Ask the Scholar
Page 1 of 1
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
Originally Processed With FOIA(s):
FOIA Number:
S
S
FOIA
MARKER
This is not a textual record. This is used as an
administrative marker by the George Bush Presidential
Library Staff.
Record Group/Collection:
George H.W. Bush Presidential Records
Collection/Office of Origin:
Speechwriting, White House Office of
Series:
Speech File Backup Files
Subseries:
Chron File, 1989-1993
OA/ID Number:
13770
Folder ID Number:
13770-013
Folder Title:
Hispanic Chamber of Commerce 9/20/91 [OA 8328] [3]
Stack:
Row:
Section:
Shelf:
Position:
G
26
21
6
2
NAFTA CHRONOLOGY
President Bush and President Salinas
June 10, 1990
of Mexico issue a joint statement
endorsing the idea of a comprehensive
free trade agreement between the United
States and Mexico. They direct their
trade ministers, U.S. Trade Represent-
ative Carla A. Hills and Mexican Secre-
tary of Commerce and Industrial Develop-
ment Jaime Serra Puche, to undertake
consultations and prepatory work.
Ambassador Hills and Secretary Serra
August 8, 1990
report back to the Presidents, jointly
recommending the initiation of formal
negotiations.
President Salinas writes to President
August 21, 1990
Bush proposing that the United States
and Mexico negotiate a free trade
agreement, a step required by U.S. law.
President Bush writes to the chairmen
September 25, 1990
of the House Ways and Means and Senate
Finance committees notifying the two
committees of free trade negotiations
with Mexico, a step required by U.S. law.
In his letter, the President also
informs the chairmen that Canada has
expressed a desire to participate in the
negotiations.
President Bush writes to the chairmen of
February 5, 1991
the Senate Finance and House Ways and
Means committees of his desire to enter
into trilateral negotiations with Mexico
and Canada for a North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA).
Senate Finance Committee holds public
February 6, 20, 1991
hearings on the proposed negotiations.
International Trade Subcommittee of the
February 20-21, 1991
House Ways and Means Committee holds
public hearings on the proposed nego-
tiations.
Sixty-day legislative review period
February 27, 1991
expires, during which time the Senate
Finance Committee or House Ways and
Means Committee could have voted to deny
fast-track procedures to legislation
implementing a free trade agreement
with Mexico.
President Bush requests a two-year
March 1, 1991
extension of fast-track procedures
to legislation implementing trade
agreements, a necessary step if the
procedures are to be used for legis-
lation implementing a NAFTA.
Deadline passes for either House of
June 1, 1991
Congress to pass a resolution
disapproving President Bush's request
for an extension of fast-track procedures.
NAFTA negotiations begin in Toronto,
June 12, 1991
Canada.
Trade Ministers of Canada, Mexico and
September 19-20,1991
the United States scheduled to meet for
NAFTA negotiations in Seattle, Washington.
Public hearing scheduled in San Diego,
August 21, 1991
California.
Public hearing scheduled in Houston,
August 26, 1991
Texas.
Public hearing scheduled in Atlanta,
August 29, 1991
Georgia.
Public hearing scheduled in Washington,
September 3, 1991
D.C.
Public hearing scheduled in Cleveland,
September 9, 1991
Ohio.
Public hearing scheduled in Boston,
September 11, 1991
Massachusetts.
MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS
NEGOTIATING GROUPS
FIRST INDICATIVE SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS
DATES
NEGOTIATING GROUPS
WEEK OF 16 SEPTEMBER
AGRICULTURE
WEEK OF 16 SEPTEMBER
TRIPS
17 SEPTEMBER
GNS (MARITIME TRANSPORT)
19 SEPTEMBER
GNS (TELECOM)
20 SEPTEMBER
GNS (FINANCIAL SERVICES)
WEEK OF 23 SEPTEMBER
GNS
26 SEPTEMBER
INSTITUTIONS
27 SEPTEMBER
MARKET ACCESS
WEEK OF 30 SEPTEMBER
RULE-MAKING AND TRIMS
ON OR ABOUT 30 SEPTEMBER
TEXTILES AND CLOTHING
OCTOBER
SURVEILLANCE BODY
21 OCTOBER . 1 NOVEMBER
GNS
18 - 26 NOVEMBER AND 9 DECEMBER
GNS
ON CALL
TNC
Governmental Process leading to a
North American Free Trade Agreement
CONGRESS
ADMINISTRATION
PRIVATE SECTOR
President notifies Senate Finance and House Ways
and Means Committees of intention to enter
Senate Finance and House Ways and
Means Committees have 60
into trade negotiations with Mexico and Canada.
legislative days to disapprove
Administration's request for bilateral
negotiating authority.
President requests extension
Hearings and consultations
of fast track negotiating
Advisory Committee for
between Administration and
authority. (March 1, 1991)
Trade and Policy Negotiations
(ACTPN) report supports
Congress on request for
President's request.
negotiating authority.
Fast Track Negotiating Authority expires June 1, 1991
Fast Track Negotiating Authority extended until June 1, 1993
Congress allows extension of
negotiating authority.
Neither house passes resolution
Administration commences formal
of disapproval by June 1, 1991.
Consultations continue with
negotiations with Mexico and
private sector throughout
Canada led by chief negotiator
negotiations.
Amb. Julius Katz. (Toronto, June
12, 1991)
Consultations continue
Actual
with Congress throughout
CANADA
negotiations
negotiations.
MEXICO
are
subdivided into
negotiating groups focusing
U.S.-Mexican joint environmental
on specific sectors.
initiatives in parallel with the
trade negotiations (EPA).
Market
Trade
Services
Investment
Intellectual
Dispute
Access
Rules
Property
Settlement
THE UNITED
STATES
A balanced comprehensive
agreement is reached among
three nations.
President give Congress at least 90
calendar days notice of his intention
to enter into a trade agreement.
(By February 28, 1993)
Notification period gives Congressional
committees of jurisdiction opportunity
to review the proposed agreement before
it is signed.
Period of informal consultations and
Extensive Consultations
President signs North American Free Trade
Agreement (by June 1, 1993.)
Consultations
Extensive
Private Sector Trade Advisory
Committee System prepares
reports on proposed trade
agreement.
cooperative drafting of implementing
Administration formally submits trilateral
legislation between the Administration
agreement, along with implementing legislation
and Congress.
and supporting documents to Congress.
Within 90 legislative days, House and Senate
approves the implementing package.
NAFTA becomes effective on
date of Implementaton agreed upon
among three nations.
The Brock Group, 1991.©
May 1, 1991
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED IN CONNECTION WITH
THE NEGOTIATION OF A NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT
In letters to the President from Chairmen Bentsen and
Rostenkowski, and from Majority Leader Gephardt, the
Administration has been asked to address a variety of economic,
labor and environmental concerns that have been raised about the
proposed North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The
Administration's response sets forth detailed action plans for
addressing these concerns, as well as views on the economic
impact of a NAFTA.
THE POSITIVE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF A NAFTA
From 1986 to 1990, as Mexico reduced import barriers, our
exports more than doubled from $12.4 billion to $28.4
billion, generating 264,000 additional U.S. jobs.
Under a NAFTA, we can do even better. Mexico still has
higher trade barriers than the U.S. Mexico's average duty
is 10% compared to 4% in the U.S. Significant nontariff
barriers remain. We therefore have much to gain from the
elimination of these barriers.
All three major economic analyses done to date corroborate
that the U.S. will benefit from a NAFTA in exports, output
and employment.
We will benefit from Mexican growth: for each dollar Mexico
spends on imports, 70 cents is spent on U.S. goods; for each
dollar of GNP growth, 15 cents is spent on U.S. goods.
Further, the resulting economic integration will strengthen
the ability of the U.S. to compete with Japan and the EC.
ADJUSTMENT PROVISIONS WE WILL SEEK IN THE NAFTA
Transition Measures: In order to avoid dislocations to
industries and workers producing goods that are import-
sensitive, tariffs and non-tariff barriers on such products
should be eliminated in small increments over a time period
sufficient to ensure orderly adjustment.
:
In determining import sensitivity, we will rely heavily
on advice of the International Trade Commission, the
Congress, and the private sector.
--
We will be prepared to consider transition periods
beyond those in the U.S.-Canada FTA.
Effective Safeguard Provisions: Even where reductions in
tariffs and other trade barriers are staged over a lengthy
period, there may be isolated cases in which injurious
increases in imports could occur. To prevent injury from
such increases, we will seek to include in the agreement a
procedure allowing temporary reimposition of duties and
other restrictions.
--
This mechanism should be designed to respond quickly,
especially in cases of sudden import increases.
--
Special "snap-back" provisions should be included to
address the unique problems faced by producers of
perishable products.
Strict Rules of Origin: We will negotiate rules of origin
to ensure that the benefits of a NAFTA do not flow to mere
pass-through operations exporting third-country products to
the U.S. with only minimal assembly in Mexico.
Rules of origin will impose clear, tough, and
predictable standards to the benefit of North American
products.
--
We will seek to strengthen the required North American
content for assembled automotive products.
--
We will consult closely with the private sector and the
Congress in designing these rules.
DOMESTIC WORKER ADJUSTMENT PROGRAM
Since trade barriers on sensitive products should be
decreased over a long timeframe, we do not expect immediate
or substantial job dislocations.
Nevertheless, beyond including adjustment provisions in the
NAFTA itself, there is a need to assist dislocated workers
who may have adjustment difficulties.
The Administration is committed to working with Congress to
ensure a worker adjustment program that is adequately funded
and that provides effective services to workers who may lose
their jobs as a result of an agreement with Mexico.
Whether provided through the improvement or expansion of an
existing program or through the creation of a new program,
worker adjustment measures should be targeted to provided
dislocated workers with comprehensive services in a timely
fashion.
LABOR ISSUES
LABOR MOBILITY
We have agreed with Mexico that labor mobility and our
immigration laws are not on the table in NAFTA talks, with
the possible exception of a narrow provision facilitating
temporary entry of certain professionals and managers.
WORKER RIGHTS AND LABOR STANDARDS
Protections afforded by Mexican labor law and practice are
stronger than generally known.
Mexico's laws provide comprehensive rights and standards for
workers in all sectors, including the maquiladoras.
--
Mexico has ratified 73 International Labor Organization
conventions on worker rights, including those on
occupational safety and health.
--
Mexico has a minimum working age of 14 and mandates
special protections and shorter working hours for those
between the ages of 14 and 16.
A substantially higher proportion of the Mexican workforce
is unionized than is the U.S. workforce.
While enforcement problems have resulted largely from a lack
of resources, a NAFTA would both raise living standards and
create resources for enforcing existing laws.
FUTURE U.S.-MEXICO COOPERATION ON LABOR MATTERS
Memorandum of Understanding: The Secretary of Labor and her
counterpart from Mexico are prepared to sign a Memorandum of
Understanding providing for cooperation and joint action on
a number of labor issues which could be implemented in
parallel with our FTA negotiations.
--
These include health and safety measures; work
conditions, including labor standards and enforcement; labor
conflicts; labor statistics; and other areas of concern to
the United States and Mexico.
Specific Projects: U.S. and Mexican officials have agreed
on joint projects to address specific concerns in the labor
sector.
--
Initial projects include: occupational health and
safety; child labor; and labor statistics.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
MEXICO'S COMMITMENT TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Mexico has no interest in becoming a pollution haven for
U.S. companies.
Mexico's comprehensive environmental law of 1988, which is
based on U.S. law and experience, is a solid foundation for
tackling its environmental problems.
All new investments are being held to these higher legal
standards and an environmental impact assessment is required
to show how they will comply.
Enforcement has in the past been a key problem, but Mexico's
record has been improving dramatically. Since 1989, Mexico
has ordered more than 980 temporary and 82 permanent shut
-downs of industrial facilities for environmental
violations; the budget of SEDUE (Mexico's EPA) has increased
almost eight-fold.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN THE NAFTA
Protection of Health and Safety: We will ensure that our
right to safeguard the environment is preserved in the
NAFTA.
:
We will maintain the right to exclude any products that
do not meet our health or safety requirements, and we
will continue to enforce those requirements.
--
We will maintain our right to impose stringent
pesticide, energy conservation, toxic waste, and health
and safety standards.
:
We will maintain our rights, consistent with other
international obligations, to limit trade in products
controlled by international treaties (such as treaties
on endangered species or protection of the ozone
layer).
Enhancement and Enforcement of Standards: We will seek a
commitment to work together with Mexico to enhance
environmental, health, and safety standards regarding
products, and to promote their enforcement.
:
We will provide for full public and scientific scrutiny
of any changes to standards before they are
implemented.
We will provide for consultations on enhancing
enforcement capability, inspection training,
monitoring, and verification.
JOINT ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES
In parallel to the FTA negotiations, we intend to pursue an
ambitious program of cooperation on a wide range of
environmental matters.
We will design and implement an integrated border
environmental plan to address air and water pollution,
hazardous wastes, chemical spills, pesticides, and
enforcement.
During the design phase of the border plan, there will be an
opportunity for public comment and hearings; during
implementation, there will be periodic comprehensive
reviews.
We will consult on national environmental standards and
regulations, and will provide an opportunity for the public
to submit data on alleged non-compliance.
We will discuss expanded cooperative enforcement activities,
such as coordinated targeting of environmental violators.
We will establish a program of technical cooperation and
training, which will include facilitating sharing of
technology for pollution abatement.
INFORMED POLICY MAKING AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
We will broaden public participation in the formulation and
implementation of trade policy to ensure that efforts to
liberalize trade are consistent with sound environmental
practices.
We will appoint individuals to selected trade policy
advisory committees who can contribute both an environmental
perspective and substantive expertise.
In consultation with interested members of the public, we
will complete a review of U.S.-Mexico environmental issues,
with particular emphasis on possible environmental effects
of the NAFTA, to enable U.S. officials to consider the
results during FTA negotiations and other bilateral efforts.
IMPORTANCE AND BENEFITS OF A NAFTA
A NAFTA WOULD CREATE ONE OF THE WORLD'S LARGEST FREE TRADE AREAS
A North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA) would create an
enormous market, encompassing some 360 million consumers and
total output of $6 trillion.
The progressive elimination of barriers to the flow of
goods, services and investment, and strengthened protection
of intellectual property rights would benefit a broad
spectrum of businesses, workers, farmers and consumers.
Creation of a NAFTA would be a catalyst for economic growth
and development in the United States, Mexico and Canada
through increased trade, investment and jobs.
THE IMPORTANCE OF NORTH AMERICAN TRADE
Canada and Mexico are America's first and third largest
trading partners, respectively. In turn, the United States
accounts for over two-thirds of their total trade. In 1990,
three-way trade came to about $237 billion.
Since 1980, U.S. exports to Mexico and Canada have doubled,
rising from $55.3 billion to $111.4 billion. Our exports to
our neighbors have grown substantially faster than those to
the rest of the world.
REMOVAL OF BARRIERS WOULD CREATE NEW TRADE AND INVESTMENT
OPPORTUNITIES
Since Mexico joined the General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade (GATT) in 1986 and started its unilateral policy of
lowering trade barriers, U.S. exports have more than
doubled, growing from $12.4 billion to $28.4 billion.
-- U.S. agricultural exports to Mexico totalled $2.5
billion in 1990, our third largest market.
:
Consumer goods exports from the United States to Mexico
have tripled since 1986, rising from $1 billion to $3
billion.
:
U.S. exports of capital goods have grown from $5
billion in 1986 to about $9.5 billion last year.
We can do better. Mexico has greater barriers to U.S.
exports than we impose on Mexican shipments to the United
States. For example:
- 2 -
:
Mexican tariffs average 10 percent, compared to the
average tariff of 4 percent we impose on Mexican
exports to us.
--
Mexico still maintains a restrictive import licensing
regime, one which affects 40 percent of U.S.
agricultural exports to Mexico.
In addition, while Mexico has liberalized its investment
regime, it is still closed to many U.S. investments, both in
manufacturing and in services, and performance requirements
distort export opportunities for U.S. products.
Mexico has already pledged to improve its protection for
intellectual property rights, and we expect action on those
pledges in the near future. A NAFTA will make those reforms
secure.
A NAFTA OFFERS BENEFITS TO U.S. PRODUCERS, WORKERS, AND CONSUMERS
Economic analyses show that a NAFTA will have a positive
impact on the U.S. economy and U.S. employment.
U.S. producers and workers will benefit from a NAFTA through
increased sales opportunities, improved operating
efficiencies and strengthened competitiveness against
competitors in Asia and Europe.
0
U.S. consumers will enjoy increased access to lower-cost,
higher quality products.
A NAFTA STRENGTHENS THE BROADER NORTH AMERICAN RELATIONSHIP
A NAFTA would help cement the extensive historical,
familial, cultural and language links the United States has
with both Mexico and Canada.
More prosperous neighbors are better neighbors and better
customers for U.S. goods and services.
We have a broad agenda with both Mexico and Canada that goes
well beyond trade, economic and investment links. By
boosting economic prosperity in all three nations, a NAFTA
will help us make progress on issues such as the
environment, drugs and immigration.
March 1, 1991
JOB CREATION, COMPETITIVENESS AND INVESTMENT
OVERALL IMPACT OF NAFTA ON U.S. EMPLOYMENT SHOULD BE SMALL, BUT
POSITIVE
An econometric analysis prepared for the Department of Labor
suggests that an FTA with Mexico would result in a net
increase of 44,000 to 64,000 jobs in the United States over
10 years, the bulk of these in manufacturing.
The overall impact of a NAFTA on U.S. employment should be
positive, but small. The Mexican economy is only about 1/25
the size of the U.S. economy and imports from Mexico now
account for only about 6 percent of total U.S. imports.
And, since we have an FTA in place with Canada, additional
effects on our trade with Canada would be limited.
Mexican trade barriers are higher than those in the United
States. Eliminating these barriers should result in
increased U.S. exports, exports that will help generate jobs
in the United States.
:
Since Mexico started its trade liberalization in 1986,
U.S. exports to Mexico have more than doubled--from
$12.4 billion in 1986 to $28.4 billion in 1990. It is
estimated that each $1 billion worth of merchandise
exports generates over 20,000 U.S. jobs.
U.S. WORKERS ARE AMONG WORLD'S MOST PRODUCTIVE
U.S. manufacturing investment and production grew strongly
throughout much of the 1980s. In 1988, the latest year for
which constant dollar data are available, manufacturing's
share of the U.S. economy stood at a post-World War II high
(23.1 percent).
U.S. workers are among the most productive in the world.
U.S. labor productivity in manufacturing showed strong
growth in 1990 (up 3 percent).
:
Depending on the measure, output per employed person in
the United States is roughly 5 or 6 times that of
Mexico.
:
Since 1980, output per person employed in U.S.
manufacturing has grown 2.5 times faster than in
Mexico.
Higher real incomes and wages in the United States reflect
superior U.S. productivity.
- 2 -
THE UNITED STATES IS AMONG THE WORLD'S MOST ATTRACTIVE LOCATIONS
FOR INVESTMENT
0
Both U.S. and foreign investors will continue to invest
heavily in the United States because low wage levels alone
are inadequate to assure competitiveness. Among the factors
that help compel investment in the United States are:
-- an educated, skilled, and highly productive U.S. work
force;
-- a fully developed and reliable transportation,
communications, and business and financial
infrastructure;
-- proximity to high quality, dependable suppliers;
-- proximity to the marketplace in which one sells; and
-- political and economic stability.
These U.S. advantages will not disappear in a NAFTA. Nor
will the manufacturing sector be weakened. Rather, the
elimination of trade and investment barriers will expand
market opportunities for exports for all three countries.
The U.S., Mexican and Canadian manufacturing sectors are
likely to be strengthened, in terms of production volumes
and average real wages.
INVESTMENT IN MEXICO CAN BOOST U.S. COMPETITIVENESS
O
When U.S. firms do invest in Mexico, such investment
strengthens their ability to meet the global competitive
challenge.
A 1988 study by the U.S. International Trade Commission
revealed that the vast majority of the 900 firms surveyed
felt that assembly in Mexico had improved their overall
international competitiveness.
Most of the firms indicated that the alternative to moving
part of their labor-intensive assembly operations to Mexico,
where a substantial amount of U.S. components are used, was
to move their U.S. operations to East Asia, which would
result in the usage of fewer U.S. components and machinery.
- 3 -
INVESTMENT IN MEXICO HELPS SAVE U.S. JOBS
A NAFTA would help save U.S. jobs by strengthening the
ability of U.S. firms to compete against Asian and European
companies.
Joint production arrangements with Mexico have helped save
existing U.S. jobs and even created new jobs. For example:
-- As a result of a move of part of its operations to
Mexico, a U.S. electronics company's sales rose 400
percent and its U.S. employment by 50 percent. One
medical equipment company says it would be out of the
health care business without its Mexican operations,
which are supported by millions of dollars in U.S.
sales.
-- USTR has received a petition requesting duty-free GSP
treatment for ceramic magnets imported from the Mexican
subsidiary of a U.S. company. These magnets are used
in electrical motors that, for example, power air
conditioner and heater blowers in automobiles. The
local U.S. labor union (representing some 3,000
employees) supports the petition, arguing that Mexican
magnets help the U.S. facility to be more competitive.
Investment in Mexico is likely to provide greater links back
for U.S. exports. Of every dollar Mexico spends on imports,
70 cents goes to purchase U.S. goods.
As investment in Mexico boosts the income of Mexicans, it
enhances their ability to buy U.S. exports.
TRANSITIONAL MEASURES WILL FACILITATE ADJUSTMENT
In cases where immediate elimination of tariffs or non-
tariff barriers would create hardship for U.S. producers, we
will negotiate transitional measures, such as phase-in
periods and safeguard procedures, to minimize adjustment
pressures.
MEXICO'S ENVIRONMENTAL EFFORTS
MEXICO HAS A STRONG COMMITMENT TO THE ENVIRONMENT
o
Mexico's 1988 General Law for Ecological Equilibrium and
Environmental Protection is sweeping legislation that
establishes a firm commitment to protect the environment.
While our legal systems are not totally equivalent, much
of Mexico's 1988 law is based on U.S. law and experience.
The 1988 law sets national policy on ecology reserves,
rational use of natural resources, and environmental
protection. It establishes administrative sanctions and
criminal penalties for non-compliance with the law.
:
Since 1988, each new investment project must submit a
detailed study assessing its environmental impact.
--
Some private companies have already responded to the
GOM's urging that they consider environmental issues as
part of overall business strategy by creating special
environmental offices to analyze environmental impacts of
proposed business activities.
Environmental studies are now part of the curriculum in
18 Mexican universities.
o
Mexico has committed itself to enforcing its new law,
regulations and standards.
--
Mexico's enforcement efforts are constrained by limited
funds. However, the Mexican Ministry of Urban Dvelopment
and Ecology (SEDUE) budget has grown significantly in
recent years.
-
The budget could be effectively doubled by an
anticipated World Bank loan, and a significant
portion of the increase may be devoted to
enforcement.
-
Anticipating early approval of the loan, SEDUE
recently announced commitment of Mexican counterpart
funds to create 50 new inspector positions for
Mexico City and 50 for the U.S. -Mexico border.
Mexico has not hesitated to close several industrial
plants in cases of non-compliance.
In a unique Mexican approach to such matters, the GOM has
negotiated agreements with environmental and industrial
groups in an effort to assure compliance with the law.
-2-
-
For example, agreements have been reached with
the Maquiladora Association, which includes most
maquilas, to encourage environmental compliance
by its members.
--
Joint EPA and SEDUE technical workshops and on-site
inspections supplement voluntary private enterprise
programs in attempts to assure environmental
compliance by maquila industries.
MEXICO HAS A STRATEGY TO COMBAT MEXICO CITY AIR POLLUTION
o
With strong international support, including promises of
significant financing from Japan and technical assistance
from the United States, Mexico announced in October 1990 an
ambitious master plan to resolve air pollution problems in
greater Mexico City.
o
Mexico also has an interim contingency plan for Mexico City
which results in drastic reductions in traffic and
industrial activity during the most serious periods of air
pollution.
O
Mexico and the IDB are putting together a debt-for-nature
swap to fund reforestation efforts around Mexico City.
MEXICO AND THE UNITED STATES WORK TOGETHER TO PROTECT THE
ENVIRONMENT
O
A U.S. Mexico Agreement in 1989 provides for technical
support to help Mexico resolve the pollution problems in
Mexico City.
--
Under the Mexico City Agreement, patterned after the
successful 1983 Border Environment Agreement, action
programs and training and technical assistance
programs have been developed to deal with problems of
air and water pollution, hazardous waste, and
environmental health issues. EPA and SEDUE are the
National Coordinators.
-- The U.S. Department of Energy and the Mexican
Petroleum Institute signed in 1990 a Memorandum of
Understanding to do a computer model study of Mexico
City air pollution.
O
There has been substantial cooperation between the U.S. and
Mexico on wildlife protection and natural resource
management.
-- Cooperative dolphin and sea turtle protection programs
have been established. As a result of Mexico's
efforts, dolphins killed per net deployed were down
58% between 1986 and 1989.
11. 01. 91 11:20 AM
P 0 1
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
OFFICE OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
STATES
OFFICE OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
Fax Cover Sheet
401-1112
TO:
Name
Michalle Nix
Organization
White House
Phone Number
FROM:
Name
John Florez
Organizaton
Phone Number
Number of pages transmitted:
D
Comments:
As requested
400 MARYLAND AVE., S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20202
11.01.91
11:20
AM
P02
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
(Los Angeles, California)
For Immediate Release
September 19, 1991
The President today announced his intention to appoint the
following individuals to be Members of the President's Advisory
Commission on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans:
ANDRES BANDE, of Illinois. He will be designated Chairman.
Currently, Mr. Bande serves as President of Ameritech
International, Incorporated in Chicago, Illinois.
GUADALUPE C. QUINTANILLA, of Texas. she will be designated Vice
Chairman. Currently, Ms. Quintanilla serves as Assistant Vice
President at the University of Houston in Houston, Texas.
NANCY MARIE LOPEZ, of Georgia. Ms. Lopez is a Professional
Golfer on the Ladies Professional Golf Association Tour.
DIANA S. NATALICIO, of Texas. Currently, Dr. Natalicio serves as
Texas. President of the University of Texas at El Paso in El Paso,
RAUL H. YZAGUIRRE, of Texas. Currently, Mr. Yzaguirre serves as
President and Chief Executive Officer of the National Council of
La Raza in Washington, D.C.
ROBERT J. MIRANDA, of California. Currently, Mr. Miranda serves
as President and Chief Executive Officer of Miranda, Strabala &
Associates in Santa Ana, California.
LYN W. ZIEGENBEIN, of Nebraska. Currently, Ms. ziegenbein serves
Nebraska. as Executive Director of the Peter Kiewit Foundation in Omaha,
PETER GEORGE MEHAS, of California. Currently, Dr. Mehas serves
as Fresno County superintendent in Fresno, California. He also
serves as a Member of the California State Board of Education.
GLORIA GONZALES ROEMER, of Colorado. Currently, Ms. Roemer
serves as Vice President and Co-Owner of the Roemer 011 Company
in Denver, Colorado,
PETER H. COORS, of Colorado. Currently, Mr. Coors serves as
President of the Coors Brewing Company in Golden, Colorado.
ERNEST H. DREW, of New Jersey. Currently, Dr. Drew serves as
President and Chief Executive Officer of Hoechst Celanase in
Summerville, New Jersey.
DONALD R. GREENE, of Georgia. Currently, Mr. Greene serves as
President of the Coca-Cola Foundation in Atlanta, Georgia.
JACINTO PABLO JUAREZ, of Texas. Currently, Dr. Juarez serves as
Vice President for Instruction at Laredo Texas Junior College in
Laredo, Texas.
YVETTE DEL PRADO, of California. Currently, Dr. Prado serves as
Vice Computers. President for Education and Public Affairs at Tandem
Services of Mead Data Central, Inc.
PAGE
2
5TH STORY of Level 1 printed in FULL format.
Copyright (c) 1991 Newsday, Inc.;
Newsday
October 13, 1991, Sunday, CITY EDITION
SECTION: NEWS; Pg. 27
LENGTH: 1204 words
HEADLINE: Jobs Top Latinos' List of Concerns
SERIES: THE NEW Nueva YORK. First in a series
BYLINE: By Clay F. Richards. STAFF WRITER
KEYWORD: NEW YORK CITY; HISPANICS; SERIES; HISPANIC-AMERICANS; DISCRIMINATION;
SOCIAL CONDITIONS; POLL; NEWSDAY; STATISTICS; DISCRIMINATION; EMPLOYMENT;
UNEMPLOYMENT; LANGUAGE
BODY:
HISPANIC NEW YORKERS say their lives are a struggle for survival, an uphill
battle against unemployment and discrimination in a city where even those fluent
in English face routine mistreatment, according to the New York Poll.
Whether they came here in the last five years from the Dominican Republic or
Colombia, or whether their grandparents moved here from Puerto Rico before they
were born, most of the Hispanics interviewed by The Gallup Organization for New
York Newsday say they have been the victims of discrimination in nearly every
aspect of daily life. Those who speak mostly Spanish say language is the barrier
that separates them from mainstream New York, but those who are well-educated
and fluent in English say they are still often victims of stereotyping.
While the majority of all city residents in earlier New York Newsday polls
reported that life in the city was a struggle against outside elements, such as
crime and drugs invading their lives, Hispanic New Yorkers painted a different
picture, one in which their lives are a struggle for basic necessities - a job,
a home and enough money to feed their families.
The poll of 800 Hispanic adults, conducted Sept. 3-8, was one of the most
extensive surveys ever made of Hispanic New Yorkers. Those who participated were
given the choice of being interviewed in Spanish or English.
Among the major findings of the poll:
One in five Hispanics says jobs and unemployment are the most important
problems facing Hispanics in New York City today. Unemployment is perceived as a
more serious problem by college graduates (27 percent) than by high school
dropouts (17 percent), an indication that it may be easier for Hispanics to find
low-paying jobs as laborers than higher-paying white-collar positions.
Eighty percent of Hispanics say they have been mistreated by the police, and
more than 70 percent say they have been mistreated by each of the following
groups: landlords, the courts, the media, their employers, shopkeepers, the
schools and local elected officials. Landlords fared the worst, with only 12
percent of the Hispanics surveyed saying they hardly ever or never have
LEXIS'NEXIS'LEXISNEXIS
Services of Mead Data Central, Inc.
PAGE
3
(c) 1991 Newsday, October 13, 1991
trouble with them, while schools did the "best," with 28 percent of the
respondents saying they seldom have problems.
Only 18 percent of Hispanics say they have language problems when dealing
with police, the telephone company, schools, getting medical care, at the bank
or other places. But among those who speak primarily Spanish, 38 percent say
language is a major problem. Twenty-nine percent of Hispanics in the city say
they speak Spanish exclusively or primarily, and 22 percent depend on Spanish
radio and newspapers as their main source of news.
After jobs and unemployment, 14 percent say race relations is the most
important problem facing Hispanics in New York City, and the same number say
education is the most serious. Some 12 percent say drugs is the most important
problem, with no other issue breaking into double digits. When asked what is the
biggest problem facing the city as a whole, Hispanics list drugs (28 percent)
and crime (27 percent) almost evenly.
One-third of Hispanics in New York have annual household incomes of less than
$ 20,000, a number almost identical with that of the black population. The
number of whites with an income that low is about half that of blacks and
Hispanics. Only 6 percent of Hispanics and blacks have an income exceeding $
60,000 a year, compared with 17 percent of whites.
The search for a better job was uppermost on the mind of David Dopico, 43,
who lives in the Fort Greene section of Brooklyn. Even though he is a
second-generation Puerto Rican, life in New York has been a struggle.
"Even if you were born here and your parents were born here, we still have
the problems of stereotyping," says Dopico, who has gone back to college in
hopes of breaking the cycle of unemployment and low-paying jobs by becoming a
teacher. "I'm fortunate that I can speak English. If you can't speak English,
you can't get a job. And it's getting worse."
SANDRA SANTIAGO, 25, a registrar at a hospital, voices similar complaints in
connection with her search for better housing. Santiago has no language problem
because her grandparents moved here from Puerto Rico more than 40 years ago and
she has spoken English all her life. But for two months she has been looking for
a bigger apartment in the North Bronx for her husband and two children and has
reluctantly concluded that being Hispanic is part of the problem.
"I'm not too sure if it's racism, or just taking care of your own," she says,
recounting how apartments suddenly turn up as unavailable when she goes to look
at them. "I try to think positive, but I'm sure there are things I'm being held
back on. And I think sometimes the same thing is happening when it comes to
job-related positions, too."
Rachael Pena, who came here from the Dominican Republic 16 years ago and
lives in the Washington Heights section of Manhattan, is one of those having
trouble finding a job. A college graduate, Pena, 36, has spent the last two
years raising her baby and now wants to re-enter the workforce. But she has
spent two months searching fruitlessly for a job as a social worker or in the
health-care field.
"Yes," Pena says of her job problems. "I think it is some part because I'm
Hispanic."
LEXIS NEXIS'LEXIS NEXIS
Services of Mead Data Central, Inc.
PAGE
4
(c) 1991 Newsday, October 13, 1991
Treatment of Hispanics
THE QUESTION: How often do you think Hispanics in New York are mistreated by
each of the following, all the time, most of the time, sometimes, hardly ever or
never?
Hardly
All or most
ever
of the time
Sometimes
or never
The police
39
41
12
»
The courts
32
34
14
Landlords
47
30
12
The media
31
39
18
Employers
37
41
11
Shopkeepers
24
41
20
The schools
23
36
28
Local elected
officials
21
34
20
-
Primary Language
THE QUESTION: Do you generally speak
...
Spanish exclusively with no English
6%
Primarily Spanish with some English
23% #
Both English and Spanish equally
42% -
Primarily English with some Spanish
24% #
English exclusively with no Spanish
5% -
ABOUT THE POLL: For this survey, The Gallup Organization conducted 800 telephone
interviews among a sample of Hispanic adults age 18 or older. Interviewing was
conducted Sept. 3-8, 1991. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 4
percentage points. Categories do not add up to 100 percent because responses of
"don't know" have been omitted.
GRAPHIC: Charts-1) THE NEW YORK POLL. NEW YORK NEWSDAY. Treatment of
Hispanics-THE QUESTION: How often do you think Hispanics in New York are
mistreated by each of the following, all the time, most of the time, sometimes,
hardly ever or never. 2) Primary Language-THE QUESTION: Do you generally speak
...Spanish exclusively with no English.-See end of text
LEXIS'NEXIS LEXIS'NEXIS
Apr. 25 / Administration of George Bush, 1989
tional marijuana and cocaine smuggling
This money then, totaling $10 million, is
ring. How many lives, how many families,
the bounty of defeated drug criminals. And
how many hopes and dreams have been
we won't stop until we nail every coward
destroyed with these chemical weapons of
who deals in death and put them where
death and destruction-drugs? Death
they belong.
bought and sold by the ton-this operation
Now, you have had outstanding results
had commercial packing equipment, under-
over the last 2 years, thanks to the team
ground storage vaults, large vans with
efforts of local, State, and Federal agents:
hidden compartments, jet aircraft, ocean-
nearly 40 million in cash confiscated, the
going vessels. Once a warehouse of death,
equivalent of 9 million injections of heroin
now it is a source of hope. Rancho del Rio
and 38 million doses of cocaine seized. And
has been reclaimed. Thanks to the Compre-
that's 15 doses for every man, woman, and
hensive Crime Control Act of 1984, pushed
child in Orange County. Do we need any
through by your former Congressman, Dan
other reason than that to win this war? Let
Lungren, we can now seize drug dealers'
these funds go then to fighting the war they
assets and use them in the war on drugs.
once financed. Let us raise awareness and
And this is the first piece of forfeited drug
build strength through a constellation of
property turned over for use by local offi-
concerned Americans in every town, city,
cials in Orange County. It's going to serve
and community in this country. And let us
as an International Narcotics Training
send a message, loud and clear, to every
Center and as a reminder to these mer-
drug merchant in America: You're going to
chants of death: Your money won't help
be out of business! That is our message.
you; in fact, we're going to use it against
That is my message to you today. Keep up
you.
the good work and continue to set an exam-
So, what you see on these tables behind
ple for the rest of our great country.
us is over $4 million-line up-[laughter]-
Thank you. God bless you. And God bless
$4 million of laundered drug money recent-
the United States of America.
ly seized by U.S. Customs and the regional
narcotics suppression program in Operation
Note: The President spoke at 12:23 p.m. out-
Shackle. And today I'd like to formally turn
side of the main house at Rancho del Rio.
these funds over to Sheriff Gates to help
He was introduced by Orange County Sher-
fund the Rancho del Rio project. I hope
iff Brad Gates. In his remarks, he referred
that all of you can help make this project a
to Michael K. Hayde, president of Drug Use
reality. I'm also pleased to present another
Is Life Abuse, and Robert Schuller, pastor
$6 million in drug money-confiscated
of the Crystal Cathedral. Prior to his re-
through a joint DEA-local sting operation in
marks, the President toured the facility.
California and Arizona-to fund more effec-
Following his remarks, he attended a work-
tive, cooperative efforts between local,
ing luncheon with law enforcement officers
State, and Federal enforcement agencies.
at the ranch.
Remarks to Members of the Hispanic-American Community in Los
Angeles, California
April 25, 1989
about
was
ad
lib
Thank you very much. And, Mr.
make note that it was here, not in this very
Schwartz-Murray, thank you, sir, for the
room, but right on this campus-Murray
warm welcome back to this campus, and I
Schwartz referring to my last visit here that
am so delighted to be here. This is a non-
was highly politicized, perhaps one of the
partisan appearance. And therefore I will
most dramatic moments in our whole cam-
resist any partisan commentary except to
paign cycle, but certainly in my life. And so,
476
Administration of George Bush, 1989 / Apr. 25
I have a feeling, a good feeling, and very
tion], who so enrich our administration.
pleased to be welcomed back by two
It was over a year ago at a LULAC
people who give so much to UCLA.
[League of United Latin American Commu-
I would just give a word of welcome to all
nities] meeting in Texas where I said time
of you. And I'm delighted to salute UCLA,
had come, long since, that we have Hispan-
one of our great universities. I would simply
ics in the President's Cabinet. And now we
say that expressing gratitude is not always
have two outstanding Secretaries: Manuel
easy. But I do want to express my gratitude
Lujan and Lauro Cavazos.
for this warm reception. I had a chance to
I don't want to embarrass this guy, but it
meet with some of the organizers early on
was here at UCLA, on one of these ques-
to tell them how grateful I am for this won-
tions they ask you at these debates out of a
derful get-together on relatively short
clear blue sky-and they asked me: Name a
notice.
couple of contemporary heroes, or who are
You know, a Hispanic patriot of our hemi-
your heroes? I've found that in this line of
sphere once said: "I am America's son. To
her I belong." Well, let me speak for Bar-
work you always get psychoanalyzed-
bara, who regrettably is not with us here
[laughter]-and you're stretched out on a
tonight. I feel that we belong, for we've
theoretical couch for people to figure out
spent a lot of our adult lives in-Barbara
what makes you tick-that just goes with
and I-in Texas, seeing close up, firsthand,
the job. But this question came out of the'
the strength of the Hispanic communities
clear blue sky, and it had something to do
there. Hispanic values touched us: disci-
with your heroes. And I cited, quite proud-
pline, caring, patriotism, love of God. And
ly, Tony Fauci, who is one of the research-
of course because of Jeb's wife, Columba,
ers and now top people at the National In-
we feel doubly blessed as a family because
stitutes of Health who is doing so much in
the Hispanic culture is our culture, too.
AIDS and cancer research and all of this.
ad
And tomorrow I'm going to meet with
What immediately came to my mind was
one of our greatest Presidents. And I'm
Jaime Escalante, who is here with us today.
lib
talking about California's always-favorite
And I-here he is-I told Jaime-I said,
son and my good friend, Ronald Reagan.
"Look"-I saw him later; I think it was back
And I can't help recalling the words that he
at the White House or somewhere-I said:
once said about Hispanic-Americans: "Just
"I hope I didn't throw you into some kind
as their forefathers sought a dream in the
of partisan limelight there because what I
new world, Hispanic-Americans have real-
really wanted to do, though, is express my
ized their dream in our great nation and
feeling of contribution, my feeling of re-
will continue to do so. Their dedication to
spect for the contribution that you have
higher purposes reflects what is best in the
made in this-what we're talking about
American spirit."
here today-excellence in education." So,
Well, my friends, that spirit brought your
right amongst us again is one of my genuine
parents and your grandparents and some of
heroes.
you to the United States. And they and you
I see many business people here, people
came in search of a better life, and you're
that know what entrepreneurship means
finding it. And you came to build a better
and have taken the lead in starting
America, and you're sure helping build it.
businesses and building them. And you are
And you're building it through family,
creating new jobs and cutting unemploy-
through church, through love of country
ment in the process-here, California, many
and belief in the value of hard work-you
of you from across the country. And as
know, building it in the school also, a new
America's fastest growing minority in the
spirit, I'd say, of public service that is
21st century, you, more than ever, will help
sweeping our educational system, from
tell the American story. And so is the prom-
grade school to grad school, building it
ise that our kids will inherit a better land
through excellence and through such lead-
than we inherited true. It is very, very
ers now as we have in Washington: Secre-
true-and I'm convinced of it.
taries Lujan [Interior] and Cavazos [Educa-
And I haven't been President very long,
477
Apr. 25 / Administration of George Bush, 1989
but I remain an optimist about the United
family-I will have nothing to do with any
States of America. The problems are big,
Federal legislation that diminishes the
but we can solve them. And when I look to
strength of the American family. We've got
the values that give us the underpinning for
to find ways to strengthen it, and I think
everything we do in society, I come right
I've learned a lot of that right here from
back to the Hispanic community. And I'm
people in this room.
grateful to you.
We are rural and urban; native-born and
Some people say that the younger gen-
foreign-born; Hispanic and non-Hispanic;
eration is selfish. I don't believe this. I have
brown, black, white-but most of all, we are
much more confidence in the young people
Americans. So, my plea is: Let's join our
than to say they're selfish. And young
hands together, for the future is ours. And
people of this country hunger to return to
as we do, please accept my thanks for this
America a measure of what America has
wonderful occasion. I do want to have an
given us all. The people in this room care
opportunity now to come and greet as
about the disadvantaged, about the environ-
many as I possibly can. God bless you.
ment. And under this administration, we
Thank you all, and God bless the United
are going to work together to transform our
States of America. Thank you very, very
caring into a commitment for action. Let us
much.
pledge, then, not simply to knock at the
door of opportunity, let's throw that door
Note: The President spoke at 5:28 p.m. in
wide open and keep it open! And let's re-
the Galleria at the James West Alumni
member that we are one nation under God
Center on the campus of the University of
and that we honor Him with the lives we
California at Los Angeles. In his remarks,
lead.
he referred to Murray Schwartz, executive
People are asking me now that you've
vice chancellor of the university; John and
been President, what are some of your
Columba Bush, his son and daughter-in-
and
major concerns? And one for me is the dim-
law; and Jaime Escalante, a calculus teacher
inution of American family. It's more than a
at Garfield High School in east Los Ange-
lib
sociological textbook kind of a concern. I
les. Prior to his remarks, the President at-
worry about it. And I want to say to you in
tended a reception in the alumni center for
this room-because I think of the Hispanic
leaders of the Hispanic community. Follow-
culture in America, in the United States, is
ing his remarks, he stayed overnight at the
family-oriented; strength coming from the
Four Seasons Hotel.
Nomination of Richard L. Armitage To Be Secretary of the Army
April 25, 1989
The President today announced his inten-
and he worked in the foreign policy office
tion to nominate Richard L. Armitage to be
of the Reagan Presidential campaign. Mr.
Secretary of the Army. He would succeed
Armitage has served as administrative assist-
John O. Marsh.
ant to Senator Robert Dole of Kansas, 1978-
Mr. Armitage has served in several capac-
1979; consultant to the Pentagon, 1975-
ities at the Department of Defense, includ-
1976; and Naval and Marine Corps adviser
ing Assistant Secretary of Defense for Inter-
with the U.S. Defense Attaché Office in
national Security Affairs, 1983 to present,
Saigon, 1973-1975. He is a member of the
and Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense
Association of Asian Studies and the World
for International Security Affairs for East
Affairs Council.
Asia, 1981-1983. From 1979 to 1983, Mr.
Mr. Armitage graduated from the U.S.
Armitage established a Washington-based
Naval Academy in 1967, where he received
consulting firm specializing in Asian affairs,
a commission as an ensign in the U.S. Navy.
478
AUSTRALIA RESEARCH
National Anthem, constitution
Australian symbols, flag
History/culture/demographics of Australia from Encyclopedia,
National Geographic pieces, almanac, etc.
Prominent Australian-Americans
Birthplace of Australians like Paul Hogan, Mel Gibson, Olivia
Newton John
Australian musical groups
Bush went to Australia in April 1982 -- What did he do when
he was there? Contact Emily Mead's office
Prime Minister Bob Hawke references in Bush speeches -- Hawk
visited during this administration (1989)
Australia was a coalition member -- what was their
contribution? e.g., number of planes, ships, troops,
casualties. (contact NSC)
Australian-U.S. relations -- history of
Johnson was the only U.S. President to go to Australia -- find
out when and copy any speeches he delivered.
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG ENTRIES
F.A. HAYEK
ITEMS 1-3 OF 74
SET 1: BRIEF DISPLAY
FILE: LCCC
(ASCENDING ORDER)
1. 54-64:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Capitalism and the
historians. Chicago], University of Chicago Press, c1954]. vii, 187 p.
20 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB501 .H39
2. 67-18436: Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Studies in
philosophy, politics and economics. Chicago], University of Chicago
Press, 19671. X, 356 P., 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HC59 .H363 1967b
3. 68-140028:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The confusion of
language in political thought. London, Institute of Economic Affairs,
1968. 36 P. 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: H11 .147 no. 20
4. 70-127444:Saulnier, Raymond Joseph. Contemporary monetary theory. New York
AMS Press, 1970, c1938J. 420 P. 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB3723 .S3 1970
5. 70-435509: Roads to freedom: essays in honour of Friedrich A. von Hayek.
London, Routledge & K. Paul, 1969. xix, 315 P. plate, illus., port, 26 cm
LC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .R575
6. 72-183945:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). A tiger by the tail.
London, Institute of Economic Affairs, 1972. xii, 124 P, 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB99.7 .H36
7. 73-82488:Hayek, Friedrich A. n/(Friedrich August). The mirage of social
justice /. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, c1976. xiv, 195 P., 23
cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: JC578 .H39 1976
8. 73-166686: on rent control: essays on the economic consequences of
political action to restrict rents in five countries. London, Institute
of Economic Affairs, 1972. xvi, 79 P, 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD7287.5 V47
9. 73-181173: Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Rules and order.
London, Routledge & K. Paul, 1973]. xi, 184 P, 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: LAW
10. 74-7272: Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Collectivist economic
planning. Clifton N.J.J, A. M. Kelly, 1975. V, 293 P, 23 cm.
NOT IN LC COLLECTION
11. 74-172773:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Economic freedom
and representative government. London], Published for the Wincott
Foundation by the Institute of Economic Affairs, 1973. 22 P, 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: H11 147 no. 39
12. 74-183821:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Individualism and
economic order. Chicago, H. Regnery Co, 1972, c1948]. vi, 271 p, 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB34 .H3 1972
13. 75-34747:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). A discussion with
Friedrich A. von Hayek. Washington, American Enterprise Institute for
Public Policy Research, c1975. 20 p., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HC106.6 .H328
14. 75-505285:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Die Irrtumer des
Konstruktivismus und die Grundlagen legitimer Kritik gesellschaftlicher
Gebilde. Tubingen, Mohr, 1975. 34 P. ill., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HM24 .H42 1975
15. 75-521367:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Prix et production /
Paris, Calmann-Levy, c1975. 199 p, 111., 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HG229 .H314
16. 76-4073:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Preise und Produktion
/. Wien New York, Springer-Verlag, c1976. 18, XV, 124 p, 111., 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB3723 .H3315 1976
17. 76-8360:Essays on Hayek /. New York, New York University Press, 1976.
xxiv, 182 P, port., 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB103. E77
18. 76-76355:HayeK, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Profits, interest,
and investment. New York, A. M. Kelley, 1969]. viii, 266 P, illus, 20
cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB3711 .H365 1969
19. 76-95610:Roads to freedom. New York], A. M. Kelley, 1969]. xix, 315 p,
port, 26 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .R575 1969
20. 76-352410:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Full employment at
any price? /. London], Institute of Economic Affairs, 1975. 52 p., 22
cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: H11 .147 vol. 45
21. 76-365840:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Choice in currency.
London, Institute of Economic Affairs, 1976. 11, 46 p., 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: H11 .147 no. 48
22. 76-369703:Rent control. Vancouver, Fraser Institute, 1975. xvili, 212 P,
ill., 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD7287.5 .R42 1975
23. 76-472506:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Geldtheorie und
Konjunkturtheorle /,, Salzburg, Neugebauer, 1976. XV, 160 p., 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB3711 .H35 1976
24. 76-525180:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Die Irrtumer des
Konstruktivismus und die Grundlagen legitimer Kritik gesellschaftlicher
Gebilde. Munchen Salzburg, W. Fink, 1970. 34 P, 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HM24 .H42
25. 77-9010:Finer, Herman. Road to reaction /. Westport, Conn, Greenwood
Press, 1977, c1945. xii, 228 p., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD82. H38 F5 1977
26. 77-88475:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). New studies in
philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas /. Chicago,
University of Chicago Press, 1978. vii, 314 p., 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: H61 .H3366 1978
27. 77-181817: Toward liberty. Menlo Park, Calif, Institute for Humane Studies
19711. 2 V, port, 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: H35 .T65
28. 77-356723:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Denationalisation
of money, London, Institute of Economic Affairs, 1976. 107 p, ill., 22
cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HG230.7 .H38
29. 77-561736:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Individualismus und
wirtschaftliche Ordnung /. Salzburg, W. Neugebauer, 1976. 357 p., 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB34 .H33 1952
30. 78-6366:Liberty and the rule of law /, College Station, Tex, Texas A&M
University Press, c1979. xi, 349 p., 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: K3171. A3 L5 1979
31. 78-25905:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The political order
of a free people /. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1979. XV, 244
p., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: JC585 .H294 1979
32. 78-183822:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The constitution of
liberty. Chicago, Regnery, 1972, c1960]. 569 P, 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: JC585 .H29 1972
33. 78-311911:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). New studies in
philosophy, politics, economics, and the history of ideas /. London,
Routledge and K. Paul, 1978. vil, 314 p., 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: H61 .H3366 1978b
34. 78-315112:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The mirage of
social justice /. London etc.], Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976. XIV,
195 p., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: JC578 .H39 1976b
35. 78-356264:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Entnationalisierung
des Geldes. Tubingen, Mohr, 1977. xiii, 136 P., 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HG230.7 .H3815
36. 78-362453:Machlup, Fritz. Wurdigung der Werke von Friedrich A. von Hayek
/. Tubingen, Mohr, 1977. 76 p., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB103. H3 M33
37. 78-369340:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Drei Vorlesungen
uber Demokratie, Gerechtigkeit und Sozialismus /. Tubingen, Mohr, 1977.
59 p., 23 cm.
LC- CALL NUMBER: JC423 .H42
38. 78-375237:Graf, Hans Georg. "Muster-Voraussagen' und "Erklarungen des
Prinzips" bei F. A. von Hayek. Tubingen, Mohr, 1978. 108 p., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB101. H39 G7
39. 79-21045:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The
counter-revolution of science. Indianapolis, Liberty Press, 1979, c1952.
415 P, port., 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: H61 .H33 1979
40. 79-54089:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). A conversation with
Friedrich A. von Hayek. Washington, American Enterprise Institute for
Public Policy Research, c1979. 21 p., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB95 .H388
41. 79-77255:MII1, John Stuart. John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor, their
friendship and subsequent marriage. New York, A. M. Kelley, 1969]. 320
P, illus., facsims., geneal. tables, ports, 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: B1606 .A28 1969
42. 79-113451:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Friedrich A. Hayek,
honorary fellow at the Hoover Institution, speaks on the reactionary
character of the Socialist conception to the Advisory Committee of the
Domestic Studies Program and the 1978-1979 visiting scholars, Stanford
University, October 27, 1978. Stanford, Calif.], The Institution,
c1979] cover 1978. 11 p., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB95 H39
43. 79-317648:Barry, Norman P. Hayek's social and economic philosophy /.
London, Macmillan, 1979. xi, 228 p., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: H59. H39 B37
4.4. 79-383885:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Wissenschaft und
Sozialismus. Tubingen, Mohr, 1979. 17 p., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HX21 H37
45. 80-17870:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Individualism and
economic order /. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1980, c1948.
vii, 271 p., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB34 .H3 1980
46. 80-477052:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Liberalismus /.
Tubingen, Mohr, 1979. 47 p., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HM276 .H37
47. 80-485373:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The three sources
of human values /. London, the London School of Economics and Political
Science, 1978. 40 p., 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: BD232 .H343
48. 81-3284:Rent control, myths and realities. Hillside, NJ, Enslow Publishers
c1981. xxill, 335 P. 111., 21 cm.
NOT IN LC COLLECTION
49. 81-102004:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Frledrich August). The road to serfdom
/. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1980?]. xxiii, 248 p., 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H38 1980
50. 81-134109:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). A tiger by the tail.
San Francisco, Calif, Cato Institute, c1979. xiv, 158 P., 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB99.7 .H363
51. 81-183903:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Unemployment and
monetary policy. San Francisco, Calif, Cato Institute, c1979 (1980
printing). XVIII, 53 p., 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD5710 .H39 1979
52. 81-459325: Friedrich A. von Hayek. Baden-Baden, Nomos-Verlagsgesellschaft,
1980. 60 p., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB101. H39 F74
53. 81-467300:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Social justice,
socialism & democracy. Turramurra, N.S.W, Centre for Independent Studies
1979. 61 p., 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: JC578 .H394
54. 82-162213:Hayek na UnB. Brasilia, DF, Editora Universidade de Brasilia,
com o apoio, Fundacao Roberto Marinho, c1981. 58 P. ports., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB101. H39 H39 1981
55. 82-176256:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Frledrich August von). Law,
legislation, and liberty. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1982. 3 V.
in 1, 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: JC585 .H293 1982
56. 82-205615:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Economic progress
in an open society /. Seoul, Korea, Korea International Economic
Institute, 1978. 53 p., 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H34518 1978
57. 82-213742:Rent control, myths & realities. Vancouver, B.C., Canada,
Fraser Institute, 1981. xxili, 335 P. 11., 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD7288.82 .R45 1981b
58. 83-12205: Conference on European Monetary Union and Currency Competition.
Currency competition and monetary union /. The Hague Boston, M. Nijhoff
Publishers Hingham, MA, Distributors for the U.S. and Canada, Kluwer
Boston, 1984. vii, 298 p., 25 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HG3894 .066 1980
59. 83-208770:Friedrich A. von Hayek. Baden-Baden, Nomos, c1982. 68 P, ill.,
port., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB101. H39 F74 1982
60. 84-227:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Money, capital, and
fluctuations. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press London, Routledge
& Kegan Paul, 1984. XI, 196 P., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HG221 .H346 1984
61. 84-6706:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The essence of Hayek /
Stanford, Calif, Hoover Institution Press, Stanford University, C1984.
Ixvill, 419. P. ill., 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB171 .H428 1984
62. 85-154043:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Money, capital &
fluctuations. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul in co-operation with London
School of Economics and Political Science, 1984. xi, 196 P., 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB171 H429 1984
63. 85-179209: The Political economy of freedom. Munchen, Philosophia Verlag,
c1985. 320 p., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB101.H39 P65 1985
64. 85-241337:Mestmacker, Ernst Joachim. Regelbildung und Rechtsschutz in
marktwirtschaftlichen Ordnungen /. Tubingen, Mohr, 1985. 35 P., 23 cm.
LC. CALL NUMBER: K3840.Z9 M47 1985
65. 87-17244:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Monetary nationalism
and international stability /. Fairfield, NJ, A.M. Kelley, 1989. xiv,
94 P., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HG221 .H345 1989
66. 87-873565:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Der Strom der
Guter und Leistungen /. Tubingen, Mohr, 1984. 28 P., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: MLCM 87/645 (H)
67. 88-9694:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The fatal conceit /.
London New York, Routledge New York, NY, Routledge, Chapman & Hall, 1988-.
P. cm.
CIP ***** NOT YET IN LC
68. 88-10082:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The collected works
of F.A. Hayek /. London New York, Routledge New York, NY, Routledge,
Chapman & Hall, 1988-. P. cm.
CIP - NOT YET IN LC
69. 88-26763:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The collected works
of F.A. Hayek /. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1989- ,c1988-.
V. <1 >, 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB171 .H426 1989
70. 88-29577:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The fatal conceit.
Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1989, c1988. xiii, 180 p., 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB171 .H426 1989 vol. 1
71. 89-78252:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Economic freedom /.
Oxford, UK Cambridge, Mass., USA, B. Blackwell, 1991. xii, 415 p., 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB95 .H389 1990
72. 90-4693: Thornton, Henry. An enquiry into the nature and effects of the
paper credit of Great Britain (1802). Fairfield, NJ, A.M. Kelley, 1991.
368 P, 11., 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HG944 T4 1991
73. 90-158740:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Camino de
servidumbre /. San Jose, Costa Rica, Libro Libre, 1989. 261 p., 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H3817 1989
74. 91-26840:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The fortunes of
liberalism. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1992. P. cm.
CIP ==== NOT YET IN LC
1. ggg13-50000:Hayek, Friedrich August von. La route de la servitude. Paris
7
Librairie de Medicis, 1945]. 179 p. 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H3815
2. 11120-300000:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Der Wettbewerb als
Entdeckungsverfahren, Kiel, 1968. 20 p, 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD41 .H35
3. 30-20692: Hayek, Friedrich August von. Geldtheorie und konjunkturtheorie,
Wien/Leipzig, Holder-Pichler-Tempsky a. g, 1929. xii, 147, 2J P, 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB3711 .H35
4., 131-163:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Priese und produktion, Wien, J.
Springer, 1931. XV, 124 P, incl. diagrs, 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB3723 .H35
5. 32-641: Hayek, Friedrich August von. Prices and production, London, G.
Routledge & sons, ltd, 1931. XV, 112 P, diagrs, 19 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HG229 .H3
6. 32-4460 Weiser, Friedrich. Gesammelte abhandlungen; Tubingen, J. C. B.
Mohr, 1929. xxxiv p., 1 1, 404 P. front. (port. ), 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB43 .W5
7. 33-15796: Hayek, Friedrich August von. Monetary theory and the trade cycle,
New York, Harcourt, Brace & CO., Inc, 1933]. 244 P, 20 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB3711 .H36
8. 33-23480:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Beitrage zur geldtheorie, Wien,
J. Springer, 1933. ix p., 1 1, 511, 1] p. diagr, 25 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HG221 .H34
9. 35-7185: Hayek, Friedrich August von. Collectivist economic planning;
London, G. Routledge & sons, ltd, 1935. V, 293 P. diagrs, 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H345
10. 35-7782: Hayek, Friedrich August von. Prices and production, London, G.
Routledge & sons, ltd, 1935]. xiv, 162 P, diagrs, 19 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HG229 .H3 1935
11. 38-17803:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Monetary nationalism and
international stability, London New York etc.], Longmans, Green and CO
, 1937. 4 p.1., xi]-xiv P, 1 1,, 94 P. 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HG221 .H345
12. 39-4889 Saulnier, Raymond Joseph. Contemporary monetary theory; New
York, Columbia university press, 1938. 420 P, 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: H31 .07 no. 443
13. 39-10703:Saulnier, Raymond Joseph. Contemporary monetary theory; New
York, 1938. 2 P, 1., 7-420 p., 1 1, 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB3723 .S3 1938
14. 39-19735:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Freedom and the economic system
Chicago, Ill, The University of Chicago press, 1939]. iv, 37, 1] p, 20
cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H35
15. 40-6253:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Monetary nationalism and
international stability, London New York etc.], Longmans, Green and CO
') 1939. 4 p.l., xi]-xiv P. 1 1., 94 p. 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HG221 H345 1939
16. 40-8258: Hayek, Friedrich August von. Profits, interest and investment,
and other essays on the theory of industrial fluctuations, London, G.
Routledge and sons, ltd, 1939]. vili, 266 p, diagrs, 19 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB3711 .H365
17. 40-10999: Thornton, Henry. An enquiry into the nature and effects of the
paper credit of Great Britain (1802) London, G. Allen & Unwin ltd,
1939]. 368 p, incl. front. (port.), 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HG944 T4 1939
18. 40-36089: Sangines Villalva, Estela. Aspecto monetario de la toeria de
Hayek Mexico, D. F, 1939. p. cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HG221 .S26
19. a41-2540:Hayek, Friedrich August von. The pure theory of capital,
London, Macmillan and CO., limited, 1941. xxxi, 454 P, diagrs, 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB501 .H392
20. 41-17893: Hayek, Friedrich August von. L'economie dirigee en regime
collectiviste; Paris, Librairie de Medicis, 1939]. 2 p, 1.,
7J-303, 1] P. diagrs, 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H3452
21. 42-25826:Mil1, John Stuart. The spirit of the age : Chicago, Ill, The
University of Chicago press, 1942]. xxxiii, 93, 1] p. 20 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HM51 .M5
22. a44-4381 Hayek, Friedrich August von. The road to serfdom, Chicago,
University of Chicago press, 19441. xi, 250 P. 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H38 1944a
23. 44-4911:Hayek, Friedrich August von. The road to serfdom, London, G.
