Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
323153182
label
Reserve Officers Assoc. 1/23/91 [OA 8321] [2]
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
323153182
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
512a5d14270018f8
ocrText
Originally Processed With FOIA(s): FOIA Number: S S FOIA MARKER This is not a textual record. This is used as an administrative marker by the George Bush Presidential Library Staff. Record Group/Collection: George H.W. Bush Presidential Records Collection/Office of Origin: Speechwriting, White House Office of Series: Speech File Backup Files Subseries: Chron File, 1989-1993 OA/ID Number: 13744 Folder ID Number: 13744-004 Folder Title: Reserve Officers Assoc. 1/23/91 [OA 8321] [2] Stack: Row: Section: Shelf: Position: G 26 21 2 4 703 697 9080 SECDEF CABLES 003 ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20301 ERVE AFFAIRS MEMORANDUM FOR MS. KATHIE EMBODY, EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE SUBJECT: Invitation to the President from the Reserve Officers Association Kattie- After reflection, I recommend that the President accept the invitation from ROA. I see no policy or political risk for the President in appearing before this particular organization and I can think of several reasons why an acceptance would be desirable. I have listed these reasons below: 1. The symbolic effect of a personal appearance before a large Reserve Organization at this time would be very important, since we are engaged in the first involuntary call-up of Reservists in 20 years. Moreover, the scale of the call-up is very large. As of November 18, some 6,408 volunteer Reservists were serving in connection with Operation DESERT SHIELD. Several thousand others had already served. Secretary Cheney has authorized an involuntary call-up of 126,250 Reservists and 44,847 of those had been activated. Since that time, several thousand more have been activated. 2. The employers and families of Reservists who have been called up can be expected to become increasingly restive the longer their employee/spouse-Reservists are absent from the workplace and home. An explanation by the President of the importance of Reserve forces to the attainment of our objectives in DESERT SHIELD would do more than dampen potential complaints. It would be an effective way to build and to solidify support for our efforts in the Persian Gulf. 3. This invitation offers an enthusiastic and very supportive forum in which the President could address any issues which he deems important. More than 2,000 people were in the audience in January 1988 when President Reagan made a very successful address to the ROA Mid-Winter Conference. Important speeches to the ROA are printed and given wide publicity. 4. As Major General Hultman notes in his letter to the President, the ROA is a somewhat unique Reserve organization. There are many National Guard and Reserve Organizations (e.g., the National Guard Association of the United States, the Naval Reserve Association, the Marine Corps Reserve Officers Association, Enlisted Association of the National Guard of 703 697 9080 SECDEF CABLES 004 United States, Adjutants General Association of the United ates), but the ROA did receive an official charter from ongress when it was incorporated by an Act of Congress in 1950. 5. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and I addressed the ROA last January in the middle of Operation JUST CAUSE. Volunteer Reservists were performing important missions during that operation and we learned that all of the Reserve components (Army Reserve, Army National Guard, Naval Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, Air Force National Guard, Air Force Reserve, and Coast Guard Reserve) were terribly interested to learn how Reservists were being used, and how the Total Force Policy was being applied in that operation. I have no doubt that there is even greater interest in the use of Reservists in DESERT SHIELD. If you would like to discuss this invitation further, please let me know. Sture Stephen M. Duncan ROA INSERT from Bob Simon INSERT BEFORE FIRST FULL PARAGRAPH ON PAGE 5 Some 70 years ago, at the very first meeting of the ROA, Gen. John J. Pershing's words still speak to us today. He said, "Where would America be today, but for the patriotism of our fathers and sons, and their willingness to stand up for principle? What becomes of nations that are not ready to yield up life and treasure against the aggressor? No nation wants war. We do not seek it. But as long as human greed and hatred exist in the hearts of nations, individual wars are possible." Gen. John Pershing is considered a founder of ROA. Except of his speed, to the 1ST RDA convention 10/3/22 General Pershing's address at that opening convention session was reported in the New York Times of October 3, 1922. The Times was published by Adolph Ochs who strongly believed in Pershing's message, and whose family for several generations strongly supported the plan created by Pershing. Pershing's words come from the files of that paper: "This convention, assembled to perfect an association of Reserve Of- ficers, is of especial importance as a stimulus in the organization of Reserve units throughout the nation. "Before the war there was no conception of even the possibility of such a society. "The number of Reserve officers was practically negligible. "There was no incentive to form a society of this character. "There was, throughout the country, an almost total lack of appreciation of the value of a reserve force of any sort. "But the war brought home to us in a very striking manner the advisabil- ity of reasonable precaution-completely vindicated the advocates of military training and preliminary organization, and demonstrated beyond question the fallacy of pacifist theories. "These results were forced upon us to be sure at the unnecessary cost of valuable life and the lesson has sunk deep in the breasts of all save those who having eyes see not, and having ears hear not. The experience so far has awakened the country to a realization of our pre-war situation that a resolve has gone forth, embodied in the law of 1920, that never again shall our un- trained boys be compelled to serve their country on the battlefield under the leadership of new officers with practically no conception of their duties and responsibilities 7 "I am not one of those who would have our people forget the bitter ex- Off perience of war-nor eliminate from our histories all reference to war, but oth instead would have every child become familiar with the sacrifices of their ancestors in the cause of right. Where would America be today but for the nat I patriotism of our fathers and our sons and their willingness to stand up for mil principle? Are we to minimize the importance to humanity of their part in in the war of the Revolution, or the World War? What becomes of nations or the people that are not ready to yield up life and treasure against the aggressor? I "NO NATION WANTS WAR. WE DO NOT SEEK IT, BUT AS LONG tril AS HUMAN GREED AND HATRED EXIST IN THE HEARTS OF NA- TIONS AND INDIVIDUALS WARS ARE POSSIBLE." Source: "The ROA Story" by John T. carlton 4 John F. Slinkman BOB - - "TAKE BACK THE GULF!" -E. McNally/Simon Jan. 16, 1991 Draft One (B:RESERVE) PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: U.S. RESERVE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION WASHINGTON HILTON WEDNESDAY, JAN. 23, 1991, 7:30 P.M. ( (At ease!) ) III Thank you, "Curly" [[Gen. Evan Hultman]]. And thank you, each of you -- not for standing up to greet me -- but for standing up for the fighting men and women defending freedom tonight in the Persian Gulf! III I'm proud to be back here with the Reserve Officers Association once again, and honored to be named the R.O.A. "Minute Man of the Year." I was born in Massachusetts -- home of the original Minute Man. But when we moved to Texas, I remember one guy bragging to me about the heroes of the Alamo. He said: "I bet you never had anybody so brave around Massachusetts." So I asked him: "Ever hear of Paul Revere?" And he said: "Paul Revere? Isn't that the guy who ran for help?!" \\\\ Of course, Paul Revere didn't really run for help -- he rode for freedom. And this month, far from home, America's best and bravest once again took to the freedom trail. This month marks a critical moment in history -- a moment of truth -- for this generation, for this nation, for this world. We were patient. We were cautious. We were slow to anger. But when the moment of truth came, America did the right thing. The Coalition did the right thing. And our troops did it well. We've come a long way -- as a Nation, and as a people -- since the days when despots could afford to take Americans 2 hostage, smug in the knowledge that nothing would be done. But this time it was different. We said that if allied troops were forced to liberate Kuwait, we would do the job quickly, massively and decisively. We said that if one American soldier had to go into battle, he would have enough force behind him to win. We said that the occupation of Kuwait would not stand. And today in the Gulf, America is keeping her word. 111 Today in the Gulf, the liberation of Kuwait has begun. 111 Today in the Gulf: It's hammer time. III Exactly one week ago, the battle was joined. Having refused to face the cold hard facts, Saddam now faces cold hard steel. It is a conflict we did not seek and did not begin. But ladies and gentlemen -- it's one we do intend to finish. III Yes, the liberation of Kuwait has begun. It has marked a proud day for every American -- and my proudest moment as Commander-in-Chief -- of the best-trained, best-equipped, and best-educated fighting force ever assembled! 111 I know our fighting men and women are heartened by the tremendous outpouring of support from the American people and the Congress. Because when I said last week that this will not be another Vietnam, I meant two things: First -- that never again will our fighting men and women be sent in to do a job with one hand tied behind their back. III And second, just as important, never again will they be sent in to do a job without the full backing of the folks back home. 3 Over the past week, the outpouring of compassion, the outpouring of love and faith and support for our troops from Americans of all walks of life has been overwhelming. Maybe you saw the comments from some of the folks in Abilene, Kansas -- hometown of Dwight D. Eisenhower. Kevin Mickey told a reporter he has no doubt that the U.S. action was necessary and will end in victory. He said: "We're the kind of people who win wars We're not sophisticated. But we know right from wrong." And Esther Foltz, who has a grandson in the Gulf, said that: "We're going to win this thing. And the world's going to be better." Esther's right. Building a better world is an important part of what the Coalition is all about. Last fall at the United Nations, I described my vision of what this new partnership of nations might look like. I called it a "partnership based on consultation, co-operation, and collective action -- especially through interna-tional organizations. A partnership united by principle and the rule of law, and supported by an equitable sharing of both cost and commitment. A partnership whose goals are to increase demo-cracy, increase prosperity, increase the peace and reduce arms." Looking back, that sounds like a pretty fair description of the unprecedented partnership that's today standing up to the aggression in the Gulf. Gone are the days when America was the lone cop on the beat. Today the Coalition in the Gulf is not so much a global policeman as it is a neighborhood fire department -- a volunteer fire department that's no longer willing to 4 stand idly by and watch the world's flash points catch fire. Today, the fire brigade in the Gulf is a cooperative and committed force freely supported by the world community for the mutual protection of the neighborhood. The volunteers come from 28 nations spanning five continents. Of an estimated $ billion in operating costs, an estimated $ billion, or 80 percent, is being paid by countries other than the United States. But even a volunteer fire department needs a leader. And whether today or in the years to come, that leader must be -- that leader can only be --- the United States of America. III The United States has always borne a disproportionate share -- not only of costs -- but also of leadership. And that's how it should be. History is moving decisively in America's favor -- thanks, in large part, to our own perserverance. The hall- marks of the modern world -- which the emerging democracies are now striving for -- are free markets, free movement, free speech, and free elections. America's had all these things for over 200 years. They have given us both our power and our purpose. And I can assure you -- America, and the world -- that we have not come through 214 years of history, fighting for freedom, only to back down now. The United States is unique. Only the United States can bear this responsibility. Not Europe, not the new Germany, not the Soviet Union, not Japan. We come from every nation on Earth -- citizens of the world -- tracing our roots to Italy and Mexico, Germany and China, Western Africa and Southeast Asia. We 5 are the one nation on this Earth that can stand against the forces of aggression, and for the forces of peace. Among the nations of the world, only the United States has both this moral standing and the means to back it up. Tonight, the world is united by shared commitments, shared interests, shared hopes. Tonight, our efforts will determine the kind of legacy we bequeath our children, the kind of world they will live in. And so tonight, let us re-dedicate ourselves to the ideals in which our troops so fiercely believe. Because our goals will not be fully achieved until we live in a world where every country is shaking hands -- and none are shaking fists. III And when this crisis is over, the opportunities ahead will be truly historic. Iraq can be welcomed back into the community of nations. And at the confluence of the Tigris and Euphrates -- where civilization began -- civilization can begin anew. 111 Tonight's dinner has special drama, not the least of which is the fact that some of the members of the R.O.A. who usually attend are an active duty with Desert Storm. From the moment they were called up on August 22nd, our Reservists have demonstrated the unique skills of the "citizen-soldier" -- and reminded us of the key role our Reserve Forces play in our Nation's defense strategy. Reserve volunteers were vital to the success of the early stages of Desert Shield, especially in communications, airlift and medical support. Today, more than 50,000 Reservists stand with the forces of the Coalition in the Gulf. And as we've seen this week in Desert Storm -- our 6 Reservists and National Guardsmen rank among the finest fighter, attack and transport pilots on Earth! The Reserves are doing their part. But I know that, at times like this, every American wants to lend a hand, and asks: "What can I do?" Well, one possibility was suggested in a letter I received from Ann Macker, a Navy nurse serving in the Persian Gulf tonight aboard the USNS Comfort. She wrote: "There is something [every American] can do Please stand outside in the cold night air and search for that star. When you find it -- and it will be there -- please pray for [us] and ask the Good Lord to bring us home safely. " And so, as you go to home tonight, look up at the night sky and send a prayer eastward towards the morning sun -- across the ocean and halfway across the world -- to the brave men and women who carry with them our hopes, our dreams, and our love. And let me say again to our troops what I said in my holiday address: The sacrifices you make will never be forgotten. America is behind you. The world is behind you. And history is behind you. And when you come home -- and we hope and pray it's soon -- you will be welcomed as what you are -- all-American heroes. The world is watching. And the world is with you. Thank you. Goodnight. And God bless the United States of America. # # # OF DEFENSE DEFENSE ISSUES Vol. 5 No. 24 The Total Force: Pillar Of U.S. Military Strategy Statement by Stephen M. Duncan, assistant secretary of defense (Reserve affairs), to the Defense Subcommittee, Senate Appropriations Committee, April 24, 1990. The Reserve forces of the today with a brief description of ber of rounds fired was the psy- United States enter the 1990s the actual performance of four chological effect on members of after a decade of growth and of the seven Reserve compo- the Panamanian Defense Forces improvement which have nents in the operation in Panama of the combat aircraft buzzing assured their status as the best which commenced on Dec. 20, isolated PDF installations. The Reserve forces in the world. I 1989. visible presence of the aircraft have no doubt that the improve- was credited as a major factor in ment in their capabilities has Operation Just Cause the widespread surrender of PDF contributed directly to what the Statistical data and words forces without a fight. Three secretary of defense described in often have limited utility in con- days after the operation began, his own recent testimony to veying the true quality and the Air Guard personnel from Congress as a "historic transfor- readiness condition of military the 180th were replaced by mation of the global security units and personnel. Intangibles, crews from the 114th TFG in environment." As we engage in such as morale, the quality of Sioux Falls, S.D., who were the continuing task of de- leadership, unit cohesiveness, flown to Panama on C-141 air- veloping specific policies to etc., can make a unit much bet- craft piloted by the Air National implement our national security ter than objective data would Guard in Mississippi. strategy, I'm honored to once suggest. The converse is also During the very early stages of again have the opportunity to true. The best measurement of the operation, other Air National appear before the committee to quality and readiness is actual Guard crews flew missions, with report on the condition of the performance. C-130 aircraft airlifting 553 tons Reserve forces and to discuss In the recent and highly visible of cargo and 3,107 people, the important responsibilities test of performance in Panama, including the very first aero- which our Reserve forces have National Guardsmen and reserv- medical evacuation flight to the been asked, and reasonably can ists with a wide range of skills, U.S. The 172nd Military Air be asked, to assume in the including many unique skills, Group of the Air National Guard future. performed brilliantly. flew C-141 missions from its For almost two decades, the The Army chief of staff has home station in Jackson, Miss., Total Force Policy has been a described Operation Just Cause transporting 1,733 people and basic pillar of our military strat- as one of the most complex con- 437 tons of cargo to Panama. The egy. The express purpose and tingency deployments and 105th MAG of the Air National the recent effect of that policy employments that U.S. forces Guard (New York) flew 49 C-5 has, of course, been to place a have undertaken since World Galaxy missions, airlifting 637 substantial portion of our total War II. When the operation personnel and more than 1,000 military power in a high quality, began on Dec. 20, 1989, person- tons of cargo. Hundreds of addi- volunteer, well-trained, well- nel from the 180th Tactical tional missions were flown in the equipped and early mobilizable Fighter Group of the Air National later stages of the conflict. Other Reserve force. In recent years, I Guard from Toledo, Ohio, were Air National Guard personnel have discussed the quality of our engaged in regularly scheduled provided various kinds of sup- Reserve forces with various com- training at Howard (Air Base) port to active Air Force person- mittees of the Congress. Since Panama, with five of their A-7 nel who were engaged in the the quality of the Reserve com- aircraft. The 180th flew 76 close operation. ponents is directly relevant to air-support sorties and expended Similar missions were flown by any consideration of the efficacy in excess of 2,700 rounds of Air Force Reserve personnel. of the Total Force Policy, permit ammunition. Two AC-130 gunships from the me to introduce my testimony More significant than the num- 919th Special Operations Group 1 "The best measurement of quality and Cause was the work of the Army Reserve civil affairs personnel readiness is actual performance. In the who very ably demonstrated the recent and highly visible test of often unique skills of the "cit- izen-soldier." Soon after the performance in Panama, National operation began, warning orders were issued to specific Army Guardsmen and reservists with a wide range Reserve civil affairs units. Army of skills, including many unique skills, Reservists by the hundreds immediately began calling to vol- performed brilliantly." unteer to go to Panama. Shortly after the operation commenced, SOUTHCOM re- quested that reservists with specific skills be deployed to of the Air Force Reserve were a despite these conditions and the Panama to conduct joint civil- major contributor to the success confusion that inevitably sur- military operations and spe- of the operation, flying 38 com- rounds combat operations is cifically to assist the new bat sorties, hitting key facilities vivid testimony to the profes- government of Panama in the and providing cover for Army sionalism of the active Air Force, restoration of essential gov- troops held hostage in the Mar- Air National Guard and Air Force ernmental services, in the riott Hotel in Panama City. Reserve crews which were assessment of the longer-term Associate KC-10 tanker units flew involved. needs of the country and in the 13 missions to refuel aircraft and Other National Guardsmen care of thousands of displaced offload 1,169,000 pounds of fuel. and reservists were also actively Panamanian citizens. Six separate C-5 and C-141 asso- involved in the early stages of The first contingent of Army ciate airlift units from five states the conflict. When the attack Reserve civil affairs specialists flew 71 missions (852 flying began, the 1138th Military Police arrived in Panama the day after hours), airlifting 3,927 personnel Company of the Army National Christmas, six days after the con- and 1,921 tons of cargo as part Guard (Missouri) was also con- flict began. By Jan. 1, a total of of their participation in the initial ducting annual training in 222 Army Reserve civil affairs assault air drop and during fol- Panama. That unit was the only personnel had arrived. Special- low-on air-land missions. military police unit in Panama ists immediately began advising In addition to the airlift and specially trained to process the ministers of the new govern- gunship crew support, Air Force POWs and civilian detainees. At ment on the rebuilding of the Reservists provided significant 1600 hours (4 p.m.) of the first day, the unit had constructed a governmental infrastructure. support in aerial refueling, aero- medical evacuation, aerial port, holding facility and was receiving Immediate steps were taken to prisoners. Although the unit was assist the new government in its intelligence and base operating efforts to build the new Public support. Reserve crews flew 10 scheduled to complete its train- Forces of Panama from the ashes aeromedical evacuation mis- ing and return home on Dec. 21, of the Panamanian Defense over one-half of its members sions. Air Force Reserve volunteered to remain in Panama Forces and to change the entire aeromed units volunteered 1,000 culture and attitude of the for- mandays of effort, and some 208 over the holiday period for an additional two weeks. mer members of the PDF so that nurses and technicians sup- The augmentation of the active the FPP will become a police ported 225 litter patients and 42 force staffs during the crisis was force dedicated to the protection ambulatory patients. They staffed another task that National of the citizens of Panama, rather medical facilities at Kelly Air Guardsmen and reservists per- than a military force which intim- Force Base, Texas, and the formed well. At the request of idates and abuses. nearby Wilford Hall U.S. Air the U.S. Southern Command, Army Reservists who serve as Force Medical Center (Lackland some 61 USAR (U.S. Army Re- judges, prosecutors and precinct AFB, Texas). serve) individual mobilization policemen in their private lives When I visited our Reserve augmentees volunteered to quickly designed a course of forces in Panama in January, I provide staff and related support instruction forall members of the was informed that at certain to both SOUTHCOM and several new FPP. The course included times during the intense early of its subordinate commands such subjects as "Police Ethics" hours of the assault, aircraft during the around-the-clock and "Human Rights," as well as were landing at Howard intense operations. The 366th such standard subjects as chain- every 15 seconds, on a very Army Reserve Public Affairs of-custody procedures for evi- crowded airfield, in blackout Detachment provided in-depth dence, arrest techniques, etc. conditions (because of the dan- media coverage for approx- The prison next to the Comman- ger of mortar rounds from imately 13 days. dancia, the former headquarters nearby hills). The fact that not a One of the more remarkable building of Gen. Manuel Noriega single accident took place stories about Operation Just and the PDF, which had been 2 emptied and ransacked after the "During the intense early hours of the attack began, was soon function- ing again as a result of the assault, aircraft were landing at Howard Air advice and active assistance of a Spanish-speaking Army Reserve Base every 15 seconds, on a very crowded captain who serves in private life airfield, in blackout conditions. The fact that as a U.S. marshal. not a single accident took place is vivid A wide variety of other nation- building tasks were also per- testimony to the professionalism of the formed by Army Reservists. A clean, organized refugee camp active Air Force, Air National Guard and Air for almost 3,000 homeless and Force Reserve crews." displaced persons was imme- diately established. Agriculture and medical specialists promptly commenced highly visible efforts were performing. He replied: the armed forces are sound. to rebuild the distribution sys- "The skills that the Reserves tems for food and medical Unfortunately, much of the supplies-by Jan. 20, 1990, a civil bring (to SOUTHCOM) are a recent public discussion about affairs unit in Colon had already godsend." the Total Force Policy has been The role which National uninformed or at least insuffi- delivered 60 tons of emergency food supplies to outlying dis- Guardsmen and reservists played ciently focused. tricts cut off by the fighting. in Operation Just Cause should Part of the confusion is gener- not be overstated, but their ated by the use of the term Housing, real estate and con- many contributions were clearly "Reserves." While a basic tenet struction specialists began important to the success of the of the Total Force Policy has detailed assessments of the operation. The prompt integra- always been that National Guard short- and long-term housing tion of active, National Guard and Reserve units constitute the needs of the citizens of Panama and Reserve forces into such a primary augmentation of the City, Colon and other areas. Air- formidable fighting force is elo- active component in military port management specialists quent testimony to the conflicts, many Guard and assisted civil airport authorities capabilities of our Reserve forces Reserve units (with a mix of part- in the return to normal civil avia- generally, to the often unique time and full-time personnel) are tion operations. Educational skills and experience they bring fully ready and capable of specialists worked to reopen the to the Total Force and to the responding rapidly to a mobiliza- schools of Panama and to evalu- progress which has been made tion or other orders to active ate the long-term educational in recent years in implementing duty. In this sense, they are not needs of the country. the DoD Total Force Policy. forces to be held in "reserve," Public works specialists but rather early deploying or repaired vehicles and equipment "mobilizable" units more typ- so that the public transportation Understanding the Policy ically found in the traditional system could operate. Engineers In recent months, the Total Continental European conscrip- cleared the streets and attacked Force Policy has become the tion-based reserve system. Other sanitation problems. In Colon, a subject of great public attention American Guard and Reserve sergeant in an Army Reserve civil and of a major study by the units are more characteristic of affairs unit (who works as a civil Department of Defense. On Feb. traditional (later-deploying) engineer in his civilian job) 2, 1990, the secretary of defense Reserve units. designed a screening device for and the chairman of the Joint The Total Force Policy was the intake valves of that city's Chiefs of Staff addressed the never intended to make active, drainage system, which had first meeting of the Total Force career soldiers and Reserve sol- been inoperative for several Policy Study Group, a group on diers fungible items or mirror months due to clogged intake which I am privileged to serve as images of each other. Given the valves and fouled turbines. His vice chairman. limited training time of part-time device worked superbly and will I can assure you that the study citizen-soldiers, sailors, airmen probably save the city from group recognizes