Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
323152947
label
University of South Carolina Commencement 5/12/90 [OA 6898] [2]
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
323152947
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
6dba92f02e4cf39b
ocrText
Originally Processed With FOIA(s): FOIA Number: S S FOIA MARKER This is not a textual record. This is used as an administrative marker by the George Bush Presidential Library Staff. Record Group/Collection: George H.W. Bush Presidential Records Collection/Office of Origin: Speechwriting, White House Office of Series: Speech File Backup Files Subseries: Chron File, 1989-1993 OA/ID Number: 13719 Folder ID Number: 13719-002 Folder Title: University of South Carolina Commencement 5/12/90 [OA 6898] [2] Stack: Row: Section: Shelf: Position: G 26 20 5 7 TRANSFER SHEET BUSH PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS PROJECT COLLECTION Bush PResideNtiAl Records ACC.NO: Office of Speechwriting The following material was withdrawn from this segment of the collection and trasferred to the AUDIOVISUAL COLLECTION XXX BOOK COLLECTION MUSEUM COLLECTION OTHER (SPECIFY: ) DESCRIPTION: UNIVERSITY of South CARoliNA YeARbook CeNteR Stage Vol. 91 1989 PlAced IN Row 12 SHELF 13 SERIES Bush PRESIDENTIAL RecoRds BOX NO. Office of Speechweiting 1990 Box 20 FILE FOLDER TITLE: Speech File - Backup UNIVERSITY of South CAROliNA Commencement 5/12/90 [OA 6898 ] TRANSFERRED BY: DATE OF TRANSFER: RFH 7/5/96 RECEIVED (Jan Jin BY: DATE RECEIVED 7/7/96 CLNS/CULP/LOS TEL No 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No. 002 P.01 CENTER FOR LAW AND NATIONAL SECURITY SCHOOL OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, CHARLOTYESVILLE VA. 22901 (804)924-4748 FAX: (804) 924-7362 N NORTON MOORE CTOR ERT F. TURNER DIATE DIRECTOR INA D. GANOE INISTANTOR FAX TRANSMITTAL COVERSHEET IDEL P. MENEFEE Please Print IOR ASSOCIATE ROUTE TO: FAX #: 202 456-6218 Area Code Number Name: First Peggy Name Middle Dooley Last Name Address: white House Speech office 1600 Penn. av. Washington City Suite DC 20500 Zip Code Room #: Telephone: 202 456-7750 Area Code Number COMMENTS: From: John 5-3-90 norton moore Date: Time: 4:42 Cover + 23 pages CLNS/CULP/LUS IEL No .804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No.002 P.02 FINAL The Rule of Law: An Overview BY JOHN NORTON MOORE Walter L Brown Professor of Law University of Virginia School of Law and Chairman of the Board of Directors United States Institute of Peace AS Co-Chairman of the American Delegation to the Seminar on the Rule of Law Moscow and Leningrad March 19-23, 1990 The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States government, the United States Institute of Peace, the University of Virginia, or any other organization with which the author is or has been affiliated. CLNS/CULP/LOS TEL No .804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No 002 P.03 "[W]hile the laws shall be obeyed all will be safe." Thomas Jefferson Original draft of first Inaugural Address, March 4, 1801, in 8 THE WRITINGS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON 1 (P. Ford ed. 1897). CLNS/CULP/LUS TEL No 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No. 002 P.04 The Rule of Law: An Overview JOHN NORTON MOORE I. Introduction The world has long admired the rich cultural and artistic heritage of the peoples of the Soviet Union, a heritage including writers, poets, and composers such as Tolstoy, Chekhov, Pushkin, Dostoyevsky, Tchalkovsky and Brodsky, and the artistic brilliance of a Bolshoy Ballet. As has been most evident in the Helsinki process, however, there has been great international concern about the protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms within the Soviet Union as well as about maintaining and promoting world order and the principles of the United Nations Charter. For these reasons the ongoing International and structural changes broadly identified with President Mikhail Gorbachev and programs of "glasnost" and "perestroika" have been warmly received in the United States and elsewhere in democracies throughout the world. The peoples of these democracies profoundly hope that these programs will succeed-not simply endure-in transforming Soviet institutions to meet the concerns on which there has been continuing engagement within the Helsinki process. In this connection, no tenet of reform has seemed more promising than commitment to the rule of law, the subject of these discussions. As recently stated by Foreign Minister Shevardnadze: And surely no one can doubt that it [National strength] lies most of all in a renewed, democratic, rule-of-law society, in a free people, in the free man.¹ Perhaps it is no coincidence that this focus on the rule of law-and indeed this welcome discussion on the rule of law-takes place under the first Chairman in recent Soviet history to be a lawyer. The language of diplomacy is frequently a language of subtlety, Indirection and omission. The language of friendship, however, is a language of candor. As you can see, I have chosen the language of candor and I deeply hope that this essential element of friendship will be a hallmark of this path-finding exchange on the rule of law. As the Helsinki Final Act affirms, the participating states "will respect each other's right freely to choose and develop its political, social, economic and cultural systems as well as its right to determine its laws and regulations." It is for the people of the Soviet Union to make the choices about fundamental 1Excerpt from an October 23 Foreign Policy Report of Soviet Foreign Minister E. A. Shevardnadze entitled "Foreign Policy and Perestroyka" reportedly delivered to a plenary session of the Supreme Soviet in Moscow. 1 CLNS/COLP/LOS TEL No 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No 002 P.05 institutions and legal structures for their own society, consistent, of course, with the fundamental commitments of the Helsinki process and international human rights covenants. Indeed, it is a certainty that no outside group can be sensitive to all of the factors affecting those choices. Nevertheless, I profoundly believe that the experience of the United States in implementing the rule of law-an experience recently proudly celebrated in the bicentennial of our Constitution-can be of great importance for the people of the Soviet Union as you open up issues concerning the rule of law in Soviet society-just as the international commitments made in the Helsinki process and In adherence to fundamental human rights covenants are of great importance. In that spirit, I hope that these discussions between American and Soviet experts will be followed by even more specific discussions on each of the components of the rule of law. And I hope that to be most useful for all parties these discussions will be full and frank. The overview discussion which follows will first set forth what I believe to be major tenets of the rule of law. It will then consider some essential components of limited government and individual rights and freedoms in a representative democracy and some essential components of the rule of law within an independent and democratic judicial process. Finally, it will note the importance of the rule of law in international affairs and of a robust legal profession. Throughout, this paper is guided by a spirit of candor, Irrespective of any possible philosophical differences perceived between and possibly even within delegations. II. Major Tenets of the Rule of Law The "rule of law" collectively symbolizes the most important features of democratic governance. Its core meaning is that governmental decisions must be rooted in the consent of the governed, acting only through structures and procedures designed to prevent individual oppression or governmental tyranny, which protect fundamental rights and freedoms, and which are subject to appraisal by an independent judiciary rendering judgments based on law. It stands in contrast to decisions based on naked power, arbitrary fiat, political expediency or personal gain. But most meaningfully, It encompasses much more than simply the opposite of these negative images. Individual judgments differ as to the core underpinnings of the rule of law, but I believe there are at least five principal tenets-each with a number of fundamental sub-tenets. These five highest-level tenets are: government of the people, by the people, and for the people; separation of powers and checks and balances; 2For the origin of this phrasing, see President Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address, November 19, 1863. 2 CLNS/COLP/LOS TEL No. 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No. 002 P.06 representative democracy and procedural and substantive limits on governmental action against the individual (the protection of human freedom and dignity); limited government and federalism; and review by an independent judiciary as a central mechanism for constitutional enforcement. Let us review each of these basic general tenets in turn. government of the people, by the people, and for the people Overwhelmingly, philosophers and political theorists have rooted the authority of democratic governance in the people-not in the few or an assumed elite. Thus, to Aristotic in democracies the people are supreme =3 John Locke viewed government as being based on popular consent and wrote that governmental actions exceeding the laws are "without authority. In a famous phrase discussing abuse of power, he concluded: "[w]herever law ends, tyranny begins a5 Echoing these premises, the American Declaration of Independence provides: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed 6 Adopted less than three weeks earlier, the Virginia Bill of Rights =7 provides: "[t]hat all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people This is emphatically not the concept of the unchallengeable general will underlying the philosophy of Jean Jacques Rousseau under which "the public must be taught to know what If wants."8 ³ARISTOTLE, POLITICS (ca. 325 B.C.). 4J. LOCKE, SECOND TREATISE OF CIVIL GOVERNMENT (1690). ⁵Id. The Declaration of Independence (U.S. July 4, 1776). From Article 2 of the Virginia Bill of Rights (June 12, 1776). 8JJ. ROUSSEAU, THE SOCIAL CONTRACT (1762). Needless to say, the Western democratic conception of "government of the people, by the people, and for the people" also is emphatically not the inverted social contract of Rousseau as reflected in his social contract 3 CLNS/COLP/LOS TEL No 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No 002 P.07 Corollaries of this first principle that the authority of law comes from the governed are: constitutions should embody the fundamental compact with the people-such constitutions should serve as the highest form of law to which all other laws and governmental actions must conform. As such, constitutions should embody the fundamental precepts of a democratic society rather than serving to incorporate ever- changing laws more appropriately dealt with by statute. Similarly, governmental structures and actions should seriously conform with constitutional norms, and constitutions should not be mere ceremonial or aspirational documents; legislatures and chief executives should be popularly elected under a system which will ensure frequent accountability. Elections must in practice be fully fair, open and meaningful. Mechanisms, such as initiative and recall, might be devised to keep elected officials close to the people; there should be no merger of B political party with the state or control of the electoral process by a political party. It is the freely elected representatives of the people, acting through governmental structures such as the legislative and executive branches, which should govern the state; and the constitutional system should provide for reasonable change and amendment as conditions and the popular will change. separation of powers and checks and balances A principal underpinning of much writing on democratic governance and the rule of law is that governmental structures should be constructed through a separation of powers and checks and balances to prevent governmental tyranny. Thus, Montesquieu wrote in The Spirit of the Laws in 1748: The political liberty of the subject is a tranquillity of mind, arising from the opinion each person has of his safety. In order to have this liberty, it is requisite the government be so constituted as one man need not be afraid of another. When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty; because apprehensions may arise, lest the same monarch or senate should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner. Again, there is no liberty, If the judicial power be not separated from the legislative and executive. Were it joined with the legislative, the life and liberty of the subject would be exposed to arbitrary control; for the judge would be then the oath for his proposed Constitution for Corsica, which provides: "I join myself, body, goods, will and all my powers, to the Corsican nation, granting her ownership of me, of myself and all who depend on me." Printed in C.R. VAUGHAN (ed.), 2 THE POLITICAL WRITINGS OF ROUSSBAU 250 (2 volumes, Cambridge, 1915). See also Chapter 1 in P. JOHNSON, INTELLECTUALS (1988). 4 CLNS/COLP/LOS TEL No 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No. 002 P.08 legislator. Were It joined to the executive power, the judge might behave with all the violence of an oppressor. The connection between this principle of separation of powers and the rule of law was vividly reflected in the Constitution of the State of Massachusetts adopted in 1780: In the government of this Commonwealth, the legislative department shall never exercise the executive and judicial powers, or either of them: The executive shall never exercise the legislative and judicial powers, or either of them: The judicial shall never exercise the legislative and executive powers, or either of them: to the end It may be a government of laws and not of men.¹⁰ And this principle was a major underpinning of the United States Constitution. As James Madison wrote in The Federalist papers, explaining the new Constitution: No political truth is certainly of greater intrinsic value or is stamped with the authority of more enlightened patrons of liberty than that on which the objection is founded. The accumulation of all powers legislative, executive and judiciary in the same hands, whether of one, a few or many, and whether hereditary, self appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny. Were the federal constitution therefore really chargeable with this accumulation of power or with a mixture of powers having a dangerous tendency to such an accumulation, no further arguments would be necessary to Inspire a universal reprobation of the system 11 Similarly, this principle was a fundamental tenet of the 1789 French Declaration of the Rights of Man where it was said: "Any society in which the guarantee of the rights is not secured, or the separation of powers not determined, has no constitution at all."12 It should be noted that the principle of separation of powers does not stand in opposition to a strong legislature or a strong executive. Indeed, it is partly rooted in the functional attributes and efficiencies of each branch in respectively making, applying and enforcing the laws (as well as the executive role in foreign affairs). And it is critically complemented by checks and balances, such as, for example in the American system. the right of the Executive to veto legislation, the right of the Senate to withhold advice and consent MONTESQUIEU, THE SPIRIT OF THE LAWS (1748). 10The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, "Part the First," art. XXX (1780), reprinted in M. CONNOLLY, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS 3, 10 (1984). 11 THE FEDERALIST No. 47, at 324 (J. Madison) (J. Cooke ed. 1961). 12 Article 16 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen (August 26, 1789). 5 CLNS/COLP/LOS TEL No. 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No. 002 P.09 to a treaty, and the requirement that Congress rather than the Executive "declare War" and "raise and support Armies." It should also be noted that an independent judiciary is a major corollary of this principle of separation of powers. Moreover, the Framers of the United States Constitution, recognizing the potential great power of the legislature in making laws, provided checks and balances even within the legislature by providing for a bicameral legislature elected by differing constituencies and for different terms. Finally, It should be noted that if separation of powers and checks and balances are avoided by unitary party control of all branches of government then the benefits of this fundamental underpinning of the rule of law could be easily lost. This is yet another reason for avoiding a merger of a political party with the state. representative democracy and procedural and substantive limits on governmental action against the individual (the protection of human freedom and dignity) Every democracy faces the problem of how to protect fundamental human freedom and dignity against governmental action-whether arbitrary or mandated by a majority. The most important and recurrent answer to this issue has been to provide constitutional guarantees of basic human freedoms-frequently denominated as a "bill of rights." Other partial answers, however, Involve building in checks against factionalism and hasty laws through representative democracy, bicameralism and cautious modes of legislative deliberation and action, as well as endowing government only with limited authority not extending to compromising such basic freedoms. Among other examples of a "bill of rights" approach, in 1215 the Magna Carta extracted a series of rights as pledges from a reluctant King John. This included the rights: No free man shall be taken or imprisoned or dispossessed, or outlawed, or banished, or in any way destroyed, nor will we go upon him, nor send upon him, except by the legal judgment of his peers or by the law of the land. To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny, or delay right or justice. 13 Similarly, following the revolution of 1688, the British Parliament extracted a "bill of rights" from the Crown. The State of Virginia adopted the Virginia Bill of Rights in 1776; in 1789 during the early months of the French Revolution, the National Constituent Assembly formulated a "Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen"; and following a major debate about the new Constitution, the first Congress of the United States formulated the Bill of Rights which was ratified by the states effective December 15, 1791. Next year America will celebrate the bicentennial of this Bill of Rights of fundamental freedoms. Time has confirmed 13Magna Carta, nos. 39 & 40 (1215) (numbers omitted). 6 CLNS/COLP/LOS TEL No. 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No. 002 P.10 their importance to an enduring democratic government. It should also be noted that the protection of fundamental rights extends both to substantive and procedural rights, including essential procedural elements incorporated in American law in the concept of due process of law. The cornerstone of the criminal justice system, as well as of administrative law, is these concepts of procedural due process. Finally, it should be noted that protection of fundamental liberties is seen as sufficiently essential to democratic governance and the rule of law that many political theorists have stressed the protection of such freedoms as a fundamental objective of democratic governance without which no government can be just. Aristotle wrote in Politics: "The basis of a democratic state is liberty: which, according to the common opinion of men, can only be enjoyed in such a state;-this they affirm to be the great end of every democracy."14 The Declaration of Independence speaks of securing "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" as the very reason for government, and the preamble of the United States Constitution includes among the reasons for establishing the Constitution: to "secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity Certainly there can be no meaningful rule of law which does not protect fundamental human freedom and dignity as a very reason for government. limited government and federalism Yet another underpinning of the rule of law is the related principles of limited government and federalism. As has just been discussed, the principle of a limited government of enumerated powers has been one partial answer to the protection of fundamental freedoms. Indeed, in The Federalist papers, Alexander Hamilton urged that the limited powers of the new federal constitution made a specific bill of rights unnecessary. Limited central government, however, serves another important function in the rule of law in maximizing regional and local control of governmental functions principally affecting peoples at a local level. In this context, limited government and federalism divide governmental authority between a central government, which should have authority in issues of defense, foreign policy, interstate commerce and other issues of governance affecting citizens on a national basis, and regional and local governmental authorities, which should have authority in issues of governance such as municipal services and education primarily affecting citizens on a more local basis. This principle simultaneously makes government more responsive to and controllable by the people and encourages a diversity in public policies adopted within different regions according to local conditions, needs, traditions and desires. It directly incorporates an insight of participatory democracy that groups affected by decisions should have a voice in those decisions. As correctly perceived, it does not detract from strong federal authority in the areas where authority must be and is centralized in a national government. Adjusting the boundaries between the federal and regional governmental units and 14ARISTOTLE, POLITICS (ca. 325 B.C.). 7 CLNS/COLP/LOS TEL No. 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No. 002 P.11 maintaining a proper balance is necessarily the essence of a large body of law in any federal system. Federalism, of course, assumes an at least initial voluntary acceptance by constituent units. judicial review by an independent judiciary as a central mechanism for constitutional enforcement An independent judiciary is a critical component of the principle of separation of powers, as well as of an effective principle of constitutionalism in embodying and realizing the major conditions of the consent of the governed. 15 Because of the great importance of judicial review as a central mechanism for constitutional enforcement and for maintenance of the rule of law, however, I believe that it should be considered a fundamental principle in its own right. Indeed, no principle in the American experience has been more important in maintaining the integrity of the major constitutional underpinnings of the rule of law than has the principle of independent judicial review. Thus, the Supreme Court has in the 1962 reappointment decision of Baker V. Carr¹⁶ sought to police the Integrity of the "one person one vote" principle underlying government of the people, by the people, and for the people. In major decisions such as INS V. Chadha,¹⁷ in which the Court in 1983 struck down the so-called "legislative veto," the Court has policed the critical workings of separation of powers and checks and balances. The Court has since its earliest days been repeatedly concerned with maintaining a proper balance in issues of federalism. And perhaps its most vital role has been in protecting the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals against encroachment by federal and state action. As the Framers correctly foresaw, the judicial power could not be 15 The "Introduction" to Melone and Mace, Judicial Review and American Democracy (1988), roots judicial review in the belief that the Constitution is the Supreme expression of the people's will." Thus, it says: The ultimate and necessary foundation upon which judicial review rests is the belief that the Constitution is the supreme expression of the people's will. Since it results from the acts of the people in their constituent capacity, it is fundamental law embodying the people's determination of the proper division and extent of governing authority between the various branches of the national government; between the central government and the state governments; between the national government and individuals; and, especially under the expanded application of the Fourteenth Amendment, between state governments and individuals. Id. at 3. The Federalist No. 78 (Hamilton) provides perhaps the strongest indication in constitutional history that the Framers contemplated judicial review concerning issues of constitutional consistency. 16Baker V. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962). INS V. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983). 8 CENS/CULP/LUS TEL No. 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No 002 P.12 subsumed within the executive or legislative branches consistent with effective exercise of the judicial role in policing these principles of the rule of law. Indeed, judicial review by an independent judiciary may be the only way to effectively ensure the supremacy of the Constitution. The realization of this point was an essential element in the reasoning of Chief Justice John Marshall in the landmark decision of the Supreme Court in the 1803 case of Marbury V. Madison, 18 setting out the doctrine of "judicial review" by declaring for the first time an act of Congress unconstitutional. Thus, Marshall wrote: Certainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and, consequently, the theory of every such government must be, that an act of the legislature, repugnant to the constitution, is void. This theory is essentially attached to a written constitution, and, is consequently, to be considered, by this court, as one of the fundamental principles of our society. It is not therefore to be lost sight of in the further consideration of this subject. If an act of the legislature, repugnant to the constitution, is void, does it, notwithstanding Its invalidity, bind the courts, and oblige them to give it effect? Or, in other words, though it be not law, does it constitute a rule as operative as If it was a law? This would be to overthrow in fact what was established in theory; and would seem, at first view, an absurdity too gross to be insisted on. It shall, however, receive a more attentive consideration. It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each. So if a law be in opposition to the constitution; if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the constitution; or conformably to the constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty. If, then, the courts are to regard the constitution, and the constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature, the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply. Those, then, who controvert the principle that the constitution is to be considered, in court, as a paramount law, are reduced to the necessity of maintaining that courts must close their eyes on the constitution, and see only the law. This doctrine would subvert the very foundation of all written constitutions. It would declare that an act which, according to the principles and theory of our government, is entirely void, is yet, in practice, completely obligatory. It would declare that if the legislature shall do what is expressly forbidden, such act, notwithstanding the express prohibition, is in reality effectual. It would be giving to the legislature a practical and real omnipotence, with the same breath which 18Marbury V. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803). 9 CLNS/COLP/LOS TEL No 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No. 002 P.13 professes to restrict their powers within narrow limits. It is prescribing limits, and declaring that those limits may be passed at pleasure. 19 A genuinely independent judiciary, of course, requires not only a doctrine of judicial review but also scrupulous protection of the independence of the judiciary in form and in fact. Details of appointment, tenure, salary, status, training and removal must all be resolved to preserve and strengthen that independence. Similarly, the selection of judiciary must not be on a partisan basis and should ensure the selection of the most qualified legal experts. And the legal profession, as well as the government and society as a whole, must internalize the independence of the judiciary and the important reasons for it. III. Some Essential Components of Limited Government and Protection of Individual Rights and Freedoms in a Representative Democracy As has been discussed, major tenets of the rule of law in a representative democracy include limited government and constitutional limits on governmental action against the individual. In turn, these tenets include a broad range of substantive and procedural components. Some such components widely regarded as essential include the following: preserving a climate of free discussion and opinion Nothing is more essential to the proper functioning of representative democracy than maintaining a climate of free discussion and opinion. This requires maintenance of freedom of speech; freedom of assembly; free and vital television, radio and newspaper media; freedom to petition government for redress of grievances; a free and vital publishing industry; academic freedom in institutions of higher learning: protection of exchange in the legislative process and depoliticization of governmental information efforts. Ultimately, an informed and involved citizenry is the lifeblood of democracy. As Thomas Jefferson reminds us: ¹⁹Id. at 176-78 (Opinion of the Court). 20The discussion which follows is emphatically not a complete list of fundamental components of the major tenets of limited government and constitutional limits on governmental action against the individual. The rights to travel and emigrate and the right to privacy, for example, are also fundamental. 10 CLNS/COLP/LOS TEL No 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No 002 P.14 If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.21 Protecting the necessary climate of free discussion and opinion is a crucial role of the rule of law. fairness in criminal process An essential element in the relationship of government to its citizens is the maintenance and operation of a criminal process. Protection of the fairness and integrity of that process is an essential element of the rule of law. The Magna Carta and numerous bills of rights throughout human history attest to the importance of such fairness. Indeed, the fourth, fifth, sixth and eighth amendments in the Bill of Rights to the United States Constitution directly relate to the fairness of criminal processes, including requirements concerning search and seizure (the fourth amendment); protection against double-jeopardy and self-incrimination (the fifth amendment); the rights to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury, to be informed of all charges, to be confronted with adverse witnesses, to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses and to have the assistance of counsel in defense (the sixth amendment); and prohibition of excessive ball or fines and of cruel and unusual punishment (the eighth amendment). Perhaps the most important guarantee undergirding the protection of the individual against the state in criminal trials, however, is the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. Similarly, the right of habeas corpus, appellate review of criminal convictions, and fairness in sentencing and subsequent treatment are also vital. Also of great concern, the criminal process must not be politicized or used for the punishment of political dissidents. Fairness in criminal process is not a monopoly of systems rooted in either common or civil law traditions. It is, however, a function of adherence to certain minimum standards such as advance promulgation of law, protection against unreasonable searches and seizures or unreasonable criminal charges, a high standard of proof by the finder of fact such as proof beyond a reasonable doubt, an impartial trial with an opportunity for an adequate defense, a right to independent advice of defense counsel, a strict separation of prosecutorial and judging functions, independent judges, and reasonable and proportional sentencing. While all traditions can be rooted in the rule of law, I prefer the adversarial process of the common law tradition as providing greater protection for an accused and a more vigorous search for the truth, among other advantages. Of possible interest, a growing body of empirical social 21 Letter to Colonel Charles Yancey, January 6, 1816," in 11 THE WORKS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON 497 (P. Ford ed. 1905). 11 CLNS/COLP/LOS TEL No 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No 002 P.15 science evidence seems to support popular preference for an adversarial process involving a genuinely independent adversarial defense over an inquisitorial model.22 protection of religious freedom The maintenance of religious freedom is one of the oldest and most important components of individual freedom. Thus, ensuring religious freedom is an essential component of the rule of law. Again, the importance of such freedom is attested throughout human history. It is a central component of, among other historic indicators, the Magna Carta in 1215, Roger Williams' "Bloudy Tenent of Persecution for Course of Conscience" in 1644, the Maryland Toleration Act of 1649, the Virginia Bill of Rights of 1776, Thomas Jefferson's masterful Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom in 1786,23 and the first amendment to the United States Constitution as ratified in 1791. Religious freedom encompasses at least two vital and interrelated principles-the free exercise of religion and the non-establishment of religion. To avoid interference with the free exercise of religion, as well as to maintain consistency with the underlying purposes of non-establishment of religion, It would seem essential also that government not establish a doctrine of non-religion, just as it must not establish a particular religion. Finally, the full protection of religious freedom may require strong and effective civil rights laws to protect against discrimination on religious grounds. protection of civil rights A democratic society must ensure equality before the law and the protection of minority and even disadvantaged majority populations. The United States fought a civil war in the long struggle for effective realization of this principle, and with the Supreme Court leading the way in Brown V. Board of Education²⁴ in 1954, the Nation has taken this principle to heart. Today such civil rights, including protection against discrimination based on race, gender, or 22See, e.g., E.A. LIND & T.R. TYLER, THE SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE (1988). Cross-cultural aspects of this research indicate key findings are likely applicable to European conditions. Id. at 129-45. 23The importance in Jefferson's mind of the Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom is reflected in the epitaph he chose for his tombstone: Here was buried Thomas Jefferson Author of the Declaration of American Independence of the Statute of Virginia for religious freedom & Father of the University of Virginia 24 Brown V. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954). 12 CLNS/COLP/LOS TEL No. 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No. 002 P.16 religion, are protected not only against abusive governmental action by constitutional principle, but also against both state and private action by a growing network of civil rights laws. Such laws are a vital component of the rule of law in a modern democratic society. accountability of governmental officials and protection of governmental processes Any modern democratic society must have a vital network of laws to ensure accountability of governmental officials and protection of governmental processes and rational decision. Such laws may include measures to facilitate petition of government for redress of grievances, "freedom of information" laws, "sunshine" laws, private suits against government or government officials in certain cases, agency inspectors general, "whistle blower" laws, "impact statements" required before decision (used particularly in the environmental area), ombudsman, conflict of interest laws, administrative remedies and appeals, and even independent counsel (though this check remains controversial in the United States). protection of the rights of workers Certainly every genuine democracy should seek to protect the rights of workers. Indeed, that is a major philosophical premise underlying the Soviet system. Yet, as the emergence of Solidarity in Poland Illustrates, the rights of workers can be abridged by the state at least as thoroughly as by private employers. The developed nations have created a detailed labor law centering on the rights of workers to organize and bargain collectively and on the maintenance of a safe and healthy work environment. The development and enforcement of such a body of labor law would seem an important component of the rule of law in a modern democratic society. civilian control of the military Many democratic societies have stressed the essential nature of civilian control of the military. In the United States this is guaranteed not only by important constitutional provisions concerning legislative control over military appropriations and appointments, but is also an essential element of the military's own code of professionalism. Similarly, the military follows a tradition that is nonpolitical. And, of course, this principle of civilian control of the military also applies to civilian control of intelligence agencies. 25 Both military and intelligence agencies must operate under the rule of law and constitutional structures. 