Routledge & sons ltd, 19441. viii, 184 P. 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H38 1944
24. 45-9861:Finer, Herman. Road to reaction, Boston, Little, Brown, and
company, 1945. xii p., 1 1, 228 P, 19 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD82. H38 F5
25. 45-16927: Press research, inc., Washington, D.C. Planning vs. freedom
Washington], Press research, inc, c1945. 1 p.l., 9 numb. 1, 30 X 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD82. H382 P7
26. 46-21427 Hayek, Friedrich August von. Individualism: true and false.
Dublin, Hodges, Figgis & CO., ltd.; etc., etc.], 1946. 38 P. 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: B824 .H3
27. 46-40423: Kamp, Mathias Ernst. Die geldliche wechsellagenlehre. Jena, G.
Fischer, 1939. X, 143, 1] P. 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HG3751 .K3 1939a
28. 47-15211:Bogliolo, Romulo. Socialismo, libertad, direccion. Buenos
Aires, La Vanguardia], 1946. 3 p.l., 9-124 p, 2 1, 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD85 .B62
29. 47-25907 Finer, Herman. Road to reaction. " London, D. Dobson, 1946].
131 P, 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD82. H38 F5 1946
30. 48-4149:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Individualism and economic order.
Chicago], Univ. of Chicago Press, 1948]. vii, 271 P, 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB34 .H3
31. 48-4321:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Pianificazione economica
collettivistica. Torino], G. Einaudi, 1946. xxi, 235 p, 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H3454
32. 48-28090:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Camino de servidumbre; Madrid,
Editorial Revista de Derecho Privado, 1946]. 245 p. port, 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H3817
33. 49-26396:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Individualism and economic order.
=
London], Routledge & K. Paul, 1949]. vii, 271 P. 22 CM.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB34 .H3 1949
34. 50-25759:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Vejen til traeldom; Kobenhavn,
Gyldendal, 1946. 263 p. 21 cm.
LC.CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H3612
35. 52-614:MII1, John Stuart. John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor. London,
Routledge & K. Paul, 1951]. 320 p, ports., facsim, 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: B1606 .A28
36. 52-8157:Hayek, Friedrich August von. The counter-revolution of science;
Glencoe, Ill, Free Press, 1952]. 255 P. 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: H61 .H33
37. 52-14469:Hayek, Friedrich August von. The sensory order. Chicago,
University of Chicago Press, 1952]. xxii, 209 p, 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: BF233 .H35
38. 52-34259:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Societe liberale ou
collectivisme totalitaire, d'apres "La route de la servitude." Paris,
P. Lhoste-Lachaume, 1945?]. 63 p, 25 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H3815 1945a
39. 52-68426: Hayek, Friedrich August von. Individualismus und wirtschaftliche
Ordnung. Erlenbach-Zurich, E. Rentsch, 1952]. 344 p. 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB34 .H33
40. 53-21448:Hayek, Friedrich August von. The sensory order. London,
Routledge & Paul, 1952J. 209 P. 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: BF181 .H385
41. 56-26965:Hayek, Friedrich August von. The political ideal of the rule of
law. Cairo, 1955. 60 P, 25 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: LAW <General Law "Haye">
42. 58-29413:Brell, Karl Heinz. Zur Problematik der progressiven
Einkommensbesteuerung Karlsruhe], 1957. 173 P, illus, 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HJ4629.H3 B7
43. 59-11618:HayeK, Friedrich August von. The constitution of liberty.
Chicago], Univeristy of Chicago Press, 19601. X, 569 P. 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: JC585 .H29
44. a60-5368:Fabbrini, Luigi. Istanze statiche ed istanze evolutive nella
modellistica contemporanea: Leontief, Hayek, post-keyneslani. Bologna]
, Cappelli, 1959]. 172 P, 25 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB177 .F25
45. 61-59726:Seldon, Arthur. Agenda for a free society; London, Published
for the Institute of Economic Affairs by Hutchinson, 19611. P. cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: JC585 S46
46. 63-18476:Finer, Herman. Road to reaction. Chicago, Quadrangle Books,
1963]. xxvill, 228 P, 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HE82. H38 F5 1963
47. a64-489:Hayek, Frierich August von. Rules, perception, and
intelligibility, London, n.d.]. p. 321]-344. 26 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: AS122 .L5 vol. 48
48. 64-7666:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Monetary nationalism and
international stability, New York, A. M. Kelley, bookseller, 1964.
xiv, 94 p. 22 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HG221 .H345 1964
49. 64-30916:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Los sindicatos y la ocupacion
obrera. Buenos Aires, Centro de Estudios sobre la Libertad, 1961. 52 p
20 cm.,
LC CALL NUMBER: HD6511 .H34
50. 64-43358:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Wirtschaft. Freiburg im Breisgau,
H. F. Schulz, 1963. 24 P, 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB71 H44
51. 66-22629:Hayek, Fr iedrich August von. Monetary theory and the trade
cycle, New York, A. M. Kelley, 1966. 244 p, 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB3711 .H36 1966
52. c67-634:Hal-yeh-k'o han t'a ti SSU hsiang. 1965]. 2, 11, 1, 235 p.
port, 19 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB103. H3 H3 (Orien China)
53. 67-19586:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Prices and production, New York,
A. M. Kelley, 1967]. xiv, 162 P, illus, 20 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HG229 H3 1967
54. 73-303125:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Die Theorie komplexer Phanomene,
Tubingen, Mohr, 1972. 38 P. 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: Q175 .H3615
55. 74-429800:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Freiburger Studien; Tubingen,
Mohr, 1969. 284 p, 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB175 .H425
56. 76-378935:Hayek, Friedrich August von. L'abuso della ragione. Firenze,
Vallecchi, 1967. p. cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: H61 H336
57. 77-842762:Chou, Te-wei. Tang tal ta ssu hsiang chia Hai-yeh-k'o hsueh
shou tsung shu. 5 64 1975]. 5, 4, 661 p., 2] leaves of plates,
:
ports., 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HB103. H3 C46 (Orien China)
58. 78-885166:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Die Verfassung der Freiheit,
Tubingen, Mohr, 1971. XVI, 530 P, 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: JC585 .H2915
59. 79-287279:Hayek, Friedrich August von. De zin van de concurrentie
=
Bussum], Comite ter Bestudering van Ordeningsvraagstukken, 195-?]. 16
P. 21 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HF1436 .H3612
60. 79-456420:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Der Wettbewerb als
Entdeckungsverfahren, Kiel, 1968. 20 P. 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HD41 H35
61. unk82-5290:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Drei Vorlesungen uber
Demokratie, Tubingen: Mohr, 1977. 59 p, " 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: JC423 H42
62. unk82-12911:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Entnationalisierung des Geldes
Tubingen : Mohr, 1977. xiii, 136 P. 24 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: HG230.7 .H3815
63. unk82-63348:Hayek, Friedrich August von. The mirage of social justice "
London etc.], : Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976. xiv, 195 P, 4 23 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: JC578 .H39 1976b
64. unk82-74179: (IS NOT IN FILE OR FILE IS NOT CURRENTLY AVAILABLE).
65. 82-800611:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Shizen jinrui bummei. 1979.
205 P. : ports., 19 cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: CB19 .H39
66. unk84-228051:Hayek, F. A. Von. La planificacion y el estado de derecho.
Cordoba, Republica Argentina, Imprenta da la Universidad, 1943. 20 p, cm.
LC CALL NUMBER: LAW <General Law "Haye">
67. unk85-57624:Hayek, F. A. The Political ideal of the Rule of law, National
Bank of Egypt Fiftieth Anniversary commemoration lectures. Cairo, 1955.
60 P. and, notes cm.
LC. CALL NUMBER: LAW <Egypt 7 Haye 1955>
89-532 GOV
CRS Report for Congress
Hispanic Heritage in the United States:
Tradition, Achievement, and Aspiration
Thomas H. Neale
Analyst in American National Government Division
Government Division
#
August 28, 1989
........
Revised September 27, 1989
CRS
Congressional. Research Service . The Library of Congress
CRS-13
Republic National Bank, serving the Cuban American community, has grown
to be among the largest financial institutions in populous Dade County.
Continued growth of America's Hispanic population has led to a parallel
increase in efforts by producers and advertisers to appeal to this vital part of
the national market. Hispanic Business magazine reports that Hispanics will
spend more than $140 billion in 1989, a figure larger than the gross national
product of many nations. Advertising firms such as Sosa and Associates of
San Antonio are directing many of the campaigns now being developed to
attract Hispanic patronage.
Coca Cola, whose chief executive officer Roberto Goizueta, is Cuban born,
recently announced a three year program, leading to the 500th anniversary of
Columbus' first voyage, which will highlight Hispanic contributions to
American life. Miller Brewing Company has also begun efforts to increase its
involvement with the Hispanic community, including sponsorship of a major
exhibit, "Images of the Mexican Revolution", at the Fort Worth Museum of
Science and History.
The growth and maturity of the Hispanic American market and business
community are unmistakable. As a study sponsored by the U.S. Chamber of
Commerce recently noted, "quietly, steadily, Hispanic-Americans are on the
move, building businesses, making jobs, creating wealth. They have proved
themselves [people] with talent and drive, and a taste for success. They show
every indication of being a stimulus to the economy in the coming decades and
a vital resource for growth."
Public Service
Sometimes the life of a single person can provide an example for an
entire people. Such was the career in public service of Dennis Chávez. In
1916, the 28 year old New Mexican arrived in Washington to work as an
interpreter for U.S. Senator Andrieus A. Jones. Dennis Chávez had been born
in poverty to a proud family which had worked the land in New Mexico since
the 16th century. Forced to abandon school at the age of 13, he worked 80
hours a week as a teamster and stable hand, while still finding time at night
to study surveying and engineering. Young Chávez caught the attention of
Senator Jones, who asked him to join his staff to interpret for his Spanish
speaking constituents and translate their letters into English.
Moving to Washington, Chávez supported his wife and family on Capitol
Hill, while studying law at night at Georgetown University Law School.
Admitted to the Bar in 1920, he returned to Albuquerque, where he opened
a successful practice as one of the few Hispanic American attorneys in New
Mexico. Elected to the State Legislature in 1923, and the U.S. House of
Representatives in 1930, he was appointed to the Senate in 1935 to fill the
vacancy created by the death of Senator Brunson Cutting.
CRS-14
Dennis Chávez won election in his own right in 1936, and was reelected
by wide margins for four additional six year terms. During his 26 years in
the Senate, Dennis Chávez never forgot the people of New Mexico. He was
a tireless fighter for equal rights and a strong supporter of Federal legislation
in the areas of public health, welfare, education, and housing. During the
McCarthy era, he was one of the first Senators to speak out against
intolerance and the reckless charges of "red baiters." By the time of his death
in 1962, Senator Chávez was fourth in seniority in the Senate, and Chairman
of the powerful Committee on Public Works. He was succeeded in the Senate
by fellow Hispanic American Joseph Montoya. In 1966, his native New Mexico
honored Dennis Chávez when his statue was placed in the U.S. Capitol.
Dennis Chávez was not the first Hispanic to be elected to either House
of Congress. Those honors belong to Joseph Hernandez, who served as a
Delegate from the Territory of Florida in the 17th Congress (1822-1823), and
Octaviano Larrazolo, of New Mexico, who served in the Senate in 1928 and
1929. But, by his distinguished achievements and length of service, Chavez
was a trailblazer for the many who have followed.
The past 25 years have seen remarkable growth in the number of
Hispanics holding public office, elective and appointive, throughout the United
States.
In Congress, the Hispanic Caucus was formed in 1976 as a bi-partisan
group dedicated to the advancement of Hispanic Americans in the United
States and its territories and associated areas through promotion of public
policy initiatives and legislation. Members of the Hispanic Caucus in the
101st Congress include Representatives Albert G. Bustamente, Kika de la
Garza, Henry Gonzalez, and Solomon Ortiz of Texas, Matthew Martinez,
Edward G. Roybal, and Esteban E. Torres of California, Bill Richardson of
New Mexico, Robert Garcia of New York, Delegates Ben Blaz of Guam and
Ron de Lugo of the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rican Resident
Commissioner Jaime B. Fuster. Hispanic American representation in the
House increased in 1989 with the election of Illeana Ros Lehtinen in Florida.
Recently a veteran Florida legislator, Representative Ros Lehtinen, became the
first Cuban American to win a seat in Congress.
The Bush Cabinet also reflects the growing influence of Hispanic
Americans in Washington. Secretary of Education Lauro Cavazos was one of
the few officers of the Reagan Cabinet asked to serve in the Bush
Administration. Cavazos is a sixth-generation Texan, proud of his Mexican
American heritage. After completing his studies, he was a professor of
Anatomy, and later Dean at the Tufts University School of Medicine in
Boston. In 1980, the Secretary was named President of Texas Tech
University, where he served with distinction until nominated by President
Reagan in 1988.
CRS-15
He has been joined in the Cabinet by Manuel Lujan, Jr., who had scarcely
retired from the House of Representatives after a 20 year career, when
President Bush tapped him for the office of Secretary of Interior. As the first,
and thus far, the only Hispanic American Republican to sit in the House, he
served as ranking Republican on the Committees on Interior and Insular
Affairs, and Science, Space, and Technology.
The nation's State and local governments have also begun to reflect the
growing importance of Hispanic Americans in public service. Mexican
American Toney Anaya was elected to a four year term as Governor of New
Mexico in 1982. Four years later, in 1986, Bob Martinez became the first
elected Hispanic American Governor of Florida.
Federico Pena came to Colorado from his native El Paso to practice law
in 1972. Within six years, he was elected to the Colorado Legislature, in
1978, and only five years later he was elected Mayor of Denver. Henry
Cisneros stepped down as Mayor of his native San Antonio in 1989. Only 29
when he was elected to the City Council in 1975, he was elected Mayor in
1981, the first Mexican American to hold the office since 1842. In 1985, 36-
year-old Xavier Suarez, Cuban born and Harvard educated, was elected Mayor
of Miami, replacing fellow Hispanic Maurice Ferre, who had held the job since
1973.
Each of these individuals gained national respect and attention for their
political and administrative abilities. They exemplify the future promise of
Hispanic Americans in public service; but they are only representative of the
ever growing number of Hispanic American public officials in the United
States.
In 1986, the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed
Officials (NALEO) identified 3,202 Hispanic elected office holders throughout
the United States. The majority of these are located in the Southwest,
reflecting the large population of Hispanic Americans, and the long-standing
Hispanic tradition in such States as California, New Mexico, and Texas.
Moreover, 15 percent of these elected public servants were women, as
compared with a national average of 9 percent women in elected office.
Even these thousands of elected officials fail to provide a full picture of
the powerful and growing commitment to public service among Hispanic
Americans. They include numerous of dedicated teachers, administrators,
social workers, and law enforcement officials.
The scope of public service extends to many professions: education, the
law, labor, and others. In each of these fields, there is a growing record of
Hispanic achievement.
Armando Rodriguez was born in Mexico, but settled in San Diego with
his family as a child. Following military service in World War II, he obtained
CRS-16
Bachelor's and Master's degrees at San Diego State, and began a 20 year
career as a classroom teacher and administrator. As Assistant Commissioner
of Education in the former U.S. Office of Education, he was one of the
motivating forces behind Federal sponsorship of and support for bilingual
education programs.
Mari-Luci Jamarillo worked her way through college at New Mexico
Highlands University, graduating in 1955, and later served as an administrator
in Latin American education programs at her alma mater. During this period,
the U.S. Agency for International Development called on her expertise as a
consultant in education, sending her to represent the United States in 21
nations around the world. In 1977, she was appointed by President Jimmy
Carter, and confirmed by the Senate, as Ambassador to Honduras, the first
woman ambassador of Hispanic descent.
Raul Castro pursued a career that included education, the law, diplomacy,
and politics. Born in Mexico, he received a degree in education at Arizona
State College in 1939. After teaching in the public schools of Tuscon, he was
employed by the U.S. Department of State for five years in Mexico. Returning
to Arizona in 1946, he taught at the University of Arizona while studying law.
Castro practiced law and served, successively, as Pima County Attorney and
State Supreme Court Judge until 1964, when he was appointed by President
Lyndon Johnson as Ambassador, first to El Salvador, and then to Bolivia. In
1974, he was elected governor of Arizona, and completed his remarkable career
in public service as Ambassador to Argentina from 1977 to 1980.
One of the most charismatic figures in the struggle for social justice for
Hispanic Americans has been Cesar Chavez. His efforts to improve working
conditions for migrant labor have aroused the conscience of the Nation.
Chavez was born in a family of migrant farm workers, and attended 30
different schools before dropping out after seventh grade to help support his
family. After years as a farm worker, he joined the movement to organize
migrant labor. In 1966, his National Farm Workers Association merged with
another union to form the United Farm Workers Organizing Committee
(UFWOC). Using only non-violent tactics, Chavez negotiated contracts with
the major California wine grape growers, and led an effective nationwide
boycott of table grapes when the table grape growers failed to bargain in good
faith. After a two year struggle, table grape growers negotiated contracts with
UFWOC in 1970. Since then, Cesar Chavez has continued the struggle to
secure decent wages and working conditions in California's huge vegetable
growing industry. He is a major figure in the history of the American labor
movement.
ASPIRATIONS
This review of the Hispanic experience in the United States provides
selected highlights of Latino tradition and achievement. For every struggle
09. 13.91 10:34 AM *OFC OF ASST SECT-ETA P02
That human Institutions require periodic redesign, If
only because of their tendency to decay, is not a
minor fact about them, nor easily overlooked. Taken
the span of history, there is no more Important lesson
to be learned.
How curious then in all this history, with all the
Immensely varied principles on which society has
been designed and operated, no people have
tol-o of 1
seriously attempted to take Into account the aging of
Institutions and to provide for their continuous
renewal. Why should we not be the first to do so.
- John W. Gardner -
WHITE HOUSE INITIATIVE:
HISPANIC EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION
Mary Dube sonders
pres. xx Personnel
CASE STATEMENT
Hisson pop. a to
in
which need we to invest-
Y most
the
monort
to
September 1991
Girft
free porticipation
exicl her woul limiguents
arium of mish) work.
09. 13. 91 10:34 AM *OFC OF ASST SECT-ETA P03
EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE FOR HISPANIC AMERICANS
THE CASE STATEMENT
MISSION: TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S CAPACITY TO PROVIDE QUALITY
EDUCATION TO HISPANIC AMERICANS CONSISTENT WITH THE
AMERICA 2000 GOALS.
CRITICAL ISSUES
The Workforce Crisis - America is facing a workforce crisis. Education
and demographics are basic to its resolution. The American workforce is:
-- Growing more slowly;
-- Aging (average age 36; 40 by the year 2000);
-- Education requirements for jobs are getting greater and the less
skilled jobs are shrinking;
-- In need of workers who are more educated.
The Untapped Workforce: Hispanics -- -- Hispanics are the youngest and
fastest growing minority. By the year 2000, Hispanics will:
-- Constitute 33% of the net growth of the workforce;
-- Comprise 10% of the total U.S. workforce;
-- Be younger, (36) while the total workforce will be older.
The Hispanic Crisis At a time when Hispanics are the fastest growing
and youngest minority in America, their wages and school completion
rates are lower than any other ethnic group. They have the fastest growing
poverty rate.
America's Choice - We can either invest in the education and training of
Hispanics and Increase productivity of our workforce today or relegate
them to tomorrow's poverty pool.
THE CHOICE IS OURS!
lastyp. sired
efe i order
belowe 46
crub
ech para
09. 13. 91 10:34 AM *OFC OF ASST SECT-ETA P05
Draft Discussion Only
THE WHITE HOUSE INITIATIVE:
EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE FOR HISPANIC AMERICANS
MISSION, GOALS AND STRATEGY
MISSION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S CAPACITY TO PROVIDE QUALITY
EDUCATION TO HISPANIC AMERICANS CONSISTENT WITH THE
AMERICA 2000 GOALS.
THE PROBLEM
America's workforce is shrinking, aging and losing its competitive edge. If
we are to revitalize our workforce, we must invest in that new source of
workers -- Hispanics. They are the youngest and fastest growing portion
of the new workforce, yet we are losing them because they lack the
education, training and resources needed to participate in today's complex
workplace. Their main problem is opportunity, not motivation.
Education, Wages. Poverty-- While certain segments of the Hispanic
population are progressing, the current trend shows that a growing
number have less education, earn lower wages and show a higher increase
in poverty than Blacks or whites:
Dropout: Hispanic youth have a higher school dropout rate -- 40+%, as
compared to 18% for Blacks and 14% for whites;
- School Readiness: Hispanics are less likely to participate in
preschool programs and more likely to repeat grade levels than their
white cohorts;
- Student Achievement: Hispanics consistently score below whites in
all measures of academic achievement;
- Post Secondary: Hispanics have the lowest participation rates. In
1989, 28.7% were Hispanic compared to 30.8% for Black and 38.8%
for whites.
- Adult Workers: Hispanic male workers have less education than Black
or white males: (1980) 10.2 Hispanic, 11.7 Black, 12.9 white.
- Wages: In 1990 Hispanic men earned less weekly wages ($322)than
Blacks ($360) or whites ($497). The same occurred for Hispanic
women ($280) as compared to Blacks ($308), and whites ($355).
09. 13. 91 10:34 AM *OFC OF ASST SECT-ETA PO6
Draft Discussion Only
- Dead End Jobs: Hispanics occupy and stay in the lowest paying jobs
which are more susceptable to economic downturns, are temporary
and have few benefits.
- Farmworkers: There are approximately 3-4 million farmworkers of
which 80% are Hispanic who, in many instances, their income is
below the poverty level.
- Immigration: There are approximately 3.5 million people in the
Immigration, Reform and Control Act (IRCA) pool waiting to become
citizens; 90% are Hispanic of which 80% are Mexican. Approximately
1.2 million are farmworkers.
- Children in Poverty: Between 1979 and 1989, the number of poor
Hispanic children grew faster than any other ethnic group -- 1/2 of
the new children in poverty are Hispanic. One out of three Hispanic
children lives in poverty.
GOALS AND STRATEGY
The White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanics will be
an integral part of the America 2000 Strategy and adopt the following
goals:
GOAL #1. National Advisory Commission -- Establish a National Advisory
Commission by September 1991, which will advise the Secretary
of Education as to how effectively all federal agencies are
meeting the educational needs of Hispanics consistent with the
President's Executive Order .
GOAL *2 Accountability -- Establish performance standards for all
federal programs by March 1992 which will assist the Secretary
in reporting progress in fulfilling the intent of the Executive
Order.
09. 13. 91 10:34 AM *OFC OF ASST SECT-ETA P07
Draft Discussion Only
GOAL #3. Innovation -- Establish innovative programs In areas where
there is a high concentration of Hispanics with low income and
focus on:
-- Enhancing parental involvement
-- Promoting early childhood education
-- Removing barriers to success in education and work,
particularly limited proficiency in the English language
-- Helping students to achieve their potential at all
educational levels
GOAL #4. Life-long Learning -- Support innovative approaches in the
public and private sector which will provide for continuous
skill upgrading for Hispanics.
GOAL *5. Community Empowerment -- Develop the diverse leadership in
communities which will adopt and implement the "America
2000 Communities" campaign.
---
09. 13. 91 10:34 AM *OFC OF ASST SECT-ETA P 0 4
THE STRATEGY: THE HISPANIC INITIATIVE WILL BE AN INTEGRAL PART OF
THE "AMERICA 2000 EDUCATIONAL STRATEGY" WHICH
CALLS FOR:
- ACCOUNTABILITY
- INNOVATION
- LIFE LONG LEARNING
- COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT
Basic Premises
-- Hispanic Education: A workforce Investment - The Hispanic
population should be viewed as one of our most valuable untapped
resources in raising the productivity of the American workforce.
-- Education is key in improving economic opportunities for Hispanics.
-- Institutional Renewal= America 2000 -- There is a need to renew our
institutions so they are flexible and responsive to the rapid change
our society is experiencing and accountable to their respective
communities.
-- Family and Community - Education should be viewed as both a family
problem which requires a family solution as well as a community
problem which requires a community solution.
A commitment to family and community are two important values
within the Hispanic sub-cultures which should be mobilized.
-- Empowerment -- The empowerment of people begins with having
expectations in their ability to be masters of their destiny. It starts
by doing things "with people, not for them". If we are to be successful
in renewing our educational institutions, we must involve the
Hispanic community from the beginning in the planning and the
implementation of our educational strategy.
---
To Bob
Date TUES
Time 7:50 PM
WHILE YOU WERE OUT
M VERO NICA
of
us Hispanic Chamba
Phone
Area Code
Number
Extension
TELEPHONED
X
PLEASE CALL
CALLED TO SEE YOU
WILL CALL AGAIN
WANTS TO SEE YOU
URGENT
RETURNED YOUR CALL
Message POTUS can't
mention the National
Business winne,
it late will be divulged
JAG
Operator
AMPAD
EFFICIENCY®
23-023 CARBONLESS
Administration of George Bush, 1990 / June 27
Nomination of George F. Murphy, Jr.,
querque to ensure the protection of serious-
To Be Inspector General of the United
ly threatened ancient Pueblo Indian and
States Information Agency
Spanish rock art. Cost sharing will be an
June 27, 1990
important component of the success of this
joint effort, and I look forward to a success-
The President today announced his inten-
ful partnership.
tion to nominate George F. Murphy, Jr., to
S. 286 also will expand the existing 365-
be Inspector General of the U.S. Informa-
acre Pecos National Monument into the
tion Agency. He would succeed Anthony J.
5,865-acre Pecos National Historical Park.
Gabriel.
This will allow for expanded protection and
Since 1988 Mr. Murphy has served as
recreation programs in an area rich in cul-
Deputy Director for the U.S. Arms Control
tural resources.
and Disarmament Agency in Washington,
I wholeheartedly support the measures
DC. Prior to this, he served as a consultant
contained in S. 286 because they will
to the nuclear industry, 1986-1987; director
ensure the protection of rich natural and
of the Senate National Security Office,
cultural resources within the State of New
1977-1986; executive director of the Joint
Mexico that are now seriously threatened.
Committee on Atomic Energy, 1975-1977;
deputy director of the Joint Committee on
George Bush
Atomic Energy, 1968-1975; and a profes-
The White House,
sional staff member on the Joint Committee
June 27, 1990.
on Atomic Energy, 1958-1968. In addition,
Mr. Murphy worked for the Central Intelli-
gence Agency, 1950-1958.
Note: S. 286, approved June 27, was as-
Mr. Murphy graduated from Harvard
signed Public Law No. 101-313.
College (A.B., 1949). He was born May 1,
1924, in Boston, MA. Mr. Murphy served in
the U.S. Army Air Corps, 1942-1946. He is
married, has two children, and resides in
Remarks Announcing the Enterprise for
Bethesda, MD.
the Americas Initiative
June 27, 1990
Thank you all very much for coming to
Statement on Signing a Bill Protecting
the White House, and it is my pleasure to
Natural and Cultural Resources in
welcome so many distinguished guests with
New Mexico
such strong interests in the vital Latin
June 27, 1990
American and Caribbean region. Let me
recognize the many members of the diplo-
I take great pleasure in signing into law
matic corps that are here and extend to you
S. 286, an Act to establish the Petroglyph
a warm welcome-from Latin America,
National Monument and the Pecos National
particularly, and the Caribbean, Europe,
Historical Park in New Mexico, and to re-
Japan. Members of our Cabinet-Nick
solve various New Mexico land issues.
Brady and Secretary Baker, Carla Hills, Sec-
West of Albuquerque, New Mexico, the
retary Mosbacher-delighted you're here.
major landscape feature is the West Mesa,
Chairman of the Council of Economic Ad-
marked by a 17-mile long basalt escarpment
visers, Mike Boskin, is here. Bill Webster,
and five volcanic cones. Within the area are
welcome. And of course, we're delighted to
an estimated 15,000 to 17,000 petroglyphs,
see Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the Fed-
which are designs carved or pecked into
eral Reserve Board, here and then an old
the rock. Establishment of the Petroglyph
friend, Barber Conable, of the World Bank,
National Monument will provide an excel-
and Richard Erb, from the IMF. And Ricky
lent opportunity to form a strong partner-
Iglesias, an old friend of the Bushes, and we
ship among the Federal Government, the
welcome him, of the IDB, and so many
State of New Mexico, and the City of Albu-
leading lights in the business and financial
1009
June 27 / Administration of George Bush, 1990
communities. To all of you, then, a wel-
ing convinced that the U.S. must review its
talks, I pl
come.
approach not only to that region but to
nations of
In the past 12 months, every one of us,
Latin America and the Caribbean as a
completio:
from the man in the White House to the
whole. And I asked Treasury Secretary
the most
man on the street, has been fascinated by
Brady to lead a review of U.S. economic
term trad
the tremendous changes, the positive
policy towards this vital region, to make a
the increa
changes, taking place around the world.
fresh assessment, if you will, of the prob-
into the o
Freedom has made great gains not just in
lems and opportunities we'll encounter in
aim in the
Eastern Europe but right here in the Amer-
the decade ahead. And that review is now
trade, and
icas; and we've seen a resurgence of demo-
complete, and the results are in, and the
ing to stre
cratic rule, a rising tide of democracy,
need for new economic initiatives is clear
expand th
never before witnessed in the history of this
and compelling.
agreed ru
beloved hemisphere. And with one excep-
All signs point to the fact that we must
commitme
tion, Cuba, the transition to democracy is
shift the focus of our economic interaction
America a
moving towards completion, and we can all
towards a new economic partnership be-
deeper ta
sense the excitement that the day is not far
cause prosperity in our hemisphere de-
products 0
off when Cuba joins the ranks of world de-
pends on trade, not aid. And I've asked you
Second,
mocracies and makes the Americas fully
here today to share with you some of the
see toward
free.
With one exception, that's the case. But
ideas, some of the ways we can build a
mate aim
the political transformation sweeping the
broad-based partnership for the nineties-to
of the Am
rest of Latin America and the Caribbean
announce the new Enterprise for the Amer-
And we lo
icas Initiative that creates incentives to re-
only are t
has its parallel in the economic sphere.
inforce Latin America's growing recogni-
democratic
Throughout the region, nations are turning
away from the statist economic policies that
tion that free-market reform is the key to
equal parti
stifle growth and are now looking to the
sustained growth and political stability.
ing from
Tierra del
power of the free market to help this hemi-
The three pillars of our new initiative are
I'm anno
sphere realize its untapped potential for
trade, investment, and debt. To expand
ready to e
progress. A new leadership has emerged,
trade, I propose that we begin the process
with other
backed by the strength of the people's man-
of creating a hemispherewide free trade
the Caribb
date, leadership that understands that the
zone; to increase investment, that we adopt
countries t.
future of Latin America lies with free gov-
measures to create a new flow of capital
of trade lib
ernment and free markets. In the words of
into the region; and to further ease the
this proces
Colombia's courageous leader, Virgilio
burden of debt, a new approach to debt in
trade agree
Barco-President Barco: The long-running
the region with important benefits for our
recognize
match between Karl Marx and Adam Smith
environment.
riers to free
is finally coming to an end" with the "rec-
Let's begin with trade. In the 1980's,
reaching m
ognition that open economies with access to
trade within our hemisphere trailed the
tough nego
markets can lead to social progress."
overall pace of growth in world trade. One
of prosperit
For the United States, these are welcome
principal reason for that: overrestrictive
is the time
developments, developments that we're
trade barriers that wall off the economies of
trade zone
eager to support. But we recognize that
our region from each other and from the
goal.
each nation in the region must make its
United States at great cost to us all. These
And thirc
own choices. There is no blueprint, no one-
barriers are the legacy of the misguided
tries aren't
size-fits-all approach, to reform. The pri-
notion that a nation's economy needs pro-
step to a f
mary responsibility for achieving economic
tection in order to thrive. The great eco-
that's why \
growth lies with each individual country.
nomic lesson of this century is that protec-
any interest
Our challenge in this country is to respond
tionism still stifles progress and free mar-
framework
in ways that support the positive changes
kets breed prosperity. To this end, we've
and develo]
now taking place in the hemisphere. We
formulated a three-point trade plan to en-
ments alrea
must forge a genuine partnership for free-
courage the emerging trend toward free-
ia. Framew
market reform.
market reform that are now gathering
move forwa
Back in February, I met in Cartagena
forces in the Americas.
eliminate (
[Colombia] with heads of the three Andean
First, as we enter the final months of the
trade and to
nations, and I came away from that meet-
current Uruguay round of the world trade
trade. And
1010
Administration of George Bush, 1990 / June 27
talks, I pledge close cooperation with the
growth and a higher standard of living in
nations of this hemisphere. The successful
Latin America and, right here at home,
completion of the Uruguay round remains
new markets for American products and
the most effective way of promoting long-
more jobs for American workers.
term trade growth in Latin America and
Promoting free trade is just one of three
the increased integration of Latin nations
key elements in our new Enterprise for the
into the overall global trading system. Our
Americas Initiative. And our second pillar is
aim in the Uruguay round is free and fair
increased investment.
trade, and through these talks we are seek-
The competition for capital today is
ing to strengthen existing trade rules and to
fierce, and the key to increased investment
expand them to areas that do not now have
is to be competitive, to turn around the
agreed rules of fairplay. And to show our
conditions that have discouraged both for-
commitment to our neighbors in Latin
eign and domestic investment-reduce the
America and the Caribbean, we will seek
regulatory burden, clear away the thicket of
deeper tariff reductions in this round on
bureaucratic barriers that choke off Latin
products of special interest to them.
America's aspiring entrepreneurs.
Second, we must build on the trend we
see toward free markets and make our ulti-
In one large Latin city, for instance, it
mate aim a free trade system that links all
takes almost 300 days to cut through the
of the Americas: North, Central, and South.
redtape to open a small garment shop. In
And we look forward to the day when not
another country, the average overseas caller
only are the Americas the first fully free,
has to make five phone calls to get through,
democratic hemisphere but when all are
and the wait for a new telephone line can
equal partners in a free trade zone stretch
be as long as 5 years. And that's got to
ing from the port of Anchorage to the
change.
Tierra del Fuego.
Investment reform is essential to make it
I'm announcing today that the U.S. stands
easier to start new business ventures and
ready to enter into free trade agreements
make it possible for international investors
with other markets in Latin America and
to participate and profit in Latin American
the Caribbean, particularly with groups of
markets. In order to create incentives for
countries that have associated for purposes
investment reform, the United States is pre-
of trade liberalization. And the first step in
pared to take the following steps:
this process is the now-announced free
First, the United States will work with
trade agreement with Mexico. We must all
the Inter-American Development Bank to
recognize that we won't bring down bar-
create a new lending program for nations
riers to free trade overnight; changes so far-
that take significant steps to remove im-
reaching may take years of preparation and
pediments to international investment. The
tough negotiations. But the payoff in terms
World Bank could also contribute to this
of prosperity is worth every effort, and now
effort.
is the time to make a comprehensive free
And second, we propose the creation of a
trade zone for the Americas our long-term
new investment fund for the Americas. This
goal.
fund, administered by the IDB, could pro-
And third, I understand that some coun-
vide up to $300 million a year in grants in
tries aren't yet ready to take that dramatic
response to market-oriented investment re-
step to a full free trade agreement. And
forms in progress in privatization. The U.S.
that's why we're prepared to negotiate with
intends to contribute $100 million to the
any interested nation in the region bilateral
fund, and we will seek matching contribu-
framework agreements to open markets
tions from Europe and Japan.
and develop closer trade ties. Such agree-
But in order to create an attractive cli-
ments already exist with Mexico and Boliv-
mate for new investment, we must build on
ia. Framework agreements will enable us to
our successful efforts to ease the debt
move forward on a step-by-step basis to
burden. That's the third pillar of this new
eliminate counterproductive barriers to
Enterprise for the Americas Initiative.
trade and towards our ultimate goal of free
Many nations have already undertaken
trade. And that's a prescription for greater
painful economic reforms for the sake of
1011
June 27 / Administration of George Bush, 1990
future growth, but the investment climate
nature swaps in countries that have set up
remains clouded, weighted down by the
such programs. These actions will be taken
heavy debt burden. Under the Brady plan,
on a case-by-case basis.
we are making significant progress. The
One measure of prosperity and the most
agreements reached with Mexico and Costa
important long-term investment any nation
Rica and Venezuela are already having a
can make is environmental well-being. As
positive impact on investment in those
part of our Enterprise for the Americas Ini-
countries. Mexico, to take just one example,
tiative, we will take action to strengthen
C
has already seen a reversal of the destruc-
environmental policies in this hemisphere.
tive capital flight that drained so many
Debt-for-nature swaps are one example,
Latin American nations of precious invest-
patterned after the innovative agreements
ment resources. That's critical. If we restore
reached by some Latin American nations
confidence, capital will follow.
and their commercial creditors. We will also
0
As one means of expanding our debt
call for the creation of environmental trusts,
strategy, we propose that the IDB add its
where interest payments owed on restruc-
V
efforts and resources to those of the Inter-
tured U.S. debt will be paid in local curren-
national Monetary Fund and the World
cy and set aside to fund environmental
Bank to support commercial bank debt re-
projects in the debtor countries.
duction in Latin America and the Caribbe-
These innovative agreements offer a pow-
an, and as in the case of World Bank and
erful new tool for preserving the natural
IMF, IDB funds should be directly linked to
wonders of this hemisphere that we share.
economic reform.
From the vistas of the unspoiled Arctic to
While the Brady plan has helped nations
the beauties of the barrier reef off Belize to
reduce commercial bank debt, for nations
the rich rain forests of the Amazon, we
with high levels of official debt-debt owed
must protect this living legacy that we hold
to governments rather than private finan-
in trust. For an increasing number of our
cial institutions-the burden remains heavy.
neighbors, the need for free-market reform
And today, across Latin America, official
is clear. These nations need economic
debt owed to the U.S. Government amounts
breathing room to enact bold reforms, and
to nearly $12 billion, with $7 billion of that
this official debt initiative is one answer, a
amount in concessional loans. And in many
way out from under the crushing burden of
cases, the heaviest official debt burdens fall
debt that slows the process of reform.
on some of the region's smallest nations,
I know there is some concern that the
countries like Honduras and El Salvador
revolutionary changes we've witnessed this
and Jamaica.
past year in Eastern Europe will shift our
That's a problem we must address today.
attention away from Latin America; but I
As the key component in addressing the
want to assure all of you here today, as I've
region's debt problem, I am proposing a
assured many democratic leaders in Central
major new initiative to reduce Latin Amer-
and South America and the Caribbean and
ica and the Caribbean's official debt to the
Mexico, the United States will not lose sight
United States for countries that adopt
of the tremendous challenges and opportu-
strong economic and investment reform
nities right here in our own hemisphere.
programs with the support of international
And indeed, as we talk with the leaders of
institutions.
the G-24 about the emerging democracies
Our debt reduction program will deal
in Europe-I've been talking to them also
separately with concessional and commer-
about their supporting democracy and eco-
cial types of loans. On the concessional
nomic freedom in Central America. Our
debt, loans made from AID or Food for
aim is a closer partnership between the
Peace accounts, we will propose substantial
Americas and our friends in Europe and in
debt reductions for the most heavily bur-
Asia.
dened countries. And we will also sell a
Two years from now, our hemisphere will
portion of outstanding commercial loans to
celebrate the 500th anniversary of an epic
facilitate these debt-for-equity and debt-for-
event: Columbus' discovery of America, our
1012
Administration of George Bush, 1990 / June 28
New World. And we trace our origins, our
of the proposed rescissions are contained in
shared history, to the time of Columbus'
the attached report.
voyage and the courageous quest for the
advancement of man. Today the bonds of
George Bush
our common heritage are strengthened by
the love of freedom and a common commit-
The White House,
ment to democracy. Our challenge, the
June 28, 1990.
challenge in this new era of the Americas, is
to secure this shared dream and all its fruits
Note: The attachment detailing the pro-
for all the people of the Americas-North,
posed rescissions was printed in the "Feder-
Central, and South.
al Register" of July 6.
The comprehensive plan that I've just
outlined is proof positive the United States
is serious about forging a new partnership
with our Latin American and Caribbean
Statement on the Japan-United States
neighbors. We're ready to play a construc-
Trade Negotiations
tive role at this critical time to make ours
June 28, 1990
the first fully free hemisphere in all of histo-
ry. Thank you all for coming and God bless
Last year the United States and Japan
the peoples of the Americas. Thank you
launched a new cooperative endeavor in
very, very much, indeed.
economic policy called the Structural Im-
pediments Initiative. This initiative is de-
signed to address underlying structural
Note: The President spoke at 2:48 p.m. in
problems in both of our economies with the
the East Room at the White House. In his
goal of contributing to more open and com-
opening remarks, he referred to Secretary of
petitive markets and to the reduction of
the Treasury Nicholas F. Brady; U.S. Trade
payments imbalances. A joint working
Representative Carla A. Hills; Secretary of
group was formed to identify and solve
Commerce Robert A. Mosbacher; William
these problems. Over the past year, these
H. Webster, Director of Central Intelligence;
discussions have demonstrated the construc-
Barber B. Conable, Jr., President of the
tive and cooperative spirit which character-
World Bank, which is also known as the
izes the relationship between our two coun-
International Bank for Reconstruction and
tries.
Development; and Richard D. Erb, Deputy
Managing Director of the International
The joint report of the SII working group
Monetary Fund. The President also referred
has just been issued in Tokyo, following up
to the Group of 24, the industrialized de-
an interim report issued in April. I welcome
mocracies that have pledged support for eco-
and endorse this joint report. Both coun-
nomic and political reform in Poland and
tries have identified structural impedi-
Hungary.
ments, taken initial corrective actions, and
made commitments to take further steps to
resolve a wide range of structural problems.
We expect that the structural policy actions
to be taken will have a positive effect on
Message to the Congress Reporting
our economies, encouraging open and com-
Budget Rescissions
petitive markets, promoting sustained world
June 28, 1990
economic growth, contributing to a reduc-
tion in global payments imbalances, and en-
To the Congress of the United States:
hancing the quality of life in both Japan and
In accordance with the Impoundment
the United States. Although our efforts on
Control Act of 1974, I herewith report
SII are bilateral, the effects will be benefi-
eight proposed rescissions totalling
cial for the entire world.
$327,375,000.
I particularly welcome the clear commit-
The proposed rescissions affect programs
ment by Japan to reduce further its current
of the Department of Defense. The details
account surplus and view the SII process as
1013
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
(Chicago, Illinois)
For Immediate Release
September 20, 1991
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
AT THE 12TH ANNUAL NATIONAL CONVENTION OF THE
UNITED STATES HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Hyatt Regency Hotel
Chicago, Illinois
1:45 P.M. CDT
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. And I really want
to thank you for that warm reception here. First, may I salute two
Secretaries of my Cabinet -- Secretary Lujan, who many of you have
known over the years is with us today; and also Secretary Sam
Skinner, who just came in with us from California, a son of Chicago
in a sense and doing a great job as Secretary of Transportation.
May I also thank the Governor of the state, Jim Edgar;
and the Mayor of this great city, Mayor Daley, for greeting me at the
airport here and welcoming us to Illinois and Chicago. And this is,
as I view it, certainly not a partisan gathering, and I think their
both showing up together, side-by-side, was a manifestation of that.
(Laughter and applause.)
But may I thank Jose, Jose Nino, who just introduced me,
your very able president; Gabe Aguirre, the outgoing chairman. And
thank you all, ladies and gentlemen, for, once again, that very warm
welcome. Let me congratulate my fellow Texan, Delia Reyes, your
newly elected chair. And warmest greetings to the many dignitaries
that are here.
I'm here a little later than originally scheduled.
Would you believe we experienced a slight flight delay? (Laughter.)
I know it happens all the time. We had to circle the city while
Michael Jordan practiced takeoffs and landings out here. (Laughter.)
And there's a second reason, too -- if I may be candid. I know
you've just heard Jack Kemp speak -- and I thought you'd want to
catch your breath for a little bit. (Laughter.)
If you're still feeling winded, it's my fault. It goes
back to our first Cabinet meeting and I asked Jack, "Can't you
generate -- can't you work up a little more enthusiasm?" And you saw
it today. But he's doing a great job for us as Secretary of Housing
and Urban Development. His concept, our concept, of tenant
management and home ownership offers really hope to millions. But
then, Jack -- and all our administration -- believe in the greatest
and most visionary of American ideals, the ideal of real equality --
ensuring that people can go as far as their abilities and their hard
work will take them.
Five centuries ago, men crossed the great ocean and
brought Hispanic America into being. Ever since then, we have called
the combination of European and American peoples on these vast lands
not a new territory, not a new colony, not a new settlement. We've
called it a New World.
Hispanic America arose out of risk and romance. Several
forces fed its growth: transoceanic trade, the movement and mingling
of peoples, the grand enterprise of discovery and development. On
MORE
- 2 -
September 20 -- this very date, but in 1519, Magellan and his party
set sail from Spain to sail around the globe. Next month we begin a
year of commemoration leading to the 500th anniversary of Columbus's
daring journey.
We must not think of these achievements as somehow
antique and irrelevant. Frontiers don't close when men settle the
wilderness, when they build cities and factories and schools. Subtle
but braver adventures confront advanced civilizations: the
adventures of creating families, educating children, knowing that no
matter how hard or how comfortable our circumstances, we must make
our world better. In the life of the Americas, in our mission of
discovery and development, 1492 was only yesterday.
How true this is in the case of commerce. Voyagers
charted the trade routes of the Americas centuries ago, but we've
only now begun to explore their full potential.
Your convention theme sings with this spirit:
"Launching New Partnerships." America's more than 400,000 Hispanic-
owned firms provide new jobs and generate new wealth. In 1987, the
latest date for these statistics, our Hispanic-owned businesses
pumped nearly $25 billion into our economy and created half a million
jobs.
You believe in yourselves -- in your abilities, your
determination, your excellence. Because you believe in yourselves,
you helped our administration get congressional approval to extend
our fast track procedures for trade negotiations. Armed with that
powerful tool -- and as you heard this morning from an able team from
three countries -- we are negotiating a North American Free Trade
Agreement.
I might say that Mexico, under President Salinas, has
been a powerful leader and ally. And I would also say that
relationships between Mexico and the United States have never in
history been better. And that is in the best interests of the United
States of America. (Applause.) When we complete that accord, and
I'm confident we will, we'll build a free trade zone that ranges from
the Yukon to the Yucatan --"a market of 360 -- get the figure -- 360
million consumers and a present annual output of $6 trillion.
When we seal the Free Trade Agreement, Hispanic-owned
firms in the United States will enjoy strong natural advantages.
Bonds of family, language, understanding the culture, already
cherished in the families represented here today -- all of these will
gain value as business assets.
Because you believe in yourselves, you also have
supported our Enterprise for the Americas Initiative, aiming to
establish a network of expanded trade, investment and cooperation
from Hudson Bay to the Straits of Magellan.
The North American Free Trade Agreement and the
Enterprise for the Americas Initiative incorporate the great lesson
of our age: trade and enterprise can build wealth and preserve
freedom. Protectionism and government control only create poverty
and backwardness, and yes, a denial of freedom.
Consider the case of Mexico. Since 1986, when Mexico
joined the GATT and dropped tariff rates from 100 percent -- 100
percent -- to little more than 10 percent, U.S. exports to Mexico
have more than doubled. Exports of automobiles and auto parts have
quadrupled. Exports of iron and steel, which were running a $12-
million deficit just four years ago, now are achieving a $300-million
surplus. And this rise in exports created almost 300,000 jobs in the
United States. Each additional $1 billion in exports will translate
into nearly 20,000 American jobs.
MORE
- 3 -
But these reforms -- it's not a one-way street -- these
reforms have helped Mexico -- a classic win-win situation, if you
will. Fidel Vélazquez Sanchez, the head of the Mexican Labor
Confederation, recognizes that increased trade will create new jobs,
indeed, new industries, in Mexico, and he strongly supports the trade
agreement.
What's good for Hispanic America will be good for the
United States. And with open trade, by the year 2000, United States
firms will be doing a robust business with dynamic economy of 100
million Mexican consumers.
The prospects seem equally exciting south of Mexico,
true. We've heard a lot about the Mexican free trade agreement.
We've heard about the negotiations. They are our friendly neighbors
on the border and we ought to -- parenthetically, I might say, we
should never just take those friends for granted, whether it be to
our north or to our south. We are blessed by peaceful borders. But
we're already advancing creative plans now to reduce debt, boost
investment and increase trade. We've now signed framework trade
liberalization agreements involving 28 countries in the hemisphere.
so it's not just Mexico. But we need your help.
Congress still has failed to give us debt reduction
authority and funding, and to give us the ability to contribute to
the Multilateral Investment Fund. This would help stimulate
investment and build stable democracies within our hemisphere. So
please, speak out in support of the Enterprise for the Americas
Initiative. And join me in urging Congress to pass the legislation
to put it into full effect. Enterprise for the Americas is not a
slogan. It will strengthen democracy and freedom in those friendly
countries south of the Rio Grande, and it will be good for American
exports, and that means it will be good for American jobs.
Our efforts to expand U.S. exports will get another
boost when my friend, Jose Martinez, becomes Director of the United
States Trade and Development Program.
And, of course, one more event will demonstrate to one
and all that we really have entered into a new era of freedom and
opportunity. I'm speaking of Cuba's becoming free and democratic.
(Applause.)
Today we hear the creaking and crumbling of that Castro
dictatorship. And the day is coming, I'm absolutely convinced of
this, sooner than Castro dares to believe, when the people of Cuba
will reclaim their destiny and rejoin the Western Hemisphere's family
of free nations. (Applause.)
And if we want to make our hemisphere a neighborhood of
peoples, we must do more than lift economic and political barriers.
Our administration also has promoted educational and cultural
exchanges between our country and our neighbors in the hemisphere.
As in commerce, the natural leaders in this enterprise will be
Hispanic Americans.
You see, something more than mere geography unites us.
Common cultural roots enable us all to seek a shared destiny for our
hemisphere, for ourselves.
And I want to thank the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce for
its endorsement of our America 2000 Education Strategy. I am
grateful for your initiatives to teach economics and entrepreneurship
to our kids, beginning in the kindergarten. And now, if only someone
could do the same for economists, I think we'd be in pretty good
shape around here. (Laughter and applause.)
MORE
- 4 -
America 2000, like our economic proposals, begins with
an article of faith: We believe that parents care about their
children, care about education, and can help find schools that will
help their children reach their potential. So we want to expand
parental choice so that parents will have as much choice in the
crucial matter of education as they now have when they wish to
purchase peanut butter.
And if we want to make the most of ourselves, we must
invite competition and show just how well we can do.
America 2000 will enable Hispanic communities to draw
upon their natural strengths and values. And it will enable parents,
teachers and, yes, church and business leaders to help reinvent
American education.
To further this goal, I have announced the membership of
the President's Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for
Hispanic Americans. Chicago's own Andres Bande, CEO of Ameritech
International, will chair the panel, and its work will play a major
role in unleashing the America 2000 revolution in education.
I understand Andres is here today, and I'd like him to
stand up -- right there. Thank you for undertaking this.
(Applause.) This is important work he's about to be engaged in. And
I know, on his behalf, I'd like to solicit your ideas and your full
cooperation.
Let me close with a few comments on a concept we talked
about earlier -- development. It's a term of art, of course, in
international economics. We tend to use "developing country" as a
sort of fuzzy euphemism for "poverty" -- for a nation short on
material or financial wealth.
But when we use the term "development" in this way, we
forget its deeper meaning. Isn't the United States -- must it not be
-- still "developing"? For all our present wealth, can we afford to
become static or stagnant? And if we're not giving our children a
moral and intellectual inheritance as good as our parents gave us,
are we a "developed" society?
I think again of the explorers on our continent five
centuries ago. Some were wise, some were foolish. And we remember
the effort wasted in trying to find the imaginary Seven Cities of
Gold. And those adventurers were not just looking in the wrong
place, they were searching for the wrong treasure. The treasure was,
and is, in men and women, in "human resources", in mind and muscle
and soul. And these, not unearned bonanzas, build civilizations.
Our work never ends. That's the key to life's
excitement. In these hopeful times, as we tear down economic
barriers and liberate ourselves from ideological confines, we must
continue supplying our own sons and our own daughters with the values
-- the fundamentals -- of a good society. Together, I know that we
shall.
You know, the longer I'm in the White House and
privileged to serve as President of the United States, and the more
Barbara and I discuss these enormous problems that Mayor Daley
confronts in his excellent way every day, or Jim Edgar, the Governor
of this state, confronts in his very effective way as Governor -- the
more we contemplate those problems and the more I look at this great
country of ours that I'm privileged to lead at this point in history
-- and I must say it's a very exciting point -- the more Barbara and
I conclude that family is absolutely essential to our success. We
have got to stay involved -- (applause) -- we have got to stay
fundamentally involved. And when I speak to this group, it's almost
like preaching to the choir because I think if you exemplify one of
the prime values and principles that this group and, indeed, Hispanic
American culture all across our country exemplifies, is love of
- 5 -
family and its faith and its conviction about our great country, the
freest and fairest on the face of the Earth. (Applause.)
So thank you very much for letting me come by and visit
this highly successful convention. And let me tell you that it's a
great joy to be back with you again. And may God bless our great
country. Thank you very very much. (Applause.)
END
2:05 P.M. CDT
U.S. Exports to Mexico
A STATE-BY-STATE OVERVIEW
1987-89
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
U.S. EXPORTS TO MEXICO:
A STATE-BY-STATE OVERVIEW, 1987-89
Prepared by:
Georg M. Mehl
William F. Kolarik
Janet M. Mims
Office of Trade & Investment Analysis
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
April 1991
FOREWORD
The pursuit of a free trade agreement with Mexico has generated growing
demand for information on merchandise exports to Mexico by individual U.S.
states and industries within the states. This book seeks to meet the demand
by providing data on state exports to Mexico from 1987 to 1989--the latest
year for which data were available at the time of publication.
This report is divided into several complementary sections. First, major
trends in state exports to Mexico are highlighted in a brief overview. Next,
there is a series of statistical tables summarizing state exports to our southern
neighbor. The final section provides, for each state and its key industries,
one-page profiles of recent exports to Mexico.
Data utilized in this publication were furnished by the Massachusetts Institute
for Social and Economic Research (MISER) of the University of
Massachusetts at Amherst. MISER statistics are based on Census Bureau
data tapes which aggregate information from Shippers' Export Declarations.
An explanation of the MISER-Census data is provided in a statistical note
following the introductory overview.
This book was produced under the direction of Barbara N. McLennan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Trade Information and Analysis. General
supervision was provided by Martin J. Kohn, Director of the Office of Trade
and Investment Analysis (OTIA). William F. Kolarik, Director of the
International Economics Division, OTIA, was Project Director and a
contributing author. The principal author was Georg M. Mehl, and Janet M.
Mims was a contributing author.
0.
iii
CONTENTS
Foreword
iii
U.S. Exports to Mexico, 1987-89:
State Export Profile
1
Statistical Note
3
I. NATIONAL SUMMARY TABLES
5
State Exports to Mexico, 1987-89
Percent Changes in State Exports to Mexico, 1987-89
Dollar Changes in State Exports to Mexico:
1987-89
(Alphabetical Listing)
Dollar Changes in State Exports to Mexico: 1987-89 (Ranked
by Dollar Change)
State Exports to Mexico, 1989, Ranked by Dollar Value
Percent of States' Exports Going to Mexico (Alphabetical
Listing)
Percent of States' Exports Going to Mexico (Ranked by 1989
Value)
State-By-State Ranking of Mexico as an Export Market
(Alphabetical Listing)
State-By-State Ranking of Mexico as an Export Market
(Market Ranking)
II. INDIVIDUAL STATE PROFILES OF EXPORTS
TO MEXICO, 1987-89
17
V
U.S. EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89: STATE EXPORT PROFILE
U.S. exports to Mexico--the third leading U.S. export market--totaled $25 billion
in 1989, a 71 percent increase from $14.6 billion in 1987.
From 1987 to 1989, 45 states and the District of Columbia expanded exports to
Mexico.
Fifteen states more than doubled exports to Mexico during 1987-89. States
reporting the greatest percentage growth in shipments to the Mexican market
over the three-year period were: Montana (1,536 percent), Nevada (721
percent), Vermont (350 percent), and Maine (319 percent).
Some of the states registering the largest dollar increases in exports to Mexico
over the 1987-89 period were: Texas (up $4.5 billion), California (up $1.9
billion), Michigan (up $643 million), and New York (up $322 million).
The top ten state exporters to Mexico in 1989 represented diverse parts of the
country and accounted for $21 billion, or 85 percent, of total U.S. exports to the
Mexican market.
-- Leading state exporters were, in descending order of 1989 shipments to
Mexico: Texas, California, Michigan, New York, Arizona, Louisiana, Illinois,
Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Florida.
-- Six key industries in the top ten states exported $13.4 billion to Mexico in
1989. These industries, and amounts exported, were: electric & electronic
equipment ($4.6 billion), transportation equipment ($2.6 billion), computers
& industrial machinery ($2.6 billion), chemicals ($1.6 billion), primary metal
industries ($1 billion), and fabricated metal products ($1 billion).
Texas was by far the dominant state exporter to Mexico in 1989. Exports from
Texas to the Mexican market totaled $11 billion and accounted for 44 percent
of total U.S. shipments to Mexico. California, with $4.2 billion in exports to
Mexico, was a distant second.
Mexico has become an increasingly important market for the United States.
The 71 percent increase in U.S. exports to Mexico from 1987 to 1989 far
outstripped the 41 percent growth in U.S. exports to the rest of the world over
the same period.
1
Consequently, the Mexican share of U.S. exports rose from 5.9 percent in 1987
to 7.2 percent in 1989.
-- Forty states and the District of Columbia registered an increase in the
Mexican share of their exports.
-- Five states--Texas, Arizona, North Dakota, Missouri, and Kansas--saw ten
percent or more of their exports go to Mexico in 1989.
In 1989, Mexico ranked among the top ten export markets in thirty-six states
and the District of Columbia.
-- Twenty states counted Mexico among their top five foreign markets.
-- Eleven states ranked Mexico as one of their top three export destinations.
-- Mexico was the number one export market of two states--Texas and Arizona.
2
STATISTICAL NOTE
U.S. state export statistics have important limitations. Users are therefore
urged to use caution when utilizing these data, especially for policy purposes.
State export figures presented in this report were provided by the
Massachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research (MISER) of the
University of Massachusetts. MISER data are drawn from Census Bureau
data tape number EQ912, which is issued quarterly. This tape aggregates
export-origin information from Shippers' Export Declarations (SEDs), which
are filed for virtually all merchandise exported from the United States.
On every SED, shippers are asked to provide the "point (state) of origin" of
the export. Answering this question is not as straightforward as it might
seem. Instructions for filling out the SED allow the shipper to choose among
several alternative definitions of the state of origin. These are:
(1) The state in which the merchandise actually starts its journey to
the port of export. This can be either the location of the factory where
the export item was produced or, in many cases, the location of a
distributor, regional warehouse, or cargo processing facility.
(2) The state of the commodity having the greatest dollar value in a
multi-product shipment.
(3) The "state of consolidation," which is the state in which various
parts of a multi-product export order are readied for shipment.
(4) The Foreign Trade Zone for exports leaving a FTZ (a FTZ is
similar in principle to bonded warehouses). Using the FTZ "state of
origin" definition, an export produced in Ohio, but shipped from a FTZ
located in Florida, would show up in state export statistics as a Florida
export.
The diverse definitions for "state of origin," coupled with the fact that
different shippers tend to interpret the guidelines in different ways, make it
impossible to say whether exports attributed to any given state actually were
produced in that state, or were simply temporarily warehoused in that
location.
3
The state-of-origin problem is particularly serious with respect to
nonmanufactures. Exporters of agricultural products, for example, almost
always specify the location of loading terminals, not the location of producing
farms, as the state of origin.
Another problem is that some shippers simply leave blank the "point of
origin" block on the SED. On the Census tape, about 25 percent of the
value of U.S. exports is unallocated by state. MISER tries to deal with this
shortcoming by applying a formula to "unallocated" data, breaking down the
category and reassigning export values to individual states. Although resulting
"massaged" numbers give a much neater picture of state exports, the precision
of the figures is unknown because MISER's reallocation procedure cannot be
validated.
Finally, MISER-Census state export data for the years 1987, 1988, and 1989
are not fully comparable for several reasons: First, revisions in the Standard
Industrial Classification system were implemented in 1988. Thus, 1988-89
state exports for individual industries are classified somewhat differently than
in earlier years. Further complicating the situation is that, beginning with
1989 data, reporting of U.S. export statistics shifted from the long-standing
"Schedule B" nomenclature to the new Harmonized System (HS). This move
introduced a number of classification problems which the Census Bureau is
currently working to resolve.
Although the MISER-Census data have major weaknesses, the fact remains
that these data are the most up-to-date source of information on state
exports. The only alternative source for state export figures is a Census
Bureau series which, while more accurate and comprehensive, is typically
issued with a three-year lag.
To sum up, care must be taken when drawing conclusions from the MISER-
Census series: One should not rely solely on MISER-Census statistics when
making statements about the contribution of exports to a given state's
employment and overall economic health. Such statements should be
supported, not only by MISER-Census data, but also by other evidence (e.g.,
anecdotal or statistical information) furnished by state agencies, trade
associations, or other sources.