fully the great and Marines, as well as the con- serious flooding during the next importance of the Total Force strained budgetary environment rainy season. It has already Policy Study, especially at a time in which the Department of stopped the flow of raw sewage of dramatic geopolitical change Defense will operate in the early into the surrounding river and when we are reducing force 1990s, it is unrealistic to attempt system. structure. A thorough examina- to make every Reserve unit the During my visit to Panama, I tion of the policy is welcome. absolute equal in terms of readi- asked Gen. Max Thurman, the Indeed, it is essential if we are ness and capability of the best commander in chief of SOUTH- to ensure that fundamental deci- active units. Rather, the ob- COM, how our Reserve forces sions concerning how we man jective is to integrate the 3 "One of the more remarkable stories about duct amphibious landings on cold Norwegian beaches, cut Operation Just Cause was the work of the roads through the mountains of Army Reserve civil affairs personnel who Honduras and set up field hospi- tals in exercises on the plains of very ably demonstrated the often-unique Germany. I have been amazed at skills of the 'citizen-soldier.' Soon after the their dedication and their profes- sionalism as I talked with them operation began Army Reservists by the on the decks of aircraft carriers, in the desert hills of the National hundreds immediately began calling to Training Center, near the DMZ in Korea and in armories and volunteer to go to Panama." Reserve centers all over the nation. By any reasonable standard, the Reserve forces are in the capabilities and strengths of peacetime, are unsuitable. Yet highest state of readiness that active and Reserve units in the others can be reasonably as- has been attained since the Total most cost-effective manner, i.e., signed to either active or Force Policy was adopted. Readi- one that provides the most total Reserve units, depending upon ness challenges remain, how- military capability and flexibility how soon the missions must be ever, in specific areas. possible within the limitations of performed after a crisis or con- Deficiencies in the military the budget. flict develops, the demographic In order to discuss the Total profile of particular geographical occupational specialty of certain reservists-i.e., in their individ- Force Policy in a meaningful areas, the particular characteris- ual skill qualification and way, it is important that broad tics of individual units and many other factors. training-have replaced equip- generalities be avoided. Too many military analysts argue for Some National Guard or ment shortages as the most serious readiness deficiency. Last large changes in the force mix Reserve units can assume even year, I informed you of the per- balance for budgetary reasons greater wartime missions and sistent readiness challenges in alone that are unrelated to any peacetime operational respon- the Army's combat-support and apparent manning philosophy or sibilities than they have now. combat-service-support forces. threat evaluation. Others assert Others clearly cannot. Certain Those problems are Army prob- that the Total Force idea has missions which have previously lems, not Reserve problems, but already been carried too far. been assigned to active forces because approximately 70 per- I am skeptical about sugges- could be transferred to Reserve cent of the Army's non-divisional tions of large broad shifts in units, especially if it can be dem- CS/CSS forces are in the Army force mix across all of the onstrated that significant cost Reserve, I have given them a Reserve components as an end savings are available with no loss great deal of personal attention. in itself. I am equally skeptical, or for a comparatively small loss I have been particularly con- however, about simplistic in capability. Other missions cerned about the readiness of and incorrect approaches to should remain with the active certain early deploying CS/CSS force mix that imply that all forces. units. Reserve units can never be "as It is important to remember good" as active units merely Making Reservists Ready that in seeking to maintain because the former train less The readiness of the Reserve required standards of readiness, and similar approaches to components to perform their National Guard and Reserve reductions in force structure wartime missions continues to units face problems that are the which result in "equal" reduc- improve. Readiness levels are, of result of factors which are tions to active and Reserve course, directly related to train- unique to guardsmen and components with no apparent ing. During FY 1989, National reservists-i.e., limited training relationship to strategy or to the Guard and Reserve officers time, the geographic dispersion need for a specific military trained for their wartime mis- of individual reservists and the capability. sions an average of 61 days. fact that Americans generally, A balanced analysis of the Reserve enlisted personnel including reservists, are mobile Total Force Policy must start with trained an average of 42 days. and tend to move from place to a focus on particular missions. One must see our citizen-sol- place. Some missions, which require a diers in training to fully appre- These and many other kinds of high surge of activity in wartime, ciate their capabilities. I have readiness challenges, however, but comparatively low activity in admired their skills while flying are not related to budgetary con- peacetime, are obviously ideal with them in the F-15, the straints. They can be corrected for reservists. Others, such as TAV-8B and other aircraft. I have by innovative thinking, good those which require long peri- felt their enthusiasm and their leadership and management, ods of forward deployment in energy as I watched them con- and by a frank recognition of the 4 fact that the high quality of our modern Reserve forces permits "Many Guard and Reserve units are fully the introduction of training ready and capable of responding rapidly to techniques and the achieve- ment of readiness levels that a mobilization or other orders to active were generally not possible only a few years ago. Several encour- duty. In this sense, they are not forces to be aging developments are taking held in 'reserve,' but rather early deploying place. Some of the most encouraging units more typically found in the work is the result of the Army's Reserve Component Training traditional Continental European Action Plan. The RC TDAP was conscription-based reserve system." prepared subsequent to the completion of an intensive study by the Army of the unique train- ing challenges faced by the Army tary mission (e.g., aviation and those units the resources that Reserve. The RC TDAP consists police work), it is possible and will permit successful of 38 separate initiatives that are desirable to hold most part-time performance. being taken by the Army to rem- reservists to the same standard Under the Total Force Policy, edy these challenges. Emphasis of performance as full-time the secretary of each military is being placed on educating active soldiers only if the reserv- department is responsible for Reserve leaders (officers, warrant ists are trained on fewer total providing the necessary pro- officers and non-commissioned tasks requiring fewer skills. I grams and budgetary actions that officers). Resident courses at the have discussed this problem support the equipping which is Army's Training and Doctrine with the senior leadership of the necessary to ensure that units Command are being recon- Army on a regular basis, and I meet readiness standards and figured to meet the training-time am happy to report that it is the deployment schedules. Since limitations of reservists. A spe- focus of considerable manage- there are insufficient resources cial Skill Qualification Test for ment attention. The Forces to fully fund all programs, clear the Reserve soldier is being Command, for instance, is work- priorities must be established. developed, and expanded use is ing to minimize the number of Prudence and common sense being made of interactive video changes to the deployment suggest that resources can and techniques and regional training schedules. should be given first to those centers. In considering the readiness of units, whether they are active or Other encouraging develop- Reserve forces, it is important to Reserve units, that will be ments include the recent efforts recognize that the readiness of deployed first to a conflict. Since of the Army to eliminate or at certain Reserve units may need 1982, the DoD policy of "first to least to reduce the turbulence in to be kept higher than that fight, first to equip" has guided the CAPSTONE alignment proc- which can be justified solely on the equipment distribution plan- ess, i.e., the process by which the basis of strategy or threat ning of the military departments. Reserve units are assigned war- evaluation. This need is based The policy requires that all units, time missions and deployment on intangible elements such as regardless of component, be schedules. For a variety of rea- morale and sense of accomplish- resourced for equipment, ac- sons, these missions and ment which are directly related cording to the sequence in schedules have been changed to decisions by reservists to which they are required to be in far too often in recent years. The leave or remain in the Reserve place to perform their wartime resulting turbulence has re- forces. The training which is mission. It is important to quired the Reserve units required to maintain certain ensure that when called to active involved to engage in con- minimum levels of readiness duty, all critical Reserve units are tinuous retraining with an usually provides those necessary instantly ready to fight. It will attendant waste of training time, intangibles. not matter at all that the amount inefficient use of resources and The readiness of Reserve units of warning time for future con- loss of esprit de corps. does, of course, depend to a flicts goes up by a factor of five, The importance of stability in great extent upon the availability if we take or permit develop- mission assignments is obvious. of modern equipment. One ments which increase the New unit missions require indi- thing is certain: When Reserve preparation time in which those vidual reservists to obtain new units are assigned significant Reserve units are ready to fight military skills during their limited missions and responsibilities, by a factor of 10! training time. While some they must be given the tools to As we go about the business reservists are engaged in civilian do the job. It is morally inde- of reducing force structure, the occupations that require the fensible to assign missions to implications for the readiness same range of skills that are Reserve units in order to achieve condition of all remaining units, required to perform their mili- cost savings and then fail to give active and Reserve, must be kept 5 "Given the limited training time of part-time shore rotations and to retain the skilled petty officers necessary to citizen-soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines, man the fleet. SIMAs would aug- ment destroyer tenders and as well as the constrained budgetary repair ships for forward battle environment the objective is to integrate damage repair. Selected reserv- ists are trained to backfill the the capabilities and strengths of active and SIMAs upon mobilization. Progress also continues on an Reserve units in the most cost-effective initiative which started in FY manner." 1986-the Army's Regional Train- ing Sites-Maintenance. These sites provide needed training for Reserve component non-divisio- in mind. In this regard, we tion of Reserve heavy equipment nal maintenance units. Of the should guard against the trap of maintenance companies to the planned 21 sites, 12 have been assuming that any reduction in Equipment Maintenance Center activated and are proving valu- military capability or readiness is in Kaiserslautern, Germany, to able in overcoming transition unacceptable. Certain types of solve theater maintenance back- and sustainment maintenance forces must, of course, be kept logs during annual training training shortfalls. at the highest state of readiness. periods has been highly success- The regional training site con- Others need not be. ful. I was updated on this cept is also being extended for In many cases, a shift of force program during a recent trip to medical personnel. Two of seven structure from the active to the Germany. During the test phase medical training sites have been Reserve components would in FY 89, six heavy equipment completed, Camp Shelby, Miss., involve no reduction in capa- Reserve maintenance companies and Fort Indiantown Gap, Pa. bility at all. Even when such a contributed 38,888 productive The Air Force Reserve and Air reduction would result, it may man-hours toward the repair of National Guard are developing be acceptable in view of a 3,100 items of equipment. This similar regional training centers, resulted in theater labor cost changed evaluation of threat, the which will provide state-of-the- nature of the specific mission avoidance of $787,000. During FY art simulator training for air- involved and the significant cost 90, 12 heavy equipment mainte- crews. Crews will travel to the savings that would result. nance companies are scheduled appropriate center to accom- for three-week deployment train- plish requirements in courses ing periods at the EMC. tailored to Air Reserve compo- Other Initiatives The National Guard's Aviation nent crew member availability A program that has proven to Classification Repair Activity and experience. be of extreme value to the readi- Depot in Brussels, Belgium, is We are also giving consider- ness and training of all of the also a successful and imaginative able attention to the modulariza- Reserve components is the use of our Reserve forces in tion of formal school courses so Overseas Deployment Training Europe. The AVCRAD provides that they will be better suited to Program. In 1989, some 3,139 our active European forces with the availability of reservists. separate Reserve units, or cells, a forward-deployed, pre-mobiliz- Many of the services' school including 88,500 Reserve person- ation, depot-level aircraft requirements for initial skill nel, trained overseas in 96 maintenance capability in peace- qualification, retraining or skill different countries. time manned by Guardsmen enhancement are longer than This program provides realistic engaged in annual training on a the training time available to mobilization and employment two- to three-week rotation reservists. Each service has training, an opportunity to train basis. I am very impressed with initiated programs to reconfigure under the operational chain of this modern facility, including these courses into modules that command and familiarity with the quality of people who have can be taken in a combination of possible areas of wartime been assigned there and the weekend and annual training employment. It offers an excel- sophisticated equipment which periods to accommodate lent opportunity to improve ties is in place. It has proven to be reservists. between Reserve component very cost-effective. One of my deputies chairs an units and their affiliated active The Naval Reserve has devel- OSD (Office of the Secretary of component counterparts, and it oped the Shore Intermediate Defense) training and training is a terrific morale builder. It Maintenance Activity program, technology subcommittee, with also provides an opportunity for which provides maintenance membership from each service, Reserve personnel to fulfill support for Naval Reserve Force the JCS, each Reserve compo- peacetime mission requirements ships. The SIMAs perform nent and selected OSD staff for theater CinCs (commanders intermediate- as well as organi- agencies. This subcommittee in chief) while conducting zational-level maintenance while searches for innovative ways to training. providing meaningful assign- apply technology to unique For example, the Army's rota- ments ashore to support sea/ Reserve component training 6 challenges. During the pat year, the subcommittee initiated an "Too many military analysts argue for large effort to find ways to contract changes in the force mix balance for for the training of reservists at their home stations. budgetary reasons alone that are unrelated We are about to finalize a new DoD directive entitled "Con- to any apparent manning philosophy or tracted Civilian Acquired threat evaluation. Others assert that the Training for Reserve Compo- nents." The purpose of CCAT is Total Force idea has already been carried to increase the number of mis- too far." sion-qualified individuals in Reserve component units. CCAT is an alternative to formal mili- tary school training and must be "reinforcing" and "sustaining" the nation. A combination in directly related to specific indi- role. According to this view, recent years of modern equip- vidual military job requirements National Guard and Reserve ment, the assumption of major and billet assignments. A pilot units would serve only to sup- wartime missions and peacetime program is under way with the plement active forces during operational responsibilities, chal- Florida Army National Guard, protracted contingencies or a lenging/realistic training and with management data being general mobilization and subse- other factors has produced a gathered by the Training Per- quent to some initial period of largely unanticipated synergistic formance and Data Center in conflict. Presumably, this con- effect-the attraction into the Orlando, Fla. I believe this effort cept would require Reserve units Reserve forces of highly moti- has considerable potential for to be assigned late-deployment vated, highly skilled people who providing quality training at the responsibilities. It assumes the are anxious to perform early home station, rather than requir- need to place all rapidly deploy- deploying missions that would ing individual reservists to leave able "contingency" forces in the have been unthinkable for their families and employers for active component. Like other Reserve forces only a few years long periods of schooling. policy proposals, it is neither as ago. Research efforts are also being simple nor as attractive as it may The nation has invested a focused on information systems seem at first blush. great deal in the creation of this that provide a capability to First of all, it is contrary to the Reserve force. It should not be analyze and correct training defi- current policy of the Department unthinkingly dismembered or ciencies. These systems are of Defense, which is to maintain relegated to a secondary role being developed by the Defense as small an active peacetime that will be unattractive to volun- Training and Performance Cen- force as national security policy, teer reservists who have no ter. One such effort is a military strategy and overseas obligation to serve at all. It microcomputer-based system commitments permit. This policy should never be forgotten that that permits us to analyze train- was not accidentally or randomly with an all-volunteer force, it is ing requirements from a geo- adopted. It was adopted as a much easier to rebuild active graphic prospective, an impor- cost-effective way to meet units with full-time personnel tant factor in view of the geo- increasing worldwide contin- than Reserve units with part-time graphical dispersion of reserv- gencies. It has been the personnel. ists. Another recent initiative of consistent policy of the DoD to Finally, the "reinforcing role" my office which has received the place maximum reliance on concept incorrectly assumes that support of the chiefs of the National Guard and Reserve force packages designed for Reserve components is the units and manpower. We use "contingency" missions cannot Reserve Component Nested active units and manpower to include reservists because such Model. This is essentially an support scheduled overseas inclusion would inevitably result expansion of the microcomputer deployments or sea duty, train- in unacceptable delays for system concept to a mainframe ing requirements and to support retraining or "mobilization." system that permits the assess- the rotation base. Above that Unless a particular conflict is ment of training needs and level, we plan to support military considerably larger than what options at all levels of command, contingencies with Guard and can fairly be characterized as a from the Reserve unit to the Reserve units and manpower "contingency," it will not service chief. when they can be available and require "mobilization" in the ready within planned deploy- sense of a massive recall of Reserves As Reinforcements ment schedules on a cost- reservists. As the armed forces adjust to effective basis. The law (Title 10, U.S. Code, current geopolitical and bud- Second, the "reinforcing role" Section 673b) currently permits getary realities, a view has concept ignores the obvious the president to make a limited, gained currency in some quar- opportunities for the use of the fast, selected recall to active ters that Reserve forces should most highly qualified Reserve duty of Selected Reserve units or be refocused and limited to a force in the peacetime history of individual mobilization aug- 7 "I am skeptical about simplistic and ple, is given a mission or equipment not found in the incorrect approaches to force mix that imply active component, there may be that Reserve units can never be 'as good' as no pipeline from which the Reserve component may receive active units (and) 'equal' reductions to personnel trained to perform or spare parts for the equipment active and Reserve components with no needed for the mission. apparent relationship to strategy or to the Certain missions, however, may call for uniqueness. The need for a specific military capability." Army Reserve civil affairs person- nel who have served in Panama since the commencement of Operation Just Cause, for exam- ple, have brought to their mentees. Thus, the president On the assumptions that the nation-building task an array of may order to active duty purpose of maintaining military civilian skills that simply cannot anywhere between one and forces is to deter war and that be found or maintained in active 200,000 members of the Selected combat units have greater deter- units. Reserve-without mobilization- rence than support units, some whenever he determines that it military leaders are of the opin- Cuts: Sound Reasons is necessary to "augment the ion that when resources are As we reduce force structure, active forces for any operational limited, combat units should it is important that budget cuts mission." The reservists involved receive available resources at the proposed by the services not can be retained on active duty expense of support units. Other have disproportionate and for as long as 180 days. Since leaders argue that a more cred- adverse impacts on National Selected Reservists are highly ible deterrence is achieved when Guard or Reserve units unless trained volunteers to begin with, potential adversaries recognize there are sound reasons for such any assumption that they are not that the United States is capable impacts. Indeed, even equal cuts available for rapid deployment is of engaging in conventional of active and Reserve forces are probably suspect. combat operations over a period not per se and inevitably wise. of time-i.e., that we have a Too many analysts are of the Force Mix Decisions strong balance between purely view that since active and In making choices about combat forces and the support Reserve forces grew together whether to assign certain war- forces that are necessary to sus- during the decade of the 1980s, time missions or peacetime tain them. they must now suffer force operating responsibilities to Logically, of course, there structure reductions at the same active or to Reserve units, it is should be no difference be- rate. Approximately equal force easy to overlook certain limiting tween the types of forces structure reductions of active factors-e.g., the fact that the needed to deter conflicts and and Guard/Reserve forces may amount of training time required the forces needed to win them. be justifiable in certain instances to perform some missions A potential adversary's percep- on the ground that when a par- creates unacceptable pressures tion of his chances of succeed- ticular combat unit is reduced, in their civilian work places for ing in a conflict is usually related its support units should receive participating reservists. En- directly to his ardor to begin it. a similar cut, but equal cuts hancing factors can also be Moreover, a reasonable question should not be automatic. Such a insufficiently taken into account. can be asked as to whether we philosophy suggests an approach Because of experience gained can afford two types of forces, to cutting force structure that during their previous full-time one devoted to deterring war bears no apparent relationship service on active duty, for exam- and one to winning it. to a sound strategy or plan and ple, many National Guardsmen I have long been of the view no recognition of the relative and reservists have capabilities that as a general proposition, cost of active and Reserve units. that equal or exceed those of active and Reserve forces should It may also exacerbate any exist- active soldiers who are currently be balanced-i.e., that each ing structure imbalance between serving on active duty. It is should contain an appropriate combat and support units. In the widely recognized, for example, mix of combat and support ele- Dec. 7, 1989, edition of The that many reservists and National ments. A corollary of this Washington Post, former Chair- Guardsmen are among the best approach is that neither active man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff fighter, attack and transport nor Reserve forces should be Adm. Bill Crowe made the point pilots in the world. Many plan- unique in the absence of a spe- that: ners also forget or have never effic military need that can or "The usual device for keeping fully understood just how much must be met by uniqueness. political pressure manageable the quality of the Reserve com- The costs of such uniqueness has been to cut all organizations ponents has improved in recent can be unacceptably high. If a and weapons procurements years. Reserve component, for exam- equally, while eliminating none 8 of them. Forces and services "Certain missions which have previously that are cut must be related to more than just budgets. As the been assigned to active forces could be size of our active forces goes down, increasing attention transferred to Reserve units, especially if it should be given to our Reserve can be demonstrated that significant cost units and the mobilization system." savings are available with no loss or for a Much of the ongoing debate about whether Reserve forces comparatively small loss in capability. Other should constitute a relatively missions should remain with the active higher percentage of the Total Force in the future relates to the forces." relative cost of assigning a par- ticular mission to a National Guard or Reserve unit rather than to an active unit. Since able levels of military capability based on a military rationale Reserve units are not fungible must also be rejected. Force mix other than "equal" cuts of active decisions must be made on a and Reserve forces for the sake items, costs vary. In some cases, the costs incurred by a Reserve mission-by-mission, unit-by-unit, of equality. unit in training for and perform- case-by-case basis. The rationale relied upon As we reduce force structure ing a particular mission are as by the services in each case and great or almost as great as those and develop the appropriate mix for each mission should be cred- incurred by active units which of active and Reserve forces, it is ible and easily understood in perform the same type of mis- important that we preserve as order to receive as wide accept- sion. In other cases, National much of our human capital as is ance as possible. Guard or Reserve units are much possible. Innovative approaches less expensive. will be necessary to ensure that Force mix proposals should Whether a particular Reserve as highly trained individuals, be regularly made and analyzed unit is one-third or two-thirds as especially leaders, leave the on a mission-by-mission, unit-by- active forces, they are encour- unit (capability) basis which is costly as an active unit, the fact aged to continue their service in clearly related to the war plans. remains that Reserve forces are Reserve units. New ideas such as If significant cost savings usually less costly over a period of time than active forces. In the "double roundout" concept can be achieved by a transfer of addition to the fact that they (in which an active division of force structure to a Reserve train an average of only 39 to 50 ground troops would have two component (for the performance National Guard/Reserve brigades of a particular mission), a work- days per year, citizen-soldiers sleep and eat at home, and the and one active brigade, instead ing presumption should be of the other way around) will established that the transfer infrastructure which is required for them is less. also need to be energetically should be made. The presump- explored. tion can then be rebutted by the Consequently, I believe that for cost reasons alone, a rebutt- Despite unreasonably high demonstration of a sound mili- able presumption should exist expectations to the contrary in tary reason why the transfer that missions should be consid- some quarters, the Total Force should not be made-e.g., the Policy Study Group will not be mission requires a forward- ered for assignment to the Reserve forces unless there are able to answer all force struc- deployed unit over a period of ture/force mix questions which time. sound and apparent military rea- sons for assigning the missions merit attention. The world A similar rebuttable pre- to the active forces. If the geopolitical situation is simply sumption should be made that presumption can't be easily too fluid and dynamic for that. when an active or a Reserve unit rebutted, then a particular mis- is withdrawn from the force sion would seem to be a prime Summary Principles structure, a certain part of the candidate for assignment to the I am very hopeful, however, cost savings will be dedicated to Reserve forces. that the study group will be able the strengthening of the remain- We should avoid wholesale to develop certain "neutral" ing force structure before the shifts of force structure to the principles that may eventually savings are applied to other Reserve components merely take the form of policy guidance needs. because they are generally less by the secretary of defense to All units, active or Reserve, expensive. Any force structure/ the services. Those principles should be resourced (for equip- force mix decision that is driven might include ideas similar to ment, training and other pur- solely by budget imperatives the following and/or other ideas: poses) according to the should be closely examined. Like the active forces, sequence in which they would However, the converse is also Reserve forces are not immune be required to perform their true. Broad conclusions that from structure cuts, but service wartime or other operational Reserve forces provide unaccept- force mix proposals should be missions. 