25See generally Chapter 19 in NATIONAL SECURITY LAW (J. MOORE, R. TURNER AND F. TIPSON eds. 1990) for measures ensuring civilian control of intelligence agencies within the United States and the operation of such agencies within the rule of law. 13 CLNS/COLP/LOS TEL No 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No 002 P.17 protecting the environment One major reason for governmental Intervention in a market economy is protection against "externalities" such as environmental damage. Because of the potentially great societal cost of environmental damage, insuring that environmental costs will be adequately considered and that high standards of environmental protection are met is an essential role of modern democratic governance. Moreover, because governmental actions and projects, if not directly accountable and if identified with government Itself, have an equal if not greater potential for ignoring environmental costs than private sector actions, vigorous protection of the environment is essential in all systems. protecting economic freedom and entitlements Perhaps no issue in the past has proceeded as thoroughly on different philosophical premises as the protection of economic freedom and property rights. The developed democracies, with a tradition of John Locke and market-oriented economies, have traditionally protected economic freedom and individual property rights. The Soviet system, however, has followed Marx and Engels in the abolition of many forms of private property. Thus, John Locke, in his Second Treatise of Civil Government in 1690, wrote at length in support "of property." And the breadth of support for this principle is illustrated by the 1789 French Declaration of the Rights of Man, which begins article 17 with the preamble "Property being a sacred and inviolable right Yet the Communist Manifesto provides in relation to certain private property: "the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property." Clearly, market-oriented economies are a major feature of the rule of law in developed societies based on Western democratic values. The economic success of those societies, not only in enhancing overall production of goods and services, but also in broadly delivering consumer goods and services, speaks with the normative force of facts. Increasingly. however, the literature in the West has also shown a powerful connection between economic freedom generally, including private property rights, and both individual freedom and overall societal levels of freedom and success of governmental structures. Thus, property rights and freedom in the economic sphere are increasingly recognized as essential components of human freedom. For If tight control of property enables pervasive state control of the individual, then freedom can be lost as effectively as through the denial of civil and political freedoms. Indeed, Professor Charles A. Reich writes in a famous article on "The New Property-26 that 26c. Reich, "The New Property," 73 YALE L.J. 733 (1964). 14 CLN$/COLP/LOS TEL No. 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No 002 P.18 "[t]he institution called property guards the troubled boundary between individual man and the state. -27 And further: At the very least, It is time to reconsider the theories under which new forms of wealth are regulated, and by which governmental power over them is measured. It is time to recognize that "the public interest" is all too often a reassuring platitude that covers up sharp clashes of conflicting values, and hides fundamental choices. It is time to see that the "privilege" or "gratuity" concept, as applied to wealth dispensed by government, is not much different from the absolute right of ownership that private capital once invoked to justify arbitrary power over employees and the public. Above all, the time has come for us to remember what the framers of the Constitution knew so well-that "a power over a man's subsistence amounts to a power over his will." We cannot safely entrust our livelihoods and our rights to the discretion of authorities, examiners, boards of control, character committees, regents, or license commissioners. We cannot permit any official or agency to pretend to sole knowledge of the public good. We cannot put the independence of any man wholly in the power of other men.28 And, of particular relevance in a system in which the individual must rely heavily on government "entitlements," a central thrust of this article by Professor Reich is the importance of protecting these state-controlled "entitlements" as "the new property" against arbitrary or politicized government denial. Moreover, the roles of private property in providing individual incentive and as a prerequisite for voluntary exchange which is the basic mechanism of decentralized market systems has long been recognized in the developed democracies. Indeed, of particular interest, there is a growing feeling among many in the West that political systems which broadly limit private property rights may not be able to adopt more open governmental processes without also adopting greater economic freedom-going far beyond efforts at greater decentralization of governmental planning. For the resulting inefficiencies in relatively centralized governmental setting of prices, as opposed to the decentralized actions of markets, may inevitably lead either to popular efforts at fundamental change in government structures or to massive emigration, as was most recently evident in the events in the German Democratic Republic following the courageous and internationally applauded dismantlement of the Berlin Wall. A discussion of this potential linkage between freedom in the economic sphere and freedom elsewhere appears in the Economic Report of the President transmitted to the United States Congress in February 1982. Chapter two of this report on "Government and the Economy" begins: 27Id. 28Id. at 787. 15 CLN$/COLP/LOS TEL No .804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No. 002 P.19 Political freedom and economic freedom are closely related. Any comparison among contemporary nations or examination of the historical record demonstrates two important relationships between the nature of the political system and the nature of the economic system: All nations which have broad-based representative government and civil liberties have most of their economic activity organized by the market. Economic conditions in market economies are generally superior to those in nations (with a comparable culture and a comparable resource base) in which the government has the dominant economic role. The evidence is striking. No nation in which the government has the dominant economic role (as measured by the proportion of gross national product originating in the government sector) has maintained broad political freedom; economic conditions in such countries are generally inferior to those in comparable nations with a predominantly market economy. Voluntary migration, sometimes at high personal cost, is uniformly to nations with both more political freedom and more economic freedom. The reasons for these two relationships between political and economic systems are simple but not widely understood. Everyone would prefer higher prices for goods sold and lower prices for goods bought. Since the farmer's wheat is the consumer's bread, however, both parties cannot achieve all they want. The most fundamental difference among economic systems is how these conflicting preferences are resolved. A market system resolves these conflicts by allowing the seller to get the highest price at which others will buy and the buyer to get the lowest price at which others will sell, by consensual exchanges that are expected to benefit both parties. Any attempt by one party to improve his outcome relative to the market outcome requires a coercive activity at the expense of some other party. The politicization of price decisions-whether of wages, commodities, or interest rates-tends to reduce both the breadth of popular support for the government and the efficiency of the economy. A rich nation can tolerate a good bit of such mischief, but not an unlimited amount. One should not be surprised that all nations in which the government has dominant control of the economy are run by a narrow oligarchy and in most economic conditions are relatively poor. In the absence of limits on the economic role of government, the erosion of economic freedom destroys both political freedom and economic performance. Only a few dozen nations now guarantee their citizens both political and economic freedom. The economic role of government in these nations differs widely, without serious jeopardy to political freedom. Within the range of experience of the United States and the other free nations, the relation between the political system and the government's economic role is more subtle. Expansion of the economic role of the government tends to reduce both the level of agreement on government policies and the inclination to engage in political dissent. The link between political and economic freedom is important. Increasing economic freedom will also provide greater assurance of our political freedom. A major objective of this Administration's economic program is to reduce the Federal Government's role in economic decisionmaking while strengthening the 16 CLN$/COLP/LOS TEL No 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No. 002 P.20 economic role of individuals, private organizations, and State and local governments. This shift will entail substantial reductions in the size and number of Federal spending programs, significant reductions in both personal and business Federal tax rates, major reforms of Federal regulatory activities, and a reduced rate of money growth. While an important element in this redefinition of the Federal Government's economic role is a political judgment about the appropriate relationship among individuals, the States, and the Federal Government, this redefinition also is supported by an extensive body of economic analysis.29 Similarly, Justice Antonin Scalia, now of the United States Supreme Court, wrote in a book published in 1987: I know no society, today or in any era of history, in which high degrees of intellectual and political freedom have flourished side by side with a high degree of state control over the relevant citizen's economic life. The free market, which presupposes relatively broad economic freedom, has historically been the cradle of broad political freedom, and in modern times the demise of economic freedom has been the grave of political freedom as well.30 Finally, quite apart from the considerable issues of whether it is necessary and of the costs to individual freedom and governmental systems from any such effort, questions are being raised in the West concerning the internal consistency of efforts to avoid exploitation of man by man through a denial of private property rights and economic freedom. That is, It has been argued that any thorough-going effort to ensure approximate economic equality requires the socialization of both economic success and economic failure. But, if so, does not this in turn 29 Chapter 2 "Government and the Economy," from the Annual Report of the Council of Economic Advisers, in ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT, TRANSMITTED TO THE CONGRESS FEBRUARY 1982, at 27-28 (1982). This chapter also contains a good summary statement of the macro-economic case for limited governmental intervention in private markets. These include: "externalities" (positive and negative), "monopoly," "public goods," "income redistribution" and "macroeconomic stability." It also contains an interesting discussion of the theoretical reasons for "government failure" as opposed to "market failure* dealt with above as settings for limited government intervention. These include the political process as "overly responsive to special interest groups," inefficiencies in "supply by government agencies," a failure to maximize responses to "diversity of conditions and preferences," "limits on information" and the over-discounting by government decisionmakers of programs which impose costs today in return for future benefits. See id. at 29-42. As these theoretical points illustrate, modern democratic governance in a market economy has ample latitude for taxation and regulatory intervention (exercise of the "police power") to protect workers, consumers, investors and the environment without banning or overburdening the market economy itself. 30A. Scalia, Economic Affairs as Human Affairs, in ECONOMIC LIBERTIES AND THE JUDICIARY 31, 32 (J. DORN & H. MANNE eds. 1987). 17 CLNS/COLP/LOS TEL No .804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No. 002 P.21 mean that inevitably there will be systematic exploitation of some groups (the economically successful) by others (the economically unsuccessful)? And, moreover, public officials, who have a major role in directing the economy in a non-market system, will have power, motive, and opportunity to do some exploiting of their own in a more direct way.31 Whatever the answers to these questions, it is increasingly clear that the protection of economic freedom is an essential component of the rule of law in a modern democratic society. I believe that addressing this issue fully and progressively is as important as any in the overall process of "perestroika."3. IV. Some Essential Components of The Rule of Law Within an Independent and Democratic Judicial Process33 Just as the fundamental tenets of limited government and protection of individual rights and freedoms depend importantly on a number of essential components, so, too, the rule of law within an independent judicial process depends on a number of essential components. These include: the supremacy of constitutional guarantees within the judicial process; the principle, "nullum crimen, nulla poena, sine lege" (literally meaning that without a law, there can be no crime and no punishment), that there can be no penalty without prior, publicly known and reasonably specific laws.³⁴ It should be emphasized that 31See generally S. ARNOLD, MARX'S RADICAL CRITIQUE OF CAPITALIST SOCIETY: A RECONSTRUCTION AND CRITICAL EVALUATION (1990). 32What is liberalized directly, of course, should not be banned indirectly through continuing criminalization of "profit," vaguely defined "speculation," or pervasive bureaucratic control. 33One can also speak of essential components of the rule of law within a democratic legislative process. These would certainly include a presumption of openness in publication of draft laws and debate before adoption and other measures concerning due process within the legislative process, and anti-corruption measures, among others. For a general discussion of the legislative process, see J. DAVIES, LEGISLATIVE LAW AND PROCESS (2d ed. 1986), W. ESKRIDGE & P. FRICKEY, CASES AND MATERIALS ON LEGISLATION: STATUTES AND THE CREATION OF PUBLIC POLICY (1988), C. NUTTING & R. DICKERSON, CASES AND MATERIALS ON LEGISLATION (5th ed. 1978). 34A seemingly similar statement was apparently made by President Mikhail Gorbachev at the Nineteenth Party Conference: "[W]e must adhere strictly to the principle that everything that is not prohibited by law is permitted." "Gorbachev Report Sizes Up Restructuring," 40:26 CURRENT DIG. OF THE SOVIET PRESS 7, 19 (Jul. 27, 1988). 18 CLN$/COLP/LOS TEL No 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No. 002 P.22 secret laws and regulations, unknown to those to whom they will be applied, are fundamentally inconsistent with the rule of law; the principle of decisions based on law, stemming from an analysis of the functional intent of the lawmaker as opposed to political factors, party affiliation, personal gain or arbitrary flat. The essence of an independent judicial process is judging based on rational analysis of the law and its underlying policies as applied in a specific case; the principle that "like cases should be treated alike"; the principle that reasons should be given for decisions, that the reasons given should be candid for appraisal by others, and that such opinions should be published and made widely available to lawyers and in specialized libraries; the principle that judges should defer to clear higher authority within a system, whether it is a constitution, a legislative enactment, or a higher court within an overall judicial system. That is, in constitutional interpretation the judge is not superior to the Constitution, in statutory interpretation the judge is not superior to a clear intent of the legislature, and a judge is bound to follow a ruling on point of a higher judge within an overall judicial system. These and other principles underlying the judicial process, including principles of interpretation, are not self-defining, and a rich body of jurisprudential writing addresses their meaning and effect. In particular, the legal realists have taught us that judicial decisionmaking is inevitably a process involving choice in rule selection, fact selection, and semantic and syntactic interpretation.3 While opinions differ as to the precise content and effect of such principles, however, there is widespread agreement on their importance to the rule of law. Professor John Jeffries of the University of Virginia says of the rule of law in the context of the "vagueness" issue in this tenet: The evils to be retarded are caprice and whim, the misuse of government power for private ends, and the unacknowledged reliance on illegitimate criteria of selection. The goals to be advanced are regularity and evenhandedness in the administration of justice and accountability in the use of government power. In short, the "rule of law" designates the cluster of values associated with conformity to law by government. Jeffries, Legality, Vagueness, and the Construction of Penal Statutes, 71 U. VIRGINIA L. REV. 189, 212-13 (1985). 35See, e.g. Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 HARV. L. REV. 457 (1897); CARDOZO, THE GROWTH OF LAW (1924); K.N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION (1960); Allen & Caldwell, Modern Logic and Judicial Decision Making: A Sketch of One View," 28 L. & CONTEMP. PROBLEMS 213-24 (1963). See also for a discussion of "the inner morality of law" in the new natural law tradition, Fuller, Positivism and Fidelity to Law-A Reply to Professor Han, 71 HARV. L. REV. 630 (1958). 19 CLN$/COLP/LOS TEL No 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No. 002 P.23 V. The Rule of Law in International Affairs Just as the rule of law is an essential component in national life, so, too, it is an essential component in international life. As John Jay wrote in The Federalist: It is of high importance to the peace of America, that she observe the laws of nations 36 And as Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1790: I think with others, that nations are to be governed with regard to their own interests, but I am convinced that it is their interest, in the long run, to be faithful to their engagements, even in the worst of circumstances, and honorable and generous always.37 One fundamental principle in international affairs is, of course, that nations should follow the rules of treaty and customary international law binding on them. Perhaps the essential principle of world order, however, is that nations must adhere to the United Nations Charter obligation not to use force aggressively in international relations. In this connection the peoples of the democracies applaud the decision by President Gorbachev to repudiate the Brezhnev doctrine and to permit genuine self-determination in the countries of Eastern Europe. Perhaps one area for future discussion might be an approach to "world peace accountability" which would highlight the critical Importance of strict adherence to the Charter prohibition against aggressive use of force in international relations and seek to raise public awareness of these issues much as the Helsinki process has raised public awareness of human rights issues. Indeed, one of the interesting paradoxes of beginning major international accountability with human rights accountability is that a whole network of practices and institutions has grown up around such human rights accountability, while there is no such network surrounding accountability for another central thrust of the United Nations Charter, the prohibition in Article 2(4) against the threat or use of aggressive force.³⁸ Accountability to this great principle, however, is, like human rights, of obvious concern to all nations as they struggle for a world free from aggressive use of force. Indeed, in an age in which legal scholars can debate the "death" of Article 2(4) of the Charter something badly needs to be "THE FEDERALIST No. 3, at 14 (J. Jay) (J. Cooke ed. 1961). 37 Letter to The Marquis De Lafayette, April 2, 1790," in 8 THE WRITINGS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON 12 (Mem. Ed. 1903). 38 There is, of course, obviously a loose international network of claims and counterclaims and some degree of international institutions devoted to such accountability but, strikingly, nothing similar to human rights accountability as it has evolved in the Helsinki process. 20 CLNS/COLP/LOS TEL No. 804-924-7362 May 3,90 15:53 No. 002 P.24 done, if possible, to revitalize this fundamental principle. Moreover, the recent statement by President Mikhail Gorbachev before the United Nations, In which he emphasized the impermissibility of the use of aggressive force in international relations, thus verbally recognizing this Charter principle as a cornerstone of world order, suggests an important opportunity to strengthen this principle through enhanced accountability. VI. A Robust Legal Profession The rule of law inevitably requires a healthy and robust legal profession. This, in turn, requires high-quality legal education in a climate of academic freedom, a vital and independent organized bar, a tradition of understanding and protection for the lawyer's role in representing unpopular as well as popular clients and causes, an independent and learned judiciary, a code of professional ethics rooted in the independence and integrity of the judicial process, and a reliable and effective system of legal reporting and public dissemination of laws. of necessity, the rule of law requires an adequate number of well-trained and professional lawyers and judges to provide defense counsel in criminal proceedings, to staff a genuinely independent judiciary, to provide advice on the law, and to carry out the myriad of other services performed by a professional bar. Resources, status, salaries and other incentives must be adequate to develop such a bar. A robust legal profession can also be assisted by enhancing support for institutions devoted to the recommendation and appraisal of individual laws and the operation of the legal system as a whole. 21 Burgess - 447-2112 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON 1985 grp of suret 1 regs. banned contacts w/ foreigners; must report contacts; group ig 3 people as large; illigal to form 4 group Romania Eeausescu 05/03/90 17:09 7777777 STATE DEPT-HA 001/012 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL BUREAU OF HUMAN RIGHTS & HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS Room 7802 Department of State Washington, D.C. 20520-7812 FAX: (202)647-9519 PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS MATERIAL: NO YES Sender's Name: Davide Burgess (HA) Date: 5/3 Phone: No of Pages: 7 (incl. cover page) Classification: UNCL MESSAGE DESCRIPTION: ABA speech; RuLe of LAW FACT Sheets TO: (Organization): # White House Deliver to: Peggy Doeley Rm. No. Tel. No. Remarks: FOR: Clearance Information Per Request Comment 05/03/90 17:09 7777777 STATE DEPT-HA 002/012 United States Department of State Washington, D.C. 20520 "EVOLUTION OF U.S. POLICIES ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRATIZATION" Remarks by David Burgess, Director of Policy, Programs, Legislation and Public Diplomacy, Bureau of Human Rights and Humanitarian Affairs, at a Forum on "Elections and Democratic Transition: How Strong the Link?", sponsored by the American Bar Association Committee on International Human Rights and the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, New York City, April 27, 1990 I am pleased to be here, and I want to thank the American Bar Association and the Bar Association of the City of New York for giving me the opportunity to speak with you today. We in the Administration feel very strongly that U.S. foreign policy cannot have its intended effect and impact abroad unless it is understood and supported by the public at home. I would like to share with you the Administration's approach to three key topics: Democracy, Human Rights and the Rule of Law. Of course, some people will tell you that a democracy is where you have the freedom to say whatever you please, but you don't have to listen to anybody else unless you want to. I do hope that you will listen today, and then ask yourselves how you too, as members of the legal profession, can help in promoting greater international respect for Democracy, Human Rights and the Rule of Law. For the past six years or so the Bureau of Human Rights and Humanitarian Affairs has been working throughout the world to cultivate these three ideas. And, to be honest, at times it seemed that we were surely plowing our way through arid fields and sowing our seeds in the midst of a drought. Totalitarian dictatorships and communist oligarchies controlled a great deal of the world's population, and in too many societies "the Rule of Law" simply meant martial law. Rights were really privileges for the elites -- ordinary people were ordinarily denied even the most basic civil and political rights, and their other fundamental human rights were frequently at risk. We also noted with irony that in so many cases, the states which 50 thoroughly repressed their people had a penchant for calling themselves "the Democratic People's Republic of Far Offistan" or comparable titles which reflected little of the reality faced by their citizens. 05/03/90 17:10 7777777 STATE DEPT-HA 003/012 -2- Our observations led us to the conclusion that while we had been pursuing the cause of human rights, often with some success -- and primarily through interventions on specific human rights cases -- we had nevertheless been neglecting some of the essential work on improving structures and systems upon which respect for human rights must be grounded. At that point, some five or six years ago, we thus made a conscious decision to till the human rights soil, if you will, and to plant the seeds of democracy, rather than simply tending to the many individual cases of human rights violations -- as tragic and heart-rending as they might be. So we continued our work, motivated, quite frankly, not only by our dedication to international human rights standards, but also by an ideological commitment to the principles that underlie American democracy. This was the Reagan Administration, of course, and we were frequently accused of mixing politics, other foreign policies and human rights. Some said we were trying to promote American ideals of democracy throughout the world, not just for the sake of human rights, but also to promote President Reagan's entire foreign policy agenda -- especially his policies towards the communist world. If we had to go to court on this allegation, I think we would happily make an "Alford Plea" -- the evidence in support of the charge is certainly substantial. We were also accused of using human rights policies to bash our ideological adversaries while giving our ideological friends a free ride. To this allegation we offer a mixed plea: On the one hand we firmly believe that there can only be one standard for international human rights, a universal standard which does not depend on race, culture, creed, form of government or level of social or economic development. On the other hand, we have clearly focussed greater attention both publicly and privately on our ideological adversaries, and we will continue to do so in the Bush Administration. (Let me distinguish here, however, by pointing out that what we do publicly is the lesser part of our human rights efforts, both with our friends and our adversaries. One of our diplomatic operating principles is to give any government the opportunity to discuss human rights issues privately, and to tend its own fields without public embarrassment. If private discourse fails to improve the situation, though, we do not hesitate to speak out publicly. Let me also note that one of the reasons that our friends are our friends and our adversaries are not, is because of the different ways in which they treat their citizens, and the different prospects and opportunities they offer their people to attain full enjoyment of fundamental human rights. 05/03/90 17:11 7777777 STATE DEPT-HA 004/012 -3- We do this for one simple reason: Democracy is the only form of government that is founded on respect for the dignity of man. Democracy is essentially anti-authoritarian -- it does not tolerate dictators, oligarchs or despots, whether from the right or the left. And when we support the growth and development of democracy, we likewise support respect for human rights. Individual rights, group and minority rights, and the rights of the majority are all protected in democracies. We do not adhere to these principles solely because they are the bedrock of American society and thus properly should be a core element of U.S. foreign and domestic policies. Rather, we firmly believe that these principles are piart of U.S. foreign policy precisely because they are universal, and thus are not constrained by cultures, different economic systems or other societies' traditions. Fundamental human rights are just that: they belong to us because we are human, not because we may be Christians, Jews, Buddhists or Muslims; not because of racial, ethnic or tribal distinctions; and not because we may be democrats, socialists, communists, colonels or clampesinos. Nor does the entitlement to these rights depend upon the specific form of one's government. Obviously, the nature of the state has a lot to do with how human rights are respected and protected -- and that is exactly why we take great pride today in fomenting democracy. President Bush has defined the State Department's new mission as the promotion and consolidation of democracy. we in the Human Rights Bureau welcome this approach and are enthusiastic that it will further solidify respect for both the Rule of Law and fundamental human rights throughout the world. Secretary of State Baker has stated that our objective is democracy, and elections are the means to achieve that objective. Elections alone, of course, do not necessarily provide protection for human rights, anymore than planting a tree means that you can now harvest the fruit. But elections -- fair and free -- do lead to self-determination, participatory government, governmental accountability and the process of democratization. This process also needs other ingredients, however. Newly elected governments and their leaders must tend to the transfer of power, a fundamental problem now facing numerous new democracies, including Romania, Guatemala, Nicaragua, El Salvador and Bulgaria. Newly elected leaders must also assure the full range of human rights which help to make that government legitimate, among them the freedoms of speech, press and assembly. And these newly democratic states must also move affirmatively to assure justice for their people. For only with justice -- 05/03/90 17:11 7777777 STATE DEPT-HA 005/012 -4- including an abiding respect for the Rule of Law -- - will human rights be secure. This is today's daunting task, as much in Eastern and Central Europe as in Asia or Central America. Let me close by recalling Reinhold Niebuhr's observation that "Man's capacity for justice is what makes democracy possible -- but man's inclination to injustice is what makes democracy necessary. We are firmly convinced that democracy, and a commitment to the Rule of Law, are essential if individuals throughout the world are to have a chance to see their fundamental human rights fully attained and safely protected. Thank you. # # # # 05/03/90 17:12 7777777 STATE DEPT-HA 006/012 May 1, 1990 US-USSR COOPERATION ON HUMAN RIGHTS I. NEW AGENDA o During the Wyoming ministerial, the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. agreed on a New Agenda on Human Rights. The Rule of Law exchanges described below are an outgrowth of our discussions with the Soviets on that issue. II. RULE OF LAW -- U.S. legal experts and their Soviet counterparts met in Moscow and Leningrad in March 1990, where they conducted a series of public seminars on Constitutional law, due process, federalism and separation of powers. -- Soviet trial and appellate judges attended a special program at the National Judicial College in Reno in late April and early May 1990, followed by several days of observation and practical legal discussions with judicial personnel and organizations in Washington, D.C. and New York, -- Plans call for several senior Soviet legal reformers to participate in a series of individual programs to study selected aspects of the Rule of Law in the U.S. -- Plans are underway for perhaps 50 post-graduate Soviet law students to come to the U.S. for in-depth study of our legal system. -- Soviet authorities have expressed interest in having one or two U.S. law professors teach American law courses at Moscow State University Law School, perhaps as early as the 1990-1991 school year. The courses would be in American Constitutional Law, and possibly also American Commercial or Business Law. -- The upcoming visit of a Soviet psychiatric delegation to the U.S. evolved out of last year's visit of an American delegation to the U.S.S.R. The Soviets reacted positively to the delegation's report on Soviet abuse of psychiatry and seem to be sincerely interested in coming here to learn modern psychiatric techniques, especially in forensic psychiatry. The visit has been postponed at this time, pending details on the U.S. program and the final composition of the Soviet team. 05/03/90 17:12 7777777 STATE DEPT-HA 007/012 -2- III. HUMANITARIAN PROGRAMS o We have developed a number of exchanges in an effort to be responsive to a humanitarian request to assist in improving the quality of Soviet life, including the disabled, the aging, and occupational health and safety. 05/03/90 17:13 7777777 STATE DEPT-HA 008/012 May 3, 1990 U.S.-U.S.S.R. JUDICIAL EXCHANGE A two-week program was conducted from April 20-May 5, 1990. A summary of the program is presented below, and a detailed description of both weeks is attached. Week 1 (April 21 - April 28) Participants attended the National Judicial College in Reno, Nevada for a specially designed program on the U.S. legal system and the Rule of Law. The program also included professional and social events with 60-70 new American judges, who were attending the National Judicial College's "General Jurisdiction Course" at the same time. Field trips to judicial, penal and legal institutions were included as well. Week 2 (April 28-May 6) The first part of this week's program (April 28-May 3) occurred in Washington, D.C., where participants visited a variety of federal, state and local institutions connected with the law and the U.S. legal system. The judges met with members of the Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals, the D.C. Superior Court, Congress, and administrative and regulatory agencies, as well as with private attorneys. Other professional and social exchanges were arranged, including visits to American homes. The second part of this week's program moved to New York City, with a focus on federal-state legal relations and the judiciary. The participants will depart from New York to the Soviet Union on May 6. The State Department's Bureau of Human Rights and Humanitarian Affairs coordinated the visit, which was funded by United States Information Agency (USIA). The program itself was conducted by the National Judicial College and the International Programs Division of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Graduate School. 05/03/90 17:13 7777777 STATE DEPT-HA 009/012 April 17, 1990 SENIOR SOVIET LEGAL EXPERTS PROGRAM The United States plans to host three to eight senior Soviet legal experts for individual professional exchange programs during 1990. Each program will last approximately four weeks, and will be individually designed to meet the professional needs of the particular expert. Suggested topics include: 1. U.S. family, inheritance, marriage, adoption and domestic relations law. 2. U.S. law and practice affecting foreign nationals, permanent resident aliens, foreign corporations, etc.; laws affecting diplomatic, consular and international organizations in the U.S.; international legal assistance agreements, relevant treaties and international conventions. 3. corporate and securities law; laws related to public and private education. 4. federalism, intrastate relations, local self-government, legislative construction and judicial interpretation. 5. separation of powers, the Rule of Law, and checks and balances among branches of government. 6. U.S. judicial system, roles of judges, juries, prosecutors, defense counsel, magistrates, etc. 7. U.S. maritime and admiralty law; insurance legislation, litigation and judicial practice. 8. immigration and naturalization law. The programs will be designed for individual participants, and each will require about 60 days advance notice to arrange. The first three Soviet participants have tentatively been identified and will include representatives from the USSR Supreme Soviet Institute of Planning and Legislation, the Supreme Soviet's Section on Constitutional Law, and the Soviet representative to the Geneva Human Rights Center. 05/03/90 17:14 7777777 STATE DEPT-HA 010/012 April 17, 1990 U.S.-U.S.S.R. ACADEMIC LEGAL EXCHANGES The program anticipates that perhaps 50 Soviet law students would study American legal systems at selected law schools in the United States. It is expected that each of the participants would pursue a course of study to be designed by the particular U.S. law school. Each program would last for an Academic Year (approximately nine months), and each participating U.S. law school might host one to three Soviet law students. It appears that the program would be most beneficial if the Soviet participants were post-graduate law students, i.e., those who have already completed their basic legal studies in the U.S.S.R. It is expected that such post-graduate law students would represent a broad range of professional aspirants, including those intending to pursue careers in private legal advocacy, government service, law faculties and legal education, and legal research and scholarship, It is proposed that this type of legal exchange program would be reciprocal, although it is understood there would probably be fewer (e.g., 20-25) U.S. post-graduate law students who would be able to study the Soviet legal system in the Soviet Union. The State Department has informally approached a number of U.S. law schools (University of Virginia, Yale, Georgetown, Columbia, etc.) to gauge their interest in participating in such an exchange. All of the schools expressed strong interest, and they were hopeful that the proposed program be developed further in the immediate future so it might commence during the 1990-1991 Academic Year. These programs are unfunded, however, although some schools have indicated that they would consider waiving tuition costs if student living expenses could be provided. An additional possibility would involve a U.S. law professor going to the Soviet Union to teach a course in U.S. Constitutional Law at the Law Faculty of Moscow State University. Perhaps a second American law professor could teach a course at the same institution on U.S. Commercial Law. The program might serve as a model for future exchanges in the field of education on American legal principles and practices, thus promoting replication of the teacher exchange in other law faculties elsewhere in the Soviet Union. 05/03/90 17:14 7777777 STATE DEPT-HA 011/012 April 17, 1990 U.S.