Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
323152808
label
Global Warming / Greenhouse 2/5/90 [OA 8312] [2]
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
323152808
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
98626f8cd4d160ce
ocrText
Originally Processed With FOIA(s): FOIA Number: S S FOIA MARKER This is not a textual record. This is used as an administrative marker by the George Bush Presidential Library Staff. Record Group/Collection: George H.W. Bush Presidential Records Collection/Office of Origin: Speechwriting, White House Office of Series: Speech File Backup Files Subseries: Chron File, 1989-1993 OA/ID Number: 13704 Folder ID Number: 13704-006 Folder Title: Global Warming / Greenhouse 2/5/90 [OA 8312] [2] Stack: Row: Section: Shelf: Position: G 26 19 6 3 all think its impropropriate- - want White House Sci /econ cont. Vacanty re-injute nego. ression Watkins Deilly Browby Zoellich will meet ervico cold was - No. 77 nations there in ANY-POYENTIAL POSSIBLE CHANATE CHANGE Boomby look understanding major the prob. our babrobip # spent research. Monitory systems. - our support of IPCC seiterate to Baker date (stress continuity) '91 budget- adding itall if 71 bit severb alone tech dev. the we serious. do, we do well. falamed 1st Besain up front - vital prior: infort. aggressibelly the get scurice if right and objective V do that which we coupt to do anyway WADKINS: F andre waknown than known - ocean as a sink NoRegets strategy Mo confort in think ill take with the # were smerting up the commits were walking notbe be to a policy that hunger. Prosp away panart to Carth Ar. Tolba - mention Icl'm confident that the IPCC will continue to fore bodeship G. Joy No 3 dim. I-din wolds where is Seing analyzed. 2 A 3 din models misropate: CO2 atop s H2O offily look cloud. - ratter than commit to: low-proble, high cost exat The - action their I own right. we policia whore leas excerd conty, don't concele on disapter person old an enviro, of uncertainty, do that which you how has posting effects the no We Can go as for an Tratcher on policy, but don't frame, f u/ assump. of warming. - get Lipt of countries [G7, [G 7, China Brayil Austalia, to attend corpreace EC, OECD, Algeria cladri USE April 18, 19th here Mexico dto Agrida? selond, Boslon, Browly: Tom Supr- econ. & surro. aren't distinct 1 a false distraction On global anyothe envire issue, too much put an end to enviro. collower waltet effort of lost time. State: strong statement reattiving Posting it Aon't refer to trading emispions formits @3PM IPCC -we need to address : P - Reaffirm leadership on int'l env. issues - commitment to lead efforts we want past: orlyloak Future: Holinwire sound Malta Phoposal - -World Bank projects - -AID; Peacecorps , "Env. President's Jackson after CAA. Pending: Clean Air legis. Su HallGrady CONTACTS FOR IPCC SPEECH State Department: Dan Reifsnyder 647-4069 Chris Dawson 647-3638 Granville Sewell 647-9832 ROD Fairweather Domestic Policy Council: OMB -Enviro. X 6827 Dr. Bromley Dr. Maynard X 6202 EPA if Int'l Div: Dr. Hecht 382-4870 Barry McBee X6437 Robert DOE mathicr kins Exec asot cabinet Affairs THE Barrie Braddewis Steve Olson WH Science office (717) 397 3768 (Browleys) X final rpt = 1ˢᵗ Assessment rpt. not final fall wf for fr. H. 0 on Climate Control Georgetown University OFFICE OF PRESIDENTIAL ADVANCE IN-TOWN EVENT CONTACT SHEET Name Office Phone Number Presidential Advance 456-7565 Presidential Advance Office Fax Number 456-2820 Lucy muckerman W.H. advance 456-7565 LISA waller WH Advance head 523-8271 wonk Carolyn Cawley WH Speechwriting 456-7750 800 BARRY MCBEE WH - (ABIHES AFFAIRS 456.2 Willie Cheatham USSS/TSD 395-6396 BRUCE E. CAUGHMAN W.H. MILITARY OFFICE 456-2150 Bill Hilton WH Comm unications 395-6310 MIKE BARTHOLF Gu TRANPORTATION DEPT 687-3952 Thomas Snead State Dept 6471561 MARY Shomon WAlcoff Assoc. 684-5588 OES Janet Gale I' "Heevren Project Mgr WalerHy Dept Assoc. of State 647-3508 684.5588 Jane Daly Seaberg Georgetown PK 687-4327 ENdre L. WILSOM Georgetacy Publicipty 687-4343 CARL VANDONEN HIBLT Cont.Cra. 687-3275 Paul Davies Hotel idonference Ctr, Sales' Catering 687-3241 Bharles Briscoe Secnet Service Lead Adv. 395 4112 Mike Muscrave Mike Musgrave Daylas Bunmingham Secret Service 395-6340 11 11 NW70 6345100 ANDREW GARLIKOV W.H. Adance 456-7565 only for Venue for "fr.cow. on climate 1stneg. session toward ) who - the unga ? least pref. like montreal UNEP &WMO = vehicle exp. mandate of IPRC from study form 2 MAN.1 8 1990 MEMORANDUM TO: Dr. D. Allan Bromley DR. MAUNAED Assistant to the President FROM: Admiral James D. Watkins D. wark. Secretary of Energy William K. Reilly Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency SUBJECT: Presidential Speech to the IPCC The meeting of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change during the first week of February offers the President an important opportunity to reaffirm his leadership on international environmental issues. Attached is the outline of a speech that he might give (Tab A). We believe that it is a positive statement of: (1) his concern for the environment in general and about global warming in particular, (2) his commitment to lead international efforts in these areas, (3) the significant U.S. efforts to fulfill this commitment and (4) U.S. support for the IPCC as the proper forum for addressing the climate change issue. We also believe that the statement is fully consistent with existing Administration policy. Also attached is an issue paper outlining options for carrying forward and expanding in the IPCC the cost and economic impact analysis of measures to limit greenhouse gas emissions (TAB B). Although not linked to the speech, the issue needs to be carefully considered. Such work must be continued in the IPCC or the international debate will continue to be based more on bold rhetoric than solid information. We have shared this outline with the State Department and believe it is, in essence, supported by them. We would like to explore these ideas with you and our colleagues in the rest of the Administration. To this end, we would appreciate your circulating these documents in preparation for a discussion which you might lead. We would welcome your advice on how to move the inter-agency review process forward expeditiously given that the date of the speech is fast approaching. Attachments cc: Frederick M. Bernthal, Assistant Secretary, Oceans & International Environmental & Scientific Affairs Bureau, Department of State TAB A 3 Proposal for Presidential Speech before the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Control (IPCC) 1. General statement of commitment to and concern for the global environment and economic development. -- Reiterate determination that the President will take active role in addressing concern about global climate change. Reiterate Secretary Baker's approach (spelled out in January 1989). -- Reiterate Noordwijk commitment to greenhouse gas stabilization as soon as possible, consistent with the requirement for global economic growth that can enhance the quality of life for people everywhere. -- Stress strong U.S. commitment to environment; e.g., domestic programs, leadership in forging international agreements on environment, assistance to and cooperative efforts with developing countries and current or former centrally planned economies. 2. U.S. Supports the IPCC Process -- Stress need for international cooperation. Congratulations to IPCC sponsors, the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and to Dr. Bolin of Sweden, IPCC Chairman. -- Establishment of the IPCC has filled the need for an orderly, intergovernmental process to assess scientific understanding, evaluate potential impacts and develop appropriate response options. Welcome IPCC reports due in August. U.S. is committed to playing a leadership role through our chairmanship of the Response Strategies Working Group (RWSG) and supporting IPCC as best forum for global climate change policy development. -- Support for UK proposal at UN to continue IPCC. ? 0 4 3. Past and Ongoing U.S. Contributions and Views on Key Issues of Convention and EmissionseLimiting Agreements Science o U.S. budget is the largest in the world and is rising, nearly $500 million in FY 1990 and to increase to almost $1 billion in FY 1991. o Importance of all countries, no matter what their level of development or economic system, contributing to understanding of the science. This cooperation needs to take several forms: - cooperation in assessment of state of the science; and - cooperation in monitoring and analysis of climate change. o Periodic international reassessment of the science at fixed intervals to aid in our decision making. -- Technology Development o U.S. has active technology development programs to improve the efficiency of both supply and demand side technologies, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. - More efficient fossil fuel generation technologies. - Renewable and energy efficiency technology initiative. - Conservation technology: end-use efficiency - Nuclear: new generation with enhanced safety features under development. o Any framework convention should provide for regular assessments of the state of technology development to determine the availability and des of technologies. 2 -- U.S. is sensitive to the need for technology transfer to other countries. Clean coal, renewable, conservation, end-use services for technology transfer, and nuclear. 0 A.I.D. appropriation bill. * EPA/Peace Corps agreement. X Change in World Bank policy. to EPA's IETTAB and DOE's CORECT program to examine X technology transfer. o Policy aid package. Economics Follow-up on Administration commitment to develop real data on costs of various response strategies and assess new response measures. Challenge others to do the same. Offer technical support to those who need it. -- Policy President should encourage consideration of truly innovative responses including: - comprehensive approach: all major greenhouse gases are included; and trading of emission permits. President should define general criteria for future agreements to limit greenhouse gas emissions: market mechanisms such as "integrated resource" planning and consistency with economic growth in all countries; and 3 1 need to work with industry to ensure that response actions do not adversely affect economic growth around the world. -- U.S. Clean Air Act Legislation Encourages emissions trading. Use of efficiency energy supplies; e.g., new clean coal technology and conservation technologies. -- National Energy Strategy Comprehensive blueprint for addressing future energy needs with consideration to climate change and other environmental issues. As first step, take those steps which contribute to other goals, but also reduce greenhouse gas emissions; e.g., clean coal technology, DOE conservation programs. My Energy efficiency programs: lighting, appliance efficiency standards, model building codes, industrial process improvement, encouraging utilities to provide the service of electricity demand reduction, transportation research and development, etc. -- Alternative energy sources are being developed. Renewables: hydro, solar, biomass, geothermal. Nuclear: new reactor design. Reforestation: Trees for U.S. -- Phase-out of CFCs by 2000 providing safe substitutes are available. o U.S. contribution to: development of safe substitutes, assessments of needs by other countries. 4. Reiterate Malta Offer to Host Convention Negotiations when IPCC is Ready --- Express commitment to finding global solutions. 4 7 Demonstrate U.S. williagness to facilitate the process. To further the debate, U.S. will host international environmental meeting composed of senior science, economics and environmental officials from all nations. Happening on 5 TAB B Issue: How to carry forward and expand in the IPCC the cost and emissions? economic impact analysis of measures to limit greenhouse gas Discussion: The IPCC's Response Strategies Working Group (RSWG) must conclude its work in the next couple of months for its report to be written on schedule. Consequently much of the cost and economic analysis that is beginning to emerge will not be included in the report. Without an ongoing analytical effort, the international discussion of emission targets and timetables will be dominated by the countries who are prepared to make substantial political commitments without much information on how they will fulfill those commitments. To move the debate over commitments to limit greenhouse gas emissions away from bold rhetoric to a realistic assessment of what is possible over different timeframes, the IPCC's work on cost and economic impact analysis must be continued and expanded. Furthermore, because targets and timetables, especially for co₂ are likely to be a major focus of attention at the fourth IPCC plenary next August and at the Second World Climate Conference (SWCC) next October-November, a means must be found for an ongoing effort over the next 5-7 months. There are three major options for proceeding. The first is to request individual countries such as the U.S., Japan and the FRG to conduct studies and continue to provide results to the IPCC even after the conclusion of the RSWG's report. A second is to instruct the RSWG's Energy and Industry Subgroup (EIS) led by Japan to continue its analyses beyond the Spring and prepare a supplemental report. The third is for the U.S. to offer to lead, under the auspices of the RSWG and perhaps in collaboration with EIS, a special effort and produce a supplemental report in time for the fourth IPCC plenary. The latter option might entail a significant commitment of resources but may be most likely to result in substantive output. The latter option also offers the possibility of bringing a number of developing countries more fully into the process, because of a cooperative project already underway in ten developing countries. Position: The U.S. should promote an ongoing effort to analyze the costs and economic impacts of & variety of targets and timetables for limiting greenhouse gas emissions. This should include the production of a supplemental report for consideration by the fourth IPCC plenary. The U.S. should favor a leadership role for EIS but be prepared to offer to lead the effort if discussions at the February IPCC meeting suggest it would be necessary to ensure meaningful output. 1 United States Department of State Washington, D.C. 20520 POLICY PLANNING STAFF FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date Sent: 1/23/90 Number of Pages: 10 (Excluding Cover Sheet) Time Sent: 9:35am S/P FAX #: 202-647-0753 Verification #: 202-647-1965 TO: NAME AGENCY PHONE # FAX. # Carolyn Cawley WH 456-7750 456-6218 FROM: Chris Dawson PHONE #: 647-3638 SUBJECT: President's Speech Before IPCC COMMENTS: United States Department of State Policy Planning Staff Carolyn, EPA has included all the comments I gave them. I know Secretary Baker believes it is particularly important to reiterate explicitly the points he made in his January, 1989, speech (I've attached a copy for your use). J. look forward to working with you on this. Chais Dansan 647 * 3638 P.3 BRITISH INFORMATION SERVICES POLICY STATEMENT FRIDAY 10 NOVEMBER, 1989 57/89 THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT The Prime Minister, The Rt. Hon. Margaret Thatcher, FRS, MP, addressed the 44th Session of the United Nations General Assembly on 8 November, 1989. The full text is attached. The main points of the Prime Minister's address are as follows: Britain is to establish a Centre for Climate Change Prediction. The Centre's objective will be to produce the best possible predictions of future climate change as a basis for developing policies to control the green- house effect, building on the established base of modelling and scientific expertise in the United Kingdom. The most pressing task facing the international community is the negotiation of a framework Convention on climate change - a "good conduct guide" for all nations. Such a convention would be modelled in the Vienna Convention of 1985 and the Montreal Protocol of 1987 and should be ready in time for the World Conference on Environment and Development in 1992. A further global convention on the conservation of animal and plant life is urgently needed. Between 3 and 50 species are being lost each day and the international community must act together to conserve this precious heritage. The British Government is to commit a further £100 million ($160 million) in bilateral aid to tropical forestry activity over the next three years. The funds will be used to support projects aimed at reducing deforestation, promoting afforestation and better manage- ment of existing tropical forests. MJH:1h A1/3/6; B5; EEC; F3/13; G3/1/6/7; G7/1/2/3/4/5; P1/3/9/10/11/13/18; PSp2; PSp9. 845 Third Avenue, New York, N.Y., 10022, Telephone: (212) 752-8400 This material is prepared, edited, issued or circulated by British Information Services, 845 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10022, which is registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act as an agent of the British Government. This material is filed with the Department of Justice where the required registration statement is available for public inspection. Registration does not indicate approval of the contents of this material by the United States Government. THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT Mr President, it gives me great pleasure to return to the podium of this assembly. When I last spoke here four years ago, on the 40th anniversary of the United Nations, the message that I and others like me gave was one of encouragement to the organisation to play the great role allotted to it. Of all the challenges faced by the world community in those four years, one has grown clearer than any other in both urgency and importance; I refer to the threat to our global environment. I shall take the opportunity of addressing the General Assembly to speak on that subject alone. INTRODUCTION During his historic voyage through the South Seas on the Beagle, Charles Darwin landed one November morning in 1835 on the shore of Western Tahiti. After breakfast he climbed a nearby hill to find a vantage point to survey the surrounding Pacific. The sight seemed to him like "a framed engraving", with blue sky, blue lagoon, and white breakers crashing against the encircling coral reef. As he looked out from that hillside, he began to form his theory of the evolution of coral. One hundred and fifty four years after Darwin's visit to Tahiti we have added little to what he discovered then. What if Charles Darwin had been able, not just to climb a foothill, but to soar through the heavens in one of the orbiting space shuttles? What would he have learned as he surveyed our planet from that altitude? From a moon's eye view of that strange and beautiful anomaly in our solar system that is the earth? Of course, we have learned much detail about our environment as we have looked back at it from space, but nothing has made a more profound impact on us than these two facts. First, as the British scientist Fred Hoyle wrote long before space travel was a reality, he said: "Once a photograph of the Earth taken from the outside is available a new idea as powerful as any other in history will be let loose". That powerful idea is the recognition of our shared inheritance on this planet. We know more clearly than ever before that we carry common burdens, face common problems, and must respond with common action. Second, as we travel through space, as we pass one dead planet after another, we look back on our Earth, a speck of life in an infinite void. It is life itself, incomparably precious, that distinguishes us from the other planets. It is life itself - human life, the innumerable species of our planet - that we wantonly destroy. It is life itself that we must battle to preserve. For over 40 years, that has been the main task of this United Nations. To bring peace where there was war; comfort where there was misery; life where there was death. The struggle has not always been successful. There have been years of failure. But recent events have brought the promise of a new dawn, of new hope. Relations between the Western nations and the Soviet Union and her allies, long frozen in suspicion and hostility, have begun to thaw. In Europe, this year, - 2 - freedom has been on the march. In Southern Africa, Namibia and Angola, the United Nations has succeeded in holding out better prospects for an end to war and for the beginning of prosperity. And in South East Asia, too, we can dare to hope for the restoration of peace after decades of fighting. While the conventional, political dangers - the threat of global annihilation, the fact of regional war - appear to be receding, we have all recently become aware of another insidious danger. It is as menacing in its way as those more accustomed perils with which international diplomacy has concerned itself for centuries. It is the prospect of irretrievable damage to the atmosphere, to the oceans, to earth itself. of course major changes in the earth's climate and the environment have taken place in earlier centuries when the world's population was a fraction of its present size. The causes are to be found in nature itself: changes in the earth's orbit, changes in the amount of radiation given off by the sun, the consequential effects on the plankton in the ocean, and in volcanic processes. All these we can observe and some we may be able to predict. But we do not have the power to prevent or control them. What we are now doing to the world, by degrading the land surfaces, by polluting the waters and by adding greenhouse gases to the air at an unprecedented rate - all this is new in the experience of the earth. It is mankind and his activities which are changing the environment of our planet in damaging and dangerous ways. We can find examples in the past. Indeed we may well conclude that it was the silting up of the river Euphrates which drove man out of the Garden of Eden. We also have the example of the tragedy of Easter Island, where people arrived by boat to find a primeval forest. In time the population increased to over 9,000 souls and the demand placed upon the environment resulted in its eventual destruction as people cut down the trees. This in turn led to warfare over the scarce remaining resources and the population crashed to a few hundred people without even enough wood to make boats to escape. The difference now is in the scale of the damage we are doing. mhofus We are seeing a vast increase in the amount of carbon dioxide reaching the atmosphere. The annual increase is three billion tonnes and half the carbon emitted since the industrial revolution still remains in the atmosphere. At the same time as this is happening, we are seeing the destruction on a vast scale of tropical forests which onle are uniquely able to remove carbon dioxide from the air. Every year an area of forest equal to the whole surface of the United Kingdom is destroyed. At present rates of clearance we shall, by the year 2000, have removed 65 per cent of forest in the humid tropical zones. The consequences of this become clearer when one remembers that tropical forests fix more than ten times as much carbon as do forests in the temperate zones. We now know, too, that great damage is being done to the ozone layer by the production of halogens and chlorofluoro-carbons. But at - 3 - least we have recognised that reducing and eventually stopping the emission of CFCs is one positive thing we can do about the menacing accumulation of greenhouse gases. It is of course true that none of us would be here but for the greenhouse effect. It gives us the moist atmosphere which sustains life on earth. We need the greenhouse effect - but only in the right proportions. More than anything, our environment is threatened by the sheer numbers of people and the plants and animals which go with them. When I was born the world's population was some 2 billion people. My grandson will grow up in a world of more than 6 billion people. Put in its bluntest form: the main threat to our environment is more and more people, and their activities: the land they cultivate ever more intensively; the forests they cut down and burn; the mountain sides they lay bare; the fossil fuels they burn; the rivers and seas they pollute. The result is that the change in future is likely to be more fundamental and more widespread than anything we have known hitherto. Change to the sea around us, change to the atmosphere above, leading in turn to change in the world's climate, which could alter the way we live in the most fundamental way of all. That prospect is a new factor in human affairs. It is comparable in its implications to the discovery of how to split the atom. Indeed, its results could be even more far-reaching. THE LATEST SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE. We are constantly learning more about these changes affecting our environment, and scientists from the Polar Institute in Cambridge and the British Antarctic Survey have been at the leading edge of research in both the Arctic and the Antarctic, warning us of the greater dangers that lie ahead. Let me quote from a letter that I received only two weeks ago, from a British scientist* on board a ship in the Antarctic Ocean. He wrote: "In the polar regions today, we are seeing what may be early signs of man-induced climatic change. Data coming in from Halley Bay and from instruments aboard the ship on which I am sailing show that we are entering a spring ozone depletion which is as deep as, if not deeper, than the depletion in the worst year to date. It completely reverses the recovery observed in 1988. The lowest recording aboard this ship is only 150 Dobson units for ozone total content during September, compared with 300 for the same season in a normal year". That of course is a very severe depletion. He also reports on a significant thinning of the sea ice. He writes that, in the Antarctic, "our data confirm that the first-year ice, which forms the bulk of sea ice cover, is remarkably thin and so is probably unable to sustain significant atmospheric warming without melting. Sea ice", he continues, "separates the ocean from the atmosphere over an area of more then 30 million square kilometres. It reflects most of the solar radiation falling on it, * Dr. Peter Wadhams. - 4 - helping to cool the earth's surface. If this area were reduced, the warming of earth would be accelerated due to the extra absorption of radiation by the ocean. The lesson of these Polar processes", he goes on, "is that an environmental or climatic change produced by man may take on a self-sustaining or 'runaway' quality ... and may be irreversible". That is from the scientists who are doing work on the ship that is at present considering these matters. These are sobering indications of what may happen and they led my correspondent to put forward the interesting idea of a World Polar Watch, amongst other initiatives which will observe the world's climate system and allow us to understand how it works. We also have new scientific evidence from an entirely different area, the Tropical Forests. Through their capacity to evaporate vast volumes of water vapour, and of gases and particles which assist the formation of clouds, the forests serve to keep their regions cool and moist by weaving a sunshade of white reflecting clouds and by bringing the rain that sustains them. A recent study by our British Meteorological Office on The Amazon Rainforest shows that large-scale deforestation may reduce rainfall and thus affect the climate directly. Past experience shows us that without trees there is no rain, and without rain there are no trees. The Scope for International Action. Mr President, the evidence is there. The damage is being done. What do we, the international community, do about it? In some areas, the action required is primarily for individual nations or groups of nations to take. I am thinking of action to deal with the pollution of rivers and many of us now see the fish back in rivers from which they had disappeared. I am thinking of action to improve agriculture methods good husbandry which ploughs back nourishment to the soil rather than the cut-and-burn which has damaged and degraded so much land in some parts of the world. I am thinking of the use of nuclear power which despite the attitude of so-called greens - is the most environmentally safe form of energy. But the problem of global climate change is one that affects us all and action will only be effective if it is taken at the international level. It is no good squabbling over who is responsible or who should pay. Whole areas of our planet could be subject to drought and starvation if the pattern of rains and monsoons were to change as a result of the destruction of forests and the accumulation of greenhouse gases. We have to look forward not backward. We shall only succeed in dealing with the problems through a vast international, co-operative effort. Before we act, we need the best possible scientific assessment, otherwise we risk making matters worse. We must use science to cast a light ahead, so that we can move step by step in the right direction. The United Kingdom has agreed to take on the task of co-ordinating such an assessment within the inter-government panel on climate change, an assessment which will be available to everyone by the time - 5 - of the second world climate conference next year. But that will take us only so far. The report will not be able to tell us where the hurricanes will be striking, who will be flooded, or how often and severe the droughts will be. Yet we will need to know these things if we are to adapt to future climate change. That means we must expand our capacity to model and predict climate change. We can test our skills and methods by seeing whether they would have successfully predicted past climate change for which historical records exist. Britain has some of the leading experts in this field and I am pleased to be able to tell you that the United Kingdom will be establishing a new centre for the prediction of climate change, which will lead the effort to improve our prophetic capacity. It will also provide the advanced computing facilities that scientists need. And it will be open to experts from all over the world, especially from the developing countries, who can come to the United Kingdom and contribute to this vital work. But as well as the science, we need to get the economics right. That means first we must have continued economic growth in order to generate the wealth required to pay for the protection of the environment. But it must be growth which does not plunder the planet today and leave our children to deal with the consequences tomorrow. Second, we must resist the simplistic tendency to blame modern multinational industry for the damage which is being done to the environment. Far from being the villains, it is on them that we rely to do the research and find the solutions. It is industry which will develop safe alternative chemicals for refrigerators and air-conditioning. It is industry which will devise bio-degradable plastics. It is industry which will find the means to treat pollutants and make nuclear waste safe - and many companies, as you know, already have massive research programmes. The multinationals have to take the long view. There will be no profit or satisfaction for anyone if pollution continues to destroy our planet. As people's consciousness of environmental needs rises, they are turning increasingly to ozone-friendly and other environmentally safe BALANCE products. The market itself acts as a corrective: the new products sell and those which caused environmental damage are disappearing from our shelves. By making these new products widely available, industry will make it possible for