Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
323152902
label
White House Conference on Global Change 4/17/90 [OA 8311] [3]
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
323152902
contentType
document
title
White House Conference on Global Change 4/17/90 [OA 8311] [3]
citationUrl
identifierLocal
13714-002
collections
Records of the White House Office of Speechwriting (George H. W. Bush Administration)
Speech Backup Chronological Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
323152902
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
7a66cbf7a06bba38
ocrText
Originally Processed With FOIA(s):
FOIA Number:
S
S
FOIA
MARKER
This is not a textual record. This is used as an
administrative marker by the George Bush Presidential
Library Staff.
Record Group/Collection:
George H.W. Bush Presidential Records
Collection/Office of Origin:
Speechwriting, White House Office of
Series:
Speech File Backup Files
Subseries:
Chron File, 1989-1993
OA/ID Number:
13714
Folder ID Number:
13714-002
Folder Title:
White House Conference on Global [Change] 4/17/90 [OA 8311] [3]
Stack:
Row:
Section:
Shelf:
Position:
G
26
20
5
2
WELCOMING REMARKS
WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE ON GLOBAL CHANGE
J.W. MARRIOTT
APRIL 17, 1990
10:00 A.M.
THANK YOU, SECRETARY BRADY. // MEMBERS OF THE
U.S. DELEGATION, MEMBERS OF MY CABINET. CO-CHAIRMEN OF
THIS CONFERENCE: MICHAEL BOSKIN. ALLAN BROMLEY. AND
MICHAEL DELAND. // I'M PLEASED TO WELCOME THIS
INTERNATIONAL FIELD OF DISTINGUISHED HIGH-LEVEL
OFFICIALS -- EXPERTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMICS,
SCIENCE AND ENERGY -- TO THE WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE ON
GLOBAL CHANGE.
TWO MONTHS AGO, I HAD THE HONOR OF ADDRESSING THE
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE -- AND LET ME
RECOGNIZE IPCC CHAIRMAN BURT BOLIN [Bo-LEEN] WHO IS
HERE THIS MORNING. // I SEE THIS CONFERENCE HELPING
TO ACCELERATE THE IPCC'S AGENDA AS IT SEARCHES FOR
UNDERSTANDING OF SOME VERY CRITICAL QUESTIONS --
BROADENING THE DIALOGUE BY EXPLORING THE LINK BETWEEN
SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS IN THE STUDY
OF GLOBAL CHANGE.
- 2 -
AND OF COURSE, THIS CONFERENCE IS ITSELF ANOTHER
SIGN OF THE GROWING IMPORTANCE OF THE ENVIRONMENT ON
THE INTERNATIONAL AGENDA. // HERE IN THE UNITED
STATES, WE'VE MOVED ONE STEP CLOSER TO A GREAT VICTORY
FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: STRENGTHENING OUR CLEAN AIR
STATUTES -- ALREADY THE WORLD'S TOUGHEST -- WITH A
COMPREHENSIVE PACKAGE OF NEW CLEAN AIR INITIATIVES.
TEN MONTHS AGO, WE RENEWED MOMENTUM LOST IN
LEGISLATIVE STALEMATE FOR 12 YEARS. AND JUST THIS
MONTH, A CLEAN AIR PACKAGE CLEARED THE U.S. SENATE,
WITH HOUSE ACTION POSSIBLE IN MAY. // WE'RE MOVING
FORWARD ON CLEAN AIR LEGISLATION BECAUSE IT IS IN
AMERICA'S INTEREST. BUT, LIKE SO MANY OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES THAT CONCERN US -- WE AREN'T THE
ONLY BENEFICIARY OF A BETTER ENVIRONMENT. // WHEN IT
COMES TO THE ENVIRONMENT, WE ARE LEARNING THAT LOCAL
ACTIONS CAN HAVE GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES.
- 3 -
UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTS OF OUR ACTIONS ON OUR
EARTH SYSTEM IS THE FIRST STEP TO A SOUND ENVIRONMENT
-- AND THE SUBJECT THAT LED ME TO INVITE ALL OF YOU
HERE. I WANT TO SPEAK THIS MORNING ABOUT WHAT WE CAN
DO OVER THE COURSE OF THE NEXT TWO DAYS TO ADVANCE OUR
UNDERSTANDING OF GLOBAL CHANGE.
THIS CONFERENCE WILL HELP IN THREE WAYS.
FIRST, IT PROVIDES AN OPPORTUNITY TO HELP SORT OUT
THE SCIENCE ON THIS COMPLEX ISSUE. // TO START WITH
WHAT WE KNOW -- ABOUT THE EARTH, THIS HOME WE SHARE.
ABOUT THE FACTORS -- NATURAL AS WELL AS MAN-MADE --
THAT CAUSE OUR ENVIRONMENT TO CHANGE. // AND TO WORK
FROM WHAT WE KNOW TOWARD ANSWERS TO THE MANY
UNCERTAINTIES THAT ABOUND.
- 4 -
PERHAPS IT'S NOT SURPRISING WHEN THE SUBJECT IS
GLOBAL CHANGE THAT THE DEBATE OFTEN GENERATES MORE HEAT
THAN LIGHT. // SOME OF YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TWO
SCIENTISTS ON A SUNDAY TALK SHOW RECENTLY, DEBATING
GLOBAL CHANGE. ONE SCIENTIST ARGUED THAT IF WE KEEP
BURNING FOSSIL FUELS AT TODAY'S RATE -- AND I QUOTE --
"BY THE END OF THE THE NEXT CENTURY, EARTH COULD BE
NINE DEGREES FARENHEIT WARMER THAN TODAY." THE OTHER
SCIENTIST SAW NO EVIDENCE OF RAPID CHANGE, AND WARNED
AGAINST A DRASTIC REORDERING OF OUR ECONOMY THAT COULD
CAUSE US, IN HIS WORDS, TO "END UP AN IMPOVERISHED
NATION AWAITING A WARMING THAT NEVER COMES." //
TWO SCIENTISTS -- TWO DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED POINTS
OF VIEW. WHERE DOES THAT LEAVE US? // WHAT WE NEED
ARE FACTS: THE STUFF SCIENCE IS MADE OF. A BETTER
UNDERSTANDING OF THE BASIC PROCESSES AT WORK IN OUR
WORLD. BETTER EARTH SYSTEM MODELS -- THAT ENABLE US TO
CALCULATE THE COMPLEX INTERACTION BETWEEN MAN AND OUR
ENVIRONMENT. //
- 5 -
THAT'S WHY I'VE ASKED CONGRESS TO APPROVE A 60%
INCREASE IN OUR BUDGET FOR THE GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH
PROGRAM -- AN AGGRESSIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM FOR WHICH
WE'VE BUDGETED MORE THAN $1 BILLION DOLLARS IN 1991 --
TO REDUCE THE UNCERTAINTIES SURROUNDING GLOBAL CHANGE,
TO ADVANCE THE SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING WE NEED, IF WE
ARE TO MAKE DECISIONS TO MAXIMIZE BENEFITS -- AND
MINIMIZE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES. //
THE SECOND WAY THIS GATHERING CAN ADVANCE OUR
UNDERSTANDING IS TO ADDRESS THE ECONOMIC FACTOR IN
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONS. WE KNOW THAT CLEANING UP OUR
ENVIRONMENT COSTS MONEY. WE KNOW IT MEANS CHANGES IN
THE WAY WE WORK AND LIVE. HERE IN THE U.S. WE'RE
ALREADY MAKING THOSE CHANGES: MOVING FORWARD ON CLEAN
AIR. PLANTING TREES THROUGH OUR AMERICA THE BEAUTIFUL
INITIATIVE, AND WORKING WITH OTHER NATIONS TO FIND WAYS
TO HALT DEFORESTATION. PHASING-OUT THE USE OF CFCS.
ENCOURAGING CONSERVATION, AND EXPLORING ALTERNATIVE
SOURCES OF FUEL AND ENERGY -- AND MARKET-BASED
INCENTIVES FOR POLLUTION CONTROL. //
- 6 -
AND YET AS WE MOVE FORWARD, ALL OF US MUST MAKE
CERTAIN WE PRESERVE OUR ENVIRONMENTAL WELL-BEING AND
OUR ECONOMIC WELFARE. WE KNOW THAT THESE ARE NOT
SEPARATE CONCERNS. THEY ARE TWO SIDES OF THE SAME
COIN. RECOGNIZING THIS FACT IS IN THE INTEREST OF
EVERY NATION HERE TODAY -- IN THE INTERESTS OF THE
DEVELOPED WORLD AND THE DEVELOPING WORLD ALIKE.
LET ME FOCUS FOR A MOMENT ON THE DEVELOPING WORLD.
IN A CLIMATE OF POVERTY, OR PERSISTENT ECONOMIC
STRUGGLE, PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT BECOMES A FAR MORE
DIFFICULT CHALLENGE. COLD STATISTICS DON'T BEGIN TO
CAPTURE THE HARSH REALITIES AT STAKE. DEVELOPMENT
DOESN'T MEAN JUST ANOTHER POINT OF GNP -- IT'S MEASURED
IN HUMAN LIVES. AN END TO HUNGER. LOWER INFANT
MORTALITY -- LONGER LIFE EXPECTANCY. / NOT JUST
QUALITY OF LIFE -- BUT LIFE ITSELF. ENVIRONMENTAL
POLICIES THAT IGNORE THE ECONOMIC FACTOR -- THE HUMAN
FACTOR -- ARE DESTINED TO FAIL.
- 7 -
BUT THERE IS ANOTHER REASON TO CONSIDER THE
ECONOMIC FACTOR WHEN THE ISSUE IS THE ENVIRONMENT. //
THERE IS NO BETTER ALLY IN SERVICE OF OUR ENVIRONMENT
THAN STRONG ECONOMIES. ECONOMIES THAT MAKE POSSIBLE
THE INCREASED EFFICIENCIES THAT ENABLE US TO MAKE
ENVIRONMENTAL GAINS. ECONOMIES THAT GENERATE THE NEW
TECHNOLOGIES THAT HELP US ARREST AND REVERSE THE DAMAGE
WE HAVE DONE TO OUR ENVIRONMENT. WE NEED ECONOMIES
THAT ALLOW US TO MAKE VITAL INVESTMENTS IN OUR COMMON
FUTURE. 11
THAT BRINGS ME TO THE THIRD WAY THIS CONFERENCE
CONTRIBUTES TO A NET GAIN IN KNOWLEDGE: THE FACT THAT
IT PROVIDES US THE OPPORTUNITY TO FORM A PARTNERSHIP --
BETWEEN NATIONS, AND ACROSS THE MANY DISCIPLINES
REPRESENTED HERE.
- 8 -
FEW SUBJECTS OFFER A GREATER CHALLENGE TO THE
UNDERSTANDING OF MAN THAN GLOBAL CHANGE. AND YET, TOO
OFTEN, THE DIFFERENT DISCIPLINES FOCUSING ON THIS
QUESTION HAVE WORKED IN ISOLATION -- WITH LITTLE
INTERCHANGE OF IDEAS, ANALYSIS, INFORMATION. // THIS
CONFERENCE IS A NEW DEPARTURE BECAUSE IT BRINGS
TOGETHER ENVIRONMENTALISTS AND ECONOMISTS, EXPERTS ON
ENERGY AND SCIENCE -- TO SEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND. TO
SHARE THE EXPERTISE EACH DISCIPLINE CAN BRING TO THIS
DIFFICULT AND DEMANDING CONCERN.
AND THIS NEW PARTNERSHIP MUST BIND NATIONS AS
WELL. THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS, NO ONE NATION --
ACTING ALONE -- CAN SAFEGUARD OUR EARTH ENVIRONMENT.
SUCCESS REQUIRES A SENSE OF GLOBAL STEWARDSHIP -- AN
UNDERSTANDING THAT IT IS THE EARTH THAT ENDURES -- AND
THAT ALL OF US ARE NO MORE THAN TENANTS, IN TEMPORARY
POSSESSION OF A SACRED TRUST. 11
- 9 -
FOR THE NEXT TWO DAYS, YOU'LL BE GRAPPLING WITH
QUESTIONS OF GLOBAL STEWARDSHIP -- QUESTIONS OF GLOBAL
CONSEQUENCE. I THANK ALL OF YOU FOR JOINING US HERE --
AND WISH YOU THE BEST IN YOUR DELIBERATIONS. // GOD
BLESS YOU ALL.
# # #
SENT BY: XEROX Telecopier 7017; 4-17-90 ; 6:58AM ;
2024566218:# 1
THE WHITE HOUSE CONVERENCE
P INTERNET a acquirence UNAME
ESLATED TO
GLOBAL CHANGE
AGENDA
MONDAY - APRIL 16, 1990
12:00 noon Early Registration -J.W. Marriott Hotel
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C.
7:00 p.m.
Reception for Delegates
National Air and Space Museum
Hosts: Robert A. Mosbacher, Secretary of Commerce
Richard H. Truly. Administrator of NASA
Martin Harwit, Director, National Air and Space Museum
TUESDAY - APRIL 17, 1990
8:00 a.m.
Continental Breakfast for Delegates
Capitol Foyer, Ballroom Level
9:30 a.m.
PLENARY SESSION I
Grand Ballroom
Moderator: Michael J. Boskin, Chairman, Council of Economic Advisors
Welcoming Remarks: Nicholas F. Brady, Secretary of the Treasury
President George Bush
Goals and Expectations for the Conference: D. Allan Bromley, Assistant to the President
for Science and Technology
Opening Remarks by Visiting Delegate: Jan Janowski, Deputy Prime Minister of Poland,
Director of the State Office for Science and Technology Development
11:00 a.m. PLENARY SESSION II
Grand Ballroom
Moderator: Michael R. Deland, Chairman, Council on Environmental Quality
Theme I- The Science and Economics Research Challenge
Theme II- Economics and Global Change: Links to the Policy Process and Science
Research
Theme III - Building Partnerships for Science and Economics Research
Presentations:
D. Allan Bromley
Michael J. Boskin
Michael R. Deland
McGroarty/Dooley
April 16, 1990
5:15 pm
PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE ON GLOBAL CHANGE
J.W. MARRIOTT
APRIL 17, 1990
10:00 A.M.
Nick
Thank you, [Introductory acknowledgements.] I'm pleased to
welcome this international field of distinguished high-level
officials -- experts on the environment, economics, science and
energy -- to the White House Conference on Global Change.
Two months ago, I had the honor of addressing the
-- IPEC Chain But Bain is
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. I see this conference
here
helping to accelerate the IPCC's agenda as it searches for
Haday.
understanding of some very critical questions -- broadening the
dialogue by exploring the link between scientific research and
economic analysis in the study of global change.
And of course, this conference is itself another sign of the
growing importance of the environment on the international
agenda. // Here in the United States, we've moved one step
closer to a great victory for the environment: strengthening our
Clean Air statutes -- already the world's toughest -- with a
comprehensive package of new Clean Air initiatives.
Ten months ago, we renewed momentum lost in legislative
stalemate for 12 years. And just this month, a clean air package
cleared the U.S. Senate, with House action possible in May. //
We're moving forward on Clean Air legislation because it is in
America's interest. But, like so many of the environmental
2
issues that concern us -- we aren't the only beneficiary of a
better environment. // When it comes to the environment, we are
learning that local actions can have global consequences.