-SOVIET SEMINARS ON THE RULE OF LAW Ten senior U.S. legal experts travelled to the Soviet Union in March 1990 (Moscow March 19-21; Leningrad March 22-23) and presented a series of seminars on the "Realization of the Rule of Law." These seminars involved a variety of legal topics, and were conducted jointly with Soviet counterparts. (A list of U.S. participants is attached.) The seminars were conducted before public audiences in both Moscow and Leningrad, and each seminar was recorded on videotape for future dissemination within the USSR. The audiences generally consisted of Soviet government and legal officials, law faculty members, law students, and the media. The seminars were enthusiastically received by the Soviet side, and generated much discussion and participation among both Soviet panelists and audience members. The U.S. and the Soviet sides both agreed that follow-up sessions in the U.S.S.R. would be beneficial, especially if they were smaller and focussed on one or two specific legal topics Ke.g., the right to counsel; freedom of speech; administrative law and government actions; etc.). 05/03/90 17:15 7777777 STATE DEPT-HA 012/012 The U.S. side was chaired jointly by: o Donald B. Ayer, Deputy Attorney General and o John Norton Moore, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the United States Institute of Peace. U.S. participants included the following legal experts, and officials from the U.S. Department of State and the Department of Justice: o Mr. A.E. Dick Howard, the White-Burkett-Miller Professor of Law and Public Affairs, University of Virginia School of Law o Mr. George P. Fletcher, Professor of Law, Columbia University School of Law o The Honorable Hans A. Linde, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the State of Oregon o The Honorable Lowell Jensen, Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California o Mr. Burt Neuborne, Professor, New York University Law School o Mr. Douglas Letter, Appellate Litigation Counsel, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice o Mr. William C. Bryson, Deputy Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice o Mr. Lawrence Robbins, Assitant Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice o Ms. Nancy Ely-Raphel, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Human Rights and Humanitarian Affairs, U.S. State Department ITHY 03 'Y0 19:46 MILLER & CHEVALIER P.1 MILLER & CHEVALIER Chartered Metropolitan Square 653 Fifteenth Street, N.W. Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20005-5701 TELECOPIER TRANSMITTAL SHEET Transmission Date: TO: Peggy Dooley FROM: Homer E. Moyer, Jr. Number of Pages (including transmittal sheet) : 5 Paper Size: We are transmitting from a: Letter Xerox 495 Auto (202) 628-0861 Legal Rapicom 120 (202) 628-0859 Total Rapicom 205 (202) 628-0858 IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE MATERIAL BEING TRANSMITTED, PLEASE CALL US IMMEDIATELY ON: (202) 626-6033 OR 6035. THANK YOU! 710 RM TIME SENT TIME CONFIRMED OPERATOR ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS: MAY 03 '90 19:46 MILLER & CHEVALIER P.2 CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPEAN LAW INSTITUTE An ABA Center for Law Reform and Comparative Law The Central and Eastern European Law Institute ("CEELI"), a proposed project of the American Bar Association ("ABA"), is a cooperative effort to facilitate the process of law reform now underway in Central and Eastern Europe. Designed to be responsive to the priorities of the participating countries, CEELI will, through a variety of means, make available U.S. legal expertise and assistance to countries that are in the process of modifying or restructuring their laws or legal systems. It will also serve as a research forum and a source of timely information on legal projects and legal developments in Central and Eastern Europe. The elements and structure of this project have been shaped by consultations with senior government officials, legal scholars, and practitioners throughout Central and Eastern Europe. Because circumstances vary from country to country, separate discussions have already taken place or are now occurring in Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Bulgaria, and Yugoslavia. The mix of project components described below is, in large part, a product of those consultations. A premise of this project, clearly understood in the region, is that the existence of a legal infrastructure is an essential predicate to lasting economic and political reform. The rule of law, so basic a part of our cultural fabric, is an urgent objective of new governments in countries now moving away from communist and socialist systems. Of critical importance in many countries is the need to create a commercial legal infrastructure that will facilitate economic integration into the global economy. International trade, privatization, direct foreign investment, joint ventures, and other forms of commercial transactions depend significantly on an established legal framework that provides the rules of the game, predictability, legal protections, and compatibility with international commercial norms. As the Soviet and Chinese experiences show, the absence of such a legal structure will complicate and ultimately stunt the economic growth that many evolving non-market economies urgently seek. Moreover, the ability of many Central and Eastern European countries to sustain political reforms may in fact be dependent upon the viability of their nascent market economies. As the Minister of Justice of one East European country said, "If our economic reforms collapse, our other reforms will collapse." CEELI will consist of multiple program components. Many will be solely ABA initiatives; others will be collaborations with other organizations and with on-going projects. CEELI will attempt to maintain an overview of legal assistance projects in Eastern Europe and, to a significant extent, serve as a coordinator for such initiatives. MAY 03 '90 19:47 MILLER & CHEVALIER P.3 The Institute A central component of CEELI, of great importance to the participating countries, will be the establishment of an institute physically located in an East European capital. As the European home of CEELI, the Institute will be the location of conferences and workshops, the home of a comparative law library, the headquarters of CEELI's East European Director, and the coordination point for the participating countries. Its counterpart office in the United States will contain a library of Central and Eastern European laws and legal materials and will be the publication point of the newsletter. Both the Executive Director and the Project Coordinator will operate out of the U.S. office of the Institute. The Institute will be supported not only by this permanent staff, but also by Country Coordinators and advisory boards in each participating country. Technical Legal Assistance In a variety of program formats, U.S. legal expertise and experience will be made available to assist in law reform and development projects. Typically in the form of workshops, expert assistance and a dialogue among the participating countries will be focused on a large variety of substantive legal areas. The formats could include workshops to draft or revise particular statutes, to conduct case studies of experiences in other countries, to implement general statutes, or to anticipate and address typical problems of administration. Workshops, which would address issues based on the priorities of the participating countries, would address legal issues of common concern through the Institute and issues of special interest in individual countries. Such technical assistance would be a central focus of CEELI. Conferences and Training In both Eastern Europe and in the United States, educational programs could address a range of legal issues and concepts. From such general legal concepts as "private property" and separation of powers, to intellectual property and administrative due process, educational programs could address legal subjects that have generally been alien to communist and socialist regimes. Such legal training could take place either in the United States or in Central and Eastern Europe and could be in short intensive two or three day sessions or extended programs of several weeks' duration. An additional training component, which could be available in the Institute in Central Europe, would be video cassette programs or lecture series on various legal subjects. Publications Newsletter, The Institute will publish a monthly newsletter, Central European Law News, that will include a master calendar of events relating to legal developments or training in Central and Eastern Europe, an inventory of new laws adopted in any of the participating countries, a catalogue of publications available in the Institute's library, a listing of new articles or publications, and reports on developments in the sister law school program. MAY 03 '90 19:48 MILLER & CHEVALIER P.4 Law Journal. CEELI will publish, perhaps jointly with a U.S. law school, a law review focusing on Eastern Europe. "A Legal Guide to Doing Business in This pocket guide series, an ongoing project in the International Section of the ABA, consists of succinct compilations of key information relevant to doing business in particular countries. Different from most country guides by virtue of the amount of legal information contained, these guides will facilitate the efforts of U.S. companies and lawyers to understand the legal framework in Central and Eastern European countries. CEELI would publish such a guide for each participating country within the first six months of operation and revise them as needed. Legal Exchanges CEELI will sponsor the temporary placement of East European lawyers in law firms and corporations in the United States. A program for English-speaking Central and Eastern European lawyers, these placements would be designed to expose lawyers from countries that have had nonmarket economies to the commercial, legal milieu of U.S. law offices. As a counterpart, one week ILEX briefing trips for U.S. lawyers to particular Central and Eastern European countries could be organized under the existing International Legal Exchange program. Sister Law Schools CEELI will assist each law school in Eastern Europe in establishing a sister institution relationship with an American law school. CEELI will arrange exchange visits of the two deans, who will then further develop the relationship as the circumstances of the particular schools warrant. Coordination CEELI will, through its newsletter calendar, advisory boards, and country coordinators, attempt to maintain an overview of legal assistance projects and activities underway in Central and Eastern Europe. Once established, the Institute may tend to become a natural locus for such activities, having the advantages of a facility in Eastern Europe, a permanent staff, and an extensive network. As such, CEELI will be able to serve as something of an umbrella for a wide variety of legal assistance projects. CEELI will also be well positioned to coordinate otherwise ad hoc efforts, collaborate with other initiatives, and identify both apparent overlap and opportunities for extending ongoing programs -- in short, to serve as something of a clearinghouse. CEELI may be able, for example, to offer support and continuity to such educational programs as the Commerce Department Legal Seminar planned for Hungary and Poland in May and the Cardozo Law School seven week Business Law Program scheduled for Budapest this spring. The ABA, in addition to being the largest U.S. legal organization, has immediate access to distinguished U.S. expertise in virtually all legal disciplines. It MAY 03 '90 19:49 MILLER & CHEVALIER P.5 is clear that many East European officials hope that the ABA, as an organization that does not have some of the mixed objectives that ad hoc offers of assistance sometimes carry, may be able to bring coherence to the currently uncoordinated scene and to serve as a neutral source of advice and assistance. CEELI is a Goal VIII Project of the ABA Section of International Law and Practice, a project designed "to advance the rule of law in the world." CEELI will draw, however, upon the full resources of the ABA, including its Sections, which are organized along the lines of legal specialties, and its 365,000 members in the U.S. and abroad. CEELI Co-chairs Talbot "Sandy" D'Alemberte Homer E. Moyer, Jr. President-Elect-Designate, ABA Chair-Elect, ABA Section of International Law and Practice U.S. Advisory Committee James R. Silkenat George C. Freeman Chairman, ABA Section of International Chair-Elect, ABA Business Law Section Law and Practice # * * Mark S. Ellis Mollie Miller Executive Director, CEELI Project Coordinator 202-638-0201 (Fax: 202-639-8238) 202-331-2295 (Fax: 202-331-2220) March 28, 1990 Agency for International Development Washington, D.C. 20523 Lawyers Office of the John Miller General Counsel January 26, 1990 AIDISC GC, John E. Mullen 697-8556 A LEGAL PROJECT FOR EASTERN EUROPE The idea of a legal project for Eastern Europe is based on the premise that the rule of law -- open, accessible, fair, and predictable -- is fundamental to a functioning market economy and political democracy. Without a rule of law to govern property rights and responsibilities and to settle disputes, capitalism becomes economic governance by permit. Without a rule of law to establish and protect individual rights and freedoms, a free and fair election can quickly become a dictatorship of the elected. The rule of law can be said to be the bridge between market economies and political democracies, the glue that holds them together, and the discipline that permits them to work efficiently. A. The American Experiment The United States has a great deal to offer. Chief Justice Marshall stated in Marbury V. Madison that, "The government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. It will certainly cease to deserve this high appellation, if the laws furnish no remedy for the violation of a vested legal right.' 1 Cr. 137, 163 (1803). Although our legal tradition is common law not civil law as is the case throughout Europe including Eastern Europe, the American experience is particularly relevant to the economic and political winds currently blowing there. Dean Pound quotes a "foreign observer" as saying about our legal tradition that its distinguishing marks are "unlimited valuation of individual liberty and respect for individual property. Nothing could be more relevant to countries with the twin goals of building democracy and market-based economies. Obviously the U.S. experience is but one that the Eastern European nations will want to consider. At the most basic level, the American concept of combining a written constitution that is 'Pound, "The Spirit of the Common Law", Marshall Jones Co., 13 (1921). Rumania 3- way como - at one paint copy of langt. - anusted an the spot Rums not allowed go - into clohn US it the Embassy receive w/aut insite mail for foreign entities 2 the sole source of individual rights and liberties,² a federal system with powers distributed between states and the federal government, and federal powers separated among three independent branches to check and balance each other, 18 unique in the world. A prominent feature of our separated powers, the "American development of the common law doctrine of supremacy of law, in our characteristic institution of judicial power over unconstitutional legislation" is a concept not shared fully by other common law countries and at times in our history even has been attacked as undemocratic because it undercuts popular responsibility. Nevertheless, "Since World War II, while Americans have continued to agonize over the justifiability of judicial review, more and more other nations have looked to courts to enforce constitutional norms Judicial review has become especially important in Germany and Italy.' Above all, however, the unquestioned success and longevity of the American experiment in both creating wealth and protecting property rights and individual liberties make it a model that should be understood in its fullest dimensions by the people and leaders of Eastern Europe. B. The Establishment of a Democratic Rule of Law; The Common Law V. Civil Law Moving from a highly centralized, attocratic system to a popularly elected democractic system that respects individual and property rights is an extremely complicated process. It involves the kind of fundamental decisions the foregding discussion implies about constitutions, judicial review and federalism. Many western states have undergone this process in modern times, especially since World War II, and most have created hybrid systems that themselves can provide guidance to East Europeans. The establishment of constitutional courts to provide judicial review in parliamentary systems is an important example. But whether in modern times or in the periods in which the great western systems of law were established, the movement to a rule of law invariably has accompanied and nurtured the unification and welding of nations. This occurred in England as the common law The question of whether the constitution is the sole source has been debated. It involves the issue of substantive due process and arguments sounding in concepts of natural law. Pound at 3. "see Thayer, "The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law, " 7 Harv. L. Rev. 129 (18$3), 1 Selected Essays 503 (1938), and Commager, Majority Rule and Minority Rights (1943) 5Gunther, "Cases and Materials on Constitutional Law.' Foundation Press, 25 (10th Ed. 1980). 3 evolved from the 14th Century onward, in France in the period surrounding the adoption of the Code Napplean in 1804, and in Germany at the time of adoption of the Burgerliches Gesetzbuch (Civil Code) in 1896. In America, not only was the establishment of the rule of law in the constitutional process the bedrock foundation of nationhood, it continued to be the cohesive element in American society and the American political process. As Chief Justice Taney commented on the role of the judiciary: "This judicial power was justly regarded as indispensable, not merely to maintain the supremacy of the laws of the United States, but also to guard the States from any encroachment upon their reserved rights by the general government so long as this Constitution shall endure, this tribunal must exist with it, deciding in the peaceful forms of judicial proceeding, the angry and irritating controversies between sovereignties, which in other countries have been determined by the arbitrament of force. " 7 The move to a democratic rule of law also involves a process of choice among the variations of common law and civil law systems that have evolved in the West over time. The civil law concept, derived from Roman law, is that of a closed system of rules in the form of codes which judges may apply only is a mechanical fashion. The strength of the common law is in its treatment of concrete controversies, with judicial law-making through the decision of particular cases. The strength of the civil law is in its logical development of abstract conceptions.⁸ In practice, the systems merge to a substantial degree. Modern common law systems also have statutory law and codes in great abundance, 9 especially in fields relating to the efficient ⁶schlesinger, "Comparative Law", Foundation Press, 168-71 (2nd Ed. 1959) "In his 'History of the English Speaking Peoples', Winston Churchill again and again drives home an important point: the focal role which the common law played in the process by which England was welded into a nation.' Id. at 179, 7 Ableman v. Booth, 21 How. 506, 520-21 (1859). a See Pound at 2. However, " the very meaning of the word 'code' depends on whether it is used by civilians or by lawyers brought up in the common law tradition. In the eyes of the latter, a code is supplemental to the unwritten law, and in construing its provisions and filling its gaps, resort must be had to the common law. To the civilain, a code is a comprehensive tatement of the law. In its interpretation, the court is always conscious of the interrelation of all the provisions contained in the whole code, 4 functioning of a market economy such as commercial law, corporations, securities and antitrust law. Judges in both systems interpret the codes and even in civil law countries their decisions along with scholarly interpretation in effect create law. What we presume the Eastern European countries will want to do is consider the basic strengths of the many extant western legal systems, first in terms of how well they promote and protect iberty and property and then in terms of how well they permit and facilitate economic growth. As noted above, this will be a complex undertaking that goes far beyond whether the system is common law or civil law based. It will require consideration of how much power they are willing to entrust to government, how impatient they are to install a modern legislated system, and the extent to which they wish to commit power and decision-making to administrative bodies which proceed extrajudicially. It also will require the most sensitive consideration of history and demographics and how a foreign code or system will work within the history and customs of the country considering it. When this framework thinking has been done, the East Europeans then will be able to consider the many successful market economy and democracy models. Japan, Germany and France, all civil law countries, are, like the United States, Britain, Canada and Australia, all capitalistic and all successful. They also are very different in their approach to regulation, taxation, and the relationship of the public and private sectors. The United States can and should help in this sifting and winnowing process. As is discussed in the following section, a law reform project may be the appropriate approach for that aspect of the establishment of the rule of law. As also is discussed in the following section, the issue involves Institutions as well as lawe. C. The Role of the United States in Establishing a Rule of Law in Eastern Europe; the Role of Lawyers, the Legal Profession, and an A.I.D. Legal Project If A.I.D. truly believes that its mission is development, growth, political pluralism, and economic and political stability, there can be no more important investment than an endeavor to assist the countries of Eastern Europe in their quest for a form of government and rule of law that permits free markets and individual freedom to flourish. It would be folly to attempt to transplant the American system in whole or in part; it would be greater folly to fail to provide them the opportunity to understand and learn and indeed in the entire code system. The intention of the legislator, where it can be ascertained, will not be disregarded. Primarily, however, code construction is grammatical, logical and teleclogical; in any event, it is free from historical reminiscences reaching back into the period prior to the preparation of the code." Schlesinger at 177-78. 5 from our experience. This does not mean simply support for elections or efforts to ensure that their laws governing joint ventures are congenial to American investment, however valuable such efforts may be. Elections alone do not create democracies. The establishment of a democratic system is not a surface undertaking but one of the greatest seriousness and profundity. The process of American constitutional development was led by men of learning, wisdom, and great depth. It involved debate on the highest theoretical and most practical levels, among men trained in law or familiar with legal theory; men familiar with Aristotle, Nontesquieu, and Locke, as well as the already centuries old system of British common and constitutional law, Roman Law, the Benaissance, and the Reformation. To the extent that A.I.D. can facilitate the availability of American constitutional and comparative legal scholars to the leaders of Eastern Europe, It will pay far greater dividends than exposure to current American methods of campaigning and conducting elections. But however wise the selection and establishment of forms and systems of government and legal processes, it will fail if not well implemented. The choice of legislative and executive forms is an integral part of the establishment of the rule of law because those institutions create and carry out law. Wisdom and competence among the practioners in legislative and executive branches is essential if an open, accessible, fair, and predictible rule of law is to flourish. Training in these areas may be an important contribution that legal and other experts from the United States can make. Apart from the fundamental process of establishing the forms and systems of government, a process in which those trained in law must participate, the concept of a legal project relates most directly to the judicial branch of government, the legal profession, and the process of law revision and reform. An efficiently functioning rule of law presumes a system of laws relevent to the modern world, that comprehend the technology and communications capabilities of the 1990s and how they relate to personal freedoms and competitiveness in a global economy. A law reform project, perhaps institutionalized in the form of a law institute, may ultimately be what Eastern Europe needs the most. It would permit the nations of Easteri Europe to consider systematically the variety of approaches to corporate and commercial law, taxation, trade, securities, antitrust, environmental, civil rights and criminal law that the West has to offer. In all probability, a survey of what now exists would be the first step. Pre-World War II laws may remain in effect. Modification rather than replacement night be in order. Consideration would have to be given to the benefits of a regional law reform or harmonization process given the multi-national nature of modern business and economic relationships. 6 Many other interventions to assist the legal infrastructure or the quality of the bar also might be possible and helpful. An efficiently fuctioning rule of law presumes a working court structure, accessibility to statutory and decisional law in libraries and other repositories, a skilled and independent bar, legal education and training, and broad accessibility to legal representation. A working court structure may require attention to the physical condition of the courts, the registries and dockets, the non-lawyer support personnel from stenorypists to para-legals, the facilities for gathering and preserving evidence in the criminal justice system, and whatever else permits courts to provide speedy trials and easy access to dispute settlement. Accessibility to law may require the refurbishing of libraries or more basically to printing and compiling laws and decisions. The establishment of an independent bar might require the forming of associations, attention to the estabishment/of firms or other forms of group practice, and consideration of canons of ethics and rules of conflict of interest. Legal education and training may require not only exposure to modern codes and western legal thought and systems, but also a fundamental examination of how law is taught. The right to legal representation may require an expansion of the legal profession as well as provision for accessibility by all elements of society. Although A.I.D. financing of legal projects has not been a consistently high priority over the years, the rule of law has long been seen as a key to development and all the foregoing elements except the fundamental discussion of constitutional theory have been touched on at some point in A.I.D. legal projects. On a small scale, most of them currently are included in one of the two legal projects being conducted in the English-speaking Caribbean islands. Several considerations are absolutely critical. 1. The American experience must not be forced but must be heard, in conjunction with or apart from West Europeans and others who may be interested in this process. 2. The American offer of assistance must not be narrow. While help in the consideration of modern legal codes that would facilitate the establishment of an efficient market-oriented economy may be a high priority, a U.S. intervention designed simply to facilitate investment would be a mistake. 3. Because of the breadth of A.I.D. 's interest in development, it is the appropriate U.S. agency to participate. And because we represent the United States, it is appropriate for us to consider participation at any or all of the levels discussed in this paper, drawing on expertise in the many departments and agencies, such as Commerce, interested in this process. 4. The full resources of the diverse American academic and practicing legal profession must be brought to bear. An organization like the American Bar Association that comprehends all such lements could be an appropriate implementing vehicle. 5. Time is of the essence. An uncoordinated, ad hoc process of molding changes in law to meet 7 particular investments or other problems already is occurring. Individuals and firms from throughout the world are selling or donating their advice and other western nations and multilateral organizations are offering advice as well individuals in each country soon will be dominated by this ad hoc The time of the key process. A coordinated effort in which the American voice is heard is paramount. It is the consideration of all these myriad issues that A.I.D must now address. John E. Mullen 1/26/90 FINAL The Rule of Law: An Overview BY JOHN NORTON MOORE Walter L. Brown Professor of Law University of Virginia School of Law and Chairman of the Board of Directors United States Institute of Peace AS Co-Chairman of the American Delegation to the Seminar on the Rule of Law Moscow and Leningrad March 19-23, 1990 The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States government, the United States Institute of Peace, the University of Virginia, or any other organization with which the author is or has been affiliated. "[W]hile the laws shall be obeyed all will be safe." Thomas Jefferson Original draft of first Inaugural Address, March 4, 1801, in 8 THE WRITINGS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON 1 (P. Ford ed. 1897). The Rule of Law: An Overview JOHN NORTON MOORE I. Introduction The world has long admired the rich cultural and artistic heritage of the peoples of the Soviet Union, a heritage including writers, poets, and composers such as Tolstoy, Chekhov, Pushkin, Dostoyevsky, Tchaikovsky and Brodsky, and the artistic brilliance of a Bolshoy Ballet. As has been most evident in the Helsinki process, however, there has been great international concern about the protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms within the Soviet Union as well as about maintaining and promoting world order and the principles of the United Nations Charter. For these reasons the ongoing international and structural changes broadly identified with President Mikhail Gorbachev and programs of "glasnost" and "perestroika" have been warmly received in the United States and elsewhere in democracies throughout the world. The peoples of these democracies profoundly hope that these programs will succeed-not simply endure-in transforming Soviet institutions to meet the concerns on which there has been continuing engagement within the Helsinki process. In this connection, no tenet of reform has seemed more promising than commitment to the rule of law, the subject of these discussions. As recently stated by Foreign Minister Shevardnadze: And surely no one can doubt that it [National strength] lies most of all in a renewed, democratic, rule-of-law society, in a free people, in the free man.¹ Perhaps it is no coincidence that this focus on the rule of law-and indeed this welcome discussion on the rule of law-takes place under the first Chairman in recent Soviet history to be a lawyer. The language of diplomacy is frequently a language of subtlety, indirection and omission. The language of friendship, however, is a language of candor. As you can see, I have chosen the language of candor and I deeply hope that this essential element of friendship will be a hallmark of this path-finding exchange on the rule of law. As the Helsinki Final Act affirms, the participating states "will respect each other's right freely to choose and develop its political, social, economic and cultural systems as well as its right to determine its laws and regulations." It is for the people of the Soviet Union to make the choices about fundamental ¹Excerpt from an October 23 Foreign Policy Report of Soviet Foreign Minister E. A. Shevardnadze entitled "Foreign Policy and Perestroyka" reportedly delivered to a plenary session of the Supreme Soviet in Moscow. 1 institutions and legal structures for their own society, consistent, of course, with the fundamental commitments of the Helsinki process and international human rights covenants. Indeed, it is a certainty that no outside group can be sensitive to all of the factors affecting those choices. Nevertheless, I profoundly believe that the experience of the United States in implementing the rule of law-an experience recently proudly celebrated in the bicentennial of our Constitution-can be of great importance for the people of the Soviet Union as you open up issues concerning the rule of law in Soviet society-just as the international commitments made in the Helsinki process and in adherence to fundamental human rights covenants are of great importance. In that spirit, I hope that these discussions between American and Soviet experts will be followed by even more specific discussions on each of the components of the rule of law. And I hope that to be most useful for all parties these discussions will be full and frank. The overview discussion which follows will first set forth what I believe to be major tenets of the rule of law. It will then consider some essential components of limited government and individual rights and freedoms in a representative democracy and some essential components of the rule of law within an independent and democratic judicial process. Finally, it will note the importance of the rule of law in international affairs and of a robust legal profession. Throughout, this paper is guided by a spirit of candor, irrespective of any possible philosophical differences perceived between and possibly even within delegations. П. Major Tenets of the Rule of Law The "rule of law" collectively symbolizes the most important features of democratic governance. Its core meaning is that governmental decisions must be rooted in the consent of the governed, acting only through structures and procedures designed to prevent individual oppression or governmental tyranny, which protect fundamental rights and freedoms, and which are subject to appraisal by an independent judiciary rendering judgments based on law. It stands in contrast to decisions based on naked power, arbitrary fiat, political expediency or personal gain. But most meaningfully, it encompasses much more than simply the opposite of these negative images. Individual judgments differ as to the core underpinnings of the rule of law, but I believe there are at least five principal tenets-each with a number of fundamental sub-tenets. These five highest-level tenets are: government of the people, by the people, and for the people;² separation of powers and checks and balances; ²For the origin of this phrasing, see President Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address, November 19, 1863. 2 representative democracy and procedural and substantive limits on governmental action against the individual (the protection of human freedom and dignity); limited government and federalism; and review by an independent judiciary as a central mechanism for constitutional enforcement. Let us review each of these basic general tenets in turn. government of the people, by the people, and for the people Overwhelmingly, philosophers and political theorists have rooted the authority of democratic governance in the people-not in the few or an assumed elite. Thus, to Aristotle " in democracies the people are supreme n3 John Locke viewed government as being based on popular consent and wrote that governmental actions exceeding the laws are "without authority."4 In a famous phrase discussing abuse of power, he concluded: "[w]herever law ends, tyranny begins "5 Echoing these premises, the American Declaration of Independence provides: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed 6 Adopted less than three weeks earlier, the Virginia Bill of Rights provides: "[t]hat all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people n7 This is emphatically not the concept of the unchallengeable general will underlying the philosophy of Jean Jacques Rousseau under which "the public must be taught to know what it wants."8 ³ARISTOTLE, POLITICS (ca. 325 B.C.). 4J. LOCKE, SECOND TREATISE OF CIVIL GOVERNMENT (1690). ⁵Id. ⁶The Declaration of Independence (U.S. July 4, 1776). ⁷From Article 2 of the Virginia Bill of Rights (June 12, 1776). ⁸J.J. ROUSSEAU, THE SOCIAL CONTRACT (1762). Needless to say, the Western democratic conception of "government of the people, by the people, and for the people" also is emphatically not the inverted social contract of Rousseau as reflected in his social contract 3 Corollaries of this first principle that the authority of law comes from the governed are: constitutions should embody the fundamental compact with the people-such constitutions should serve as the highest form of law to which all other laws and governmental actions must conform. As such, constitutions should embody the fundamental precepts of a democratic society rather than serving to incorporate ever- changing laws more appropriately dealt with by statute. Similarly, governmental structures and actions should seriously conform with constitutional norms, and constitutions should not be mere ceremonial or aspirational documents; legislatures and chief executives should be popularly elected under a system which will ensure frequent accountability. Elections must in practice be fully fair, open and meaningful. Mechanisms, such as initiative and recall, might be devised to keep elected officials close to the people; there should be no merger of a political party with the state or control of the electoral process by a political party. It is the freely elected representatives of the people, acting through governmental structures such as the legislative and executive branches, which should govern the state; and the constitutional system should provide for reasonable change and amendment as conditions and the popular will change. separation of powers and checks and balances A principal underpinning of much writing on democratic governance and the rule of law is that governmental structures should be constructed through a separation of powers and checks and balances to prevent governmental tyranny. Thus, Montesquieu wrote in The Spirit of the Laws in 1748: The political liberty of the subject is a tranquillity of mind, arising from the opinion each person has of his safety. In order to have this liberty, it is requisite the government be so constituted as one man need not be afraid of another. When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty; because apprehensions may arise, lest the same monarch or senate should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner. Again, there is no liberty, if the judicial power be not separated from the legislative and executive. Were it joined with the legislative, the life and liberty of the subject would be exposed to arbitrary control; for the judge would be then the oath for his proposed Constitution for Corsica, which provides: "I join myself, body, goods, will and all my powers, to the Corsican nation, granting her ownership of me, of myself and all who depend on me." Printed in C.R. VAUGHAN (ed.), 2 THE POLITICAL WRITINGS OF ROUSSEAU 250 (2 volumes, Cambridge, 1915). See also Chapter 1 in P. JOHNSON, INTELLECTUALS (1988). 