9 "By any reasonable standard, the Reserve Reserve components under the Total Force Policy require that forces are in the highest state of readiness units of the Selected Reserve, that has been attained since the Total Force especially early deploying units, be manned at combat-ready Policy was adopted. Readiness challenges levels. End-strength reductions in the remain, however, in specific areas." Army Reserve (10,044) and the Army National Guard (9,660) since FY 1989 are offset by the combined increase of 4,700 authorizations for the other four A rebuttable presumption end strength will decline to Reserve components. The Army should be established against 2,038,800, some 91,400 less than Reserve decrease is based on fis- force mix decisions that result in the FY 1989 level and roughly cal constraints, while the Army placing a particular mission equal to 1980 end strength. The National Guard decrease was exclusively in a Reserve compo- decrease in the end strength of required to pay for the needed nent. The presumption can be the overall Selected Reserve rep- additional full-time personnel. rebutted by the demonstration resents the first decrease in over In FY 1991, general purpose of a sound military reason why a decade and is in marked con- forces will thus include 30 divi- the principle should not apply in trast to the nearly 35 percent sions. The Army will decline to a particular case. growth of the Selected Reserve 16 active divisions (about half between FY 1980 and FY 1989. with Reserve roundout brigades) During that period, Selected and 10 Reserve divisions; the Selected Reserve Manpower Reserve manpower increased by Marine Corps will have three It is clear that we must con- more than 300,000-from 868,617 active divisions/wings and one tinue to anchor our global to 1,170,560. Reserve wing. Naval aviation will military strategy to the funda- The Selected Reserve strength include 13 active and two mentally sound doctrines of reductions included in the FY Reserve carrier air wings. deterrence, flexible response, 1991 budget for the Reserve Strength adjustments after FY forward defense, security components of the Army were 1991 will be dependent in impor- alliances and prudent arms based primarily on fiscal con- tant part on principles being reductions. The challenging siderations-i.e., to achieve developed by the Total Force issue is the question of what compliance with the 1990 bud- Policy Study Group and the kind of forces are needed to get resolution and the partial allocation of missions among all carry out the strategy. sequestration-and were not of the uniformed components of In addressing that issue during premised on force structure the Total Force the preparation of our FY 1991 reductions or realignments. budget request, we established Within the overall reduction in Conclusion certain budgetary priorities, Selected Reserve strengths, how- including the retention of The world is rapidly changing. ever, the Army National Guard, versatile, ready, deployable and The changes present major chal- in an effort to improve readi- sustainable conventional forces; ness, has increased its full-time lenges to the planning of the and substantial Reserve force structure and (active/ Active Guard and Reserve Reserve) force mix which are forces-including essential logis- strengths. The Selected Reserve tics, infrastructure and planning necessary for the implementa- strength request for the Naval bases. tion of our national military Reserve in FY 1991 provides for The end-year strength for the an increase associated with addi- strategy, including the prepara- tion for future conflicts which Selected Reserve which has been tional ships being transferred to requested in the president's the Reserve and an increase in are increasingly difficult to pre- dict. I continue to believe, budget for FY 1991 is 1,151,600, a the Reserve medical program, modest reduction of 3,400 from however, that these challenges offset by manpower economies FY 1990. The strength at the end can be met successfully if we in areas that are now considered address them with candor and of FY 1990 will be 15,600 below excess to need. There are only FY 1989. The lower strength is energy, as well as an informed minor changes in strength levels and focused discussion of how due to a FY 1990 reduction of in the Marine Corps Reserve and 9,700 by the Army National we can yet improve a Total Force the Reserve components of the Guard and a 10,000 reduction in Policy that has already proven to Air Force. the Army Reserve. An additional be a major success. Despite the FY 1990 and FY decrease of 3,700 in the FY 1991 1991 reductions, the Selected program is almost entirely Reserve will continue to con- Published for internal information use by the attributable to the reduction in stitute 1.2 million of the 3.2 American Forces Information Service, a field the Naval Reserve. million-member Total Force. The activity of the Office of the Assistant Secretary By comparison, by the end expanded scope, size and nature of Defense (Public Affairs), Washington, D.C. This material is in the public domain and may of FY 1991, the active force of the missions assigned to the be reprinted without permission. 10 1-004634A017 01/17/91 ICS IPMRYNF RNO 00691 RENO NV 01-17 0826A PST RYNE / JAN 17 All : 30 ICS IPMWHDS 1-004611A017 01/17/91 ICS IPMWGWJ WSH 00440 4-0233315016 5164998111 FRB TDRN COMMACK NY 01-16 PMS PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH RPT DLY MGM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC 20500 MR PRESIDENT WE SUPPORT ANY DECISION YOU MAKE TO STOP THIS MANIAC IT'S HAMMER TIME. GOD BLESS YOU THE KEEFE'S 79 HAYRICK LN COMMACK NY 11725 1128 EST 1131 EST 4-0225838017 01/17/91 ICS IPMBNGZ CSP JUJAN17 4074791091 POM TDBN BOCA RATON FL 23 01-17 0849P EST P8:48 PMS PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH WHITE HOUSE DC 20500 DON'T ALLOW ANOTHER MAD MAN TO LET LOOSE A HOLOCAUST ON THE INNOCENT CHILDREN OF THE REMNANTS OF A PEOPLE. GIVE IRAQ HELL. MR AND MRS BERNARD SHAPIRO 8113 AVENUE L BROOKLYN NY 11236 2050 EST 4-021947S017 01/17/91 ICS IPMBNGZ CSP 2128615112 POM TDBN NEW YORK NY 23 01-17 0808P EST P8: 09 PMS PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH WHITE HOUSE DC 20500 WE WERE OPPOSED TO THE WAR BEFORE THE UNTHINKABLE : UNSPEAKABLE CHEMICAL WARFARE ATTACK UPON ISREAL. PLEASE BOMB THE HELL OUT OF IRAQ. ARNOLD AND CLAR SOLLAR 150 E 69TH ST NEW YORK NY 10021 2009 EST 4-022620S017 01/17/91 ICS IPMBNGZ CSP 9194733776 POM TDBN MANTEO NC 21 01-17 0851P EST :1 JAN17 P8:51 PMS PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH WHITE HOUSE DC 20500 MAKE SADDAM EAT YOUR BROCOLLI. KEEP HITTING THEM HARD. YOU'RE DOING GREAT JOB. WE SUPPORT YOU AND ISRAELIS 110 PER CENT. JOSH & DIANE WOODIN RR1 BOX 754 MANTEO NC 27954 2052 EST 4-0005875018 01/18/91 ICS IPMBNGZ CSP 7172838298 POM TDBN FORTY FORT PA 11 01-18 0747A ESTOAN 18 A8:22 PMS PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH RPT DLY MGM WHITE HOUSE DC 20500 FORMER VIETNAM PROTESTER. OUTRAGED AT ATTACKS ON ISRAEL. BLOW HUSSEIN AWAY. DAVID BESWICK 72 YEAGER FORTY FORT PA 18704 0747 EST 1-005814A017 01/17/91 ICS IPMRYNJ RNO 01741 RENO NV 01-17 1018A PST RYNI JAN 17 P 1 : 20 ICS IPMWHDS 1-005779A017 01/17/91 ICS IPMWGWC WSH 00470 WASHINGTON DC 01-17 0116P EDT PMS WHITE HOUSE DC 20500 4-011484S016 01-16 6198866059 FRS TDRN EL CAJON CA 01-16 PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC WORKING CLASS AMERICA SUPPOARTS YOU. MY USMC UNIFORMS STILL FIT. LETS KICK SOME BUTT. GOD BLESS AND SEMPER FI JIM CUNNINGHAM 100 FLETCHER PKWY EL CAJON CA 92020 1318 EST 1321 EST 1-006737A017 01/17/91 ICS IPMRYNB RNO :1 JAN 17 P2: 28 01551 RENO NV 01-17 1125A PST RYNA ICS IPMWHDS 1-006515A017 01/17/91 ICS IPMWGWC WSH 00431 01-17 0211P EDT PMS WHITE HOUSE DC 20500 4-0083695017 01/17/91 ICS IPMRNCZ CSP 4098837404 FRS TDRN ORANGE-OA TX 26 01-17 1143A CST PMS PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH, DLR WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC 20000 MR PRESIDENT, GOOD JOB. WE SUPPORT YOU. TED WILLIAMS WAS OUR LAST 400 HITTER. YOU'RE BATTING 999. GOD BLESS YOU AND THE USA. PROCELLE BROTHERS ORANGE TX 77630 1251 EST 1416 EST 1430 EST 4-0261665016 01/17/91 ICS IPMBNGZ CSP 6029795687 POM TDBN UG GLENDALE AZ 30 01-16 093107 EST 42: 07 PMS PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH RPT DLY MGM WHITE HOUSE DC 20500 WE SUPPORT YOUR ACTIONS AGAINST IRAQ 100 PER CENT. YOU HAVE DONE THE RIGHT THING. KEEP IT UP. MAKE SURE WE WIN AND WIN BIG. BRING OUR TROOPS HOME QUICKLY. PHILLIP AND DEBORAH MCKEOWN 6102 W TROLLA GLENDALE AZ 85304 0206 EST pro operation storm IS. third 4-026169S016 01/17/91 ICS IPMBNGZ CSP 5127361712 POM TDBN SAN ANTONIO TX 7 ait 1610931A 2sT06 PMS PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH WHITE HOUSE DC 20500 RIGHT ON. DON'T STOP. GOD BLESS YOU. SHARON DIX WHITE 527 KINGS COURT SAN ANTONIO TX 78212 0206 EST 4-004274S017 01/17/91 ICS IPMRNCZ CSP 3149688052 POM TDRN ST LOUIS MO 27 01-17 1035A ESTAN17 All : 03 PMS PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH WHITE HOUSE DC 20500 YOUR RIGHT. SANCTIONS DIDN'T WORK. AGAINST WAR. BUT WE HAVE NO CHOICE AGAINST THAT TYRANT WHO GASSED HIS OWN PEOPLE. I APPLAUD YOUR COURAGE AND STRONG STAND. MARY M. AYRES 505 LAKE ST LOUIS MO 63119 1036 EST 4-0043115017 01/17/91 ICS IPMRNCZ CSP 6123749390 POM TDRN MINNEAPOLIS MN 19 01-17 1037A EST 17 all: 04 PMS PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH WHITE HOUSE DC 20500 CONGRATULATIONS. YOU'RE RIGHT. I WAS WRONG 40 YEARS YOUNGER AND I'D ENLIST. GREAT PLANNING. PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN. DOCTOR DONNA DENBOER 2424 LYNDALE AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 1038 EST 4-003393S017 01/17/91 ICS IPMRNCZ CSP : 03 7143375656 POM TDRN LAKE ARROWHEAD CA 26 01-17 1003A EST PMS PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH RPT DLY MGM WHITE HOUSE DC 20500 DEAR MR. PRESIDENT, WE HAVE A SON ON THE FRONT LINES AND WE FEEL YOU HAVE DONE THE RIGHT THING AND ARE BEHIND YOU 100 PERCENT. SHARON AND DON CIOTA PO BOX 440 LAKE ARROWHEAD CA 92352 1004 EST 6 4-0254539016 01/17/91 ICS IPMRNCZ CSP 7149833870 POM TDRN ONTARIO CA 24 01-16 0858P EST JAN 17 A12: 36 PMS PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH WHITE HOUSE DC 20500 DEAR PRESIDENT BUSH, OUR PRAYERS ARE WITH YOU. OUR SON IS IN SAUDI ARABIA AND MAY GOD DIRECT YOUR HAND. MAY GOD SPEED. SINCERELY STEPHEN MCINTYRE AND FAMILY 1556 NORTH OAKS CT ONTARIO CA 91762-1050 0036 EST 1-003293I017 01/17/91 TWX ESL62911224 001 DLY TDWX AUSTIN TX FUAN17 All : 04 PMS PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH DLR THE WHITE HOUSE 1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE WASHINGTON DC 20500 DEAR PRESIDENT BUSH. FOR EVERY PEACE PROTESTER IN THE STREET THERE ARE A MILLION AMERICANS SITTING QUIETLY AT HOME ADMIRING YOUR COURAGE. WISDOM AND DETERMINATION. THANK YOU FOR HAVING THE GUTS TO MAKE A DIFFICULT DECISION. RESPECTFULLY. SSGT BRIAN L. GOINS AND FAMILY 447 W. 17TH SPOKANE WA 99203 1041 EST 4-025905S016 01/17/91 ICS IPMBNGZ CSP 3189338627 POM TDBN SHREVEPORT LA 13 1-24 PMS PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH WHITE HOUSE DC 20500 I SUPPORT YOU TOTALLY. GET IT DONE GET IT OVER AND GET OUT. GIVE 'EM HELL AND DONT GIVE 'EM A REST. ROBERT AND H R SMITH 9918 LORETTA ST KEITHVILLE LA 71047 0125 EST 4-0260755016 01/17/91 ICS IPMRNCZ CSP 8175660166 POM TDRN DENTON TX 49 01-16 09279A1E97 A1:53 PMS PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH WHITE HOUSE DC 20500 DEAR PRESIDENT BUSH. GOD BLESS AMERICA AND GOD BLESS YOU, PRESIDENT BUSH. I SUPPORT THE OPERATION DESERT STORM AND PRAY THAT ALL GOES WELL. LETS KICK SOME BUTT. PERFERABLE SADDAMS. I STILL DON'T WANT TO PAY FOR A LAWRENCE WELK MUSEUM. BUT OTHER THAN THAT YOUR DOING GREAT. SINCERELY. SHARON WESTBROOK, STRONG REPUBLICAN AGAIN RTE 1 BOX 131W RIO VISTA TX 76093 4-024450S016 01/16/91 ICS IPMRNCZ CSP 8187076462 POM TDRN AGOURA HILLS CA 138 01-16 UAN 0807PIEST 41 PMS PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH RPT DLY MGM WHITE HOUSE DC 20500 DEAR PRESIDENT BUSH I DO NOT IN PRINCIPLE BELIEVE IN WAR. MY BROTHER A VIETNAM VET WAS SO PSYCHOLOGICALLY DAMAGED BY HIS PARTICIPATION IN THAT WAR THAT HE HAS WITHDRAWN FROM EVERYONE AND JUST BARELY EXISTS. I PROTESTED AGAINST VIETNAM BUT I BELIEVE WHAT YOU ARE DOING IS RIGHT AND I WISH I COULD DO MORE TO PARTICIPATE. GOD BLESS YOU AND YOUR BEAUTIFUL WIFE AND FAMILY DURING THESE DIFFICULT TIMES FOR DOING WHAT MUST BE DONE TO PROTECT OUR WORLD. I HAVE NEVER SENT A TELEGRAM TO MY PRESIDENT BEFORE BUT I HAD TO TELL YOU HOW BRAVE AND COURAGEOUS I FEEL YOU ARE FOR TAKING THE RESPONSIBILITY OF STOPPING A DANGEROUS MADMAN BEFORE HIS MOMENTUM DESTROYS MORE LIVES. YOUR STRENGTH AND LEADERSHIP MAKE ME PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN. AGAIN GOD BLESS YOU AND KEEP YOU. KIM HANFT 30601 JANLOR DR AGOURA HILLS CA 91301 2332 EST 62. I have always been opposed even to the thought of fighting Without the ideals, the hopes and aspirations of humanity; those a "preventive war." There is nothing more foolish than to think things of the soul and spirit which great men of history have valued that war can be stopped by war. You don't "prevent" anything by far above peace and material wealth and even life itself peace war except peace. is an inhuman existence. HARRY S. TRUMAN DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER 1952; Memoirs, II, 383 Address at Columbia University, Mar. 23, 1950; Peace, p. 12 63. Warfare, no matter what weapons it employs, is a means to 69. The war maker is first of all a propagandist. an end, and if that end can be achieved by negotiated settlements Until war is eliminated from international relations, unprepared- of conditional surrender, there is no need for war. ness for it is well nigh as criminal as war itself. HARRY S. TRUMAN It is shocking that, though many millions have been volun- 1955; Ibid., I, 210 tarily donated for research in cancer of the individual body, noth- 64. Morale is the greatest single factor in successful wars. ing similar has been done with respect to the most malignant cancer DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER of the world body-war. DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER June 23, 1945 Address at Columbia University, Mar. 23, 1950; Ibid., 65. There is one thing you have in war that you do not have in pp. 14, 19 peace. You have unification, compelled by a very threatening danger. In other words, Franklin's old saying, "If we don't hang 70. Possibly my hatred of war blinds me so that I cannot compre- together, we'll hang separately," applies in war more definitely hend the arguments that its advocates adduce. But, in my opinion, than it does in peace. there is no such thing as a preventive war. Although this suggestion DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER is repeatedly made, no one has yet explained how war prevents Press Conference, Paris, France, June 16, 1945; Eisenhower war. Nor has anyone been able to explain away the fact that war Speaks, p. 23 begets conditions that beget further war. DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER 66. Prosperous nations are not war-hungry, but a hungry nation Address at Pittsburgh, Pa., October, 1950; What Eisenhower will always seek war if it has to in desperation. Thinks, p. 91 DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER Speech in New York, N.Y., June 19, 1945; Ibid., p. 44 71. Abhorring war as a chosen way to balk the purpose of those who threaten us, we hold it to be the first task of statesmanship to 67. I hate war as only a soldier who has lived it can, only as one develop the strength that will deter the forces of aggression and who has seen its brutality, its futility, its stupidity. Yet there is one promote the conditions of peace. For, as it must be the supreme thing to say on its credit side-victory required a mighty manifes- purpose of all free men, so it must be the dedication of their lead- tation of the most ennobling of the virtues of man-faith, courage, ers, to save humanity from preying upon itself. fortitude, sacrifice! DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER First Inaugural Address, Jan. 20, 1953 Address in Ottawa, Canada, Jan. 10, 1946; Ibid., p. 64 72. The hope of the world is that wisdom can arrest conflict be- 68. In discussing war and peace, we incline to paint one all black tween brothers. I believe that war is the deadly harvest of arrogant and the other all white. We like to repeat "there never was a good and unreasoning minds. And I find grounds for this belief in the war, or a bad peace." But war often has provided the setting for wisdom literature of Proverbs. It says panic strikes like a storm comradeship and understanding and greatness of spirit-among and calamity comes like a whirlwind to those who hate knowledge nations, as well as men-beyond anything in quiet days; while and ignore their God. peace may be marked by chicanery, treachery, and the tempo- DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER rary triumph of expediency over all spiritual values. Address to National Education Association, Apr. 4, 1957; The pact of Munich was a greater blow to humanity than the Public Papers Eisenhower, 1957, p. 264 atomic bomb at Hiroshima. Suffocation of human freedom among a once free people, however quietly and peacefully accomplished, 73. We know we are peaceful Government only with the is more far-reaching in its implications and its effects on their fu- consent of the governed does not start wars, because it is the ture than the destruction of their homes, industrial centers, and people that have to fight them that make the decision. transportation facilities. Out of rubble heaps, willing hands can DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER rebuild a better city; but out of freedom lost can stem only genera- Remarks to League of Women Voters, Washington, D.C., tions of hate and bitter struggle and brutal oppression May 1, 1957; Ibid., p. 317 SUPPLEMENT: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1990 NEWSWEEK September 17 1990 Pg. 12 But John never complained about the costs or sacrifices Remembering of being in the Reserves. Come to think of it, he never complained about much of anything; he was one of the happiest men we knew. Surely he had concerns; the mort- John Gordon gage, how to finance a college education for his three smart children. But you never saw those worries in his face. He was always smiling, always had the best, often hilarious jokes. Any outing, party or tennis match was more fun BY JOE KAMALICK with John there. He still smoked cigarettes, and many of us used to bug him about it. At a recent party he stepped outside to have a smoke, not wanting to annoy his hostess aj. John Gordon went down with his Air Force or other guests. No one asked him to; no one would have M C-5A Galaxy on Wednesday, Aug. 29, near even thought of it. But he was a gentleman (and he Ramstein Air Base in West. Germany. On the probably wanted a quiet smoke without having to take any day he died, John's Air Force Reserve unit flak from us). His hair was thinning and, like many of us was called to active duty, but he and other who are in our middle 40s, he was fighting a holding action volunteers had already been flying missions for three in the battle of the bulge. A few years ago, in an attempt weeks. He was one of 13 on board who were killed; only to improve our tennis game and maybe shed a few pounds, four survived. The news reports from West Germany spoke we used to play an hour of predawn tennis almost every of the flight's mission and cargo-carrying food, spare day before work. parts and other supplies to U.S. forces in Saudi Arabia. All these things might sound like the elements of a Every available cargo plane and crew were pressed perfectly average life and, on the face of it, they are. But into service to rush vital supplies to our troops on the as a casual student of American history, I have often Saudi-Kuwaiti border, to help them hold the line should wondered what they were like, those men and women of the Iraqi armor move south. The Air Force was throwing our revolutionary past, the ones who left family, farm and an air bridge from supply shop to fight for freedom. depots in Europe to the Surely, until the call came Arabian desert. The huge and they answered, many long-range C-5As were in of these patriots lived work- the air for such long hours aday lives. Little do we that many, like John's last know that they are among flight, carried two crews to us still and, like John, are spell each other. It is what anything but ordinary. the military calls "maxi- Our loyalty: Any veteran of mum effort." the '60s knows that it has But I'll leave all the stra- been popular or at least com- tegic talk and the sweeping mon to challenge govern- language of world crisis to ment policy in times of con- others. Here in John Gor- flict and war. That is as it don's neighborhood just north of Houston, the talk is of should be. And history will judge the wisdom of our current his love for his family, his country and his devotion to call to arms. But whatever our opinions, we owe loyalty to the flying. Like many true patriots, John Gordon didn't wear men and women-soldiers, sailors and fliers, friends and his patriotism on his sleeve. But it was there in his neighbors-who on our behalf go in harm's way. heart all the same. And now many of us, his neighbors The technology of modern war is vastly different from and friends, recognize and honor his love of our nation. As those early days of our history. And the world, it seems, is is all too often the case, our honor for this good man is more complex, our options less clear-cut, our choices more late in coming. But who could have known? We knew he difficult than those facing our countrymen long ago. But to flew those big C-5As on weekends. We knew he was in John Gordon the choice was clear. He will be missed, and we the Air Force Reserve. When John and I were on a neigh- and our children are in his debt. At John's home, after the borhood men's tennis team (strictly F level, but we took Air Force chaplain left, neighbors and friends from afar joking pride in being "F Troop"), John sometimes had to came and called throughout the day and night. His fine wife, miss a match or practice because he was off flying those big Judy, struggled with grief but greeted us all. In time we will birds for Uncle Sam. And we knew that when the call went return to our lives, the mundane, routine business of living; out Aug. 1 for volunteers from the Reserves, John an- Judy will be with her children and her sorrow. John made swered call. his sacrifice. His widow and children now continue theirs in John changed jobs now and then, but not always, I think, bearing their grief, in doing without a husband and father. out of preference. His flight duties often took him away So they, too, are patriots. from home and work for longer than the advertised one The Marines' Hymn proudly claims (with, of course, a gibe weekend a month. Sometimes his world-circling flights at other services) that "If the Army and the Navy ever look kept him away for a couple of weekdays as well. Beyond lip on heaven's scenes, they will find the streets are guarded by service, many employers are unwilling to share the burden United States Marines." No doubt. Then surely Air Force borne by reservists and their families. I ran into him some veterans will be running heaven's shuttle service. And weeks ago in the local grocery store and we joked that it there's John strolling along the flight line with other pilots, was getting hard to find time to eat, much less to play swapping jokes-and reaching for his smokes. Go ahead tennis. I didn't know then that John had been laid off. It John, light one up. We won't bug you about it. wasn't the kind of information that he would volunteer, And John, thanks. and I did not find out about it until after he had answered the call for pilots and gone off to the Mideast. Kamalick is a writer and newsletter publisher in Houston. A 26 01. 07. 91 05:51 PM *NAVY P03 JAN 07 '91 15:59 JPAO 4TH MARDIV P.3/10 GySgt. John Dittus, 44, USMCR, belongs to Marine Medium Helicopter Squadron 764 CHMM-7643 in MCAS E1 Toro, CA - He is a Vietnam veteran who spent 14 years out of the Marine Corps before returning to the Marine Corps Reserve in 1982. Although no longer a young man he still wanted to serve. When his unit was activated in November 1990, Dittus was a police sergeant in Santa Ana, CA - He has left a wife and two children in an uncomfortable financial situation because the loss in pay from his civilian position to his Marine gunnery sergeant's pay is $3,300. par month. He has put one car in the garage to save on insurance, has gotten assistance from his bank concerning home mortgage payments, but didn't get someone to replace him as little league manager. 01.07.91 05:51 PM *NAVY P06 JAN 07 '91 16:04 JPAO 4TH MARDIV P.4/8 COMMANDER CLAIRE WEIDMAN, USNR OF NORFOLK, VA IS THE FLIGHT SURGEON FOR MARINE AIR GROUP 46, HMM-764, 4TH MARINE AIRCRAFT WING IN NORFOLK. DURING VIETNAM, WEIDMAN WAS A PFC IN THE MARINE CORPS. FOLLOWING THE WAR, HE ENROLLED IN MEDICAL SCHOOL AND BECAME A DOCTOR AND SHORTLY AFTER THAT, AN OFFICER IN THE NAVAL RESERVE. STILL FEELING AN ATTACHMENT TO THE MARINE CORPS, CMDR WEIDMAN REQUESTED TO BE THE FLIGHT SURGEON FOR A MARINE SQUADRON. IN THE CIVILIAN WORLD, CMDR WEIDMAN IS AN ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON AND MAKES OVER $300,000 A YEAR. WHEN HIS UNIT WAS ACTIVATED, WEIDMAN VOLUNTEERED TO LEAVE HIS FAMILY AND TAKE A PAY REDUCTION OF APPROXIMATELY $240,000 PER YEAR IN ORDER TO SERVE HIS COUNTRY. WEIDMAN PAYED $80,000 IN TAXES TO THE IRS LAST YEAR. WITH HIS ACTIVATION, HIS TOTAL SALARY THIS YEAR WILL BE ONLY $60,000. POC-CW04 LEDLOW (804)444-7816 -01. .07. 91 05:51 PM *NAVY P08 JAN 07 '91 16:05 JPAO 4TH MARDIV P.6/8 CAPTAIN JOHN ROBERTS, USMCR, OF ATLANTA, GA WAS THE RESERVE COMMANDING OFFICER OF BATTERY 'A', FOURTH LOW ALTITUDE AIR DEFENSE BATTALION (4TH LAAD BN) IN MARIETTA, GA. HIS CIVILIAN POSITION WAS FLIGHT CREW MEMBER ON A DELTA AIRLINES L-1011, A POSITION HE HAS HELD FOR FIVE YEARS. JUST PRIOR TO BEING ACTIVATED, CAFT. ROBERTS HAD BEEN SELECTED BY DELTA TO FLY THE BOEING 767 AIRCRAFT ON THE COVETED LONG HAUL, INTERNATIONAL ROUTES. THIS MEANT A HIGHER, MORE CAREER ENHANCING POSITION IN THE AIRLINE, A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PAY, AN OPPORTUNITY TO WORK BETTER HOURS AND ON NEWER EQUIPMENT. AFTER PAYING HIS DUES, SO TO SPEAK, HIS BIG CHANCE WAS TO BE HANDED TO HIM IN DECEMBER. HE WAS ACTIVATED INSTEAD! IN ADDITION TO TAKING A $65,000 CUT IN PAY, CAPT. ROBERTS WILL ALSO MISS THE MAY, 1991 BIRTH OF HIS THIRD CHILD. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT WHEN CAPT. ROBERTS REPORTED TO MCAS CHERRY POINT, NC, HE WAS REPLACED AS COMMANDING OFFICER OF HIS UNIT BECAUSE A MORE EXPERIENCED OFFICER WAS AVAILABLE. DESPITE LOSING HIS COMMAND, HE CONTINUES TO SERVE THE CORPS WITH A VERY POSITIVE ATTITUDE AS THE 2D LAAD BN INTELLIGENCE OFFICER. POC--LTCOL RUTHENBERG (404)421-5421 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DATE: 1/8/90 TO: Bab Semon Here's a wonderful letter you might find a use for- - Ag SHIRLEY M. GREEN Special Assistant to the President for Presidential Messages and Correspondence Room 94-OEOB, 456-7610 Shirley: copies of incoming from former Kuwait hostage you wanted to share with Leg. Affairs. I spoke with Mr. Cox 1/7/91 and he was pleased to have his letter used if we choo: to do so. also offered to help any other way. if you want more copies, we can do. SN 202105 Wayne G. Cox 9037 Bay Hill Blvd. Orlando, Florida 32819 Tel: (407) 876-2922 December 19, 1990 Dear President Bush, You are to be admired and praised for the courage you've shown and decisions you have thus far made in dealing with the Gulf crisis. And if every American, whether they be the man on the street, Congressman or Senator cannot fully support the actions you've thus far taken in the Gulf, then they are blatantly unconcerned with what is right and wrong in the world. My Kuwaiti wife, and I and my three children who are natural-born U.S. citizens, were trapped in Kuwait since the August 2nd invasion until being flown out December 13th on the same plane as that of Ambassador Howell. With our fortunate release though, we have carried with us a burden in our hearts to do whatever we can to keep the world conscious of the seriousness of the situation we were eyewitnesses to and left behind. Indeed, the murder of innocent civilians from premature babies to grandparents, rapes pf Phillipino, Sri Lankan, Indian, Kuwaiti and German women are factual and not just hyped up news stories. As well every item and product of value in Kuwait has been or is being stolen and transported to Iraq. And if force is not used soon, it is predicted that the Iraqis (not looters, as they'd like to blame) will dismantle buildings and transport them to Iraq. On my flight over from Frankfurt to Andrews A.F.B., I learned from an Arab source that actual, entire elevators were now being dismantled from buildings. Complete, organized, expert thievery ordered by the Iraqi government is taking place as I write this letter and while Saddam Hussein continues to postpone peace talks. Allowed to remain in Kuwait another day as you read this letter Mr. Bush is another day that brings him closer to entering the very homes of the remaining, unarmed, fear-striken Kuwaitis (who sheltered and fed myself and other Americans while there) to dismantle their homes while they watch and, yes, murder and rape at their discretion. Our Kuwaiti friends hoped that I might be able to stress to you, Mr. Bush, that the only way to deal with Saddam Hussein is through the use of force. "He cannot be allowed to leave Kuwait without severe punishment." The Kuwaiti people, as well as I myself, were ready for force from the first week. It is the only thing, unfortunately, that the Middle eastern mind of Saddam Hussein (and Gaddafi!) can understand Bang 'em around! In my interviews with the press in Baghdad, Frankfurt, Washington and Orlando since December 9th, I summed up my feelings of the Gulf crisis as an American in Kuwait with a quote from you, Mr. President: "It is simply a matter between right and wrong. " And if any human being on the face of this earth cannot come to that assessment and back the noble cause and fight for justice which you have SO courageously accepted, they must not have all the facts or else they have no sacrificial desire whatsoever to see evil overcome by good. Throughout history God always spoke to and used only one man to fulfill His will and His people were never totally unanimous in backing him. Democracy is a wonderful form of government, but we are fortunate to have in our United States Constitution the clause that permits the President to spontaneously use what he knows without a shadow of a doubt is the last and only solution in correcting obvious horror and injustice the use of military force. Mr. President, on behalf of the Kuwaiti people who love you and know that only God and you, His instrument, are their -2- only hope are deeply appreciative of all you have already done in standing up to the evil agression done to them by Iraq. May God bless and keep you always. You have my vote, my backing, my love and my highest respect of any world leader I have known in my 40 years. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you and Mrs. Bush and Family! Sincerely, Wayne G. g Cox Cox P.S. I cried when I heard on the Voice of America, back on August 8th, your speech on how you responded without hes- itation to the calling to stand up against wrong. Thank you. -3- - - Thursday, January 10, 1991 House of Representatives Debate: Rep. Robert Michel Transcript ID: 670818 (175 lines) UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DEBATE ON THE PERSIAN GULF CRISIS AND THE USE OF FORCE REMARKS BY REPRESENTATIVE ROBERT H. MICHEL (R-IL) REP. MICHEL: Mr. Speaker, I'm going to yield myself such time as I may consume. And at the conclusion of my remarks, we'll devote -- we're going to have a system of rotating -- managing on this side for the time being. The distinguished ranking member of the Foreign Affairs Committee then, Mr. Broomfield, will manage the time. SPEAKER: The gentleman from Illinois is recognized. REP. MICHEL: I ask the Speaker to revise and extend my remarks. SPEAKER: Without objection, so ordered. REP. MICHEL: May I first pay my compliments to the distinguished Majority Leader for the tenor of his remarks. He's the Majority Leader in this body. I happen to be the Minority Leader. Later on, we're going to be supporting differing resolutions because we have a difference of views on this. But I would applaud and certainly subscribe to the thought -- to the expression of the distinguished Majority Leader that after all the debate is over and it has been concluded, we will abide by the will of the majority when all is said and done. That's our system. And even if it carries by one vote, that's the way we operate in this country -- to give everybody an opportunity to have their say. And I am happy and proud that the resolution which I support -- the bipartisan resolution is one that's in the form of a joint resolution. That would obviously go to the other body -- require the signature of the President. Then we would all be speaking with one voice. But Mr. Speaker, as this debate opens and the United States of America has over 370,000 troops in the Gulf area, they're face to face with troops of a ruthless dictator, and our troops will be aware of every word we say in this debate and so will the dictator. And the question we have to ask ourselves is this: When this debate is finished, will the House be seen as a tower of strength or as a tower of battle? I speak from the prejudice of being a combat veteran of World War II, and those of our generation know from bloody experience that unchecked aggression against a small nation is a prelude to an international disaster. Saddam Hussein today has more planes and tanks and, frankly, men under arms than Hitler had at the time when Prime Minister Chamberlain (sp) came back from Munich with that miserable piece of paper, Peace in Our Time. I'll never forget that replay of that movie in my life, and I have an obligation, I guess, coming from that generation to transmit those thoughts I had at the time to the younger generation who didn't experience what we did. Saddam Hussein not only invaded Kuwait, he occupied, terrorized, murdered civilians, systematically looted and turned a peaceful nation into a wasteland of horror. He seeks control over one of the world's vital resources, and he ultimately seeks to make himself the unchallenged anti-Western dictator of the Mideast. Either we stop him now and stop him permanently or we won't stop him at all. Now, the President has clearly presented the reasons why we can't stand by idly in his words, and I'd quote them, "We're in the Gulf because the world must not and cannot reward aggression, and we're there because our vital interests are at stake." Now we're told by some that we must show patience. We must wait for sanctions to work. We must wait six months or a year before force is used. We must stay the course. My question is this: Stay what course? A course that allows Saddam to know he is free from surprise attack, free from sudden offensive movement for six months or a year or more? And I guess to you who advocate that course, I would have to ask you to do what you would do about the attitude of the American people in that interval period of time. How long is the American people will the American people put up with that? How long with that delicate coalition that we have pulled together currently? How long will they stay that kind of course -- not to mention our troops abroad and an extended period of time, and in that kind of an environment, when frankly over an extended period of time we'd have to be thinking seriously of rotation and all that that implies. So I think during the course of this debate, those who advocate that course are going to have to answer some of those questions. Patience and delay can be virtues when they help bring about military or diplomatic goals. But when patience and delay become foreign policy goals in themselves, as I fear they have with some of our colleagues, they're no longer virtues. I understand principal pacifism, which holds that nothing justifies the taking of a human life. I grew up in that tradition, and I respect it because World War II caused me to come grips with the very same question in my mind and in my conscience. What I can't understand is a policy that asks us to believe that after six months or a year the alliance will still hold, our sophisticated equipment will be in better shape than it is now after frying in the desert, our troops will have higher morale and better readiness. Such a policy is not just an uncertain trumpet to the men and women in our armed forces. It is a veritable brass choir of indecision, doubt and confusion. Patience at any price is not a policy; it's a cop-out. We will be told by those who want delay that they don't want to risk American lives in combat. Let no one in this chamber or anyone else lecture me on the horrors of war. And I see my friend, the gentleman from Florida, and several others, the gentleman from Ohio, Mr. Wylie, similarly who know of all the horrors of war. We've seen it at its worst. The memory will remain within our heart and minds for the rest of our lives. It's Saddam Hussein who will be responsible for those who make the supreme sacrifice and Saddam Hussein himself. If Saddam convinces his neighbors he can survive this crisis, he'll become something more than a former hit man with delusions of grandeur. He'll be someone who has triumphed over a worldwide coalition. And if you seriously think that you wouldn't be -- that that wouldn't be a sinister event in the history of the 20th century, I think you're fooling yourself. In our democracy, we elect our President to speak and act for us, primarily in foreign affairs, that our message might be clear and unmistakable. And we in the Congress have our role to play, and we can't shirk our responsibility. This is the time, it seems to me, for us to rally around the Chief and give him the support he deserves for our well-crafted bipartisan resolution. And may I, in conclusion, thank my colleagues, my co-sponsors of this joint bipartisan resolution for the excellent work that's been done on this side of the aisle and on our side of the aisle by those who are listed as sponsors of our bipartisan resolution. I hope the debate will go forward on a very high plane. As the distinguished Majority Leader said, this is the time to really come to grips with probably one of the most important issues we'll have, certainly, in this Congress and, for some of us, during the tenure of our Congress here. We hope it's conducted on a high plane and, ultimately, then come to a resolution of it sometime Saturday and will abide by the will of the majority. Hopefully, that will be in strong support of the action the President has taken thus far and feels he may have to take in the future. I yield back. (Applause.) END tions 121 and 673b of title 10 of the United States Code, I hereby determine that it is necessary to augment the active armed forces of the United States for the effective conduct of operational missions in and around the Arabian Peninsula. Further, under the stated authority, I hereby author- ize the Secretary of Defense, and the Secre- tary of Transportation with respect to the Coast Guard when the latter is not operat- ing as a service in the Department of the Navy, to order to active duty units and indi- vidual members not assigned to units, of the Selected Reserve. This order is intended only to improve the internal management of the executive branch, and is not intended to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any person. This order shall be published in the Fed- eral Register and transmitted promptly to the Congress. George Bush The White House, August 22, 1990. [Filed with the Office of the Federal Regis- ter, 4:41 p.m., August 24, 1990] Letter to the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate on the Mobilization of United States Reserves August 22, 1990 Dear Mr. Speaker: (Dear Mr. President:) I have today, pursuant to section 673b of title 10, United States Code, authorized the Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of Transportation with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service within the Department of the Navy, to Executive Order 12727-Ordering the order to active duty units and individual Selected Reserve of the Armed Forces members not assigned to units of the Select- to Active Duty ed Reserve to perform such missions the August 22, 1990 Secretary of Defense may determine neces- sary. The deployment of United States By the authority vested in me as Presi- forces to conduct operational missions in dent by the Constitution and the laws of and around the Arabian Peninsula necessi- the United States of America, including sec- tates this action. 1278 Administration of George Bush, 1990 / Aug. 22 A copy of the Executive order imple- dural, enforceable at law by a party against menting this action is attached. the United States, its agencies, its officers, Sincerely, or any person. George Bush George Bush Note: Identical letters were sent to Thomas The White House, S. Foley, Speaker of the House of Represent- August 22, 1990. atives, and Dan Quayle, President of the Senate. [Filed with the Office of the Federal Regis- ter, 4:42 p.m., August 24, 1990] Executive Order 12728-Delegating the President's Authority To Suspend Statement by Press Secretary Fitzwater Any Provision of Law Relating to the on the Mobilization of United States Promotion, Retirement, or Separation Reserves of Members of the Armed Forces August 22, 1990 August 22, 1990 The President today authorized the Sec- By the authority vested in me as Presi- retary of Defense to call Reserve units of dent by the Constitution and the laws of the Armed Forces to active duty. The order the United States of America, including sec- permits the Secretary of Defense to call to tion 673c of title 10 of the United States duty selected members and units of the Re- Code and section 301 of title 3 of the serve components of the Army, Navy, Air United States Code, I hereby order: Force, and Marine Corps as needed to sup- Section 1. The Secretary of Defense, and port United States and multinational oper- the Secretary of Transportation with re- ations now underway. The President signed spect to the Coast Guard when it is not the order after the Secretary of Defense operating as a service in the Department of advised him that the effective conduct of the Navy, are hereby designated and em- military operations in and around the Arabi- powered to exercise, without the approval, an Peninsula may require augmentation of ratification, or other action of the President, Active components of the Armed Forces. the authority vested in the President by The actual number of Reserve personnel to section 673c of title 10 of the United States be called to active duty will depend upon Code (1) to suspend any provision of law the operational needs of the Armed Forces, relating to promotion, retirement, or sepa- but at this time, we do not anticipate ap- ration applicable to any member of the proaching the full 200,000 authority provid- armed forces determined to be essential to ed by law. the national security of the United States, The Total Force Policy, which was estab- and (2) to determine, for the purposes of lished in 1973, allocates various military ca- said section, that members of the armed pabilities among the Active, Reserve, and forces are essential to the national security National Guard components that together of the United States. make up the Armed Forces of the United Sec. 2. The authority delegated to the States. Under this policy, the capability to Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of perform certain critical military activities Transportation by this order may be redele- has been concentrated in the Reserve com- gated and further subdelegated to subordi- ponent. Activating reservists to support op- nates who are appointed to their offices by erations such as those now underway has the President, by and with the advice and been a central feature of this approach. consent of the Senate. The skills concentrated in the Reserve Sec. 3. This order is intended only to im- component include airlift, food and water prove the internal management of the exec- handling, surface transportation, cargo han- utive branch and is not intended to create dling, medical services, construction, and any right or benefit, substantive or proce- intelligence. By making judicious use of the 1279 RESERVE PARTICIPATION IN OPERATION DESERT SHIELD (As of December 30, 1990) ALL SERVICES First RC units activated on 24 August (six airlift squadrons) 189,250 ceiling authorized under 673b (including Coast Guard) 1,810 units, 129,790 personnel called 1,347 IMAs called 69% of 673b allocation used 5,176 volunteers on duty (peak volunteer participation was 10,658 on 22 August) All 50 states alerted; RC personnel activated from all states (except Alaska), District of Columbia, Federal Republic of Germany, and Puerto Rico -- 15% of U.S. forces deployed to the Operation Desert Shield Area of Responsibility are Reservists (45,583) THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON January 8, 1991 MEMORANDUM FOR CHRISS WINSTON DEPUTY ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT FOR COMMUNICATIONS AND DIRECTOR OF SPEECHWRITING FROM: BOB SIMON RESEARCH ASSISTANT OFFICE OF RESEARCH Dr SUBJECT: PRESIDENTIAL REQUESTS TO CONGRESS ON THE USE OF FORCE For your information, the last president to ask Congress for a declaration of war was Franklin Roosevelt after Pearl Harbor. Prior to that, Woodrow Wilson gave a lengthy speech in person asking Congress to declare war against Germany. Both Presidents Johnson and Truman did not go to Capitol Hill in person to ask for resolutions authorizing force in Vietnam and Korea. Nor did Eisenhower make a personal appeal in 1955, when he sought and received unanimous approval for a resolution authorizing force to defend the islands of Quemoy and Matsu from Chinese communist aggression. (Eisenhower held the authority for years, but never used it.) Also, in 1898, President McKinley did not appear before Congress -- as was the custom then -- when asking for a declaration of war against Spain. Churchill Churchill 745 e the companions The destiny of mankind is not decided by Do not let us speak of darker days; let us ur garment; con- material computation. When great causes speak rather of sterner days. These are not hield. We must be are on the move in the world we learn dark days: these are great days-the great- nted, we must be that we are spirits, not animals, and that est days our country has ever lived; and we something is going on in space and time, and must all thank God that we have been al- the war, House of beyond space and time, which, whether we lowed, each of us according to our stations, to [October 8, 1940] like it or not, spells duty. play a part in making these days memorable ng-promised inva- Radio broadcast to America on re- in the history of our race. Ib. ceiving the honorary degree of Doc- 8 In the past we have had a light which flick- cast to the French tor of Laws from the University ered, in the present we have a light which [October 21, 1940] of Rochester, New York [June 16, flames, and in the future there will be a light g lamp stumbles 1941] which shines over all the land and sea. trying to recon- Hitler is a monster of wickedness, insatia- Speech on war with Japan, House ts echoes, and kin- ble in his lust for blood and plunder. Not con- of Commons [December 8, 1941] passion of former tent with having all Europe under his heel, or 9 all this? The only else terrorized into various forms of abject What kind of people do they [the Japanese] think we are? ascience; the only submission, he must now carry his work of rectitude and sin- butchery and desolation among the vast mul- Speech to the U.S. Congress ery imprudent to titudes of Russia and of Asia. The terrible [December 26, 1941] t this shield, be- military machine, which we and the rest of 10 We have not journeyed all this way across ked by the failure ecivilized world SO foolishly, so supinely, so the centuries, across the oceans, across the ing of our calcula- insensately allowed the Nazi gangsters to mountains, across the prairies, because we however the fates build up year by year from almost nothing, are made of sugar candy. ys in the ranks of annot stand idle lest it rust or fall to pieces. Speech to the Canadian Senate and So now this bloodthirsty guttersnipe House of Commons, Ottawa [De- ille Chamberlain, must launch his mechanized armies upon cember 30, 1941] ons [November 12, new fields of slaughter, pillage and devasta- 11 This is no time to speak of the hopes of the non. future, or the broader world which lies be- even when, for the Radio broadcast on the German in- yond our struggles and our victory. We have for the time with vasion of Russia [June 22, 1941] to win that world for our children. We have We will have no truce or parley with you to win it by our sacrifices. We have not won House of Commons Hitler], or the grisly gang who work your it yet. The crisis is upon us. In this January 22, 1941] wicked will. You do your worst-and we will strange, terrible world war there is a place ich I will give to do our best. for everyone, man and woman, old and Give us the tools, Speech to the London County young, hale and halt; service in a thousand Council [July 14, 1941] forms is open. There is no room now for the [February 9, 1941] The V sign is the symbol of the unconquer- dilettante, the weakling, for the shirker, or ases in which the able will of the occupied territories, and a the sluggard. The mine, the factory, the dock- the facts. portent of the fate awaiting the Nazi tyr- yard, the salt sea waves, the fields to till, the House of Commons anny. home, the hospital, the chair of the scientist, rachute descent in Message to the people of Europe on the pulpit of the preacher-from the highest dolf Hess [May 13, launching the V for Victory propa- to the humblest tasks, all are of equal honor; ganda campaign [July 20, 1941] all have their part to play. Ib. que in this respect. Nothing is more dangerous in wartime 12 When I warned [the French] that Britain who like to be told than to live in the temperamental atmo- would fight on alone whatever they did, their like to be told the sphere of a Gallup Poll, always feeling one's generals told their prime minister and his pulse and taking one's temperature. divided cabinet, "In three weeks England the war, House of Report on the war, House of Com- will have her neck wrung like a chicken." ns [June 10, 1941] mons [September 30, 1941] Some chicken; some neck. Ib. to use the new Never give in, never give in, never, never, 13 The late M. Venizelos³ observed that in all scorn of mankind never. never- nothing, great or small, her wars England-he should have said Brit- arge or petty give in except to con- ain, of course-always wins one battle-the St. James's Palace, victions of honor and good sense.² last. lon [June 12, 1941] Address at Harrow School Speech at the Lord Mayor's Day [October 29, 1941] Nasjonal Samling party Luncheon, London [November 10, i collaborated with the Dr George H. Gallup founded the British Institute of 1942] Norway [April 9, 1940]. Opinion in 1936. 23, 1945]. Shakespeare. 235:18, and William Pitt, 351:5. ¹Eleutherios Venizelos [1864-1936], Greek statesman. [35] Feb. 2I Public Papers of the Presidents Americas, the United States can give fur- NOTE: On September 3, 1949, the President approved ther, practical form to the high purposes of a bill extending the Institute of Inter-American Affairs (63 Stat. 685). our policy. HARRY S. TRUMAN 36 Remarks at a Dinner in Honor of General Vaughan Given by the Reserve Officers Association. February 22, 1949 I DON'T know whether I am supposed to President of the United States. tell all I know on Vaughan or not-if I I have three aides now, all able and effi- haven't, the time is about right; but I am cient officers in the Army, the Navy, and the very happy to be here tonight because I have Air Force. I see my Naval Aide is sitting known General Vaughan all his military here at this end of the table. He used to life, and some time besides. command the battleship Missouri. I had He was at Fort Sill in 1917 at the training quite a trip on that battleship. General camp known as Camp Donovan, 35th Divi- Landry, over there, my Aide for Air, is an sion, First World War. That dates him- efficient and able one; and I have an aide for and me, too. He was a sergeant in the field health over here, Dr. Graham, who is re- artillery when I was down there, and I was sponsible for the fact that I can travel 31,700 a first lieutenant. He went to a school miles and make 357 speeches and wear out down there known as the university of all the newspapermen on the trip. "doubt." He came out, I think, number What I am leading up to is this, that there four in his class. At any rate, he got a have been some very vicious attacks on my commission as first lieutenant. From then military aide, unjustified, and I say it ad- on he was in the heavies, 35th Field visedly, vicious. They are not intended to Artillery-155 Howitzers-went through smear him, but he happens to be my mili- the First World War, with honor to himself tary aide and in a campaign I am the head and a credit to his organization. of one of the great political parties, and there- And then in 1940 he was my secretary fore a fair target for everything, and those when I was United States Senator from who are around me sometimes get the at- Missouri. He could have remained as my tacks, and they are not pleasant. secretary if he had chosen to do it. Instead But I can say this to you, that I have four of that he was called into active service as a secretaries, these three military aides, and a lieutenant colonel in the field artillery, and number of executive assistants, and they are was sent to Australia. He served down able to take it. there until he met with an accident-an air- I was reading a book this evening on poll- plane accident-chest crushed, leg was sters. It is a most interesting book-it's broken, and he was sent back to the United just out. And the gentleman who wrote States. that book made a remark which I think is a When I became Vice President of the classic. He said that if he ever found him- United States, I made him one of my secre- self in agreement with the Chicago Tribune, taries, and my military adviser. When I or some of these columnists and broad- became President, I made him aide to the casters who have been attacking my staff, he 142 Harry S. Truman, 1949 Feb. 22 [36] would know very well that he was wrong Bureau. That was General Bradley. He and he would survey his situation once more was made head of the Veterans Bureau by before he decided. me. Then I made him Chief of Staff. I It was my very great privilege to have think he is one of the ablest military men General Marshall as Chief of Staff, when I in the United States. I am glad he is here became President of the United States. Gen- tonight. I am glad to pay him that tribute. eral Eisenhower was in command of all the Now, I am just as fond and just as loyal to Armies in the European theatre, General my military aide as I am to the high brass, MacArthur was in command of all the and I want you to distinctly understand that Armies in the Asiatic theatre, and General anyone who thinks he can cause any of those Eisenhower had an Army Commander who people to be discharged by me, by some commanded more troops in the field than smart aleck statement over the air or in the any other general in the history of the world. paper, he has got another think coming. One day I got General Marshall to come No commentator or columnist name any over to see me, and he came into the outer members of my Cabinet, or my staff. I office to wait for his turn to come in. name them myself. And when it is time for Now I may be bragging a little bit if I them to be moved on, I do the moving- say I am usually prompt in my appoint- nobody else. ments-nobody has to wait on me; but he I think I have one trait, and that is I never had to wait because he was early. And my go back on a friend. A great many so-called appointment secretary asked him if he re- friends have been a little jittery about me, membered a certain conversation that I had sometimes, but I have never been. They had with him in his office in 1940, when we were not so jittery on the 3d of November as passed the Draft Act. I had gone down to they were on the first. see General Marshall then, and asked him It is a very great pleasure to me to be able if he could make arrangements for me to to come over here tonight and be present at have an artillery group in the coming un- these fine tributes that have been paid to my pleasantness, which I thought at that time able and efficient military aide. we had to face. I want to say to you, and to all the rest And he looked at me, pulled his specs of my secretaries, that I want you to bear down on his nose, like that, and said, "How that in mind, because that is the reason we old are you?" I said, "I am 56." "Well," can operate smoothly and put over a pro- he said, "you are too derned old, you had gram which the voters decided that we better go home and keep on working in the should put over on November the 2d. And Senate." we are going to put it over, don't forget that! My appointment secretary asked him what Thank you very much. he would say under present circumstances, NOTE: The President spoke at 8:50 p.m. at the if he were asked the same question. And Army and Navy Country Club in Arlington, Va. General Marshall stuck to his guns and said, In his remarks the President referred to Maj. Gen. Harry H. Vaughan, Military Aide to the President; "I would say the same thing, only I would Rear Adm. Robert L. Dennison, Naval Aide to the be a little more diplomatic." President; Brig. Gen. Robert B. Landry, Air Aide Well, what I wanted to see General Mar- to the President; Brig. Gen. Wallace H. Graham, the White House Physician; and Matthew J. Con- shall about was to assign his famous field nelly, Appointments Secretary to the President. commander to me as head of the Veterans I43 [174] June 27 Public Papers of the Presidents ancient Hebrew prophet, we should say, NOTE: The President spoke at 3:43 p.m. In his "Let judgment run down as waters, and opening words he referred to Chief Justice of the United States Fred M. Vinson, Chief Judge Harold righteousness as a mighty stream." M. Stephens of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the In no other way can the nations of the District of Columbia, who was the chairman for the earth endure. occasion, and Chief Judge Bolitha J. Laws of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. 