Understanding the effects of our actions on our Earth system
is the first step to a sound environment -- and the subject that
led me to invite all of you here. I want to speak this morning
about what we can do over the course of the next two days to
advance our understanding of global change.
This conference will help in three ways.
First, it provides an opportunity to help sort out the
science on this complex issue. // To start with what we know --
about the Earth, this home we share. About the factors --
natural as well as man-made -- that cause our environment to
change. // And to work from what we know toward answers to the
many uncertainties that abound.
Perhaps it's not surprising when the subject is global
change that the debate often generates more heat than light. //
Some of you may have seen two scientists on a Sunday talk show
recently, debating global change. One scientist argued that if
we keep burning fossil fuels at today's rate -- and I quote --
"by the end of the the next century, Earth could be nine degrees
farenheit warmer than today." The other scientist saw no
evidence of rapid change, and warned against a drastic reordering
of our economy that could cause us, in his words, to "end up an
impoverished nation awaiting a warming that never comes." //
3
Two scientists -- two diametrically opposed points of view.
Where does that leave us? // What we need are facts: the stuff
science is made of. A better understanding of the basic
processes at work in our world. Better earth system models --
that enable us to calculate the complex interaction between man
and our environment. //
That's why I've asked Congress to approve a 60% increase in
our budget for the Global Change Research Program -- an
aggressive research program for which we've budgeted more than $1
billion dollars in 1991 -- to reduce the uncertainties
surrounding global change, to advance the scientific
understanding we need, if we are to make decisions to maximize
benefits -- and minimize unintended consequences. //
The second way this gathering can advance our understanding
is to address the economic factor in environmental questions. We
know that cleaning up our environment costs money. We know it
means changes in the way we work and live. Here in the U.S.
we're already making those changes: Moving forward on clean air.
Planting trees through our America the Beautiful initiative, and
working with other nations to find ways to halt deforestation.
Phasing-out the use of CFCs. Encouraging conservation, and
exploring alternative sources of fuel and energy -- and market-
based incentives for pollution control. //
And yet as we move forward, all of us must make certain we
preserve our environmental well-being and our economic welfare.
We know that these are not separate concerns. They are two sides
4
of the same coin. Recognizing this fact is in the interest of
every nation here today -- in the interests of the developed
world and the developing world alike.
Let me focus for a moment on the developing world. In a
climate of poverty, or persistent economic struggle, protecting
the environment becomes a far more difficult challenge. Cold
statistics don't begin to capture the harsh realities at stake.
Development doesn't mean just another point of GNP -- it's
measured in human lives. An end to hunger. Lower infant
mortality -- longer life expectancy. / Not just quality of life
-- but life itself. Environmental policies that ignore the
economic factor -- the human factor -- are destined to fail.
But there is another reason to consider the economic factor
when the issue is the environment. // There is no better ally
in service of our environment than strong economies. Economies
that make possible the increased efficiencies that enable us to
make environmental gains. Economies that generate the new
technologies that help us arrest and reverse the damage we have
done to our environment. We need economies that allow us to make
vital investments in our common future. //
That brings me to the third way this conference contributes
to a net gain in knowledge: the fact that it provides us the
opportunity to form a partnership -- between nations, and across
the many disciplines represented here.
Few subjects offer a greater challenge to the understanding
of man than global change. And yet, too often, the different
5
disciplines focusing on this question have worked in isolation --
with little interchange of ideas, analysis, information. //
This conference is a new departure because it brings together
environmentalists and economists, experts on energy and science -
- to search for common ground. To share the expertise each
discipline can bring to this difficult and demanding concern.
And this new partnership must bind nations as well. The
fact of the matter is, no one nation -- acting alone -- can
safeguard our Earth environment. Success requires a sense of
global stewardship -- an understanding that it is the Earth that
endures -- and that all of us are no more than tenants, in
temporary possession of a sacred trust. //
For the next two days, you'll be grappling with questions of
global stewardship -- questions of global consequence. I thank
all of you for joining us here -- and wish you the best in your
deliberations. // God bless you all.
# # #
I want to you of all
recognize you
the members of om delegation. Conference
Co- Charinen & Michael Bishin, Wm
Reilter Dr, Bromley + Michael De Land,
McGroarty/Dooley
April 16, 1990
4:00 pm
[change]
PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE ON GLOBAL CHANGE
J.W. MARRIOTT
APRIL 17, 1990
10:00 A.M.
Thank you. [Introductory acknowledgements.] I'm pleased to
welcome this international field of distinguished high-level
officials -- experts on the environment, economics, science and
energy -- to the White House Conference on Global Change.
Two months ago, I had the honor of addressing the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change -- the UN body doing
such vital work on this key environmental issue. I see this
conference helping to accelerate the IPCC's agenda as it searches
for understanding of some very critical questions. // This
gathering is the first to focus on the obligation to broaden the
dialogue -- the first to explore the link between scientific
research and economic analysis in the study of global change.
And of course, this conference is itself another sign of the
growing importance of the environment on the international
agenda. // Here in the United States, we've moved one step
closer to a great victory for the environment: strengthening our
Clean Air statutes -- already the world's toughest -- with a
comprehensive package of new Clean Air initiatives.
Ten months ago, we renewed momentum lost in legislative
stalemate for 12 years. / And just this month, a clean air
package cleared the U.S. Senate, with overwhelming support. In
2
the House -- now working on its own version of a clean air bill -
- a full floor vote is possible in early May. ///
We're moving forward on Clean Air legislation because it is
in America's interest. But, like so many of the environmental
issues that concern us -- we aren't the only beneficiary of a
better environment. // When it comes to the environment, we are
learning that local actions can have global consequences.
Understanding the effects of our actions on our Earth system
is the first step to a sound environment -- and the subject that
led me to invite all of you here. I want to speak this morning
about what we can do over the course of the next two days to
advance our understanding of global change.
This conference will help in three ways.
First, it provides an opportunity to help sort out the
science on this complex issue. // To start with what we know -
- about the Earth, this home we share. About the factors --
natural as well as man-made -- that cause our environment to
Tom Super
change. // And to work from what we know toward answers to the
many uncertainties that abound.
5750
Perhaps it's not surprising when the subject is global
change that the debate often generates more heat than light. //
Some of you may have seen two scientists on one of the Sunday
HALAD
talks shows two days back, debating global change. One --
Michael Oppenhemier -- arguing that if we keep burning fossil
fuels at today's rate -- and I quote -- "by the end of the the
next century, Earth could be nine degrees farenheit warmer than
3
today " The other scientist -- Patrick Michaels -- saw no
evidence of rapid change, and warned against a drastic reordering
of our economy that could cause us, in his words, to "end up an
impoverished nation awaiting a warming that never comes. " //
Two scientists -- two diametrically opposed points of view.
Where does that leave us? // What we need are facts: the stuff
science is made of. A better understanding of the basic
processes at work in our world. Better earth system models --
that enable us to calculate the complex interaction between man
and our environment. //
That's why I've asked Congress to approve a 60% increase in
our budget for the Global Change Research Program -- an
aggressive research program for which we've budgeted more than $1
billion dollars in 1991 -- to reduce the uncertainties
surrounding global change, to advance the scientific
understanding we need, if we are to make decisions to maximize
benefits -- and minimize unintended consequences. //
The second way this gathering can advance our understanding
is to address the economic factor in environmental questions. We
know that cleaning up our environment costs money. We know it
means changes in the way we work and live. Here in the U.S.
we're already making those changes: Moving forward on clean air.
Planting trees through our America the Beautiful initiative, and
working with other nations to find ways to halt deforestation.
Phasing-out the use of CFCs. Encouraging conservation, and
exploring alternative sources of fuel and energy -- and market-
4
based incentives for pollution control. We're proud of all we've
done -- but we know we're far from finished.
And yet as we move forward, all of us must make certain we
preserve our environmental well-being and our economic welfare.
We know that these are not separate concerns. They are two sides
of the same coin. Recognizing this fact is in the interest of
every nation here today -- in the interests of the developed
world and the developing world alike.
Let me focus for a moment on the developing world. In a
climate of poverty, or persistent economic struggle, protecting
the environment becomes a far more difficult challenge. Cold
statistics don't begin to capture the harsh realities at stake.
Development doesn't mean just another point of GNP -- it's
measured in human lives. An end to hunger. Lower infant
mortality -- longer life expectancy. / Not just quality of life
-- but life itself. Environmental policies that ignore the
economic factor -- the human factor -- are destined to fail.
But there is another reason to consider the economic factor
when the issue is the environment. // There is no better ally
in service of our environment than strong economies. Economies
that make possible the increased efficiencies that enable us to
make environmental gains. Economies that generate the new
technologies that help us arrest and reverse the damage we have
done to our environment. Whatever the technology -- whether it's
CFC substitutes, new refrigerants, reformulated gasoline -- each
new venture provides economic opportunities as well as
5
environmental benefits. We need economies that allow us to make
vital investments in our common future. //
That brings me to the third way this conference contributes
to a net gain in knowledge: the fact that it provides us the
opportunity to form a partnership -- between nations, and across
the many disciplines represented here.
No subject is so vast as the field of global change. Few
subjects offer greater challenge to the understanding of man.
And yet, too often, the different disciplines focusing on this
question have worked in isolation -- with little interchange of
ideas, analysis, information. // This conference is a new
departure -- because it brings together, for the first time at a
high level and in a working format, environmentalists and
economists, experts from the fields of energy and science -- to
search for common ground. To share the expertise each discipline
can bring to this difficult and demanding concern.
And this new partnership must bind nations as well. The
fact of the matter is, no one nation -- acting alone -- can
safeguard our Earth environment. Success requires a sense of
global stewardship -- an understanding that it is the Earth that
endures -- and that all of us are no more than tenants, in
temporary possession of a sacred trust. //
For the next two days, you'll be grappling with questions of
global stewardship -- questions of global consequence. I thank
all of you for joining us here -- and wish you the best in your
deliberations. // God bless you all.
chair ,PCL Bolin (BO-LEEN)
followan
dist. guest us Delegation?
Juntter
Reilly
Truly
Mosbacher
Bloch
lujan Walkins
Knauss
Brady (intro)
olson
Boskin
-
Bromley
Deland
?
Jan Janowski
with
E
evenyone except featter
Her be there
Pres Bromley
Jan Jankow kow
THE OF S OF SEAL THE UNITED
THE WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE
ON SCIENCE AND ECONOMICS RESEARCH
RELATED TO GLOBAL CHANGE
April 17-18, 1990
Washington, D.C.
THE WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE
ON,SCIENCE & ECONOMICS RESEARCH
RELATED TO
GLOBAL CHANGE
THE OF SEAL OF THE UNITED
THE WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE
ON SCIENCE AND ECONOMICS RESEARCH
RELATED TO GLOBAL CHANGE
April 17-18, 1990
Washington, D.C.
THE WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE
ON SCIENCE & ECONOMICS RESEARCH
ACT
RELATED TO
GLOBAL CHANGE
THE WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE
ON SCIENCE & ECONOMICS RESEARCH
RELATED TO
GLOBAL CHANGE
PRE-CONFERENCE MATERIAL
FOR DELEGATES
Printed on Recycled Paper
THE WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE
ON SCIENCE & ECONOMICS RESEARCH
April 5, 1990
RELATED TO
GLOBAL CHANGE
Dear Colleague:
On behalf of President Bush, we are honored that you will be coming to the United
States April 16-18 to serve as a delegate to the White House Conference on Science
and Economics Research Related to Global Change.
By contributing your country's expertise in identifying the critical needs in the fields
of science and economics research, you will advance international cooperation and
understanding in dealing with the uncertainties of global change.
The United States welcomes a free and open discussion of the science and economics
research issues related to global change. As co-chairmen of the Conference, we look
forward to joining you in that effort.
Yours Sincerely,
DAMAN Franley
D. Allan Bromley
Assistant to the President
for Science and Technology
Mahal J Brown
Michael J. Boskin
Chairman
Council of Economic Advisers
Michael R. Deland
Chairman
Council on Environmental
Quality
THE WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE
ON SCIENCE & ECONOMICS RESEARCH
RELATED TO
GLOBAL CHANGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Overview of the Conference
Preliminary Delegation List
Conference Co-Chairmen Biographies
U.S. Delegation Biographies
Hotel/Transportation/Logistics
THE WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE
ON SCIENCE & ECONOMICS RESEARCH
$
RELATED TO
GLOBAL CHANGE
OVERVIEW OF THE CONFERENCE
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE CONFERENCE:
President George Bush invited the Heads of State from seventeen nations and the leadership of the
E.C. and the OECD to send ministerial-level delegations to the White House Conference on Science
and Economics Research Related to Global Change. The Conference is designed to bring together
government leaders in science, economics, energy, and the environment concerned with the central
research issues of Global Change. The Conference is designed to advance understanding of Global
Change phenomena, to enhance international cooperation, and to build the basis for future efforts
among nations to integrate more fully science and economics research into the policy process. The
Conference adds a new dimension to the international dialogue on Global Change - the proposition
that economics, both analysis and research on economic policy and economic consequences, is an
essential link between the science of Global Change and policy alternatives. Science and economics
research can also serve to identify and develop technologies and policy instruments that relax the
tension between growth and Global Change, allowing for greater progress on both fronts. To address
these broad goals, the Conference will:
Focus on science and economics research issues relevant to policy on Global Change,
Address important next steps to substantially enhance and broaden international
understanding of science and economics research issues that relate to Global Change,
Highlight the special role that economics plays in integrating the science of Global Change
with the policy process,
Demonstrate linkages between science and economics research and domestic and
international policy processes, and
Seek to take the initial steps to implement joint international science and economics
research efforts.
The Conference is conceived as an integral part of the ongoing international process to understand
the science of and policy options relating to global environmental issues. The need to improve
substantially understanding of both the science and economics of Global Change has been noted by
many world leaders. The Conference, therefore, focuses on science and economics research issues as
a complement to the ongoing Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and other interna-
tional forums that seek to address the issue of Global Change. It is hoped that the results of the Con-
ference will contribute to the IPCC process and other ongoing international debates and actions.
The Conference focuses on "Global Change," an area of research concerned with understanding the
fundamental processes that govern the Earth system functions. Global Change encompasses such
diverse and interrelated issues as ozone depletion, greenhouse gases, climate change, food security,
water supply, sea level changes, wetlands, deforestation, biodiversity, population change, and energy
demand.
1
OVERVIEW
Pre-Conference Material
for Delegates
The Conference will provide a forum for international leaders to address the complex science and
economics research issues central to the policy process, including:
How well can we predict temperature trends in the decades ahead?
How "good" are our global scale models, such as models to predict temperature changes?
How well can we predict the interconnections between global environmental change and the
resulting social and economic impacts?
What are the economic consequences of adapting to or mitigatinGlobal Change?
How "good" are the models used to assess these economic consequences and their impact on
the well-being of humanity?
By addressing such questions, it is hoped that the nations might pledge to enhance joint international
research efforts that focus on rapid improvement of both scientific and economic knowledge and de-
velopment of the necessary infrastructure to implement such efforts.
