's a national tragedy: more than a million and a half abortions in this country every year. We know there must be a better way. The other side turns a deaf ear to humane and responsible alternatives -- like adoption; like abstinence. Seven times I have ignored the polls and acted on principle -- and vetoed abortion legislation. And I promise you again today, no matter the political price, I will stand on conscience, I will turn away any abortion-on demand legislation. // As you look at all these issues, a clear pattern emerges. Both sides talk about restoring values like personal responsibility, but only one side has the courage to take a stand. So the question is -- Who do you trust: those with the courage to stand for what may not be popular -- but is right? or the side that talks a good game -- but whose record and example make a mockery of their words? 7 Let me be clear to the American people. If you're looking to restore America's moral fiber, why buy synthetic, when you can get real cotton? This is the choice we face. Nowhere is it more clear in the decisions a President must make every day to build real peace: to establish freedom and democracy, not the mere absence of war. Saint Ignatius said, "Work as though all depended upon yourself, and pray as though all depended on God." The practice of that motto conquered Communism. Ceaseless prayer and tireless work halted the Cold War \ and spared us from the catastrophe of a third world war. Believers behind the Iron Curtain defied persecution; believers in the West defied indifference. Over four decades, our servicemen trained -- our taxpayers paid four trillion dollars -- to keep our defenses strong. And as a consequence, the Iron Curtain is no more -- and our kids no longer face the threat of nuclear war. But while the Soviet bear is no more, there are still plenty of wolves in the woods. When we faced our first big challenge after the Cold War, we didn't shrink. We stood up to Saddam's aggression and expelled him from Kuwait. We protected the people of Israel and Saudi Arabia. Now we've brought age-old adversaries to the peace table for the first time. His Holiness, Pope John Paul, has spent many days and nights at work and in prayer for peace in the Middle East. As long as I am President, I assure you I'll do everything I can to bring about that peace that so many pray for. 8 Here's the case I will be taking to the American people: Now that we have changed the world, we can change America. But we must keep something in mind. Now that our moral values are victorious around the globe -- we cannot and we will not abandon them at home! Let the other side traffic in trendy and transitory moral fashions, I'll stick to 100 percent family values. I'm going to defend the principles for which you stand so firm. \ We'll keep our sights on what's good in America. We'll keep our focus on the potential in our families and our kids. We'll keep a reliable compass. We'll put our ship of state in finest sailing trim. We'll navigate our way to shining new horizons. 11 Thank you. May God bless you and our beloved country. # # # 600 34240155 nent No. WHITE HOUSE STAFFING MEMORANDUM 6022 DATE: August 3, 1992 ACTION/CONCURRENCE/COMMENT DUE BY: 9:00 am TUES. , AUGUST 4, 1992 SUBJECT: PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, NEW YORK MARRIOTT MARQUIS, NEW YORK, NEW YORK, WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1992 ACTION FYI ACTION FYI VICE PRESIDENT HORNER SKINNER MCBRIDE SCOWCROFT NICE X MOORE DARMAN PETERSMEYER BRADY PORTER BROMLEY x PROVOST CALIO NIL SMITH N/C DEMAREST YEUTTER FITZWATER FINDLAY GRAY 6257 KAUFMAN we Liberman HOLIDAY N/C REMARKS: Please provide comments on the attached directly to Dan McGroarty, Room 122, x2930, with a copy to this office NOT LATER THAN 9:00 A.M., TUESDAY, AUGUST 4th. called at 9AM. called at 10AM mc RESPONSE: TO: DANIEL B. MCGROARTY August 3, 1992 €0:80 to 7nr 26 The NSC staff concurs in the proposed presidential remarks. B PHILLIP D. BRADY Assistant to the President Brent Scowcroft and Staff Secretary CC: Phillip D. Brady Ext. 2702 (Duggan/Bunton) August 3, 1992 Draft Six 2 AUG 3 P12: 47 Knights PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS NEW YORK MARRIOTT MARQUIS NEW YORK, NEW YORK WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1992 11:00 a.m Thank you, Virgil Dechant. Your Eminence, Cardinal O'Connor and reverend clergy; distinguished Knights; ladies and gentlemen: A report came across my desk the other day. It stated that most people in the Western world "felt exceedingly gloomy about the future.' It said that "institutions were decaying, well- meaning people were growing cynical." My first thought was: That's what happens when people spend too much time watching the network evening news. 11 But what I was reading was / not a report about 1992. It was a history of public attitudes in 1492. Public moods are prone to change. When some people turn negative, all I can do is hold the rudder firm. ((I told Barbara that the more I'm criticized, the more I turn it into humor. She said, "At this rate, you'll soon be funnier than Jay Leno. ")) As I said, public moods are prone to change. We know the gloom of 1492 was not to last for long. It was dispelled by the achievement of a man of humble birth. a man of vision and courage. a man named Christopher Columbus. 11 Columbus opened up a new world of opportunity for the spread of commerce \ culture \ and faith. \ In this 500th anniversary year of his voyage of discovery, I'm honored to meet 2 with a group of Americans dedicated to his ideals. This year we hear a lot of talk about change. And sure, there are things I'd like to change. Though maybe a better word is renewal -- because the changes we need must be based on principles that never change. My parents were like yours: They brought me up to understand that mankind's fundamental moral standards were established by Almighty God. They're as natural and unchangeable as the laws of physics. Our common law, our Constitution and our Bill of Rights are firmly rooted in this tradition -- the Judaeo- Christian tradition. Only recently in America have we seen the rise of legal theories and practices that reject our tradition. Cardinal O'Connor eloquently describes this as an "inversion of values." It's a deeply disturbing trend -- and it is diametrically opposed to my idea of the kind of change that's good for our country. 11 Last month on a stage just 12 blocks from here, there was another convention -- very different from this one. Now, I didn't hear any of those speeches. I was up in the mountains fishing -- where the air was clear, not hot. But I understand one of the speakers, known for his florid language, called me "the captain of the ship of state." He didn't mean it as a compliment, but believe me: As a Navy man at a Knights of Columbus convention the term suits me just fine. Whoever is chosen to pilot the ship of state must have a reliable moral compass. 11 Personal responsibility -- among the 3 people and in our leaders -- must be more than just a slogan. It must be embodied in our ideas and actions. Americans will make a choice this year about economic freedom and growth, and about keeping our defenses second to none -- keeping America safe and strong. But the choice is about more than that: It is about renewing our moral strength. Principles don't change from one day to the next. Principles aren't driven by opinion polls. Principles endure. 11 This year, one side offers real change to make America One Nation under God. The other side -- in that convention I spoke of -- wrote a 10,000 word platform -- and never once mentioned the one word that counts the most: God. You can see the differences of philosophy reflected in our policies. As a baseball umpire would put it, "You make the call." Consider our system of welfare. In too many cases, it's not lifting people up, it's holding them down. This system is neither well nor fair. 11 The key to reform: personal responsibility. Now, on the other side of the debate are the interests that want to protect bureaucracy and spending -- even if it means saying no to unwed mothers who want to get married. Even if it means saying no to families on public aid who somehow manage to put money aside in savings. It's time the system started saying yes: Yes to people like Sandra Rosato, who worked and saved money for college because she didn't want to leave a legacy of welfare to her kids. The system 4 said her family couldn't continue to get benefits while she saved money for school. She saved $4,000. I call that amazing. The welfare bureaucrats? They called it fraud. Something is wrong here. That's why I aim to shake up the top-down bureaucratic way of welfare and let our states innovate to reward people like Sandra -- reward work and responsibility. 11 Take education. We know that renewing education depends on giving parents real freedom and real responsibility to choose their kids' schools. The other side tries to posture on the side of parents, but I don't think anyone is fooled. Remember how old Henry Ford used to tell his customers, they can have any color Model T they want -- so long as it's black? Well, the other side says their ideal is that parents could choose any school for their kids -- as long as it's run by the government. 11 My plan is different -- it's called the G.I. Bill for Children. Right now, if parents choose a Catholic school or any other alternative to the public schools, they have to pay twice - - first for tuition and again through taxes. Catholic parents I met in Philadelphia last month made it plain to me: that makes it hard to exercise your religious freedom. Like the original G.I. Bill, my new bill offers scholarships or vouchers for students to take to any qualified school -- not only public schools, but Bible schools, yeshivas, and Catholic parish schools if that is what parents want. 11 My plan for education preserves religious freedom. That's also true of another issue where there's a Grand Canyon of a 5 divide. ((A small boy once began a prayer this way: "God bless mother and daddy, my brother and sister." He continued, "And, oh, God, do take care of yourself, because if anything happens to you, we're all sunk.")) That boy knew why, according to the Gallup Poll, America is the most religious nation on earth. Sadly, one side this year thinks it's fine to give out condoms in school but not to say a prayer. I totally disagree. So today, I again call on Congress to pass a Constitutional Amendment restoring voluntary prayer to our classrooms -- and I challenge my opponent to support me. Let's bring the Faith of our Fathers back to our schools. 11 And there's the issue of a national tragedy: more than a million and a half abortions in this country every year. We know there must be a better way. 11 The other side turns a deaf ear to humane and responsible alternatives -- like adoption; like abstinence. The other side refuses to let the Governor of Pennsylvania present a pro-life view at his own party's convention. The other side is pushing a so-called "Freedom of Choice" bill, which is in fact the most radical abortion-on- demand legislation ever offered. This bill would prevent states from enacting even modest restraints against abortion on demand. It would threaten the autonomy of Catholic hospitals and other private institutions that refuse as a matter of conscience to perform abortions. Suffice it to say: This radical abortion on demand bill will never become law as long as I am President of the United States 6 of America. On each of these issues, the choice is clear. Who do you trust to change America -- to renew timeless values like personal responsibility? Who do you trust: those with the courage to stand for what may not be popular -- but is right? Or the side that talks a good game -- mouths the right rhetoric about values -- but whose record and example make a mockery of their words? Nowhere is this choice more vital than in the decisions a President must make every day to build what I call real peace: the triumph of freedom and democracy, not the mere absence of war. Saint Ignatius said, "Work as though all depended upon yourself, and pray as though all depended on God." The practice of that motto conquered Communism. Ceaseless prayer and tireless work halted the Cold War \ and spared us from the catastrophe of a third World War. Believers behind the Iron Curtain defied persecution; believers in the West defied indifference. Over four decades, our servicemen trained -- our taxpayers paid four trillion dollars -- to keep our defenses strong. And as a consequence, the Iron Curtain is no more -- and our kids no longer face the kind of nuclear threat that used to haunt us. I'll always be grateful for the Knights of Columbus' support on the morality of our strategic deterrence. Because Americans understood the moral stakes in the Cold War, because we persevered -- we're now able to work at building a lasting peace between East and West. We're working with democratic Russia to 7 reduce the arsenals that once threatened to unleash a nuclear war and to cooperate on defenses against ballistic missiles. When we faced our first big challenge after the Cold War, we didn't shrink. We stood up to Saddam Hussein's aggression and expelled him from Kuwait. We protected the people of Israel and Saudi Arabia. Now we've brought age-old adversaries to the peace table for the first time. We've gained the greatest opportunity in centuries to establish peace and stability in the Holy Land. His Holiness, Pope John Paul, has spent many sleepless nights in prayer and endeavor for peace in the Middle East. As long as I am President, I assure you I'll do everything I can to bring about that peace that so many pray for. 11 Respect for life \ for freedom \ for human dignity \ forms the common basis both for peace in the world and for renewal at home. The Knights of Columbus are in the forefront of this effort. In countless ways you help your neighbors: Organizing Scout Troops. Sponsoring that magnificent program, the Special Olympics. Visiting the sick and the elderly. Nourishing minds and souls that hunger for sound values. You bear witness to the fact that real compassion and tolerance cannot abide abandonment of standards of right and wrong. I try to keep that at my core. Whatever the political cost, I intend to do what's right for America. I'll work to protect and renew America -- with a strong national defense, and with a true and steady moral compass. 11 Now that America's moral values -- liberty, honor, personal responsibility -- are 8 victorious around the globe -- why in the world would we abandon them at home? We cannot. As long as I'm President, we will not. Let the other side traffic in values that are trendy and transitory. I'm going to defend the principles for which you stand so firm. We'll keep our sights on what's good in America. We'll keep our focus on the potential in our families and our kids. We'll keep a reliable compass. We'll put our ship of state in finest sailing trim. We'll navigate our way to shining new horizons. 