Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
323153211
label
American Association for the Advancement of Science 2/15/91 [OA 6855] [1]
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
323153211
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
a758f53cef67fb47
ocrText
Originally Processed With FOIA(s): FOIA Number: S S FOIA MARKER This is not a textual record. This is used as an administrative marker by the George Bush Presidential Library Staff. Record Group/Collection: George H.W. Bush Presidential Records Collection/Office of Origin: Speechwriting, White House Office of Series: Speech File Backup Files Subseries: Chron File, 1989-1993 OA/ID Number: 13746 Folder ID Number: 13746-005 Folder Title: American Association for the Advancement of Science 2/15/91 [OA 6855] [1] Stack: Row: Section: Shelf: Position: G 26 21 2 6 AG5 .525 WH THE FIRST OF EVERYTHING A Compendium of Important, Eventful, and Just-Plain-Fun Facts About All Kinds of Firsts DENNIS SANDERS Research coordinated by LEONARD LOVALLO DELACORTE PRESS/NEW YORK SINGING IN THE SHOWER: Firsts Found in the Smallest Room of Your House ASPIRIN Acetylsalicylic acid was produced for the first time in 1899 by Ger- man chemists Felix Hoffman and Hermann Dreser, who manufac- tured the pain killer and fever reducer from coal tar. In 1905, aspirin was marketed for the first time by Bayer Aspirin, and soon became the largest selling over-the-counter, nonprescription drug in the world. KLEENEX The Kimberly-Clark Company manufactured the world's first dis- posable handkerchief in 1924 under the name Celluwipes. The prod- uct was later renamed Kleenex 'Kerchiefs, and eventually shortened to Kleenex. THE FLUSH TOILET English poet John Harrington invented a practical flushing water closet in 1595, but the device made no inroads against the common chamber pot. In 1775 Alexander Cummings, an English inventor, received the first patent for a flush toilet, and in 1778 Joseph Brahama, age thirty, invented the valve and syphon-type flushing 12 EVERYDAY FIRSTS R: mechanism which became the model for all future toilets. However, the chamber pot remained firmly entrenched until the end of the nineteenth century, when the rich began discovering the joys of indoor bathroom plumbing. THE TOOTHBRUSH ouse The toothbrush is said to have been invented in China in 1498, though they didn't become commonplace in Europe until the seven- teenth century. The first nylon bristle brush was marketed in the United States in 1938 as Dr. West's Miracle Tuft Toothbrush. The bristles were made of Du Pont nylon. Squibb manufactured the first electric toothbrush in 1961. BAND-AIDS e in 1899 by Ger- Johnson & Johnson of New Brunswick, New Jersey, introduced the er, who manufac- Band-Aid-essentially unchanged today-in 1920. r. In 1905, aspirin and soon became tion drug in the ALKA-SELTZER In 1931 Miles Laboratories of Elkhart, Indiana, introduced a tablet (containing sodium bicarbonate, monocalcium phosphate, aspirin, and citric acid), which fizzled in water. The product, Alka-Seltzer, would sell in excess of 2.5 billion tablets a year by the 1970's. : world's first dis- uwipes. The prod- entually shortened MERTHIOLATE Eli Lilly Company introduced tincture of Merthiolate for cuts and scratches in 1930, though the product was not successful until Lilly added dye to make it stain the skin and alcohol to make it sting. cal flushing water ainst the common THE SAFETY RAZOR English inventor, i in 1778 Joseph King Camp Gillette patented the safety razor in 1901, and started hon-type flushing his Gillette Safety Razor Company in Boston the same year. The new 13 DENNIS SANDERS razors went on sale in 1903, when a grand total of 51 razors and 168 blades were sold. MOUTHWASH The Lambert Pharmaceutical Company of St. Louis introduced Listerine (named after Dr. Joseph Lister, discoverer of antiseptic surgical procedures) in 1880. However, the "it-kills-germs-by-the- millions-on-contact" slogan wouldn't make Listerine a household word until a massive marketing and advertising campaign was started in 1922. KOTEX During World War I, German-American chemist Ernst Mahler, thirty-one, developed a wood-cellulose substitute for cotton, called cellucotton, which helped alleviate a critical shortage of bandages when introduced in 1918. The Kimberly-Clark Company of Neenah, Wisconsin, which manufactured cellucotton bandages, learned that Red Cross nurses at military hospitals were using the bandages as sanitary napkins, and decided they were onto a good thing. In 1921 they introduced their modified cellucotton bandage as the world's first commercial sanitary napkin under the name "Kotex." 14 of 51 razors and 168 WHAT'S COOKING? Kitcheny Firsts t. Louis introduced coverer of antiseptic t-kills-germs-by-the- isterine a household ising campaign was emist Ernst Mahler, GAS STOVE ite for cotton, called hortage of bandages James Sharp, a gas company executive in Northampton, England, Company of Neenah, designed and built the first practical gas stove for his own kitchen andages, learned that in 1826, and started manufacturing the stoves commercially in 1836. sing the bandages as 1 good thing. In 1921 ndage as the world's ELECTRIC OVEN me "Kotex." The first known electric oven was installed by an unknown inventor in a Swiss hotel in 1889, and by 1891 the Carpenter Electric Heating Manufacturing Company of St. Paul, Minnesota, offered the first electric ovens for sale. However, during the "gaslight" era, electricity was an expensive power source, and electric ovens and stoves did not become popular with the public until the cheap electricity era of the 1930's. POP-UP TOASTER Charles Strite, an American inventor, patented the first pop-up elec- tric toaster in 1918; the famous Toastmaster was first marketed by the Elgin Illinois Company of McGraw Electric in 1930. 15 DENNIS SANDERS REFRIGERATOR ALUMII The first commercial home refrigerator was the Domelre, manufac- Henry A tured in Chicago in 1913, which retailed for a costly nine hundred 1890, wh dollars. The first Kelvinator was made in 1918, and the first Frigi- daire in 1919. Early refrigeration was not a runaway success with homemakers, and annual sales didn't exceed ten thousand units until TEFLOI 1920. General Electric's famous "monitor" top refrigerator (the first with a hermetically sealed compressor) went on the market in 1927 Roy J. P1 and soon became the most successful model sold. lene, or : soon beir BLENDER TUPPEI The blender was invented by Fred Waring, well-known band leader of the thirties and forties, in 1936, and revolutionized food prepara- Earl W. tion and bartending. pany to n in 1945. DISHWASHER TIN CA Invented by Mrs. W.A. Cochran, a Shelbyville, Indiana, housewife, 1879-89. The tin C the hand and solde WASHING MACHINE introduce the first The Hurley Machine Company of Chicago introduced the "Thor" opened W -the first self-contained electric clothes washer-in 1907. ALUMIN MICROWAVE OVEN Americar Microwave cooking was accidentally discovered by Percy Le Baron in 1960; Spencer of the Raytheon Company, who found that microwave sig- burgh in nals melted a candy bar in his pocket; Raytheon developed Spencer's ary, 1963 discovery into a commercial microwave oven which they marketed cans. in 1947. The first compact microwave oven was introduced by Amana in 1967. 16 EVERYDAY FIRSTS ALUMINUM SAUCEPAN e Domelre, manufac- Henry Avery of Cleveland produced the first aluminum saucepan in costly nine hundred 1890, which Mrs. Avery used until 1933. 8, and the first Frigi- unaway success with 1 thousand units until TEFLON refrigerator (the first n the market in 1927 Roy J. Plunkett, a Du Pont chemist, discovered polytetrafluoroethy- old. lene, or Teflon, by accident in 1938, and the nonstick surface was soon being used for cooking utensils as well as industrial wiring. TUPPERWARE I-known band leader onized food prepara- Earl W. Tupper, a former Du Pont chemist, started his own com- pany to manufacture airtight plastic kitchen storage bowls and boxes in 1945. TIN CANS , Indiana, housewife, The tin can was patented in 1810 by Peter Duran of England, but the handmade cans were expensive (one tinsmith could cut, mold, and solder only about sixty cans a day); machine-stamped cans were introduced in 1847. In 1865 tins were made of thinner steel, allowing the first can opener to be made-prior to that, tin cans had been roduced the "Thor" opened with a hammer and chisel. er-in 1907. ALUMINUM AND TAB-TOP CANS American manufacturers introduced aluminum cans for soft drinks 1 by Percy Le Baron in 1960; the tab-top can, sponsored by Alcoa, was tested in Pitts- that microwave sig- burgh in 1962, and introduced on Schlitz beer nationally in Febru- developed Spencer's ary, 1963. By 1970, 90 percent of all beer was being sold in tab-top which they marketed cans. was introduced by 17 BETTER MOUSETRAPS: Revolutionary Inventions and Discoveries THE TELESCOPE Man's concept of the universe was revolutionized in 1609 when Galileo Galilei (1564-1642), Italian astronomer, built the first re- fracting telescope, after having heard a description of a "magnifying tube" invented by a Dutch spectacle maker, Hans Lippershey, in 1608. The first reflecting telescope, which focuses the image on a mirror, rather than passing it through lenses directly to the viewer, was built in 1672 by Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727). THE MICROSCOPE The man generally credited with inventing the microscope is Za- charias Janssen, a Dutch spectacle maker who discovered com- pound, or multiple lens magnification, ca. 1590. Italian astronomer Galileo Galilei also claimed to have invented the microscope in 1610. His microscope was developed as an out- growth of his telescope experiments (both instruments use com- pound lenses), and it's not known if the Italian knew of Janssen's invention. However, there may have been an indirect connection ewardesses began service with Janssen's and Galileo's microscopes by way of the "magnifying tendants (as they are now e that most-but not all- tube" built in 1608 by Dutchman Hans Lippershey. Galileo did THE BETTMANN ARCHIVE, INC. know of the Lippershey tube, and Lippershey and Janssen, being 47 DENNIS SANDERS countrymen, contemporaries, and spectacle makers, may well have been aware of each other's work. THE LOOM The simplest loom is not much more than a frame used to hold threads while being woven together, and it's been in use since about 4400 B.C. The automatic fly shuttle, which greatly speeded up the weaving process, was invented in 1733 by John Kay of England, and in 1785 Edmund Cartwright patented the first practical power loom. The first Jacquard loom was perfected in 1804; the Jacquard process, which makes use of punched paper patterns which are "read" by the loom to automatically weave complicated designs, had far-reaching implications for the eventual development of the computer punch card. Frazenzo THE COTTON GIN 12-18-67 67 Sainz Eli Whitney (1765-1825), a twenty-seven-year-old Yale graduate, invented the cotton gin in 1792 while visiting Mulberry Grove Plan- 2:30 12-18. tation on the Savannah River, Georgia. Whitney had noticed the difficulty with which seeds were separated from short-staple cotton bolls, and built a simple turning cylinder device with saw teeth made from bird cage wire which caught the seeds as the cotton fibers were pulled through by the rotating teeth. The Whitney device enabled one slave laborer to clean as much as fifty pounds of cotton a day, as opposed to the one pound which had been average with manual cleaning. In the decade after Whitney's gin was invented the agricul- tural economy of the United States had radically changed, with the 140,000 pounds of cotton produced in 1792 increasing to a staggering 35 million pounds by 1800. THE STEAM ENGINE The first crude steam engine was invented in 1698 by Thomas Savery, an English engineer. Called the "miner's friend," it was used to pump water from coal mines. In 1705 Thomas Newcomen, an English blacksmith, built the first steam engine with a piston driven by 48 S INVENTIVE, EXPLOSIVE, AND DEADLY FIRSTS le makers, may well have condensed steam. James Watt of Scotland, usually credited with the "invention" of the steam engine, built his famous machine in 1765. Watt's steam engine greatly improved the efficiency of the Newco- men model by adding a condenser chamber. in a frame used to hold THE SEWING MACHINE S been in use since about 1 greatly speeded up the The first sewing machine was built in 1829 by Barthelemy Thim- ohn Kay of England, and monier, a tailor in the town of Amplepuis in the Rhone district of rst practical power loom. France. Though built for his own use, Thimmonier received an order 04; the Jacquard process, for eighty of his machines from a Paris uniform factory two years which are "read" by the later, and the inventor himself was hired by the company. Unfortu- lesigns, had far-reaching nately, the other employees felt their livelihood was threatened by of the computer punch the mechanization of hand sewing, and an "anti-sewing-machine mob" destroyed all but one of the machines, which was saved by Thimmonier. In 1845 the ill-starred Thimmonier got backing from a businessman, went into production, and once again had his sewing machines destroyed by an angry mob. The French sewing-machine business somehow never seemed to get off the ground. ear-old Yale graduate, The first sewing machine built for home use was the famous Singer ; Mulberry Grove Plan- model, invented by Isaac Singer in 1850 and patented and manufac- hitney had noticed the tured in 1851 at a Boston factory. Later Singer had to pay royalties rom short-staple cotton to Elias Howe of Spencer, Massachusetts, who had patented his own ice with saw teeth made machine in 1846, which was used by tailors in the United States and S the cotton fibers were Britain. But the Singer model went on to become the first common Vhitney device enabled labor-saving machine in the average American household. ounds of cotton a day, n average with manual as invented the agricul- THE ELEVATOR cally changed, with the creasing to a staggering Pulley-and-weight mechanisms have been in use for a long time for lifting freight and sometimes people (Louis XV had a "lift" to carry him upstairs from his suite at Versailles to that of his mistress, in 1743). But the revolution in the urban landscape wrought by the elevator began in 1852 in Yonkers, New York, where Elisha Graves Otis, then aged forty-one, invented the safety elevator, which had ,98 by Thomas Savery, teeth and ratchets to prevent the platform from falling should the it was used to pump rope break. Otis himself dramatically demonstrated this in 1853 at ewcomen, an English the Crystal Palace exhibition when, before a dubious crowd, he had h a piston driven by himself hoisted above the floor, then deliberately cut the ropes. The 49 DENNIS SANDERS audience gasped and screamed, but Otis's gears held, and the proud white ph inventor stepped safely to the ground, taking a bow. screen th The Otis elevator was soon in production. The first to be installed image. T in a hotel went to the Fifth Avenue Hotel, New York, in 1859; the a final C first in a commercial business went into the famous cast iron Hag- Louis D wout Department Store at Broadway and Broome Street (still stand- graphic ing) in 1857. The Hagwout elevator was the first to have a completely color sep enclosed passenger car. ferring t Color some of BESSEMER STEEL CONVERTER it wasn't cess that In 1856 Henry Bessemer, a British engineer, patented his converter, which made the production of high quality, low-cost steel possible by decarbonizing pig iron with a blast of cold air. The Bessemer THE O process would make steel widely available for construction; cheap steel, when combined with the Otis elevator, would father the mod- Man ha ern skyscraper. boat hul as by the in 1859 THE PHOTO CAMERA named I at what In the eighteenth century scientists discovered that silver salts dark- oil-beari ened under light; in 1802 Thomas Wedgwood, the physician son of and was the famous potter, Josiah, took the world's first photograph when he used ma spread moist silver nitrate on a piece of paper, then projected an mercial image onto the sheet. The image "took," but Wedgwood had no way Pennsyl to fix the "image" and it soon faded. The first permanent photo was (Kerose made in 1822, when J. N. Niepce and his seventeen-year-old cousin, of Newt Claude, discovered a method of producing fixed images on glass liquid " treated with bitumen. a paten Though cameras had been commercially available since 1839 product when the french firm of Alphonse Giroux offered a large box camera were du for sale for four hundred francs, photography remained largely in the tion by hands of professionals until 1895 when the first pocket camera devel- oped by George Eastman was introduced by the Eastman Kodak Company of Rochester, New York. The even more successful THE E Brownie camera was introduced in 1900, at a price of one dollar, putting photography in the grasp of amateurs for the first time. The firs The first color photograph was made in 1861 by Scotch physicist first tim James Maxwell, who developed a technique of taking black-and- constru 50 ERS INVENTIVE, EXPLOSIVE, AND DEADLY FIRSTS 's gears held, and the proud white photos through three color filters, then projecting them on a aking a bow. screen through the same filters (red, blue, and green) to give a color ion. The first to be installed image. This early experiment in the three-color process didn't give el, New York, in 1859; the a final color print-only a "slide projection." In 1868, however, the famous cast iron Hag- Louis Ducos de Hauron of France made the first true color photo- Broome Street (still stand- graphic print-of his home village of Agen-by taking the three- ie first to have a completely color separation process of Maxwell and devising a method of trans- ferring