To address these complex and interrelated issues, President Bush invited heads of state from a small
group of nations to send delegations led by ministerial-level officials. The Conference was conceived
with the idea that a representative group of countries would be invited to participate. Their selection
was based on the simple criteria that the meeting should include countries or organizations of
countries that have substantial populations, large land masses, industrialized economies, heavy
future energy needs, major research infrastructures, or have provided international leadership on
issues related to climate and Global Change. These countries and organizations were selected:
1.
Australia
2. Brazil
3. Canada
4.
Federal Republic of Germany
5. France
6. India
7.
Indonesia
8. Italy
9. Japan
10.
Mexico
11.
Netherlands
12.
Nigeria
13.
Norway
14. Poland
15.
Soviet Union
16.
United Kingdom
17.
Zaire
18.
European Community
19.
OECD
The White House Conference
2
on Science and Economics Research
Related to Global Change
THE EXPECTED RESULTS OF THE CONFERENCE
The Conference will provide an opportunity to address the science and economics research issues
related to Global Change in the context of the policy process. To accomplish these goals, the Confer-
ence will focus on and seek to promote:
A substantially enhanced understanding of science, economics, and environmental research
agenda central to the needs of future Global Change policy development.
A substantive understanding of the uncertainties in both science and economics knowledge of
changes in the global environment of the planet.
Increased mutual understanding of and sensitivity to the substance of science and economics
research between both of those research communities.
Increased sensitivity by the two research communities to the policy needs evolving in such
areas as environmental and energy policy, and vice versa.
A solid and well implemented science and economics research effort as a prerequisite for a
complement to evolving efforts by nations to address the international policy questions of
global environmental changes.
A communication network among national leaders concerned with, and responsible for, the
research and policy agenda related to Global Change. More particularly, this Conference
provides a "first-ever" opportunity to forge a partnership between the science and economics
research communities and the policy-makers.
To provide a vehicle to focus on these vital issues, the Conference will include two Plenary Sessions
and several concurrent Working Groups, which will address the three major themes of the Confer-
ence:
The Science and Economics Research Challenge
Integrating Science and Economics Research in the Policy Process
Building a Partnership for Science and Economics Research
The Conference is expected to produce a Co-Chairmen's Report, which will outline the deliberations
of the Conference and set forth common actions designed to expand research and cooperation among
nations.
As President Bush stated in his invitation letter, "It is my hope that the expertise, experience, and
data available in our respective countries can be brought together in a more integrated and coherent
fashion. By working together, our nations can enhance international cooperation in these vital areas
and contribute to the success of the ongoing IPCC process."
3
OVERVIEW
Pre-Conference Material
for Delegates
THE WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE
ON SCIENCE & ECONOMICS RESEARCH
RELATED TO
GLOBAL CHANGE
PRELIMINARY DELEGATION LIST
Current as of April 4, 1990; 12:00 Noon
BRAZIL
(tentative)
Name
Title
Jose Lutzenberger
Environment Secretary
Jose Goldemberg
Science Secretary
CANADA
(tentative)
Name
Title
Lucien Bouchard
Federal Environment Minister
Derek Burney
Ambassador to the U.S.
Dr. Ann White
Director, Canadian Global Change Program
Dr. Arthur W. May
President, the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
(confirmed)
Name
Title
Professor Dr. Klaus Töpfer
Federal Minister for Environment, Nature Protection and Nuclear
Safety
Dr. Gebhard Ziller
State Secretary, Ministry for Research and Technology
Dr. Wilhelm Knittel
State Secretary, Ministry for Transportation
Baldur Wagner
Assistant Secretary, Federal Chancellery
Dr. Mario Graf von Matuschka
Assistant Secretary, Foreign Ministry
Dr. Horst Glatzel
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Federal Chancellery
Walter Lötz
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Ministry of Economics
Professor Dr. Ansgar Vogel
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Ministry for Environment, Nature
Protection, and Nuclear Safety
Dietrich Kupfer
Director, Office of International Cooperation, Ministry for
Environment, Nature Protection and Nuclear Safety
Professor Dr. Hartmut Grossl
Scientist, Max Planck Society, Hamburg
1
PRELIMINARY DELEGATIONLI
Pre-Conference Material
for Delegates
FRANCE
(tentative)
Name
Title
Minister Hubert Curien
Minister of Research and Technology
Minister Brice Lalonde
Secretary of State for the Environment
Jean Audouze
Science Advisor to the President
Claude Alegre
Special Advisor to the Minister of Education
Ambassador Jean Ripert
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Environment)
Yves Martin
Chairman of the Interministry Committee on Greenhouse
Madame Borione
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Andre LeBeau
General Director of the Meteorological Center
M. Nasse
Ministry of Economy and Budget
Sylvie Faucheux
Professor of Economy at Paris I
INDIA
(tentative)
Name
Title
Ms. Maneka Gandhi
Minister of State for Environment and Forests
Vasant Gowarikar
Secretary of Department of Science and Technology
Mahesh Prasad
Secretary of Ministry of Environment and Forests
Dr. A.P. Mitra
Director General of Council for Science and Industrial Research
The White House Conference
2
on Science and Economics Research
Related to Global Change
INDONESIA
(confirmed)
Name
Title
Prof. Dr. Ing. B.J. Habibie
Minister of State for Research and Technology; Chairman of the
Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology
Prof. Dr. Samaun Samadikun
Chairman of the Indonesian Institute of Science
Prof. Dr. John A. Katili
Deputy Chairman of the National Research Council
Prof. Dr. Gunawan Satari
Permanent Secretary, Ministry of State for Research and Technology
Mr. Poedji Kuntarso, MA
Director General for Foreign Economic Relations; Ministry of Foreign
Affairs
Prof. Dr. Rustam Didong
Deputy Chairman (Economics), National Development Planning
Agency
Prof. Dr. Harsono Wiryosumarto
Deputy Chairman (Technology Development); Agency for the
Assessment and Application of Technology
Prof. Dr. S.B. Joedono
Assistant Minister (Industry, Energy and Mining), Office of the
Coordinating Minister for the Economy, Finance, Industry and
Development Supervision
Dr. M. Alwi Dahlan
Assistant Ministery (Population), Office of the Minister of State for
Population and the Environment
His Excellency Abdulrachman Ramly
Ambassador of the Republic of Indonesia to the United States of
America
ITALY
(tentative)
Name
Title
Hon. Adolfo Battaglia
Minister of Industry, Head of Delegation
Prof. Umberto Colombo
Director of the National Agency for Nuclear and Renewable Energies
Prof. Giuseppe Biorci
Vice President of the National Research Council
Prof. Giuseppe Bianchi
Director General for Energy Sources, Ministry of Industry
Prof. Antonio Praturlon
President of the CNR Committee on Geological Sciences
Prof. Roberto Frassetto
CNR Institute of the Dynamics of Great Masses
Prof. Emilio Gerelli
Economic Counselor to the Minister of Environment
Dr. Corrado Clini
Director General for Pollution Prevention, Ministry of Environment
Prof. Guido Visconti
Department of Physics, University of Aquila
Dr. Giovanni Sacco
Vice Director General of Treasury, Ministry of Treasury
3
PRELIMINARY DELEGATION LIST
Pre-Conference Material
for Delegates
MEXICO
(tentative)
Name
Title
Lic. Patricio Chirinos
Secretary of Urban Development and Ecology
Dr. Jose Sarukhan
Rector, National Autonomous University
Dr. Herminio Blanco
Undersecretary for Foreign Commerce, Secretariat of Commerce and
Industrial Development
Ing. Alberto Escofet
Undersecretary for Energy, Secretariat of Energy, Mines and Parastatal
Industries
Lic. Jose Angel Gurria
Undersecretary for International Financial Affairs, Secretariat of the
Treasury
Fis. Sergio Reyes
Undersecretary for Ecology
Amb. Alberto Szekely
Legal Counsel, Secretariat of Foreign Affairs
Dr. Julian Adem
Director, Center for Atmospheric Studies, National Autonomous
University
Dr. Manuel Ortega
Director General, National Council for Science and Technology
Hector Santana
Staff Aide to Secretary Chirinos
THE NETHERLANDS
(tentative)
Name
Title
Hans Alders
Minister for Housing, Physical Planning and Environment
Dr. B.C.J. Zoeteman
Deputy Director-General for Environment
Dr. Pier Vellinga
Coordinator for National Climate Programs
N.D. Van Egmond
Director for Chemistry and Physics, State Institute for Public Health
and Environmental Hygiene
I.G. Roos
Directorate-General for European Cooperation, Ministry of Foreign
Affairs
Dr. H.M. Fijnaut
Director of the Royal Dutch Meteorological Institute
Dr. A.P.M. Baede
Head of the Department for Dynamical Meteorology
D.F.W.T. Pietermaat
Environmental Coordinator in the Directorate-General for Energy,
Ministry of Economic Affairs
Prof. J.B. Opschoor
Professor of Ecology, Free University, Amsterdam
The White House Conference
4
on Science and Economics Research
Related to Global Change
NORWAY
(confirmed)
Name
Title
Kristin Hille Valla
Minister of Environment
Einar Steensnaes
Minister of Education and Research
Ambassador Kjeld Vibe
Norwegian Ambassador to the United States
Oddmund Graham
Secretary General, Ministry of Environment
Kaare Bryn
Director General, Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Dr. Tore Olsen
Director General, Ministry of Education and Research
Per M. Bakken
Coordinator, Air Pollution, Ministry of Environment
Lorents Lorentsen
Director of Research, Central Bureau of Statistics
Professor Dr. Ivar Isaksen
University of Oslo
Leif Westegaard
Science Officer, Norwegian Embassy in Washington
THE OECD
(tentative)
Name
Title
Robert Cornell
Deputy Secretary-General
William L. Long
Director for Environment
John Ferriter
Deputy Executive Director, International Energy Agency
Andrew Dean
Administrator, Department for Economic Affairs and Statistics
George Kowalski
Head of the Division of Economic Analysis, International Energy
Agency
5
PRELIMINARY DELEGATIONLIST
Pre-Conference Material
for Delegates
POLAND
(tentative)
Name
Title
Jan Janowski
Deputy Prime Minister; Head of the Office of Scientific and
Technological Progress
Andreyewski
Deputy Minister of the Environment
Tadeusz Diem
Deputy Minister of Education
Rybicki
Central Planning Office
Kazimierz Duchowski
Department of Economic Cooperation, Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Wiackowski
Chairman, Parliamentary Commission on Environmental Protection
Stakel
Professor, Polish Academy of Sciences
Sadowski
Institute of Metallurgy and Water Management
Wlodzimierz Bojarski
Senator
Jan Kinast
Polish Ambassador to the United States
SOVIET UNION
(tentative)
Name
Title
Nikolay P. Laverov
Chairman of the USSR State Committee on Science and Technology
Yuriy A. Izrael
Chairman of the State Committee on Hydrometeorology
V.F. Kostin
Deputy Chairman, State Committee for Nature Protection
Aleksander A. Metalnikov
Deputy Chairman, State Committee for Hydrometeorology
A.A. Troitsky
Deputy Chairman, State Planning Committee
V.M. Kotliakov
Director, Institute of Geography, USSR Academy of Sciences
Yu. L. Golubev
Assistant to Chairman, State Committee for Hydrometeorology
Yu. V. Vakajuk
Chief, Division of Global Geophysical Problems, Climate Change
and Economic Consequences, State Committee for Hydrometeorology
Yu. V. Pikhanov
State Committee for Hydrometeorology, Department of International
Cooperation
Mrs. N. Yu. Vail
State Department Committee for Hydrometeorology, Department of
International Cooperation
The White House Conference
6
on Science and Economics Research
Related to Global Change
UNITED KINGDOM
(tentative)
Name
Title
David Trippier RD, JP, MP
Minister for the Environment and Countryside
Sir John Fairclough
Chief Scientific Adviser, the Cabinet Office
Sir Crispin C.C. Tickell, GCMG, KCVO
United Kingdom Permanent Representative to the United Nations
Dr. John T. Houghton CBE
Director-General, Meteorological Office
J.G. Odling-Smee
Deputy Chief Economic Adviser; HM Treasury
Dr. David J. Fisk
Chief Scientist, Department of Environment
Dr. W. David Evans
Chief Scientist, Department of Energy
Dr. Eileen Buttle
Secretary, Natural Environment Research Council
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(confirmed)
Name
Title
Nicholas F. Brady
Secretary of the Treasury
Manuel Lujan, Jr.
Secretary of the Interior
Clayton Yeutter
Secretary of Agriculture
Robert A. Mosbacher
Secretary of Commerce
Admiral James D. Watkins (Ret)
Secretary of Energy
William K. Reilly
Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency
Richard H. Truly
Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
John A. Knauss
Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere; and
Director, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Erich Bloch
Director, National Science Foundation
Richard Schmalensee
Member, Council of Economic Advisers
Bolin
7116
ZAIRE
(tentative)
Name
Title
Citoyen Lobo Kanza Kanza
Secretary of State (Deputy Minister); Ministry of Environment and
Conservation of Nature
7
PRELIMINARY DELEGATION LIST
Pre-Conference Material
for Delegates
THE WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE
ON SCIENCE & ECONOMICS RESEARCH
RELATED TO
GLOBAL CHANGE
CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRMEN BIOGRAPHIES
MICHAEL J. BOSKIN
D. ALLAN BROMLEY
MICHAEL R. DELAND
Michael J. Boskin
Chairman
President's Council of
Economic Advisers
Michael J. Boskin is the Chairman of the President's Council of Economic Advisers. He was appointed
to this post by the President on February 2, 1989, following unanimous confirmation by the Senate. As
Chairman, he provides economic analysis and advice directly to the President and assists in formulating
national economic policies. Dr. Boskin is on leave from Stanford University, where he is the Burnet C.
and Mildred Finley Wohlford Professor of Economics, and was the founder and Director of the Center
for Economic Policy Research. He is also on leave as a Research Associate of the National Bureau of
Economic Research.
Dr. Boskin is the recipient of numerous professional awards and citations, ranging from the
Chancellor's Award and the Department Citation as outstanding undergraduate at the University of
California in 1967 and the first National Tax Association Outstanding Doctoral Dissertation Award in
1971 to the Abramson Award for Outstanding Research from the National Association of Business
Economists in 1987 and Stanford University's Distinguished Teaching Award in 1988. He is the author
of more than 80 books and articles in the areas of government spending, tax theory and policy, public
debt, Social Security, retirement patterns and behavior, U.S. saving behavior, capital formation, U.S.
economic growth, and the economic status of the elderly.
Dr. Boskin received his B.A. degree with highest honors in 1967 from the University of California at
Berkeley, where he received his M.A. in 1968 and his Ph.D. in 1971.
Previously, Dr. Boskin had served as a consultant and adviser to the White House, Department of
Health and Human Services, Treasury Department, National Science Foundation, and other govern-
ment agencies, and various congressional committees.
Dr. Boskin is a member of the Economic Education Committee of the American Economic Association.
He and his wife Chris moved to Washington, D.C. from California. They both enjoy skiing and tennis.
D. Allan Bromley
Assistant to the President
Science and Technology
D. Allan Bromley is Assistant to the President for Science and Technology and Director of the Office of
Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) in the Executive Office of the President. He is on leave from his
former position as Henry Ford II Professor of Physics at Yale University, where he was founder and
Director of the A.W. Wright Nuclear Structure Laboratory.