4 legislator. Were it joined to the executive power, the judge might behave with all the violence of an oppressor.⁹ The connection between this principle of separation of powers and the rule of law was vividly reflected in the Constitution of the State of Massachusetts adopted in 1780: In the government of this Commonwealth, the legislative department shall never exercise the executive and judicial powers, or either of them: The executive shall never exercise the legislative and judicial powers, or either of them: The judicial shall never exercise the legislative and executive powers, or either of them: to the end it may be a government of laws and not of men. 10 And this principle was a major underpinning of the United States Constitution. As James Madison wrote in The Federalist papers, explaining the new Constitution: No political truth is certainly of greater intrinsic value or is stamped with the authority of more enlightened patrons of liberty than that on which the objection is founded. The accumulation of all powers legislative, executive and judiciary in the same hands, whether of one, a few or many, and whether hereditary, self appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny. Were the federal constitution therefore really chargeable with this accumulation of power or with a mixture of powers having a dangerous tendency to such an accumulation, no further arguments would be necessary to inspire a universal reprobation of the system. 11 Similarly, this principle was a fundamental tenet of the 1789 French Declaration of the Rights of Man where it was said: "Any society in which the guarantee of the rights is not secured, or the separation of powers not determined, has no constitution at all. n12 It should be noted that the principle of separation of powers does not stand in opposition to a strong legislature or a strong executive. Indeed, it is partly rooted in the functional attributes and efficiencies of each branch in respectively making, applying and enforcing the laws (as well as the executive role in foreign affairs). And it is critically complemented by checks and balances, such as, for example in the American system, the right of the Executive to veto legislation, the right of the Senate to withhold advice and consent ⁹MONTESQUIEU, THE SPIRIT OF THE LAWS (1748). 10 The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, "Part the First," art. XXX (1780), reprinted in M. CONNOLLY, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS 3, 10 (1984). ¹¹THE FEDERALIST No. 47, at 324 (J. Madison) (J. Cooke ed. 1961). 12 Article 16 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen (August 26, 1789). 5 to a treaty, and the requirement that Congress rather than the Executive "declare War" and "raise and support Armies." It should also be noted that an independent judiciary is a major corollary of this principle of separation of powers. Moreover, the Framers of the United States Constitution, recognizing the potential great power of the legislature in making laws, provided checks and balances even within the legislature by providing for a bicameral legislature elected by differing constituencies and for different terms. Finally, it should be noted that if separation of powers and checks and balances are avoided by unitary party control of all branches of government then the benefits of this fundamental underpinning of the rule of law could be easily lost. This is yet another reason for avoiding a merger of a political party with the state. representative democracy and procedural and substantive limits on governmental action against the individual (the protection of human freedom and dignity) Every democracy faces the problem of how to protect fundamental human freedom and dignity against governmental action-whether arbitrary or mandated by a majority. The most important and recurrent answer to this issue has been to provide constitutional guarantees of basic human freedoms-frequently denominated as a "bill of rights." Other partial answers, however, involve building in checks against factionalism and hasty laws through representative democracy, bicameralism and cautious modes of legislative deliberation and action, as well as endowing government only with limited authority not extending to compromising such basic freedoms. Among other examples of a "bill of rights" approach, in 1215 the Magna Carta extracted a series of rights as pledges from a reluctant King John. This included the rights: No free man shall be taken or imprisoned or dispossessed, or outlawed, or banished, or in any way destroyed, nor will we go upon him, nor send upon him, except by the legal judgment of his peers or by the law of the land. To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny, or delay right or justice. 13 Similarly, following the revolution of 1688, the British Parliament extracted a "bill of rights" from the Crown. The State of Virginia adopted the Virginia Bill of Rights in 1776; in 1789 during the early months of the French Revolution, the National Constituent Assembly formulated a "Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen"; and following a major debate about the new Constitution, the first Congress of the United States formulated the Bill of Rights which was ratified by the states effective December 15, 1791. Next year America will celebrate the bicentennial of this Bill of Rights of fundamental freedoms. Time has confirmed 13 Magna Carta, nos. 39 & 40 (1215) (numbers omitted). 6 their importance to an enduring democratic government. It should also be noted that the protection of fundamental rights extends both to substantive and procedural rights, including essential procedural elements incorporated in American law in the concept of due process of law. The cornerstone of the criminal justice system, as well as of administrative law, is these concepts of procedural due process. Finally, it should be noted that protection of fundamental liberties is seen as sufficiently essential to democratic governance and the rule of law that many political theorists have stressed the protection of such freedoms as a fundamental objective of democratic governance without which no government can be just. Aristotle wrote in Politics: "The basis of a democratic state is liberty; which, according to the common opinion of men, can only be enjoyed in such a state;-this they affirm to be the great end of every democracy." The Declaration of Independence speaks of securing "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" as the very reason for government, and the preamble of the United States Constitution includes among the reasons for establishing the Constitution: to "secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity Certainly there can be no meaningful rule of law which does not protect fundamental human freedom and dignity as a very reason for government. limited government and federalism Yet another underpinning of the rule of law is the related principles of limited government and federalism. As has just been discussed, the principle of a limited government of enumerated powers has been one partial answer to the protection of fundamental freedoms. Indeed, in The Federalist papers, Alexander Hamilton urged that the limited powers of the new federal constitution made a specific bill of rights unnecessary. Limited central government, however, serves another important function in the rule of law in maximizing regional and local control of governmental functions principally affecting peoples at a local level. In this context, limited government and federalism divide governmental authority between a central government, which should have authority in issues of defense, foreign policy, interstate commerce and other issues of governance affecting citizens on a national basis, and regional and local governmental authorities, which should have authority in issues of governance such as municipal services and education primarily affecting citizens on a more local basis. This principle simultaneously makes government more responsive to and controllable by the people and encourages a diversity in public policies adopted within different regions according to local conditions, needs, traditions and desires. It directly incorporates an insight of participatory democracy that groups affected by decisions should have a voice in those decisions. As correctly perceived, it does not detract from strong federal authority in the areas where authority must be and is centralized in a national government. Adjusting the boundaries between the federal and regional governmental units and 14 ARISTOTLE, POLITICS (ca. 325 B.C.). 7 maintaining a proper balance is necessarily the essence of a large body of law in any federal system. Federalism, of course, assumes an at least initial voluntary acceptance by constituent units. judicial review by an independent judiciary as a central mechanism for constitutional enforcement An independent judiciary is a critical component of the principle of separation of powers, as well as of an effective principle of constitutionalism in embodying and realizing the major conditions of the consent of the governed. 15 Because of the great importance of judicial review as a central mechanism for constitutional enforcement and for maintenance of the rule of law, however, I believe that it should be considered a fundamental principle in its own right. Indeed, no principle in the American experience has been more important in maintaining the integrity of the major constitutional underpinnings of the rule of law than has the principle of independent judicial review. Thus, the Supreme Court has in the 1962 reappointment decision of Baker v. Carr¹⁶ sought to police the integrity of the "one person one vote" principle underlying government of the people, by the people, and for the people. In major decisions such as INS v. Chadha,¹⁷ in which the Court in 1983 struck down the so-called "legislative veto," the Court has policed the critical workings of separation of powers and checks and balances. The Court has since its earliest days been repeatedly concerned with maintaining a proper balance in issues of federalism. And perhaps its most vital role has been in protecting the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals against encroachment by federal and state action. As the Framers correctly foresaw, the judicial power could not be ¹⁵The "Introduction" to Melone and Mace, Judicial Review and American Democracy (1988), roots judicial review in the belief that the Constitution is the Supreme expression of the people's will." Thus, it says: The ultimate and necessary foundation upon which judicial review rests is the belief that the Constitution is the supreme expression of the people's will. Since it results from the acts of the people in their constituent capacity, it is fundamental law embodying the people's determination of the proper division and extent of governing authority between the various branches of the national government; between the central government and the state governments; between the national government and individuals; and, especially under the expanded application of the Fourteenth Amendment, between state governments and individuals. Id. at 3. The Federalist No. 78 (Hamilton) provides perhaps the strongest indication in constitutional history that the Framers contemplated judicial review concerning issues of constitutional consistency. 16 Baker V. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962). 17 INS V. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983). 8 subsumed within the executive or legislative branches consistent with effective exercise of the judicial role in policing these principles of the rule of law. Indeed, judicial review by an independent judiciary may be the only way to effectively ensure the supremacy of the Constitution. The realization of this point was an essential element in the reasoning of Chief Justice John Marshall in the landmark decision of the Supreme Court in the 1803 case of Marbury v. Madison, 18 setting out the doctrine of "judicial review" by declaring for the first time an act of Congress unconstitutional. Thus, Marshall wrote: Certainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and, consequently, the theory of every such government must be, that an act of the legislature, repugnant to the constitution, is void. This theory is essentially attached to a written constitution, and, is consequently, to be considered, by this court, as one of the fundamental principles of our society. It is not therefore to be lost sight of in the further consideration of this subject. If an act of the legislature, repugnant to the constitution, is void, does it, notwithstanding its invalidity, bind the courts, and oblige them to give it effect? Or, in other words, though it be not law, does it constitute a rule as operative as if it was a law? This would be to overthrow in fact what was established in theory; and would seem, at first view, an absurdity too gross to be insisted on. It shall, however, receive a more attentive consideration. It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each. So if a law be in opposition to the constitution; if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the constitution; or conformably to the constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty. If, then, the courts are to regard the constitution, and the constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature, the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply. Those, then, who controvert the principle that the constitution is to be considered, in court, as a paramount law, are reduced to the necessity of maintaining that courts must close their eyes on the constitution, and see only the law. This doctrine would subvert the very foundation of all written constitutions. It would declare that an act which, according to the principles and theory of our government, is entirely void, is yet, in practice, completely obligatory. It would declare that if the legislature shall do what is expressly forbidden, such act, notwithstanding the express prohibition, is in reality effectual. It would be giving to the legislature a practical and real omnipotence, with the same breath which 18 Marbury V. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803). 9 professes to restrict their powers within narrow limits. It is prescribing limits, and declaring that those limits may be passed at pleasure. 19 A genuinely independent judiciary, of course, requires not only a doctrine of judicial review but also scrupulous protection of the independence of the judiciary in form and in fact. Details of appointment, tenure, salary, status, training and removal must all be resolved to preserve and strengthen that independence. Similarly, the selection of judiciary must not be on a partisan basis and should ensure the selection of the most qualified legal experts. And the legal profession, as well as the government and society as a whole, must internalize the independence of the judiciary and the important reasons for it. III. Some Essential Components of Limited Government and Protection of Individual Rights and Freedoms in a Representative Democracy As has been discussed, major tenets of the rule of law in a representative democracy include limited government and constitutional limits on governmental action against the individual. In turn, these tenets include a broad range of substantive and procedural components. Some such components widely regarded as essential include the following: preserving a climate of free discussion and opinion Nothing is more essential to the proper functioning of representative democracy than maintaining a climate of free discussion and opinion. This requires maintenance of freedom of speech; freedom of assembly; free and vital television, radio and newspaper media; freedom to petition government for redress of grievances; a free and vital publishing industry; academic freedom in institutions of higher learning; protection of exchange in the legislative process and depoliticization of governmental information efforts. Ultimately, an informed and involved citizenry is the lifeblood of democracy. As Thomas Jefferson reminds us: ¹⁹Id. at 176-78 (Opinion of the Court). 20The discussion which follows is emphatically not a complete list of fundamental components of the major tenets of limited government and constitutional limits on governmental action against the individual. The rights to travel and emigrate and the right to privacy, for example, are also fundamental. 10 If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.2¹ Protecting the necessary climate of free discussion and opinion is a crucial role of the rule of law. fairness in criminal process An essential element in the relationship of government to its citizens is the maintenance and operation of a criminal process. Protection of the fairness and integrity of that process is an essential element of the rule of law, The Magna Carta and numerous bills of rights throughout human history attest to the importance of such fairness. Indeed, the fourth, fifth, sixth and eighth amendments in the Bill of Rights to the United States Constitution directly relate to the fairness of criminal processes, including requirements concerning search and seizure (the fourth amendment); protection against double-jeopardy and self-incrimination (the fifth amendment); the rights to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury, to be informed of all charges, to be confronted with adverse witnesses, to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses and to have the assistance of counsel in defense (the sixth amendment); and prohibition of excessive bail or fines and of cruel and unusual punishment (the eighth amendment). Perhaps the most important guarantee undergirding the protection of the individual against the state in criminal trials, however, is the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. Similarly, the right of habeas corpus, appellate review of criminal convictions, and fairness in sentencing and subsequent treatment are also vital. Also of great concern, the criminal process must not be politicized or used for the punishment of political dissidents. Fairness in criminal process is not a monopoly of systems rooted in either common or civil law traditions. It is, however, a function of adherence to certain minimum standards such as advance promulgation of law, protection against unreasonable searches and seizures or unreasonable criminal charges, a high standard of proof by the finder of fact such as proof beyond a reasonable doubt, an impartial trial with an opportunity for an adequate defense, a right to independent advice of defense counsel, a strict separation of prosecutorial and judging functions, independent judges, and reasonable and proportional sentencing. While all traditions can be rooted in the rule of law, I prefer the adversarial process of the common law tradition as providing greater protection for an accused and a more vigorous search for the truth, among other advantages. Of possible interest, a growing body of empirical social 21 'Letter to Colonel Charles Yancey, January 6, 1816," in 11 THE WORKS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON 497 (P. Ford ed. 1905). 11 science evidence seems to support popular preference for an adversarial process involving a genuinely independent adversarial defense over an inquisitorial model. 22 protection of religious freedom The maintenance of religious freedom is one of the oldest and most important components of individual freedom. Thus, ensuring religious freedom is an essential component of the rule of law. Again, the importance of such freedom is attested throughout human history. It is a central component of, among other historic indicators, the Magna Carta in 1215, Roger Williams' "Bloudy Tenent of Persecution for Course of Conscience" in 1644, the Maryland Toleration Act of 1649, the Virginia Bill of Rights of 1776, Thomas Jefferson's masterful Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom in 1786, 23 and the first amendment to the United States Constitution as ratified in 1791. Religious freedom encompasses at least two vital and interrelated principles-the free exercise of religion and the non-establishment of religion. To avoid interference with the free exercise of religion, as well as to maintain consistency with the underlying purposes of non-establishment of religion, it would seem essential also that government not establish a doctrine of non-religion, just as it must not establish a particular religion. Finally, the full protection of religious freedom may require strong and effective civil rights laws to protect against discrimination on religious grounds. protection of civil rights A democratic society must ensure equality before the law and the protection of minority and even disadvantaged majority populations. The United States fought a civil war in the long struggle for effective realization of this principle, and with the Supreme Court leading the way in Brown V. Board of Education²⁴ in 1954, the Nation has taken this principle to heart. Today such civil rights, including protection against discrimination based on race, gender, or 22See, e.g., E.A. LIND & T.R. TYLER, THE SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE (1988). Cross-cultural aspects of this research indicate key findings are likely applicable to European conditions. Id. at 129-45. 23 The importance in Jefferson's mind of the Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom is reflected in the epitaph he chose for his tombstone: Here was buried Thomas Jefferson Author of the Declaration of American Independence of the Statute of Virginia for religious freedom & Father of the University of Virginia 24 Brown V. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954). 12 religion, are protected not only against abusive governmental action by constitutional principle, but also against both state and private action by a growing network of civil rights laws. Such laws are a vital component of the rule of law in a modern democratic society. accountability of governmental officials and protection of governmental processes Any modern democratic society must have a vital network of laws to ensure accountability of governmental officials and protection of governmental processes and rational decision. Such laws may include measures to facilitate petition of government for redress of grievances, "freedom of information" laws, "sunshine" laws, private suits against government or government officials in certain cases, agency inspectors general, "whistle blower" laws, "impact statements" required before decision (used particularly in the environmental area), ombudsman, conflict of interest laws, administrative remedies and appeals, and even independent counsel (though this check remains controversial in the United States). protection of the rights of workers Certainly every genuine democracy should seek to protect the rights of workers. Indeed, that is a major philosophical premise underlying the Soviet system. Yet, as the emergence of Solidarity in Poland illustrates, the rights of workers can be abridged by the state at least as thoroughly as by private employers. The developed nations have created a detailed labor law centering on the rights of workers to organize and bargain collectively and on the maintenance of a safe and healthy work environment. The development and enforcement of such a body of labor law would seem an important component of the rule of law in a modern democratic society. civilian control of the military Many democratic societies have stressed the essential nature of civilian control of the military. In the United States this is guaranteed not only by important constitutional provisions concerning legislative control over military appropriations and appointments, but is also an essential element of the military's own code of professionalism. Similarly, the military follows a tradition that is nonpolitical. And, of course, this principle of civilian control of the military also applies to civilian control of intelligence agencies. 25 Both military and intelligence agencies must operate under the rule of law and constitutional structures. 25 See generally Chapter 19 in NATIONAL SECURITY LAW (J. MOORE, R. TURNER AND F. TIPSON eds. 1990) for measures ensuring civilian control of intelligence agencies within the United States and the operation of such agencies within the rule of law. 13 protecting the environment One major reason for governmental intervention in a market economy is protection against "externalities" such as environmental damage. Because of the potentially great societal cost of environmental damage, insuring that environmental costs will be adequately considered and that high standards of environmental protection are met is an essential role of modern democratic governance. Moreover, because governmental actions and projects, if not directly accountable and if identified with government itself, have an equal if not greater potential for ignoring environmental costs than private sector actions, vigorous protection of the environment is essential in all systems. protecting economic freedom and entitlements Perhaps no issue in the past has proceeded as thoroughly on different philosophical premises as the protection of economic freedom and property rights. The developed democracies, with a tradition of John Locke and market-oriented economies, have traditionally protected economic freedom and individual property rights. The Soviet system, however, has followed Marx and Engels in the abolition of many forms of private property. Thus, John Locke, in his Second Treatise of Civil Government in 1690, wrote at length in support "of property." And the breadth of support for this principle is illustrated by the 1789 French Declaration of the Rights of Man, which begins article 17 with the preamble "Property being a sacred and inviolable right Yet the Communist Manifesto provides in relation to certain private property: "the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property." Clearly, market-oriented economies are a major feature of the rule of law in developed societies based on Western democratic values. The economic success of those societies, not only in enhancing overall production of goods and services, but also in broadly delivering consumer goods and services, speaks with the normative force of facts. Increasingly, however, the literature in the West has also shown a powerful connection between economic freedom generally, including private property rights, and both individual freedom and overall societal levels of freedom and success of governmental structures. Thus, property rights and freedom in the economic sphere are increasingly recognized as essential components of human freedom. For if tight control of property enables pervasive state control of the individual, then freedom can be lost as effectively as through the denial of civil and political freedoms. Indeed, Professor Charles A. Reich writes in a famous article on "The New Propertyⁿ²⁶ that ²⁶C. Reich, "The New Property," 73 YALE L.J. 733 (1964). 14 "[t]he institution called property guards the troubled boundary between individual man and the state. n27 And further: At the very least, it is time to reconsider the theories under which new forms of wealth are regulated, and by which governmental power over them is measured. It is time to recognize that "the public interest" is all too often a reassuring platitude that covers up sharp clashes of conflicting values, and hides fundamental choices. It is time to see that the "privilege" or "gratuity" concept, as applied to wealth dispensed by government, is not much different from the absolute right of ownership that private capital once invoked to justify arbitrary power over employees and the public. Above all, the time has come for us to remember what the framers of the Constitution knew so well-that "a power over a man's subsistence amounts to a power over his will." We cannot safely entrust our livelihoods and our rights to the discretion of authorities, examiners, boards of control, character committees, regents, or license commissioners. We cannot permit any official or agency to pretend to sole knowledge of the public good. We cannot put the independence of any man wholly in the power of other men. 28 And, of particular relevance in a system in which the individual must rely heavily on government "entitlements," a central thrust of this article by Professor Reich is the importance of protecting these state-controlled "entitlements" as "the new property" against arbitrary or politicized government denial. Moreover, the roles of private property in providing individual incentive and as a prerequisite for voluntary exchange which is the basic mechanism of decentralized market systems has long been recognized in the developed democracies. Indeed, of particular interest, there is a growing feeling among many in the West that political systems which broadly limit private property rights may not be able to adopt more open governmental processes without also adopting greater economic freedom-going far beyond efforts at greater decentralization of governmental planning. For the resulting inefficiencies in relatively centralized governmental setting of prices, as opposed to the decentralized actions of markets, may inevitably lead either to popular efforts at fundamental change in government structures or to massive emigration, as was most recently evident in the events in the German Democratic Republic following the courageous and internationally applauded dismantlement of the Berlin Wall. A discussion of this potential linkage between freedom in the economic sphere and freedom elsewhere appears in the Economic Report of the President transmitted to the United States Congress in February 1982. Chapter two of this report on "Government and the Economy" begins: ²⁷Id. 28Id. at 787. 15 Political freedom and economic freedom are closely related. Any comparison among contemporary nations or examination of the historical record demonstrates two important relationships between the nature of the political system and the nature of the economic system: All nations which have broad-based representative government and civil liberties have most of their economic activity organized by the market. Economic conditions in market economies are generally superior to those in nations (with a comparable culture and a comparable resource base) in which the government has the dominant economic role. The evidence is striking. No nation in which the government has the dominant economic role (as measured by the proportion of gross national product originating in the government sector) has maintained broad political freedom; economic conditions in such countries are generally inferior to those in comparable nations with a predominantly market economy. Voluntary migration, sometimes at high personal cost, is uniformly to nations with both more political freedom and more economic freedom. The reasons for these two relationships between political and economic systems are simple but not widely understood. Everyone would prefer higher prices for goods sold and lower prices for goods bought. Since the farmer's wheat is the consumer's bread, however, both parties cannot achieve all they want. The most fundamental difference among economic systems is how these conflicting preferences are resolved. A market system resolves these conflicts by allowing the seller to get the highest price at which others will buy and the buyer to get the lowest price at which others will sell, by consensual exchanges that are expected to benefit both parties. Any attempt by one party to improve his outcome relative to the market outcome requires a coercive activity at the expense of some other party. The politicization of price decisions-whether of wages, commodities, or interest rates-tends to reduce both the breadth of popular support for the government and the efficiency of the economy. A rich nation can tolerate a good bit of such mischief, but not an unlimited amount. One should not be surprised that all nations in which the government has dominant control of the economy are run by a narrow oligarchy and in most economic conditions are relatively poor. In the absence of limits on the economic role of government, the erosion of economic freedom destroys both political freedom and economic performance. Only a few dozen nations now guarantee their citizens both political and economic freedom. The economic role of government in these nations differs widely, without serious jeopardy to political freedom. Within the range of experience of the United States and the other free nations, the relation between the political system and the government's economic role is more subtle. Expansion of the economic role of the government tends to reduce both the level of agreement on government policies and the inclination to engage in political dissent. The link between political and economic freedom is important. Increasing economic freedom will also provide greater assurance of our political freedom. A major objective of this Administration's economic program is to reduce the Federal Government's role in economic decisionmaking while strengthening the 16 economic role of individuals, private organizations, and State and local governments. This shift will entail substantial reductions in the size and number of Federal spending programs, significant reductions in both personal and business Federal tax rates, major reforms of Federal regulatory activities, and a reduced rate of money growth. While an important element in this redefinition of the Federal Government's economic role is a political judgment about the appropriate relationship among individuals, the States, and the Federal Government, this redefinition also is supported by an extensive body of economic analysis.²⁹ Similarly, Justice Antonin Scalia, now of the United States Supreme Court, wrote in a book published in 1987: I know no society, today or in any era of history, in which high degrees of intellectual and political freedom have flourished side by side with a high degree of state control over the relevant citizen's economic life. The free market, which presupposes relatively broad economic freedom, has historically been the cradle of broad political freedom, and in modern times the demise of economic freedom has been the grave of political freedom as well.³⁰ Finally, quite apart from the considerable issues of whether it is necessary and of the costs to individual freedom and governmental systems from any such effort, questions are being raised in the West concerning the internal consistency of efforts to avoid exploitation of man by man through a denial of private property rights and economic freedom. That is, it has been argued that any thorough-going effort to ensure approximate economic equality requires the socialization of both economic success and economic failure. But, if so, does not this in turn 29 Chapter 2 "Government and the Economy," from the Annual Report of the Council of Economic Advisers, in ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT, TRANSMITTED TO THE CONGRESS FEBRUARY 1982, at 27-28 (1982). This chapter also contains a good summary statement of the macro-economic case for limited governmental intervention in private markets. These include: "externalities" (positive and negative), "monopoly," "public goods," "income redistribution" and "macroeconomic stability." It also contains an interesting discussion of the theoretical reasons for "government failure" as opposed to "market failure" dealt with above as settings for limited government intervention. These include the political process as "overly responsive to special interest groups," inefficiencies in "supply by government agencies," a failure to maximize responses to "diversity of conditions and preferences," "limits on information" and the over-discounting by government decisionmakers of programs which impose costs today in return for future benefits. See id. at 29-42. As these theoretical points illustrate, modern democratic governance in a market economy has ample latitude for taxation and regulatory intervention (exercise of the "police power") to protect workers, consumers, investors and the environment without banning or overburdening the market economy itself. ³⁰A. Scalia, Economic Affairs as Human Affairs, in ECONOMIC LIBERTIES AND THE JUDICIARY 31, 32 (J. DORN & H. MANNE eds. 1987). 17 mean that inevitably there will be systematic exploitation of some groups (the economically successful) by others (the economically unsuccessful)? And, moreover, public officials, who have a major role in directing the economy in a non-market system, will have power, motive, and opportunity to do some exploiting of their own in a more direct way. 31 Whatever the answers to these questions, it is increasingly clear that the protection of economic freedom is an essential component of the rule of law in a modern democratic society. I believe that addressing this issue fully and progressively is as important as any in the overall process of "perestroika."32 IV. Some Essential Components of The Rule of Law Within an Independent and Democratic Judicial Process³³ Just as the fundamental tenets of limited government and protection of individual rights and freedoms depend importantly on a number of essential components, so, too, the rule of law within an independent judicial process depends on a number of essential components. These include: the supremacy of constitutional guarantees within the judicial process; the principle, "nullum crimen, nulla poena, sine lege" (literally meaning that without a law, there can be no crime and no punishment), that there can be no penalty without prior, publicly known and reasonably specific laws.³⁴ It should be emphasized that ³¹See generally S. ARNOLD, MARX'S RADICAL CRITIQUE OF CAPITALIST SOCIETY: A RECONSTRUCTION AND CRITICAL EVALUATION (1990). 32 What is liberalized directly, of course, should not be banned indirectly through continuing criminalization of "profit," vaguely defined "speculation," or pervasive bureaucratic control. 33 One can also speak of essential components of the rule of law within a democratic legislative process. These would certainly include a presumption of openness in publication of draft laws and debate before adoption and other measures concerning due process within the legislative process, and anti-corruption measures, among others. For a general discussion of the legislative process, see J. DAVIES, LEGISLATIVE LAW AND PROCESS (2d ed. 1986), W. ESKRIDGE & P. FRICKEY, CASES AND MATERIALS ON LEGISLATION: STATUTES AND THE CREATION OF PUBLIC POLICY (1988), C. NUTTING & R. DICKERSON, CASES AND MATERIALS ON LEGISLATION (5th ed. 1978). ³⁴A seemingly similar statement was apparently made by President Mikhail Gorbachev at the Nineteenth Party Conference: "[W]e must adhere strictly to the principle that everything that is not prohibited by law is permitted." "Gorbachev Report Sizes Up Restructuring," 40:26 CURRENT DIG. OF THE SOVIET PRESS 7, 19 (Jul. 27, 1988). 