175 Exchange of Messages With Governor Dewey Concerning U.S. Action in Korea. June 27, I950 I AM grateful for your message and hasten [Honorable Thomas E. Dewey, Governor of New to assure you that I shall find strength and York, Albany, New York] courage in your brave words. The whole- NOTE: The text of Governor Dewey's telegram to hearted pledge of support which you give the President, dated June 27, follows: The President will be a source of inspiration and fortitude The White House as we gird ourselves for the difficult tasks I whole-heartedly agree with and support the ahead. We have taken our stand on the difficult decision you have made today to extend American assistance to the Republic of Korea in side of Korea and our pledge of faith to combatting armed communist aggression. Your that nation is a witness to all the world action there, in Formosa, the Philippines, and in that we champion liberty wherever the Indochina was necessary to the security of our country and the free world. It should be supported tyranny of communism is the aggressor. by a united America. THOMAS E. DEWEY HARRY S. TRUMAN 176 Remarks to Members of Reserve Officers Association. June 28, 1950 I APPRECIATE most highly the remarks necessary, but he owes service to his govern- of the Secretary of Defense. I think he gave ment as a civilian, he should take a part in the Commander in Chief a little more credit his city, county, and State government; and than he deserves, but then I like that, too. he should be willing, whenever necessary, to You gentlemen represent one of the prin- serve the United States Government in what- cipal components of the authority of the ever capacity he is fitted to serve it. United States in the world. One of the great It is difficult, these days, to get the right things about our Government is that it is sort of men for the right places, due to the founded on the fact that the people are the fact that they not only have to give up civilian government. income, which is in most cases much greater George Washington, in a message to the than you can get from Government, but they Congress, and in correspondence with some also have to stand and receive a certain of his friends, made the statement that every amount of criticism and mudslinging which man who lives under a government that is they do not deserve. controlled by the people owes that govern- Back in 1920-about 30 years ago-it was ment certain service. Not only does he owe my privilege to organize the first Reserve that service in a military way, if it becomes Officers Association in the United States. It 496 Harry S. Truman, 1950 June 28 [176] consisted of Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and think General Bradley told me that I still Air. It was a unified Reserve Association. have a commission as a colonel in the Re- When it became my duty as President of serve Corps. I am somewhat beyond the the United States to look into a defense pro- age of retirement, but I don't believe they gram for the future, after the shooting in are going to retire me, at least for 2½ years. the Second World War had stopped, I made I hope you gentlemen will continue to it my business to get in touch with every attend your schools and keep yourselves up commander-every field commander that we to date in matters military, and in matters had at that time-and we had some of the civil. greatest ever produced. And I corresponded Remember that the civil government is with those gentlemen, and nearly every one just as important for your welfare, and for of them is on record as to what he thinks of a the welfare of the Nation, as your education unified defense program. They were all as military men. I hope that you will take for it. time out maybe to read a short speech which We have succeeded in implementing a I made yesterday on the laying of the cor- defense program. That is a unification of nerstone of the courts building here in the the services on the basis where rivalry doesn't District of Columbia. I went into some cease, as esprit de corps is just as important detail on the rights of the individual under as any other morale factor that makes up the his Government. If you will study that, you Nation. It doesn't mean that there can't be will never become a man who thirsts for rivalry between organizations under the power, you will never become one who over- same command, between the Army, Navy, rides the rights of the people to get into and the Air Force as to who has the best men a position of power. and who does the best job. But it means That is the most important thing in the that when necessary there is complete co- Constitution of the United States, that the operation between them, for the welfare of rights of the individual come first. I am im- the country as a whole. That's all that uni- bued with that idea. I believe that this is a fication means. And it has been imple- Government of and by and for the people, mented, I think, in such a manner that the as Abraham Lincoln said. And as far as I morale of no single organization has been can, as President of the United States, I am hurt. trying to implement that theory, not only Your organization is of vital importance in the United States but in the world at to the welfare of the Nation. You are the large. men who, on your own time, try to keep Thank you very much. yourselves informed on the latest of mili- NOTE: The President spoke at 10:25 a.m. at the tary subjects so that in case of emergency Mayflower Hotel in Washington. In his opening you can fill the places that would ordinarily words he referred to Louis Johnson, Secretary of be necessary in an emergency. Defense. Later he referred to Gen. Omar N. Brad- ley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. I am proud to be a Reserve officer. I 497 THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON MEMORANDUM TO: David Demarest FROM: JOSEPH W. HAGIN SUBJECT: APPROVED PRESIDENTIAL ACTIVITY EVENT: Attend Reserve Officers Association of the U.S. Annual Dinner DATE: January 23, 1991 - Wednesday TIME: 7:15 p.m. DURATION: 45 minutes LOCATION: Washington Hilton Hotel ATTIRE: Black Tie REMARKS REQUIRED: Yes MEDIA COVERAGE: Open FIRST LADY Is Invited PARTICIPATION: ADDITIONAL 2 Tier - H.T. Reception INFORMATION: Evan "Curly" CONTACT: General/Holtman , TELEPHONE: OFFICE 479-2200 HOME NOTE: PROJECT OFFICER, SEE ATTACHED CHECKLIST Ed Rogers Marlin Fitzwater Ede Holiday James Cicconi David Demarest David Valdez Fred McClure Fran Norris USSS PPD Susan Porter Rose Sig Rogich Gary Walters Patty Presock John Keller WHCA Audio/Visual Chriss Winston Bruce Caughman WHCA Operations Laurie Firestone J. Bonnie Newman C. Boyden Gray William Kristol Paul Bateman Laura Melillo Jackie Kennedy Debra Romash John Herrick Deb Anderson Richard Trefry DEPARTMENT OF DETAILS DoD 1215.15-H DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GUARD TOTAL ACTIVE FORCE-THE Ш *** NATION'S RESERVE SHIELD: RESERVE COMPONENTS OF THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR RESERVE AFFAIRS MAY 1990 OF DETAILS ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20301 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RESERVE AFFAIRS May 1, 1990 FOREWORD Since its adoption in the early 1970's, the Total Force Policy has been a basic pillar of our Nation's military strategy. As a result of that policy, the Reserve components of the United States Armed Forces have become an increasingly important element of our national defense. After a decade of growth and improvement, Reserve forces are now responsible for the performance of a variety of important missions in the event of armed conflict, and for assisting the Active forces in meeting peacetime operating requirements. The historic geopolitical developments which have occurred in the two years since this Handbook was last published promise to have a profound impact on policies relating to the Reserve components. The President has recently observed that as we adjust force structure in response to changes in the security environment, we must thoroughly explore the alternative of retaining National Guard and Reserve units as a way to reduce defense costs, while still hedging against uncertainties. This Handbook contains a broad range of information about the Reserve component forces of the United States. While it is not practical to include more detailed information about the organization, strength, training and administration of the United States Reserve Forces, the Handbook should have great utility. Within the covers of this single publication, readers will find a condensed, yet compre- hensive description of the significant improvements which have been made in all of the Reserve component forces in recent years and of the important contributions which are being made by those forces to the national security interests of the United States. The Handbook has been prepared for the purpose of providing a general understanding of our Reserve forces and is issued under the authority of Department of Defense Directive 1215.15, "Reserve Officers Foreign Exchange Program," September 8, 1987. It will be distributed to our NATO allies and to their Reserve forces and it may, therefore, be translated into the French and German languages. Department of Defense Components may obtain copies of this publication through their own publica- tion channels. Other Federal Agencies and the public may obtain copies from the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA, 22161. Stephen m. Duncan Stephen M. Duncan 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreword 1 Table of Contents 3 Figures and Tables 4 CHAPTER 1 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 5 CHAPTER 2 TOTAL FORCE 8 CHAPTER 3 RESERVE CATEGORIES 12 CHAPTER 4 STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION 15 CHAPTER 5 RESERVE COMPONENTS 18 Army National Guard and Army Reserve 18 Naval Reserve 23 Marine Corps Reserve 27 Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve 31 Coast Guard Reserve 38 CHAPTER 6 SERVICE IN THE RESERVE COMPONENTS 43 CHAPTER 7 TRAINING 45 CHAPTER 8 FULL-TIME SUPPORT 47 CHAPTER 9 MOBILIZATION 50 CHAPTER 10 EMPLOYER SUPPORT 52 CHAPTER 11 RESERVE COMPONENT PAY, BENEFITS, AND ENTITLEMENTS 54 CHAPTER 12 LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS 57 Appendices A. Total Reserve Strength 59 B. Reserve Drill Pay Rates 60 C. Insignia of Rank of the Armed Forces 61 D. Reserve Component Addresses 63 3 FIGURES AND TABLES Figure Title Page 1 Total Force Mix by Service 9 2 OASD (RA) Organizational Chart 15 3 USAR Contributions to the Total Army 20 4 ARNG Contributions to the Total Army 21 5 USNR Contributions to the Total Navy 26 6 USMCR Contributions to the Total Marine Corps 29 7 ANG Contributions to the Total Air Force 35 8 USAFR Contributions to the Total Air Force 36 9 USCGR Contributions to the Total Coast Guard 41 10 Unit Training Time Squeeze 47 Table Title Page 1 Reserve Strength 9 2 Reserve Component Expenditures 11 3 Selected Reserve Strength 13 4 Full Time Support Personnel 49 4 CHAPTER 1 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Colonial America adopted the concept of the citizen soldier from England, which had an armed citizens' militia prepared for service in war or peace. This system was ideally suited for the American colonies, which faced the task of developing frontier defense with limited economic means. Before the American Revolutionary War, the militia was the only defense of Colonial America. In 1636, the first permanent regiments of the militia were organized in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Just before the American Revolution, some militia members were designated "minutemen"- for duty at a minute's notice. Other militia units were available in several hours. The militia was organized into local citizen units controlled by the Colonial Assemblies. From Lexington to Yorktown, the militiamen fought in every battle and provided support to the Continental Army. The citizen-soldier often paid a heavy price, having to set aside or neglect ordinary means of livelihood. The primary motivation was a strong sense of patriotism. Thus, a tradition of military service was established reflecting one of the most basic attitudes of all free people. George Washington, a colonel in the Virginia Militia from 1752 through 1758, holds the distinction of being the first of 18 former members of the militia or National Guard to later become President of the United States. While serving as President, Washington is quoted as having said, "Citizens must be prepared to devote a portion of their routines in order to be capable in defense of country." This tradition has served the United States well. In peacetime, the United States has neither desired nor been willing to finance a standing active military force sufficient to meet all requirements of war. The United States' major conflicts have been fought by an active force nucleus augmented substantially by individuals and units from mobilized Reserve forces. 5 The organized part of the militia became known as the "National Guard." The name was inspired by a French hero, the Marquis de Lafayette, who had served as a major general in the Continental Army. The 2nd Battalion, 11th Artillery, New York Militia, adopted the designation "National Guards" in 1824 in honor of Lafayette who had commanded the French militia the "Garde Nationale." By the 1890's, each State militia had adopted the National Guard designation. During the passage of years, the organized militia-the National Guard, later joined by the Service Reserve components-became an integral part of community life. Not only military but civic and social activities were centered in the militia meeting halls of many towns. As communities and industries grew, some leaders in the American business community began en- couraging employees to participate in National Guard and Reserve activities as citizen-soldiers. This employer support has grown during this century and continues today. The U.S. Armed Forces have traditionally been an extension of our civilian society. The defense of our Nation has been based on the concept of the civilian who becomes a soldier-at-arms in time of national emergency. During peacetime, the civilians who are also National Guardsmen and reservists prepare for active service. At the beginning of World War II, the Reserve component forces organized into units were poor in equipment and required extensive training prior to entering combat. These volunteers helped the Active Army expand from 264,118 on June 30, 1940 to 1,455,565 one year later. About 300,000 of this increase came from the National Guard and Reserves. Once fully trained and equipped, reservists made outstanding contributions to victory. The nearly 1 million National Guard and Reserve members mobilized during the Korean War in the early 1950s were relatively better prepared to respond than their counterparts had been in previous conflicts. They required less postmobilization training as most of them were veterans of World War II. Despite receiving little or no training since the end of the war, the first reservists and Guard members called for Korea were sent into combat as individual fillers assigned to duty with Active units. As was the case in World War II, at the start of the Korean conflict there was a lack of National Guard and Reserve units which were sufficiently trained and equipped to be employed as units. This situation led to a major revitalization of the U.S. Reserve forces in the years that followed. During the Berlin Crisis of 1961 and 1962, 148,000 National Guardsmen and reservists served on active duty. The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 involved 14,000 Air Force reservists who reported from civilian life to their units within as few as 9 hours. The Pueblo Crisis and the war in Vietnam in the late 1960s saw the mobilization of 35,000 National Guard and Reserve members with their units, plus nearly 2,000 called as individuals in a non-unit status. 6 During the 1970s and 1980s, there has been a dramatic increase in reliance on Reserve component forces in the fulfilling of peacetime and combat operational responsibilities of the U.S. military. Naval reservists have assumed shipping-control responsibilities and have served with the crews of mine- sweepers and other ships which deployed to the Persian Gulf, just as others served aboard USS NEW JERSEY (BB-62) off the coast of Lebanon. U.S. Air Force Reserve crews airlifted students from Grenada and an Army Reserve Civil Affairs unit helped restore order in that small island country. U.S. Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard crews flew refueling missions for the bomber aircraft which struck the retaliatory blow in Libya. Personnel from the Army's Reserve components are providing substantial maintenance support in Europe and served on the Joint Task Force in Honduras. Air National Guard and U.S. Air Force Reserve crews airlifted troops to Honduras and also flew humanitarian relief supplies to Armenia, Central America and Jamaica. Air National Guard pilots continuously fly routine air defense missions with modern aircraft such as the F-16. Marine Corps Reserve air refueling tanker aircraft regularly support Active force tactical aircraft worldwide. Coast Guard reservists volunteered in substantial numbers to assist in the cleanup following a major oil spill at Valdez, Alaska. In late 1989, Reserve component forces provided substantial contributions toward the success of operation "Just Cause," the liberation of the Republic of Panama. U.S. Army Reserve and Army National Guard individuals and units provided essential support in such areas as security, public affairs and civil affairs. Air National Guard and U.S. Air Force Reserve crews provided hundreds of flying sorties ranging from strategic and tactical airlift to close air support and gunship missions. As in Grenada, Army reservists assumed a lead role in the process of restoring order and essential services to Panama in the aftermath of the military operations. Historically, Congress has played an important role in shaping the U.S. Reserve components. Laws concerning the exact role of Federal and State governments with respect to the National Guard were first drawn up in 1903, and, since 1933, the National Guard has had a dual status as a State force and a Federal Reserve component. The first purely Federal Reserve force, the Army Medical Reserve Corps, was established in 1908. It was not until 1916, when the realities of World War I became clear, that additional Federal Reserve components were established. The "Armed Forces Reserve Act of 1952" was the first of several major initiatives of the 1950's and 1960's which, together, form the basis for today's Reserve components personnel, training and pay structure. This act established the Ready Reserve, the Standby Reserve, the Retired Reserve, and also specified the seven Reserve components. In 1967, Congress passed the first law to establish annual personnel strengths for the Reserve components. This law also required that each Reserve component maintain part of its structure in organized and trained units. It set minimum annual training require- ments for Reserve units, and also established chiefs of the Reserve components at the flag and general officer rank. With the expanding use of and reliance on Reserve forces, Congress, in 1983, authorized an Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs. Thus, a principal staff assistant for Reserve component matters was positioned at the highest decision-making level of the Department of Defense. 7 CHAPTER 2 TOTAL FORCE The end to conscription in 1973 and the need to make the most effective use of available resources led the Department of Defense to formulate the "Total Force" policy. The objective of the policy is a balanced mix of forces that fully utilizes all available assets, while ensuring that the maximum military capability is achieved at the minimum realistic cost. Today, this policy is a reality and the National Guard and Reserve forces have been assigned significantly expanded peacetime operational responsi- bilities as well as greater wartime missions. The total force includes the Active and Reserve components, military retirees, civilian employees of the Department of Defense, and civilian contractors. This personnel mix permits a large segment of the civilian population to remain productive in the peacetime economy while remaining available for rapid mobilization as members of, or in direct support of, the Armed Forces in time of crisis. The key elements of the total force are the Active and Reserve components of the U.S. Armed Forces. The Armed Forces of the U.S. are the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps and Coast Guard. Their Reserve components consist of: Army National Guard (ARNG) and Army Reserve (USAR); Air National Guard (ANG) and Air Force Reserve (USAFR); Naval Reserve (USNR); Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR); and Coast Guard Reserve (USCGR). Reserve Personnel Reserve and National Guard forces total over 1.6 million uniformed personnel or around 44 percent of the U.S. total military force. A significant asset in and of itself, the retired reserve, with over 1.8 million members, could be recalled in an emergency. The following chart illustrates the force mix of the U.S. military by Active and Reserve component(s) of each of the Services, excluding retirees: 8 TOTAL FORCE MIX BY SERVICE (expressed in thousands - excludes Retirees) USA USAR/ARNG 765.3 (20%) 1061.6 (28%) USCG USNR 36.7 (1%) 248.0 (0%) USCGR 17.8 (<0.5%) USAF USN 566.5 (15%) 586.6 (15%) USMCR USAFR/ANG 81.5 (2%) USMC 269.7 (7%) 196.8 (5%) During the 1980's, efforts to improve the quality of personnel who serve in the Reserve components have met with great success. The improvements can be seen and measured in various ways. For example, over 90 percent of enlisted accessions without prior service are high school graduates and about 95 percent scored "average" or higher in the standardized Armed Forces Qualification Test. This represents an increase of over 20 percent in both categories since 1980. The following table reflects the trend in recent years of the total strength of the Reserve components including the Ready and Standby Reserve categories. Reserve categories are defined later in this Handbook. Table 1. RESERVE STRENGTH (In Thousands) 1980 1984 1988 1989 ARNG 373.8 443.7 464.2 467.1 USAR 431.3 552.0 606.1 594.5 USNR 217.4 201.2 244.2 248.0 USMCR 94.2 91.7 87.4 81.5 ANG 96.6 105.0 115.2 116.1 USAFR 146.6 140.5 159.8 153.6 USCGR 21.5 18.7 18.1 17.8 Total 1381.4 1552.8 1695.0 1678.6 9 Reserve Equipment In consonance with the total force, the quality of National Guard and Reserve equipment has signifi- cantly improved. Clearly, if Reserve components are to play a credible role in the force structure, it is imperative that they be provided with modern equipment. This equipment must be compatible with the Active component, and supportable within the current logistics base. Since 1980, the Reserve components have been the beneficiaries of a significant modernization program. The guiding principle is contained in guidance which the Secretary of Defense gave to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Services in June 1982: - "The long range goal of the Department is to equip all Active, Guard and Reserve units to full wartime requirements units that fight first shall be equipped first regardless of component." early deploying Guard and Reserve units must have equipment to perform their missions. Active and Reserve units deploying at the same time should have equal claim on modern equipment inventories." In fiscal years 1988 and 1989, a total of $6.05 billion was provided for new equipment for the National Guard and Reserves. During the same 2-year period, equipment valued at $20.5 billion was distributed to the Reserve components including equipment from new production and serviceable equipment from the Active components, such as F-16s, C-5s, Perry class guided missile frigates, and M60A3 and M-1 tanks. When added to Fiscal Year 1990 equipment distribution projections of $10.9 billion, this yields a total of $30.4 billion for equipment programmed to enter Reserve component inventories over the 3-year period. Cost Effectiveness Although the Reserve components comprise approximately 45 percent of the total military force of the United States, the costs associated with Reserve capabilities are relatively modest. The three principal elements of the U.S. defense budget which affect the Reserve components are: operations and maintenance (O&M); procurement, consisting of new weapons systems and ammunition; and personnel. The following table depicts the expenditures in these three categories for the Reserve components as a percentage of total Defense Department expenditures for fiscal year 1989. 10 Table 2. RESERVE COMPONENT EXPENDITURES (In Billions of Dollars) CATEGORY RESERVE TOTAL DEFENSE* PERCENTAGE O&M $ 6.822 $ 86.922 07.8% Procurement $ 2.858 $ 79.692 03.6% Personnel $ 9.100 $ 78.803 11.5% Total $18.780 $245.417* 07.6% * Not included in the Defense total is money expended for other major budget items such as facilities construction and research, development, test and evaluation. 11 CHAPTER 3 RESERVE CATEGORIES The Reserve components make up a complex structure. Each Reserve component consists of three Reserve categories: Ready Reserve, Standby Reserve, and Retired Reserve. The exceptions are the Army National Guard and Air National Guard, which do not have a Standby Reserve. Reserve component personnel strengths by categories are shown in Appendix A. READY RESERVE. The Ready Reserve consists of Reserve component units, individual reservists assigned to Active component units, and individuals subject to recall to active duty to augment the Active forces in time of war or national emergency. The Ready Reserve consists of three subgroups: the Selected Reserve, the Individual Ready Reserve and the Inactive National Guard. Selected Reserve. The Selected Reserve is composed of those units and individuals designated by their respective Services and approved by the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, as so essential to initial wartime missions that they have priority for training, equipment, and personnel over all other Reserve elements. Individual mobilization augmentees (IMAs) are members of the Selected Reserve not assigned to a Reserve component unit but rather assigned to and trained for an Active component organization, Selective Service System, or Federal Emergency Management Agency billet that must be filled on or shortly after mobilization. Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). The IRR is a manpower pool consisting mainly of trained individuals who have previously served in Active component units or in the Selected Reserve. IRR members are liable for involuntary active duty for training and fulfillment of mobilization requirements. Inactive National Guard (ING). The ING consists of Army National Guard personnel who are in an inactive status (the term does not apply to the Air National Guard). Members of the ING are attached to National Guard units but do not participate in training activities. Upon mobilization, they would mobilize with their units. To remain members of the ING, individuals must report annually to their assigned unit. 12 STANDBY RESERVE. Personnel assigned to the Standby Reserve have completed all obligated or required service or have been removed from the Ready Reserve because of civilian employment, temporary hardship, or disability. Standby Reservists maintain military affiliation, but are not required to perform training or to be assigned to a unit. RETIRED RESERVE. The Retired Reserve consists of personnel who have been placed in a retire- ment status based on completion of 20 or more qualifying years of Reserve component and/or Active component service. A member of the Retired Reserve does not receive retired pay until reaching age 60, unless he or she has 20 or more years active Federal service. Selected Reserve Growth While all segments of the Reserve components are subject to mobilization during war or national emergency declared by Congress, the Selected Reserve is the mainstay of the Reserve Force. Most Selected Reservists are assigned to units which conduct monthly and annual training. All Selected Reservists will be the first to mobilize. As the primary source of timely augmentation of the Active force, the Selected Reserve receives major attention within each Service component. The Selected Reserve has increased by 30 percent since 1980, as shown in the following table: Table 3. SELECTED RESERVE STRENGTH (In Thousands) 1980 1984 1988 1989 ARNG 366.6 434.3 455.2 457.0 USAR 213.2 275.1 312.8 319.2 USNR 97.1 120.6 149.5 151.5 USMCR 35.7 40.6 43.5 43.6 ANG 96.3 105.0 115.2 116.1 USAFR 59.8 70.3 82.1 83.2 USCGR 11.9 12.4 12.1 12.0 Total 880.5 1058.2 1170.4 1182.6 13 Individual Ready Reserve Growth The IRR is the principal source of trained individuals to fill wartime manpower shortages in Active and Reserve units, to replace unskilled or partially skilled unit members and to replace combat casualties during the first 120 days after mobilization. The IRR reached a peak strength of over 1.5 million in the early 1970s during the Vietnam conflict. Beginning in 1973, the IRR experienced a period of declining strength which lasted until 1978. From that point, increases in both the Active and Reserve components have yielded parallel growth in this vital Reserve category. An increase in the Military Service Obligation from 6 years to 8 years, enacted in 1984, will generate further growth into the 1990s. Approximate IRR strength for various fiscal years (FYs) has been as follows: FY 1971 - 1,593,000 (high point) FY 1978-356,000 (low point) FY 1983-417,000 FY 1988-489,000 FY 1991-695,000 (projection) 14 CHAPTER 4 STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION The President of the United States is Commander-in-Chief of all Armed Forces. The President appoints a Secretary of Defense, with the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate, to direct the entire military establishment. Within the Department of Defense, there is an Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs, also appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs is responsible for exercising overall supervision of Reserve component matters within the Department of Defense. The organization of the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs (OASD(RA))is depicted in figure 2: Figure 2. OASD(RA) Organization. ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE RESERVE FORCES FOR RESERVE AFFAIRS POLICY BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYSIS MOBILIZATION MANAGEMENT DIRECTORATE POLICY & PLANS DIRECTORATE DIRECTORATE DASD DASD DASD DASD MANPOWER & READINESS & MATERIEL & PROGRAM & NCESGR PERSONNEL TRAINING FACILITIES BUDGET DIRECTOR. MANPOWER DIRECTOR, READINESS COORDINATOR, INVESTMENT DIRECTOR, PUBLIC REQUIREMENTS & PROGRAMS & FORCE STRUCTURE AFFAIRS DIRECTOR FOR FORCES STRUCTURE FACILITIES DIRECTOR. SYSTEMS & DIVISION COORDINATOR, MANPOWER DIRECTOR, FINANCE & ANALYSIS FACILITY MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS ADMINISTRATION DIRECTOR, TRAINING DIVISION DIRECTOR. PERSONNEL CONSTRUCTION COORDINATOR, DIRECTOR, POLICY & COMPENSATION TRAINING POLICIES DIVISION PLANNING FIELD OPERATIONS DIVISION REAL PROPERTY DIRECTOR. PERSONNEL TRAINING SUPPORT & DIVISION MANAGEMENT & TRAINING MANAGEMENT DIVISION COORDINATOR, PROGRAMS OMBUDSMAN DIRECTOR, READINESS DIRECTOR FOR MATERIEL SPECIAL PROJECTS RESOURCES & EVALUATION COORDINATOR, MANAGEMENT DIVISION SYSTEMS & INTRA-GOVT Supervisory PLANTS & PROGRAM AFFAIRS DIVISION Support and/or Coordination 15 The Reserve Forces Policy Board (RFPB), acting through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs, is the principal policy advisor to the Secretary of Defense on matters relating to the Reserve components. The RFPB is established under section 175 of title 10, United States Code. The Board consists of: a civilian chairman; the Assistant Secretaries of the Military Departments for Manpower and Reserve Affairs; Regular officers from each of the Services; and Reserve officers from each of the Reserve components. The Secretaries of the Military Departments and the Secretary of Transportation administer the different Reserve components. The Secretary of the Army administers the Army National Guard of the United States and the Army Reserve; the Secretary of the Navy administers the Naval Reserve, the Marine Corps Reserve and, in time of war, the Coast Guard Reserve; and the Secretary of the Air Force administers the Air National Guard of the United States and the Air Force Reserve. During peacetime, the Secretary of Transportation administers the Coast Guard Reserve. Personnel strength and budget levels for the Reserve components are recommended by the President and approved by the Congress. The Congress has historically taken a strong oversight interest in the Reserve components, consistently acting to ensure that the Reserve forces are a major part of the U.S. defense structure. The National Guard The Army and Air National Guard are unique among the world's Reserve military forces, in that they combine both Federal and State functions. The National Guard of each State is both a State military force under the command of the respective State and territorial governor and, at the same time, a Federal Reserve component. The dual State-Federal missions derive from the U.S. Constitution and the United States Code of Laws. The National Guard's Federal mission is to provide properly trained and equipped units available for prompt mobilization in the event of a war, national emergency or as otherwise needed. The Guard's State mission is to provide military support within the State. Army and Air National Guard units in a non-mobilized status are commanded by the governors of the 50 States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the territories of Guam and the Virgin Islands, and the Commanding General of the District of Columbia. The National Guard of each State is directly supervised by the State adjutant general, an official who usually holds the rank of major general. There are hundreds of State callups of National Guard units each year for such missions as emergency relief from natural disasters, search and rescue operations, protection of life, preservation of order, and maintenance of vital public services. The National Guard also plays an important role in the U.S. war on drugs. During Fiscal Year 1989, the National Guard executed over 1800 missions in support of local, State, and Federal law enforce- ment agencies. 16 National Guard Bureau The Army and Air National Guard of the United States are administered on the Federal side through the National Guard Bureau (NGB). The NGB is a joint bureau of the Departments of the Army and Air Force, serving as both a staff and an operating Agency of the two Services. Its functions include directing resources to support the National Guard mission of providing combat ready units to accomplish the national military strategy of deterring war by (1) developing, coordinating and administering all National Guard Federal policies, plans and programs, (2) channeling communications between the Services, States and units, and (3) assisting the States in organization, maintenance, and operation of National Guard units. The Chief of the NGB is appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate. The Chief, who must be a National Guard officer, serves for a term of 4 years, and is eligible for a second term. The President has included the Chief on the list of positions of responsibility and importance in which the incumbent is nominated to serve in the grade of lieutenant general. This officer reports to the Chiefs of Staff of the Army and Air Force and serves as their principal staff advisor on National Guard affairs. Reporting directly to the Chief of the NGB are: the Director, Joint Staff; the Director, Army National Guard; and the Director, Air National Guard. The Joint Staff provides liaison and coordination between the Army and Air Guard. Each of the three Directorates is supported by seven to ten specialized offices or divisions. 17 CHAPTER 5 RESERVE COMPONENTS The seven Reserve components augment the Active components in accomplishment of their assigned missions. The Army and Air Force both have components from the National Guard and the Reserve. The Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard each have a single Reserve component. A description of each of the seven Reserve components of the U.S. Armed Forces follows. Army National Guard and Army Reserve Mission The Army National Guard (ARNG) and the Army Reserve (USAR) provide trained units and individuals in support of the Army's Active component wartime force. The USAR is a Federal force while the ARNG has both a Federal and State mission. Selected ARNG and USAR units participate with Active component units to improve readiness through the Directed Training Associations (DTA). These associations include CAPSTONE, Active Component/Reserve Component Partnership Program, and affiliation. Army National Guard History Having celebrated its 350th anniversary in 1986, the ARNG is the oldest military force in the country, dating from 1636. The oldest military units in the National Guard and U.S. Army are four Massachu- setts ARNG units; the 181st and 182nd Infantries, the 101st Field Artillery, and the 101st Engineer Battalion. The ARNG has participated in all U.S. wars and conflicts from the Revolutionary War to Vietnam and is entitled to nearly all of the 168 battle and campaign streamers on the Army flag. A graphic portrayal of the participation of the militia/National Guard is shown below. 1775 - Revolutionary War 164,000 militiamen. 1812 - War of 1812 489,173 militiamen. 1846 - Mexican War 73,000 militiamen. 18 1898 - Spanish-American War 165,000 Army Guardsmen. 1916 - Mexican-American border 158,000 Army Guardsmen. 1917 - World War 1379,000 Army Guardsmen 17 combat divisions (40% of American Expedi- tionary Force). 1940 - World War II 300,000 Army Guardsmen. 1950 - Korean War 183,000 Army Guardsmen. 1961 - Berlin Crisis 45,115 Army Guardsmen. 1968 - Vietnam War 12,234 Army Guardsmen. Army National Guard Structure In terms of Selected Reserve strength, the ARNG is the largest of the nation's seven Reserve compo- nents and is composed predominantly of combat units. It consists of more than 5,900 battalion, company, detachment and team size units located in more than 2,600 communities in all States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and the District of Columbia. The author- ized peacetime strength of the ARNG is over 460,000. Wartime structure is more than 480,000. The ARNG operates 260 State training sites of various sizes and two partially active Army installa- tions. Increased emphasis placed on Reserve component readiness has resulted in additional require- ments for maintenance, storage, and training facilities. Army Reserve History The Modern Army Reserve began with the establishment of the Medical Corps Reserve on April 23, 1908, with 364 officers. The USAR from 1908 through World War II was primarily composed of officers. After World I, the USAR was composed of 26 divisions, all of which suffered from severe shortages of personnel, equipment and training. As a result, callups in the early stages of World War II were of individual reservists, not Reserve units. The U.S. Army ended World War II with 89 combat divisions on active duty. By 1946, that number had been reduced to 10 Active divisions with 27 divisions assigned to the National Guard and 26 divisions assigned to the USAR. Since 1917, the USAR has been highly involved in our nation's international commitments. 1917 - WWI over 160,000 reservists served. 1941 - WWII over 200,000 reservists served. 1950 - Korean War 244,000 reservists served. 1961 - Berlin Crisis 40,000 reservists served. 1968 - Vietnam War 5,181 mobilized with 3,500 deployed to Vietnam. Army Reserve Structure In 1967, a reorganization eliminated the combat divisions and restructured the USAR to provide combat, combat support, and combat service support units. This reorganization provided the forma- tion of 18 Army Reserve Commands (ARCOM) organized on a geographic basis. Two additional ARCOMs were added, one in 1973 and a second in 1986, for a total of 20. The USAR is second in size among the Reserve components in terms of Selected Reserve strength. It consists mainly of approximately 3,300 company/detachment sized units, primarily combat support and combat service support units. The authorized peacetime Selected Reserve strength for the USAR is over 300,000. 19 The Chief of the Army Reserve serves as the principal adviser to the Army Chief of Staff on USAR matters. The Chief of the Army Reserve is appointed from the USAR by the President, confirmed by the U.S. Senate, and serves in the grade of major general. All USAR units are assigned to an ARCOM or to a General Officer Command (GOCOM). General Officer Commands include all units authorized a general officer as commander (except ARCOMs). An ARCOM, authorized a major general or brigadier general as commander, has command of USAR units located in a specific geographic area. ARCOMs are commanded by the Commander, U.S. Forces Command (FORSCOM) through one of the five numbered Continental United States (CONUS) armies, by the U.S. Army Special Operations Command, or by an overseas major commander. Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) supervises initial entry and service school training for individual reservists. Total Army Contribution Since 1980, the combined ARNG and USAR personnel strength has increased over 30 percent compared to a small decline in the strength of the Active Army over the same period. Over half of the total Army's combat forces and two-thirds of its aggregate combat support and combat service support are in the ARNG and the USAR. Reserve Component contributions to the total Army are reflected in the following chart: Figure 3. USAR Contributions to the Total Army. Training Divisions 100 Legal Units 98 Civil Affairs Units 97 Smoke Generator Units 68 Army Hospitals 61 Intelligence Units 54 Pathfinder Units 50 Conventional Ammunition 44 Watercraft Companies 32 Public Affairs Units 29 Engineer Bridge Companies 26 Truck Companies 21 Combat Engineer Units 17 Separate Brigades 9 Infantry Battalions 5 0 100 USAR PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL ARMY As of September 30, 1989 20 Figure 4. ARNG Contributions to the Total Army. TOW Light Anti-Tank Infantry Bn 100 Infantry Scout Troups 100 Heavy Helicopter Companies 100 Separate Brigades 67 Infantry Battalions 53 Field Artillery Battalions 51 Maintenance Units 49 Armored Battalions 47 Mechanized Infantry Battalions 47 Armored Cavalry Regiments 40 Combat Engineer Units 40 Combat Divisions 36 Corps Attack Helicopter Bn 35 Special Forces Groups 25 0 100 ARNG PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL ARMY As of September 30, 1989 The Army Reserve comprises less than 10 percent of total Army combat units as compared to the Army Guard's 44 percent. This relationship reverses itself in the combat support and combat service support areas. The USAR and ARNG perform nearly all of the missions assigned to the U.S. Army. As of the end of FY 1989, the two components fielded an impressive number of units within the Total Army, including: Combat Combat Support/Service Support 82 Infantry Battalions 7 Heavy Helicopter Companies 53 Armored Battalions 47 Training Brigades 123 Field Artillery Battalions 140 Judge Advocate General Units 8 Special Forces Units 77 Supply and Service Units (Quartermaster) 45 Mechanized Infantry Battalions 192 Maintenance Units 2 Armored Cavalry Regiments 116 Engineer Units 24 Attack Helicopter Battalions 154 Military Police Units 12 Corps Signal Battalions 38 Major Logistical Units 62 Engineer Bridge Companies 79 Public Affairs Units 36 Civil Affairs Units 118 Hospitals-all types 21 Force Modernization As a part of the growing partnership, the ARNG and USAR are moving ahead aggressively with a program of modernization which will further improve their combat readiness and their ability to support the missions of the total Army. The ARNG and USAR are placing special emphasis on aviation force modernization, including the activation of aviation brigades in all of the divisions and many new corps level units. Highlights of the ARNG modernization program are AH-64 helicopter attack battalions and UH-60 helicopter assault units. The Army Guard received 54 AH-64 aicraft in FY 89, bringing their total to 78 aircraft assigned. Also during 1989, the ARNG received 82 UH-60s bringing to 127 the number of these aircraft assigned. Modernization of ground forces of the ARNG continues as well. The inventory includes over 300 Bradley Fighting Vehicles, and over 425 Improved TOW Vehicles. In addition, Army Guard units have received more M1 tanks, M-198 Howitzers, Chaparrals, Heavy Expandable Mobility Tactical Trucks, and Commercial Utility Cargo Vehicles. During 1988 and 1989, nearly 8,000 personnel and more than 190 aircraft were added to the USAR aviation structure. Two new attack helicopter battalions equipped with AH-1 (Cobras), two attack helicopter regiment headquarters, and numerous other elements were added in 1988 to make USAR aviation forces more responsive to total Army mobilization needs. In 1989, three attack helicopter battalions were activated in the USAR and aligned with four Active U.S. Army corps. During 1989, USAR ground combat units were completely fielded with M60A3 battle tanks with 105MM guns, thermal sights, laser range finders, and analog ballistics computers. USAR units con- tinue to receive a wide array of wheeled and tracked vehicles which have been purchased expressly for the Reserves under the Dedicated Procurement Program. Two major USAR programs are the Deployable Medical Systems (DEPMEDS) program and the construction of sites to support the Regional Training Site-Medical (RTS-MED) program. Currently, 94 USAR hospital units are scheduled for DEPMEDS distribution. Seven RTS-MEDS are being constructed to support training on DEPMEDS equipment. Five of these sites are USAR and two are ARNG. Fort Devens, Massachusetts is the first USAR site for construction, with occupancy sche- duled for early 1991. 22 Naval Reserve Mission The mission of the U.S. Naval Reserve (USNR) is to provide trained units to increase the Navy's force level during mobilization and trained individuals to sustain Active component force operations around-the-clock. In recent years, the Naval Reserve has shouldered an increasing share of the Navy's operational responsibilities. Today's Naval Reserve is serving an indispensable role in the nation's maritime defense. History President Thomas Jefferson, in 1805, suggested the creation of a naval militia, but nothing came of it. In the early days of the Civil War a "sort of Naval Reserve"-the Volunteer Navy of the United States-was created to provide officers for the increased needs of the Navy. Over 7,500 volunteer officers served during the conflict. In May 1888, Massachusetts established a naval battalion within the State militia. By 1897, 16 other States had a naval militia. A year later these trained bodies were to prove of value during the Spanish-American War, as the militia furnished 4,216 men to the Navy. In 1914 the Division of Militia Affairs was established in the Navy Department. The origin of today's Naval Reserve dates from March 1915, when Congress established a Naval Reserve Force. The contributions of Naval reservists in conflicts during this century have been very impressive: 1917- WWI- 330,000 reservists served. 1941- WWII- over 2,000,000 reservists served. Most of these were inductees assigned to the Reserve. 1950- Korea- over 130,000 reservists served. 1968- Vietnam- One out of seven on active duty were reservists and two Reserve Seabee battal- ions were mobilized. After World War II many of the sailors who had served joined the USNR, resulting in a cadre of 130,000 drilling reservists. Many of these reservists were recalled to active duty during the Korean War, when 75 percent of the Navy's combat sorties were flown by USNR aviators. Today, the USNR is taking on vital operational responsibilities. For example, in 1986 the USNR ship USS PRESERVER spearheaded the salvage operation of the space shuttle Challenger, with a reservist diver locating the Challenger's crew compartment. Since 1987, when hostilities intensified in the Persian Gulf, deployed USNR minesweepers have been continuously on station under operation "Earnest Will" to augment airborne mine countermeasures and explosives ordnance disposal units already on scene. Two Reserve guided missile frigates also deployed to the Persian Gulf to assist in maintaining the increased operational tempo. In addition, USNR special boat units and volunteer personnel were sent to the area to support Navy operations. 23 Structure The Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) is responsible to the Secretary of the Navy for the organization, administration, training, and equipping of the USNR and for mobilization planning to reinforce and augment the Active forces. The USNR command structure, which supports the CNO, is headed by a rear admiral, either Regular or Reserve, who serves as Director of Naval Reserve (DIRNAVRES) and Commander, Naval Reserve Force (COMNAVRESFOR). This officer also holds the title of Chief of Naval Reserve (CNAVRES). The incumbent, based in Washington, D.C., is the principal advisor to the CNO on matters of policy, plans, programming, and budgeting for the USNR. COMNAVRESFOR, a field command headquartered in New Orleans, Louisiana, is responsible for the operations, training, administration, and readiness of Naval reservists. Two subordinate flag commands are also located in New Orleans with a Regular or Reserve flag officer commanding each: Commander, Naval Surface Reserve Force (COMNAVSURFRESFOR), and Commander, Naval Air Reserve Force (COMNAVAIRESFOR). The senior of the two also serves as Deputy COMNAVRESFOR. As of September 30, 1989, there were 248,040 members of the USNR, 151,505 of whom are members of the Selected Reserve. The vanguard of the USNR-the Navy's source of immediate mobilization manpower-is the drilling Selected Reservist. These men and women normally train 1 weekend a month and perform at least 2 weeks of active duty annually. The Selected Reserve is structured to provide an increase in the Navy's combat capability upon mobilization by delivering three types of trained, combat-ready resources: (1) commissioned units; (2) reinforcing units; and (3) sustaining units. Commissioned Units are complete operational entities. These units, which have organic equip- ment, include ships, aircraft squadrons, construction battalions, cargo handling battalions, mobile inshore undersea warfare units, and special boat units. As of the end of Fiscal Year 1989, the USNR included the following surface and air commissioned units: Ships 46 ships - 22 frigates (FF) (8 KNOX class/16 PERRY class) I 1 destroyer (DD) - 18 minesweepers (MSO) - 2 amphibious ships (LST) - 3 salvage ships (ARS) 24 Shore and Support Forces 12 cargo handling battalions (CHB) 17 mobile construction battalions (RNMCB) 23 mobile inshore undersea warfare (MIUW) units 14 craft of opportunity (COOP) units 4 special boat units (SBU) 1 cargo handling training battalion (CHTB) 2 explosive ordnance disposal mobile units (EODMU) 9 naval construction regiments (RNCR) 4 naval construction force support units (RNCFSU) Aircraft (51 Squadrons) 2 carrier air wings - 4 fighter squadrons (VF) - 3 strike fighter squadrons (VFA) - 1 light attack squadrons (VAL) — 2 medium attack squadron (VAM) -- 2 carrier airborne early warning squadrons (VAW) - 2 tactical electronic warfare squadrons (VAQ) 2 patrol air wings - 13 maritime patrol squadrons (VP) 1 helicopter air wing - 1 helicopter combat search and rescue squadron (HC) - 1 helicopter light attack squadron (HAL) — 2 helicopter carrier ASW squadrons (HS) - 3 helicopter ASW LAMPS (light airborne multipurpose system) squadrons (HSL) - 2 helicopter mine countermeasure squadrons (HM) - 1 helicopter combat support special squadron (HCS) fleet logistics support wing - 12 fleet logistic support squadrons (VR) — 2 fleet fighter/composite squadrons (VFC) The Selected Reserve also includes over 3,000 reinforcing and sustaining units. These units are composed of professionals in more than 30 fields, such as intelligence, medicine and law. They provide augmentation personnel for virtually every type of Active Navy organization. Reinforcing Units augment Active Navy commissioned units and operating staffs (and some Marine Corps combat commands) with trained personnel to enable combat forces to operate at the highest level of personnel readiness for an indefinite period of time. 25 Sustaining Units augment fleet support activities with the trained personnel necessary for a surge capability and for sustaining the high level of activity required to support the deployed forces. Total Force Contribution The Navy's heavy investment in its Reserve forces over the past decade has provided adequate force structure for deterrence to be maintained at an affordable cost. While front line equipment is kept in a combat-ready status, the Navy accrues substantial savings in reduced personnel and operating costs. If these forces were held in reserve for mobilization purposes only, force structure cost savings would still accrue, but there would be no peacetime dividend on the outlays for Reserve personnel, equip- ment and training. Seeking such a dividend, the Navy has structured Reserve training to support a peacetime payoff in the form of "mutual support." In May 1988, the Secretary of the Navy approved a new category of training for Naval reservists, "Mutual Support Training," under which reservists work alongside their active duty counterparts for "hands on" training with the fleet. Below are some examples of mutual support: Reserve patrol squadrons provide support for fleet training and exercises, drug interdiction and static displays. Reserve fleet logistic support squadrons provide nearly all of the Navy's organic airlift in the continental United States as well as substantial support to the Mediterranean and western Pacific theaters. Reserve fighter composite squadrons, flying three versions of the Douglas A-4 aircraft, provide training support to Active Navy and Marine Corps units in dissimilar air combat maneuvering, intercept training, air-to-air and surface-to-air weapons targeting and fleet exercises. Examples of the USNR as a percentage of the Navy's total capability are presented in figure 5: Figure 5. USNR Contributions to the Total Navy US Based Fleet Logistics Aircraft 100 US Based Fleet Composite Aircraft 100 Light Attack Helicopters 100 Combat SAR Helicopters 100 Harbor Protection Units 100 Cargo Handling Battalions 93 Military Sealift Command Personnel 85 Mine Warfare Ships 82 Mobile Construction Battalions 65 Special Boat Forces 57 Fleet Hospitals 55 Airborne Mine Countermeasure Sqs 40 Maritime Air Patrol Squadrons 35 Intelligence Personnel 35 LAMPS Anti-Submarine Warfare Sqs 33 Frigates 22 Carrier Air Wings 14 0 100 USNR PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL NAVY As of September 30, 1989 26 Force Modernization The partnership between the Navy and the USNR has made the Navy "total force" a reality. The ships operated by the USNR are an integral part of the total Navy. In fact, by the early 1990s one of every 10 ships of the proposed 550-ship Navy will be operated by the Naval Reserve. Modernization of the Naval Reserve Force (NRF) continued in 1989 with the acceptance of one FFG-7 PERRY Class frigate and one FF-1052 KNOX class frigate. In FY 1990, the NRF will receive an additional two FFG-7 class frigates. An additional 10 FF-1052 class frigates are scheduled to transfer to the NRF between FYs 1990 and 1991. This will bring the total number of frigates in the NRF to 18 FFG-7 class and 18 FF-1052 class frigates. One amphibious tank landing ship is scheduled to transfer to the NRF in Fiscal Year 1990. In addition, the USNR is scheduled to receive new MHC-52 HERON class coastal mine hunters during the 1990s. Three new mobile inshore undersea warfare units were established in 1989 with two more scheduled in 1990, bringing the total to 30 units. Modernization of Naval Reserve aviation is accomplished through the Navy's policy of "horizontal integration"-the process of modernizing ships and aircraft by class and type and introducing new generation equipment into the USNR as it is brought on line in the Active force. During the 1980s, Reserve air wings received such aircraft as the F-14, the A-7E and the F/A-18. A second airborne mine countermeasure squadron, flying the RH-53D, was commissioned in the USNR in 1989. Marine Corps Reserve Mission Charged with providing the means for rapid expansion of the Marine Corps during a national emer- gency, the U.S. Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR) is the underlying foundation for the sustainability of the Marine Corps upon mobilization. With trained units and qualified individuals on call to rapidly augment and reinforce Active forces in response to crises, the USMCR provides a valuable dimension of the "Total Force" policy. USMCR roles upon mobilization will be to: - Selectively augment the Active forces in order to field three Marine Expeditionary Forces (MEFs) at full wartime structure. - If augmentation/reinforcement is not ordered, provide a nucleus to reconstitute a Division, Wing and Force Service Support Group. 