developing countries to avoid many of the mistakes which we older industrialised countries have made. We should always remember that free markets are a means to an end. They would defeat their object if by their output they did more damage to the quality of life through pollution than the well-being they achieve by the production of goods and services. On the basis then of sound science and sound economics, we need to build a strong framework for international action. It is not new institutions that we need. Rather we need to strengthen and improve those which already exist; in particular, the World Meteorological Organisation and The United Nations Environment Programme. The United - 6 - Kingdom has recently more than doubled its contribution to UNEP. We urge others, who have not done so and who can afford it, to do the same, and the central organs of the United Nations, like this General Assembly, must also be seized of a problem which reaches into virtually all aspects of their work and will do so still more in the future. The most pressing task which faces us at the international level is to negotiate a framework convention on climate change - a sort of good conduct guide for all nations. Fortunately we have a model in the action already taken to protect the ozone layer. The Vienna Convention in 1985 and the Montreal Protocol in 1987 established landmarks in international law. They aimed to prevent rather than just cure a global environmental problem. I believe we should aim to have a convention on global climate change ready by the time the World Conference on Environment and Development meets in 1992. That will be among the most important conferences the United Nations has ever held. I hope that we shall accept a responsibility to meet this timetable. The 1992 conference is indeed already being discussed among many countries in many places. I draw particular attention to the very valuable discussion that members of the Commonwealth had under the Prime Minister of Malaysia's chairmanship at our recent Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting in Kuala Lumpur. But a framework is not enough. It will need to be filled out with specific undertakings, or protocols in diplomatic language, on the different aspects of climate change. These protocols must be binding and there must be effective regimes to supervise and monitor their application. Otherwise those nations which accept and abide by environmental agreements, thus adding to their industrial costs, will lose out competitively to those who do not. The negotiation of some of these protocols will undoubtedly be difficult, and no issue will be more contentious than the need to control emissions of carbon dioxide, the major contributor - apart from water vapour - to the greenhouse effect. We can't just do nothing. But the measures we take must be based on sound scientific analysis of the effect of the different gases and the ways in which these can be reduced. In the past there has been a tendency to solve one problem at the expense of making others worse. The United Kingdom therefore, proposes that we prolong the role of the inter-governmental panel on climate change after it submits its report next year, so that it can provide an authoritative scientific base for the negotiation of this and other protocols. We can then agree to targets to reduce the greenhouse gases, and how much individual countries should contribute to their achievement. We think it important that this should be done in a way which enables all our economies to continue to grow and develop. We agreed yesterday at the Dutch Ministerial Conference on Climate Change that the Inter-Governmental Panel would examine the basis on which carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases would be stabilized. The challenge for our negotiators on matters like this is as great as for any disarmament treaty. The intergovernmental panel's work must remain on target, and we must not allow ourselves to be diverted into fruitless and divisive arguments. Time is too short for that. - 7 - Before leaving the area where international action is needed, I would make a plea for a further global convention, one to conserve the infinite variety of species - of plant and animal life - which inhabit our planet. The tropical forests contain a half of the species in the world, so their disappearance is doubly damaging. It is astonishing but true that our civilisation, whose imagination has reached the boundaries of the universe, does not know, to within a factor of ten, how many species the earth supports. What we do know is that we are losing them at a reckless rate - between three and fifty each day on some estimates - species which could perhaps be helping us to advance the frontiers of medical science. We should act together to conserve this precious heritage. Britain's Contribution Every nation will need to make its contribution to the world effort. So I want to tell you how Britain intends to contribute, either by improving our own national performance in protecting the environment, or through the help that we give to others. And I shall tell you under four headings. First, we shall be introducing over the coming months a comprehensive system of pollution control to deal with all kinds of industrial pollution whether to air, water or land. We are encouraging British industry to develop new technologies to clean up the environment and minimise the amount of waste it produces, and we aim to recycle fifty per cent of our household waste by the end of the century. Secondly, we shall be drawing up over the coming year our own environmental agenda for the decade ahead. That will cover energy, transport, agriculture, industry - everything which affects the environment. With regard to energy, we already have a 2 billion pounds sterling programme of improvements to reduce acid rain emissions from our power stations. We shall be looking more closely at the role of non-fossil fuel sources, including nuclear, in generating energy, and our latest legislation requires companies which supply electricity positively to promote energy efficiency. On transport, we shall look for ways to strengthen controls over vehicle emissions and to develop the lean-burn engine which offers a far better long term solution than the three-way catalyst, in terms of carbon dioxide and the greenhouse effect. We have already reduced the tax on lead-free petrol to encourage its use. That is an example of using market-based incentives to promote good environmental practice. We shall see whether there are other areas where this same principle can be applied. With regard to agriculture, we recognise that farmers not only produce food - which they do with great efficiency - they need to conserve the beauty of the priceless heritage of our countryside. So we are therefore encouraging them to reduce the intensity of their methods and to conserve wild-life habitats. We are planting new woods and forests - indeed there has been a fifty per cent increase in tree planting in Britain in the last ten years. We also aim to reduce chemical inputs to the soil and - 8 - are bringing forward measures to deal with the complex problem of nitrates in water. All that is part of our own ten-year programme coming up to the end of this century. Third, we are increasing our investment in research into global environmental problems. I have already mentioned the climate change centre that we are establishing. In addition we are supporting our own scientists, and in particular the British Antarctic survey's crucial contribution to the world ocean circulation experiment, as well as the voyages of our aptly-named research ship, the 'Charles Darwin'. We have also provided more money for the climate and environment satellite monitoring programmes in the European Space Agency. Fourth, we help poorer countries cope with their environmental problems through our aid programme. We shall give special help to manage and preserve the tropical forests. We are already assisting in twenty countries and have recently signed agreements with India and Brazil. As a new pledge, I can announce today that we aim to commit a further 100 million pounds sterling bilaterally to tropical forestry activities over the next three years, mostly within the framework of the tropical forestry action plan. That is all of what we are doing in Britain under these four headings - all of those things. Conclusion Mr President, the environmental challenge which confronts the whole world demands an equivalent response from the whole world. Every country will be affected and no-one can opt out. We should work through this great organisation and its agencies to secure world-wide agreements on ways to cope with the effects of climate change, the thinning of the ozone layer, and the loss of precious species. We need a realistic programme of action and an equally realistic timetable. Each country has to contribute, and those countries who are industrialised must contribute more to help those who are not. The work ahead will be long and exacting. We should embark on it hopeful of success, not fearful of failure. I began with Charles Darwin and his work on the theory of evolution and the origin of species. Darwin's voyages were among the high-points of scientific discovery, they were undertaken at a time when men and women felt growing confidence that we could not only understand the natural world but that we could master it, too. Today, we have learned rather more humility and respect for the balance of nature. But another of the beliefs of Darwin's era should help to see us through - the belief in reason and the scientific method. Reason is humanity's special gift. It allows us to understand the structure of the nucleus. It enables us to explore the heavens. - 9 - It helps us to conquer disease. Now we must use our reason to find a way in which we can live with nature, and not dominate nature. At the end of a book* which has helped many young people to shape their own sense of stewardship for our planet, its American author quotes one of our greatest English poems, Milton's "Paradise Lost". When Adam in that poem asks about the movements of the heavens, Raphael the Archangel refuses to answer. "Let us speak", he says, "The Maker's high magnificence, who built So spacious, and his line stretcht out so far, That man may know he dwells not in his own; An edifice too large for him to fill, Lodg'd in a small partition, and the rest Ordain'd for uses to his Lord best known". We need our reason to teach us today that we are not, that we must not try to be, Lords of all we survey. We are not the Lords, we are the Lord's creatures, the trustees of this planet, charged today with preserving life itself; preserving life with all its mystery and all its wonder. May we all be equal to that task. *"The End of Nature"; Bill McKibben. (Random House, 1989.) END THE NORTON ANTHOLOGY OF ENGLISH LITERATURE Fifth Edition 1948 WILLIAM BUTLER YEATS The Second Coming¹ Turning and turning in the widening gyre The falcon cannot hear the falconer; Things fall apart; the center cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere The ceremony of innocence is drowned; The best lack all conviction, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity. Surely some revelation is at hand; Surely the Second Coming is at hand. The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi³ Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert A shape with lion body and the head of a man, A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun, Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds. The darkness drops again; but now I know That twenty centuries of stony sleep Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,⁴ And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born? January 1919 1920, 1921 A Prayer for My Daughter¹ Once more the storm is howling, and half hid Under this cradle-hood and coverlid My child sleeps on. There is no obstacle But Gregory's wood² and one bare hill 1. This poem expresses Yeats's sense of the disso- the last stanza of A Prayer for My Daughter. lution of the civilization of his time, the end of 3. The Spirit or Soul of the Universe, with which one cycle of history and the approach of another. all individual souls are connected through the He called each cycle of history a "gyre" (line I)- "Great Memory," which Yeats held to be a un literally a circular or spiral turn (Yeats pronounced versal subconscious in which the human race per it with a hard g). The birth of Christ brought to an serves its past memories. It is thus a source of end the cycle that had lasted from what Yeats called symbolic images for the poet. the "Babylonian mathematical starlight" (2000 B.C.) 4. I.e., the cradle of the infant Christ. to the dissolution of Greco-Roman culture. "What 1. Yeats's daughter, christened Anne Butler, was if the irrational return?" Yeats asked in his prose born on Feb. 26, 1919, in the refitted Normas work A Vision. "What if the circle begin again?" tower of Thoor Ballylee (Ballylee Castle) in Cal He speculates that "we may be about to accept the way, where Yeats lived: it is not far from Cook most implacable authority the world has known." Park. 2. Lines 4-8 refer to the Russian Revolution of 2. Originally part of the Gregory estate, which had 1917. "The ceremony of innocence" suggests Yeats's once also included Thoor Ballylee. view of ritual as the basis of civilized living. Cf. / (Lange/Cawley) January 31, 1989 7:00 A.M. [IPCC.DOC] PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MONDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1990 10:15 A.M. who else ?! Thank you, Dr. Bolin. Professor Obasi. Dr. Tolba. Reifsnyder Delegates of the World Meteorological Congress, and the United Nations Environment Program. Let me congratulate all of you [[ Brief reflection, post-war: even as prospect of world war appears to diminish, importance of world stewardship grows. ]] Over the last forty years, we've unleashed the most albeit technologically advanced creations of man. We've gained new, better, incorpie still understanding of the most ecologically fragile creations of nature. But whether created by man or nature -- what is critical to endurance, is balance. Balance will certainly be crucial to the efforts of this Panel. For you are called upon to strike an unprecedented international bargain: a balance between global environmental policy, and global economic policy, where both sides benefit -- and neither is compromised. This will be possible only if we understand that economic growth and environmental integrity are not contradictory priorities. One reinforces and complements the other. 2 A sound environment is the basis for the continuity and quality of human life and enterprise. And strong economies allow nations to fulfill the obligations of environmental stewardship. Where there is strength wealth, environmental stewardship is considered a necessity. But where there is poverty, it is too often a luxury. For that reason, I believe that within this decade, we must usher in a new era of global cooperation: for environmental protection and economic growth. For intelligent management of industrial and natural resources. Above all, for sustainable development -- around the world. The United States believes the I.P.C.C. is the best forum to develop policy on global climate change. We're committed to international cooperation on this issue. And we consider it vital that the community of nations is drawn together -- in an ordered, rational way -- to assess the potential for climate change. The state of the science; the social and economic impacts; and the right response strategies: all are crucial components to a global resolution. But in this, we must attend to what we know. And what we do, must be done responsibly and well. The stakes here are very high. There is no question that human activities are changing the atmosphere in unexpected and unprecedented ways. Over the past three centuries, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has gone up by 25 percent. Atmospheric methane has doubled. What we don't yet understand are the extent and consequences 3 of the alterations we've brought about -- and how they're linked to a significant, imminent climate change. The state of our thinking, like the state of nature, calls for balance. Last fall, many -- among them, world leaders -- were citing a significant thinning of sea ice at the poles, as evidence that global warming had arrived. But recent observations show that the polar ice sheets are not melting, they're growing in size. I'm not prepared -- academically, or otherwise -- to draw conclusions. But I have noticed something about the scientists drawing the conclusions. Those who see climate change as a clear and present danger represent one distinct minority. Those who discount it completely, represent another minority. But many scientists -- if not most -- are not ready to claim that the extent of global climate change can now be reliably detected -- or predicted. That may be to their credit. Observing the fervor of the French Revolution, the English poet William Blake wrote, "The best lack all conviction, while the worst are filled with passionate intensity." Here, too, we are called upon for action based on observation -- not media- driven emotion, or the politics of apocalypse. What science now knows with confidence, policy-makers can't use. And what policy-makers are interested in, science doesn't yet know. 4 The questions that remain -- over the reflective effects of cloud cover, the cooling effects and CO2 absorption of oceans, and other sinks and feedback mechanisms we don't yet understand -- suggest that we should attend to what is known about climate change -- and work to know more. Current computer models are marvels of mathematics. Still, they cannot yet be said to represent reality -- and cannot be expected to predict the future. Above all, responsible policy cannot rest on the shifting sands of hypothesis and a chaos of conjecture. Given this level of uncertainty, some suggest we should act now, on the chance that significant climate change becomes certain. Others point to the opposite edge of that sword: any meaningful preemptive policies would bring only the certainty of prohibitive expense; conflict with Third World development; and declining standards of living, worldwide. We're confident that the world will neither be caught surprised by a greenhouse effect it didn't expect, nor impoverished in anticipation of a cataclysmic warming that never arrived. There is a middle way that may be sought -- a balance that must be struck -- that reconciles policy to emerging scientific knowledge, and environmental protection to economic development. The United States remains committed to its leadership role on environmental issues: in our domestic programs, in our work to forge international agreements, in our assistance to 5 developing and East Bloc nations, and through our chairmanship of the Response Strategies Working Group in the I.P.C.C. Overall, we're already doing more than any other country -- in terms of financial and human resources, by more than a factor of ten -- to understand and address global warming, among other major environmental concerns. Funds devoted to environment- related research in our proposed 1991 budget now total over $70 billion. Funding for the U.S. Global Change Research Program will increase by nearly 60 percent in fiscal 1991, to over $1 billion. It allows NASA to proceed with its "Mission to Planet Earth" -- and funds the launch of the first U.S. Earth Observing System, to advance the state of knowledge about the planet we share. Along the way, we will seek the involvement of all nations, no matter what their level of development or economic system, to monitor and analyze climate change, and reassess the science. We place the highest priority on better understanding the earth and its interrelated systems -- and developing high-performance computing systems up to the task. We seek immediate action, and have already taken a number of steps, that bring major benefits in their own right; make sense on their own merits; and will also help reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases now building up in the atmosphere, stimulating concern about potential climate change. Last year I announced our support for a worldwide ban on cloroflourocarbon production, to the extent safe substitutes are 6 available. We recently placed a fee on CFC production that is expected to reduce American CFC emissions even below the levels of international protocols. We have compelling reasons to stabilize -- and reduce where possible -- both overall emissions and energy consumption. Ultimately, but eventually, fossil fuel will be all too finite. So we're actively pursuing technology development programs to improve the effectiveness of both supply- and demand-side technologies for energy of all kinds -- through more efficient fuel generation technologies, renewable sources and end-use efficiency, and enhanced nuclear generation safety. And we're committed to regular assessments of the state of technology development. To achieve domestic reductions in airborne emissions, we've introduced new Clean Air Act legislation -- emphasizing clean Leg. Aff coal technology, conservation measures, the trading of emissions permits, and other devices to encourage industry to find creative, market-driven solutions. We're in the midst of a comprehensive review and revision of our National Energy Strategy, to consider our future energy needs in light of environmental, efficiency, and conservation issues -- and to develop alternative energy sources in hydro, solar, biomass, and geothermal designs. Forests, particularly in tropical regions, are being lost at a rate of 40 million acres a year -- an area larger than East Germany. The burning of this biomass and its after-effects 7 account for as much as a quarter of the carbon dioxide that human beings are adding to the atmosphere. For that reason -- and for the sake of the irreplaceable species being lost day by day -- we are working through diplomatic channels, and through innovative measures like debt-for-nature swaps, to do more than simply reduce deforestation. We hope to reverse it. Here at home -- aware that new growth forests absorb significantly more CO2 than old grove timber -- we ve launched a major reforestation initiative, to plant a billion trees a year on private land across America. The economics of our domestic strategies are now being scrutinized in Congress. Let me also assure you, given our role in the R.S.W.G., that the economics of international responses to potential climate change will get equally intensive study. We intend to develop real data on the costs of various response strategies, assess new measures, and challenge other nations to follow suit. We will offer technical support to those who need it. In creating policy to manage CO2 and other emissions now believed to be implicated in climate change, we want to encourage truly innovative responses -- including the trading of emissions permits if appropriate -- as well as a comprehensive approach where all major emissions implicated in climate change are included. Wherever possible, we believe that market mechanisms should be applied -- and that policy must be consistent with economic 8 growth and free market principles in all countries. This is where the quest for balance will be most crucial. It will be important to work with, not against, industry if we hope to promote environmental protection and economic growth around the world. That will mean moving beyond the tradition of command, control, and compliance -- toward a new kind of environmental cooperation. Many industries, in fact, are already providing crucial research and solutions. And a few are already ahead of us. One power-plant management firm, just across the river in Virginia, donated $2 million in 1988 for tree planting in Guatemala -- to compensate for a coal-fired plant it was building in Connecticut. The company expects to couple tree-planting programs with all seven new power plants now on its drawing boards. Where the developing nations are concerned, some suggest we'll have to abandon the laissez-faire, free-market principles that allowed the industrial world to prosper. Well, we're headed in the opposite direction. We intend to apply the principles of the free market in the service of the environment -- especially in the developing nations. Sustainable economic development demands that we enlist the desires of the developing world, rather than try to limit them. To be effective, the I.P.C.C. must truly represent the interests of the world community of nations. The share of total emissions contributed by developing countries is expected to rise 9 dramatically in the future -- becoming more than 50 percent by 2025. We understand that China plans to double its use of coal by the end of the century, and India plans a tripling. But there may be good news here. To the extent we can accelerate the advancement of these and other developing nations, it will take less energy for them to produce wealth: In modern industrial countries, energy use per unit of Gross National Product has declined -- steadily, and dramatically. So we need to work with the developing nations: Applying the power of the marketplace. Allowing for the trading of emissions permits where appropriate. Considering technology transfer for clean coal and renewable technologies, conservation, and end-use services. And encouraging industry to assist developing nations in making quantum leaps in technologies. Leaps that will allow LDC's NDC to grow more quickly and easily -- and may help them avoid making the environmental mistakes we older nations have made. As I said earlier, I believe we should make use of what we know. We know of the power of free markets to find creative solutions. To make resources and talent more rapidly available. We understand the efficiency of an economic incentive. We should apply it now, in defense of the environment we share. We rely on the greenhouse effect, as long as it remains in balance. Without it, the surface of the earth would resemble that of the moon. 10 So just as we rely on the corrective action of the biosphere, we must learn to rely on the corrective actions of free markets to give incentives and integrity to our climate change strategies. To keep this process moving, and advance the debate, we will host an international environment meeting on April 18 and 19 here Reifenyder in Washington. I look forward to first assessment report in June, and IPCC reports in August, etc. Wish the three working groups the best of luck. Confident your work will be done carefully and well. Sure the I.P.C.C. Reifoarder will continue to prosper under , and benefit from Dr. Tolba's leadership ### 08/97/19 10:08 2022 202 0100 OPA 1 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 JAN 18 1990 OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: IPCC Speech Material FROM: Daniel c. Esty DCE Special Assistant to the Administrator TO: Robert E. Grady Associate Director Natural Resources, Energy and science Attached is a copy of the proposed Presidential speech outline, as revised through consultations with the Energy Department. Also attached are several sets of "raw material" to help flesh out the outline. The draft speech outline has been sent to Dr. Bromley as a joint product of Secretary Watkins and Administrator Reilly. The State Department (Zoellick) has also reviewed the draft. Let me know if you would like anything else. Attachments 98/97/19 10:08 $202 252 0780 UPA W 000 Box Input for Presidential Speach U.S. Supports the IPCC Process 1. Congratulations to its sponsors, UNEP and WMO, and to Dr. Bolin (Sweden) its chairman. - In May, 1987 the Tenth World Neteorological Congress asked the Executive Council of the World Neteorological Organization (WMO), in cooperation with the U.N. Environment Programme (UNEP) "to arrange appropriate mechanisms to undertake further developments of scientific and other aspects of greenhouse gases. - In June 1987, the WMO Executive Council (which consists o representatives of WMO member countries) and the UNEP Governing Council (which is made up of representatives of essentially the same countries) responded by asking the Secretary-General of WMO, Professor Obasi, and the Executive Director of UNEP, Dr. Telba to cooperate in the establishment of an intergovernmental mechanism to carry out the intentions of the Tenth Congress. - The IPCC was established after subsequent discussions. - The first session of the IPCC was held in Geneva, Switzerland, on November 9-11, 1988. It was attended by representatives of 30 countries and 18 international organizations. - Dr. Bert Bolin of Sweden, a senior science advisor to the government of Sweden, was elected Chairman. Dr. Bolin is generally recognized as an outstanding chairman -- even handed, adroit, with an excellent, understated sense of humor. 2. U.S. saw a need for an orderly, intergovernmental process to assess scientific understanding, evaluate potential impacts and develop appropriate response strategies. - The issue of global climate change began to emerge as an important public policy issue during early and mid nineteen eighties as the earth experienced some of the hottest years in NO the last century (5 of the 10 hottest years in the last 100 have occurred in the 1980s) and as evidence of a significant build-up in the atmosphere of certain "greenhouse gases" became more widely known. - During the early and mid 1980s, discussion of the issue took place largely in the context of a number of loosely resulted, albeit important conferences. 01/25/90 10:10 9819 797 7070 UPA 4 004 - As the implication of the issue becams clearer, the ,U.S. and a number of the countries began to perceive the need to address the issue through an on-going, international process that spann the broad range of relevant issues and expertise. - This led to the proposals by the Tenth World Meteorological Congress, the WMO Executive Council, and the UNEP Governing Council. 3. IPCC has filled that role. - Participation in the IPCC has increased continuously and new includes over 50 nations, hundreds of scientists and policy makers, and many non-governmental and international organizations. - The work of the IPCC is carried out through three major working groups: The Working Group on Science, chaired by the United Kingdom, is reviewing and assessing the existing scientific information on, and understanding of, global climate change. The Working Group on Impacts, chaired by the USSR, is assessing the potential environmental and socio-economic impacts of global climate change. The Response Strategies Working Group, chaired by the U.S., is identifying and assessing possible strategies for responding to global climate change -- both by limiting greenhouse gas emissions and adapting to climate change. 4. Welcome the IPCC reports due in August. - The three working groups will complete their reports to the IPCC late this Spring. The overall IPCC report will be prepared during the Summer and considered by the full IPCC at a meeting in Stockholm at the end of August. It will then be forwarded to UNEP and WHO and considered by the U.N. General Assembly next Fall and at the Second World Climate Conference (swee) during the last week of October and first week of November. 5. U.S. is committed to playing a leadership role and supporting the IPCC as the best forum for global climate change policy development. 