18 secret laws and regulations, unknown to those to whom they will be applied, are fundamentally inconsistent with the rule of law; the principle of decisions based on law, stemming from an analysis of the functional intent of the lawmaker as opposed to political factors, party affiliation, personal gain or arbitrary fiat. The essence of an independent judicial process is judging based on rational analysis of the law and its underlying policies as applied in a specific case; the principle that "like cases should be treated alike"; the principle that reasons should be given for decisions, that the reasons given should be candid for appraisal by others, and that such opinions should be published and made widely available to lawyers and in specialized libraries; the principle that judges should defer to clear higher authority within a system, whether it is a constitution, a legislative enactment, or a higher court within an overall judicial system. That is, in constitutional interpretation the judge is not superior to the Constitution, in statutory interpretation the judge is not superior to a clear intent of the legislature, and a judge is bound to follow a ruling on point of a higher judge within an overall judicial system. These and other principles underlying the judicial process, including principles of interpretation, are not self-defining, and a rich body of jurisprudential writing addresses their meaning and effect. In particular, the legal realists have taught us that judicial decisionmaking is inevitably a process involving choice in rule selection, fact selection, and semantic and syntactic interpretation.35 While opinions differ as to the precise content and effect of such principles, however, there is widespread agreement on their importance to the rule of law. Professor John Jeffries of the University of Virginia says of the rule of law in the context of the "vagueness" issue in this tenet: The evils to be retarded are caprice and whim, the misuse of government power for private ends, and the unacknowledged reliance on illegitimate criteria of selection. The goals to be advanced are regularity and evenhandedness in the administration of justice and accountability in the use of government power. In short, the "rule of law" designates the cluster of values associated with conformity to law by government. Jeffries, Legality, Vagueness, and the Construction of Penal Statutes, 71 U. VIRGINIA L. REV. 189, 212-13 (1985). 35See, e.g. Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 HARV. L. REV. 457 (1897); CARDOZO, THE GROWTH OF LAW (1924); K.N. LLEWELLYN, THE COMMON LAW TRADITION (1960); Allen & Caldwell, Modern Logic and Judicial Decision Making: A Sketch of One View," 28 L. & CONTEMP. PROBLEMS 213-24 (1963). See also for a discussion of "the inner morality of law" in the new natural law tradition, Fuller, Positivism and Fidelity to Law-A Reply to Professor Hart, 71 HARV. L. REV. 630 (1958). 19 V. The Rule of Law in International Affairs Just as the rule of law is an essential component in national life, so, too, it is an essential component in international life. As John Jay wrote in The Federalist: It is of high importance to the peace of America, that she observe the laws of nations 36 And as Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1790: I think with others, that nations are to be governed with regard to their own interests, but I am convinced that it is their interest, in the long run, to be faithful to their engagements, even in the worst of circumstances, and honorable and generous always. 37 One fundamental principle in international affairs is, of course, that nations should follow the rules of treaty and customary international law binding on them. Perhaps the essential principle of world order, however, is that nations must adhere to the United Nations Charter obligation not to use force aggressively in international relations. In this connection the peoples of the democracies applaud the decision by President Gorbachev to repudiate the Brezhnev doctrine and to permit genuine self-determination in the countries of Eastern Europe. Perhaps one area for future discussion might be an approach to "world peace accountability" which would highlight the critical importance of strict adherence to the Charter prohibition against aggressive use of force in international relations and seek to raise public awareness of these issues much as the Helsinki process has raised public awareness of human rights issues. Indeed, one of the interesting paradoxes of beginning major international accountability with human rights accountability is that a whole network of practices and institutions has grown up around such human rights accountability, while there is no such network surrounding accountability for another central thrust of the United Nations Charter, the prohibition in Article 2(4) against the threat or use of aggressive force. 38 Accountability to this great principle, however, is, like human rights, of obvious concern to all nations as they struggle for a world free from aggressive use of force. Indeed, in an age in which legal scholars can debate the "death" of Article 2(4) of the Charter something badly needs to be ³⁶THE FEDERALIST No. 3, at 14 (J. Jay) (J. Cooke ed. 1961). 37 Letter to The Marquis De Lafayette, April 2, 1790," in 8 THE WRITINGS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON 12 (Mem. Ed. 1903). 38 There is, of course, obviously a loose international network of claims and counterclaims and some degree of international institutions devoted to such accountability but, strikingly, nothing similar to human rights accountability as it has evolved in the Helsinki process. 20 done, if possible, to revitalize this fundamental principle. Moreover, the recent statement by President Mikhail Gorbachev before the United Nations, in which he emphasized the impermissibility of the use of aggressive force in international relations, thus verbally recognizing this Charter principle as a cornerstone of world order, suggests an important opportunity to strengthen this principle through enhanced accountability. VI. A Robust Legal Profession The rule of law inevitably requires a healthy and robust legal profession. This, in turn, requires high-quality legal education in a climate of academic freedom, a vital and independent organized bar, a tradition of understanding and protection for the lawyer's role in representing unpopular as well as popular clients and causes, an independent and learned judiciary, a code of professional ethics rooted in the independence and integrity of the judicial process, and a reliable and effective system of legal reporting and public dissemination of laws. Of necessity, the rule of law requires an adequate number of well-trained and professional lawyers and judges to provide defense counsel in criminal proceedings, to staff a genuinely independent judiciary, to provide advice on the law, and to carry out the myriad of other services performed by a professional bar. Resources, status, salaries and other incentives must be adequate to develop such a bar. A robust legal profession can also be assisted by enhancing support for institutions devoted to the recommendation and appraisal of individual laws and the operation of the legal system as a whole. 21 MON 10 am MRSC walp-thru natl. Salvation foront = old regime Limisona = Berkeley HungrPal, RFE elections may 20 if we lose theal elections, you R looking @ the future pol prisoness of Rum before 12/22 - illegal for 3 people to have convo 4 churches in Buchaust, 3 were padlocked election day resumen? # lack of morality - told to do for 1/5 yrs. July 1987 - TV Guide U.S. Constitution stamed for info 4 1936 cand, prison Toyrs. - woman, running again 31 yr-old unemployed for 12 yro. They stote our revolution 10 Braser - coal mines, imprisoned 4 no, 1948 now VP 4115 Darty Hist like stop in 1948 11:20 Chas Fried 495-310Q 4636 Lloyd Cutter Marchatx CWP 663-6000 1sst Sec. Dick Schifter 647-2126 David Burgess 2112 State - Hum Rghts secret reqp - people not allowed to all, no one knows what they are Hung Justice Minister = fmr Sup. Gt Justic quit Kalman Kulcsar (Kohl-jar) been here several times Anglo-Saxon law expert - U.S. 457-1700 . of Peace - John norton moore mle of law programs abopnof 804/924-7441 UVA Hung + SU locked onto anglo-Saxon + common law system Court interpretation not Raman Mapolianic /Continental Wde- - law & my for everything 1. ind judiciary (Manyland) gor appts exec control w/leg approval independence election cycle, w/a yrs. 12nd - put participation dist. gote to retain for 15 yrs. take wdit for helping them 2. trial by jury now- 1 judge w/2 laymen our system w/2 Aes - "sleeping judges" odd # jurars (5 or 7) smaller one 3. notion of habeus corpus Hung. has it -dug it out from past Magyan princes - Hung embasay right Dr. to complain Istran Pataki Dep. Chief of Mission 362-6730 David Riukin - Boyden's office (Soviet emigre - as kid) unit side = more justice, party not as involved /. Hung 3. Poland (not as far to go - Cath Church) 2. Czech watchdog Freedom of Rel - Sor longt. freedom to he atherst from - atheres prosetyly as atherat, not as Prof, moore State justice, USIA US dnot 1) outside consultant, survey field re! EE & SO of Place rot to a) Me to do to enhance rol engagement Charles Smith Prof. A.E. Dick Howard - UVA Gech - (SLE talks (max Kampelman Copenhages Round 639-7000 1) free elections 2) rule of law - Thromburgh (70reign appro - Spring) trip HOSU 1990 30 & Rule - Don ayers - deptb Y Prof moore took fed judges, UK + France namelua law school intro ? Chapee Rep Juck Brooks Cheney Darman Bob Draham Cavazos simpson Jaime Escalante may, aug. Dec Junny stewart Rev Robt Runcie Pearl Bailey Billy Gramm Bill Cooley may 84 Lune Kirkland Bill Buckley alex Halley may 86 Ran mcnair Carl Scegan Walter Cronkite Pope - only univ. Mumenical yr @ unin. MAY 03-'90 09:21 ID:UNIV SOUTH CAROLINA TEL NO: 803-777-9480 #366 P01 THE 2002 PRINT UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA, s.c. 29208 DATE 5/3/90 TIME 10:15 am TELECOPY COVER LETTER NAME DELIVER Regg THE FOLLOWING Doolue PAGES TO: PLEASE FROM Christopher Simpson) TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES 2 , INCLUDING COVER LETTER. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CONTACT Jennifer PHONE: (803) 777-3106 FAX NUMBER: (803) 777-9480 COMMENTS: (202) 456-6218 MOY-03-'90 09:22 ID:UNIV SOUTH CAROLINA TEL NO:803-777-9480 #366 P02 Order of Exercises Presiding: JAMES B. HOLDERMAN President of the University of South Carolina MUSICAL PRELUDE The University Concert Choir The University Symphonic Band PROCESSIONS The University Mace The University Faculties The Platform Party NATIONAL ANTHEM The University Concert Choir INVOCATION His Eminence Archbishop Iakovos Primate of the Greek Orthodox Church of North and South America MUSICAL TRIBUTE The University Concert Choir OPENING REMARKS President Holderman PRESENTATION OF CANDIDATES FOR DEGREES Dr. Arthur K. Smith Provost CONFERRING OF DEGREES IN COURSE President Holderman "MEMORY" In Honor of the Class of 1990 PRESENTATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND MRS. BUSH CONFERRING OF HONORARY DEGREES President Holderman Provost Smith Thomas L. stepp Secretary, Board of Trustees HONORARY DEGREE RECIPIENTS Michael Dammann Eisner Chairman and Chief Executive Officer The Walt Disney Company Andrew Lloyd Webber Composer Barbara Pierce Bush Advocate for Literacy ADDRESS The President of the United States BENEDICTION Archbishop Iakovos ALMA MATER Dr. Richard Conant school of Music RECESSIONAL thus toteoworth THE WHITE HOUSE Purckney WASHINGTON 1st Bd. of Trustees, nom to be 1st Chair, but lost by 4 votes ABA- early proponent of state unise, hegan Homer Mozer efforts in 1770 - chartered 31 yrs later, unev 298- -6020 geuded bull to ust. uner three state Senate legal 661, 77 why. institute A Ref unup what doing oil in process ? mmy Pal 885-2648 Prof Hum amenicanum Schwartz Cyech Bulg Hung GDR 11/ 828e Some of These may be useful either directly or indirectly. any a drome just IF you want Steve LAW LAW 1079 Laugh at your friends, and if your friends are clusion of the Roman Twelve Tables: Salus sore, populi suprema lex; and to know that laws, ex- So much the better, you may laugh the more. cept they be in order to that end, are but things POPE, Epilogue to Satires. Dial. i, 1. 55. captious, and oracles not well inspired. 1 FRANCIS BACON, Essays: Of Judicature. He chastises manners with a laugh. (Castigat 10 ridendo mores.) Law is founded not on theory but upon na- JEAN BAPTISTE DE SANTEUL, Motto, of the ture. (Neque opinione sed natura constitutum Opéra-Comique, Paris. esse jus.) Fight Virtue's cause, stand up in Wit's defence, CICERO, De Legibus. Bk. i, ch. 10, sec. 28. Win us from vice and laugh us into sense. Law is nothing but a correct principle drawn THOMAS TICKELL, On the Prospect of Peace. from the inspiration of the gods, commanding St. 38. what is honest, and forbidding the contrary. 2 Let us not be laughing-stocks to other men's CICERO, Philippica. No. xi, sec. 12. 11 humours. Reason is the life of the law; nay, the com- SHAKESPEARE, The Merry Wives of Windsor mon law itself is nothing but reason. Act iii, SC. 1, 1. 88. 3 The law. which is perfection of reason. There are few who would not rather be hated SIR EDWARD COKE, Institutes. Pt. i. than laughed at. How long soever it hath continued, if it be SYDNEY SMITH, Sketches of Moral Philosophy. against reason, it is of no force in law. Lecture 11. SIR EDWARD COKE, Institutes. Pt. i. 4 Law governs man and reason the law. For still the world prevail'd, and its dread THOMAS FULLER, Gnomologia. No. 3149. laugh, Which scarce the firm philosopher can scorn. Let us consider the reason of the case. For noth- ing is law that is not reason. THOMSON, The Seasons: Autumn, 1. 233. Sir JOHN POWELL, Coggs us. Bernard (2 Ld. Raym. Rep. p. 911.) LAW 12 The law is for the protection of the weak I-Law: Definitions 5 more than the strong. Law is a form of order. and good law must SIR WILLIAM ERLE, Reg. v. Woolley. (4 Cox, necessarily mean good order. C.C. 196) 13 ARISTOTLE, Politica. Bk. vii, ch. 4, sec. 5. 6 The law groweth of sin, and doth punish it. There are two, and only two, foundations of JOHN FLORIO, First Fruites. Fo. 32. (1578) law, equity and utility. The law's made to take care of raskills. EDMUND BURKE, Tracts on the Popery Laws. GEORGE ELIOT, Mill on the Floss. Bk. iii, ch. 4. Pt. i, ch. 3. 14 The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the Laws, like houses, lean on one another. rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges. EDMUND BURKE, Tracts on the Popery Laws. Pt. i, ch. 3. to beg in the streets. nd to steal bread. 7 ANATOLE FRANCE. (COURNOS, Modern Plu- Law is whatever is boldly asserted and plaus- tarch, p. 27.) 15 ibly maintained. The Law is what it is-a majestic edifice. AARON BURR. (PARTON, Life and Times of sheltering all of us, each stone of which Aaron Burr. Vol. i, p. 149.) rests on another. 8 The absolute justice of the State, enlight- JOHN GALSWORTHY, Justice. Act ii. It is the ened by the perfect reason of the State: that Judge speaking. 16 is law. Law, licensed breaking of the peace. RUFUS CHOATE, Conservative Force of the MATTHEW GREEN, The Spleen, 1. 286. American Bar. 9 Law, grown a forest, where perplex The laws place the safety of all before the The mazes, and the brambles vex. safety of individuals. (Leges omnium salutem MATTHEW GREEN, The Spleen, 1. 292. 17 singulorum saluti anteponunt.) Laws spring from the instinct of self-preser- CICERO, De Finibus. Bk. iii, ch. 19, sec. 64. vation. The safety of the people shall be the highest R. G. INGERSOLL, Some Mistakes of Moses. law. (Salus populi suprema lex esto.) 18 CICERO, De Legibus. Bk. iii, sec. 3. Derived by The law is the last result of human wisdom tradition from the Twelve Tables of Roman acting upon human experience for the benefit law. of the public. Judges ought above all to remember the Con- SAMUEL JOHNSON, Miscellanies, i, 223. Dorothy Baher 5 1080 LAW LAW Laws are not made for particular cases, but for A law should be brief in order that the unlearned men in general. may grasp it more easily. (Legem enim brevem SAMUEL JOHNSON. (BOSWELL, Life, 1776.) esse oportet, quo facilius ab imperitis teneatur.) 1 POSIDONIUS. (SENECA, Epistulæ ad Lucilium No law can possibly meet the convenience Epis. xciv, sec. 38.) of every one: we must be satisfied if it be 9 beneficial on the whole and to the majority. Law, in a free country, is, or ought to be, the LIVY, History. Bk. xxxiv, sec. 3. determination of the majority of those who The law is blind, and speaks in general terms; have property in land. She cannot pity where occasion serves. SWIFT, Thoughts on Various Subjects. 10 THOMAS MAY, The Heir. Act iv. (1620) Law is the crystallization of the habit and 2 The Habeas Corpus Act the most strin- thought of society. gent curb that ever legislation imposed on WOODROW WILSON, Lecture, Princeton, 1893. tyranny. II-Law: Apothegms MACAULAY, History of England. Ch. 6. 11 3 The law is open. The man who does no wrong needs no law. New Testament: Acts, xix, 38. ('O unõèv àðikw» oúõevos SEiTaL vóuov.) 12 MENANDER, Fragments. No. 845. The devil hath eleven points of the law All laws are useless, for good men do not need against you. that is. possession. them and bad men are made no better by them. THOMAS ADAMS, Works, p. 97. (1630) DEMONAX. (PLUTARCH, Apothegms.) Possession is nine points of the law. When men are pure, laws are useless; when men THOMAS FULLER, Holy War. Bk. v, ch. 29. are corrupt, laws are broken. Both these proverbs were in frequent use. BENJAMIN DISRAELI, Contarini Fleming. Possession is eleven points of the law and there Just laws are no restraint upon the freedom of are but twelve. the good, for the good man desires nothing which JOHN RAY, English Proverbs. a just law will interfere with. That possession was the strongest tenure of the J. A. FROUDE, Short Studies on Great Subjects: law. Reciprocal Duties of State and Subject. PILPAY, Fables: The Cat and the Two Birds. It is only rogues who feel the restraint of law. Eight points of the law: 1. A good cause; 2. J. G. HOLLAND, Gold-Foil: Perject Liberty. A good purse; 3. An honest and skilful attorney; 4. Good evidence; 5. Able counsel; 6. An up- The good needs fear no law, right judge; 7. An intelligent jury; 8. Good It is his safety and the bad man's awe. luck. MASSINGER, The Old Law. Act v, SC. 1. Attributed to GEORGE AUGUSTUS SELWYN, 4 Virtue alone is not sufficient for the exercise when a candidate for Chamberlain of the City of London, C. 1750. of government; laws alone carry themselves 13 into practice. Law Is a Bottomless Pit. MENCIUS, Works. Bk. iv, pt. i, ch. 1, sec. 3. JOHN ARBUTHNOT, Title of Pamphlet, 1712. 5 He that goes to law (as the proverb is) holds a Law can discover sin, but not remove, wolf by the ears. Save by those shadowy expiations weak. ROBERT BURTON, Anatomy of Melancholy: MILTON, Paradise Lost. Bk. xii, 1. 290. Democritus to the Reader. So many laws argue so many sins. The worst of law is that one suit breeds twenty. MILTON, Paradise Lost. Bk. xii, 1. 283. GEORGE HERBERT, Jacula Prudentum. 6 Lawsuits consume time, and money, and rest Laws were made that the stronger might not and friends. in all things have his way. (Inde datæ leges, GEORGE HERBERT, Jacula Prudentum. ne firmior omnia posset.) Whoso loves law dies either mad or poor. OVID, Fasti. Bk. iii, 1. 279. THOMAS MIDDLETON, The Phoenix. 7 14 The laws obey custom. (Leges mori serviunt.) There is no magic in parchment or in wax. PLAUTUS, Trinummus. Act iv, SC. 3, 1. 36. WILLIAM HENRY ASHURST, Master v. Miller, With customs we live well, but laws undo us. 1763. (4 T. R. 320.) GEORGE HERBERT, Jacula Prudentum. The mysterious virtue of wax and parchment. 8 EDMUND BURKE, Speech on Conciliation with A law should be a voice, as it were, sent down America. from heaven; it should command, not dis- Is not this a lamentable thing, that of the skin cuss. (Velut emissa divinitus vox sit; jubeat, of an innocent lamb should be made parchment; non disputet.) that parchment, being scribbled o'er, should POSIDONIUS. (SENECA, Epistulæ ad Lucilium. undo a man? Epis. xciv, sec. 38.) SHAKESPEARE, 11 Henry VI. Act iv, SC. 2, 1. 86. LAW LAW 1081 1 Forsyth (Life), "have perhaps been oftener Nowadays the law is ended as a man is misapplied than any in the Latin language. friended. They are constantly translated or used in HENRY BRINKELOW, Complaint of Roderick the sense of, 'What good is it?' 'To what Mors. Ch. 11. (c. 1542) end does it serve?' Their real meaning is, Matters be ended as they be friended. 'Who gains by it?' "To whom is it an ad- THOMAS STARKEY, England in the Reign of vantage?' Forsyth goes on to explain that Henry VIII. Bk. i, ch. 3. in a trial for murder Lucius Cassius in- A friend in court is worth a penny in a man's structed the jury to inquire who had a motive for the crime, who would gain by the purse. JOHN RAY, English Proverbs. death, in other words, "cui bono fuerit?" Bon fait avoir ami en cour, There was an ancient Roman lawyer. of great Car le procès en est plus court. fame in the history of Roman jurisprudence, A French variant of the proverb. whom they called Cui Bono, from his having first See also under COURT. introduced into judicial proceedings the argu- 2 ment, "What end or object could the party have Law and arbitrary power are in eternal en- had in the act with which he is accused." mity. EDMUND BURKE, Impeachment of Warren EDMUND BURKE, Impeachment of Warren Hastings. 7 Hastings, 16 Feb., 1788. 3 Laws go as kings like. (Allá van leyes do That which is a law to-day is none to-morrow. quieren Reyes.) ROBERT BURTON, Anatomy of Melancholy: CERVANTES, Don Quixote. Pt. i, ch. 45. Democritus to the Reader. She made what pleased her lawful. (Che libito fe' The law is not the same at morning and at licito in sua legge.) night. DANTE, Inferno. Canto v, 1. 56. From the Latin, GEORGE HERBERT, Jacula Prudentum. "Si libet, licet." 8 New lords, new laws. JOHN RAY, English Proverbs. Who to himself is law, no law doth need, Offends no law, and is a king indeed. And he that gives us in these days GEORGE CHAPMAN, Bussy d'Ambois. Act ii, SC. 1. New Lords may give us new laws. 9 GEORGE WITHER, Contented Man's Morrice. After an existence of nearly twenty years 4 of almost innocuous desuetude these laws are Arms and laws do not flourish together. (Tov aúròv бтл ши Kai vóuwv kalpov eival.) brought forth. JULIUS C.ÆSAR. (PLUTARCH, Lives: Julius GROVER CLEVELAND, Message, 1 March, 1886. Casar. Ch. 35, sec. 3.) I used those words and thought they would The law speaks too softly to be heard amid the please the Western taxpayers, who are fond of din of arms. (Toû біа TOV TWV бтлач фофог such things. où GROVER CLEVELAND, referring to "innocuous GAIUS MARIUS. (PLUTARCH, Lives: Gaius desuetude." (Interview, New York Herald, Marius. Ch. 28, sec. 2.) 9 June, 1886.) Laws are dumb in the midst of arms. (Silent The law hath not been dead, though it hath enim leges inter arma.) slept. CICERO, Pro Milone. Ch. 4, sec. 11. SHAKESPEARE, Measure for Measure. Act ii, The clatter of arms drowns the voice of the SC. 2, 1. 90. law. 10 MONTAIGNE, Essays. Bk. iii, ch. 1. The gladsome light of jurisprudence. 5 SIR EDWARD COKE, Institutes. Pt. i. Agree. for the law is costly. 11 WILLIAM CAMDEN, Remains, p. 316. (1605) Law is the safest helmet. (Lex est tutissima cassis.) Agree, agree. says the old saw, the law is costly. SIR EDWARD COKE, Inscription, on rings which ROGER L'ESTRANGE, Fables of AESOP. (1692) he gave to friends. Come, agree, the law's costly. 12 SWIFT, Polite Conversation. Dial. i. (1738) All things by Law. (Пávтa vomori.) 6 DEMOCRITUS. (MARCUS AURELIUS, Medita- Who stood to gain? (Cui bono fuerit?) tions. Bk. vii, sec. 31.) LUCIUS CASSIUS LONGINUS, the judge, who 13 used it as a maxim in instructing a jury to A delusion, a mockery, and a snare. seek for the motive of a crime. (CICERO, SIR THOMAS DENMAN, an English judge, in his Pro Milone. Ch. xii, sec. 32.) judgment in O'Connell vs. the Queen (11 Clarke and Finnelly, 351): "If it is possible For whose good? (Cui bono?) that such a practice as that which has taken CICERO, quoting from Lucius Cassius in the place in the present instance should be al- Second Philippic. "These two words," says lowed to pass without a remedy, trial by 1082 LAW LAW jury itself, instead of being a security to Ill manners produce good laws. persons who are accused. will be a delusion, CHARLES CAHIER, Six Mille Proverbes, p. 195. 1 a mockery, and a snare." (4 Sept., 1894) As manners make laws, manners likewise re- That 1 peal them. "If the law supposes that," said Mr. Bumble, SAMUEL JOHNSON. (BOSWELL, Life, ii, 419.) SH "the law is a ass." 12 2 DICKENS, Oliver Twist. Ch. 51. As the case stands. The 2 Any laws but those we make for ourselves are MIDDLETON AND MASSINGER, The Old Law. Act ii, SC. 1. (1626); MATTHEW HENRY, Com. Hav laughable. mentaries: Psalm cxix. Si EMERSON, Essays, Second Series: Politics. Every case stands upon its own bottom. 3 3 Law makes long spokes of the short stakes SIR FRANCIS PEMBERTON, Judgment, Fitz- Stil S of men. harris case. (8 How. St. Tr., 280) 13 Jus EMPSON, Legal Fiction. 4 No customer brings so much grist to the mill Laws too gentle are seldom obeyed; too se- As the wealthy old woman who makes her 4 vere. seldom executed. own Will. Sa BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, Poor Richard, 1756. CHARLES NEAVES, The Jolly Testator. 5 14 A penny-weight of love is worth a pound of A famous case. (Cause célèbre.) law. FRANÇOIS DE PETEVAL. Title of a work in 20 THOMAS FULLER, Gnomologia. No. 343. vols., Paris, 1734. The full title is Causes 4 Célèbres et Intéressantes. In a thousand pounds of law there is not an I 15 ounce of love. Where law ends, there tyranny begins. JOHN RAY, English Proverbs. 6 WILLIAM PITT, Case of Wilkes: Speech, 9 Jan, Much law but little justice. 1770. 16 THOMAS FULLER, Gnomologia. You little know how hazardous it is to go to Law cannot persuade where it cannot punish. law. (Nescis quam meticulosa res sit ire ad THOMAS FULLER, Gnomologia. judicem.) The more laws the more offenders. PLAUTUS, Mostellaria, 1. 1101. THOMAS FULLER, Gnomologia. 17 7 I will drive a coach and six through the Act Thou knowest a barley straw of Settlement. Will make a parish parson go to law. STEPHEN RICE, Chief Baron of the Irish Ex- WILLIAM GODDARD, Nest of Wasps. No. 16. chequer, 1686. (MACAULAY, History of Eng- (1615) land. Ch. 12; BURNET, History of My Own 8 Times.) Do law away, what is a king? Where is the right of any thing? I can drive a coach-and-six through any act of JOHN GOWER, Confessio Amantis. Bk. vii. Parliament. 9 DANIEL O'CONNELL, Speech. Taken in flagrant violation of the law. (In 18 flagranti crimine comprehensi.) The law often allows what honor forbids. JUSTINIAN, Corpus Juris Civilis Romani. (La loi permet souvent ce que défend l'hon- Codex ix, tit. 13, sec. 1. Usually quoted, neur.) "In flagrante delicto." Its English equiva- SAURIN, Spartacus. Act iii, SC. 3. lent, "Caught red-handed," referred orig- 19 inally only to murderers. Ignorance of the law excuses no man: not 10 that all men know the law, but because 'tis The law is a sort of hocus-pocus science, that an excuse every man will plead, and no man smiles in yer face while it picks yer pocket; can tell how to confute him. and the glorious uncertainty of it is of mair JOHN SELDEN. Table-Talk: Law. use to the professors than the justice of it. Ignorance of the law excuses no one. (Ignorantia CHARLES MACKLIN, Love à la Mode. Act ii, legis excusat neminem.) SC. 1. (1759) This is probably the origin UNKNOWN. A legal maxim. of the phrase, "The glorious uncertainty of the law," though there is a legend that it "Tis a sluggard's part not to know what he may was used as a toast by a lawyer named lawfully do. (Inertis est nescire quid liceat Wilbraham at a dinner given to Lord sibi.) Mansfield in London, in 1756. (See Gentle- SENECA, Octavia, 1. 453. man's Magazine, August, 1830.) 20 11 The rusty curb of old father antic, the law. Good laws are produced by bad manners. SHAKESPEARE, I Henry IV. Act i, SC. 2, 1. 69. (Bonae leges ex malis moribus procreantur.) A rotten case abides no handling. MACROBIUS, Saturnalia. Bk. iii, 1. 17. SHAKESPEARE, II Henry IV. Act iv, SC. 1, 1. 161. LAW LAW 1083 1 Has he affections in him. Divine Law That thus can make him bite the law by the 11 nose? There is but one law for all, namely, that SHAKESPEARE, Measure for Measure, iii, 1, 108. law which governs all law, the law of our 2 Creator, the law of humanity, justice, equity The laws, your curb and whip, in their rough -the law of nature and of nations. power EDMUND BURKE, Impeachment of Warren Have uncheck'd theft. Hastings, 28 May, 1794. SHAKESPEARE, Timon of Athens, iv, 3, 446. 12 The ultimate, angels' law, 3 Indulging every instinct of the soul Still you keep o' the windy side of the law. There where law, life, joy, impulse are one SHAKESPEARE, Twelfth Night, iii, 4, 1S1. thing! Just to the windward of the law. ROBERT BROWNING, A Death in the Desert. CHARLES CHURCHILL, The Ghost. Bk. iii, 1. 56. 13 4 Our human laws are but the copies, more or Abraham: Do you bite your thumb at us, sir? less imperfect, of the eternal laws, so far as Sampson: Is the law of our side. if I say ay? we can read them. SHAKESPEARE, Romeo and Juliet, i, 1, 54. J. A. FROUDE, Short Studies: Calvinism. The laws are with us, and God on our side. The law of heaven and earth is life for life. ROBERT SOUTHEY, Essays: On the Rise and BYRON, The Curse of Minerva. St. 15. Progress of Popular Disaffection. 4a EYE FOR EYE, see under RETRIBUTION. I will not say with Lord Hale, that "The law 14 will admit of no rival," but I will say Of Law there can be no less acknowledged, that it is a jealous mistress. and requires a long than that her seat is the bosom of God, her and constant courtship. It is not to be won by voice the harmony of the world. trifling favors, but by lavish homage. RICHARD HOOKER, Ecclesiastical Polity. Bk. i. 15 JOSEPH STORY, The Value and Importance of All things obey fixed laws. (Legibus omnia Legal Studies. (Miscellaneous Writings, p. parent.) 523.) This was Justice Story's address at his MANILIUS, Astronomica, i, 479. inauguration, 15 Aug., 1829. as Dane Profes- sor of Law at Harvard University. See Dicta, In all things there is a kind of law of cycles. Nov., 1945. Often attributed to Blackstone. (Rebus cunctis inest quidam velut orbis.) See Illinois Law Review, xxvii, 329. TACITUS, Annals. Bk. iii, sec. 55. 5 Things have their laws as well as men, and A man must not go to law because the musi- things refuse to be trifled with. cian keeps false time with his foot. EMERSON, Essays, Second Series: Politics. 16 JEREMY TAYLOR, Worthy Communicant. Ch. The first Almighty Cause iv, sec. 4. Quoted from Schott, Adagia. 6 Acts not by partial but by gen'ral laws. No man e'er felt the halter draw, POPE, Essay on Man. Epis. i, 1. 145. With good opinion of the law. Mark what unvaried laws preserve each state, JOHN TRUMBULL, MacFingal. Canto iii, 1. 489. Laws wise as Nature, and as fix'd as Fate. 7 POPE, Essay on Man. Epis. iii, 1. 189. The Law: It has honored us. may we honor it. 17 DANIEL WEBSTER, Toast, at the Charleston Bar That very law which moulds a tear dinner, 10 May, 1847. And bids it trickle from its source,- 8 That law preserves the earth a sphere, What we seek is the reign of law, based upon And guides the planets in their course. the consent of the governed and sustained SAMUEL ROGERS, On a Tear. Rogers is referring by the organized opinion of mankind. to the law of gravitation. WOODROW WILSON, Speech, Mount Vernon, 4 18 July, 1918, referring to League of Nations. On a divine law divination rests. The Reign of Law. SCHILLER, Wallenstein. Act i, SC. 9. JAMES LANE ALLEN. Title of novel. 19 9 In the corrupted currents of this world When the law shows her teeth. but dares not Offence's gilded hand may shove by justice, bite. And oft 'tis seen the wicked prize itself YOUNG, Love of Fame. Sat. i, 1. 17. Buys out the law: but 'tis not so above; III-Law: Varieties There is no shuffling. there the action lies 10 In his true nature; and we ourselves compell'd, For thus men say each country has its laws. Even to the teeth and forehead of our taults, CHAUCER, Troilus and Criseyde. Bk. ii, st. 6. To give in evidence. (c. 1374) SHAKESPEARE, Hamlet. Act iii, SC. 3, 1. 57. So many countries, so many laws. 20 UNKNOWN, Politeuphuia, 224. (1669) See also God is law, say the wise; 0 Soul, and let under OPINION. us rejoice, 1084 LAW LAW For if He thunder by law the thunder is yet 6 His voice. 0 king, establish the decree, and sign the TENNYSON, The Higher Pantheism. St. 7. writing, that it be not changed. according to 1 the law of the Medes and Persians, which Foul shame and scorn be on ye all altereth not. Who turn the good to evil, Old Testament: Daniel, vi, 8. And steal the Bible from the Lord, The thing is true, according to the law of Medes To give it to the Devil! and Persians, which altereth not. Than garbled text or parchment law Old Testament: Daniel, vi, 12. I own a statute higher; Let it be written among the laws of the Persians And God is true. though every book and the Medes, that it be not altered. And every man's a liar! Old Testament: Esther, i. 19. WHITTIER, A Sabbath Scene. St. 18. 7 Draco made his laws not with ink, but with The Law of Nations blood. 2 The law of human society. (Jus humanæ DEMADES. Draco had made the least theft societatis.) punishable with death. (PLUTARCH, Lives: CICERO, De Officiis. Bk. i, ch. 7, sec. 21. Solon.) Hence "Draconian," in the sense of 3 severe. 8 Natural law; the law of mankind. (Jus hominum.) Connecticut in her blue-laws. laying it down CICERO, Tusculanarum Disputationum. Bk. i, as a principle, that the laws of God should ch. 26, sec. 64. be the law of the land. 4 THOMAS JEFFERSON, Letter to John Adams, The bond of union is closer between those 24 Jan., 1814. who belong to the same nation. and closer 9 still between those who are citizens of the There is a written and an unwritten law. same state. It is for this reason that our Written law is that under which we live in forefathers chose to understand one thing different cities, but that which has arisen by the law of nations (jus gentium), and an- from custom is called unwritten law. (Nóµov other by the civil or common law (jus civile). ôvo, à µèv yap айтой respannévos, o 0€ CICERO, De Officis. Bk. iii, ch. 17, sec. 69. aypados.) In every matter the consensus of opinion among PLATO. (DIOGENES LAERTIUS, Plato. Sec. 86.) all nations is to be regarded as the law of nature. Dementia Americana; the unwritten law. (Omni autem in re consensio omnium gentium DELPHIN MICHAEL DELMAS. At the trial of lex naturae putanda est.) Harry Thaw for the murder of Stanford CICERO, Tusculanarum Disputationum. Bk. i, White, in 1907. ch. 13, sec. 30. Brain-storm, the paranoia of the millionaire. That which natural reason has established WILLIAM TRAVERS JEROME. The district at- amongst all men is called the law of nations. torney who prosecuted Thaw. (Quod naturalis ratio inter omnes homines con- The silver-tongued spell-binder of the Pacific stituit vocatur jus gentium.) Coast. GAIUS, Institutione Juris Civilis. Bk. i, sec. 1. Sobriquet of Delphin Michael Delmas. 10 Against the law of nature, law of nations. First Clown: Argal, he that is not guilty of MILTON, Samson Agonistes, 1. 889. his own death shortens not his own life. Miscellaneous Laws Second Clown: But is this law? 5 I oft have heard of Lydford Law, First Clown: Ay, marry is't; crowner's quest law. How in the morn they hang and draw, And sit in judgement after. SHAKESPEARE, Hamlet. Act v, SC. 1, 1. 21. 11 SIR THOMAS BROWNE, Lydford Journey. St. 1. A sumptuary law. (Lex sumptuaria.) (1644) TACITUS, Annals. Bk. iii, sec. 52. First hang and draw, 12 Then hear the cause by Lidford law. For this is the law of the feudal days, THOMAS FULLER, Worthies of England, i. 399. The law for one and all. (1662) That whoso lives on the baron's land, I have had Halifax law-to be condemned first May feed as he will at the baron's hand, and inquired upon afterwards. But whoso feeds at the baron's hand, LEICESTER. (MOTLEY, United Netherlands. Vol. Must answer the baron's call. i, p. 444.) THOMAS F. WOODLOCK, The Law. Are you going to hang him anyhow-and try him IV-Law: The Net of Law afterwards? 13 MARK TWAIN, Innocents at Home. Ch. 5. Laws are like spiders' webs; they hold the LAW LAW 1085 weak and délicate who are caught in their While the great break out again. meshes, but are torn in pieces by the rich RICHARD BRATHWAITE, Care's Cure. and powerful. Laws like to cobwebs, catch small flies, ANACHARSIS, to Solon, when the latter was Great ones break them before your eyes. compiling his laws. (PLUTARCH, Lives: BENJAMIN FRANKLIN, Poor Richard, 1734. Solon. Ch. 5, sec. 2.) For the most part, laws are but like spiders' Men keep their engagements when it is to the webs, taking the small gnats. or perhaps some- advantage of both parties not to break them. times the fat flesh flies, but hornets that have SOLON, Answering Anacharsis. (PLUTARCH, sharp stings and greater strength, break through Lives: Solon.) See also No. 7, below. them. 1 Laws grind the poor, and rich men rule the SIR JOHN HARINGTON, Orlando Furioso. Bk. 32. law. Laws are like cobwebs, which may catch small GOLDSMITH, The Traveller, 1. 386. flies, but let wasps and hornets break through. 2 SWIFT, Essay on the Faculties of the Mind. The verdict acquits the raven, but condemns 8 the dove. (Dat veniam corvis, vexat censura The net's not spread to catch the hawk or kite columbas.) Who do us wrong, but for the innocent birds JUVENAL, Satires. Sat. ii, 1. 63. Who do us none at all. 3 (Quia non rete accipitri tennitur neque milvo, In vain thy reason finer webs will draw, Qui male faciunt nobis: illis qui nihil faciunt Entangle justice in her net of law, tennitur.) And right, too rigid, harden into wrong, TERENCE, Phormio, 1. 330. (Act iii, SC. 1.) Still for the strong too weak, the weak too 9 strong. The law doth punish man or woman POPE, Essay on Man. Epis. iii, 1. 191. That steals the goose from off the common, 4 But lets the greater felon loose, The net of law is spread so wide, That steals the common from the goose. No sinner from its sweep may hide. UNKNOWN. An 18th century epigram. (See Its meshes are so fine and strong, Notes and Queries. Ser. vii, 6, 469; 7, 98. They take in every child of wrong. Ser. viii, 10, 273.) There are various versions, 0 wondrous web of mystery! all prompted by the Enclosure Acts. The Big fish alone escape from thee! version given above was written when Sir JAMES JEFFREY ROCHE, The Net of Law. Charles Pratt, First Earl of Camden, 5 enclosed a common strip of land in front of Petty sacrilege is punished, but sacrilege on Camden House, 7 Oct., 1764. a grand scale is honored by a triumphal pro- 10 cession. (Nam sacrilegia minuta puniuntur, There is no law without a loophole for him magna in triumphis feruntur.) who can find it. (Es giebt kein Gesetz was SENECA, Epistulæ ad Lucilium. Epis. lxxxvii, hat nicht ein Loch. wer's finden kann.) sec. 24. UNKNOWN. A German proverb. All, look up with reverential awe, At crimes that 'scape, or triumph o'er the law. V-Law: Its Tyranny POPE, Epilogue to Satires. Dial. i, 1. 