11 Thank you. May God bless you and our beloved country. # # # THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON August 4, 1992 MEMORANDUM FOR DAN McGROARTY FROM: ROGER B. PORTER R&P SUBJECT: Presidential Remarks: Knights of Columbus We have reviewed the attached remarks and have noted a few suggested changes on the draft. Please let us know if you have any questions or if we may help in any other way. CC: Phillip D. Brady 80:2d to GULD 26 Due Dack 8/4/92 by (Duggan/Bunton) August 3, 1992 Draft Six Knights PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS NEW YORK MARRIOTT MARQUIS NEW YORK, NEW YORK WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1992 11:00 a.m Thank you, Virgil Dechant. Your Eminence, Cardinal O'Connor and reverend clergy; distinguished Knights; ladies and gentlemen: A report came across my desk the other day. It stated that most people in the Western world "felt exceedingly gloomy about the future." It said that "institutions were decaying, well- meaning people were growing cynical." My first thought was: That's what happens when people spend too much time watching the network evening news. 11 But what I was reading was not a report about 1992. It was a history of public attitudes in 1492. Public moods are prone to change. When some people turn negative, all I can do is hold the rudder firm. ((I told Barbara that the more I'm criticized, the more I turn it into humor. She said, "At this rate, you'll soon be funnier than Jay Leno. ) As I said, public moods are prone to change. We know the gloom of 1492 was not to last for long. It was dispelled by the achievement of a man of humble birth. a man of vision and courage. a man named Christopher Columbus. 11 Columbus opened up a new world of opportunity for the spread of commerce \ culture \ and faith. \ In this 500th anniversary year of his voyage of discovery, I'm honored to meet L #:6844 459 202 2045562218 SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 8- 4-92 :10:06AM ; 2 with a group of Americans dedicated to his ideals. This year we hear a lot of talk about change. And sure, there are things I'd like to change. Though maybe a better word is renewal -- because the changes we need must be based on principles that never change. My parents were like yours: They brought me up to understand that mankind's fundamental moral standards were established by Almighty God. They're as natural and unchangeable as the laws of physics. our common law, our Constitution and our Bill of Rights are firmly rooted in this tradition -- the Judaeo- Christian tradition. only recently in America have we seen the rise of legal theories and practices that reject our tradition. Cardinal O'Connor eloquently describes this as an "inversion of values." It's a deeply disturbing trend -- and it is diametrically opposed to my idea of the kind of change that's good for our country. 11 Last month on a stage just 12 blocks from here, there was another convention -- very different from this one. Now, I didn't hear any of those speeches. I was up in the mountains fishing -- where the air was clear, not hot. But I understand one of the speakers, known for his florid language, called me "the captain of the ship of state." He didn't mean it as a compliment, but believe me: As a Navy man at a Knights of Columbus convention the term suits me just fine. Whoever is chosen to pilot the ship of state must have a reliable moral compass. Personal responsibility - -- among the Z #:6844 459 202 2025662218 SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 8- 4-92 :10:06AM ; 3 people and in our leaders -- must be more than just a slogan. It must be embodied in our ideas and actions. Americans will make a choice this year about economic freedom and growth, and about keeping our defenses second to none -- keeping America safe and strong. But the choice is about more than that: It is about renewing our moral strength. Principles don't change from one day to the next. Principles aren't driven by opinion polls. Principles endure. 11 This year, one side offers real change to make America One Nation under God. The other side -- in that convention I spoke of -- wrote a 10,000 word platform -- and never once mentioned the one word that counts the most: God. You can see the differences of philosophy reflected in our policies. As a baseball umpire would put it, "You make the call." Consider our system of welfare. In too many cases, it's not lifting people up, it's holding them down. This system is neither well nor fair. 11 The key to reform: personal responsibility. Now, on the other side of the debate are the interests that want to protect bureaucracy and spending -- even if it means saying no to unwed mothers who want to get married. Even if it means saying no to families on public aid who somehow manage to put money aside in savings. It's time the system started saying yes: Yes to people like Sandra Rosato, who worked and saved money for college because she didn't want to leave a legacy of welfare to her kids. The system E #:66:# 459 202 2025662218 SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 8- 4-92 :10:07AM ; 4 said her family couldn't continue to get benefits while she saved money for school. She saved $4,000. I call that amazing. The welfare bureaucrats? They called it fraud. Something is wrong here. That's why I aim to shake up the top-down bureaucratic J SYSTEM MOVE FORWARD WITH of I welfare Vand let our statesV innovate to reward people like Sandra TO reward work and responsibility. IONS Take education. We know that renewing education depends on giving parents real freedom and real responsibility to choose their kids' schools. The other side tries to posture on the side of parents, but I don't think anyone is fooled. Remember how old I Henry Ford used to tell his customers, they can have any color Model T they want -- so long as it's black? Well, the other side says their ideal is that parents could choose any school for their kids -- as long as it's run by the government. 11 My plan is different -- it's called the G.I. Bill for Children. Right now, if parents choose a Catholic school or any other alternative to the AQ public schools, they have to pay twice - - first for tuition and again through taxes. Catholic parents I met in Philadelphia last month made it plain to me: that makes it hard to exercise your religious freedom. Like the original G.I. Bill, my new bill offers scholarships or vouchers for students to take to any qualified school -- not only public USE ATg or schools, but Bible schools, yeshivas, and Catholic parish schools if that is what parents want. 11 P My plan for education preserves religious freedom. That's also true of another issue where there's a Grand Canyon of a V #:6844 459 202 2025562218 SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 8- 4-92 :10:07AM ; 5 divide. (A small boy once began a prayer this way: "God bless mother and daddy, my brother and sister." He continued, "And, oh, God, do take care of yourself, because if anything happens to you, we're all sunk.")) That boy knew why, according to the Gallup Poll, America is the most religious nation on earth. Sadly, one side this year thinks it's fine to give out condoms in school but not to say a prayer. I totally disagree. So today, I again call on Congress to pass a Constitutional Amendment restoring voluntary prayer to our classrooms -- and I challenge my opponent to support me. Let's bring the Faith of our Fathers back to our schools. 11 And there's the issue of a national tragedy: more than a million and a half abortions in this country every year. We know ? IS ? there must be a better way. 11 The other side turns a deaf ear to humane and responsible alternatives -- like adoption; like abstinence. The other side refuses to let the Governor of Pennsylvania present a pro-life view at his own party's convention. The other side is pushing a so-called "Freedom of Choice" bill, which is in fact the most radical abortion-on- demand legislation ever offered. This bill would prevent states from enacting even modest restraints against abortion on demand. It would threaten the autonomy of Catholic hospitals and other private institutions that refuse as a matter of conscience to perform abortions. Suffice it to say: This radical abortion on demand bill will never become law as long as I am President of the United States G #:6844 456 202 2025562218 SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 8- 4-92 ;10:08AM ; 6 of America. 11 on each of these issues, the choice is clear. Who do you trust to change America -- to renew timeless values like personal responsibility? who do you trust: those with the courage to stand for what may not be popular -- but is right? or the side that talks a good game -- mouths the right rhetoric about values -- but whose record and example make a mockery of their words? Nowhere is this choice more vital than in the decisions a President must make every day to build what I call real peace: the triumph of freedom and democracy, not the mere absence of war. Saint Ignatius said, "Work as though all depended upon yourself, and pray as though all depended on God." The practice of that motto conquered Communism. Ceaseless prayer and tireless work halted the Cold War \ and spared us from the catastrophe of a third World War. Believers behind the Iron Curtain defied persecution; believers in the West defied indifference. Over four decades, our servicemen trained -- our taxpayers paid four trillion dollars -- to keep our defenses strong. And as a consequence, the Iron Curtain is no more -- and our kids no longer face the kind of nuclear threat that used to haunt us. I'll always be grateful for the Knights of Columbus' support on the morality of our strategic deterrence. Because Americans understood the moral stakes in the Cold War, because we persevered -- we're now able to work at building a lasting peace between East and West. We're working with democratic Russia to 9 #:68:4 456 202 2025662218 SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 8- 4-92 ;10:08AM ; 7 reduce the arsenals that once threatened to unleash a nuclear war and to cooperate on defenses against ballistic missiles. When we faced our first big challenge after the Cold War, we didn't shrink. We stood up to Saddam Hussein's aggression and expelled him from Kuwait. We protected the people of Israel and Saudi Arabia. Now we've brought age-old adversaries to the peace table for the first time. We've gained the greatest opportunity in centuries to establish peace and stability in the Holy Land. His Holiness, Pope John Paul, has spent many sleepless nights in prayer and endeavor for peace in the Middle East. As long as I am President, I assure you I'll do everything I can to bring about that peace that so many pray for. 11 Respect for life \ for freedom \ for human dignity \ forms I the common basis both for peace in the world and for renewal at home. The Knights of Columbus are in the forefront of this effort. In countless ways you help your neighbors: Organizing Scout Troops. Sponsoring that magnificent program, the Special olympics. Visiting the sick and the elderly. Nourishing minds and souls that hunger for sound values. You bear witness to the fact that real compassion and tolerance cannot abide abandonment of standards of right and wrong. 11 I try to keep that at my core. Whatever the political cost, I intend to do what's right for America. I'll work to protect and renew America -- with a strong national defense, and with a true and steady moral compass. 11 Now that America's moral values -- liberty, honor, personal responsibility -- are L #:6844 459 202 2025562218 SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 8- 4-92 :10:09AM ; 8 victorious around the globe -- why in the world would we abandon them at home? We cannot. As long as I'm President, we will not. Let the other side traffic in values that are trendy and transitory. I'm going to defend the principles for which you stand so firm. We'll keep our sights on what's good in America. We'll keep our focus on the potential in our families and our kids. We'll keep a reliable compass. We'll put our ship of state in finest sailing trime We AND 11 navigate our way to shining new horizons. 11 Thank you. May God bless you and our beloved country. # # # 8 #:6844 459 202 2025562218 SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 8- 4-92 :10:09AM ; 7739 Due back by 10AM 8/4/92 (Duggan/Bunton) August 3, 1992 Draft Six Knights PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS NEW YORK MARRIOTT MARQUIS NEW YORK, NEW YORK WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1992 11:00 a.m Thank you, Virgil Dechant. Your Eminence, Cardinal O'Connor and reverend clergy; distinguished Knights; ladies and gentlemen: A report came across my desk the other day. It stated that most people in the Western world "felt exceedingly gloomy about the future." It said that "institutions were decaying, well- meaning people were growing cynical." My first thought was: That's what happens when people spend too much time watching the network evening news. 11 But what I was reading was not a report about 1992. It was a history of public attitudes in 1492. Public moods are prone to change. When some people turn negative, all I can do is hold the rudder firm. ((I told Barbara that the more I'm criticized, the more I turn it into humor. She said, "At this rate, you'll soon be funnier than Jay Leno. As I said, public moods are prone to change. We know the gloom of 1492 was not to last for long. It was dispelled by the achievement of a man of humble birth. a man of vision and courage. a man named Christopher Columbus. 11 Columbus opened up a new world of opportunity for the spread of commerce \ culture \ and faith. \ In this 500th anniversary year of his voyage of discovery, I'm honored to meet 2 with a group of Americans dedicated to his ideals. This year we hear a lot of talk about change. And sure, there are things I'd like to change. Though maybe a better word is renewal -- because the changes we need must be based on principles that never change. My parents were like yours: They brought me up to understand that mankind's fundamental moral standards were established by Almighty God. They're as natural and unchangeable as the laws of physics. Our common law, our Constitution and our Bill of Rights are firmly rooted in this tradition -- the Judaeo- Christian tradition. Only recently in America have we seen the rise of legal theories and practices that reject our tradition. Cardinal O'Connor eloquently describes this as an "inversion of values. It's a deeply disturbing trend -- and it is diametrically opposed to my idea of the kind of change that's good for our country. 