the three screens to one print in three dye steps. Color photography remained complicated and difficult (though some of the early images that have survived are quite beautiful), and it wasn't until 1935 with the development of the Kodachrome pro- cess that color photography became readily available to the public. er, patented his converter, ty, low-cost steel possible f cold air. The Bessemer THE OIL WELL e for construction; cheap )r, would father the mod- Man has been using petroleum for thousands of years for coating boat hulls, cementing bricks, occasionally as a flaming weapon, or, as by the American Indians, for body paint. But the oil age was born in 1859 when an unemployed forty-year-old railroad conductor named Edwin L. Drake successfully drilled the world's first oil well at what is now Titusville, Pennsylvania. The seventy-foot well hit red that silver salts dark- oil-bearing shale using salt-well drilling equipment on August 28, od, the physician son of and was soon producing two thousand barrels a day. The oil was irst photograph when he used mainly in the production of kerosene for lamps. The first com- aper, then projected an Wedgwood had no way mercial oil refinery was opened in June, 1860, at Oil Creek valley in Pennsylvania, where only kerosene was extracted from the crude oil. st permanent photo was (Kerosene was first extracted from oil in 1855 by Abraham Gesner /enteen-year-old cousin, of Newtown Creek, now part of Queens, New York, who named the ; fixed images on glass liquid "Keros," after the Greek word for wax, and promoted it as y available since 1839 a patented medicine!) At the Oil Creek valley refinery the by- products of the kerosene refining, including gasoline, had no use and ered a large box camera remained largely in the were dumped into Oil Creek, creating the first environmental pollu- tion by the oil industry. st pocket camera devel- y the Eastman Kodak even more successful THE ELECTRIC LIGHT a price of one dollar, S for the first time. The first practical incandescent light bulb was demonstrated for the 61 by Scotch physicist first time on December 20, 1879, by Thomas Alva Edison, who had of taking black-and- constructed the bulb with a carbonized cotton filament after thirteen 51 DENNIS SANDERS months of experiments at his Menlo Park, New Jersey, laboratories; the cotton filament bulb was first built by Edison on October 21 of that year. A year earlier, however, British inventor and chemist Joseph Swan had demonstrated his carbon filament bulb to the New- castle-on-Tyne Chemical Society (December 18, 1878). But the Swan bulb was not completely successful, and though he later perfected the bulb and went into production in 1881, the slightly "younger" but workable Edison bulb overtook the Swan design, and the modern electric industry developed from the Edison Company. THE NUCLEAR REACTOR The world's first controlled, self-sustaining nuclear reaction was achieved on December 2, 1942, at Stagg Field, University of Chi- cago, by a team headed by Enrico Fermi, Edward Teller, and Leo Szilard; their work led directly to the Manhattan Project in Los Alamos, New Mexico, which produced the first atomic bomb. After World War II, the application of atomic reactions to produce some- thing other than destructive energy led to the first reactor, built in 1951 by the Atomic Energy Commission. Peaceful atomic energy remained largely experimental until 1956, when the first full-scale atomic-powered electric turbine went into operation at Calder Hall in England (August 20) and began supplying power to the British electric system on October 17 of the same year. The first commercial nuclear reactor (that is, privately built and operated for energy production) was opened in 1963 by New Jersey Power and Light at Oyster Creek, New Jersey; the first serious nuclear reactor accident occured on March 28, 1979, when the Three Mile Island reactor in Pennsylvania suffered a series of systems breakdowns causing the contamination of the central core room, a shutdown of the plant, the release of radioactive gas into the atmo- sphere (intentionally, to lower radiation levels in the reactor room), and the evacuation of area residents. RADAR The first practical radar device was developed by Rudolph Kuhnold, Signals Research Chief of the German Navy, and demonstrated at 52 S INVENTIVE, EXPLOSIVE, AND DEADLY FIRSTS New Jersey, laboratories; Kiel Harbor on March 20, 1934. Kuhnold bounced signals from his Edison on October 21 of seven-hundred-watt transmitter from a battleship anchored six hun- sh inventor and chemist dred yards away; this and subsequent tests were so successful that filament bulb to the New- the German Government appropriated money to develop the device, r 18, 1878). But the Swan which has had a dramatic impact on warfare, auto traffic, and even ugh he later perfected the geologic research and other scientific applications. e slightly "younger" but design, and the modern on Company. THE COMPUTER The first known mechanical computing device-or computer-is none other than the abacus, which was in use in China as early as (and probably earlier than) the sixth century B.C., and in Greece and 1g nuclear reaction was Rome of ancient days. This most basic computer is still in use in parts Field, University of Chi- of the Orient. Edward Teller, and Leo The first complex, modern computer was conceived, designed, and anhattan Project in Los partially built by Charles Babbage (1792-1871), a British mathemati- first atomic bomb. After cian, who began building his computer in 1822. The Babbage ma- actions to produce some- chine (which was never completed because the sheer complexity of the first reactor, built in its moving parts was beyond the technology of the day) utilized many Peaceful atomic energy features and principles of the modern comput er, including the punch when the first full-scale card, borrowed from the famous Jacquard loom punch cards of 1804. operation at Calder Hall Babbage's first concept, the "analytical engine," was put forth in ing power to the British 1822; the second and more complex, the "difference engine," was year. designed in 1833 and, had it been finished with sufficient technical at is, privately built and accuracy, would have worked as well as early digital computers of 1 in 1963 by New Jersey the twentieth century. Jersey; the first serious The first electronic computer (actually a tabulating machine) was 28, 1979, when the Three built by Dr. Herman Hollerith for the U.S. Census Bureau in 1889 red a series of systems for the 1890 census. The Hollerith machine made use of punch cards the central core room, a with eighty columns, which became part of the IBM system, and the ctive gas into the atmo- card today bears Hollerith's name. els in the reactor room), The first digital computer was the Mark I, completed in 1944 by Professor Howard Aiken of Harvard. The Mark I used both elec- tronic and mechanical parts for operation. The first electronic com- puter was the Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer (ENIAC), completed in 1946 at the University of Pennsylvania. ENIAC, which contained some eighteen thousand vacuum tubes and d by Rudolph Kuhnold, diodes, weighed thirty tons, and was used by the U.S. Army to solve y, and demonstrated at artillery problems. 53 DENNIS SANDERS The modern computer industry began in 1951 with the introduc- tion of UNIVAC, the first mass-produced computer available to private enterprise. THE LASER The first laser was built in 1960 by Theodore Maiman of the Hughes Research Laboratory, Malibu, California, based on work patented by physicists Charles Townes and Arthur Schwarlow. The term laser (light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation) was first coined by R. Gordon Gould of Columbia University in 1957, but Gould's leftist political activities in the 1940's caused his work on lasers to be hampered by the Defense Department and research agencies. The first laser used a ruby rod surrounded by a flash tube to agitate chromium atoms in the ruby's lattice crystal to an excited state, TH producing pulses of red light with coherent waves. The laser, thought of by the public as a twenty-first-century tool, At has found numerous applications in holography, surgery, physics, the and even astronomy. igr (14 orl the Ke pla EV In cul tio de ch rach cal the the 54 S n 1951 with the introduc- ed computer available to CONCEPTUAL FIRSTS: Five Ideas That Revolutionized Thinking re Maiman of the Hughes ased on work patented by hwarlow. The term laser in of radiation) was first 1 University in 1957, but 940's caused his work on Department and research d by a flash tube to agitate /stal to an excited state, THE HELIOCENTRIC SYSTEM nt waves. twenty-first-century tool, Aristarchus of Alexandria, in the middle of the third century B.C., graphy, surgery, physics, theorized that the Earth moved around the Sun, but his idea was ignored until revived by Copernicus in 1530. Though Copernicus (1473-1543) made errors, like assuming that planets have circular orbits, his destruction of the concept that the Earth is the center of the universe had a profound effect on later scientists like Newton and Kepler, and deflated traditional theological theories about man's place in things. EVOLUTION In 1859 Charles Darwin published Origin of Species, the mammoth culmination of years of travel and research, which led to his formula- tion of his theory of organic evolution. His ideas, such as the slow development of new and varied species through an interaction of chance and environmental adaptation, was heresy to theologians, but radically changed man's understanding of how he came to be. Ironi- cally, Alfred R. Wallace of England developed an almost identical theory of evolution independently, at the same time as Darwin, and they jointly published their preliminary papers in 1858. 55 DENNIS SANDERS PSYCHOLOGY Heraclitus, the Greek philosopher, was the first to say that dreams are not supernatural encounters but journeys into a personal world, in the fifth century B.C. But this concept was not to come to fruition until Sigmund Freud developed his theories of dreams, the sub- conscious, and sexuality beginning with his papers On the Psychical Mechanism of Hysterical Phenomena and Studies in Hysteria (writ- ten with early colleague Joseph Breuer) in 1893 and 1895. By 1900 Freud had written his Interpretation of Dreams, and within a few years men, women, and children were talking in terms of their egos, repression, Oedipal conflicts, and the subconscious. THE DIVISIBILITY OF THE ATOM From the time of Democritus in 330 B.C., the atom had been consid- ered the smallest particle of matter (the word is Greek for indivisible or indestructible) until 1897 when Joseph John Thompson, a British physicist, put forth a model of the atom with nucleus orbited by electrons. The discovery that the atom was itself made up of smaller, moving particles revolutionized scientific thinking about the nature of matter-it suddenly had positive, negative, and neutral charges— and physicists are still discovering more and more obscure and curi- ous subatomic particles every decade. RELATIVITY Albert Einstein revolutionized physics in 1905 with the introduction of his special theory of relativity, which made time the fourth dimen- sion. One of the many aspects of the theory is that mass and energy are equivalent, a basic concept leading to the development of nuclear fission and the atomic bomb. The bomb demonstrated most impres- sively the divisibility of the atom (see above). However, it may some- day render the concepts of psychology, evolution, and the heliocen- tric system irrelevant, since there may be no one left to psychoanalyze, nothing to evolve, and nothing left to revolve around the sun but radioactive dust. 56 SPEAK UP: Communications Milestones DOT-DOT-DASH-DOT On May 24, 1844, Samuel F.B. Morse, a successful painter-turned- inventor, transmitted the famous first message, "What hath God wrought" from the U.S. Capitol in Washington to his assistant, Alfred Vail, at the Mount Clare station of the B. & O. Railroad in Baltimore, the first long-distance telegraph message. Morse had begun developing his apparatus in 1832, while a profes- sor of art at New York University, and had given the first public demonstration in 1837, the year he took out a patent on the tele- graph. The same year Vail devised the Morse code to replace the cumbersome numbered system he and Morse had used up to that time. Prior to Morse, British inventor Francis Ronald had devised an electric telegraph in 1822, which failed to get off the ground due to lack of Government interest. And two other British inventors, Charles Wheatstone and William Fothergill Cooke, patented their telegraph in 1837, the same year Morse gave his first demonstration. In 1831 Joseph Henry demonstrated an electromagnetic telegraph in Albany, New York, but failed to patent or promote the device, thus losing out to Morse-who made a fortune from his telegraph. Wheatstone and Cooke were more fortunate-the British telegraph system grew out of their patented invention, which they sold for a whopping £168,000 in 1846. 58 INVENTIVE, EXPLOSIVE, AND DEADLY FIRSTS UNDER THE OCEAN AND THROUGH THE WOODS Cable service from New York to Chicago began in 1848. The English ilestones Channel cable was completed in 1850; the transamerican cable from New York to San Francisco was completed (despite Indians' objec- tions) in 1861, putting the Pony Express out of business; and a major communications first came in 1866 when Cyrus W. Field completed the first transatlantic cable, allowing instantaneous communication between two continents for the first time. ELEMENTARY, MY DEAR WATSON On March 10, 1876, Alexander Graham Bell spoke the first sentence to be transmitted over wire at 5 Exeter Place, Boston, when he said, "Mr. Watson, come here, I want you." The first practical telephone was an improved version of the machine built in 1875, when Bell discovered by accident that a telegraph transmitter using harmonic frequencies in matching receivers could transmit matching sounds successful painter-turned- (June 2, 1875). Bell was only twenty-nine at the time he called iessage, "What hath God Thomas Watson, who was twenty-two. ashington to his assistant, of the B. & O. Railroad in oh message. THE NEXT BEST THING TO BEING THERE tus in 1832, while a profes- had given the first public The first long-distance phone call was placed in October, 1876, when out a patent on the tele- Boston lawyer Gardiner Hubbard, future father-in-law of Bell and Morse code to replace the an early promoter of the phone, took two of young Bell's telephones, forse had used up to that hooked them up to a telegraph wire running from Boston to the Cambridge Observatory across the Charles River, and spoke to is Ronald had devised an Thomas Watson for over three hours. get off the ground due to other British inventors, gill Cooke, patented their HELLO, CENTRAL ive his first demonstration. ectromagnetic telegraph in The first telephone was sold by Bell in May, 1877, to the Cambridge r promote the device, thus Board of Waterworks. By August there were eight hundred in ser- tune from his telegraph. vice. The first switchboard was installed in the offices of the Holmes ate-the British telegraph Burglar Alarm Company of Boston, at 342 Washington Street, who ion, which they sold for a used their existing burglar alarm lines from a client's premises as phone lines during the day and burglar alarms at night. Bell loaned 59 DENNIS SANDERS twelve of his phones to Holmes, and Holmes in turn didn't charge clients for the phone service. The first commercial phone exchange was opened in New Haven, Connecticut, by the District Telephone Company on January 28, 1878, with twenty-one customers subscribing to the service. The first telephone operator was George W. Coy, who answered calls with shouts of "Ahoy!" SORRY, WRONG NUMBER The first telephone in a private home was installed on April 4, 1877, in Somerville, Massachusetts, in the home of Charles Williams, Jr., at the corner of Arlington and William streets. Mr. Williams was also the first to manufacture Bell phones commercially. Since the first coreless phone exchange had yet to be installed, Williams had to have a line run to his office in Boston so there would be someplace to call. THAT WILL BE FIVE CENTS, PLEASE, FOR THE NEXT William Gray, an inventor from Hartford, Connecticut, installed the first coin pay phone in the Hartford Bank in 1889 and began wide- spread installation in 1891. The cost of a call was a nickel, making a pay call one of the most stationary prices of modern times. DIAL "U" FOR UNDERTAKER The first automatic telephone, the precursor of today's dials and touchtones, utilized three keys which were depressed to register the number through a mechanical, operatorless central switchboard. It was patented in March, 1889, and went into service at La Porte, Indiana, on November 3, 1892. The inventor was Almon Strowger, an undertaker in Kansas City, who was moved to create the device because he was convinced that one of Kansas City's operators, who happened to be the wife of one of his chief rivals in the funeral business, was diverting calls for undertakers to her husband's estab- lishment. 