4
NATIONAL SUMMARY TABLES
STATE EXPORTS TO MEXICO: 1987-89
(Thousand $)
(Percent Change)
1987
1988
1989
1987-88
1988-89
1987-89
ALABAMA
$80,551
$114,216
$156,037
41.8
36.6
93.7
ALASKA
5,293
2,678
9,942
-49.4
271.3
87.9
ARIZONA
644,677
761,786
759,494
18.2
-0.3
17.8
ARKANSAS
37,710
42,664
80,519
13.1
88.7
113.5
CALIFORNIA
2,257,263
3,241,765
4,172,918
43.6
28.7
84.9
COLORADO
69,290
79,955
96,398
15.4
20.6
39.1
CONNECTICUT
115,378
160,174
182,953
38.8
14.2
58.6
DELAWARE
28,033
38,900
51,414
38.8
32.2
83.4
DIST. OF COL.
4,932
7,063
6,627
43.2
-6.2
34.4
FLORIDA
218,998
326,336
424,199
49.0
30.0
93.7
GEORGIA
108,097
157,208
232,017
45.4
47.6
114.6
HAWAII
61
216
22
256.5
-89.9
-64.1
IDAHO
11,238
36,331
22,652
223.3
-37.7
101.6
ILLINOIS
278,373
448,166
569,203
61.0
27.0
104.5
INDIANA
270,929
155,910
203,961
-42.5
30.8
-24.7
IOWA
66,084
93,773
116,720
41.9
24.5
76.6
KANSAS
124,979
279,445
221,210
123.6
-20.8
77.0
KENTUCKY
43,266
86,127
99,428
99.1
15.4
129.8
LOUISIANA
377,426
530,149
671,019
40.5
26.6
77.8
MAINE
2,685
10,858
11,237
304.5
3.5
318.6
MARYLAND
17,044
33,212
25,262
94.9
-23.9
48.2
MASSACHUSETTS
100,117
116,530
155,449
16.4
33.4
55.3
MICHIGAN
1,077,870
1,317,396
1,720,558
22.2
30.6
59.6
MINNESOTA
89,975
135,383
162,847
50.5
20.3
81.0
MISSISSIPPI
52,510
69,557
97,460
32.5
40.1
85.6
MISSOURI
198,713
312,727
322,043
57.4
3.0
62.1
MONTANA
1,219
2,255
19,948
85.0
784.8
1536.4
NEBRASKA
44,546
52,275
50,581
17.3
-3.2
13.5
NEVADA
2,706
5,476
22,207
102.4
305.5
720.7
NEW HAMPSHIRE
9,790
14,280
18,316
45.9
28.3
87.1
NEW JERSEY
189,017
266,749
390,817
41.1
46.5
106.6
NEW MEXICO
9,058
15,968
14,479
76.3
-9.3
59.9
NEW YORK
512,368
827,931
834,284
61.6
0.8
62.8
NORTH CAROLINA
94,670
137,110
190,184
44.8
38.7
100.9
NORTH DAKOTA
39,886
37,483
51,651
-6.0
37.8
29.5
OHIO
245,232
381,331
464,034
55.5
21.7
89.2
OKLAHOMA
44,248
97,769
62,369
121.0
-36.2
41.0
OREGON
19,477
23,453
38,067
20.4
62.3
95.4
PENNSYLVANIA
181,126
337,393
474,687
86.3
40.7
162.1
RHODE ISLAND
14,664
23,941
32,108
63.3
34.1
119.0
SOUTH CAROLINA
32,350
54,853
59,751
69.6
8.9
84.7
SOUTH DAKOTA
5,358
4,760
5,251
-11.2
10.3
-2.0
TENNESSEE
100,938
141,177
244,237
39.9
73.0
142.0
TEXAS
6,465,123
9,334,029
11,010,627
44.4
18.0
70.3
UTAH
37,088
50,985
31,758
37.5
-37.7
-14.4
VERMONT
2,570
16,351
11,550
536.3
-29.4
349.5
VIRGINIA
41,056
63,513
85,743
54.7
35.0
108.8
WASHINGTON
83,382
90,990
119,270
9.1
31.1
43.0
WEST VIRGINIA
43,988
18,567
26,273
-57.8
41.5
-40.3
WISCONSIN
77,322
83,188
135,217
7.6
62.5
74.9
WYOMING
3,374
3,055
3,824
-9.5
25.2
13.3
TOTAL U.S.
$14,582,239
$20,643,408
$24,968,823
41.6
21.0
71.2
7
PERCENT CHANGES IN STATE EXPORTS
TO MEXICO: 1987-89
% Change
1987-89
Rank
MONTANA
1536.4
1
NEVADA
720.7
2
VERMONT
349.5
3
MAINE
318.6
4
PENNSYLVANIA
162.1
5
TENNESSEE
142.0
6
KENTUCKY
129.8
7
RHODE ISLAND
119.0
8
GEORGIA
114.6
9
ARKANSAS
113.5
10
VIRGINIA
108.8
11
NEW JERSEY
106.6
12
ILLINOIS
104.5
13
IDAHO
101.6
14
NORTH CAROLINA
100.9
15
OREGON
95.4
16
ALABAMA
93.7
17
FLORIDA
93.7
18
OHIO
89.2
19
ALASKA
87.9
20
NEW HAMPSHIRE
87.1
21
MISSISSIPPI
85.6
22
CALIFORNIA
84.9
23
SOUTH CAROLINA
84.7
24
DELAWARE
83.4
25
MINNESOTA
81.0
26
LOUISIANA
77.8
27
KANSAS
77.0
28
IOWA
76.6
29
WISCONSIN
74.9
30
TEXAS
70.3
31
NEW YORK
62.8
32
MISSOURI
62.1
33
NEW MEXICO
59.9
34
MICHIGAN
59.6
35
CONNECTICUT
58.6
36
MASSACHUSETTS
55.3
37
MARYLAND
48.2
38
WASHINGTON
43.0
39
OKLAHOMA
41.0
40
COLORADO
39.1
41
DIST. OF COL.
34.4
42
NORTH DAKOTA
29.5
43
ARIZONA
17.8
44
NEBRASKA
13.5
45
WYOMING
13.3
46
SOUTH DAKOTA
-2.0
47
UTAH
-14.4
48
INDIANA
-24.7
49
WEST VIRGINIA
-40.3
50
HAWAII
-64.1
51
TOTAL U.S.
71.2
8
DOLLAR CHANGES IN STATE EXPORTS
TO MEXICO: 1987-89*
(Thousand $)
$ Change
1987-89
Rank
ALABAMA
$75,487
17
ALASKA
4,650
44
ARIZONA
114,816
14
ARKANSAS
42,808
26
CALIFORNIA
1,915,656
2
COLORADO
27,108
29
CONNECTICUT
67,575
19
DELAWARE
23,381
30
DIST. OF COL.
1,695
45
FLORIDA
205,201
9
GEORGIA
123,919
12
HAWAII
(39)
47
IDAHO
11,414
37
ILLINOIS
290,830
7
INDIANA
(66,968)
51
IOWA
50,636
23
KANSAS
96,231
15
KENTUCKY
56,163
21
LOUISIANA
293,592
5
MAINE
8,553
39
MARYLAND
8,218
41
MASSACHUSETTS
55,332
22
MICHIGAN
642,688
3
MINNESOTA
72,872
18
MISSISSIPPI
44,950
24
MISSOURI
123,331
13
MONTANA
18,729
32
NEBRASKA
6,035
42
NEVADA
19,501
31
NEW HAMPSHIRE
8,526
40
NEW JERSEY
201,799
10
NEW MEXICO
5,421
43
NEW YORK
321,916
4
NORTH CAROLINA
95,514
16
NORTH DAKOTA
11,765
36
OHIO
218,802
8
OKLAHOMA
18,121
34
OREGON
18,590
33
PENNSYLVANIA
293,561
6
RHODE ISLAND
17,444
35
SOUTH CAROLINA
27,401
28
SOUTH DAKOTA
(107)
48
TENNESSEE
143,299
11
TEXAS
4,545,504
1
UTAH
(5,329)
49
VERMONT
8,980
38
VIRGINIA
44,687
25
WASHINGTON
35,889
27
WEST VIRGINIA
(17,715)
50
WISCONSIN
57,895
20
WYOMING
449
46
TOTAL U.S.
$10,386,584
*Negative values are in parentheses
9
DOLLAR CHANGES IN STATE EXPORTS
TO MEXICO: 1987-89*
(Ranked by Dollar Value - Thousand $)
$ Change
1987-89
Rank
TEXAS
$4,545,504
1
CALIFORNIA
1,915,656
2
MICHIGAN
642,688
3
NEW YORK
321,916
4
LOUISIANA
293,592
5
PENNSYLVANIA
293,561
6
ILLINOIS
290,830
7
OHIO
218,802
8
FLORIDA
205,201
9
NEW JERSEY
201,799
10
TENNESSEE
143,299
11
GEORGIA
123,919
12
MISSOURI
123,331
13
ARIZONA
114,816
14
KANSAS
96,231
15
NORTH CAROLINA
95,514
16
ALABAMA
75,487
17
MINNESOTA
72,872
18
CONNECTICUT
67,575
19
WISCONSIN
57,895
20
KENTUCKY
56,163
21
MASSACHUSETTS
55,332
22
IOWA
50,636
23
MISSISSIPPI
44,950
24
VIRGINIA
44,687
25
ARKANSAS
42,808
26
WASHINGTON
35,889
27
SOUTH CAROLINA
27,401
28
COLORADO
27,108
29
DELAWARE
23,381
30
NEVADA
19,501
31
MONTANA
18,729
32
OREGON
18,590
33
OKLAHOMA
18,121
34
RHODE ISLAND
17,444
35
NORTH DAKOTA
11,765
36
IDAHO
11,414
37
VERMONT
8,980
38
MAINE
8,553
39
NEW HAMPSHIRE
8,526
40
MARYLAND
8,218
41
NEBRASKA
6,035
42
NEW MEXICO
5,421
43
ALASKA
4,650
44
DIST. OF COL.
1,695
45
WYOMING
449
46
HAWAII
(39)
47
SOUTH DAKOTA
(107)
48
UTAH
(5,329)
49
WEST VIRGINIA
(17,715)
50
INDIANA
(66,968)
51,
TOTAL U.S.
$10,386,584
*Negative values are in parentheses
10
STATE EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1989
(Ranked by Dollar Value-Thousand $)
1989
Rank
TEXAS
$11,010,627
1
CALIFORNIA
4,172,918
2
MICHIGAN
1,720,558
3
NEW YORK
834,284
4
ARIZONA
759,494
5
LOUISIANA
671,019
6
ILLINOIS
569,203
7
PENNSYLVANIA
474,687
8
OHIO
464,034
9
FLORIDA
424,199
10
NEW JERSEY
390,817
11
MISSOURI
322,043
12
TENNESSEE
244,237
13
GEORGIA
232,017
14
KANSAS
221,210
15
INDIANA
203,961
16
NORTH CAROLINA
190,184
17
CONNECTICUT
182,953
18
MINNESOTA
162,847
19
ALABAMA
156,037
20
MASSACHUSETTS
155,449
21
WISCONSIN
135,217
22
WASHINGTON
119,270
23
IOWA
116,720
24
KENTUCKY
99,428
25
MISSISSIPPI
97,460
26
COLORADO
96,398
27
VIRGINIA
85,743
28
ARKANSAS
80,519
29
OKLAHOMA
62,369
30
SOUTH CAROLINA
59,751
31
NORTH DAKOTA
51,651
32
DELAWARE
51,414
33
NEBRASKA
50,581
34
OREGON
38,067
35
RHODE ISLAND
32,108
36
UTAH
31,758
37
WEST VIRGINIA
26,273
38
MARYLAND
25,262
39
IDAHO
22,652
40
NEVADA
22,207
41
MONTANA
19,948
42
NEW HAMPSHIRE
18,316
43
NEW MEXICO
14,479
44
VERMONT
11,550
45
MAINE
11,237
46
ALASKA
9,942
47
DIST. OF COL.
6,627
48
SOUTH DAKOTA
5,251
49
WYOMING
3,824
50
HAWAII
22
51
TOTAL U.S.
$24,968,823
11
PERCENT OF STATES' EXPORTS GOING TO MEXICO: 1987-89
1987
1988
1989
ALABAMA
3.3
4.0
4.5
ALASKA
0.3
0.1
0.4
ARIZONA
21.5
21.5
18.7
ARKANSAS
5.4
6.0
9.6
CALIFORNIA
6.6
6.8
7.8
COLORADO
4.0
3.8
3.8
CONNECTICUT
3.5
4.2
4.1
DELAWARE
3.3
3.2
4.2
DIST. OF COL.
1.7
2.6
2.2
FLORIDA
2.1
2.4
2.9
GEORGIA
2.7
3.2
3.8
HAWAII
0.0
0.1
0.0
IDAHO
2.1
5.2
2.7
ILLINOIS
3.2
3.9
4.3
INDIANA
6.5
3.3
3.8
IOWA
3.6
4.3
4.5
KANSAS
7.7
14.2
10.9
KENTUCKY
1.9
2.9
3.4
LOUISIANA
2.8
3.6
3.8
MAINE
0.4
1.3
1.2
MARYLAND
0.8
1.3
0.8
MASSACHUSETTS
1.2
1.2
1.5
MICHIGAN
6.0
6.3
8.1
MINNESOTA
2.2
2.7
3.1
MISSISSIPPI
4.1
5.1
5.5
MISSOURI
6.7
11.4
11.2
MONTANA
0.4
0.6
5.8
NEBRASKA
5.7
5.7
6.1
NEVADA
0.7
2.2
6.9
NEW HAMPSHIRE
1.1
1.4
1.7
NEW JERSEY
2.8
3.2
4.5
NEW MEXICO
5.4
8.3
6.8
NEW YORK
2.6
3.1
3.1
NORTH CAROLINA
1.6
2.0
2.3
NORTH DAKOTA
13.4
13.4
13.5
OHIO
2.4
3.1
3.5
OKLAHOMA
4.1
6.3
3.8
OREGON
0.6
0.5
0.7
PENNSYLVANIA
3.0
4.3
5.5
RHODE ISLAND
2.9
4.3
4.9
SOUTH CAROLINA
1.4
1.8
1.7
SOUTH DAKOTA
8.1
5.2
3.3
TENNESSEE
4.0
4.7
6.7
TEXAS
25.5
27.0
28.9
UTAH
4.6
5.4
2.6
VERMONT
0.4
1.4
0.7
VIRGINIA
0.6
0.8
1.0
WASHINGTON
0.6
0.5
0.5
WEST VIRGINIA
3.6
1.4
1.9
WISCONSIN
2.0
1.8
2.7
WYOMING
1.4
1.3
1.5
TOTAL U.S.
5.9
6.6
7.2
12
PERCENT OF STATES' EXPORTS GOING TO MEXICO: 1987-89
(Ranked by 1989 Values)
1987
1988
1989
TEXAS
25.5
27.0
28.9
ARIZONA
21.5
21.5
18.7
NORTH DAKOTA
13.4
13.4
13.5
MISSOURI
6.7
11.4
11.2
KANSAS
7.7
14.2
10.9
ARKANSAS
5.4
6.0
9.6
MICHIGAN
6.0
6.3
8.1
CALIFORNIA
6.6
6.8
7.8
NEVADA
0.7
2.2
6.9
NEW MEXICO
5.4
8.3
6.8
TENNESSEE
4.0
4.7
6.7
NEBRASKA
5.7
5.7
6.1
MONTANA
0.4
0.6
5.8
MISSISSIPPI
4.1
5.1
5.5
PENNSYLVANIA
3.0
4.3
5.5
RHODE ISLAND
2.9
4.3
4.9
NEW JERSEY
2.8
3.2
4.5
IOWA
3.6
4.3
4.5
ALABAMA
3.3
4.0
4.5
ILLINOIS
3.2
3.9
4.3
DELAWARE
3.3
3.2
4.2
CONNECTICUT
3.5
4.2
4.1
GEORGIA
2.7
3.2
3.8
COLORADO
4.0
3.8
3.8
OKLAHOMA
4.1
6.3
3.8
LOUISIANA
2.8
3.6
3.8
INDIANA
6.5
3.3
3.8
OHIO
2.4
3.1
3.5
KENTUCKY
1.9
2.9
3.4
SOUTH DAKOTA
8.1
5.2
3.3
NEW YORK
2.6
3.1
3.1
MINNESOTA
2.2
2.7
3.1
FLORIDA
2.1
2.4
2.9
IDAHO
2.1
5.2
2.7
WISCONSIN
2.0
1.8
2.7
UTAH
4.6
5.4
2.6
NORTH CAROLINA
1.6
2.0
2.3
DIST. OF COL.
1.7
2.6
2.2
WEST VIRGINIA
3.6
1.4
1.9
SOUTH CAROLINA
1.4
1.8
1.7
NEW HAMPSHIRE
1.1
1.4
1.7
WYOMING
1.4
1.3
1.5
MASSACHUSETTS
1.2
1.2
1.5
MAINE
0.4
1.3
1.2
VIRGINIA
0.6
0.8
1.0
MARYLAND
0.8
1.3
0.8
OREGON
0.6
0.5
0.7
VERMONT
0.4
1.4
0.7
WASHINGTON
0.6
0.5
0.5
ALASKA
0.3
0.1
0.4
HAWAII
0.0
0.1
0.0
TOTAL U.S.
5.9
6.6
7.2
13
STATE-BY-STATE RANKING OF MEXICO
AS AN EXPORT MARKET, 1989
Total # of Markets
Mexico's Rank Among
This State Exports to*
Foreign Markets
ALABAMA
153
6
ALASKA
90
19
ARIZONA
149
1
ARKANSAS
118
3
CALIFORNIA
197
3
COLORADO
149
9
CONNECTICUT
157
7
DELAWARE
101
2
DIST. OF COL.
136
9
FLORIDA
185
10
GEORGIA
185
6
HAWAII
70
49
IDAHO
98
8
ILLINOIS
179
6
INDIANA
154
4
IOWA
139
3
KANSAS
150
3
KENTUCKY
131
8
LOUISIANA
171
5
MAINE
113
16
MARYLAND
164
25
MASSACHUSETTS
177
15
MICHIGAN
162
2
MINNESOTA
167
9
MISSISSIPPI
142
5
MISSOURI
151
3
MONTANA
69
4
NEBRASKA
119
4
NEVADA
101
5
NEW HAMPSHIRE
114
15
NEW JERSEY
184
5
NEW MEXICO
77
6
NEW YORK
188
8
NORTH CAROLINA
165
14
NORTH DAKOTA
71
2
OHIO
169
6
OKLAHOMA
139
7
OREGON
166
20
PENNSYLVANIA
177
5
RHODE ISLAND
110
5
SOUTH CAROLINA
148
15
SOUTH DAKOTA
71
7
TENNESSEE
156
3
TEXAS
190
1
UTAH
123
12
VERMONT
96
7
VIRGINIA
171
20
WASHINGTON
174
29
WEST VIRGINIA
99
13
WISCONSIN
174
10
WYOMING
53
15
*The Census Bureau recognizes 217 destinations for U.S. exports. These geographic
entities are sovereign countries (the majority), their dependencies and protectorates,
and various localities of indeterminate political status.
14
STATE-BY-STATE RANKING OF MEXICO AS AN
EXPORT MARKET, SORTED BY 1989 MARKET RANK
Total # of Markets
Mexico's Rank Among
This State Exports to*
Foreign Markets
ARIZONA
149
1
TEXAS
190
1
NORTH DAKOTA
71
2
DELAWARE
101
2
MICHIGAN
162
2
ARKANSAS
118
3
IOWA
139
3
KANSAS
150
3
MISSOURI
151
3
TENNESSEE
156
3
CALIFORNIA
197
3
MONTANA
69
4
NEBRASKA
119
4
INDIANA
154
4
NEVADA
101
5
RHODE ISLAND
110
5
MISSISSIPPI
142
5
LOUISIANA
171
5
PENNSYLVANIA
177
5
NEW JERSEY
184
5
NEW MEXICO
77
6
ALABAMA
153
6
OHIO
169
6
ILLINOIS
179
6
GEORGIA
185
6
SOUTH DAKOTA
71
7
VERMONT
96
7
OKLAHOMA
139
7
CONNECTICUT
157
7
IDAHO
98
8
KENTUCKY
131
8
NEW YORK
188
8
DIST. OF COL.
136
9
COLORADO
149
9
MINNESOTA
167
9
WISCONSIN
174
10
FLORIDA
185
10
UTAH
123
12
WEST VIRGINIA
99
13
NORTH CAROLINA
165
14
WYOMING
53
15
NEW HAMPSHIRE
114
15
SOUTH CAROLINA
148
15
MASSACHUSETTS
177
15
MAINE
113
16
ALASKA
90
19
OREGON
166
20
VIRGINIA
171
20
MARYLAND
164
25
WASHINGTON
174
29
HAWAII
70
49
*The Census Bureau recognizes 217 destinations for U.S. exports. These geographic
entities are sovereign countries (the majority), their dependencies and protectorates,
and various localities of indeterminate political status.
15
INDIVIDUAL STATE PROFILES
ALABAMA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Alabama's Exports to Mexico Grew by
80 Percent of Alabama's
94 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
180
160
Non-Manufacturing
$156.0
Electric &
Manufacturing
Electronic Eqp.
$40.9
140
$114.2
Primary Metal
120
Industries
$32.3
100
$80.6
Paper Products
$22.0
80
60
Chemicals
$17.4
40
20
Computers &
Industrial Mach.
$12.0
0
1987
1988
1989
0
10
20
30
40
50
ALABAMA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
5,832.8
111.5
8,407.3
Agriculture - crops
5,680.5
0.0
8,407.3
Agriculture - livestock
152.3
111.5
0.0
Forestry
0.0
0.0
0.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
242.0
11,561.1
724.9
Metal Mining
38.6
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
104.7
10,372.8
305.2
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
10.4
Non-Metallic Minerals
98.6
1,188.3
409.2
MANUFACTURING
70,190.2
96,579.3
142,253.9
Food Products
724.4
627.5
251.8
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
2.4
Textile Mill Products
212.2
1,718.2
2,111.7
Apparel
113.9
159.8
2,352.4
Lumber & Wood Products
0.0
22.7
313.1
Furniture & Fixtures
26.8
104.4
389.9
Paper Products
28,705.9
30,235.8
22,037.1
Printing & Publishing
0.0
1.6
10.5
Chemical Products
14,509.0
17,356.6
17,396.7
Petroleum Refining Products
9,773.8
281.9
5,135.9
Rubber & Plastic Products
375.6
189.6
1,313.1
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
17.8
307.7
1,655.7
Primary Metal Industries
6,340.1
15,285.7
32,286.9
Fabricated Metal Products
1,820.2
684.5
1,228.8
Computers & Industrial Machinery
3,789.0
10,750.4
12,049.6
Electric & Electronic Equipment
2,602.7
17,583.2
40,853.1
Transportation Equipment
779.2
541.7
1,846.7
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
391.4
613.3
930.3
Miscellaneous Equipment
8.1
114.7
88.3
OTHER
4,285.8
5,964.3
4,651.1
Scrap & Waste
4,075.4
4,749.6
4,122.2
Second Hand Goods
201.7
681.7
0.0
Military Equipment
8.7
533.0
528.9
ALABAMA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
80,550.7
114,216.1
156,037.2
ALABAMA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
2,431,683.0
2,867,348.6
3,484,424.2
MEXICO'S SHARE OF ALABAMA'S EXPORTS
3.3%
4.0%
4.5%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked SIXTH Among Alabama's 153 Export Markets
19
ALASKA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Alaska's Exports to Mexico Grew by
87 Percent of Alaska's
88 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
12
Non-Manufacturing
$9.9
Food Products
$3.6
10
Manufacturing
8
Paper Products
$1.7
6
$5.3
Chemicals
$1.7
4
$2.7
Stone, Clay &
Glass Products
$1.3
2
Primary Metal
Industries
$0.4
0
1987
1988
1989
0
1
2
3
4
5
ALASKA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
22.7
30.6
159.6
Agriculture crops
0.0
0.0
0.0
Agriculture - livestock
22.7
27.5
24.0
Forestry
0.0
3.1
0.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
135.6
MINING
24.7
0.0
21.5
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
21.5
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
24.7
0.0
0.0
MANUFACTURING
5,128.0
1,347.6
9,372.5
Food Products
77.7
8.0
3,570.4
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
0.0
25.8
88.6
Apparel
0.0
0.0
0.0
Lumber & Wood Products
0.0
24.3
62.2
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
0.0
0.0
Paper Products
82.2
61.2
1,670.3
Printing & Publishing
0.0
26.1
0.0
Chemical Products
4,341.8
149.7
1,664.7
Petroleum Refining Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
50.0
0.0
89.9
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
48.8
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
4.0
246.6
1,317.5
Primary Metal Industries
9.1
77.3
436.8
Fabricated Metal Products
12.3
6.3
11.0
Computers & Industrial Machinery
26.8
109.4
186.1
Electric & Electronic Equipment
412.5
312.4
117.5
Transportation Equipment
13.7
81.6
92.8
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
0.0
0.0
8.3
Miscellaneous Equipment
97.8
218.9
7.7
OTHER
117.2
1,299.6
388.7
Scrap & Waste
117.2
1,236.7
388.7
Second Hand Goods
0.0
0.0
0.0
Military Equipment
0.0
62.9
0.0
ALASKA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
5,292.6
2,677.8
9,942.2
ALASKA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
1,809,993.1
2,358,616.3
2,720,881.4
MEXICO'S SHARE OF ALASKA'S EXPORTS
0.3%
0.1%
0.4%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked 19TH Among Alaska's 90 Export Markets
20
ARIZONA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Arizona's Exports to Mexico Grew by
70 Percent of Arizona's
18 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
1500
Non-Manufacturing
Electric &
$217.8
Manufacturing
Electronic Eqp.
1000
Apparel
$114.3
$761.8
$759.5
Computers &
$644.7
$100.4
Industrial Mach.
500
Transportation
$51.5
Equipment
Paper Products
$46.0
0
1987
1988
1989
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
ARIZONA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
11,411.0
36,268.7
42,718.2
Agriculture crops
6,624.3
25,810.2
36,580.5
Agriculture - livestock
4,115.6
10,385.8
5,569.9
Forestry
671.1
72.8
160.4
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
407.5
MINING
52.0
78.7
214.8
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
63.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
52.0
78.7
151.8
MANUFACTURING
627,078.6
711,586.1
700,740.9
Food Products
2,195.2
12,174.0
29,829.9
Tobacco Products
0.0
135.7
535.1
Textile Mill Products
20,439.3
35,503.3
2,624.1
Apparel
34,591.2
47,674.1
114,326.3
Lumber & Wood Products
1,133.3
4,209.5
2,156.6
Furniture & Fixtures
506.5
1,472.2
4,566.9
Paper Products
23,411.0
33,719.3
45,970.8
Printing & Publishing
782.9
1,458.1
1,061.0
Chemical Products
11,651.1
13,393.7
8,929.7
Petroleum Refining Products
4,997.5
522.9
7,483.8
Rubber & Plastic Products
27,068.4
33,441.2
11,670.8
Leather Products
686.5
2,449.3
4,932.4
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
987.9
1,298.3
2,819.1
Primary Metal Industries
16,741.1
22,394.7
21,589.6
Fabricated Metal Products
6,551.1
14,244.4
42,683.1
Computers & Industrial Machinery
159,599.2
143,119.5
100,366.8
Electric & Electronic Equipment
252,366.7
268,158.9
217,772.6
Transportation Equipment
53,459.6
64,664.1
51,497.7
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
4,920.7
7,371.2
24,847.0
Miscellaneous Equipment
4,989.4
4,181.7
5,077.6
OTHER
6,135.8
13,852.1
15,819.7
Scrap & Waste
651.6
1,539.9
1,116.1
Second Hand Goods
2,979.3
5,402.6
2,555.4
Military Equipment
2,505.0
6,909.6
12,148.2
ARIZONA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
644,677.5
761,785.6
759,493.6
ARIZONA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
2,999,012.4
3,547,607.9
4,058,324.3
MEXICO'S SHARE OF ARIZONA'S EXPORTS
21.5%
21.5%
18.7%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked FIRST Among Arizona's 149 Export Markets
21
ARKANSAS: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
Arkansas' Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
75 Percent of Arkansas'
114 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
100
Non-Manufacturing
Manufacturing
$80.5
Food Products
$29.6
80
Primary Metal
Industries
$11.8
60
$42.7
Chemicals
$10.7
$37.7
40
Electric &
Electronic Eqp.
$4.3
20
Agriculture-Crops
$4.0
0
1987
1988
1989
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
ARKANSAS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
558.8
341.9
5,133.7
Agriculture - crops
409.6
28.7
3,987.5
Agriculture - livestock
144.8
311.2
1,144.0
Forestry
4.4
1.9
2.2
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
143.8
10.4
189.1
Metal Mining
0.0
10.4
66.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
143.8
0.0
123.1
MANUFACTURING
34,465.0
39,540.5
72,631.3
Food Products
868.7
1,776.5
29,573.5
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
60.0
20.6
262.4
Apparel
87.5
129.5
1,355.5
Lumber & Wood Products
24.8
95.4
1,548.7
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
14.2
119.4
Paper Products
4,253.6
2,590.3
2,394.7
Printing & Publishing
259.6
193.4
11.4
Chemical Products
9,137.8
7,805.5
10,674.2
Petroleum Refining Products
29.9
2.3
2.7
Rubber & Plastic Products
815.9
1,112.2
737.0
Leather Products
0.0
235.7
221.4
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
2,432.7
3,266.3
2,405.0
Primary Metal Industries
709.4
5,988.9
11,819.9
Fabricated Metal Products
1,731.4
721.0
813.6
Computers & Industrial Machinery
6,965.1
9,145.1
3,368.3
Electric & Electronic Equipment
5,146.4
4,192.6
4,333.8
Transportation Equipment
1,187.6
1,326.9
1,424.1
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
244.6
40.0
782.3
Miscellaneous Equipment
510.2
884.0
783.1
OTHER
2,542.6
2,771.7
2,564.5
Scrap & Waste
2,429.9
2,588.7
2,340.9
Second Hand Goods
95.0
5.0
133.0
Military Equipment
17.7
178.0
90.6
ARKANSAS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO
37,710.2
42,664.4
80,518.6
ARKANSAS' EXPORTS TO WORLD
695,229.7
709,663.3
838,571.1
MEXICO'S SHARE OF ARKANSAS' EXPORTS
5.4%
6.0%
9.6%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked THIRD Among Arkansas' 118 Export Markets
22
CALIFORNIA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
California's Exports to Mexico Grew by
55 Percent of California's
85 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Billion $
Million $
6
Electric &
Non-Manufacturing
$762.4
5
Electronic Eqp.
Manufacturing
$4.17
Computers &
$539.0
4
Industrial Mach.
$3.24
Transportation
3
$444.2
$2.26
Equipment
2
Petroleum
$324.2
Products
1
Fabricated
$242.0
Metal Prod.
0
1987
1988
1989
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
CALIFORNIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
36,928.1
99,996.1
105,436.9
Agriculture crops
34,040.2
68,106.3
82,901.1
Agriculture - livestock
2,239.3
30,407.6
18,395.6
Forestry
606.8
1,144.5
1,621.3
Fishing, Hunting
41.8
337.8
2,518.9
MINING
47.8
13,643.9
12,441.8
Metal Mining
3.6
30.2
113.1
Coal Mining
16.6
60.4
255.5
Oil & Gas
24.0
0.0
98.6
Non-Metallic Minerals
3.7
13,553.3
11,974.6
CONSTRUCTION
9,041.7
0.0
0.0
MANUFACTURING
2,147,660.5
3,038,055.0
3,961,306.3
Food Products
53,462.5
121,269.3
190,057.2
Tobacco Products
0.0
5.1
1.8
Textile Mill Products
13,503.9
28,102.4
29,838.4
Apparel
29,210.3
52,360.6
64,020.0
Lumber & Wood Products
90,594.7
129,593.5
168,813.5
Furniture & Fixtures
18,568.8
41,491.6
61,650.4
Paper Products
68,878.2
97,229.5
149,019.8
Printing & Publishing
9,541.2
15,457.3
18,585.0
Chemical Products
90,603.6
181,942.5
196,573.4
Petroleum Refining Products
349,879.5
206,527.4
324,210.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
111,698.2
163,036.0
198,396.3
Leather Products
6,495.9
10,836.9
23,807.4
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
33,465.7
35,105.0
39,328.5
Primary Metal Industries
100,602.7
157,698.9
182,863.5
Fabricated Metal Products
131,943.0
196,538.7
241,969.8
Computers & Industrial Machinery
385,122.9
607,159.9
538,958.4
Electric & Electronic Equipment
430,760.7
627,222.3
762,406.3
Transportation Equipment
80,858.3
116,705.5
444,159.5
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
78,867.9
129,766.5
150,548.3
Miscellaneous Equipment
63,602.7
120,006.3
176,098.9
OTHER
63,584.6
90,070.4
93,733.5
Scrap & Waste
18,812.7
32,869.7
29,900.3
Second Hand Goods
8,862.8
15,031.8
4,169.7
Military Equipment
35,909.0
42,168.9
59,663.5
CALIFORNIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
2,257,262.7
3,241,765.4
4,172,918.5
CALIFORNIA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
34,311,151.0
47,789,371.2
53,547,596.0
MEXICO'S SHARE OF CALIFORNIA'S EXPORTS
6.6%
6.8%
7.8%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked THIRD Among California's 197 Export Markets
23
COLORADO: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
Colorado's Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
68 Percent of Colorado's
39 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
120
Non-Manufacturing
100
Manufacturing
$96.4
Agriculture-Crops
$17.6
$80.0
Computers &
80
$69.3
Industrial Mach.
$15.2
60
Chemicals
$15.0
40
Apparel
$9.1
20
Food Products
$8.5
0
1987
1988
1989
0
10
20
30
COLORADO'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
2,538.4
9,628.2
17,817.5
Agriculture crops
2,471.2
6,379.6
17,633.2
Agriculture livestock
53.3
3,217.4
82.3
Forestry
14.0
31.2
101.9
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
895.1
559.6
3,110.0
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
2,631.3
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
895.1
559.6
478.6
MANUFACTURING
62,797.4
67,391.0
73,325.6
Food Products
13,416.7
16,118.4
8,497.0
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
323.2
176.4
1,217.8
Apparel
98.3
338.5
9,089.2
Lumber & Wood Products
46.1
29.8
126.6
Furniture & Fixtures
111.7
15.9
110.3
Paper Products
1,706.9
1,121.7
1,094.7
Printing & Publishing
185.5
297.4
334.1
Chemical Products
9,210.1
15,144.8
14,980.6
Petroleum Refining Products
80.6
51.6
143.5
Rubber & Plastic Products
1,863.5
2,090.0
4,024.8
Leather Products
0.0
566.8
167.1
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
249.3
499.2
474.9
Primary Metal Industries
302.4
460.5
2,174.1
Fabricated Metal Products
11,680.7
9,101.7
2,263.2
Computers & Industrial Machinery
11,691.3
11,999.7
15,232.9
Electric & Electronic Equipment
4,799.1
3,899.8
7,266.7
Transportation Equipment
472.9
335.3
1,343.5
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
6,341.8
4,883.4
2,271.1
Miscellaneous Equipment
217.2
260.2
2,513.6
OTHER
3,059.0
2,375.7
2,144.7
Scrap & Waste
2,311.6
1,763.8
894.9
Second Hand Goods
152.7
355.8
98.0
Military Equipment
594.8
256.0
1,151.8
COLORADO'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
69,290.0
79,954.5
96,397.8
COLORADO'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
1,718,961.9
2,098,007.5
2,526,651.4
MEXICO'S SHARE OF COLORADO'S EXPORTS
4.0%
3.8%
3.8%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked NINTH Among Colorado's 149 Export Markets
24
CONNECTICUT: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Connecticut's Exports to Mexico Grew by
75 Percent of Connecticut's
59 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
Non-Manufacturing
Chemicals
$69.8
200
Manufacturing
$183.0
Electric &
$160.2
$26.4
Electronic Eqp.
$115.4
Computers &
$20.3
Industrial Mach.
100
Scrap & Waste
$11.0
Primary Metal
Industries
$9.9
0
1987
1988
1989
0
20
40
60
80
100
CONNECTICUT'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
484.6
929.9
827.2
Agriculture crops
175.2
0.0
10.8
Agriculture livestock
222.8
766.1
767.0
Forestry
86.6
163.7
49.4
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
401.9
449.2
441.7
Metal Mining
11.6
8.0
2.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
46.6
Non-Metallic Minerals
390.3
441.2
393.2
MANUFACTURING
107,411.1
145,218.9
168,492.7
Food Products
0.0
263.7
1,050.1
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
94.2
54.6
348.0
Apparel
79.5
105.7
21.1
Lumber & Wood Products
402.9
295.5
196.7
Furniture & Fixtures
88.8
451.8
181.5
Paper Products
7,238.6
15,911.4
9,732.1
Printing & Publishing
271.5
107.3
281.8
Chemical Products
47,833.5
47,794.7
69,765.1
Petroleum Refining Products
512.2
906.1
3,814.2
Rubber & Plastic Products
1,316.0
2,866.7
1,336.4
Leather Products
0.0
51.8
38.6
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
320.5
643.5
353.0
Primary Metal Industries
5,353.1
7,751.4
9,857.3
Fabricated Metal Products
1,201.5
1,870.4
2,114.5
Computers & Industrial Machinery
14,497.7
21,004.9
20,258.7
Electric & Electronic Equipment
11,468.9
23,061.4
26,441.5
Transportation Equipment
6,839.1
10,666.7
7,727.8
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
6,375.0
8,669.8
8,793.0
Miscellaneous Equipment
3,518.3
2,741.5
6,181.3
OTHER
7,080.3
13,575.7
13,191.6
Scrap & Waste
6,636.9
12,243.4
11,023.6
Second Hand Goods
46.4
4.0
11.0
Military Equipment
397.0
1,328.3
2,157.0
CONNECTICUT'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
115,377.9
160,173.7
182,953.2
CONNECTICUT'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
3,318,913.9
3,828,715.4
4,472,941.9
MEXICO'S SHARE OF CONNECTICUT'S EXPORTS
3.5%
4.2%
4.1%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked SEVENTH Among Connecticut's 157 Export Markets
25
DELAWARE: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Delaware's Exports to Mexico Grew by
92 Percent of Delaware's
83 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
70
60
Non-Manufacturing
Chemicals
Manufacturing
$36.6
$51.4
50
Scientific &
$38.9
Measuring Instru.
$3.4
40
Rubber &
30
$28.0
Plastic Prod.
$3.1
20
Computers &
Industrial Mach.
$2.2
10
Apparel
$2.2
0
1987
1988
1989
0
10
20
30
40
50
DELAWARE'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
27.0
20.0
174.3
Agriculture crops
0.0
0.0
0.0
Agriculture livestock
0.0
0.0
0.0
Forestry
27.0
20.0
174.3
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
10.8
49.1
473.6
Metal Mining
10.8
29.1
422.6
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
0.0
19.9
51.1
MANUFACTURING
27,984.7
38,110.1
50,630.7
Food Products
119.9
116.9
71.7
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
131.9
1,073.1
855.3
Apparel
12.2
1,739.9
2,188.8
Lumber & Wood Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
0.0
6.5
Paper Products
199.3
477.6
282.5
Printing & Publishing
0.0
5.8
3.8
Chemical Products
21,835.8
28,104.1
36,639.8
Petroleum Refining Products
49.6
6.4
0.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
2,794.3
4,434.9
3,104.8
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
59.1
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
14.5
52.6
114.3
Primary Metal Industries
182.8
132.3
104.0
Fabricated Metal Products
390.1
251.9
892.6
Computers & Industrial Machinery
604.6
634.9
2,246.2
Electric & Electronic Equipment
468.8
9.4
220.5
Transportation Equipment
391.8
484.4
277.9
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
788.9
564.8
3,376.4
Miscellaneous Equipment
0.0
21.1
186.4
OTHER
11.0
720.7
135.6
Scrap & Waste
9.1
0.0
0.0
Second Hand Goods
0.0
9.4
0.0
Military Equipment
1.9
711.3
135.6
DELAWARE'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
28,033.5
38,899.9
51,414.3
DELAWARE'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
851,779.8
1,202,207.3
1,231,251.2
MEXICO'S SHARE OF DELAWARE'S EXPORTS
3.3%
3.2%
4.2%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked SECOND Among Delaware's 101 Export Markets
26
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The District's Exports to Mexico Rose by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
89 Percent of the District's
34 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
10
Non-Manufacturing
Forestry
$4.3
8
Manufacturing
$7.1
$6.6
Computers &
Industrial Mach.
$0.5
6
$4.9
Scientific &
Measuring Instru.
$0.4
4
Transportation
$0.3
Equipment
2
Electric &
Electronic Eqp.
$0.3
0
1987
1988
1989
0
1
2
3
4
5
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
3.2
42.3
4,344.8
Agriculture - crops
0.0
42.3
7.5
Agriculture - livestock
0.0
0.0
0.0
Forestry
3.2
0.0
4,337.3
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
0.0
0.0
0.0
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
0.0
0.0
0.0
MANUFACTURING
4,872.2
6,959.4
2,155.4
Food Products
3,007.0
5,219.3
29.2
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
2.4
20.9
1.7
Apparel
0.0
5.8
0.0
Lumber & Wood Products
0.0
0.0
11.3
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
0.0
115.3
Paper Products
15.4
763.5
48.5
Printing & Publishing
8.3
33.9
117.6
Chemical Products
32.7
352.3
58.3
Petroleum Refining Products
0.0
2.1
0.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
0.0
36.6
108.5
Leather Products
10.3
14.7
3.7
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
0.0
0.0
10.9
Primary Metal Industries
0.0
2.9
15.7
Fabricated Metal Products
9.1
53.6
57.3
Computers & Industrial Machinery
204.3
185.6
475.6
Electric & Electronic Equipment
76.6
102.0
291.1
Transportation Equipment
1,315.7
105.6
346.5
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
157.7
60.6
428.2
Miscellaneous Equipment
32.7
0.0
36.0
OTHER
56.6
61.4
127.0
Scrap & Waste
0.0
1.7
11.1
Second Hand Goods
6.9
0.0
0.0
Military Equipment
49.6
59.7
115.8
D.C.'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
4,932.0
7,063.1
6,627.1
D.C.'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
288,416.3
269,893.4
303,567.7
MEXICO'S SHARE OF D.C.'S EXPORTS
1.7%
2.6%
2.2%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked NINTH Among The District's 136 Export Markets
27
FLORIDA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
Florida's Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
64 Percent of Florida's
94 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
500
Non-Manufacturing
$424.2
Chemicals
$112.0
400
Manufacturing
$326.3
Computers &
Industrial Mach.
$66.9
300
Electric &
$219.0
$40.3
Electronic Eqp.
200
Scrap & Waste
$27.0
100
Paper Products
$25.9
0
1987
1988
1989
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
FLORIDA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
266.3
563.3
987.7
Agriculture crops
32.6
96.1
217.3
Agriculture - livestock
210.2
444.3
395.6
Forestry
23.6
9.6
20.9
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
13.3
353.8
MINING
282.6
345.6
4,734.5
Metal Mining
116.0
89.4
590.5
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
166.7
256.1
4,144.0
MANUFACTURING
208,098.4
306,489.5
387,013.1
Food Products
2,984.3
5,533.2
7,775.2
Tobacco Products
195.7
24.5
78.8
Textile Mill Products
2,286.3
13,813.6
2,855.8
Apparel
1,876.5
4,780.5
11,092.8
Lumber & Wood Products
63.7
704.3
579.9
Furniture & Fixtures
1,322.8
2,315.6
4,887.9
Paper Products
15,398.4
22,430.8
25,867.7
Printing & Publishing
4,080.2
6,208.2
12,943.6
Chemical Products
54,440.8
74,914.0
111,955.4
Petroleum Refining Products
907.2
389.6
309.6
Rubber & Plastic Products
1,281.9
4,313.2
7,262.0
Leather Products
450.1
4,419.4
4,383.7
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
1,507.4
2,512.2
3,851.6
Primary Metal Industries
8,163.6
12,695.6
23,590.5
Fabricated Metal Products
3,078.9
5,134.2
10,530.9
Computers & Industrial Machinery
71,204.2
84,128.2
66,870.1
Electric & Electronic Equipment
14,151.0
26,411.5
40,299.8
Transportation Equipment
16,212.2
17,348.0
21,790.9
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
7,259.2
15,176.7
22,269.9
Miscellaneous Equipment
1,234.0
3,236.4
7,817.1
OTHER
10,351.1
18,938.0
31,464.0
Scrap & Waste
6,223.2
11,437.8
26,999.3
Second Hand Goods
674.4
1,008.4
900.2
Military Equipment
3,453.5
6,491.8
3,564.5
FLORIDA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
218,998.5
326,336.4
424,199.3
FLORIDA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
10,367,608.1
13,423,569.8
14,419,603.3
MEXICO'S SHARE OF FLORIDA'S EXPORTS
2.1%
2.4%
2.9%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked TENTH Among Florida's 185 Export Markets
28
GEORGIA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Georgia's Exports to Mexico Grew by
71 Percent of Georgia's
115 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
300
Non-Manufacturing
Chemicals
$39.5
$232.0
Manufacturing
Computers &
$34.7
200
Industrial Mach.
$157.2
Paper Products
$34.1
$108.1
100
Scientific &
$32.3
Measuring Instru.
Transportation
$24.3
Equipment
0
1987
1988
1989
0
10
20
30
40
50
GEORGIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
519.4
592.8
1,798.0
Agriculture crops
121.0
274.1
1,344.1
Agriculture livestock
40.4
175.9
29.7
Forestry
358.0
142.8
419.8
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
4.4
MINING
15,113.7
12,731.9
8,348.2
Metal Mining
146.7
153.8
47.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
14,967.0
12,578.1
8,301.2
MANUFACTURING
88,674.7
138,934.1
213,214.2
Food Products
3,943.8
2,809.1
9,958.5
Tobacco Products
0.0
53.9
75.2
Textile Mill Products
2,111.5
5,008.6
9,876.3
Apparel
407.2
906.9
1,062.8
Lumber & Wood Products
15.2
13.8
28.6
Furniture & Fixtures
36.0
16.1
395.7
Paper Products
22,045.2
23,103.9
34,089.1
Printing & Publishing
84.2
363.9
260.4
Chemical Products
15,908.6
20,920.8
39,455.9
Petroleum Refining Products
18.0
178.2
138.1
Rubber & Plastic Products
1,797.8
4,221.2
3,622.1
Leather Products
15.2
220.5
61.6
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
4,138.9
1,435.1
3,122.8
Primary Metal Industries
2,656.3
3,114.3
8,225.6
Fabricated Metal Products
886.9
1,165.9
2,650.2
Computers & Industrial Machinery
11,311.4
30,827.7
34,699.7
Electric & Electronic Equipment
20,311.8
6,313.4
8,135.5
Transportation Equipment
858.6
2,318.5
24,289.1
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
2,076.6
35,299.3
32,341.3
Miscellaneous Equipment
51.5
642.9
725.5
OTHER
3,789.4
4,949.6
8,656.2
Scrap & Waste
3,378.0
4,240.5
7,600.2
Second Hand Goods
327.1
246.0
76.2
Military Equipment
84.3
463.1
979.8
GEORGIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
108,097.1
157,208.4
232,016.6
GEORGIA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
3,977,200.6
4,889,448.6
6,054,727.2
MEXICO'S SHARE OF GEORGIA'S EXPORTS
2.7%
3.2%
3.8%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked SIXTH Among Georgia's 185 Export Markets
29
HAWAII: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
Hawaii's Exports to Mexico Fell by
The Top 3 Exports Accounted for
100 Percent of Hawaii's
64 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Thousand $
Thousand $
400
Non-Manufacturing
Computers &
300
Manufacturing
Industrial Mach.
$13.1
$215.7
Rubber &
200
Plastic Prod.
$5.4
100
$60.5
Transportation
$21.7
Equipment
$3.2
0
1987
1988
1989
0
5
10
15
20
HAWAII'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
6.0
1.8
0.0
Agriculture crops
6.0
1.8
0.0
Agriculture - livestock
0.0
0.0
0.0
Forestry
0.0
0.0
0.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
0.0
0.0
0.0
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
0.0
0.0
0.0
MANUFACTURING
52.0
203.4
21.7
Food Products
0.0
3.7
0.0
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Apparel
0.0
0.0
0.0
Lumber & Wood Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
0.0
0.0
Paper Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Printing & Publishing
0.0
0.0
0.0
Chemical Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Petroleum Refining Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
0.0
0.0
5.4
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Primary Metal Industries
0.0
0.0
0.0
Fabricated Metal Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Computers & Industrial Machinery
41.8
0.0
13.1
Electric & Electronic Equipment
10.2
199.7
0.0
Transportation Equipment
0.0
0.0
3.2
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
0.0
0.0
0.0
Miscellaneous Equipment
0.0
0.0
0.0
OTHER
2.5
10.4
0.0
Scrap & Waste
0.0
0.0
0.0
Second Hand Goods
0.0
0.0
0.0
Military Equipment
2.5
10.4
0.0
HAWAII'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
60.5
215.7
21.7
HAWAII'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
225,343.8
202,142.4
263,126.6
MEXICO'S SHARE OF HAWAII'S EXPORTS
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked 49TH Among Hawaii's 70 Export Markets
30
IDAHO: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
Idaho's Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
88 Percent of Idaho's
102 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
50
Non-Manufacturing
Computers &
$6.6
Manufacturing
Industrial Mach.
40
$36.3
Paper Products
$4.8
30
$22.7
Chemicals
$4.5
20
Electric &
$11.2
Electronic Eqp.
$2.0
10
Agriculture-Crops
$2.0
0
1987
1988
1989
0
2
4
6
8
10
IDAHO'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
390.0
516.3
2,064.1
Agriculture - crops
390.0
425.3
2,006.4
Agriculture - livestock
0.0
90.9
0.0
Forestry
0.0
0.0
57.6
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
0.0
0.0
0.0
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
0.0
0.0
0.0
MANUFACTURING
10,079.9
34,669.3
20,240.8
Food Products
905.1
1,029.5
1,817.4
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Apparel
0.0
0.0
0.0
Lumber & Wood Products
0.0
5.7
29.8
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
4.3
0.0
Paper Products
901.0
2,259.7
4,829.7
Printing & Publishing
6.5
78.1
17.0
Chemical Products
3,817.0
3,625.7
4,548.4
Petroleum Refining Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
0.0
114.6
9.1
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
0.0
5.2
0.0
Primary Metal Industries
325.4
12.1
19.9
Fabricated Metal Products
80.5
364.0
119.3
Computers & Industrial Machinery
2,974.3
7,743.6
6,602.1
Electric & Electronic Equipment
256.7
1,158.2
2,007.4
Transportation Equipment
790.1
18,263.5
116.9
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
23.3
2.4
119.4
Miscellaneous Equipment
0.0
2.9
4.3
OTHER
768.0
1,145.9
346.9
Scrap & Waste
768.0
1,107.6
288.2
Second Hand Goods
0.0
9.0
0.0
Military Equipment
0.0
29.3
58.7
IDAHO'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
11,237.9
36,331.5
22,651.7
IDAHO'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
523,547.4
697,665.6
836,099.9
MEXICO'S SHARE OF IDAHO'S EXPORTS
2.1%
5.2%
2.7%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked EIGHTH Among Idaho's 98 Export Markets
31
ILLINOIS: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
Illinois' Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
75 Percent of Illinois'
104 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
700
Million $
600
Non-Manufacturing
$569.2
Computers &
Manufacturing
Industrial Mach.
$195.6
500
$448.2
Transportation
Equipment
$75.6
400
Electric &
300
$278.4
$71.4
Electronic Eqp.
200
Chemicals
$54.7
100
Food Products
$29.9
0
1987
1988
1989
0
50
100
150
200
250
ILLINOIS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
1,323.1
1,903.2
2,750.7
Agriculture crops
1,183.2
1,035.2
1,650.0
Agriculture livestock
139.9
765.1
812.4
Forestry
0.0
85.7
283.1
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
17.2
5.1
MINING
1,735.1
1,802.8
1,281.0
Metal Mining
298.3
60.1
38.4
Coal Mining
581.6
299.3
129.4
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
855.1
1,443.4
1,113.2
MANUFACTURING
254,291.1
412,885.7
536,049.0
Food Products
4,276.3
19,741.2
29,905.3
Tobacco Products
2.4
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
67.5
1,436.4
2,206.1
Apparel
413.5
1,227.4
2,784.2
Lumber & Wood Products
29.4
499.1
861.8
Furniture & Fixtures
350.7
585.7
1,259.4
Paper Products
5,606.4
5,801.4
12,927.2
Printing & Publishing
891.5
3,322.5
3,273.2
Chemical Products
22,656.2
27,425.7
54,670.1
Petroleum Refining Products
1,425.1
3,144.3
2,041.7
Rubber & Plastic Products
5,241.9
7,031.0
10,407.9
Leather Products
59.1
1,298.1
606.7
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
8,046.3
5,650.0
4,340.1
Primary Metal Industries
10,235.5
43,471.6
28,119.0
Fabricated Metal Products
5,913.3
8,387.1
17,017.5
Computers & Industrial Machinery
114,134.3
162,574.7
195,617.1
Electric & Electronic Equipment
42,263.2
59,181.6
71,412.3
Transportation Equipment
22,322.2
47,768.0
75,609.0
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
8,968.9
12,299.3
17,206.9
Miscellaneous Equipment
1,387.5
2,040.7
5,783.6
OTHER
21,024.2
31,574.0
29,122.6
Scrap & Waste
18,287.9
28,102.1
26,989.0
Second Hand Goods
732.2
667.6
0.0
Military Equipment
2,004.0
2,804.3
2,133.6
ILLINOIS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO
278,373.4
448,165.7
569,203.2
ILLINOIS' EXPORTS TO WORLD
8,717,324.2
11,513,482.8
13,159,862.8
MEXICO'S SHARE OF ILLINOIS' EXPORTS
3.2%
3.9%
4.3%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked SIXTH Among Illinois' 179 Export Markets
32
INDIANA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Indiana's Exports to Mexico Fell by
91 Percent of Indiana's
25 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
400
Non-Manufacturing
Computers &
$53.1
Manufacturing
Industrial Mach.
300
$270.9
Primary Metal
$46.0
Industries
$204.0
200
Transportation
$43.8
$155.9
Equipment
Chemicals
$27.4
100
Electric &
$14.7
Electronic Eqp.
0
1987
1988
1989
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
INDIANA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
319.6
374.8
1,412.9
Agriculture - crops
250.5
353.7
1,401.9
Agriculture - livestock
69.1
16.2
11.0
Forestry
0.0
5.0
0.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
2.2
21.5
4.8
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
18.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
2.2
3.5
4.8
MANUFACTURING
269,855.8
155,002.2
201,724.0
Food Products
1,952.1
2,192.3
2,097.8
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
110.0
1,508.1
947.6
Apparel
24.4
113.5
164.0
Lumber & Wood Products
318.6
873.7
1,354.9
Furniture & Fixtures
1,072.9
592.3
274.8
Paper Products
796.9
711.2
1,467.6
Printing & Publishing
616.3
414.9
186.6
Chemical Products
19,558.7
25,382.6
27,432.8
Petroleum Refining Products
78.2
150.3
175.9
Rubber & Plastic Products
1,901.8
2,474.2
3,828.9
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
948.8
872.6
773.6
Primary Metal Industries
19,588.5
24,433.4
45,997.1
Fabricated Metal Products
706.4
1,907.8
2,407.7
Computers & Industrial Machinery
61,035.0
56,044.7
53,105.7
Electric & Electronic Equipment
47,574.2
13,092.7
14,650.6
Transportation Equipment
12,996.7
18,369.0
43,775.6
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
100,442.3
5,733.1
2,738.2
Miscellaneous Equipment
134.0
135.8
344.7
OTHER
751.1
511.0
818.9
Scrap & Waste
590.8
377.2
645.2
Second Hand Goods
54.4
16.4
3.9
Military Equipment
105.9
117.4
169.8
INDIANA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
270,928.8
155,909.5
203,960.6
INDIANA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
4,169,677.0
4,758,973.1
5,414,098.1
MEXICO'S SHARE OF INDIANA'S EXPORTS
6.5%
3.3%
3.8%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked FOURTH Among Indiana's 154 Export Markets
33
IOWA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
lowa's Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
84 Percent of lowa's
77 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
140
Non-Manufacturing
120
Manufacturing
$116.7
Food Products
$58.9
100
$93.8
Primary Metal
Industries
$12.0
80
$66.1
Agriculture-Crops
$11.6
60
40
Computers &
Industrial Mach.
$9.3
20
Chemicals
$5.7
0
1987
1988
1989
0
20
40
60
80
IOWA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
14,310.4
22,227.1
15,820.7
Agriculture crops
13,121.3
18,208.1
11,591.3
Agriculture livestock
1,189.1
4,019.0
3,485.8
Forestry
0.0
0.0
743.6
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
182.4
0.0
6.7
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
182.4
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
0.0
0.0
6.7
MANUFACTURING
51,228.1
70,770.5
99,876.4
Food Products
28,452.5
44,233.4
58,893.3
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
0.0
46.6
139.7
Apparel
3.2
10.0
56.4
Lumber & Wood Products
3.2
4.2
9.1
Furniture & Fixtures
18.0
2.8
529.6
Paper Products
59.6
402.0
1,581.4
Printing & Publishing
1.8
39.8
84.9
Chemical Products
1,868.3
3,085.8
5,675.0
Petroleum Refining Products
8.8
87.5
51.5
Rubber & Plastic Products
888.6
1,606.2
408.0
Leather Products
67.6
2.6
0.0
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
67.8
10.7
83.3
Primary Metal Industries
2,085.8
5,171.1
12,025.3
Fabricated Metal Products
1,075.5
1,012.3
3,812.5
Computers & Industrial Machinery
8,344.2
9,880.9
9,318.6
Electric & Electronic Equipment
6,822.1
2,814.1
4,334.2
Transportation Equipment
641.6
897.3
1,659.4
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
707.8
884.2
593.1
Miscellaneous Equipment
111.7
578.9
621.3
OTHER
363.1
775.6
1,016.0
Scrap & Waste
291.7
557.8
943.3
Second Hand Goods
25.3
55.8
11.0
Military Equipment
46.0
162.0
61.6
IOWA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
66,084.0
93,773.1
116,719.7
IOWA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
1,839,720.0
2,164,724.1
2,583,277.0
MEXICO'S SHARE OF IOWA'S EXPORTS
3.6%
4.3%
4.5%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked THIRD Among Iowa's 139 Export Markets
34
KANSAS: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Kansas' Exports to Mexico Grew by
91 Percent of Kansas'
77 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
500
Non-Manufacturing
Agriculture-Crops
$114.5
400
Manufacturing
Food Products
$37.9
300
$279.4
$221.2
Electric &
Electronic Eqp.
$21.6
200
$125.0
Transportation
$17.8
Equipment
100
Computers &
Industrial Mach.
$10.1
0
1987
1988
1989
0
50
100
150
200
KANSAS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
89,172.0
170,548.8
114,619.9
Agriculture crops
88,064.6
170,156.6
114,521.4
Agriculture - livestock
1,089.0
392.2
98.5
Forestry
18.4
0.0
0.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
284.6
228.7
172.3
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
284.6
228.7
172.3
MANUFACTURING
34,838.2
106,023.2
102,068.5
Food Products
16,303.7
43,457.8
37,928.6
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
25.3
45.1
118.3
Apparel
4.6
114.9
335.4
Lumber & Wood Products
25.2
44.7
215.5
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
31.5
44.8
Paper Products
208.2
299.4
630.2
Printing & Publishing
9.5
76.8
49.4
Chemical Products
1,468.4
10,334.3
2,092.7
Petroleum Refining Products
232.9
104.5
5,823.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
375.8
1,916.3
961.2
Leather Products
0.0
59.0
12.4
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
40.3
355.5
625.2
Primary Metal Industries
58.5
304.1
1,076.2
Fabricated Metal Products
203.3
1,129.8
1,000.6
Computers & Industrial Machinery
4,227.3
8,813.3
10,138.2
Electric & Electronic Equipment
6,148.5
12,740.1
21,593.9
Transportation Equipment
4,278.3
25,614.0
17,836.4
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
1,226.2
539.6
1,548.5
Miscellaneous Equipment
2.2
42.4
37.8
OTHER
683.9
2,644.7
4,348.9
Scrap & Waste
301.5
2,139.5
4,010.9
Second Hand Goods
210.1
398.9
230.6
Military Equipment
172.2
106.3
107.4
KANSAS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO
124,978.7
279,445.4
221,209.6
KANSAS' EXPORTS TO WORLD
1,622,685.8
1,961,576.5
2,032,379.2
MEXICO'S SHARE OF KANSAS' EXPORTS
7.7%
14.2%
10.9%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked THIRD Among Kansas' 150 Export Markets
35
KENTUCKY: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Kentucky's Exports to Mexico Grew by
77 Percent of Kentucky's
130 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
140
Non-Manufacturing
Chemicals
$24.1
120
Manufacturing
$99.4
Computers &
100
$86.1
Industrial Mach.
$19.7
80
Transportation
$13.8
Equipment
60
$43.3
Electric &
40
$11.7
Electronic Eqp.