11 Last month on a stage just 12 blocks from here, there was another convention -- very different from this one. Now, I didn't hear any of those speeches. I was up in the mountains fishing -- where the air was clear, not hot. But I understand one of the speakers, known for his florid language, called me "the captain of the ship of state." He didn't mean it as a compliment, but believe me: As a Navy man at a Knights of Columbus convention the term suits me just fine. Whoever is chosen to pilot the ship of state must have a reliable moral compass. Personal responsibility -- among the 3 people and in our leaders -- must be more than just a slogan. It must be embodied in our ideas and actions. Americans will make a choice this year about economic freedom and growth, and about keeping our defenses second to none -- keeping America safe and strong. But the choice is about more than that: It is about renewing our moral strength. Principles don't change from one day to the next. Principles aren't driven by opinion polls. Principles endure. This year, one side offers real change to make America One Nation under God. The other side -- in that convention I spoke of -- wrote a 10,000 word platform -- and never once mentioned the one word that counts the most: God. You can see the differences of philosophy reflected in our policies. As a baseball umpire would put it, "You make the call. " Consider our system of welfare. In too many cases, it's not lifting people up, it's holding them down. This system is neither well nor fair. 11 The key to reform: personal responsibility. Now, on the other side of the debate are the interests that want to protect bureaucracy and spending -- even if it means saying no to unwed mothers who want to get married. Even if it means saying no to families on public aid who somehow manage to put money aside in savings. It's time the system started saying yes: Yes to people like Sandra Rosato, who worked and saved money for college because she didn't want to leave a legacy of welfare to her kids. The system 4 said her family couldn't continue to get benefits while she saved money for school. She saved $4,000. I call that amazing. The welfare bureaucrats? They called it fraud. Something is wrong here. That's why I aim to shake up the top-down bureaucratic way of welfare and let our states innovate to reward people like Sandra -- reward work and responsibility. Take education. We know that renewing education depends on giving parents real freedom and real responsibility to choose their kids' schools. The other side tries to posture on the side of parents, but I don't think anyone is fooled. Remember how old Henry Ford used to tell his customers, they can have any color Model T they want -- so long as it's black? Well, the other side says their ideal is that parents could choose any school for their kids -- as long as it's run by the government. 11 My plan is different -- it's called the G.I. Bill for Children. Right now, if parents choose a Catholic school or any other alternative to the public schools, they have to pay twice - - first for tuition and again through taxes. Catholic parents I met in Philadelphia last month made it plain to me: that makes it hard to exercise your religious freedom. Like the original G.I. Bill, my new bill offers scholarships or vouchers for students to take to any qualified school -- not only public schools, but Bible schools, yeshivas, and Catholic parish schools if that is what parents want. 11 My plan for education preserves religious freedom. That's also true of another issue where there's a Grand Canyon of a 5 divide. ((A small boy once began a prayer this way: "God bless mother and daddy, my brother and sister." He continued, "And, oh, God, do take care of yourself, because if anything happens to you, we're all sunk.")) That boy knew why, according to the Gallup Poll, America is the most religious nation on earth. Sadly, one side this year thinks it's fine to give out condoms in school but not to say a prayer. I totally disagree. So today, I again call on Congress to pass a Constitutional Amendment restoring voluntary prayer to our classrooms -- and I challenge my opponent to support me. Let's bring the Faith of our Fathers back to our schools. 11 And there's the issue of a national tragedy: more than a million and a half abortions in this country every year. We know there must be a better way. The other side turns a deaf ear to humane and responsible alternatives -- like adoption; like abstinence. The other side refuses to let the Governor of Pennsylvania present a pro-life view at his own party's convention. The other side is pushing a so-called "Freedom of Choice" bill, which is in fact the most radical abortion-on- demand legislation ever offered. This bill would prevent states from enacting even modest restraints against abortion on demand. It would threaten the autonomy of Catholic hospitals and other private institutions that refuse as a matter of conscience to perform abortions. Suffice it to say: This radical abortion on demand bill will never become law as long as I am President of the United States 6 of America. On each of these issues, the choice is clear. Who do you trust to change America -- to renew timeless values like personal responsibility? Who do you trust: those with the courage to stand for what may not be popular -- but is right? or the side that talks a good game -- mouths the right rhetoric about values -- but whose record and example make a mockery of their words? Nowhere is this choice more vital than in the decisions a President must make every day to build what I call real peace: the triumph of freedom and democracy, not the mere absence of war. Saint Ignatius said, "Work as though all depended upon yourself, and pray as though all depended on God." The practice of that motto conquered Communism. Ceaseless prayer and tireless work halted the Cold War \ and spared us from the catastrophe of a third World War. Believers behind the Iron Curtain defied persecution; believers in the West defied indifference. Over four decades, our servicemen trained -- our taxpayers paid four trillion dollars -- to keep our defenses strong. And as a consequence, the Iron Curtain is no more -- and our kids no longer face the kind of nuclear threat that used to haunt us. I'll always be grateful for the Knights of Columbus' support on the morality of our strategic deterrence. Because Americans understood the moral stakes in the Cold War, because we persevered -- we're now able to work at building a lasting peace between East and West. We're working with democratic Russia to 7 reduce the arsenals that once threatened to unleash a nuclear war and to cooperate on defenses against ballistic missiles. When we faced our first big challenge after the Cold War, we didn't shrink. We stood up to Saddam Hussein's aggression and expelled him from Kuwait. We protected the people of Israel and Saudi Arabia. Now we've brought age-old adversaries to the peace table for the first time. We've gained the greatest opportunity in centuries to establish peace and stability in the Holy Land. His Holiness, Pope John Paul, has spent many sleepless nights in prayer and endeavor for peace in the Middle East. As long as I am President, I assure you I'll do everything I can to bring about that peace that so many pray for. Respect for life \ for freedom \ for human dignity \ forms the common basis both for peace in the world and for renewal at home. The Knights of Columbus are in the forefront of this effort. In countless ways you help your neighbors: Organizing Scout Troops. Sponsoring that magnificent program, the Special Olympics. Visiting the sick and the elderly. Nourishing minds and souls that hunger for sound values. You bear witness to the fact that real compassion and tolerance cannot abide abandonment of standards of right and wrong. I try to keep that at my core. Whatever the political cost, I intend to do what's right for America. I'll work to protect and renew America -- with a strong national defense, and with a true and steady moral compass. Now that America's moral values -- liberty, honor, personal responsibility -- are 8 victorious around the globe -- why in the world would we abandon them at home? We cannot. As long as I'm President, we will not. Let the other side traffic in values that are trendy and transitory. I'm going to defend the principles for which you stand so firm. We'll keep our sights on what's good in America. We'll keep our focus on the potential in our families and our kids. We'll keep a reliable compass. We'll put our ship of state in finest sailing trim. We'll navigate our way to shining new horizons. 11 Thank you. May God bless you and our beloved country. # # # (Duggan/Bunton) August 3, 1992 Draft Six Knights PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS NEW YORK MARRIOTT MARQUIS NEW YORK, NEW YORK WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1992 11:00 a.m Thank you, Virgil Dechant. Your Eminence, Cardinal O'Connor and reverend clergy; distinguished Knights; ladies and gentlemen: A report came across my desk the other day. It stated that most people in the Western world "felt exceedingly gloomy about the future." It said that "institutions were decaying, well- meaning people were growing cynical." My first thought was: That's what happens when people spend too much time watching the network evening news. 11 But what I was reading was not a report about 1992. It was a history of public attitudes in 1492. Public moods are prone to change. When some people turn negative, all I can do is hold the rudder firm. ((I told Barbara that the more I'm criticized, the more I turn it into humor. She said, "At this rate, you'll soon be funnier than Jay Leno." ) As I said, public moods are prone to change. We know the gloom of 1492 was not to last for long. It was dispelled by the achievement of a man of humble birth. a man of vision and courage a man named Christopher Columbus. 11 Columbus opened up a new world of opportunity for the spread of commerce \ culture \ and faith. \ In this 500th anniversary year of his voyage of discovery, I'm honored to meet 2 with a group of Americans dedicated to his ideals. This year we hear a lot of talk about change. And sure, there are things I'd like to change. Though maybe a better word is renewal -- because the changes we need must be based on principles that never change. My parents were like yours: They brought me up to understand that mankind's fundamental moral standards were established by Almighty God. They're as natural and unchangeable as the laws of physics. Our common law, our Constitution and our Bill of Rights are firmly rooted in this tradition -- the Judaeo- Christian tradition. Only recently in America have we seen the rise of legal theories and practices that reject our tradition. Cardinal O'Connor eloquently describes this as an "inversion of values." It's a deeply disturbing trend -- and it is diametrically opposed to my idea of the kind of change that's good for our country. Last month on a stage just 12 blocks from here, there was another convention -- very different from this one. Now, I didn't hear any of those speeches. I was up in the mountains fishing -- where the air was clear, not hot. But I understand one of the speakers, known for his florid language, called me "the captain of the ship of state." He didn't mean it as a compliment, but believe me: As a Navy man at a Knights of Columbus convention the term suits me just fine. Whoever is chosen to pilot the ship of state must have a reliable moral compass. Personal responsibility -- among the 3 people and in our leaders -- must be more than just a slogan. It must be embodied in our ideas and actions. Americans will make a choice this year about economic freedom and growth, and about keeping our defenses second to none -- keeping America safe and strong. But the choice is about more than that: It is about renewing our moral strength. Principles don't change from one day to the next. Principles aren't driven by opinion polls. Principles endure. 11 This year, one side offers real change to make America One Nation under God. The other side -- in that convention I spoke of -- wrote a 10,000 word platform -- and never once mentioned the one word that counts the most: God. You can see the differences of philosophy reflected in our policies. As a baseball umpire would put it, "You make the call. " Consider our system of welfare. In too many cases, it's not lifting people up, it's holding them down. This system is neither well nor fair. 11 The key to reform: personal responsibility. Now, on the other side of the debate are the interests that want to protect bureaucracy and spending -- even if it means saying no to unwed mothers who want to get married. Even if it means saying no to families on public aid who somehow manage to put money aside in savings. It's time the system started saying yes: Yes to people like Sandra Rosato, who worked and saved money for college because she didn't want to leave a legacy of welfare to her kids. The system 4 said her family couldn't continue to get benefits while she saved money for school. She saved $4,000. I call that amazing. The welfare bureaucrats? They called it fraud. Something is wrong here. That's why I aim to shake up the top-down bureaucratic way of welfare and let our states innovate to reward people like Sandra -- reward work and responsibility. Take education. We know that renewing education depends on giving parents real freedom and real responsibility to choose their kids' schools. The other side tries to posture on the side of parents, but I don't think anyone is fooled. Remember how old Henry Ford used to tell his customers, they can have any color Model T they want -- so long as it's black? Well, the other side says their ideal is that parents could choose any school for their kids -- as long as it's run by the government. 