60 RS INVENTIVE, EXPLOSIVE, AND DEADLY FIRSTS Imes in turn didn't charge THEY TOLD MARCONI WIRELESS WAS A PHONY vas opened in New Haven, Wireless telegraphy was developed between 1894 and September, Company on January 28, 1895, by Guglielmo Marconi at his family's country house, the Villa ing to the service. The first Grifone, at Pontecchio near Bologna. Marconi, whose mother was who answered calls with British, took his device to Britain, where he demonstrated how elec- tronic signals could be transmitted through the air, over hills, and around obstacles-privately in September, 1896, on Salisbury Plain and publicly on December 12 at Toynbee Hall in London. Ironically, the wireless, which has made Marconi famous, was apparently demonstrated first by an American, Mahlon Loomis of installed on April 4, 1877, Washington, in 1866. Unfortunately, Loomis was a bit ahead of his e of Charles Williams, Jr., time, and that, in combination with financial setbacks, prevented his streets. Mr. Williams was wireless from getting off the ground. ommercially. Since the first Marconi was more fortunate, and formed the Wireless Telegraph Villiams had to have a line Company Limited in July, 1897, for the manufacture and sale of his Id be someplace to call. equipment. Though wireless telegraphy would find many applica- tions (the Titanic used wireless to signal that she was going down in 1912), Marconi's invention would be even more important than EASE, FOR THE the beginning of radio. , Connecticut, installed the LOOK, MA, NO WIRES! k in 1889 and began wide- 1 call was a nickel, making The first transatlantic wireless message was sent from Poldhu, Corn- ices of modern times. wall, on December 12, 1901, and received in Newfoundland by Marconi, using a wired kite as a receiving antenna. The message received consisted of the letter S. ursor of today's dials and YOU SOUND LIKE YOU'RE JUST NEXT DOOR re depressed to register the ess central switchboard. It Transcontinental phone service began January 25, 1915, when Alex- t into service at La Porte, ander Graham Bell in New York called Thomas Watson in San ntor was Almon Strowger, Francisco and repeated their famous message of 1876. The call took moved to create the device twenty-three minutes to get through, and cost $20.70. (Presumably insas City's operators, who Mr. Bell put it on his expense account at Bell Telephone, but that's chief rivals in the funeral what a paying customer would have forked out.) ters to her husband's estab- 61 DENNIS SANDERS LET YOUR FINGERS DO THE WALKING The first true dial phones were introduced November 8, 1919, in Norfolk, Virginia. Dial mechanisms had been available earlier, but A.T. & T. hadn't been interested until a potential operators' strike threatened to stop phone service. PLEASE DEPOSIT SEVENTY-FIVE DOLLARS FOR THE FIRST THREE MINUTES Intercontinental long-distance service began January 7, 1927, be- tween New York and London. AFGHANISTAN? I WAS TRYING TO DIAL ARKANSAS The first direct-dial long-distance service began on October 10, 1951. LONG, LONG DISTANCE A.T. & T. launched Telstar, the first private communications satel- lite, on July 10, 1962, to relay television programs globally. On April 6, 1965, the Communications Satellite Corporation (Comsat) launched Early Bird, the first of a projected network of commercial satellites designed to provide almost unlimited global telephone and telegraph communications. 62 WAY OVERDRIVE: ennsylvania Turnpike, ie wide, almost flat bed = divided highway fea- The Automobile from ffic, and access limited Pressure Cooker to Edsel proposed a highway- th and South America, es. Except for a section olombia, the highway : impassable except in al jungles, 15,000-foot 1690 Denis Papin (1647-1712), French physicist and inventor of the pressure cooker ("steam digester"), proposed a road vehicle driven by piston engine. 1769 Nicholas Joseph Cugnot (1725-1804) took the first ride in a self-propelled, steam-driven vehicle of his own invention. The vehi- :ral Aid Highway Act, cle, which attained a speed of about 2½ mph, also resulted in the first interstate freeway sys- auto accident. Cugnot knocked down a wall in Paris, where the e project was budgeted experiment took place. for by Uncle Sam. The ough 38,000 miles were 1801 Englishman Richard Trevithick (1771-1833) invented and the budget. The inter- built the first successful steam vehicle, which he test ran-at a speed bsidy since the building somewhere between 4 and 9 mph-in Cambourne, Cornwall. 1 ironically contributed When the first model went up in flames, a veritable auto-da-fé, siness. Trevithick rebuilt his vehicle, which in 1803 made the first cross-city trip, from Leather Lane to Paddington, London, by way of Oxford Street. 1805 Isaac de Rivaz built the first vehicle powered by an internal- combustion engine, which, unfortunately, only made it a few yards. Since this was the first internal-combustion auto, it was also the first to pollute the air with carbon monoxide. 1829 Goldsworth Guerney made the first long-distance auto jour- ney, from London to Bath, in his eighteen-seater, six-wheeled steam 75 DENNIS SANDERS coach. The size of Guerney's vehicle should also qualify him as the first bus driver, and the trip as the first bus tour. The distance traveled was about eighty miles. 1831 . The world's first scheduled "bus" service operated for a few months between Gloucester and Cheltenham, England, using three Guerney steam carriages. 1860 . Belgian-born inventor Jean Joseph Étienne Lenoir (1822- 1910) built the world's first successful internal-combustion-engine vehicle-a "gas carriage"-using an engine he first constructed the previous year. By 1863 a second Lenoir vehicle traveled from Paris to Vincennes, a distance of six miles, in three hours-giving an average speed of one-half mile per hour. 1864 . The first auto export in history: Lenoir sold one of his internal-combustion-powered carriages to Czar Alexander II of Russia. 1865 . Karl Benz of Germany (1844-1929) designed and built a three-wheeled gas-driven vehicle, the first to be designed and built as a motor vehicle, rather than converted from a carriage. The Benz had its first test runs in 1886. 1888 . John Dunlop (1840-1921) "invented" the pneumatic tire (or, rather, tyre), marking the beginning of the modern tire industry. Curiously, another Scotsman, R. W. Thomson, took out a patent on pneumatic tyres in 1845. But Dunlop got all the credit. 1891 . French inventor Ferdinand Forest built the first four-cylin- der gas engine with mechanical valve operation; a few years later he built the first six-cylinder engine. Ironically, Forest's inventions— which became the standard for millions of automobiles-were first used in boats, and he failed to be recognized for his contribution when they were later used in automobiles. 1893 . Brothers Charles Edgar and James Frank Duryea (1861- 1938, 1869-1967) built the first "motor buggy" in Springfield, Mas- sachusetts. Other motor vehicles had been built in the United States before the Duryeas', but theirs is recognized as the first practicable automobile built in the United States. 76 INVENTIVE, EXPLOSIVE, AND DEADLY FIRSTS also qualify him as the 1894 Henry G. Morris and Pedro Salom open the first automobile ous tour. The distance factory in the United States in Philadelphia. The product: the Elec- trobat. rvice operated for a few 1896 Henry Ford (1863-1947), Ransom Eli Olds (1864-1950), C. 1, England, using three B. King, and Alexander Winton-all major pioneers in the Ameri- can auto industry-built and tested their first models. In France, Léon Bollée offered his voiturette (little car), the first with pneumatic Étienne Lenoir (1822- tires a standard feature. rnal-combustion-engine he first constructed the icle traveled from Paris 1899 Ransom Eli Olds began production of the first Oldsmobiles. hree hours-giving an 1901 Cannstatt-Daimler of Germany introduced the first Mer- cedes, named after the teen-aged daughter of Emil Jellinek, one of Lenoir sold one of his Daimler's first customers. Czar Alexander II of 1902 Dr. Lehwess Panhard made the first attempt to drive around the world, but his auto caravan Passe Partout didn't get past Ninji, 1) designed and built a Novgorod, Russia. be designed and built as carriage. The Benz had 1903 Henry Ford founded the Ford Motor Company in Detroit, Michigan. The same year, H.M. Leland founded the Cadillac Motor Car Company in the same city. ed" the pneumatic tire e modern tire industry. 1906 Sir (Frederick) Henry Royce (1863-1933) of England, who on, took out a patent on built his first Royce car in 1904, organized an auto manufacturing II the credit. business with C. S. Rolls, and the first Rolls-Royce was born. uilt the first four-cylin- on; a few years later he 1908 William C. Durant (1861-1947) founded General Motors , Forest's inventions— Company, and Henry Ford produced the first Model T Ford, per- automobiles-were first haps the most famous single model car ever built. The first year, eight ed for his contribution thousand Model T's were built. 1909 In France, De Dion Bouton produced the first important Frank Duryea (1861- production-line auto with a V-8 engine. y" in Springfield, Mas- ilt in the United States 1911 Ford opened its first overseas factory at Trafford Park, Man- as the first practicable chester, England. The same year Cadillac was the first manufacturer to feature electric lights and starters on their models. 77 DENNIS SANDERS WATERMEM UP COUNTRY HENRY FORD AND HI FIRST CAR. I For Ford and country: Sitting at the helm of his first car, complete with Stars and Stripes superimposed, this early public relations photograph of Henry Ford 1 in retrospect makes a point about the impact of Detroit on the American Way of Life. THE BETTMANN ARCHIVE, INC. 1 I S C 1913 . Henry Ford used conveyor belts in his assembly lines for the F first time, but only for assembly of the magneto. In 1914 Ford g 78 INVENTIVE, EXPLOSIVE, AND DEADLY FIRSTS produced the first cars completely assembled on conveyor belts, reducing the time required to build a car from twelve and one-half hours to one and one-half hours, revolutionizing American industry. 1915 Because sales had surpassed annual target figures, Ford Motor Company offered the first rebate-fifty dollars-to anyone who purchased a Model T. 1918 For the first time, car registrations in the United States exceeded 5 million. 1922 In the United States, Trico introduced the electric wind- shield wiper. 1924 Walter P. Chrysler (1875-1940) produced the first Chry- slers. 1934 The Chrysler Corporation produced the first Airflow cars- streamlined vehicles that were to have a revolutionary impact on auto design. Airflow also featured the first overdrive transmis- sions. 1936 The Nazi Government financed the development and manu- facture of the first Volkswagens, the design of which remained virtu- ally unchanged to the 1970's. 1939 The Lincoln division of Ford Motor Company produced the first Lincoln Continental and Mercury models. 1948 Rover of Great Britain introduced the first four-wheel-drive Land-Rovers. complete with Stars hotograph of Henry Ford 1950 on the American Way Rover pioneered the first gas-turbine engine car. BETTMANN ARCHIVE, INC. 1956 Ford Motor stock sold to the public for the first time since Henry Ford bought out all Ford shareholders in 1917. In the 1917 stock buy-back, Henry Ford paid 105 million dollars to buy out other shareholders, which gave a return of 12 million dollars on an investment of five thousand dollars in Ford stock made in 1908. assembly lines for the From 1917 to 1956 the Ford family retained full control of the In 1914 Ford giant business. 79 DENNIS SANDERS The Ford Foundation, which offered the stock for sale in 1956, netted some 643 million dollars from the transaction, 500 million dollars of which it gave away within the next eighteen months. 1957 Ford produced the first Edsel-Detroit's first major flop. 80 FAR OUT: Astronomical Firsts WHICH WAY TO POLARIS, JACK? Hipparchus, a Greek astronomer, is credited with making the first star map in 134 B.C. after seeing a new star appear in the constellation Scorpio. He hoped his map would make it easier for future stargazers to spot new sky happenings. LIGHTS OUT The first recorded total solar eclipse occurred in China, October 22, 2137 B.C.: The two royal astronomers Hi and Ho were drunk and neglected to frighten away the dragon that had eaten the sun, for which negligence they were beheaded by Emperor Chung K'ang. NOT WITHIN WALKING DISTANCE Ancient astronomers had attempted to measure the distance of stars by using the trigonometric method of parallax, which had given them decent values for the distance of the sun, and for the diameter of the Earth. However, they had no concept of the immense vastness of space, and the minute measurements required for measuring the parallax of stars was wa-a-ay beyond their instruments. In 1838, three astronomers, working independently, each mea- 200 FARAWAY FIRSTS sured with reasonable accuracy the distance of a star. They were Friedrich Bessel of Königsberg Observatory, Germany, who gave a distance of less than 11 light-years for 61 Cygni. Thomas Henderson, rsts Astronomer Royal of Scotland, gave a figure of 4.3 light-years for Alpha Centauri; in Russia, F.G.W. von Struve announced a figure of 27 light-years for Vega. For the first time, man knew that space was very big, indeed. so BIG YET so SMALL In 1845 the third Earl of Rosse, an amateur astronomer of some means, built the world's largest telescope on his estate in Ireland. The earl's reflecting telescope had a seventy-two-inch metal mirror, and was suspended between two ivy-covered stone walls. The telescope revealed that what had appeared to be stars in other telescopes were actually glowing spiral objects. Ross did not realize, however, that ed with making the first these tiny spiral objects were galaxies, each as large as or larger than pear in the constellation our own, each with hundreds of millions of stars. sier for future stargazers FASTER THAN A SPEEDING BULLET In 1675, Ole Roemer of Denmark noticed that satellites of Jupiter were eclipsed by the giant planet at irregular intervals-when Jupiter ed in China, October 22, was closest to Earth the eclipses came too soon, and vice versa when nd Ho were drunk and Jupiter was at its farthest point. Roemer understood, of course, that : had eaten the sun, for the light was taking longer or shorter times to reach Earth, and by mperor Chung K'ang. careful measurement and calculation he was able to estimate the actual speed of light. His answer was 186,000 miles per second-an amazingly accurate figure for 1675: The modern value is 186,282.397 m.p.s. The figure was so astonishingly high that Roemer didn't be- lieve his own calculations. ure the distance of stars allax, which had given in, and for the diameter FIRE IN THE SKY of the immense vastness uired for measuring the In A.D. 1054 Chinese and Japanese astronomers recorded the sudden instruments. appearance of a new, remarkably bright star in the sky. We know dependently, each mea- today that it was a supernova-a star that, in a one-day explosion, 201 DENNIS SANDERS can increase in brightness up to one million times. The remnants of the 1054 explosion are today's Crab Nebula. GALILEO'S MANY FIRST SIGHTINGS When Galileo turned his newly built telescope on the Italian sky in 1609 (see: "Better Mousetraps"), he saw more things for the first time than almost any astronomer since. To wit: the mountains of the moon; the rings of Saturn (which puzzled him); the "invisible" Pleiades (six stars of the constellation are visible to the naked eye, but Galileo saw forty in his telescope). In 1610 Galileo spotted three satellites of Jupiter, and in 1611 he observed for the first time sun- spots and stars in the Milky Way. COME AGAIN In 1705, English astronomer Edmund Halley realized that the com- ets which were recorded in 1531, 1607, and 1682 were one and the same, and predicted that it would appear again in 1758. Halley died in 1742, but his prediction came true on Christmas Day of 1758, and the heavenly wanderer was duly named after him. Halley's comet last appeared in 1910, and it's due again in 1986. VENICE ON MARS In 1659 the Dutch astronomer-physicist Christian Huygens noticed that the planet Mars had markings on its surface. In 1877 Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli discovered narrow, regular lines crossing the Martian desert, and named the markings canali. The public-and some astronomers-soon came up with all sorts of fan- ciful ideas about the origins of these "structures," though Schiapa- relli himself never suggested that they were anything other than natural features. We now know there are no canals on the red planet, and the "canals" are structural features of the planet's crust. 