20
Primary Metal
$7.5
Industries
0
1987
1988
1989
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
KENTUCKY'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
2.5
816.5
2,033.4
Agriculture crops
0.0
80.9
0.0
Agriculture - livestock
2.5
717.2
1,991.3
Forestry
0.0
18.4
42.1
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
1,596.6
1,291.0
2,183.0
Metal Mining
38.4
7.0
0.0
Coal Mining
156.1
48.9
173.8
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
1,402.2
1,235.1
2,009.2
MANUFACTURING
41,558.3
83,054.4
94,469.3
Food Products
638.5
1,715.6
1,959.7
Tobacco Products
79.1
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
242.4
678.4
325.4
Apparel
22.9
61.5
344.4
Lumber & Wood Products
128.8
268.6
140.7
Furniture & Fixtures
177.5
52.1
343.8
Paper Products
56.8
108.1
264.8
Printing & Publishing
922.6
79.7
1,077.0
Chemical Products
12,344.9
19,289.6
24,105.5
Petroleum Refining Products
915.9
361.7
78.1
Rubber & Plastic Products
379.3
1,362.6
1,127.0
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
212.4
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
2,656.9
4,353.8
4,879.5
Primary Metal Industries
2,414.2
1,668.8
7,461.2
Fabricated Metal Products
327.4
871.5
2,313.8
Computers & Industrial Machinery
13,840.9
16,055.9
19,725.9
Electric & Electronic Equipment
1,618.8
9,915.1
11,729.1
Transportation Equipment
4,494.3
24,481.9
13,813.3
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
186.3
418.1
1,234.1
Miscellaneous Equipment
110.9
1,311.2
3,333.5
OTHER
108.3
965.1
742.6
Scrap & Waste
75.0
868.4
535.5
Second Hand Goods
0.0
14.3
162.5
Military Equipment
33.3
82.4
44.6
KENTUCKY'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
43,265.7
86,127.0
99,428.3
KENTUCKY'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
2,295,979.4
2,938,287.5
2,965,331.7
MEXICO'S SHARE OF KENTUCKY'S EXPORTS
1.9%
2.9%
3.4%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked EIGHTH Among Kentucky's 131 Export Markets
36
LOUISIANA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Louisiana's Exports to Mexico Grew by
96 Percent of Louisiana's
78 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
800
Non-Manufacturing
Agriculture-crops
$415.9
Manufacturing
$671.0
600
Chemicals
$126.1
$530.1
$377.4
Food Products
$88.5
400
Petroleum
Products
$7.8
200
Lumber &
Wood Products
$5.0
0
1987
1988
1989
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
LOUISIANA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
164,234.0
244,899.4
418,549.7
Agriculture - crops
164,169.7
244,881.3
415,864.6
Agriculture - livestock
64.3
18.1
56.1
Forestry
0.0
0.0
110.7
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
2,518.2
MINING
8,487.6
6,667.5
775.1
Metal Mining
350.4
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
3,468.7
1,571.2
764.2
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
4,668.5
5,096.3
10.9
MANUFACTURING
200,749.7
266,381.4
246,991.0
Food Products
10,412.0
32,939.8
88,460.0
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
608.7
1,408.2
164.5
Apparel
143.7
509.9
214.4
Lumber & Wood Products
59.0
3,217.1
5,035.0
Furniture & Fixtures
140.4
150.5
514.7
Paper Products
6,406.6
10,241.3
2,714.6
Printing & Publishing
618.0
404.8
42.6
Chemical Products
113,477.7
142,911.6
126,141.0
Petroleum Refining Products
18,871.8
21,311.9
7,797.9
Rubber & Plastic Products
4,643.3
4,558.7
939.9
Leather Products
3.5
1,154.0
3.3
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
2,499.6
1,557.7
754.5
Primary Metal Industries
4,171.0
4,459.7
1,735.1
Fabricated Metal Products
1,495.3
2,928.3
1,669.6
Computers & Industrial Machinery
12,011.2
14,924.5
4,846.7
Electric & Electronic Equipment
4,724.3
6,918.7
2,511.4
Transportation Equipment
18,958.0
13,183.3
1,478.1
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
1,242.0
1,767.4
1,597.3
Miscellaneous Equipment
263.6
1,834.0
370.2
OTHER
3,954.9
12,200.5
4,702.9
Scrap & Waste
3,471.8
9,449.5
4,696.4
Second Hand Goods
143.9
306.8
0.0
Military Equipment
339.2
2,444.2
6.5
LOUISIANA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
377,426.2
530,148.8
671,018.7
LOUISIANA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
13,616,822.0
14,921,923.4
17,753,807.5
MEXICO'S SHARE OF LOUISIANA'S EXPORTS
2.8%
3.6%
3.8%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked FIFTH Among Louisiana's 171 Export Markets
37
MAINE: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
Maine's Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
84 Percent of Maine's
319 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
20
Non-Manufacturing
Forestry
$4.0
16
Manufacturing
Electric &
12
$10.9
$11.2
Electronic Eqp.
$2.2
Stone, Clay &
Glass Products
$1.5
8
Paper Products
$0.9
4
$2.7
Leather Products
$0.9
0
1987
1988
1989
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
MAINE'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
11.6
0.0
4,055.8
Agriculture crops
5.9
0.0
34.6
Agriculture livestock
5.6
0.0
0.0
Forestry
0.0
0.0
4,005.4
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
15.8
MINING
0.0
4.9
0.0
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
0.0
4.9
0.0
MANUFACTURING
2,467.0
5,838.7
7,021.8
Food Products
1,376.6
2,184.0
46.0
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
17.1
75.8
26.8
Apparel
0.0
63.1
0.0
Lumber & Wood Products
1.6
4.3
0.0
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
10.6
0.0
Paper Products
276.6
1,206.7
929.9
Printing & Publishing
6.5
0.0
0.0
Chemical Products
9.0
135.1
68.1
Petroleum Refining Products
0.0
0.0
26.2
Rubber & Plastic Products
9.3
174.0
81.6
Leather Products
15.9
76.4
857.8
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
389.6
270.6
1,495.1
Primary Metal Industries
44.7
322.9
91.1
Fabricated Metal Products
17.2
23.3
84.7
Computers & Industrial Machinery
103.1
799.3
562.7
Electric & Electronic Equipment
162.1
395.1
2,180.3
Transportation Equipment
0.0
48.0
307.4
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
37.8
42.3
257.9
Miscellaneous Equipment
0.0
7.3
6.2
OTHER
206.0
5,014.3
159.5
Scrap & Waste
206.0
5,014.3
159.5
Second Hand Goods
0.0
0.0
0.0
Military Equipment
0.0
0.0
0.0
MAINE'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
2,684.6
10,857.9
11,237.2
MAINE'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
656,102.3
805,281.5
914,779.3
MEXICO'S SHARE OF MAINE'S EXPORTS
0.4%
1.3%
1.2%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked 16TH Among Maine's 113 Export Markets
38
MARYLAND: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
Maryland's Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
73 Percent of Maryland's
48 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
50
Non-Manufacturing
Primary Metal
$5.1
Manufacturing
Industries
40
$33.2
Computers &
$4.9
Industrial Mach.
30
$25.3
Chemicals
$3.6
20
$17.0
Electric &
$2.8
Electronic Eqp.
10
Scientific &
$2.0
Measuring Instru.
0
1987
1988
1989
0
2
4
6
8
10
MARYLAND'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
747.4
1,267.8
301.2
Agriculture crops
685.9
1,178.7
127.2
Agriculture - livestock
2.6
40.2
0.0
Forestry
59.0
48.9
174.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
250.4
0.0
1,341.7
Metal Mining
238.3
0.0
31.1
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
12.1
0.0
1,310.6
MANUFACTURING
14,607.4
31,409.5
22,946.1
Food Products
1,758.9
1,198.8
975.5
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
18.6
354.9
55.4
Apparel
60.9
77.0
16.3
Lumber & Wood Products
0.0
0.0
34.3
Furniture & Fixtures
6.6
1.7
81.8
Paper Products
15.9
27.3
59.3
Printing & Publishing
98.3
22.7
833.5
Chemical Products
1,826.7
3,494.6
3,583.9
Petroleum Refining Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
124.1
143.7
201.7
Leather Products
0.0
107.9
44.2
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
70.6
26.7
166.7
Primary Metal Industries
976.2
1,029.9
5,076.4
Fabricated Metal Products
256.6
630.7
827.9
Computers & Industrial Machinery
5,547.5
4,691.8
4,892.3
Electric & Electronic Equipment
1,442.7
2,715.9
2,803.0
Transportation Equipment
590.6
341.5
1,118.8
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
1,804.2
16,542.0
2,048.8
Miscellaneous Equipment
9.0
2.5
126.2
OTHER
1,439.2
534.2
673.4
Scrap & Waste
1,289.7
446.5
439.9
Second Hand Goods
123.4
10.0
0.0
Military Equipment
26.2
77.7
233.5
MARYLAND'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
17,044.4
33,211.5
25,262.5
MARYLAND'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
2,128,837.1
2,551,577.6
3,173,706.7
MEXICO'S SHARE OF MARYLAND'S EXPORTS
0.8%
1.3%
0.8%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked 25TH Among Maryland's 164 Export Markets
39
MASSACHUSETTS: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
Massachusetts' Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
78 Percent of Massachusetts'
55 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
240
Non-Manufacturing
Computers &
Industrial Mach.
$53.4
200
Manufacturing
Scientific &
$155.4
160
Measuring Instru.
$22.0
$116.5
Electric &
120
$100.1
Electronic Eqp.
$21.4
80
Chemicals
$15.0
40
Paper Products
$8.6
0
1987
1988
1989
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
MASSACHUSETTS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
335.4
73.7
29.5
Agriculture crops
6.0
42.7
12.4
Agriculture - livestock
327.3
0.0
0.0
Forestry
2.1
31.0
9.5
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
7.7
MINING
85.5
152.0
491.2
Metal Mining
0.0
21.3
286.4
Coal Mining
0.0
4.8
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
1.9
Non-Metallic Minerals
85.5
125.9
202.9
MANUFACTURING
97,859.5
114,437.4
151,511.5
Food Products
116.8
486.5
1,884.6
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
391.5
1,155.6
2,382.3
Apparel
392.4
106.6
421.8
Lumber & Wood Products
0.0
25.2
69.3
Furniture & Fixtures
30.5
128.5
242.5
Paper Products
5,478.2
6,034.7
8,631.9
Printing & Publishing
799.3
595.2
1,184.2
Chemical Products
7,466.2
8,437.4
15,024.9
Petroleum Refining Products
68.1
8.3
29.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
5,297.0
8,017.5
7,987.4
Leather Products
156.3
3,017.8
1,771.5
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
2,815.2
3,252.5
3,772.7
Primary Metal Industries
1,378.9
2,376.4
3,293.6
Fabricated Metal Products
2,047.5
4,681.8
4,883.4
Computers & Industrial Machinery
46,999.9
44,365.8
53,390.3
Electric & Electronic Equipment
9,536.0
15,535.9
21,425.8
Transportation Equipment
291.7
706.4
693.8
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
14,166.9
15,040.8
22,003.8
Miscellaneous Equipment
427.0
464.5
2,418.7
OTHER
1,836.8
1,867.0
3,416.8
Scrap & Waste
25.5
511.0
60.9
Second Hand Goods
32.7
86.8
0.0
Military Equipment
1,778.6
1,269.2
3,355.9
MASSACHUSETTS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO
100,117.2
116,530.2
155,449.0
MASSACHUSETTS' EXPORTS TO WORLD
8,349,259.9
9,691,807.7
10,471,988.3
MEXICO'S SHARE OF MASSACHUSETTS' EXPORTS
1.2%
1.2%
1.5%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked 15TH Among Massachusetts' 177 Export Markets
40
MICHIGAN: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Michigan's Exports to Mexico Grew by
83 Percent of Michigan's
60 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Billion $
Million $
2.8
Non-Manufacturing
Transportation
$797.8
Manufacturing
Equipment
2.4
Military
2
$191.1
$1.721
Equipment
1.6
$1.317
Computers &
Industrial Mach.
$160.5
1.2
$1.078
Fabricated
Metal Products
$147.1
0.8
0.4
Electric &
$138.9
Electronic Eqp.
0
1987
1988
1989
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
MICHIGAN'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
2,463.3
2,721.3
1,914.9
Agriculture crops
2,391.3
2,446.5
1,621.2
Agriculture - livestock
72.0
268.6
280.2
Forestry
0.0
6.1
13.5
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
2,323.5
1,208.9
289.0
Metal Mining
1,736.1
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
11.5
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
9.1
Non-Metallic Minerals
575.9
1,208.9
279.8
MANUFACTURING
1,071,690.4
1,311,025.1
1,523,886.1
Food Products
468.5
676.8
1,487.3
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
410.6
5,975.6
13,806.2
Apparel
534.8
1,310.0
5,894.7
Lumber & Wood Products
123.9
400.1
343.0
Furniture & Fixtures
2,025.3
1,818.5
25,742.3
Paper Products
9,556.2
9,040.0
8,778.8
Printing & Publishing
216.2
293.1
560.3
Chemical Products
29,783.7
21,621.8
33,966.2
Petroleum Refining Products
1,867.7
950.8
310.4
Rubber & Plastic Products
8,535.5
20,628.1
47,759.4
Leather Products
61.1
101.0
419.8
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
4,919.3
2,582.5
10,043.4
Primary Metal Industries
17,223.0
29,518.5
113,348.0
Fabricated Metal Products
16,950.8
36,394.4
147,129.8
Computers & Industrial Machinery
129,510.5
186,138.2
160,501.0
Electric & Electronic Equipment
20,313.1
68,563.6
138,923.7
Transportation Equipment
821,065.1
916,179.6
797,848.9
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
7,871.9
8,555.2
14,478.4
Miscellaneous Equipment
253.2
277.1
2,544.3
OTHER
1,392.3
2,441.1
194,468.1
Scrap & Waste
631.3
1,594.5
3,404.6
Second Hand Goods
254.0
193.6
0.0
Military Equipment
506.9
652.9
191,063.4
MICHIGAN'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
1,077,869.6
1,317,396.4
1,720,558.1
MICHIGAN'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
18,104,343.1
21,015,863.0
21,206,700.7
MEXICO'S SHARE OF MICHIGAN'S EXPORTS
6.0%
6.3%
8.1%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked SECOND Among Michigan's 162 Export Markets
41
MINNESOTA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
Minnesota's Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
87 Percent of Minnesota's
81 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
280
Non-Manufacturing
Computers &
240
Industrial Mach.
$75.2
Manufacturing
200
Food Products
$31.4
$162.8
160
$135.4
Agriculture-crops
$20.1
120
$90.0
Scientific &
80
Measuring Instru.
$7.7
40
Electric &
Electronic Eqp.
$7.0
0
1987
1988
1989
0
20
40
60
80
100
MINNESOTA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
18,610.2
19,213.8
24,445.5
Agriculture crops
18,505.7
17,156.4
20,124.0
Agriculture - livestock
58.6
2,055.0
4,294.1
Forestry
45.8
2.4
27.5
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
354.8
331.9
28.0
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
354.8
331.9
28.0
MANUFACTURING
70,301.1
114,753.2
137,575.6
Food Products
10,603.2
10,017.4
31,398.9
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
57.5
221.0
546.6
Apparel
4.9
15.9
411.3
Lumber & Wood Products
7.4
12.0
336.6
Furniture & Fixtures
10.9
54.2
62.1
Paper Products
889.5
996.6
2,044.8
Printing & Publishing
278.7
175.7
166.6
Chemical Products
1,336.6
1,223.4
2,204.6
Petroleum Refining Products
7.0
15.5
709.4
Rubber & Plastic Products
1,158.7
1,263.6
1,969.1
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
12.7
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
101.0
434.7
749.3
Primary Metal Industries
958.5
756.0
527.9
Fabricated Metal Products
1,439.4
2,031.2
3,177.6
Computers & Industrial Machinery
41,154.2
82,200.21
75,176.2
Electric & Electronic Equipment
6,858.5
5,873.9
7,026.7
Transportation Equipment
2,627.5
1,343.6
2,991.2
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
2,682.3
8,055.3
7,732.2
Miscellaneous Equipment
125.5
63.2
331.7
OTHER
709.0
1,084.0
798.1
Scrap & Waste
507.5
724.0
551.6
Second Hand Goods
126.4
18.2
6.9
Military Equipment
75.0
341.8
239.5
MINNESOTA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
89,975.0
135,382.9
162,847.2
MINNESOTA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
4,121,294.5
5,093,448.0
5,309,693.5
MEXICO'S SHARE OF MINNESOTA'S EXPORTS
2.2%
2.7%
3.1%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked NINTH Among Minnesota's 167 Export Markets
42
MISSISSIPPI: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Mississippi's Exports to Mexico Grew by
77 Percent of Mississippi's
86 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
140
Non-Manufacturing
Electric &
$29.8
Manufacturing
Electronic Eqp.
120
$97.5
Primary Metal
$15.6
100
Industries
80
$69.6
Petroleum
$14.2
Products
60
$52.5
Chemicals
$8.7
40
20
Agriculture-crops
$6.5
0
1987
1988
1989
0
10
20
30
40
MISSISSIPPI'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
4,895.9
234.3
6,518.6
Agriculture - crops
4,885.9
221.7
6,495.6
Agriculture - livestock
10.1
12.7
23.0
Forestry
0.0
0.0
0.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
30.7
248.9
1,403.9
Metal Mining
0.0
184.2
1,275.7
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
30.7
64.8
128.1
MANUFACTURING
45,965.3
67,488.6
89,198.3
Food Products
998.6
1,707.2
690.7
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
184.8
564.1
1,246.1
Apparel
1,628.5
1,699.7
1,642.4
Lumber & Wood Products
16.6
130.1
434.1
Furniture & Fixtures
1,069.3
173.1
1,165.2
Paper Products
15,213.3
18,129.0
6,479.3
Printing & Publishing
1.6
0.0
8.4
Chemical Products
2,614.8
4,462.1
8,654.4
Petroleum Refining Products
4,555.4
8,640.6
14,192.6
Rubber & Plastic Products
223.3
3,959.0
5,110.8
Leather Products
0.0
162.2
4.1
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
690.2
130.1
80.4
Primary Metal Industries
477.7
2,557.9
15,583.5
Fabricated Metal Products
164.7
113.7
348.5
Computers & Industrial Machinery
730.4
883.2
2,075.3
Electric & Electronic Equipment
16,900.5
21,860.7
29,826.3
Transportation Equipment
101.0
338.7
1,224.0
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
339.5
1,870.7
111.5
Miscellaneous Equipment
54.9
106.6
321.0
OTHER
1,618.1
1,584.8
339.1
Scrap & Waste
1,172.5
1,366.2
198.9
Second Hand Goods
421.5
132.9
4.0
Military Equipment
24.1
85.7
136.2
MISSISSIPPI'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
52,510.1
69,556.8
97,459.9
MISSISSIPPI'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
1,290,476.4
1,359,383.5
1,760,093.8
MEXICO'S SHARE OF MISSISSIPPI'S EXPORTS
4.1%
5.1%
5.5%.
Mexico in 1989 Ranked FIFTH Among Mississippi's 142 Export Markets
43
MISSOURI: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
Missouri's Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
75 Percent of Missouri's
62 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
500
Non-Manufacturing
400
Manufacturing
Agriculture-Crops
$83.9
$312.7
$322.0
Electric &
300
Electronic Eqp.
$64.6
$198.7
Food Products
$56.0
200
Computers &
Industrial Mach.
$19.2
100
Chemicals
$18.3
0
1987
1988
1989
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
MISSOURI'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
76,987.6
95,461.2
84,010.6
Agriculture - crops
76,453.6
92,109.6
83,907.0
Agriculture - livestock
534.0
3,329.6
95.6
Forestry
0.0
22.0
8.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
1,514.0
1,715.2
1,062.2
Metal Mining
25.4
4.5
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
1,488.6
1,710.7
1,062.2
MANUFACTURING
114,286.7
205,375.9
219,313.0
Food Products
28,200.9
72,852.0
55,983.0
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
593.5
668.2
191.0
Apparel
1,691.6
2,671.0
552.6
Lumber & Wood Products
468.8
1,178.3
1,613.5
Furniture & Fixtures
290.0
755.1
2,416.9
Paper Products
2,642.8
3,189.3
4,527.1
Printing & Publishing
5,942.2
9,086.3
9,769.0
Chemical Products
11,646.5
12,015.4
18,339.4
Petroleum Refining Products
534.5
347.3
196.7
Rubber & Plastic Products
2,783.9
5,738.3
13,075.8
Leather Products
107.3
493.6
438.7
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
780.8
825.4
1,194.9
Primary Metal Industries
4,371.3
6,401.7
6,929.4
Fabricated Metal Products
4,938.7
6,122.1
6,669.7
Computers & Industrial Machinery
11,320.4
12,059.5
19,222.7
Electric & Electronic Equipment
24,757.6
58,123.2
64,566.1
Transportation Equipment
11,058.3
9,857.1
8,009.4
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
1,396.5
1,781.0
3,307.8
Miscellaneous Equipment
761.1
1,211.1
2,309.1
OTHER
5,924.5
10,174.3
17,657.6
Scrap & Waste
5,633.2
9,563.2
11,995.3
Second Hand Goods
269.1
545.2
46.3
Military Equipment
22.1
65.9
5,616.0
MISSOURI'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
198,712.8
312,726.6
322,043.4
MISSOURI'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
2,984,431.7
2,737,541.4
2,877,651.8
MEXICO'S SHARE OF MISSOURI'S EXPORTS
6.7%
11.4%
11.2%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked THIRD Among Missouri's 151 Export Markets
44
MONTANA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 3 Exports Accounted for
Montana's Exports to Mexico Grew by
91 Percent of Montana's
1536 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
24
Non-Manufacturing
Manufacturing
$19.9
Agriculture-Crops
$14.9
20
16
Food Products
$1.9
12
8
Primary Metal
4
$1.2
$2.3
$1.3
Industries
0
1987
1988
1989
0
5
10
15
20
MONTANA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
440.1
133.7
14,964.2
Agriculture crops
187.4
66.6
14,857.2
Agriculture - livestock
252.6
67.1
100.2
Forestry
0.0
0.0
6.8
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
0.0
0.0
137.6
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
5.4
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
0.0
0.0
132.2
MANUFACTURING
778.9
2,120.9
4,791.9
Food Products
14.6
55.9
1,898.9
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Apparel
0.0
0.0
0.0
Lumber & Wood Products
0.0
39.4
0.0
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
0.0
14.0
Paper Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Printing & Publishing
0.0
0.0
0.0
Chemical Products
96.6
2.6
51.1
Petroleum Refining Products
0.0
234.4
0.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
0.0
0.0
2.8
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
16.9
44.8
0.0
Primary Metal Industries
4.2
576.4
1,309.2
Fabricated Metal Products
6.1
17.3
99.5
Computers & Industrial Machinery
21.4
289.8
922.7
Electric & Electronic Equipment
8.9
12.2
168.8
Transportation Equipment
610.2
817.5
320.5
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
0.0
0.0
4.4
Miscellaneous Equipment
0.0
30.6
0.0
OTHER
0.0
0.0
53.9
Scrap & Waste
0.0
0.0
25.8
Second Hand Goods
0.0
0.0
0.0
Military Equipment
0.0
0.0
28.1
MONTANA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
1,219.0
2,254.6
19,947.6
MONTANA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
286,470.8
398,087.7
346,422.8
MEXICO'S SHARE OF MONTANA'S EXPORTS
0.4%
0.6%
5.8%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked FOURTH Among Montana's 69 Export Markets
45
NEBRASKA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
Nebraska's Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
87 Percent of Nebraska's
14 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
80
Non-Manufacturing
Food Products
Manufacturing
$19.8
60
$52.3
$50.6
$44.5
Agriculture-Crops
$13.9
40
Rubber &
Plastic Prod.
$4.0
Computers &
Industrial Mach.
$3.5
20
Agriculture-
Livestock
$2.7
0
1987
0
1988
5
1989
10
15
20
25
NEBRASKA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
19,550.9
15,436.9
16,633.3
Agriculture crops
18,592.2
13,695.7
13,927.9
Agriculture livestock
958.7
1,741.2
2,705.4
Forestry
0.0
0.0
0.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
2.9
5.8
5.3
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
2.9
5.8
5.3
MANUFACTURING
24,352.5
36,545.9
33,059.2
Food Products
15,362.0
27,219.5
19,842.7
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
0.0
15.5
39.1
Apparel
31.3
31.1
30.7
Lumber & Wood Products
32.8
15.8
19.1
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
6.8
0.0
Paper Products
185.9
246.2
171.7
Printing & Publishing
377.2
61.5
154.6
Chemical Products
552.0
458.0
443.5
Petroleum Refining Products
0.0
0.0
43.5
Rubber & Plastic Products
2,217.1
3,558.8
3,968.1
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
37.8
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
0.0
4.8
9.0
Primary Metal Industries
337.0
300.4
707.8
Fabricated Metal Products
222.1
914.8
1,344.7
Computers & Industrial Machinery
980.6
1,669.7
3,501.0
Electric & Electronic Equipment
2,233.5
878.3
1,719.7
Transportation Equipment
1,735.6
787.3
673.0
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
82.2
374.6
270.2
Miscellaneous Equipment
3.2
2.6
83.1
OTHER
640.2
286.3
883.6
Scrap & Waste
27.2
6.2
167.4
Second Hand Goods
610.8
263.2
71.7
Military Equipment
2.2
17.0
644.6
NEBRASKA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
44,546.4
52,274.8
50,581.4
NEBRASKA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
779,626.9
916,421.3
824,509.6
MEXICO'S SHARE OF NEBRASKA'S EXPORTS
5.7%
5.7%
6.1%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked FOURTH Among Nebraska's 119 Export Markets
46
NEVADA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Nevada's Exports to Mexico Grew by
92 Percent of Nevada's
721 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
30
Non-Manufacturing
Textile Mill
$16.1
$22.2
Products
Manufacturing
20
Chemicals
$2.1
Transportation
$1.4
Equipment
10
Printing &
$5.5
$0.5
Publishing
$2.7
Computers &
$0.4
Industrial Mach.
0
1987
1988
1989
0
5
10
15
20
NEVADA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
0.0
3.0
84.4
Agriculture - crops
0.0
3.0
84.4
Agriculture - livestock
0.0
0.0
0.0
Forestry
0.0
0.0
0.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
0.0
2.2
16.6
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
9.5
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
2.2
Non-Metallic Minerals
0.0
2.2
5.0
MANUFACTURING
2,695.4
5,450.6
22,092.3
Food Products
31.7
17.4
173.3
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
112.0
148.8
105.9
Apparel
0.0
1,514.0
16,132.1
Lumber & Wood Products
5.8
7.2
17.5
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
11.8
16.5
Paper Products
125.4
42.6
276.3
Printing & Publishing
272.6
688.0
484.0
Chemical Products
334.6
1,388.0
2,058.5
Petroleum Refining Products
0.0
0.0
28.5
Rubber & Plastic Products
84.4
15.2
216.8
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
0.0
0.0
7.7
Primary Metal Industries
0.0
39.9
175.5
Fabricated Metal Products
48.1
45.5
34.6
Computers & Industrial Machinery
361.6
160.2
364.4
Electric & Electronic Equipment
78.7
331.1
189.8
Transportation Equipment
40.0
8.9
201.1
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
808.1
868.1
1,382.0
Miscellaneous Equipment
392.4
164.1
227.9
OTHER
10.5
20.4
13.3
Scrap & Waste
0.0
20.4
2.0
Second Hand Goods
0.0
0.0
0.0
Military Equipment
10.5
0.0
11.3
NEVADA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
2,705.9
5,476.2
22,206.7
NEVADA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
380,231.1
248,264.7
322,046.4
MEXICO'S SHARE OF NEVADA'S EXPORTS
0.7%
2.2%
6.9%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked FIFTH Among Nevada's 101 Export Markets
47
NEW HAMPSHIRE: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
New Hampshire's Exports to Mexico Grew
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
by 87 Percent From 1987 to 1989
73 Percent of New Hampshire's
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
24
Non-Manufacturing
Computers &
20
Manufacturing
Industrial Mach.
$5.9
$18.3
Chemicals
16
$14.3
$2.7
12
Leather Prod.
$9.8
$2.5
8
Stone, Clay
& Glass
$1.3
4
Scientific &
Measuring Inst.
$1.0
0
1987
1988
1989
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
NEW HAMPSHIRE'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
0.0
2.5
2.7
Agriculture - crops
0.0
0.0
0.0
Agriculture livestock
0.0
0.0
0.0
Forestry
0.0
2.5
2.7
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
0.0
5.7
43.8
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
8.2
Non-Metallic Minerals
0.0
5.7
35.6
MANUFACTURING
9,739.9
14,102.3
18,261.2
Food Products
0.0
140.3
16.4
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
57.7
66.0
566.8
Apparel
3.5
7.5
97.0
Lumber & Wood Products
0.0
126.0
888.4
Furniture & Fixtures
6.3
0.0
9.7
Paper Products
871.9
1,109.6
975.2
Printing & Publishing
45.7
49.2
15.8
Chemical Products
2,350.4
1,976.0
2,689.3
Petroleum Refining Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
286.3
1,042.3
441.8
Leather Products
406.2
2,104.5
2,482.6
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
163.8
446.8
1,348.6
Primary Metal Industries
62.9
112.4
246.8
Fabricated Metal Products
54.4
234.6
572.4
Computers & Industrial Machinery
3,484.2
4,278.0
5,911.9
Electric & Electronic Equipment
971.0
315.5
468.2
Transportation Equipment
2.3
2.4
295.8
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
951.8
1,394.1
978.1
Miscellaneous Equipment
21.5
697.1
256.5
OTHER
50.4
169.6
8.5
Scrap & Waste
0.0
0.0
7.0
Second Hand Goods
0.0
0.0
0.0
Military Equipment
50.4
169.6
1.5
NEW HAMPSHIRE'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
9,790.4
14,280.0
18,316.1
NEW HAMPSHIRE'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
885,399.8
1,025,288.1
1,106,079.2
MEXICO'S SHARE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE'S EXPORTS
1.1%
1.4%
1.7%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked 15TH Among New Hampshire's 114 Export Markets
48
NEW JERSEY: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
New Jersey's Exports to Mexico Grew by
75 Percent of New Jersey's
107 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
500
Non-Manufacturing
Manufacturing
$390.8
Chemicals
$112.1
400
Computers &
Industrial Mach.
$67.8
300
$266.7
Electric &
$67.0
$189.0
Electronic Eqp.
200
Food Products
$27.4
100
Scientific &
$18.2
Measuring Instru.
0
1987
1988
1989
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
NEW JERSEY'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
1,198.2
1,890.5
2,432.9
Agriculture crops
549.8
1,111.7
1,139.4
Agriculture - livestock
0.0
5.0
1.6
Forestry
648.4
761.8
1,281.8
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
12.0
10.2
MINING
4,541.3
3,841.4
16,599.2
Metal Mining
3,444.2
2,733.0
14,379.5
Coal Mining
0.0
9.8
4.6
Oil & Gas
0.0
1.6
12.6
Non-Metallic Minerals
1,097.1
1,096.9
2,202.4
MANUFACTURING
180,239.7
237,737.1
367,870.2
Food Products
947.9
2,290.0
27,441.8
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
1,206.8
2,388.5
2,327.2
Apparel
642.9
2,284.4
7,364.1
Lumber & Wood Products
1,074.3
1,037.5
404.5
Furniture & Fixtures
867.4
1,181.3
5,053.3
Paper Products
3,587.0
4,149.8
6,902.3
Printing & Publishing
2,071.2
1,739.7
4,186.8
Chemical Products
71,801.0
84,261.9
112,140.5
Petroleum Refining Products
479.1
315.5
1,028.8
Rubber & Plastic Products
5,571.6
7,048.0
9,466.0
Leather Products
743.3
611.3
1,110.7
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
2,280.4
2,753.3
6,880.7
Primary Metal Industries
9,354.5
11,844.0
10,414.2
Fabricated Metal Products
4,817.5
13,313.2
10,977.8
Computers & Industrial Machinery
33,014.0
48,793.7
67,778.8
Electric & Electronic Equipment
26,754.1
36,919.4
67,035.7
Transportation Equipment
1,758.8
3,125.5
3,741.7
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
11,566.8
9,995.1
18,150.4
Miscellaneous Equipment
1,701.2
3,685.0
5,464.8
OTHER
3,038.4
23,280.2
3,914.6
Scrap & Waste
2,222.4
19,272.5
1,149.6
Second Hand Goods
634.3
327.9
0.0
Military Equipment
181.7
3,679.8
2,765.0
NEW JERSEY'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
189,017.5
266,749.1
390,816.9
NEW JERSEY'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
6,783,159.4
8,308,991.7
8,642,913.6
MEXICO'S SHARE OF NEW JERSEY'S EXPORTS
2.8%
3.2%
4.5%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked FIFTH Among New Jersey's 184 Export Markets
49
NEW MEXICO: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
New Mexico's Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
71 Percent of New Mexico's
60 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
28
Non-Manufacturing
Chemicals
$3.3
24
Manufacturing
Petroleum
20
$16.0
Products
$2.4
16
$14.5
Computers &
Industrial Mach.
$1.7
12
$9.1
Lumber &
8
Wood Prod.
$1.4
4
Agriculture-Crops
$1.4
0
1987
1988
1989
0
1
2.
3
4
NEW MEXICO'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
511.9
2,176.4
2,027.0
Agriculture - crops
146.4
334.1
1,379.6
Agriculture - livestock
365.5
1,842.4
647.4
Forestry
0.0
0.0
0.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
407.6
180.2
501.2
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
496.6
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
407.6
180.2
4.7
MANUFACTURING
7,512.6
12,855.5
11,315.4
Food Products
44.4
1,266.5
650.5
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
17.0
50.2
5.4
Apparel
10.2
10.3
0.0
Lumber & Wood Products
5.0
695.3
1,413.8
Furniture & Fixtures
8.4
90.0
14.2
Paper Products
45.6
63.1
143.1
Printing & Publishing
42.7
0.0
0.0
Chemical Products
3,869.0
7,079.7
3,290.9
Petroleum Refining Products
1,384.4
11.1
2,437.8
Rubber & Plastic Products
175.0
197.3
189.2
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
32.6
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
0.0
0.0
219.8
Primary Metal Industries
64.8
181.1
304.1
Fabricated Metal Products
112.7
234.6
67.4
Computers & Industrial Machinery
1,246.9
2,274.3
1,733.7
Electric & Electronic Equipment
99.3
156.7
152.4
Transportation Equipment
105.8
268.3
440.5
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
281.5
180.3
169.6
Miscellaneous Equipment
0.0
96.7
50.5
OTHER
625.6
755.8
635.6
Scrap & Waste
366.5
231.9
395.2
Second Hand Goods
259.1
506.4
237.3
Military Equipment
0.0
17.5
3.0
NEW MEXICO'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
9,057.7
15,967.9
14,479.2
NEW MEXICO'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
166,972.1
193,327.4
213,660.2
MEXICO'S SHARE OF NEW MEXICO'S EXPORTS
5.4%
8.3%
6.8%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked SIXTH Among New Mexico's 77 Export Markets
50
NEW YORK: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
New York's Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
64 Percent of New York's
63 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
1200
Non-Manufacturing
Scientific &
$152.3
1000
Manufact.
Measuring Instru.
$827.9
$834.3
Computers &
800
Industrial Mach.
$108.9
Primary Metal
600
$512.4
$104.7
Industries
400
Chemicals
$97.8
200
Paper Products
$69.7
0
1987
1988
1989
0
50
100
150
200
NEW YORK'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
2,709.6
5,508.8
3,496.1
Agriculture crops
755.8
3,805.2
1,853.9
Agriculture - livestock
188.0
178.3
111.5
Forestry
1,765.8
1,525.3
1,503.7
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
27.0
MINING
4,107.7
2,944.2
4,292.9
Metal Mining
3,395.0
2,098.5
1,895.9
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
166.2
Non-Metallic Minerals
712.7
845.7
2,230.8
MANUFACTURING
493,615.7
802,632.9
810,460.2
Food Products
12,494.5
36,509.7
34,821.0
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
4,118.1
8,107.1
15,270.6
Apparel
1,531.1
6,182.9
15,552.1
Lumber & Wood Products
288.4
632.1
910.8
Furniture & Fixtures
280.9
357.6
630.9
Paper Products
44,770.2
64,818.9
69,696.0
Printing & Publishing
2,160.7
2,081.8
4,534.5
Chemical Products
65,154.2
92,673.5
97,821.7
Petroleum Refining Products
1,766.0
985.3
4,377.6
Rubber & Plastic Products
18,064.0
25,271.7
27,918.2
Leather Products
599.1
3,540.3
3,310.1
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
7,733.9
11,994.9
7,572.7
Primary Metal Industries
34,770.1
27,700.1
104,743.3
Fabricated Metal Products
49,859.8
76,883.2
14,493.0
Computers & Industrial Machinery
68,260.1
99,334.1
108,892.8
Electric & Electronic Equipment
44,879.9
71,105.8
65,190.0
Transportation Equipment
78,821.1
173,558.4
40,749.3
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
54,869.9
93,570.4
152,266.6
Miscellaneous Equipment
3,193.7
7,325.2
41,709.3
OTHER
11,935.1
16,845.4
16,034.5
Scrap & Waste
6,558.2
12,134.9
11,584.5
Second Hand Goods
211.4
1,171.5
38.2
Military Equipment
5,165.6
3,539.0
4,411.8
NEW YORK'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
512,368.1
827,931.2
834,283.7
NEW YORK'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
19,873,716.1
26,961,338.8
26,789,951:9
MEXICO'S SHARE OF NEW YORK'S EXPORTS
2.6%
3.1%
3.1%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked EIGHTH Among New York's 188 Export Markets
51
NORTH CAROLINA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
North Carolina's Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
75 Percent of North Carolina's
101 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
240
Non-Manufacturing
Computers &
$49.5
Manufacturing
Industrial Mach.
200
$190.2
Chemicals
$28.0
160
$137.1
120
Paper Products
$26.0
$94.7
Electric &
80
Electronic Eqp.
$22.2
40
Textile Mill
Products
$17.4
0
1987
1988
1989
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
NORTH CAROLINA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
734.3
1,020.1
836.5
Agriculture - crops
65.4
0.0
93.4
Agriculture - livestock
659.8
1,014.9
735.0
Forestry
9.1
5.2
8.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
188.7
163.6
665.2
Metal Mining
42.9
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
4.4
Non-Metallic Minerals
145.8
163.6
660.7
MANUFACTURING
93,312.1
134,675.6
187,850.4
Food Products
623.1
2,190.2
2,462.2
Tobacco Products
291.0
449.4
500.7
Textile Mill Products
3,115.2
9,495.7
17,372.1
Apparel
7,600.5
6,884.9
7,575.0
Lumber & Wood Products
32.6
351.4
416.8
Furniture & Fixtures
69.8
927.1
1,525.9
Paper Products
17,869.3
19,328.7
25,953.5
Printing & Publishing
918.9
1,343.6
1,624.4
Chemical Products
16,922.9
24,812.7
27,982.2
Petroleum Refining Products
125.1
0.0
165.1
Rubber & Plastic Products
6,142.5
7,916.6
11,582.5
Leather Products
917.0
363.2
75.1
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
1,300.9
2,008.7
2,557.9
Primary Metal Industries
1,566.2
2,197.2
6,785.5
Fabricated Metal Products
557.2
2,612.3
3,029.9
Computers & Industrial Machinery
24,371.0
35,938.4
49,514.2
Electric & Electronic Equipment
6,849.3
11,332.6
22,197.2
Transportation Equipment
1,152.6
1,681.1
2,399.4
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
2,696.8
4,525.2
3,054.5
Miscellaneous Equipment
190.2
316.6
1,076.2
OTHER
435.4
1,250.6
832.0
Scrap & Waste
117.7
637.9
804.9
Second Hand Goods
210.8
398.3
0.0
Military Equipment
107.0
214.5
27.1
NORTH CAROLINA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
94,670.5
137,109.9
190,184.1
NORTH CAROLINA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
5,890,715.4
6,786,576.8
8,161,936.2
MEXICO'S SHARE OF NORTH CAROLINA'S EXPORTS
1.6%
2.0%
2.3%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked 14TH Among North Carolina's 165 Export Markets
52
NORTH DAKOTA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 3 Exports Accounted for
North Dakota's Exports to Mexico Grew by
99 Percent of North Dakota's
30 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
70
60
Non-Manufacturing
Manufacturing
$51.7
Agriculture-Crops
$34.6
50
$39.9
$37.5
40
Food Products
$15.9
30
20
Computers &
$0.9
10
Industrial Mach.
0
1987
1988
1989
0
10
20
30
40
50
NORTH DAKOTA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
23,033.2
20,143.7
34,601.4
Agriculture crops
23,033.2
20,143.7
34,584.0
Agriculture livestock
0.0
0.0
17.4
Forestry
0.0
0.0
0.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
0.0
11.6
7.0
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
11.6
7.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
0.0
0.0
0.0
MANUFACTURING
16,650.1
17,328.1
17,042.6
Food Products
15,433.1
16,490.0
15,941.0
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Apparel
0.0
0.0
0.0
Lumber & Wood Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
0.0
0.0
Paper Products
0.0
0.0
17.5
Printing & Publishing
0.0
0.0
6.3
Chemical Products
3.0
0.0
12.6
Petroleum Refining Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
0.0
6.9
11.3
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
0.0
3.5
0.0
Primary Metal Industries
0.0
0.0
4.8
Fabricated Metal Products
227.6
213.0
50.5
Computers & Industrial Machinery
915.6
604.9
929.4
Electric & Electronic Equipment
24.7
1.5
6.8
Transportation Equipment
44.4
8.3
62.4
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
1.7
0.0
0.0
Miscellaneous Equipment
0.0
0.0
0.0
OTHER
202.4
0.0
0.0
Scrap & Waste
0.0
0.0
0.0
Second Hand Goods
202.4
0.0
0.0
Military Equipment
0.0
0.0
0.0
NORTH DAKOTA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
39,885.7
37,483.4
51,651.0
NORTH DAKOTA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
297,567.6
279,972.6
382,900.4
MEXICO'S SHARE OF NORTH DAKOTA'S EXPORTS
13.4%
13.4%
13.5%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked SECOND Among North Dakota's 71 Export Markets
53
OHIO: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
Ohio's Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
78 Percent of Ohio's
89 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
600
Non-Manufacturing
Computers &
500
Manufacturing
$464.0
Industrial Mach.
$110.9
$381.3
Primary Metal
400
Industries
$84.5
300
$245.2
Chemicals
$84.4
200
Rubber &
Plastic Prod.
$45.8
100
Transportation
Equipment
$36.0
0
1987
1988
1989
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
OHIO'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
478.9
506.6
741.8
Agriculture - crops
0.0
43.7
13.6
Agriculture - livestock
104.7
48.9
145.3
Forestry
374.2
414.0
582.9
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
691.7
1,802.2
925.1
Metal Mining
175.9
1,053.4
11.6
Coal Mining
172.1
6.6
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
343.7
742.2
913.6
MANUFACTURING
242,514.3
376,036.2
459,231.4
Food Products
2,743.1
4,195.2
3,836.8
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
1,333.4
1,747.3
1,058.1
Apparel
59.2
432.8
310.8
Lumber & Wood Products
286.5
403.3
214.7
Furniture & Fixtures
98.7
3,416.4
2,907.1
Paper Products
1,733.3
2,432.7
2,827.4
Printing & Publishing
373.1
278.4
1,076.0
Chemical Products
59,929.3
80,079.8
84,365.5
Petroleum Refining Products
714.5
465.9
7,342.5
Rubber & Plastic Products
13,572.8
34,399.3
45,842.9
Leather Products
0.0
291.1
6,885.4
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
9,360.1
12,950.9
11,389.6
Primary Metal Industries
12,273.1
62,977.4
84,498.5
Fabricated Metal Products
12,198.5
12,461.3
15,321.5
Computers & Industrial Machinery
68,981.1
85,850.2
110,884.9
Electric & Electronic Equipment
31,684.7
28,420.5
29,826.0
Transportation Equipment
20,328.7
31,136.6
36,020.5
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
6,614.1
12,987.2
12,381.4
Miscellaneous Equipment
230.2
1,110.0
2,241.7
OTHER
1,547.3
2,985.5
3,136.0
Scrap & Waste
981.9
1,820.7
2,639.7
Second Hand Goods
64.7
247.9
148.7
Military Equipment
500.7
917.0
347.6
OHIO'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
245,232.1
381,330.6
464,034.3
OHIO'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
10,018,676.3
12,276,607.5
13,322,751.1
MEXICO'S SHARE OF OHIO'S EXPORTS
2.4%
3.1%
3.5%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked SIXTH Among Ohio's 169 Export Markets
54
OKLAHOMA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Oklahoma's Exports to Mexico Grew by
59 Percent of Oklahoma's
41 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
140
Non-Manufacturing
Food Products
$15.0
120
Manufacturing
100
$97.8
Computers &
$11.3
Industrial Mach.
80
$62.4
Chemicals
$4.9
60
$44.2
Stone, Clay &
40
$2.8
Glass Products
20
Transportation
$2.7
Equipment
0
1987
1988
1989
0
5
10
15
20
OKLAHOMA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
6,693.4
26,078.2
12,426.2
Agriculture crops
6,519.0
25,700.2
11,557.9
Agriculture livestock
174.4
369.8
823.3
Forestry
0.0
8.2
45.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
345.5
246.9
389.1
Metal Mining
5.8
7.9
4.4
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
339.7
239.0
384.7
MANUFACTURING
36,688.2
70,793.2
48,455.2
Food Products
2,694.6
1,264.7
14,980.1
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
0.0
18.3
4.0
Apparel
9.4
8.0
25.2
Lumber & Wood Products
26.5
0.0
11.4
Furniture & Fixtures
9.9
26.0
104.7
Paper Products
10.3
250.4
366.7
Printing & Publishing
2.1
14.6
7.8
Chemical Products
4,807.3
6,757.6
4,877.2
Petroleum Refining Products
3,480.8
104.2
590.7
Rubber & Plastic Products
6,361.4
8,180.2
1,418.6
Leather Products
293.7
1,215.6
482.2
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
1,463.9
2,404.8
2,764.7
Primary Metal Industries
728.8
853.2
2,101.2
Fabricated Metal Products
1,507.6
2,412.3
2,443.7
Computers & Industrial Machinery
9,594.6
31,607.9
11,260.8
Electric & Electronic Equipment
2,094.6
1,285.3
2,108.5
Transportation Equipment
670.5
1,812.9
2,674.3
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
2,925.6
12,556.7
2,147.3
Miscellaneous Equipment
6.7
20.8
86.1
OTHER
520.5
651.0
1,098.6
Scrap & Waste
412.6
302.8
819.4
Second Hand Goods
79.0
290.2
238.5
Military Equipment
28.9
58.1
40.7
OKLAHOMA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
44,247.7
97,769.3
62,369.1
OKLAHOMA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
1,077,954.3
1,541,158.5
1,637,515.7
MEXICO'S SHARE OF OKLAHOMA'S EXPORTS
4.1%
6.3%
3.8%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked SEVENTH Among Oklahoma's 139 Export Markets
55
OREGON: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Oregon's Exports to Mexico Grew by
79 Percent of Oregon's
95 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
50
Non-Manufacturing
Computers &
Industrial Mach.
$17.4
40
Manufacturing
$38.1
Agriculture-Crops
$6.6
30
$23.5
Scientific &
$19.5
Measuring Instru.
$2.3
20
Transportation
Equipment
$2.1
10
Primary Metal
Industries
$1.8
0
1987
1988
1989
0
5
10
15
20
25
OREGON'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
484.4
562.8
6,625.6
Agriculture crops
484.4
539.4
6,613.2
Agriculture - livestock
0.0
23.4
1.7
Forestry
0.0
0.0
10.7
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
24.9
4.5
0.0
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
24.9
4.5
0.0
MANUFACTURING
18,473.4
20,768.0
31,428.3
Food Products
1,237.4
214.0
493.9
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
0.0
301.6
10.0
Apparel
3.4
37.9
150.1
Lumber & Wood Products
411.5
718.1
382.3
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
0.0
14.5
Paper Products
1,892.6
247.4
458.6
Printing & Publishing
16.3
0.0
4.7
Chemical Products
3,208.4
452.9
471.4
Petroleum Refining Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
45.0
121.5
577.4
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
956.1
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
15.4
2.7
1,608.0
Primary Metal Industries
333.4
358.2
1,833.1
Fabricated Metal Products
219.7
621.2
936.9
Computers & Industrial Machinery
7,207.1
12,773.3
17,415.0
Electric & Electronic Equipment
2,377.8
2,467.3
1,095.1
Transportation Equipment
343.7
585.7
2,112.1
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
1,138.7
1,689.9
2,279.6
Miscellaneous Equipment
23.2
176.2
629.2
OTHER
494.5
2,117.9
13.0
Scrap & Waste
391.2
1.7
2.3
Second Hand Goods
55.8
0.0
0.0
Military Equipment
47.5
2,116.2
10.7
OREGON'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
19,477.3
23,453.1
38,066.8
OREGON'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
3,051,517.6
4,522,818.7
5,090,612.8
MEXICO'S SHARE OF OREGON'S EXPORTS
0.6%
0.5%
0.7%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked 20TH Among Oregon's 166 Export Markets
56
PENNSYLVANIA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Pennsylvania's Exports to Mexico Grew by
74 Percent of Pennsylvania's
162 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
600
Non-Manufacturing
Computers &
500
$474.7
Industrial Mach.
$97.5
Manufacturing
Electric &
400
$337.4
Electronic Eqp.
$85.8
300
Primary Metal
$71.7
Industries
$181.1
200
Chemicals
$68.7
100
Food Products
$25.3
0
1987
1988
1989
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
PENNSYLVANIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
804.2
903.6
1,706.6
Agriculture crops
340.7
168.9
410.7
Agriculture - livestock
461.8
729.6
352.4
Forestry
1.7
5.0
943.5
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
1,059.5
1,605.6
3,819.2
Metal Mining
366.4
681.7
381.9
Coal Mining
214.7
58.6
1,092.4
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
16.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
478.4
865.4
2,329.0
MANUFACTURING
177,361.7
331,079.9
460,397.5
Food Products
2,323.0
8,280.5
25,335.8
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
860.5
1,017.5
6,400.4
Apparel
154.4
799.8
589.8
Lumber & Wood Products
1,327.5
134.8
92.6
Furniture & Fixtures
22.3
325.5
1,158.9
Paper Products
9,394.0
7,479.3
13,491.2
Printing & Publishing
2,739.5
222.5
1,055.2
Chemical Products
42,751.8
70,847.8
68,683.5
Petroleum Refining Products
4,177.0
1,156.3
8,369.1
Rubber & Plastic Products
4,303.5
8,851.0
4,504.7
Leather Products
70.0
178.2
392.9
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
3,750.0
6,401.0
18,920.3
Primary Metal Industries
18,987.9
53,717.9
71,699.3
Fabricated Metal Products
4,373.6
10,352.9
21,037.2
Computers & Industrial Machinery
44,905.2
81,379.2
97,477.4
Electric & Electronic Equipment
18,434.8
54,454.3
85,766.3
Transportation Equipment
6,686.0
5,513.4
14,434.2
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
8,381.2
19,038.7
18,275.9
Miscellaneous Equipment
3,719.6
929.4
2,713.0
OTHER
1,900.5
3,803.6
8,763.9
Scrap & Waste
963.9
2,428.1
7,095.0
Second Hand Goods
256.0
57.7
0.0
Military Equipment
680.6
1,317.8
1,668.9
PENNSYLVANIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
181,126.0
337,392.6
474,687.3
PENNSYLVANIA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
6,131,822.9
7,801,506.9
8,576,020.3
MEXICO'S SHARE OF PENNSYLVANIA'S EXPORTS
3.0%
4.3%
5.5%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked FIFTH Among Pennsylvania's 177 Export Markets
57
RHODE ISLAND: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
Rhode Island's Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
83 Percent of Rhode Island's
119 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
35
Non-Manufacturing
$32.1
Computers &
30
Manufacturing
Industrial Mach.
$10.7
25
$23.9
Primary Metal
Industries
$6.5
20
$14.7
Chemicals
$4.3
15
Electric &
10
$3.5
Electronic Eqp.
5
Miscellaneous Eqp.
$1.5
0
1987
1988
1989
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
RHODE ISLAND'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
136.5
0.0
0.0
Agriculture - crops
44.8
0.0
0.0
Agriculture - livestock
91.6
0.0
0.0
Forestry
0.0
0.0
0.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
3.2
14.8
0.0
Metal Mining
3.2
6.9
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
0.0
7.9
0.0
MANUFACTURING
14,365.9
23,841.0
32,078.2
Food Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
12.1
231.2
89.1
Apparel
27.5
190.4
407.3
Lumber & Wood Products
0.0
16.0
0.0
Furniture & Fixtures
4.7
241.1
19.5
Paper Products
220.2
363.1
1,098.1
Printing & Publishing
25.1
60.9
0.0
Chemical Products
1,409.8
3,187.9
4,310.2
Petroleum Refining Products
1.9
2.2
0.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
1,853.9
2,073.0
638.0
Leather Products
6.9
547.6
7.2
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
109.5
10.2
166.9
Primary Metal Industries
1,583.6
5,775.0
6,533.4
Fabricated Metal Products
179.1
1,153.7
1,170.7
Computers & Industrial Machinery
5,924.5
6,883.6
10,746.2
Electric & Electronic Equipment
1,979.7
1,296.0
3,456.7
Transportation Equipment
370.3
599.5
1,062.6
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
101.1
251.5
840.9
Miscellaneous Equipment
555.9
958.0
1,531.5
OTHER
158.2
85.0
29.6
Scrap & Waste
0.0
0.0
0.0
Second Hand Goods
131.9
85.0
0.0
Military Equipment
26.3
0.0
29.6
RHODE ISLAND'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
14,663.7
23,940.8
32,107.8
RHODE ISLAND'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
509,304.4
559,849.5
649,675.5
MEXICO'S SHARE OF RHODE ISLAND'S EXPORTS
2.9%
4.3%
4.9%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked FIFTH Among Rhode Island's 110 Export Markets
58
SOUTH CAROLINA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
South Carolina's Exports to Mexico Grew by
81 Percent of South Carolina's
85 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
70
Non-Manufacturing
$59.8
Computers &
$21.7
60
Manufacturing $54.9
Industrial Mach.
50
Chemicals
$11.3
40
$32.3
Rubber &
Plastic Prod.
$7.0
30
Textile Mill
20
$5.0
Products
10
Paper Products
$3.3
0
1987
1988
1989
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
SOUTH CAROLINA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
20.8
50.5
94.3
Agriculture crops
12.8
48.1
47.9
Agriculture - livestock
8.0
2.4
41.5
Forestry
0.0
0.0
4.8
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
136.4
70.0
128.4
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
27.6
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
136.4
70.0
100.8
MANUFACTURING
31,326.4
54,186.2
58,630.6
Food Products
255.8
223.3
1,855.6
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
1,763.1
5,537.5
5,027.5
Apparel
6.9
689.1
505.4
Lumber & Wood Products
18.1
62.5
45.9
Furniture & Fixtures
30.9
0.0
55.7
Paper Products
2,020.4
927.8
3,315.2
Printing & Publishing
0.0
26.4
99.0
Chemical Products
7,381.8
15,341.7
11,295.5
Petroleum Refining Products
35.1
6.0
4.8
Rubber & Plastic Products
7,003.4
5,052.5
6,983.6
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
2.0
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
365.8
232.0
655.7
Primary Metal Industries
317.6
1,390.7
1,301.7
Fabricated Metal Products
291.5
491.2
1,306.8
Computers & Industrial Machinery
10,123.3
21,375.3
21,711.9
Electric & Electronic Equipment
802.7
1,774.1
2,396.1
Transportation Equipment
605.2
369.1
1,184.0
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
122.3
442.6
671.0
Miscellaneous Equipment
182.7
244.5
213.2
OTHER
866.3
546.2
898.0
Scrap & Waste
360.2
292.3
532.1
Second Hand Goods
345.5
26.0
0.0
Military Equipment
160.6
227.9
365.9
SOUTH CAROLINA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
32,349.8
54,852.9
59,751.2
SOUTH CAROLINA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
2,279,508.3
2,997,912.2
3,531,116.2
MEXICO'S SHARE OF SOUTH CAROLINA'S EXPORTS
1.4%
1.8%
1.7%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked 15TH Among South Carolina's 148 Export Markets
59
SOUTH DAKOTA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 3 Exports Accounted for
South Dakota's Exports to Mexico Fell by
90 Percent of South Dakota's
2 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
8
7
Non-Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Food Products
6
$2.1
$5.4
$5.3
5
$4.8
4
Computers &
Industrial Mach.
$1.4
3
2
Textile Mill
1
Products
$1.2
0
1987
1988
1989
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
SOUTH DAKOTA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
142.2
563.3
202.7
Agriculture - crops
142.2
563.3
0.0
Agriculture - livestock
0.0
0.0
202.7
Forestry
0.0
0.0
0.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
184.1
2.7
54.3
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
184.1
2.7
54.3
MANUFACTURING
5,012.3
4,186.4
4,978.9
Food Products
3,673.6
3,743.8
2,053.4
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
695.8
0.0
1,241.8
Apparel
0.0
0.0
0.0
Lumber & Wood Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
0.0
0.0
Paper Products
0.0
0.0
3.1
Printing & Publishing
0.0
0.0
4.6
Chemical Products
0.0
0.0
2.9
Petroleum Refining Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
16.1
7.5
22.5
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
2.6
155.7
0.0
Primary Metal Industries
0.0
0.0
0.0
Fabricated Metal Products
1.6
1.9
0.0
Computers & Industrial Machinery
596.1
240.2
1,412.3
Electric & Electronic Equipment
15.6
35.2
88.4
Transportation Equipment
5.0
2.0
142.4
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
3.3
0.0
3.0
Miscellaneous Equipment
2.6
0.0
4.5
OTHER
19.6
8.0
15.2
Scrap & Waste
0.0
0.0
0.0
Second Hand Goods
19.6
8.0
15.2
Military Equipment
0.0
0.0
0.0
SOUTH DAKOTA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
5,358.3
4,760.4
5,251.0
SOUTH DAKOTA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
66,092.7
91,868.0
158,445.6
MEXICO'S SHARE OF SOUTH DAKOTA'S EXPORTS
8.1%
5.2%
3.3%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked SEVENTH Among South Dakota's 71 Export Markets
60
TENNESSEE: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Tennessee's Exports to Mexico Grew by
59 Percent of Tennessee's
142 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
300
Non-Manufacturing
$244.2
Transportation
$33.1
Manufacturing
Equipment
200
Paper Products
$32.5
$141.2
Chemicals
$30.2
$100.9
100
Electric &
$25.4
Electronic Eqp.
Military Eqpmt.
$22.1
0
1987
1988
1989
0
10
20
30
40
TENNESSEE'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
18,282.3
2,700.1
6,206.2
Agriculture crops
18,194.1
2,270.7
5,172.0
Agriculture - livestock
61.0
409.4
1,004.5
Forestry
27.2
19.9
0.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
29.7
MINING
2,016.2
1,894.3
4,166.2
Metal Mining
385.0
23.2
2,361.9
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
1,631.3
1,871.1
1,804.3
MANUFACTURING
80,046.1
133,933.5
207,327.5
Food Products
4,672.3
10,812.0
10,407.4
Tobacco Products
10.2
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
2,592.2
1,519.4
6,803.6
Apparel
1,689.3
134.5
650.1
Lumber & Wood Products
23.5
550.9
745.5
Furniture & Fixtures
172.8
1,372.4
452.6
Paper Products
4,697.0
12,642.9
32,544.7
Printing & Publishing
110.4
203.0
267.4
Chemical Products
19,856.3
24,124.5
30,150.2
Petroleum Refining Products
661.1
56.6
349.4
Rubber & Plastic Products
5,127.9
9,946.7
4,186.0
Leather Products
21.9
425.7
11,517.6
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
676.3
880.9
2,311.2
Primary Metal Industries
10,840.0
12,331.5
15,606.2
Fabricated Metal Products
2,971.8
6,950.4
9,802.8
Computers & Industrial Machinery
9,666.7
14,112.1
19,629.6
Electric & Electronic Equipment
7,711.1
16,873.6
25,377.5
Transportation Equipment
4,917.7
12,801.7
33,125.2
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
3,294.8
7,860.2
2,782.5
Miscellaneous Equipment
332.8
334.5
617.8
OTHER
593.1
2,649.5
26,536.8
Scrap & Waste
490.2
2,392.5
4,435.6
Second Hand Goods
93.4
49.7
0.0
Military Equipment
9.6
207.3
22,101.2
TENNESSEE'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
100,937.8
141,177.4
244,236.6
TENNESSEE'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
2,506,246.2
2,995,308.7
3,622,501.5
MEXICO'S SHARE OF TENNESSEE'S EXPORTS
4.0%
4.7%
6.7%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked THIRD Among Tennessee's 156 Export Markets
61
TEXAS: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Texas' Exports to Mexico Grew by
62 Percent of Texas'
70 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Billion $
Billion $
Non-Manufacturing
Electric &
12
$11.0
Electronic Eqp.
$3.2
Manufacturing
$9.3
Computers &
9
$1.2
Industrial Mach.