11 My plan is different -- it's called the G.I. Bill for Children. Right now, if parents choose a Catholic school or any other alternative to the public schools, they have to pay twice - - first for tuition and again through taxes. Catholic parents I met in Philadelphia last month made it plain to me: that makes it hard to exercise your religious freedom. Like the original G.I. Bill, my new bill offers scholarships or vouchers for students to take to any qualified school -- not only public schools, but Bible schools, yeshivas, and Catholic parish schools if that is what parents want. My plan for education preserves religious freedom. That's also true of another issue where there's a Grand Canyon of a 5 divide. ((A small boy once began a prayer this way: "God bless mother and daddy, my brother and sister." He continued, "And, oh, God, do take care of yourself, because if anything happens to you, we're all sunk.")) That boy knew why, according to the Gallup Poll, America is the most religious nation on earth. Sadly, one side this year thinks it's fine to give out condoms in school but not to say a prayer. I totally disagree. So today, I again call on Congress to pass a Constitutional Amendment restoring voluntary prayer to our classrooms -- and I challenge my opponent to support me. Let's bring the Faith of our Fathers back to our schools. And there's the issue of a national tragedy: more than a million and a half abortions in this country every year. We know there must be a better way. The other side turns a deaf ear to humane and responsible alternatives -- like adoption; like abstinence. The other side refuses to let the Governor of Pennsylvania present a pro-life view at his own party's convention. The other side is pushing a so-called "Freedom of Choice" bill, which is in fact the most radical abortion-on- demand legislation ever offered. This bill would prevent states from enacting even modest restraints against abortion on demand. It would threaten the autonomy of Catholic hospitals and other private institutions that refuse as a matter of conscience to perform abortions. Suffice it to say: This radical abortion on demand bill will never become law as long as I am President of the United States 6 of America. 11 On each of these issues, the choice is clear. Who do you trust to change America -- to renew timeless values like personal responsibility? Who do you trust: those with the courage to stand for what may not be popular -- but is right? or the side that talks a good game -- mouths the right rhetoric about values -- but whose record and example make a mockery of their words? Nowhere is this choice more vital than in the decisions a President must make every day to build what I call real peace: the triumph of freedom and democracy, not the mere absence of war. Saint Ignatius said, "Work as though all depended upon yourself, and pray as though all depended on God." The practice of that motto conquered Communism. Ceaseless prayer and tireless work halted the Cold War \ and spared us from the catastrophe of a third World War. Believers behind the Iron Curtain defied persecution; believers in the West defied indifference. Over four decades, our servicemen trained -- our taxpayers paid four trillion dollars -- to keep our defenses strong. And as a consequence, the Iron Curtain is no more -- and our kids no longer face the kind of nuclear threat that used to haunt us. I'll always be grateful for the Knights of Columbus' support on the morality of our strategic deterrence. Because Americans understood the moral stakes in the Cold War, because we persevered -- we're now able to work at building a lasting peace between East and West. We're working with democratic Russia to 7 reduce the arsenals that once threatened to unleash a nuclear war and to cooperate on defenses against ballistic missiles. When we faced our first big challenge after the Cold War, we didn't shrink. We stood up to Saddam Hussein's aggression and expelled him from Kuwait. We protected the people of Israel and Saudi Arabia. Now we've brought age-old adversaries to the peace table for the first time. We've gained the greatest opportunity in centuries to establish peace and stability in the Holy Land. His Holiness, Pope John Paul, has spent many sleepless nights in prayer and endeavor for peace in the Middle East. As long as I am President, I assure you I'll do everything I can to bring about that peace that so many pray for. 11 Respect for life \ for freedom \ for human dignity \ forms the common basis both for peace in the world and for renewal at home. The Knights of Columbus are in the forefront of this effort. In countless ways you help your neighbors: Organizing Scout Troops. Sponsoring that magnificent program, the Special Olympics. Visiting the sick and the elderly. Nourishing minds and souls that hunger for sound values. You bear witness to the fact that real compassion and tolerance cannot abide abandonment of standards of right and wrong. 11 I try to keep that at my core. Whatever the political cost, I intend to do what's right for America. I'll work to protect and renew America -- with a strong national defense, and with a true and steady moral compass. Now that America's moral values -- liberty, honor, personal responsibility -- are 8 victorious around the globe -- why in the world would we abandon them at home? We cannot. As long as I'm President, we will not. Let the other side traffic in values that are trendy and transitory. I'm going to defend the principles for which you stand so firm. We'll keep our sights on what's good in America. We'll keep our focus on the potential in our families and our kids. We'll keep a reliable compass. We'll put our ship of state in finest sailing trim. We'll navigate our way to shining new horizons. 11 Thank you. May God bless you and our beloved country. # # # THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DATE: 8/3/92 TO: Dan McGroarty FROM: GREG FITCH Office of Public Liaison Room 196, OEOB, x7142 130 7120 FYI Appropriate Action Joe M please Let's Discuss Per Our Conversation Read. Per Your Request will Please Return COMMENTS: A great, hard hitting speech - but one concern I thought I'd share w/yon: "The other side refuses to let the for. of PA present a pro-life Niew at his own party's convention." Doyor think the media or pro choices world pounce this sentence Have we allowed pro-choicers to beheard at our own platform discussion, and upcoming convention? owill they beat The I'm just wondering whether themedia and pro-choice advocates "hypecracy," will leap on this statement, conyings and in the process divert cause attention from the Presidents to be diverted strong pro-life record- - Gres EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 03-Aug-1992 03:33pm TO: (See Below) FROM: Drucillia S. Scaling Office of Communications SUBJECT: REVISED KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS comments due 9:00am Tuesday (Duggan/Bunton) August 3, 1992 Draft Six Knights.2 PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS NEW YORK MARRIOTT MARQUIS NEW YORK, NEW YORK WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1992 11:00 a.m Thank you, Virgil Dechant. Your Eminence, Cardinal O'Connor and reverend clergy; distinguished Knights; ladies and gentlemen: A report came across my desk the other day. It stated that most people in the Western world "felt exceedingly gloomy about the future." It said that "institutions were decaying, well- meaning people were growing cynical." My first thought was: That's what happens when people spend too much time watching the network evening news. 11 But what I was reading was not a report about 1992. It was a history of public attitudes in 1492. Public moods are prone to change. When some people turn negative, all I can do is hold the rudder firm. ((I told Barbara that the more I'm criticized, the more I turn it into humor. She said, "At this rate, you'll soon be funnier than Jay Leno. ) As I said, public moods are prone to change. We know the gloom of 1492 was not to last for long. It was dispelled by the achievement of a man of humble birth. a man of vision and courage. a man named Christopher Columbus. 11 Columbus opened up a new world of opportunity for the spread of commerce \ culture \ and faith. \ In this 500th anniversary year of his voyage of discovery, I'm honored to meet with a group of Americans dedicated to his ideals. This year we hear a lot of talk about change. And sure, there are things I'd like to change. Though maybe a better word is renewal -- because the changes we need must be based on principles that never change. My parents were like yours: They brought me up to understand that mankind's fundamental moral standards were established by Almighty God. They're as natural and unchangeable as the laws of physics. Our common law, our Constitution and our Bill of Rights are firmly rooted in this tradition -- the Judaeo- Christian tradition. Only recently in America have we seen the rise of legal theories and practices that reject our tradition. Cardinal O'Connor eloquently describes this as an "inversion of values." It's a deeply disturbing trend -- and it is diametrically opposed to my idea of the kind of change that's good for our country. Last month on a stage just 12 blocks from here, there was another convention -- very different from this one. Now, I didn't hear any of those speeches. I was up in the mountains fishing --- where the air was clear, not hot. But I understand one of the speakers, known for his florid language, called me "the captain of the ship of state." He didn't mean it as a compliment, but believe me: As a Navy man at a Knights of Columbus convention the term suits me just fine. Whoever is chosen to pilot the ship of state must have a reliable moral compass. 11 Personal responsibility -- among the people and in our leaders -- must be more than just a slogan. It must be embodied in our ideas and actions. Americans will make a choice this year about economic freedom and growth, and about keeping our defenses second to none -- keeping America safe and strong. But the choice is about more than that: It is about renewing our moral strength. Principles don't change from one day to the next. Principles aren't driven by opinion polls. Principles endure. 11 This year, one side offers real change to make America One Nation under God. The other side -- in that convention I spoke of -- wrote a 10,000 word platform -- and never once mentioned the one word that counts the most: God. You can see the differences of philosophy reflected in our policies. As a baseball umpire would put it, "You make the call." Consider our system of welfare. In too many cases, it's not lifting people up, it's holding them down. This system is neither well nor fair. 11 The key to reform: personal responsibility. Now, on the other side of the debate are the interests that want to protect bureaucracy and spending -- even if it means saying no to unwed mothers who want to get married. Even if it means saying no to families on public aid who somehow manage to put money aside in savings. It's time the system started saying yes: Yes to people like Sandra Rosato, who worked and saved money for college because she didn't want to leave a legacy of welfare to her kids. The system said her family couldn't continue to get benefits while she saved money for school. She saved $4,000. I call that amazing. The welfare bureaucrats? They called it fraud. Something is wrong here. That's why I aim to shake up the top-down bureaucratic way of welfare and let our states innovate to reward people like Sandra -- reward work and responsibility. 11 Take education. We know that renewing education depends on giving parents real freedom and real responsibility to choose their kids' schools. The other side tries to posture on the side of parents, but I don't think anyone is fooled. Remember how old Henry Ford used to tell his customers, they can have any color Model T they want -- so long as it's black? Well, the other side says their ideal is that parents could choose any school for their kids -- as long as it's run by the government. 11 My plan is different -- it's called the G.I. Bill for Children. Right now, if parents choose a Catholic school or any other alternative to the public schools, they have to pay twice - - first for tuition and again through taxes. Catholic parents I met in Philadelphia last month made it plain to me: that makes it hard to exercise your religious freedom. Like the original G.I. Bill, my new bill offers scholarships or vouchers for students to take to any qualified school -- not only public schools, but Bible schools, yeshivas, and Catholic parish schools if that is what parents want. My plan for education preserves religious freedom. That's also true of another issue where there's a Grand Canyon of a divide. ((A small boy once began a prayer this way: "God bless mother and daddy, my brother and sister." He continued, "And, oh, God, do take care of yourself, because if anything happens to you, we're all sunk.")) That boy knew why, according to the Gallup Poll, America is the most religious nation on earth. Sadly, one side this year thinks it's fine to give out condoms in school but not to say a prayer. I totally disagree. So today, I again call on Congress to pass a Constitutional Amendment restoring voluntary prayer to our classrooms -- and I challenge my opponent to support me. Let's bring the Faith of our Fathers back to our schools. And there's the issue of a national tragedy: more than a million and a half abortions in this country every year. We know there must be a better way. 11 The other side turns a deaf ear to humane and responsible alternatives -- like adoption; like abstinence. The other side refuses to let the Governor of Pennsylvania present a pro-life view at his own party's convention. The other side is pushing a so-called "Freedom of Choice" bill, which is in fact the most radical abortion-on- demand legislation ever offered. This bill would prevent states from enacting even modest restraints against abortion on demand. It would threaten the autonomy of Catholic hospitals and other private institutions that refuse as a matter of conscience to perform abortions. Suffice it to say: This radical abortion on demand bill will never become law as long as I am President of the United States of America. 11 On each of these issues, the choice is clear. Who do you trust to change America -- to renew timeless values like personal responsibility? Who do you trust: those with the courage to stand for what may not be popular -- but is right? Or the side that talks a good game -- mouths the right rhetoric about values -- but whose record and example make a mockery of their words? Nowhere is this choice more vital than in the decisions a President must make every day to build what I call real peace: the triumph of freedom and democracy, not the mere absence of war. Saint Ignatius said, "Work as though all depended upon yourself, and pray as though all depended on God." The practice of that motto conquered Communism. Ceaseless prayer and tireless work halted the Cold War \ and spared us from the catastrophe of a third World War. Believers behind the Iron Curtain defied persecution; believers in the West defied indifference. Over four decades, our servicemen trained -- our taxpayers paid four trillion dollars -- to keep our defenses strong. And as a consequence, the Iron Curtain is no more -- and our kids no longer face the kind of nuclear threat that used to haunt us. I'll always be grateful for the Knights of Columbus' support on the morality of our strategic deterrence. Because Americans understood the moral stakes in the Cold War, because we persevered -- we're now able to work at building a lasting peace between East and West. We're working with democratic Russia to reduce the arsenals that once threatened to unleash a nuclear war and to cooperate on defenses against ballistic missiles. When we faced our first big challenge after the Cold War, we didn't shrink. We stood up to Saddam Hussein's aggression and expelled him from Kuwait. We protected the people of Israel and Saudi Arabia. Now we've brought age-old adversaries to the peace table for the first time. We've gained the greatest opportunity in centuries to establish peace and stability in the Holy Land. His Holiness, Pope John Paul, has spent many sleepless nights in prayer and endeavor for peace in the Middle East. As long as I am President, I assure you I'll do everything I can to bring about that peace that so many pray for. 11 Respect for life \ for freedom \ for human dignity \ forms the common basis both for peace in the world and for renewal at home. The Knights of Columbus are in the forefront of this effort. In countless ways you help your neighbors: Organizing Scout Troops. Sponsoring that magnificent program, the Special Olympics. Visiting the sick and the elderly. Nourishing minds and souls that hunger for sound values. You bear witness to the fact that real compassion and tolerance cannot abide abandonment of standards of right and wrong. 