167. 11 6 Law is king of all. Laws are generally found to be nets of such HENRY ALFORD, School of the Heart. Lesson 6. a texture, as the little creep through, the great break through, and the middle-sized Law is King. (Lex Rex.) SAMUEL RUTHERFORD. Title of book published are alone entangled in. 1644. WILLIAM SHENSTONE. On Politics. 12 7 There is no worse torture than the torture Laws are spiders' webs, which stand firm of laws. when any light and yielding object falls upon FRANCIS BACON, Essays: Oj Judicature. them, while a larger thing breaks through them and escapes. It is a hard thing to torture the laws so that SOLON. (DIOGENES LAERTIUS, Solon. Sec. 14.) they torture men. FRANCIS BACON, De Augmentis Scientiarum. One of the Seven [Wise Men of Greece] was Pt. i, bk. viii, aph. 13. wont to say: "That laws were like cobwebs; 13 where the small flies were caught, and the great We, like the eagles, were born to be free. Yet brake through." we are obliged, in order to live at all, to FRANCIS BACON, Apothegms. No. 181. make a cage of laws for ourselves and to Should I sigh, because I see stand on the perch. Laws like spider-webs to be? WILLIAM BOLITHO, Twelve Against the Gods: Lesser flies are quickly ta'en Introduction. 1086 LAW LAW As soon as laws are necessary for men, men are For law's sake only, to be held in bonds? no longer fit for freedom. SWINBURNE, Mary Stuart. Act i, SC. 1. PYTHAGORAS. 1 VI-Law: Letter and Spirit People crushed by law have no hopes but 18 from power. If laws are their enemies, they No man has ever yet been hanged for break- will be enemies to laws; and those who have mg the spirit of a law. much to hope and nothing to lose will al- GROVER CLEVELAND. (RHODES, History of the ways be dangerous. United States, viii, 403; HIBBEN, Peerless EDMUND BURKE, Letter, to the Hon. C. J. Leader, p. 155.) Fox, 8 Oct., 1777. 14 The letter killeth. but the spirit giveth life. Bad laws are the worst sort of tyranny. New Testament: II Corinthians, iii, 6. (Litera EDMUND BURKE, Speech, Bristol. enim occidit, Spiritus autem vivificat. 2 Extreme law. extreme injustice. (Summum -Vulgate.) jus. summa injuria.) Legality kills us. (La légalité nous tue.) CICERO, De Officiis. Bk. i, sec. 10. See under VIENNET, Épitres. 15 JUSTICE AND INJUSTICE. 3 We are lost by what is lawful. (Perimus lici- Our sense of private dignity can survive the tis.) most oppressive man-despot, but the despot- SIR MATTHEW HALE, quoted from St. Gregory, ism of law corrodes it. Morals. Bk. V, homily 35, meaning, "We NORMAN DOUGLAS, Good-bye to Western are demoralised by indulgence in things Culture. which are not contrary to law." 16 4 Shall free-born men, in humble awe, To the law and to the testimony. Submit to servile shame; Old Testament: Isaiah, viii, 20. 17 Who from consent and custom draw Exact laws, like all the other ultimates and ab- The same right to be ruled by law, solutes, are as fabulous as the crock of gold Which kings pretend to reign? at the rainbow's end. DRYDEN, On the Young Statesman. G. N. LEWIS, The Anatomy of Science, p. 154. 5 18 All rights and laws are still transmitted, But now we are delivered from the law, that Like an eternal sickness to the race. being dead wherein we were held; that we (Es erben sich Gesetz und Rechte should serve in newness of spirit, and not Wie eine ew'ge Krankheit fort.) in the oldness of the letter. GOETHE, Faust. Pt. i, SC. 4, 1. 449. 6 New Testament: Romans, vii, 6. 19 0 wearisome condition of humanity! Let him have all the rigour of the law. Born under one law. to another bound. SHAKESPEARE, II Henry VI. Act i, SC. 3, 1. 199. FULKE GREVILLE, Mustapha. Act v, SC. 4. 7 He follows close the rigour of the statute, Law is the tyrant of mankind, and often To make him an example. compels us to do many things which are SHAKESPEARE, Measure for Measure. Act i, against nature. SC. 4, 1. 66. HIPPIAS. (PLATO, Protagoras. Sec. 337.) Is it so nominated in the bond? 8 SHAKESPEARE, The Merchant of Venice. Act iv, The law is laid down to you. (Dicta tibi est SC. 1, 1. 259. lex.) 20 HORACE, Epistles. Bk. ii, epis. 2, 1. 18. The bloody book of law 9 You shall yourself read in the bitter letter. Then too [in law] there are a thousand SHAKESPEARE, Othello. Act i, SC. 3, 1. 67. causes of disgust, a thousand delays to be 21 endured. (Tunc quoque mille ferenda Tædia, In bondage to the letter still, mille moræ.) We give it power to cramp and kill,- To tax God's fulness with a scheme JUVENAL, Satires. Sat. xvi, 1. 43. 10 Narrower than Peter's house-top dream, The law is so lordly and loth to maken end. His wisdom and his love with plans LANGLAND, Piers Plowman. Passus iv, 1. 199. Poor and inadequate as man's. 11 WHITTIER, Miriam, 1. 97. We have strict statutes and most biting laws. SHAKESPEARE, Measure for Measure. Act i, VII-Law: Precedent SC. 3, 1. 19. 12 See also Precedent God's blood! is law for man's sake made, or 22 man An argument derived from authority is of LAW LAW 1087 the greatest force in law. (Argumentum ab 10 Laws are not masters but servants. and he auctoritate fortissimum est in lege.) rules them who obeys them. SIR EDWARD COKE, On Littleton, 144. HENRY WARD BEECHER, Proverbs from Plym- 1 The mere repetition of the Cantilena of the outh Pulpit: Political. 11 lawyers cannot make it law. Law will never be strong or respected unless SIR THOMAS DENMAN, O'Connell v. The it has the sentiment of the people behind it. Queen. 2 If the people of a State make bad laws, they The acts of today may become the prece- will suffer for it. They will be the first to dents of tomorrow. suffer. Let them suffer. Suffering, and noth- FARRER HERSCHELL, Lord Chancellor, Speech, ing else, will implant that sentiment of re- 23 May, 1878. sponsibility which is the first step to re- 3 form. All the sentences of precedent judges that JAMES BRYCE, American Commonwealth. Vol. have ever been cannot altogether make a law i, p. 352. contrary to natural equity. I know no method to secure the repeal of bad THOMAS HOBBES, Leviathan. Pt. ii, ch. 26. or obnoxious laws so effective as their stringent 4 execution. One precedent creates another. They soon U. S. GRANT, Inaugural Address, 4 March, accumulate and become law. 1869. JUNIUS, Letters: Dedication. 12 5 He who holds no laws in awe, A precedent embalms a principle. He must perish by the law. WILLIAM SCOTT, BARON STOWELL, Opinion, BYRON, A Very Mournful Ballad on the Siege while Advocate-General, 1788. (WILLIAM and Conquest of Alhama. St. 12. SCOTT, Lord Stowell.) BENJAMIN DISRAELI, 13 Speech, House of Commons, 22 Feb., 1848; Let a man keep the law,-any law,-and Endymion. Ch. 9. his way will be strewn with satisfactions. 6 EMERSON, Essays, First Series: Prudence. It must not be; there is no power in Venice 14 Can alter a decree established: Good men must not obey the laws too well. "Twill be recorded for a precedent, EMERSON, Essays, Second Series: Politics. And many an error by the same example No law can be sacred to me but that of my Will rush into the state. nature. Good and bad are but names very SHAKESPEARE, The Merchant of Venice. Act iv, readily transferable to that or this; the only SC. 1, 1. 218. right is what is after my own constitution; the 7 Every law which originated in ignorance and only wrong what is against it. EMERSON, Essays, First Series: Self-Reliance. malice, and gratifies the passions from which 15 it sprang, we call the wisdom of our ances- For the bond of all men's states is this, tors. When they with honor hold by law. SYDNEY SMITH, Peter Plymley Letters. No. 5. (Tò yap TOL ouvéxov πó́eis 8 TOÛT' Eoo, örav TIS TOÙS vóuovs owsn kalws.) Mastering the lawless science of our law, EURIPIDES, Suppliants, 1. 313. That codeless myriad of precedent, 16 That wilderness of single instances, The laws of God, the laws of man, Through which a few, by wit or fortune led, He may keep that will and can; May beat a pathway out to wealth and fame. Not I: let God and man decree TENNYSON, Aylmer's Field, 1. 436. Laws for themselves and not for me. A. E. HOUSMAN, Laws. 17 VIII-Law: Obedience to Law A strict observance of the written laws is 9 Where there are laws. he who has not broken doubtless one of the high virtues of a good them need not tremble. (Ove son leggi, Tre- citizen. but it is not the highest. The laws mar non dee chi leggi non infranse.) of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving ALFIERI, Virginia. Sc. 2. our country when in danger, are of higher ob- ligation. Who breaks no law is subject to no king. THOMAS JEFFERSON, Writings. Vol. xii, p. 418. CHAPMAN, Bussy d'Ambois. Act iv, SC. 1. 18 Fear God, and offend not the Prince nor his Without a notion of a law-maker, it is im- laws, possible to have a notion of a law, and an And keep thyself out of the magistrate's claws. obligation to observe it. THOMAS TUSSER, Five Hundred Points of JOHN LOCKE, An Essay Concerning Human Good Husbandry. Understanding. Bk. i, ch. iv, sec. 8. PN6081 M4 WHRC New DICTIONARY OF QUOTATIONS ON HISTORICAL PRINCIPLES FROM ANCIENT AND MODERN SOURCES Selected and Edited by H. L. MENCKEN NEW YORK : ALFRED A. KNOPF : 1976 Laughter 654 Law Law 655 Law Laughing has always been considered by the- One who is always laughing is a fool; and one Laws, like cobwebs, entangle the weak, but ologians as a crime. who never laughs a knave. are broken by the strong. The laws put the safety of all above the safety of one. R. G. INGERSOLL: Speech in Chicago, SPANISH PROVERB Ascribed to SOLON, c. 575 B.C. CICERO: De finibus, II, c. 50 B.C. Nov. 26, 1882 The laughter of a fool is like that of a horse. The foundation of law is not opinion but na- The more mandates and laws are enacted, the ture. The mere possibility of employing laughter as WELSH PROVERB more there will be thieves and robbers. CICERO: De legibus, c. 50 B.C. a weapon shows that it involves the idea of [See also Anarchy, Anger, Comedy, Drinking, LAO-TSZE: The Tao Teh King, c. 500 B.C. Time law. is the best interpreter of every doubtful power. Fool, Jest, Man, Medicine, Merry, Mirth, HARALD HÖFFDING: Psykologiske Under- Sorrow. The safety of the people is the highest law. DIONYSIUS OF HALICARNASSUS: Antiquities sögelser, 1889 The Twelve Tables, XII, 450 B.C. of Rome, II, c. 20 B.C. Laughter and Tears He who laughs best today will also laugh last. Laws can never be enforced unless fear sup- The purpose of law is to prevent the strong al- F. W. NIETZSCHE: The Twilight of the Even in laughter the heart is sorrowful; and ports them. SOPHOCLES: Ajax, c. 450 B.C. ways having their way. Idols, 1889 the end of that mirth is heaviness. The commands of the law are conventional and OVID: Fasti, III, c. 5 PROVERBS XIV, 13, c. 350 B.C. have no root in nature. Law is deaf, inexorable, calculated rather for Laughter is not a bad beginning for a friend- Woe unto you that laugh now! for ye shall ANTIPHON: Orations, c. 435 B.C. the safety and advantage of the poor than of ship, and it is the best ending for one. mourn and weep. LUKE VI, 25, c. 75 the rich, and admits of no relaxation or in- OSCAR WILDE: The Picture of Dorian Gray, The makers of laws are the majority who are dulgence if its bounds are transgressed. 1891 Learn weeping, and thou shalt gain laughing. weak; they make laws and distribute praises GEORGE HERBERT: Outlandish Proverbs, LIVY: History of Rome, II, c. 10 and censures with a view to themselves and Man alone suffers so excruciatingly in the world 1640 to their own interests; and they terrify the No law perfectly suits the convenience of every that he was compelled to invent laughter. He who laughs on Friday will weep on Sunday. stronger sort of men, and those who are able member of the community; the only consid- F. W. NIETZSCHE: The Will to Power, I, 1896 JEAN RACINE: Les plaideurs, I, 1668 to get the better of them, in order that they eration is, whether upon the whole it be may not get the better of them. profitable to the greater part. The attitudes, gestures and movements of a He can laugh and cry, and both in a wind. PLATO: Gorgias, c. 360 B.C. LIVY: History of Rome, XXXIV JOHN RAY: English Proverbs, 1670 human body are laughable in exact propor- The law is light. What a slight foundation for virtue it is to be tion as they make it remind us of a machine. I am forced to try to make myself laugh that I good only from fear of the law! PROVERBS VI, 23, c. 350 B.C. HENRI BERGSON: Le rire, 1900 may not cry: for one or other I must do; and SENECA: De Ira, II, c. 43 is it not philosophy carried to the highest It makes no difference whether a good man has Laughter is the bark of delight of a gregarious pitch for a man to conquer such tumults of defrauded a bad man or a bad man de- The law is good, if a man use it lawfully. animal at the proximity of his kind. soul as I am sometimes agitated by, and in frauded a good man, or whether a good or I TIMOTHY I, 8, c. 60 Laughter is the female of tragedy. the very height of the storm to quaver out a bad man has committed adultery: the law The law is not made for a righteous man, but Laughter is the mind sneezing. a horselaugh? can look only to the amount of damage done. for the lawless and disobedient, for the un- WYNDHAM LEWIS: Inferior Religions, 1920 SAMUEL RICHARDSON: Clarissa, LXXXIV, ARISTOTLE: The Nicomachean Ethics, v, godly and for sinners, for unholy and pro- 1748 c. 340 B.C. fane, for murderers of fathers and murderers He was born with the gift of laughter and a of mothers, for manslayers. sense that the world was mad. I laugh at everything, for fear of being obliged The actions ordained by law are just actions RAFAEL SABATINI: Scaramouche, I, 1921 only accidentally. I TIMOTHY I, 9 to weep. IBID. (This sentence is inscribed over the en- CARON DE BEAUMARCHAIS: Le barbier de Laws do not persuade because they threaten. trance to the Sterling Hall of Graduate Séville, I, 1775 The law is reason free from passion. SENECA: Epistulæ morales ad Lucilium, Studies at Yale University, though with- ARISTOTLE: Politics, III, c. 322 B.C. Laughter and tears are meant to turn the wheels c. 63 out credit to Sabatini) of the same sensibility; one is a wind-power Ancient laws remain in force long after the peo- The law is open. ACTS XIX, 38, c. 75 Progress is nothing but the victory of laughter and the other water-power, that is all. ple have the power to change them. over dogma. O. W. HOLMES: The Autocrat of the Break- ARISTOTLE: Politics, IV The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. BENJAMIN DECASSERES: Fantasia Im- fast-Table, IV, 1858 TACITUS: History, ш, c. 100 Good law means good order. promptu, 1933 Laugh, and the world laughs with you; ARISTOTLE: Politics, VII As physicians are the preservers of the sick, so are the laws of the injured. Weep, and you weep alone. He who laughs, lasts. For the sad old earth must borrow its mirth, It is best that laws should be so constructed as EPICTETUS: Encheiridion, c. 110 MARY PETTIBONE POOLE: A Glass Eye at But has troubles enough of its own. to leave as little as possible to the decision of those who judge. Good men need no laws, and bad men are not the Keyhole, 1938 ELLA WHEELER WILCOX: Solitude, 1883 made better by them. ARISTOTLE: Rhetoric, I, c. 322 B.C. Ef yo' take a cat to chu'ch, de folks gwine to An onion can make people cry, but there is yet Ascribed to DEMONAX OF CYPRUS, c. 150 laugh. AMERICAN NEGRO SAYING to be invented a vegetable that can make Law is a pledge that the citizens of a state will The precepts of the law are these: to live hon- them laugh. Author unidentified do justice to one another. orably, to injure no other man, to render to We must laugh before we are happy, lest we Ascribed to LYCOPHRON by ARISTOTLE: every man his due. should die without having laughed. [See also Widow, Woman. Politics, III, c. 322 B.C. THE INSTITUTES OF JUSTINIAN, 533 FRENCH PROVERB Lavender The law follows custom. No freeman shall be taken, or imprisoned, or Too much laughter deadens the mind. PLAUTUS: Trinummus, IV, c. 190 B.C. HEBREW PROVERB Let's go to that house, for the linen looks white, disseized, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any and smells of lavender, and I long to lie in According to the law of the Medes and Persians, way harmed, nor will we go upon or send A man with a loud laugh makes truth itself a pair of sheets that smell so. which altereth not. upon him, save by the lawful judgment of seem folly. IRISH PROVERB IZAAK WALTON: The Compleat Angler, IV, DANIEL VI, 8, c. 165 B.C. (Also in verse 12) his peers or by the law of the land. 1653 MAGNA CARTA, XXXIX, 1215 Laughter makes good blood. Law Law is nothing else but right reason, calling us ITALIAN PROVERB imperiously to our duty, and prohibiting Law is a regulation in accord with reason, is- Ye shall have one manner of law, as well for sued by a lawful superior for the common every violation of it. good. He that laughs alane will mak sport in com- the stranger, as for one of your own country. CICERO: Orationes Philippicae, XI, pany. SCOTTISH PROVERB LEVITICUS XXIV, 22, c. 700 B.C. THOMAS AQUINAS: Summa theologicæ, I, c. 60 B.C. Law Law Law 656 657 Law For the most part laws are but like spiders' That which is a law today is none tomorrow. Too many matters have been regulated by laws, The law is lordly. WILLIAM LANGLAND: Piers Plowman, 1377 webs, taking the small gnats, or perhaps IBID. which nature, long custom and general con- sometimes the fat flesh flies, but hornets that sent ought only to have governed. have sharp stings and greater strength break Law is a pickpurse. WILLIAM PETTY: Political Arithmetic, Lawmakers ought not to be law-breakers. JAMES HOWELL: Familiar Letters, I, 1645 through. pref., c. 1677 ENGLISH PROVERB, traced by Apperson to JOHN HARINGTON: Tr. of LUDOVICO ARI- (March 20, 1621) CHAUCER: The Canterbury Pilgrims (The OSTO: Orlando Furioso, XXXII (1532), Let not the law of thy country be the non-ultra Man of Law's Tale), c. 1386 1591 That law may be set down as good which is of thy honesty; nor think that always good certain in meaning, just in precept, conven- enough which the law will make good. There is nothing more difficult to undertake, I have perhaps some shallow spirit of judg- ient in execution, agreeable to the form of THOMAS BROWNE: Christian Morals, I, more uncertain to succeed, and more danger- government, and productive of virtue in c. 1680 ous to manage, than to prescribe new laws. Because he who innovates in that manner has But ment, in these nice sharp quillets of the law, those that live under it. FRANCIS BACON: De augmentis scien- Law is nothing else but the will of him that for his enemies all those who made any ad- Good faith, I am no wiser than a daw. SHAKESPEARE: I Henry VI, II, c. 1591 tiarum, VIII, 1623 hath the power of the supreme father. vantage by the old laws; and those who ex- ROBERT FILMER: Patriarcha, 1680 pect to benefit by the new will be but cool Law, logic and Switzers may be hired to fight The law obliges us to do what is proper, not and lukewarm in his defence. simply what is just. No written laws can be so plain, so pure, NICCOLÒ MACHIAVELLI: The Prince, VI, for anybody. ENGLISH PROVERB, traced by Apperson to HUGO GROTIUS: De jure belli ac pacis, I, But wit may gloss and malice may obscure. 1513 1593 1625 JOHN DRYDEN: The Hind and the Panther, II, 1687 All laws are promulgated for this end: that Of law there can be no less acknowledged No freeman whatsoever ought to be imprisoned every man may know his duty; and there- than that her seat is the bosom of God, her but according to the law of the land. The pretended power of suspending of laws fore the plainest and most obvious sense of or the execution of laws by regal authority voice the harmony of the world. JOHN SELDEN: Argument in Darnel's Case, the words is that which must be put on them. without consent of Parliament is illegal. RICHARD HOOKER: Of the Laws of Eccle- 1627 THOMAS MORE: Utopia, 1516 THE ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS, I, Dec., 1689 siastical Polity, I, 1594 Extremity of law is extremity of wrong. The law of God, we call the moral law, What are twenty acts of Parliament amongst Laws they are not which public approbation JOHN CLARKE: Paræmiologia Anglo- friends? must alone be the scope, and rule, and end, JOHN SELDEN: Table-Talk, 1689 hath not made so. IBID. Latina, 1639 of all laws. If anything be imprinted on the mind of all JOHN CALVIN: Institutes of the Christian In law, what plea so tainted and corrupt Here the great art lies, to discern in which the men as a law, all men must have a certain Religion, IV, 1536 But being season'd with a gracious voice law is to bid restraint and punishment, and and unavoidable knowledge that certain and Obscures the show of evil? in what things persuasion only is to work. unavoidable punishment will attend a breach Little money, little law. SHAKESPEARE: The Merchant of Venice, JOHN MILTON: Areopagitica, 1644 of it. Anon.: The Parliament of Byrdes, c. 1550 III, c. 1597 JOHN LOCKE: Essay Concerning Human The law is not the same at morning and at The law groweth of sin, and doth punish it. Old father antic, the law. Understanding, I, 1690 night. JOHN FLORIO: First Frutes, 1578 SHAKESPEARE: I Henry IV, I, c. 1598 GEORGE HERBERT: Jacula Prudentum, 1651 Law is but a heathen word for power. It is the rule of rules and the general law of In the corrupted currents of this world, DANIEL DEFOE: The History of the Kentish With customs we live well, but laws undo us. Offence's gilded hand may shove by justice; Petition, 1701 laws that every man shall obey that of the IBID. place where he is. And oft 'tis seen the wicked prize itself The voice of nations and the course of things MICHEL DE MONTAIGNE: Essays, I, 1580 Buys out the law. Where there is no common power there is no Allow that laws superior are to kings. SHAKESPEARE: Hamlet, III, c. 1601 law. THOMAS HOBBES: Leviathan, I, 1651 DANIEL DEFOE: The True-Born English- For law, king, people. (Pro lege, rege, grege.) Who to himself is law, no law doth need, man, II, 1701 MoTTo OF WILLIAM OF ORANGE (1533- Offends no law, and is a king indeed. A good law is that which is needful for the 1584) GEORGE CHAPMAN: Bussy D'Ambois, II, good of the people, and withal perspicuous. Law, in a free country, is, or ought to be, the 1604 THOMAS HOBBES: Leviathan, II determination of the majority of those who It would be better to have no laws at all than have property in land. it is to have so many as we have.* We must not make a scarecrow of the law, All the sentences of precedent judges that have JONATHAN SWIFT: Thoughts on Various MICHEL DE MONTAIGNE: Essays, III, 1588 Setting it up to fear the birds of prey, ever been cannot altogether make a law Subjects, 1706 Laws are now maintained in credit, not because And let it keep one shape, till custom make it contrary to natural equity. IBID. Law is a bottomless pit. they are essentially just, but because they Their perch and not their terror. Unnecessary laws are not good laws, but traps JOHN ARBUTHNOT: Title of a pamphlet, are laws. It is the mystical foundation of their SHAKESPEARE: Measure for Measure, II, for money. 1712 1604 IBID. authority; they have none other. They are often made by fools; more often by men who The law, being made, is but words and paper A penny-weight of love is worth a pound of in hatred of equality have want of equity; Some say men on the back of law May ride and rule it like a patient ass, without the hands and swords of men. law. but ever by men who are vain and irresolute. JAMES HARRINGTON: The Commonwealth JAMES KELLY: Complete Collection of There is nothing so grossly and largely of- And with a golden bridle in the mouth Direct it into anything they please. of Oceana, 1656 Scottish Proverbs, 1721 (Cf. RAY, fending, nor SO ordinarily wrongful, as the ante, 1670) NATHANIEL FIELD: A Woman Is a laws. IBID. Weathercock, п, 1609 Law can discover sin, but not remove. New laws are too apt to be voluminous, and so JOHN MILTON: Paradise Lost, XII, 1667 No man is so exquisitely honest or upright but perplexed and mutable, from whence pro- he brings his actions and thoughts within New lords, new laws. ceeds neglect, contempt and ignorance. JOHN HARINGTON: Nugæ Antiquæ, c. 1610 In a thousand pounds of law there's not an WILLIAM WARBURTON (BISHOP OF compass and danger of the laws, and that ounce of love. ten times in his life might not lawfully be The law is blind, and speaks in general terms. GLOUCESTER): The Causes of JOHN RAY: English Proverbs, 1670 hanged. IBID. THOMAS MAY: The Heir, c. 1620 Prodigies and Miracles, I, 1727 There is one law governing all things. He that goes to law holds a wolf by the ear. The common good of all is the supreme law. ROBERT BURTON: The Anatomy of Melan- RICHARD CUMBERLAND: De legibus Be you never so high, the law is above you. GIORDANO BRUNO: De monade numero et naturæ, I, 1672 THOMAS FULLER: Gnomologia, 1732 fgura, II, 1591 choly, 1621 (Quoted as a proverb) 658 Law Law Law 659 Law Ill kings make many good laws. IBID. Laws should be made by legislators, not by People, crushed by law, have no hopes but what the law is today can guess what it will judges. C. B. BECCARIA: Trattato dei delitti e delle from power. If laws are their enemies, they be tomorrow. Law cannot persuade where it cannot punish. will be enemies to laws; and those who have IBID. pene, 1764 ALEXANDER HAMILTON: The Federalist, much to hope and nothing to lose, will al- 1788 IBID. The law doth punish man or woman ways be dangerous, more or less. Much law, but little justice. That steals the goose from off the common, EDMUND BURKE: Letter to Charles James The general object which all laws have, or The more laws, the more offenders. IBID. But lets the greater felon loose Fox, Oct. 8, 1777 ought to have, in common, is to augment the That steals the common from the goose. total happiness of the community; and there- Force first made conquest, and that conquest Author unidentified, c. 1764 The law is to us precisely what I am in my barn- fore, in the first place, to exclude, so far as yard, a bridle and check to prevent the strong may be, everything that tends to subtract law. ALEXANDER POPE: An Essay on Man, III, Laws grind the poor, and rich men rule the law. and greedy from oppressing the timid and from that happiness: in other words, to ex- 1733 OLIVER GOLDSMITH: The Traveler, 1764 weak. clude mischief. ST. JOHN DE CRÈVECOEUR: Letters from an JEREMY BENTHAM: The Principles of By length of time and continuance laws are so How small, of all that human hearts endure, American Farmer, п, 1782 Morals and Legislation, XIII, 1789 multiplied and grown to that excessive vari- That part which kings or laws can cause or ety that there is a necessity of a reduction of cure! No man e'er felt the halter draw The law ought to prohibit only actions hurtful SAMUEL JOHNSON: Inserted in OLIVER With good opinion of the law. to society. What is not prohibited by the law them, or otherwise it is not manageable. MATTHEW HALE: History of the Pleas of GOLDSMITH: The Traveler, 1764 JOHN TRUMBULL: Fingal, III, 1782 should not be hindered, nor should any one the Crown, 1736 be compelled to that which the law does not Laws are generally nets of such a texture as the The law does not consist in particular instances, require. little creep through, the great break through, though it is explained by particular instances Law [is] licensed breaking of the peace. Declaration of the Rights of Man by the MATTHEW GREEN: The Spleen, 1737 and the middle-sized alone are entangled in. and rules, but the law consists of principles French National Assembly, V, 1789 WILLIAM SHENSTONE: Of Men and which govern specific and individual cases Laws can have no further effect than to re- Manners, 1764 as they happen to arise. The law is an expression of the will of the com- strain men from an open violation of right, LORD MANSFIELD: Judgment in Rex vs. munity. All citizens have a right to concur, Let all the laws be clear, uniform and precise: while what is done amiss in private, though Bembridge, 1783 either personally or by their representatives, to interpret laws is almost always to corrupt in its formation. It should be the same to all, equally tending to the public prejudice, es- them. Miserable is the condition of individuals, dan- whether it protects or punishes. capes their animadversion. VOLTAIRE: Philosophical Dictionary, 1764 gerous is the condition of the state, if there is WILLIAM WARBURTON (BISHOP OF Declaration of the Rights of Man by the GLOUCESTER): The Divine Lega- no certain law, or, which is the same thing, French National Assembly, VI Let the law never be contradictory to custom: tion of Moses, I, 1737 no certain administration of law, to protect for if the custom be good, the law is worth- individuals or to guard the state. No man should be accused, arrested, or held in less. IBID. LORD MANSFIELD: Judgment in Rex vs. confinement except in cases determined by The laws of a country ought to bear reference Shipley, 1784 the law, and according to the forms which it to its physical character, to the climate, A rule of civil conduct, prescribed by the su- has prescribed. All who promote, solicit, exe- whether warm, cold, or temperate; to the preme power in a state, commanding what is The first maxim of a free state is that the laws cute, or cause to be executed, arbitrary or- quality of the soil, to its situation, to its size, right and prohibiting what is wrong. be made by one set of men, and adminis- ders, ought to be punished; and every citi- to the kind of life led by the people, whether WILLIAM BLACKSTONE: Commentaries on the Laws of England, I, 1765 tered by another; in other words, that the zen called upon or apprehended by virtue of farmers, hunters, or laborers. C. L. DE MONTEQUIEU: The Spirit of the legislative and judicial characters be kept the law ought immediately to obey, and not Laws, I, 1748 Where law ends, tyranny begins. separate. render himself culpable by resistance. WILLIAM PITT (EARL OF CHATHAM): WILLIAM PALEY: The Principles of Moral Declaration of the Rights of Man by the Laws undertake to punish only overt acts. Speech in the House of Lords, in de- and Political Philosophy, VI, 1785 French National Assembly, VII C. L. DE MONTESQUIEU: The Spirit of the fense of John Wilkes, Jan. 9, 1770 The law is the last result of human wisdom act- The execution of the laws is more important Laws, XII When any people are ruled by laws in framing ing upon human experience for the benefit than the making them. Right is the rule of law, and law is declaratory which they have no part, that are to bind of the public. THOMAS JEFFERSON: Letter to the Abbé them to all intents and purposes, without, in SAMUEL JOHNSON: Mrs. Piozzi's Anecdotes, Arnond, 1789 of right. BENJAMIN WHICHCOTE: Moral and Reli- the same manner, binding the legislators 1786 gious Aphorisms, 1753 themselves, they are, in the strictest sense, One law for the lion and ox is oppression. slaves; and the government, with respect to Ignorance of the law is no excuse in any coun- WILLIAM BLAKE: The Marriage of Heaven Laws too gentle are seldom obeyed; too severe, try. If it were, the laws would lose their ef- and Hell, 1790 them, is despotic. seldom executed. ALEXANDER HAMILTON: The Farmer fect, because it can be always pretended. A law not repealed continues in force, not be- BENJAMIN FRANKLIN: Poor Richard's Refuted, 1775 THOMAS JEFFERSON: Letter to M. Limozin, cause it cannot be repealed, but because it Almanac, 1756 1787 Laws are formed by the manner and exigencies is not repealed, and the non-repealing passes The law is a sort of hocus-pocus science, that of particular times, and it is but accidental for consent. The sober second thought of the people shall smiles in yer face while it picks yer pocket. that they last longer than their causes. be law. THOMAS PAINE: The Rights of Man, I, 1791 CHARLES MACKLIN: Love à la Mode, II, SAMUEL JOHNSON: Letter to James Boswell, FISHER AMES: Speech in Congress, 1788 Laws, not blood! 1759 (Cf. HOWELL, ante, 1621) Feb. 3, 1775 Law and arbitrary power are in eternal enmity. M. J. DE CHÉNIER: Caius Gracchus, 1792 Laws are always useful to persons of property, Whenever the offence inspires less horror than EDMUND BURKE: Speech on the impeach- As new cases occur the law is perpetually and hurtful to those who have none. the punishment, the rigor of penal law is ment of Warren Hastings, Feb. 15, 1788 found deficient. It is therefore perpetually J.-J. ROUSSEAU: Du contrat social, I, 1761 obliged to give way to the common feelings necessary to make new laws. of mankind. It will be of little avail to the people that the WILLIAM GODWIN: An Enquiry Concerning Good laws lead to the making of better ones; EDWARD GIBBON: The Decline and Fall of laws are made by men of their own choice if Political Justice, 1793 bad ones bring in worse. the Roman Empire, I, 1776 the laws be so voluminous that they cannot J.-J. ROUSSEAU: Du contrat social, III Laws are not made for particular cases, but for be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be Laws always lose in energy what the govern- understood; if they be repealed or revised be- ment gains in extent. Just to the windward of the law. men in general. fore they are promulgated, or undergo such IMMANUEL KANT: Perpetual Peace, CHARLES CHURCHILL: The Ghost, III, 1763 SAMUEL JOHNSON: Boswell's Life, 1776 incessant changes that no man, who knows Supplement I, 1795 Law Law 660 Law 661 Law Law is whatever is boldly asserted and plau- The lawless science of our law, In a criminal proceeding the question is not It is always justifiable, in examining the prin- That codeless myriad of precedent, alone whether substantial justice has been ciple of a law, to inquire what other laws sibly maintained. That wilderness of single instances. done, but whether justice has been done ac- can be passed with equal reason, and to im- Ascribed to AARON BURR in JAMES PARTON: Life and Times of Aaron Burr, 1858 ALFRED TENNYSON: Aylmer's Field, 1864 cording to law. pute to it all the mischiefs for which it may be used as a precedent. (c. 1835) MR. JUSTICE COCKBURN: Judgment in Mar- No state shall make or enforce any law which tin vs. Mackonochie, 1878 JOHN NICHOLAS: Speech in the House of The law is a ass, a idiot. shall abridge the privileges or immunities of Representatives, Feb. 25, 1799 CHARLES DICKENS: Oliver Twist, LI, 1838 citizens of the United States; nor shall any It is far more important the law should be ad- state deprive any person of life, liberty or ministered with absolute integrity than that The glorious uncertainty of the law. Good men must not obey the laws too well. property without due process of law, nor in this case or in that the law should be a ENGLISH PHRASE, not recorded before the R. W. EMERSON: Politics, 1841 deny to any person within its jurisdiction good law or a bad one. XIX century the equal protection of the laws. LORD COLERIDGE: Judgment in Regina vs. The law is only a memorandum. IBID. CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, Ramsey, 1883 When I hear any man talk of an unalterable Amendment XIV, July 28, 1868 The law is an adroit mixture of customs that are law, the only effect it produces upon me is to I am beginning to think with Horsley - that convince me that he is an unalterable fool. " the people have nothing to do with the laws The beginning of civilization is marked by an beneficial to society, and would be followed SYDNEY SMITH: Peter Plymley's Letters, I, but to obey them." intense legality; that legality is the very con- even if no law existed, and others that are of 1807 E. A. POE: Fifty Suggestions, 1845 (Gra- dition of its existence, the bond which ties it advantage to a ruling minority but harmful ham's Magazine, May-June) together; but that legality - that tendency to to the masses of men, and can be enforced on impose a settled customary yoke upon all them only by terror. Every law which originated in ignorance and malice, and gratifies the passions from which It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the men and all actions, if it goes on, kills the P. A. KROPOTKIN: Paroles d'un révolté, it sprang, we call the wisdom of our an- law so much as for the right. variability implanted by nature, and makes 1884 cestors. H. D. THOREAU: An Essay on Civil different men and different ages facsimiles SYDNEY SMITH: Peter Plymley's Letters, V of other men and other ages. The law has no claim to human respect. It has Disobedience, 1849 WALTER BAGEHOT: Physics and Politics, no more civilizing mission; its only purpose is 1869 to protect exploitation. IBID. Laws are inherited like diseases. The law is for the protection of the weak more J. W. GOETHE: I Faust, I, 1808 than the strong. Laws and institutions require to be adapted, The law condemns and punishes only actions MR. JUSTICE ERLE: Judgment in Regina vs. that fall within certain definite and narrow Woolley, 1850 not to good men, but to bad. No man has a natural right to commit aggres- J. S. MILL: The Subjection of Women, II, limits; it thereby justifies, in a way, all simi- sion on the equal rights of another, and this lar actions that lie outside those limits. 1869 is all from which the laws ought to restrain I will have no laws. I will acknowledge none. LYOF N. TOLSTOY: What I Believe, 1884 him; every man is under the natural duty of I protest against every law which an author- Laws never would be improved if there were ity calling itself necessary imposes upon my Laws come before men live together in society, contributing to the necessities of society, and not numerous persons whose moral senti- free will. and have their origin in the natural and con- this is all the laws should enforce on him; ments are better than the existing laws. and no man having a natural right to be the P. J. PROUDHON: Idée générale de la sequently in the eternal law. IBID. judge between himself and another, it is his révolution, 1851 POPE LEO XIII: Libertas praestantissimum, I know no method to secure the repeal of bad June 20, 1888 natural duty to submit to the umpirage of an impartial third. The clash between what the law forbids and or obnoxious laws so effective as their strin- what society not only tolerates but seeks The authority of the law is grounded on the THOMAS JEFFERSON: Letter to F. W. gent execution. thesis: God gave it, and the fathers lived it. Gilmor, 1816 after, is one of the essential features of a U. S. GRANT: Inaugural address, March 4, F. W. NIETZSCHE: The Antichrist, LVII, state of society which is on the verge of ruin. 1869 1888 Laws were made to be broken. LOUIS DE LOMÉNIE: Beaumarchais and His JOHN WILSON: Noctes Ambrosianæ, XXIV, Times, 1855 Numbers make the laws, but the good has noth- Laws only bind when they are in accordance 1822 ing to do with figures. with right reason, and hence with the eter- We bury men when they are dead, but we try H. F. AMIEL: Journal, June 12, 1871 nal law of God. Laws are made for men of ordinary under- to embalm the dead body of laws, keeping POPE LEO XIII: Rerum novarum, May 15, the corpse in sight long after the vitality has All law has for its object to confirm and exalt standing, and should therefore be construed 1891 by the ordinary rules of common sense. Their gone. It usually takes a hundred years to into a system the exploitation of the workers meaning is not to be sought for in meta- make a law; and then, after it has done its by a ruling class. We know how laws are made - we who have physical subtleties, which may make any- work, it usually takes a hundred years to get M. A. BAKUNIN: Dieu et l'état, 1871 been behind the scenes. They are the prod- rid of it. ucts of selfishness, deception and party prej- thing mean everything or nothing, at pleas- H. W. BEECHER: Life Thoughts, 1858 Laws are like medicines: they usually cure the udice. True justice is not in them, and can- ure. disease only by setting up another that is not be in them. THOMAS JEFFERSON: Letter to William The law does not generate justice. The law is lesser or more transient. LYOF N. TOLSTOY: The Kingdom of God Is Johnson, 1823 nothing but a declaration and application of OTTO VON BISMARCK: Speech in the Prus- Within You, 1893 what is already just. sian Upper House, March 6, 1872 What are laws but expressions of the opinion P. J. PROUDHON: De la justice dans la The attempt to guard adult man by law is a of some class which has power over the rest révolution, I, 1858 The law is the true embodiment bad education for the battle of life. of the community? By what was the world Of everything that's excellent. W. E. H. LECKY: Democracy and Liberty, ever governed but by the opinion of some The laws and just restraints are to a noble na- W. S. GILBERT: Trial By Jury, 1875 1896 person or persons? By what else can it ever tion, not chains, but chain mail - strength be governed? and defence, though something also of an Men would be great criminals did they need as The reign of law. T. B. MACAULAY: Southey's Colloquies, encumbrance. many laws as they make. JAMES LANE ALLEN: Title of a novel, 1900 1830 JOHN RUSKIN: The Two Paths, v, 1859 C. J. DARLING: Scintillæ Juris, 1877 It is difficult to make our material condition Law is an alliance of those who have farsight better by the best laws, but it is easy enough Laws exist in vain for those who have not the No laws, however stringent, can make the idle courage and the means to defend them. and insight against the shortsighted. to ruin it by bad laws. industrious, the thriftless provident, or the RUDOLF VON JHERING: Der Zweck im THEODORE ROOSEVELT: Speech in Provi- T. B. MACAULAY: Burleigh and His Times, drunken sober. 