One of the world's leading nuclear physicists, he has carried out pioneering studies on both the struc-
ture and dynamics of nuclei and is considered the father of modern heavy ion science, one of the major
areas of nuclear science. He has also played major roles in the development of accelerators, of detection
systems, and in computer-based data acquisition and analysis systems. An outstanding teacher, over
the past two decades his laboratory at Yale graduated more Ph.D.'s in experimental nuclear physics
than any other institution worldwide. He has published over 450 papers in science and technology as
well as edited eighteen books and has received numerous honors and awards, including the National
Medal of Science.
For more than two decades, Dr. Bromley has been a leader in the national and international science and
science policy communities. As Chairman of the National Academy's Physics Survey in the early 1970s,
he contributed in a central way to charting the future of that science in the subsequent decade. As
President of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the world's largest scientific
society, and the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics, the world coordinating body for that
science, he has been one of the leading spokesmen for U.S. science and for international scientific
cooperation.
Prior to his present appointment, Dr. Bromley served as a member of the White House Science Council
throughout the Reagan Administration and as a member of the National Science Board in 1988-1989. As
the U.S. chairman for both the Gandhi-Reagan, Indo/U.S. and the Sarney-Reagan, Brazil/U.S. Science
and Technology Initiatives, he led four Presidential missions to conduct negotiations for bilateral
cooperation in science and technology.
Born in Westmeath, Ontario, Canada, he received the B.Sc. degree with highest honors in 1948 in the
Faculty of Engineering at Queen's University, Ontario, Canada. He received the M.Sc. degree from
Queen's University in 1950 and the Ph.D. degree from the University of Rochester in 1952, both degrees
in nuclear physics. He subsequently has been awarded ten honorary degrees from universities in
Canada, France, Germany, Italy, South Africa, and the United States.
Dr. Bromley is married to the Former Patricia J. Brassor, and they have two children, David John and
Karen Lynn.
Michael R. Deland
Chairman
White House Council
on Environmental Quality
Michael R. Deland was appointed by President Bush to be Chairman of the White House Council on
Environmental Quality on August 1, 1989, following unanimous confirmation by the United States
Senate. In this capacity he serves as environmental adviser to the President as well as Director of the
Office of Environmental Quality which oversees the development of environmental policy, interagency
coordination of environmental quality programs and environmental data acquisition and assessment.
In addition, Mr. Deland is responsible for overseeing implementation of the National Environmental
Policy Act.
Prior to Mr. Deland's appointment as CEQ Chairman, he was the New England Regional Administrator
for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In that capacity, from 1983 to 1989, he admini-
stered the federal government's programs dealing with air and water pollution control, hazardous
waste management, drinking water, toxic substances, radiation, and pesticides.
Mr. Deland was counsel at Environmental Research and Technology, Inc., a national firm headquar-
tered in Concord, Massachusetts from 1976 to 1983. While in the private sector, Mr. Deland published
numerous papers and articles, including the Regulatory Focus monthly column in Environment, Science
and Technology. Between 1971 and 1976, Mr. Deland served in EPA's Office of Regional Counsel in New
England (Region I) in several capacities, including Chief of the Agency's Legal Review Section and
Chief of the Enforcement Branch.
Mr. Deland received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Harvard College in 1963 and served as an officer
in the U.S. Navy before obtaining his law degree from Boston College in 1969. He is a member of the
Massachusetts Bar and the American Bar Association and its Natural Resources Committee. Mr.
Deland was President of the Business Associates Club (Boston) from 1981 to 1982 and is a former
Director of the Environmental Lobby of Massachusetts and the Center for Environmental Intern
Programs, a national non-profit organization headquartered in Boston.
Mr. Deland has received numerous awards and citations, including the Massachusetts Audubon Society
Award for his leadership in cleaning up Boston Harbor and the New England Environment Leadership
Award for the New England Environmental Network. In 1987, he was honored as "Environmentalist of
the Year" by the Massachusetts Association of Conservation Commissions. In March of 1989, he was
awarded the National Wildlife Federation's Special Achievement Award for his role in prompting the
cleanup of Boston Harbor, for his efforts at protecting valuable fishing areas from off-shore oil drilling,
and for his early endorsement of environmentally-based growth controls on Cape Cod. Mr. Deland
resides in Washington with his wife Jane and three children.
THE WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE
ON SCIENCE & ECONOMICS RESEARCH
RELATED TO
GLOBAL CHANGE
U.S. Delegation Biographies
As part of the Conference handout materials, we are
preparing an information/reference booklet which will
include:
one-page narrative biography of each delegate
an 8" X 10" photograph of each delegate
the delegate's organization's logo/seal
The biographies, logos and photographs of the U.S.
delegation included in this section are representative of the
materials we are seeking from each foreign delegation
member.
Please provide this information to the White House
Conference as soon as possible.
THE OF 1 THE TREASURY
1789
Nicholas F. Brady
Secretary
Department of the Treasury
Nicholas F. Brady became the 68th Secretary of the Treasury on September 15, 1988.
Secretary Brady served in the United States Senate from April 20, 1982 through December 27, 1982.
During that time he was a member of The Armed Services Committee and the Banking, Housing and
Urban Affairs Committee.
In 1984 President Reagan appointed Secretary Brady Chairman of the President's Commission on
Executive, Legislative and Judicial Salaries. He has also served on the President's Commission on
Strategic Forces (1983), the National Bipartisan Commission on Central America (1983), the Commis-
sion on Security and Economic Assistance (1983), and the Blue Ribbon Commission on Defense
Management (1985). Most recently, Secretary Brady chaired the Presidential Task Force on Market
Mechanisms (1987).
Secretary Brady's career in the banking industry spans 34 years. He joined Dillon, Read & Co., Inc. in
New York in 1954, rising to Chairman of the Board. He has been a Director of the NCR Corporation, the
MITRE Corporation, and the H.J. Heinz Company, among others.
He has also served as a trustee of Rockefeller University and a member of the Board of the Economic
Club of New York. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. He is a former trustee of
the Boys' Club of Newark.
Mr. Brady was born April 11, 1930 in New York City. He was educated at Yale University (B.A., 1952)
and Harvard University (M.B.A., 1954). He and his wife, Katherine, have four children.
S.
DEF OF THE INTERIOR
March
3.
1849
Manuel Lujan, Jr.
Secretary
Department of the Interior
POLITICAL
President George Bush selected Manuel Lujan, Jr., who had just completed a 20-year career in the House of Repre-
sentatives, to be his Secretary of the Interior. He was sworn in on February 3, 1989.
The 46th Secretary of the Interior, Lujan was first elected to the House of Representatives from New Mexico in 1968.
When he left the Congress on January 3, 1989, he ranked 15th in seniority among all Republicans and 52nd in senior-
ity among all House members.
A member of the House Interior and Insular Affairs Committee since 1969, Lujan was its second ranking Republican.
The Committee has jurisdiction over all activity in the U.S. Department of the Interior as well as the Nuclear Regu-
latory Commission. Lujan was also the senior Republican on the Energy and Environment Subcommittee.
Lujan was the Vice-Chairman of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee. As senior Republican,
Lujan was a member of all subcommittees, including Space Science and Applications which has oversight over
NASA.
PERSONAL
Born May 12, 1928 in San Ildefonso, New Mexico. Raised in Santa Fe where Lujan's father, Manuel Lujan, Sr.,
served three elected terms as Mayor.
A graduate of the College of Santa Fe with a B.A. degree, Lujan also attended St. Mary's College in California.
Prior to entering Congress, the Secretary was a partner in a family insurance and real estate business with three
offices in New Mexico. His brother, Edward Lujan, is the managing partner of the business.
Married to the former Jean Couchman of Santa Fe, the Lujans have four children; Terra Everett, Jay, Barbara and Jeff.
Secretary and Mrs. Lujan maintain residences in both Washington, D.C. and Albuquerque.
LEGISLATIVE
Economy in Government: Lujan was a Congressional leader in the battle against wasteful government spending.
"The effort to stop inflation boils down to a fight against needless government intervention and spending," stated Lujan.
Environmental Protection: Lujan has co-sponsored seven major environmental protection bills including the Clean
Air Act of 1970 and the Clean Water Act. More recently, Lujan successfully sponsored legislation setting aside
more than 600,000 acres of New Mexico land as wilderness areas, ensuring its beauty and enjoyment for future
generations.
Education: Lujan strongly supported student loan programs in the public and private sectors. His work led to New
Mexico adopting a student loan program that is a model for other states.
Technology: Lujan believes strongly that scientific research is the key to our future. "Science and technology can help
us meet the challenges of the 21st century," said Lujan.
SUNTED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
Clayton Yeutter
Secretary
Department of Agriculture
Clayton Yeutter was sworn in as the 23rd United States Secretary of Agriculture on February 8, 1989.
Yeutter's career includes distinguished public and private-sector service in agricultural policy develop-
ment, law, economics, marketing and trade.
From July 1985 until shortly before his new cabinet appointment, Yeutter served as U.S. Trade Repre-
sentative. His previous USDA posts include Assistant Secretary for International Affairs and Commod-
ity Programs from March 1974 to June 1975, Assistant Secretary for Marketing and Consumer Service
from January 1973 to March 1974 and Administrator of the Consumer and Marketing Service from
October 1970 to December 1971.
Yeutter's other career highlights: President and Chief Executive officer, Chicago Mercantile Exchange,
July 1978 to June 1985; senior partner, law firm of Nelson, Harding, Yeutter & Leonard, Lincoln,
Nebraska, April 1977 to June 1978; Deputy U.S. Special Trade Representative, June 1975 to February
1977; Director, University of Nebraska Mission in Colombia (a large agricultural technical assistance
program), September 1968 to October 1970; executive assistant to the governor of Nebraska, January
1966 to September 1968; faculty member, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Ne-
braska, January 1960 to January 1966; operator of a 2,500 acre farming-ranching-cattle feeding enterprise
in central Nebraska, 1957-1975; and enlistee, later commissioned officer, U.S. Air Force, 1952-1957.
Yeutter was graduated with high distinction from the University of Nebraska in 1952 with a Bachelor of
Science degree in animal husbandry. In 1963, he obtained his law degree from the same university,
graduating cum laude and ranked first in his class. In 1966, he received his Ph.D. in agricultural
economics, again from the University of Nebraska, and was named outstanding graduate student in the
program.
Yeutter is a former member or chairman of many private and public-sector boards of directors, councils
and trusteeships, including: the President's Export Council; the Chicago Association of Commerce and
Industry; the Chicago-Tokyo Bank; the U.S. Meat Export Federation; the Chicago Council on Foreign
Relations; the Farm Foundation, Oak Brook, Illinois; Tri-Valley Growers, San Francisco, California; and
ConAgra, Inc., Omaha, Nebraska.
Yeutter was born in Eustis, Nebraska, December 10, 1931. He and his wife, Jeanne Vierk Yeutter, have
four children. He retains ownership of his Nebraska farm, which is currently operated by a tenant.
Yeutter's permanent home is in Lincoln, Nebraska, but he currently resides in McLean, Virginia.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
*
*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robert A. Mosbacher
Secretary
Department of Commerce
Nominated Secretary of Commerce by President-Elect George Bush on December 6, 1988. He was
confirmed 100-0 by the United States Senate on January 31, 1989.
Formerly:
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Mosbacher Energy Company
Director of Texas Commerce Bancshares, Houston, Texas
Director, Enron Corporation, Houston, Texas
Director, New York Life Insurance Company, New York
Past Chairman of the National Petroleum Council
Charter member and past Chairman of the All American Wildcatters Association
Member of the Executive Committee and Board of Directors of the American Petroleum Institute
Past Chairman of the Mid-Continent Oil and Gas Association
Twice Past Chairman of the Board of Visitors of the Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Institute
Former member of Board of Trustees of the Texas Heart Institute
Former National Trustee, Boys Clubs of America Southwest Region
Past Active Trustee of the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies
Member of Washington Roundtable and Co-Chair of Houston Roundtable of the Center for Strategic
and International Studies
National Finance Chairman for George Bush for President
National Finance Chairman of the Fund for America's Future
Chairman of Victory 88'
Co-Chairman of the Republican National Finance Committee
Member of the Executive Committee for Reagan-Bush
National Finance Chairman for the President Ford Committee in 1976
Won both the North American and World Sailing Championships in the Olympic classes (Dragon
and Soling)
Won the Southern Ocean Racing Circuit
Won the Gold Cup twice
Born in White Plains, New York, Mosbacher has lived in Houston, Texas since 1948. He graduated from
Washington and Lee University in Lexington, Virginia in 1947.
Mosbacher is married to the former Georgette Paulsin and is the father of four (Diane, Robert Jr.,
Kathryn and Lisa) and grandfather of five. The Mosbachers reside in Washington, D.C.
DEBA RIMENT STATES OF OF ENERGY
James D. Watkins
Secretary
Department of Energy
James David Watkins was nominated by the President to be the sixth Secretary of Energy on January 20,
1989. Admiral Watkins was confirmed by the United States Senate and sworn into office on March 1,
1989.
Admiral Watkins was born in California on March 7, 1927, and claims the city of Pasadena as his home.
A 1949 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy, his tours as flag officer included Chief of Naval Personnel;
Commander of the Sixth Fleet; Vice Chief of Naval Operations; and Commander-in-Chief of the Pacific
Fleet. Admiral Watkins was selected by President Reagan to become the 22nd Chief of Naval Opera-
tions on June 30, 1982. His military decorations include several Distinguished Service and Legion of
Merit medals, the Bronze Star with combat "V" and other medals, campaign and service ribbons, and
decorations from many foreign nations.
Following his retirement on June 30, 1986, Admiral Watkins devoted his time to issues regarding
America's youth, and worked with a number of philanthropic organizations to establish a national
program for personal excellence. He also served as a member of advisory boards in both the education
and energy fields and has received several honorary doctorates and public service awards.
In October 1987, Admiral Watkins was appointed Chairman of the Presidential Commission on the
Human-Immunodeficiency Virus (AIDS) Epidemic, submitting the Commission's final report to the
President on June 24, 1988.
Admiral Watkins received his master's degree in mechanical engineering in 1958, and is a graduate of
the reactor engineering course at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. He was selected by Admiral
Hyman G. Rickover to enter the Navy's nuclear-powered submarine program in 1959, and was quali-
fied as an Engineering Officer of the Watch at one of the Navy's land-based reactor plants. He served
for three years in the Atomic Energy Commission as Admiral Rickover's assistant for Naval Nuclear
Propulsion and later, in a variety of assignments associated with the management of the nuclear navy.
These assignments included Commanding Officer of a nuclear-powered submarine and Executive
Officer of the world's first nuclear-powered cruiser.
Admiral Watkins married Sheila Jo McKinney of San Diego, California, in 1950. They have six children:
Katherine Watkins Coopersmith, Laura Jo Watkins Kauffmann, Susan, Charles, James Jr., and Edward.
Admiral and Mrs. Watkins have eight grandchildren.
UNITED
STATES.