202 FARAWAY FIRSTS times. The remnants of SPACE ROCKS 1. The first sighting of an asteroid came when Sicilian astronomer Giuseppe Pazzi discovered a 623-mile-diameter asteroid, which was S named Ceres, on January 1, 1801. There are now estimated to be forty thousand asteroids in the great belt between Mars and Jupiter. be on the Italian sky in ore things for the first it: the mountains of the THE FIRST PLANET TO BE "DISCOVERED" him); the "invisible" sible to the naked eye, Until 1781 the solar system consisted of six planets: Mercury, Venus, 0 Galileo spotted three Earth, Mars, Saturn, and Jupiter. In that year William Herschel, a for the first time sun- young musician who studied the heavens through a telescope in his spare time, was enjoying his nightly "review of the heavens" when he noticed a strange disc. Herschel thought it was a comet, but when he showed the disc to other astronomers, they realized the amateur had discovered the first new planet in man's history. The planet, 1.7 billion miles from Earth, was named Uranus. George III gave realized that the com- Herschel a pension as a reward, and he settled down to a lifetime of 1682 were one and the stargazing. Among other things, Herschel was also the first to show n in 1758. Halley died the arrangement of stars in the Milky Way. tmas Day of 1758, and r him. Halley's comet 1986. IT'S GOT TO BE THERE SOMEWHERE Once Uranus was discovered, it was studied closely, and astronomers noticed certain irregularities in its orbit. In 1834, the Reverend stian Huygens noticed T.J. Hussey, an astronomer and the rector of Hayes, Kent, theorized rface. In 1877 Italian that the presence of yet another planet was causing the irregularities. Astronomers then worked out theoretically where the distant, "in- narrow, regular lines visible" planet should be, and on August 4, 1846, Professor James markings canali. The p with all sorts of fan- Challis picked up the planet through a telescope. The new planet was named Neptune. res," though Schiapa- anything other than nals on the red planet, WHITE DWARF-THE DARK COMPANION e planet's crust. In 1834 Bessel, one of the first to measure star distances with accu- racy, noticed that Sirius, the Dog Star, had irregular motion which could only be accounted for by an unseen body. In the case of Sirius, a large star, the "dark companion" (as it became known) would have 203 DENNIS SANDERS to be at least as massive as our own sun to exert such a strong gravitational force on Sirius. In 1862 Alvan Clark, an American astronomer testing a new telescope, became the first to see Sirius's dim companion star. The new star, Sirius B, nicknamed the Pup, turned out to be the first in a series of unusual kinds of stars that astronomers were to discover in the next century. Sirius B is a very small, dim, but massive star. Only 24,000 miles in diameter (smaller than Jupiter, Saturn, or Uranus), it has as much mass as our sun-867,000 miles in diameter. A matchbox full of Sirius matter would weigh fifty tons on earth. This type of star, known as a white dwarf, results when a medium- size star, like our sun, evolves through a red giant stage, burning up its fuel, leaving a cold, dense, dying core. FAST AND HEAVY In 1939 J. Robert Oppenheimer (who also did important work on the first atom bomb) demonstrated mathematically how a star somewhat larger than our sun could, under certain conditions, implode, that is, suddenly collapse into a superdense body, smaller and denser than a white dwarf. Such a body would be only about ten miles across, and a cubic inch would weigh 10 billion tons. The atoms in the body would be so compressed that most of the atomic matter would have been thrown off, leaving only neutrons tightly packed together. In 1967 the first of these neutron stars was discovered at Cam- bridge, University when Jocelyn Bell, a graduate student, detected weak but very precise radio signals coming from a spot in space. The signals were flicking on and off at intervals of 1.33730113 seconds. When Bell presented her discovery to Anthony Hewish, head of the team, it was at first thought that an intelligence might be sending the signals. However, the signals continued at the same precise intervals for months, and the astronomers realized that they had discovered a neutron star. The small, dense body, with an intense magnetic field, was rotating extremely fast (imagine a sphere ten miles in diameter rotating once every 1.3 seconds!), and with each rotation a radio signal created by the magnetic field was being thrown our way. These pulsing radio sources were dubbed pulsars, and others were soon found. The fastest known is the pulsar in the Crab Nebula, which signals thirty-three times a second. It is also the first (and so far, 204 FARAWAY FIRSTS to exert such a strong only) visible pulsar, discovered by astronomers at Seward Observa- tory in Arizona in 1969. The object, named NP0532, is the remnant tronomer testing a new of the star which exploded creating the Crab Nebula, which was im companion star. The visible on Earth as the supernova of A.D. 1054. ned out to be the first in nomers were to discover I, dim, but massive star. han Jupiter, Saturn, or BLACK HOLES 57,000 miles in diameter. eigh fifty tons on earth. In 1939, when Oppenheimer did his mathematical work on neutron results when a medium- stars, he theorized an even more bizarre object, which would be giant stage, burning up created if a very large star-one fifty times the size of the sun- imploded. The mass of the star would be so great in an implosion that its gravitational pull would collapse it, not into a neutron star, but into a black hole. The black hole, which would be no more than forty miles across, would exert such tremendous gravitational pull that not even light could escape-hence its invisibility. Even more provoca- tive, a black hole would literally pull matter into nothingness-a 1 important work on the concept new to astronomers-and it has been theorized that black lly how a star somewhat holes are actually holes in our universe where matter leaks into other ditions, implode, that is, universes, which possibly run in reverse to ours. maller and denser than The first black hole was detected in 1972 in the binary star X-ray about ten miles across, source, Cygnus X-1. The source is a massive, radiating star with a The atoms in the body black hole companion which has a mass about ten times that of the mic matter would have sun, but a diameter of only 3.67 miles. tly packed together. as discovered at Cam- duate student, detected FARTHEST OUT: QUASARS om a spot in space. The of 1.33730113 seconds. In 1963 Maarten Schmidt, a Dutch astronomer working at Mount ny Hewish, head of the Palomar in California, was looking for a star in the Milky Way which ce might be sending the was believed to be a source of unusual radio signals. He found an e same precise intervals object in the sky, but it turned out not to be a star at all, but at they had discovered something quite different. First of all, it was very far away-about 1 intense magnetic field, 1 billion light-years, the most distant thing seen up to that time. e ten miles in diameter each rotation a radio Second, it was very bright-as bright as two hundred Milky Way thrown our way. These galaxies put together (there are 100 billion stars in the Milky Way). and others were soon Third, it was moving away from us very fast-almost at the speed of light. e Crab Nebula, which Dubbed quasi-stellar radio source, or quasar 3C273, Schmidt's 0 the first (and so far, finding was only the first of many. Astronomers have now found 205 DENNIS SANDERS more than two hundred quasars, and they are the most distant (and therefore, the oldest observable) objects in space. The most distant quasar was discovered in 1974, and is receding from the center of the universe at 95.5 percent of the speed of light. 206 RS y are the most distant (and in space. The most distant GIANT LEAPS: eding from the center of the light. Firsts from Blastoff to Man on the Moon One of the most astonishing feats in man's history is the landing of man on the moon sixty-six years after the Wright brothers' first flight, and just forty-three years after the first fuel-propelled rocket flight. Here are some milestone firsts along the way. BLASTOFF Dr. Robert H. Goddard (1882-1945) of the United States developed and tested the first liquid fueled rocket. Goddard's work was done primarily without outside help, and with limited funding. (The Smithsonian Institution gave him a five-thousand dollar grant.) The first test of Goddard's rocket was made in November, 1923, when a liquid fuel missile was given a static test-that is, fired while attached to a holding platform. Though the static test was successful, Goddard spent three years modifying his apparatus before conduct- ing the first rocket free-flight, on March 16, 1926, in a field near Auburn, Massachusetts. The three-foot rocket was ignited by God- dard himself, using a blowtorch attached to a long pole. The rocket attained a height of 184 feet and a speed of 60 m.p.h. Goddard, who was accompanied only by his wife Estha and two assistants at this historic moment, decided not to publish or announce his success since his earlier work on rockets had been ridiculed severely in many newspapers. In less than half a century, Goddard's modest rocket had given 207 DENNIS SANDERS birth to the giant Saturn V, over 100 times as high as the first model, and the five thousand dollar Smithsonian grant had grown to a 50-billion-dollar United States Government space program invest- ment. SOVIET SURPRISE On September 4, 1957, the world was stunned by the announcement that Russia had launched Sputnik 1, the first artificial satellite to orbit the earth. Sputnik, weighing a modest 184.3 pounds and mea- suring only 22.8 inches in diameter, gave the USSR the world lead in space and rocketry technology until the mid-sixties. A lagging United States managed to get its first satellite, Explorer 1, into orbit on January 31, 1958. Explorer, a featherweight 18.2 pounds, carried instruments designed by Dr. James Van Allen. The instruments detected for the first time the intense belts of radiation which surround the earth. They were named the Van Allen belts in the good doctor's honor. BUT IS THERE LIFE ON MARS? The precocious Russians chalked up another first on November 3, 1957, when they launched Sputnik 2, carrying a female dog named Laika. Laika was the first living thing from earth to be shot into space -except for a possible germ or two on Sputnik 1. Laika also became the first space-race victim when she died in her 1,100-pound capsule on the sixth day, due to a faulty temperature control mechanism. Sputnik 2 continued to orbit the earth for 162 days; it burned up on reentering the Earth's atmosphere. FREE AT LAST A major first in the journey to the moon came on January 2, 1959, when Russia launched Lunik 1, the first object to break away from the gravitational pull of the Earth. Lunik passed within 4,000 miles of the moon before moving on to fall into orbit around the sun- making it the first artificial planet. 208 S FARAWAY FIRSTS as high as the first model, THE MAN IN THE MOON GETS A PIE IN THE FACE n grant had grown to a nt space program invest- Humankind's first contact with the moon was less than dignified. The Soviet's Lunik 2, the first man-made earthly object to touch another heavenly body, smashed into the moon's surface on Septem- ber 13, 1959. Since the satellite's instruments were destroyed in the crash, no data were relayed back to Earth to record man's first physical contact with the moon. ned by the announcement first artificial satellite to st 184.3 pounds and mea- THE DARK SIDE OF THE MOON the USSR the world lead e mid-sixties. The first satellite to orbit the moon was Luna 3, launched by Russia its first satellite, Explorer on October 4, 1959. The satellite carried a single photographic cam- rer, a featherweight 18.2 era (with self-contained film processing equipment), which transmit- )r. James Van Allen. The ted photos back to Earth. A gyroscopic system kept the camera lens intense belts of radiation oriented continuously toward the moon. After a year of orbiting, ed the Van Allen belts in Luna had sent enough pictures back to Earth to enable Russian scientists to publish an atlas of the heretofore unseen dark side of the moon. STRELKA AND BELKA, COME HOME her first on November 3, ying a female dog named A major step in the space race was taken with Russia's Sputnik 5, earth to be shot into space launched August 19, 1960: For the first time, a live payload-in this tnik 1. Laika also became case consisting of two dogs named Strelka and Belka-was recovered her 1, 100-pound capsule after orbiting the Earth for twenty-four hours. The animals returned ture control mechanism. safely to Earth via an ejection mechanism which pulled them from 162 days; it burned up on the capsule as it reentered the atmosphere and lowered them by parachute to a soft landing on the ground. The Russians continued to pioneer dry-ground landings, while the United States concen- trated on ocean landings. ame on January 2, 1959, SPACED OUT ject to break away from assed within 4,000 miles On April 12, 1960, the Soviets launched Vostok 1, a 71/2-foot, 10,416- orbit around the sun- pound spherical capsule which contained Yuri Gagarin, a twenty- seven-year-old cosmonaut, the first human being to enter space and to orbit the earth. The capsule orbited the earth one time, in 89.34 209 DENNIS SANDERS seconds, and the total flight lasted only 108 minutes from takeoff at 9:07 A.M. in Tyura Tam, Kazakhstan, to touchdown at 10:55 A.M. near Smelkova, Saratov, USSR. Gagarin became an overnight celebrity, but his fame was over- shadowed by persistent rumors penetrating the cloud of secrecy around the Russian space program. The rumors were to the effect that Gagarin had not in fact been first man in space and that fellow cosmonaut Serge Ilyushin had made a three-orbit space flight three days earlier than Gagarin, but had been hospitalized immediately after landing. The rumors were never proven or disproven. Gagarin died seven years later in a plane crash, at age thirty-four. OUR BOYS IN SPACE In 1958 NASA, or the National Space and Aeronautics Administra- tion, selected seven men to be the United States' first space travelers. The chosen few-all married men-were picked from 508 volunteers and candidates from military and civilian test pilots. They were: M. Scott Carpenter; Leroy Gordon Cooper, Jr.; John H. Glenn, Jr.; Virgil I. "Gus" Grissom; Walter M. Schirra, Jr.; Alan B. Shepard, Jr.; and Donald K. Slayton. UNCLE SAM KEEPS UP The first American in space-a year after Gagarin-was Alan B. Shepard, Jr., who was launched from Cape Canaveral on May 5, 1961. Shepard's flight, which arched into space and back again with- out achieving orbit, reached an altitude of 114 miles and a speed of 5,181 mph. S THE QUEEN OF OUTER SPACE On June 16, 1963, the Soviets launched their Vostok 6 carrying Valentina Tereshkova, a former textile worker, in a forty-eight-orbit flight. The first woman in space later married fellow cosmonaut Andrian Nicolavev, making them the first spacemates. 210 RS FARAWAY FIRSTS 08 minutes from takeoff at THREE'S A CROWD, COMRADE touchdown at 10:55 A.M. The Russians also took honors for being the first to put more than y, but his fame was over- one man at a time into space. On October 12, 1964, they launched ting the cloud of secrecy Voskhod 1, carrying three men: Vladimir Komarov; Boris Yegorov rumors were to the effect (an Air Force doctor); and Konstantin Feoktiskov, a civilian scien- in in space and that fellow tist. The last two were the first doctor and the first civilian in space, ree-orbit space flight three respectively. Their flight was also the first with a pressurized cabin, hospitalized immediately enabling the three men to forego pressurized space suits and helmets. oven or disproven. e crash, at age thirty-four. ON RYE WITH EXTRA MUSTARD American astronaut John Young, who made the first multimanned U.S. flight with Gus Grissom starting March 23, 1965, was the first I Aeronautics Administra- man to eat a corned beef sandwich in space. Young smuggled the States' first space travelers. sandwich on board to supplement the usual fare of dehydrated foods. icked from 508 volunteers However, stray crumbs posed a threat to the capsule's complex test pilots. They were: M. machinery, and Young was reprimanded by NASA officials for his Jr.; John H. Glenn, Jr.; celestial cravings. ΓΓa, Jr.; Alan B. Shepard, SHOOTING THE MOON On January 31, 1966, Russia launched Lunik 9, weighing 3,490 pounds, which approached within fifty miles of the lunar surface and r Gagarin-was Alan B. released a spherical landing capsule. The capsule then made the first pe Canaveral on May 5, soft-landing on the moon. pace and back again with- On touchdown in the Ocean of Storms (February 9), the Lunik 9 114 miles and a speed of landing capsule opened four petal-like panels to expose a camera lens, which then took three panoramic photo views of the lunar surface and transmitted them back to Earth-man's first close look at his nearest neighbor in space. their Vostok 6 carrying RIVER OF NO RETURN ker, in a forty-eight-orbit arried fellow cosmonaut The first man to die in space was Russian cosmonaut Vladimir spacemates. Komarov. His Soyuz 2 satellite was launched from Tyura Tam, USSR, on April 23, 1967, on a scheduled twenty-five-hour, eighteen- orbit flight. Komarov died when the parachute straps lowering the 211 DENNIS SANDERS capsule to earth "became twisted and the craft descended at a great EA speed." Western scientists have questioned the story, however, be- cause Russian capsules have a device which ejects cosmonauts from Ap their capsules as they reenter the atmosphere. Komarov did not eject off possibly because of equipment failure, or because the capsule over- 19 heated on entering the atmosphere. po The first official statement after Komarov's flight was "Komarov No is in good health and feeling well." The death was not announced E. until twelve hours after the crash-landing. C The first American astronauts to die were Virgil Grissom, Roger an Chaffee, and Ed White-on January 27, 1967, when their capsule th was swept by fire during a routine on-the-ground test. The fire, fir thought to have originated from a faulty electrical cable, swept th through the sealed capsule so quickly that the astronauts couldn't activate escape mechanisms. A subsequent investigation cited "113 significant engineering orders" that had been improperly carried out N in the building of the capsule. The tragedy resulted in considerable redesign and reengineering work on the Apollo capsule. T A S( a GREEN CHEESE IT AIN'T The first firsthand look at the moon came on the Apollo 8 expedition, F launched by the United States in December, 1968, with Frank Bor- man, James Lovell, Jr., and Bill Anders on board. Among the high- lights of man's first orbit of the moon were the crew's reading of the opening verses of Genesis, "In the beginning, God created the Heav- S ens and the Earth. and Borman's description of the moon's surface: "Looks just like plaster of Paris." so NEAR YET so FAR On the Apollo 10 expedition Tom Stafford, John Young, and Eugene Cernan came within miles of immortality: It was their job to give the lunar landing module a dry run for the later moon landing. With the command module in orbit, Young and Cernan took the lunar lander to within eight miles of the lunar surface-the first close pass for the landing vehicle-and then returned to the command module for docking and flight back to Earth. 