01/20/90 10: 11 9819 70% 707 UPA X you 3 - The IFCC is the best forum for global climate change policy development because: (a) it is focused exclusively on the issue; (b) its program of work addresses the broad range of relevant issues, not just e.g. emission reduction, (c) it has successfully involved the broad range of necessary expertise; (d) it is not overly politicized, and (e) it is truly international, with over 50 countries currently involved and more becoming involved. Essentially, it has proved a productive and increasingly popular forum for international analysis and discussion of the issue. - The President is committed to playing a leadership role in the international community's efforts to address global climate change. The U.S. is playing a major leadership role in the IPCC and has provided substantial financial and analytic support for all major IPCC activities. 5. Support the UK proposal at the UN to continue the IPCC - In her speech on November 9, 1989, to the UN General Assembly, Prime Minister Thatcher proposed the continuation of No the IPCC after it submits its interim report next Fall so that it can provide an authoritative scientific basis for the negotiation of protocols to a framework convention. We should strongly support this proposal and broaden its rationale to include the need for a sound analytical basis, broadly construed to include analysis of the administrative and technical feasibility, costs and economic consequences of future protocols. There will be a NOI need for years to come to (a) continually improve and periodically assess our scientific understanding of global climate change and its impacts, and (b) develop and evaluate response measures. strent RAW MATERIAL FOR A PRESIDENTIAL SPEECH TO THE IPCC Section 5: 1. The Clean Air Act I have submitted to Congress extensive revisions to the Clean Air Act which should result not only in cleaning the nation's air, but in reducing greenhouse gas emissions as well. Powerful incentives exist in our acid rain program for conserving energy. These will reduce carbon diexide emissions from electric utilities by about 75 million tons. The alternative transportation fuels program in the bill also offers the potential for reductions in emissions, up to 60 million tons, depending on what fuels make it to the market. 2. Energy Conservation Program. Since taking office, my Administration has proposed or promulgated energy efficiency standards for refrigerators, dishwashers, washing machines, and dryers. Together, these will reduce emissions by around 15 million tons. In addition, I have submitted a request to Congress to increase the size of DOE's Conservation Program by $150 million. 3. Alternative Energy Sources to be provided by DOE Reforestation The U.S. is firmly committed to positive action in response to threats imposed by global climate change. one immediate and tangible action which I have called for is a major reforestation program within the U.S. I am calling upon all Americans to join in a twenty-year program to plant and maintain twenty billion treas. We expect to provide up to $175 million per year to support programs ranging from urban tree planting, to sharing the cost of large tree plantations, to enhancing the quality and ultimately the biological yield of existing timber stands. Complimenting these public investments, I have called for a private, non-profit foundation called the "America the Beautiful Foundation", which would capitalize a fund of potentially billions of private dellars, the yield of which will be used to support tree planting and maintenance throughout the United States. The objectives of these tree planting programs will be to absorb from 5 to 10 percent of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions, as well as enhance water quality and wildlife habitat. 5. Chloroflourogarbong (CFCS) These currently account for 25% of the current U.S. contribution to global warming. In addition to possibly affecting the climate system, these substances also are responsible for the depletion of the ozone layer. I fully support the international efforts to fully phaseout production of these substances by the year 2000. In addition, the US is aggressively working with developing countries to assist them in making the transition to substitute chemicals. For example, we are working with the refrigeration industry to facilitate CFC substitution in China and we are sending technical missions to Brazil, Egypt and Mexico. 6. State Initiatives The States deserve significant credit for their contributions to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Their efforts include programs to increase energy efficiency in homes, offices, and industries, to expand the use of alternative fuels in the transportation sector, and to plant trees. Several states have even mandated general greenhouse gas emissions reduction efforts. For example, the Governor of New Jersey recently signed an executive order requiring state agencies to implement measures designed to reduce energy and CFC use and to maximize the number of trees in New Jersey. The Oregon legislature has mandated that the state reduce emissions of greenhouse gases by 20% by 2005. Almost every state has implemented energy efficiency programs. An example of a program that has successfully reduced energy consumption in industry is the Energy Advisory Service to Industry in New York. In 1988, CO2 reductions attributable to this program were approximately 682,000 tons, while consumers saved more than $60 million in energy costs. In California, the South Coast Air Quality Management District is implementing stringent air quality standards that will eventually require substantial use of alternative fuels. (However, this plan calls for the use of methanol fuel, which, if derived from natural gas, is only slightly less carbon intensive than coal, and, if derived from coal, is 50- 75% more carbon intensive than coal.) In addition to individual programs, a number of states are now undertaking "Least-Cost Utility Planning" which requires utilities to undertake the least cost alternative to providing power, which is also often the option with the lowest greanhouse gas emissions, i.e., energy efficiancy. A few states, such as Wisconsin, New York and oregon, are taking this a step further by applying an environmental weighting factor in competitive bidding procedures for private power supply options. This tends to encourage natural gas and non-fossil sources of energy. States are also undertaking their own tree planting programs geared toward reducing carbon dioxide. The States of North Dakota and Missouri, for example, have established tree planting programs. oh The former has set a target of 100 million trees by 2000. THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary REMARKS BY CHIEF OF STAFF GOVERNOR JOHN SUNUNU TO THE AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE October 30, 1989 Mayflower Hotel Washington, DC GOVERNOR SUNUNU: I appreciate you giving the right priority to all that. You're absolutely right. The last is what I consider my most significant involvement and achievement. It is a pleasure to be here with you today. Obviously, it is a gathering that not only is representative of what is important and strong about America's economy, but what is important and strong about the world economy. Those of you who are here from outside of town and outside of the country, let me add my welcome to that which I'm already positive you have heard from previous speakers. It is my understanding that Brent Scowcroft was here ahead of me. I'll have to remind him one of my jobs is cleaning up after him. (Laughter.) But it's my understanding that Brent was here a little earlier and talked to you about some of the wonderful, amazing things that are taking place around the world today. And as trite as the statement of these are, these times are the most interesting and critical times in a long, long time. As trite as that statement may be, I really do think it applicable in the sense of both what is happening and the potential for what can continue to happen and impact the world around us. I'm sure Brent spent a little time talking to you about what was happening in the context of a victory for Western values. And it really is, although we are very careful at times not to give it that emphasis. Any careful reading of what is taking place in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe -- even in China, although it was aborted a little bit -- and around the world is a celebration of victory in two respects. First of all, the American -- the Western commitment to democracy is being rejoiced around the world in political change and reform that is being pressed from within, being pressed from the bottom up in many cases, and accompanied -- surprisingly enough and constructively enough -- by a pressure that -- it joins what's coming from the bottom up by a movement aggressively in that direction in virtually all those countries from the top down as well. It has created a sense of inevitability in many cases for the kind of political change that has been the hope and dream of free countries around the world that see extended to those countries that have lived in less free environments. In the same respect, accompanying this we see changes on the economic side -- changes that again it is not inappropriate to say is a celebration of the Western commitment to the free market approach, the Western commitment to a capitalist society. It is surprising to me that even those of us in this country who are -- have had an opportunity to discuss or own economic system seem reluctant at times to suggest that it is a capitalist society. And yet that is a fact and we ought not to be uncomfortable with that world. And what we are seeing in these countries around the world is a yearning to make themselves a structure in which the MORE - 2 - economy and the benefits of free markets are accrued to their citizens. And in order to do that, they understand that one thing that has to be done is to establish an internal economic structure that is attractive to investment, attractive to capital. And I find it amazing that we can go to Poland and hear the President of Poland and the leader of the communist party in Poland asking the President of the United States how that economic system can create incentives for capital investment so that they can improve their situation and job opportunities. And it's amazing then when you move down to Hungary and hear the leaders of the communist party in Hungary talk about the changes they're going to make, and again emphasize their understanding that what they need is a society that is attractive to capital investment so that a strong economy can be created. And the context of that discussion just before the President of the United States was to go to Karl Marx University and give a talk on the issues of democracy and free markets. It's just unbelievable, and yet that is what is happening. And I only point that out that as we in this country have opportunities for establishing policies that are incentives for the investment of capital, we ought to just keep in our mind the amazing context that the rest of the world at times seems to understand this better than those of us who have had these benefits all along. There are other issues taking place not only -- developing not only in this country, but around the world, that will impact what is clearly understood now to be an economy that is so globally interwound that major changes in one country, whether it is overregulation or appropriate regulation or deregulation, can have impacts on what takes place in other countries around the world. A situation that is real, a situation that is of interest, a situation that is of concern and a situation that is populist enough to capture headlines is the situation involved in terms of the environment. And I am fortunate today as I came to talk to you to have join me in the visit here, alhough not scheduled to speak today, Bill Reilly, who is the Administrator at EPA, and Dr. Allan Bromley, who is the President's Advisor on Science and Technology -- both of who are involved in the development of environmental policy and very much involved in the development of economic and domestic policy for this administration. And I point that out because what I would like to touch on for a little bit this afternoon are some of those issues involved in terms of the environment, and the approach that I'm sure will have all the details filled in by Bill Reilly when he makes his presentation tomorrow that I would like to talk about -- the approach that has been taken by this administration to bring together some of these very same basic principles that are clearly the strengths of this nation and the strengths that are being aspired to by countries around the world. This President, President Bush, has laid out a series of initiatives -- an agenda on the environment that is as much an agenda involving the economy as a commitment to making sure that we fulfill our responsibility as stewards of the environment. And it is important that we understand that national and international environmental policy is in part a component of national and international economic policy. They go hand in hand. An effective focus on these issues provides policies that are complementary, rather than contradictory. An effective focus -- a focus that deals with our responsibilities across the board is a focus that yields -- to no one in our the strength of our commitment to the environment. It yields to no one in terms of our understanding that a strong economy is critical, so that we can fulfill the obligations of that stewardship. And so what the President has put forward in terms of its environmental initiatives, the Clean Air Act, a bill that was presented by the President to Congress to break the logjam that MORE - 3 - existed for nearly a decade in terms of dealing with our needs of establishing policies that were broad enough to deal with the environment and protect the air quality of this country and constructive and realistic enough to allow that and, in fact, require that to be done without gutting the strength of the economic system that supports (inaudible.) That plan was sent up by the President. It was a plan that was balanced; it was a plan that reflected an understanding of the role of a free market itself in creating domestic and internal incentives to do what is right. It was a plan that balanced out the requirements and the commitments and, in fact, the impositions that are necessary for us as citizens and for us as members of public institutions, such as local government, state government and the federal government to deal with these issues. It was a plan that understood that the global playing field not only domestically, but internationally, requires us to do this in a way that does not put our domestic industries at a disadvantage. And yet, it was a plan that was realistic enough in terms of what had to be accomplished for the environment that was recognized as being a significant step forward in that direction. I urge you to understand that the balance that was developed within that program is one that must be maintained and kept as we work this through Congress. I understand that everybody impacted one way or the other is tempted to suggest the dials ought to be readjusted to get back individually or corporately a little bit more preference. And I hope that that part of the system does not so disrupt the balance fills into the program that again this country will lose an opportunity to get an act of clean air legislation that is both protective and will work in -- (inaudible) -- with our economic strength. The President, in addition to that, has proposed a phase out of the chloroflouro carbons that have a negative impact on the quality of not only our own environment, our own air quality, but in terms of the international aspect in terms of the long-range capacity of the world environment -- (inaudible.) And we made that commitment to phasing these out in a practical way, in a responsive way by the year 2000. It was done with an understanding that merely stating the phase-out without recognizing that the partnership with the private sector sector would be required in order to develop the alternatives, but impose on us the obligation to have a time frame that was doable. And it was done with that in mind and in a balance way that again, this administration leads -- and it's across the board in all the departments of this administration -- we believe that that approach is one that meets both the environmental and the economic responsibility. So the administration has taken action again in dealing with fuel economy. It's taken action again in addressing our responsibilities towards the global environment in terms of global climate research. The President's budget that he sent up in February included significant increases for this research, both -- (inaudible) -- what impact specific pollutants have, or the capacity of our environment to maintain not only air quality detecting, but the integrity of the thermal balance that is so critical. We are spending as a government with a budget proposed by the President almost one half a billion dollars -- $500 million across all government entities. And the reserach that is necessary to help us to find a policy that makes sense and addresses not only our needs within our own borders, but makes us a constructive partner for policies around the world. Now, let me address that because it has become an issue that is easy for folks to get -- (inaudible) -- with. It has become an issue that appears to be a bit -- (inaudible) -- and yet, the fact of the matter is, an issue that must be examined not only in a popular sense, not only in an emotional response to the concern that caring citizens around the world have for the environment, but must be dealt with in such a way where the policies which will shift the MORE - 4 - focus of resources probably in a global level, unprecedented in history. It must be done in such a way in which that shift of resources truly has the promise of having a beneficial impact. For those of you that may not know the general history of that issue, let me point out that, in the last couple of years, as a result of examination of some data and as a result of some of the computer modeling, the analysis that is being done, there is a discussion of a coupling between the emissions of some of the industrial products that we have, some of the inevitable industrial products that we have, as having an impact on the environment's tendency to be warmed as a result of the non-linear relationships between entity in and entity out, depending on the composition of the environment. Carbon-dioxide is one of the components of concern. Carbon-dioxide is an inevitable product and it is virtually an unscrubable product of the combustion of any of the fossil fuels, whether it is natural gas or coal or oil or wood. The fact is that there have been in recent years, over the last handful-and-a-half of decades, a buildup of the levels of carbon-dioxide in our atmosphere. And there is some concern that there is a coupling between that buildup and the change in the average temperature, the mean temperature of the world's atmosphere over a period of time. There has been significant work done in this direction. There is significant work yet to be done. May I point out tangentially that the level of concern which focused worldwide attention were concerns in which people determined with the initial models that about a four or five -- (inaudible) -- degree rise in temperature might be expected if we -- over a period of years -- 30 to 50 years double the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere. There have been in recent months some refinements of those models which fortunately, in terms of policy and certainly these are not yet in themselves definitive models -- models which suggest this rise may be less, but still in that same general direction. It's been reported in a number of journals in recent months that work done at both the British Meteorlogical Office and work done at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder have indicated a rise of between one and two degrees is a more realistic assessment. The point is, is that neither the older pessimistic numbers nor the current optimistic numbers should be taken as the final word. And what we ought to do is commit ourselves to the kind of investment, both in terms of dollars and national resources, that the President has laid out as part of his agenda and determine as quickly as we can and as accurately as we can both the quantitative impact and cause of the kinds of problem we are concerned with and the benefits of any remedial action that may result from international policy to -- (inaudible) -- this change. Those are the kinds of obligations we have to ourselves as members of the nation and to ourselves as a nation as members of an international community. And I guess one concern that I have as I look at those who are involved in policy development on the Hill is a sometimes irresponsible commitment to -- (inaudible) -- because it seems to fit the more populist image or that newer data that seems to reflect that a more prudent approach might be more constructive. And I ask that those who of you that care about this issue, that those of you who understand the coupling of this issue to economic well-being so that we can meet our responsibilities to those parts of the world that do not enjoy the quality of life that we do -- and I am talking very specifically about our economic capacity to deal with the parts of the world that have hunger problems, parts of the world that have problems in terms of their development and their industrialization that we understand that we have a responsibility to do this right, not only to ourselves, but to the billions that fall into the categories of the have-nots around the world. Bill Reilly and Al Bromley will be going to the MORE - 5 - Netherlands in about a week to discuss with the international community how we can responsibly -- and the emphasis is on that word "responsibly" address the current status of understanding of the problem, the current commitment to developing a better understanding of the issue, and a utilization of that better understanding for the development of international policies that constructively deal with our obligations across the board. And it is important to understand that as they do so they are going again in the context of an administration that has made a commitment to deal with this issue. An administration that has laid out an agenda, working with the United Nations intergovernmental panel on -- (inaudible) -- to develop by 1990, by November 1990, a report in which the status of what is understood both as the state of the art or science and the capacity of economic and industrial response to deal with the environmental needs can be put into a worldwide context. In that respect, Administrator Reilly -- the President has made a commitment to host here a meeting, probably in very early 1990, with the working group that is developing those policies. And it is expected that as part of that program, there will be initiated -- discussions will continue that have already been initiated, mainly the discussions on a framework convention on this issue of global warming. Now, I spent a little bit of time in my presentation today on this issue because I find it is one that is certainly -- (end of tape.) ICE ON THE WORLD By SAMUEL W. MATTHEWS SENIOR ASSISTANT EDITOR Fleeting phenomenon of an ice cave lures an explorer into a remnant of the Muir Glacier in southeast Alaska. Creator and destroyer, ice relentlessly molds landforms and climate, yet can fall with a snowflake's lightness. ToM BEAN 3.3/D polar ice sheets ? 3 79 ICE ONTHEWORLD T BEGINS, if it can be said to have any of man on earth-Cro-Magnon man and his one beginning, in the great storm of ilk. Some 18,000 years ago it buried more early December. The jet stream dips than three-tenths of the world's land surface sharply south, and a huge tongue of under thick ice and mantling snow. And no, polar air slides under warm and humid the Ice Age, geologists say firmly, is still with low-pressure air all across the North us. We are living in only a slightly warmer American heartland. Dense, blowing snow spell of it. all but obliterates pro football games that Ice scoured and heaped the hills around Sunday in Minneapolis, Green Bay, Buffa- New York City, fed the river courses that lo, and Boston. The snow falls, and blows meet at St. Louis, shaped the lochs and golf into great drifts, for five days. links of Scotland, gouged the Great Lake ba- That winter brings a series of such storms, sins and Norwegian fjords, and even now, more than anyone in the North can remem- by continued melting, is slowly raising the ber. In January the snowpack on fields out- level of all the oceans. Someday-soon, say side Buffalo lies 17 feet deep. The white some climatologists, who think in millen- blanket extends south to Mississippi. Or- nia-ice could creep south again over North ange groves in Florida die as far south as America to bulldoze away Chicago and Okeechobee. There is ice on the Tenn-Tom shove its wreckage to St. Louis. Waterway and the aqueducts of the Central Ice still covers one-tenth of all earth's Arizona Project. land. An entire ocean, the Arctic, is covered By July it should have been only a memo- with it, like a solid scum on a bowl of cold pea ry-but it is not. Snow still lies in sheltered, soup. Huge domes of ice lie atop Antarctica shadowy places outside Butte and Duluth and Greenland. Glacial rivers of ice in Cana- and Bangor. It is colder across the northern da and Alaska and on mountains even on the tier than at any time in weather records. Equator help regulate earth's weather. And when the first snow comes again, in The Alaskan glaciers have recently been late August in the high country, it falls on puzzling and bemusing scientists with unex- snow from the winter before that has not pected, even startling, activity. While some melted. It piles up faster even than in that are retreating, others are surging forward. bad December. More of it comes, and keeps Last spring the giant Hubbard Glacier coming, again for months. blocked the mouth of a long tidal fjord and The TV weathermen talk about it con- turned it into a fast-rising freshwater lake stantly, but it is the glaciologists who recog- (pages 107-119). nize the signal. The Ice Age, which has Ice not only crowns polar reaches and really not left the planet for two million towering mountains with white glory, it years, is reasserting itself. The warm time, also gleams as diadems from roof edges and which has lasted less than 12,000 years, is over. The next great return of ice has begun. An oasis of fresh water on sea ice quenches a Greenlander's thirst. Salt AS THERE EVER REALLY W water freezes at 28.7°F. As sea floes an age of ice, long ago and thicken, gravity pulls brine from the far away? surface. The relatively fresher layer on Yes and no. Yes, an Ice Age top can be sipped in summer or chipped (the most recent, that is) did exist in the time and melted in winter. BRYAN AND CHERRY ALEXANDER 84 Freshwater islands, icebergs fall from straight to the bottom. Icebergs would not oceanfront glaciers and sail on heels that float. Lakes, rivers, and seas would freeze form the bulk of their mass (below). from the bottom up. The world would be in North Atlantic icebergs, such as the one deep, cold trouble. that sank Titanic, break away from Ice is one of nature's most beautiful and Greenland and Canada. elegant substances. It can form in the Dye sprayed on the face of Antarctica's Ross Ice Shelf (facing atmosphere as snow-lacy, delicate crys- page) locates a current meter emplaced for tals, like fairy place mats, each flake unlike a study of ice and sea interaction. The any other. shelf may have calved the largest berg Thoreau called snowflakes chariot ever recorded-some 200 by 60 miles. wheels fallen from a battle in the sky. To Job, Elihu said, "By the breath of God ice is giv- en, and the broad waters are frozen fast." On quiet ponds and lakes, as winter air drops water temperature to zero degrees C (32°F), a thin skim of ice glazes the surface. The heat given up by crystallization is lost to the air; the water beneath is both slightly warmer and denser. If the lake is absolutely still, the skim will rapid- ly thicken, forming a transparent pane on the surface. The pond MITSUAKI IWAGO (ABOVE): STAN JACOBS, LAMONT-DOHERTY GEOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY (RIGHT) creaks, even sometimes sheathes forests and gardens in shimmering groans soulfully, as it freezes. In daylight it crystal, brings streams and waterfalls to appears as black as the water beneath. frozen stillness. This black ice, skaters know, is the best of It menaces your daily life. It can kill you all-strong, absolutely smooth, lightning on a street or highway, ground your plane or fast. If not yet too thick, it will undulate be- sink the ship you take to Europe, cause a tree neath you, yet safely hold your weight as you or hailstones the size of baseballs to fall on glide across it. If wind or current ripples the your head. It can break your water pipes or ice, or if snow falls upon it while freezing, a car's engine block, flood your farm, freeze white, softer ice forms, full of air, rougher to your crops, cut off your electricity. the skates, opaque to the eye. It cannot be As seen from the moon or space, the earth shaved down to black ice; unless it melts is blue, brown, and white. Much of the completely before the next freeze, that year's white is ice, whether solid, rime, snow, or skating will be second-rate. frozen cloud. Sea ice is unlike freshwater ice. Because of its dissolved minerals (3.5 percent on A REMARKABLE STUFF indeed. average), salt water does not begin freezing Not only does ice produce heat until its temperature drops to minus 2°C while freezing and absorb it in (28.7°F). Then a thin slurry or scum of fresh- melting; it floats, because (un- water ice crystals appears. Between the like almost every other substance) it is crystals, as they grow and interconnect, tiny lighter as a solid than as a liquid. pockets of brine are trapped and enclosed. If it were not for this phenomenon, ice Sea ice thus separates fresh and salt water cubes dropped in a glass of water would go to some extent. Newly frozen, it may be only 86 National Geographic, January 1987 Fighting ice with ice, an Exxon oil rig in Alaska's Beaufort Sea pumps out water that freezes into bulwarks against crushing ice floes. Standing on a steel mat anchored 60 feet down, the movable station reduces the cost of Arctic oil exploration. one-tenth as salty as the water beneath. As the ice grows older and thicker, it becomes fresher; the heavier brine migrates down- ward, pulled by gravity. Eskimos know and make use of this phe- nomenon; they melt the surface ice and its covering snow for drinking and cooking. The Inuit, or Eskimos, have dozens of words for different kinds of ice. NOW THAT FALLS on land either S melts away entirely the next sum- mer or becomes thicker year by year, compresses by sheer weight, and gradually turns to ice. "Whenever and wherever one year's snowfall doesn't melt before the next year's snow, a glacier is born," University of Wis- consin climatologist Reid Bryson reminds his students. "If it goes on long enough and widely enough, you have an ice sheet." Such an ice sheet covered much of North America's northern half in the time geolo- gists call the Pleistocene (map, facing page). The glacial age began more than 2.5 million years ago, when man's early forebears, the australopithecines, prowled Africa's plains. creatures can reveal the temperature of the It was at its most recent peak only 18,000 waters, both surface and deep, in which years ago, when Cro-Magnon artists were they grew and died. Core samples brought painting cave walls in southern France. up by oceanographic research ships can re- In that human span of time the ice sheets veal as well just how much ice existed on the and glaciers came and went, waxed and earth in different geologic