11 I try to keep that at my core. Whatever the political cost, I intend to do what's right for America. I'll work to protect and renew America -- with a strong national defense, and with a true and steady moral compass. 11 Now that America's moral values -- liberty, honor, personal responsibility -- are victorious around the globe -- why in the world would we abandon them at home? We cannot. As long as I'm President, we will not. Let the other side traffic in values that are trendy and transitory. I'm going to defend the principles for which you stand so firm. We'll keep our sights on what's good in America. We'll keep our focus on the potential in our families and our kids. We'll keep a reliable compass. We'll put our ship of state in finest sailing trim. We'll navigate our way to shining new horizons. 11 Thank you. May God bless you and our beloved country. # # # DISTRIBUTION: TO: Sharon M. Botwin TO: Kris M. Dee TO: Drucillia S. Scaling TO: Andrew Ferguson TO: Elizabeth M. Hinchliffe TO: Joseph P. Duggan TO: Janice S. Crouse TO: Carol B. Aarhus TO: Jean M. Bunton TO: Gary J. Gershowitz TO: Jennifer A. Grossman TO: Susan M. Nix TO: Edward J. Walters TO: Clifford T. Alderman TO: Donna L. Barron TO: John A. Cline TO: Mark Frantz TO: Margaret M. Jonas TO: Barbara B. Kilberg TO: Helen R. Mobley TO: James J. Snyder TO: Mary T. Woods TO: Gregory H. Fitch TO: Clayton S. Fong TO: Cecile B. Kremer TO: Leigh A. Metzger TO: Kathryn E. Rust TO: Lindley H. White TO: William B. Caldwell TO: Susan R. Denniston TO: Walter C. Hazlitt TO: Jane B. BARNETT TO: Molly P. Osborne TO: Shiree Sanchez TO: C. James Schaefer (Duggan/Bunton) August 3, 1992 Draft Six Knights PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS NEW YORK MARRIOTT MARQUIS NEW YORK, NEW YORK WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1992 11:00 a.m Thank you, Virgil Dechant. Your Eminence, Cardinal O'Connor and reverend clergy; distinguished Knights; ladies and gentlemen: A report came across my desk the other day. It stated that most people in the Western world "felt exceedingly gloomy about the future." It said that "institutions were decaying, well- meaning people were growing cynical." My first thought was: That's what happens when people spend too much time watching the network evening news. 11 But what I was reading was not a report about 1992. It was a history of public attitudes in 1492. Public moods are prone to change. When some people turn negative, all I can do is hold the rudder firm. ((I told Barbara that the more I'm criticized, the more I turn it into humor. She said, "At this rate, you'll soon be funnier than Jay Leno.")) As I said, public moods are prone to change. We know the gloom of 1492 was not to last for long. It was dispelled by the achievement of a man of humble birth. a man of vision and courage. a man named Christopher Columbus. 11 Columbus opened up a new world of opportunity for the spread of commerce \ culture \ and faith. \ In this 500th anniversary year of his voyage of discovery, I'm honored to meet 2 with a group of Americans dedicated to his ideals. This year we hear a lot of talk about change. And sure, there are things I'd like to change. Though maybe a better word is renewal -- because the changes we need must be based on principles that never change. My parents were like yours: They brought me up to understand that mankind's fundamental moral standards were established by Almighty God. They're as natural and unchangeable as the laws of physics. Our common law, our Constitution and our Bill of Rights are firmly rooted in this tradition -- the Judaeo- Christian tradition. Only recently in America have we seen the rise of legal theories and practices that reject our tradition. Cardinal O'Connor eloquently describes this as an "inversion of values." It's a deeply disturbing trend -- and it is diametrically opposed to my idea of the kind of change that's good for our country. Last month on a stage just 12 blocks from here, there was another convention -- very different from this one. Now, I didn't hear any of those speeches. I was up in the mountains fishing -- where the air was clear, not hot. But I understand one of the speakers, known for his florid language, called me "the captain of the ship of state." He didn't mean it as a compliment, but believe me: As a Navy man at a Knights of Columbus convention the term suits me just fine. Whoever is chosen to pilot the ship of state must have a reliable moral compass. Personal responsibility -- among the 3 people and in our leaders -- must be more than just a slogan. It must be embodied in our ideas and actions. Americans will make a choice this year about economic freedom and growth, and about keeping our defenses second to none -- keeping America safe and strong. But the choice is about more than that: It is about renewing our moral strength. Principles don't change from one day to the next. Principles aren't driven by opinion polls. Principles endure. 11 This year, one side offers real change to make America One Nation under God. The other side -- in that convention I spoke of -- wrote a 10,000 word platform -- and never once mentioned the one word that counts the most: God. You can see the differences of philosophy reflected in our policies. As a baseball umpire would put it, "You make the call." Consider our system of welfare. In too many cases, it's not lifting people up, it's holding them down. This system is neither well nor fair. 11 The key to reform: personal responsibility. Now, on the other side of the debate are the interests that want to protect bureaucracy and spending -- even if it means saying no to unwed mothers who want to get married. Even if it means saying no to families on public aid who somehow manage to put money aside in savings. It's time the system started saying yes: Yes to people like Sandra Rosato, who worked and saved money for college because she didn't want to leave a legacy of welfare to her kids. The system 4 said her family couldn't continue to get benefits while she saved money for school. She saved $4,000. I call that amazing. The welfare bureaucrats? They called it fraud. Something is wrong here. That's why I aim to shake up the top-down bureaucratic way of welfare and let our states innovate to reward people like Sandra -- reward work and responsibility. 11 Take education. We know that renewing education depends on giving parents real freedom and real responsibility to choose their kids' schools. The other side tries to posture on the side of parents, but I don't think anyone is fooled. Remember how old Henry Ford used to tell his customers, they can have any color Model T they want -- so long as it's black? Well, the other side says their ideal is that parents could choose any school for their kids -- as long as it's run by the government. 11 My plan is different -- it's called the G.I. Bill for Children. Right now, if parents choose a Catholic school or any other alternative to the public schools, they have to pay twice - - first for tuition and again through taxes. Catholic parents I met in Philadelphia last month made it plain to me: that makes it hard to exercise your religious freedom. Like the original G.I. Bill, my new bill offers scholarships or vouchers for students to take to any qualified school -- not only public schools, but Bible schools, yeshivas, and Catholic parish schools if that is what parents want. 11 My plan for education preserves religious freedom. That's also true of another issue where there's a Grand Canyon of a 5 divide. ((A small boy once began a prayer this way: "God bless mother and daddy, my brother and sister." He continued, "And, oh, God, do take care of yourself, because if anything happens to you, we're all sunk.")) That boy knew why, according to the Gallup Poll, America is the most religious nation on earth. Sadly, one side this year thinks it's fine to give out condoms in school but not to say a prayer. I totally disagree. So today, I again call on Congress to pass a Constitutional Amendment restoring voluntary prayer to our classrooms -- and I challenge my opponent to support me. Let's bring the Faith of our Fathers back to our schools. 11 And there's the issue of a national tragedy: more than a million and a half abortions in this country every year. We know there must be a better way. 11 The other side turns a deaf ear to humane and responsible alternatives -- like adoption; like abstinence. The other side refuses to let the Governor of Pennsylvania present a pro-life view at his own party's convention. The other side is pushing a so-called "Freedom of Choice" bill, which is in fact the most radical abortion-on- demand legislation ever offered. This bill would prevent states from enacting even modest restraints against abortion on demand. It would threaten the autonomy of Catholic hospitals and other private institutions that refuse as a matter of conscience to perform abortions. Suffice it to say: This radical abortion on demand bill will never become law as long as I am President of the United States 6 of America. On each of these issues, the choice is clear. Who do you trust to change America -- to renew timeless values like personal responsibility? Who do you trust: those with the courage to stand for what may not be popular -- but is right? or the side that talks a good game -- mouths the right rhetoric about values -- but whose record and example make a mockery of their words? Nowhere is this choice more vital than in the decisions a President must make every day to build what I call real peace: the triumph of freedom and democracy, not the mere absence of war. Saint Ignatius said, "Work as though all depended upon yourself, and pray as though all depended on God." The practice of that motto conquered Communism. Ceaseless prayer and tireless work halted the Cold War \ and spared us from the catastrophe of a third World War. Believers behind the Iron Curtain defied persecution; believers in the West defied indifference. Over four decades, our servicemen trained -- our taxpayers paid four trillion dollars -- to keep our defenses strong. And as a consequence, the Iron Curtain is no more -- and our kids no longer face the kind of nuclear threat that used to haunt us. I'll always be grateful for the Knights of Columbus' support on the morality of our strategic deterrence. Because Americans understood the moral stakes in the Cold War, because we persevered -- we're now able to work at building a lasting peace between East and West. We're working with democratic Russia to 7 reduce the arsenals that once threatened to unleash a nuclear war and to cooperate on defenses against ballistic missiles. When we faced our first big challenge after the Cold War, we didn't shrink. We stood up to Saddam Hussein's aggression and expelled him from Kuwait. We protected the people of Israel and Saudi Arabia. Now we've brought age-old adversaries to the peace table for the first time. We've gained the greatest opportunity in centuries to establish peace and stability in the Holy Land. His Holiness, Pope John Paul, has spent many sleepless nights in prayer and endeavor for peace in the Middle East. As long as I am President, I assure you I'll do everything I can to bring about that peace that so many pray for. 11 Respect for life \ for freedom \ for human dignity \ forms the common basis both for peace in the world and for renewal at home. The Knights of Columbus are in the forefront of this effort. In countless ways you help your neighbors: Organizing Scout Troops. Sponsoring that magnificent program, the Special Olympics. Visiting the sick and the elderly. Nourishing minds and souls that hunger for sound values. You bear witness to the fact that real compassion and tolerance cannot abide abandonment of standards of right and wrong. I try to keep that at my core. Whatever the political cost, I intend to do what's right for America. I'll work to protect and renew America -- with a strong national defense, and with a true and steady moral compass. 11 Now that America's moral values -- liberty, honor, personal responsibility -- are 8 victorious around the globe -- why in the world would we abandon them at home? We cannot. As long as I'm President, we will not. Let the other side traffic in values that are trendy and transitory. I'm going to defend the principles for which you stand so firm. We'll keep our sights on what's good in America. We'll keep our focus on the potential in our families and our kids. We'll keep a reliable compass. We'll put our ship of state in finest sailing trim. We'll navigate our way to shining new horizons. 11 Thank you. May God bless you and our beloved country. # # # THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON August 4, 1992 MEMORANDUM FOR ALL WRITERS FROM: DAN MC GROARTY omr SUBJECT: APPLAUSE LINES As an exercise to help us strengthen the dead spots, a new SOP: Each writer should add to the file in 122 a copy of each staffed speech marked for expected applause lines. UNCLASSIFIED WHITE HOUSE SITUATION ROOM PRECEDENCE. IMMEDIATE PRIORITY RELEASER: Bhyler ROUTINE DTG: 03/704AM692 MESSAGE NO. 07 UNCLASSIFIED CLASSIFICATION PAGES 8 FROM DAN MCGROARTY (Name) 2930 122 (Phone Number) (Room No.) MESSAGE DESCRIPTION kofc SPEECH LOCATION DELIVER TO AF / CHRISTINA MARTIN AF / STEVE PROVOST JACKSONVillE, ,FL FL " REMARKS: WENT TO SAFFING JB UNCLASSIFIED : (Duggan/Bunton) August 3, 1992 Draft Six Knights PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS NEW YORK MARRIOTT MARQUIS NEW YORK, NEW YORK WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1992 11:00 a.m Thank you, Virgil Dechant. Your Eminence, Cardinal O'Connor and reverend clergy; distinguished Knights; ladies and gentlemen: fungrator A report came across my desk the other day. It stated that most people in the Western world "felt exceedingly gloomy about the future." It said that "institutions were decaying, well- meaning people were growing cynical." My first thought was: That's what happens when people spend too much time watching the network evening news. 11 But what I was reading was not a report about 1992. It was a history of public attitudes in 1492. Public moods are prone to change. When some people turn negative, all I can do is hold the rudder firm. ((I told Barbara that the more I'm criticized, the more I you're youb to turn it into humor. She said, "At this rate, you 11 soon be funnier than Jay Leno.")) As I said, public moods are prone to change. We know the gloom of 1492 was not to last for long. It was dispelled by the achievement of a man of humble birth. a man of vision and courage. a man named Christopher Columbus. 