1 Recht, VIII, 1877 dence, R. I., Aug. 23, 1902 1832 (Edinburgh Review, April) SAMUEL SMILES: Self-Help, I, 1859 Law 662 Law Law-abiding 663 Law, English While there still is doubt, while opposite con- The more by law, the less by right. DANISH PROVERB Jury, King, Law (Natural), Lawyer, Liberty, victions still keep a battlefront against each The Common Law is not a brooding omnipres- Litigation, Magistrate, Man and Woman, ence in the sky but the articulate voice of other, the time for law has not come. O. W. HOLMES II: Speech in New York, The law has a wax nose. FRENCH PROVERB Manners, Maxim, Monk, Moving-picture, some sovereign or quasi-sovereign that can Nicety, Opinion, Possession, Precedent, be identified. Feb. 15, 1913 New laws are followed by new tricks. Prince, Property, Punishment, Sin, Song, MR. JUSTICE O. W. HOLMES: Dissenting GERMAN PROVERB State, Supreme Court, Trifle, Tyranny, Vigi- Law is the expression and the perfection of opinion in Southern Pacific Company lance, War. vs. Jensen, 1916 common sense. The more laws the less justice. IBID. Ascribed to JOSEPH H. CHOATE (1832- Thus is the law written. (Ita lex scripta est.) Law-abiding A fortuitous concourse of atoms. 1917) in G. J. CLARK: Great Sayings by Author unidentified Great Lawyers, 1922 LATIN PHRASE He that keepeth the law, happy is he. PROVERBS XXIX, 18, c. 350 B.C. Laws are made by the conqueror, and accepted At Common Law you are done for at once; in The passing of an unjust law is the suicide of by the conquered. LATIN PROVERB authority. Render therefore unto Cæsar the things which equity you are not so easily disposed of. The former is a bullet which is instantane- Pastoral Letter of the American Roman are Cæsar's. MATTHEW XXII, 21, c. 75 Law is king. (Lex rex.) IBID. ously and charmingly effective; the latter, the Catholic Hierarchy, Feb., 1920 Let the people obey the magistrates, and the Fear God, and offend not the prince nor his angler's hook, which plays with the victim A year ago, if I had $100 in gold in my pocket, laws, before it kills him. Common Law is prussic magistrates the laws. IBID. And keep thyself out of the magistrate's claws. acid; equity is laudanum. IBID. I was a law-abiding citizen; if I perchance had a pint of whiskey I was a criminal. To- The more law, the less justice. (Summum jus, THOMAS TUSSER: Five Hundred Points of [See also Christianity, Law. day, if I have the whiskey, I am a law- summa injuria.) IBID. Good Husbandry, 1580 abiding citizen; but if I have the gold I am No punishment without law. (Nulla poena sine Follow law, and forms of law, as far as con- Law, Divine a criminal violating the law. lege.) LEGAL MAXIM venient. [See Law (Natural). L. J. DICKINSON: Speech at Cleveland, O., ABRAHAM LINCOLN: Instructions to U.S. Jan. 5, 1934 The later decisions are the stronger in law. Grant, Oct. 21, 1862 Law Enforcement (Judicia posteriora sunt in lege fortiora.) Legal concepts are supernatural entities which IBID. The observance of the law is the greatest sol- No man is above the law and no man is below do not have a verifiable existence except to vent of public ills. it, nor do we ask any man's permission when the eyes of faith. The law forces no one to do vain or useless CALVIN COOLIDGE: Speech of acceptance, we require him to obey it. FELIX S. COHEN: Transcendental Nonsense things. (Lex neminem cogit ad vana seu July 27, 1920 THEODORE ROOSEVELT: Message to Con- and the Functional Approach, 1935 inutilia peragenda.) IBID. gress, Jan., 1904 The law of blood (jus sanguinis); canon law The law looks forward, not backward. (Lex It is the duty of a citizen not only to observe the law but to let it be known that he is op- Violations of law weaken and threaten govern- (jus canonicum); the civil law (jus civile, prospicit non respicit.) IBID. posed to its violation. ment itself. No honest government can con- or lex civile); the law for the government The law regards the course of nature. (Lex CALVIN COOLIDGE: Message to Congress, done such actions on the part of its citi- of the church (jus ecclesiasticum the law spectat naturae ordinem.) Dec. 6, 1923 zens. The Republican party pledges the full IBID. of commerce (jus commercii); the common Lawbreaker strength of the government for the main- law (jus commune or lex communis); the The laws are adapted to those cases which most tenance of these principles by the enforce- law of contract (lex contractus); the divine frequently arise. (Ad ea quae frequentius [See Criminal. ment of the Constitution and of all laws. law (jus divinum); the law divine and accidunt jura adaptantur.) IBID. Republican National Platform, 1924 human (lex divina ac humana) the gen- Law, Canon eral law (lex generalis); the law of the The laws grow by litigation. (Litigando jura The canon law is a body of Roman ecclesiasti- If the law is upheld only by government offi- Germans (lex Germanica); the law of God crescunt.) IBID. cal law relative to such matters as that church cials, then all law is at an end. (lex Domini); the law of human society (jus humanae societatis); international law The laws keep the vigilant, not those who sleep. either has, or pretends to have, the proper HERBERT HOOVER: Message to Congress, 1929 (Vigilantibus, non dormientibus, subveniunt jurisdiction. (jus inter gentes); the law of the land (lex [See also Law. terrae); the law of the majority. (lex ma- jura.) IBID. WILLIAM BLACKSTONE: Commentaries on the Laws of England, I, 1765 joris partis); the law of mankind (jus ho- The law will always furnish a remedy. (Lex Law, English minum the law merchant (lex mercatoria); semper dubit remedium.) IBID. Law, Common There is no pretense to say or insinuate to the the law of Moses (lex Moysi); municipal law (jus privatum); the law nations (jus Reason is the life of the law; nay, the Common contrary but that the laws and customs of The niceties of the law are not the law. (Apices Law itself is nothing but reason. England are not only good but the very best. gentium); natural law (jus naturæ); the juris non sunt jura.) IBID. law of Parliament (lex parliamenti); the EDWARD COKE: Institutes, I, 1628 JOHN FORTESCUE: De laudibus legum Wherever there is society there is law. (Ubi Angliae, c. 1462 law of the place where a man has his domi- cile (lex domicilii); the law of the place societas ibi lex.) IBID. The Common Law is the custom of the king- dom, and we are bound to know it, and The law of England is the greatest grievance of where an action is brought (lex actus, lex fori, lex ordinandi, lex reisitae, or lex situs); Wretched is the slavery where the law is must be all governed by it. the nation, very expensive and dilatory. private law (lex privata) public law (jus changeable or uncertain. (Misera est servitus MR. CHIEF JUSTICE NORTH: Judgment in GILBERT BURNET (BISHOP OF SALISBURY): ubi jus est vagum aut incertum.) IBID. Whitebread's Case, 1679 The History of My Own Times, 1724 publicum, or lex publica); the law of reli- gion (jus ponticium); the law of retaliation Like king, like law; like law, like people. Every man who comes into England is en- I consider all the encroachments made on the (lex talionis); sumptuary law (lex sumptu- PORTUGUESE PROVERB titled to the protection of the English law, aria); the law of things (jus rerum); the un- Constitution heretofore as nothing, as mere whatever oppression he may heretofore have written law (lex non scripta); the law of [See also Aggression, Arms, Ballad, Constitu- retail stuff, compared with the wholesale suffered, and whatever may be the color of tion, Court, Crime, Crime and Punishment, doctrine that there is a Common Law in war (jus belli); the written law (lex scripta). his skin. LATIN PHRASES Criminal, Custom, Disciple, Equity, Error, force in the United States, of which, and LORD MANSFIELD: Judgment in the case of Evil, Execution, Freedom, Golden Rule, of all the cases within its provisions, their James Somersett, a Negro, June 22, 1772 The law protects everybody who can afford to Habeas Corpus, Hanging, Hell, Ignorance, courts have cognizance. hire a good lawyer. Author unidentified Injustice, Judge, Judiciary, Jurisprudence, THOMAS JEFFERSON: Letter to Charles There is no presumption in this country [Eng- Pinckney, Oct., 1799 land] that every person knows the law: it PN6081 932 HRC. t: FPR BOOK OF QUOTATIONS A NEW COLLECTION OF FAMOUS SAYINGS, REFLECT- ING THE WISDOM AND THE WIT OF TIMES PAST AND PRESENT AND INCLUDING THE VIRTUOUS, HUMOR- OUS, AND PHILOSOPHIC COMMENTARY ON LIFE BY MEN AND WOMEN OF EVERY AGE TOGETHER WITH RICHES FROM THE PROFOUND WELLS OF THE BI- BLE, PROVERBS, AND ANONYMITY AS SELECTED BY FRANKLIN PIERCE ADAMS I quote others only in order the better to express myself. - MONTAIGNE 140828 FUNK & WAGNALLS COMPANY : : NEW YORK 484 LAUGHTER LAUGHTER 485 LAW coming to I laugh because I must not cry. igh. When -ABRAHAM LINCOLN (1809-1865) There are few who would not rather A fool lifteth up his voice with laugh- If you are wise, laugh. be hated than laughed at. ter, but a wise man doth scarce smile e. SMITH 670-1729) SC. i Sketches SYDNEY of Moral Philosophy (1771-1845) a little. -MARTIAL (c. A.D. 66) Epigrams -Ibid. xxi, 20 sides with Laughter holding both his sides. The pleasantest laughter is at the ex- LAW -JOHN MILTON (1608-1674) L'Alle- gro pense of our enemies. 870) The -SOPHOCLES (495-406 B.C.) Ajax Taking the law into one's own hands. -ESOP (6th C. B.C.) Fables He deserves Paradise who makes his companions laugh. The Horse-Laugh is a distinguishing he vacant -MOHAMMED (570-632) The Koran characteristic of the rural hoyden. Who to himself is law, no law doth -RICHARD STEELE (1672-1729) The need, 730-1774) I'm made a laughing-stock. Guardian, No. 29 Offends no law, and is a king indeed. -PLAUTUS (c. 254-184 B.C.) Me- In laughing whole-heartedly a man -GEORGE CHAPMAN (1559?-1634?) næchmi Bussy D'Ambois laughs at must attain a certain freedom from at every- He who laughs, lasts. selfishness, a certain purity; and the The laws place the safety of all be- -MARY PETTIBONE POOLE (contempo- greatest saints are the merriest-heart- fore the safety of individuals. 01-1658) rary) A Glass Eye at the Keyhole ed people. -CICERO (106-43 B.C.) De Finibus, 9 Laugh and grow fat. --MARY WEBB (1881-1927) Spring of Bk. III, ch. xix laught in -ENGLISH PROVERB Joy: Laughter He laughs best who laughs last. Laugh, and the world laughs with you; The voice of nations and the course ?-1580?) -ENGLISH PROVERB Weep, and you weep alone. of things For the sad old earth must borrow its Allow that laws superior are to kings. Too much laughter deadens the mind. mirth, -DANIEL DEFOE (1661?-1731) The se among -HEBREW PROVERB But has troubles enough of its own. True-Born Englishman Better to write of laughter than of -ELLA WHEELER WILCOX (1855-1919) c.) Iliad, tears, Solitude Time is the best interpreter of every doubtful law. Because to laugh is proper to a man. ere is no Laughter is not a bad beginning for a -FRANÇOIS RABELAIS (1494?-1553) -DIONYSIUS OF HALICARNASSUS (d. c. ghter. friendship, and it is the best ending for 7 B.C.) Antiquities of Rome Gargantua: To the Readers la, Bk. I, one. He who laughs Friday will cry Sunday. -OSCAR WILDE (1854-1900) The Pic- Some say men on the back of law -JEAN BAPTISTE RACINE (1639-1699) ture of Dorian Gray May ride and rule it like a patient ass, nd laugh Les Plaideurs, Act I, SC. ii And with a golden bridle in the mouth Woe unto you that laugh now! for ye ) Every He was born with a gift of laughter shall mourn and weep. Direct it into anything they please. and a sense that the world is mad. -NEW TESTAMENT: Luke, vi, 25 -NATHANIEL FIELD (1587-1633) A Act III, Woman is a Weathercock -RAFAEL SABATINI (1875-1950) Sca- As the crackling of thorns under a pot, ramouche a laugh. so is the laughter of a fool. Possession is nine points of the law. tires, no. Everything gives cause for either -OLD TESTAMENT: Ecclesiastes, vii, 6 -THOMAS FULLER (1608-1681) Holy laughter or tears. War, Bk. v, ch. 29 Laughed thee to scorn. -SENECA (4? B.C.-A.D. 65) De Ira, ght of a -Ibid. Isaiah, xxxvii, 22 Bk. II, ch. x, sec. 5 The law is laid down to you. imity of Even in laughter the heart is sorrow- -HORACE (65-8 B.C.) Epistula, Bk. e female I will laugh like a hyen. ful; and the end of that mirth is II, ep. ii the mind -WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE (1564-1616) heaviness. As You Like It, IV, i, I62 -lbid. Proverbs, xiv, I3 Taken in flagrant violation of the law. ) In- I shall laugh myself to death. -JUSTINIAN I (527-565) Corpus Iuris He will laugh thee to scorn. -Idem The Tempest, II, ii, 159 Civilis Romani, Code IX, tit. xiii, -APOCRYPHA: Ecclesiasticus, xiii, 7 sec. I LAW 486 LAW 487 LAW LAW In law a man is guilty when he vio- Let them have all the rigour of the The letter killeth, but the spirit giveth The beginning of the law is benevo- lates the rights of another. In ethics law. life. lence, and with benevolence it ends. he is guilty if he only thinks of doing NEW TESTAMENT: II Corinthians, -BABYLONIAN TALMUD: Sotah -WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE (1564-1616) so. II Henry VI, I, iii, 199 iii, 6 II. LAW: ITS SHORTCOMINGS -IMMANUEL KANT (1724-1804) Lec- But now we are delivered from the ture at Königsberg, 1775 We must not make a scarecrow of the law, law, that being dead wherein we were Written laws are like spiders' webs; Not everything which the law allows held; that we should serve in newness they hold the weak and delicate who is honorable. Setting it up to fear the birds of prey, And let it keep one shape, till custom of spirit, and not in the oldness of the might be caught in their meshes, but -LEGAL MAXIM letter. are torn in pieces by the rich and pow- make it -Ibid. Romans, vii, 6 erful. Laws only bind when they are in ac- Their perch and not their terror. -ANACHARSIS (f. c. 600 B.C.) in Plu- cordance with right reason, and hence -Idem Measure for Measure, II, i, The law is not made for a righteous tarch's Solon with the eternal law of God. man, but for the lawless and disobe- He will give you both the law and the -POPE LEO XIII (1810-1903) Rerum dient, for the ungodly and for sinners, Agree, for the law is costly. prophets. Novarum for manslayers. -WILLIAM CAMDEN (1551-1623) Re- -GEORGE BERNARD SHAW (1856-1950) -Ibid. I Timothy, i, 9 mains Concerning Britain The man who does no wrong needs no Captain Brassbound's Conversation, law. Act II I. LAW: DEFINITIONS Men would be great criminals did they -MENANDER (342-291 B.C.) Frag- need as many laws as they make. The common sense of most shall hold Law is a pledge that the citizens of a ments CHARLES JOHN DARLING (1849- a fretful realm in awe, state will do justice to one another The purpose of law is to prevent the And the kindly earth shall slumber, -ARISTOTLE (384-322 B.C.) Politics 1936) Scintillæ Juris strong always having their way. lapt in universal law. Law is not justice, but the sacrifice All laws are useless, for good men do -OVID (43 B.C.-A.D. 18?) Fasti -ALFRED, LORD TENNYSON (1809- Of singular virtues to the dull world's not need them, and bad men are made Law, lord of all, mortals and immor- 1892) Locksley Hall ease of mind. no better by them. tals, carries everything with a high He gives laws to the peoples, and -GORDON BOTTOMLEY (1874- ) -DEMONAX (f. 150) in Lucian's (2nd hand. makes for himself a way to the heav- The Riding to Lithend C.) Demonax -PINDAR (c. 522-442 B.C.) Fragments ens. Law is whatever is boldly asserted and Laws too gentle are seldom obeyed; There is a written and an unwritten -VERGIL (70-19 B.C.) Georgics, iv, plausibly maintained. too severe, seldom executed. law. Written law is that under which 562 -AARON BURR (1756-1836) -BENJAMIN FRANKLIN (1706-1790) we live in different cities, but that The law of the past cannot be eluded, Law is nothing else but right reason, Poor Richard's Almanack which has arisen from custom is called The law of the present and future calling us imperiously to our duty, and Laws grind the poor, and rich men unwritten law. cannot be eluded prohibiting every violation of it. rule the law. -PLATO (428-347 B.C.) attr. The law of the living cannot be eluded -CICERO (106-43 B.C.) Orationes Phi- -OLIVER GOLDSMITH (1730-1774) The Abundance of law breaks no law. -it is eternal. lippica Traveller, 1. 386 Do more than the law requires, rather -WALT WHITMAN (1819-1892) To The Law is the true embodiment Think of Time The attempt to guard adult man by than leave anything undone that it Of everything that's excellent. law is a bad education for the battle does. O king, establish the decree, and sign It has no kind of fault or flaw, of life. -SCOTTISH PROVERB the writing, that it be not changed, And I, my Lords, embody the Law. -WILLIAM EDWARD HARTPOLE LECKY The law of nations. according to the law of the Medes and -SIR WILLIAM S. GILBERT (1836-1911) (1838-1903) Democracy and Liberty -FRANÇOIS RABELAIS (1494?-1553) Persians, which altereth not. Iolanthe, Act I Pantagruel, Bk. iii, ch. 44 -OLD TESTAMENT: Daniel, vi, 8 The law is blind, and speaks in general Laws were made to be broken. -CHRISTOPHER NORTH (1785-1854) Ye shall have one manner of law, as terms. No man is above the law and no man -THOMAS MAY (1595-1650) The Heir Noctes Ambrosianæ, No. 24 is below it; nor do we ask any man's well for the stranger, as for one of permission when we require him to your own country. Law, the despot of mankind, often The law for rich and poor is not the obey it. -Ibid. Leviticus, xxiv, 22 compels us to do many things which same. -THEODORE ROOSEVELT (1858-1919) He that keepeth the law, happy is he. are against nature. -PLAUTUS (c. 254-184 B.C.) Cistel- Message, January, 1904 -Ibid. Proverbs, xxix, 18 -PLATO (428-347 B.C.) Protagoras laria PN6081 B27 1980 WH t: Familiar Quotations A collection of passages, phrases and proverbs traced to their sources in ancient and modern literature FIFTEENTH AND 125TH ANNIVERSARY EDITION REVISED AND ENLARGED John Bartlett Edited by EMILY MORISON BECK and the editorial staff of Little; Brown and Company LB LITTLE, BROWN AND COMPANY BOSTON TORONTO Virgil Virgil 105 es upon the deep.9 1 We have been Trojans; Troy has been. 17 Death's brother, Sleep.⁹ Ib. l. 278 Ib. l. 89 Ib. l. 325 18 The swamp of Styx, by which the gods take nes blessed!¹⁰ There is but one safety to the vanquished oath. 2 Ib. l. 323 Ib. l. 94 to hope not safety. Ib. l. 354 19 Unwillingly I left your land, 0 Queen. 10 Ib. l. I50 3 Our foes will provide us with arms. Ib. l. 460 Ib. l. 39r orse things; God will 20 Had I a hundred tongues, a hundred so. Ib. l. I99 4 The gods thought otherwise.¹ mouths, a voice of iron and a chest of brass, Ib. l. 428 I could not tell all the forms of crime, could will be pleasant to re- 5 Thrice would I have thrown my arms about not name all the types of punishment. 11 Ib. l. 203 her neck, and thrice the ghost embraced fled Ib. l. 625 nan. 12 Ib. l. 3⁶₄ from my grasp: like a fluttering breeze, like a Ib. l. 793 21 That happy place, the green groves of the fleeting dream. 2 er as a true goddess. dwelling of the blest. Ib. l. 638 Ib. l. 405 6 O accurst craving for gold! Ib. III, l. 57 22 The spirit within nourishes, and the mind, lose walls already rise! diffused through all the members, sways the Ib. l. 437 7 Rumor flies. Ib. l. I21 mass and mingles with the whole frame. I feel again a spark of that ancient Ib. l. 726 ; of things; mortality flame.⁴ Ib. IV, l. 23 Ib. l. 462 23 Each of us bears his own Hell. 12 9 Deep in her breast lives the silent wound. Ib. l. 743 on between Trojan and Ib. l. 6₇ Ib. l. 574 24 Others, I take it, will work better with 10 A woman is always a fickle, unstable breathing bronze and draw living faces from S own rectitude. 14 thing.⁵ Ib. l. 569 marble; others will plead at law with greater Ib. l. 604 11 Arise from my bones, avenger of these eloquence, or measure the pathways of the all run down to the sea, wrongs! Ib. l. 625 sky, or forecast the rising stars. Be it your e mountain slopes, or 12 Thus, thus, it is joy to pass to the world concern, Roman, to rule the nations under ult of heaven, so long below.⁶ Ib. l. 660 law (this is your proper skill) and establish ur name, your praises the way of peace; to spare the conquered and Ib. l. 607 13 Naked in death upon an unknown shore. put down the mighty from their seat. 13 Ib. V, l. 871 W and learned to aid the Aeneid, Ib. l. 847 14 Yield not to evils, but attack all the more Ib. l. 630 25 Give me handfuls of lilies to scatter. 14 boldly. Ib. VI, l. 95 Ib. l. 883 ieen, is the sorrow you 15 It is easy to go down into Hell; night and Ib. II, l. 3 day, the gates of dark Death stand wide; but 26 There are two gates of Sleep. One is of to climb back again, to retrace one's steps to horn, easy of passage for the shades of truth; ear Greeks even when the upper there's the rub, the task.⁷ the other, of gleaming white ivory, permits Ib. l. 49 Ib. l. 126 false dreams to ascend to the upper air. 15 e know the nation. Ib. l. 893 Ib. l. 65 16 Faithful Achates. 27 Ib. l. 158 and elsewhere Prayed to the Genius of the place. 16 Ib. l. 204 Ib. VII, l. 136 ¹Dis aliter visum. um home of the gods, O ²Virgil here translates HOMER, Odyssey, bk. XI, l. 204. 28 We descend from Jove; in ancestral Jove Ib. l. 241 See 60:8. battle! Troy's sons rejoice. Ib. l. 219 ³Fama volat. ext door. 17 ⁴Agnosco veteris vestigia flammae. 29 If I cannot bend Heaven, I shall move Hell. Ib. l. 311 See Dante, 142:6. ⁵Varium et mutabile semper femina. Ib. l. 312 Woman often changes; foolish the man who trusts her. 30 An old story, but the glory of it is forever. eati! -FRANCIS I OF FRANCE [1494-1547], written by him with neminisse iuvabit, his ring on a window of the château of Chambord (BRAN- Ib. IX, l. 79 TÔME, Oeuvres, VII, 395) 9See Homer, 58:20; Daniel, 182:4; Shakespeare, 238:6; La donna è mobile. FRANCESCO MARIA PIAVE [1810- and Shelley, 466:6. et mentem mortalia tangunt. 1879], libretto of Verdi's Rigoletto, Duke's song ¹⁰Aeneas to the ghost of Dido, who had killed herself frectitude, laughed to scorn the See Scott, 431:2. when he left her. ID [43 B.C.-A.D. 18], Fasti, bk. Sic, sic, iuvat ire sub umbras. "See Homer, 57:19. ⁷Facilis descensus Averni: Noctes atque dies patet atri "See Marlowe, 183:21 and 184:1; Browne, 274:15; Mil- 0 Danaos et dona ferentis. ianua Ditis; revocare gradum superasque evadere ton, 283:13 and 285:12; Eliot, 809:1; Sartre, 865:12; and ad auras, Hoc opus, hic labor est. Lowell, 893:7. Ucalegon. See Matthew 7:13-14, 38:15; Bion, 92:7; Shakespeare, ¹³See Milton, 281:17. he ancient counselors who sat 218:28 and 238:2; and Milton, 284:17. "Quoted by DANTE in The Divine Comedy, Purgatorio, His house was next to that of ⁸Fidus Achates. Proverbial for a trusty friend; Achates canto XXX, l. 21. was the faithful comrade of Aeneas. as. ¹⁵See Homer, 61:2. April 24, 1990 MEMORANDUM FOR CHRISS WINSTON DAN MCGROARTY PEGGY DOOLEY FROM: STEPHANIE BLESSEY SUBJECT: USC COMMENCEMENT REMARKS The following is information gathered from the pre-advance trip to Columbia, South Carolina. Joke Material: - When Louie, Louie is played at game upper decks of Coliseum rock. They say, "If it ain't swaying, we ain't playing." (USC fixed the upper decks, but they still say it.) - Parking is impossible. - A pretty girl at Clemson is a visitor. - 144 Clemson students are gross ignorance. - All dirt roads lead to Clemson. - The USC versus Southern California - Jokes written by USC attached. Special Places: - The Horseshoe is the center of campus. - Russell House is central activity center. - Thomas Cooper Library is underground. Students have to "go down" to study. - throwing frisbee on the horseshoe, eating at Russell House" - grabbing a sandwich at Andy's deli - eating at Yesterday's - going out in 5 points - Late night eats: IHOP and Capital Cafe Familiars: - As freshmen, taking University 101 - As seniors, trying to sell back your books - In between, reading the personals in The Gamecock - Song: 'Carolina on my Mind' - University Tree Lighting on Horseshoe after Community Service week. School groups: - NAACP - Carolina Cares - community service - CPU - Carolina Program Union Famous teachers: - Ambassador Walker (to South Korea) - James Dickey - poet in residence Trivia: Mascot: Cocky the Gamecock Colors: Garnet and black 12 schools in the University Sports: - Football is big sport, but they lost every game this year. - Athletic director - King Dickson - Football coach - Sparky Woods - Together - The King and Sparky Show - Cockfest is the homecoming pep rally. - Play theme of 2001 at football games. - Todd Ellis (q-back) and Harold Green were drafted for NFL. - DO NOT mention George Rogers, the Heisman Trophy winner. - Joe Morrison, the football coach, died last year; team was the "black magic" of Joe Morrison. Famous Visitors: - The Pope in '87. He said, "It's good to be young and a student at U.S.C." (Seniors were sophomores.) - Henry Kissinger - President Reagan - Sicily Tyson Volunteers: - Huricane Hugo - hundreds of students started by packing supplies to be sent to the coast, and they continued their efforts through the year -- travelling from Camden to Sumner helping others get their lives back together. - Classes would go help together. -From Sister Care to Literacy programs to soup kitchens and shelters. Attachments: Yearbook Binder of background including jokes International WEST MEETS EAST playing the role of a Washington or DeGaulle as they get underway." Drawn by pure democracy, consultants are reborn in Eastern Europe, Argentinian pollster Felipe by James David Barber Noguera has it right when he says that "these countries are not just At the invitation of numerous There were surprises that awak- going though a change of adminis- emerging political parties in ened our jaded band. For instance, tration, but of regime." Czechoslovakia, Poland, and Hun- is there anything more vital to a In Hungary we were scheduled gary, Campaigns & Elections export- campaign than lists of voters? Last to seminar in "Karl Marx University." ed its campaign training seminars fall. Hungary did a major national By the time we got there, the name to Eastern Europe for sessions referendum, a vote which decided had been changed to "University of March 6-16. One of the partici- to delay the choice of a president Economics of Budapest." pants, James David Barber, was the until the new parliament was elect- The big news from the three na- designated scribe. This is bis report. ed. Surely anyone gearing up for a tions we visited is that democracy parliamentary election would want has stepped out onto the high wire, We arrived as humble teachers. that referendum list specifying thou- leaving behind the rigid communist We left as activist allies, anxious to sands of available voters. But to platform. facing forward to a risky help make democracy-real democ- Hungarians. person-listing had been chance to establish freedom and jus- racy-happen in Eastern Europe. a weapon of the secret police for tice for all. Now is the hour to guar- Our conscience was off limits. more than four decades. Tear them antee non violence, citizenship for We didn't come to preach at the up and throw them away, they said. all, rational consent of the gov- democratic converts like some pon- We thought the rock-bottom erned. genuine law to regulate the tificating patriarch who drops in to challenge of political journalism is straighten out his children. From the going to be how to write the story. start, as our Canadian leader Gor- But over there. the biggest challenge don Robson put it, we were not in is getting paper to print the story Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and on. In Poland, the Communists bill Poland to instruct them on how to their own newspapers 800 zlotys imitate us. Our American leader, (about 8 cents) for a section of Campaigns & Elections publisher paper. Solidarity, the democracy James Dwinell, echoed Robson's movement, is charged 5,000 zlotys, sentiments when he said, "We are per section. In Eastern Europe, not here to teach but to learn. We newspapers are powerful campaign will show you our ways but as with tools. not forums for unbiased re- a menu, you need to choose the porting. tactics and strategies that are right And, we thought, if you're run- for you and your political culture ning for office, surely you'd like to and teach us." get your spouse on television or in We came stressing cool tolerance the newspaper. But to them, that and open mindedness, and listened implies nepotism-that if you win, for their special needs and con- your spouse will get a special job. cerns. As Florida-based consultant The political scene in Eastern Eu- Lee Miller put it, "We offered you rope is different from that in Eastern hammers and nails." New Jersey. As Wayne Johnson ob- We whirled around, spending a served. "We argue about zoning. Democracy comes to Wenceslas Square, Prague few days in each country, working They're deciding whether or not to economy and society, and secure, seminars which started out sparsely legalize private property." democratically controlled foreign re- populated in Budapest, and ended The upcoming elections are not lations. in Warsaw with more than 350 polit- like our 1988 model. They are But to make it happen, leader- ical party officials attending. On the more like 1788, when our democra- ship is necessary. In Hungary there way, we changed. We fell off the cy was being constituted in its basic is a revulsion against coming out for teacher's stool and took up the flag fundamentals. Tony Quinn may be some new political star. In of freedom. We planed back to right in suggesting that "maybe we Czechoslovakia, the opposite oc- America eager to help democracy should encourage them to think of curred. The love for Havel, the play- grow from the revolution. [Vaclav] Havel and [Lech] Walesa as wright-president, is almost universal. April - May, 1990 / Page 17 INSIDE POLITICS In Poland. Solidarity leader Lech coalitions, eyes lit up. A new ver- supper with a beautiful 17-year-old Walesa has increasingly quiet re- sion of the Federalist Papers might gypsy girl who is emerging as a spect, as if he were becoming yes- make a hit. vivid volunteer among many who terday's leader. Media politics is on a roll, but think a gypsy is an animal; when More importantly, what's needed wobbling. Christine LaPaille says you breakfast with a reporter whose is local leadership, from the village that "as democracy emerges in these weekly magazine was underground on up. In Poland, countries, the press and now going public; or you walk they need thousands will emerge also." the street with a woman translator of candidates for But virtually all the about to have a third child, who local and regional radio, television, and says she never joined the commu- offices before the newspaper facilities nists because "you have to look June election, an are owned by the your children in the eye;" those event unknown state. Harsh censors happenings turn your mind. since World War II. at the top have been Randy Gilliland. president of Political parties replaced by permis- Gilliland & Co.. a fundraising firm, have been born, but VEREJNOST sive editors and pro- put it this way: "After spending they have yet to pass ducers. Reporters on many years in the American political through their identity PROTI the street are invent- arena. I had grown cynical. I had crisis. Solidarity start- ed as a trade union NÁSILIU ing their journalism tired of petty. political arguments day by day. and in many ways lost my sense of and is now an um- The Slovak organization "Public Democracy rests political vision and idealism. This brella for all sorts of Against Violence" has become an on citizens, which is trip invigorated me. It made me turn parties. As a Solidari- umbrella for smaller Czech parties why Campaigns & back to the dreams and idealistic ty M.P. put it, "What unifies us is the Elections' seminars centered on the views of my younger years." will to fight the communists." But age-old questions of democracy. Such renewed dreams are spark- with the communists on the way How do you activate voters? Where ing realities: Gilliland and Wayne out. Solidarity must begin to orga- do you get money to buy the tools Johnson are raising funds for six nize national unity. for campaign action? East European political organiza- Hungary. on the other hand, As the long days went on, those tions, working to get U.S. newspa- lacks a national umbrella. The of us who listened and looked pers to support papers in Poland. Czechs have a broad-based "Civic began to experience a newness of and trying to have equipment con- Forum" and the Slovaks the rapidly life. When you have lunch with an tributed to party offices. broadening "Public Against Vio- aging fellow working hard in poli- Lee Miller, has taken on projects lence." When our professional con- tics after being jailed for six years as in two countries for "organizational sultants talked about how to build a political prisoner; when you have and communications opportunities." C&E'S EASTERN EUROPE FACULTY Ginnie Kontnik Harriman Communications Center Chuck Adams Andrew Frank Washington, DC Adams and Co., Salem, OR C&E, Washington, DC Jerry Lampert James David Barber George Gibault Principal Secretary to the Premier Duke University, Durham, NC Public Affairs Bureau, Victoria, BC Victoria, BC Robin Bell Randy Gilliland Christine LaPaille International Center for Gilliland & Company, Midlothian, VA Agenda Communications Development Policy, Washington, DC Sal Guzzetta Chicago, IL Scott Berkowitz Political Publishing, Alexandria, VA Greg Lyle C&E, Washington, DC Wayne Johnson Principal Secretary to the Premier of Graham Bruce, M.L.A. Wayne C. Johnson & Assoc., Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba Government of British Columbia, Sacramento, CA Lindsay Mattison Duncan. BC Jennifer Kessler International Center for James Dwinell C&E, Washington, DC Development Policy, Washington, DC C&E, Washington, DC Kelly Kimball Lee Miller Barry Fadem Kimball Petition Management Miller Consulting Group, Ltd. Bagatelos & Fadem, San Francisco, CA West Los Angeles, CA Fort Lauderdale. FL Page 18 / Campaigns & Elections 10th Anniversary Issue George Gibault, director of re- daily from April until the June elec- search for the Public Affairs Bureau tion. The first one tells the Czech John Sinclair, Inc. in British Columbia, linked himself voter: "VPN took you to the revolu- to numerous agricultural enterprises, tion in Wenceslas Square. Vote on whose technical aid he will enlist the ballot SO we can finish the revo- for urgent training needs. lution!" A stunning conversion from To finish the revolution is to preaching to participating happened found democracy. In the capitol of when Ginnie Kontnik, director of Poland, we visited the great hall of Harriman Communi- the national parlia- cations Center in ment. Up front, fac- Washington. and ing the elected rep- professional consul- resentatives, is the tants Kelly Kimball. symbol of Poland. a Image Management Trish Whitcomb. white eagle with Issue Delineation Barry Fadem, and outstretched wings. Grey Lyle struggled The communists Crisis Control all night with "Pub- left the eagle there Strategic Consulting lic Against Vio- in 1945, but smash- Public Relations lence," the major or- ed the crown off its ganization working head. When we Speech Writing for democracy in were there, workers the Slovakia part of were putting on a Czechoslovakia. new crown. Will Kontnik and the Collecting political party volunteers in the new crown of rest see themselves Wenceslas Square, Prague democracy hold as "volunteers who were asked to firm on the head of the nation? The help." And help they will. They wonder and the uncertainty are still have formed the nonprofit volun- there. teers for democracy to get donations of high-tech equipment and a sup- James David Barber is on the Guaranteed ply of detailed strategic advice. The faculty of Duke University in North Performance group already has put together a set Carolina as a James B. Duke Pro- of four-minute television ads for fessor of Political Science and Policy Public Against Violence to be used Studies. Exceptional Results Rev. James Noble Cliff Scotton Decatur, GA New Democratic Party of Canada, Phil Noble Nanaimo, BC The Palmetto Project, Charleston, SC Amanda Smith Felipe Noguera Sex Equity Consultant, Durham, NC Mora y Araujo Noguera, Patricia Whitcomb Buenos Aires, Argentina Bates & Associates, Indianapolis, IN Beth Provinse Robert White John Sinclair, Inc. Conotabs, Bethesda, MD International Center for 28 Hart Avenue Tony Quinn Development Policy, Washington, DC Hopewell, NJ 08525 Braun and Company Sacramento, CA VOLUNTEERS FOR DEMOCRACY 609/466-9223 Gianni Riotta Several participants in C&E's trip For more information Corriere Della Sera, New York, NY have formed a non-profit organiza- circle # 12 tion to provide support for VPN, the Gordon Robson Slovak Democracy movement. If you on reader response card Robson and Assoc., Maple Ridge, BC would like to donate computers, Mary Robson, faxes, copiers, your time, or anything Robson and Assoc., Maple Ridge, BC else, please call (800) 237-7842. April - May, 1990 / Page 19 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON Bush spoke at USC in 1985. Maybe Emily has it Smithsonia Guide to Hytoric Cenerica 156 THE MIDLANDS Whitehall (310 West Earle Street, private) is Greenville's oldest residence, built in 1813. It was constructed as the summer home of former South Carolina governor Henry Middleton, who served at another time as ambassador to Russia. His father, Arthur Middleton, was a signer of the Declaration of Independence. The Bob Jones University Art Gallery and Museum (1700 Wade Hampton Boulevard, 803-242-5100) has an important international collection of religious art, dating from the thirteenth to the nineteenth century, from Spain, Italy, France, Germany, and Holland, featuring works by Dolci, Rembrandt, Rubens, Titian, and Van Dyck. In the town of Conestee is the McBee Methodist Church Chapel (Main Street), one of few octagonal churches remaining in America. The brick one-story structure with a pyramidal roof and an octago- nal cupola was built around 1841. THE MIDLANDS South Carolina was originally divided along the fall line stretching diagonally across the state from Aiken in the southwest to Cheraw in the northeast. The fall line thus divided the "civilized" low-country, including Charleston, from the "uncivilized" up-country north and west. Eventually the region that was not close enough to the moun- tains to be considered part of the up-country but too far north of Charleston to be claimed by the low-country began to be designated as the midlands. This tour begins in the capital city of Columbia and moves southwest toward Aiken and then southeast through the counties of Aiken, Barnwell, Allendale, and Bamberg. From there, it swings north to cover the midlands area south of Columbia and then turns northeast to the Pee Dee River country near Florence. COLUMBIA In 1786 the South Carolina legislature voted to establish a capital city near the geographic center of the state, where the Broad and Saluda rivers converge to become the Congaree River. The decision to move the seat of government from Charleston to the new site represented a compromise between up-country farmers and low-country planters. OPPOSITE: Columbia's First Prebyterian Church where Woodrow Wilson's father served as minister from 1870-1874, and where his parents are buried. 