$6.5
Transportation
$1.1
6
Equipment
Chemicals
$0.8
3
Food Products
$0.5
0
1987
1988
1989
0
1
2
3
4
TEXAS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
258,447.9
562,642.0
545,037.3
Agriculture - crops
224,560.9
377,328.4
451,006.4
Agriculture - livestock
25,768.2
174,760.0
63,455.7
Forestry
8,118.8
10,551.9
9,506.4
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
1.7
21,068.7
MINING
24,618.4
24,677.7
26,686.5
Metal Mining
5,582.3
7,121.4
6,326.0
Coal Mining
1,331.2
2,042.0
494.0
Oil & Gas
8.0
1,103.0
928.8
Non-Metallic Minerals
17,696.9
14,411.3
18,937.8
MANUFACTURING
6,007,613.7
8,483,698.1
10,232,764.9
Food Products
187,115.1
392,577.4
496,052.8
Tobacco Products
351.6
539.6
1,142.2
Textile Mill Products
158,599.2
179,504.8
199,713.7
Apparel
137,495.6
173,905.0
251,094.3
Lumber & Wood Products
21,784.6
40,818.0
55,067.9
Furniture & Fixtures
65,049.2
80,434.5
122,797.6
Paper Products
249,669.7
330,424.5
397,184.1
Printing & Publishing
10,007.6
17,056.8
25,556.8
Chemical Products
502,844.9
796,864.9
810,356.7
Petroleum Refining Products
216,853.9
75,142.3
318,674.3
Rubber & Plastic Products
232,291.7
413,257.3
363,799.4
Leather Products
32,864.3
54,941.4
69,683.8
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
57,150.4
85,385.3
54,780.1
Primary Metal Industries
214,159.9
350,246.1
398,181.4
Fabricated Metal Products
284,390.9
326,399.4
489,337.8
Computers & Industrial Machinery
832,132.7
1,094,858.6
1,193,520.1
Electric & Electronic Equipment
2,113,228.7
2,946,481.8
3,233,488.3
Transportation Equipment
483,629.7
646,473.5
1,132,881.6
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
146,519.2
363,910.0
474,312.7
Miscellaneous Equipment
61,474.8
114,476.8
145,139.3
OTHER
174,442.7
263,011.5
206,138.4
Scrap & Waste
112,490.0
161,682.3
163,581.9
Second Hand Goods
39,312.6
56,454.3
8,397.5
Military Equipment
22,640.1
44,874.9
34,159.0
TEXAS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO
6,465,122.7
9,334,029.2
11,010,627.0
TEXAS' EXPORTS TO WORLD
25,323,676.0
34,578,455.2
38,093,254.4
MEXICO'S SHARE OF TEXAS' EXPORTS
25.5%
27.0%
28.9%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked FIRST Among Texas' 190 Export Markets
62
UTAH: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Utah's Exports to Mexico Fell by
87 Percent of Utah's
14 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
70
Non-Manufacturing
Scientific &
60
$13.8
Manufacturing
$51.0
Measuring Instru.
50
Paper Products
$5.5
40
$37.1
$31.8
Rubber &
$4.8
30
Plastic Prod.
Computers &
20
Industrial Mach.
$2.2
10
Food Products
$1.5
0
1987
1988
1989
0
5
10
15
20
UTAH'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
0.0
9.1
88.5
Agriculture - crops
0.0
7.0
0.0
Agriculture - livestock
0.0
2.1
88.5
Forestry
0.0
0.0
0.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
183.3
136.1
63.0
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
183.3
136.1
63.0
MANUFACTURING
36,904.5
49,883.0
31,559.5
Food Products
148.5
1,420.2
1,517.4
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
790.1
601.7
59.2
Apparel
7,018.0
6,988.6
159.0
Lumber & Wood Products
5.0
0.0
3.0
Furniture & Fixtures
5.1
13.6
0.0
Paper Products
5,972.5
9,019.9
5,490.2
Printing & Publishing
380.5
1,667.1
481.8
Chemical Products
206.9
821.1
543.2
Petroleum Refining Products
22.3
0.0
5.7
Rubber & Plastic Products
8,491.7
12,358.4
4,777.9
Leather Products
0.0
5.8
2.8
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
585.2
241.3
28.0
Primary Metal Industries
388.0
701.6
585.3
Fabricated Metal Products
375.8
239.0
414.2
Computers & Industrial Machinery
2,397.4
2,101.7
2,208.8
Electric & Electronic Equipment
9,136.3
1,767.7
869.5
Transportation Equipment
123.7
121.0
300.1
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
320.8
10,853.7
13,766.2
Miscellaneous Equipment
536.6
960.5
347.2
OTHER
0.0
957.0
47.4
Scrap & Waste
0.0
936.2
0.0
Second Hand Goods
0.0
0.0
6.5
Military Equipment
0.0
20.8
40.9
UTAH'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
37,087.8
50,985.2
31,758.3
UTAH'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
806,060.1
943,319.8
1,244,000.6
MEXICO'S SHARE OF UTAH'S EXPORTS
4.6%
5.4%
2.6%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked 12TH Among Utah's 123 Export Markets
63
VERMONT: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
Vermont's Exports to Mexico Rose by
The Top 3 Exports Accounted for
80 Percent of Vermont's
350 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
24
Non-Manufacturing
Electric &
Manufacturing
$7.5
20
Electronic Eqp.
$16.4
16
$11.6
12
Paper Products
$1.2
8
4
$2.6
Primary Metal
$0.5
Industries
0
1987
1988
1989
0
2
4
6
8
10
VERMONT'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
0.0
0.0
0.0
Agriculture crops
0.0
0.0
0.0
Agriculture - livestock
0.0
0.0
0.0
Forestry
0.0
0.0
0.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
31.1
11.7
119.8
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
31.1
11.7
119.8
MANUFACTURING
2,536.8
16,283.9
11,270.1
Food Products
943.8
621.4
196.0
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
8.4
66.8
79.8
Apparel
0.0
0.0
350.9
Lumber & Wood Products
0.0
39.7
62.0
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
0.0
26.7
Paper Products
553.2
1,735.6
1,192.9
Printing & Publishing
2.2
30.1
0.0
Chemical Products
164.0
96.1
71.5
Petroleum Refining Products
0.0
10.0
0.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
61.1
46.8
218.5
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
20.4
342.1
225.1
Primary Metal Industries
88.0
194.4
510.6
Fabricated Metal Products
22.4
113.5
7.0
Computers & Industrial Machinery
295.1
2,732.5
436.3
Electric & Electronic Equipment
315.1
10,032.4
7,504.4
Transportation Equipment
0.0
7.4
4.7
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
63.0
215.1
383.9
Miscellaneous Equipment
0.0
0.0
0.0
OTHER
1.8
55.9
160.0
Scrap & Waste
1.8
12.0
155.8
Second Hand Goods
0.0
0.0
0.0
Military Equipment
0.0
43.8
4.3
VERMONT'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
2,569.6
16,351.5
11,549.9
VERMONT'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
731,106.1
1,172,521.0
1,683,531.0
MEXICO'S SHARE OF VERMONT'S EXPORTS
0.4%
1.4%
0.7%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked SEVENTH Among Vermont's 96 Export Markets
64
VIRGINIA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
Virginia's Exports to Mexico Grew by
77 Percent of Virginia's
109 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
100
Non-Manufacturing
$85.7
Electric &
$26.0
80
Manufacturing
Electronic Eqp.
$63.5
Chemicals
$11.8
60
Transportation
$41.1
$10.9
Equipment
40
Computers &
Industrial Mach.
$9.8
20
Primary Metal
$7.2
Industries
0
1987
1988
1989
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
VIRGINIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
3,844.5
265.8
433.2
Agriculture crops
3,710.9
24.0
408.2
Agriculture - livestock
79.6
43.3
25.0
Forestry
54.1
198.6
0.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
767.4
910.9
1,808.5
Metal Mining
73.5
1.7
15.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
693.9
909.3
1,793.5
MANUFACTURING
36,111.3
60,395.6
81,692.5
Food Products
1,142.4
1,926.1
1,400.8
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
4.8
Textile Mill Products
322.7
558.4
722.2
Apparel
97.6
202.3
151.5
Lumber & Wood Products
109.4
66.7
164.7
Furniture & Fixtures
59.3
732.8
2,319.8
Paper Products
112.7
455.7
1,488.9
Printing & Publishing
23.3
39.9
825.0
Chemical Products
10,282.3
18,039.2
11,773.6
Petroleum Refining Products
26.5
5.8
0.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
475.1
744.8
1,217.3
Leather Products
0.0
9.2
43.2
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
2,003.1
1,572.1
1,938.2
Primary Metal Industries
3,808.8
3,365.7
7,234.5
Fabricated Metal Products
1,949.4
1,564.3
3,289.5
Computers & Industrial Machinery
6,401.8
11,821.5
9,833.6
Electric & Electronic Equipment
6,133.1
12,851.8
26,029.0
Transportation Equipment
1,606.1
3,528.5
10,880.4
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
1,508.8
2,654.3
1,754.6
Miscellaneous Equipment
48.7
256.6
621.0
OTHER
333.0
1,940.6
1,809.0
Scrap & Waste
279.8
1,114.6
1,505.3
Second Hand Goods
50.3
235.4
21.9
Military Equipment
3.0
590.6
281.8
VIRGINIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
41,056.3
63,513.1
85,743.2
VIRGINIA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
6,704,789.1
7,887,757.3
8,717,771.5
MEXICO'S SHARE OF VIRGINIA'S EXPORTS
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked 20TH Among Virginia's 171 Export Markets
65
WASHINGTON: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
Washington's Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
78 Percent of Washington's
43 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
150
Non-Manufacturing
$119.3
Food Products
Manufacturing
100
$91.0
Paper Products
$44.5
$18.8
$83.4
Agriculture-Crops
$14.6
50
Computers &
Industrial Mach.
$11.3
Fabricated
Metal Prod.
$4.0
0
1987
1988
1989
0
10
20
30
40
50
WASHINGTON'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
1,324.6
16,535.6
16,916.8
Agriculture - crops
1,278.0
16,531.9
14,609.4
Agriculture - livestock
46.6
3.7
516.6
Forestry
0.0
0.0
1,790.8
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
0.0
0.0
0.0
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
0.0
0.0
0.0
MANUFACTURING
81,532.5
73,550.5
99,425.3
Food Products
8,953.0
33,372.6
44,518.9
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
199.1
953.3
149.0
Apparel
27.2
6.8
27.2
Lumber & Wood Products
0.0
6.9
176.2
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
38.5
90.2
Paper Products
9,412.6
21,894.9
18,838.8
Printing & Publishing
412.3
1,111.1
1,854.6
Chemical Products
1,169.5
1,636.3
1,331.3
Petroleum Refining Products
3,501.9
2.9
2,554.2
Rubber & Plastic Products
6.1
248.5
799.4
Leather Products
0.0
20.4
18.2
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
6.7
130.8
117.5
Primary Metal Industries
1,768.7
1,059.2
1,432.5
Fabricated Metal Products
401.3
436.2
3,990.9
Computers & Industrial Machinery
2,468.1
3,790.4
11,334.6
Electric & Electronic Equipment
1,759.8
2,632.8
2,515.4
Transportation Equipment
50,290.5
4,354.6
3,061.6
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
1,098.6
1,690.8
2,971.1
Miscellaneous Equipment
57.3
163.4
3,643.8
OTHER
524.5
903.9
2,928.3
Scrap & Waste
351.6
668.5
130.4
Second Hand Goods
121.0
10.7
90.0
Military Equipment
51.9
224.7
2,707.9
WASHINGTON'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
83,381.5
90,990.0
119,270.5
WASHINGTON'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
13,056,390.5
17,865,012.2
23,964,772.3
MEXICO'S SHARE OF WASHINGTON'S EXPORTS
0.6%
0.5%
0.5%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked 29TH Among Washington's 174 Export Markets
66
WEST VIRGINIA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 3 Exports Accounted for
West Virginia's Exports to Mexico Fell by
94 Percent of West Virginia's
40 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
80
Non-Manufacturing
Chemicals
$19.8
Manufacturing
60
$44.0
Primary Metal
40
$4.4
Industries
$26.3
$18.6
20
Computers &
$0.5
Industrial Mach.
0
1987
1989
0
5
10
15
20
25
1988
WEST VIRGINIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
0.0
0.0
19.6
Agriculture crops
0.0
0.0
0.0
Agriculture - livestock
0.0
0.0
19.6
Forestry
0.0
0.0
0.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
275.9
321.8
85.7
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
275.9
321.8
85.7
MANUFACTURING
43,573.5
18,133.8
26,167.9
Food Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
0.0
25.8
2.1
Apparel
1.9
0.0
0.0
Lumber & Wood Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
0.0
0.0
Paper Products
94.8
262.0
88.9
Printing & Publishing
0.0
0.0
0.0
Chemical Products
15,826.2
14,614.3
19,815.3
Petroleum Refining Products
3,245.7
41.7
0.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
239.0
326.3
74.8
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
102.3
114.9
274.8
Primary Metal Industries
632.7
1,724.9
4,374.9
Fabricated Metal Products
6,276.6
362.8
296.1
Computers & Industrial Machinery
16,635.9
246.8
518.6
Electric & Electronic Equipment
189.5
63.2
194.6
Transportation Equipment
307.4
153.4
154.4
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
21.5
197.7
348.7
Miscellaneous Equipment
0.0
0.0
24.6
OTHER
138.9
111.7
0.0
Scrap & Waste
0.0
17.3
0.0
Second Hand Goods
138.9
0.0
0.0
Military Equipment
0.0
94.4
0.0
WEST VIRGINIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
43,988.4
18,567.4
26,273.2
WEST VIRGINIA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
1,224,336.3
1,349,556.3
1,413,217.8
MEXICO'S SHARE OF WEST VIRGINIA'S EXPORTS
3.6%
1.4%
1.9%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked 13TH Among West Virginia's 99 Export Markets
67
WISCONSIN: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
Wisconsin's Exports to Mexico Grew by
The Top 5 Exports Accounted for
78 Percent of Wisconsin's
75 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
150
$135.2
Non-Manufacturing
Computers &
Industrial Mach.
$51.4
Manufacturing
100
Food Products
$30.9
$77.3
$83.2
Scientific &
$9.1
Measuring Instru.
50
Transportation
$7.3
Equipment
Electric &
$6.6
Electronic Eqp.
0
1987
1988
1989
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
WISCONSIN'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
8,536.9
8,690.8
5,621.9
Agriculture - crops
7,559.9
5,487.5
952.7
Agriculture - livestock
977.1
3,198.1
4,647.0
Forestry
0.0
5.3
22.2
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
49.1
60.1
173.4
Metal Mining
7.2
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
41.8
60.1
173.4
MANUFACTURING
68,532.5
73,776.6
128,672.0
Food Products
8,182.3
2,739.3
30,884.2
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
0.0
247.1
216.0
Apparel
486.7
12.1
11.7
Lumber & Wood Products
51.6
239.9
508.8
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
186.4
760.9
Paper Products
791.0
3,001.3
4,399.4
Printing & Publishing
143.5
189.4
291.2
Chemical Products
1,827.4
2,184.2
2,555.8
Petroleum Refining Products
122.3
198.2
52.7
Rubber & Plastic Products
2,283.8
4,340.3
3,038.4
Leather Products
468.0
449.0
431.6
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
516.0
353.0
468.5
Primary Metal Industries
1,132.4
1,670.9
2,613.4
Fabricated Metal Products
1,220.6
2,958.5
6,376.1
Computers & Industrial Machinery
39,935.5
33,681.4
51,442.4
Electric & Electronic Equipment
4,438.0
4,325.6
6,635.3
Transportation Equipment
3,774.7
4,652.6
7,341.2
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
2,069.5
11,654.3
9,091.2
Miscellaneous Equipment
1,089.5
693.2
1,553.3
OTHER
203.8
660.5
750.2
Scrap & Waste
121.6
267.5
560.7
Second Hand Goods
10.5
86.4
0.0
Military Equipment
71.7
306.6
189.5
WISCONSIN'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
77,322.2
83,188.0
135,217.4
WISCONSIN'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
3,951,481.9
4,724,810.3
5,002,882.6
MEXICO'S SHARE OF WISCONSIN'S EXPORTS
2.0%
1.8%
2.7%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked TENTH Among Wisconsin's 174 Export Markets
68
WYOMING: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89
The Top 3 Exports Accounted for
Wyoming's Exports to Mexico Grew by
96 Percent of Wyoming's
13 Percent From 1987 to 1989
Total Exports to Mexico in 1989
Million $
Million $
7
Non-Manufacturing
6
Chemicals
$1.9
Manufacturing
5
4
$3.8
$3.4
$3.1
Computers &
$1.2
3
Industrial Mach.
2
Agriculture-Crops
$0.6
1
0
1987
1988
1989
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
WYOMING'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR
(Thousands of Dollars)
1987
1988
1989
AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES
0.0
0.0
628.1
Agriculture crops
0.0
0.0
592.7
Agriculture livestock
0.0
0.0
35.4
Forestry
0.0
0.0
0.0
Fishing, Hunting
0.0
0.0
0.0
MINING
0.0
0.0
6.3
Metal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Mining
0.0
0.0
0.0
Oil & Gas
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-Metallic Minerals
0.0
0.0
6.3
MANUFACTURING
3,374.3
3,054.9
3,189.1
Food Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Tobacco Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Textile Mill Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Apparel
0.0
0.0
0.0
Lumber & Wood Products
0.0
0:0
0.0
Furniture & Fixtures
0.0
1.7
0.0
Paper Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Printing & Publishing
0.0
0.0
0.0
Chemical Products
3,284.6
2,340.9
1,926.1
Petroleum Refining Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Rubber & Plastic Products
19.9
31.0
64.1
Leather Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Stone, Clay & Glass Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Primary Metal Industries
0.0
0.0
0.0
Fabricated Metal Products
0.0
0.0
0.0
Computers & Industrial Machinery
69.9
675.1
1,162.5
Electric & Electronic Equipment
0.0
2.1
36.3
Transportation Equipment
0.0
4.0
0.0
Scientific & Measuring Instruments
0.0
0.0
0.0
Miscellaneous Equipment
0.0
0.0
0.0
OTHER
0.0
0.0
0.0
Scrap & Waste
0.0
0.0
0.0
Second Hand Goods
0.0
0.0
0.0
Military Equipment
0.0
0.0
0.0
WYOMING'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO
3,374.3
3,054.9
3,823.5
WYOMING'S EXPORTS TO WORLD
237,979.8
235,145.1
247,181.6
MEXICO'S SHARE OF WYOMING'S EXPORTS
1.4%
1.3%
1.5%
Mexico in 1989 Ranked 15TH Among Wyoming's 53 Export Markets
69
Page data
- Page
- 1
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- document
- Media ID
- 9baecca38d62f76e
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 323153521
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "323153521",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/323153521",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Hispanic Chamber of Commerce 9/20/91 [OA 8328] [3]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/323153521",
"identifierLocal": "13770-013",
"collections": [
"Records of the White House Office of Speechwriting (George H. W. Bush Administration)",
"Speech Backup Chronological Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/bush/gb-spe/speechwriting_backup_chron_579003/41-bpr-speech-backup-chron-13770-013_323153521.pdf",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/bush/gb-spe/speechwriting_backup_chron_579003/41-bpr-speech-backup-chron-13770-013_323153521.pdf",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/bush/gb-spe/speechwriting_backup_chron_579003/41-bpr-speech-backup-chron-13770-013_323153521.pdf",
"imageCount": 1,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "323153521",
"label": "Hispanic Chamber of Commerce 9/20/91 [OA 8328] [3]",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/323153521"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "323153521",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/323153521",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Hispanic Chamber of Commerce 9/20/91 [OA 8328] [3]",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/323153521",
"identifierLocal": "13770-013",
"collections": [
"Records of the White House Office of Speechwriting (George H. W. Bush Administration)",
"Speech Backup Chronological Files"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/bush/gb-spe/speechwriting_backup_chron_579003/41-bpr-speech-backup-chron-13770-013_323153521.pdf",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/bush/gb-spe/speechwriting_backup_chron_579003/41-bpr-speech-backup-chron-13770-013_323153521.pdf",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/bush/gb-spe/speechwriting_backup_chron_579003/41-bpr-speech-backup-chron-13770-013_323153521.pdf",
"imageCount": 1,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/323153521",
"naId": 323153521,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 1,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "document",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/bush/gb-spe/speechwriting_backup_chron_579003/41-bpr-speech-backup-chron-13770-013_323153521.pdf",
"mediaId": "9baecca38d62f76e",
"ocrText": "Originally Processed With FOIA(s):\nFOIA Number:\nS\nS\nFOIA\nMARKER\nThis is not a textual record. This is used as an\nadministrative marker by the George Bush Presidential\nLibrary Staff.\nRecord Group/Collection:\nGeorge H.W. Bush Presidential Records\nCollection/Office of Origin:\nSpeechwriting, White House Office of\nSeries:\nSpeech File Backup Files\nSubseries:\nChron File, 1989-1993\nOA/ID Number:\n13770\nFolder ID Number:\n13770-013\nFolder Title:\nHispanic Chamber of Commerce 9/20/91 [OA 8328] [3]\nStack:\nRow:\nSection:\nShelf:\nPosition:\nG\n26\n21\n6\n2\nNAFTA CHRONOLOGY\nPresident Bush and President Salinas\nJune 10, 1990\nof Mexico issue a joint statement\nendorsing the idea of a comprehensive\nfree trade agreement between the United\nStates and Mexico. They direct their\ntrade ministers, U.S. Trade Represent-\native Carla A. Hills and Mexican Secre-\ntary of Commerce and Industrial Develop-\nment Jaime Serra Puche, to undertake\nconsultations and prepatory work.\nAmbassador Hills and Secretary Serra\nAugust 8, 1990\nreport back to the Presidents, jointly\nrecommending the initiation of formal\nnegotiations.\nPresident Salinas writes to President\nAugust 21, 1990\nBush proposing that the United States\nand Mexico negotiate a free trade\nagreement, a step required by U.S. law.\nPresident Bush writes to the chairmen\nSeptember 25, 1990\nof the House Ways and Means and Senate\nFinance committees notifying the two\ncommittees of free trade negotiations\nwith Mexico, a step required by U.S. law.\nIn his letter, the President also\ninforms the chairmen that Canada has\nexpressed a desire to participate in the\nnegotiations.\nPresident Bush writes to the chairmen of\nFebruary 5, 1991\nthe Senate Finance and House Ways and\nMeans committees of his desire to enter\ninto trilateral negotiations with Mexico\nand Canada for a North American Free Trade\nAgreement (NAFTA).\nSenate Finance Committee holds public\nFebruary 6, 20, 1991\nhearings on the proposed negotiations.\nInternational Trade Subcommittee of the\nFebruary 20-21, 1991\nHouse Ways and Means Committee holds\npublic hearings on the proposed nego-\ntiations.\nSixty-day legislative review period\nFebruary 27, 1991\nexpires, during which time the Senate\nFinance Committee or House Ways and\nMeans Committee could have voted to deny\nfast-track procedures to legislation\nimplementing a free trade agreement\nwith Mexico.\nPresident Bush requests a two-year\nMarch 1, 1991\nextension of fast-track procedures\nto legislation implementing trade\nagreements, a necessary step if the\nprocedures are to be used for legis-\nlation implementing a NAFTA.\nDeadline passes for either House of\nJune 1, 1991\nCongress to pass a resolution\ndisapproving President Bush's request\nfor an extension of fast-track procedures.\nNAFTA negotiations begin in Toronto,\nJune 12, 1991\nCanada.\nTrade Ministers of Canada, Mexico and\nSeptember 19-20,1991\nthe United States scheduled to meet for\nNAFTA negotiations in Seattle, Washington.\nPublic hearing scheduled in San Diego,\nAugust 21, 1991\nCalifornia.\nPublic hearing scheduled in Houston,\nAugust 26, 1991\nTexas.\nPublic hearing scheduled in Atlanta,\nAugust 29, 1991\nGeorgia.\nPublic hearing scheduled in Washington,\nSeptember 3, 1991\nD.C.\nPublic hearing scheduled in Cleveland,\nSeptember 9, 1991\nOhio.\nPublic hearing scheduled in Boston,\nSeptember 11, 1991\nMassachusetts.\nMULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS\nNEGOTIATING GROUPS\nFIRST INDICATIVE SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS\nDATES\nNEGOTIATING GROUPS\nWEEK OF 16 SEPTEMBER\nAGRICULTURE\nWEEK OF 16 SEPTEMBER\nTRIPS\n17 SEPTEMBER\nGNS (MARITIME TRANSPORT)\n19 SEPTEMBER\nGNS (TELECOM)\n20 SEPTEMBER\nGNS (FINANCIAL SERVICES)\nWEEK OF 23 SEPTEMBER\nGNS\n26 SEPTEMBER\nINSTITUTIONS\n27 SEPTEMBER\nMARKET ACCESS\nWEEK OF 30 SEPTEMBER\nRULE-MAKING AND TRIMS\nON OR ABOUT 30 SEPTEMBER\nTEXTILES AND CLOTHING\nOCTOBER\nSURVEILLANCE BODY\n21 OCTOBER . 1 NOVEMBER\nGNS\n18 - 26 NOVEMBER AND 9 DECEMBER\nGNS\nON CALL\nTNC\nGovernmental Process leading to a\nNorth American Free Trade Agreement\nCONGRESS\nADMINISTRATION\nPRIVATE SECTOR\nPresident notifies Senate Finance and House Ways\nand Means Committees of intention to enter\nSenate Finance and House Ways and\nMeans Committees have 60\ninto trade negotiations with Mexico and Canada.\nlegislative days to disapprove\nAdministration's request for bilateral\nnegotiating authority.\nPresident requests extension\nHearings and consultations\nof fast track negotiating\nAdvisory Committee for\nbetween Administration and\nauthority. (March 1, 1991)\nTrade and Policy Negotiations\n(ACTPN) report supports\nCongress on request for\nPresident's request.\nnegotiating authority.\nFast Track Negotiating Authority expires June 1, 1991\nFast Track Negotiating Authority extended until June 1, 1993\nCongress allows extension of\nnegotiating authority.\nNeither house passes resolution\nAdministration commences formal\nof disapproval by June 1, 1991.\nConsultations continue with\nnegotiations with Mexico and\nprivate sector throughout\nCanada led by chief negotiator\nnegotiations.\nAmb. Julius Katz. (Toronto, June\n12, 1991)\nConsultations continue\nActual\nwith Congress throughout\nCANADA\nnegotiations\nnegotiations.\nMEXICO\nare\nsubdivided into\nnegotiating groups focusing\nU.S.-Mexican joint environmental\non specific sectors.\ninitiatives in parallel with the\ntrade negotiations (EPA).\nMarket\nTrade\nServices\nInvestment\nIntellectual\nDispute\nAccess\nRules\nProperty\nSettlement\nTHE UNITED\nSTATES\nA balanced comprehensive\nagreement is reached among\nthree nations.\nPresident give Congress at least 90\ncalendar days notice of his intention\nto enter into a trade agreement.\n(By February 28, 1993)\nNotification period gives Congressional\ncommittees of jurisdiction opportunity\nto review the proposed agreement before\nit is signed.\nPeriod of informal consultations and\nExtensive Consultations\nPresident signs North American Free Trade\nAgreement (by June 1, 1993.)\nConsultations\nExtensive\nPrivate Sector Trade Advisory\nCommittee System prepares\nreports on proposed trade\nagreement.\ncooperative drafting of implementing\nAdministration formally submits trilateral\nlegislation between the Administration\nagreement, along with implementing legislation\nand Congress.\nand supporting documents to Congress.\nWithin 90 legislative days, House and Senate\napproves the implementing package.\nNAFTA becomes effective on\ndate of Implementaton agreed upon\namong three nations.\nThe Brock Group, 1991.©\nMay 1, 1991\nEXECUTIVE SUMMARY\nRESPONSE TO ISSUES RAISED IN CONNECTION WITH\nTHE NEGOTIATION OF A NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT\nIn letters to the President from Chairmen Bentsen and\nRostenkowski, and from Majority Leader Gephardt, the\nAdministration has been asked to address a variety of economic,\nlabor and environmental concerns that have been raised about the\nproposed North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The\nAdministration's response sets forth detailed action plans for\naddressing these concerns, as well as views on the economic\nimpact of a NAFTA.\nTHE POSITIVE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF A NAFTA\nFrom 1986 to 1990, as Mexico reduced import barriers, our\nexports more than doubled from $12.4 billion to $28.4\nbillion, generating 264,000 additional U.S. jobs.\nUnder a NAFTA, we can do even better. Mexico still has\nhigher trade barriers than the U.S. Mexico's average duty\nis 10% compared to 4% in the U.S. Significant nontariff\nbarriers remain. We therefore have much to gain from the\nelimination of these barriers.\nAll three major economic analyses done to date corroborate\nthat the U.S. will benefit from a NAFTA in exports, output\nand employment.\nWe will benefit from Mexican growth: for each dollar Mexico\nspends on imports, 70 cents is spent on U.S. goods; for each\ndollar of GNP growth, 15 cents is spent on U.S. goods.\nFurther, the resulting economic integration will strengthen\nthe ability of the U.S. to compete with Japan and the EC.\nADJUSTMENT PROVISIONS WE WILL SEEK IN THE NAFTA\nTransition Measures: In order to avoid dislocations to\nindustries and workers producing goods that are import-\nsensitive, tariffs and non-tariff barriers on such products\nshould be eliminated in small increments over a time period\nsufficient to ensure orderly adjustment.\n:\nIn determining import sensitivity, we will rely heavily\non advice of the International Trade Commission, the\nCongress, and the private sector.\n--\nWe will be prepared to consider transition periods\nbeyond those in the U.S.-Canada FTA.\nEffective Safeguard Provisions: Even where reductions in\ntariffs and other trade barriers are staged over a lengthy\nperiod, there may be isolated cases in which injurious\nincreases in imports could occur. To prevent injury from\nsuch increases, we will seek to include in the agreement a\nprocedure allowing temporary reimposition of duties and\nother restrictions.\n--\nThis mechanism should be designed to respond quickly,\nespecially in cases of sudden import increases.\n--\nSpecial \"snap-back\" provisions should be included to\naddress the unique problems faced by producers of\nperishable products.\nStrict Rules of Origin: We will negotiate rules of origin\nto ensure that the benefits of a NAFTA do not flow to mere\npass-through operations exporting third-country products to\nthe U.S. with only minimal assembly in Mexico.\nRules of origin will impose clear, tough, and\npredictable standards to the benefit of North American\nproducts.\n--\nWe will seek to strengthen the required North American\ncontent for assembled automotive products.\n--\nWe will consult closely with the private sector and the\nCongress in designing these rules.\nDOMESTIC WORKER ADJUSTMENT PROGRAM\nSince trade barriers on sensitive products should be\ndecreased over a long timeframe, we do not expect immediate\nor substantial job dislocations.\nNevertheless, beyond including adjustment provisions in the\nNAFTA itself, there is a need to assist dislocated workers\nwho may have adjustment difficulties.\nThe Administration is committed to working with Congress to\nensure a worker adjustment program that is adequately funded\nand that provides effective services to workers who may lose\ntheir jobs as a result of an agreement with Mexico.\nWhether provided through the improvement or expansion of an\nexisting program or through the creation of a new program,\nworker adjustment measures should be targeted to provided\ndislocated workers with comprehensive services in a timely\nfashion.\nLABOR ISSUES\nLABOR MOBILITY\nWe have agreed with Mexico that labor mobility and our\nimmigration laws are not on the table in NAFTA talks, with\nthe possible exception of a narrow provision facilitating\ntemporary entry of certain professionals and managers.\nWORKER RIGHTS AND LABOR STANDARDS\nProtections afforded by Mexican labor law and practice are\nstronger than generally known.\nMexico's laws provide comprehensive rights and standards for\nworkers in all sectors, including the maquiladoras.\n--\nMexico has ratified 73 International Labor Organization\nconventions on worker rights, including those on\noccupational safety and health.\n--\nMexico has a minimum working age of 14 and mandates\nspecial protections and shorter working hours for those\nbetween the ages of 14 and 16.\nA substantially higher proportion of the Mexican workforce\nis unionized than is the U.S. workforce.\nWhile enforcement problems have resulted largely from a lack\nof resources, a NAFTA would both raise living standards and\ncreate resources for enforcing existing laws.\nFUTURE U.S.-MEXICO COOPERATION ON LABOR MATTERS\nMemorandum of Understanding: The Secretary of Labor and her\ncounterpart from Mexico are prepared to sign a Memorandum of\nUnderstanding providing for cooperation and joint action on\na number of labor issues which could be implemented in\nparallel with our FTA negotiations.\n--\nThese include health and safety measures; work\nconditions, including labor standards and enforcement; labor\nconflicts; labor statistics; and other areas of concern to\nthe United States and Mexico.\nSpecific Projects: U.S. and Mexican officials have agreed\non joint projects to address specific concerns in the labor\nsector.\n--\nInitial projects include: occupational health and\nsafety; child labor; and labor statistics.\nENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES\nMEXICO'S COMMITMENT TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION\nMexico has no interest in becoming a pollution haven for\nU.S. companies.\nMexico's comprehensive environmental law of 1988, which is\nbased on U.S. law and experience, is a solid foundation for\ntackling its environmental problems.\nAll new investments are being held to these higher legal\nstandards and an environmental impact assessment is required\nto show how they will comply.\nEnforcement has in the past been a key problem, but Mexico's\nrecord has been improving dramatically. Since 1989, Mexico\nhas ordered more than 980 temporary and 82 permanent shut\n-downs of industrial facilities for environmental\nviolations; the budget of SEDUE (Mexico's EPA) has increased\nalmost eight-fold.\nENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN THE NAFTA\nProtection of Health and Safety: We will ensure that our\nright to safeguard the environment is preserved in the\nNAFTA.\n:\nWe will maintain the right to exclude any products that\ndo not meet our health or safety requirements, and we\nwill continue to enforce those requirements.\n--\nWe will maintain our right to impose stringent\npesticide, energy conservation, toxic waste, and health\nand safety standards.\n:\nWe will maintain our rights, consistent with other\ninternational obligations, to limit trade in products\ncontrolled by international treaties (such as treaties\non endangered species or protection of the ozone\nlayer).\nEnhancement and Enforcement of Standards: We will seek a\ncommitment to work together with Mexico to enhance\nenvironmental, health, and safety standards regarding\nproducts, and to promote their enforcement.\n:\nWe will provide for full public and scientific scrutiny\nof any changes to standards before they are\nimplemented.\nWe will provide for consultations on enhancing\nenforcement capability, inspection training,\nmonitoring, and verification.\nJOINT ENVIRONMENTAL INITIATIVES\nIn parallel to the FTA negotiations, we intend to pursue an\nambitious program of cooperation on a wide range of\nenvironmental matters.\nWe will design and implement an integrated border\nenvironmental plan to address air and water pollution,\nhazardous wastes, chemical spills, pesticides, and\nenforcement.\nDuring the design phase of the border plan, there will be an\nopportunity for public comment and hearings; during\nimplementation, there will be periodic comprehensive\nreviews.\nWe will consult on national environmental standards and\nregulations, and will provide an opportunity for the public\nto submit data on alleged non-compliance.\nWe will discuss expanded cooperative enforcement activities,\nsuch as coordinated targeting of environmental violators.\nWe will establish a program of technical cooperation and\ntraining, which will include facilitating sharing of\ntechnology for pollution abatement.\nINFORMED POLICY MAKING AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION\nWe will broaden public participation in the formulation and\nimplementation of trade policy to ensure that efforts to\nliberalize trade are consistent with sound environmental\npractices.\nWe will appoint individuals to selected trade policy\nadvisory committees who can contribute both an environmental\nperspective and substantive expertise.\nIn consultation with interested members of the public, we\nwill complete a review of U.S.-Mexico environmental issues,\nwith particular emphasis on possible environmental effects\nof the NAFTA, to enable U.S. officials to consider the\nresults during FTA negotiations and other bilateral efforts.\nIMPORTANCE AND BENEFITS OF A NAFTA\nA NAFTA WOULD CREATE ONE OF THE WORLD'S LARGEST FREE TRADE AREAS\nA North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA) would create an\nenormous market, encompassing some 360 million consumers and\ntotal output of $6 trillion.\nThe progressive elimination of barriers to the flow of\ngoods, services and investment, and strengthened protection\nof intellectual property rights would benefit a broad\nspectrum of businesses, workers, farmers and consumers.\nCreation of a NAFTA would be a catalyst for economic growth\nand development in the United States, Mexico and Canada\nthrough increased trade, investment and jobs.\nTHE IMPORTANCE OF NORTH AMERICAN TRADE\nCanada and Mexico are America's first and third largest\ntrading partners, respectively. In turn, the United States\naccounts for over two-thirds of their total trade. In 1990,\nthree-way trade came to about $237 billion.\nSince 1980, U.S. exports to Mexico and Canada have doubled,\nrising from $55.3 billion to $111.4 billion. Our exports to\nour neighbors have grown substantially faster than those to\nthe rest of the world.\nREMOVAL OF BARRIERS WOULD CREATE NEW TRADE AND INVESTMENT\nOPPORTUNITIES\nSince Mexico joined the General Agreement on Tariffs and\nTrade (GATT) in 1986 and started its unilateral policy of\nlowering trade barriers, U.S. exports have more than\ndoubled, growing from $12.4 billion to $28.4 billion.\n-- U.S. agricultural exports to Mexico totalled $2.5\nbillion in 1990, our third largest market.\n:\nConsumer goods exports from the United States to Mexico\nhave tripled since 1986, rising from $1 billion to $3\nbillion.\n:\nU.S. exports of capital goods have grown from $5\nbillion in 1986 to about $9.5 billion last year.\nWe can do better. Mexico has greater barriers to U.S.\nexports than we impose on Mexican shipments to the United\nStates. For example:\n- 2 -\n:\nMexican tariffs average 10 percent, compared to the\naverage tariff of 4 percent we impose on Mexican\nexports to us.\n--\nMexico still maintains a restrictive import licensing\nregime, one which affects 40 percent of U.S.\nagricultural exports to Mexico.\nIn addition, while Mexico has liberalized its investment\nregime, it is still closed to many U.S. investments, both in\nmanufacturing and in services, and performance requirements\ndistort export opportunities for U.S. products.\nMexico has already pledged to improve its protection for\nintellectual property rights, and we expect action on those\npledges in the near future. A NAFTA will make those reforms\nsecure.\nA NAFTA OFFERS BENEFITS TO U.S. PRODUCERS, WORKERS, AND CONSUMERS\nEconomic analyses show that a NAFTA will have a positive\nimpact on the U.S. economy and U.S. employment.\nU.S. producers and workers will benefit from a NAFTA through\nincreased sales opportunities, improved operating\nefficiencies and strengthened competitiveness against\ncompetitors in Asia and Europe.\n0\nU.S. consumers will enjoy increased access to lower-cost,\nhigher quality products.\nA NAFTA STRENGTHENS THE BROADER NORTH AMERICAN RELATIONSHIP\nA NAFTA would help cement the extensive historical,\nfamilial, cultural and language links the United States has\nwith both Mexico and Canada.\nMore prosperous neighbors are better neighbors and better\ncustomers for U.S. goods and services.\nWe have a broad agenda with both Mexico and Canada that goes\nwell beyond trade, economic and investment links. By\nboosting economic prosperity in all three nations, a NAFTA\nwill help us make progress on issues such as the\nenvironment, drugs and immigration.\nMarch 1, 1991\nJOB CREATION, COMPETITIVENESS AND INVESTMENT\nOVERALL IMPACT OF NAFTA ON U.S. EMPLOYMENT SHOULD BE SMALL, BUT\nPOSITIVE\nAn econometric analysis prepared for the Department of Labor\nsuggests that an FTA with Mexico would result in a net\nincrease of 44,000 to 64,000 jobs in the United States over\n10 years, the bulk of these in manufacturing.\nThe overall impact of a NAFTA on U.S. employment should be\npositive, but small. The Mexican economy is only about 1/25\nthe size of the U.S. economy and imports from Mexico now\naccount for only about 6 percent of total U.S. imports.\nAnd, since we have an FTA in place with Canada, additional\neffects on our trade with Canada would be limited.\nMexican trade barriers are higher than those in the United\nStates. Eliminating these barriers should result in\nincreased U.S. exports, exports that will help generate jobs\nin the United States.\n:\nSince Mexico started its trade liberalization in 1986,\nU.S. exports to Mexico have more than doubled--from\n$12.4 billion in 1986 to $28.4 billion in 1990. It is\nestimated that each $1 billion worth of merchandise\nexports generates over 20,000 U.S. jobs.\nU.S. WORKERS ARE AMONG WORLD'S MOST PRODUCTIVE\nU.S. manufacturing investment and production grew strongly\nthroughout much of the 1980s. In 1988, the latest year for\nwhich constant dollar data are available, manufacturing's\nshare of the U.S. economy stood at a post-World War II high\n(23.1 percent).\nU.S. workers are among the most productive in the world.\nU.S. labor productivity in manufacturing showed strong\ngrowth in 1990 (up 3 percent).\n:\nDepending on the measure, output per employed person in\nthe United States is roughly 5 or 6 times that of\nMexico.\n:\nSince 1980, output per person employed in U.S.\nmanufacturing has grown 2.5 times faster than in\nMexico.\nHigher real incomes and wages in the United States reflect\nsuperior U.S. productivity.\n- 2 -\nTHE UNITED STATES IS AMONG THE WORLD'S MOST ATTRACTIVE LOCATIONS\nFOR INVESTMENT\n0\nBoth U.S. and foreign investors will continue to invest\nheavily in the United States because low wage levels alone\nare inadequate to assure competitiveness. Among the factors\nthat help compel investment in the United States are:\n-- an educated, skilled, and highly productive U.S. work\nforce;\n-- a fully developed and reliable transportation,\ncommunications, and business and financial\ninfrastructure;\n-- proximity to high quality, dependable suppliers;\n-- proximity to the marketplace in which one sells; and\n-- political and economic stability.\nThese U.S. advantages will not disappear in a NAFTA. Nor\nwill the manufacturing sector be weakened. Rather, the\nelimination of trade and investment barriers will expand\nmarket opportunities for exports for all three countries.\nThe U.S., Mexican and Canadian manufacturing sectors are\nlikely to be strengthened, in terms of production volumes\nand average real wages.\nINVESTMENT IN MEXICO CAN BOOST U.S. COMPETITIVENESS\nO\nWhen U.S. firms do invest in Mexico, such investment\nstrengthens their ability to meet the global competitive\nchallenge.\nA 1988 study by the U.S. International Trade Commission\nrevealed that the vast majority of the 900 firms surveyed\nfelt that assembly in Mexico had improved their overall\ninternational competitiveness.\nMost of the firms indicated that the alternative to moving\npart of their labor-intensive assembly operations to Mexico,\nwhere a substantial amount of U.S. components are used, was\nto move their U.S. operations to East Asia, which would\nresult in the usage of fewer U.S. components and machinery.\n- 3 -\nINVESTMENT IN MEXICO HELPS SAVE U.S. JOBS\nA NAFTA would help save U.S. jobs by strengthening the\nability of U.S. firms to compete against Asian and European\ncompanies.\nJoint production arrangements with Mexico have helped save\nexisting U.S. jobs and even created new jobs. For example:\n-- As a result of a move of part of its operations to\nMexico, a U.S. electronics company's sales rose 400\npercent and its U.S. employment by 50 percent. One\nmedical equipment company says it would be out of the\nhealth care business without its Mexican operations,\nwhich are supported by millions of dollars in U.S.\nsales.\n-- USTR has received a petition requesting duty-free GSP\ntreatment for ceramic magnets imported from the Mexican\nsubsidiary of a U.S. company. These magnets are used\nin electrical motors that, for example, power air\nconditioner and heater blowers in automobiles. The\nlocal U.S. labor union (representing some 3,000\nemployees) supports the petition, arguing that Mexican\nmagnets help the U.S. facility to be more competitive.\nInvestment in Mexico is likely to provide greater links back\nfor U.S. exports. Of every dollar Mexico spends on imports,\n70 cents goes to purchase U.S. goods.\nAs investment in Mexico boosts the income of Mexicans, it\nenhances their ability to buy U.S. exports.\nTRANSITIONAL MEASURES WILL FACILITATE ADJUSTMENT\nIn cases where immediate elimination of tariffs or non-\ntariff barriers would create hardship for U.S. producers, we\nwill negotiate transitional measures, such as phase-in\nperiods and safeguard procedures, to minimize adjustment\npressures.\nMEXICO'S ENVIRONMENTAL EFFORTS\nMEXICO HAS A STRONG COMMITMENT TO THE ENVIRONMENT\no\nMexico's 1988 General Law for Ecological Equilibrium and\nEnvironmental Protection is sweeping legislation that\nestablishes a firm commitment to protect the environment.\nWhile our legal systems are not totally equivalent, much\nof Mexico's 1988 law is based on U.S. law and experience.\nThe 1988 law sets national policy on ecology reserves,\nrational use of natural resources, and environmental\nprotection. It establishes administrative sanctions and\ncriminal penalties for non-compliance with the law.\n:\nSince 1988, each new investment project must submit a\ndetailed study assessing its environmental impact.\n--\nSome private companies have already responded to the\nGOM's urging that they consider environmental issues as\npart of overall business strategy by creating special\nenvironmental offices to analyze environmental impacts of\nproposed business activities.\nEnvironmental studies are now part of the curriculum in\n18 Mexican universities.\no\nMexico has committed itself to enforcing its new law,\nregulations and standards.\n--\nMexico's enforcement efforts are constrained by limited\nfunds. However, the Mexican Ministry of Urban Dvelopment\nand Ecology (SEDUE) budget has grown significantly in\nrecent years.\n-\nThe budget could be effectively doubled by an\nanticipated World Bank loan, and a significant\nportion of the increase may be devoted to\nenforcement.\n-\nAnticipating early approval of the loan, SEDUE\nrecently announced commitment of Mexican counterpart\nfunds to create 50 new inspector positions for\nMexico City and 50 for the U.S. -Mexico border.\nMexico has not hesitated to close several industrial\nplants in cases of non-compliance.\nIn a unique Mexican approach to such matters, the GOM has\nnegotiated agreements with environmental and industrial\ngroups in an effort to assure compliance with the law.\n-2-\n-\nFor example, agreements have been reached with\nthe Maquiladora Association, which includes most\nmaquilas, to encourage environmental compliance\nby its members.\n--\nJoint EPA and SEDUE technical workshops and on-site\ninspections supplement voluntary private enterprise\nprograms in attempts to assure environmental\ncompliance by maquila industries.\nMEXICO HAS A STRATEGY TO COMBAT MEXICO CITY AIR POLLUTION\no\nWith strong international support, including promises of\nsignificant financing from Japan and technical assistance\nfrom the United States, Mexico announced in October 1990 an\nambitious master plan to resolve air pollution problems in\ngreater Mexico City.\no\nMexico also has an interim contingency plan for Mexico City\nwhich results in drastic reductions in traffic and\nindustrial activity during the most serious periods of air\npollution.\nO\nMexico and the IDB are putting together a debt-for-nature\nswap to fund reforestation efforts around Mexico City.\nMEXICO AND THE UNITED STATES WORK TOGETHER TO PROTECT THE\nENVIRONMENT\nO\nA U.S. Mexico Agreement in 1989 provides for technical\nsupport to help Mexico resolve the pollution problems in\nMexico City.\n--\nUnder the Mexico City Agreement, patterned after the\nsuccessful 1983 Border Environment Agreement, action\nprograms and training and technical assistance\nprograms have been developed to deal with problems of\nair and water pollution, hazardous waste, and\nenvironmental health issues. EPA and SEDUE are the\nNational Coordinators.\n-- The U.S. Department of Energy and the Mexican\nPetroleum Institute signed in 1990 a Memorandum of\nUnderstanding to do a computer model study of Mexico\nCity air pollution.\nO\nThere has been substantial cooperation between the U.S. and\nMexico on wildlife protection and natural resource\nmanagement.\n-- Cooperative dolphin and sea turtle protection programs\nhave been established. As a result of Mexico's\nefforts, dolphins killed per net deployed were down\n58% between 1986 and 1989.\n11. 01. 91 11:20 AM\nP 0 1\nUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION\nOFFICE OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION\nSTATES\nOFFICE OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION\nFax Cover Sheet\n401-1112\nTO:\nName\nMichalle Nix\nOrganization\nWhite House\nPhone Number\nFROM:\nName\nJohn Florez\nOrganizaton\nPhone Number\nNumber of pages transmitted:\nD\nComments:\nAs requested\n400 MARYLAND AVE., S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20202\n11.01.91\n11:20\nAM\nP02\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nOffice of the Press Secretary\n(Los Angeles, California)\nFor Immediate Release\nSeptember 19, 1991\nThe President today announced his intention to appoint the\nfollowing individuals to be Members of the President's Advisory\nCommission on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans:\nANDRES BANDE, of Illinois. He will be designated Chairman.\nCurrently, Mr. Bande serves as President of Ameritech\nInternational, Incorporated in Chicago, Illinois.\nGUADALUPE C. QUINTANILLA, of Texas. she will be designated Vice\nChairman. Currently, Ms. Quintanilla serves as Assistant Vice\nPresident at the University of Houston in Houston, Texas.\nNANCY MARIE LOPEZ, of Georgia. Ms. Lopez is a Professional\nGolfer on the Ladies Professional Golf Association Tour.\nDIANA S. NATALICIO, of Texas. Currently, Dr. Natalicio serves as\nTexas. President of the University of Texas at El Paso in El Paso,\nRAUL H. YZAGUIRRE, of Texas. Currently, Mr. Yzaguirre serves as\nPresident and Chief Executive Officer of the National Council of\nLa Raza in Washington, D.C.\nROBERT J. MIRANDA, of California. Currently, Mr. Miranda serves\nas President and Chief Executive Officer of Miranda, Strabala &\nAssociates in Santa Ana, California.\nLYN W. ZIEGENBEIN, of Nebraska. Currently, Ms. ziegenbein serves\nNebraska. as Executive Director of the Peter Kiewit Foundation in Omaha,\nPETER GEORGE MEHAS, of California. Currently, Dr. Mehas serves\nas Fresno County superintendent in Fresno, California. He also\nserves as a Member of the California State Board of Education.\nGLORIA GONZALES ROEMER, of Colorado. Currently, Ms. Roemer\nserves as Vice President and Co-Owner of the Roemer 011 Company\nin Denver, Colorado,\nPETER H. COORS, of Colorado. Currently, Mr. Coors serves as\nPresident of the Coors Brewing Company in Golden, Colorado.\nERNEST H. DREW, of New Jersey. Currently, Dr. Drew serves as\nPresident and Chief Executive Officer of Hoechst Celanase in\nSummerville, New Jersey.\nDONALD R. GREENE, of Georgia. Currently, Mr. Greene serves as\nPresident of the Coca-Cola Foundation in Atlanta, Georgia.\nJACINTO PABLO JUAREZ, of Texas. Currently, Dr. Juarez serves as\nVice President for Instruction at Laredo Texas Junior College in\nLaredo, Texas.\nYVETTE DEL PRADO, of California. Currently, Dr. Prado serves as\nVice Computers. President for Education and Public Affairs at Tandem\nServices of Mead Data Central, Inc.\nPAGE\n2\n5TH STORY of Level 1 printed in FULL format.\nCopyright (c) 1991 Newsday, Inc.;\nNewsday\nOctober 13, 1991, Sunday, CITY EDITION\nSECTION: NEWS; Pg. 27\nLENGTH: 1204 words\nHEADLINE: Jobs Top Latinos' List of Concerns\nSERIES: THE NEW Nueva YORK. First in a series\nBYLINE: By Clay F. Richards. STAFF WRITER\nKEYWORD: NEW YORK CITY; HISPANICS; SERIES; HISPANIC-AMERICANS; DISCRIMINATION;\nSOCIAL CONDITIONS; POLL; NEWSDAY; STATISTICS; DISCRIMINATION; EMPLOYMENT;\nUNEMPLOYMENT; LANGUAGE\nBODY:\nHISPANIC NEW YORKERS say their lives are a struggle for survival, an uphill\nbattle against unemployment and discrimination in a city where even those fluent\nin English face routine mistreatment, according to the New York Poll.\nWhether they came here in the last five years from the Dominican Republic or\nColombia, or whether their grandparents moved here from Puerto Rico before they\nwere born, most of the Hispanics interviewed by The Gallup Organization for New\nYork Newsday say they have been the victims of discrimination in nearly every\naspect of daily life. Those who speak mostly Spanish say language is the barrier\nthat separates them from mainstream New York, but those who are well-educated\nand fluent in English say they are still often victims of stereotyping.\nWhile the majority of all city residents in earlier New York Newsday polls\nreported that life in the city was a struggle against outside elements, such as\ncrime and drugs invading their lives, Hispanic New Yorkers painted a different\npicture, one in which their lives are a struggle for basic necessities - a job,\na home and enough money to feed their families.\nThe poll of 800 Hispanic adults, conducted Sept. 3-8, was one of the most\nextensive surveys ever made of Hispanic New Yorkers. Those who participated were\ngiven the choice of being interviewed in Spanish or English.\nAmong the major findings of the poll:\nOne in five Hispanics says jobs and unemployment are the most important\nproblems facing Hispanics in New York City today. Unemployment is perceived as a\nmore serious problem by college graduates (27 percent) than by high school\ndropouts (17 percent), an indication that it may be easier for Hispanics to find\nlow-paying jobs as laborers than higher-paying white-collar positions.\nEighty percent of Hispanics say they have been mistreated by the police, and\nmore than 70 percent say they have been mistreated by each of the following\ngroups: landlords, the courts, the media, their employers, shopkeepers, the\nschools and local elected officials. Landlords fared the worst, with only 12\npercent of the Hispanics surveyed saying they hardly ever or never have\nLEXIS'NEXIS'LEXISNEXIS\nServices of Mead Data Central, Inc.\nPAGE\n3\n(c) 1991 Newsday, October 13, 1991\ntrouble with them, while schools did the \"best,\" with 28 percent of the\nrespondents saying they seldom have problems.\nOnly 18 percent of Hispanics say they have language problems when dealing\nwith police, the telephone company, schools, getting medical care, at the bank\nor other places. But among those who speak primarily Spanish, 38 percent say\nlanguage is a major problem. Twenty-nine percent of Hispanics in the city say\nthey speak Spanish exclusively or primarily, and 22 percent depend on Spanish\nradio and newspapers as their main source of news.\nAfter jobs and unemployment, 14 percent say race relations is the most\nimportant problem facing Hispanics in New York City, and the same number say\neducation is the most serious. Some 12 percent say drugs is the most important\nproblem, with no other issue breaking into double digits. When asked what is the\nbiggest problem facing the city as a whole, Hispanics list drugs (28 percent)\nand crime (27 percent) almost evenly.\nOne-third of Hispanics in New York have annual household incomes of less than\n$ 20,000, a number almost identical with that of the black population. The\nnumber of whites with an income that low is about half that of blacks and\nHispanics. Only 6 percent of Hispanics and blacks have an income exceeding $\n60,000 a year, compared with 17 percent of whites.\nThe search for a better job was uppermost on the mind of David Dopico, 43,\nwho lives in the Fort Greene section of Brooklyn. Even though he is a\nsecond-generation Puerto Rican, life in New York has been a struggle.\n\"Even if you were born here and your parents were born here, we still have\nthe problems of stereotyping,\" says Dopico, who has gone back to college in\nhopes of breaking the cycle of unemployment and low-paying jobs by becoming a\nteacher. \"I'm fortunate that I can speak English. If you can't speak English,\nyou can't get a job. And it's getting worse.\"\nSANDRA SANTIAGO, 25, a registrar at a hospital, voices similar complaints in\nconnection with her search for better housing. Santiago has no language problem\nbecause her grandparents moved here from Puerto Rico more than 40 years ago and\nshe has spoken English all her life. But for two months she has been looking for\na bigger apartment in the North Bronx for her husband and two children and has\nreluctantly concluded that being Hispanic is part of the problem.\n\"I'm not too sure if it's racism, or just taking care of your own,\" she says,\nrecounting how apartments suddenly turn up as unavailable when she goes to look\nat them. \"I try to think positive, but I'm sure there are things I'm being held\nback on. And I think sometimes the same thing is happening when it comes to\njob-related positions, too.\"\nRachael Pena, who came here from the Dominican Republic 16 years ago and\nlives in the Washington Heights section of Manhattan, is one of those having\ntrouble finding a job. A college graduate, Pena, 36, has spent the last two\nyears raising her baby and now wants to re-enter the workforce. But she has\nspent two months searching fruitlessly for a job as a social worker or in the\nhealth-care field.\n\"Yes,\" Pena says of her job problems. \"I think it is some part because I'm\nHispanic.\"\nLEXIS NEXIS'LEXIS NEXIS\nServices of Mead Data Central, Inc.\nPAGE\n4\n(c) 1991 Newsday, October 13, 1991\nTreatment of Hispanics\nTHE QUESTION: How often do you think Hispanics in New York are mistreated by\neach of the following, all the time, most of the time, sometimes, hardly ever or\nnever?\nHardly\nAll or most\never\nof the time\nSometimes\nor never\nThe police\n39\n41\n12\n»\nThe courts\n32\n34\n14\nLandlords\n47\n30\n12\nThe media\n31\n39\n18\nEmployers\n37\n41\n11\nShopkeepers\n24\n41\n20\nThe schools\n23\n36\n28\nLocal elected\nofficials\n21\n34\n20\n-\nPrimary Language\nTHE QUESTION: Do you generally speak\n...\nSpanish exclusively with no English\n6%\nPrimarily Spanish with some English\n23% #\nBoth English and Spanish equally\n42% -\nPrimarily English with some Spanish\n24% #\nEnglish exclusively with no Spanish\n5% -\nABOUT THE POLL: For this survey, The Gallup Organization conducted 800 telephone\ninterviews among a sample of Hispanic adults age 18 or older. Interviewing was\nconducted Sept. 3-8, 1991. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 4\npercentage points. Categories do not add up to 100 percent because responses of\n\"don't know\" have been omitted.\nGRAPHIC: Charts-1) THE NEW YORK POLL. NEW YORK NEWSDAY. Treatment of\nHispanics-THE QUESTION: How often do you think Hispanics in New York are\nmistreated by each of the following, all the time, most of the time, sometimes,\nhardly ever or never. 2) Primary Language-THE QUESTION: Do you generally speak\n...Spanish exclusively with no English.-See end of text\nLEXIS'NEXIS LEXIS'NEXIS\nApr. 25 / Administration of George Bush, 1989\ntional marijuana and cocaine smuggling\nThis money then, totaling $10 million, is\nring. How many lives, how many families,\nthe bounty of defeated drug criminals. And\nhow many hopes and dreams have been\nwe won't stop until we nail every coward\ndestroyed with these chemical weapons of\nwho deals in death and put them where\ndeath and destruction-drugs? Death\nthey belong.\nbought and sold by the ton-this operation\nNow, you have had outstanding results\nhad commercial packing equipment, under-\nover the last 2 years, thanks to the team\nground storage vaults, large vans with\nefforts of local, State, and Federal agents:\nhidden compartments, jet aircraft, ocean-\nnearly 40 million in cash confiscated, the\ngoing vessels. Once a warehouse of death,\nequivalent of 9 million injections of heroin\nnow it is a source of hope. Rancho del Rio\nand 38 million doses of cocaine seized. And\nhas been reclaimed. Thanks to the Compre-\nthat's 15 doses for every man, woman, and\nhensive Crime Control Act of 1984, pushed\nchild in Orange County. Do we need any\nthrough by your former Congressman, Dan\nother reason than that to win this war? Let\nLungren, we can now seize drug dealers'\nthese funds go then to fighting the war they\nassets and use them in the war on drugs.\nonce financed. Let us raise awareness and\nAnd this is the first piece of forfeited drug\nbuild strength through a constellation of\nproperty turned over for use by local offi-\nconcerned Americans in every town, city,\ncials in Orange County. It's going to serve\nand community in this country. And let us\nas an International Narcotics Training\nsend a message, loud and clear, to every\nCenter and as a reminder to these mer-\ndrug merchant in America: You're going to\nchants of death: Your money won't help\nbe out of business! That is our message.\nyou; in fact, we're going to use it against\nThat is my message to you today. Keep up\nyou.\nthe good work and continue to set an exam-\nSo, what you see on these tables behind\nple for the rest of our great country.\nus is over $4 million-line up-[laughter]-\nThank you. God bless you. And God bless\n$4 million of laundered drug money recent-\nthe United States of America.\nly seized by U.S. Customs and the regional\nnarcotics suppression program in Operation\nNote: The President spoke at 12:23 p.m. out-\nShackle. And today I'd like to formally turn\nside of the main house at Rancho del Rio.\nthese funds over to Sheriff Gates to help\nHe was introduced by Orange County Sher-\nfund the Rancho del Rio project. I hope\niff Brad Gates. In his remarks, he referred\nthat all of you can help make this project a\nto Michael K. Hayde, president of Drug Use\nreality. I'm also pleased to present another\nIs Life Abuse, and Robert Schuller, pastor\n$6 million in drug money-confiscated\nof the Crystal Cathedral. Prior to his re-\nthrough a joint DEA-local sting operation in\nmarks, the President toured the facility.