212 RS FARAWAY FIRSTS craft descended at a great EAT YOUR HEART OUT, JULES VERNE ed the story, however, be- ch ejects cosmonauts from Apollo 11, the U.S. mission destined to land on the moon, blasted ere. Komarov did not eject off from Cape Kennedy at 9:32 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, July 16, because the capsule over- 1969. The Saturn V rocket stood 363 feet tall, weighed 6,000,000 pounds, and developed a 7,600,000-pound thrust. On board were ov's flight was "Komarov Neil Armstrong, thirty-eight, commander of the expedition, Edwin death was not announced E. "Buzz" Aldrin, the lunar module pilot, and Colonel Michael ;. Collins of the U.S. Air Force. The expedition went without a hitch, ere Virgil Grissom, Roger and the lunar module with Armstrong and Aldrin touched down on 1967, when their capsule the moon at 20.17 hours 42 seconds, G.M.T., July 20, 1969. Aldrin's he-ground test. The fire, first words after touchdown-the first by man from another body in ty electrical cable, swept the solar system-were, "Tranquility Base: the Eagle has landed." it the astronauts couldn't t investigation cited "113 en improperly carried out NO PIE IN THE SKY y resulted in considerable tpollo capsule. The first meal eaten on the moon-consumed by Armstrong and Aldrin before their historic moonwalk-consisted of four bacon squares, three sugar cookies, peaches, pineapple-grapefruit drink, and coffee. n the Apollo 8 expedition, r, 1968, with Frank Bor- PUT YOUR LITTLE FOOT board. Among the high- the crew's reading of the At 2:56 hours, 15 seconds, G.M.T., July 21, 1969, Neil Armstrong g, God created the Heav- became the first human to set foot on another world when he de- lescription of the moon's scended from the lunar landing module. His words were "I'm at the foot of the ladder. The LM [lunar module] footpads are only de- pressed in the surface about two inches, though the surface appears to be very, very fine grained as you get close to it, like powder. Okay. I'm going to step off the LM now. (Pause) That's one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind. The surface is fine and powdery. I can kick it loosely with my toe." John Young, and Eugene t was their job to give the moon landing. With the DO YOU MIND IF I TAKE THIS CALL? ian took the lunar lander he first close pass for the President Richard M. Nixon placed the first phone call to the moon, e command module for on July 21, when he spoke to Armstrong and Aldrin in their lunar module parked on the moon's surface. Said Nixon, "Neil and Buzz, 213 DENNIS SANDERS Do you mind if I tape this call? President Richard M. Nixon places the first phone call to the moon, July 21, 1969, when he spoke to Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, 240,000 miles away. THE BETTMANN ARCHIVE, INC. I'm talking to you from the Oval Room of the White House, and this certainly has to be the most historic telephone call ever made." Like most of Nixon's phone calls, this one was both tape recorded and widely disseminated among the public. However, it was one taped call he wasn't later to regret. Nixon summed up his feelings about the moon landing by saying, "This is the greatest work in the history of the world since its creation." 214 FROM ATOM TO ADAM: The First 15 Billion Years of the Universe THE COSMIC EGG: THE FIRST THING EVER More than 15.5 billion years ago the universe as we know it did not exist. All matter, or so most astronomers believe, was compressed together into a superdense core at the center of an empty universe. This core is known as the Cosmic Egg. Science has yet to propose a Cosmic Chicken. THE FIRST EVENT, EVER And it was a big one. The Cosmic Egg exploded, hurling the com- pressed matter out into the emptiness of space. This "Big Bang" signaled the start of the universe as we know it, about 15.5 billion years ago. A STAR IS BORN lirigible to fly around the About 12 billion years ago matter from the Big Bang began to Building, the world's first condense into clusters of hundreds of billions of stars-the first 1,000 feet in height. The ible docking, but the idea galaxies. A galaxy is usually a flat spiral with dense concentrations cking above the canyons of stars near the center of the spiral, thinning out along the arms. The he period, showing New whole thing rotates as it hurtles through space, and astronomers IE BETTMANN ARCHIVE, INC. estimate there are hundreds of billions of them out there. 345 DENNIS SANDERS Our own galaxy, the Milky Way, is 100,000 light-years across, 30,000 light-years thick at the center, and is moving at 170 miles per second. TERRA FIRMA About 10 billion years ago our sun had a star companion (or, some theories go, a nebula companion), which was finally pulled apart 5½ or 6 billion years back by the tidal forces between the two objects. The remnants of this destroyed companion began collecting into the first planets about 5 billion years ago. HOT ROCKS When the earth was first formed it was about one thousand times larger and five hundred times heavier than the planet we know. The earth spent the first half billion years or so of its existence cooling down and settling in. The heavier elements (iron, nickel, cobalt) settled to the earth's core, while the lighter elements (hydrogen and helium) moved up into the atmosphere, with large amounts escaping the planet's gravity altogether. By 4.5 billion years ago the molten planet had cooled down enough for the first basaltic rocks to form, making a crust on the planet. WATER, WATER, EVERYWHERE The molten, volcanic conditions in the primordial earth created huge amounts of water vapor which, along with poisonous methane and ammonia, made up the atmosphere. When the crust cooled suffi- ciently about 4 billion years ago, the water vapor began condensing, forming the first oceans, which cover 71.43 percent of the surface. OUT OF THE PRIMORDIAL OOZE In 1979 a rock from Australia was found to have wavelike layers that are believed to be the fossils of threadlike bacteria that were alive 3.5 billion years ago in the ocean of the Precambrian era. The bacteria 346 FIRST THINGS LAST ,000 light-years across, represent a fairly complex state of evolution, and indicate that the noving at 170 miles per formation of organic molecules by the interaction of the oceans and atmosphere, which evolved into the first life, began soon after oceans were formed. THE FIRST LAND ANIMAL r companion (or, some finally pulled apart 5½ The scorpion (like spiders, an arachnid, and part of the phylum tween the two objects. Arthropoda, which includes true insects and crustaceans) evolved egan collecting into the during the Silurian period, 405-425 million years ago; it was possibly the first animal to live on land and to take oxygen directly from the atmosphere. Amphibians had yet to evolve. WHEN DINOSAURS RULED THE EARTH it one thousand times = planet we know. The During the Jurassic period, 150 million years ago, small animals f its existence cooling evolved that gave birth to live young and nourished them with (iron, nickel, cobalt) secretions from the female's skin. Reptiles, especially dinosaurs, ements (hydrogen and dominated the animal world at the time, and these first mammals arge amounts escaping remained relatively inconspicuous for millions of years. years ago the molten asaltic rocks to form, VERY HANDY Fifty to sixty million years ago, the first primates-small lemurs and tarsiers-evolved. The arboreal, nocturnal mammals developed bin- ocular stereoscopic vision and five-fingered hands to cope with their ial earth created huge environment. Their great-great grandchild, Homo sapiens, would isonous methane and eventually rule the earth. ie crust cooled suffi- or began condensing, ercent of the surface. PLANET OF THE APES Thirty million years ago the first apes began to evolve from their primate ancestor, the monkey. The apes, who would eventually evolve into the modern gibbon, orangutan, chimpanzee, gorilla, and : wavelike layers that man, developed brachiation-locomotion by overarm swinging, a ia that were alive 3.5 high ratio of brain volume to spinal cord volume, and complex social an era. The bacteria and child-rearing behavior. 347 VOLUME 16 Jefferson to Latin THE ENCYCLOPEDIA AMERICANA INTERNATIONAL EDITION COMPLETE IN THIRTY VOLUMES FIRST PUBLISHED IN 1829 GROLIER INCORPORATED International Headquarters: Danbury, Connecticut 06816 since its destruction by an earthquake in 1933. Its port is at Mandrakion. Ancient Kos is mentioned in the Iliad as an ally of the Greeks. It was settled by Dorian Greeks from the northern Peloponnesus and be- came the birthplace of Ptolemy II (Ptolemy Phil- adelphus), the poet Theocritus, the painter Apel- les, and the physician Hippocrates, who founded a school of medicine there. It was occupied by Alexander the Great in 336 B.C. and in the ensu- ing centuries was controlled by Persians, Greeks, Egyptians, and Romans. It was captured by the Ottoman Turks in 1523, occupied by Italy in 1912, and was ceded to Italy by the Treaty of Lausanne in 1924 and then to Greece by the treaty of peace with Italy in 1947. Population: (1971) of the island, 17,939; of the city, 7,828. KOSCIUSKO, Mount, kos-ē-us'kō, a mountain in southeastern New South Wales, Australia. It is located in the Snowy Mountains of the Australian Alps and, with an altitude of 7,305 feet (2,228 meters), is Australia's highest peak. It is snow- covered from May to September and bears evi- dence of Ice Age glaciation. The Snowy, Mur- ray, and other rivers that form important units in the Snowy Mountains Hydro-Electric Scheme are fed by its snows. BBC HULTON PICTURE The mountain was named by Sir Paul Strzel- General Kościuszko figured prominently in both the ecki in 1840 after the Polish patriot Tadeusz ican and the Polish struggles for independence. Kościuszko. It rises in Kosciusko National Park, a preserve of about 2,070 square miles (5,370 sq km), and is a major ski resort during the at Raclawice, leading an army that include winter. peasants wielding pikes and scythes. But in tober the Polish army was beaten at Macie KOŚCIUSZKO, kôsh-choosh'ko, Tadeusz Andrzej wice, where Kościuszko was wounded and takes Bonawentura (1746-1817), Polish statesman and prisoner. The insurrection collapsed and the soldier, who fought in the American Revolution nal partition of Poland took place. Kościuszko and led an uprising for national independence in was imprisoned in Russia until 1796. his homeland. In 1797 he traveled to the United States and Tadeusz (often written Thaddeus in English) established a lasting friendship with Thomas Jet Kościuszko was born in the Polish village of Mer- ferson. He hastened back to Europe in 1798 eczowszczyno on Feb. 4, 1746, to a family of where the ferment caused by the rise of Napo- noble origin. He began his military education at leon encouraged him to believe he could the Warsaw Corps of Cadets and then continued vance Poland's cause. He discovered, however it in Germany, France, and Italy, specializing in that a restored democratic Poland did not suit the fortification. He returned to Poland in 1774. goals of any European power. His proposal to In 1776 he fled to France to escape the con- Czar Alexander I in 1814 to establish a large Pol. sequences of a love affair. He went on to Amer- ish state with a liberal social order was also ica and joined the colonists in their war for inde- ignored. After this rebuff Kościuszko retired to pendence from Britain. From 1778 to 1780 he Solothurn, Switzerland, where he died on Oct. supervised the fortification of West Point, and he 15, 1817. He was buried in Kraków's cathedral later served under Gen. Nathanael Greene as an alongside the Polish kings. engineer and a cavalry officer. He ended the Kościuszko's life spanned the entire era of war as a brigadier general. Kościuszko's in- 18th century democratic revolutions, of which he volvement in America's struggle for indepen- remains an outstanding figure. It is an irony of dence influenced his later life. history that his ideas were ahead of their time in He returned to Polish service in 1784 and in his own homeland. 1792 led Polish troops against Russian forces that PETER CZAP, JR., Amherst College had invaded Poland to suppress the reformist Further Reading: Gardner, Monica M., Koscius:ko constitution of May 3, 1791. When the Russians (1920; rev. ed., Norton 1942); Haiman. Mieceslaus. Kor ciuszko in the American Revolution (1943: reprint, Koo completed their occupation of Poland and forced ciuszko Foundation 1975); id., Kosciuszko. Leader and Exile Poland's King Stanislav II to renounce the con- (1946; reprint, Kosciuszko Foundation 1977). stitution, Kościuszko went into exile. An under- ground resistance movement was formed in Po- KOSHER, kõ'sher, in Judaism, a term that desig. land in 1793 and Kościuszko was asked to lead it. nates whether foods individually or in combina- Before a tumultuous gathering in Kraków in tion, or their mode of preparation or processing. 1794, he vowed to restore Poland's indepen- are in accordance with biblical and rabbinical dence. In his role as political and military head rules. The term kosher (the Ashkenazic form of of the Polish insurrection, he exercised virtually Kasher) means "clean" or "proper," and the sys. dictatorial power. To promote greater equality tem of dietary laws is known as kashrut. Ortho- throughout Polish society he issued the Polaniec dox and Conservative Jews are obliged by tradi- Proclamation on May 7. 1794, which declared the tion to "keep kosher,' whereas Reform Jews are serfs free. In April 1794 he routed the Russians not. See DIETARY LAWS. 568 News & Comment USED IN AAAS Remarks Can Science Education Be Saved? Feb 15,1990 Three ambitious but very different projects are testing a variety of ways to overhaul an education system that has been getting failing grades WISCONSIN 9TH GRADER E. Culotta need to know; second, illus- Joel Marino has already de- trate how they can learn it; cided at age 14 that science is third, spread the revolution bad news, but he's pretty around. In stage one, teams content with the project his of prominent scientists delin- earth science teacher gave eated what every high school him last September: building graduate should know about a working, three-dimensional science in a 100-page expo- model of a mid-ocean ridge. sition published in 1989 titled To Joel, "This project is more "Science for All Americans." recreational. It's not from the The book emphasizes con- book, you don't have to cepts over data and consider- memorize stuff, and you can ably lightens the burden of work together. Also, it's not facts students must know. due tomorrow. It's not like Oxidation and isotopes are real science." in; the periodic table is out. Joel's dreary image of "real Not every reviewer loved science"-sitting alone Hands on. Third graders in McFarland, Wisconsin, learn about dilution memorizing books-will through direct experimentation with eyedropper and colored water. the book. "Still No Beef," complained an editorial in come as no surprise to anyone who has and the third, a project of the National The Washington Post, saying Project 2061's heard the litany of reports on the dismal state Council of Teachers of Mathematics, is try- "lofty theorists" had put off the work of of U.S. science and math education. But the ing to overhaul the content and style of developing a curriculum. Of scientists' reac- scope and ambition of current efforts to math courses. Will these programs-or any tions to their colleagues' work, Project 2061 attack the problem may be surprising. After others around the country-succeed? No director F. James Rutherford sighs, "They 7 years of gloomy warnings about the prob- one can answer that question today. But always want more of their own discipline in lem, legions of teachers and scientists are these efforts to use classrooms as laborato- there." together launching a reform movement the ries for education experiments-to permit But many educators and scientists have likes of which hasn't been seen since Sput- hands-on, creative, even noisy environments endorsed both the book and the entire nik. And scientists are playing an increas- for "real science"-will receive their own project as a vision of what education could ingly important role in the revolution. grades in the coming years, as local districts become. "For the first time we have a total As individuals, scientists across the nation decide whether to jump on the reform band- representation of what should constitute are trying to advise and cajole their local wagon or cling to the status quo. science education," says Luther Williams, school boards and the teachers of their chil- To Joel, the folks who came up with his head of education and human resources at dren to teach science in a more compelling plate boundary project deserve-well, at the National Science Foundation. NSF has manner. Some scientists have even taken on least a B. While the specific project isn't part provided more than praise; it chipped in entire school systems-Nobel prize-winning of a reform program, Joel's teacher, Joe over $2 million for the project's $8.5-mil- physicist Leon Lederman is leading an effort Cabibbo, is a member of a revolutionary lion second phase. IBM, the Department of to reform science curricula and teaching cadre of teachers and scientists involved in Education, AAAS itself, two private founda- throughout the city of Chicago (Science, 31 what is arguably the most ambitious of all tions, and state and local governments made August, p. 979). But if there is to be reform the efforts: the AAAS's Project 2061. substantial contributions. on a national scale it will likely require more Named for the year Comet Halley returns to The Post's criticisms are being answered- than the heroic efforts of individuals. Earth, Project 2061's long-term goal is slowly-by this crucial second phase, now During the past few months, Science has nothing less than the complete transforma- under