AGENCY
PROTECTION
William K. Reilly
Administrator
Environmental Protection Agency
William Kane Reilly was sworn in as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by
President Bush on February 8, 1989. The President announced his appointment on December 22, 1988,
and officially nominated him on January 20, 1989. The U.S. Senate unanimously confirmed his nomina-
tion on February 2, 1989.
Prior to becoming EPA Administrator, Reilly held five environment-related positions during the
previous two decades. He was President of World Wildlife Fund-U.S. (1985-1989) and President of the
Conservation Foundation (1973-1989). Those two organizations joined in a formal affiliation in 1985
and Reilly became President of both organizations. He was Executive Director of the Task Force on
Land Use and Urban Growth from 1972-1973. From 1970 to 1972, he was on the staff of the President's
Council on Environmental Quality and, from 1968 to 1970, was Associate Director, Urban Policy Center
and the National Urban Coalition. He also served as Chairman of the Natural Resources Council of
America, an association of all major conservation groups, from 1981-1983.
During his presidency of World Wildlife Fund-U.S., Reilly intensified his mission, the protection of the
diversity of life on earth. Between 1961 and 1989, the organization supported 1,371 wildlife and
endangered habitat projects in 103 countries. At the Conservation Foundation, he continued its long-
standing interest in land programs and initiated new programs in environmental dispute resolution,
water toxic substances control, and urban conservation and energy. In 1976, Reilly began a program
advocating direct cooperation between business leaders and conservationists in resolving polarizing
issues in resources and environmental policy, which resulted in several major consensus-building
policy dialogues, including the National Groundwater Policy Forum and the National Wetlands Policy
Forum.
Reilly has written and lectured extensively on environmental issues, has served on the boards of various
private and public sector organizations and received the Horace Albright Medal for his contributions to
national parks and the Alfred B. LaGasse Medal for his contributions to environmental progress.
An alumnus of Yale University, Reilly holds a law degree from Harvard University and a master's
degree in urban planning from Columbia University. He was born in Decatur, Illinois on January 26,
1940, grew up in Fall River, Massachusetts, and served as a U.S. Army captain (1966 to 1967).
He is married to Elizabeth "Libbie" Bennet Buxton Reilly. They have two daughters, Katherine Buxton
Reilly, age 19, and Margaret Mahalah Reilly, age 14. The family resides in Alexandria, Virginia.
NASA
Richard H. Truly
Administrator
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration
Richard H. Truly became the eighth Administrator of NASA on July 1, 1989. One day earlier, he
concluded his naval career of more than 30 years, retiring as a Vice Admiral, United States Navy. He is
the first astronaut to head the nation's civilian space agency.
Truly became NASA's associate administrator for space flight on February 20, 1986. In this position, he
led the painstaking rebuilding of the Space Shuttle program. This was highlighted by NASA's cele-
brated "return to flight" on September 29, 1988, when Discovery lifted off from Kennedy Space Center,
Florida, on the first Shuttle mission in almost three years.
Before returning to NASA, the former Shuttle astronaut served as the first commander of the Naval
Space Command, Dahlgren, Virginia, established October 1, 1983. His career in the U.S. Navy began in
1959, when he was commissioned an ensign. This coincided with his graduation from Georgia Institute
of Technology, which he attended as a Naval R.O.T.C. midshipman and earned a bachelor's degree in
aeronautical engineering.
Following flight school, he was designated a naval aviator in 1960. His initial tour of duty, Fighter
Squadron 33, was aboard USS Intrepid and USS Enterprise, and he made more than 300 carrier land-
ings. From 1963 to 1965, he was a student and then instructor at the U.S. Air Force Aerospace Research
Pilot School, Edwards Air Force Base, California.
In 1965, Truly became one of the first military astronauts selected to the Air Force's Manned Orbiting
Laboratory program in Los Angeles, California, and transferred to NASA as an astronaut in August
1969. He served as capsule communicator for all three of the manned Skylab missions in 1973 and the
Apollo-Soyuz mission in 1975. As a naval aviator, test pilot, and astronaut, Truly has logged over 7,500
hours in numerous military and civilian jet aircraft.
He was pilot for one of the two-man crews that flew the 747/Space Shuttle Enterprise approach and
landing test flights during 1977. He then served as backup pilot for STS-1, the first orbital test of the
Shuttle. His first flight in space was November 12-14, 1981, as pilot of Space Shuttle Columbia (STS-2),
significant as the first manned spacecraft to be reflown in space. His second flight (STS-9, August
30-September 5, 1983) was as commander of Space Shuttle Challenger, the first night launch and
landing in the Shuttle program.
On January 18, 1989, Truly was awarded the Presidential Citizen's Medal by President Reagan. His
NASA awards include two NASA Distinguished Service Medals, the NASA Outstanding Leadership
Medal, two NASA Exceptional Service Medals, and NASA Space Distinguished Service Medal, the
Defense Superior Service Medal, two Legions of Merit, the Navy Distinguished Flying Cross, and the
Meritorious Service Medal.
Truly was born in Fayette, Mississippi, on November 12, 1937 and attended school in Fayette and
Meridian, Mississippi. He is married to the former Colleen (Cody) Hanner of Milledgeville, Georgia.
They have three children: Mike, Dan and Lee, and three grandchildren: Ashley, Courtney and Peter.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John A. Knauss
Under Secretary
Department of Commerce
John A. Knauss, Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere and Administrator of the Department's
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), took office August 7, 1989.
A noted oceanographer and educator, Knauss was a professor of oceanography at the Graduate School
of Oceanography at the University of Rhode Island (URI). He also served as dean of the URI Gradu-
ate School of Oceanography from 1962 to 1987, and as the university's provost for marine affairs from
1969 to 1982.
Knauss has been a member of two presidential commissions on marine affairs: the Commission on
Marine Science, Resources, and Engineering (the Stratton Commission) in 1967 to 1968 and the National
Advisory Committee on Oceans and Atmosphere (NACOA), 1978 to 1985. He served as Chairman of
NACOA from 1981 to 1985. He has been President of the Association of Sea Grant Program Instititions,
Chairman of the Ocean Science Committee of the National Academy of Sciences/National Research
Council, and Chairman of the Marine Division of the National Association of State Universities and
Land-Grant Colleges.
He has served as President of the oceanographic section of the American Geophysical Union (AGU),
Vice President of the Marine Technology Society (MTS), Vice Chairman of the American Association for
the Advancement of Science's (AAAS) Atmospheric and Hydrospheric Sciences Section, and a council
member of the American Meteorological Society. He was a co-founder of the Law of the Sea Institute
and served on its governing board from 1965 to 1976 and 1981 to 1987. He has been elected a fellow of
the AAAS, the AGU, and the MTS.
Knauss graduated from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (B.S., 1946), the University of Michigan
(M.S., 1949), and the University of California, Scripps Institution of Oceanography (Ph.D., 1959).
nst
Erich Bloch
Director
National Science Foundation
Erich Bloch was confirmed by the Senate to be Director of the National Science Foundation on August 6,
1984. As Director, he is responsible for an agency charged with strengthening the national scientific and
engineering research potential and with improving science and engineering education at all levels. The
Foundation has an annual budget exceeding $1.7 billion and the annual award of 12,000 to 14,000 grants
for research in all fields of natural, social sciences, and engineering.
Before joining NSF, Mr. Bloch was a corporate Vice President for Technical Personnel Development at
IBM Corporation, which he joined in 1952 as an electrical engineer. During his career at IBM, Mr. Bloch
was the engineering manager of IBM's STRETCH supercomputer system in the late 1950's and early
1960's. In 1962, he headed development of the Solid Logic Technology program, which provided IBM
with microelectronic technology for its System/360 computer. Subsequently, Mr. Bloch was appointed
a vice president of the company's Data Systems Division and general manager of the East Fishkill
facility, which is responsible for the development and manufacture of semiconductor components used
in IBM's product line. He was elected an IBM vice president in 1981.
From 1981 to 1984, Mr. Bloch served as Chairman of the Semi-conductor Research Cooperative, a group
of leading computer and electronics firms that fund advanced research in universities and shares in the
results, and was the IBM representative on the board of the Semiconductor Industry Association.
In February 1985, Mr. Bloch was awarded the National Medal of Technology by President Reagan. The
award was made for his part in pioneering developments related to the IBM/360 computer that
revolutionized the computer industry. In 1989, Mr. Bloch was the recipient of the IEEE United States
Activities Board Award for Distinguished Public Service and the IEEE 1990 Founders Medal. He also
received honorary Doctorate of Engineering degrees from the Colorado School of Mines, the University
of Notre Dame, and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; honorary Doctorate of Science degrees from the
University of Massachusetts at Amherst, George Washington University, State University of New York
at Buffalo, the University of Rochester, Oberlin College, and Washington College; and an honorary
Doctorate of Science and Engineering degree from the Ohio State University.
He is a member of the National Academy of Engineering and is a Fellow of the American Association
for the Advancement of Science and of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and a
member of its Computer Society. He received his education in electrical engineering at the Federal
Polytechnic Institute of Zurich, Switzerland, and a Bachelor of Science degree in electrical engineering
from the University of Buffalo in 1952.
Richard Schmalensee
Council of Economic Advisers
Office of the President
Richard Schmalensee is a Member of the Council of Economic Advisers. He has primary responsibility
for the analysis of microeconomic and regulatory policy. Dr. Schmalensee is on leave from the Massa-
chusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where he is the Gordon Y. Billard Professor of Economics and
Management.
Dr. Schmalensee's research and teaching have focused on industrial organization and on anti-trust and
regulatory policy. He has written numerous articles in professional journals and is the author of three
books and co-author of three others. He has extensive consulting experience on anti-trust and regula-
tory matters. He has served on the editorial boards of several economics journals, is co-editor of the
Handbook of Industrial Organization, and is founding editor of the MIT Press Regulation of Economic
Activity monograph series. Dr. Schmalensee has also served on various committees of the American
Economic Association and the Econometric Society, of which he is a Fellow.
Dr. Schmalensee attended the public schools of Belleville, Illinois and received his B.S. (Economics,
Politics and Science; 1965) and Ph.D. ( Economics; 1970) degrees from MIT. Prior to joining the MIT
faculty in 1977, he taught at the University of California, San Diego. He is married to the former Diane
Hawk; they have two sons.
THE WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE
ON SCIENCE & ECONOMICS RESEARCH
RELATED TO
GLOBAL CHANGE
HOTEL/TRANSPORTATION/LOGISTICS
Dr. Franmarie Keel
White House Conference on Global Change
Suite 615
1019 19th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 653-5980
Fax: (202) 653-2034
Telex: 249118SDAVISUR
Telemail (OMNET): GLOBAL.CHANGE
HOTEL
The White House Conference is being held at:
The J.W. Marriott Hotel
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004.
Telephone: 202-393-2000
The White House Conference has reserved rooms for each official delegation member.
Charges for the hotel room April 16th and 17th, 1990 and for Conference meals served
April 17 and 18, 1990, will be paid for by the White House Conference.
Hotel room check-in is 3:00 p.m. Conference registration begins at 12:00 noon, Sunday, April
15, for delegates arriving in Washington early. Registration will continue Monday all day
and until 12:00 noon on Tuesday, April 17. Special arrangements should be made with White
House Conference coordinators for early or late arrivals/departures and check-in.
To cover any personal incidental expenditures (such as telephone calls, charges at the hotel
restaurants and gift shops, and additional room service), each delegation member must
present one of the following upon registration at the hotel to guarantee incidentals:
credit card (American Express, VISA, Master Card, Diners Club, JCV)
a letter received by April 14th, 1990 from the delegation's embassy
stating embassy will cover its delegation's incidentals prior to
delegation's departure from the hotel
TRANSPORTATION
Delegations will be met by White House Conference personnel at Washington National
Airport, Washington Dulles Airport, Baltimore-Washington International Airport, and
Andrews Air Force Base and will be escorted to the hotel beginning Sunday, April 15.
White House Conference personnel meeting flights can be identified by a White House
Conference sign. Delegations arriving in Washington domestically will be met at the gate.
International arrivals will be met at the exit of the mobil lounge at the entrance to U.S.
Immigration and Customs.
Procedures have been established by the Conference to assist in the facilitation of U.S.
Customs.
1
HOTEL/TRANSPORTATION/LOGISTICS
Pre-Conference Material
for Delegates
Transportation will be provided for delegations' return to those designated airports after the
close of the Conference Wednesday, April 18, through Thursday evening, April 19.
All transportation for official Conference events held outside of the J.W. Marriott Hotel will
be provided by the White House Conference.
All airline arrival and departure times must be confirmed as soon as possible with the
White House Conference at 202/653-5980.
Please inform the White House Conference immediately if flight plans change at
departure (i.e. cancelled flight, family emergency, etc.)
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
Any special room, bed, dietary, or medical requirements should be forwarded to White
House Conference coordinators as soon as possible.
MISCELLANEOUS
Simultaneous interpretation in Russian, Spanish, and French will be provided during the
Conference meetings.
Please note the dinner at the State Department, on Tuesday, April 17, is business attire.
The White House Conference
2
on Science and Economics Research
Related to Global Change
WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND ECONOMICS
RESEARCH RELATED TO GLOBAL CHANGE
Delegate Travel Accommodation Registration
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE
Name:
Title:
Country Delegation:
HOTEL ACCOMMODATIONS:
In order to facilitate your registration upon arrival at the Conference site at the J.W. Marri-
ott Hotel, it will be necessary to provide the information requested in this form. The White
House Conference provides each delegate with a hotel room from check-in April 16th to
check-out on April 18th. The J.W. Marriott Hotel requires guarantee of payment for inci-
dentals, such as telephone, room service, gift shop, laundry, restaurants, etc., with cash, a
credit card or a Letter of Guarantee from your Embassy. A Letter of Guarantee should in-
clude delegate's name, check-in date, Embassy Financial Officer, and any stipulations, and
must be received by April 14, 1990.
Credit Card #
Expiration Date:
Type (American Express, Visa, Master Card, Diners Club, JCV):
Name as it appears on card:
Signature:
Date:
This should be completed and sent by fax (202-653-2034) to Susan Thoren at the White
House Conference in Washington, D.C., or delivered by April 12th to 1019 19th Street NW,
Suite 615, Washington D.C. 20036
8
7
9
6
Class
10
3
11
5
12
1
4
13
14
2
Rendering by S. Finkenberg, New York.
1. JW Marriott Hotel
8. United States Capitol
2. The White House
9. Air and Space Museum
3. Convention Center
10. Hirshhorn Museum
4. Museum of American History
11. Smithsonian "Castle"
5. Natural History Museum
12. Freer Gallery
6. National Gallery of Art
13. Department of Agriculture
7. National Gallery of Art East Wing
14. Washington Monument
Printed on Recycled Paper
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
April 13, 1990
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT
THROUGH:
CHRISS WINSTON cw
FROM:
DAN MCGROARTY much
SUBJECT:
WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE ON GLOBAL CHANGE: WELCOME
I. SUMMARY
On Tuesday, April 17, at 10:00 a.m. you will address
the first plenary session of the White House Conference on
Global Change at the J.W. Marriott. About 400-450 people
will be in the audience, representing the U.S. and seventeen
foreign delegations, the EC and OECD.