\nCalifornia and Arizona-to fund more effec-\nFollowing his remarks, he attended a work-\ntive, cooperative efforts between local,\ning luncheon with law enforcement officers\nState, and Federal enforcement agencies.\nat the ranch.\nRemarks to Members of the Hispanic-American Community in Los\nAngeles, California\nApril 25, 1989\nabout\nwas\nad\nlib\nThank you very much. And, Mr.\nmake note that it was here, not in this very\nSchwartz-Murray, thank you, sir, for the\nroom, but right on this campus-Murray\nwarm welcome back to this campus, and I\nSchwartz referring to my last visit here that\nam so delighted to be here. This is a non-\nwas highly politicized, perhaps one of the\npartisan appearance. And therefore I will\nmost dramatic moments in our whole cam-\nresist any partisan commentary except to\npaign cycle, but certainly in my life. And so,\n476\nAdministration of George Bush, 1989 / Apr. 25\nI have a feeling, a good feeling, and very\ntion], who so enrich our administration.\npleased to be welcomed back by two\nIt was over a year ago at a LULAC\npeople who give so much to UCLA.\n[League of United Latin American Commu-\nI would just give a word of welcome to all\nnities] meeting in Texas where I said time\nof you. And I'm delighted to salute UCLA,\nhad come, long since, that we have Hispan-\none of our great universities. I would simply\nics in the President's Cabinet. And now we\nsay that expressing gratitude is not always\nhave two outstanding Secretaries: Manuel\neasy. But I do want to express my gratitude\nLujan and Lauro Cavazos.\nfor this warm reception. I had a chance to\nI don't want to embarrass this guy, but it\nmeet with some of the organizers early on\nwas here at UCLA, on one of these ques-\nto tell them how grateful I am for this won-\ntions they ask you at these debates out of a\nderful get-together on relatively short\nclear blue sky-and they asked me: Name a\nnotice.\ncouple of contemporary heroes, or who are\nYou know, a Hispanic patriot of our hemi-\nyour heroes? I've found that in this line of\nsphere once said: \"I am America's son. To\nher I belong.\" Well, let me speak for Bar-\nwork you always get psychoanalyzed-\nbara, who regrettably is not with us here\n[laughter]-and you're stretched out on a\ntonight. I feel that we belong, for we've\ntheoretical couch for people to figure out\nspent a lot of our adult lives in-Barbara\nwhat makes you tick-that just goes with\nand I-in Texas, seeing close up, firsthand,\nthe job. But this question came out of the'\nthe strength of the Hispanic communities\nclear blue sky, and it had something to do\nthere. Hispanic values touched us: disci-\nwith your heroes. And I cited, quite proud-\npline, caring, patriotism, love of God. And\nly, Tony Fauci, who is one of the research-\nof course because of Jeb's wife, Columba,\ners and now top people at the National In-\nwe feel doubly blessed as a family because\nstitutes of Health who is doing so much in\nthe Hispanic culture is our culture, too.\nAIDS and cancer research and all of this.\nad\nAnd tomorrow I'm going to meet with\nWhat immediately came to my mind was\none of our greatest Presidents. And I'm\nJaime Escalante, who is here with us today.\nlib\ntalking about California's always-favorite\nAnd I-here he is-I told Jaime-I said,\nson and my good friend, Ronald Reagan.\n\"Look\"-I saw him later; I think it was back\nAnd I can't help recalling the words that he\nat the White House or somewhere-I said:\nonce said about Hispanic-Americans: \"Just\n\"I hope I didn't throw you into some kind\nas their forefathers sought a dream in the\nof partisan limelight there because what I\nnew world, Hispanic-Americans have real-\nreally wanted to do, though, is express my\nized their dream in our great nation and\nfeeling of contribution, my feeling of re-\nwill continue to do so. Their dedication to\nspect for the contribution that you have\nhigher purposes reflects what is best in the\nmade in this-what we're talking about\nAmerican spirit.\"\nhere today-excellence in education.\" So,\nWell, my friends, that spirit brought your\nright amongst us again is one of my genuine\nparents and your grandparents and some of\nheroes.\nyou to the United States. And they and you\nI see many business people here, people\ncame in search of a better life, and you're\nthat know what entrepreneurship means\nfinding it. And you came to build a better\nand have taken the lead in starting\nAmerica, and you're sure helping build it.\nbusinesses and building them. And you are\nAnd you're building it through family,\ncreating new jobs and cutting unemploy-\nthrough church, through love of country\nment in the process-here, California, many\nand belief in the value of hard work-you\nof you from across the country. And as\nknow, building it in the school also, a new\nAmerica's fastest growing minority in the\nspirit, I'd say, of public service that is\n21st century, you, more than ever, will help\nsweeping our educational system, from\ntell the American story. And so is the prom-\ngrade school to grad school, building it\nise that our kids will inherit a better land\nthrough excellence and through such lead-\nthan we inherited true. It is very, very\ners now as we have in Washington: Secre-\ntrue-and I'm convinced of it.\ntaries Lujan [Interior] and Cavazos [Educa-\nAnd I haven't been President very long,\n477\nApr. 25 / Administration of George Bush, 1989\nbut I remain an optimist about the United\nfamily-I will have nothing to do with any\nStates of America. The problems are big,\nFederal legislation that diminishes the\nbut we can solve them. And when I look to\nstrength of the American family. We've got\nthe values that give us the underpinning for\nto find ways to strengthen it, and I think\neverything we do in society, I come right\nI've learned a lot of that right here from\nback to the Hispanic community. And I'm\npeople in this room.\ngrateful to you.\nWe are rural and urban; native-born and\nSome people say that the younger gen-\nforeign-born; Hispanic and non-Hispanic;\neration is selfish. I don't believe this. I have\nbrown, black, white-but most of all, we are\nmuch more confidence in the young people\nAmericans. So, my plea is: Let's join our\nthan to say they're selfish. And young\nhands together, for the future is ours. And\npeople of this country hunger to return to\nas we do, please accept my thanks for this\nAmerica a measure of what America has\nwonderful occasion. I do want to have an\ngiven us all. The people in this room care\nopportunity now to come and greet as\nabout the disadvantaged, about the environ-\nmany as I possibly can. God bless you.\nment. And under this administration, we\nThank you all, and God bless the United\nare going to work together to transform our\nStates of America. Thank you very, very\ncaring into a commitment for action. Let us\nmuch.\npledge, then, not simply to knock at the\ndoor of opportunity, let's throw that door\nNote: The President spoke at 5:28 p.m. in\nwide open and keep it open! And let's re-\nthe Galleria at the James West Alumni\nmember that we are one nation under God\nCenter on the campus of the University of\nand that we honor Him with the lives we\nCalifornia at Los Angeles. In his remarks,\nlead.\nhe referred to Murray Schwartz, executive\nPeople are asking me now that you've\nvice chancellor of the university; John and\nbeen President, what are some of your\nColumba Bush, his son and daughter-in-\nand\nmajor concerns? And one for me is the dim-\nlaw; and Jaime Escalante, a calculus teacher\ninution of American family. It's more than a\nat Garfield High School in east Los Ange-\nlib\nsociological textbook kind of a concern. I\nles. Prior to his remarks, the President at-\nworry about it. And I want to say to you in\ntended a reception in the alumni center for\nthis room-because I think of the Hispanic\nleaders of the Hispanic community. Follow-\nculture in America, in the United States, is\ning his remarks, he stayed overnight at the\nfamily-oriented; strength coming from the\nFour Seasons Hotel.\nNomination of Richard L. Armitage To Be Secretary of the Army\nApril 25, 1989\nThe President today announced his inten-\nand he worked in the foreign policy office\ntion to nominate Richard L. Armitage to be\nof the Reagan Presidential campaign. Mr.\nSecretary of the Army. He would succeed\nArmitage has served as administrative assist-\nJohn O. Marsh.\nant to Senator Robert Dole of Kansas, 1978-\nMr. Armitage has served in several capac-\n1979; consultant to the Pentagon, 1975-\nities at the Department of Defense, includ-\n1976; and Naval and Marine Corps adviser\ning Assistant Secretary of Defense for Inter-\nwith the U.S. Defense Attaché Office in\nnational Security Affairs, 1983 to present,\nSaigon, 1973-1975. He is a member of the\nand Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense\nAssociation of Asian Studies and the World\nfor International Security Affairs for East\nAffairs Council.\nAsia, 1981-1983. From 1979 to 1983, Mr.\nMr. Armitage graduated from the U.S.\nArmitage established a Washington-based\nNaval Academy in 1967, where he received\nconsulting firm specializing in Asian affairs,\na commission as an ensign in the U.S. Navy.\n478\nAUSTRALIA RESEARCH\nNational Anthem, constitution\nAustralian symbols, flag\nHistory/culture/demographics of Australia from Encyclopedia,\nNational Geographic pieces, almanac, etc.\nProminent Australian-Americans\nBirthplace of Australians like Paul Hogan, Mel Gibson, Olivia\nNewton John\nAustralian musical groups\nBush went to Australia in April 1982 -- What did he do when\nhe was there? Contact Emily Mead's office\nPrime Minister Bob Hawke references in Bush speeches -- Hawk\nvisited during this administration (1989)\nAustralia was a coalition member -- what was their\ncontribution? e.g., number of planes, ships, troops,\ncasualties. (contact NSC)\nAustralian-U.S. relations -- history of\nJohnson was the only U.S. President to go to Australia -- find\nout when and copy any speeches he delivered.\nLIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG ENTRIES\nF.A. HAYEK\nITEMS 1-3 OF 74\nSET 1: BRIEF DISPLAY\nFILE: LCCC\n(ASCENDING ORDER)\n1. 54-64:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Capitalism and the\nhistorians. Chicago], University of Chicago Press, c1954]. vii, 187 p.\n20 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB501 .H39\n2. 67-18436: Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Studies in\nphilosophy, politics and economics. Chicago], University of Chicago\nPress, 19671. X, 356 P., 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HC59 .H363 1967b\n3. 68-140028:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The confusion of\nlanguage in political thought. London, Institute of Economic Affairs,\n1968. 36 P. 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: H11 .147 no. 20\n4. 70-127444:Saulnier, Raymond Joseph. Contemporary monetary theory. New York\nAMS Press, 1970, c1938J. 420 P. 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB3723 .S3 1970\n5. 70-435509: Roads to freedom: essays in honour of Friedrich A. von Hayek.\nLondon, Routledge & K. Paul, 1969. xix, 315 P. plate, illus., port, 26 cm\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .R575\n6. 72-183945:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). A tiger by the tail.\nLondon, Institute of Economic Affairs, 1972. xii, 124 P, 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB99.7 .H36\n7. 73-82488:Hayek, Friedrich A. n/(Friedrich August). The mirage of social\njustice /. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, c1976. xiv, 195 P., 23\ncm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: JC578 .H39 1976\n8. 73-166686: on rent control: essays on the economic consequences of\npolitical action to restrict rents in five countries. London, Institute\nof Economic Affairs, 1972. xvi, 79 P, 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD7287.5 V47\n9. 73-181173: Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Rules and order.\nLondon, Routledge & K. Paul, 1973]. xi, 184 P, 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: LAW\n10. 74-7272: Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Collectivist economic\nplanning. Clifton N.J.J, A. M. Kelly, 1975. V, 293 P, 23 cm.\nNOT IN LC COLLECTION\n11. 74-172773:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Economic freedom\nand representative government. London], Published for the Wincott\nFoundation by the Institute of Economic Affairs, 1973. 22 P, 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: H11 147 no. 39\n12. 74-183821:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Individualism and\neconomic order. Chicago, H. Regnery Co, 1972, c1948]. vi, 271 p, 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB34 .H3 1972\n13. 75-34747:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). A discussion with\nFriedrich A. von Hayek. Washington, American Enterprise Institute for\nPublic Policy Research, c1975. 20 p., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HC106.6 .H328\n14. 75-505285:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Die Irrtumer des\nKonstruktivismus und die Grundlagen legitimer Kritik gesellschaftlicher\nGebilde. Tubingen, Mohr, 1975. 34 P. ill., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HM24 .H42 1975\n15. 75-521367:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Prix et production /\nParis, Calmann-Levy, c1975. 199 p, 111., 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HG229 .H314\n16. 76-4073:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Preise und Produktion\n/. Wien New York, Springer-Verlag, c1976. 18, XV, 124 p, 111., 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB3723 .H3315 1976\n17. 76-8360:Essays on Hayek /. New York, New York University Press, 1976.\nxxiv, 182 P, port., 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB103. E77\n18. 76-76355:HayeK, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Profits, interest,\nand investment. New York, A. M. Kelley, 1969]. viii, 266 P, illus, 20\ncm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB3711 .H365 1969\n19. 76-95610:Roads to freedom. New York], A. M. Kelley, 1969]. xix, 315 p,\nport, 26 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .R575 1969\n20. 76-352410:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Full employment at\nany price? /. London], Institute of Economic Affairs, 1975. 52 p., 22\ncm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: H11 .147 vol. 45\n21. 76-365840:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Choice in currency.\nLondon, Institute of Economic Affairs, 1976. 11, 46 p., 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: H11 .147 no. 48\n22. 76-369703:Rent control. Vancouver, Fraser Institute, 1975. xvili, 212 P,\nill., 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD7287.5 .R42 1975\n23. 76-472506:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Geldtheorie und\nKonjunkturtheorle /,, Salzburg, Neugebauer, 1976. XV, 160 p., 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB3711 .H35 1976\n24. 76-525180:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Die Irrtumer des\nKonstruktivismus und die Grundlagen legitimer Kritik gesellschaftlicher\nGebilde. Munchen Salzburg, W. Fink, 1970. 34 P, 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HM24 .H42\n25. 77-9010:Finer, Herman. Road to reaction /. Westport, Conn, Greenwood\nPress, 1977, c1945. xii, 228 p., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD82. H38 F5 1977\n26. 77-88475:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). New studies in\nphilosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas /. Chicago,\nUniversity of Chicago Press, 1978. vii, 314 p., 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: H61 .H3366 1978\n27. 77-181817: Toward liberty. Menlo Park, Calif, Institute for Humane Studies\n19711. 2 V, port, 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: H35 .T65\n28. 77-356723:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Denationalisation\nof money, London, Institute of Economic Affairs, 1976. 107 p, ill., 22\ncm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HG230.7 .H38\n29. 77-561736:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Individualismus und\nwirtschaftliche Ordnung /. Salzburg, W. Neugebauer, 1976. 357 p., 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB34 .H33 1952\n30. 78-6366:Liberty and the rule of law /, College Station, Tex, Texas A&M\nUniversity Press, c1979. xi, 349 p., 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: K3171. A3 L5 1979\n31. 78-25905:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The political order\nof a free people /. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1979. XV, 244\np., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: JC585 .H294 1979\n32. 78-183822:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The constitution of\nliberty. Chicago, Regnery, 1972, c1960]. 569 P, 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: JC585 .H29 1972\n33. 78-311911:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). New studies in\nphilosophy, politics, economics, and the history of ideas /. London,\nRoutledge and K. Paul, 1978. vil, 314 p., 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: H61 .H3366 1978b\n34. 78-315112:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The mirage of\nsocial justice /. London etc.], Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976. XIV,\n195 p., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: JC578 .H39 1976b\n35. 78-356264:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Entnationalisierung\ndes Geldes. Tubingen, Mohr, 1977. xiii, 136 P., 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HG230.7 .H3815\n36. 78-362453:Machlup, Fritz. Wurdigung der Werke von Friedrich A. von Hayek\n/. Tubingen, Mohr, 1977. 76 p., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB103. H3 M33\n37. 78-369340:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Drei Vorlesungen\nuber Demokratie, Gerechtigkeit und Sozialismus /. Tubingen, Mohr, 1977.\n59 p., 23 cm.\nLC- CALL NUMBER: JC423 .H42\n38. 78-375237:Graf, Hans Georg. \"Muster-Voraussagen' und \"Erklarungen des\nPrinzips\" bei F. A. von Hayek. Tubingen, Mohr, 1978. 108 p., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB101. H39 G7\n39. 79-21045:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The\ncounter-revolution of science. Indianapolis, Liberty Press, 1979, c1952.\n415 P, port., 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: H61 .H33 1979\n40. 79-54089:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). A conversation with\nFriedrich A. von Hayek. Washington, American Enterprise Institute for\nPublic Policy Research, c1979. 21 p., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB95 .H388\n41. 79-77255:MII1, John Stuart. John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor, their\nfriendship and subsequent marriage. New York, A. M. Kelley, 1969]. 320\nP, illus., facsims., geneal. tables, ports, 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: B1606 .A28 1969\n42. 79-113451:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Friedrich A. Hayek,\nhonorary fellow at the Hoover Institution, speaks on the reactionary\ncharacter of the Socialist conception to the Advisory Committee of the\nDomestic Studies Program and the 1978-1979 visiting scholars, Stanford\nUniversity, October 27, 1978. Stanford, Calif.], The Institution,\nc1979] cover 1978. 11 p., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB95 H39\n43. 79-317648:Barry, Norman P. Hayek's social and economic philosophy /.\nLondon, Macmillan, 1979. xi, 228 p., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: H59. H39 B37\n4.4. 79-383885:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Wissenschaft und\nSozialismus. Tubingen, Mohr, 1979. 17 p., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HX21 H37\n45. 80-17870:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Individualism and\neconomic order /. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1980, c1948.\nvii, 271 p., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB34 .H3 1980\n46. 80-477052:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Liberalismus /.\nTubingen, Mohr, 1979. 47 p., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HM276 .H37\n47. 80-485373:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The three sources\nof human values /. London, the London School of Economics and Political\nScience, 1978. 40 p., 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: BD232 .H343\n48. 81-3284:Rent control, myths and realities. Hillside, NJ, Enslow Publishers\nc1981. xxill, 335 P. 111., 21 cm.\nNOT IN LC COLLECTION\n49. 81-102004:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Frledrich August). The road to serfdom\n/. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1980?]. xxiii, 248 p., 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H38 1980\n50. 81-134109:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). A tiger by the tail.\nSan Francisco, Calif, Cato Institute, c1979. xiv, 158 P., 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB99.7 .H363\n51. 81-183903:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Unemployment and\nmonetary policy. San Francisco, Calif, Cato Institute, c1979 (1980\nprinting). XVIII, 53 p., 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD5710 .H39 1979\n52. 81-459325: Friedrich A. von Hayek. Baden-Baden, Nomos-Verlagsgesellschaft,\n1980. 60 p., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB101. H39 F74\n53. 81-467300:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Social justice,\nsocialism & democracy. Turramurra, N.S.W, Centre for Independent Studies\n1979. 61 p., 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: JC578 .H394\n54. 82-162213:Hayek na UnB. Brasilia, DF, Editora Universidade de Brasilia,\ncom o apoio, Fundacao Roberto Marinho, c1981. 58 P. ports., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB101. H39 H39 1981\n55. 82-176256:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Frledrich August von). Law,\nlegislation, and liberty. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1982. 3 V.\nin 1, 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: JC585 .H293 1982\n56. 82-205615:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Economic progress\nin an open society /. Seoul, Korea, Korea International Economic\nInstitute, 1978. 53 p., 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H34518 1978\n57. 82-213742:Rent control, myths & realities. Vancouver, B.C., Canada,\nFraser Institute, 1981. xxili, 335 P. 11., 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD7288.82 .R45 1981b\n58. 83-12205: Conference on European Monetary Union and Currency Competition.\nCurrency competition and monetary union /. The Hague Boston, M. Nijhoff\nPublishers Hingham, MA, Distributors for the U.S. and Canada, Kluwer\nBoston, 1984. vii, 298 p., 25 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HG3894 .066 1980\n59. 83-208770:Friedrich A. von Hayek. Baden-Baden, Nomos, c1982. 68 P, ill.,\nport., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB101. H39 F74 1982\n60. 84-227:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Money, capital, and\nfluctuations. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press London, Routledge\n& Kegan Paul, 1984. XI, 196 P., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HG221 .H346 1984\n61. 84-6706:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The essence of Hayek /\nStanford, Calif, Hoover Institution Press, Stanford University, C1984.\nIxvill, 419. P. ill., 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB171 .H428 1984\n62. 85-154043:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Money, capital &\nfluctuations. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul in co-operation with London\nSchool of Economics and Political Science, 1984. xi, 196 P., 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB171 H429 1984\n63. 85-179209: The Political economy of freedom. Munchen, Philosophia Verlag,\nc1985. 320 p., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB101.H39 P65 1985\n64. 85-241337:Mestmacker, Ernst Joachim. Regelbildung und Rechtsschutz in\nmarktwirtschaftlichen Ordnungen /. Tubingen, Mohr, 1985. 35 P., 23 cm.\nLC. CALL NUMBER: K3840.Z9 M47 1985\n65. 87-17244:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Monetary nationalism\nand international stability /. Fairfield, NJ, A.M. Kelley, 1989. xiv,\n94 P., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HG221 .H345 1989\n66. 87-873565:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Der Strom der\nGuter und Leistungen /. Tubingen, Mohr, 1984. 28 P., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: MLCM 87/645 (H)\n67. 88-9694:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The fatal conceit /.\nLondon New York, Routledge New York, NY, Routledge, Chapman & Hall, 1988-.\nP. cm.\nCIP ***** NOT YET IN LC\n68. 88-10082:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The collected works\nof F.A. Hayek /. London New York, Routledge New York, NY, Routledge,\nChapman & Hall, 1988-. P. cm.\nCIP - NOT YET IN LC\n69. 88-26763:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The collected works\nof F.A. Hayek /. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1989- ,c1988-.\nV. <1 >, 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB171 .H426 1989\n70. 88-29577:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The fatal conceit.\nChicago, University of Chicago Press, 1989, c1988. xiii, 180 p., 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB171 .H426 1989 vol. 1\n71. 89-78252:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Economic freedom /.\nOxford, UK Cambridge, Mass., USA, B. Blackwell, 1991. xii, 415 p., 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB95 .H389 1990\n72. 90-4693: Thornton, Henry. An enquiry into the nature and effects of the\npaper credit of Great Britain (1802). Fairfield, NJ, A.M. Kelley, 1991.\n368 P, 11., 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HG944 T4 1991\n73. 90-158740:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). Camino de\nservidumbre /. San Jose, Costa Rica, Libro Libre, 1989. 261 p., 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H3817 1989\n74. 91-26840:Hayek, Friedrich A. von/(Friedrich August). The fortunes of\nliberalism. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1992. P. cm.\nCIP ==== NOT YET IN LC\n1. ggg13-50000:Hayek, Friedrich August von. La route de la servitude. Paris\n7\nLibrairie de Medicis, 1945]. 179 p. 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H3815\n2. 11120-300000:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Der Wettbewerb als\nEntdeckungsverfahren, Kiel, 1968. 20 p, 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD41 .H35\n3. 30-20692: Hayek, Friedrich August von. Geldtheorie und konjunkturtheorie,\nWien/Leipzig, Holder-Pichler-Tempsky a. g, 1929. xii, 147, 2J P, 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB3711 .H35\n4., 131-163:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Priese und produktion, Wien, J.\nSpringer, 1931. XV, 124 P, incl. diagrs, 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB3723 .H35\n5. 32-641: Hayek, Friedrich August von. Prices and production, London, G.\nRoutledge & sons, ltd, 1931. XV, 112 P, diagrs, 19 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HG229 .H3\n6. 32-4460 Weiser, Friedrich. Gesammelte abhandlungen; Tubingen, J. C. B.\nMohr, 1929. xxxiv p., 1 1, 404 P. front. (port. ), 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB43 .W5\n7. 33-15796: Hayek, Friedrich August von. Monetary theory and the trade cycle,\nNew York, Harcourt, Brace & CO., Inc, 1933]. 244 P, 20 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB3711 .H36\n8. 33-23480:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Beitrage zur geldtheorie, Wien,\nJ. Springer, 1933. ix p., 1 1, 511, 1] p. diagr, 25 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HG221 .H34\n9. 35-7185: Hayek, Friedrich August von. Collectivist economic planning;\nLondon, G. Routledge & sons, ltd, 1935. V, 293 P. diagrs, 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H345\n10. 35-7782: Hayek, Friedrich August von. Prices and production, London, G.\nRoutledge & sons, ltd, 1935]. xiv, 162 P, diagrs, 19 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HG229 .H3 1935\n11. 38-17803:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Monetary nationalism and\ninternational stability, London New York etc.], Longmans, Green and CO\n, 1937. 4 p.1., xi]-xiv P, 1 1,, 94 P. 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HG221 .H345\n12. 39-4889 Saulnier, Raymond Joseph. Contemporary monetary theory; New\nYork, Columbia university press, 1938. 420 P, 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: H31 .07 no. 443\n13. 39-10703:Saulnier, Raymond Joseph. Contemporary monetary theory; New\nYork, 1938. 2 P, 1., 7-420 p., 1 1, 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB3723 .S3 1938\n14. 39-19735:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Freedom and the economic system\nChicago, Ill, The University of Chicago press, 1939]. iv, 37, 1] p, 20\ncm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H35\n15. 40-6253:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Monetary nationalism and\ninternational stability, London New York etc.], Longmans, Green and CO\n') 1939. 4 p.l., xi]-xiv P. 1 1., 94 p. 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HG221 H345 1939\n16. 40-8258: Hayek, Friedrich August von. Profits, interest and investment,\nand other essays on the theory of industrial fluctuations, London, G.\nRoutledge and sons, ltd, 1939]. vili, 266 p, diagrs, 19 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB3711 .H365\n17. 40-10999: Thornton, Henry. An enquiry into the nature and effects of the\npaper credit of Great Britain (1802) London, G. Allen & Unwin ltd,\n1939]. 368 p, incl. front. (port.), 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HG944 T4 1939\n18. 40-36089: Sangines Villalva, Estela. Aspecto monetario de la toeria de\nHayek Mexico, D. F, 1939. p. cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HG221 .S26\n19. a41-2540:Hayek, Friedrich August von. The pure theory of capital,\nLondon, Macmillan and CO., limited, 1941. xxxi, 454 P, diagrs, 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB501 .H392\n20. 41-17893: Hayek, Friedrich August von. L'economie dirigee en regime\ncollectiviste; Paris, Librairie de Medicis, 1939]. 2 p, 1.,\n7J-303, 1] P. diagrs, 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H3452\n21. 42-25826:Mil1, John Stuart. The spirit of the age : Chicago, Ill, The\nUniversity of Chicago press, 1942]. xxxiii, 93, 1] p. 20 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HM51 .M5\n22. a44-4381 Hayek, Friedrich August von. The road to serfdom, Chicago,\nUniversity of Chicago press, 19441. xi, 250 P. 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H38 1944a\n23. 44-4911:Hayek, Friedrich August von. The road to serfdom, London, G.\nRoutledge & sons ltd, 19441. viii, 184 P. 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H38 1944\n24. 45-9861:Finer, Herman. Road to reaction, Boston, Little, Brown, and\ncompany, 1945. xii p., 1 1, 228 P, 19 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD82. H38 F5\n25. 45-16927: Press research, inc., Washington, D.C. Planning vs. freedom\nWashington], Press research, inc, c1945. 1 p.l., 9 numb. 1, 30 X 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD82. H382 P7\n26. 46-21427 Hayek, Friedrich August von. Individualism: true and false.\nDublin, Hodges, Figgis & CO., ltd.; etc., etc.], 1946. 38 P. 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: B824 .H3\n27. 46-40423: Kamp, Mathias Ernst. Die geldliche wechsellagenlehre. Jena, G.\nFischer, 1939. X, 143, 1] P. 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HG3751 .K3 1939a\n28. 47-15211:Bogliolo, Romulo. Socialismo, libertad, direccion. Buenos\nAires, La Vanguardia], 1946. 3 p.l., 9-124 p, 2 1, 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD85 .B62\n29. 47-25907 Finer, Herman. Road to reaction. \" London, D. Dobson, 1946].\n131 P, 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD82. H38 F5 1946\n30. 48-4149:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Individualism and economic order.\nChicago], Univ. of Chicago Press, 1948]. vii, 271 P, 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB34 .H3\n31. 48-4321:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Pianificazione economica\ncollettivistica. Torino], G. Einaudi, 1946. xxi, 235 p, 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H3454\n32. 48-28090:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Camino de servidumbre; Madrid,\nEditorial Revista de Derecho Privado, 1946]. 245 p. port, 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H3817\n33. 49-26396:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Individualism and economic order.\n=\nLondon], Routledge & K. Paul, 1949]. vii, 271 P. 22 CM.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB34 .H3 1949\n34. 50-25759:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Vejen til traeldom; Kobenhavn,\nGyldendal, 1946. 263 p. 21 cm.\nLC.CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H3612\n35. 52-614:MII1, John Stuart. John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor. London,\nRoutledge & K. Paul, 1951]. 320 p, ports., facsim, 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: B1606 .A28\n36. 52-8157:Hayek, Friedrich August von. The counter-revolution of science;\nGlencoe, Ill, Free Press, 1952]. 255 P. 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: H61 .H33\n37. 52-14469:Hayek, Friedrich August von. The sensory order. Chicago,\nUniversity of Chicago Press, 1952]. xxii, 209 p, 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: BF233 .H35\n38. 52-34259:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Societe liberale ou\ncollectivisme totalitaire, d'apres \"La route de la servitude.\" Paris,\nP. Lhoste-Lachaume, 1945?]. 63 p, 25 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD82 .H3815 1945a\n39. 52-68426: Hayek, Friedrich August von. Individualismus und wirtschaftliche\nOrdnung. Erlenbach-Zurich, E. Rentsch, 1952]. 344 p. 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB34 .H33\n40. 53-21448:Hayek, Friedrich August von. The sensory order. London,\nRoutledge & Paul, 1952J. 209 P. 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: BF181 .H385\n41. 56-26965:Hayek, Friedrich August von. The political ideal of the rule of\nlaw. Cairo, 1955. 60 P, 25 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: LAW <General Law \"Haye\">\n42. 58-29413:Brell, Karl Heinz. Zur Problematik der progressiven\nEinkommensbesteuerung Karlsruhe], 1957. 173 P, illus, 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HJ4629.H3 B7\n43. 59-11618:HayeK, Friedrich August von. The constitution of liberty.\nChicago], Univeristy of Chicago Press, 19601. X, 569 P. 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: JC585 .H29\n44. a60-5368:Fabbrini, Luigi. Istanze statiche ed istanze evolutive nella\nmodellistica contemporanea: Leontief, Hayek, post-keyneslani. Bologna]\n, Cappelli, 1959]. 172 P, 25 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB177 .F25\n45. 61-59726:Seldon, Arthur. Agenda for a free society; London, Published\nfor the Institute of Economic Affairs by Hutchinson, 19611. P. cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: JC585 S46\n46. 63-18476:Finer, Herman. Road to reaction. Chicago, Quadrangle Books,\n1963]. xxvill, 228 P, 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HE82. H38 F5 1963\n47. a64-489:Hayek, Frierich August von. Rules, perception, and\nintelligibility, London, n.d.]. p. 321]-344. 26 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: AS122 .L5 vol. 48\n48. 64-7666:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Monetary nationalism and\ninternational stability, New York, A. M. Kelley, bookseller, 1964.\nxiv, 94 p. 22 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HG221 .H345 1964\n49. 64-30916:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Los sindicatos y la ocupacion\nobrera. Buenos Aires, Centro de Estudios sobre la Libertad, 1961. 52 p\n20 cm.,\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD6511 .H34\n50. 64-43358:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Wirtschaft. Freiburg im Breisgau,\nH. F. Schulz, 1963. 24 P, 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB71 H44\n51. 66-22629:Hayek, Fr iedrich August von. Monetary theory and the trade\ncycle, New York, A. M. Kelley, 1966. 244 p, 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB3711 .H36 1966\n52. c67-634:Hal-yeh-k'o han t'a ti SSU hsiang. 1965]. 2, 11, 1, 235 p.\nport, 19 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB103. H3 H3 (Orien China)\n53. 67-19586:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Prices and production, New York,\nA. M. Kelley, 1967]. xiv, 162 P, illus, 20 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HG229 H3 1967\n54. 73-303125:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Die Theorie komplexer Phanomene,\nTubingen, Mohr, 1972. 38 P. 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: Q175 .H3615\n55. 74-429800:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Freiburger Studien; Tubingen,\nMohr, 1969. 284 p, 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB175 .H425\n56. 76-378935:Hayek, Friedrich August von. L'abuso della ragione. Firenze,\nVallecchi, 1967. p. cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: H61 H336\n57. 77-842762:Chou, Te-wei. Tang tal ta ssu hsiang chia Hai-yeh-k'o hsueh\nshou tsung shu. 5 64 1975]. 5, 4, 661 p., 2] leaves of plates,\n:\nports., 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HB103. H3 C46 (Orien China)\n58. 78-885166:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Die Verfassung der Freiheit,\nTubingen, Mohr, 1971. XVI, 530 P, 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: JC585 .H2915\n59. 79-287279:Hayek, Friedrich August von. De zin van de concurrentie\n=\nBussum], Comite ter Bestudering van Ordeningsvraagstukken, 195-?]. 16\nP. 21 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HF1436 .H3612\n60. 79-456420:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Der Wettbewerb als\nEntdeckungsverfahren, Kiel, 1968. 20 P. 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HD41 H35\n61. unk82-5290:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Drei Vorlesungen uber\nDemokratie, Tubingen: Mohr, 1977. 59 p, \" 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: JC423 H42\n62. unk82-12911:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Entnationalisierung des Geldes\nTubingen : Mohr, 1977. xiii, 136 P. 24 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: HG230.7 .H3815\n63. unk82-63348:Hayek, Friedrich August von. The mirage of social justice \"\nLondon etc.], : Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1976. xiv, 195 P, 4 23 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: JC578 .H39 1976b\n64. unk82-74179: (IS NOT IN FILE OR FILE IS NOT CURRENTLY AVAILABLE).\n65. 82-800611:Hayek, Friedrich August von. Shizen jinrui bummei. 1979.\n205 P. : ports., 19 cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: CB19 .H39\n66. unk84-228051:Hayek, F. A. Von. La planificacion y el estado de derecho.\nCordoba, Republica Argentina, Imprenta da la Universidad, 1943. 20 p, cm.\nLC CALL NUMBER: LAW <General Law \"Haye\">\n67. unk85-57624:Hayek, F. A. The Political ideal of the Rule of law, National\nBank of Egypt Fiftieth Anniversary commemoration lectures. Cairo, 1955.\n60 P. and, notes cm.\nLC. CALL NUMBER: LAW <Egypt 7 Haye 1955>\n89-532 GOV\nCRS Report for Congress\nHispanic Heritage in the United States:\nTradition, Achievement, and Aspiration\nThomas H. Neale\nAnalyst in American National Government Division\nGovernment Division\n#\nAugust 28, 1989\n........\nRevised September 27, 1989\nCRS\nCongressional. Research Service . The Library of Congress\nCRS-13\nRepublic National Bank, serving the Cuban American community, has grown\nto be among the largest financial institutions in populous Dade County.\nContinued growth of America's Hispanic population has led to a parallel\nincrease in efforts by producers and advertisers to appeal to this vital part of\nthe national market. Hispanic Business magazine reports that Hispanics will\nspend more than $140 billion in 1989, a figure larger than the gross national\nproduct of many nations. Advertising firms such as Sosa and Associates of\nSan Antonio are directing many of the campaigns now being developed to\nattract Hispanic patronage.\nCoca Cola, whose chief executive officer Roberto Goizueta, is Cuban born,\nrecently announced a three year program, leading to the 500th anniversary of\nColumbus' first voyage, which will highlight Hispanic contributions to\nAmerican life. Miller Brewing Company has also begun efforts to increase its\ninvolvement with the Hispanic community, including sponsorship of a major\nexhibit, \"Images of the Mexican Revolution\", at the Fort Worth Museum of\nScience and History.\nThe growth and maturity of the Hispanic American market and business\ncommunity are unmistakable. As a study sponsored by the U.S. Chamber of\nCommerce recently noted, \"quietly, steadily, Hispanic-Americans are on the\nmove, building businesses, making jobs, creating wealth. They have proved\nthemselves [people] with talent and drive, and a taste for success. They show\nevery indication of being a stimulus to the economy in the coming decades and\na vital resource for growth.\"\nPublic Service\nSometimes the life of a single person can provide an example for an\nentire people. Such was the career in public service of Dennis Chávez. In\n1916, the 28 year old New Mexican arrived in Washington to work as an\ninterpreter for U.S. Senator Andrieus A. Jones. Dennis Chávez had been born\nin poverty to a proud family which had worked the land in New Mexico since\nthe 16th century. Forced to abandon school at the age of 13, he worked 80\nhours a week as a teamster and stable hand, while still finding time at night\nto study surveying and engineering. Young Chávez caught the attention of\nSenator Jones, who asked him to join his staff to interpret for his Spanish\nspeaking constituents and translate their letters into English.\nMoving to Washington, Chávez supported his wife and family on Capitol\nHill, while studying law at night at Georgetown University Law School.\nAdmitted to the Bar in 1920, he returned to Albuquerque, where he opened\na successful practice as one of the few Hispanic American attorneys in New\nMexico. Elected to the State Legislature in 1923, and the U.S. House of\nRepresentatives in 1930, he was appointed to the Senate in 1935 to fill the\nvacancy created by the death of Senator Brunson Cutting.\nCRS-14\nDennis Chávez won election in his own right in 1936, and was reelected\nby wide margins for four additional six year terms. During his 26 years in\nthe Senate, Dennis Chávez never forgot the people of New Mexico. He was\na tireless fighter for equal rights and a strong supporter of Federal legislation\nin the areas of public health, welfare, education, and housing. During the\nMcCarthy era, he was one of the first Senators to speak out against\nintolerance and the reckless charges of \"red baiters.\" By the time of his death\nin 1962, Senator Chávez was fourth in seniority in the Senate, and Chairman\nof the powerful Committee on Public Works. He was succeeded in the Senate\nby fellow Hispanic American Joseph Montoya. In 1966, his native New Mexico\nhonored Dennis Chávez when his statue was placed in the U.S. Capitol.\nDennis Chávez was not the first Hispanic to be elected to either House\nof Congress. Those honors belong to Joseph Hernandez, who served as a\nDelegate from the Territory of Florida in the 17th Congress (1822-1823), and\nOctaviano Larrazolo, of New Mexico, who served in the Senate in 1928 and\n1929. But, by his distinguished achievements and length of service, Chavez\nwas a trailblazer for the many who have followed.\nThe past 25 years have seen remarkable growth in the number of\nHispanics holding public office, elective and appointive, throughout the United\nStates.\nIn Congress, the Hispanic Caucus was formed in 1976 as a bi-partisan\ngroup dedicated to the advancement of Hispanic Americans in the United\nStates and its territories and associated areas through promotion of public\npolicy initiatives and legislation. Members of the Hispanic Caucus in the\n101st Congress include Representatives Albert G. Bustamente, Kika de la\nGarza, Henry Gonzalez, and Solomon Ortiz of Texas, Matthew Martinez,\nEdward G. Roybal, and Esteban E. Torres of California, Bill Richardson of\nNew Mexico, Robert Garcia of New York, Delegates Ben Blaz of Guam and\nRon de Lugo of the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rican Resident\nCommissioner Jaime B. Fuster. Hispanic American representation in the\nHouse increased in 1989 with the election of Illeana Ros Lehtinen in Florida.\nRecently a veteran Florida legislator, Representative Ros Lehtinen, became the\nfirst Cuban American to win a seat in Congress.\nThe Bush Cabinet also reflects the growing influence of Hispanic\nAmericans in Washington. Secretary of Education Lauro Cavazos was one of\nthe few officers of the Reagan Cabinet asked to serve in the Bush\nAdministration. Cavazos is a sixth-generation Texan, proud of his Mexican\nAmerican heritage. After completing his studies, he was a professor of\nAnatomy, and later Dean at the Tufts University School of Medicine in\nBoston. In 1980, the Secretary was named President of Texas Tech\nUniversity, where he served with distinction until nominated by President\nReagan in 1988.\nCRS-15\nHe has been joined in the Cabinet by Manuel Lujan, Jr., who had scarcely\nretired from the House of Representatives after a 20 year career, when\nPresident Bush tapped him for the office of Secretary of Interior. As the first,\nand thus far, the only Hispanic American Republican to sit in the House, he\nserved as ranking Republican on the Committees on Interior and Insular\nAffairs, and Science, Space, and Technology.\nThe nation's State and local governments have also begun to reflect the\ngrowing importance of Hispanic Americans in public service. Mexican\nAmerican Toney Anaya was elected to a four year term as Governor of New\nMexico in 1982. Four years later, in 1986, Bob Martinez became the first\nelected Hispanic American Governor of Florida.\nFederico Pena came to Colorado from his native El Paso to practice law\nin 1972. Within six years, he was elected to the Colorado Legislature, in\n1978, and only five years later he was elected Mayor of Denver. Henry\nCisneros stepped down as Mayor of his native San Antonio in 1989. Only 29\nwhen he was elected to the City Council in 1975, he was elected Mayor in\n1981, the first Mexican American to hold the office since 1842. In 1985, 36-\nyear-old Xavier Suarez, Cuban born and Harvard educated, was elected Mayor\nof Miami, replacing fellow Hispanic Maurice Ferre, who had held the job since\n1973.\nEach of these individuals gained national respect and attention for their\npolitical and administrative abilities. They exemplify the future promise of\nHispanic Americans in public service; but they are only representative of the\never growing number of Hispanic American public officials in the United\nStates.\nIn 1986, the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed\nOfficials (NALEO) identified 3,202 Hispanic elected office holders throughout\nthe United States. The majority of these are located in the Southwest,\nreflecting the large population of Hispanic Americans, and the long-standing\nHispanic tradition in such States as California, New Mexico, and Texas.\nMoreover, 15 percent of these elected public servants were women, as\ncompared with a national average of 9 percent women in elected office.\nEven these thousands of elected officials fail to provide a full picture of\nthe powerful and growing commitment to public service among Hispanic\nAmericans. They include numerous of dedicated teachers, administrators,\nsocial workers, and law enforcement officials.\nThe scope of public service extends to many professions: education, the\nlaw, labor, and others. In each of these fields, there is a growing record of\nHispanic achievement.\nArmando Rodriguez was born in Mexico, but settled in San Diego with\nhis family as a child. Following military service in World War II, he obtained\nCRS-16\nBachelor's and Master's degrees at San Diego State, and began a 20 year\ncareer as a classroom teacher and administrator. As Assistant Commissioner\nof Education in the former U.S. Office of Education, he was one of the\nmotivating forces behind Federal sponsorship of and support for bilingual\neducation programs.\nMari-Luci Jamarillo worked her way through college at New Mexico\nHighlands University, graduating in 1955, and later served as an administrator\nin Latin American education programs at her alma mater. During this period,\nthe U.S. Agency for International Development called on her expertise as a\nconsultant in education, sending her to represent the United States in 21\nnations around the world. In 1977, she was appointed by President Jimmy\nCarter, and confirmed by the Senate, as Ambassador to Honduras, the first\nwoman ambassador of Hispanic descent.\nRaul Castro pursued a career that included education, the law, diplomacy,\nand politics. Born in Mexico, he received a degree in education at Arizona\nState College in 1939. After teaching in the public schools of Tuscon, he was\nemployed by the U.S. Department of State for five years in Mexico. Returning\nto Arizona in 1946, he taught at the University of Arizona while studying law.\nCastro practiced law and served, successively, as Pima County Attorney and\nState Supreme Court Judge until 1964, when he was appointed by President\nLyndon Johnson as Ambassador, first to El Salvador, and then to Bolivia. In\n1974, he was elected governor of Arizona, and completed his remarkable career\nin public service as Ambassador to Argentina from 1977 to 1980.\nOne of the most charismatic figures in the struggle for social justice for\nHispanic Americans has been Cesar Chavez. His efforts to improve working\nconditions for migrant labor have aroused the conscience of the Nation.\nChavez was born in a family of migrant farm workers, and attended 30\ndifferent schools before dropping out after seventh grade to help support his\nfamily. After years as a farm worker, he joined the movement to organize\nmigrant labor. In 1966, his National Farm Workers Association merged with\nanother union to form the United Farm Workers Organizing Committee\n(UFWOC). Using only non-violent tactics, Chavez negotiated contracts with\nthe major California wine grape growers, and led an effective nationwide\nboycott of table grapes when the table grape growers failed to bargain in good\nfaith. After a two year struggle, table grape growers negotiated contracts with\nUFWOC in 1970. Since then, Cesar Chavez has continued the struggle to\nsecure decent wages and working conditions in California's huge vegetable\ngrowing industry. He is a major figure in the history of the American labor\nmovement.\nASPIRATIONS\nThis review of the Hispanic experience in the United States provides\nselected highlights of Latino tradition and achievement. For every struggle\n09. 13.91 10:34 AM *OFC OF ASST SECT-ETA P02\nThat human Institutions require periodic redesign, If\nonly because of their tendency to decay, is not a\nminor fact about them, nor easily overlooked. Taken\nthe span of history, there is no more Important lesson\nto be learned.\nHow curious then in all this history, with all the\nImmensely varied principles on which society has\nbeen designed and operated, no people have\ntol-o of 1\nseriously attempted to take Into account the aging of\nInstitutions and to provide for their continuous\nrenewal. Why should we not be the first to do so.\n- John W. Gardner -\nWHITE HOUSE INITIATIVE:\nHISPANIC EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION\nMary Dube sonders\npres. xx Personnel\nCASE STATEMENT\nHisson pop. a to\nin\nwhich need we to invest-\nY most\nthe\nmonort\nto\nSeptember 1991\nGirft\nfree porticipation\nexicl her woul limiguents\narium of mish) work.\n09. 13. 91 10:34 AM *OFC OF ASST SECT-ETA P03\nEDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE FOR HISPANIC AMERICANS\nTHE CASE STATEMENT\nMISSION: TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S CAPACITY TO PROVIDE QUALITY\nEDUCATION TO HISPANIC AMERICANS CONSISTENT WITH THE\nAMERICA 2000 GOALS.\nCRITICAL ISSUES\nThe Workforce Crisis - America is facing a workforce crisis. Education\nand demographics are basic to its resolution. The American workforce is:\n-- Growing more slowly;\n-- Aging (average age 36; 40 by the year 2000);\n-- Education requirements for jobs are getting greater and the less\nskilled jobs are shrinking;\n-- In need of workers who are more educated.\nThe Untapped Workforce: Hispanics -- -- Hispanics are the youngest and\nfastest growing minority. By the year 2000, Hispanics will:\n-- Constitute 33% of the net growth of the workforce;\n-- Comprise 10% of the total U.S. workforce;\n-- Be younger, (36) while the total workforce will be older.\nThe Hispanic Crisis At a time when Hispanics are the fastest growing\nand youngest minority in America, their wages and school completion\nrates are lower than any other ethnic group. They have the fastest growing\npoverty rate.\nAmerica's Choice - We can either invest in the education and training of\nHispanics and Increase productivity of our workforce today or relegate\nthem to tomorrow's poverty pool.\nTHE CHOICE IS OURS!\nlastyp. sired\nefe i order\nbelowe 46\ncrub\nech para\n09. 13. 91 10:34 AM *OFC OF ASST SECT-ETA P05\nDraft Discussion Only\nTHE WHITE HOUSE INITIATIVE:\nEDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE FOR HISPANIC AMERICANS\nMISSION, GOALS AND STRATEGY\nMISSION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S CAPACITY TO PROVIDE QUALITY\nEDUCATION TO HISPANIC AMERICANS CONSISTENT WITH THE\nAMERICA 2000 GOALS.\nTHE PROBLEM\nAmerica's workforce is shrinking, aging and losing its competitive edge. If\nwe are to revitalize our workforce, we must invest in that new source of\nworkers -- Hispanics. They are the youngest and fastest growing portion\nof the new workforce, yet we are losing them because they lack the\neducation, training and resources needed to participate in today's complex\nworkplace. Their main problem is opportunity, not motivation.\nEducation, Wages. Poverty-- While certain segments of the Hispanic\npopulation are progressing, the current trend shows that a growing\nnumber have less education, earn lower wages and show a higher increase\nin poverty than Blacks or whites:\nDropout: Hispanic youth have a higher school dropout rate -- 40+%, as\ncompared to 18% for Blacks and 14% for whites;\n- School Readiness: Hispanics are less likely to participate in\npreschool programs and more likely to repeat grade levels than their\nwhite cohorts;\n- Student Achievement: Hispanics consistently score below whites in\nall measures of academic achievement;\n- Post Secondary: Hispanics have the lowest participation rates. In\n1989, 28.7% were Hispanic compared to 30.8% for Black and 38.8%\nfor whites.\n- Adult Workers: Hispanic male workers have less education than Black\nor white males: (1980) 10.2 Hispanic, 11.7 Black, 12.9 white.\n- Wages: In 1990 Hispanic men earned less weekly wages ($322)than\nBlacks ($360) or whites ($497). The same occurred for Hispanic\nwomen ($280) as compared to Blacks ($308), and whites ($355).\n09. 13. 91 10:34 AM *OFC OF ASST SECT-ETA PO6\nDraft Discussion Only\n- Dead End Jobs: Hispanics occupy and stay in the lowest paying jobs\nwhich are more susceptable to economic downturns, are temporary\nand have few benefits.\n- Farmworkers: There are approximately 3-4 million farmworkers of\nwhich 80% are Hispanic who, in many instances, their income is\nbelow the poverty level.\n- Immigration: There are approximately 3.5 million people in the\nImmigration, Reform and Control Act (IRCA) pool waiting to become\ncitizens; 90% are Hispanic of which 80% are Mexican. Approximately\n1.2 million are farmworkers.\n- Children in Poverty: Between 1979 and 1989, the number of poor\nHispanic children grew faster than any other ethnic group -- 1/2 of\nthe new children in poverty are Hispanic. One out of three Hispanic\nchildren lives in poverty.\nGOALS AND STRATEGY\nThe White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanics will be\nan integral part of the America 2000 Strategy and adopt the following\ngoals:\nGOAL #1. National Advisory Commission -- Establish a National Advisory\nCommission by September 1991, which will advise the Secretary\nof Education as to how effectively all federal agencies are\nmeeting the educational needs of Hispanics consistent with the\nPresident's Executive Order .\nGOAL *2 Accountability -- Establish performance standards for all\nfederal programs by March 1992 which will assist the Secretary\nin reporting progress in fulfilling the intent of the Executive\nOrder.\n09. 13. 91 10:34 AM *OFC OF ASST SECT-ETA P07\nDraft Discussion Only\nGOAL #3. Innovation -- Establish innovative programs In areas where\nthere is a high concentration of Hispanics with low income and\nfocus on:\n-- Enhancing parental involvement\n-- Promoting early childhood education\n-- Removing barriers to success in education and work,\nparticularly limited proficiency in the English language\n-- Helping students to achieve their potential at all\neducational levels\nGOAL #4. Life-long Learning -- Support innovative approaches in the\npublic and private sector which will provide for continuous\nskill upgrading for Hispanics.\nGOAL *5. Community Empowerment -- Develop the diverse leadership in\ncommunities which will adopt and implement the \"America\n2000 Communities\" campaign.\n---\n09. 13. 91 10:34 AM *OFC OF ASST SECT-ETA P 0 4\nTHE STRATEGY: THE HISPANIC INITIATIVE WILL BE AN INTEGRAL PART OF\nTHE \"AMERICA 2000 EDUCATIONAL STRATEGY\" WHICH\nCALLS FOR:\n- ACCOUNTABILITY\n- INNOVATION\n- LIFE LONG LEARNING\n- COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT\nBasic Premises\n-- Hispanic Education: A workforce Investment - The Hispanic\npopulation should be viewed as one of our most valuable untapped\nresources in raising the productivity of the American workforce.\n-- Education is key in improving economic opportunities for Hispanics.\n-- Institutional Renewal= America 2000 -- There is a need to renew our\ninstitutions so they are flexible and responsive to the rapid change\nour society is experiencing and accountable to their respective\ncommunities.\n-- Family and Community - Education should be viewed as both a family\nproblem which requires a family solution as well as a community\nproblem which requires a community solution.\nA commitment to family and community are two important values\nwithin the Hispanic sub-cultures which should be mobilized.\n-- Empowerment -- The empowerment of people begins with having\nexpectations in their ability to be masters of their destiny. It starts\nby doing things \"with people, not for them\". If we are to be successful\nin renewing our educational institutions, we must involve the\nHispanic community from the beginning in the planning and the\nimplementation of our educational strategy.\n---\nTo Bob\nDate TUES\nTime 7:50 PM\nWHILE YOU WERE OUT\nM VERO NICA\nof\nus Hispanic Chamba\nPhone\nArea Code\nNumber\nExtension\nTELEPHONED\nX\nPLEASE CALL\nCALLED TO SEE YOU\nWILL CALL AGAIN\nWANTS TO SEE YOU\nURGENT\nRETURNED YOUR CALL\nMessage POTUS can't\nmention the National\nBusiness winne,\nit late will be divulged\nJAG\nOperator\nAMPAD\nEFFICIENCY®\n23-023 CARBONLESS\nAdministration of George Bush, 1990 / June 27\nNomination of George F. Murphy, Jr.,\nquerque to ensure the protection of serious-\nTo Be Inspector General of the United\nly threatened ancient Pueblo Indian and\nStates Information Agency\nSpanish rock art. Cost sharing will be an\nJune 27, 1990\nimportant component of the success of this\njoint effort, and I look forward to a success-\nThe President today announced his inten-\nful partnership.\ntion to nominate George F. Murphy, Jr., to\nS. 286 also will expand the existing 365-\nbe Inspector General of the U.S. Informa-\nacre Pecos National Monument into the\ntion Agency. He would succeed Anthony J.\n5,865-acre Pecos National Historical Park.\nGabriel.\nThis will allow for expanded protection and\nSince 1988 Mr. Murphy has served as\nrecreation programs in an area rich in cul-\nDeputy Director for the U.S. Arms Control\ntural resources.\nand Disarmament Agency in Washington,\nI wholeheartedly support the measures\nDC. Prior to this, he served as a consultant\ncontained in S. 286 because they will\nto the nuclear industry, 1986-1987; director\nensure the protection of rich natural and\nof the Senate National Security Office,\ncultural resources within the State of New\n1977-1986; executive director of the Joint\nMexico that are now seriously threatened.\nCommittee on Atomic Energy, 1975-1977;\ndeputy director of the Joint Committee on\nGeorge Bush\nAtomic Energy, 1968-1975; and a profes-\nThe White House,\nsional staff member on the Joint Committee\nJune 27, 1990.\non Atomic Energy, 1958-1968. In addition,\nMr. Murphy worked for the Central Intelli-\ngence Agency, 1950-1958.