way at six sites around the country: looked at three national reform programs, tion of science, math, and social studies Philadelphia; McFarland, Wisconsin; rural each dedicated to heeding Joel's message, teaching from kindergarten through 12th Georgia; San Antonio; San Francisco; and but each pursuing a rather different route to grade. No part of the present system is San Diego. This time, it's the teachers who the grail of getting kids intellectually in- considered sacred. Subjects, textbooks, are in charge. Their mission: to design a new volved in science. One is a long-range effort grades-all are under scrutiny, and if this type of curriculum that carefully builds an sponsored by the American Association for project somehow winds up flunking as a accurate picture of the way the world works. the Advancement of Science (AAAS is also revolutionary movement, it will at least have With support from scientists, they're trans- the publisher of Science); the second, run by earned an A for effort. lating the concepts in "Science for All the National Science Teachers' Association, Project 2061 is developing its vision in Americans" backward into simple ideas chil- is concentrating on more immediate goals; three stages: First, decide what students dren can understand, reorganizing the 7 DECEMBER 1990 NEWS & COMMENT 1327 book's knowledge into a framework for Here is a picture of a roller-coaster track: Graphic example. A sample imation Sketch a graph to show the speed of the roller coaster "led in "Floating curricula. For example, a high school lem from the new math standard versus its position on the track. understanding of organ systems might (Source: "Reshaping School Math- and expected to including biology and biology as learn they ity. Instead The of heart testing of go begin with the simple statement: ematics: A New Philosophy and "Things go on inside my body that I Framework for Curriculum," Na- can't see." That seems obvious, but tional Academy Press, 1990.) B kids need to thoroughly comprehend it C before they attempt to understand body system. As Rutherford puts it, "We G processes, 2061 teachers say. can't overwhelm that system; we've E This type of work, more conceptual got to out think it." than concrete, draws critics such as the But schools can't wait years to director of a smaller science education improve. While members of Project program, who extended the Post's 2061 dream of the possibilities, complaint to stage two and told Science that But even if 2061 were to get the seal of other science teachers, through the Na- 2061 was too idealistic and slow. But the approval from the scientific and education tional Science Teachers Association (NSTA), project was never intended to make change communities in 1993, the project's Achilles' have spearheaded another massive project quickly, responds Rutherford. This is to be heel may be the decades required by stage called Scope, Sequence, and Coordination a thorough and therefore slow revolution. If three. AAAS knows the risk, and took it, (SSC). NSF coughed up an even larger the models are any good, AAAS expects the because it felt that every quick fix previously amount for this teacher-based program- rest of the nation to join the revolution, tried in the U.S. educational system had $8.6 million-and the Department of Educa- district by district, throughout the decade eventually fallen before the multi-headed tion awarded an additional $2.5 million and later. But Rutherford himself concedes monster that has parceled out authority (Science, 31 August, p. 978). Focusing on that 1993 will be the watershed year for the across 50 states and 80,000 schools. Reform- grades 7 through 12, the project is already in project. That's when the curriculum models ers might change any one piece of the sys- classrooms in three sites-California, Iowa, will be unveiled and a few vanguard districts tem-say, by training teachers differently- and Houston-and planning is under way in are expected to start putting the 2061 phi- but the other pieces, such as textbooks, stan- two more, Puerto Rico and North Carolina. losophy into practice. And that's when crit- dardized tests and school boards, will drag It works something like this: Seventh ics will finally have something tangible to teachers back to the status quo. So, for good graders in Houston don't study the life and endorse or reject. or ill, AAAS opted to try to change the entire physical sciences separately, but instead learn The Reform Agenda: Emerging Consensus It may be a time of experimentation for science education, but Do it yourself. At the end of the school day in inner-city many trials are testing the same hypotheses. Some common Philadelphia; teachers gather to learn how to separate salt from themes are emerging from the patchwork of programs: pepper using static electricity. They're being trained to use an Less is more. It's time for kids to stop memorizing the elementary science kit, doing all the experiments their students difference between a type I and type II lever and the names of will do. A staple of the 1960s reforms, hands-on activities are all the molecules involved in photosynthesis. One study esti- back and better, with a new emphasis on quality-"minds-on" as mated that students encounter more new words in a high school well as hands-on. Teachers are to be trained more carefully and biology book than in 2 years of instruction in a foreign language. given the logistic support they need. 'We still live with the Victorian view of school, with minds Two-way traffic. Kids haven't understood much of what trained like dogs to memorize things," says Timothy Gold- we've been telling them, in part because we haven't listened to smith, chair of the committee that wrote a recent report on the ideas they already have. For example, research shows that biology education for the National Research Council. New many youngsters don't understand the concept of temperature. programs have kids doing more projects and less memorizing. They think putting on a sweater keeps you warm because Teacher power. Post-Sputnik reforms sometimes took the sweaters always exist at a higher temperature. Listening to kids tone of academic highbrows telling teachers what to do, and can give teachers clues on how to change such ideas. teachers have taken much of the blame for education's ills. But Science for everyone. It's vital to widen the science career the new goal is to boost teachers, not bash them, giving them pipeline, especially to include more women and minorities. time to learn science themselves, rather than berating them for Reformers now also recognize a second goal: producing scientifi- their backgrounds. cally literate citizens. Even students who will never become Science without walls. Sixth graders in rural Elbert County scientists need to understand more about how the world works. Georgia don't take science, math, social studies, or reading. New programs are aimed at all students, not just the gifted. Instead, they take one big course-200 minutes run by four Matchmaker, matchmaker. Scientists and teachers come teachers-that incorporates all four subjects. A trial balloon from very different worlds. Elementary teachers often opted out floated by members of Project 2061, the course illustrates the of science as soon as they could, but they know their business- push for integrating subjects. Real life problems rarely come kids. Meanwhile many scientists would like to help with science labeled. as "chemistry" or "math," educators say. How far education, but don't know how to do it. "We're like a long-term should such course integration go? Each program seems to have marriage broker," says F. James Rutherford of Project 2061. a different answer. Meanwhile, Georgia teachers are still seeking "Our job is finding useful work and structures where both sides a good moniker for their mega-course. can interact." E.C. 42 1328 SCIENCE, VOL. 250 ng -sophy Na- School Math. and rath sample imation in thematic blocks. In one, experiment. A second concern is that SSC zations, after a period of initial jostling over fled "Floating and Sinking," students are teachers are being asked to do too much. their respective roles the two programs have expected to learn some physics, chemistry, NSF's Williams, though clearly an overall endorsed each other, with Project 2061 and biology as they try density experiments, booster of SSC, nevertheless warns, "In my staking out the long-term vision and SSC including testing gold jewelry for authentic- view, the greatest potential liability of the moving ahead now. But no matter how ity. The heart of SSC is spaced learning: program is the preparation of the teachers." cordial science educators seem, they've a Instead of getting 1 year each of biology, Indeed, several Houston life science teach- long way to go before reaching the solidarity physics and chemistry, youngsters study each ers hadn't had chemistry since high school of the math community, which is sponsor- discipline each year so they remember what and never took physics, but are now required ing a third great challenge to the educational they've learned, according to Bill Aldridge, to teach both. NSTA officials say they've status quo in the United States. executive director of NSTA. Each site is to built in teacher supports, such as summer While science educators experiment with produce and test course materials for NSTA workshops and detailed training sessions. course integration and current events, and to distribute; Houston's "Floating and Aldridge himself gave a workshop on argue about what to toss out of the curricu- Sinking" has already been sent to other sites. "Floating and Sinking" to the Houston lum, they watch with envy as the math Also, students are to learn concrete ideas teachers. "Most of them hadn't had any community calmly describes what to teach first, then move to abstractions. "The 7th physics, and they didn't have any trouble and how to teach it. Mathematicians have grade textbooks define temperature as the with it," he says. already wrestled with the tough curricular average kinetic energy of molecules. That's Ironically, while Project 2061 is criticized questions and are moving swiftly toward not even true at very low temperatures and for being too slow, SSC gets accused of implementing reform. Last year, math cur- means absolutely nothing to a 7th grader," moving too fast to make real change. Several riculum standards for all grade levels were says Aldridge. "In 7th grade you should be education experts, including one involved issued in the form of a 250-page book that learning about temperature as it's connected was almost universally endorsed. The sequel to experience-the difference between heat E. Culotta comes next spring, when another book on and temperature, thermal equilibrium. But professional standards will explain how the materials start with atoms and electrons. teachers can reach the curriculum goals. That's stupid," he says indignantly. Part of the smooth progress in math seems NSTA coordinates the program and ev- to come from the cozy relations between eryone involved is committed to spaced mathematicians and math teachers. The learning, concrete ideas, and fewer facts, but National Council of Teachers of Mathemat- each site has quite a bit of independence. In ics (NCTM) developed the standards, but Davenport, Iowa, for example, 6th graders works closely with representatives from the gather around a specially designed gold and math community on the Mathematical Sci- white commode for their science project, ences Education Board (MSEB), an arm of "The Royal Flush." Their task: to investi- the National Research Council. "The de- gate ecology and consumer choice by test- gree to which people agree is amazing," says ing how well various types of toilet paper Iris Carl, who happens to be both president disintegrate. That project is a Science/ of the teachers' group and vice-chair of the Technology/Society (STS) project run by education board. the Chautauqua program of the University Mathematicians have an easier time of Iowa Science Education Center. Recently reaching consensus because their field the center hooked up with SSC and was doesn't encompass sub-disciplines as diverse funded this fall to develop 6th grade mate- rials. "Traditionally kids were told, 'Learn Human development. Philadelphia high as those in science, Carl says. Also, almost school student giving presentation in class everyone, including parents, believes kids this and you'll find it useful.' But it wasn't taught by a Project 2061 team member. should learn math starting on the first day of useful. Now we turn that around," says school. Of course, most parents think math program director Robert Yager. with SSC itself, told Science they worried = multiplication tables, and popular opin- Yet another example involves trade-ori- that at some sites the project could become ions can be a burden as well as a blessing, ented high school juniors in Iowa-a class a cosmetic reshuffling of the old curriculum. says MSEB executive director Kenneth one teacher referred to as the future cosme- Aldridge counters that on his advice the Hoffman. "Math came to replace Latin in tologists of America-who focused on the NSF funds are conditional on an annual the minds of some people. It's one of those ozone hole as a way to learn about science. show of progress. If a center doesn't seem to things you do because it's good for you, to To their teacher's amazement, the students be doing the job, NSF can simply yank it off teach you neatness, discipline, and order." were soon clamoring for information: the project-and perhaps substitute a will- Lovers of discipline are in for a bit of a "What's an atom? What's a molecule? What ing newcomer from a growing pool of states surprise. The draft version of the profes- does pH mean?" The class became the com- eager to join the program. Also, NSTA sional standards describes a different style of munity ozone experts, and college-bound officials say they expect change to snowball, classroom. Youngsters work and talk in students began to complain that their course as other parts of the system accommodate groups, explaining problems to each other. was too dull, Yager says. the project. In conjunction with SSC, Cali- Calculators and computers are everywhere If all this sounds scientifically sensible, it fornia has already begun to use new hands- and thinking skills and reasoning are empha- isn't without its critics. For one thing, the on tests so unusual that some 6th graders sized. Kids are to spend less time laboriously strong STS focus on current events draws asked to take them again, says Tom Sachse, plotting points and more time understand- fire from Aldridge himself, who believes in coordinator of the California site. ing graphs-after a computer does the principles first, applications second. But he's While SSC and 2061 compete for funds plotting. It sounds great, but what if the 12- willing to support Yager in developing the and are sponsored by very different organi- year-olds resist engaging in "mathematical 7 DECEMBER 1990 NEWS & COMMENT 1329 discourse" and chatter about rap music in- tional Academy of Sciences, for example, is Snyder and other educators would prefer stead? Be patient, counsel the math wizards. expected to decide upon a much-expanded to focus instead on the momentum for "I tell people over and over: Don't expect role for itself in science education in late change. The president and National Gover- it to happen overnight," says Shirley Hill, December. A few educators who work for nors' Association, they boast, have announced former chair of MSEB and professor of math existing programs fear the academy will re- the goal of having U.S. students first in math and education at the University of Missouri. peat or compete with their efforts, although and science by 2000. Privately, though, al- "Kids are conditioned otherwise and they're executive officer Philip Smith insists the most no one thinks that can be done. At not going to expect math to be fun or institution won't invade any turf. Academy least, those involved plaintively conclude, relevant all of a sudden. It's a process." The officials are still plotting their strategy and the goal is on the national agenda. The best math teachers already run classrooms Smith defers any detailed revelations until unspoken question: How long will our eas- like those in the standards, says Carl. later this month. But he says they're consid- ily distracted society keep it there? Back in For reform to spread, educators say it's ering a two-pronged approach, to provide Wisconsin, Joel Marino had the persever- important that all these projects-and many immediate relief as well as long-term vision. ance to complete his model of a mid-ocean smaller ones not mentioned here-work And he hints that the academy may tackle ridge with chicken wire, blue plastic, kitty together, or at least pull in the same direc- undergraduate instruction, an arena where litter, and a mysterious red substance that tion. "No one will succeed in isolation," says other educators say they'd especially wel- quickly developed fruit flies. If the educa- Williams. But while there's much agreement come the academy's clout. tion experts succeed equally well with their on what teachers should strive for, each For the moment, all sides tend to own models, then Joel-or at least his program has a slightly different vision of the downplay whatever differences may exist. younger siblings-may one day admit that future. It's not exactly clear, for example, "It doesn't hurt at all to have different science and recreation can sometimes be the how the new math standards fit with "Sci- experiments going on simultaneously," says same thing. ELIZABETH CULOTTA ence for All Americans," which includes Susan Snyder of NSF's division of teacher math, but less of it. preparation and enhancement. "We'll prob- Elizabeth Culotta