ages. waned; the oceans rose and fell; extensive "Seabed cores are our library of the far areas of the globe were alternately dry land past," marine geologist William Ruddiman and below sea level. The forcing mecha- of Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty hisms for these vast changes are now be- Geological Observatory said to me recently. lieved to be slow variations in earth's orbit "They tell us the earth's past climate, the around the sun, its tilt in space, and stately movements of its crustal plates, where the back-and-forth nodding of its spin axis. ice sheets lay, and why in large part life These so-called Milankovitch cycles, today is as it is. named for the Yugoslav astronomer who At different times in the past one million calculated them in the 1920s, control the years, there must have been about three amount of sunlight received by the two times as much ice on the earth as now exists hemispheres in winter and summer. in Antarctica and Greenland. The greatest Much of this theory is supported by deep- amount, the geologic record shows, lay sea sediments. Shells of long-dead sea on North America, in the Laurentide and 88 National Geographic, January 1987 Cordilleran ice sheets. Ice stretched from the OW THICK were the northern ice high Arctic islands south across what is now H sheets at the height of the Wiscon- Hudson Bay and the Great Lakes, down the sin? In New England the ice had to midwestern plains as far as today's Ohio and be at least 4,000 feet deep to have Missouri River Valleys, and in the west covered the White and Green Mountains. across the Yukon and western British Co- Over Hudson Bay and the ancient Canadian lumbia to Puget Sound. Shield it must have been more than two In Europe an ice sheet covered the entire miles thick to have bent down and depressed Scandinavian Peninsula, the North and bedrock as much as 1,000 feet. The land sur- Baltic Seas, much of the British Isles, and face from the Great Lakes north is still re- extended from the Low Countries acróss bounding from release of that great weight, northern Germany and Poland into Russia. as is all Scandinavia. There was in Siberia and, beyond the dry When the meltback began and the release Bering Strait, glaciers spilled out from the came, it took relatively little time-a few mountains of southern Alaska (although thousand years. The land was unlocked, other parts of that far northern peninsula changed dramatically by both the coming remained strangely ice free). and the going of the ice. The Pleistocene ice advanced and with- The ice sheet left ground-up debris, called drew, again and again. In the past million till or drift, smeared wherever it had been. It years there have been nine full glacial peri- left ridges, or moraines, of heaped-up debris ods, separated by much shorter intergla- along the farthest lines of advance; Long Is- cials, or warm spells. Each glacial period land and Cape Cod are two such moraines. has lasted about 100,000 years; each inter- It left myriad lake basins, as in Wisconsin glacial, as little as 10,000. and Minnesota; ice-block potholes, called The most recent advance of the ice is kettles; long sinuous ridges of stream- GENE MOORE (ABOVE): GERD PFEIFER called the Wisconsin glaciation in North deposited gravel, called eskers; and curious S, hailstones grow America, the Würm in the Alps. At its height ice-molded hills, called drumlins. as they pass through 18,000 years ago, it withdrew unevenly, And it left water-sheets of water running ooled water droplets. probably in two distinct stages of melting, from atop and below the ice, rivers gushing aindrops are called sleet, about 13,000 and 10,000 years ago, glaciolo- from tunnels in the ice front, huge glacial Economic damage from gists now think. lakes such as Agassiz in Minnesota, Manito- , primarily through That marks the start of the Holocene, or ba, and the Dakotas, and Bonneville in rops, exceeds that wholly modern, era. The world was warmer Utah and Nevada. does. at 6000 B.C., in the so-called Climatic Opti- These lakes occasionally broke out from mum or Thermal Maximum, than at any behind ice dams in monstrous floods. One time since the previous interglacial some swept across northern Idaho and south- 125,000 years ago. eastern Washington and created the chan- There have been bitter returns to cold, neled, tortuous scablands. Another came wet times for mankind since then-from the sweeping down the Mississippi Valley to second to the first millennium B.C., and decimate life in the Gulf of Mexico about again beginning after A.D. 1200 in high lati- 11,600 years ago. Year after year, century tudes of the Northern Hemisphere, continu- after century, the flow of meltwater must ing until the mid-1800s. In the latter Little have been prodigious. Ice Age, glaciers grew again in the Alps and As the ice melted from North America, southeastern Alaska. Viking colonies were from northern Europe, from the icebergs frozen out in Greenland. that spilled from Antarctica and Greenland, Then the world's climate turned warm the seas steadily rose. Measurements on again-warmer than in any period since the the continental shelves, on drowned sea- Climatic Optimum. From about 1880 until mounts, on coral islands, all put the rise at present, temperatures have ranged well close to 110 meters-360 feet. Intruding seas above the average for the entire Holocene dramatically reshaped coastlines, broke up interglacial period. Yet, in our self-centered floating ice shelves, flooded into Hudson view, we regard our own time in history as Bay and the Baltic Sea, and left the face of "normal." It is anything but that. the globe much as we see it today. Ice on the World 91 O GO BACK, to actually see what inland plateau of ice, one flies from the main T the ice atop North America must U.S. Antarctic base at McMurdo Sound, at have been like, one can fly across the edge of the Ross Ice Shelf, up the mas- Greenland en route to Iceland or sive, fractured Beardmore Glacier. On the Europe. Better yet, one cango to Antarctica. dark, gaunt mountainsides, striations and Almost 90 percent of all the ice on earth narrow bands of glacial debris, called lateral lies atop the Antarctic Continent: seven mil- moraines, show where ice higher than to- lion cubic miles of it (30 million cubic kilo- day's has scoured. and scraped across in the meters). It rises more than two miles; at the dim past. More dramatically still, here and South Pole it is 9,200 feet thick; at the Soviet there run bands of lighter sandstones, and Union's Vostok Station, more than 12,000. amid them jet black streaks of coal. Antarctica is literally a desert; most of it Antarctica was not always shrouded in gets less than two inches of snow a year. But ice. Long before the Pleistocene, the conti- that snow scarcely ever melts-it just blows nent was warm and held lush vegetation, from place to place and grows deeper. even forests. Only such organic matter, later From the lofty dome of ice deep in the inte- covered by warm seas and thick marine sed- rior, behind a wall of mountains that divides iment, could have produced the coal seams the white continent diagonally, ice slowly that run through the Transantarctic Moun- flows outward and down to the sea on all tains, some of the most extensive on earth. sides. It escapes through passages in the Other startling evidence of ancient land- mountains to the ice-submerged archipela- scapes and seaways near the South Pole has go called West Antarctica, and to the great recently been found high on these peaks. ice shelves of the Ross and Weddell Seas. Tree stems, roots, pollen, and tiny fossils of To reach the South Pole, on the high open-water marine life have been identified CIRCA 1650, FROM "WANDERINGS OF A PILGRIM IN SEARCH OF THE PICTURESQUE,' OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, 1975 (ABOVE): CARY WOLINSKY "We are making ice by evaporation almost every night." In the winter of 1828 in Allahabad, "the oven of India," Englishwoman Fanny Parks described how water ladled into bowls set into the ground froze as a result of cooling evaporation even when air temperatures hovered above freezing. Preserved in pits covered by thatched- roofed huts, the 120 tons produced that year lasted into August. Today pond ice hauled from storage caves comes to market in Kashi, China (right). 94 National Geographic, January 1987. by Ohio State geologists Peter-Noel Webb, The polar vegetation found on the flanks David M. Harwood, and John II. Mercer as of the Beardmore Glacier late in 1985, say being two to four million years old, from the Webb and his colleagues, must have grown Pliocene epoch. Yet up to now it has been along the edges of the ice as it advanced and thought that ice lay deep on Antarctica as retreated, melted and returned, in a time long as 15, even 30, million years ago. much warmer than today. The shrub wood (following page) grew on Thus the microfossils from the sea and the the banks and shores of alpine streams and ancient wood fragments require a major and lakes during several interglacial periods, the radical rethinking of Antarctica's long gla- researchers suggest. In those relatively cial history. Its icecover must have been un- warm times, great open seaways may have stable, subject to massive advances and reached deep into the Antarctic interior, and retreats much like those of the northern half the great central ice mass may have retreat- of the globe. ed to much smaller ice caps and high alpine glaciers (diagrams, page 97). S THE ICE on Antarctica today shrink- When, as in the Northern Hemisphere, ing, growing, or in balance? On this sub- the central ice sheet began growing again, it ject scientists are deeply divided. Most must have scraped up the tiny fossils from admit they simply do not know, and say the floor of an inland sea and carried them it will take years, if not decades, of further high into the Transantarctic Mountains. research to find out. Or did the mountain range, the mightiest The out pouring of ice from the high interi- in Antarctica, also lurch and rise upward or down to the coast, feeding the great float- thousands of feet? If it once was lower, less ing shelves, seemingly keeps Antarctica's ice would have been needed to override it. ice cover in balance. "But that balance may Ice on the World 95 be illusory," says glaciologist George H. RILLING DEEP into Antarctica's Denton of the University of Maine. Denton and his colleague Terence J. D ice is a way for climatologists to read the far past. Such work in Hughes are authors of a monumental study, Antarctica was undertaken by the The Last Great Ice Sheets. In it they discuss United States in 1967-68 at Byrd Station, what might happen if the West Antarctic ice where a core drill went down 2, 164 meters sheet, resting largely below sea level, were (7,101 feet) before it hit liquid water near to "collapse," or melt away entirely. bedrock, then froze fast. "The edges of that ice sheet have clearly In 1970 Soviet scientists began drilling at retreated,' Denton says. "We see it in the Vostok Station, high on the inland ice cap in Ross and Weddell Sea embayments and on East Antarctica. In 1981-82 French scien- coastal mountains poking up through the tists reached more than 900 meters beneath ice, like so many dipsticks in reverse." a point named Dome C, near the center of Ian Whillans of Ohio State, studying great the huge ice cap. And since 1980 the Vostok ice streams that drain the broad West Ant- ice drillers have bored through more than arctic ice sheet, agrees: He sees thinning of ice on both sides of the Transantarctic Mountains. Denton, conversely, thinks the main East Antarctic ice cap is growing thicker. He-cites increased snowfall brought on by a still warming climate. The paradox: warmer times, more snow and ice. Oddly enough, in that much warmer time before the truly polar Pleistocene Ice Age be- gan, the East Antarctic ice sheet must have been far thicker than today's, Denton says. As it grew, pushing perhaps through Peter Webb's inland seas, the ice left marks on the very tops of the Transantarctic Mountains, above 14,000 feet today. If indeed the central ice sheet is again 1/MADEINU.R.R.2 3 thickening, that growth may be matched by JAMES A. SUGAR, BLACK STAR outflow of glaciers, by calving of icebergs from the ice shelves (recent Norwegian stud- 2,080 meters of the 3,700 meters (12,140 ies show more bergs being produced than feet) of the ice under the station. previously assumed), and perhaps by melt- "The Vostok core is the first to cover, ing underneath the ice shelves. completely and unambiguously, the entire Hughes and others have calculated that a last 150,000 years of earth's ice-age cycle," total collapse of West Antarctic ice, with the French glaciologist Claude Lorius reported ice shelves gone, would cause a rise in sea in 1985, after working with Soviet scientists level worldwide of four to six meters-14 to on the ice core. "It clearly goes back through 20 feet-in as little as two to five centuries. earth's previous interglacial warm period, But if the ice shelves hold, says Denton, the called the Eem or Sangamon, and well into specter of collapse of Antarctic ice and a cat- the ice age before that. astrophic rise of sea level seems unlikely. "That previous interglacial was similar Though worried by continuing increase of but markedly warmer than our present carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, leading to warm spell, the Holocene," he told me in even warmer climate ahead, most scientists Washington, D. C., a few months after re- put the possible rise in sea level, largely from turning from Antarctica in 1985. "The be- expansion of warm seawater and the melt- ginning of the previous warming was as ing of Northern Hemisphere glaciers, at sharp and extensive as was the opening of only one to two feet by the year 2100. the Holocene, between about 10,000 and After that, as polar ice grows thicker from 8,000 years ago." more snowfall, sea level may fall again. The Vostok core, somewhat surprisingly 96 National Geographic, January 1987 Ice's handiwork can be as annoying as a to Professor Lorius, does not hold evidence pothole or as magical as circles of stones of more volcanie activity on earth during the found in Spitsbergen (above) and past glacial age and previous interglacial periglacial regions worldwide. As wet than in modern times. But the volcanic dust silty ground freezes and thaws, the soil seen there, as in cores taken from the Green- slowly circulates by convection Rocks land cap, has given a precise and dramat- lifted to the surface by repeated freezing ic record of many great volcanic events of drift to the border of the soil current. the distant past: Eastern Pennsylvania resembled present- day Greenland when these red sandstone N 1980-81 Danish, Swiss, and American boulders (center) were fractured by frost and rounded by meltwater 10,000 years scientists penetrated more than a mile ago. In Alaska's Wrangell Mountains deep at a point named Dye 3 in southern frost-shattered rock interlaced with ice Greenland. From winter-summer vari- creeps downhill one to two inches a year ations in the preserved frozen core, the drill- as a rock glacier (far right). ers can read year-by-year weather for the past 11,000 years. The massive eruptions of the volcanoes 98 National Geographic, January 1987 BERNARD HALLET (LEFT); CARY WOLINSKY (CENTER); GEORGE HERBEN (RIGHT) Laki in Iceland in 1783 and Tambora in the killed in 44 B.C. A blast in 1390 B.C. may East Indies in 1815 are clearly identifiable have been one of several that spelled the end near the top of the Dye 3 core. The latter pro- of the volcanic isle of Thera in the Aegean. duced the notorious "Year Without a Sum- On back through time, the Dye 3 core mer" in New England in 1816, when crops gives absolute dates to unwritten events: froze and snow fell in July and August. 4401 B.C. Explosion of Mount Mazama in Sequences of heavy summer melting from Oregon created Crater Lake. A.D. 950 to roughly 1200 confirm the world's 7911 to 7090 B.C. Seven different great warmth during the time that Vikings settled eruptions occurred somewhere on earth. and thrived in Greenland, before the cold of From 25,000 down to 10,000 years ago, the Little Ice Age froze them out. (From high amounts of wind-blown continental about 1200 until the mid-1800s, world cli- dust marked the last glacial maximum in the mate was colder than at any time since the Northern Hemisphere, before the start of last deglaciation.) global warming in the Holocene. Even deeper in the core, volcanic acids Analyses of a previous deep ice core taken show that an eruption must have darkened at Camp Century in Greenland provide omi- skies over Rome the year Julius Caesar was nous evidence that the last interglacial may Ice on the World 99 have ended suddenly and dramatically. A Greenland, named Vatnajökull. Lying un- brief, sharp cooling was followed by tem- derneath Vatnajökull is an active volcano, peratures only slightly lower than today's. Grímsvötn. And beneath the smaller But both ice and seabed cores show it took Mýrdalsjökull, not far to the southwest, only 5,000 to 10,000 years for ice sheets to is another, Katla. build up on the earth-some 25 million cu- I have twice been to Iceland to see these bic kilometers of ice, with a corresponding glaciers, and to drive across vast outwash 60-meter (200-foot) drop in world sea level. plains of black sand and ground-up lava be- Could it happen again? And that fast, in tween the ice-locked mountains and the cold the stately turning of the geologic calendar? sea. With an Icelandic glacier expert, Helgi Björnsson, I talked of what happens when a AST. OF GREENLAND, which is volcano exists under a huge sheet of ice. E no longer green, lies Iceland, an is- "There is what we call a jökulhlaup-a land of volcanic fire and ash more glacier burst-and it is nothing to be in the than of ice. But it does hold one of way of, he said. "At least 13 have occurred the largest ice caps outside Antarctica and from the Grímsvötn region of Vatna since 1955. Katla produced a catastrophic one in 1918; more water than the Amazon carries burst forth and flowed to the sea for only a few days. "These floods shape much of Iceland's south coast. They keep stretches of it all but cut off from the rest of the country because of the washout of roads on the coastal plain. "Vatna bursts about every two years, with a bad one every five years. In between, geothermal heat beneath the ice builds up a big pool or reservoir of meltwater, as much as a thousand feet deep. A ridge of rock holds it in, until suddenly it breaks open a channel under the ice, sometimes 30 miles long." Helgi told me of an ambitious plan to end the Grímsvötn floods. After a future burst, when the glacier pool has drained to its low- est, a tunnel "the size of my office" might be drilled through the mountain ridge, he said, to carry off gathering meltwater and prevent another outburst. ROM TALK of a volcano meltwater F tunnel in Iceland, I traveled to a high- way tunnel being bored through a mountain beneath the largest glacier left in Norway, Jostedalsbreen. Much of west-central Norway is cut off from the populated south by deep fjords and the glacier-capped mountains above. Boats and roundabout roads provide the only way TOM BEAN to reach towns and farms isolated by ice. But Wiggling through tiny air pockets in an a dream of decades was nearing reality at the Alaska glacier, an inch-long ice worm- head of a lovely fjord and farm community Mesemchytraeus solofiugus, once thought named Fjærland. to be mythical-feeds on algae and pollen. "We'll be driving our cars 4,000 feet be- neath the surface of Jostedalsbreen when the 100 National Geographic, January 1987 tunnel is completed," said an old friend, ancient scour marks and moraine lines on glaciologist Olav Orheim of the Norsk Polar- the mountainsides. Finally we landed on the institutt. A veteran of research journeys to ink-dark water at Fjærland. both the Arctic and Antarctic, Olav for "This fjord drops to more than 3,000 feet years has helped his family operate a sum- deep at its mouth," Olay said, "and once it mer hotel at jarland. Its name, the Mun- held solid ice up to 3,000 feet above us." dal, is not only that of the oldest farm in the valley, but also as anglicized that of for- mer Vice President of the United States Wal- A LIVING DIORAMA of the Ice Age in the United States lies in the gla- ter Mondale, whose family came from there. ciers of Alaska's southeastern Olav and 1 and GEOGRAPHIC photogra- Panhandle and the Chugach, pher Otis Imboden flew by floatplane over Wrangell, and St. Elias ranges between An- the heights of Jostedalsbreen, under clouds chorage on the west and Yakutat to the east. only a few hundred feet above the glacier Amid mountain scenery as spectacular as surface. Down the tumbled, crevassed spill- any on earth, the glaciers spill down from ways of ice we twisted and turned, following gaunt peaks, flow together, and fan out in DOUG ALLEN. OXFORD SCIENTIFIC FILMS. LTD. A crimson tide of summer blooming algae tints " glacier in the South Orkney Islands. Common throughout the world, these one celled plants form a vital first link in polar food chains. Discovery of brown algae on the underside of Arctic ice floes renews concern about the effects of oil spills on the environment. lee on the World 101 multistriped ice fields along the Gulf of Alaska. Each black stripe of glacial debris is a side moraine from a different ice river. Count the stripes, and you know the number of glaciers feeding the final broad ice stream. Occasionally a glacier will "surge"-a technical term to glaciologists, translated in popular jargon to "galloping." The ice sud- denly begins flowing far faster than normal, grinding and pushing downhill at speeds of tens, even hundreds of feet a day. I went to Alaska in 1982 because a well- known glacier immediately adjacent to the Hubbard, the Variegated, was in early stages of a surge. Glaciologists from the Uni- versities of Washington and Alaska, Cal- tech, and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology were camped on the glacier with ice drills, theodolites, and other gear to record the ice river's gallop forward. It had begun only a few weeks before. "Our thinking is that a glacier that surges has changed its internal plumbing system," explained Barclay Kamb of Caltech, a friendly, articulate ice scientist. "Meltwater at the base, blocked in its normal escape pas- sages, builds up pressure until the friction between ice and rock is nearly overcome, al- lowing the ice to slide downhill much faster [diagrams; pages 114-15]." Day by day I could sense it moving- hear it and all but see it. Along the edges of the Variegated, creaking and groaning and booming of tortured ice gave loud proof that the frozen river on which the scientists were camped was indeed lurching downhill. "We can measure not only the surface mo- tion-between three and twenty feet a day right now-but also what is more interesting to us: pulses of water pressure traveling un- derneath. In a series of drill holes through LONNIE G. THOMPSON the glacier, we are recording pressure waves Frozen archive of weather reports, the 50- moving as fast as 1,000 feet an hour." meter face of the Quelccaya Ice Cap in Peru's The surface of the ice was also rising and Andes displays annual layers of snow falling slowly, like the back of a massive cat- separated by dry-season dust. A 165-meter- erpillar, measured by precise instruments long ice core, taken at the ice cap's summit, mounted on high promontories and cliff holds 1,500 years of climatic data. Ice cores ledges above the glacier. Water flowed from Greenland and Antarctica trace through deep crevasses in the glacier and conditions as far back as 150,000 years. But Quelccaya offers a rare record of equatorial gushed in a milky freshet from its snout. weather patterns, such as El Niño, which When British explorer George Vancouver can wreak global havoc. sailed this coast in 1794, ice entirely blocked the mouths of several of today's deep, 102 National Geographic, January 1987 is along the Gulf of winding fjords-among them, Glacier Bay "Exactly the opposite is happening to the ripe of glacial debris is southeast of Yakutat. He saw that an inlet Hubbard. While the Columbia draws back, a different ice river. existed there, but he could not sail in to the Hubbard may be undergoing a major you know the number prove it. Today ships as large as ocean liners advance, heading back down its bay toward final broad ice stream. call regularly in Glacier Bay-call with their where it stood hundreds of years ago. cier will "surge"-a great horns to try to bring down ice cliffs in "Why? Tidewater glaciers such as these ologists, translated in thunderous collapse. seem to follow long-term cycles of advance lloping.' The ice sud- Muir Glacier, from the point where famed and retreat. They do not behave alike or in ar faster than normal, naturalist John Muir saw it in 1879, has phase. Their changes relate to dynamics of downhill at speeds of retreated an additional 30 miles, nearly ice movement, different shapes of their val- feet a day. doubling the extent of the ice-freed bay. leys and snow-accumulation areas, and con- 1982 because a well- ditions at and under their faces." iately adjacent to the A NOTHER ICE RIVER in Alaska is Extraordinarily heavy snows of the past gated, was in early in the process of doing the same three winters in southeastern Alaska, from ologists from the Uni- thing: Columbia Glacier, just 1983 to 1986, may be forcing the Hubbard's on and Alaska, Cal- west of the oil-pipeline port of advance, says Dr. Maynard M. Miller of the Federal Institute of Valdez. Its towering ice cliffs front on deep University of Idaho. For 40 years he has aped on the glacier water in Prince William Sound. There it has studied and recorded glacier activity cen- tes, and other gear to stood, calving icebergs and smaller chunks tered in the Juneau Ice Field. allop forward. It had called growlers and bergy bits and brash ice, But other glaciologists disagree. Many of S before. for hundreds of years. them see little connection between local L a glacier that surges It has, that is, until a few years ago. Then, weather or short-term climate changes and 11 plumbing system," for reasons best known to the gods of ice-and the behavior of these great ice streams that amb of Caltech, a sea change, the cliffs began spawning more end in the sea. scientist. "Meltwater icebergs and inching back off the glacier's ts normal escape pas- doorsill, its terminal moraine. HUS GLACIOLOGISTS watch are until the friction NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC photographer T and measure and ponder: Under the nearly overcome, al- Joe Scherschel and I visited Valdez in 1982 inexorable Milankovitch cycles of lownhill much faster to see the Columbia as its retreat was accel- earth's solar orbit, will the great 5]." erating. With a grizzled, friendly glaciolo- continental ice sheets again begin growing? I sense it moving- gist named Austin Post, we flew over the A hundred, a thousand years hence, will the it. Along the edges Columbia and down along its face in an old ice have returned? aking and groaning Cessna. From the plane's open door we Certainly the planet's climate will change ired ice gave loud peered straight down and full face at a great in coming millennia, say the scientists of a river on which the embayment in the ice front. It towered 200 study called CLIMAP-an acronym for Cli- was indeed lurching to 300 feet above the water. Loose brash ice mate: Long-range Investigation, Mapping, and bergy bits clustered at its face, but re- and Prediction. The Northern Hemisphere, only the surface mo- markably few large icebergs. overall but particularly in high latitudes, ap- d twenty feet a day Four years later the scene at the Columbia pears already to be cooling, after a century at is more interesting was far different (following pages). The gla- and a half of abnormal warmth. essure traveling un- cier's face had moved back more than a mile On the other side of the equation is man drill holes through and a half. In front of it, trapped between himself. Will we, by our profligate burning ding pressure waves the glacier and its former submarine sill, lay of hydrocarbon fuels, intensify the green- feet an hour." a jam-packed apron of icebergs, floes, and house effect of excessive carbon dioxide in was also rising and bits-loose ice that kept any ship, no matter the atmosphere and delay the natural plane- ack of a massive cat- how large, from approaching. tary cycle? Will the present interglacial precise instruments "The Columbia went back fast the first thus become even warmer, and the oceans nontories and cliff couple of years," Austin told me. "Now it's continue to rise, as the ice sheets of Antarc- ier. Water flowed thinned down somewhat and may be paus- tica and Greenland pull back and turn to in the glacier and ing before it begins breaking back again. water? Or will the ice caps grow and spread t from its snout. But since the terminus lies in deep water under increasing snowfall, and the seas George Vancouver [measured in September at nearly 1,000 begin to fall again? ice entirely blocked feet], we think it will continue to retreat Stay tuned for the weather broadcasts of of today's deep, rapidly. the next millennium. aphic, January 1987 Ice on the World 103 SCIENTIFIC SEPTEMBER 1989 $3.95 AMERICAN SPECIAL AUG 71 10 ISSUE WHITE HOUSE LIBRARY MANAGING PLANET EARTH 04 0 74820 08715 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN September 1989 Volume 261 Number 3 Managing Planet Earth Introducing a single-topic issue that explores the prospects for sustainable human development on a planet with finite resources and a fragile environment by William C. Clark E very form of life continually fac- sibility for, their ultimate collision today by unprecedented increases in es the challenge of reconciling with a finite environment. In contrast, the rate, scale and complexity of those its innate capacity for growth the same wellsprings of human inven- interactions. What were once local in- with the opportunities and con- tiveness and energy that are so trans- cidents of pollution now involve sev- straints that arise through its interac- forming the earth have also given us eral nations-witness the concern for tions with the natural environment. an unprecedented understanding of acid deposition in Europe and in North The remarkable success of our own how the planet works, how our pres- America. What were once acute epi- species in meeting that challenge is ent activities threaten its workings sodes of relatively reversible dam- reflected in the striking image that and how we can intervene to improve age now affect multiple generations- graces the cover of this single-topic the prospects for its sustainable de- witness the debates over chemical- issue of Scientific American. That ini- velopment. Our ability to look back on and radioactive-waste disposal. What tial success, however, is only the be- ourselves from outer space symbol- were once straightforward confronta- ginning of the story. izes the unique perspective we have tions between ecological preservation As we seek to imagine different on our environment and on where and economic growth now involve ways in which that story might unfold, we are headed as a species. With this multiple linkages-witness the feed- analogies can be helpful. The global knowledge comes a responsibility not backs among energy consumption, pattern of light created by today's civ- borne by the bacteria: the responsibil- agriculture and climatic change that ilizations is not unlike the pattern of ity to manage the human use of plan- are thought to enter into the green- exuberant growth that develops soon et earth. house effect. after bacteria are introduced to a nu- At the individual level, people have