\nNote: S. 286, approved June 27, was as-\nMr. Murphy graduated from Harvard\nsigned Public Law No. 101-313.\nCollege (A.B., 1949). He was born May 1,\n1924, in Boston, MA. Mr. Murphy served in\nthe U.S. Army Air Corps, 1942-1946. He is\nmarried, has two children, and resides in\nRemarks Announcing the Enterprise for\nBethesda, MD.\nthe Americas Initiative\nJune 27, 1990\nThank you all very much for coming to\nStatement on Signing a Bill Protecting\nthe White House, and it is my pleasure to\nNatural and Cultural Resources in\nwelcome so many distinguished guests with\nNew Mexico\nsuch strong interests in the vital Latin\nJune 27, 1990\nAmerican and Caribbean region. Let me\nrecognize the many members of the diplo-\nI take great pleasure in signing into law\nmatic corps that are here and extend to you\nS. 286, an Act to establish the Petroglyph\na warm welcome-from Latin America,\nNational Monument and the Pecos National\nparticularly, and the Caribbean, Europe,\nHistorical Park in New Mexico, and to re-\nJapan. Members of our Cabinet-Nick\nsolve various New Mexico land issues.\nBrady and Secretary Baker, Carla Hills, Sec-\nWest of Albuquerque, New Mexico, the\nretary Mosbacher-delighted you're here.\nmajor landscape feature is the West Mesa,\nChairman of the Council of Economic Ad-\nmarked by a 17-mile long basalt escarpment\nvisers, Mike Boskin, is here. Bill Webster,\nand five volcanic cones. Within the area are\nwelcome. And of course, we're delighted to\nan estimated 15,000 to 17,000 petroglyphs,\nsee Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the Fed-\nwhich are designs carved or pecked into\neral Reserve Board, here and then an old\nthe rock. Establishment of the Petroglyph\nfriend, Barber Conable, of the World Bank,\nNational Monument will provide an excel-\nand Richard Erb, from the IMF. And Ricky\nlent opportunity to form a strong partner-\nIglesias, an old friend of the Bushes, and we\nship among the Federal Government, the\nwelcome him, of the IDB, and so many\nState of New Mexico, and the City of Albu-\nleading lights in the business and financial\n1009\nJune 27 / Administration of George Bush, 1990\ncommunities. To all of you, then, a wel-\ning convinced that the U.S. must review its\ntalks, I pl\ncome.\napproach not only to that region but to\nnations of\nIn the past 12 months, every one of us,\nLatin America and the Caribbean as a\ncompletio:\nfrom the man in the White House to the\nwhole. And I asked Treasury Secretary\nthe most\nman on the street, has been fascinated by\nBrady to lead a review of U.S. economic\nterm trad\nthe tremendous changes, the positive\npolicy towards this vital region, to make a\nthe increa\nchanges, taking place around the world.\nfresh assessment, if you will, of the prob-\ninto the o\nFreedom has made great gains not just in\nlems and opportunities we'll encounter in\naim in the\nEastern Europe but right here in the Amer-\nthe decade ahead. And that review is now\ntrade, and\nicas; and we've seen a resurgence of demo-\ncomplete, and the results are in, and the\ning to stre\ncratic rule, a rising tide of democracy,\nneed for new economic initiatives is clear\nexpand th\nnever before witnessed in the history of this\nand compelling.\nagreed ru\nbeloved hemisphere. And with one excep-\nAll signs point to the fact that we must\ncommitme\ntion, Cuba, the transition to democracy is\nshift the focus of our economic interaction\nAmerica a\nmoving towards completion, and we can all\ntowards a new economic partnership be-\ndeeper ta\nsense the excitement that the day is not far\ncause prosperity in our hemisphere de-\nproducts 0\noff when Cuba joins the ranks of world de-\npends on trade, not aid. And I've asked you\nSecond,\nmocracies and makes the Americas fully\nhere today to share with you some of the\nsee toward\nfree.\nWith one exception, that's the case. But\nideas, some of the ways we can build a\nmate aim\nthe political transformation sweeping the\nbroad-based partnership for the nineties-to\nof the Am\nrest of Latin America and the Caribbean\nannounce the new Enterprise for the Amer-\nAnd we lo\nicas Initiative that creates incentives to re-\nonly are t\nhas its parallel in the economic sphere.\ninforce Latin America's growing recogni-\ndemocratic\nThroughout the region, nations are turning\naway from the statist economic policies that\ntion that free-market reform is the key to\nequal parti\nstifle growth and are now looking to the\nsustained growth and political stability.\ning from\nTierra del\npower of the free market to help this hemi-\nThe three pillars of our new initiative are\nI'm anno\nsphere realize its untapped potential for\ntrade, investment, and debt. To expand\nready to e\nprogress. A new leadership has emerged,\ntrade, I propose that we begin the process\nwith other\nbacked by the strength of the people's man-\nof creating a hemispherewide free trade\nthe Caribb\ndate, leadership that understands that the\nzone; to increase investment, that we adopt\ncountries t.\nfuture of Latin America lies with free gov-\nmeasures to create a new flow of capital\nof trade lib\nernment and free markets. In the words of\ninto the region; and to further ease the\nthis proces\nColombia's courageous leader, Virgilio\nburden of debt, a new approach to debt in\ntrade agree\nBarco-President Barco: The long-running\nthe region with important benefits for our\nrecognize\nmatch between Karl Marx and Adam Smith\nenvironment.\nriers to free\nis finally coming to an end\" with the \"rec-\nLet's begin with trade. In the 1980's,\nreaching m\nognition that open economies with access to\ntrade within our hemisphere trailed the\ntough nego\nmarkets can lead to social progress.\"\noverall pace of growth in world trade. One\nof prosperit\nFor the United States, these are welcome\nprincipal reason for that: overrestrictive\nis the time\ndevelopments, developments that we're\ntrade barriers that wall off the economies of\ntrade zone\neager to support. But we recognize that\nour region from each other and from the\ngoal.\neach nation in the region must make its\nUnited States at great cost to us all. These\nAnd thirc\nown choices. There is no blueprint, no one-\nbarriers are the legacy of the misguided\ntries aren't\nsize-fits-all approach, to reform. The pri-\nnotion that a nation's economy needs pro-\nstep to a f\nmary responsibility for achieving economic\ntection in order to thrive. The great eco-\nthat's why \\\ngrowth lies with each individual country.\nnomic lesson of this century is that protec-\nany interest\nOur challenge in this country is to respond\ntionism still stifles progress and free mar-\nframework\nin ways that support the positive changes\nkets breed prosperity. To this end, we've\nand develo]\nnow taking place in the hemisphere. We\nformulated a three-point trade plan to en-\nments alrea\nmust forge a genuine partnership for free-\ncourage the emerging trend toward free-\nia. Framew\nmarket reform.\nmarket reform that are now gathering\nmove forwa\nBack in February, I met in Cartagena\nforces in the Americas.\neliminate (\n[Colombia] with heads of the three Andean\nFirst, as we enter the final months of the\ntrade and to\nnations, and I came away from that meet-\ncurrent Uruguay round of the world trade\ntrade. And\n1010\nAdministration of George Bush, 1990 / June 27\ntalks, I pledge close cooperation with the\ngrowth and a higher standard of living in\nnations of this hemisphere. The successful\nLatin America and, right here at home,\ncompletion of the Uruguay round remains\nnew markets for American products and\nthe most effective way of promoting long-\nmore jobs for American workers.\nterm trade growth in Latin America and\nPromoting free trade is just one of three\nthe increased integration of Latin nations\nkey elements in our new Enterprise for the\ninto the overall global trading system. Our\nAmericas Initiative. And our second pillar is\naim in the Uruguay round is free and fair\nincreased investment.\ntrade, and through these talks we are seek-\nThe competition for capital today is\ning to strengthen existing trade rules and to\nfierce, and the key to increased investment\nexpand them to areas that do not now have\nis to be competitive, to turn around the\nagreed rules of fairplay. And to show our\nconditions that have discouraged both for-\ncommitment to our neighbors in Latin\neign and domestic investment-reduce the\nAmerica and the Caribbean, we will seek\nregulatory burden, clear away the thicket of\ndeeper tariff reductions in this round on\nbureaucratic barriers that choke off Latin\nproducts of special interest to them.\nAmerica's aspiring entrepreneurs.\nSecond, we must build on the trend we\nsee toward free markets and make our ulti-\nIn one large Latin city, for instance, it\nmate aim a free trade system that links all\ntakes almost 300 days to cut through the\nof the Americas: North, Central, and South.\nredtape to open a small garment shop. In\nAnd we look forward to the day when not\nanother country, the average overseas caller\nonly are the Americas the first fully free,\nhas to make five phone calls to get through,\ndemocratic hemisphere but when all are\nand the wait for a new telephone line can\nequal partners in a free trade zone stretch\nbe as long as 5 years. And that's got to\ning from the port of Anchorage to the\nchange.\nTierra del Fuego.\nInvestment reform is essential to make it\nI'm announcing today that the U.S. stands\neasier to start new business ventures and\nready to enter into free trade agreements\nmake it possible for international investors\nwith other markets in Latin America and\nto participate and profit in Latin American\nthe Caribbean, particularly with groups of\nmarkets. In order to create incentives for\ncountries that have associated for purposes\ninvestment reform, the United States is pre-\nof trade liberalization. And the first step in\npared to take the following steps:\nthis process is the now-announced free\nFirst, the United States will work with\ntrade agreement with Mexico. We must all\nthe Inter-American Development Bank to\nrecognize that we won't bring down bar-\ncreate a new lending program for nations\nriers to free trade overnight; changes so far-\nthat take significant steps to remove im-\nreaching may take years of preparation and\npediments to international investment. The\ntough negotiations. But the payoff in terms\nWorld Bank could also contribute to this\nof prosperity is worth every effort, and now\neffort.\nis the time to make a comprehensive free\nAnd second, we propose the creation of a\ntrade zone for the Americas our long-term\nnew investment fund for the Americas. This\ngoal.\nfund, administered by the IDB, could pro-\nAnd third, I understand that some coun-\nvide up to $300 million a year in grants in\ntries aren't yet ready to take that dramatic\nresponse to market-oriented investment re-\nstep to a full free trade agreement. And\nforms in progress in privatization. The U.S.\nthat's why we're prepared to negotiate with\nintends to contribute $100 million to the\nany interested nation in the region bilateral\nfund, and we will seek matching contribu-\nframework agreements to open markets\ntions from Europe and Japan.\nand develop closer trade ties. Such agree-\nBut in order to create an attractive cli-\nments already exist with Mexico and Boliv-\nmate for new investment, we must build on\nia. Framework agreements will enable us to\nour successful efforts to ease the debt\nmove forward on a step-by-step basis to\nburden. That's the third pillar of this new\neliminate counterproductive barriers to\nEnterprise for the Americas Initiative.\ntrade and towards our ultimate goal of free\nMany nations have already undertaken\ntrade. And that's a prescription for greater\npainful economic reforms for the sake of\n1011\nJune 27 / Administration of George Bush, 1990\nfuture growth, but the investment climate\nnature swaps in countries that have set up\nremains clouded, weighted down by the\nsuch programs. These actions will be taken\nheavy debt burden. Under the Brady plan,\non a case-by-case basis.\nwe are making significant progress. The\nOne measure of prosperity and the most\nagreements reached with Mexico and Costa\nimportant long-term investment any nation\nRica and Venezuela are already having a\ncan make is environmental well-being. As\npositive impact on investment in those\npart of our Enterprise for the Americas Ini-\ncountries. Mexico, to take just one example,\ntiative, we will take action to strengthen\nC\nhas already seen a reversal of the destruc-\nenvironmental policies in this hemisphere.\ntive capital flight that drained so many\nDebt-for-nature swaps are one example,\nLatin American nations of precious invest-\npatterned after the innovative agreements\nment resources. That's critical. If we restore\nreached by some Latin American nations\nconfidence, capital will follow.\nand their commercial creditors. We will also\n0\nAs one means of expanding our debt\ncall for the creation of environmental trusts,\nstrategy, we propose that the IDB add its\nwhere interest payments owed on restruc-\nV\nefforts and resources to those of the Inter-\ntured U.S. debt will be paid in local curren-\nnational Monetary Fund and the World\ncy and set aside to fund environmental\nBank to support commercial bank debt re-\nprojects in the debtor countries.\nduction in Latin America and the Caribbe-\nThese innovative agreements offer a pow-\nan, and as in the case of World Bank and\nerful new tool for preserving the natural\nIMF, IDB funds should be directly linked to\nwonders of this hemisphere that we share.\neconomic reform.\nFrom the vistas of the unspoiled Arctic to\nWhile the Brady plan has helped nations\nthe beauties of the barrier reef off Belize to\nreduce commercial bank debt, for nations\nthe rich rain forests of the Amazon, we\nwith high levels of official debt-debt owed\nmust protect this living legacy that we hold\nto governments rather than private finan-\nin trust. For an increasing number of our\ncial institutions-the burden remains heavy.\nneighbors, the need for free-market reform\nAnd today, across Latin America, official\nis clear. These nations need economic\ndebt owed to the U.S. Government amounts\nbreathing room to enact bold reforms, and\nto nearly $12 billion, with $7 billion of that\nthis official debt initiative is one answer, a\namount in concessional loans. And in many\nway out from under the crushing burden of\ncases, the heaviest official debt burdens fall\ndebt that slows the process of reform.\non some of the region's smallest nations,\nI know there is some concern that the\ncountries like Honduras and El Salvador\nrevolutionary changes we've witnessed this\nand Jamaica.\npast year in Eastern Europe will shift our\nThat's a problem we must address today.\nattention away from Latin America; but I\nAs the key component in addressing the\nwant to assure all of you here today, as I've\nregion's debt problem, I am proposing a\nassured many democratic leaders in Central\nmajor new initiative to reduce Latin Amer-\nand South America and the Caribbean and\nica and the Caribbean's official debt to the\nMexico, the United States will not lose sight\nUnited States for countries that adopt\nof the tremendous challenges and opportu-\nstrong economic and investment reform\nnities right here in our own hemisphere.\nprograms with the support of international\nAnd indeed, as we talk with the leaders of\ninstitutions.\nthe G-24 about the emerging democracies\nOur debt reduction program will deal\nin Europe-I've been talking to them also\nseparately with concessional and commer-\nabout their supporting democracy and eco-\ncial types of loans. On the concessional\nnomic freedom in Central America. Our\ndebt, loans made from AID or Food for\naim is a closer partnership between the\nPeace accounts, we will propose substantial\nAmericas and our friends in Europe and in\ndebt reductions for the most heavily bur-\nAsia.\ndened countries. And we will also sell a\nTwo years from now, our hemisphere will\nportion of outstanding commercial loans to\ncelebrate the 500th anniversary of an epic\nfacilitate these debt-for-equity and debt-for-\nevent: Columbus' discovery of America, our\n1012\nAdministration of George Bush, 1990 / June 28\nNew World. And we trace our origins, our\nof the proposed rescissions are contained in\nshared history, to the time of Columbus'\nthe attached report.\nvoyage and the courageous quest for the\nadvancement of man. Today the bonds of\nGeorge Bush\nour common heritage are strengthened by\nthe love of freedom and a common commit-\nThe White House,\nment to democracy. Our challenge, the\nJune 28, 1990.\nchallenge in this new era of the Americas, is\nto secure this shared dream and all its fruits\nNote: The attachment detailing the pro-\nfor all the people of the Americas-North,\nposed rescissions was printed in the \"Feder-\nCentral, and South.\nal Register\" of July 6.\nThe comprehensive plan that I've just\noutlined is proof positive the United States\nis serious about forging a new partnership\nwith our Latin American and Caribbean\nStatement on the Japan-United States\nneighbors. We're ready to play a construc-\nTrade Negotiations\ntive role at this critical time to make ours\nJune 28, 1990\nthe first fully free hemisphere in all of histo-\nry. Thank you all for coming and God bless\nLast year the United States and Japan\nthe peoples of the Americas. Thank you\nlaunched a new cooperative endeavor in\nvery, very much, indeed.\neconomic policy called the Structural Im-\npediments Initiative. This initiative is de-\nsigned to address underlying structural\nNote: The President spoke at 2:48 p.m. in\nproblems in both of our economies with the\nthe East Room at the White House. In his\ngoal of contributing to more open and com-\nopening remarks, he referred to Secretary of\npetitive markets and to the reduction of\nthe Treasury Nicholas F. Brady; U.S. Trade\npayments imbalances. A joint working\nRepresentative Carla A. Hills; Secretary of\ngroup was formed to identify and solve\nCommerce Robert A. Mosbacher; William\nthese problems. Over the past year, these\nH. Webster, Director of Central Intelligence;\ndiscussions have demonstrated the construc-\nBarber B. Conable, Jr., President of the\ntive and cooperative spirit which character-\nWorld Bank, which is also known as the\nizes the relationship between our two coun-\nInternational Bank for Reconstruction and\ntries.\nDevelopment; and Richard D. Erb, Deputy\nManaging Director of the International\nThe joint report of the SII working group\nMonetary Fund. The President also referred\nhas just been issued in Tokyo, following up\nto the Group of 24, the industrialized de-\nan interim report issued in April. I welcome\nmocracies that have pledged support for eco-\nand endorse this joint report. Both coun-\nnomic and political reform in Poland and\ntries have identified structural impedi-\nHungary.\nments, taken initial corrective actions, and\nmade commitments to take further steps to\nresolve a wide range of structural problems.\nWe expect that the structural policy actions\nto be taken will have a positive effect on\nMessage to the Congress Reporting\nour economies, encouraging open and com-\nBudget Rescissions\npetitive markets, promoting sustained world\nJune 28, 1990\neconomic growth, contributing to a reduc-\ntion in global payments imbalances, and en-\nTo the Congress of the United States:\nhancing the quality of life in both Japan and\nIn accordance with the Impoundment\nthe United States. Although our efforts on\nControl Act of 1974, I herewith report\nSII are bilateral, the effects will be benefi-\neight proposed rescissions totalling\ncial for the entire world.\n$327,375,000.\nI particularly welcome the clear commit-\nThe proposed rescissions affect programs\nment by Japan to reduce further its current\nof the Department of Defense. The details\naccount surplus and view the SII process as\n1013\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nOffice of the Press Secretary\n(Chicago, Illinois)\nFor Immediate Release\nSeptember 20, 1991\nREMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT\nAT THE 12TH ANNUAL NATIONAL CONVENTION OF THE\nUNITED STATES HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE\nHyatt Regency Hotel\nChicago, Illinois\n1:45 P.M. CDT\nTHE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. And I really want\nto thank you for that warm reception here. First, may I salute two\nSecretaries of my Cabinet -- Secretary Lujan, who many of you have\nknown over the years is with us today; and also Secretary Sam\nSkinner, who just came in with us from California, a son of Chicago\nin a sense and doing a great job as Secretary of Transportation.\nMay I also thank the Governor of the state, Jim Edgar;\nand the Mayor of this great city, Mayor Daley, for greeting me at the\nairport here and welcoming us to Illinois and Chicago. And this is,\nas I view it, certainly not a partisan gathering, and I think their\nboth showing up together, side-by-side, was a manifestation of that.\n(Laughter and applause.)\nBut may I thank Jose, Jose Nino, who just introduced me,\nyour very able president; Gabe Aguirre, the outgoing chairman. And\nthank you all, ladies and gentlemen, for, once again, that very warm\nwelcome. Let me congratulate my fellow Texan, Delia Reyes, your\nnewly elected chair. And warmest greetings to the many dignitaries\nthat are here.\nI'm here a little later than originally scheduled.\nWould you believe we experienced a slight flight delay? (Laughter.)\nI know it happens all the time. We had to circle the city while\nMichael Jordan practiced takeoffs and landings out here. (Laughter.)\nAnd there's a second reason, too -- if I may be candid. I know\nyou've just heard Jack Kemp speak -- and I thought you'd want to\ncatch your breath for a little bit. (Laughter.)\nIf you're still feeling winded, it's my fault. It goes\nback to our first Cabinet meeting and I asked Jack, \"Can't you\ngenerate -- can't you work up a little more enthusiasm?\" And you saw\nit today. But he's doing a great job for us as Secretary of Housing\nand Urban Development. His concept, our concept, of tenant\nmanagement and home ownership offers really hope to millions. But\nthen, Jack -- and all our administration -- believe in the greatest\nand most visionary of American ideals, the ideal of real equality --\nensuring that people can go as far as their abilities and their hard\nwork will take them.\nFive centuries ago, men crossed the great ocean and\nbrought Hispanic America into being. Ever since then, we have called\nthe combination of European and American peoples on these vast lands\nnot a new territory, not a new colony, not a new settlement. We've\ncalled it a New World.\nHispanic America arose out of risk and romance. Several\nforces fed its growth: transoceanic trade, the movement and mingling\nof peoples, the grand enterprise of discovery and development. On\nMORE\n- 2 -\nSeptember 20 -- this very date, but in 1519, Magellan and his party\nset sail from Spain to sail around the globe. Next month we begin a\nyear of commemoration leading to the 500th anniversary of Columbus's\ndaring journey.\nWe must not think of these achievements as somehow\nantique and irrelevant. Frontiers don't close when men settle the\nwilderness, when they build cities and factories and schools. Subtle\nbut braver adventures confront advanced civilizations: the\nadventures of creating families, educating children, knowing that no\nmatter how hard or how comfortable our circumstances, we must make\nour world better. In the life of the Americas, in our mission of\ndiscovery and development, 1492 was only yesterday.\nHow true this is in the case of commerce. Voyagers\ncharted the trade routes of the Americas centuries ago, but we've\nonly now begun to explore their full potential.\nYour convention theme sings with this spirit:\n\"Launching New Partnerships.\" America's more than 400,000 Hispanic-\nowned firms provide new jobs and generate new wealth. In 1987, the\nlatest date for these statistics, our Hispanic-owned businesses\npumped nearly $25 billion into our economy and created half a million\njobs.\nYou believe in yourselves -- in your abilities, your\ndetermination, your excellence. Because you believe in yourselves,\nyou helped our administration get congressional approval to extend\nour fast track procedures for trade negotiations. Armed with that\npowerful tool -- and as you heard this morning from an able team from\nthree countries -- we are negotiating a North American Free Trade\nAgreement.\nI might say that Mexico, under President Salinas, has\nbeen a powerful leader and ally. And I would also say that\nrelationships between Mexico and the United States have never in\nhistory been better. And that is in the best interests of the United\nStates of America. (Applause.) When we complete that accord, and\nI'm confident we will, we'll build a free trade zone that ranges from\nthe Yukon to the Yucatan --\"a market of 360 -- get the figure -- 360\nmillion consumers and a present annual output of $6 trillion.\nWhen we seal the Free Trade Agreement, Hispanic-owned\nfirms in the United States will enjoy strong natural advantages.\nBonds of family, language, understanding the culture, already\ncherished in the families represented here today -- all of these will\ngain value as business assets.\nBecause you believe in yourselves, you also have\nsupported our Enterprise for the Americas Initiative, aiming to\nestablish a network of expanded trade, investment and cooperation\nfrom Hudson Bay to the Straits of Magellan.\nThe North American Free Trade Agreement and the\nEnterprise for the Americas Initiative incorporate the great lesson\nof our age: trade and enterprise can build wealth and preserve\nfreedom. Protectionism and government control only create poverty\nand backwardness, and yes, a denial of freedom.\nConsider the case of Mexico. Since 1986, when Mexico\njoined the GATT and dropped tariff rates from 100 percent -- 100\npercent -- to little more than 10 percent, U.S. exports to Mexico\nhave more than doubled. Exports of automobiles and auto parts have\nquadrupled. Exports of iron and steel, which were running a $12-\nmillion deficit just four years ago, now are achieving a $300-million\nsurplus. And this rise in exports created almost 300,000 jobs in the\nUnited States. Each additional $1 billion in exports will translate\ninto nearly 20,000 American jobs.\nMORE\n- 3 -\nBut these reforms -- it's not a one-way street -- these\nreforms have helped Mexico -- a classic win-win situation, if you\nwill. Fidel Vélazquez Sanchez, the head of the Mexican Labor\nConfederation, recognizes that increased trade will create new jobs,\nindeed, new industries, in Mexico, and he strongly supports the trade\nagreement.\nWhat's good for Hispanic America will be good for the\nUnited States. And with open trade, by the year 2000, United States\nfirms will be doing a robust business with dynamic economy of 100\nmillion Mexican consumers.\nThe prospects seem equally exciting south of Mexico,\ntrue. We've heard a lot about the Mexican free trade agreement.\nWe've heard about the negotiations. They are our friendly neighbors\non the border and we ought to -- parenthetically, I might say, we\nshould never just take those friends for granted, whether it be to\nour north or to our south. We are blessed by peaceful borders. But\nwe're already advancing creative plans now to reduce debt, boost\ninvestment and increase trade. We've now signed framework trade\nliberalization agreements involving 28 countries in the hemisphere.\nso it's not just Mexico. But we need your help.\nCongress still has failed to give us debt reduction\nauthority and funding, and to give us the ability to contribute to\nthe Multilateral Investment Fund. This would help stimulate\ninvestment and build stable democracies within our hemisphere. So\nplease, speak out in support of the Enterprise for the Americas\nInitiative. And join me in urging Congress to pass the legislation\nto put it into full effect. Enterprise for the Americas is not a\nslogan. It will strengthen democracy and freedom in those friendly\ncountries south of the Rio Grande, and it will be good for American\nexports, and that means it will be good for American jobs.\nOur efforts to expand U.S. exports will get another\nboost when my friend, Jose Martinez, becomes Director of the United\nStates Trade and Development Program.\nAnd, of course, one more event will demonstrate to one\nand all that we really have entered into a new era of freedom and\nopportunity. I'm speaking of Cuba's becoming free and democratic.\n(Applause.)\nToday we hear the creaking and crumbling of that Castro\ndictatorship. And the day is coming, I'm absolutely convinced of\nthis, sooner than Castro dares to believe, when the people of Cuba\nwill reclaim their destiny and rejoin the Western Hemisphere's family\nof free nations. (Applause.)\nAnd if we want to make our hemisphere a neighborhood of\npeoples, we must do more than lift economic and political barriers.\nOur administration also has promoted educational and cultural\nexchanges between our country and our neighbors in the hemisphere.\nAs in commerce, the natural leaders in this enterprise will be\nHispanic Americans.\nYou see, something more than mere geography unites us.\nCommon cultural roots enable us all to seek a shared destiny for our\nhemisphere, for ourselves.\nAnd I want to thank the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce for\nits endorsement of our America 2000 Education Strategy. I am\ngrateful for your initiatives to teach economics and entrepreneurship\nto our kids, beginning in the kindergarten. And now, if only someone\ncould do the same for economists, I think we'd be in pretty good\nshape around here. (Laughter and applause.)\nMORE\n- 4 -\nAmerica 2000, like our economic proposals, begins with\nan article of faith: We believe that parents care about their\nchildren, care about education, and can help find schools that will\nhelp their children reach their potential. So we want to expand\nparental choice so that parents will have as much choice in the\ncrucial matter of education as they now have when they wish to\npurchase peanut butter.\nAnd if we want to make the most of ourselves, we must\ninvite competition and show just how well we can do.\nAmerica 2000 will enable Hispanic communities to draw\nupon their natural strengths and values. And it will enable parents,\nteachers and, yes, church and business leaders to help reinvent\nAmerican education.\nTo further this goal, I have announced the membership of\nthe President's Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for\nHispanic Americans. Chicago's own Andres Bande, CEO of Ameritech\nInternational, will chair the panel, and its work will play a major\nrole in unleashing the America 2000 revolution in education.\nI understand Andres is here today, and I'd like him to\nstand up -- right there. Thank you for undertaking this.\n(Applause.) This is important work he's about to be engaged in. And\nI know, on his behalf, I'd like to solicit your ideas and your full\ncooperation.\nLet me close with a few comments on a concept we talked\nabout earlier -- development. It's a term of art, of course, in\ninternational economics. We tend to use \"developing country\" as a\nsort of fuzzy euphemism for \"poverty\" -- for a nation short on\nmaterial or financial wealth.\nBut when we use the term \"development\" in this way, we\nforget its deeper meaning. Isn't the United States -- must it not be\n-- still \"developing\"? For all our present wealth, can we afford to\nbecome static or stagnant? And if we're not giving our children a\nmoral and intellectual inheritance as good as our parents gave us,\nare we a \"developed\" society?\nI think again of the explorers on our continent five\ncenturies ago. Some were wise, some were foolish. And we remember\nthe effort wasted in trying to find the imaginary Seven Cities of\nGold. And those adventurers were not just looking in the wrong\nplace, they were searching for the wrong treasure. The treasure was,\nand is, in men and women, in \"human resources\", in mind and muscle\nand soul. And these, not unearned bonanzas, build civilizations.\nOur work never ends. That's the key to life's\nexcitement. In these hopeful times, as we tear down economic\nbarriers and liberate ourselves from ideological confines, we must\ncontinue supplying our own sons and our own daughters with the values\n-- the fundamentals -- of a good society. Together, I know that we\nshall.\nYou know, the longer I'm in the White House and\nprivileged to serve as President of the United States, and the more\nBarbara and I discuss these enormous problems that Mayor Daley\nconfronts in his excellent way every day, or Jim Edgar, the Governor\nof this state, confronts in his very effective way as Governor -- the\nmore we contemplate those problems and the more I look at this great\ncountry of ours that I'm privileged to lead at this point in history\n-- and I must say it's a very exciting point -- the more Barbara and\nI conclude that family is absolutely essential to our success. We\nhave got to stay involved -- (applause) -- we have got to stay\nfundamentally involved. And when I speak to this group, it's almost\nlike preaching to the choir because I think if you exemplify one of\nthe prime values and principles that this group and, indeed, Hispanic\nAmerican culture all across our country exemplifies, is love of\n- 5 -\nfamily and its faith and its conviction about our great country, the\nfreest and fairest on the face of the Earth. (Applause.)\nSo thank you very much for letting me come by and visit\nthis highly successful convention. And let me tell you that it's a\ngreat joy to be back with you again. And may God bless our great\ncountry. Thank you very very much. (Applause.)\nEND\n2:05 P.M. CDT\nU.S. Exports to Mexico\nA STATE-BY-STATE OVERVIEW\n1987-89\nU.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE\nInternational Trade Administration\nU.S. EXPORTS TO MEXICO:\nA STATE-BY-STATE OVERVIEW, 1987-89\nPrepared by:\nGeorg M. Mehl\nWilliam F. Kolarik\nJanet M. Mims\nOffice of Trade & Investment Analysis\nU.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE\nInternational Trade Administration\nApril 1991\nFOREWORD\nThe pursuit of a free trade agreement with Mexico has generated growing\ndemand for information on merchandise exports to Mexico by individual U.S.\nstates and industries within the states. This book seeks to meet the demand\nby providing data on state exports to Mexico from 1987 to 1989--the latest\nyear for which data were available at the time of publication.\nThis report is divided into several complementary sections. First, major\ntrends in state exports to Mexico are highlighted in a brief overview. Next,\nthere is a series of statistical tables summarizing state exports to our southern\nneighbor. The final section provides, for each state and its key industries,\none-page profiles of recent exports to Mexico.\nData utilized in this publication were furnished by the Massachusetts Institute\nfor Social and Economic Research (MISER) of the University of\nMassachusetts at Amherst. MISER statistics are based on Census Bureau\ndata tapes which aggregate information from Shippers' Export Declarations.\nAn explanation of the MISER-Census data is provided in a statistical note\nfollowing the introductory overview.\nThis book was produced under the direction of Barbara N. McLennan,\nDeputy Assistant Secretary for Trade Information and Analysis. General\nsupervision was provided by Martin J. Kohn, Director of the Office of Trade\nand Investment Analysis (OTIA). William F. Kolarik, Director of the\nInternational Economics Division, OTIA, was Project Director and a\ncontributing author. The principal author was Georg M. Mehl, and Janet M.\nMims was a contributing author.\n0.\niii\nCONTENTS\nForeword\niii\nU.S. Exports to Mexico, 1987-89:\nState Export Profile\n1\nStatistical Note\n3\nI. NATIONAL SUMMARY TABLES\n5\nState Exports to Mexico, 1987-89\nPercent Changes in State Exports to Mexico, 1987-89\nDollar Changes in State Exports to Mexico:\n1987-89\n(Alphabetical Listing)\nDollar Changes in State Exports to Mexico: 1987-89 (Ranked\nby Dollar Change)\nState Exports to Mexico, 1989, Ranked by Dollar Value\nPercent of States' Exports Going to Mexico (Alphabetical\nListing)\nPercent of States' Exports Going to Mexico (Ranked by 1989\nValue)\nState-By-State Ranking of Mexico as an Export Market\n(Alphabetical Listing)\nState-By-State Ranking of Mexico as an Export Market\n(Market Ranking)\nII. INDIVIDUAL STATE PROFILES OF EXPORTS\nTO MEXICO, 1987-89\n17\nV\nU.S. EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89: STATE EXPORT PROFILE\nU.S. exports to Mexico--the third leading U.S. export market--totaled $25 billion\nin 1989, a 71 percent increase from $14.6 billion in 1987.\nFrom 1987 to 1989, 45 states and the District of Columbia expanded exports to\nMexico.\nFifteen states more than doubled exports to Mexico during 1987-89. States\nreporting the greatest percentage growth in shipments to the Mexican market\nover the three-year period were: Montana (1,536 percent), Nevada (721\npercent), Vermont (350 percent), and Maine (319 percent).\nSome of the states registering the largest dollar increases in exports to Mexico\nover the 1987-89 period were: Texas (up $4.5 billion), California (up $1.9\nbillion), Michigan (up $643 million), and New York (up $322 million).\nThe top ten state exporters to Mexico in 1989 represented diverse parts of the\ncountry and accounted for $21 billion, or 85 percent, of total U.S. exports to the\nMexican market.\n-- Leading state exporters were, in descending order of 1989 shipments to\nMexico: Texas, California, Michigan, New York, Arizona, Louisiana, Illinois,\nPennsylvania, Ohio, and Florida.\n-- Six key industries in the top ten states exported $13.4 billion to Mexico in\n1989. These industries, and amounts exported, were: electric & electronic\nequipment ($4.6 billion), transportation equipment ($2.6 billion), computers\n& industrial machinery ($2.6 billion), chemicals ($1.6 billion), primary metal\nindustries ($1 billion), and fabricated metal products ($1 billion).\nTexas was by far the dominant state exporter to Mexico in 1989. Exports from\nTexas to the Mexican market totaled $11 billion and accounted for 44 percent\nof total U.S. shipments to Mexico. California, with $4.2 billion in exports to\nMexico, was a distant second.\nMexico has become an increasingly important market for the United States.\nThe 71 percent increase in U.S. exports to Mexico from 1987 to 1989 far\noutstripped the 41 percent growth in U.S. exports to the rest of the world over\nthe same period.\n1\nConsequently, the Mexican share of U.S. exports rose from 5.9 percent in 1987\nto 7.2 percent in 1989.\n-- Forty states and the District of Columbia registered an increase in the\nMexican share of their exports.\n-- Five states--Texas, Arizona, North Dakota, Missouri, and Kansas--saw ten\npercent or more of their exports go to Mexico in 1989.\nIn 1989, Mexico ranked among the top ten export markets in thirty-six states\nand the District of Columbia.\n-- Twenty states counted Mexico among their top five foreign markets.\n-- Eleven states ranked Mexico as one of their top three export destinations.\n-- Mexico was the number one export market of two states--Texas and Arizona.\n2\nSTATISTICAL NOTE\nU.S. state export statistics have important limitations. Users are therefore\nurged to use caution when utilizing these data, especially for policy purposes.\nState export figures presented in this report were provided by the\nMassachusetts Institute for Social and Economic Research (MISER) of the\nUniversity of Massachusetts. MISER data are drawn from Census Bureau\ndata tape number EQ912, which is issued quarterly. This tape aggregates\nexport-origin information from Shippers' Export Declarations (SEDs), which\nare filed for virtually all merchandise exported from the United States.\nOn every SED, shippers are asked to provide the \"point (state) of origin\" of\nthe export. Answering this question is not as straightforward as it might\nseem. Instructions for filling out the SED allow the shipper to choose among\nseveral alternative definitions of the state of origin. These are:\n(1) The state in which the merchandise actually starts its journey to\nthe port of export. This can be either the location of the factory where\nthe export item was produced or, in many cases, the location of a\ndistributor, regional warehouse, or cargo processing facility.\n(2) The state of the commodity having the greatest dollar value in a\nmulti-product shipment.\n(3) The \"state of consolidation,\" which is the state in which various\nparts of a multi-product export order are readied for shipment.\n(4) The Foreign Trade Zone for exports leaving a FTZ (a FTZ is\nsimilar in principle to bonded warehouses). Using the FTZ \"state of\norigin\" definition, an export produced in Ohio, but shipped from a FTZ\nlocated in Florida, would show up in state export statistics as a Florida\nexport.\nThe diverse definitions for \"state of origin,\" coupled with the fact that\ndifferent shippers tend to interpret the guidelines in different ways, make it\nimpossible to say whether exports attributed to any given state actually were\nproduced in that state, or were simply temporarily warehoused in that\nlocation.\n3\nThe state-of-origin problem is particularly serious with respect to\nnonmanufactures. Exporters of agricultural products, for example, almost\nalways specify the location of loading terminals, not the location of producing\nfarms, as the state of origin.\nAnother problem is that some shippers simply leave blank the \"point of\norigin\" block on the SED. On the Census tape, about 25 percent of the\nvalue of U.S. exports is unallocated by state. MISER tries to deal with this\nshortcoming by applying a formula to \"unallocated\" data, breaking down the\ncategory and reassigning export values to individual states. Although resulting\n\"massaged\" numbers give a much neater picture of state exports, the precision\nof the figures is unknown because MISER's reallocation procedure cannot be\nvalidated.\nFinally, MISER-Census state export data for the years 1987, 1988, and 1989\nare not fully comparable for several reasons: First, revisions in the Standard\nIndustrial Classification system were implemented in 1988. Thus, 1988-89\nstate exports for individual industries are classified somewhat differently than\nin earlier years. Further complicating the situation is that, beginning with\n1989 data, reporting of U.S. export statistics shifted from the long-standing\n\"Schedule B\" nomenclature to the new Harmonized System (HS). This move\nintroduced a number of classification problems which the Census Bureau is\ncurrently working to resolve.\nAlthough the MISER-Census data have major weaknesses, the fact remains\nthat these data are the most up-to-date source of information on state\nexports. The only alternative source for state export figures is a Census\nBureau series which, while more accurate and comprehensive, is typically\nissued with a three-year lag.\nTo sum up, care must be taken when drawing conclusions from the MISER-\nCensus series: One should not rely solely on MISER-Census statistics when\nmaking statements about the contribution of exports to a given state's\nemployment and overall economic health. Such statements should be\nsupported, not only by MISER-Census data, but also by other evidence (e.g.,\nanecdotal or statistical information) furnished by state agencies, trade\nassociations, or other sources.\n4\nNATIONAL SUMMARY TABLES\nSTATE EXPORTS TO MEXICO: 1987-89\n(Thousand $)\n(Percent Change)\n1987\n1988\n1989\n1987-88\n1988-89\n1987-89\nALABAMA\n$80,551\n$114,216\n$156,037\n41.8\n36.6\n93.7\nALASKA\n5,293\n2,678\n9,942\n-49.4\n271.3\n87.9\nARIZONA\n644,677\n761,786\n759,494\n18.2\n-0.3\n17.8\nARKANSAS\n37,710\n42,664\n80,519\n13.1\n88.7\n113.5\nCALIFORNIA\n2,257,263\n3,241,765\n4,172,918\n43.6\n28.7\n84.9\nCOLORADO\n69,290\n79,955\n96,398\n15.4\n20.6\n39.1\nCONNECTICUT\n115,378\n160,174\n182,953\n38.8\n14.2\n58.6\nDELAWARE\n28,033\n38,900\n51,414\n38.8\n32.2\n83.4\nDIST. OF COL.\n4,932\n7,063\n6,627\n43.2\n-6.2\n34.4\nFLORIDA\n218,998\n326,336\n424,199\n49.0\n30.0\n93.7\nGEORGIA\n108,097\n157,208\n232,017\n45.4\n47.6\n114.6\nHAWAII\n61\n216\n22\n256.5\n-89.9\n-64.1\nIDAHO\n11,238\n36,331\n22,652\n223.3\n-37.7\n101.6\nILLINOIS\n278,373\n448,166\n569,203\n61.0\n27.0\n104.5\nINDIANA\n270,929\n155,910\n203,961\n-42.5\n30.8\n-24.7\nIOWA\n66,084\n93,773\n116,720\n41.9\n24.5\n76.6\nKANSAS\n124,979\n279,445\n221,210\n123.6\n-20.8\n77.0\nKENTUCKY\n43,266\n86,127\n99,428\n99.1\n15.4\n129.8\nLOUISIANA\n377,426\n530,149\n671,019\n40.5\n26.6\n77.8\nMAINE\n2,685\n10,858\n11,237\n304.5\n3.5\n318.6\nMARYLAND\n17,044\n33,212\n25,262\n94.9\n-23.9\n48.2\nMASSACHUSETTS\n100,117\n116,530\n155,449\n16.4\n33.4\n55.3\nMICHIGAN\n1,077,870\n1,317,396\n1,720,558\n22.2\n30.6\n59.6\nMINNESOTA\n89,975\n135,383\n162,847\n50.5\n20.3\n81.0\nMISSISSIPPI\n52,510\n69,557\n97,460\n32.5\n40.1\n85.6\nMISSOURI\n198,713\n312,727\n322,043\n57.4\n3.0\n62.1\nMONTANA\n1,219\n2,255\n19,948\n85.0\n784.8\n1536.4\nNEBRASKA\n44,546\n52,275\n50,581\n17.3\n-3.2\n13.5\nNEVADA\n2,706\n5,476\n22,207\n102.4\n305.5\n720.7\nNEW HAMPSHIRE\n9,790\n14,280\n18,316\n45.9\n28.3\n87.1\nNEW JERSEY\n189,017\n266,749\n390,817\n41.1\n46.5\n106.6\nNEW MEXICO\n9,058\n15,968\n14,479\n76.3\n-9.3\n59.9\nNEW YORK\n512,368\n827,931\n834,284\n61.6\n0.8\n62.8\nNORTH CAROLINA\n94,670\n137,110\n190,184\n44.8\n38.7\n100.9\nNORTH DAKOTA\n39,886\n37,483\n51,651\n-6.0\n37.8\n29.5\nOHIO\n245,232\n381,331\n464,034\n55.5\n21.7\n89.2\nOKLAHOMA\n44,248\n97,769\n62,369\n121.0\n-36.2\n41.0\nOREGON\n19,477\n23,453\n38,067\n20.4\n62.3\n95.4\nPENNSYLVANIA\n181,126\n337,393\n474,687\n86.3\n40.7\n162.1\nRHODE ISLAND\n14,664\n23,941\n32,108\n63.3\n34.1\n119.0\nSOUTH CAROLINA\n32,350\n54,853\n59,751\n69.6\n8.9\n84.7\nSOUTH DAKOTA\n5,358\n4,760\n5,251\n-11.2\n10.3\n-2.0\nTENNESSEE\n100,938\n141,177\n244,237\n39.9\n73.0\n142.0\nTEXAS\n6,465,123\n9,334,029\n11,010,627\n44.4\n18.0\n70.3\nUTAH\n37,088\n50,985\n31,758\n37.5\n-37.7\n-14.4\nVERMONT\n2,570\n16,351\n11,550\n536.3\n-29.4\n349.5\nVIRGINIA\n41,056\n63,513\n85,743\n54.7\n35.0\n108.8\nWASHINGTON\n83,382\n90,990\n119,270\n9.1\n31.1\n43.0\nWEST VIRGINIA\n43,988\n18,567\n26,273\n-57.8\n41.5\n-40.3\nWISCONSIN\n77,322\n83,188\n135,217\n7.6\n62.5\n74.9\nWYOMING\n3,374\n3,055\n3,824\n-9.5\n25.2\n13.3\nTOTAL U.S.\n$14,582,239\n$20,643,408\n$24,968,823\n41.6\n21.0\n71.2\n7\nPERCENT CHANGES IN STATE EXPORTS\nTO MEXICO: 1987-89\n% Change\n1987-89\nRank\nMONTANA\n1536.4\n1\nNEVADA\n720.7\n2\nVERMONT\n349.5\n3\nMAINE\n318.6\n4\nPENNSYLVANIA\n162.1\n5\nTENNESSEE\n142.0\n6\nKENTUCKY\n129.8\n7\nRHODE ISLAND\n119.0\n8\nGEORGIA\n114.6\n9\nARKANSAS\n113.5\n10\nVIRGINIA\n108.8\n11\nNEW JERSEY\n106.6\n12\nILLINOIS\n104.5\n13\nIDAHO\n101.6\n14\nNORTH CAROLINA\n100.9\n15\nOREGON\n95.4\n16\nALABAMA\n93.7\n17\nFLORIDA\n93.7\n18\nOHIO\n89.2\n19\nALASKA\n87.9\n20\nNEW HAMPSHIRE\n87.1\n21\nMISSISSIPPI\n85.6\n22\nCALIFORNIA\n84.9\n23\nSOUTH CAROLINA\n84.7\n24\nDELAWARE\n83.4\n25\nMINNESOTA\n81.0\n26\nLOUISIANA\n77.8\n27\nKANSAS\n77.0\n28\nIOWA\n76.6\n29\nWISCONSIN\n74.9\n30\nTEXAS\n70.3\n31\nNEW YORK\n62.8\n32\nMISSOURI\n62.1\n33\nNEW MEXICO\n59.9\n34\nMICHIGAN\n59.6\n35\nCONNECTICUT\n58.6\n36\nMASSACHUSETTS\n55.3\n37\nMARYLAND\n48.2\n38\nWASHINGTON\n43.0\n39\nOKLAHOMA\n41.0\n40\nCOLORADO\n39.1\n41\nDIST. OF COL.\n34.4\n42\nNORTH DAKOTA\n29.5\n43\nARIZONA\n17.8\n44\nNEBRASKA\n13.5\n45\nWYOMING\n13.3\n46\nSOUTH DAKOTA\n-2.0\n47\nUTAH\n-14.4\n48\nINDIANA\n-24.7\n49\nWEST VIRGINIA\n-40.3\n50\nHAWAII\n-64.1\n51\nTOTAL U.S.\n71.2\n8\nDOLLAR CHANGES IN STATE EXPORTS\nTO MEXICO: 1987-89*\n(Thousand $)\n$ Change\n1987-89\nRank\nALABAMA\n$75,487\n17\nALASKA\n4,650\n44\nARIZONA\n114,816\n14\nARKANSAS\n42,808\n26\nCALIFORNIA\n1,915,656\n2\nCOLORADO\n27,108\n29\nCONNECTICUT\n67,575\n19\nDELAWARE\n23,381\n30\nDIST. OF COL.\n1,695\n45\nFLORIDA\n205,201\n9\nGEORGIA\n123,919\n12\nHAWAII\n(39)\n47\nIDAHO\n11,414\n37\nILLINOIS\n290,830\n7\nINDIANA\n(66,968)\n51\nIOWA\n50,636\n23\nKANSAS\n96,231\n15\nKENTUCKY\n56,163\n21\nLOUISIANA\n293,592\n5\nMAINE\n8,553\n39\nMARYLAND\n8,218\n41\nMASSACHUSETTS\n55,332\n22\nMICHIGAN\n642,688\n3\nMINNESOTA\n72,872\n18\nMISSISSIPPI\n44,950\n24\nMISSOURI\n123,331\n13\nMONTANA\n18,729\n32\nNEBRASKA\n6,035\n42\nNEVADA\n19,501\n31\nNEW HAMPSHIRE\n8,526\n40\nNEW JERSEY\n201,799\n10\nNEW MEXICO\n5,421\n43\nNEW YORK\n321,916\n4\nNORTH CAROLINA\n95,514\n16\nNORTH DAKOTA\n11,765\n36\nOHIO\n218,802\n8\nOKLAHOMA\n18,121\n34\nOREGON\n18,590\n33\nPENNSYLVANIA\n293,561\n6\nRHODE ISLAND\n17,444\n35\nSOUTH CAROLINA\n27,401\n28\nSOUTH DAKOTA\n(107)\n48\nTENNESSEE\n143,299\n11\nTEXAS\n4,545,504\n1\nUTAH\n(5,329)\n49\nVERMONT\n8,980\n38\nVIRGINIA\n44,687\n25\nWASHINGTON\n35,889\n27\nWEST VIRGINIA\n(17,715)\n50\nWISCONSIN\n57,895\n20\nWYOMING\n449\n46\nTOTAL U.S.\n$10,386,584\n*Negative values are in parentheses\n9\nDOLLAR CHANGES IN STATE EXPORTS\nTO MEXICO: 1987-89*\n(Ranked by Dollar Value - Thousand $)\n$ Change\n1987-89\nRank\nTEXAS\n$4,545,504\n1\nCALIFORNIA\n1,915,656\n2\nMICHIGAN\n642,688\n3\nNEW YORK\n321,916\n4\nLOUISIANA\n293,592\n5\nPENNSYLVANIA\n293,561\n6\nILLINOIS\n290,830\n7\nOHIO\n218,802\n8\nFLORIDA\n205,201\n9\nNEW JERSEY\n201,799\n10\nTENNESSEE\n143,299\n11\nGEORGIA\n123,919\n12\nMISSOURI\n123,331\n13\nARIZONA\n114,816\n14\nKANSAS\n96,231\n15\nNORTH CAROLINA\n95,514\n16\nALABAMA\n75,487\n17\nMINNESOTA\n72,872\n18\nCONNECTICUT\n67,575\n19\nWISCONSIN\n57,895\n20\nKENTUCKY\n56,163\n21\nMASSACHUSETTS\n55,332\n22\nIOWA\n50,636\n23\nMISSISSIPPI\n44,950\n24\nVIRGINIA\n44,687\n25\nARKANSAS\n42,808\n26\nWASHINGTON\n35,889\n27\nSOUTH CAROLINA\n27,401\n28\nCOLORADO\n27,108\n29\nDELAWARE\n23,381\n30\nNEVADA\n19,501\n31\nMONTANA\n18,729\n32\nOREGON\n18,590\n33\nOKLAHOMA\n18,121\n34\nRHODE ISLAND\n17,444\n35\nNORTH DAKOTA\n11,765\n36\nIDAHO\n11,414\n37\nVERMONT\n8,980\n38\nMAINE\n8,553\n39\nNEW HAMPSHIRE\n8,526\n40\nMARYLAND\n8,218\n41\nNEBRASKA\n6,035\n42\nNEW MEXICO\n5,421\n43\nALASKA\n4,650\n44\nDIST. OF COL.\n1,695\n45\nWYOMING\n449\n46\nHAWAII\n(39)\n47\nSOUTH DAKOTA\n(107)\n48\nUTAH\n(5,329)\n49\nWEST VIRGINIA\n(17,715)\n50\nINDIANA\n(66,968)\n51,\nTOTAL U.S.\n$10,386,584\n*Negative values are in parentheses\n10\nSTATE EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1989\n(Ranked by Dollar Value-Thousand $)\n1989\nRank\nTEXAS\n$11,010,627\n1\nCALIFORNIA\n4,172,918\n2\nMICHIGAN\n1,720,558\n3\nNEW YORK\n834,284\n4\nARIZONA\n759,494\n5\nLOUISIANA\n671,019\n6\nILLINOIS\n569,203\n7\nPENNSYLVANIA\n474,687\n8\nOHIO\n464,034\n9\nFLORIDA\n424,199\n10\nNEW JERSEY\n390,817\n11\nMISSOURI\n322,043\n12\nTENNESSEE\n244,237\n13\nGEORGIA\n232,017\n14\nKANSAS\n221,210\n15\nINDIANA\n203,961\n16\nNORTH CAROLINA\n190,184\n17\nCONNECTICUT\n182,953\n18\nMINNESOTA\n162,847\n19\nALABAMA\n156,037\n20\nMASSACHUSETTS\n155,449\n21\nWISCONSIN\n135,217\n22\nWASHINGTON\n119,270\n23\nIOWA\n116,720\n24\nKENTUCKY\n99,428\n25\nMISSISSIPPI\n97,460\n26\nCOLORADO\n96,398\n27\nVIRGINIA\n85,743\n28\nARKANSAS\n80,519\n29\nOKLAHOMA\n62,369\n30\nSOUTH CAROLINA\n59,751\n31\nNORTH DAKOTA\n51,651\n32\nDELAWARE\n51,414\n33\nNEBRASKA\n50,581\n34\nOREGON\n38,067\n35\nRHODE ISLAND\n32,108\n36\nUTAH\n31,758\n37\nWEST VIRGINIA\n26,273\n38\nMARYLAND\n25,262\n39\nIDAHO\n22,652\n40\nNEVADA\n22,207\n41\nMONTANA\n19,948\n42\nNEW HAMPSHIRE\n18,316\n43\nNEW MEXICO\n14,479\n44\nVERMONT\n11,550\n45\nMAINE\n11,237\n46\nALASKA\n9,942\n47\nDIST. OF COL.\n6,627\n48\nSOUTH DAKOTA\n5,251\n49\nWYOMING\n3,824\n50\nHAWAII\n22\n51\nTOTAL U.S.\n$24,968,823\n11\nPERCENT OF STATES' EXPORTS GOING TO MEXICO: 1987-89\n1987\n1988\n1989\nALABAMA\n3.3\n4.0\n4.5\nALASKA\n0.3\n0.1\n0.4\nARIZONA\n21.5\n21.5\n18.7\nARKANSAS\n5.4\n6.0\n9.6\nCALIFORNIA\n6.6\n6.8\n7.8\nCOLORADO\n4.0\n3.8\n3.8\nCONNECTICUT\n3.5\n4.2\n4.1\nDELAWARE\n3.3\n3.2\n4.2\nDIST. OF COL.\n1.7\n2.6\n2.2\nFLORIDA\n2.1\n2.4\n2.9\nGEORGIA\n2.7\n3.2\n3.8\nHAWAII\n0.0\n0.1\n0.0\nIDAHO\n2.1\n5.2\n2.7\nILLINOIS\n3.2\n3.9\n4.3\nINDIANA\n6.5\n3.3\n3.8\nIOWA\n3.6\n4.3\n4.5\nKANSAS\n7.7\n14.2\n10.9\nKENTUCKY\n1.9\n2.9\n3.4\nLOUISIANA\n2.8\n3.6\n3.8\nMAINE\n0.4\n1.3\n1.2\nMARYLAND\n0.8\n1.3\n0.8\nMASSACHUSETTS\n1.2\n1.2\n1.5\nMICHIGAN\n6.0\n6.3\n8.1\nMINNESOTA\n2.2\n2.7\n3.1\nMISSISSIPPI\n4.1\n5.1\n5.5\nMISSOURI\n6.7\n11.4\n11.2\nMONTANA\n0.4\n0.6\n5.8\nNEBRASKA\n5.7\n5.7\n6.1\nNEVADA\n0.7\n2.2\n6.9\nNEW HAMPSHIRE\n1.1\n1.4\n1.7\nNEW JERSEY\n2.8\n3.2\n4.5\nNEW MEXICO\n5.4\n8.3\n6.8\nNEW YORK\n2.6\n3.1\n3.1\nNORTH CAROLINA\n1.6\n2.0\n2.3\nNORTH DAKOTA\n13.4\n13.4\n13.5\nOHIO\n2.4\n3.1\n3.5\nOKLAHOMA\n4.1\n6.3\n3.8\nOREGON\n0.6\n0.5\n0.7\nPENNSYLVANIA\n3.0\n4.3\n5.5\nRHODE ISLAND\n2.9\n4.3\n4.9\nSOUTH CAROLINA\n1.4\n1.8\n1.7\nSOUTH DAKOTA\n8.1\n5.2\n3.3\nTENNESSEE\n4.0\n4.7\n6.7\nTEXAS\n25.5\n27.0\n28.9\nUTAH\n4.6\n5.4\n2.6\nVERMONT\n0.4\n1.4\n0.7\nVIRGINIA\n0.6\n0.8\n1.0\nWASHINGTON\n0.6\n0.5\n0.5\nWEST VIRGINIA\n3.6\n1.4\n1.9\nWISCONSIN\n2.0\n1.8\n2.7\nWYOMING\n1.4\n1.3\n1.5\nTOTAL U.S.\n5.9\n6.6\n7.2\n12\nPERCENT OF STATES' EXPORTS GOING TO MEXICO: 1987-89\n(Ranked by 1989 Values)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nTEXAS\n25.5\n27.0\n28.9\nARIZONA\n21.5\n21.5\n18.7\nNORTH DAKOTA\n13.4\n13.4\n13.5\nMISSOURI\n6.7\n11.4\n11.2\nKANSAS\n7.7\n14.2\n10.9\nARKANSAS\n5.4\n6.0\n9.6\nMICHIGAN\n6.0\n6.3\n8.1\nCALIFORNIA\n6.6\n6.8\n7.8\nNEVADA\n0.7\n2.2\n6.9\nNEW MEXICO\n5.4\n8.3\n6.8\nTENNESSEE\n4.0\n4.7\n6.7\nNEBRASKA\n5.7\n5.7\n6.1\nMONTANA\n0.4\n0.6\n5.8\nMISSISSIPPI\n4.1\n5.1\n5.5\nPENNSYLVANIA\n3.0\n4.3\n5.5\nRHODE ISLAND\n2.9\n4.3\n4.9\nNEW JERSEY\n2.8\n3.2\n4.5\nIOWA\n3.6\n4.3\n4.5\nALABAMA\n3.3\n4.0\n4.5\nILLINOIS\n3.2\n3.9\n4.3\nDELAWARE\n3.3\n3.2\n4.2\nCONNECTICUT\n3.5\n4.2\n4.1\nGEORGIA\n2.7\n3.2\n3.8\nCOLORADO\n4.0\n3.8\n3.8\nOKLAHOMA\n4.1\n6.3\n3.8\nLOUISIANA\n2.8\n3.6\n3.8\nINDIANA\n6.5\n3.3\n3.8\nOHIO\n2.4\n3.1\n3.5\nKENTUCKY\n1.9\n2.9\n3.4\nSOUTH DAKOTA\n8.1\n5.2\n3.3\nNEW YORK\n2.6\n3.1\n3.1\nMINNESOTA\n2.2\n2.7\n3.1\nFLORIDA\n2.1\n2.4\n2.9\nIDAHO\n2.1\n5.2\n2.7\nWISCONSIN\n2.0\n1.8\n2.7\nUTAH\n4.6\n5.4\n2.6\nNORTH CAROLINA\n1.6\n2.0\n2.3\nDIST. OF COL.\n1.7\n2.6\n2.2\nWEST VIRGINIA\n3.6\n1.4\n1.9\nSOUTH CAROLINA\n1.4\n1.8\n1.7\nNEW HAMPSHIRE\n1.1\n1.4\n1.7\nWYOMING\n1.4\n1.3\n1.5\nMASSACHUSETTS\n1.2\n1.2\n1.5\nMAINE\n0.4\n1.3\n1.2\nVIRGINIA\n0.6\n0.8\n1.0\nMARYLAND\n0.8\n1.3\n0.8\nOREGON\n0.6\n0.5\n0.7\nVERMONT\n0.4\n1.4\n0.7\nWASHINGTON\n0.6\n0.5\n0.5\nALASKA\n0.3\n0.1\n0.4\nHAWAII\n0.0\n0.1\n0.0\nTOTAL U.S.\n5.9\n6.6\n7.2\n13\nSTATE-BY-STATE RANKING OF MEXICO\nAS AN EXPORT MARKET, 1989\nTotal # of Markets\nMexico's Rank Among\nThis State Exports to*\nForeign Markets\nALABAMA\n153\n6\nALASKA\n90\n19\nARIZONA\n149\n1\nARKANSAS\n118\n3\nCALIFORNIA\n197\n3\nCOLORADO\n149\n9\nCONNECTICUT\n157\n7\nDELAWARE\n101\n2\nDIST. OF COL.\n136\n9\nFLORIDA\n185\n10\nGEORGIA\n185\n6\nHAWAII\n70\n49\nIDAHO\n98\n8\nILLINOIS\n179\n6\nINDIANA\n154\n4\nIOWA\n139\n3\nKANSAS\n150\n3\nKENTUCKY\n131\n8\nLOUISIANA\n171\n5\nMAINE\n113\n16\nMARYLAND\n164\n25\nMASSACHUSETTS\n177\n15\nMICHIGAN\n162\n2\nMINNESOTA\n167\n9\nMISSISSIPPI\n142\n5\nMISSOURI\n151\n3\nMONTANA\n69\n4\nNEBRASKA\n119\n4\nNEVADA\n101\n5\nNEW HAMPSHIRE\n114\n15\nNEW JERSEY\n184\n5\nNEW MEXICO\n77\n6\nNEW YORK\n188\n8\nNORTH CAROLINA\n165\n14\nNORTH DAKOTA\n71\n2\nOHIO\n169\n6\nOKLAHOMA\n139\n7\nOREGON\n166\n20\nPENNSYLVANIA\n177\n5\nRHODE ISLAND\n110\n5\nSOUTH CAROLINA\n148\n15\nSOUTH DAKOTA\n71\n7\nTENNESSEE\n156\n3\nTEXAS\n190\n1\nUTAH\n123\n12\nVERMONT\n96\n7\nVIRGINIA\n171\n20\nWASHINGTON\n174\n29\nWEST VIRGINIA\n99\n13\nWISCONSIN\n174\n10\nWYOMING\n53\n15\n*The Census Bureau recognizes 217 destinations for U.S. exports. These geographic\nentities are sovereign countries (the majority), their dependencies and protectorates,\nand various localities of indeterminate political status.\n14\nSTATE-BY-STATE RANKING OF MEXICO AS AN\nEXPORT MARKET, SORTED BY 1989 MARKET RANK\nTotal # of Markets\nMexico's Rank Among\nThis State Exports to*\nForeign Markets\nARIZONA\n149\n1\nTEXAS\n190\n1\nNORTH DAKOTA\n71\n2\nDELAWARE\n101\n2\nMICHIGAN\n162\n2\nARKANSAS\n118\n3\nIOWA\n139\n3\nKANSAS\n150\n3\nMISSOURI\n151\n3\nTENNESSEE\n156\n3\nCALIFORNIA\n197\n3\nMONTANA\n69\n4\nNEBRASKA\n119\n4\nINDIANA\n154\n4\nNEVADA\n101\n5\nRHODE ISLAND\n110\n5\nMISSISSIPPI\n142\n5\nLOUISIANA\n171\n5\nPENNSYLVANIA\n177\n5\nNEW JERSEY\n184\n5\nNEW MEXICO\n77\n6\nALABAMA\n153\n6\nOHIO\n169\n6\nILLINOIS\n179\n6\nGEORGIA\n185\n6\nSOUTH DAKOTA\n71\n7\nVERMONT\n96\n7\nOKLAHOMA\n139\n7\nCONNECTICUT\n157\n7\nIDAHO\n98\n8\nKENTUCKY\n131\n8\nNEW YORK\n188\n8\nDIST. OF COL.\n136\n9\nCOLORADO\n149\n9\nMINNESOTA\n167\n9\nWISCONSIN\n174\n10\nFLORIDA\n185\n10\nUTAH\n123\n12\nWEST VIRGINIA\n99\n13\nNORTH CAROLINA\n165\n14\nWYOMING\n53\n15\nNEW HAMPSHIRE\n114\n15\nSOUTH CAROLINA\n148\n15\nMASSACHUSETTS\n177\n15\nMAINE\n113\n16\nALASKA\n90\n19\nOREGON\n166\n20\nVIRGINIA\n171\n20\nMARYLAND\n164\n25\nWASHINGTON\n174\n29\nHAWAII\n70\n49\n*The Census Bureau recognizes 217 destinations for U.S. exports. These geographic\nentities are sovereign countries (the majority), their dependencies and protectorates,\nand various localities of indeterminate political status.\n15\nINDIVIDUAL STATE PROFILES\nALABAMA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nAlabama's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n80 Percent of Alabama's\n94 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n180\n160\nNon-Manufacturing\n$156.0\nElectric &\nManufacturing\nElectronic Eqp.\n$40.9\n140\n$114.2\nPrimary Metal\n120\nIndustries\n$32.3\n100\n$80.6\nPaper Products\n$22.0\n80\n60\nChemicals\n$17.4\n40\n20\nComputers &\nIndustrial Mach.\n$12.0\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n10\n20\n30\n40\n50\nALABAMA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n5,832.8\n111.5\n8,407.3\nAgriculture - crops\n5,680.5\n0.0\n8,407.3\nAgriculture - livestock\n152.3\n111.5\n0.0\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n242.0\n11,561.1\n724.9\nMetal Mining\n38.6\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n104.7\n10,372.8\n305.2\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n10.4\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n98.6\n1,188.3\n409.2\nMANUFACTURING\n70,190.2\n96,579.3\n142,253.9\nFood Products\n724.4\n627.5\n251.8\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n2.4\nTextile Mill Products\n212.2\n1,718.2\n2,111.7\nApparel\n113.9\n159.8\n2,352.4\nLumber & Wood Products\n0.0\n22.7\n313.1\nFurniture & Fixtures\n26.8\n104.4\n389.9\nPaper Products\n28,705.9\n30,235.8\n22,037.1\nPrinting & Publishing\n0.0\n1.6\n10.5\nChemical Products\n14,509.0\n17,356.6\n17,396.7\nPetroleum Refining Products\n9,773.8\n281.9\n5,135.9\nRubber & Plastic Products\n375.6\n189.6\n1,313.1\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n17.8\n307.7\n1,655.7\nPrimary Metal Industries\n6,340.1\n15,285.7\n32,286.9\nFabricated Metal Products\n1,820.2\n684.5\n1,228.8\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n3,789.0\n10,750.4\n12,049.6\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n2,602.7\n17,583.2\n40,853.1\nTransportation Equipment\n779.2\n541.7\n1,846.7\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n391.4\n613.3\n930.3\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n8.1\n114.7\n88.3\nOTHER\n4,285.8\n5,964.3\n4,651.1\nScrap & Waste\n4,075.4\n4,749.6\n4,122.2\nSecond Hand Goods\n201.7\n681.7\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n8.7\n533.0\n528.9\nALABAMA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n80,550.7\n114,216.1\n156,037.2\nALABAMA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n2,431,683.0\n2,867,348.6\n3,484,424.2\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF ALABAMA'S EXPORTS\n3.3%\n4.0%\n4.5%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked SIXTH Among Alabama's 153 Export Markets\n19\nALASKA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nAlaska's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n87 Percent of Alaska's\n88 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n12\nNon-Manufacturing\n$9.9\nFood Products\n$3.6\n10\nManufacturing\n8\nPaper Products\n$1.7\n6\n$5.3\nChemicals\n$1.7\n4\n$2.7\nStone, Clay &\nGlass Products\n$1.3\n2\nPrimary Metal\nIndustries\n$0.4\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nALASKA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n22.7\n30.6\n159.6\nAgriculture crops\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nAgriculture - livestock\n22.7\n27.5\n24.0\nForestry\n0.0\n3.1\n0.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n135.6\nMINING\n24.7\n0.0\n21.5\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n21.5\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n24.7\n0.0\n0.0\nMANUFACTURING\n5,128.0\n1,347.6\n9,372.5\nFood Products\n77.7\n8.0\n3,570.4\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n0.0\n25.8\n88.6\nApparel\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nLumber & Wood Products\n0.0\n24.3\n62.2\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nPaper Products\n82.2\n61.2\n1,670.3\nPrinting & Publishing\n0.0\n26.1\n0.0\nChemical Products\n4,341.8\n149.7\n1,664.7\nPetroleum Refining Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n50.0\n0.0\n89.9\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n48.8\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n4.0\n246.6\n1,317.5\nPrimary Metal Industries\n9.1\n77.3\n436.8\nFabricated Metal Products\n12.3\n6.3\n11.0\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n26.8\n109.4\n186.1\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n412.5\n312.4\n117.5\nTransportation Equipment\n13.7\n81.6\n92.8\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n0.0\n0.0\n8.3\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n97.8\n218.9\n7.7\nOTHER\n117.2\n1,299.6\n388.7\nScrap & Waste\n117.2\n1,236.7\n388.7\nSecond Hand Goods\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n0.0\n62.9\n0.0\nALASKA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n5,292.6\n2,677.8\n9,942.2\nALASKA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n1,809,993.1\n2,358,616.3\n2,720,881.4\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF ALASKA'S EXPORTS\n0.3%\n0.1%\n0.4%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked 19TH Among Alaska's 90 Export Markets\n20\nARIZONA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nArizona's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n70 Percent of Arizona's\n18 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n1500\nNon-Manufacturing\nElectric &\n$217.8\nManufacturing\nElectronic Eqp.