is a science writer for And new programs are coming. The Na- ably never have one single answer." the Milwaukee Journal. Computer Security: NAS Sounds the Alarm Electronic vandals, viruses, and other malignancies of the com- However, McIlroy points out that between 1983 and 1990, puter world are likely to grow more virulent soon, according to the NSA ran an advisory body "outside the perimeter" of secrecy a new report from the National Research Council. Indeed, a called the National Computer Security Center. It set public panel of computer security experts chaired by David Clark of the standards and served as a clearinghouse for research. This was a Massachusetts Institute of Technology warns that unless pre- valuable service for the handful of companies-like his own ventive action is taken, the economy could suffer. In a study titled AT&T-that wanted to develop better defenses. But this year, "Computers at Risk," the panel calls for the establishment of the NCSC went back "behind the wire" of secrecy, McIlroy says, an Information Security Foundation, a private nonprofit body and it's not clear that any other office will step in to serve the that would set standards, promote research, and review the public. The National Institute of Standards and Technology "trustworthiness" of computer software and hardware. It would (NIST) might fit the bill, but the report comments that NIST require federal support to get started, says one panel member, and "has limited technical expertise and funds" to do the work. after that, it could support itself with membership dues. Congress gave it only $2.5 million for computer security pro- "To date, we have been remarkably lucky," the report begins. grams in 1990; when NIST attempted to double this budget for Money has been stolen by computer-perhaps millions of 1991, the increase was axed by Congress. dollars from credit card companies alone-and "lives have been Meanwhile, companies are reluctant to advertise security lost because of computer software errors." But no intruder has problems. Their customers often aren't convinced that they're been able to "subvert" a critical system. Yet the report warns real. Unless they have been stung themselves, says McIlroy, they that "there is reason to believe that our luck will soon run out." may not want to bear the costs of improving systems. Many The reason: Little is being done outside the government to computer users try to get around the problem in a superficial reduce the vulnerability of computer networks, even though the way, using security gimmicks of one kind or another. As a result, nation's reliance on them is growing. For example, no concerted hundreds of products are offered for sale, but there's no objective effort has been made to plug the many faults of personal com- means of judging their quality. The Clark report recommends puters, which are difficult to make secure because of the way they several actions, in addition to creating a new foundation: were designed. As network linkages grow, more PCs will be Establish guidelines for "trustworthy systems" that reflect the connected, and the weak points in systems will increase. "There's consensus of security experts. no doubt that things get considerably more dangerous when you Take a series of immediate short-term actions such as creating get unprofessionally administered machines on networks," says emergency response teams and asking vendors to ship products panel member M. Douglas McIlroy of AT&T Bell Laboratories. with security systems automatically turned "on." Most computer and software manufacturers have failed to Create a system to monitor security breaks and to collect data take the risks of attack seriously, responding to problems as they on them for research. occur in an "episodic and fragmented" fashion, says the report. Clarify a confusing jumble of export controls and consider And within government, computer security work is concentrated relaxing limits on the use of the U.S. Data Encryption Standard. in the National Security Agency, which has been constrained by Develop and fund a comprehensive program of research on its secrecy and its national defense mission. computer security issues. ELIOT MARSHALL 1330 SCIENCE, VOL. 250 EDWARD F. DENISON **** Trends in American Economic Growth, 1929-1982 per Steve Olson, OSTP, x (Feb. 5860 13,91; : 3pm) 1/2 of ec. growth per employed person -OR- LN 1/3 of ec. growth THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION Washington, D.C. Saving and Investment Rates 18 Domestic Investment Rate in Constant Dollars 21 Land 21 Capital and Land per Person Employed 21 Total Factor Input and Output per Unit of Input 22 Contents Components of Output per Unit of Input 22 Reallocation of Labor from Farming 23 Nonfarm Proprietors and Unpaid Family Workers 23 Costs of Pollution Abatement 24 Costs of Protecting Worker Safety and Health 24 Costs of Dishonesty and Crime 25 Effect of Weather on Farm Output 25 Work Stoppages Due to Labor Disputes 25 Length and Composition of the Year 25 Preface XV Fluctuations in Intensity of Demand 26 Occupancy Ratio for Dwellings 26 Selected Findings XV The Semiresidual 27 Economies of Scale Associated with Growth of The Tables and Their Derivation xvii the National Market 27 Selected Definitions xviii Advances in Knowledge and Miscellaneous Determinants 28 Concept of Potential Output XX Sources of Long-Term Growth 30 Definition of Potential Output xxi Weighted Unemployment Standard Not Used xxii 3. The Slowdown in Growth 33 Present Meaning of Potential Output xxiii Determinants Responsible for the Declines in Growth Rates 33 Potential Output. Total and per Person 1. The Record of Output Employed: Declines, 1948-73 10 and Productivity 1 1973-82 33 Potential Output per Person Employed: Identification of Time Periods 1 Declines. 1964-73 10 1973-79 and 1973-79 10 1979-82 35 A Comparison of the 1948-73 Period with Potential and Actual Output per Person 1973-79 and 1979-82 3 Employed in Nonresidential Business: Growth of Potential Output in the Whole Declines, 1948-73 to 1973-82 36 Economy 3 Potential Output per Person Employed in Growth of Actual Output in the Whole Nonresidential Business: Declines, 1964-73 Economy 3 to 1973-79 and 1973-79 to 1979-82 37 Growth in Nonresidential Business 6 Actual Output per Person Employed in The Loss of Production 7 Nonresidential Business: Declines, 1964-73 to 1973-79 and 1973-79 to 1979-82 38 Three Generalizations 38 2. Determinants of Output Changes The Decline in Growth of since 1929 9 Residual Productivity 39 Components of the Series 40 Labor Input 9 Technological Knowledge 40 Employment 11 Managerial Knowledge and Managerial Average Hours of Work 12 Performance 44 The Age-Sex Distribution of Hours Worked 12 Work Effort 47 The Effect on Output of Changes in Average Misallocation of Resources 47 Hours 13 Energy Prices and Use 52 Education 15 Background Conditions and Additional Unallocated Labor Input 16 Causes of Slowdown 56 Capital and Land 16 America's Response to the Slowdown 57 Capital in Nonresidential Business 17 Preliminary Observations 57 The Services of Dwellings 17 Government Response 58 International Assets 18 Business Reaction 61 xi 28 TWO Determinants of Output Changes since 1929 Advances in Knowledge and Miscellaneous To obtain such estimates, the dollar value of the In the pa Determinants contribution of R&D to yearly growth is calculated this index fr. by multiplying the annual cost of R&D expenditures an acceptab Advancing knowledge of ways to produce at low of types that, if successful. will raise measured output made to gro cost is the biggest and most basic reason for the persistent long-term growth of output per unit of per unit of input by a social rate of return on such edge into to input. The term "advances in knowledge" covers R&D expenditures (estimated to be extremely high) effects of so that is based on sample studies (mainly, the admirable series is far both technological knowledge and managerial and work of Edwin Mansfield and his collaborators). per hour WG organizational knowledge. It includes knowledge Sometimes a deduction is made for estimated obso- been identifi: originating in this country and abroad, and knowl- edge obtained in any way: by organized research, by lescence on knowledge acquired from previous R&D.5 However. m individual research workers, and by simple obser- Unfortunately. there is no way to estimate directly improvement vation and experience. the contribution of advances in knowledge derived the followin The term must, however, be limited in a study of from any other source. or all other sources. to the First. an growth rate of output per unit of input in nonresiden- the stable gr the sources of growth of any output series to those tial business. tribution of advances in knowledge that allow the same amount The combined contribution of changes in all de- pected to she of measured output to be obtained with less input. This limitation automatically excludes knowledge terminants of output that were not directly measured and most di: applied outside the business sector. It also excludes on an annual basis, including advances in knowledge rose every y: new knowledge that leads to "unmeasured" quality and a group of miscellaneous determinants. is ob- rate. In the i change in the final products of the business sector. tained by removing from the growth rate of output growth rate: The introduction of new and improved products for the effects of changes in all determinants that were 1.46 percent so measured. Table 5-1, column 12, shows an index increases We final sale from the business sector to consumers and constructed in this way. From 1948 to 1973 it grew expected fro: government provides the buyer with a greater range of choice or enables him to meet his needs better at an annual rate of 1.38 percent (table 5-3). the series pl measure as with the same use of resources, but it does not in general contribute to growth as measured; rather, it other output improvements in the quality of goods and services." See John W. A second results in unmeasured quality change. Hence ad- Kendrick, The Formation and Stocks of Total Capital (New York: estimates fo vances in knowledge that permit business to supply National Bureau of Economic Research. 1976). pp. 9-10. To households and government with final products that obtain the contribution of R&D to growth of measured output. appeared re: either R&D that does not contribute to measured productivity are different from those previously available are edge. 54 In ori must be excluded or, if such R&D is counted. the rate of return excluded. must be lowered by including it with a zero rate of return. rates of out Organized R&D conducted in the United States 53. The estimates assume. I believe correctly. that but little the United S knowledge that raises measured output results from the spinoff tries and mo of the type covered by the National Science Foun- of findings of military research to commercial applications. Richard dation series for R&D expenditures contributed an R. Nelson finds that whatever spinoff may once have occurred. conformed : it dwindled away decades ago as military hardware became more estimated 0.2 percentage points, or, at most, 0.3 nology was r specialized and distinct from its civilian counterparts (as in the points to the growth rate of measured output in case of the airplane) or became concentrated in areas without prevailing in civilian counterparts. See Richard R. Nelson. "Policies in Support of the index nonresidential business during the postwar period." of High Technology Industries," Working Paper 1011 (Institution United Stat for Social and Policy Studies. Yale University, July 1984). David 51. Besides the tables indicated in footnote 34, data relating beliefs abou M. Levy and Nestor E. Terleckyj infer from correlation analysis to this determinant appear in table 4-4. that federally financed R&D has an effect on commercial output Finally. 52. For a discussion of these estimates see Slower Growth, but that it does so by stimulating government contractors to estimates fc pp. 123-26; Zvi Griliches, "R&D and the Productivity Slowdown," increase their private expenditures on R&D in order to adapt their and Edward F. Denison, "Comment," both in American Economic findings to commercial products. See David M. Levy and Nestor may affect Review, vol. 70 (May 1980, Papers and Proceedings, 1979). pp. E. Terleckyj, "Effects of Government R&D on Private R&D quantify the 343-48. 354-55; Barry P. Bosworth, Tax Incentives and Economic Investment and Productivity: A Macroeconomic Analysis," paper Growth (Brookings, 1984), pp. 32-33; and citations in these periods and presented to the Southern Economic Association. Atlanta, No- sources. As I explain later (in chapter 3), a higher estimate by vember 11, 1982. Edwin Mansfield reached a similar conclusion ers.⁵⁵ My John W. Kendrick is not comparable. nor pertinent to an expla- based on a questionnaire survey ("Engineering Employment. miscellanec nation of changes in any existing output series, because Kendrick Federal Funding, and Company-financed R&D Expenditures." is really estimating what R&D would have contributed to an paper presented to the American Economic Association. New imaginary output series that would be obtained if the rise in output York. December 1982) while Frank R. Lichtenberg reached the could somehow capture the welfare benefits from new and im- opposite conclusion ("The Relationship Between Federal Contract 54. Edwar proved final products. Kendrick has implicitly recognized this R&D and Company R&D," American Economic Review, vol. 74 Contribution situation by noting that the part of R&D "that results in cost [May 1984, Papers and Proceedings, 1983] pp. 73-78). Because Russian trans reduction increases productivity and the part that results in new all private expenditures are counted, when appropriate, in com- ican Sympos! and improved consumer goods increases satisfaction. However. puting the estimate of the contribution of R&D to the growth rate 55. Exam real product and productivity estimates are generally consid- that is cited in the text. the estimate includes any positive or writings. See ered to understate growth to the extent that there have been net negative effect of government expenditures on private R&D. Growth Rate, Components of Output per Unit of Input 29 e of the In the past I have interpreted the movement of offsetting. Confidence in this conclusion, as applied Iculated this index from 1948 to 1973 (but not thereafter) as to 1948-73. is weakened by experience after 1973, nditures an acceptable approximation of the contribution when miscellaneous determinants apparently ex- output made to growth by the incorporation of new knowl- erted a large negative effect on growth. Although on such edge into the process of production. Because the there are reasons why miscellaneous determinants :ly high) effects of so many determinants were measured, this should have changed more after 1973 than before, it imirable series is far more refined than the indexes of output is not clear why their effect was so large. Despite rators). per hour worked and unit of capital that have often this later experience, I still consider that the 1.38 d obso- been identified as measures of "technical progress." percent growth rate of the residual provides a rea- R&D.53 However, my interpretation was based on more than sonable estimate of the contribution of advances in directly improvement upon precedent. It was supported by knowledge in 1948-73. derived the following considerations. The growth rate of the residual is also, I believe, to the First, and most important, the index displayed an acceptable estimate of the contribution of ad- residen- the stable growth that an index measuring the con- vances in knowledge in 1941-48. It was 1.11 percent. tribution of advances in knowledge would be ex- Interpretation of the 0.34 percent growth rate in } all de- pected to show in the world's most advanced, largest, 1929-41 is more dubious. In a previous examination easured and most diversified economy. From 1948 to 1973 it of the period I concluded that restrictive practices wledge rose every year. Moreover, it did so at a rather steady introduced during the Depression that affected the is ob- rate. In the three shorter periods in this time span its miscellaneous determinants restrained the growth of output growth rates were 1.33 percent. 1.34 percent. and output per unit of input, but probably were not at were 1.46 percent. Irregularities in the size of the annual responsible for much more than one-tenth of a per- n index increases were scarcely greater than one might have centage point of the difference between the 1929-41 it grew expected from calendar differences alone. even though and 1948-69 growth rates. 