We have entered an era character- trient-rich petri dish. In the limited begun to respond to increased aware- ized by syndromes of global change world of the petri dish, such growth is ness of global environmental change that stem from the interdependence not sustainable. Sooner or later, as the by altering their values, beliefs and between human development and the bacterial populations deplete avail- actions. Changes in individual behav- environment. As we attempt to move able resources and submerge in their ior are surely necessary but are not own wastes, their initial blossoming is enough. It is as a global species that replaced by stagnation or collapse. we are transforming the planet. It WILLIAM C. CLARK is a senior research The analogy breaks down in the fact is only as a global species-pooling associate at Harvard University's Ken- that bacterial populations have no our knowledge, coordinating our ac- nedy School of Government. He received control over, and therefore no respon- tions and sharing what the planet has a B.S. in 1971 from Yale University and to offer-that we have any prospect a Ph.D. in 1979 from the University of British Columbia. Clark led studies for managing the planet's transforma- on sustainable development of the bio- tion along pathways of sustainable de- MANAGING PLANET EARTH will require sphere at the International Institute for velopment. Self-conscious, intelligent Applied Systems Analysis in Austria. He answers to two questions: What kind of management of the earth is one of the is a member of the U.S. National Acad- planet do we want? What kind of planet great challenges facing humanity as it emy of Sciences Committee on Global can we get? To resolve these questions approaches the 21st century. Change and edits Environment maga- human beings must understand how zine. His interests at the Kennedy School their activities affect the global environ- ment and must choose strategies for developing the planet. One local aspect A Ithough efforts to manage the in- focus on the policy issues that arise from the competing international con- teractions between people and cerns of development, environment and of a possible global strategy is symbol- their environments are as old security. In 1983 Clark received the Mac- ized here by a Nepalese woman planting as human civilization, the manage- Arthur prize. a tree as part of a reforestation project. ment problem has been transformed striking SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN September 1989 47 from merely causing these syndromes ronment and Development (WCED), countries [see illustrations below and to managing them consciously, two chaired by Prime Minister Brundt- on next three pages]. central questions must be addressed: land, characterizes sustainable devel- At one extreme, the richest 15 per- What kind of planet do we want? What opment as paths of social, economic cent of the world's population con- kind of planet can we get? and political progress that meet "the sumes more than one third of the What kind of planet we want is ul- needs of the present without compro- planet's fertilizer and more than half timately a question of values. How mising the ability of future genera- of its energy. At the other extreme, much species diversity should be tions to meet their own needs." Sus- perhaps one quarter of the world's maintained in the world? Should the tainable development thus reflects a population goes hungry during at size or the growth rate of the human choice of values for managing planet least some seasons of the year. More population be curtailed to protect earth in which equity matters-equity than a third live in countries where the the global environment? How much among peoples around the world to- mortality for young children is greater climatic change is acceptable? How day, equity between parents and their than one in 10. The vast majority exist much poverty? Should the deep ocean grandchildren. on per capita incomes below the offi- be considered an option for hazard- cial poverty level in the U.S. ous-waste disposal? M anaging the planet toward As we look to the future, it is encour- Science can illuminate these issues sustainable development is an aging that the growth rate of the hu- but cannot resolve them. The choice undertaking made no less man population is declining virtually of answers is ours to make and our daunting by its urgency. The basic everywhere. Even if the trends respon- grandchildren's to live with. Because human dimensions of the task are sible for the decline continue, howev- different people live in different cir- explored by Nathan Keyfitz in "The er, the next century will probably see cumstances and have different values, Growing Human Population" on page a doubling of the number of people individual choices can be expected 118 and by Jim MacNeill in "Strate- trying to extract a living from plan- to vary enormously. As pointed out gies for Sustainable Economic Devel- et earth. Nearly all of the increase will by Gro Harlem Brundtland in the clos- opment" on page 154. The broad pic- take place in today's poorer countries. ing essay to this issue, poor people ture, although familiar, bears recount- According to the WCED, a fivefold to and rich people are especially likely ing. The planet today is inhabited by tenfold increase in world economic to place different values on econom- somewhat more than five billion peo- activity during the next 50 years will ic growth and environmental conser- ple who each year appropriate 40 per- be required to meet the basic needs vation. Recently, however, the long- cent of the organic material fixed by and aspirations of the future popula- standing debate over growth versus photosynthesis on land, consume the tion. The implications of this desper- environment has matured considera- equivalent of two tons of coal per ately needed economic growth for the bly. A broad consensus has begun to person and produce an average of 150 already stressed planetary environ- emerge that interactions between peo- kilograms of steel for each man, wom- ment are at least problematic and are ple and their environments should be an and child on the earth. The distri- potentially catastrophic. managed with the goal of sustainable bution of these people, their well- Efforts to manage the sustainable development. being and their impact on the en- development of the earth must there- The World Commission on Envi- vironment vary significantly among fore have three specific objectives. UNDER 20 20-50 50-100 100-150 150-200 OVER 200 CHILD MORTALITY is one measure of a population's well-be- people live in countries where the mortality is greater than ing. The map shows deaths per 1,000 live births for children one in 10. The data, estimated for 1985 to 1990, are from the younger than five years. More than one third of the world's U.N.'s Department of International Economic and Social Affairs. 48 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN September 1989 to disseminate the knowledge with the Russian mineralogist Vladi- A second important component of the is means necessary to control mir I. Vernadsky's seminal writings on the planet's environment is the global human population growth. The sec- the biosphere. It received important circulation and processing of major is to facilitate sufficiently vigor- impetus from the International Geo- chemical elements such as carbon, ox- economic growth and equitable physical Year of 1957 and is now be- ygen, nitrogen, phosphorus and sul- distribution of its benefits to meet the ing carried forward through a lively fur. These elements are the principal basic needs of the human population array of research and monitoring ef- components of life. In chemical forms this and subsequent generations. forts around the world, capped by such as carbon dioxide, methane and The third is to structure the growth an ambitious new International Geo- nitrous oxide, they also exert a ma- ways that keep its enormous poten- sphere Biosphere Program. Although jor influence on climate. Even in the tial for environmental transformation the "global change" revolution is far absence of human influences, the within safe limits-limits that are yet from complete, its broad outlines can earth's climate and chemistry have to be determined. be summarized in the illustration on undergone abrupt and tightly linked page 52. changes such as those reflected in f the goals of sustainable develop- The view of environmental change the ice-core records shown on page I ment describe the type of planet outlined in the illustration shows a 75. When added to these natural fluc- people want, the second question planet dominated through decades tuations, human activities have cre- still remains: What kind of planet can and centuries by the interactions of ated disturbances in global chemi- we actually get? When we address this climate and chemical flows of major cal flows that manifest themselves question, the focus shifts from what elements, interactions that are woven as smog, acid precipitation, strato- we value to what we know. together by the global hydrological spheric ozone depletion and other In the end the strategies for sustain- cycle and are significantly influenced problems [see "The Changing Atmos- able development must translate into by the presence of life. phere," by Thomas E. Graedel and Paul local action if they are to have any The climate system incorporates at- J. Crutzen, page 58]. impact at all. As I have noted, how- mospheric and oceanic processes that The third component of the illustra- ever, many of today's most intractable govern the global distribution of wind, tion, the hydrological cycle, includes challenges to sustainability involve rainfall and temperature. Processes the processes of evaporation and time scales of decades or centuries central to human transformation and precipitation, runoff and circulation. and global spatial scales. Any signif- management of planet earth include Water is a key agent of topograph- icant improvements in our ability to changes in concentrations of green- ic change and an overall regulator of manage planet earth will require that house gases and their impact on tem- global chemistry and climate. As de- we learn how to relate local develop- perature; the effect of ocean circula- scribed by J. W. Maurits la Rivière ment action to a global environmental tion on the timing and distribution of in "Threats to the World's Water" on perspective. climatic changes; and the role of vege- page 80, human impacts on the hydro- Fortunately, understanding of glob- tation in regulating the flux of water logical cycle that require attention in- al environmental change has been rev- between land and atmosphere [see clude pollution of groundwater, sur- olutionized in recent years. The rev- "The Changing Climate," by Stephen face waters and oceans, redistribution olution has its roots in the 1920's, H. Schneider, page 70]. of water flows on the earth's surface UNDER .15 .15-.25 .25-.35 .35-.45 .45-.55 OVER .55 CROPLAND PER CAPITA is an index of the flexibility societies less than about .2 hectare per capita are especially limited have to adjust their land-use practices. Shown here is crop- in their options for managing the environment. Data are from land in hectares per capita for the mid-1980's. Countries with the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN September 1989 49 and potential sea-level changes in- tury, the human population has in- than 3 percent a year in the utilization duced by global warming. creased by a factor of eight; average of such basic metals as lead, copper Life, the final component in the il- life expectancy has at least doubled. and iron [see "Strategies for Manufac- lustration on page 52, has found the During the same period human eco- turing," by Robert A. Frosch and Nich- environment of planet earth to be re- nomic activity has become increasing- olas E. Gallopoulos, page 144]. plete with possibilities, resulting in ly global, with demands for goods and The transformation of the planetary the evolution of an astounding-but services in one part of the planet being environment induced by this explo- rapidly decreasing-degree of biologi- met with supplies from half a world sion of human activity is particular- cal diversity [see "Threats to Biodiver- away. The volume of goods exchanged ly evident in changes to the physi- sity," by Edward O. Wilson, page 108]. in international trade has increased by cal landscape. Since the beginning of It has not been widely appreciated a factor of 800 or more and now repre- the 18th century, the planet has lost until recently that life is also a key sents more than a third of the world's six million square kilometers of for- player in conditioning and regulating total economic product. est-an area larger than Europe. Land the global environment, through its The three components of this degradation has increased to a signifi- influence on the chemical and hydro- growth and globalization of human cant but uncertain degree [see illustra- logical cycles. Finally, one form of activity that have had greatest impact tion on opposite page]. Sediment loads life-the human species-has grown on the environment are agriculture, have risen threefold in major river over the past several centuries from a energy and manufacturing, each of systems and eightfold in smaller ba- position of negligible influence at the which is discussed at length in subse- sins that support intense human ac- planetary scale to one of great signifi- quent articles. Agriculture has been tivity; the resulting flow of carbon to cance as an agent of global change. the dominant agent of global land the sea is between one and two billion transformation; since the middle of tons a year. During the same period A Ithough our knowledge of the the last century, nine million square the amount of water humans with- earth system is quickly expand- kilometers of the earth's surface have draw from the hydrological cycle has ing, we do not yet know been converted into permanent crop- increased from perhaps 100 to 3,600 enough about it to say with any cer- lands [see "Strategies for Agriculture," cubic kilometers per year-a volume tainty how much change the system as by Pierre R. Crosson and Norman J. equivalent to that of Lake Huron. a whole can tolerate or what its capac- Rosenberg, page 128]. Energy use has Many substantial changes in the ity may be for sustaining human de- risen by a factor of 80 over the same planet's other chemical flows have velopment. We do, however, know a period, with profound consequences taken place. In the past 300 years good deal about interactions between for the planet's chemical flows of car- agricultural and industrial develop- individual components of the global bon, sulfur and nitrogen [see "Strate- ment has doubled the amount of environment and specific human ac- gies for Energy Use," by John H. Gib- methane in the atmosphere and in- tivities. This admittedly incomplete bons, Peter D. Blair and Holly L. Gwin, creased the concentration of carbon knowledge provides some useful per- page 136]. Finally, the world's indus- dioxide by 25 percent. The global spectives on questions of planetary trial production has increased more flows of major elements such as sul- management. than 100-fold in 100 years, supported fur and nitrogen that result from hu- Since the beginning of the 18th cen- by long-term growth rates of more man activity are comparable to or 0-.75 .75-1.50 1.50-2.25 2.25-3.00 3.00-3.75 OVER 3.75 CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS are one impact of human activ- expressed as tons of carbon per person per year. Highest Bhu ities on the environment. Shown are carbon dioxide releas- tan. Data were compiled by the author's student Susan Subak are East Germany and the U.S. Lowest are Burundi and es from energy use, industrial activities and deforestation 50 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN September 1989 greater than the natural flows of these tion of change by comparing the pres- organic solvent and extinction of ma- the trace metals, ent rate of transformation with that of rine mammals-also represents pri- dements which the many of which are Many of which toxic to life, Jerome a generation ago. The dominant im- marily phenomena of the 20th century O. the Canadian National pression from this analysis is the rela- that are now decelerating. Water Research Institute and Jozef M. tive recency of most global environ- The crude measure of long-term de- Pacyna of the Norwegian Institute for mental change. None of the compo- celeration presented here gives no Air Pollution Research have shown nents we reviewed had reached 50 assurance that the declining transfor- that human emissions of lead, cadmi- percent of its total transformation be- mation rates reflect increasing com- um and zinc exceed the flux from fore the 19th century. Most passed the petence in planetary management. natural sources by factors of 18, five 50 percent level only in the second (Specific transformation rates could, and three, respectively. For several half of the 20th century. for example, decline simply because other metals, including arsenic, mer- Beyond this general conclusion, four there are no more species to exter- cury, nickel and vanadium, the human broad patterns of transformation minate or because we turn to cheap- contribution is now as much as two emerge. The first pattern, character- er fuels that happen to emit differ- times that from natural sources. Final- ized by relatively long-established ent pollutants.) Nevertheless, for most S ly, of the more than 70,000 chemicals and still accelerating change, includes of the cases I have cited, at least synthesized by humans, a number- deforestation and soil erosion. The some fraction of the deceleration can such as the chlorofluorocarbons and second, established relatively recently be attributed to deliberate large-scale, DDT-have been shown to affect the and still accelerating, includes the de- long-term efforts at environmental global environment significantly, even struction of floral diversity, withdraw- management. at very low concentrations. al of water from the hydrological cy- cle, sediment flows and human mo- ssessment of the prospects for bilization of carbon, nitrogen and T he global patterns sketched A so far provide a necessary but sustainable development of the phosphorus. There is little reason to insufficient perspective from earth shows that the change in believe that human society has yet which to reflect on the prospects for the rates at which human activities are learned to manage on a global scale improving the management of planet transforming the planet may be as any of these accelerating transforma- earth. Also needed is an appreciation important as the absolute magnitudes tions of the environment. of the regional faces of change. To involved. B. L. Turner, Robert W. Kates More encouraging are two decel- analyze regional situations in any de- and I have analyzed historical trans- erating trends. Human-induced ex- tail is beyond the scope of this essay; formation rates for several compo- tinctions of terrestrial vertebrates still, it will be helpful to recall the nents of the global environmental sys- reached half of their present total extraordinary range of local circum- tem. For each component, we first by the late 19th century and are ap- stances that will have to be dealt with characterized the recency of change- parently occurring more slowly today if the human transformation of the the date by which half of the total than they were a generation ago. The planet is to be steered along paths of human transformation from prehis- remaining group of transformations sustainable development. toric times to the present had taken we examined-releases of sulfur, lead, Any classification of regional per- place. Next, we assessed the accelera- radioactive fallout, a representative spectives on sustainable development AREAS WITH ACUTE SCARCITY OR DEFICIT OF FUELWOOD AREAS UNDER STRESS FROM ACIDIFICATION AREAS WITH VERY HIGH AREAS WHERE POPULATION MAY OR HIGH RISK OF EXCEED CARRYING CAPACITY DESERTIFICATION OF LOCAL AGRICULTURE LAND DEGRADATION results from a variety of human activi- feed more people than the land is actually able to support. The ties. Shown are regions threatened by desertification, overhar- data are from the U.N.'s Food and Agriculture Organization and vesting of firewood, acid rain and stress induced by efforts to the Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment. SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN September 1989 51 Oliver S. Owen The HEAT Is On The Greenhouse Effect and the Earth's Future Weather experts are seeking the causes and effects of global warming - the "greenhouse ef- fect." Now is the time to examine how this worldwide warm-up may affect our lives. Consider the following events for a moment: In 1987, an enormous chunk of ice - twice the size of Rhode Island - broke away from the Ant- arctic ice field and splashed into the sea. Shortly after being spawned Greenhouse gases emitted from millions of industrial smokestacks as well as other sources off the west coast of Africa in Au- have a warming influence on the world's climate. gust 1988, Hurricane Gilbert at- tained wind speeds of more than ally pervasive experiment whose a much smaller scale. 200 miles per hour. At its peak, it ultimate consequences could be Our inadvertent tampering with was the most violent hurricane second only to a nuclear war," was the global climate must be con- ever experienced in the Western the message issued by an interna- trolled. As one scientist at the To- Hemisphere. tional conference of scientists and ronto meeting stressed: "This con- During the summer of 1988, policy makers that convened in To- ference is screaming out to the all-time heat records for many cities ronto in 1988. The "test tube" that nations of the world to put the throughout the United States were humanity is using in this global ex- brakes on the emissions of green- shattered. On August 1, for exam- periment is the atmosphere. Into house gases." ple, Furnace Creek, California, this "test tube" we are spewing a lived up to its name with an oven- variety of greenhouse gases, such The Greenhouse Effect like temperature reading of 116° as carbon dioxide, methane, ni- What is the greenhouse effect? At first glance, it would appear trous oxide, and ozone, all of which Let's give a familiar example. You that the above events have little in have a warming influence on the know what happens if you park common. Nevertheless, according world's climate. These gases are your car in the parking lot on a hot to some scientists these seemingly emitted from millions of industrial summer day and forget to open the unrelated episodes may all be the smokestacks, motor vehicles, waste windows. When you get back in- direct result of a global climatic dumps, and other sources. side your car, it is hot as an oven. phenomenon called the greenhouse Today the world's industrialized This rapid warm-up is due to a effect. The importance of this phe- nations, such as the United States, greenhouse effect: The sun's radi- nomenon to human society can England, West Germany, and ant energy easily passes through hardly be overstated. Indeed, ac- Japan, are enjoying a quality of life the car's windows, and some of cording to one prominent climatol- unsurpassed in human history. Re- this energy is then converted into ogist, the greenhouse effect, if grettably, however, that lifestyle is heat or infrared radiation. Since uncontrolled, could wipe out civili- being bought at enormous environ- this radiation cannot readily escape zation within 500 years. mental costs. And one of these costs back through the windows, it is It is ironic that we ourselves are is global warming caused by the trapped inside, and the car warms responsible for the climatic di- greenhouse effect. The less-devel- up. lemma with which we are now oped nations of South America, Af- Molecules of greenhouse gases, threatened. "Humanity is conduct- rica, and Asia are also contributing such as CO2, behave very much ing an enormous, unintended, glob- to the greenhouse problem, but on like the glass in car windows or in 34 THE FUTURIST, September-October 1989 a greenhouse. In a sense, the year 2050 and will hike up the greenhouse gases form a "glass global "thermostat" about 4° C window" over the earth. They trap (7° F). heat that otherwise would escape from the earth's surface into outer The Greenhouse Controversy Senator space. It may appear that the green- Gore Carbon dioxide is continuously house explanation of the global removed from the atmosphere by warming trend of the 1980s is uni- In Antarctica green plants during photosyn- versally accepted by the scientific thesis. On the other hand, carbon community. This is not true. In dioxide is gradually released back fact, a number of highly respected Senator Albert Gore, Jr., has into the air when plants and ani- climatologists are not convinced. long been interested in the mals respire, when organic matter Stephen Schneider, a climatol- earth's environment. He chaired decays, when forests, grasslands, ogist with the National Center for the first congressional hearings or any organic material is burned, Atmospheric Research at Boulder, on the greenhouse effect and and when water evaporates. For Colorado, states that the current has introduced legislation to thousands of years these processes warm-up during the 1980s "doesn't combat climate change and were in balance, the amount of car- prove the greenhouse effect." ozone depletion. bon dioxide removed from the Schneider's views are similar to In 1988, Gore visited Antarc- atmosphere equaling the amount those of Chester Ropelewski, a tica to gather information about entering it. Since 1860, however, weather expert with the Climate global warming and other envi- atmospheric levels of CO2 have Analysis Center in Maryland. Ac- ronmental problems and found risen substantially. By itself, fossil- cording to Ropelewski, "It's still that the Antarctic ice contains fuel consumption is responsible for not clear whether this is the CO₂ clear evidence of how the earth's the annual release of 5 billion met- signal. The hard evidence isn't atmosphere is changing. ric tons of carbon into the air - there." Kenneth E.F. Watt, profes- "Ice cores contain highly accu- roughly one ton for each person on sor of environmental science at the rate information about the earth! The rate of carbon release University of California-Davis, has makeup of the Earth's atmo- from such combustion has in- ridiculed concern about the green- sphere year by year for tens of creased 53-fold since 1860. The house effect as the "laugh of the thousands of years," Gore re- clearing and burning of tropical century." ported. "From such cores, we rain forests to make room for cattle Despite such skepticism, how- know, for example, that there ranches and farms releases an addi- ever, several highly respected were dramatically lower levels tional 1.6 billion tons into the air climatologists are certain that the of carbon dioxide in the atmo- annually. current warm-up of our planet is sphere at the peak of the last Ice Scientists have used several dif- indeed a bona fide greenhouse sig- Age, 20,000 years ago. By ferent techniques to determine the nal. For example, in late 1988 James contrast, the ice and snow laid atmospheric CO2 levels of past cen- E. Hansen of NASA's Goddard In- down in the 1980s show levels turies. For example, they have stitute of Space Studies testified be- of carbon dioxide, methane, analyzed air bubbles trapped in fore the Senate Energy and Natural CFCs, nitrous oxide, and other glacial ice and have examined Resources Committee that "we can gases responsible for the green- wood from century-old trees. Since state with 99% confidence that a house effect higher than they 1958, CO2 levels have been con- cause-and-effect relationship exists have been in at least 160,000 tinuously monitored with sensitive between the greenhouse effect and years (as far back as the ice cores instruments atop Mauna Loa, a the observed warming." measure) 13,677-foot volcanic mountain on "Something else is different the island of Hawaii. Another cur- "Greenhouse" Benefits about the ice layers from the rent monitoring site is located at The effects of the greenhouse 1980s - they look different to the the South Pole station of the U.S. phenomenon will not all be bad. naked eye because of the thick, Antarctic Program. Both sites are Let's consider some of its possible alternating layers of 'hoar' ice, far removed from industrial areas benefits: apparently caused by partial where CO2 levels would be abnor- The cost of heating homes, melting and recrystallization mally high. The CO2 levels re- stores, and factories would be into larger granules. The scien- corded at Mauna Loa and the South somewhat less. According to F. tists are as yet cautiously with- Pole are virtually identical. Kenneth Hare, a meteorologist at holding judgment on whether On the basis of such techniques, the University of Toronto, if the this is the clear signal of Antarc- climatologists have determined CO₂ level rises to 550 ppm by 2050, tic warming that many have an- that levels of atmospheric CO2 rose Canadian fuel costs for heating ticipated." from 275 parts per millimeter purposes could be slashed by 15%. (ppm) in 1860 to 346 ppm in 1986 The sub-Arctic grasslands, Source: "Postcard Antarctica: Unbear- able Whiteness" by Albert Gore, in the - an increase of 26%. At current now populated largely by lem- December 26, 1988, issue of The New Re- rates of increase, the CO2 concen- mings and caribou, may warm up public. tration will reach 550 ppm by the sufficiently to attract not only THE FUTURIST, September-October 1989 35 human settlement, but agricultural and industrial development as well. Certainly an average warm- up of 7° F or more would probably be most welcome to the few people who are now living in the frigid realms of northern Canada, Scan- dinavia, and the Soviet Union. Some greenhouse researchers have even suggested that millions of Americans will emigrate to Canada because they will find living and working opportunities so attrac- tive. As a result, Canada's popula- tion, as well as its political and economic clout, could grow enor- mously, eventually even surpass- ing that of the United States. The added carbon dioxide in the atmosphere could bring in- creased rainfall as well as a longer growing season; hence, agricul- tural production should improve in NEW YORK CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU places such as Canada, Europe, If the level of the earth's seas rises due to melting of the polar ice caps, waterfront cities and northeast Africa. For example, such as New York would experience major flooding and destruction. the 110-day growing season in Canada's wheat belt could increase water needs of Los Angeles for the Hotter summers. Several of to 160 days. As Robert Stewart, cli- next 675 years!" the leading weather experts in the mate expert from Agriculture A 3.3 foot (1 meter) rise in ocean United States are confident that the Canada, has said, "The green- levels by 2035 would cause the seas searing heat experienced in 1988 house effect is not doom and gloom to move 100 feet (30 meters) further was indeed the result of the green- [for Canada] in any sense!" inland along our nation's shores, house phenomenon. Heat records thus reshaping the coastline. Along were broken and re-broken in Harmful Effects the Atlantic and Gulf shores, major towns throughout the Middle Unfortunately, most of the ef- portions of Florida and Louisiana West, as well as in New England, fects of global warming would be would be flooded. Billions of dol- the Middle Atlantic states, and the highly detrimental. These negative lars of property, including homes, far West. In Ohio, the