11 Columbus opened up a new world of opportunity for the spread of commerce \ culture \ and faith. \ In this 500th anniversary year of his voyage of discovery, I'm honored to meet 2 with a group of Americans dedicated to his ideals. This year we hear a lot of talk about change. And sure, there are things I'd like to change. Though maybe a better word is renewal -- because the changes we need must be based on principles that never change. My parents were like yours: They brought me up to understand that mankind's fundamental moral standards were established by Almighty God. They're as natural and unchangeable as the laws of physics. Our common law, our Constitution and our Bill of Rights are firmly rooted in this tradition -- the Judaeo- Christian tradition. Only recently in America have we seen the rise of legal theories and practices that reject our tradition. Cardinal O'Connor eloquently describes this as an "inversion of values.' It's a deeply disturbing trend -- and it is diametrically opposed to my idea of the kind of change that's good for our country. 11 Last month on a stage just 12 blocks from here, there was another convention -- very different from this one. Now, I didn't hear any of those speeches. I was up in the mountains fishing where the air was clear, not hot. But I understand one of the speakers, known for his florid language, called me I'm not meant Has complition "the captain of the ship of state. He didn't mean- it as a compliment, but believe me: As a Navy man at a Knights of Columbus convention the term suits me just fine. Whoever is chosen to pilot the ship of state must have a reliable moral compass. 11 Personal responsibility -- among the 3 people and in our leaders -- must be more than just a slogan. It must be embodied in our ideas and actions. Americans will make a choice this year about economic freedom and growth, and about keeping our defenses second to none -- keeping America safe and strong. But the choice is about more than that: It is about renewing our moral strength. Principles don't change from one day to the next. Principles aren't driven by opinion polls. Principles endure. 11 This year, one side offers real change to make America One Nation under God. The other side -- in that convention I spoke of -- letters wrote a 10,000 word platform -- and never once mentioned the one word that counts the most: God. G-O-D. You can see the differences of philosophy reflected in our policies. As a baseball umpire would put it, "You make the call. Consider our system of welfare. In too many cases, it's not lifting people up, it's holding them down. This system is neither well nor fair. The key to reform: personal responsibility. Now, on the other side of the debate are the interests that want to protect bureaucracy and spending -- even if it means saying no to unwed mothers who want to get married. Even if it means saying no to families on public aid who somehow manage to put money aside in savings. It's time the system started saying yes: Yes to people like Sandra Rosato, who worked and saved money for college because she didn't want to leave a legacy of welfare to her kids. The system 4 said her family couldn't continue to get benefits while she saved money for school. She saved $4,000. I call that amazing. The welfare bureaucrats? They called it fraud. Something is wrong here. That's why I aim to shake up the top-down bureaucratic way of welfare and let our states innovate to reward people like Sandra -- reward work and responsibility. 11 Take education. We know that renewing education depends on giving parents real freedom and real responsibility to choose their kids' schools. The other side tries to posture on the side of parents, but I don't think anyone is fooled. Remember how old Henry Ford used to tell his customers, they can have any color Model T they want -- SO long as it's black? Well, the other side says their ideal is that parents could choose any school for their kids -- as long as it's run by the government. 11 My plan is different -- it's called the G.I. Bill for Children. Right now, if parents choose a Catholic school or any other alternative to the public schools, they have to pay twice - - first for tuition and again through taxes. Catholic parents I met in Philadelphia last month made it plain to me: that makes it hard to exercise your religious freedom. Like the original G.I. Bill, my new bill offers scholarships or vouchers for students to take to any qualified school -- not only public schools, but Bible schools, yeshivas, and Catholic parish schools if that is what parents want. 11 My plan for education preserves religious freedom. That's also true of another issue where there's a Grand Canyon of a 5 divide. ((A small boy once began a prayer this way: "God bless mother and daddy, my brother and sister." He continued, "And, oh, God, do take care of yourself, because if anything happens to you, we're all sunk.")) That boy knew why, according to the Gallup Poll, America is the most religious nation on earth. Sadly, one side this year thinks it's fine to give out condoms in school but not to say a prayer. I totally disagree. So today, I again call on Congress to pass a Constitutional Amendment restoring voluntary prayer to our classrooms -- and I challenge my opponent to support me. Let's bring the Faith of our Fathers back to our schools. 11 And there's the issue of a national tragedy: more than a million and a half abortions in this country every year. We know there must be a better way. 11 The other side turns a deaf ear to humane and responsible alternatives --- like adoption; like abstinence. The other side refuses to let the Governor of Pennsylvania present a pro-life view at his own party's convention. The other side is pushing a so-called "Freedom of Choice" bill, which is in fact the most radical abortion-on- demand legislation ever offered. This bill would prevent states from enacting even modest restraints against abortion on demand. It would threaten the autonomy of Catholic hospitals and other private institutions that refuse as a matter of conscience to perform abortions. Suffice it to say: This radical abortion on demand bill will never become law as long as I am President of the United States 6 of America, On each of these issues, the choice is clear. Who do you trust to change America -- to renew timeless values like personal responsibility? Who do you trust: those with the courage to stand for what may not be popular -- but is right? or the side that talks a good game -- mouths the right rhetoric about values -- but whose record and example make a mockery of their words? Nowhere is this choice more vital than in the decisions a President must make every day to build what I call real peace: the triumph of freedom and democracy, not the mere absence of war. Saint Ignatius said, "Work as though all depended upon yourself, and pray as though all depended on God." The practice of that motto conquered Communism. Ceaseless prayer and tireless work halted the Cold War \ and spared us from the catastrophe of a third World War. Believers behind the Iron Curtain defied persecution; believers in the West defied indifference. Over four decades, our servicemen trained -- our taxpayers paid four trillion dollars -- to keep our defenses strong. And as a consequence, the Iron Curtain is no more -- and our kids no longer face the kind of nuclear threat that used to haunt us. I'll always be grateful for the Knights of Columbus' support on the morality of our strategic deterrence. Because Americans understood the moral stakes in the Cold War, because we persevered -- we're now able to work at building a lasting peace between East and West. We're working with democratic Russia to 7 reduce the arsenals that once threatened to unleash a nuclear war and to cooperate on defenses against ballistic missiles. When we faced our first big challenge after the Cold War, we didn't shrink. We stood up to Saddam Hussein's aggression and expelled him from Kuwait. We protected the people of Israel and Saudi Arabia. Now we've brought age-old adversaries to the peace table for the first time. We've gained the greatest opportunity in centuries to establish peace and stability in the Holy Land. His Holiness, Pope John Paul, has spent many sleepless nights in prayer and endeavor for peace in the Middle East. As long as I am President, I assure you I'll do everything I can to bring about that peace that so many pray for. 11 Respect for life \ for freedom \ for human dignity \ forms the common basis both for peace in the world and for renewal at home. The Knights of Columbus are in the forefront of this effort. In countless ways you help your neighbors: Organizing Scout Troops. Sponsoring that magnificent program, the Special Olympics. Visiting the sick and the elderly. Nourishing minds and souls that hunger for sound values. You bear witness to the fact that real compassion and tolerance cannot abide abandonment of standards of right and wrong. 11 I try to keep that at my core. Whatever the political cost, I intend to do what's right for America. I'll work to protect and renew America --- with a strong national defense, and with a true and steady moral compass. 11 Now that America's moral values -- liberty, honor, personal responsibility -- are 8 victorious around the globe -- why in the world would we abandon them at home? We cannot. As long as I'm President, we will not. Let the other side traffic in values that are trendy and transitory. I'm going to defend the principles for which you stand so firm. We'll keep our sights on what's good in America. We'll keep our focus on the potential in our families and our kids. We'll keep a reliable compass. We'll put our ship of state in finest sailing trim. We'll navigate our way to shining new horizons. 11 Thank you. May God bless you and our beloved country. # 34240155 Document No. WHITE HOUSE STAFFING MEMORANDUM 32 AUG 4 A10: 11 DATE: August 3, 1992 ACTION/CONCURRENCE/COMMENT DUE BY: 9:00 am TUES , AUGUST 4, 1992 SUBJECT: PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, NEW YORK MARRIOTT MARQUIS, NEW YORK, NEW YORK, WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1992 SP- CTION FY ACTION FYI THESE ARE ALL THE COMMENTS REMINDER WE HAVE. TO POTUS RIDE you CAN IGNORE OMB'S- - WE'VE BY NOON USED This LANG. petersmi YER BEFORE CM PORTER LEE'S MEMO IS YOUR CALL PROVOST SMITH DEMAREST YEUTTER FITZWATER FINDLAY GRAY KAUFMAN HOLIDAY REMARKS: Please provide comments on the attached directly to Dan McGroarty, Room 122, x2930, with a copy to this office NOT LATER THAN 9:00 A.M., TUESDAY, AUGUST 4th. -MASTER- RESPONSE: See comments Bob Trady may be providing additional comments (4844) PHILLIP D. BRADY Assistant to the President and Staff Secretary Ext. 2702 (Duggan/Bunton) August 3, 1992 Draft Six 2 AUG 3 P12: 47 Knights PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS NEW YORK MARRIOTT MARQUIS NEW YORK, NEW YORK WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1992 11:00 a.m Thank you, Virgil Dechant. Your Eminence, Cardinal O'Connor and reverend clergy; distinguished Knights; ladies and gentlemen: A report came across my desk the other day. It stated that most people in the Western world "felt exceedingly gloomy about the future. It said that "institutions were decaying, well- meaning people were growing cynical." My first thought was: That's what happens when people spend too much time watching the network evening news. 11 But what I was reading was not a report about 1992. It was a history of public attitudes in 1492. Public moods are prone to change. When some people turn negative, all I can do is hold the rudder firm. ((I told Barbara that the more I'm criticized, the more I turn it into humor. She said, "At this rate, you'll soon be funnier than Jay Leno. ")) As I said, public moods are prone to change. We know the gloom of 1492 was not to last for long. It was dispelled by the achievement of a man of humble birth. a man of vision and courage. a man named Christopher Columbus. 11 Columbus opened up a new world of opportunity for the spread of commerce \ culture \ and faith. \ In this 500th anniversary year of his voyage of discovery, I'm honored to meet 2 with a group of Americans dedicated to his ideals. This year we hear a lot of talk about change. And sure, there are things I'd like to change. Though maybe a better word is renewal -- because the changes we need must be based on principles that never change. My parents were like yours: They brought me up to understand that mankind's fundamental moral standards were established by Almighty God. They're as natural and unchangeable as the laws of physics. Our common law, our Constitution and our Bill of Rights are firmly rooted in this tradition -- the Judaeo- Christian tradition. Only recently in America have we seen the rise of legal theories and practices that reject our tradition. Cardinal O'Connor eloquently describes this as an "inversion of values. It's a deeply disturbing trend -- and it is diametrically opposed to my idea of the kind of change that's good for our country. 11 Last month on a stage just 12 blocks from here, there was another convention -- very different from this one. Now, I didn't hear any of those speeches. I was up in the mountains fishing -- where the air was clear, not hot. But I understand one of the speakers, known for his florid language, called me "the captain of the ship of state." He didn't mean it as a compliment, but believe me: As a Navy man at a Knights of Columbus convention the term suits me just fine. Whoever is chosen to pilot the ship of state must have a reliable moral compass. 11 Personal responsibility -- among the 3 people and in our leaders -- must be more than just a slogan. It must be embodied in our ideas and actions. Americans will make a choice this year about economic freedom and growth, and about keeping our defenses second to none -- keeping America safe and strong. But the choice is about more than that: It is about renewing our moral strength. Principles don't change from one day to the next. Principles aren't driven by opinion polls. Principles endure. 