56 Advances in knowledge the series picks up the effect of errors in the output evidently contributed much less to growth in 1929- measure as well as certain errors in the indexes for 41 than in 1948-73. other output determinants. The behavior of the residual series since 1973 has John W. A second consideration was that similar residual been altogether different from anything that has gone W York: -10. To estimates for other countries revealed a pattern that before (tables 5-1 and 5-3). Its growth rate dropped output, appeared reasonable for the contribution of knowl- by 1 full percentage point, or 72 percent, from 1948- Suctivity edge.54 In brief, despite large differences in the growth 73 to 1973-78, and by an additional full percentage of return rates of output, the residuals were fairly similar in point from 1973-78 to 1978-82. In 1973-78 the growth but little the United States and other advanced Western coun- rate was about as low as it had been in 1929-41, and spinoff tries and moderately higher in Japan-a pattern that thereafter it was actually negative by a substantial Richard curred, conformed to the accepted belief that in Japan tech- amount, 0.66 percent, in 1978-82 and was prob- ne more nology was moving up toward the much higher levels ably little different in 1978-83. The peak in the index in the prevailing in the West. The fact that the growth rate to date was reached in 1978. The decline in the without Support of the index had increased from earlier periods in the growth rate after 1973 was abrupt, with no hint of stitution United States itself was also in accord with usual slackening through 1973 and a sudden decline there- David analysis beliefs about the pace of new knowledge. after. Moreover, since 1973 the index has behaved A output Finally, although I had not attempted annual erratically, rising in four years and falling in five. clors to estimates for the miscellaneous determinants that It is not plausible that an index measuring the ini their Nestor may affect the residual index, I had attempted to contribution of advances in knowledge would have R&D quantify the contribution of some of them over longer behaved this way. I can only conclude that some of paper No- periods and to judge the possible magnitude of oth- the miscellaneous determinants of output were Γe- clusion ers. My conclusion was that the effects of the sponsible for the collapse in the growth rate of the /ment. miscellaneous determinants probably were small and residual and its erratic movement. I offer this opinion .ures," New t.ed the intract 54. Edward F. Denison. "A Cross-Country View of the 12, 20, 21, and appendixes M. N: Accounting for Growth, PP. 76- vol. 74 Contribution of Knowledge to Economic Growth." published in 79: Slower Growth, pp. 81-83 and chap. 9: and "Accounting for ccause Russian translation in T. S. Khachaturov. ed., The Soviet-Amer- Slower Economic Growth: An Update," pp. 21-37. in com- ican Symposium of Economics (Moscow, 1978), pp. 39-46. 56. Accounting for Growth. pp. 81-82. An alternative way of th rate 55. Examples of such estimates are scattered throughout my measuring real output-using current price weights for each decade tive or writings. See Denison. Sources of Growth. chaps. 15-20: Why instead of the same weights for all periods-would also narrow D. Growth Rates Differ. chaps. 3, 9. 17 (part 3). 18, parts of chaps. the differences between periods. 30 TWO I Determinants of Output Changes since 1929 even though. as the next chapter indicates, the neous determinants subtracted 0.21 points. Neither show that evidence is insufficient to establish conclusively source affects growth of measured output in the period. am which of the many developments suspected of being other sectors, and so these sources contributed smaller widely am the culprits responsible for the collapse were really amounts to the growth rate of potential national The gr to blame. income in the whole economy: advances in knowl- potential This conclusion leaves no way to measure what edge, 0.84 percentage points, and miscellaneous first colum actually happened to the contribution of advances in determinants, -0.16 points. Reasonable variations potential n knowledge after 1973. It is not unlikely that the in the numbers used for 1929-41 and 1973-82 would the classic contribution was reduced. The period from World not greatly change these results. made posit War II to 1973 was one in which, it appears, progress largest cor in all types of knowledge was exceptionally fast by Sources of Long-Term Growth is identifie historical standards. A gradual falling back to longer in "labor is term rates would not have been surprising. However. Detailed estimates of the contributions that the increase in there is no certainty that such a decline occurred. output determinants made to the growth rates of when acco In the following section I summarize estimates of various output series during each of the eleven and charac the sources of growth of output over the 1929-82 standard periods are shown in tables 7-1 to 7-4 and tion) and o period as a whole. Solely for this purpose I assume 8-1 to 8-4. These sources-of-growth tables are pro- upon the " (reasonably) that the residual series measures the vided for four measures of total national income and percent, is contribution of advances in knowledge from 1941 to four of national income per person employed, as well process of 1973; and (as guesses) that the 0.34 percent growth as for output per unit of input, a subtotal given in the at low cos rate of the residual from 1929 to 1941 consisted of a tables. The tables show the number of percentage the service 0.45 percent rate for advances in knowledge and a points contributed to the growth rate. at 13 perce -0.11 percent rate for miscellaneous determinants. The tabulation below condenses growth sources of persons while the -0.07 percent growth rate of the residual into ten groups and shows the percentage of the sector. (If from 1973 to 1982 consisted of a 1.00 percent growth growth rate of each of the eight output series contrib- combined rate for advances in knowledge and a 1.07 percent uted by each group of determinants over the fifty- cent-oftl growth rate for miscellaneous determinants. This three years from 1929 to 1982. This tabulation iden- each. are procedure results in an estimate that advances in tifies the sources of growth in the United States over reduction knowledge contributed 1.07 percentage points to the the longest period presently possible. However. and to non 1929-82 growth rate of total potential national in- these distributions should not be regarded as "nor- factors ne come in nonresidential business. while miscella- mal" or "typical" patterns. The data in this study growth rat environme cent, and Contributions to 1929-82 growth rates percent. 01 Potential national income Actual national income amount all the preced Total Per person employed Total Per person employed inclusion Nonresi- Nonresi- Nonresi- Nonresi- The sec Whole dential Whole dential Whole dential Whole dential tial output economy business economy business economy business economy business When the (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) contributic Growth rate 3.2 3.1 1.6 1.7 2.9 2.8 1.5 1.6 and the CC Percent of growth rate All sources 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 other sour Labor input except education 34 25 -13 -23 32 20 12 -25 growth in Education per worker 13 16 26 30 14 19 27 34 tions secto Capital 17 12 15 10 19 14 20 13 cation, an Advances in knowledge 26 34 54 64 28 39 55 68 Improved resource allocation 8 11 16 19 8 11 16 18 dwellings : Economies of scale 8 11 17 20 9 12 18 22 able to cap Changes in legal and human the largest environment I 2 -3 -4 -1 -2 3 -4 ness. follo Land 0 0 -3 -4 0 0 -3 -3 Irregular factors 0 0 0 0 -3 -5 -7 -8 Other determinants 5 -7 -10 -13 5 -8 10 -13 57. See Fast. pp. 39- Sources of Long-Term Growth 31 Neither show that patterns have changed from period to The third column of the tabulation analyzes the in the period. and other studies show that they have differed growth of potential output per person potentially smaller widely among countries.57 employed in the whole economy. To an important national The greatest interest attaches to the estimates for extent this growth rate was the net result of offsetting knowl- potential output shown in the first four columns. The positive and negative influences. Five of the ten laneous first column of the tabulation analyzes the growth of groups of determinants contributed an amount equal riations potential national income in the whole economy. By to 128 percent of the growth rate, one (irregular 2 would the classification adopted, six groups of sources factors) did not affect it, and four subtracted an made positive contributions to this growth rate. The amount equal to 28 percent. When expressed in largest contribution, 34 percent of the growth rate, percentage points, the contributions of education per is identified in the table as coming from the increase worker, advances in knowledge, improved resource in "labor input except education." It represents the allocation, economies of scale, changes in legal and that the increase in the amount of work done in our economy, human environment, irregular factors, and "other rates of when account is taken of the number, working hours, determinants" are all practically the same as their eleven and characteristics of workers (except their educa- contributions to the growth rate of total potential 7-4 and tion) and of the effect of changes in the hours of work output in the whole economy, but when expressed are pro- upon the work done in an hour. Second largest, at 26 as percentages of the growth rate, they are about ome and percent, is the incorporation into the productive twice as large. The contribution of advances in as well process of advances in knowledge of how to produce knowledge equaled 54 percent of this growth rate. en in the at low cost. Third, at 17 percent, is the increase in On a per person employed basis. labor input except centage the services provided by four types of capital. Fourth. education declined and made a negative contribution at 13 percent, is the increase in the level of education equal to 13 percent of the growth rate because of sources of persons employed in the nonresidential business declining average hours (including the effect of an = of the sector. (If the two components of labor input are increase in part-time employment) and the change in contrib- combined. they account for nearly half-47 per- the demographic composition of hours worked. Land he fifty- cent-of the growth rate.) Fifth and sixth, at 8 percent per person potentially employed also declined and on iden- each. are gains from economies of scale and the subtracted an amount equal to 3 percent of the growth ites over reduction in the overallocation of labor to farming rate. owever, and to nonfarm self-employment. Land and irregular The fourth column refers to potential national as "nor- factors neither added to nor subtracted from this income per person potentially employed in nonresi- is study growth rate. Three changes in the legal and human dential business. The contribution of capital was a environment subtracted an amount equal to 1 per- smaller percentage of the growth rate than in the cent. and other determinants an amount equal to 5 whole economy, where it includes dwellings and percent, of the growth rate. The latter consists of the international assets, but the positive or negative amount allocated to miscellaneous determinants in contributions of all other determinants were larger the preceding section, with a slight offset from the and the importance of offsets correspondingly greater. employed inclusion of the dwellings occupancy ratio. Advances in knowledge alone contributed an amount Nonresi- The second column analyzes the growth of poten- equal to 64 percent of the growth rate, education per dential tial output in the nonresidential business sector alone. worker 30 percent. In all, five groups contributed an business When the other three sectors are eliminated, the amount equal to 143 percent of this growth rate, (8) contributions of labor input and of capital are reduced while four subtracted an amount equal to 43 percent. 1.6 and the contributions (positive or negative) of the Columns 5 through 8 of the informal tabulation 100 other sources are increased. The reason is that all provide estimates for the actual output series that -25 growth in the government. households. and institu- are the counterparts of the potential output series 34 tions sector is ascribable to labor input except edu- just reviewed. The contributions of many determi- 13 cation, and practically all growth in the services of 68 nants are the same on an actual as on a potential 18 dwellings and international assets sectors is ascrib- basis when expressed in percentage points, but differ 22 able to capital. Advances in knowledge were much when expressed as percentages of the growth rate the largest source of growth in nonresidential busi- because the growth rates are different. When contri- -4 ness. followed by labor input except education. butions expressed in percentage points differ, the -3 3 -8 58. There were also offsetting pluses and minuses within the -13 - 57. See Denison and Chung. How Japan's Economy Grew So "labor input except education" group and also. no doubt. among Fast. PP. 39-45. the "other determinants," 32 TWO Determinants of Output Changes since 1929 only reason is that the positions of 1929 and 1982 Depression and World War II had not cut net capital with respect to the business cycle and productivity formation and birth rates in 1930-46? Or were capital cycle were different. Irregular factors make a nega- formation and population growth in the postwar tive contribution to growth rates on an actual basis years larger than they would otherwise have been so because the index for the effect on output per unit of that the deficiency was eliminated? The reader may input in nonresidential business of changes in the suppose that the percentage of growth contributed intensity of utilization of employed resources result- Th by capital is reduced by inclusion of the period's last ing from fluctuations in intensity of demand was 7 three years, 1980-82, in which business activity was percent lower in 1982 than in 1929. weak, but in fact all the percentages for capital in the Contributions to the series computed on a poten- informal tabulation were the same or lower in 1929- tial basis are not affected by the cyclical positions of 79 than in 1929-82. end years, but even they may be somewhat affected The following chapter examines changes in the by the cyclical pattern-and international events- sources of growth after 1973. Readers are encouraged of the past. However, the effect is rarely known. For to look at the estimates for other periods shown in example, would the sizes of the capital stock and the tables, which have been discussed in my previous potential employment in 1982 have been bigger if the books. The grov and prod long per The amc the first The grov the whol or from 3 most ser age poin person e The D HORACE FREELAND JUDSON The Search for Solutions ABRIDGED EDITION (text complete, pictures and captions omitted) Introduction by Lewis Thomas, M.D. 1987 The Johns Hopkins University Press BALTIMORE Copyright © 1980 by Playback Associates Johns Hopkins Paperbacks edition copyright © 1987 by The Johns Hopkins University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America The abridgment of this Johns Hopkins Paperbacks edition of The Search for Solutions is limited to the deletion of photographs and captions from the original hardcover edition. The text of the book has not been altered. The illustrated edition was published by Holt, Rinehart and Winston. This edition is reprinted by arrangement with Henry Holt and Company, Inc. The Johns Hopkins University Press 701 West 40th Street Baltimore, Maryland 21211 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Judson, Horace Freeland. The search for solutions. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Science-Social aspects. 2. Technology-Social aspects. 3. Scientists-Interviews. I. Title. Q175.5.J82 1987 500 87-2856 ISBN 0-8018-3526-7 (pbk.) Photo credits: p. 21, World Wide Photos; p. 50, Mike Jackson; p. 66, Susan Shaw; pp. 90, 100, Playback Associates; p. 153, Bachrach; p. 182, Caltech Photo; p. 193, Wayne Miller/Magnum Photos; p. 244, courtesy Florida State University the builder of bridges: the professional's pride in and the inn skill; the swelling gratification that comes with them. Two recognition accorded by colleagues and peers; although Jac perhaps the competitor's fierce appetite; perhaps parallel-Isa ambition for a kind of fame more durable than death, said: most. At the beginning is curiosity, and with I do not kr curiosity the delight in mastery-the joy of to myself figuring it out that is the birthright of every child. playing or I once asked Murray Gell-Mann, a theoretical now and t physicist, how he got started in science. His prettier sh answer was to point to the summer sky: "When I of truth lay was a boy, I used to ask all sorts of simple For some, questions-like, 'What holds the clouds up?" the world to Rosalind Franklin, the crystallographer whose early Sheldon Gla death deprived her of a share in the Nobel Prize at Harvard, that was given for the discovery of the structure of simple ques DNA (the stuff that genes are made of), one day learning abo was helping a young collaborator draft an and the mo application for research money, when she looked said. "And I up at him and said, "What we can't tell them is the Man in that it's so much fun!" He still remembers her us"-that th glint of mischief. The play of the mind, in an same face to almost childlike innocence, is a pleasure that 'Why is the appears again and again in scientists' reflections on us?' She was their work. The geneticist Barbara McClintock, as was hard. A1 a woman in American science in the 1930s, had no in college-le chance at the academic posts open to her male learns the ar colleagues, but that hardly mattered to her. "I did difference is, it because it was fun!" she said forty years later. "I moon and W couldn't wait to get up in the morning! I never interesting'- thought of it as 'science.'' can't let go." The exuberant innocence can be poignant. Curiosity François Jacob, who won his share of a Nobel Prize by far, a wor as one of the small group of molecular biologists for creation, in the fifties who brought sense and order into the arts, Medaw: interactions by which bacteria regulate their life to young scie processes, recently read an account I had written exploratory i of that work, and said to me with surprise and an incomprehen evident pang of regret, "We were like children other side of playing!" He meant the fun of it-but also the problem wor simplicity of the problems they had encountered and months 4 The Search for Solutions 5 Investigati