Chairman Boskin is the moderator for the session, and
Secretary Brady will speak before you. The three co-
chairmen of the conference -- Chairmen Boskin and Deland and
Director Bromley -- will be there. Also present will be;
Governor Sununu, Secretaries Mosbacher, Lujan, Yeutter,
Watkins, Administrator Reilley, Erich Bloch (Director of
National Science Foundation), and John Knauss (Director of
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration).
II. DISCUSSION
The remarks (10 min./teleprompter) discuss the three
ways this conference will help tackle global change,
focusing on the issues of scientific uncertainty and
understanding; the relation of science and economics, and
the need to form an international partnership of knowledge
and investigation on the matter.
###
McGroarty/Dooley
April 13, 1990
3:00 pm
[change]
PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE ON GLOBAL CHANGE
J.W. MARRIOTT
APRIL 17, 1990
10:00 A.M.
Thank you. [Introductory acknowledgements.) I'm pleased to
welcome this international field of distinguished high-level
officials -- experts on the environment, economics, science and
energy to the White House Conference on Global Change.
Two months ago, I had the honor of addressing the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change -- the UN body doing
such vital work on this key environmental issue. I see this
conference helping to accelerate the IPCC's agenda as it searches
for understanding of some very critical questions. 11
This gathering is the first to focus on the obligation to
broaden the global change dialogue -- the first to explore the
link between scientific research and economic analysis in the
study of global change. // And of course, this conference is
itself another sign of the growing importance of the environment
on the international agenda.
Here in the United States, we've moved one step closer to a
great victory for the environment: strengthening our Clean Air
TomSuper
statutes -- already the world's toughest -- with a comprehensive
package of new Clean Air initiatives.
2
Tom super
Ten months ago, we renewed momentum lost in legislative
stalemate for 12 years. / This month, a clean air package
cleared the U.S. Senate, with overwhelming support. And just two
weeks ago, the House Committee on Energy and Commerce voted out
Rob
Portman
its own version of a clean air bill, 42-1 -- with a full, floor
vote in the House possible in early May.
//
2230
The hard work isn't over. Both Houses -- and the White
House -- still have plenty to say on the shape of the final Clean
Air bill. But we certainly hope that the United States will have
a new Clean Air Act on the books before the year is out. //
We're moving ahead on Clean Air legislation because it is in
America's interest. But, like so many of the environmental
issues that concern us -- we aren't the only beneficiary of a
better environment. // When it comes to the environment, we are
learning that local actions can have global consequences.
Understanding the effects of our actions on our Earth system
is the first step to a sound environment -- and the subject that
led me to invite all of you here. I want to speak this morning
about what we can do over the course of the next two days to
advance our understanding of the critical question of global
change.
This conference will help in three ways.
First, it provides an opportunity to help sort out the
science on the complex issue of global change. // To start with
what we know -- about the Earth, this home we share. About the
factors -- natural as well as man-made -- that cause our
3
environment to change. // And to work from what we know toward
answers to the many uncertainties that abound.
Perhaps it's not surprising when the subject is global
change that the debate often generates more heat than light. //
One thing we do know is that we can't afford to bury our heads in
the sand. // What we need are facts: the stuff science is made
of. A better understanding of the basic processes and their
relationships as they work in our environment. Better earth
system models -- that enable us to calculate the complex
interaction between man and our environment.
That's why I've asked Congress to approve a 60% increase in
our budget for the Global Change Research Program -- an
aggressive research program for which we've budgeted more than $1
billion dollars in 1991 -- to reduce the uncertainties
surrounding global change, and move us closer to the scientific
understanding we need, if we are to make decisions to maximize
benefits -- and minimize unintended consequences. //
The second way this gathering can advance our understanding
is to address the economic factor in environmental questions. We
know that cleaning up our environment costs money. We know it
means changes in the way we work and live. Here in the U.S.,
we're already making those changes -- moving forward on clean
air. Planting trees -- through our America the Beautiful
Coison
initiative -- and working with other nations to find ways to halt
John
deforestation. Phasing-out the use of CFCs. Encouraging
conservation and exploring alternative sources of fuel and
4
energy, and market-based incentives for pollution control. We're
proud of all we've done -- but we know we're far from finished.
And yet as we move forward, all of us must make certain we
preserve our environmental well-being and our economic welfare.
We know that these are not separate concerns. They are two sides
of the same coin. Recognizing this fact is in the interest of
every nation here today -- in the interests of the developed
world and the developing world alike.
Let me focus for a moment on the developing world. In a
climate of poverty, or persistent economic struggle, protecting
the environment becomes a far more difficult challenge. Cold
statistics don't begin to capture the harsh realities at stake.
Development doesn't mean just another point of GNP -- it's
measured in human lives. An end to hunger. Longer life
expectancy. Lower infant mortality. 11 Not just quality of
life -- but life itself. Environmental policies that ignore the
economic factor -- the human factor -- are destined to fail.
But there is another reason to consider the economic factor
when the issue is the environment. Economic policies that ignore
the environment will undermine the very basis for both life and
growth. There is no better ally in service of our environment
than strong economies. Economies that make possible the
increased efficiencies that enable us to make environmental
gains. Economies that generate the new technologies that help us
arrest and reverse the damage we have done to our environment.
Whatever the technology -- whether it's CFC substitutes, new
5
refrigerants, reformulated gasoline -- each new venture provides
economic opportunities as well as environmental benefits. // We
need economies that allow us to make vital investments in our
common future. //
That brings me to the third way this conference contributes
to a net gain in knowledge: the fact that it provides us the
opportunity to form a partnership -- between nations, and across
the many disciplines represented here.
No subject is so vast as the field of global change. Few
subjects offer a greater challenge to the understanding of man.
And yet, too often, the different disciplines focusing on this
question have worked in isolation -- with little interchange of
ideas, analysis, information.
This conference is a new departure -- a logical next step in
the study of global change -- because it brings together, for the
first time at a high level and in a working format,
environmentalists and economists, experts from the fields of
energy and science -- to search for common ground. To provide an
opportunity to share the expertise each discipline can bring to
this difficult and demanding concern.
And this new partnership must bind nations as well. The
fact of the matter is, no one nation --- acting alone -- can
safeguard our Earth environment. Success requires a sense of
global stewardship -- an understanding that it is the Earth that
endures -- and that all of us are no more than tenants, in
temporary possession of a sacred trust. 11
6
For the next two days, you'll be grappling with questions of
global stewardship -- questions of global consequence. I thank
all of you for joining us here -- for seeking to advance our
current state of understanding on an issue with such profound
affect on every nation and every individual for generations to
come. 11 God bless you all.
# # #
Call Martha
Brown
X7000
NBC
PD- Bob Ford from State
returned your call:
IPCC was put on under the
auspices of 2 UN organizations:
UNEP (UN Enviro Program)
+
WMO (World Meteorological org.)
IPCC is not itself a UN program-
its more an ad hoc group.
Call him if you have Q's.
C2
GE 30B (1/87
OFFICE OF PRESIDENTIAL ADVANCE
IN-TOWN EVENT CONTACT SHEET
Name
Office
Phone Number
Presidential Advance
456-7565
Presidential Advance Office Fax Number
456-2820
Lucy Muckerman
coordinator trip / Advance WH
456-7565
JOHN GIBBONS
LEAD ADV -377-5001 H-256-1987
Melinda Andrews
whiteHour Conjerncelead 775-8881-
DEE DACEY
MOHAMMED INSAN'S ASS'T 6266929
JUSTIN MACaRUDER
CONVENTION FLOOR MANAGER 606-6955
Regina Roberts
STAN NOWATKOSKI
admin, ENGINEERING asst to Banguet Manager 626-6956 393-0362
BLANCHO Diummond
Security MGR
626-6968
Carolyn Cawley
WH Speechwriting
456-7750
Peggy Dooley
WH Speechwriting
456-7750
BOBBY CARR
WH PRESS ADvance
447-5091
Mark Hatfield, for
WH Conference Ops.Dir.
653-5980
mohammed Itsan
JW matriott hotel
626-6920
Wyatt HAll
Marriero
6266918
Paul A. ZAlochA
Mey Zummo
JWM- CONVENTIONS
626-6916
Jwm - Cateing
626-6924
LEE Cox
WHCA
395-6083
APR-13-'90 12:38
ID:10
DE :1-202-653-2581
#554 P01
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
OFFICE or T.ID WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE
i'll
Science and Economics Research Related to Global Change
:
Facsimile Cover Sheet
TO: PHONE FAX NUMBER: Psages NUMBER Doaley 456-773-
6018 NO. OF PAGES FOLLOWING: 6
DATE: 4/13
FROM:
12:11
Washington, DC 20036
FAX NUMBER: (202)
THONE HUMBER: 653-5980
(202)724-0621
SUBJECT:
COMMENTS:
In addition to the US. names you
Please add
- Richard Schmalznssee
Member, Conal of Economic. Asums
- Bert Balines - (tille to fallow
Plenary Tuesday
The President S
APR-13-'90 12:38
White house Conference
On
Science & Economics Research
Salon 1
Salon 2
Salon 3
Salon 4
Related to Global Change
ID:10
a INSURED
Sown
Resorter
KI
April 17-18, 1990
Buller
White buse Stall
3W Marriott Hotel
0
Washington, DC
Projection
as
Setup for Plenary
Tuesday
by: Robert Yates
& Associates, Inc
Scab: 1/8"=1"
hterpfeter's Booths
Interpreter's Booms
proter's Boot S
April 10, 1990
1-202-653-2581 X
Active Booths
Sound Board
for Plenary Sessions
0
w
20
30'
#554 P02
Plenary Wednesday
The President's
APR-13-'90 12:39
White House Conference
On
Science & Economics Research
Salon 1
Salon 2
Salen i
Salon 4
Related to Global Change
ID:10
SECTION
7x7 Street
AWAY
a
April 17-18, 1990
Butlex
While Hours Start
JW Marriett Hotel
Microphone
0
Washington, DC
II
Projection
WS
Setup for Plenary
Wednesday
by: Robert Yates
& Associates, Inc
Scale: 1/8'=1
sterp eter's Booths
terporater's Boot hs
Interpreter's Boot as
April 10, 1990
11-302-653-2581 DO
Active Booths
Sound Board
for Plenary Sessions
0
10
20'
30'
#554 P03
Heads of Delegation/Minister-level
Reception/Photo-up
Australia
Neal Blewett
Member of Parliment, Minister
for Trade Negotiations
Brazil
Jose Lutzenberger
Environment Secretary
APR-13-'90 12:39 ID:10
Jose Goldemberg
Science Secretary
Canada
Lucien Bouchard
Federal Environment Minister
Jak Epp
Federal Energy Minister
France
Hubert Curien
Minister of Research and
Technology
Brice Lalonde
Secretary of State for the
Environment
Germany
Professor Dr. Klaus Topfer
Federal Minister for the
Environment, Nature Protection
and Nuclear Safety
India
Ms. Maneka Gandhi
Minister of State for
Environment and Forests
Indonesia
Prof. Dr. Ing. B.J. Habibie
Minister of State for Research
11-306-853-2581 DO
and Technology; Chairman of
the Agency for the Assessment
and Application of Technology
Italy
Hon. Adolfo Battaglia
Minister of Industry, Head of
Delegation
#554 P04
Japan
Ishimatsu Kitagawa
Minister of State, Director
General of Environment Agency
Shigeto Nagano
Parliamentary Vice Minister of
Science and Technology
APR-13-'90 12:40
Mexico
Lic. Patricio Chirinos
Secretary of Urban Development
and Ecology
Netherlands
J.G.M. Alders
Minister, Ministry of Housing,
Physical Planning and
ID:10
Environment
Nigeria
Major General Mamman Kontagora
Minister of Works and Housing
Gordian Ezekwe
Minister of Science and
Technology
Norway
Kristin Hille Valla
Minister of Environment
Einar Steensnaes
Minister of Education and
Science
Poland
Jan Janowski
Deputy Prime Minister; Head of
the Agency for Science and
Technological Progress and
Application
U.S.S.R.
Nikolay Pavlovich Laviorov
Chairman of the U.S.S.R. State
11-202-653-2591 DO
Committee on Science and
Technology
Juriy Antonievich Israel
Chairman of the U.S.S.R. State
Committee on Hydrometeorology
United Kingdom
David Trippier RD, JP, MP
Minister for the Environment
and Countryside
#554 P05
APR-13-'90 12:40
ID:10
1-202-653-2581
#554 P06
UNIVERSITY
RELATED TO
GLOBAL CHANGE
AGENDA
MONDAY # APRIL 16, 1990
12:00 p.m.
Early Registration - J.W. Marriott Hotel
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C.
7:00 p.m.
Reception a National Air and Space Museum (Closed to Media)
Hosts: Robert A. Mosbacher, Secretary of Commerce
Richard H. Truly, Administrator of NASA
Martin Harwit, Director, National Air and Space Museum
TUESDAY, APRIL 17, 1990
9:30 a.m.
PLENARY SESSION I (Open to Media)
Moderator: Michael J. Boskin, Chairman, Council of Economic Advisors
Welcoming Remarks: Nicholas F. Brady, Secretary of the Treasury
President George Bush
Goals and Expectations for the Conference: D. Allan Bromley, Assistant to the President for
Science and Technology
Opening Remarks by Visiting Delegate: Jan Janowski, Deputy Prime Minister of Poland,
Director of the State Office for Science and Technology Development
11:00 a.m.
PLENARY SESSION II (Open to Media)
Moderstor: Michael R. Deland, Chairman, Council on Environmental Quality
Theme I - The Science and Economics Research Challenge
Theme II . Integrating Science and Economics Research in the Policy Process
Theme III to Building Partnerships for Science and Economics Research
Presentations:
D. Allan Bromley
Michael J. Boskin
Michael R. Deland
APR-13-'90 12:41
ID:10
De :1-202-653-2581
#554 P07
12:00
Luncheon (Open to Media)
Speaker: William K. Reilly. Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency
1:45 p.m.
WORKING GROUP SESSIONS (Closed to Media)
Working Group Session I
Working Group Session II
6:00 P.M.
Reception at the National Academy of Sciences Building (Closed to Media)
Host: Frank Press, President of the National Academy of Sciences and
Robert White, President of the National Academy of Engineering
8:00 p.m.
Official Delegate Dinner (Closed to Media)
Host:
Lawrence Eagleburger, Deputy Secretary of State
Address: Bert Bolin, Professor of Meteorelogy. Stockholm University, Sweden
Chairman. Inter-Government Panel on Climate Change
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 18, 1990
9:00 a.m.
WORKING GROUP SESSIONS (Closed to Media)
Working Group Session III
Working Group Session IV
12:00 p.m.
Luncheon (Open to Media)
Speaker: James D. Watkins, Secretary. Department of Energy
1:45 p.m.
CONCLUDING SESSION (Open to Media)
Moderator: D. Allan Bromley
Review of Co-Chairmen's Report: Michael R. Deland, for the Conference Co-Chairmen
President George Bush
3:00 p.m.
Conference Ends
- CEQ/Bookin
McGroarty/Dooley
5080
April 12, 1990
11:00 am
[change]
5750
PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE ON GLOBAL CHANGE
J.W. MARRIOTT
APRIL 17, 1990
X:XX A.M.