11 This year, one side offers real change to make America One Nation under God. The other side -- in that convention I spoke of -- wrote a 10,000 word platform -- and never once mentioned the one word that counts the most: God. You can see the differences of philosophy reflected in our policies. As a baseball umpire would put it, "You make the call." Consider our system of welfare. In too many cases, it's not lifting people up, it's holding them down. This system is neither well nor fair. 11 The key to reform: personal responsibility. Now, on the other side of the debate are the interests that want to protect bureaucracy and spending -- even if it means saying no to unwed mothers who want to get married. Even if it means saying no to families on public aid who somehow manage to put money aside in savings. It's time the system started saying yes: Yes to people like Sandra Rosato, who worked and saved money for college because she didn't want to leave a legacy of welfare to her kids. The system 4 said her family couldn't continue to get benefits while she saved money for school. She saved $4,000. I call that amazing. The welfare bureaucrats? They called it fraud. Something is wrong here. That's why I aim to shake up the top-down bureaucratic way of welfare and let our states innovate to reward people like Sandra -- reward work and responsibility. Take education. We know that renewing education depends on giving parents real freedom and real responsibility to choose their kids' schools. The other side tries to posture on the side of parents, but I don't think anyone is fooled. Remember how old Henry Ford used to tell his customers, they can have any color Model T they want -- so long as it's black? Well, the other side says their ideal is that parents could choose any school for their kids -- as long as it's run by the government. 11 My plan is different -- it's called the G.I. Bill for Children. Right now, if parents choose a Catholic school or any other alternative to the public schools, they have to pay twice - - first for tuition and again through taxes. Catholic parents I met in Philadelphia last month made it plain to me: that makes 'if on it hard to exercise your religious freedom. Like the original G.I. Bill, my new bill offers scholarships or vouchers for X befor lawfully operating students to take to any qualified school -- not only public schools, but Bible schools, and yeshivas, and Catholic parish schools Christian if that is what parents want. My plan for education preserves religious freedom. That's 6150) also true of another issue where there's a Grand Canyon of a 5 divide. ((A small boy once began a prayer this way: "God bless mother and daddy, my brother and sister." He continued, "And, oh, God, do take care of yourself, because if anything happens to you, we're all sunk.")) That boy knew why, according to the Gallup Poll, America is the most religious nation on earth. Sadly, one side this year thinks it's fine to give out condoms in school but not to say a prayer. I totally disagree. So today, I again call on Congress to pass a Constitutional Amendment restoring voluntary prayer to our classrooms -- and I challenge my opponent to support me. Let's bring the Faith of our Fathers back to our schools. 11 And there's the issue of a national tragedy: more than a million and a half abortions in this country every year. We know there must be a better way. The other side turns a deaf ear to humane and responsible alternatives -- like adoption; like abstinence. The other side refuses to let the Governor of Pennsylvania present a pro-life view at his own party's convention. The other side is pushing a so-called "Freedom of Choice" bill, which is in fact the most radical abortion-on- demand legislation ever offered. This bill would prevent states from enacting even modest restraints against abortion on demand. It would threaten the autonomy of Catholic hospitals and other private institutions that refuse as a matter of conscience to perform abortions. Suffice it to say: This radical abortion on demand bill will never become law as long as I am President of the United States 6 of America. 11 On each of these issues, the choice is clear. Who do you trust to change America -- to renew timeless values like personal responsibility? Who do you trust: those with the courage to stand for what may not be popular -- but is right? Or the side that talks a good game -- mouths the right rhetoric about values -- but whose record and example make a mockery of their words? Nowhere is this choice more vital than in the decisions a President must make every day to build what I call real peace: the triumph of freedom and democracy, not the mere absence of war. Saint Ignatius said, "Work as though all depended upon yourself, and pray as though all depended on God." The practice of that motto conquered Communism. Ceaseless prayer and tireless work halted the Cold War \ and spared us from the catastrophe of a third World War. Believers behind the Iron Curtain defied persecution; believers in the West defied indifference. Over four decades, our servicemen trained -- our taxpayers paid four trillion dollars -- to keep our defenses strong. And as a consequence, the Iron Curtain is no more -- and our kids no longer face the kind of nuclear threat that used to haunt us. I'll always be grateful for the Knights of Columbus' support on the morality of our strategic deterrence. Because Americans understood the moral stakes in the Cold War, because we persevered -- we're now able to work at building a lasting peace between East and West. We're working with democratic Russia to 7 reduce the arsenals that once threatened to unleash a nuclear war and to cooperate on defenses against ballistic missiles. When we faced our first big challenge after the Cold War, we didn't shrink. We stood up to Saddam Hussein's aggression and expelled him from Kuwait. We protected the people of Israel and Saudi Arabia. Now we've brought age-old adversaries to the peace table for the first time. We've gained the greatest opportunity in centuries to establish peace and stability in the Holy Land. His Holiness, Pope John Paul, has spent many sleepless nights in prayer and endeavor for peace in the Middle East. As long as I am President, I assure you I'll do everything I can to bring about that peace that so many pray for. Respect for life \ for freedom \ for human dignity \ forms the common basis both for peace in the world and for renewal at home. The Knights of Columbus are in the forefront of this effort. In countless ways you help your neighbors: Organizing Scout Troops. Sponsoring that magnificent program, the Special Olympics. Visiting the sick and the elderly. Nourishing minds and souls that hunger for sound values. You bear witness to the fact that real compassion and tolerance cannot abide abandonment of standards of right and wrong. I try to keep that at my core. Whatever the political cost, I intend to do what's right for America. I'll work to protect and renew America -- with a strong national defense, and with a true and steady moral compass. 11 Now that America's moral values -- liberty, honor, personal responsibility -- are 8 victorious around the globe -- why in the world would we abandon them at home? We cannot. As long as I'm President, we will not. Let the other side traffic in values that are trendy and transitory. I'm going to defend the principles for which you stand so firm. We'll keep our sights on what's good in America. We'll keep our focus on the potential in our families and our kids. We'll keep a reliable compass. We'll put our ship of state in finest sailing trim. We'll navigate our way to shining new horizons. 11 Thank you. May God bless you and our beloved country. # # # THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON August 4, 1992 MEMORANDUM FOR PHIL BRADY ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT AND STAFF SECRETARY FROM: LEE S. LIBERMAN ASSOCIATE COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT SUBJECT: Presidential Remarks to the Knights of Columbus New York, New York On page five, last paragraph, after the second sentence, Counsel's Office recommends inserting the following: "moreover, to the supporters of this legislation--which include Al Gore, who has co-sponsored it, and the Governor of Arkansas, who has endorsed it--are so committed to their extreme position that they want to make sure no "weakening" amendments are passed. Weakening amendments, that is, like allowing states to require informed consent from a woman before an abortion is performed on her--or prohibiting abortions obtained merely for reasons of sex selection-or really limiting abortions in the last three months of pregnancy." cc: Dan McGroarty Leigh Ann Metzger A = applause line (Duggan/Bunton) August 4, 1992 Draft Eight Knights.2 PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS NEW YORK MARRIOTT MARQUIS NEW YORK, NEW YORK WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 1992 11:00 a.m Thank you, Virgil Dechant. Your Eminence, Cardinal 'Connor; reverend clergy; ladies and gentlemen: A report came across my desk the other day. It stated that most people in the Western world "felt exceedingly gloomy about the future." It said that "institutions were decaying, well- meaning people were growing cynical." My first thought was: That's what happens when people spend too much time watching the network evening news. 11 laugh line But what I was reading was not a report about Nineteen ninety-two. It was a history of public attitudes in Europe in Fourteen ninety-two! 11 largh line. Public moods are prone to change, of course. We know the gloom of 1492 was not to last for long. It was dispelled by the achievement of a man of humble birth. a man of vision and courage. a man named Christopher Columbus. 11 Columbus opened up a new world of opportunity for the spread of commerce \ culture \ and faith. \ In this 500th anniversary year of his voyage of discovery, I'm honored to meet with a group of Americans dedicated to his ideals. This year we hear a lot of talk about change. And sure, there are things I'd like to change. Though maybe a better word is renewal -- because the changes we need must be based on 2 principles that never change. 11A My parents were like yours: They brought me up to understand that our fundamental moral standards were established by Almighty God. They're as natural and unchangeable as the laws of physics. 11 Our common law, our Constitution and our Bill of Rights are firmly rooted in this Judaeo-Christian tradition. Only recently in America have we seen the rise of legal theories and practices that reject our tradition. Cardinal O'Connor eloquently describes this as an "inversion of values." It's a deeply disturbing trend -- and it is diametrically opposed to my idea of the kind of change that's good for our country. 11 AD Last month just 12 blocks from here, there was another convention -- very different from this one. Now, I didn't hear any of those speeches. I was up in the mountains fishing. But I understand one of the speakers, known for his florid language, called me "the captain of the ship of state.' 11 He didn't mean it as a compliment, but believe me: As a Navy man at a Knights of Columbus convention the term suits me just fine. 11$ That reminds me of a story about Columbus. He wrote in his log that the longer he stayed on course -- the farther he traveled on his mission -- the more he faced threats from crewmen who wanted to throw him overboard and turn the ship around. 11 Let me make you this promise: No matter how rough the going gets, I won't turn around. *11 I'm going to stay on course. All I'm going to finish what I've started. 11 A Whoever is chosen to pilot the ship of state must have a A 3 reliable moral compass. 11 Personal responsibility -- among the people and in our leaders -- must be more than just a slogan. It must be embodied in our ideas and actions. 11# Americans will make a choice this year about economic freedom and growth, and about keeping our defenses second to none -- keeping America safe and strong. But the choice is about more than that: It is about renewing our moral strength. A Every day we hear stories showing the human cost of the breakdown in values. Somewhere in this country every day, an innocent kid gets killed in the crossfire of the drug wars. Just last month we read of an honor student, a kid from a good neighborhood, charged with gun-running. He tried to make his privilege a cover for his lack of responsibility. "It's not like I'm a criminal," he told the police. "I'm on the dean's list." Well, you and I know that the Ten Commandments don't have exclusions for the poor -- or the rich. Principles don't change from one day to the next. \ Principles aren't driven by opinion polls. \ Principles endure. 11$ This year, one side offers real change to renew America as One Nation under God. The other side -- in that convention I spoke of -- wrote a 10,000 word platform -- and never once mentioned the one word that counts the most: God. You can see the differences of philosophy reflected in our policies. As a baseball umpire would put it, "You make the call." Consider our system of welfare. In too many cases, it's not lifting people up, it's holding them down. This system is 4 neither well nor fair The key to reform: personal responsibility. Now, on the other side of the debate are the interests that want to protect bureaucracy and spending -- even if it means saying no to people who want to take responsibility. It's time the system started saying yes: Yes to people like Sandra Rosado, who worked and saved money for college because she didn't want to leave a legacy of welfare to her kids. The system said her family couldn't get benefits while she saved money for school. She saved $4,900. I call that amazing. The bureaucrats called it fraud. Something's wrong here That's why I aim to shake up the old bureaucratic ways and let our states reward people like Sandra -- reward work and responsibility. IM Take education. We know that renewing education depends on giving parents real freedom and real responsibility to choose their kids' schools. The other side tries to posture on the side of parents, but I don't think anyone is fooled. Remember how old Henry Ford used to tell his customers, they can have any color laugh line Model T they want -- so long as it's black? Well, the other side A says their ideal is that parents could choose any school for orglance their kids -- as long as it's run by the government. And A their leader won the teachers union endorsement by saying he's "unalterably opposed" -- those are his words, "unalterably opposed" -- to letting Catholic parents and other private school parents have a fair share of education benefits. 