158 THE MIDLANDS THE MIDLANDS 159 The planned city was surveyed in 1787 on a two-mile-square plot. By laying out all streets 100 feet wide and main thoroughfares 150 most of Columbia was destroyed by fire. Eighty-four blocks were left diseases feet wide, the planners created a spacious town where, they hoped, in ashes. Some historians have pointed out that the fires that destroyed much of Columbia were in part the responsibility of evac- was named after Christopher Columbus. would not spread rapidly from house to house. The city uating Confederate troops who set fire to cotton bales, piled in the James Hoban, later the architect of the White House, designed streets, to keep the cotton from Yankee hands. Others point to the the first state house, where the South Carolina General Assembly fact that whiskey left behind by the Confederates fueled the passions of some Federal soldiers, who did indeed set fires in Columbia. met in 1790. When George Washington visited there in 1791, he few described Columbia in his journal as "an uncleared wood with Later, Sherman insisted that he never wanted to burn Columbia and houses in it." Just west of the present State House, a granite very pointed out that he led the effort to put out the fires. In the area known as Arsenal Hill, which includes the monument marks the site of the first structure. The textile indus- try 1800s. and other businesses were active in Columbia by the early Governor's Mansion Complex and the surrounding nineteenth-cen- In 1801 the University of South Carolina (then South tury residential district, is the Columbia City Hall (1737 Main at Carolina College) was chartered. The population grew and the Laurel Street), built in 1874 to serve as a federal courthouse and economy thrived through the 1830s. A convention was held in post office. The Columbia Historic District is a residential area that includes the Robert Mills House and other mansions of various Columbia at the First Baptist Church on December 17, 1860, to draw up the South Carolina Ordinance of Secession. The docu- architectural styles built for the city's bankers, merchants, and law- makers. A notable example is the Seibels House (1601 Richland after a smallpox epidemic caused the relocation of the convention. ment was completed and signed in Charleston on December 20, Street, 803-252-7742). The oldest home in Columbia, built in the The First Baptist Church was the site of meetings of the South late 1700s and renovated in the 1920s, it is now headquarters for the Carolina General Assembly during Reconstruction when the State Historic Columbia Foundation. Many of the homes burned during House was under construction. Sherman's occupation in 1865. The Old Campus District of the The First Presbyterian Church (1324 Marion Street) was University of South Carolina includes the campus buildings nized in 1795. The present Gothic Revival building was built in orga- 1853 designed by Robert Mills, the 1805 Rutledge College, and the 1827 and remodeled and enlarged in 1925. The Ladson Presbyterian Maxcy Monument. Allen University (1530 Harden Street), with a school Church (1720 Sumter Street) was organized in 1838 as a Sunday small campus built between 1881 and 1941, is named for the for blacks by the First Presbyterian Church; the founder of the African Methodist Episcopal Church, Bishop Richard building, the second on this site, was built in 1896. Saint present Peter's Allen. The brick Georgian Revival Chapelle Administration Building Catholic Church (1529 Assembly Street) was first built in 1824 for was built in 1922 to designs by John Anderson Lankford, a leading Catholic immigrants who had moved to the area to construct the black architect of the day. The school emphasized training for the Victorian Gothic Washington Street United Methodist Church (1401 Columbia Canal; the present church was built in 1906. The High clergy and also offered industrial and agricultural courses and a law curriculum, a feature distinguishing it from other southern schools Washington Street) was rebuilt in 1866 and again in 1872 after it for blacks. The Saluda Factory Historic District (along the Saluda burned during Sherman's 1865 march through Columbia. River in West Columbia, southeast of the intersection of Routes I- During the Civil War, hospitals, banks, a Confederate mint, 126 and I-26) was a Confederate prisoner-of-war camp. The granite and a weapons factory operated in the capital. As Sherman's foundations of the factory complex are all that remained standing here. proceeded through the state, thousands of people took refuge army after the burning of Columbia. Sherman and his Federal troops took the city on February Fort Jackson, named for President Andrew Jackson, was built 17, 1865, after shelling it from across the Congaree River in 1917. On the post is the Fort Jackson Museum (Jackson February 16. On the first night of Sherman's occupation of the city, on Boulevard, 803-751-7419) with collections relating to the history of the fort. THE MIDLANDS 161 South Carolina State Museum Beside the Congaree River is the 1895 Columbia Duck Mill (former- ly a manufacturer of heavy cotton duck fabric); it was among the first cotton mills in America to be fully powered with electricity. The renovated factory building now holds the state museum complex. Each level of the massive, four-story brick mill highlights a different aspect of life in the state. An art gallery features works by artists with South Carolina connections. Natural history exhibits cover modern and prehistoric animals and the geology of the region. Science and technology exhibits include a section on the development of the laser and maser by the 1964 Nobel Prize winner in physics, Charles H. Townes, a South Carolinian. Cultural history exhibits display arti- facts illustrating the region's history from about 12,000 B.C. to the present. The complex is also the headquarters for the Greater Columbia Convention and Visitors Bureau (803-254-0479). LOCATION: 301 Gervais Street. HOURS: 10-5 Monday-Saturday, 1-5 Sunday. FEE: Yes. TELEPHONE: 803-737-4921. Riverfront Park and Historic Columbia Canal (off Laurel Street, 803-733-8613) preserves a one-mile canal completed in 1824. It allowed barges to bypass the rapids that presented the only naviga- tional hazard where the Saluda and Broad rivers join to become the Congaree. By 1895 the canal powered the Columbia Duck Mill, also called the Mount Vernon Mill. The park surrounds the city's origi- nal hydroelectric plant and restored waterworks facility, which is open to the public. Governor's Mansion Complex Two blocks north of the Canal Park is the nine-acre Governor's Mansion Complex, which comprises the Governor's Mansion, Lace House, and Boylston House. The Governor's Mansion, completed in 1855, is a two-story stucco structure with wrought-iron grillwork orna- menting the flanking porches. Originally the officers' quarters of the state arsenal's military academy, the building has been the gov- ernor's residence since 1868. Some rooms are open to the public. Also enclosed in a block-long area surrounded by a wrought-iron fence and gateway are the Lace House (803 Richland Street), built OPPOSITE: A palmetto, the South Carolina state tree, stands in front of the Governor's Mansion in Columbia. 162 THE MIDLANDS THE MIDLANDS 163 in 1854 with Greek Revival elements, and the Boylston House (829 Richland Street), built in the 1820s. Burke Davis, "Logan swore fearfully when he was handed Sherman's order" but yielded the house to the determined nun. LOCATION: 800 block of Richland Street. HOURS: By appointment The house is furnished with family pieces from three plantations only. FEE: None. TELEPHONE: 803-737-1710. of the Hamptons and Prestons, including photographs, crystal, and china from the family's Millwood Plantation. The Rococo Revival fur- Mann-Simons Cottage niture in the drawing room reflects Caroline Hampton Preston's This cottage was built around 1850 by Celia Mann, a freed slave tastes. A centerpiece of the Manning Room, which features fashions from Charleston, one of 200 free blacks in Columbia. Mann estab- of the 1800s, is a gold silk brocade wedding dress. Other family lished the First Calvary Baptist Church here, one of the earliest pieces include General Wade Hampton II's gold-handled umbrella post-Civil War black churches in South Carolina. The structure, and his father's ivory and ebony dominoes. restored to the period of the 1880s, was also home to Bill Simons, LOCATION: 1615 Blanding Street. HOURS: 10:15-3:15 Tuesday- black musician and music teacher. It houses a museum of African- a Saturday, 1-5 Sunday. FEE: Yes. TELEPHONE: 803-252-1770. American culture, including personal items that belonged to Mann and other black Columbia residents. Robert Mills Historic House LOCATION: 1403 Richland Street. HOURS: 10-4 Tuesday-Friday, 11-2 One of the ten or so documented residences designed by Robert Saturday. FEE: Yes. TELEPHONE: 803-254-1450. Mills, this house was built for Mills's friend Ainsley Hall, a prosperous merchant who had lived in the house across the street until he sold it Hampton-Preston Mansion in 1823 to Wade Hampton I. The story goes that Wade Hampton took his new bride on a buggy ride around Columbia and told her he The mansion, built around 1818 and originally owned by the would buy her any home she wanted. When Mrs. Hampton chose wealthy merchant Ainsley Hall, was the townhouse of the Hampton Ainsley Hall's house at 1615 Blanding Street, Hall sold quickly at a family from 1823 to 1873. This well-known South Carolina family good price, but without consulting his wife, who refused to move included three Wade Hamptons: The first was a veteran of the until her husband agreed to build her a new house, bigger than the American Revolution and a general in the War of 1812; his son first, across the street and looking down on the old one. inherited his plantations and became even richer; the third, a Civil The brick "two-story house, with a two-story Ionic portico built War general, served later as a South Carolina governor and U.S. sen- over a high, aboveground arcaded basement, is one of the most ator. The house passed to State Senator John S. Preston with his ambitious of Mills's Greek Revival structures. The house, with three- marriage to Caroline Hampton, and in the 1840s, they changed the part Venetian windows with movable interior shutters, has a symmet- red brick to stucco and added a suite of twenty-four rooms. The two- rical floor plan: four rooms to each floor, with curved ends in two and-a-half-story structure, with Jeffersonian Classical elements, has a rooms and the main hall. Mills is best known as the designer of the full-width Doric portico with a full entablature and a wrought-iron U.S. Treasury Building, Patent Office, and the Washington railing over a high arcaded basement. Monument in Washington, DC, although his plans for the monu- During the Federal occupation of Columbia, the house was the ment were not followed. The Halls never occupied the house headquarters of General John Logan, who intended to destroy it because Ainsley Hall died before it was completed. His widow sold it upon his departure. However, it was saved by an Ursuline nun, Sister to the Presbyterian Synod for use as the Columbia Theological Baptista, who had known General Sherman before the war. She Seminary. The restored brick townhouse now houses a decorative- asked Sherman to provide a shelter for the girls in her care after her arts museum of early-nineteenth-century furnishings. convent had burned. The general instructed her to choose "any of the houses left in the city" for her use. According to the historian LOCATION: 1616 Blanding Street. HOURS: 10:15-3:15 Tuesday- Saturday, 1-5 Sunday. FEE: Yes. TELEPHONE: 803-252-1770. 164 THE MIDLANDS The brick Greek Revival First Baptist Church (1306 Hampton Street), with four Tuscan columns of molded brick, was the site of the first meeting of the South Carolina Secession Convention held in 1860. Legend has it that the church escaped burning during the Federal occupation when a black sexton of the First Baptist gave sol- diers directions to an old wooden structure instead of this one. Woodrow Wilson Boyhood Home Built in 1872 by the Reverend Joseph Ruggles Wilson and Jessie Woodrow Wilson, the Tuscan-villa-style house was the home of Thomas Woodrow Wilson from the age of 14 to 17. Known as "Tommy" to Columbians, Woodrow Wilson lived here while his father was a professor at the Columbia Theological Seminary and the minister of Columbia's First Presbyterian Church. The house, with gas lighting fixtures, Wilson family photographs, period pieces, and some original furnishings, is a good example of a Victorian middle- class Presbyterian home during the period of Reconstruction in South Carolina. Furnishings include the bed where the twenty-eighth president was born when the family lived in Virginia. LOCATION: 1705 Hampton Street. HOURS: 10-4 Tuesday-Saturday, 1-5 Sunday. FEE: Yes. TELEPHONE: 803-252-1770. Also on Hampton Street is the Chesnut Cottage (1718 Hampton Street, private), the Civil War home of Confederate general James Chesnut and his wife, writer Mary Boykin Miller Chesnut, author of A Diary From Dixie, written during the Civil War but published posthu- mously in 1905. The white frame one-and-a-half-story house is a good example of the "Columbia cottage": It has a central dormer with an arched window above the central entrance; the small porch has four octagonal columns and an ironwork balustrade. Mary Chesnut described a visit from Jefferson Davis to the house in 1864: When Davis was recognized on the porch by a passerby, a crowd gathered, and "the President's hand was nearly shaken off." The Horry- Guignard House (1527 Senate Street, private), a two-story frame resi- dence with square front columns, is believed to have been built around 1813 by Revolutionary War colonel Peter Horry. opposite: The west parlor of the Robert Mills House, completed in 1825, contains an Aubusson rug and a pair of sofas from the period. 166 167 THE midlands THE MIDLANDS South Carolina State House native The three-story Italian Renaissance Revival State House of granite, and brick was designed by John R. Niernsee. It is iron, Columbia. only structure on Main Street that predates the burning the of noticed that it was a "handsome granite structure." But when 1865, he building allowed as his army arrived outside the city on February 16, When General Sherman first glimpsed the unfinished authorized the Confederate flag waving defiantly above the building he he his batteries to fire on it from a distance of mark one-half mile. Bronze stars on the south and west exterior more than the spots where the shells hit. Begun in 1851, the State House walls Milburn was not completed until 1907. After Niernsee's death in 1885, drum, designed the central dome with a square base, Frank and and cupola. In 1907 Charles Coker Wilson added the octagonal and south porticoes. Impressive granite stairs lead to these columns north the second-floor entrances. LOCATION: Main and Gervais streets. HOURS: 9-12 and 1:30-4 The South Carolina State House is constructed of blue granite from local quarries. To Monday-Friday. FEE: None. TELEPHONE: 803-734-2430. transport the stone, a special three-mile railroad was built from Columbia to the quarries in 1857. OVERLEAF: The ruins of Millwood, the house where the Confederate General Wade Hampton spent much of his boyhood. University of South Carolina-Horseshoe the Founded in 1801 and opened in 1805 as South Carolina Movietone News film collection, newsreels shot worldwide from shoe original part of the campus was laid out in the shape of College, a horse- 1919 to 1963. Horseshoe and surrounded by a brick wall. Located in the 1827 is the Maxcy Monument, designed by Robert center Mills of the LOCATION: 900 Sumter Street. HOURS: 9-4 Monday-Friday, 10-5 the Civil was the first of five college buildings constructed completed here in Rutledge 1805, College, also designed by Robert Mills and Maxcy. to honor the first college president, Dr. Jonathan in Saturday, 1-5 Sunday, FEE: None. TELEPHONE: 803-777-7251. Near the campus is the South Carolina Confederate Relic Room and Union War. It was used as a Confederate hospital, as before for Museum (920 Sumter Street, 803-734-9813), where exhibits focus Reconstruction. troops, and as a General Assembly meeting place quarters on all periods of South Carolina history, with the primary collection In 1865 the school was rechartered during devoted to the period of the Confederacy. Relics include firearms a a three-story brick Greek Revival building built in 1840, ed University in of South Carolina. The South Caroliniana Library, as locat- the made in South Carolina, sabers, flags, currency, newspapers, pho- tographs, and uniforms from the colonial period to the present. large and collection of South Carolina manuscripts, personal holds Built in 1846 and designed by Edward Brickell White after the antique silver and cut gemstones, as well as exhibits of maps, prints. The McKissick Museum features collections papers, design of England's York Cathedral, Trinity Cathedral (1100 Sumter Street) is one of the South's finest examples of ecclesiastical Gothic continuously shows selections from the museum's extensive folklife, history, modern art, and science. A popular on gallery Southern here Revival architecture. The structure survived the burning of the city in 1865. It has old-fashioned box pews, hand-carved choir stalls, a marble baptismal font designed by Hiram Powers, and a ceiling with associate of science in nursing at Beaufort in cooperation with Beaufort Technical cember 1807. North Hall (later De Saussure College) was completed in 1809. College and at Sumter with Sumter Area Technical College and associate of Thomas Cooper (BDAE) was president from 1820 to 1834. Robert Woodward science in general commerce and in secretarial science at Lancaster and Union Barnwell served as president from 1835 to 1841 and again from 1866 to 1873. and in criminal justice at Lancaster. The College of Engineering was established in 1848. College Hall was built in University of South Carolina-Beaufort had more than 700 students and a full- 1855. Cadet companies were organized in 1861, and the college was closed in time faculty of 17 in the 1980s at a five-building campus that had been the site June 1862 when the entire student body volunteered for service in the Confederate of the former Beaufort College. Student activities include the Student Government army. The college buildings were used as a Confederate military hospital during Association, an honor society, and a student newspaper. University of South the rest of the Civil War. The Union Army took possession of the college Carolina-Lancaster had more than 700 students and a full-time faculty of 34 on buildings on May 25, 1865. Maximilian LaBorde, head of the school from 1861 a four-building campus. Among fifteen student organizations are the Student to 1865, was credited with saving the college from destruction during the military Government Association, No Name Communicator weekly newspaper, and campaign of William Tecumseh Sherman. Excalibur/Synthesis yearbook and magazine. University of South Carolina- The institution was reopened as the University of South Carolina in 1865. Salkehatchie enrolled more than 700 students and had a full-time faculty of 34. Schools of Law and Medicine were established. Admission of a black student There are seven buildings on the Allendale campus located on three separate in 1873 led to resignation of the faculty; the school was reorganized and reopened sites. The thirteen student organizations include the Student Government with restrictions imposed on admission of black students. A normal school was Association, an honor society, and Salkehatchie Literary Magazine. There is an opened in Rutledge Hall. Continued conflict led to the college being closed again intercollegiate baseball team. The University of South Carolina-Sumter enrolled in 1877. It was opened as the South Carolina College of Agriculture and Mechanic more than 1,200 students and had a full-time faculty of 43. The University of Arts in October 1880 with William Porcher Miles as president (1880-1882). He South Carolina-Union had more than 300 students and a full-time faculty of 14. was succeeded by John McLaren McBryde (1882-1891) and James Woodrow It is located on a nine-acre campus with six buildings. Among student organizations (1891-1897). The Law School was established in 1884. The college was re- is the Student Government Association, a student newspaper, and a yearbook. chartered in 1906 as the University of South Carolina. Samuel Chiles Mitchell The university system conducts the bachelor of arts in interdisciplinary studies (BDAE) was president from 1908 to 1913; he was succeeded by William Spenser degree program, which permits students to earn all but fifteen credits in the two- Currell (1914-1922). The Students' Army Training Corps was conducted on the year colleges and in correspondence, television, or independent studies. Extension campus during World War I. The College of Education was established in 1906, classes and graduate courses are conducted at the two-year campuses. The two- the School of Commerce in 1919, and the College of Journalism in 1923. Leonard year campuses are administered by deans. Thomas Franklin Jones, Jr., president Theodore Baker (1931-1936) and James Rion McKissick (1936-1944) directed of the University of South Carolina from 1962, became the first president of the the university during the Great Depression and World War II. Naval V-5 and system in 1964; he also served as chancellor of the Columbia campus from 1964 V-12 programs were conducted on the campus during World War II. to 1974. A twenty-member board of trustees governs the system; it is comprised The School of Nursing was instituted in 1957. A regional campus system was of representatives from each of the state's sixteen judicial districts and four ex organized in 1957 with opening of the first extension center in Florence, South Carolina. Additional branch campuses were established at Conway (1959) and officio members: the governor, state superintendent of education, and the chairmen of the state senate and house committees on education. The board selects the Aiken (1961), South Carolina. The Conway branch had been organized as Caro- lina Coastal Junior College in 1954 in affiliation with the College at Charleston.* president of the system, who also serves as president of the University of South In 1958 the College of Charleston discontinued the affiliation, and in 1959 the junior Carolina at Columbia. James Bowker Holderman has been president of the system and of the University of South Carolina at Columbia since 1977. college chose to become a regional campus of the university. The Aiken campus was initiated in 1961 as a two-year branch. Thomas Franklin Jones, Jr., served the longest South Carolina, University of. The Horseshoe, Columbia, South Carolina term as president from 1962 to 1974. In 1964 the university was reorganized as the 29208 (803) 777-3101. The South Carolina legislature granted a charter for University of South Carolina System, the president of the university also serving as South Carolina College at Columbia, South Carolina, on December 19, 1801. president of the system. The School of Medicine was opened in 1977. South Carolina A twenty-four-acre site was acquired, and South Building (later Rutledge Col- College was reestablished as the honors college in 1978. lege) was constructed in 1803. Jonathan Maxcy (BDAE) was appointed the first On the 216-acre main campus are more than 130 buildings, including South president in 1804; he served until his death on June 4, 1820. The college was Caroliniana Library (1840), World War Memorial building, Old Observatory, opened on January 10, 1805, to nine students with a faculty of two. The first Osborne Administration Building, Sloan College art building, Barnwell College degrees were conferred on one student in 1806 and five male students in De- psychology building, Humanities Classroom Building, Rutledge College Chapel, Medical Sciences Building, Peabody College of Education, Carolina Coliseum master of arts degrees. The College of Humanities and Social Sciences confers (1968), Law Center (1973), Sumwalt College of Engineering, Gambrell Audito- bachelor of arts, science, fine arts, music, media arts, and arts in interdisciplinary rium (1976), Russell House student center (1976), Earth and Water Sciences studies; master of arts; master of public administration; and doctor of philosophy building (1981), Jones Physical Sciences Center, Coker Life Sciences building degrees. The College of Journalism grants bachelor of arts in journalism, master (1976), Thomas Cooper Library (1976), Callcott Social Sciences Center, Booker of arts, and master of mass communication degrees. Located at the college are the T. Washington Medical Center, Soloman Blatt Physical Education Center (1970), South Carolina Press Association, South Carolina Broadcasters Association, South 32 student residence halls, and 4 apartment house complexes. The School of Med- Carolina Scholastic Press Association, South Carolina Scholastic Broadcasters icine facilities are located at the Veterans Administration Medical Center. The Association, and Southern Interscholastic Press Association. The College of university maintains the R. G. Bell Camp recreation facility thirteen miles south Nursing offers bachelor of science in nursing, master of nursing, and associate in of the campus. Among graduates were Christopher Gustavus Memminger (BDAE); science in nursing degrees. Confederate army generals Wade Hampton, Maxcy Gregg, and Thomas M. Lo- The College of Pharmacy awards bachelor of science in pharmacy and master gan; governors George McDuffie, John Peter Richardson, Robert E. McNair, and of science degrees. The doctor of philosophy degree is offered jointly with the John C. West; Cardinal Joseph Bernardin; U.S. Senator Frederick Hollings; and Medical University of South Carolina.* The College of Science and Mathematics industrialist John E. Swearingen. Among graduates who served on the faculty was confers bachelor of science, science in chemistry, and science in medical tech- Newton Edwards (BDAE); other faculty members included Edward Southey Joynes nology; master of arts, mathematics, and science; and doctor of philosophy de- (BDAE) and Francis Lieber (BDAE). grees. The master of arts in teaching and interdisciplinary master of arts in teaching University of South Carolina is a public, coeducational, residential and com- degrees are offered in cooperation with the College of Education. The College of muter university operating on the semester academic calendar with two summer Librarianship grants master of librarianship and specialist in librarianship de- sessions. In the 1980s there were more than 17,000 full-time and 8,000 part-time students with a full-time faculty of 980 and a part-time faculty of 265. The uni- grees. There is a joint master of arts/master of librarianship degrees program with versity is organized into colleges of Applied Professional Sciences, Business the Department of English. The College of Social Work offers the master of social Administration, Criminal Justice, Education, Engineering, Health, Humanities and work degree. The Law School awards the juris doctor degree. There are joint juris doctor/master of business administration, accountancy, arts in economics, and Social Sciences, Journalism, Nursing, Pharmacy, Science and Mathematics, Li- brarianship, and Social Work; Law School; School of Medicine; Graduate School; public administration degrees programs. Law student organizations include the and South Carolina College. The College of Applied Professional Sciences offers Student Bar Association, two law fraternities, and an honor society. Students pub- bachelor of arts in interdisciplinary studies, science, and science in interdiscipli- lish the South Carolina Law Review. The school conducts institutes of Law and nary studies and associate in science degrees. It includes a Hotel, Restaurant and Education, Criminal Justice, Legal History, and Continuing Legal Education. Tourism Administration program. The College of Business Administration awards The Medical School confers doctor of medicine and doctor of philosophy de- bachelor of science in business administration; master of business administration, grees. Affiliated with the school are Richland Memorial Hospital, William S. Hall science, and accountancy; and doctor of philosophy degrees. It conducts the Charles Psychiatric Institute, and W.J.B. Dorn Veterans Administration Medical Center. E. Daniel Center for Management Education and the Bureau of Business and Eco- South Carolina College conducts honors programs for the colleges of Humanities nomic Research. The College of Criminal Justice confers bachelor of science and and Social Sciences and Science and Mathematics; it awards the master of criminal justice degrees. baccalaurens artium et scientiae (bachelor of arts and science) degree. The Degrees granted by the College of Education are bachelor of arts in education, university conducts the Belle W. Baruch Institute for Marine Biology and Coastal science in education, and music education; master of arts, education, and arts in Research, Bureau of Governmental Research and Service, Center for Industrial teaching; interdisciplinary master of arts in teaching; education specialist; doctor Research, Earth Sciences and Resources Institute, Institute of Archeology and of education; and doctor of philosophy. It publishes the University of South Car- Anthropology, Institute of International Studies, Social Problems Research In- olina Education Report. The College of Engineering offers bachelor of science in stitute, and Institute for Southern Studies. It operates the University of South engineering, master of engineering, master of science, and doctor of philosophy Carolina Press. The university participates with Winthrop College* in the Uni- degrees. The College of Health is organized into the School of Public Health and versity Affiliated Facilities Program to improve the quality of life for the disabled departments of Physical Education and Communicative Disorders. It awards and handicapped. It is a member of the National Student Exchange program. bachelor of science in health education, arts in health education, and science in Students may enroll in Air Force, Army, and Naval Reserve Officers' Training physical education; master of science, audiology, speech pathology, education, Corps program. Among more than 250 student organizations are the Student arts in teaching, public health, and science in public health; and interdisciplinary Government, professional associations, Phi Beta Kappa (1926). and 12 other honor societies, 18 social fraternities, and 12 social sororities. Students publish Student Government, professional associations, and special interest groups. Stu- the Gamecock triweekly student newspaper, the Garnet and Black yearbook, dents publish the Hoof student newspaper and Broken Ink literary magazine. The and Portfolio student magazine and operate WUSC-FM radio station. The uni- college participates in men's baseball and golf, women's volleyball, and men's versity is a member of the Metropolitan Collegiate Athletic Conference and and women's basketball. The Gregg-Graniteville Library has more than 78,000 participates in men's football, track, cross-country, baseball, and soccer; wom- volumes. The college is accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and en's softball and volleyball; and men's and women's basketball, golf, tennis, Schools. Robert E. Alexander became chancellor in 1983. and swimming. The Thomas Cooper, Business, Law, Map, Medical, Music, REFERENCE: Frankie H. Cubbedge, University of South Carolina-Aiken. and South Caroliniana libraries have more than 1.9 million volumes. The uni- South Carolina Coastal Carolina College, University of. Post Office Box versity is accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools. James 1954, Conway, South Carolina 29526 (803) 347-3161. On July 23, 1954, a Bowker Holderman has been president since 1977. group of citizens of Horry County, South Carolina, met in the county library to REFERENCES: John A. Bernardin, Jr., University of South Carolina; Daniel Walker Hollis, University of South Carolina, 2 vols. (Columbia: University of South Carolina discuss the need for a local college. The group formed the Coastal Education Press, 1951 and 1956). Foundation on August 6, 1954, and Coastal Carolina Junior College was opened South Carolina-Aiken, University of. 171 University Parkway, Aiken, South on September 23, 1954, with 53 students under E. J. Woodhouse (1954-1955). Carolina 29801 (803) 648-6851. The South Carolina legislature granted authority The college was affiliated with the College of Charleston* as a branch campus with classes conducted in the Conway High School. The College of Charleston to the University of South Carolina to establish a two-year, off-campus branch discontinued the affiliation in 1958. On August 1, 1959, the college signed a campus at Aiken, South Carolina, in 1961. In September 1961 the Aiken Center was opened in Banksia, a renovated mansion in Aiken, with 139 students and contract as a two-year regional college of the University of South Carolina.* a faculty of 3, including Christopher S. Sharpe as director (1961-1963). He was Edward Marion Singleton became director of the school on July 1, 1963; he succeeded by William Cecil Casper in 1963 who became chancellor in 1969 and served until 1983. The college was moved in September 1963 into a new admin- served until 1983. In 1964 the college became a part of the University of South istration/classroom building on a 185-acre site that had been donated by Bur- Carolina System. The campus was moved to a new 100-acre site in 1972 where roughs Timber Company and the International Paper Company. In 1964 the the Classroom/Administration Building was completed. In 1973 the offering of college became a part of the University of South Carolina System. In 1972 the junior level courses was approved, and in 1975 senior level courses and granting South Carolina General Assembly granted the college the right to add a third of baccalaureate degree programs were approved. In September 1976 the campus year when enrollment reached 700 and a fourth year at 1,000 students; the third was granted academic autonomy, and the first bachelor's degrees were awarded year was added in 1973 and the fourth in 1974. The first bachelor's degrees in May 1977. The college gained regional accreditation in 1977. On the 144- were awarded in 1974. On the campus are seven buildings: Administrative acre campus are the Administration/Classroom Building (1972), Gregg-Granite- Building (1963), Williams-Brice physical education and nursing building (1972), ville Library (1975), Student Activities Center (1977), Classroom Building (1978), Academic Building (1974), William A. Kimbel Library/Classroom Building and Supply and Maintenance Center (1979). (1977), College Center (1978), Fine Arts Building (1979), Wheelwright Per- University of South Carolina-Aiken is a public, coeducational, commuter forming Arts Center (1981), and Science Building (1982). college operating on the semester academic calendar with two summer sessions. University of South Carolina Coastal Carolina College is a public, coeduca- In the 1980s there were 1,140 full-time and 600 part-time students with a full- tional, commuter, liberal arts college. It operates on the semester academic time faculty of 80 and a part-time faculty of 50. The college is organized into calendar and conducts summer sessions. In the 1980s there were 2,300 students divisions of Arts and Letters; Business Administration and Economics; Educa- and a faculty of about 115. The college is organized into schools of Business tion; Mathematics, Computer Science and Engineering; Natural Sciences; Nurs- Administration; Health, Physical Education, and Recreation; Humanities; Math- ing; and Social and Behavioral Sciences. Degrees offered are bachelor of arts, ematics, Computer Science, and Statistics; Nursing; Science; Social and Behav- science, and interdisciplinary studies; associate of arts; associate of science; and ioral Sciences; and Teacher Education. Degrees offered are bachelor of science associate in science in technical nursing. The Office of Continuing Education in business administration, science in physical education, arts, science, arts in offers a variety of noncrediti courses and workshops. The Graduate Regional education, and science in education; associate in arts; and associate in science Studies Office provides credit toward graduate degrees offered by the University in nursing. The School of Science operates the M/S Coastal research vessel. It of South Carolina* at Columbia. Students may enroll in Reserve Officers' Train- maintains a close relationship with the University of South Carolina's Belle W. ing Corps programs at the University of South Carolina (Naval) and at Augusta Baruch Marine Field Laboratory at nearby Georgetown, South Carolina. Among Colleget (Army). There are more than fifty student organizations, including the forty student organizations are the Student Government Association, five honor