27 History The Marine Corps Reserve was established by law in 1916, but its unofficial history can be traced back to 1893 when seven states established Marine detachments within their Naval Militia organizations. When World War I was declared in 1917 and the Reserve was called to active duty, it consisted of three officers and 32 enlisted reservists. Over 6,400 Marine reservists served in France with the 4th Marine Brigade. Many other Marine Reserves served during WWI, including the First Marine Aero- nautic Company, the first American flying unit of any service to deploy overseas completely trained and equipped. During the period between World War I and World War II, the USMCR was maintained through the voluntary efforts of a few who desired to see the Corps have a Reserve program. By the late 1930s, their dedication paid off as the program was officially revitalized and expanded. The contributions of the USMCR in the other major conflicts of this century are as follows: WWII-70 percent of the Marines total strength of 475,000 served as reservists. Almost all of the 10,000 Marine aviators served as reservists. Korea-Over 85,000 reservists called to active duty Vietnam-Although no national mobilization took place, several USMCR elements were deployed to Southeast Asia and served with distinction. Structure The Commandant of the Marine Corps is responsible to the Secretary of the Navy for the operation of the Marine Corps' Reserve component. As a member of the Commandant's staff, the Deputy Chief of Staff for Manpower and Reserve Affairs is the principal staff officer for oversight of Reserve matters. The Deputy Chief of Staff for Manpower and Reserve Affairs is normally an active duty lieutenant general. As of September 30, 1989, USMCR strength was 80,128, of which 43,576 were members of the Selected Reserve. The key element of the USMCR is the Selected Marine Corps Reserve (SMCR) with units organized under the 4th Marine Division (MARDIV), 4th Marine Aircraft Wing (MAW), and 4th Force Service Support Group (FSSG). The Reserve division and wing headquarters are each commanded by an active duty major general and both are located in New Orleans, Louisiana. The 4th FSSG Head- quarters is located in Atlanta, Georgia and commanded by a Reserve brigadier general who reports to the Commanding General, 4th Marine Division. USMCR units are located in 46 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. The 4th MARDIV is made up of nine infantry battalions, an artillery regiment, two tank battalions and various combat and combat support units. The 4th MAW has over 200 fixed and rotary wing aircraft in 19 flying squadrons. These units provide fighter, attack, reconnaisance, assault support, air control and aerial refueling capabilities. The 4th MAW also possesses one light anti-aircraft missile battalion and a variety of aviation support units. The 4th FSSG provides combat service support to the SMCR. 28 Total Force Contribution In support of the total force, the USMCR is a fully integrated partner of the Active Marine Corps. Marine reservists are dedicated, professional men and women with a patriotic commitment to our Nation's defense. They are an indispensable asset to the Corps in meeting its role as the Nation's "Force-in-Readiness." The USMCR constitutes a full 25 percent of the Marine Corps force structure and 33 percent of the trained manpower. The blending of Active and Reserve Marines is the only way to achieve the military strength necessary to meet full Marine Corps wartime requirements. Specific examples of the USMCR contributions to the total force are depicted in figure 6. Figure 6. USMCR Contributions to the Total Marine Corps. Civil Affairs Group 100 Bulk Fuel Units 62 Force Reconnaisance Units 50 Air Naval Gunfire Liaison Units 50 Tank Battalions 40 Beach and Port Companies 40 Heavy Artillery Batteries 33 Observation Aircraft 33 Aerial Refueling Aircraft 29 Light Attack Aircraft 28 Infantry Battalions 27 Low Altitude Air Defense 25 Anti-Aircraft Missile Battalions 25 Fighter Aircraft 20 Helicopters 18 0 100 USMCR PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL MARINE CORPS As of September 30, 1989 29 Force Modernization The Reserve is an integral partner of the Active force. All equipment acquisition objectives include Active and Reserve requirements concurrently. The single acquisition objective facilitates the moder- nization of Marine Corps components and places continuous attention on achieving and maintaining a single equipment inventory. This, in turn, will ensure organizational integrity, maintenance compati- bility, single generation supply support and battlefield interoperability. When possible, the Marine Corps follows a horizontal fielding plan for distribution of new assets. Disbursement of equipment to the Reserves generally follows mobilization priorities based upon various scenarios-that is, "first to fight," whether Active or Reserve, will be "first to be equipped." The 4th Marine Air Wing is an integral part of the Marine Corps' fighting capability and has been the subject of continual review, repair parts support capability and adaption. In the near future the 4th MAW will add six low altitude air defense platoons and absorb one light anti-aircraft missile battery. Current aircraft upgrade plans for the 4th MAW are to replace the CH-46 helicopter with more modern troop transport aircraft, to replace the AH-1J attack helicopter with the AH-1W and replace the F-4 with the F/A-18 or the AV-8B "Harrier." This replacement schedule commenced in 1989 and extends into the 1990s. Two major changes have significantly increased warfighting capability: the expansion to two AH-1 attack helicopter squadrons, one at Camp Pendleton, California; the other at Marietta, Georgia and the activation of a second KC-130T refueling squadron at Stewart International Airport near West Point, New York. Structural changes for USMCR ground forces that have been directed as part of the Commandant's warfighting initiatives include: Adding scout infantry to the Reserve armored battalion. Transferring three general support artillery battalions to the Reserves and adding two general support artillery batteries. Transferring three bulk fuel companies and two bridge companies to the Reserve. Other significant improvements in the Selected Marine Corps Reserve have occurred in the recent past. A light armored vehicle battalion was activated in FY 88. Four TOW missile platoons will complete the structure of Anti-tank Company, 4th Tank Battalion, and an additional platoon will be placed in each of the three infantry regiments. 30 Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Mission The mission of the Air National Guard (ANG) and U.S. Air Force Reserve (USAFR) is to provide trained units and qualified individuals immediately available for Federal active duty in times of national emergency, as the emergency and as national security may require. Reserve component units must be responsive to situations covering the entire spectrum of warfare-from a mere threat to general war. Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, the ANG and USAFR have become an integral part of the total force, immediately deployable to support Air Force requirements. During peacetime, all units are assigned to gaining Air Force commands which include the Military Airlift Command, Strategic Air Command, Tactical Air Command, Air Force Communications Command, Pacific Air Forces, Alaskan Air Command, Electronic Security Command and Air Training Command. Increased reliance on the ANG and the USAFR as full partners in defense has allowed these compo- nents to evolve into first-line Reserve forces. Today, ANG and USAFR units can be found performing missions throughout the world, from Europe to Asia to the Middle East and to Central and South America. Because they are an integral part of the total force, all ANG and USAFR units must meet Active component training and combat readiness standards. Air National Guard History The National Guard's involvement in aviation began in 1911, when members of the First Company, Signal Corps, New York National Guard became the first in the National Guard to fly a plane. Members of units in Missouri and California also established flying units, but it was not until 1915 that the First Aero Company of New York was federally recognized as the first aviation unit. A year later, the First Aero Company, along with the rest of the National Guard was called to active duty to patrol the Mexican-American border. Coincident with the establishment of the Department of the Air Force, the Air National Guard was officially established September 18, 1947. The 20th Fighter Squadron of Colorado was the first ANG , unit to receive Federal recognition. Since its establishment, the ANG has been involved in every national emergency utilizing Reserve component forces. 1950 - Korean War-45,500 members served-four of the U.S. jet Aces were ANG pilots. 1961-62 - Berlin crisis-22,000 ANG personnel mobilized. 1968-73 - Vietnam War-10,511 ANG members activated. 31 Air National Guard Structure ANG units in peacetime are commanded by their State/territorial governors. However, when on Federal active duty, the units are assigned to gaining Air Force commands as an integral part of the total force. Upon mobilization, they are immediately deployable to support Air Force requirements. The ANG constitutes 27 percent of the Air Force structure with over 115,000 members and 1,735 aircraft organized into: 24 wing headquarters 67 group headquarters 98 flying squadrons 282 mission support units Air Force Reserve History The National Defense Act of 1916 authorized 296 officers and 2,000 enlisted men to serve in the Aviation Section, Signal Reserve Corps. During World War I, the First Reserve Squadron was formed in New York State. It was mobilized in 1917 and deployed overseas for service in France. Through two decades of austere budgets and manning limitations after World War I, the Army Air Corps used reservists, who were not charged against ceilings, to "keep 'em flying." With the outbreak of World War II, approximately 1,500 Reserve pilots helped the Army Air Corps during the very critical days following the attack on Pearl Harbor. As a consequence of the U.S. Air Force attaining separate status in September 1947, the Air Force Reserve was created on April 14, 1948. The following are some significant highlights involving the USAFR since that time. 1950-Korea-147,000 Air Force reservists participated. 1961-62-Berlin crisis 5,000 Air Force Reserve members were mobilized. Over 14,000 were called up during the Cuban missile crisis. 1968-73-Vietnam- over 5,600 Air Force reservists activated. 1983-An Air Force Reserve C-141 crew brought back the first American evacuees from Grenada. 32 Air Force Reserve Structure As of September 30, 1989, the USAFR had over 153,000 members. Of this number, over 83,000 were Selected Reservists. About 70,000 Selected Reservists serve as members of 58 USAFR flying units and over 400 combat support units. Most of the remainder are Individual Mobilization Augmen- tees. The USAFR also assigns full-time statutory tour personnel at many headquarters levels. The Chief of the Air Force Reserve is a Reserve major general ordered to active duty to head the Office of Air Force Reserve, Headquarters, United States Air Force. Based at the Pentagon, this officer is the principal advisor to the Air Force Chief of Staff and to the Secretary of the Air Force on all Air Force Reserve matters. He develops overall policy for the USAFR and directs two separate headquarters within the USAFR: Headquarters Air Force Reserve (AFRES), Robins Air Force Base, Georgia; and the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC), Denver, Colorado. The Chief also coordinates with and assists the other Air Staff Agencies in the development of broad policies, plans, and programs pertain- ing to the USAFR. The Vice Commander and chief operating official of the USAFR is also a Reserve major general ordered to extended active duty at the Command's Georgia Headquarters. Day-to-day operations of the Command are managed through the three Reserve Numbered Air Forces; the Fourth at McClellan Air Force Base, California; Tenth at Bergstrom Air Force Base, Texas; and Fourteenth at Dobbins Air Force Base, Georgia. 33 Total Air Force Contribution The Air Force continues to transfer new equipment and missions to the ANG and USAFR. As a by-product of their primary mission of training for mobilization, the ANG and USAFR perform peacetime missions that are compatible with training and mobilization readiness requirements. These missions help to promote the total force under which all Active and Reserve component forces are one for contingency planning purposes. The ANG's 102nd Aerospace Rescue and Recovery Squadron, which began as the First Aero Com- pany of New York (the National Guard's first flying unit), holds the high distinction of being the designated rescue unit for all manned Shuttle missions at NASA's Cape Canaveral launch facility. In the USAFR, the Reserve Associate Program, developed in 1968, trains reservists with the Military Airlift Command (MAC). Associate crews use the aircraft and maintenance facilities of an Active MAC strategic airlift unit and train with Active component personnel. They fly regularly scheduled strategic airlift and aeromedical airlift missions, thus reducing MAC's personnel needs and overhead costs. Associate maintenance personnel provide MAC a surge capability to allow it to fly the increased hours necessary during contingencies or in wartime. These units provide approximately 50 percent of the authorized aircrews and 40 percent of the maintenance force for the operation of MAC's C-141 Starlifter and C-5 Galaxy transports, and over 90 percent of the aircrews for the C-9 Nightingale aeromedical evacuation aircraft. 34 In 1981, the Reserve Associate Program was expanded to include the Strategic Air Command. The Air Force Reserve provides 50 percent of the aircrews for operation of the KC-10A Extender aircraft. The contribution of the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve is significant as depicted in figures 7 and 8: Figure 7. ANG Contributions to the Total Air Force. CONUS Strategic Interceptor 92 Tactical & Weather Recon 42 Tactical Airlift 35 Communications Units 32 Civil Engineering Units 30 Tactical Fighters 26 Air Rescue 24 Strategic Tankers 19 Support Aircraft 18 Weather Units 14 Aerial Port Units 14 Medical Personnel 13 Strategic Airlift 6 Special Operations 5 0 100 ANG PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL AIR FORCE As of September 30, 1989 35 Figure 8. USAFR Contributions to the Total Air Force. Aerial Spraying Capability 100 Aeromedical Evacuation Crews 67 Aircraft Battle-Damage Repair 59 Aerial Port Units 57 Strategic Airlift Crews 50 Strategic Airlift Maintenance 40 Air Rescue and Recovery 39 Tanker/Cargo Crews 38 Aeromedical Airlift Crews 30 Weather Reconnaissance 27 Tactical Airlift 24 Special Operations 18 Civil Engineering 17 Strategic Airlift 11 Tactical Fighters 5 0 100 USAFR PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL AIR FORCE As of September 30, 1989 Force Modernization Since 1980, ANG and USAFR individual combat and combat support units have increased from 770 to over 820. In the 10 year period beginning in 1980, almost all ANG and USAFR units have experienced some form of equipment modification. The ANG continues to modernize its tactical fighter force, replacing older F-4C/D and OA-37 aircraft with more capable F-16, F-15, and A-10 aircraft. During 1989, the ANG converted four squadrons to F-16s, one to F-15s and another to A-10s. During 1990, the program of conversion to more modern aircraft will proceed at an even greater rate, including the first conversion of an A-7 squadron to the F-16. The ANG's C-5 conversion was completed in 1989. During 1988, the ANG received 10 additional KC-135 strategic refueling aircraft to robust five squadrons from eight to ten authorized aircraft. During 1989, the Air Guard continued to modernize its C-130 fleet, replacing older A/B models with E/H models. 36 The USAFR upgraded fighter forces by converting two F-4 units to F-16A/B aircraft in FY 1989. This program will continue with plans for completing conversions of one unit in 1990 and two units in 1991. Acquisition of C-130H aircraft in 1988 allowed the USAFR to retire its last C-130A. In 1989 six C-130Hs will replace six C-130Bs and in 1991 another unit will convert from C-130B to C-130E aircraft. Aerial refueling capability in the USAFR will be enhanced in 1990 with each unit receiving two additional KC-135E aircraft. Strategic airlift conversions were completed with a C-141 unit in 1988 and a C-5 unit in 1989. Additional enhancements of strategic airlift capability scheduled for FY 1991 includes the conversion of a unit to C-141Bs. The ANG and USAFR are also modernizing existing aircraft. Upgrades are underway on such aircraft as the F-15, F-16, A-7 and A-10. Most of these upgrades consist of installation of state-of-the-art avionics hardware and software which will yield improved operational capabilities. 37 Coast Guard Reserve Mission The mission of the U.S. Coast Guard Reserve (USCGR) is to provide trained units and personnel for active duty in time of war or national emergencies and to fill the needs of the parent Service whenever more units and personnel are needed than are in the Active component. The USCGR provides nearly one-fourth of the Coast Guard's total manpower resources. Coast Guard mission assignments in the event of war or national emergency stem from two major sources. First are the statutory missions assigned to the Coast Guard by law, such as security of the nation's ports and waterways, maritime law enforcement, search and rescue, commercial vessel safety, polar and domestic icebreaking, as well as others. Most of these activities would continue in wartime. Some, such as port security, would expand dramatically in wartime because of the need to protect the nation's water transportation systems. Other major wartime mission assignments result from war plan tasking developed by the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff and assigned to the Coast Guard. The Navy also shares or reassigns certain wartime tasks to the Coast Guard. Maritime Defense Zones (MDZs) have brought the wartime mobilization mission of the Coast Guard Reserve into sharper focus. Concern over security of the nation's littoral approaches, ports and waterways in a wartime environment led to the formation of the MDZs in 1984. The MDZs were established in principle by a Memorandum of Agreement between the Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of the Navy, creating Atlantic and Pacific MDZs. By agreement with the Chief of Naval Operations, Coast Guard Atlantic and Pacific Area commanders are designated zone commanders, responsible to fleet commanders-in-chief for preparing, planning, coordinating and conducting coastal defense of the United States. This includes port security, harbor defense, anti- submarine warfare, mine-countermeasures, search and rescue, aids to navigation, and surveillance and interdiction. The commanders of the MDZs will meld together Active and Reserve Forces of the Coast Guard and the Navy in order to accomplish their missions. Atlantic and Pacific MDZ Commanders each have a joint Navy/Coast Guard staff in place that is responsible for all plans. The coastal defense mission takes advantage of the Coast Guard's resources, knowledge, experience and capabilities in operations in the coastal area and of the resources of Navy Active and Reserve units that are trained in the special naval warfare mission. 38 The U.S. Coast Guard serves within the Department of Transportation in peacetime. Because of this, the Secretary of Transportation is authorized to call elements of the USCGR to active duty in support of domestic emergencies which require augmentation of the Active Coast Guard. History The USCGR was established on February 19, 1941. Shortly thereafter, on November 23, 1942, a Women's Reserve was established as a branch of the USCGR. The World War II Reserve consisted entirely of personnel on active duty designated as Reserves, reaching a peak strength of about 144,000 men and women during the war years. During the conflict, Reserves serving on active duty outnumbered Regulars by over 5 to 1. In addition, the Coast Guard Temporary Reserve, an organization that reached a peak strength of about 45,000 members, per- formed port security. The enactment of the Magnuson Act in 1950 resulted in a significant expansion of Coast Guard responsibilities with respect to the safety and security of the nation's ports, waterways and waterfront facilities. At about this same time, funds were designated by Congress for the establishment of a paid drilling Reserve in support of the increase in port security responsibilities. The first organized USCGR unit was formed in Boston in October 1950. There were no formal callups of USCGR elements for the conflicts in Korea and Vietnam. However, in each case, reservists volunteered for active duty in sufficient numbers to effectively augment the Active Coast Guard. 39 Structure Unlike the other Armed Forces of the United States which are in the Department of Defense, the Coast Guard serves in peacetime as an agency within the Department of Transportation. In wartime or whenever the President so directs, the Coast Guard becomes a Service under the Department of the Navy. The USCGR is directed by an active duty rear admiral serving as Chief, Office of Readiness and Reserve. As of September 30, 1989, the USCGR had a strength of approximately 17,800. Of this number about 12,000 were members of the Selected Reserve. They are assigned to 260 Coast Guard Selected Reserve units located in 40 states, Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia and Guam. The following chart depicts the seven types of Reserve units with the number in each category. These units are incorporated into 51 Reserve group commands within the ten Coast Guard Districts. USCGR UNITS Type of Unit Number Port Security 187 General Support 30 Rescue Coordination 3 Inspection 7 Vessel Augmentation 9 Aviation 3 Mobilization Planning and Procedures 8 Administrative Groups 51 Total Force Contribution The strength of the Coast Guard forces is a vital factor in defense readiness. Active forces of the Coast Guard represent the nucleus manpower requirements for mobilization. The most critical of the short- falls in these requirements-those that must be filled during the first 30 days following an order to mobilize-are scheduled to be filled by the Ready Reserve. Since most of the Coast Guard's missions are equally applicable in peace and war, much of its Reserve component training is directed to supporting Coast Guard programs. Reservists perform nearly two- thirds of their training by augmenting Active component units. Coast Guard reservists are fully integrated into the functions and responsibilities of Captain of the Port operations, conducting port security inspections, safety and environmental protection patrols, and monitoring petroleum and hazardous material transfer and handling operations. At coastal search and rescue stations, reservists are integrated into station operations by standing communications watches and participating as crew members of search and rescue boats. Many reservists have qualified as boat coxswains and boat engineers, and it is not unusual for a mixed Active/Reserve component crew to have a Reserve coxswain. Reservists also augment and train on major Coast Guard cutters. 40 Reservists are frequently called to active duty to augment the Active Coast Guard in response to major disasters, both natural and man-made. During the 1980s, reservists have contributed significantly to Coast Guard efforts in response to such situations as the influx of hundreds of thousands of Cuban nationals along the southern U.S. coastal area, the Space Shuttle "Challenger" disaster, and others. Reservists have participated actively in port security operations for such major events as the 1984 Olympics and the Statue of Liberty centennial. Reservists are frequently called upon to assist in the protection of sensitive naval vessels as they enter and leave port-sometimes encountering large civilian demonstrations. In response to the massive Exxon Valdez oil spill in 1989, nearly 400 Coast Guard reservists from all over the United States were sent to Alaska in support of Coast Guard oversight for clean-up opera- tions, providing over 13,000 man-days of assistance. The destruction which resulted from Hurricane Hugo in 1989 provided yet another instance in which reservists quickly took positions alongside their active duty counterparts to expand the Coast Guard's capabilities. The security and recovery roles they played helped return life to normal in areas devastated by that storm. Examples of the USCGR as a percentage of total Coast Guard capability are shown in figure 10: Figure 9: USCGR Contributions to the Total Coast Guard Deployable Port Security 100 Marine Safety Offices 56 Operational Shore Facilities 26 Repair/Supply/Research 22 Command and Control 18 Vessels 11 Air Stations 3 Training Commands 11 0 100 USCGR PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL COAST GUARD As of September 30, 1989 41 Force Modernization At the request of the U.S. Congress, the Secretary of Transportation has prepared a plan for the USCGR to achieve 95 percent of its wartime mobilization requirements for Selected Reserve strength in terms of personnel and equipment over a 10-year period. As a first step, the President requested an increase in the authorized personnel strength of the Coast Guard Selected Reserve in his Fiscal Year 1990 budget request. Modernization initiatives are underway to reduce mobilization equipment shortfalls, and to ensure that Coast Guard reservists will be adequately equipped to perform their wartime tasks. During 1989, communications upgrades were made in support of both the harbor defense role and the Coast Guard's other traditional missions. The three Coast Guard deployable port security units, presently 100 percent Reserve force manned, received their transportable port security boats in 1989. Other planned upgrades to the Coast Guard Reserve will involve procurement of such items as boats, surface vehicles, personal gear, protective clothing, defensive weapons systems and sensors. 42 CHAPTER 6 SERVICE IN THE RESERVE COMPONENTS Since 1973, the U.S. military has been an all volunteer force, but each individual appointed or enlisted automatically assumes a military service obligation (MSO). The military service obligation may be fulfilled by serving in the Active component, the Reserve component or a combination of both. On June 1, 1984 the military service obligation for new accessions was increased from 6 to 8 years. Personnel Source Personnel in National Guard and Reserve units come from two sources-non-prior service and prior service. Non-prior Service. Men and women without prior military service may enlist in a Reserve program provided they meet age, mental, and physical standards. A person may enlist at age 17 with parental consent. Individuals normally enlist for a specific unit compatible with their background, abilities, and interests. Reserve programs require enlistees to serve an initial period on active duty to undergo basic training and basic technical schooling or on-the-job training in a military specialty or occupation. Upon completion of the active duty training the reservist returns to the local unit in which he or she enlisted. Prior Service. Personnel with prior military service are recruited into the Reserve components. These individuals have completed their active duty obligation and voluntarily accept a Reserve obliga- tion. Pay, camaraderie, and sense of duty are reasons why these people voluntarily join a Reserve unit. Approximately 44 percent of Reserve component members have completed 2 or more years of active duty. The more demanding technical skills tend to rely heavily on prior service individuals who have had technical training and hands-on experience while on active duty. For example, all Navy and Marine Corps pilots have completed 5 or more years of active duty before joining the Reserve component. 43 Women. Women comprise about 11 percent of Reserve component personnel and serve in nearly all military skills except those involving direct combat. Promotions. Reserve component promotion systems are separate from those of the Active com- ponent. Reserve personnel compete only with other reservists of their service for promotion. It is possible to be promoted from Army recruit to sergeant within 40 months; from second lieutenant to colonel in 16 years. Officer Procurement. Sources of commissioned officers are the Federal Service Academies, Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC), Officer Candidate School (OCS), and direct appointment. The Federal Service Academies offer 4 years of college education leading to a bachelor degree. ROTC training is offered at selected public and private colleges and universities throughout the United States. ROTC scholarships are available to many qualified students; all students in the advanced ROTC course (third and fourth college years) receive a $100 monthly stipend. Each Active component offers an Officer Candidate Program. Additionally, the National Guard offers state OCS programs to quali- fied high school graduates. The Air National Guard offers the Academy of Military Sciences for qualified college graduates. The majority of commissioned officers in the Reserve components have 2 or more years of active duty experience. 