11 My plan is different -- it's called the G.I. Bill for Children. \ Right now, if parents want any alternative to the 5 public schools, they have to pay twice -- first for tuition and again through taxes. As Catholic parents told me in Philadelphia last month: That makes it hard to exercise your religious freedom. Like the original G.I. Bill, my new bill offers scholarships or vouchers for students to take to any qualified school -- not only public schools, but Bible schools, yeshivas, and Catholic parish schools if that is what parents want. My education plan preserves religious freedom. That's also true of another issue where there's a Grand Canyon of a divide. ((A small boy once began a prayer this way: "God bless mother and daddy, my brother and sister. And, God, he said, "do take care of yourself. If anything happens to you, we're all sunk. ")) lough That boy knew why, according to the Gallup Poll, America is the most religious nation on earth. Now, one side thinks it's fine to give out condoms in school but not to say a prayer. I totally disagree. II call again on Congress to pass a constitutional A amendment restoring voluntary prayer to our classrooms. Let's allow the faith of our Fathers back into our schools. And there's a national tragedy: more than a million and a half abortions in this country every year. We know there must be a better way. The other side turns a deaf ear to humane and responsible alternatives -- like adoption; like abstinence. The other side refuses to let the Governor of Pennsylvania present a pro-life view at his own party's convention. The leader of the other side has promised to appoint only judges who would uphold Roe versus Wade -- in other words, an out-and-out litmus test for 6 appointments to the court. The other side is pushing a so- called "Freedom of Choice" bill, which is in fact the most radical abortion-on-demand legislation ever offered. 11 This bill would prevent states from enacting even modest restraints against abortion on demand. It would threaten the autonomy of Catholic hospitals and other private institutions that refuse as a matter of conscience to perform abortions. Suffice it to say: This radical abortion on demand bill will never become law as long as I am President. On each of these issues, the choice is clear. Who do you trust to change America -- to renew timeless values like personal responsibility? Who do you trust: those with the courage to stand for what may not be popular -- but is right? or the side that talks a good game -- mouths the right rhetoric about values -- but whose record and example make a mockery of their words? Nowhere is the choice more vital than in the decisions a President must make every day to build real peace: to establish freedom and democracy, not the mere absence of war. Saint Ignatius said, "Work as though all depended upon yourself, and pray as though all depended on God." The practice of that motto conquered Communism. Ceaseless prayer and tireless work halted the Cold War \ and spared us from the catastrophe of a third World War. Believers behind the Iron Curtain defied persecution; believers in the West defied indifference. Over four decades, our servicemen trained -- our taxpayers paid four trillion dollars -- to keep our defenses strong. And as a 7 consequence, the Iron Curtain is no more -- and our kids no longer face the kind of nuclear threat that used to haunt us. I'll always be grateful for the Knights of Columbus' support on the morality of our strategic deterrence. Because Americans understood the moral stakes in the Cold War, because we persevered -- now we're able to work at building a lasting peace between East and West. We're working with democratic Russia to reduce the arsenals that once threatened to unleash a nuclear war and to cooperate on defenses against ballistic missiles. When we faced our first big challenge after the Cold War, we didn't shrink. We stood up to Saddam's aggression and expelled him from Kuwait We protected the people of Israel and Saudi Arabia. Now we've brought age-old adversaries to the peace table for the first time. We've gained the greatest opportunity in centuries to establish real peace in the Holy Land. His Holiness, Pope John Paul, has spent many days and nights at work and in prayer for peace in the Middle East. As long as I am President, I assure you I'll do everything I can to bring about that peace that so many pray for. Respect for life \ for freedom \ for human dignity \ forms the common basis both for peace in the world and for renewal at home. The Knights of Columbus are in the forefront of this effort. In countless ways you help your neighbors: Organizing Scout troops. Sponsoring the Special Olympics. Visiting the sick. Nourishing minds and souls that hunger for sound values. You bear witness to the fact that real compassion and tolerance 8 cannot abide abandonment of standards of right and wrong. 11 I try to keep that at my core. Whatever the cost, I intend to do what's right for America. DI I'll work to protect and renew America -- with a strong national defense, and with a true and steady moral compass. AT Now that America's moral values -- liberty, honor, personal responsibility -- are victorious around the globe -- why in the world would we abandon them at home? We cannot. As long as I'm President, we will not Let the other side traffic in trendy and transitory moral fashions. I'm going to defend the principles for which you stand so firm. & We'll keep our sights on what's good in America. We'll keep our focus on the potential in our families and our kids. We'll keep a reliable compass. We'll put our ship of state in finest sailing trim. We'll navigate our way to shining new horizons. 11 Thank you. May God bless you and our beloved country. # # # pleadge today Iwillureto ay aboutm 5 school -- not only public schools, but Bible schools, yeshivas, and Catholic parish schools if that is what parents want. 11 My education plan preserves religious freedom. That's also true of another issue where there's a Grand Canyon of a divide. ((A small boy once began a prayer this way: "God bless mother and daddy, my brother and sister. And, God," he said, "do take care of yourself. If anything happens to you, we're all sunk. ) That boy knew why, according to the recnt Gallup Poll, America is remains the the mart most havent religious nation on earth. Now, theothr one side thinks it's fine okay - wallower Kill to pitthels to give out condoms in school but not to say a prayer. I totally. huch disagree. I call again on Congress to pass a constitutional togethorin stoud to I have amendment restoring voluntary prayer to our classrooms. Let's allow the faith of our Fathers back into our schools. 11 And there's a national tragedy: more than a million and a half abortions in this country every year. We know there must be a better way. 11 The other side turns a deaf ear to humane and responsible alternatives -- like adoption; like abstinence. The hear you 10/10 other side refuses to let the Governor of Pennsylvania present a acm post, pro life view at his own party's convention. The other side is caseon, pushing a so-called "Freedom of Choice" bill, which is in fact the most radical abortion on demand legislation ever offered. Ipramise Card today This bill would prevent states from enacting even modest above- restraints against abortion on demand It would threaten the autonomy of Catholic hospitals and other private institutions on legition that refuse as a matter of conscience to perform abortions. Suffice it to say: This radical abortion on démand bill will dan'tyou think you The Ahu Lide talks ofa "Agn Count but Does 14 you wey they I u gree- them, 5 might have tand roam ih Huh 10,000 work plattorm for B but Tethers- -0-0-0-0." Av you look at there fall issued, there a patter emerger. Both sides talk about al waker like perality reportibility, butanly cae side her the cookse to take estails 6 never become law as long as I am President. 11 Onceach of these issues, the choice is clear. Who do you trust to change America to renew timeless values like personal bility? Who do you trust: those with the courage to stand for what may not be popular -- but is right? Or the side that talks a good game -- mouths the right rhetoric about values Her the vacifico -- but whose record and example make a mockery of their words? Nowhere is the choice more vital than in the decisions a President must make every day to build real peace: to establish freedom and democracy, not the mere absence of war. Saint Ignatius said, "Work as though all depended upon yourself, and pray as though all depended on God." The practice of that motto conquered Communism. Ceaseless prayer and tireless work halted the Cold War \ and spared us from the catastrophe of a third World War. Believers behind the Iron Curtain defied persecution; believers in the West defied indifference. Over four decades, our servicemen trained -- our taxpayers paid four trillion dollars -- to keep our defenses strong. And as a consequence, the Iron Curtain is no more -- and our kids no longer face the kind of nuclear threat that used to haunt us. I'll 11 always be grateful for the Knights of Columbus! support on the morality of our strategic deterrence. Because Americans understood the moral stakes in the Cold War, because we persevered -- now we're able to work at building a lasting peace between East and West. We're working with democratic Russia to reduce the arsenals that once threatened to unleash a nuclear war Taday I ray to the America Aeceple, when it comer the to resulted Metary idea Gatuer like peronal responsibility why choose sythe a Wha yau can hure 100 yo corrective cultur? 7 and to cooperate on defenses against ballistic missiles. When we faced our first big challenge after the Cold War, we didn't shrink. We stood up to Saddam's aggression and expelled him from Kuwait. We protected the people of Israel and Saudi Arabia. Now we've brought age-old adversaries to the peace table for the first time. We've gained the greatest opportunity in centuries to establish real peace in the Holy Land. His Holiness, Pope John Paul, has spent many days and nights at work and in prayer for peace in the Middle East. As long as I am President, I assure you I'll do everything I can to bring about that peace that so many pray for. 11 Respect for life \ for freedom \ for human dignity \ forms the common basis both for peace in the world and for renewal at home. The Knights of Columbus are in the forefront of this effort. In countless ways you help your neighbors: Organizing Scout troops. Sponsoring the Special Olympics. Visiting the sick. Nourishing minds and souls that hunger for sound values. You bear witness to the fact that real compassion and tolerance cannot abide abandonment of standards of right and wrong. 11 I try to keep that at my core. Whatever the cost, I intend to do what's right for America. I'll work to protect and renew America -- with a strong national defense, and with a true and steady moral compass. 11 Now that America's moral values -- liberty, honor, personal responsibility -- are victorious around the globe -- why in the world would we abandon them at home? We cannot. As long as I'm President, we will not. Let the 8 other side traffic in trendy and transitory moral fashions. I'm going to defend the principles for which you stand so firm. We'll keep our sights on what's good in America. We'll keep our focus on the potential in our families and our kids. We'll keep a reliable compass. We'll put our ship of state in finest sailing trim. We'll navigate our way to shining new horizons. 11 Thank you. May God bless you and our beloved country. # # # B-Q '92 F histan THE DAILY LINE for Republican Newsmakers Talking Points Tuesday, August 4, 1992 "CLINTON'S HEALTH PLAN: A BITTER TAX TO SWALLOW" Today: President Bush meets with Republican Senators on Capitol If Americans wanted long lines and revolving-door health care, we'd Hill, where he will push for passage of his health care reform put doctors to work down at the Department of Motor Vehicles. package and to discuss Bill Clinton's costly "pay-or-play" proposal - The Canadian system, typical of a government-run national health - a proposal for government-run health care. To pay for "pay or care system, creates waiting lists and long lines for needed care play", a hidden seven percent payroll tax will be required. This tax it takes an average six months to get a coronary bypass, 3.5 will throw 700,000 Americans out of work and slash the average months to get a tonsillectomy and 6 to 10 months to get a hip working American's taxes wages by at least $1,700 a year. replacement in some parts of Canada. If Bill Clinton wants to raise taxes to pay for nationalized medicine, Americans don't want to have the government placed between he should admit it. Americans are entitled to quality care at an themselves and their doctors. We need common sense, affordable price - without having to suffer a tax increase to pay for comprehensive health care reform and we need to start on it right it. Having raised taxes and fees 128 times in Arkansas, Bill Clinton now. Unlike the Democrats' proposals, President Bush's now wants to apply his taxing philosophy to the nation's health. comprehensive health care plan has no government mandates, no tax increases, no government takeover of the health insurance Not even the New York Times likes the Clinton plan. "[Bill Clinton] industry, no health care rationing system, no waiting lists for critical has offered little more than vague pieties Mr. Clinton has evaded health care, and no government price-setting in the private sector. tough choices. He's for universal coverage, but doesn't say how to pay for it or how to contain health care costs." (The New York Some say nationalized health care would serve everyone. Sure, it Times, Week in Review, August 2, 1992) would like a restaurant that serves bad food but in very generous proportions. THE BUSH PLAN THE CLINTON PLAN President Bush's health care plan expands health care coverage, Bill Clinton's health care "tax everyone" plan will: controls costs, and improves quality -- without raising taxes. Raise taxes by $80 billion, increase spending by almost $200 Bush's plan will: billion over four years. Provide secure coverage to all Americans, including workers Increase each American worker's taxes an average of $1,700 between jobs and those Americans who can least afford it. a year. For many workers, it will be even more expensive. Cut rising health care costs by reducing red tape; limiting out- Throw 700,000 Americans out of work, and put 9 million more of-control malpractice suits; and allowing small businesses to jobs at risk. pool resources and bargain for less expensive insurance. Limit Americans' ability to choose their own doctors and Allow individuals -- not federal bureaucrats - to choose their involve faceless bureaucrats in this very personal decision. own doctors.