Thank you. [Introductory acknowledgements.] I'm pleased to
welcome this international field of high-level officials --
experts on the environment, economy, science and energy to the
White House Conference on Global Change.
Two months ago, I had the honor of addressing the
The eminent int.
Frances Li a
International Panel on Climate Change -- a UN body doing such
Dan 2/5 Ford
Reifsauder vital
work on this key environmental issue. I see this
647 of of state 40661
3647-2764
conference making a key contribution to the process begun by the
IPCC. / /
This gathering is the first to focus on a new dimension in
Maynard
the global change dialogue -- the first to explore the link
between scientific research and economic analysis in the study of
global change. // And of course, this conference is itself
another sign of the growing importance of the environment on the
international agenda.
Here in the United States, we've moved one step closer to a
great victory for the environment: the passage of a
significantly stronger Clean Air Act. Ten months ago, we renewed
a
momentum lost for 12 years. / This month, our clean air package
cleared the U.S. Senate, with overwhelming support. And just
2
last week, the House Committee on Energy and Commerce voted out
its own version of a clean air bill, 42-1 -- and a full, floor
vote in the House may come in early May. //
The hard work isn't over. Both Houses and the White
House still have plenty to say on the shape of the final Clean
Air bill But we can say with certainty that the United States
will have a new Clean Air Act on the books before the year is
out
//
we will continue TO work w/congress to develop an
environmentally strong. + economically sound new CAA.
Let me be clear: We're moving ahead on Clean Air
legislation because it is in America's interest. But, like so
many of the environmental issues that concern us -- we aren't the
only beneficiary of a better environment. // When it comes to
the environment, we are learning that local actions have global
consequences.
Understanding the effects of our actions on the environment
is the first step to a sound ecology -- and the subject that led
me to invite all of you here. I want to speak this morning about
what we can do over the course of the next two days to advance
our understanding of the critical question of global change.
This conference will help in three ways.
First, it provides an opportunity to sort out the science on
the complex issue of global change. // To start with what we
know -- about the Earth, this home we share. About the factors -
- natural as well as man-made -- that cause our environment to
change. // And to work from what we know toward answers to the
many uncertainties that abound.
3
Perhaps it's not surprising when the subject is global
change that the debate often generates more heat than light. //
Certainly, the apocalyptic pronouncements we've all heard don't
help us make policy. If they're meant to wake us up -- warn us
about the urgency of this issue -- well, we already know enough
to know we can't afford to bury our heads in the sand.
What we need is fact: the stuff science is made of. A
better understanding of the basic processes at work in our
environment -- and how they relate to one another. Better earth
system models -- that enable us to calculate the complex
interaction between man and our environment.
That's why I've asked Congress to approve a 60% increase in
our budget for the Global Change Research Program -- an
aggressive research program for which I've budgeted more than $1
billion dollars in 1991 -- to reduce the uncertainties
surrounding global change, and move us closer to the scientific
understanding we need.
//
The second way this gathering can advance our understanding
is to address the economic factor in environmental questions. We
know that cleaning up our environment costs money. We know it
means changes in the way we work and live. Here in the U.S.,
we're already making those changes -- whether it's moving forward
on clean air, phasing-out the use of CFCs, or exploring
alternative sources of fuel and energy. We're proud of what
we've done -- but we know we're far from finished.
4
And yet as we move forward, all of us must make certain we
preserve our environmental well-being and our economic welfare.
This is in the interest of every nation here today -- in the
interests of the developed world and the developing world alike.
Let me focus for a moment on the developing world. In a
climate of poverty, or persistent economic decline protecting
the environment becomes a far more difficult challenge. Cold
statistics don't begin to capture the harsh realities at stake.
Development doesn't mean just another point of GNP -- it's
meansured in human lives. An end to hunger. Longer life
expectancy. Lower infant mortality. 11 Not just quality of
life -- but life itself. Environmental policies that ignore the
economic factor -- the human factor -- are destined to fail.
But there is another reason to consider the economic factor
when the issue is the environment. There is no better ally in
service of our environment than strong economies. Economies that
make possible the increased efficiencies that enable us to make
environmental gains. Economies that generate the new
technologies that help us arrest and reverse the damage we have
done to our environment. //
That brings me to the third way this conference contributes
to a net gain in knowledge: the fact that it provides us the
opportunity to form a partnership -- between nations, and across
the many disciplines represented here.
No subject is so vast as the study of global change -- the
ecology of the Earth. No subject offers greater challenges to
CI
Brad
minus Brady + Mosbacher
5
the understanding of man. Too often, these different disciplines
focusing on this question have worked in isolation -- with little
interchange of ideas, analysis, information.
This conference is a new departure -- a logical next step in
the study of global change -- because it brings together
environmentalists and economists, experts from the fields of
energy and science -- to search for common ground, to create a
clearing house through which we share the expertise each
discipline can bring to this difficult and demanding concern.
And this new partnership must bind nations as well. The
fact of the matter is, no one nation -- acting alone -- can
safeguard our Earth environment. Success requires a sense of
global stewardship -- an understanding that it is the Earth that
endures -- and that all of us are no more than tenants, in
temporary possession of a sacred trust. //
For the next two days, you'll be grappling with questions of
global consequence. I thank all of you for joining us here --
for seeking to advance our current state of understanding on an
e
issue with such profound affect on every nation and every
individual for generations to come. // God bless you all.
# # #
Mary Nugent 724-0622
724-0601-5
Jim Fox
(MJ Jamison)
Rick Davis 0620/1/2
Mon. 3
Sununu
Brady
Mosbacher
Lujan
Yeutter
Watkins
ErichBloch Reilly - NSF - Dis.
John A. Knauss - Undersec Camm Oceans
" Atmos & Dis. NOAA
Co-Chairs Boskin
Bromley
Deland
co-chairs
12 names,
(Lange/Cawley)
April 12, 1990
11:25 P.M.
[GLOBAL.DOC]
PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE ON GLOBAL CHANGE
[PLACE]
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 18, 1990
[2:30 P.M.]
[Acknowledgements...]
After all of the work that has taken place here -- in what
I know was an atmosphere of lively debate -- I would begin with
thanks, and a moment of perspective: for your purpose here is
profoundly important to the state of nature, and the fate
of mankind.
Your presence offers hope for a new era of environmental
cooperation around the world -- and the promise of a quieter,
more thoughtful, more careful tenancy of nature's legacy to
humanity.
A growing sense of global stewardship prompted us to
host this conference. It is a sense of stewardship shared by
all of you, and by the nations you represent. And it arises
out of a natural sense of obligation. An understanding that
we owe our existence, all that we know and are, to the miraculous
sphere that sustains us.
Such stewardship finds expression in many ways -- from
public demonstration, to landmark legislation. But it is also
rewarded in many ways, in moments unexpected and unforgettable.
To feel the cold rush of water falling from an ancient glacier,
to see the glint of light in a panther's eye, to stand in silent
witness to the timeless beauty of a heron's flight: Such moments
2
are among the most precious mankind might know on this abundant
earth.
Such moments also have a special power -- a resonance that
at once elevates the mind's eye, and yet humbles us as well.
Before such beauty the works of humanity seem somehow small.
We may build cathedrals, temples and mosques; monuments and
mausoleums to great men and high ideals. And still we know we
can build no monuments to compare with nature. Our greatest
creations cannot equal God's smallest.
Yet as our tools and intellects advance, we've learned of
our power to alter the earth. We understand that small actions,
taken together, have profound global consequences for the
environment we share, and the humanity we share it with.
Global stewardship can only be understood in human terms.
That is the reason we have held this conference.
Ours is a prosperous planet -- with greater hopes now than
ever before that more of our people may come to know
an unexpected peace, and an unprecedented prosperity.
So we are called upon to ensure that both the earth's
integrity -- and mankind's prospects for prosperity, peace,
and in some regions, even survival -- are not put at risk by
intemperate action.
The minds at work here are among the very best we have --
and the best insurance that our actions are sound. Here,
for the first time, we gathered talent from around the world --
scientists, economists, environmentalists, energy ministers,
3
policy-makers -- to assess the environmental and developmental
future of the planet. An unprecedented cross-fertilization of
disciplines -- and of nations. That alone is reason for hope.
If you have raised more questions than conclusions here,
your work has been worthwhile. But if diversity of perspective
is expected, unity of purpose is crucial. In an atmosphere of
uncertainty, we must foster a climate of good will -- and a
stubborn hope, that we might forge solutions without the
excessive heat of politics.
Among all of the challenges in our tenancy of the planet,
climate change is, of course, foremost in your minds. You are
helping us work from what we know, through the uncertainty of
both the science and the economics of climate change. But there
is one area where we will allow for no uncertainty -- and that is
our commitment to finding solutions that work.
There are several things that the climate change debate is
not about. It is not "Jobs versus Environment" -- the two are
inseparably interdependent, as the destructive experience of so
many developing nations has shown. We must clearly understand
both environmental cause and economic effect. For if we cannot
see the forest for the trees, we risk losing both.
Nor is the climate change debate about "Economists versus
Environmentalists." Only in the most primitive minds has it
been reduced to a rhetorical holy-war between bean-counters and
tree-huggers.
4
But above all, the climate change debate is not about
"Research versus Action" -- for we have never considered research
any substitute for action. We already know enough to act --
and we are.
Over the last two days you've heard from key members of this
administration about action the United States is already taking
-- our leading investment in climate change research and response
strategies, our Clean Air legislation, our comprehensive national
energy strategy, our search for alternative and more efficient
sources, our re-forestation initiatives, and technical assistance
programs to developing nations.
What bears emphasis is that we are committed to -- moving on
-- and out front with -- domestic and international policies that
are environmentally aggressive, effective, and cost-effective.
And we are deeply committed to an international partnership,
through the I.P.C.C. process. We look forward to its Interim
Assessment -- and would encourage a framework convention as part
of a comprehensive approach addressing the system, sources, and
sinks as a whole. We hope to host the first negotiating sessions
here in the U.S. -- and we've just offered four new proposals at
this conference:
[ Specific U.S. proposals, T.B.D. noon Wednesday 4/18 per
Dr.s Bromley/Maynard. Roughly: To endorse a "Charter for
Cooperation in Science and Economics Research Related to Global
Change" ; To create "International Institutes for Research on
the Science and Economics of Global Change" ; To encourage data
5
and information transfer through a "Global Change Communications
Network" ; and to endorse a "Statement of Principle to develop an
internal strategy for cooperation in Scientific and Economic
Research in Global Change.' ]
All of you here today understand climate change as one
of many challenges in the call to global stewardship. Ozone
depletion, food security, water supply, ocean pollution,
wetlands, deforestation, biodiversity, population change, hunger,
energy demand -- in short, all of the interrelated issues of
sustainable development: Each demands our attention. And each
has a human dimension we must never forget.
Understand the choices we are making. They affect us all,
but in profoundly different ways.
The consequences of reducing carbon dioxide emissions in a
wealthy nation like the United States would likely be measured
in relatively manageable terms: additional costs incurred, to be
sure; job losses, probably temporary; and some effect on G.N.P.
But in too many developing countries, the consequences of
such policy will surely be painfully reflected in the hollow eyes
of hungry children. In life-threatening competition for already-
scarce resources. In political instability -- and man-made
limits to prosperity. Security. Survival.
If developed nations ignore the needs of developing nations,
it emperils all. We know that a change in G.N.P. of even a few
tenths of a percent often means the difference between adequate
shelter, food, and health care -- and human castastrophe.
6
To bear this in mind is no barrier to action. It merely
suggests that those who have ascended the economic hill must
think twice before building walls that would prevent others
from making the climb.
It is a reminder that economic limits have serious human
costs. And it suggests that the best policies are those of well-
managed growth: The only kind of growth that true global
stewardship allows -- but only possible if the nations of the
world are linked in partnerships of every kind: scientific,
economic, technical, agricultural, environmental.
Developing nations will contribute a growing share of the
world's emissions in the coming decades. They face the greatest
threats from environmental degradation of every kind -- and can
least afford the consequences.
But pollution is not, as we once believed, the inevitable
by-product of progress. The developed nations of the world will
better serve their own interests, and those of the world
community, not by seeking limits to growth -- which would never
survive human nature -- but by catalyzing environmental
protection through more intelligent, more informed, more
efficient growth.
Here, I must confess to some confusion. Those who value
environmental quality most highly, should be the most ardent
supporters of strategies that tap the power of free wills and
free markets, that turn human nature to environmental advantage.
Efficient strategies are the only realistic hope that developing
7
nations might avoid making the mistakes that developed nations
have made.
And we have made mistakes. When America made its transition
from an agrarian to an industrial economy, we paid a price. What
we learned, we learned the hard way. And in some ways, we're
still fighting our way back. But over the past century we've
made tremendous progress -- especially in the last twenty years.
Two decades ago, this nation -- holding to its birth-right
of free expression and the value of the dissenting voice -- was
home to one protest movement in an era of protests, called Earth
Day. It motivated President Nixon to sign into law "a national
policy [to] encourage productive and enjoyable harmony between
man and his environment." And it set in motion a new sense of
conscience, that a few idealists hoped would change the world.
It did. What began as an isolated American movement twenty
years ago is now shared by 135 countries on seven continents.
And while many thought our experiment in environmental protection
would prove impossible -- that you couldn't maintain both a
productive economy and protective ecology -- we've learned that
economic prosperity and environmental protection go hand in hand.
And we understand no nation can act effectively alone.
Unilateral action is futile. But united action? Essential --
and more than merely possible, as the Montreal Protocol proved.
Around the world, America and other nations now extend an
offered hand to emerging democracies denied that knowledge
emerging in Eastern Europe and in this hemisphere. And only now
8
do we see the extent of the challenge we share.
In this hemisphere and in Africa, the raging fires of
forests burned for compelling but mistaken economic reasons have
been visible to astronauts in space. Other nations, in the
struggle to support life, have been virtually stripped of the
resources that sustain life.
And whether through the tyranny of ignorance, or the
ignorance of tyrants, pollution has been unveiled as one of
Eastern Europe's cruelest dictators. An oppressor. Not man --
but man-made. In the majestic city of Krakow, statues that
survived invasions by Swedish Kings and Austrian emperors, by
Hitler and by Stalin -- monuments to great men -- have been
defaced by pollution, as their medieval majesty is reduced to
shapeless lumps of stone.
If mankind's greatest creations cannot equal God's smallest,
some may grieve that our greatest destruction is turned at times
upon ourselves. And we may not see much hope in the faces of the
starving, or the faces of ancient monuments. But we can find
cause for optimism among the men and women in this room.
Let us act on what we know, and in good faith. The earth
cannot, must not be sacrificed to blind material ambition -- nor
can the health, the very survival of millions be sacrificed by
intemperate policies. Let us work to meet the needs of this
generation, while preserving the earth for the next, and all that
follow.