Environmen- effects include: factories, chemical storage tanks, tal Protection Agency issued an Melting of glaciers and rising railroads, and highways would be ozone warning because the hot air seas. An increase in global average inundated. It is estimated that the acted like a lid over Cleveland, Co- temperature of only 4° C (7° F) city of Charleston, South Carolina, lumbus, and other cities and would result in a thermal expan- alone would sustain $650 million caused a serious buildup of the sion of the warmed-up sea water, in flood damage. Boston, New health-threatening gas. Health au- a melting of glaciers such as the York City, Baltimore, Norfolk, thorities throughout the United Antarctic ice cap, and, therefore, a Miami, Mobile, New Orleans, and States advised the aged and those rise in ocean levels. Indeed, such Houston would likely experience with heart or respiratory problems melting has already begun, as evi- similar destruction. Millions of to remain indoors and reduce their denced by the slab of ice that broke people would be forced to relocate; physical activity during extreme off from the Antarctic ice field in human stress, anxiety, and dis- heat waves. Despite these warn- 1987 and splashed into the Ross comfort would be severe. The salty ings, however, a number of heat- Sea. So huge was this chunk - 25 water of the rising seas would related deaths occurred. by 99 miles in area - that its loss gradually "invade" brackish water More frequent and severe actually reshaped Antarctica's estuaries such as the Chesapeake droughts. Suppose that the U.S. shoreline. In fact, the Bay of Bay, with the result being a mas- Weather Service announced to- Whales is now gone forever, except sive contamination of breeding and morrow that the nation would re- in mapmakers' memories! nursery habitats used by valuable ceive 40% less precipitation than Guy Guthrie, manager of the Na- food fish such as red snapper, normal during the next 100 years. tional Science Foundation's Polar bluefish, striped bass, and floun- The report would send shock Information Program, notes, "The der. Moreover, salt water would waves through the country. Such size of the iceberg in human terms seep into water-holding layers of a drastic decline in moisture would is staggering. If you could some- porous rock (aquifers) and pollute cause an environmental-agricul- how transport it to California and the drinking water on which mil- tural-economic disaster of enor- melt it, it would supply all the lions of people depend. mous dimensions. But such cli- 36 THE FUTURIST, September-October 1989 matic trauma is precisely what is tons per acre per year on 4.7 million number of very intense hurricanes predicted by Walter Orr Roberts, acres of cropland - an area the size that will be triggered by global former director of the National of New Jersey. This is triple the rate warming. Wunsch has stated that Center for Atmospheric Research that soil scientists consider "toler- "the climatic conditions associated in Boulder, Colorado, when the able." with Gilbert were consistent with greenhouse effect really takes hold. And what of the future? Unfortu- what you would expect to see hap- In other words, droughts would be nately, because of the greenhouse pen under the greenhouse effect. considered "normal" and could be effect, soil scientists predict that My gut feeling is that that is what expected year after year. the dust storms of the future will we are seeing." Several other re- An increase in the frequency be even worse. Greenhouse expert searchers at MIT predict that an and severity of dust storms. The Walter Orr Roberts writes, "The ocean warming of only 5° F would most-destructive soil storms in U.S. Dust Bowl of the 1930s was the fuel super-hurricanes that could be history raged during the Dust Bowl greatest climatic disaster in the na- 50% more destructive than those era of the 1930s. Coffee-colored tion's history. But it will seem like of the past. dust clouds more than a mile thick child's play compared to the Dust A growth in the number and billowed darkly across central U.S. Bowls of the 2040s." severity of forest fires. The U.S. prairies. On May 11, 1934, one of More frequent and severe Forest Service called the summer these "black blizzards" airlifted 300 hurricanes. The energy that pow- of 1988 the worst fire season in 30 million tons of fertile soil - an ers a hurricane is derived from years. That summer's drought amount equal to the tonnage ocean waters that have warmed up transformed much of the nation's scooped out of Central America to to at least 80° F (27° C). Is it possible timber into kindling wood, vulner- form the Panama Canal. The soil that 1988's Hurricane Gilbert was able to being set ablaze by lightning loss in this single storm was equiv- spawned by an ocean warm-up strikes. By midsummer, scores of alent to the removal of 3,000 one- caused by the greenhouse effect? forest fires were raging in Alaska, hundred-acre farms. Several leading climatologists are Idaho, California, Oregon, Utah, Soil erosion is still a critical prob- of that opinion. One of them is Carl Wyoming, and Wisconsin. More lem today. In March 1989, the U.S. Wunsch of MIT. Wunsch believes than 3.65 million acres - an area Soil Conservation Service reported that Hurricane Gilbert may have larger than Connecticut - was re- wind-erosion rates of at least 15 been only the first of an increasing duced to char and smoking em- USDA The greenhouse effect would make forest fires, such as the ones that devastated millions of acres of U.S. forests in 1988, more common in the future. THE FUTURIST, September-October 1989 37 "The rate of wildlife extinction will be much greater during the sudden temperature rise of the next century than it was in the much more gradual thousand-year warm-ups of the past." bers. At Yellowstone National Park greenhouse signal. However, sci- thermal rise, thousands of years alone, flames seared more than a entists predict that, as forests be- ago, a number of warm-climate million acres, forcing the evacua- come hotter and drier when the species expanded their ranges tion of thousands of tourists who greenhouse effect does arrive, the northward as far as Canada. Osage had come to watch the eruptions forest wildfire picture in the United oranges, for example, grew near of Old Faithful. Fire Chief Fred States will be much like that of Toronto; wild pigs flourished in Roach, who had battled such 1988, but on a regular basis, year Pennsylvania. Of course, many blazes for more than 20 years, told after year. plants and animals were not able reporters he "had never seen any- Wildlife extinction. Many ma- to adjust to the thermal shift and thing as awesome as this." jor temperature shifts have occurred became extinct. The crucial point The outbreak of fires in 1988 may during the 3-billion-year history of is that these extinctions were or may not have been an authentic life on this planet. During the last caused by a warm-up of 5° C over Larry Ephron The Next Ice Age Not everyone agrees season in so many areas. What is Major ice ages recur on a vast that the greenhouse going on? 100,000-year cycle - about 90,000 will lead to worldwide The greenhouse effect is occur- years cold, only about 10,000 years 18-26,000 ring primarily in the tropics and warm (with up to a couple of warming. In fact, some lower latitudes, where there is a lot thousand years variation). Evi- experts think that a more of the sun's heat for the dence of the past 25 of these cycles greenhouse gases to magnify. Since has been discovered in sea-floor new ice age may be the polar regions are cold and even and polar-ice cores. imminent. Author dark much of the year, the green- We are about 10,800 years into a Larry Ephron is one house effect is minimal there. So warm period, one of the so-called the greenhouse effect is resulting such contrarian. interglacial periods. Everything we in the tropics becoming hotter, call human civilization - pottery, while the poles stay about the agriculture, writing, cities - has same. been created in that brief span of Any meteorologist can tell you time since the last major ice age the consequences: The hot tropical ended and the earth warmed up air rises faster, and cold polar air again. Most people assume that the rushes in to replace it. The result What could cause such an awe- greenhouse effect will warm the is higher winds, including more some recurring cycle of ice ages? earth's climate dramatically in com- and bigger hurricanes and tor- Up until recently, many scientists ing years. There does seem to have nadoes. These greenhouse winds have believed that the major ice been a slight increase in the earth's often carry much moisture with ages are caused by very small average temperature during the them, evaporated from the over- changes in the earth's orbit and ro- past 100 years, and the four hottest heated tropical oceans. Carried in tation, affecting the amount of sun- years of the century were all in the clouds to the higher latitudes, this light falling on various parts of the 1980s. But winters have also been moisture falls as increasing rain globe. Some of these orbital move- getting longer and colder during during the spring and fall and as ments do seem to cause relatively this same period of time. Never in increasing snow during the winter. minor fluctuations in the earth's ice recorded history have Northern Thus, winters get longer and colder, cover. But many scientists now feel Hemisphere winters been so cold and there are more devastating that these variations are too small or has snow fallen so late in the floods in the spring. to be the cause of major ice ages. 38 THE FUTURIST, September-October 1989 a span of thousands of years. International Law of the 3. Promote energy conservation Today, however, greenhouse sci- Atmosphere by recycling paper, glass, and met- entists predict an equivalent tem- What can be done to mitigate the als and using garbage and crop res- perature rise in only 61 years. greenhouse effect? In 1989, the En- idues as sources of fuel. If the global temperature does in- vironmental Protection Agency ad- 4. Greatly expand the develop- deed rise 5° C by 2050, the climate vocated a number of policy options ment of solar energy so that the will shift poleward about 200 miles that, in aggregate, could reduce the use of fossil fuels can be reduced. per century. Could wildlife keep rate of global warming by 60%, to 5. Develop large "energy planta- pace? Many of their natural migra- about 1° C per century. Among the tions" of fast-growing trees. Burn- tion paths or escape routes would, recommended options are the fol- ing this wood would not result in of course, be blocked. For exam- lowing: any net increase in atmospheric ple, it would be extremely diffi- 1. Reduce CO2 emissions from CO2, since the CO₂ released would cult for a deer to thread its way cars by switching from gasoline to only equal the amount taken in by through the urban sprawl of a cleaner-burning fuels such as the trees when they were alive. major city. methane, making more-extensive 6. Halt the destruction of forests If the greenhouse prophets are use of mass transit, mandating that in the tropics. correct, the rate of wildlife extinc- all new cars have a minimum fuel These measures should be pur- tion will be much greater during efficiency of 50 miles per gallon, sued vigorously as soon as pos- the sudden temperature rise of the and eventually converting to elec- sible, both in the United States and next century than it was in the tric-powered vehicles. around the world. Since CO2 and much more gradual thousand-year 2. Impose a CO2-user tax on all other greenhouse gases have long warm-ups of the past. fossil fuels. air-lives and disperse readily Fifty years ago, Sir George Simp- back into the atmosphere, where it This time around, we're accel- son, former head of Great Britain's recombines with oxygen to form erating the natural processes of Royal Meteorological Society, sug- large quantities of carbon dioxide. climatic change by adding our own gested that some source of in- Since carbon dioxide traps more man-made greenhouse effect: cut- creased energy would be needed heat from the sun, the increase ting down the world's remaining to move the huge amounts of mois- creates a naturally occurring green- forests at an ever-increasing pace, ture that build up ice-age glaciers. house effect, with severe climatic burning fossil remains of long- More recently, John Hamaker, a consequences. buried forests that have turned to mechanical engineer who has been This greenhouse effect continues coal, oil, and natural gas, and so studying the climate from a multi- for tens of thousands of years, forth. disciplinary perspective for the transferring more and more mois- In 1979, Genevieve Woillard, a past 15 years, has theorized that ture to the growing polar glaciers pollen specialist in France, con- the energy to build up the ice-age and creating an ice age. Paradoxi- cluded from detailed studies of the glaciers comes from a greenhouse cally, the tropics are known to be remains of ancient trees that the effect. hotter during an ice age and, ini- shift from a warm interglacial cli- Science has long known that a tially, summers in temperate re- mate to the beginning of the last great deal of erosion by wind and gions get hotter and hotter for a ice age (when it became too cold water takes place during the 10,000 while. for fruit and nut trees to grow) took years of each warm interglacial Why does an ice age ever come less than 20 years. Observing that period. One of the major conse- to an end? That's the last piece of European forests now seem to be quences of this erosion is that the this incredible puzzle. As the dying in a similarly precipitous minerals in the soil get eroded glaciers slowly advance over tens way, she wrote that we may now away or are leached deep into the of thousands of years, they grind be in a similar period of climatic subsoil where they are no longer up the rocks in their path into a change and could be only a few available to the trees and other fine dust. This dust is carried by years from the beginning of the plants. As the minerals vital to streams and blown by wind over next ice age. plant growth get eroded away, the the earth. This rock dust - com- earth's temperate-region forests posed of vital minerals - re- get progressively weaker and even- mineralizes the earth's soil and tually begin to die back. They suc- nourishes the forests again. As the cumb more readily to insects, dis- forests thrive and spread, they con- About the Author ease, drought, and forest fires. sume the excess carbon dioxide in Larry Ephron is director of People for a the atmosphere. The greenhouse Future, author of The End: The Imminent Ice As the forests die back, they not Age & How We Can Stop It, and producer only consume less carbon dioxide, engine eventually subsides, and of the hour-long video Stopping the Coming but they also release the huge another temperate interglacial pe- Ice Age. His address is 2140 Shattuck amounts of carbon stored in them riod is ushered in. Avenue, Berkeley, California 94704. THE FUTURIST, September-October 1989 39 "The effective control of the greenhouse problem demands a concerted international effort." through the air from one nation to tions, such as China and India, crease per capita gross national another, the effective control of the have just launched an industriali- product to just 15% that of the greenhouse problem demands a zation process that they hope will United States. To accomplish this, concerted international effort. To lead to a better quality of life. How- the nation would have to burn so this end, the United Nations has ever, such development is depen- much fossil fuel that the increase sponsored a series of conferences dent on energy derived from fossil in CO2 emissions would equal the involving over 40 countries. The fuels, the consumption of which re- total CO2 released from all the coal TRADI first was held in Washington, D.C., leases large amounts of CO2. Cur- currently consumed by the United in early 1989. It is hoped that these rently, the per capita emission of States. conferences will lead eventually to CO2 by heavily industrialized na- The world's soaring population an International Law of the Atmo- tions such as the United States and is another major barrier to the inter- sphere, with provisions for the sig- Japan is 20 to 50 times greater than national control of CO2 emissions. nificant reduction of greenhouse- that by underdeveloped nations The number of people on earth is gas emissions throughout the such as China and India. Certainly projected to double in the next half world. it only seems right that the poor century. It is apparent, therefore, Unfortunately, there are serious nations have the same opportunity that without creative control strat- obstacles to the implementation of to develop economically as did egies emissions of CO2 will in- such a law. One problem is that a first-world nations. Suppose, how- crease dramatically even if the number of underdeveloped na- ever, that China would like to in- global quality of life is merely main- tained at its present level. Despite these formidable prob- lems, a growing number of the world's weather experts, environ- Clouds and Global Warming mentalists, and lawmakers are con- vinced that humanity must come Scientists are paying more at- But if a warmer climate results to grips with the greenhouse effect. tention to the "wild card" in the At a recent congressional hearing, in more cirrus clouds - high, Senator Max Baucus of Montana climate system - clouds - to thin ice clouds - the problem determine their relationship to could be compounded because sounded a note of urgency: "The global warming. Different cloud cirrus clouds do not block sun- Environmental Protection Agency's formations can either prevent or policy options report makes a com- light and tend to trap heat near accelerate global warming, so a the earth. pelling argument for action now. crucial question is how warmer Noctilucent clouds, the strik- The question confronting us is, will surface temperatures on the ing silvery blue clouds seen on we heed this warning?" We should indeed - and without further earth will affect clouds. summer evenings only at high Marine stratocumulus clouds, latitudes, have been viewed as delay. After all, "the heat is on." which form low-lying cloud a natural phenomenon for the banks over the oceans off the past century. However, Gary west coasts of North America, Thomas, a professor at CU-Boul- South America, and Africa, pre- der, now believes they are actu- vent sunlight from reaching the ally a signal of atmospheric earth and therefore keep the changes brought on by the planet cooler. Thus, a warmer Industrial Revolution - specifi- climate resulting in more marine cally, increasing levels of meth- About stratocumulus clouds will help ane gas in the upper atmo- the prevent global warming, says sphere. Author Howard Hanson, a research as- sociate with the Cooperative Source: University of Colorado at Boul- Oliver S. Owen is professor of biology at the Institute for Research in Envi- der, Office of Public Relations, 354 Wil- University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau ronmental Sciences at the Uni- lard Administrative Center, Campus Claire, Wisconsin 54702. He is the editor of versity of Colorado at Boulder. Box 9, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0009. Natural Resource Conservation: An Ecolog- ical Approach, the fifth edition of which will be published by Macmillan Press this fall. (Lange/Cawley) January 31, 1989 9:45 A.M. [IPCC.DOC] PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MONDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1990 Bert 10:15 Cholum A.M. Thank you, Dr. Bolin. Professor Obasi. Dr. Tolba. Reifsnyder 647-4069 Delegates of the World Meteorological Congress, and the United Nations Environment Program. Let me thank and congratulate all of you, for taking on an issue of such great importance. In recent years we've seen emerge the most technologically advanced creations of man. We've also gained new -- better -- though still incomplete understanding of the most ecologically fragile creations of nature. But whether created by man or by survival? nature -- what is critical to endurance is balance. Balance will certainly be crucial to the efforts of this Panel. For you are called upon to strike an unprecedented international bargain: a balance between global environmental policy, and global economic policy, where both sides benefit -- and neither is compromised. This will be possible only if we understand that economic growth and environmental integrity are not contradictory priorities. One reinforces and complements the other. A sound environment is the basis for the continuity and quality of human life and enterprise. And strong economies allow nations to fulfill the obligations of environmental stewardship. Where there is economic strength, such stewardship is considered 2 a necessity. But where there is poverty, it is too often a luxury. For that reason, I believe that within this decade, we must usher in a new era of global cooperation: for environmental protection and economic growth. For intelligent management of industrial and natural resources. Above all, for sustainable development -- around the world. Watkins/ Reilly Memo The United States believes the I.P.C.C. is the best forum to to Bromley develop policy on global climate change. We're committed to Bernthals speech NPC; state international cooperation on this issue. And we consider it PAO 1216 vital that the community of nations is drawn together -- in an ordered, rational way -- to assess the potential for climate change. The state of the science; the social and economic impacts; and the right response strategies: all are crucial components to a global resolution. But in this, we must attend to what we know. And what we do, must be done responsibly and well. The stakes here are very high. There is no question that human activities are changing the Foreign 89 Policy #74 atmosphere in unexpected and unprecedented ways. Over the past ipring climate chars avid wirth two three centuries, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere since but mid 19th has gone up by 25 percent. Atmospheric methane has doubled. is the R. What we don't yet understand are the extent and consequences since of the alterations we've brought about -- and how they're linked to a significant, imminent climate change. The state of our thinking, like the state of nature, calls for balance. Last fall, many people among them, world leaders -- were citing 3 Thatcher's to the U.N.; a significant thinning of sea ice at the poles, as evidence that Oct 1989 global warming had arrived. But recent observations show that the polar ice sheets are not melting, they're growing in size. I'm not prepared -- academically, or otherwise --- to draw conclusions. But I have noticed something about the scientists drawing the conclusions. Those who see climate change as a clear and present danger represent one distinct minority. Those who discount it completely, represent another minority. But many scientists - if not most -- are not ready to claim that the extent of global climate change can now be reliably detected --- or predicted. That may be to their credit. Observing the fervor of the French Revolution, the English "London" poet William Blake wrote, "The best lack all conviction, while the worst are filled with passionate intensity." Here, too, we are called upon for action based on observation -- not media- driven emotion, or the politics of apocalypse. What science now knows with confidence, policy-makers can't use. And what policy-makers are interested in, science doesn't yet know. The questions that remain -- over the reflective effects of cloud cover, the cooling effects and CO2 absorption of oceans, and other sinks and feedback mechanisms we don't yet understand. There and others, suggest that we should attend to what is known about climate change -- and work to know more. 4 Current computer models are marvels of mathematics. Still, they cannot yet be said to represent reality -- and cannot be expected to predict the future. Above all, responsible policy cannot rest on the shifting sands of hypothesis and a chaos of conjecture. Given this level of uncertainty, some suggest we should act now, on the chance that significant climate change becomes certain. Others point to the opposite edge of that sword: any meaningful, preemptive policies would bring only the certainty of prohibitive expense; conflict with Third World development; and declining standards of living, worldwide. We're confident that the world will neither be caught surprised by a greenhouse effect it didn't expect, nor impoverished in anticipation of a cataclysmic warming that never arrived. There is a middle way that must be sought -- a balance that must be struck -- that reconciles policy to emerging scientific knowledge, and environmental protection to economic development. The United States remains committed to its leadership role on environmental issues: in our domestic programs, in our work Dauson to forge international agreements, in our assistance to developing and East Bloc nations, and through our chairmanship of the Response Strategies Working Group in the I.P.C.C. Overall, we're already doing more than any other country Bromley in terms of financial and human resources, by more than a factor X5860 of ten -- to understand and address global warming, among other 12/4/89 NYAcodemy DOESTB 5 major environmental concerns. Funds devoted to environment- billion. dollars. Robertos Washing Walkins thems related research in our proposed 1991 budget now total over $70 sg Budget p.129 Eal Funding for the U.S. Global Change Research Program will increase by nearly 60 percent in fiscal 1991, to over $1 billion. It allows NASA to proceed with its "Mission to Planet Earth" -- and funds the launch of the first U.S. Earth Observing System, to advance the state of knowledge about the planet we share. Along the way, we will seek the involvement of all nations, no matter what their level of development or economic system, to monitor and analyze climate change, and reassess the science. We place the highest priority on better understanding the earth and its interrelated systems -- and developing high-performance computing systems up to the task. We seek immediate action, and have already taken a number of steps that bring major benefits in their own right; that make sense on their own merits; and that will also help reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases now building up in the atmosphere, stimulating concern about potential climate change. Let me outline them very briefly: We called last year for a worldwide ban on chloro- Dawson flourocarbon production, to the extent safe substitutes are 6473630 available. We're working to stabilize, and reduce where possible, both overall emissions and energy consumption. We're actively pursuing technology development to improve the 6 effectiveness of both supply- and demand-side technologies for energy of all kinds. We've introduced new Clean Air Act legislation -- Legis emphasizing clean coal technology, conservation measures, the Affairs trading of emissions permits, and other devices to encourage industry to find creative, markét-driven solutions. We're in the middle of a comprehensive review and revision Natkins/Rerly of our National Energy Strategy, considering our future energy nemo to Promineeds in light of environmental, efficiency, and conservation issues and developing alternative energy sources in hydro, solar, biomass, and geothermal designs. We're working through diplomatic channels, and through Treasury innovative measures like debt-for-nature swaps, to do more than simply reduce global deforestation. We hope to reverse it. And here at home -- aware that new growth forests absorb significantly more CO2 than old grove timber -- we've launched a 1sg FY'91 Budger ma jor reforestation initiative, to plant a billion trees a year p.122 on private land across America. +30B in communities The economics of our domestic strategies are now being scrutinized in Congress. Rest assured, given our role in the R.S.W.G., that the economics of international responses to potential climate change will get equally intensive study. We intend to develop real data on the costs of various response strategies, assess new measures, and challenge other nations to follow suit. We will also offer technical support to those who need it. 7 In creating policy to manage CO2 and other emissions now believed to be implicated in climate change, we want to encourage truly innovative responses -- including the trading of emissions permits if appropriate -- as well as a comprehensive approach where all major emissions implicated in climate change are included. Wherever possible, we believe that market mechanisms should be applied -- and that policy must be consistent with economic growth and free market principles in all countries. This is where the quest for balance will be most crucial. If we hope to promote environmental protection and economic growth around the world, it will be important to work with, not against, industry. That will mean moving beyond the tradition of command, control, and compliance -- toward a new kind of environmental cooperation. Many industries, in fact, are already providing crucial research and solutions. And a few are already ahead of us. One power-plant management firm, just across the river in Virginia, donated $2 million in 1988 for tree planting in Fortune Guatemala -- to compensate for a coal-fired plant it was building Magazine 1/12/90 in Connecticut. The company expects to couple tree-planting p.55 programs with all seven new power plants now on its drawing boards. Where developing nations are concerned, some suggest we'll have to abandon the laissez-faire, free-market principles that allowed the industrial world to prosper. Well, we're headed in 8 the opposite direction. We intend to apply the principles of the free market in the service of the environment -- especially in the developing nations. Sustainable economic development demands that we enlist the desires of the developing world, rather than try to limit them. The share of total emissions contributed by developing countries is expected to rise dramatically in the future. We 3ernthats speech understand that China plans to double its use of coal by the end do NPC; Sept 1989 of the century, and India plans a tripling. late Dept PAO # 1216 To the extent we can accelerate the advancement of these and other developing nations, it will take less energy for them to produce wealth: Because in modern industrial countries, energy slicy Options for tabilizing global use per unit of Gross National Product has declined over time -- limak; EPA IFT 2 congress; /ggsteadily, and dramátically. p.I.7. So we need to work with the developing nations: Applying the power of the marketplace. Considering technology transfer for conservation, clean coal and renewable technologies. And encouraging industry to assist developing nations in making quantum leaps in technologies. That will allow (LDC's to grow more quickly and easily -- and may help them avoid making the environmental mistakes we older nations have made. As I said earlier, I believe we should make use of what we know. We know of the power of free markets to find creative solutions. To make resources and talent more rapidly available. We understand the efficiency of an economic incentive. We should apply it now, in defense of the environment we share. 