44 CHAPTER 7 TRAINING Training Obligations. Each member of the Selected Reserve assigned to a unit is required to attend at least 48 paid training assemblies, each being a minimum of four hours duration, and to perform two weeks annual training (AT) each year. The prevalent system in most units is to meet one weekend (16 hours) per month. Individuals are also eligible for active duty for training (ADT) to accomplish additional military training and schooling. The minimum training objective is to attain unit level proficiency for its mobilization mission. Integrated Training. Each of the Services has incorporated training of its Reserve components with its Active component. For example, the Army through CAPSTONE, the Air Force through its Associate program, and most services in Augmentation Training. CAPSTONE. Links units of the Active Army, Army National Guard, and Army Reserve that would likely operate together. Because many peacetime chains-of-command would change after mobil- ization, the Army decided that those units that would serve together after a call-up need to coordinate, plan, and train together during peacetime. CAPSTONE helps determine where, when, and with whom a unit will train. Linked units and commands trade staff visits and standard operating procedures, and fashion strong informal ties among commanders and staff members. Roundout. A special type of CAPSTONE relationship, provides units of the ARNG and USAR to bring Active component units to full strength. Upon mobilization, Reserve component Roundout units complete the force structure of Active component units that are organized-in peacetime-at less than their full wartime configurations. For instance, there are nine Active component divisions that cannot achieve full combat potential until augmented by ARNG or USAR units of battalion or brigade size. 45 Reserve Associate Program. The Air Force Reserve Associate Program trains reservists with the Military Airlift Command (MAC). Associate crews, which have no aircraft of their own, use the aircraft and maintenance facilities of the MAC strategic airlift unit and train with Active component personnel. They fly regularly scheduled MAC strategic airlift and aeromedical airlift missions, thus reducing MAC's personnel needs and overhead costs. Associate maintenance personnel provide MAC a surge capability to allow it to fly the increased hours necessary during contingencies or in wartime. The USAFR also performs an associate role with the Strategic Air Command (SAC), flying the KC-10 Extender aircraft, which increases SAC's ability to provide support to fighter and transport aircraft deployments. Augmentation Training. Augmentation Training is defined as any Reserve component activity that supports effective training for mobilization while meeting a stated need of an element of the Active component. For example, since the Coast Guard's missions are equally applicable in peace and war, the majority of Reserve training is directed to supporting the Coast Guard programs (search and rescue, merchant marine and boating safety, aids to navigation, icebreaking, port safety, and law enforcement) and thus supplements the Active component during national emergencies or natural disasters. Exchange Programs. Reserve exchange programs are designed to provide Reserve individuals and units an opportunity to orient themselves in their military duties while serving with counterparts in the armed forces of the host nation. Additionally, they provide a sharing of expertise and knowledge between NATO allies and the United States which can be utilized to enhance total force readiness of all allies. Currently there are two DoD exchange programs at the individual Reserve officer level, one with the United Kingdom and the and the other with the Federal Republic of Germany. Several other programs exist between the respective services and foreign countries that include Reserve officer and/or enlisted personnel exchanges. Overseas Training. Each of the Reserve components participates in overseas training. This program sends entire Reserve units-or cells composed of key unit members-to train overseas in locations where the unit would be most likely to deploy after a mobilization. This training is realistic and provides the opportunity for units and individuals to conduct mission-oriented training in an overseas environment while completing tasks in support of real world requirements. Many of these programs are reciprocal, involving exchanges of units or individuals, both officer and enlisted, between the U.S. and other countries. In FY 89, more than 110,000 reservists trained in over 50 countries worldwide. The growth of the overseas training program is evident when the '89 figures are compared with FY 81, when only 19,824 reservists participated. 46 CHAPTER 8 FULL-TIME SUPPORT With the exception of the Coast Guard Reserve, Reserve component units are manned by a mix of part-time and full-time personnel. However, most unit members are drilling reservists, trained men and women who participate on a part-time basis, spending 300 to 350 hours a year in maintaining their proficiency. This limited time must be used for training and mission preparation. Because of these constraints, unit commanders and members are painfully aware of the unit training "time squeeze." This competition for a reservist's time is graphically portrayed in figure 10: Figure 10. Unit Training Time Squeeze. AGI'S MOB TNG COMET STUDIES & TESTS INDIV WPNS QUALIF PRE INITIAL CREW SVD ADT TNG WPNS QUALIF MAINTENANCE READINESS PT & PARTIC IN NEW EQUIP RETENTION CPX FTX TNG AT SQT PREPARATION MOS TNG OPS & ARTEPS SHORT NOTICE INSPECTIONS COMMUNITY SUPPORT LEGAL COUNSELING 47 Clearly, continuity of mission, maintenance, and administration can not be accomplished with only part-time participation. Nor would it be effective to use valuable training time of part-time reservists to perform everyday housekeeping tasks. For this reason, extensive use is made of full-time support personnel to provide for administration, maintenance, recruiting, and training the Reserve components. Except for some civil service employees, each individual in a full-time support position also fills an organizational billet within the Reserve unit. There are four categories of full-time support personnel: Active Component personnel: Provide current experience with Active component equipment, operational doctrine, and training techniques. Upon mobilization, these personnel will serve with the Reserve unit to which assigned. Reserve component personnel on active duty: Provide Reserve component expertise and assignment flexibility. The generic term applied to these personnel is Active Guard/Reserve (AGR). They are sometimes referred to as Training and Administration of Reserve (TAR) in the Naval Reserve and as Full Time Support (FTS) in the Marine Corps Reserve. Military Technicians: Dual status individuals who work full time as a civilian for a Reserve unit and also are a drilling reservist. Military Technicians serve in the four Reserve components of the Army and the Air Force. Civilian: Provide clerical, technical an administrative support at all levels. They have no require- ment to belong to the Reserve components. Together, these elements enable drilling reservists to concentrate their limited training time on prepar- ing for their mobilization missions. Shown below is the Full Time Support Personnel actual end strength as of September 30, 1989: 48 Table 4. Full Time Support Personnel ACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE SERVICE COMPONENT AGR TECHNICIAN CIVILIAN TOTALS ARNG 576 25893 25923 3091 55483 USAR 1163 13344 7613 5613 27733 USNR 7239 21987 0 2895 32121 USMCR 5430 1948 0 333 7711 ANG 600 8019 23140 2511 34270 USAFR 592 635 9299 4856 15382 USCGR 599 o 0 112 711 TOTAL 16199 71826 65975 19411 173411 49 CHAPTER 9 MOBILIZATION Authority The President and the Congress of the United States have broad powers to utilize the National Guard and Reserve in a national emergency. The President has the authority, under law, to order to active duty: (1) as many as 200,000 members of the Selected Reserve for up to 90 days and to extend the callup for an additional 90 days, if necessary, without regard to a state of national emergency or war for the purpose of augmenting the Active component forces for an operational mission; (2) as many as one million members of the Ready Reserve, for not longer than 24 months in a national emergency. With a declaration by the U.S. Congress of a national emergency or war, all the Reserve components, including those in Standby and Retired status could be ordered to active duty for the duration of the war, plus 6 months. In recent years, the Congress has authorized the Secretary of Transportation to mobilize selected units and individuals in the Coast Guard Reserve to meet urgent needs of a domestic emergency, particu- larly those relating to natural disasters. A similar authority, held by the governors of the states and territories, has also been a long-standing feature of the National Guard in fulfilling its peacetime responsibilities as a state or territorial force. The U.S. Active component military forces are currently manned at a peacetime level. In the event of mobilization, wartime strength would be achieved by calling to active duty the National Guard and Reserve forces. In later months, these pretrained personnel would be supplemented by newly trained draftees or volunteers. 50 Personnel Screening Ready Reserve. The screening process is used to identify members who would be unable to meet mobilization requirements and to eliminate those members from the Ready Reserve before mobiliza- tion. Upon mobilization, all members remaining in the Ready Reserve are considered immediately available for active service. Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). All members of the IRR are required to serve at least 1 day of duty each year for screening to ensure maximum availability and utilization of the IRR in time of mobilization. During this process, personnel records are updated, physical condition is checked and military skill proficiency is tested. Personnel Reporting Upon notification, members of the Selected Reserve are required to report for active duty within 24 hours to their unit or initial reporting assignment. Individual Ready Reserve and Inactive National Guard members are required to report within 5 to 15 days of notification as determined by the respective Military Service. Official notification may either be written or oral. 51 CHAPTER 10 EMPLOYER SUPPORT Members of the Reserve components face one major challenge not encountered by members of the Active components-most of them have civilian employment. Consequently, to accomplish training, members of the Reserve components must frequently request time off from their employers. While there are laws that provide protections to many employees, the willing support of the employer is obviously beneficial to the individual reservist or National Guard member. Therefore, employers can play an important role in the national defense. Conflicts between the employer and the employee because of competing employment and military priorities must be minimized. The National Committee for Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve was established in 1972 to achieve cooperation and understanding between employers and members of the National Guard or Reserve and to assist in the resolution of conflicts. Its basic mission is one of education-few employ- ers are knowledgeable about the role the National Guard and Reserve now play in the national defense and the higher readiness standards that the Reserve components must therefore meet. A great many employers, when they know the facts, demonstrate their full support of their employees who are members of the Reserve components. In some cases, private and public employers pay reservists their full salaries during annual training time; others make up the difference between the employee's çivilian pay and the military pay. The National Committee, working through the efforts of some 3600 unpaid volunteers in 55 State and territorial committees, conducts a variety of public affairs activities to accomplish its mission. In 1989, the State committees conducted 89 "bosslifts," taking employers to see National Guard and Reserve training. The committees conducted 153 other events to plan and support their programs. 52 The National Committee, supported by the Advertising Council, manages a national public service advertising program. In 1989, two television products and new print and radio advertisements were produced and released. The theme of the campaign was "Be a hero! Support the Guard and Reserve. It's good for your country and your company." For the first time, advertising materials were produced in Spanish to reach employers in Hispanic communities. Distribution was made to 9300 newspapers and 4700 other publications. Billboard posters were shipped to 518 outdoor advertising companies. To support distribution, State committees identified local public affairs volunteers, trained at the first National Public Affairs Seminar, to visit local media outlets and seek their support by educating the directors/editors on the number of members of the community who were National Guard or Reserve members. Over 7100 awards were presented to recognize employers across the nation who supported their employees. This figure includes 20 Pro Patria awards, signed by the Secretary of Defense, that recog- nize particularly significant contributions on the part of the employer. The National Committee's goal for 1990 is "Mission One", a program to ultimately place a trained, knowledgeable volunteer with every National Guard and Reserve training site in the nation-over 6000. The purpose is to provide every Reserve component commander and member with an imme- diate resource should an employment conflict occur. 53 CHAPTER 11 RESERVE COMPONENT PAY, BENEFITS, AND ENTITLEMENTS Pay Reserve component pay is based on the active duty pay scale for grade and length of service. During Inactive Duty Training (IDT) periods, members of the Selected Reserve receive one day's basic pay (plus any special pay to which entitled) for each Unit Training Assembly (UTA) attended. An example of special pay is flight pay for aircrew members. A UTA is 4 to 6 hours in duration, typically performed on a weekend. Since 2 UTA's can be performed in 1 day, National Guardsmen and reservists normally receive 2 days' basic pay for each 8 hour period. During Annual Training (AT), Active Duty for Training (ADT), and Full Time Training Duty (FTTD) periods, members receive essentially the same compensation (basic pay, special pay, reimbursement for quarters and subsist- ence) as their Active component counterparts; in other words, one day's pay and allowances for each day of duty performed. For extended tours of active duty, depending on duration, reservists receive other entitlements such as paid leave, moving allowance and others. Based on pay tables effective January 1 1990, annual earnings of a lieutenant colonel or equivalent with 18 years of service could be more than $7,500 for attending 48 training assemblies and 2 weeks annual tràining. A junior enlisted member (E3 with 3 years service) would be paid approximately $1,800 for attending 48 training assemblies and 2 weeks annual training. Reservists with dependents receive an additional allowance for quarters during annual training. Some Reserve component person- nel are eligible for additional special pay for aviation duty, medical, or dental service or hazardous duty pay. 54 Bonuses In addition to pay received for weekend drills and their two week annual active duty for training periods, many enlisted reservists are eligible for enlistment and reenlistment bonuses. Cash bonuses are granted to enlisted members in the Selected Reserve who possess critically needed skills. Qualified non-prior service enlistees can earn bonuses of up to $2,000 for a 6 year commitment to the Selected Reserve. Additionally, for those members leaving active duty who still have a remaining Military Service Obligation (MSO), a cash bonus may be paid (up to 50 dollars per month) for each month remaining on the MSO, provided the member agrees to affiliate with the Selected Reserve. To retain personnel in the Reserve components beyond their initial term of service, a reenlistment/enlistment bonus of up to $1,500 for a 3-year reenlistment and up to $3,000 for a 6-year reenlistment is offered in qualifying critical specialties and units. Beginning in 1986, a prior service bonus was offered for the first time to be paid on the same basis as the reenlistment bonus for either a 3 or 6 year commitment in the Selected Reserve. Educational Assistance The G.I. Bill for Selected Reservists was, effective July 1 1985. It offers an educational assistance program towards a baccalaureate degree for both officers and enlisted personnel who agree to serve in the Selected Reserve for 6 years. Benefits may not be paid to members prior to completion of their initial period of active duty training. Payments for full-time students are $140 a month for 36 months Monies received from the G.I. Bill program are non-taxable. Certain members of the Selected Reserve actively pursuing a college education may have portions of government-financed student loans forgiven at the rate of 15 percent or 500 dollars (whichever is greater) per year for each year of satisfactory participation in the Selected Reserve. This program is currently available to members of the Army Reserve and the Air National Guard. Benefits Members of the Ready Reserve are entitled to use the military exchange system based upon the formula of 1 day of shopping for each period of inactive duty training. Selected Reservists are authorized up to 12 days commissary use per year. In addition, Reserve component personnel may use military clothing stores, official library services, and have access to some service clubs. Ready Reser- vists who perform at least 12 drills yearly and participate in Annual Training also may receive full-time Servicemen's Group Life Insurance with $50,000 coverage for $4.00 per month. 55 Entitlements Members of the Reserve components who accumulate 20 qualifying years of creditable service and who reach age 60 are entitled to retired pay-computed on the basis of retirement points accumulated. The qualifying years can be earned on active duty, inactive duty or a combination of both, but the last 8 qualifying years must be served in a Reserve component. A qualifying year is not the same as a calendar year, but is one during which a member of a Reserve component accumulates 50 or more retirement points. Points are awarded on the basis of one point for each 4-hour assembly (UTA), each day of active duty, and each three credits of military correspondence studies completed. Additionally, 15 points are awarded annually for membership. Not more than 60 points per year for inactive duty training and membership may be credited for retirement purposes during any retirement year. Retired pay is computed by totalling all retirement points accumulated and dividing by 360. The quotient is then multiplied by 2½ percent and the resulting percentage applied to the active duty base pay rate for the grade and number of years of service, using the pay schedule in effect at the time the member draws retired pay. Based on the 1990 pay schedule, a lieutenant colonel or equivalent, retired with three years of active Federal service and 20 years of Reserve component service (about 2200 retirement points), would receive approximately $600 per month retired pay beginning at age 60. Upon receipt of retired pay, reservists and their dependents become eligible for the same medical care benefits as are accorded Active component retirees. Retirees are also eligible to use military facilities such as commissary stores, post exchanges, clothing sales stores, theaters, recreation facilities, clubs, guest house accommodations and more. Space-available air travel on military aircraft is also authorized for retired reservists. 56 CHAPTER 12 LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS Two important legislative proposals affecting the U.S. Reserve component personnel policy continued to be worked and refined during 1989. These are the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act, already sent to the Congress for approval, and the Uniformed Services Employment Rights Act, which was in the final review process in the Executive branch as of February 1990. Both measures could become law in 1990. Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA) ROPMA is designed to provide a new set of laws to update personnel management of Reserve officers along the lines of the Defense Officer Personnel Management Act, previously enacted, which applies to Active component officers. Specific goals of ROPMA include: provide common rules for all Reserve components regarding appointment, promotion, and separation of Reserve officers. establish a uniform and improved officer personnel management system for Reserve officers not on extended active duty. provide the flexibility to respond to changing officer requirements. allow for an attractive career progression for Reserve officers while still achieving management objectives. Uniformed Services Employment Rights Act This proposed legislation is the result of a joint study by the Department of Defense and the Depart- ment of Labor. It would provide an update of statutes governing both employment and reemployment rights for reservists. The effort is intended to address a number of issues, including: rights of Federal Government employees who are reservists; more effective use of conciliation rather than formal enforcement action to resolve disputes; a clearer definition of "active duty" as it applies to reemploy- ment rights; and a description of the obligations owed by reservists to their civilian employers. 57 Insignia of Rank The officer and enlisted insignias of rank for each of the Armed Services are portrayed at Appendix C. There is no differentiation of rank or insignia between the Active and Reserve components. Reserve Component Addresses Addresses for each of the Reserve components are provided in Appendix D for anyone desiring additional information. 58 APPENDIX A TOTAL RESERVE STRENGTH TOTAL FY 1989 RESERVE MANPOWER TOTAL RESERVE MANPOWER ARNG 467,086 USAR 594,464 USNR 248,040 OFFICIAL USMCR 81,529 AS OF: SEPTEMBER 1989 NUMBERs ANG 116,061 (4th Qtr, FY 1989) USAFR 153,630 TOTAL DOD 1,660,810 USCGR 17,773 TOTAL 1,678,583 READY STANDBY RESERVE RESERVE ARNG 467,086 ARNG 0 USAR 593,832 USAR 632 USNR 238,061 USNR 9,979 USMCR 80,128 USMCR 1,401 ANG 116,061 ANG 0 USAFR 136,331 USAFR 17,299 TOTAL DOD 1,631,499 TOTAL DOD 29,311 USCGR 17,211 USCGR 562 TOTAL 1,648,710 TOTAL 29,875 SELECTED IRR/ING RESERVE ARNG 456,960 ARNG 10,126 USAR 319,244 USAR 274,588 USNR 151,505 USNR 86,556 USMCR 43,576 USMCR 36,552 ANG 116,061 ANG 0 USAFR 83,214 USAFR 53,117 TOTAL DOD 1,170,560 TOTAL DOD 460,939 USCGR 12,012 USCGR 5,199 TOTAL 1,182,572 TOTAL 466,138 TRAINED PERSONNEL TRAINING IRR ING (UNIT & INDIVIDUALS) PIPELINE ARNG 418,467 ARNG 38,493 ARNG 0 ARNG 10,126 USAR 288,275 USAR 30,969 USAR 274,588 USNR 142,194 USNR 9,311 USNR 86,556 USMCR 39,357 USMCR 4,219 USMCR 36,552 ANG 113,154 ANG 2,907 ANG 0 USAFR 81,328 USAFR 1,886 USAFR 53,117 TOTAL DOD 1,082,775 TOTAL DOD 85,925 TOTAL DOD 450,813 USCGR 11,594 USCGR 418 USCGR 5,199 TOTAL 1,094,369 TOTAL 86,343 TOTAL 456,012 2006-5 59 APPENDIX B RESERVE DRILL PAY RATES 4 DAYS OF DRILL PAY EFFECTIVE 1 JANUARY 1990 YEARS OF SERVICE PAY GRADE <2 2 3 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 26 COMMISSIONED OFFICERS O-10 788.84 816.60 816.60 816.60 816.60 847.92 847.92 894.92 894.92 949.68 949.68 949.68 949.68 1007.80 O-9 699.12 717.44 732.72 732.72 732.72 751.36 751.36 782.64 782.64 847.92 847.92 894.92 894.92 949.68 O-8 633.24 652.20 667.68 667.68 667.68 717.44 717.44 751.36 751.36 782.64 816.60 847.92 868.80 868.80 O-7 526.16 561.92 561.92 561.92 587.12 587.12 621.16 621.16 652.20 717.44 766.80 766.80 766.80 766.80 0-6 390.00 428.48 456.56 456.56 456.56 456.56 456.56 456.56 472.04 546.68 574.60 587.12 621.16 673.68 O-5 311.88 366.24 391.56 391.56 391.56 391.56 403.40 425.08 453.60 487.56 515.52 531.12 549.68 549.68 O-4 262.92 320.16 341.52 341.52 347.84 363.20 387.96 409.76 428.48 447.28 459.64 459.64 459.64 459.64 O-3 244.32 273.16 292.04 323.12 338.56 350.72 369.68 387.96 397.52 397.52 397.52 397.52 397.52 397.52 O-2 213.04 232.68 279.52 288.92 294.96 294.96 294.96 294.96 294.96 294.96 294.96 294.96 294.96 294.96 O-1 184.96 192.56 232.68 232.68 232.68 232.68 232.68 232.68 232.68 232.68 232.68 232.68 232.68 232.68 COMMISSIONED OFFICERS WITH OVER 4 YEARS ACTIVE DUTY AS AN ENLISTED MEMBER OR WARRANT OFFICER O-3E 0.00 0.00 0.00 323.12 338.56 350.72 369.68 387.96 403.40 403.40 403.40 403.40 403.40 403.40 O-2E 0.00 0.00 0.00 288.92 294.96 304.28 320.16 332.40 341.52 341.52 341.52 341.52 341.52 341.52 O-1E 0.00 0.00 0.00 232.68 248.56 257.72 267.04 276.36 288.92 288.92 288.92 288.92 288.92 288.92 WARRANT OFFICERS W-4 248.92 267.04 267.04 273.16 285.56 298.16 310.68 332.40 347.84 360.04 369.68 381.64 394.40 425.08 W-3 226.24 245.40 245.40 248.56 251.44 269.84 285.56 294.96 304.28 313.36 323.12 335.68 347.84 360.04 W-2 198.12 214.36 214.36 220.64 232.68 245.40 254.72 264.04 273.16 282.76 292.04 301.24 313.36 313.36 W-1 165.08 189.28 189.28 205.08 214.36 223.60 232.68 242.28 251.44 260.84 269.84 279.52 279.52 279.52 ENLISTED MEMBERS E-9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 289.56 296.08 302.80 309.72 316.64 322.80 339.76 372.80 E-8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 242.84 249.76 256.36 263.00 269.96 276.16 282.96 299.56 332.92 E-7 169.52 183.00 189.80 196.44 203.12 209.60 216.32 223.04 233.16 239.76 246.44 249.64 266.40 299.56 E-6 145.88 158.96 165.60 172.64 179.08 185.56 192.40 202.32 208.64 215.40 218.68 218.68 218.68 218.68 E-5 128.00 139.32 146.08 152.44 162.44 169.08 175.80 182.24 185.56 185.56 185.56 185.56 185.56 185.56 E-4 119.40 126.08 133.48 143.84 149.52 149.52 149.52 149.52 149.52 149.52 149.52 149.52 149.52 149.52 E-3 112.48 118.64 123.40 128.28 128.28 128.28 128.28 128.28 128.28 128.28 128.28 128.28 128.28 128.28 E-2 108.24 108.24 108.24 108.24 108.24 108.24 108.24 108.24 108.24 108.24 108.24 108.24 108.24 108.24 E-1>4 96.56 96.56 96.56 96.56 96.56 96.56 96.56 96.56 96.56 96.56 96.56 96.56 96.56 96.56 E-1<4 89.28 89.28 89.28 89.28 89.28 89.28 89.28 89.28 89.28 89.28 89.28 89.28 89.28 89.28 60 APPENDIX C INSIGNIA OF RANK OF THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES OFFICERS O-1 O-2 O-3 O-4 O-5 0-6 O-7 O-8 O-9 O-10 SPECIAL NAVY ENSIGN LIEUTENANT LIEUTENANT LIEUTENANT COMMANDER CAPTAIN REAR ADMIRAL REAR VICE ADMIRAL ADMIRAL FLEET JUNIOR COMMANDER (LOWER HALF) ADMIRAL ADMIRAL GRADE MARINES SECOND FIRST CAPTAIN MAJOR LIEUTENANT COLONEL BRIGADIER MAJOR LIEUTENANT GENERAL LIEUTENANT LIEUTENANT COLONEL GENERAL GENERAL GENERAL ARMY SECOND FIRST CAPTAIN MAJOR LIEUTENANT COLONEL BRIGADIER MAJOR LIEUTENANT GENERAL GENERAL LIEUTENANT LIEUTENANT COLONEL GENERAL GENERAL GENERAL OF THE ARMY AIR FORCE GENERAL SECOND FIRST CAPTAIN MAJOR LIEUTENANT COLONEL BRIGADIER MAJOR LIEUTENANT GENERAL OF THE LIEUTENANT LIEUTENANT COLONEL GENERAL GENERAL GENERAL AIR FORCE WARRANT NAVY MARINES ARMY COAST GUARD WARRANT WARRANT WARRANT OFFICER OFFICER OFFICER W-1 000 & CHIEF WARRANT CHIEF CHIEF OFFICER W-2 WARRANT OFFICER WARRANT OFFICER Coast Guard enlisted rating badges are the same as the Navy for grades E-1 through E-6. E-7, through E.9. have silver specialty marks, eagles CHIEF WARRANT CHIEF CHIEF and stars, and gold chevrons. The bodge of the Master Chief OFFICER W-3 WARRANT OFFICER WARRANT OFFICER Patty Officer of the Coast Guard has a gold chevron and specially mark, a gilver eagle and gold stars. Coast Guard officers use the same rank insignia as Navy officers. For CHIEF WARRANT CHIEF CHIEF all ranks, the gold Coast OFFICER W-4 WARRANT OFFICER WARRANT OFFICER Guard shield on the uniform sleeve replaces the Navy stor. *U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1986-726-037:6003 61 ENLISTED E-1 E-2 E-3 E-4 E-5 E-6 E-7 E-8 E-9 NAVY SEAMAN SEAMAN SEAMAN PETTY PETTY PETTY CHIEF SENIOR CHIEF MASTER CHIEF MASTER CHIEF RECRUIT APPRENTICE OFFICER OFFICER OFFICER PETTY PETTY PETTY PETTY OFFICER THIRD CLASS SECOND CLASS FIRST CLASS OFFICER OFFICER OFFICER OF THE NAVY MARINES (no insignia) PRIVATE PRIVATE LANCE CORPORAL SERGEANT STAFF GUNNERY FIRST SERGEANT SERGEANT FIRST CORPORAL SERGEANT SERGEANT SERGEANT MAJOR MAJOR CLASS OF THE MARINE CORPS MASTER MASTER SERGEANT GUNNERY SERGEANT ARMY (no insignia) PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE CORPORAL SERGEANT STAFF SERGEANT FIRST COMMAND FIRST SERGEANT FIRST CLASS SERGEANT SERGEANT MAJOR CLASS SERGEANT MAJOR OF THE ARMY SPECIALIST 4 MASTER SERGEANT SERGEANT MAJOR AIR FORCE SERGEANT (no insignia) AIRMAN AIRMAN AIRMAN STAFF TECHNICAL MASTER SENIOR CHIEF CHIEF BASIC FIRST CLASS SENIOR SERGEANT SERGEANT SERGEANT MASTER MASTER MASTER SERGEANT AIRMAN SERGEANT SERGEANT OF THE AIR FORCE Chart by Phyllis Cox and John Pack 62 APPENDIX D RESERVE COMPONENT ADDRESSES STATEMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Reserve Affairs) The Pentagon UNITED STATES OF FAMERICA Washington, D.C. 20301-1500 THE NRMY NOTHE TAXI Chief, National Guard Bureau The Pentagon Washington, D.C. 20310-2500 ARMY NATIONAL GUARD Director, Army National Guard The Pentagon * Washington, D.C. 20310-2500 * AIR NATIONAL GUARD Director, Air National Guard The Pentagon * Washington, D.C. 20310-2500 UNITED STATES ARMY WESERVE Chief, Army Reserve The Pentagon Washington, D.C. 20310 DEPARTMENT OF Director, Naval Reserve * The Pentagon Washington, D.C. 20350 NAVAL RESERVE Chief, Air Force Reserve The Pentagon HIR Washington, D.C. 20330-5440 FORCE RESERVE UNITED STATE MARINE Commandant of the Marine Corps Deputy Chief of Staff for Manpower and Reserve Affairs (Code: RES) CORPS Washington, D.C. 20380-0001 Chief, Office of Readiness and Reserve UNITED GUARD Headquarters, U.S. Coast Guard 179 2100 2nd Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20593 63