# # #
STEPS: CCIVI will eres
REPORT.410
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
The White House Conference
on
Science and Economics Research Related to Global Change
DRAFT OF CO-CHAIRMEN'S CONFERENCE REPORT
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE CONFERENCE:
A White House Conference, initiated by President George Bush, on Science and Economics Research Related
to Global Change was held in Washington, D.C., April 16-18, 1990. Conference Co-Chairmen were, the
Chairman of the President's Council of Economic Advisers, Dr. Michael J. Boskin, the Assistant to the
President for Science and Technology, Dr. D. Allan Bromley, and the Chairman of the White House Council
on Environmental Quality, Mr. Michael R. Deland. Seventeen nations and the leadership of the E.C. and the
OECD sent ministerial-level delegations to the Conference (See Appendix I for a List of Delegates). The
Conference sought to add a integrating focus for international thought on Global Change, by introducing the
concept of "Global Stewardship", and by adding a new dimension to the international dialogue on Global
Change -- the proposition that economics, both analysis and research on broad economic policy and on
economic consequences of policy options, is an essential link between the science of Global Change and policy
alternatives.
the "Frangtore" Binding
GLOBAL STEWARDSHIP
(INSERT GLOBAL STEWARDSHIP TEXT HERE)
THE CONFERENCE AGENDA
To address the substantive Conference goals, the agenda focussed the presentations and discussions on:
Science and economics research issues relevant to policy on global change,
Important next steps that substantially enhance and broaden international understanding of
science and economic research issues that relate to global change,
The special role that economics plays in integrating the science of Global Change with the
policy process,
Demonstrating linkages between science and economics research results and both domestic
and international policy processes, and
Framing the initial steps towards strategies for implementing joint international science and
economics research efforts.
Tuesday
April 10. 1990
1
9:08 am
The Conference focussed on "Global Change," a scope of research interests that evolved out of the sciences
that are concerned with understanding the fundamental processes that govern the way the global Earth system
functions. Global Change encompasses such diverse and interrelated issues as ozone depletion, greenhouse
gases, climate change, food security, water supply, sea level changes, wetlands, deforestation, biodiversity,
population changes, and energy demands.
The Conference was conceived as an integral part of the on-going international process to understand the
science of and policy options relating to global environment issues. The need to substantially improve
understanding of both the science and economics of global change has been noted by virtually all world
leaders. The Conference, therefore, focused on scientific and economic research issues as a complement to
the on-going Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and other international forums that seek
to address the research agenda for Global Change.
The Conference provided a forum of international leaders to address a variety of complex science and
economics research issues central to the policy process, for example:
How well can we predict temperature trends in the decades ahead?
How "good" are our global-scale models, such as models to predict temperature changes?
How well can we predict the interconnections between global environmental change and the
resulting social and economic impacts?
What are the economic costs of adapting to or mitigating global change?
How "good" are the economic models used to compute these costs?
By having ministerial-level discussions of such questions, it was hoped that nations might join together to
enhance cooperative international research programs that focus on rapid improvement of both scientific and
economic knowledge.
To address these complex and interrelated issues, ministerial-level delegations were invited to the Conference
from a representative group of nations. The Conference was conceived with the idea that a small representative
group of countries would participate. Their selection was based on the simple criteria that the meeting should
be modest in size and include countries or organizations of countries that have substantial populations, large
land masses, industrialized economies or heavy future energy needs, major research infrastructures, or have
provided international leadership on issues related to climate and global change. A representative group of
countries was selected, including:
1. Australia
2. Brazil
3. Canada
4. Federal Republic of Germany
5. France
6. India
7. Indonesia
8. Italy
9. Japan
10. Mexico
11. Netherlands
Tuesday
April 10, 1990
2
9:08 am
12. Nigeria
13. Norway
14. Poland
15. Soviet Union
16. United Kingdom
17. Zaire
18. European Community
19. OECD
CONFERENCE PLENARY AND WORKING GROUP SESSIONS
The Conference Plenary and Working Group Sessions provided an opportunity for delegates to address the
critical science and economics research issues related to Global Change. The agenda was designed to provide
a forum to:
Substantially increase collective understanding of the critical scientific, economic, and environmental
research agenda central to the needs of future global change policy development.
Identify the uncertainties in both scientific and economics knowledge critical understanding changes
in the global environment of the planet,
Increase mutual understanding of and sensitivity to scientific and economic research efforts between
both of those research communities.
Increase sensitivity by the two research communities to the policy needs in the environmental and
energy arena, and visa versa.
Foster the concept of the importance of a solid and well implemented scientific and economics
research effort, as a pre-requisite for and parallel complement to, the evolving efforts by nations to
address the international policy questions of global environmental changes.
Enhance communications and establish a broader "network" of among national leaders, concerned with
and responsible for, the research and policy agenda related to global change. The Conference sought
to provide a forum to forge partnerships between the scientific and technical research communities
and the policy-makers.
To provide a vehicle to focus on these vital issues, the Conference Program was designed around a balance
between several Plenary Sessions and concurrent Working Groups that addressed three major themes:
Theme I: The Science and Economics Research Challenge
Theme II: Integrating Science and Economics Research in the Policy Process
Theme III: Building Partnerships for Science and Economics Research
PLENARY SESSIONS
Tuesday
April 10, 1990
3
9:08 am
The program for the Conference was divided into three broad components: (i) One half day of Opening
Plenary Sessions, (ii) two half days of Working Groups Sessions, and (iii) a half day of integrating and
Summary Plenary Sessions.
OPENING PLENARY SESSIONS
Opening: The Conference was opened with a presentation by Secretary of the Treasury, Nicholas F.
Brady. The welcome addressed focussed on
Include Summary of Brady's Remarks.
Address by President George Bush: The President of the United States, George Bush spoke to the
Conference and his central messages was
Include a Summary of President Bush's
Speech. Full Text of the President's Speech is appended in Appendix A.
Remarks by
, Delegate from
. The Honorable
, from
, provided the Conference with a visiting delegation perspective on the Conference, during
which
Include a Summary of his remarks. Include full text if available in the Appendices.
Central Themes of the Conference: The Three Conference Co-Chairmen gave major addresses on the
three Conference Themes, the purpose of which was to outline the central issues of the Conference
and to provide a focus on each Theme for the Working Group Sessions. The full text of these three
speeches is appended in Appendix B.
Theme I: The Science and Economics Research Challenge. Dr. D. Allan Bromley
Include a Summary of Bromley's Speech
Theme II: Integrating Science and Economics Research in the Policy Process.
Dr. Michael J. Boskin
Include a Summary of Boskin's Speech
Theme III: Building Partnerships for Science and Economics Research.
Mr. Michael R. Deland
Include a Summary of Deland Speech
Visiting Delegations Perspectives on the Themes. Three delegates formed a Panel to discuss
the Themes and to give several visiting delegations views on the Themes of the
Conference.
0 Foreign Delegate - Include Short Summary Here
Foreign Delegate - Include Short Summary Here
Foreign Delegate - Include Short Summary Here
(Include full text if available in Appendices)
MAJOR ADDRESSES
There were two major addresses given during the Conference Luncheons.
o Admin. William Reilly - Include a Summary of that Address
0 Sec. James D. Watkins - Include a Summary of that Address
Tuesday
April 10, 1990
4
9:08 am
The full text of both of these address is included in Appendix C.
WORKING GROUP SESSIONS
The Conference agenda was organized so that delegates were divided into three Working Groups (Working
Groups A, B, and C), each of which consisted of a mix of ministerial-level delegates from science, economics,
and the environment agencies of government, and in some cases from energy agencies. All countries were
represented in each Working Group. The list of Working Groups is contained in Appendix D. Four Working
Group Sessions met sequentially, two on Tuesday afternoon of April 17 and two on Wednesday morning of
April 18. The first sessions were devoted to the three Conference Themes and the fourth was designed as a
session to integrate the discussions and to prepare a written summary of the Working Group deliberations as
a contribution to the Co-Chairmen's Conference Report. Those reports are summarized herein.
Working Group A: Summary Report of Working Group "A"
Working Group B: Summary Report of Working Group "B"
Working Group C: Summary Report of Working Group "C
SUMMARY PLENARY SESSIONS
SUMMARIES OF CONCLUDING ADDRESSES AND PRESENTATIONS
1.)
Foreign Delegations Summary of Conference: Three visiting delegates reviewed the results
of the Conference from their perspective, a summary of those remarks follow. Include the
comments here. (Include full text if available in Appendices)
2.)
Working Group Leader Summaries of the Conference: The three Working Groups gave
summaries of their deliberations, a summary of which follows.
Include it here.
(Include full text if available in Appendices)
3.)
Conference Co-Chairmen Summaries of the Conference: The three Conference Co-Chairmen
outlined their summary views on the Conference, a summary of those comments follow.
Include those here. (Include full text if available in Appendices)
4.)
Closing Remarks by President George Bush: The President of the United States, George
Bush presented his closing remarks to the Conference.
Include a Summary of President
Bush's Speech Full Text of the President's Remarks is appended in Appendix A with the
Opening Address.
SUMMARIES OF PROPOSALS FOR ACTION OFFERED DURING THE CONFERENCE
The delegates of the Conference concluded that several specific actions, developed during the
Conference should be addressed in the period immediately after the Conference. These include:
1.)
The Working Groups considered a proposal by the U.S. to endorse the principles contained
in a "Charter for Cooperation in Science and Economics Research Related to Global
Change", the draft of which is contained in Appendix E. The general consensus of the
Conference was
Include the specific results of discussions on
5
including any recommended action steps.
2.)
The U.S. proposed an initiative designed to initiate international and jointly sponsored
research "centers" that focus research on the science and economics of global change. The
purpose of these centers, which might be called International Institutes for Research on the
Science and Economics of Global Change, is to develop internationally recognized "Center
of Excellence" where both resident and visiting scholars address key research topics that
contribute research results to the international policy process. A draft of the U.S. proposal
is contained in Appendix F. The Working Groups discussed this proposal and concluded
Include the results of those discussions here
3.)
The U.S. proposed an initiative to increase communications among nations engaged in
research on global change. The U.S. proposal suggested that nations join together in what
might be called a "Global Change Communications Network". The proposal suggested that
a joint effort be undertaken that builds on the available technology for data and information
transfer, electronic mail, and other telecommunications technologies. A draft of the concept
is enclosed in Appendix G. The Working Groups discussed this matter and concluded
that
Include the results of those discussions here.
4.)
The U.S. proposed that the Conference consider endorsing a "Statement of Principle" for
developing an international Strategy for Cooperation in Scientific and Economic Research
in Global Change. The draft "Statement" is attached in Appendix H. The "Statement of
Principles" outlines the basis for developing a strategy among nations for a cooperative
international effort to implement joint scientific and economics research programs, including
sharing of scientific and economic data, coordinating the development of international global
observing systems, and facilitating joint research efforts to substantially
improve the capabilities of models to predict controlling global and regional environmental
process (i.e. GCM's). The "Statement" outlines the essential ingredients for an overall
strategy to implement cooperative research internationally. The focus would be on research
efforts that can be substantially enhanced by joint efforts that build on the expertise,
experience, and data available of each participating country. The U.S. suggested that if the
"Statement of Principles" is endorsed by the Conference, then a Task Team of interested
nations would prepare a Draft Strategy, within a few months, for consideration by
government agencies responsible for implementing Global Change research programs and
projects. The proposal suggested that such a Strategy then could lead to what might be
called, an "International Global Change Research Program". The proposal suggested that
such a more fully coordinated international research effort could substantially assist the on-
going policy debate and could support other up-coming international meetings, such as the
IPCC and the Second World Climate Conference. The proposal builds upon existing
discussions initiated by the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) during its
recent Annual Meeting in Lisbon, in October, 1989. The proposal is intended to fully
facilitate the implementation of the research programs of the World Climate Research
Program (WCRP), the International Geosphere-Biosphere Program (IGBP), and others. The
Working Groups considered the proposal and concluded
Include the results of the
Working Group discussions here.
5.)
Other proposals - include here.
File = REPORT.410
6
APPENDIX A
PRESIDENTS TWO SPEECHES
(To be Added at Conference)
Tuesday
April 10, 1990
7
9:08 am
APPENDIX B
THREE CO-CHAIRS THEME SPEECHES
(To be Added at Conference)
Tuesday
April 10, 1990
8
9:08 am
APPENDIX C
LUNCHEON SPEECHES
(By Wm. Reilly and James Watkins)
(To be Added at Conference)
Tuesday
April 10, 1990
9
9:08 am
APPENDIX D
WORKING GROUPS MEMBERSHIP LISTS
(To be Added at Conference)
Tuesday
April 10, 1990
10
9:08 am
APPENDIX E
CHARTER FOR COOPERATION
in the
Science and Economics Research Related to Global Change"
Government officials of Science, Economics, and the Environment from eighteen nations, the European
Community (EC), and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) gathered in
Washington, D.C. on April 16-18, 1990, to attend a White House Conference on Science and Economics
Research Related to Global Change. The Conference was designed to address important next steps for
substantially enhancing and broadening international understanding of science and economic research related
to Global Change. The delegates to the Conference noted that;
WHEREAS:
Scientific evidence demonstrates that the Earth and its environment are changing on time
and spacial scales unknown to humankind,
Scientific uncertainty remains as to the contributions made by natural variability in Earth
system processes and those made by impacts from anthropogenic sources, hence limiting the
ability of science to predict, with acceptable accuracy, the future behavior of the Earth system.
Gaps in scientific understanding substantially limit the abilities of nations to determine the
economic and societal impacts of global changes in the environment,
World leaders are considering unprecedented postures and actions to address the potential
?
economic and social implications of these changes, and
These national and international developments, taken in total, have placed global
environmental issues central on the agenda of international affairs.
THEREFORE:
The nations gathered at the White House Conference on Science and Economics Research Related to Global
Change will seek to:
Increase and coordinate their science and economics research programs with internationally
planned research efforts,
Work together to develop national science and economic research programs that complement
and contribute to a coherent international effort,
Work to enhance existing international mechanisms for planning and implementing science
and economics research programs, and to foster, when necessary and appropriate new
mechanisms to foster cooperation among the world's governments and international agencies.
Work toward full participation of all nations in the formulation, refining, and implementation
of the science and economics research agenda,
Encourage the nations of the world to contribute resources and personnel to the research
agenda in measure and kind reflecting national capabilities,
Tuesday
April 10. 1990
11
9:08 am
o
Collaborate with other nations in support of education, training, and human resources
development that is focussed on the research agenda and that supports full participation by
developing countries, and
0
Work toward developing cooperative access to pertinent research facilities and research data
and information by all nations and toward developing indigenous research activities relevant
to the global environment change research program in all participating nations.
FILE = CHARTER.410
Tuesday
April 10, 1990
12
9:08 am
APPENDIX F
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE CONCEPT PAPER
Tuesday
April 10, 1990
13
9:08 am
APPENDIX G
GLOBAL CHANGE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK CONCEPT PAPER
Tuesday
April 10, 1990
14
9:08 am
APPENDIX H
STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES
FOR
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES FOR COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAMS
Tuesday
April 10, 1990
15
9:08 am
APPENDIX I
LIST OF DELEGATIONS
(To be Added at Conference)
Tuesday
April 10, 1990
16
9:08 am
THE WHITE HOUSE
10 april 1990
Dear ambassador Lake,
Please accept my pincere thanks
for your gracious hospitality. It was
good to meet you and Paul spencer
and to learn even more about my
family's Please home. stay in touch. Warniest I look
forward regards. to seeing you soon cerely,
sincerely, Sin
Joe watkins