9 You all understand that we benefit from the greenhouse effect -- as long as it remains in balance. Without it, the surface of the earth would resemble that of the moon. As you begin your Third Plenary Session, I hope the idea of balance takes root and prospers here. Without it, the intellectual climate may be more than a little harsh. And just as we rely on the corrective action of the biosphere, I hope we will learn to rely on the corrective actions of free markets -- to give incentives and integrity to our strategies for climate change. I wish the three working groups the best of luck. I'm confident that your work will be done carefully, and well -- and that the I.P.C.C. will continue in its vital role. Thank you ; and bless you. And good luck! # # # DRAFT #3 (Lange/Cawley) January 31, 1989 2:45 P.M. [IPCC.DOC] PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MONDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1990 10:15 A.M. [Bow-leene] Refsngder Thank you, Dr. Bolin. Professor Obasi. Dr. Tolba. 4069 Delegates of the World Meteorological Congress, and the United Nations Environment Program. Let me thank and congratulate all of you, for taking on an issue of such great importance. Over the past century we've produced the most technologically advanced creations of man. We've also gained new understanding -- though still incomplete --- of the most ecologically fragile creations of nature. But unfortunately, somewhere along the way, we picked up a bias, that has harmed both man and nature: a mistaken belief that there is a divergence of interests -- a logical division -- between the natural world and we who inhabit it. Nothing could be further from the truth - - or more central to the work of this Panel. For you are called upon to strike an unprecedented international bargain: a convergence between global environmental policy, and global economic policy, where both sides benefit -- and neither is compromised. You are called upon to end to the environmental cold war. This will be possible only if we understand that economic growth and environmental integrity are not contradictory priorities. One reinforces and complements the other. 2 A sound environment is the basis for the continuity and quality of human life and enterprise. And strong economies allow nations to fulfill the obligations of environmental stewardship. Where there is economic strength, such stewardship is considered a necessity. But where there is poverty, it is too often a luxury. are saying by For that reason, I believe that within this decade, we must usher in a new era of global cooperation: for environmental protection and economic growth. For intelligent management of industrial and natural resources. Above all, for sustainable development -- around the world. watkins/Restly The United States believes the I.P.C.C. is the best forum to nemo to develop policy on global climate change. We're committed to Bromley international cooperation on this issue. And we consider it vital that the community of nations is drawn together -- in an ordered, rational way -- to assess the potential for climate change. The state of the science; the social and economic impacts; and the right response strategies: all are crucial components to a global resolution. But in this, we must attend to what we know. And what we do, must be done responsibly and well. The stakes here are very high. There is no question that human activities are changing the atmosphere in unexpected and unprecedented ways. Over the past Foreign Policy since the Industrial Rev spring "Climate chais 89,P.3 three centuries, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by wirth has gone up by 25 percent. Atmospheric methane has doubled. But 90% brown the is 3 What we don't yet understand are the extent and consequences of the alterations we've brought about -- and how they're linked to a significant, imminent climate change. Last fall, many clear thinkers among them, world leaders were citing a significant thinning of sea ice at the poles as evidence that global warming had arrived. Recent observations show that the polar ice sheets are not melting, they're growing in size. I'm not prepared -- academically, or otherwise -- to draw conclusions. But I have noticed something about the scientists drawing the conclusions. Those who see climate change as a clear and present danger represent one distinct minority. Those who discount it completely, represent another minority. But many scientists -- if not most -- are not ready to claim that the extent of global climate change can now be reliably detected -- or predicted. That may be to their credit. Observing the fervor of the French Revolution, the English poet William Blake wrote, "The best lack all conviction, while the worst are filled with passionate intensity." Here, too, we are called upon for action based on observation -- not media- driven emotion, or the politics of apocalypse. What science now knows with confidence, policy-makers can't use. And what policy-makers are interested in, science doesn't yet know. 4 Questions remain -- over the reflective effects of cloud cover, the cooling effects and CO2 absorption of oceans, and other sinks and feedback mechanisms we don't yet understand. Those questions, among others, suggest that we should attend to what is known about climate change -- and work to know more. Current computer models are marvels of mathematics. Still, they cannot yet be said to represent reality -- and cannot be expected to predict the future. Above all, responsible policy cannot rest on the shifting sands of hypothesis and a chaos of conjecture. Given this level of uncertainty, some suggest we should act now, on the chance that significant climate change becomes certain. Others point to the opposite edge of that sword: any meaningful, preemptive policies would bring only the certainty of prohibitive expense; conflict with Third World development; and declining standards of living, worldwide. We're confident that the world will neither be caught surprised by a greenhouse effect it didn't expect, nor impoverished in anticipation of a cataclysmic warming that never arrived. There is a middle way that must be sought -- a symmetry that must be reached -- that reconciles policy to emerging scientific knowledge, and environmental protection to economic development. The United States remains committed to its leadership role Dawson on environmental issues: in our domestic programs, in our work 647- 3638 to forge international agreements, in our assistance to developing and East (X Bloc nations, and through our chairmanship of 5 Dawson the Response Strategies Working Group in the I.P.C.C. Steve Olson Overall, we're already doing more than any other country -- X5860 in terms of financial and human resources, by more than a factor of ten - - to understand and address global warming, among other major environmental concerns. Funds devoted to environment- Robert Mathios related research in our proposed 1991 budget now total over $70 DUE billion. dollars. Funding for the U.S. Global Change Research Program will usg Budget, FY'91 p.129 increase by nearly 60 percent in fiscal 1991, to over $1 billion. It allows NASA to proceed with its "Mission to Planet Earth" -- and funds the launch of the first U.S. Earth Observing System, to advance the state of knowledge about the planet we share. Along the way, we will seek the involvement of all nations, no matter what their level of development or economic system, to monitor and analyze climate change, and reassess the science. We place the highest priority on better understanding the earth and its interrelated systems -- and developing high-performance computing systems up to the task. We seek immediate action, and have already taken a number of steps that bring major benefits in their own right; that make sense on their own merits; and that will also help reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases now building up in the atmosphere, stimulating concern about potential climate change. Let me outline them very briefly: 6 Chris Dawson We called last year for a worldwide ban on chloro- state flourocarbon production, to the extent safe substitutes are Policy 647-3638 available. We're working to stabilize, and reduce where possible, both overall emissions and energy consumption. We're actively pursuing technology development to improve the effectiveness of both supply- and demand-side technologies for energy of all kinds. We've introduced new Clean Air Act legislation -- Legislative Affairs emphasizing clean coal technology, conservation measures, the trading of emissions permits, and other devices to encourage industry to find creative, market-driven solutions. Natkins/Reilly We're in the middle of a comprehensive review and revision memo to Dr Bromicy of our National Energy Strategy, considering our future energy needs in light of environmental, efficiency, and conservation issues --and developing alternative energy sources in hydro, solar, biomass, and geothermal designs. We're working through diplomatic channels, and through hris Dauson state innovative measures like debt-for-nature swaps, to do more than Depl647-3635 simply reduce global deforestation. We hope to reverse it. And here at home -- aware that new growth forests absorb signifícantly more CO2 than old grove timber -- we've launched a major reforestation initiative, to plant a billion trees a year usg FY'91 budget on private land across America. 30B in communities p.122 The economics of our domestic strategies are now being scrutinized in Congress. Rest assured, given our role in the 7 R.S.W.G., that the economics of international responses to potential climate change will get equally intensive study. We intend to develop real data on the costs of various response strategies, assess new measures, and challenge other nations to follow suit. We will also offer technical support to those who need it. In creating policy to manage CO2 and other emissions now believed to be implicated in climate change, we want to encourage truly innovative responses -- including the trading of emissions permits if appropriate -- as well as a comprehensive approach where all major emissions implicated in climate change are included. Wherever possible, we believe that market mechanisms should be applied -- and that policy must be consistent with economic growth and free market principles in all countries. This is where ending the environmental cold war will be most crucial. If we hope to promote environmental protection and economic growth around the world, it will be important to work with, not against industry. That will mean moving beyond the tradition of command, control, and compliance -- toward a new kind of environmental cooperation. Many industries, in fact, are already providing crucial research and solutions. And a few are already ahead of us. One power-plant management firm, just across the river in Fortance Virginia, donated $2 million in 1988 for tree planting in Guatemala -- to compénsate for a coal-fired plant it was building 1/12/96 8 in Connecticut. The company expects to couple tree-planting obtells programs with all seven new power plants now on its drawing boards. Where developing nations are concerned, some suggest we'll have to abandon the laissez-faire, free-market principles that allowed the industrial world to prosper. Well, we don't see it that way. We intend to apply the principles of the free market in the service of the environment -- especially in the developing nations. Sustainable economic development demands that we enlist the desires of the developing world, rather than try to limit them. The share of total emissions contributed by developing countries is expected to rise dramatically in the future. We r Bernthalinderstand that China plans to double its use of coal by the end pecchess clubx the century, and India's use may triple. Hate qt 89 Dept + 1216 To the extent we can accelerate the advancement of these and other developing nations, it will take less energy for them to produce wealth: Because in modern industrial countries, energy Options unit óf Gross National Product has declined over time -- and dramatically. So we need to work with the developing nations: Applying the power of the marketplace. Considering technology transfer for conservation, clean coal and renewable technologies. And encouraging industry to assist developing nations in making quantum leaps in technologies. That will allow developing nations to grow more quickly and easily -- and may help them 9 avoid making the environmental mistakes we older nations have made. As I said earlier, I believe we should make use of what we know. We know of the power of free markets to find creative solutions. To make resources and talent more rapidly available. We understand the efficiency of an economic incentive. We should apply it now, in defense of the environment we share. Just as we rely on the corrective action of the biosphere, I hope we will learn to rely on the corrective actions of free markets -- to give incentives and integrity to our strategies for climate change. Let me wish the three working groups the very best of luck. I'm confident that your work will be done carefully, and well -- and that the I.P.C.C. will continue in its vital role. Thank you -- and God bless you. # # # Draft #4 (Lange/Cawley) January 31, 1989 7:00 P.M. [IPCC.DOC] PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MONDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1990 10:15 A.M. Thank you, Dr. Bolin. Professor Obasi. Dr. Tolba. Reifsnyder Delegates of the World Meteorological Congress, and the United 647-4069 Nations Environment Program. Let me thank and congratulate all of you, for taking on an issue of such great importance. Over the past century we've produced the most technologically advanced creations of man. We've also gained new understanding -- though still incomplete -- of the most ecologically fragile creations of nature. But unfortunately, somewhere along the way, we picked up a bias, that has harmed both man and nature: a mistaken belief that there is a divergence of interests -- a logical division -- between the natural world and we who inhabit it. Nothing could be further from the truth -- or more central to the work of this Panel. You are called upon to strike an unprecedented international bargain: a convergence between global environmental policy, and global economic policy, where both sides benefit -- and neither is compromised. You are called upon to end the environmental cold war. This will be possible only if we understand that economic growth and environmental integrity are not contradictory priorities. One reinforces and complements the other. 2 A sound environment is the basis for the continuity and quality of human life and enterprise. And strong economies allow nations to fulfill the obligations of environmental stewardship. Where there is economic strength, such stewardship is considered a necessity. But where there is poverty, it is too often a luxury. For that reason, I believe we must usher in a new era of global cooperation: for environmental protection and economic growth. For intelligent management of industrial and natural resources. Above all, for sustainable development -- around the world. Vatkins/Reilly memo The United States believes the I.P.C.C. is the best forum to to Bromley develop policy on global climate X change. We re committed to X x X X X international cooperation on this issue. And we consider it vital that the community of nations is drawn together -- in an ordered, rational way -- to assess the potential for climate change. The state of the science; the social and economic impacts; and the right response strategies: all are crucial components to a global resolution. The stakes here are very high. There is no question that human activities are changing the atmosphere in unexpected and unprecedented ways. Since the mid- oreign Policy X 1800s, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has gone up pring 89,p3 X climate, by 25 percent. chaos by D. wirth 3 What we don't yet understand is the extent of the alterations we've brought about -- and how they're linked to a significant, imminent climate change. Thatcher speech Last fall, many clear thinkers -- among them, world leaders to the UN -- were citing a significant thinning of sea ice at the poles as Oct, 1989 evidence that global warming had arrived. Recent observations show that the polar ice sheets are not melting, they're growing in size. I'm not prepared -- academically, or otherwise -- to draw conclusions. But I have noticed something about the scientists drawing the conclusions. Those who see climate change as a clear and present danger represent one distinct minority. Those who discount it completely, represent another minority. But many scientists -- if not most -- are not ready to claim that the extent of global climate change can now be reliably detected -- or predicted. That may be to their credit. When he was observing the fervor of the French Revolution, the English poet William Blake wrote, "The best lack all Tammy conviction, while the worst are filled with passionate intensity." Here, too, we are called upon for action based on observation -- not media-driven emotion, or the politics of apocalypse. Questions remain, about the reflective effects of cloud cover, the cooling effects and CO2 absorption of oceans, and other sinks and feedback mechanisms we don't yet understand. 4 Those questions, among others, suggest that we should attend to what is known about climate change -- and work to know more. Current computer models are marvels of mathematics. Still, they cannot yet be said to represent reality -- and cannot be expected to predict the future. Above all, responsible policy cannot rest on the shifting sands of hypothesis and a chaos of conjecture. In the search for answers, the United States continues to lead the world. We're seeking hard data and new ways to improve the science. Because what science now knows with confidence, policy-makers can't use. And what policy-makers need to make decisions, science doesn't yet know. In spite of the uncertainty, some suggest we should act now, on the chance that significant climate change becomes certain. Others point to the opposite edge of that sword: any meaningful preemptive policies would bring only the certainty of prohibitive expense; conflict with Third World development; and declining standards of living, worldwide. I believe we can do better. There is a middle way, that matches policy to emerging scientific knowledge -- and reconciles environmental protection to economic development. With every word, with every decision made here, we're also making a committment that is profoundly personal. I think all of us understand, deep inside, how the actions we take now speak to the future. 5 Last week, in my State of the Union address, I spoke of stewardship. I believe it's something we owe our children and grandchildren -- because the earth we stand upon is only borrowed, never owned. hris Dawson So the United States remains committed to a leadership role state Dept policy X on environmental issues. In our domestic programs. Our work to 647-3638 X X forge international agreements. Our assistance to developing and X X East Bloc nátions. And here, by leading the Response Strategies Working Group. Overall, we re already doing more than any other country to understand and address global warming -- in terms of financial and human resources, by more than a factor of ten. I just proposed a budget to our Congress for fiscal 1991 Robert that devotes a total of over [$70] billion to environment-related Mathios DUE work. Funding for the U.S. Global Change Research Program will 15g Budget FY "91 X X increase by nearly 60 percent, to over $1 billion. p.129 X That will allow NASA to move forward with its "Mission to Planet Earth" -- and will fund the launch of the first U.S. Earth Observing System, to advance the state of knowledge about the planet we share. We ve already taken many steps that bring major benefits in their own right. Steps that make sense on their own merits, and Chris Dawson that will also help reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases now building up in the atmòsphere. Let me outline them very briefly: usually single dont nt gases 6 Dawson We want to stabilize -- and reduce wherever we can -- both our energy consumption and our total emissions. So we're pursuing new technology development. Working on a revised Clean Legis! AFF Air Act with incentives for industry to find creative, market- driven solutions. Working out a comprehensive review and Notkins/Reilly mematkins revision of our National Energy Strategy. And launching a major reforestation initiative to plant a billion trees a year on sg Frat budgetz private land across America. 30 We're also working through diplomatic channels, and through innovative measures like debt-for-nature swaps, to do more than hrs simply reduce global deforestation. We hope to reverse it. The economics of our response strategies to climate change are getting intensive study. We intend to develop real data on the costs of various response strategies, assess new measures, and challenge other nations to follow suit. We will offer technical support to those who need it. And as we work to create policy to manage CO2 and other emissions, we want to encourage the most innovative responses. Wherever possible, we believe that market mechanisms should be applied -- and that policy must be consistent with economic growth and free market principles in all countries. This is where ending the environmental cold war will be most crucial. If we hope to promote environmental protection and economic growth around the world, it will be important to work with, not against industry. That will mean moving beyond the tradition of command, control, and compliance -- toward a new kind of 7 environmental cooperation. Many industries, in fact, are already providing crucial research and solutions. And a few are already ahead of us. One power-plant management firm, just across the river in p.55 Virginia, donated $2 million in 1988 for tree planting in Guatemala -- to compensate for a coal-fired plant it was building in Connecticut. The company expects to couple tree-planting programs with all seven new power plants now on its drawing boards. Where developing nations are concerned, some suggest we'll have to abandon the laissez-faire, free-market principles that allowed the industrial world to prosper. In fact, we think it's all the more important in the developing countries, to apply the principles of the free market in the service of the environment. To the extent we can accelerate the advancement of these and other developing nations, it will take less energy for them to produce wealth: in modern industrial countries, energy use per unit of Gross National Product has declined over time -- alobal 2pt 2/89 to steadily, and dramatically. Engress, So we need to work with the developing nations: Applying the power of the marketplace, considering technology transfer, and encouraging industry to assist developing nations in making This pawsa quantum leaps in technologies. That will allow developing nations to grow more quickly and easily -- and may help them avoid making the environmental mistakes we older nations have made. continuew 8 As I said earlier, I believe we should make use of what we know. We know that free markets find creative solutions. We understand the efficiency of economic incentive. Our challenge now is to apply that knowledge, in defense of the environment we share. Just as we are coming to understand the natural mechanisms and symmetry of the planet that supports us, I hope we will also learn to rely on the corrective action and natural wisdom of free markets: they can bring integrity to our strategies for climate change. Let me wish the three working groups the very best of luck. I'm confident that your work will be done carefully and well -- and that the I.P.C.C. will continue in its vital role. Thank you -- and God bless you. # # # Draft #5 Staffed Copy (Lange/Cawley) February 1, 1989 10:45 A.M. [IPCC.DOC] PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MONDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1990 10:15 A.M. Thank you, Dr. Bolin [Bo-leen]. Professor Obasi. Dr. Tolba. Delegates of the World Meteorological Congress, and the United Nations Environment Program. Let me thank and congratulate all of you, for taking on an issue of such great importance. The decisions this organization makes will have a profound effect on the world's environmental and economic policy. In the post-war era, we've produced the most technologically advanced creations of man. We've also gained new understanding -- though still incomplete -- of the most ecologically fragile creations of nature. But unfortunately, somewhere along the way, we picked up a bias, that has harmed both man and nature: a mistaken belief that there is a divergence of interests -- a logical division -- between the natural world and we who inhabit it. Nothing could be further from the truth -- or more central to the work of this Panel. You are called upon to strike an unprecedented international bargain: a convergence between global environmental policy, and global economic policy, where both sides benefit -- and neither is compromised. You are called upon to end the environmental cold war. 2 This will be possible only if we understand that economic growth and environmental integrity are not contradictory priorities. One reinforces and complements the other. A sound environment is the basis for the continuity and quality of human life and enterprise. And strong economies allow nations to fulfill the obligations of environmental stewardship. Where there is economic strength, such stewardship is considered a necessity. But where there is poverty, it is too often a luxury. For that reason, I believe we must usher in a new era of global cooperation: for environmental protection and economic growth. For intelligent management of industrial and natural resources. Above all, for sustainable development -- around the world. The United States believes the I.P.C.C. is the best forum to develop policy on global climate change. We're committed to international cooperation on this issue. And we consider it vital, that the community of nations is drawn together -- in an ordered, rational way -- to assess the potential for climate change. The state of the science; the social and economic impacts; and the right response strategies: all are crucial components to a global resolution. The stakes here are very high. There is no question that human activities are changing the atmosphere in unexpected and unprecedented ways. Since the mid- 3 1800s, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has gone up by 25 percent. What we don't yet understand is the extent of the alterations we've brought about -- and how they're linked to a significant, imminent climate change. Last fall, many clear thinkers --- among them, world leaders -- were citing a significant thinning of sea ice at the poles as evidence that global warming had arrived. Recent observations show that the polar ice sheets are not melting, they're growing in size I'm not prepared -- academically, or otherwise -- to draw conclusions. But I have noticed something about the scientists drawing the conclusions. Those who see climate change as a clear and present danger represent one distinct minority. Those who discount it completely, represent another minority. But many scientists -- if not most ---- are not ready to claim that the extent of global climate change can now be reliably detected -- or predicted. That may be to their credit. When he was observing the fervor of the French Revolution, william Yats the English poet William Blake wrote, "The best lack all conviction, while the worst are filled with passionate intensity." Here, too, we are called upon for action based on observation -- not media-driven emotion, or the politics of apocalypse. The decisions being made are too important to be compromised intellectually -- or polarized politically. 4 Questions remain: about the reflective effects of cloud cover, the cooling effects and CO2 absorption of oceans, and other sinks and feedback mechanisms we don't yet understand. Those questions, among others, suggest that we should attend to what is known about climate change -- and work to know more. Current computer models are marvels of mathematics. Still, they cannot yet be said to represent reality -- and cannot be expected to predict the future. Above all, responsible policy cannot rest on the shifting sands of hypothesis and a chaos of conjecture. In the search for answers, the United States continues to lead the world. We're seeking hard data and new ways to improve the science. Because what science now knows with confidence, policy-makers can't use. And what policy-makers need to make decisions, science doesn't yet know. In spite of this uncertainty, some suggest we should act now, on the chance that significant climate change becomes certain. Others point to the opposite edge of that sword: any meaningful preemptive policies would bring only the certainty of prohibitive expense; conflict with Third World development; and declining standards of living, worldwide. I believe we can do better. There is a reasoned middle ground, that matches policy to emerging scientific knowledge -- and reconciles environmental protection to economic development. With every word, with every decision made here, we're also making a committment that is profoundly personal. I think all of 5 us understand, deep inside, how the actions we take now speak to the future. Last week, in my State of the Union address, I spoke of stewardship. I believe it's something we owe our children and grandchildren -- because the earth we stand upon is only borrowed, never owned. So the United States remains committed to a leadership role on environmental issues. In our domestic programs. Our work to forge international agreements. Our assistance to developing and East Bloc nations. And here, by leading the Response Strategies Working Group. Overall, we're already doing more than any other country to understand and address global warming -- in terms of financial and human resources, by more than a factor of ten. I just proposed a budget to our Congress for fiscal 1991 2Bin New spending * that devotes a total of over [$70] billion to environment-related work. Funding for the U.S. Global Change Research Program will increase by nearly 60 percent, to over $1 billion. RoB Roinweather That will allow NASA to move forward with its "Mission to OMB X6827 Planet Earth" -- and will fund the launch of the first U.S. Earth X Observing System, to advance the state of knowledge about the planet we share. We've already taken many steps that bring major benefits in their own right. Steps that make sense on their own merits, and that will also help reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other 6 gases now building up in the atmosphere. Let me outline them very briefly: We want to stabilize -- and reduce wherever we can -- both our energy consumption and our total emissions. So we're pursuing new technology development. Creating a revised Clean Air Act with incentives for industry to find creative, market- driven solutions. Working out a comprehensive review and revision of our National Energy Strategy. And launching a major reforestation initiative to plant a billion trees a year on private land across America. We're also working through diplomatic channels, and through innovative measures like debt-for-nature swaps, to do more than simply reduce global deforestation. We hope to reverse it. The economics of our response strategies to climate change are getting intensive study. We intend to develop real data on the costs of various response strategies, assess new measures, and challenge other nations to follow suit. And we will offer technical support to those who need it. As we work to create policy to manage CO2 and other emissions, we want to encourage the most innovative responses. Wherever possible, we believe that market mechanisms should be applied -- and that policy must be consistent with economic growth and free market principles in all countries. But we will break the hold of the environmental cold war only through dialogue -- through a shared commitment to consensus. 7 If we hope to promote environmental protection and economic growth around the world, it will be important to work with, not against industry. That will mean moving beyond the tradition of command, control, and compliance -- toward a new kind of environmental cooperation. Many industries, in fact, are already providing crucial research and solutions. And a few are already ahead of us. One power-plant management firm, just across the river in Virginia, donated $2 million in 1988 for tree planting in Guatemala -- to compensate for a coal-fired plant it was building in Connecticut. And the company expects to couple tree-planting programs with all of the new power plants now on its drawing boards. Where developing nations are concerned, some suggest we'll have to abandon the laissez-faire, free-market principles that allowed the industrial world to prosper. In fact, we think it's all the more crucial, in the developing countries, to apply the principles of the free market in the service of the environment. To the extent we can accelerate the advancement of these nations, it will take less energy for them to produce wealth: in modern industrial countries, energy use per unit of G.N.P. has declined over time -- steadily, and dramatically. So we need to work with the developing nations: Applying the power of the marketplace, considering technology transfer, and encouraging industry to assist developing nations in making quantum leaps in technologies. That will allow developing 8 nations to grow more quickly and easily -- and may help them avoid making the environmental mistakes we older nations have made. As I said a moment ago, I believe we should make use of what we know. We know that the future of the earth cannot be compromised. We bear a sacred trust in our tenancy here -- and a covenant with those most precious to us: our children, and theirs. We also know of the efficiency of economic incentive -- and that free markets yield the most creative solutions. We must now apply the wisdom of the market, in defense of the environment we share. It is time to heal this false schism. It is time to put an end to the environmental cold war. Working together, with good faith and earnest dialogue, I believe it can be done. But more important: We know it must be done. Thank you -- and God bless you. # # # Lange & Cawley's I's (Lange/Cawley) February 1, 1989 10:45 A.M. [IPCC.DOC] PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MONDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1990 10:15 A.M. O.? Thank you, Dr. Bolin [Bo-leen]. Professor Obasi. Dr. Tolba. Delegates of the World Meteorological Congress, and the United Nations Environment Program. Let me thank and congratulate all of you, for taking on an issue of such great importance. The decisions this organization makes will have a profound effect on the world's environmental and economic policy. In the post-war era, we've produced the most technologically advanced creations of man. We've also gained new understanding -- though still incomplete -- of the most ecologically fragile creations of nature. But unfortunately, somewhere along the way, we picked up a bias, that has harmed both man and nature: a mistaken belief that there is a divergence of interests -- a logical division -- between the natural world and we who inhabit it. Nothing could be further from the truth -- or more central to the work of this Panel. You are called upon to strike an unprecedented international bargain: a convergence between global environmental policy, and global economic policy, where both sides benefit -- and neither is compromised. You are called upon to end the environmental cold war. 2 This will be possible only if we understand that economic growth and environmental integrity are not contradictory priorities. One reinforces and complements the other. A sound environment is the basis for the continuity and quality of human life and enterprise. And strong economies allow nations to fulfill the obligations of environmental stewardship. Where there is economic strength, such stewardship is considered a necessity. But where there is poverty, it is too often a luxury. For that reason, I believe we must usher in a new era of global cooperation: for environmental protection and economic growth. For intelligent management of industrial and natural resources. Above all, for sustainable development -- around the world. The United States believes the I.P.C.C. is the best forum to develop policy on global climate change. We're committed to international cooperation on this issue. And we consider it vital, that the community of nations is drawn together -- in an ordered, rational way -- to assess the potential for climate change. The state of the science; the social and economic impacts; and the right response strategies: all are crucial components to a global resolution. The stakes here are very high. There is no question that human activities are changing the atmosphere in unexpected and unprecedented ways. Since the mid- 3 1800s, the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has gone up by 25 percent. What we don't yet understand is the extent of the alterations we've brought about -- and how they're linked to a significant, imminent climate change. Last fall, many clear thinkers -- among them, world leaders -- were citing a significant thinning of sea ice at the poles as evidence that global warming had arrived. Recent observations show that the polar ice sheets are not melting, they're growing in size. I'm not prepared -- academically, or otherwise -- to draw conclusions. But I have noticed something about the scientists drawing the conclusions. Those who see climate change as a clear and present danger represent one distinct minority. Those who discount it completely, represent another minority. But many scientists --- if not most -- are not ready to claim that the extent of global climate change can now be reliably detected -- or predicted. That may be to their credit. When he was observing the fervor of the Russing Revolution, Ivish Butter Yeats the English poet William Blake wrote, "The best lack all conviction, while the worst are filled full with passionate of intensity." Here, too, we are called upon for action based on observation -- not media-driven emotion, or the politics of apocalypse. The decisions being made are too important to be compromised intellectually -- or polarized politically. 4 Questions remain: about the reflective effects of cloud cover, the cooling effects and CO2 absorption of oceans, and other sinks and feedback mechanisms we don't yet understand. Those questions, among others, suggest that we should attend to what is known about climate change -- and work to know more. Current computer models are marvels of mathematics. Still, they cannot yet be said to represent reality -- and cannot be expected to predict the future. Above all, responsible policy cannot rest on the shifting sands of hypothesis and a chaos of conjecture. In the search for answers, the United States continues to lead the world. We're seeking hard data and new ways to improve the science. Because what science now knows with confidence, policy-makers can't use. And what policy-makers need to make decisions, science doesn't yet know. In spite of this uncertainty, some suggest we should act now, on the chance that significant climate change becomes certain. Others point to the opposite edge of that sword: any meaningful preemptive policies would bring only the certainty of prohibitive expense; conflict with Third World development; and declining standards of living, worldwide. I believe we can do better. There is a reasoned middle ground, that matches policy to emerging scientific knowledge -- and reconciles environmental protection to economic development. With every word, with every decision made here, we're also making a committment that is profoundly personal. I think all of 5 us understand, deep inside, how the actions we take now speak to the future. Last week, in my State of the Union address, I spoke of stewardship. I believe it's something we owe our children and grandchildren -- because the earth we stand upon is only borrowed, never owned. So the United States remains committed to a leadership role on environmental issues. In our domestic programs. Our work to forge international agreements. Our assistance to developing and East Bloc nations. And here, by leading the Response Strategies Working Group. Overall, we're already doing more than any other country to understand and address global warming -- in terms of financial and human resources, by more than a factor of ten. I just proposed a budget to our Congress for fiscal 1991 dollars with $2 billion in new spending to protect the environment. Funding for the U.S. Global Change Research Program will increase by nearly 60 percent, to over $1 billion. dollars That will allow NASA to move forward with its "Mission to Planet Earth" -- and will fund the launch of the first U.S. Earth Observing System, to advance the state of knowledge about the planet we share. We've already taken many steps that bring major benefits in their own right. Steps that make sense on their own merits, and that will also help reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other 6 gases now building up in the atmosphere. Let me outline them very briefly: We want to stabilize -- and reduce wherever we can -- both our energy consumption and our total emissions. So we're pursuing new technology development. Creating a revised Clean Air Act with incentives for industry to find creative, market- driven solutions. Working out a comprehensive review and revision of our National Energy Strategy. And launching a major reforestation initiative to plant a billion trees a year on private land across America. We're also working through diplomatic channels, and through innovative measures like debt-for-nature swaps, to do more than simply reduce global deforestation. We hope to reverse it. The economics of our response strategies to climate change are getting intensive study. We intend to develop real data on the costs of various response strategies, assess new measures, the power n, and challenge other nations to follow suit. And we will offer technical support to those who need it. As we work to create policy to manage CO2 and other of emissions, we want to encourage the most innovative responses. Wherever possible, we believe that market mechanisms should be applied -- and that policy must be consistent with economic growth and free market principles in all countries. But we will break the hold of the environmental cold war only through dialogue -- through a shared commitment to consensus. 7 If we hope to promote environmental protection and economic growth around the world, it will be important to work with, not against industry. That will mean moving beyond the tradition of command, control, and compliance -- toward a new kind of environmental cooperation. Many industries, in fact, are already providing crucial research and solutions. And a few are already ahead of us. One power-plant management firm, just across the river in Virginia, donated $2 million in 1988 for tree planting in Guatemala -- to compensate for a coal-fired plant it was building in Connecticut. And the company expects to couple tree-planting programs with all of the new power plants now on its drawing boards. Where developing nations are concerned, some suggest we'll have to abandon the laissez-faire, free-market principles that allowed the industrial world to prosper. In fact, we think it's all the more crucial, in the developing countries, to apply the principles of the free market in the service of the environment. To the extent we can accelerate the advancement of these nations, it will take less energy for them to produce wealth: in modern industrial countries, energy use per unit of G.N.P. has declined over time -- steadily, and dramatically. So we need to work with the developing nations: Applying the power of the marketplace, considering technology transfer, and encouraging industry to assist developing nations in making quantum leaps in technologies. That will allow developing 8 nations to grow more quickly and easily -- and may help them avoid making the environmental mistakes we older nations have made. As I said a moment ago, I believe we should make use of what we know. We know that the future of the earth cannot be compromised. We bear a sacred trust in our tenancy here -- and a covenant with those most precious to us: our children, and theirs. We also know of the efficiency of economic incentive -- and that free markets yield the most creative solutions. We must now apply the wisdom of the market, in defense of the environment we share. It is time to heal this false schism. It is time to put an end to the environmental cold war. Working together, with good faith and earnest dialogue, I believe it can be done. But more important: We know it must be done. Thank you -- and God bless you. ### Add -maeta framework - white House mtg. THE GREENHOUSE BLUES Keep Cool About Global Warming DIXY LEE RAY T he year 1988 ended on a high note of hysteria, radiation to penetrate. When that warms the surface, one that was to continue well into 1989. The issue, infrared heat is radiated back. The "greenhouse gases"- fueled by an unusually hot, dry summer, was global carbon dioxide, water vapor, methane, hydrocarbons— warming. NASA's James Hansen testified at a Senate all absorb longwave (infrared) radiation. This process hearing that the high temperatures presaged the onset moderates the surface temperature. Let us therefore of the long-debated "greenhouse effect" and global rejoice and be glad that the Earth does indeed function warming due to buildup of carbon dioxide in the at- as a greenhouse! mosphere. Forgotten were the harsh winters of 1978 In addition, the greenhouse gases are all produced (when barges carrying coal and heating oil froze in river by nature as well as by human activity. For example, ice and more than 200 people lost their lives in the carbon dioxide comes from the respiration of all living cold weather) and 1982. things, and from forest fires, decaying vegetation, and Memory is a capricious thing. Perhaps the early winter volcanoes, as well as from humans burning fossil fuel. months of 1989 will remind prophets of global warming The total amount divides about 50/50 between what that nature can be fickle. Only days after Time magazine nature produces and what people can be blamed for. featured as its "Man" of the Year for 1988 a doomed Hydrocarbons come from growing plants, especially Planet Earth, perishing from human mismanagement evergreens such as the pines and firs that cause the "blue and greenhouse overheat, Alaska experienced the worst haze" of the Great Smoky Mountains and other areas cold in its history. Twenty locations in our most northerly where coniferous forests abound. Hydrocarbons also state recorded their lowest-ever temperatures, mainly in come from various industrial activities and incomplete the range of -50 to -65 degrees Fahrenheit. The cold did combustion in automobiles. Both hydrocarbons and not begin to move south until the first week in February, methane enter the atmosphere from the "burping" of when it seeped down from Alaska on both sides of the COWS and other ruminants. The contribution of hydrocar- Rocky Mountains, bringing near-record lows to the bons to our air is also about evenly divided between Pacific Northwest and throughout the Midwest, south to nature and human activities. Methane comes from Texas, and eventually to the mid-Atlantic and New swamps, termites, coal mines, and rice paddies. Ap- England states. Proponents of the "greenhouse-effect-is- proximately 90 percent of methane comes from nature here-global-warming-has-begun" theory were very quiet and only about 10 percent from human activity. during these weeks. Contrary Computer Models Seeing Infrared These gases have always been present in the atmos- To be fair, even if there is a potential for increased phere, but in total they have been increasing during the temperatures due to enhancement of the greenhouse last century. Carbon dioxide, the most carefully effect, no one would expect it to occur all at once or measured, has increased 25 percent since the Industrial without intervening cold spells. So let us examine the Revolution. The current rate of increase in carbon situation more closely. dioxide plus the other greenhouse gases is about 1 Earth, with its blanket of atmosphere, constitutes a percent a year. Assuming this rate continues, the amount "greenhouse." This fact has never been at issue. Indeed, of greenhouse gases will double in this century. were it not for the greenhouse function of air, the Earth's According to the leading computer models of climate surface would be like the moon's, bitterly cold (-270 degrees Farenheit) at night and unbearably hot (+212 DIXY LEE RAY was formerly Democratic governor of Washington degrees) during the day. Although the amount of solar state and chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, a precursor energy reaching the moon is similar to that reaching the to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. This article is excerpted Earth, the Earth's atmosphere permits incoming solar from a forthcoming book on the excesses of environmentalism. 70 Policy Review Although Mitch Snyder admits his numbers are meaningless, Ernest Hollings and Jim Wright cited them this year as fact. less than 50 percent (less than 1-to-1), and six of these policymaking, but to all policymaking. were less than 30 percent. The one study that found a An inaccurate count of the homeless, high or low, ratio higher than 50 percent adds less fuel for the diverts attention from the condition of the people who homeless advocates' fire than one might imagine. Over need help. To devise effective treatment programs for a six-month period during 1985-86, sociologist Peter the mentally ill homeless, who account for about one- Rossi of the University of Massachusetts' Social and third of the homeless population, it is essential to know Demographic Research Institute conducted a stratified just how many of these tragic individuals there are. The random sample of street homeless on Census blocks in problems of homeless alcoholics are far different from Chicago (a separate count had been conducted of the those of homeless mothers with young children, and city's shelters). City authorities assisted Rossi in dividing "advocates" who disparage research about their numbers blocks into those with a high probability of encountering are doing a serious injustice to the people they ostensibly a homeless person, and those with a low probability. are trying to aid. Interviewers then searched all possible sites where the For better or worse, Mitch Snyder's aggressive con- homeless might be found. During autumn months, the tempt for facts has set the tenor for the homeless move- street-to-shelter ratio was 59 percent; during the colder ment. His meteoric rise in stature has been an inspiration winter months, the figure declined to 27 percent. Rossi, for heightened political involvement among an irrational a pioneer in social research methods, estimated the total social type for whom strident moral appeals, often tinged number of Chicago's homeless to be between only 3,700 with religious symbolism, can and must substitute for and 6,000. good research. Such people reject more than "good One local study that generously allowed for the pos- data." They reject the very rational-positivist basis of sibility of not detecting the concealed homeless still science-that problem definition precedes solution; that counted many fewer homeless than the Community for facts precede values; and that means and ends are in- Creative Non-Violence maintains. According to a full timately linked. In this sense, Snyder's remark about count of street and shelter people conducted by the Americans having "Western little minds" is more than a University of the District of Columbia's Center for Ap- little self-revealing. plied Research and Public Policy, the maximum number Snyder sounded the opening salvo of a national speak- of homeless in Washington, D.C., in July 1985 was 7,142. ing tour in mid-April, announcing to a church group in The author, Frederic Robinson, obtained this figure by Harrisonburg, Virginia, "they [Congress] know we're weighting the actual street count upward by 2.5; without facing the worst domestic crisis the country has ever this inflation, the figure would have been 4,347. In either faced. And all that stands between that happening and case, the total is well below the 1980 Hombs-Snyder not is money. Affordable housing disappears, because Washington estimate of 15,000. if the federal government doesn't build affordable hous- ing, nobody does." Of course, one might respond that Why Numbers Matter unsubsidized private enterprise has been responsible for Advocates for the homeless have made an art form of most of the more than 12 million housing completions deflecting questions about their inflated and often ab- this decade, that the nonprofit sector has initiated suc- surd estimates, either by denying the validity of lower cessful, low-cost housing rehabilitation programs nation- estimates, questioning the competence or the sensitivity wide, that there were homeless people before HUD's of researchers who obtain them, or denying altogether budget cuts, and that a strong economy is still the best the importance of accurate measurement. As a result, defense against a housing depression. Snyder would view the perception of millions of neglected homeless roam- making such points as foot-dragging, an excuse for con- ing the streets has gathered wide currency, abetted by a tinuing neglect, as the number of homeless climbs to news media that has given advocates a nearly free ride, four million, five million, and God-knows-what beyond. regularly indulging their grand gestures such as hunger Ironically, this manipulation of issues and statistics into strikes without subjecting their assertions to reasonable a giddy, evasive, and yes, McCarthyist game will do little scrutiny. This situation is harmful not only to housing for the people who most need help: the homeless. Summer 1989 69 scientists, the rise in carbon dioxide concentration since the middle of the 19th century should have caused measurable warming of 1 to 5 degrees centigrade (2 to 9 degrees Fahrenheit). But it hasn't! The temperature has oscillated and the overall rise is in the range of 0.3 to 0.7 degrees centigrade. (Nobody knows what has happened in the Southern Hemisphere, which is 90 percent ocean, because oceanic temperature measure- ments are so scarce.) Recall that the public furor started June 1988, when NASA scientist James Hansen testified in the U.S. Senate that the greenhouse effect was here and changing the climate. He said he was 99 percent sure of it and that "1988 would be the warmest year on record unless there is some remarkable, improbable cooling in the remainder of the year." Well, there was. (Ask them in Washington State Tourism Division Alaska!) While Hansen was testifying, the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean cooled drastically. The temperature dropped 7 degrees quite suddenly and is now at near- Volcanoes such as Mount St. Helens are responsible record lows. No one knows why. The phenomenon is for some of the increase in carbon dioxide. called La Niña, to contrast it with the warmer El Niño current. Such cooling has occurred 19 times in the last year cycle of volcanic activity, which may have something 102 years. But Hansen didn't consider La Niña because to do with the carbon dioxide increase. The quantity of his computer model didn't take sea temperatures into air-polluting materials produced by man during his en- account even though sea water covers 73 percent of tire existence on Earth does not begin to equal the Earth's surface. When a NASA scientist talks "global" it's quantities of toxic gases and particulates spewed forth hard to imagine that he would ignore 73 percent of the into the atmosphere from just three volcanic eruptions: globe's surface-but he did. Krakatau in Indonesia in 1883, Mount Katmai in Alaska Another possible explanation for the absence of the in 1912, and Hekla in Iceland in 1947. Mount St. Helens warming predicted by the computer models: both carbon pumped out 910,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide dioxide and water vapor have several absorption bands during six months in 1982, not including the eruption. besides the infrared. While longwave (infrared) radia- tion may be kept in, some shorter waves of the incoming Switch to Nuclear solar radiation may be kept out (by the combined effect Despite the uncertainty about whether we are now of carbon dioxide and water) so that less heat becomes experiencing global warming, it is prudent to reduce the available to be trapped in the first place. Nature has many production of greenhouse gases through human activity. feedback and self-regulating mechanisms of which this Because no one really knows what the ultimate conse- is only one. quences of the increases in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases might be, we should reduce man's Eddy's Sun Spots contribution wherever possible. While there is no need There also may be cosmic forces at work that influence to take draconian measures that would damage our Earth temperatures more than does the greenhouse standard of living, there are several things we can do. effect. John Eddy of the National Center for Atmospheric For starters, we can phase out the use of fossil fuel for Research has found an interesting correlation between generating electricity and turn to technology with no decades of low sunspot activity and cold periods such as the "Little Ice Age" of the 17th century, when there was a virtual absence of sunspot activity between 1645 and We should do what we can to 1715. (During the winter of 1683-84, recorded in the novel Lorna Doone, the trees of Somerset could be heard reduce our own carbon bursting in the cold.) Conversely, Eddy found that decades of high sunspot activity coincided with warm temperatures on Earth. If Eddy's theory holds up, the dioxide contribution-proper high solar activity of the mid-20th century accounts for the period's unusual warmth, and Earth may soon enter stewardship of the Earth a slow return to colder temperatures. (Ice ages recur about every 10,000 to 12,000 years, and it is now 11,000 demands nothing less. years since the last one.) While most environmentalists blame deforestation and the burning of fossil fuel for the carbon dioxide known adverse impact on the atmosphere-nuclear increase, they generally fail to take into account the role power. We can shift to an essentially all-electric economy. of volcanoes in affecting the composition of the atmos- We can turn, once again, to electric buses and trains and phere. We are currently near the peak of a 500-to-600- eventually to electric automobiles. For air travel we could Summer 1989 71 demands nothing less. To do so, we need not be panicked into precipitous and costly "corrective" actions that only reduce our stand- ard of living. We can phase out fossil fuels-replacing them with nuclear power and other fuels such as hydrogen-in a deliberate, responsible way. We can also plant lots of trees. Apocalypse No A final note on the supposedly dire consequences of a global temperature rise of 1.5 to 4.5 degrees centigrade over the next 50 years: Such a climate change, should it occur, is not nearly so drastic a change for humans as a move by an Alaskan to Palm Springs. Elevated tempera- tures would have greater impact on agriculture and vegetation in general. But with plants, temperature is hardly the only determinant of growth. Perhaps as im- portant are the duration and quality of light (latitude is significant here), soil moisture, and the amounts, timing, and duration of rainfall, and the possibilities for irriga- Reforestation is far more effective in carbon dioxide tion. A warmer Earth-and the changes in rainfall that reduction than preservation of existing forests. might accompany it-would make some areas of farmland more fertile or less fertile than today. But that replace fossil fuels with hydrogen. New ceramics hardly constitutes global environmental doom. materials and ceramics-metal compounds can overcome Nor do the predictions of melting ice caps and pos- the former problem of embrittlement resulting from the sible inundation of low-lying areas. Most weather absorption of hydrogen into metal. Recent advances in specialists predict that a global temperature rise of 1.5 storage technology promise to ease the necessity for to 4.5 degrees centigrade-enough to dislodge Antarctic large, heavy, high-pressure, low-temperature hydrogen ice submerged under the surface-would cause the sea storage tanks. level to rise by one and a half to four and a half feet. Should this happen, a number of cities would be vul- Sapling Hopes nerable to flooding of the sort that Venice and Holland We can also take advantage of photosynthesis to ab- have coped with for centuries. Some beachfronts would sorb carbon dioxide and producé oxygen. Those who be gradually moved back a few miles, and some people urge preservation of old growth, or "climax," forests on would have to move. The inconvenience of all this should the basis of their contribution to the oxygen-carbon not be minimized, but it is hardly apocalypse. dioxide balance in the atmosphere overlook the fact that Is a global warming on the way? Maybe sometime, but old trees metabolize far less rapidly than young ones it is not here now. Why do so many people believe in (like humans and most living things). Indeed, old trees the dire forecasts? Perhaps the historian Hans Morgen- contribute little to removing carbon dioxide or produc- ing oxygen, whereas a forest of young trees will remove carbon dioxide from the air at a rate of five or six tons per acre. Reforestation, therefore, is far more effective High solar activity, not the in carbon dioxide reduction than is preservation of existing forests. We should also vastly increase the use of greenhouse effect, may plants in urban areas, where air pollution is usually worse account for the unusual than in rural regions. In considering possible carbon dioxide mitigating warmth of the mid-20th actions, it is important to keep in mind that these steps are feasible for an advanced, highly technical industrial- ized society with plenty of electricity. Around the world, century. however, fossil fuel burning will inevitably continue for many years. In China, for example, 936 million metric tons of coal were burned in 1987-88. Who is going to tell thau was right when he wrote in 1946, "The intellectual them to stop or to change? What alternatives do they and moral history of mankind is the story of insecurity, have? No matter what we do in the United States, or even of the anticipation of impending doom, of metaphysical throughout the Western world, the carbon dioxide from anxieties." John Maddox, editor of the British journal man-made sources is bound to rise. Should global warm- Nature, says, "But these days there also seems to be an ing occur, it is estimated that no nation, acting alone, underlying cataclysmic sense among people. Scientists could affect it by more than 10 percent. We should don't seem to be immune to this." nevertheless do what we can to reduce our own carbon Well, they ought to be. What the greenhouse debate dioxide contribution-proper stewardship of the Earth needs most is a dose of healthy skepticism. 72 Policy Review