\n1000\nApparel\n$114.3\n$761.8\n$759.5\nComputers &\n$644.7\n$100.4\nIndustrial Mach.\n500\nTransportation\n$51.5\nEquipment\nPaper Products\n$46.0\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n50\n100\n150\n200\n250\n300\nARIZONA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n11,411.0\n36,268.7\n42,718.2\nAgriculture crops\n6,624.3\n25,810.2\n36,580.5\nAgriculture - livestock\n4,115.6\n10,385.8\n5,569.9\nForestry\n671.1\n72.8\n160.4\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n407.5\nMINING\n52.0\n78.7\n214.8\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n63.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n52.0\n78.7\n151.8\nMANUFACTURING\n627,078.6\n711,586.1\n700,740.9\nFood Products\n2,195.2\n12,174.0\n29,829.9\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n135.7\n535.1\nTextile Mill Products\n20,439.3\n35,503.3\n2,624.1\nApparel\n34,591.2\n47,674.1\n114,326.3\nLumber & Wood Products\n1,133.3\n4,209.5\n2,156.6\nFurniture & Fixtures\n506.5\n1,472.2\n4,566.9\nPaper Products\n23,411.0\n33,719.3\n45,970.8\nPrinting & Publishing\n782.9\n1,458.1\n1,061.0\nChemical Products\n11,651.1\n13,393.7\n8,929.7\nPetroleum Refining Products\n4,997.5\n522.9\n7,483.8\nRubber & Plastic Products\n27,068.4\n33,441.2\n11,670.8\nLeather Products\n686.5\n2,449.3\n4,932.4\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n987.9\n1,298.3\n2,819.1\nPrimary Metal Industries\n16,741.1\n22,394.7\n21,589.6\nFabricated Metal Products\n6,551.1\n14,244.4\n42,683.1\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n159,599.2\n143,119.5\n100,366.8\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n252,366.7\n268,158.9\n217,772.6\nTransportation Equipment\n53,459.6\n64,664.1\n51,497.7\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n4,920.7\n7,371.2\n24,847.0\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n4,989.4\n4,181.7\n5,077.6\nOTHER\n6,135.8\n13,852.1\n15,819.7\nScrap & Waste\n651.6\n1,539.9\n1,116.1\nSecond Hand Goods\n2,979.3\n5,402.6\n2,555.4\nMilitary Equipment\n2,505.0\n6,909.6\n12,148.2\nARIZONA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n644,677.5\n761,785.6\n759,493.6\nARIZONA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n2,999,012.4\n3,547,607.9\n4,058,324.3\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF ARIZONA'S EXPORTS\n21.5%\n21.5%\n18.7%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked FIRST Among Arizona's 149 Export Markets\n21\nARKANSAS: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nArkansas' Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n75 Percent of Arkansas'\n114 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n100\nNon-Manufacturing\nManufacturing\n$80.5\nFood Products\n$29.6\n80\nPrimary Metal\nIndustries\n$11.8\n60\n$42.7\nChemicals\n$10.7\n$37.7\n40\nElectric &\nElectronic Eqp.\n$4.3\n20\nAgriculture-Crops\n$4.0\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n5\n10\n15\n20\n25\n30\n35\n40\nARKANSAS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n558.8\n341.9\n5,133.7\nAgriculture - crops\n409.6\n28.7\n3,987.5\nAgriculture - livestock\n144.8\n311.2\n1,144.0\nForestry\n4.4\n1.9\n2.2\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n143.8\n10.4\n189.1\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n10.4\n66.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n143.8\n0.0\n123.1\nMANUFACTURING\n34,465.0\n39,540.5\n72,631.3\nFood Products\n868.7\n1,776.5\n29,573.5\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n60.0\n20.6\n262.4\nApparel\n87.5\n129.5\n1,355.5\nLumber & Wood Products\n24.8\n95.4\n1,548.7\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n14.2\n119.4\nPaper Products\n4,253.6\n2,590.3\n2,394.7\nPrinting & Publishing\n259.6\n193.4\n11.4\nChemical Products\n9,137.8\n7,805.5\n10,674.2\nPetroleum Refining Products\n29.9\n2.3\n2.7\nRubber & Plastic Products\n815.9\n1,112.2\n737.0\nLeather Products\n0.0\n235.7\n221.4\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n2,432.7\n3,266.3\n2,405.0\nPrimary Metal Industries\n709.4\n5,988.9\n11,819.9\nFabricated Metal Products\n1,731.4\n721.0\n813.6\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n6,965.1\n9,145.1\n3,368.3\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n5,146.4\n4,192.6\n4,333.8\nTransportation Equipment\n1,187.6\n1,326.9\n1,424.1\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n244.6\n40.0\n782.3\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n510.2\n884.0\n783.1\nOTHER\n2,542.6\n2,771.7\n2,564.5\nScrap & Waste\n2,429.9\n2,588.7\n2,340.9\nSecond Hand Goods\n95.0\n5.0\n133.0\nMilitary Equipment\n17.7\n178.0\n90.6\nARKANSAS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n37,710.2\n42,664.4\n80,518.6\nARKANSAS' EXPORTS TO WORLD\n695,229.7\n709,663.3\n838,571.1\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF ARKANSAS' EXPORTS\n5.4%\n6.0%\n9.6%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked THIRD Among Arkansas' 118 Export Markets\n22\nCALIFORNIA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nCalifornia's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n55 Percent of California's\n85 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nBillion $\nMillion $\n6\nElectric &\nNon-Manufacturing\n$762.4\n5\nElectronic Eqp.\nManufacturing\n$4.17\nComputers &\n$539.0\n4\nIndustrial Mach.\n$3.24\nTransportation\n3\n$444.2\n$2.26\nEquipment\n2\nPetroleum\n$324.2\nProducts\n1\nFabricated\n$242.0\nMetal Prod.\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n200\n400\n600\n800\n1,000\nCALIFORNIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n36,928.1\n99,996.1\n105,436.9\nAgriculture crops\n34,040.2\n68,106.3\n82,901.1\nAgriculture - livestock\n2,239.3\n30,407.6\n18,395.6\nForestry\n606.8\n1,144.5\n1,621.3\nFishing, Hunting\n41.8\n337.8\n2,518.9\nMINING\n47.8\n13,643.9\n12,441.8\nMetal Mining\n3.6\n30.2\n113.1\nCoal Mining\n16.6\n60.4\n255.5\nOil & Gas\n24.0\n0.0\n98.6\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n3.7\n13,553.3\n11,974.6\nCONSTRUCTION\n9,041.7\n0.0\n0.0\nMANUFACTURING\n2,147,660.5\n3,038,055.0\n3,961,306.3\nFood Products\n53,462.5\n121,269.3\n190,057.2\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n5.1\n1.8\nTextile Mill Products\n13,503.9\n28,102.4\n29,838.4\nApparel\n29,210.3\n52,360.6\n64,020.0\nLumber & Wood Products\n90,594.7\n129,593.5\n168,813.5\nFurniture & Fixtures\n18,568.8\n41,491.6\n61,650.4\nPaper Products\n68,878.2\n97,229.5\n149,019.8\nPrinting & Publishing\n9,541.2\n15,457.3\n18,585.0\nChemical Products\n90,603.6\n181,942.5\n196,573.4\nPetroleum Refining Products\n349,879.5\n206,527.4\n324,210.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n111,698.2\n163,036.0\n198,396.3\nLeather Products\n6,495.9\n10,836.9\n23,807.4\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n33,465.7\n35,105.0\n39,328.5\nPrimary Metal Industries\n100,602.7\n157,698.9\n182,863.5\nFabricated Metal Products\n131,943.0\n196,538.7\n241,969.8\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n385,122.9\n607,159.9\n538,958.4\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n430,760.7\n627,222.3\n762,406.3\nTransportation Equipment\n80,858.3\n116,705.5\n444,159.5\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n78,867.9\n129,766.5\n150,548.3\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n63,602.7\n120,006.3\n176,098.9\nOTHER\n63,584.6\n90,070.4\n93,733.5\nScrap & Waste\n18,812.7\n32,869.7\n29,900.3\nSecond Hand Goods\n8,862.8\n15,031.8\n4,169.7\nMilitary Equipment\n35,909.0\n42,168.9\n59,663.5\nCALIFORNIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n2,257,262.7\n3,241,765.4\n4,172,918.5\nCALIFORNIA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n34,311,151.0\n47,789,371.2\n53,547,596.0\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF CALIFORNIA'S EXPORTS\n6.6%\n6.8%\n7.8%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked THIRD Among California's 197 Export Markets\n23\nCOLORADO: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nColorado's Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n68 Percent of Colorado's\n39 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n120\nNon-Manufacturing\n100\nManufacturing\n$96.4\nAgriculture-Crops\n$17.6\n$80.0\nComputers &\n80\n$69.3\nIndustrial Mach.\n$15.2\n60\nChemicals\n$15.0\n40\nApparel\n$9.1\n20\nFood Products\n$8.5\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n10\n20\n30\nCOLORADO'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n2,538.4\n9,628.2\n17,817.5\nAgriculture crops\n2,471.2\n6,379.6\n17,633.2\nAgriculture livestock\n53.3\n3,217.4\n82.3\nForestry\n14.0\n31.2\n101.9\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n895.1\n559.6\n3,110.0\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n2,631.3\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n895.1\n559.6\n478.6\nMANUFACTURING\n62,797.4\n67,391.0\n73,325.6\nFood Products\n13,416.7\n16,118.4\n8,497.0\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n323.2\n176.4\n1,217.8\nApparel\n98.3\n338.5\n9,089.2\nLumber & Wood Products\n46.1\n29.8\n126.6\nFurniture & Fixtures\n111.7\n15.9\n110.3\nPaper Products\n1,706.9\n1,121.7\n1,094.7\nPrinting & Publishing\n185.5\n297.4\n334.1\nChemical Products\n9,210.1\n15,144.8\n14,980.6\nPetroleum Refining Products\n80.6\n51.6\n143.5\nRubber & Plastic Products\n1,863.5\n2,090.0\n4,024.8\nLeather Products\n0.0\n566.8\n167.1\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n249.3\n499.2\n474.9\nPrimary Metal Industries\n302.4\n460.5\n2,174.1\nFabricated Metal Products\n11,680.7\n9,101.7\n2,263.2\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n11,691.3\n11,999.7\n15,232.9\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n4,799.1\n3,899.8\n7,266.7\nTransportation Equipment\n472.9\n335.3\n1,343.5\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n6,341.8\n4,883.4\n2,271.1\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n217.2\n260.2\n2,513.6\nOTHER\n3,059.0\n2,375.7\n2,144.7\nScrap & Waste\n2,311.6\n1,763.8\n894.9\nSecond Hand Goods\n152.7\n355.8\n98.0\nMilitary Equipment\n594.8\n256.0\n1,151.8\nCOLORADO'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n69,290.0\n79,954.5\n96,397.8\nCOLORADO'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n1,718,961.9\n2,098,007.5\n2,526,651.4\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF COLORADO'S EXPORTS\n4.0%\n3.8%\n3.8%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked NINTH Among Colorado's 149 Export Markets\n24\nCONNECTICUT: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nConnecticut's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n75 Percent of Connecticut's\n59 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\nNon-Manufacturing\nChemicals\n$69.8\n200\nManufacturing\n$183.0\nElectric &\n$160.2\n$26.4\nElectronic Eqp.\n$115.4\nComputers &\n$20.3\nIndustrial Mach.\n100\nScrap & Waste\n$11.0\nPrimary Metal\nIndustries\n$9.9\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n20\n40\n60\n80\n100\nCONNECTICUT'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n484.6\n929.9\n827.2\nAgriculture crops\n175.2\n0.0\n10.8\nAgriculture livestock\n222.8\n766.1\n767.0\nForestry\n86.6\n163.7\n49.4\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n401.9\n449.2\n441.7\nMetal Mining\n11.6\n8.0\n2.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n46.6\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n390.3\n441.2\n393.2\nMANUFACTURING\n107,411.1\n145,218.9\n168,492.7\nFood Products\n0.0\n263.7\n1,050.1\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n94.2\n54.6\n348.0\nApparel\n79.5\n105.7\n21.1\nLumber & Wood Products\n402.9\n295.5\n196.7\nFurniture & Fixtures\n88.8\n451.8\n181.5\nPaper Products\n7,238.6\n15,911.4\n9,732.1\nPrinting & Publishing\n271.5\n107.3\n281.8\nChemical Products\n47,833.5\n47,794.7\n69,765.1\nPetroleum Refining Products\n512.2\n906.1\n3,814.2\nRubber & Plastic Products\n1,316.0\n2,866.7\n1,336.4\nLeather Products\n0.0\n51.8\n38.6\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n320.5\n643.5\n353.0\nPrimary Metal Industries\n5,353.1\n7,751.4\n9,857.3\nFabricated Metal Products\n1,201.5\n1,870.4\n2,114.5\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n14,497.7\n21,004.9\n20,258.7\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n11,468.9\n23,061.4\n26,441.5\nTransportation Equipment\n6,839.1\n10,666.7\n7,727.8\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n6,375.0\n8,669.8\n8,793.0\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n3,518.3\n2,741.5\n6,181.3\nOTHER\n7,080.3\n13,575.7\n13,191.6\nScrap & Waste\n6,636.9\n12,243.4\n11,023.6\nSecond Hand Goods\n46.4\n4.0\n11.0\nMilitary Equipment\n397.0\n1,328.3\n2,157.0\nCONNECTICUT'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n115,377.9\n160,173.7\n182,953.2\nCONNECTICUT'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n3,318,913.9\n3,828,715.4\n4,472,941.9\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF CONNECTICUT'S EXPORTS\n3.5%\n4.2%\n4.1%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked SEVENTH Among Connecticut's 157 Export Markets\n25\nDELAWARE: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nDelaware's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n92 Percent of Delaware's\n83 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n70\n60\nNon-Manufacturing\nChemicals\nManufacturing\n$36.6\n$51.4\n50\nScientific &\n$38.9\nMeasuring Instru.\n$3.4\n40\nRubber &\n30\n$28.0\nPlastic Prod.\n$3.1\n20\nComputers &\nIndustrial Mach.\n$2.2\n10\nApparel\n$2.2\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n10\n20\n30\n40\n50\nDELAWARE'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n27.0\n20.0\n174.3\nAgriculture crops\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nAgriculture livestock\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nForestry\n27.0\n20.0\n174.3\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n10.8\n49.1\n473.6\nMetal Mining\n10.8\n29.1\n422.6\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n0.0\n19.9\n51.1\nMANUFACTURING\n27,984.7\n38,110.1\n50,630.7\nFood Products\n119.9\n116.9\n71.7\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n131.9\n1,073.1\n855.3\nApparel\n12.2\n1,739.9\n2,188.8\nLumber & Wood Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n0.0\n6.5\nPaper Products\n199.3\n477.6\n282.5\nPrinting & Publishing\n0.0\n5.8\n3.8\nChemical Products\n21,835.8\n28,104.1\n36,639.8\nPetroleum Refining Products\n49.6\n6.4\n0.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n2,794.3\n4,434.9\n3,104.8\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n59.1\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n14.5\n52.6\n114.3\nPrimary Metal Industries\n182.8\n132.3\n104.0\nFabricated Metal Products\n390.1\n251.9\n892.6\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n604.6\n634.9\n2,246.2\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n468.8\n9.4\n220.5\nTransportation Equipment\n391.8\n484.4\n277.9\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n788.9\n564.8\n3,376.4\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n0.0\n21.1\n186.4\nOTHER\n11.0\n720.7\n135.6\nScrap & Waste\n9.1\n0.0\n0.0\nSecond Hand Goods\n0.0\n9.4\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n1.9\n711.3\n135.6\nDELAWARE'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n28,033.5\n38,899.9\n51,414.3\nDELAWARE'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n851,779.8\n1,202,207.3\n1,231,251.2\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF DELAWARE'S EXPORTS\n3.3%\n3.2%\n4.2%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked SECOND Among Delaware's 101 Export Markets\n26\nDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe District's Exports to Mexico Rose by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n89 Percent of the District's\n34 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n10\nNon-Manufacturing\nForestry\n$4.3\n8\nManufacturing\n$7.1\n$6.6\nComputers &\nIndustrial Mach.\n$0.5\n6\n$4.9\nScientific &\nMeasuring Instru.\n$0.4\n4\nTransportation\n$0.3\nEquipment\n2\nElectric &\nElectronic Eqp.\n$0.3\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\nDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n3.2\n42.3\n4,344.8\nAgriculture - crops\n0.0\n42.3\n7.5\nAgriculture - livestock\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nForestry\n3.2\n0.0\n4,337.3\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMANUFACTURING\n4,872.2\n6,959.4\n2,155.4\nFood Products\n3,007.0\n5,219.3\n29.2\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n2.4\n20.9\n1.7\nApparel\n0.0\n5.8\n0.0\nLumber & Wood Products\n0.0\n0.0\n11.3\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n0.0\n115.3\nPaper Products\n15.4\n763.5\n48.5\nPrinting & Publishing\n8.3\n33.9\n117.6\nChemical Products\n32.7\n352.3\n58.3\nPetroleum Refining Products\n0.0\n2.1\n0.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n0.0\n36.6\n108.5\nLeather Products\n10.3\n14.7\n3.7\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n0.0\n0.0\n10.9\nPrimary Metal Industries\n0.0\n2.9\n15.7\nFabricated Metal Products\n9.1\n53.6\n57.3\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n204.3\n185.6\n475.6\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n76.6\n102.0\n291.1\nTransportation Equipment\n1,315.7\n105.6\n346.5\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n157.7\n60.6\n428.2\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n32.7\n0.0\n36.0\nOTHER\n56.6\n61.4\n127.0\nScrap & Waste\n0.0\n1.7\n11.1\nSecond Hand Goods\n6.9\n0.0\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n49.6\n59.7\n115.8\nD.C.'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n4,932.0\n7,063.1\n6,627.1\nD.C.'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n288,416.3\n269,893.4\n303,567.7\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF D.C.'S EXPORTS\n1.7%\n2.6%\n2.2%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked NINTH Among The District's 136 Export Markets\n27\nFLORIDA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nFlorida's Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n64 Percent of Florida's\n94 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n500\nNon-Manufacturing\n$424.2\nChemicals\n$112.0\n400\nManufacturing\n$326.3\nComputers &\nIndustrial Mach.\n$66.9\n300\nElectric &\n$219.0\n$40.3\nElectronic Eqp.\n200\nScrap & Waste\n$27.0\n100\nPaper Products\n$25.9\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n20\n40\n60\n80\n100\n120\n140\nFLORIDA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n266.3\n563.3\n987.7\nAgriculture crops\n32.6\n96.1\n217.3\nAgriculture - livestock\n210.2\n444.3\n395.6\nForestry\n23.6\n9.6\n20.9\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n13.3\n353.8\nMINING\n282.6\n345.6\n4,734.5\nMetal Mining\n116.0\n89.4\n590.5\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n166.7\n256.1\n4,144.0\nMANUFACTURING\n208,098.4\n306,489.5\n387,013.1\nFood Products\n2,984.3\n5,533.2\n7,775.2\nTobacco Products\n195.7\n24.5\n78.8\nTextile Mill Products\n2,286.3\n13,813.6\n2,855.8\nApparel\n1,876.5\n4,780.5\n11,092.8\nLumber & Wood Products\n63.7\n704.3\n579.9\nFurniture & Fixtures\n1,322.8\n2,315.6\n4,887.9\nPaper Products\n15,398.4\n22,430.8\n25,867.7\nPrinting & Publishing\n4,080.2\n6,208.2\n12,943.6\nChemical Products\n54,440.8\n74,914.0\n111,955.4\nPetroleum Refining Products\n907.2\n389.6\n309.6\nRubber & Plastic Products\n1,281.9\n4,313.2\n7,262.0\nLeather Products\n450.1\n4,419.4\n4,383.7\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n1,507.4\n2,512.2\n3,851.6\nPrimary Metal Industries\n8,163.6\n12,695.6\n23,590.5\nFabricated Metal Products\n3,078.9\n5,134.2\n10,530.9\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n71,204.2\n84,128.2\n66,870.1\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n14,151.0\n26,411.5\n40,299.8\nTransportation Equipment\n16,212.2\n17,348.0\n21,790.9\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n7,259.2\n15,176.7\n22,269.9\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n1,234.0\n3,236.4\n7,817.1\nOTHER\n10,351.1\n18,938.0\n31,464.0\nScrap & Waste\n6,223.2\n11,437.8\n26,999.3\nSecond Hand Goods\n674.4\n1,008.4\n900.2\nMilitary Equipment\n3,453.5\n6,491.8\n3,564.5\nFLORIDA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n218,998.5\n326,336.4\n424,199.3\nFLORIDA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n10,367,608.1\n13,423,569.8\n14,419,603.3\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF FLORIDA'S EXPORTS\n2.1%\n2.4%\n2.9%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked TENTH Among Florida's 185 Export Markets\n28\nGEORGIA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nGeorgia's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n71 Percent of Georgia's\n115 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n300\nNon-Manufacturing\nChemicals\n$39.5\n$232.0\nManufacturing\nComputers &\n$34.7\n200\nIndustrial Mach.\n$157.2\nPaper Products\n$34.1\n$108.1\n100\nScientific &\n$32.3\nMeasuring Instru.\nTransportation\n$24.3\nEquipment\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n10\n20\n30\n40\n50\nGEORGIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n519.4\n592.8\n1,798.0\nAgriculture crops\n121.0\n274.1\n1,344.1\nAgriculture livestock\n40.4\n175.9\n29.7\nForestry\n358.0\n142.8\n419.8\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n4.4\nMINING\n15,113.7\n12,731.9\n8,348.2\nMetal Mining\n146.7\n153.8\n47.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n14,967.0\n12,578.1\n8,301.2\nMANUFACTURING\n88,674.7\n138,934.1\n213,214.2\nFood Products\n3,943.8\n2,809.1\n9,958.5\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n53.9\n75.2\nTextile Mill Products\n2,111.5\n5,008.6\n9,876.3\nApparel\n407.2\n906.9\n1,062.8\nLumber & Wood Products\n15.2\n13.8\n28.6\nFurniture & Fixtures\n36.0\n16.1\n395.7\nPaper Products\n22,045.2\n23,103.9\n34,089.1\nPrinting & Publishing\n84.2\n363.9\n260.4\nChemical Products\n15,908.6\n20,920.8\n39,455.9\nPetroleum Refining Products\n18.0\n178.2\n138.1\nRubber & Plastic Products\n1,797.8\n4,221.2\n3,622.1\nLeather Products\n15.2\n220.5\n61.6\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n4,138.9\n1,435.1\n3,122.8\nPrimary Metal Industries\n2,656.3\n3,114.3\n8,225.6\nFabricated Metal Products\n886.9\n1,165.9\n2,650.2\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n11,311.4\n30,827.7\n34,699.7\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n20,311.8\n6,313.4\n8,135.5\nTransportation Equipment\n858.6\n2,318.5\n24,289.1\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n2,076.6\n35,299.3\n32,341.3\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n51.5\n642.9\n725.5\nOTHER\n3,789.4\n4,949.6\n8,656.2\nScrap & Waste\n3,378.0\n4,240.5\n7,600.2\nSecond Hand Goods\n327.1\n246.0\n76.2\nMilitary Equipment\n84.3\n463.1\n979.8\nGEORGIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n108,097.1\n157,208.4\n232,016.6\nGEORGIA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n3,977,200.6\n4,889,448.6\n6,054,727.2\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF GEORGIA'S EXPORTS\n2.7%\n3.2%\n3.8%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked SIXTH Among Georgia's 185 Export Markets\n29\nHAWAII: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nHawaii's Exports to Mexico Fell by\nThe Top 3 Exports Accounted for\n100 Percent of Hawaii's\n64 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nThousand $\nThousand $\n400\nNon-Manufacturing\nComputers &\n300\nManufacturing\nIndustrial Mach.\n$13.1\n$215.7\nRubber &\n200\nPlastic Prod.\n$5.4\n100\n$60.5\nTransportation\n$21.7\nEquipment\n$3.2\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n5\n10\n15\n20\nHAWAII'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n6.0\n1.8\n0.0\nAgriculture crops\n6.0\n1.8\n0.0\nAgriculture - livestock\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMANUFACTURING\n52.0\n203.4\n21.7\nFood Products\n0.0\n3.7\n0.0\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nApparel\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nLumber & Wood Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nPaper Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nPrinting & Publishing\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nChemical Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nPetroleum Refining Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n0.0\n0.0\n5.4\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nPrimary Metal Industries\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFabricated Metal Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n41.8\n0.0\n13.1\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n10.2\n199.7\n0.0\nTransportation Equipment\n0.0\n0.0\n3.2\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOTHER\n2.5\n10.4\n0.0\nScrap & Waste\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nSecond Hand Goods\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n2.5\n10.4\n0.0\nHAWAII'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n60.5\n215.7\n21.7\nHAWAII'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n225,343.8\n202,142.4\n263,126.6\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF HAWAII'S EXPORTS\n0.0%\n0.1%\n0.0%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked 49TH Among Hawaii's 70 Export Markets\n30\nIDAHO: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nIdaho's Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n88 Percent of Idaho's\n102 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n50\nNon-Manufacturing\nComputers &\n$6.6\nManufacturing\nIndustrial Mach.\n40\n$36.3\nPaper Products\n$4.8\n30\n$22.7\nChemicals\n$4.5\n20\nElectric &\n$11.2\nElectronic Eqp.\n$2.0\n10\nAgriculture-Crops\n$2.0\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n2\n4\n6\n8\n10\nIDAHO'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n390.0\n516.3\n2,064.1\nAgriculture - crops\n390.0\n425.3\n2,006.4\nAgriculture - livestock\n0.0\n90.9\n0.0\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n57.6\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMANUFACTURING\n10,079.9\n34,669.3\n20,240.8\nFood Products\n905.1\n1,029.5\n1,817.4\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nApparel\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nLumber & Wood Products\n0.0\n5.7\n29.8\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n4.3\n0.0\nPaper Products\n901.0\n2,259.7\n4,829.7\nPrinting & Publishing\n6.5\n78.1\n17.0\nChemical Products\n3,817.0\n3,625.7\n4,548.4\nPetroleum Refining Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n0.0\n114.6\n9.1\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n0.0\n5.2\n0.0\nPrimary Metal Industries\n325.4\n12.1\n19.9\nFabricated Metal Products\n80.5\n364.0\n119.3\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n2,974.3\n7,743.6\n6,602.1\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n256.7\n1,158.2\n2,007.4\nTransportation Equipment\n790.1\n18,263.5\n116.9\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n23.3\n2.4\n119.4\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n0.0\n2.9\n4.3\nOTHER\n768.0\n1,145.9\n346.9\nScrap & Waste\n768.0\n1,107.6\n288.2\nSecond Hand Goods\n0.0\n9.0\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n0.0\n29.3\n58.7\nIDAHO'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n11,237.9\n36,331.5\n22,651.7\nIDAHO'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n523,547.4\n697,665.6\n836,099.9\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF IDAHO'S EXPORTS\n2.1%\n5.2%\n2.7%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked EIGHTH Among Idaho's 98 Export Markets\n31\nILLINOIS: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nIllinois' Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n75 Percent of Illinois'\n104 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\n700\nMillion $\n600\nNon-Manufacturing\n$569.2\nComputers &\nManufacturing\nIndustrial Mach.\n$195.6\n500\n$448.2\nTransportation\nEquipment\n$75.6\n400\nElectric &\n300\n$278.4\n$71.4\nElectronic Eqp.\n200\nChemicals\n$54.7\n100\nFood Products\n$29.9\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n50\n100\n150\n200\n250\nILLINOIS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n1,323.1\n1,903.2\n2,750.7\nAgriculture crops\n1,183.2\n1,035.2\n1,650.0\nAgriculture livestock\n139.9\n765.1\n812.4\nForestry\n0.0\n85.7\n283.1\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n17.2\n5.1\nMINING\n1,735.1\n1,802.8\n1,281.0\nMetal Mining\n298.3\n60.1\n38.4\nCoal Mining\n581.6\n299.3\n129.4\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n855.1\n1,443.4\n1,113.2\nMANUFACTURING\n254,291.1\n412,885.7\n536,049.0\nFood Products\n4,276.3\n19,741.2\n29,905.3\nTobacco Products\n2.4\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n67.5\n1,436.4\n2,206.1\nApparel\n413.5\n1,227.4\n2,784.2\nLumber & Wood Products\n29.4\n499.1\n861.8\nFurniture & Fixtures\n350.7\n585.7\n1,259.4\nPaper Products\n5,606.4\n5,801.4\n12,927.2\nPrinting & Publishing\n891.5\n3,322.5\n3,273.2\nChemical Products\n22,656.2\n27,425.7\n54,670.1\nPetroleum Refining Products\n1,425.1\n3,144.3\n2,041.7\nRubber & Plastic Products\n5,241.9\n7,031.0\n10,407.9\nLeather Products\n59.1\n1,298.1\n606.7\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n8,046.3\n5,650.0\n4,340.1\nPrimary Metal Industries\n10,235.5\n43,471.6\n28,119.0\nFabricated Metal Products\n5,913.3\n8,387.1\n17,017.5\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n114,134.3\n162,574.7\n195,617.1\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n42,263.2\n59,181.6\n71,412.3\nTransportation Equipment\n22,322.2\n47,768.0\n75,609.0\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n8,968.9\n12,299.3\n17,206.9\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n1,387.5\n2,040.7\n5,783.6\nOTHER\n21,024.2\n31,574.0\n29,122.6\nScrap & Waste\n18,287.9\n28,102.1\n26,989.0\nSecond Hand Goods\n732.2\n667.6\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n2,004.0\n2,804.3\n2,133.6\nILLINOIS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n278,373.4\n448,165.7\n569,203.2\nILLINOIS' EXPORTS TO WORLD\n8,717,324.2\n11,513,482.8\n13,159,862.8\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF ILLINOIS' EXPORTS\n3.2%\n3.9%\n4.3%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked SIXTH Among Illinois' 179 Export Markets\n32\nINDIANA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nIndiana's Exports to Mexico Fell by\n91 Percent of Indiana's\n25 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n400\nNon-Manufacturing\nComputers &\n$53.1\nManufacturing\nIndustrial Mach.\n300\n$270.9\nPrimary Metal\n$46.0\nIndustries\n$204.0\n200\nTransportation\n$43.8\n$155.9\nEquipment\nChemicals\n$27.4\n100\nElectric &\n$14.7\nElectronic Eqp.\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n10\n20\n30\n40\n50\n60\n70\nINDIANA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n319.6\n374.8\n1,412.9\nAgriculture - crops\n250.5\n353.7\n1,401.9\nAgriculture - livestock\n69.1\n16.2\n11.0\nForestry\n0.0\n5.0\n0.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n2.2\n21.5\n4.8\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n18.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n2.2\n3.5\n4.8\nMANUFACTURING\n269,855.8\n155,002.2\n201,724.0\nFood Products\n1,952.1\n2,192.3\n2,097.8\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n110.0\n1,508.1\n947.6\nApparel\n24.4\n113.5\n164.0\nLumber & Wood Products\n318.6\n873.7\n1,354.9\nFurniture & Fixtures\n1,072.9\n592.3\n274.8\nPaper Products\n796.9\n711.2\n1,467.6\nPrinting & Publishing\n616.3\n414.9\n186.6\nChemical Products\n19,558.7\n25,382.6\n27,432.8\nPetroleum Refining Products\n78.2\n150.3\n175.9\nRubber & Plastic Products\n1,901.8\n2,474.2\n3,828.9\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n948.8\n872.6\n773.6\nPrimary Metal Industries\n19,588.5\n24,433.4\n45,997.1\nFabricated Metal Products\n706.4\n1,907.8\n2,407.7\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n61,035.0\n56,044.7\n53,105.7\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n47,574.2\n13,092.7\n14,650.6\nTransportation Equipment\n12,996.7\n18,369.0\n43,775.6\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n100,442.3\n5,733.1\n2,738.2\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n134.0\n135.8\n344.7\nOTHER\n751.1\n511.0\n818.9\nScrap & Waste\n590.8\n377.2\n645.2\nSecond Hand Goods\n54.4\n16.4\n3.9\nMilitary Equipment\n105.9\n117.4\n169.8\nINDIANA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n270,928.8\n155,909.5\n203,960.6\nINDIANA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n4,169,677.0\n4,758,973.1\n5,414,098.1\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF INDIANA'S EXPORTS\n6.5%\n3.3%\n3.8%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked FOURTH Among Indiana's 154 Export Markets\n33\nIOWA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nlowa's Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n84 Percent of lowa's\n77 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n140\nNon-Manufacturing\n120\nManufacturing\n$116.7\nFood Products\n$58.9\n100\n$93.8\nPrimary Metal\nIndustries\n$12.0\n80\n$66.1\nAgriculture-Crops\n$11.6\n60\n40\nComputers &\nIndustrial Mach.\n$9.3\n20\nChemicals\n$5.7\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n20\n40\n60\n80\nIOWA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n14,310.4\n22,227.1\n15,820.7\nAgriculture crops\n13,121.3\n18,208.1\n11,591.3\nAgriculture livestock\n1,189.1\n4,019.0\n3,485.8\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n743.6\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n182.4\n0.0\n6.7\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n182.4\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n0.0\n0.0\n6.7\nMANUFACTURING\n51,228.1\n70,770.5\n99,876.4\nFood Products\n28,452.5\n44,233.4\n58,893.3\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n0.0\n46.6\n139.7\nApparel\n3.2\n10.0\n56.4\nLumber & Wood Products\n3.2\n4.2\n9.1\nFurniture & Fixtures\n18.0\n2.8\n529.6\nPaper Products\n59.6\n402.0\n1,581.4\nPrinting & Publishing\n1.8\n39.8\n84.9\nChemical Products\n1,868.3\n3,085.8\n5,675.0\nPetroleum Refining Products\n8.8\n87.5\n51.5\nRubber & Plastic Products\n888.6\n1,606.2\n408.0\nLeather Products\n67.6\n2.6\n0.0\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n67.8\n10.7\n83.3\nPrimary Metal Industries\n2,085.8\n5,171.1\n12,025.3\nFabricated Metal Products\n1,075.5\n1,012.3\n3,812.5\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n8,344.2\n9,880.9\n9,318.6\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n6,822.1\n2,814.1\n4,334.2\nTransportation Equipment\n641.6\n897.3\n1,659.4\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n707.8\n884.2\n593.1\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n111.7\n578.9\n621.3\nOTHER\n363.1\n775.6\n1,016.0\nScrap & Waste\n291.7\n557.8\n943.3\nSecond Hand Goods\n25.3\n55.8\n11.0\nMilitary Equipment\n46.0\n162.0\n61.6\nIOWA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n66,084.0\n93,773.1\n116,719.7\nIOWA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n1,839,720.0\n2,164,724.1\n2,583,277.0\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF IOWA'S EXPORTS\n3.6%\n4.3%\n4.5%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked THIRD Among Iowa's 139 Export Markets\n34\nKANSAS: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nKansas' Exports to Mexico Grew by\n91 Percent of Kansas'\n77 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n500\nNon-Manufacturing\nAgriculture-Crops\n$114.5\n400\nManufacturing\nFood Products\n$37.9\n300\n$279.4\n$221.2\nElectric &\nElectronic Eqp.\n$21.6\n200\n$125.0\nTransportation\n$17.8\nEquipment\n100\nComputers &\nIndustrial Mach.\n$10.1\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n50\n100\n150\n200\nKANSAS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n89,172.0\n170,548.8\n114,619.9\nAgriculture crops\n88,064.6\n170,156.6\n114,521.4\nAgriculture - livestock\n1,089.0\n392.2\n98.5\nForestry\n18.4\n0.0\n0.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n284.6\n228.7\n172.3\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n284.6\n228.7\n172.3\nMANUFACTURING\n34,838.2\n106,023.2\n102,068.5\nFood Products\n16,303.7\n43,457.8\n37,928.6\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n25.3\n45.1\n118.3\nApparel\n4.6\n114.9\n335.4\nLumber & Wood Products\n25.2\n44.7\n215.5\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n31.5\n44.8\nPaper Products\n208.2\n299.4\n630.2\nPrinting & Publishing\n9.5\n76.8\n49.4\nChemical Products\n1,468.4\n10,334.3\n2,092.7\nPetroleum Refining Products\n232.9\n104.5\n5,823.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n375.8\n1,916.3\n961.2\nLeather Products\n0.0\n59.0\n12.4\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n40.3\n355.5\n625.2\nPrimary Metal Industries\n58.5\n304.1\n1,076.2\nFabricated Metal Products\n203.3\n1,129.8\n1,000.6\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n4,227.3\n8,813.3\n10,138.2\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n6,148.5\n12,740.1\n21,593.9\nTransportation Equipment\n4,278.3\n25,614.0\n17,836.4\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n1,226.2\n539.6\n1,548.5\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n2.2\n42.4\n37.8\nOTHER\n683.9\n2,644.7\n4,348.9\nScrap & Waste\n301.5\n2,139.5\n4,010.9\nSecond Hand Goods\n210.1\n398.9\n230.6\nMilitary Equipment\n172.2\n106.3\n107.4\nKANSAS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n124,978.7\n279,445.4\n221,209.6\nKANSAS' EXPORTS TO WORLD\n1,622,685.8\n1,961,576.5\n2,032,379.2\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF KANSAS' EXPORTS\n7.7%\n14.2%\n10.9%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked THIRD Among Kansas' 150 Export Markets\n35\nKENTUCKY: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nKentucky's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n77 Percent of Kentucky's\n130 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n140\nNon-Manufacturing\nChemicals\n$24.1\n120\nManufacturing\n$99.4\nComputers &\n100\n$86.1\nIndustrial Mach.\n$19.7\n80\nTransportation\n$13.8\nEquipment\n60\n$43.3\nElectric &\n40\n$11.7\nElectronic Eqp.\n20\nPrimary Metal\n$7.5\nIndustries\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n5\n10\n15\n20\n25\n30\n35\nKENTUCKY'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n2.5\n816.5\n2,033.4\nAgriculture crops\n0.0\n80.9\n0.0\nAgriculture - livestock\n2.5\n717.2\n1,991.3\nForestry\n0.0\n18.4\n42.1\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n1,596.6\n1,291.0\n2,183.0\nMetal Mining\n38.4\n7.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n156.1\n48.9\n173.8\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n1,402.2\n1,235.1\n2,009.2\nMANUFACTURING\n41,558.3\n83,054.4\n94,469.3\nFood Products\n638.5\n1,715.6\n1,959.7\nTobacco Products\n79.1\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n242.4\n678.4\n325.4\nApparel\n22.9\n61.5\n344.4\nLumber & Wood Products\n128.8\n268.6\n140.7\nFurniture & Fixtures\n177.5\n52.1\n343.8\nPaper Products\n56.8\n108.1\n264.8\nPrinting & Publishing\n922.6\n79.7\n1,077.0\nChemical Products\n12,344.9\n19,289.6\n24,105.5\nPetroleum Refining Products\n915.9\n361.7\n78.1\nRubber & Plastic Products\n379.3\n1,362.6\n1,127.0\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n212.4\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n2,656.9\n4,353.8\n4,879.5\nPrimary Metal Industries\n2,414.2\n1,668.8\n7,461.2\nFabricated Metal Products\n327.4\n871.5\n2,313.8\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n13,840.9\n16,055.9\n19,725.9\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n1,618.8\n9,915.1\n11,729.1\nTransportation Equipment\n4,494.3\n24,481.9\n13,813.3\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n186.3\n418.1\n1,234.1\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n110.9\n1,311.2\n3,333.5\nOTHER\n108.3\n965.1\n742.6\nScrap & Waste\n75.0\n868.4\n535.5\nSecond Hand Goods\n0.0\n14.3\n162.5\nMilitary Equipment\n33.3\n82.4\n44.6\nKENTUCKY'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n43,265.7\n86,127.0\n99,428.3\nKENTUCKY'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n2,295,979.4\n2,938,287.5\n2,965,331.7\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF KENTUCKY'S EXPORTS\n1.9%\n2.9%\n3.4%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked EIGHTH Among Kentucky's 131 Export Markets\n36\nLOUISIANA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nLouisiana's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n96 Percent of Louisiana's\n78 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n800\nNon-Manufacturing\nAgriculture-crops\n$415.9\nManufacturing\n$671.0\n600\nChemicals\n$126.1\n$530.1\n$377.4\nFood Products\n$88.5\n400\nPetroleum\nProducts\n$7.8\n200\nLumber &\nWood Products\n$5.0\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n100\n200\n300\n400\n500\n600\n700\nLOUISIANA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n164,234.0\n244,899.4\n418,549.7\nAgriculture - crops\n164,169.7\n244,881.3\n415,864.6\nAgriculture - livestock\n64.3\n18.1\n56.1\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n110.7\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n2,518.2\nMINING\n8,487.6\n6,667.5\n775.1\nMetal Mining\n350.4\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n3,468.7\n1,571.2\n764.2\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n4,668.5\n5,096.3\n10.9\nMANUFACTURING\n200,749.7\n266,381.4\n246,991.0\nFood Products\n10,412.0\n32,939.8\n88,460.0\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n608.7\n1,408.2\n164.5\nApparel\n143.7\n509.9\n214.4\nLumber & Wood Products\n59.0\n3,217.1\n5,035.0\nFurniture & Fixtures\n140.4\n150.5\n514.7\nPaper Products\n6,406.6\n10,241.3\n2,714.6\nPrinting & Publishing\n618.0\n404.8\n42.6\nChemical Products\n113,477.7\n142,911.6\n126,141.0\nPetroleum Refining Products\n18,871.8\n21,311.9\n7,797.9\nRubber & Plastic Products\n4,643.3\n4,558.7\n939.9\nLeather Products\n3.5\n1,154.0\n3.3\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n2,499.6\n1,557.7\n754.5\nPrimary Metal Industries\n4,171.0\n4,459.7\n1,735.1\nFabricated Metal Products\n1,495.3\n2,928.3\n1,669.6\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n12,011.2\n14,924.5\n4,846.7\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n4,724.3\n6,918.7\n2,511.4\nTransportation Equipment\n18,958.0\n13,183.3\n1,478.1\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n1,242.0\n1,767.4\n1,597.3\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n263.6\n1,834.0\n370.2\nOTHER\n3,954.9\n12,200.5\n4,702.9\nScrap & Waste\n3,471.8\n9,449.5\n4,696.4\nSecond Hand Goods\n143.9\n306.8\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n339.2\n2,444.2\n6.5\nLOUISIANA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n377,426.2\n530,148.8\n671,018.7\nLOUISIANA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n13,616,822.0\n14,921,923.4\n17,753,807.5\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF LOUISIANA'S EXPORTS\n2.8%\n3.6%\n3.8%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked FIFTH Among Louisiana's 171 Export Markets\n37\nMAINE: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nMaine's Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n84 Percent of Maine's\n319 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n20\nNon-Manufacturing\nForestry\n$4.0\n16\nManufacturing\nElectric &\n12\n$10.9\n$11.2\nElectronic Eqp.\n$2.2\nStone, Clay &\nGlass Products\n$1.5\n8\nPaper Products\n$0.9\n4\n$2.7\nLeather Products\n$0.9\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\nMAINE'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n11.6\n0.0\n4,055.8\nAgriculture crops\n5.9\n0.0\n34.6\nAgriculture livestock\n5.6\n0.0\n0.0\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n4,005.4\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n15.8\nMINING\n0.0\n4.9\n0.0\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n0.0\n4.9\n0.0\nMANUFACTURING\n2,467.0\n5,838.7\n7,021.8\nFood Products\n1,376.6\n2,184.0\n46.0\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n17.1\n75.8\n26.8\nApparel\n0.0\n63.1\n0.0\nLumber & Wood Products\n1.6\n4.3\n0.0\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n10.6\n0.0\nPaper Products\n276.6\n1,206.7\n929.9\nPrinting & Publishing\n6.5\n0.0\n0.0\nChemical Products\n9.0\n135.1\n68.1\nPetroleum Refining Products\n0.0\n0.0\n26.2\nRubber & Plastic Products\n9.3\n174.0\n81.6\nLeather Products\n15.9\n76.4\n857.8\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n389.6\n270.6\n1,495.1\nPrimary Metal Industries\n44.7\n322.9\n91.1\nFabricated Metal Products\n17.2\n23.3\n84.7\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n103.1\n799.3\n562.7\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n162.1\n395.1\n2,180.3\nTransportation Equipment\n0.0\n48.0\n307.4\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n37.8\n42.3\n257.9\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n0.0\n7.3\n6.2\nOTHER\n206.0\n5,014.3\n159.5\nScrap & Waste\n206.0\n5,014.3\n159.5\nSecond Hand Goods\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMAINE'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n2,684.6\n10,857.9\n11,237.2\nMAINE'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n656,102.3\n805,281.5\n914,779.3\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF MAINE'S EXPORTS\n0.4%\n1.3%\n1.2%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked 16TH Among Maine's 113 Export Markets\n38\nMARYLAND: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nMaryland's Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n73 Percent of Maryland's\n48 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n50\nNon-Manufacturing\nPrimary Metal\n$5.1\nManufacturing\nIndustries\n40\n$33.2\nComputers &\n$4.9\nIndustrial Mach.\n30\n$25.3\nChemicals\n$3.6\n20\n$17.0\nElectric &\n$2.8\nElectronic Eqp.\n10\nScientific &\n$2.0\nMeasuring Instru.\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n2\n4\n6\n8\n10\nMARYLAND'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n747.4\n1,267.8\n301.2\nAgriculture crops\n685.9\n1,178.7\n127.2\nAgriculture - livestock\n2.6\n40.2\n0.0\nForestry\n59.0\n48.9\n174.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n250.4\n0.0\n1,341.7\nMetal Mining\n238.3\n0.0\n31.1\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n12.1\n0.0\n1,310.6\nMANUFACTURING\n14,607.4\n31,409.5\n22,946.1\nFood Products\n1,758.9\n1,198.8\n975.5\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n18.6\n354.9\n55.4\nApparel\n60.9\n77.0\n16.3\nLumber & Wood Products\n0.0\n0.0\n34.3\nFurniture & Fixtures\n6.6\n1.7\n81.8\nPaper Products\n15.9\n27.3\n59.3\nPrinting & Publishing\n98.3\n22.7\n833.5\nChemical Products\n1,826.7\n3,494.6\n3,583.9\nPetroleum Refining Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n124.1\n143.7\n201.7\nLeather Products\n0.0\n107.9\n44.2\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n70.6\n26.7\n166.7\nPrimary Metal Industries\n976.2\n1,029.9\n5,076.4\nFabricated Metal Products\n256.6\n630.7\n827.9\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n5,547.5\n4,691.8\n4,892.3\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n1,442.7\n2,715.9\n2,803.0\nTransportation Equipment\n590.6\n341.5\n1,118.8\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n1,804.2\n16,542.0\n2,048.8\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n9.0\n2.5\n126.2\nOTHER\n1,439.2\n534.2\n673.4\nScrap & Waste\n1,289.7\n446.5\n439.9\nSecond Hand Goods\n123.4\n10.0\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n26.2\n77.7\n233.5\nMARYLAND'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n17,044.4\n33,211.5\n25,262.5\nMARYLAND'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n2,128,837.1\n2,551,577.6\n3,173,706.7\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF MARYLAND'S EXPORTS\n0.8%\n1.3%\n0.8%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked 25TH Among Maryland's 164 Export Markets\n39\nMASSACHUSETTS: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nMassachusetts' Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n78 Percent of Massachusetts'\n55 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n240\nNon-Manufacturing\nComputers &\nIndustrial Mach.\n$53.4\n200\nManufacturing\nScientific &\n$155.4\n160\nMeasuring Instru.\n$22.0\n$116.5\nElectric &\n120\n$100.1\nElectronic Eqp.\n$21.4\n80\nChemicals\n$15.0\n40\nPaper Products\n$8.6\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n10\n20\n30\n40\n50\n60\n70\nMASSACHUSETTS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n335.4\n73.7\n29.5\nAgriculture crops\n6.0\n42.7\n12.4\nAgriculture - livestock\n327.3\n0.0\n0.0\nForestry\n2.1\n31.0\n9.5\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n7.7\nMINING\n85.5\n152.0\n491.2\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n21.3\n286.4\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n4.8\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n1.9\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n85.5\n125.9\n202.9\nMANUFACTURING\n97,859.5\n114,437.4\n151,511.5\nFood Products\n116.8\n486.5\n1,884.6\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n391.5\n1,155.6\n2,382.3\nApparel\n392.4\n106.6\n421.8\nLumber & Wood Products\n0.0\n25.2\n69.3\nFurniture & Fixtures\n30.5\n128.5\n242.5\nPaper Products\n5,478.2\n6,034.7\n8,631.9\nPrinting & Publishing\n799.3\n595.2\n1,184.2\nChemical Products\n7,466.2\n8,437.4\n15,024.9\nPetroleum Refining Products\n68.1\n8.3\n29.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n5,297.0\n8,017.5\n7,987.4\nLeather Products\n156.3\n3,017.8\n1,771.5\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n2,815.2\n3,252.5\n3,772.7\nPrimary Metal Industries\n1,378.9\n2,376.4\n3,293.6\nFabricated Metal Products\n2,047.5\n4,681.8\n4,883.4\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n46,999.9\n44,365.8\n53,390.3\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n9,536.0\n15,535.9\n21,425.8\nTransportation Equipment\n291.7\n706.4\n693.8\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n14,166.9\n15,040.8\n22,003.8\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n427.0\n464.5\n2,418.7\nOTHER\n1,836.8\n1,867.0\n3,416.8\nScrap & Waste\n25.5\n511.0\n60.9\nSecond Hand Goods\n32.7\n86.8\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n1,778.6\n1,269.2\n3,355.9\nMASSACHUSETTS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n100,117.2\n116,530.2\n155,449.0\nMASSACHUSETTS' EXPORTS TO WORLD\n8,349,259.9\n9,691,807.7\n10,471,988.3\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF MASSACHUSETTS' EXPORTS\n1.2%\n1.2%\n1.5%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked 15TH Among Massachusetts' 177 Export Markets\n40\nMICHIGAN: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nMichigan's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n83 Percent of Michigan's\n60 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nBillion $\nMillion $\n2.8\nNon-Manufacturing\nTransportation\n$797.8\nManufacturing\nEquipment\n2.4\nMilitary\n2\n$191.1\n$1.721\nEquipment\n1.6\n$1.317\nComputers &\nIndustrial Mach.\n$160.5\n1.2\n$1.078\nFabricated\nMetal Products\n$147.1\n0.8\n0.4\nElectric &\n$138.9\nElectronic Eqp.\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n200\n400\n600\n800\n1,000\n1,200\nMICHIGAN'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n2,463.3\n2,721.3\n1,914.9\nAgriculture crops\n2,391.3\n2,446.5\n1,621.2\nAgriculture - livestock\n72.0\n268.6\n280.2\nForestry\n0.0\n6.1\n13.5\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n2,323.5\n1,208.9\n289.0\nMetal Mining\n1,736.1\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n11.5\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n9.1\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n575.9\n1,208.9\n279.8\nMANUFACTURING\n1,071,690.4\n1,311,025.1\n1,523,886.1\nFood Products\n468.5\n676.8\n1,487.3\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n410.6\n5,975.6\n13,806.2\nApparel\n534.8\n1,310.0\n5,894.7\nLumber & Wood Products\n123.9\n400.1\n343.0\nFurniture & Fixtures\n2,025.3\n1,818.5\n25,742.3\nPaper Products\n9,556.2\n9,040.0\n8,778.8\nPrinting & Publishing\n216.2\n293.1\n560.3\nChemical Products\n29,783.7\n21,621.8\n33,966.2\nPetroleum Refining Products\n1,867.7\n950.8\n310.4\nRubber & Plastic Products\n8,535.5\n20,628.1\n47,759.4\nLeather Products\n61.1\n101.0\n419.8\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n4,919.3\n2,582.5\n10,043.4\nPrimary Metal Industries\n17,223.0\n29,518.5\n113,348.0\nFabricated Metal Products\n16,950.8\n36,394.4\n147,129.8\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n129,510.5\n186,138.2\n160,501.0\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n20,313.1\n68,563.6\n138,923.7\nTransportation Equipment\n821,065.1\n916,179.6\n797,848.9\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n7,871.9\n8,555.2\n14,478.4\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n253.2\n277.1\n2,544.3\nOTHER\n1,392.3\n2,441.1\n194,468.1\nScrap & Waste\n631.3\n1,594.5\n3,404.6\nSecond Hand Goods\n254.0\n193.6\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n506.9\n652.9\n191,063.4\nMICHIGAN'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n1,077,869.6\n1,317,396.4\n1,720,558.1\nMICHIGAN'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n18,104,343.1\n21,015,863.0\n21,206,700.7\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF MICHIGAN'S EXPORTS\n6.0%\n6.3%\n8.1%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked SECOND Among Michigan's 162 Export Markets\n41\nMINNESOTA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nMinnesota's Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n87 Percent of Minnesota's\n81 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n280\nNon-Manufacturing\nComputers &\n240\nIndustrial Mach.\n$75.2\nManufacturing\n200\nFood Products\n$31.4\n$162.8\n160\n$135.4\nAgriculture-crops\n$20.1\n120\n$90.0\nScientific &\n80\nMeasuring Instru.\n$7.7\n40\nElectric &\nElectronic Eqp.\n$7.0\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n20\n40\n60\n80\n100\nMINNESOTA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n18,610.2\n19,213.8\n24,445.5\nAgriculture crops\n18,505.7\n17,156.4\n20,124.0\nAgriculture - livestock\n58.6\n2,055.0\n4,294.1\nForestry\n45.8\n2.4\n27.5\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n354.8\n331.9\n28.0\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n354.8\n331.9\n28.0\nMANUFACTURING\n70,301.1\n114,753.2\n137,575.6\nFood Products\n10,603.2\n10,017.4\n31,398.9\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n57.5\n221.0\n546.6\nApparel\n4.9\n15.9\n411.3\nLumber & Wood Products\n7.4\n12.0\n336.6\nFurniture & Fixtures\n10.9\n54.2\n62.1\nPaper Products\n889.5\n996.6\n2,044.8\nPrinting & Publishing\n278.7\n175.7\n166.6\nChemical Products\n1,336.6\n1,223.4\n2,204.6\nPetroleum Refining Products\n7.0\n15.5\n709.4\nRubber & Plastic Products\n1,158.7\n1,263.6\n1,969.1\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n12.7\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n101.0\n434.7\n749.3\nPrimary Metal Industries\n958.5\n756.0\n527.9\nFabricated Metal Products\n1,439.4\n2,031.2\n3,177.6\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n41,154.2\n82,200.21\n75,176.2\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n6,858.5\n5,873.9\n7,026.7\nTransportation Equipment\n2,627.5\n1,343.6\n2,991.2\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n2,682.3\n8,055.3\n7,732.2\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n125.5\n63.2\n331.7\nOTHER\n709.0\n1,084.0\n798.1\nScrap & Waste\n507.5\n724.0\n551.6\nSecond Hand Goods\n126.4\n18.2\n6.9\nMilitary Equipment\n75.0\n341.8\n239.5\nMINNESOTA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n89,975.0\n135,382.9\n162,847.2\nMINNESOTA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n4,121,294.5\n5,093,448.0\n5,309,693.5\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF MINNESOTA'S EXPORTS\n2.2%\n2.7%\n3.1%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked NINTH Among Minnesota's 167 Export Markets\n42\nMISSISSIPPI: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nMississippi's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n77 Percent of Mississippi's\n86 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n140\nNon-Manufacturing\nElectric &\n$29.8\nManufacturing\nElectronic Eqp.\n120\n$97.5\nPrimary Metal\n$15.6\n100\nIndustries\n80\n$69.6\nPetroleum\n$14.2\nProducts\n60\n$52.5\nChemicals\n$8.7\n40\n20\nAgriculture-crops\n$6.5\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n10\n20\n30\n40\nMISSISSIPPI'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n4,895.9\n234.3\n6,518.6\nAgriculture - crops\n4,885.9\n221.7\n6,495.6\nAgriculture - livestock\n10.1\n12.7\n23.0\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n30.7\n248.9\n1,403.9\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n184.2\n1,275.7\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n30.7\n64.8\n128.1\nMANUFACTURING\n45,965.3\n67,488.6\n89,198.3\nFood Products\n998.6\n1,707.2\n690.7\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n184.8\n564.1\n1,246.1\nApparel\n1,628.5\n1,699.7\n1,642.4\nLumber & Wood Products\n16.6\n130.1\n434.1\nFurniture & Fixtures\n1,069.3\n173.1\n1,165.2\nPaper Products\n15,213.3\n18,129.0\n6,479.3\nPrinting & Publishing\n1.6\n0.0\n8.4\nChemical Products\n2,614.8\n4,462.1\n8,654.4\nPetroleum Refining Products\n4,555.4\n8,640.6\n14,192.6\nRubber & Plastic Products\n223.3\n3,959.0\n5,110.8\nLeather Products\n0.0\n162.2\n4.1\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n690.2\n130.1\n80.4\nPrimary Metal Industries\n477.7\n2,557.9\n15,583.5\nFabricated Metal Products\n164.7\n113.7\n348.5\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n730.4\n883.2\n2,075.3\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n16,900.5\n21,860.7\n29,826.3\nTransportation Equipment\n101.0\n338.7\n1,224.0\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n339.5\n1,870.7\n111.5\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n54.9\n106.6\n321.0\nOTHER\n1,618.1\n1,584.8\n339.1\nScrap & Waste\n1,172.5\n1,366.2\n198.9\nSecond Hand Goods\n421.5\n132.9\n4.0\nMilitary Equipment\n24.1\n85.7\n136.2\nMISSISSIPPI'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n52,510.1\n69,556.8\n97,459.9\nMISSISSIPPI'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n1,290,476.4\n1,359,383.5\n1,760,093.8\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF MISSISSIPPI'S EXPORTS\n4.1%\n5.1%\n5.5%.\nMexico in 1989 Ranked FIFTH Among Mississippi's 142 Export Markets\n43\nMISSOURI: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nMissouri's Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n75 Percent of Missouri's\n62 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n500\nNon-Manufacturing\n400\nManufacturing\nAgriculture-Crops\n$83.9\n$312.7\n$322.0\nElectric &\n300\nElectronic Eqp.\n$64.6\n$198.7\nFood Products\n$56.0\n200\nComputers &\nIndustrial Mach.\n$19.2\n100\nChemicals\n$18.3\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n20\n40\n60\n80\n100\n120\nMISSOURI'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n76,987.6\n95,461.2\n84,010.6\nAgriculture - crops\n76,453.6\n92,109.6\n83,907.0\nAgriculture - livestock\n534.0\n3,329.6\n95.6\nForestry\n0.0\n22.0\n8.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n1,514.0\n1,715.2\n1,062.2\nMetal Mining\n25.4\n4.5\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n1,488.6\n1,710.7\n1,062.2\nMANUFACTURING\n114,286.7\n205,375.9\n219,313.0\nFood Products\n28,200.9\n72,852.0\n55,983.0\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n593.5\n668.2\n191.0\nApparel\n1,691.6\n2,671.0\n552.6\nLumber & Wood Products\n468.8\n1,178.3\n1,613.5\nFurniture & Fixtures\n290.0\n755.1\n2,416.9\nPaper Products\n2,642.8\n3,189.3\n4,527.1\nPrinting & Publishing\n5,942.2\n9,086.3\n9,769.0\nChemical Products\n11,646.5\n12,015.4\n18,339.4\nPetroleum Refining Products\n534.5\n347.3\n196.7\nRubber & Plastic Products\n2,783.9\n5,738.3\n13,075.8\nLeather Products\n107.3\n493.6\n438.7\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n780.8\n825.4\n1,194.9\nPrimary Metal Industries\n4,371.3\n6,401.7\n6,929.4\nFabricated Metal Products\n4,938.7\n6,122.1\n6,669.7\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n11,320.4\n12,059.5\n19,222.7\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n24,757.6\n58,123.2\n64,566.1\nTransportation Equipment\n11,058.3\n9,857.1\n8,009.4\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n1,396.5\n1,781.0\n3,307.8\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n761.1\n1,211.1\n2,309.1\nOTHER\n5,924.5\n10,174.3\n17,657.6\nScrap & Waste\n5,633.2\n9,563.2\n11,995.3\nSecond Hand Goods\n269.1\n545.2\n46.3\nMilitary Equipment\n22.1\n65.9\n5,616.0\nMISSOURI'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n198,712.8\n312,726.6\n322,043.4\nMISSOURI'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n2,984,431.7\n2,737,541.4\n2,877,651.8\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF MISSOURI'S EXPORTS\n6.7%\n11.4%\n11.2%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked THIRD Among Missouri's 151 Export Markets\n44\nMONTANA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 3 Exports Accounted for\nMontana's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n91 Percent of Montana's\n1536 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n24\nNon-Manufacturing\nManufacturing\n$19.9\nAgriculture-Crops\n$14.9\n20\n16\nFood Products\n$1.9\n12\n8\nPrimary Metal\n4\n$1.2\n$2.3\n$1.3\nIndustries\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n5\n10\n15\n20\nMONTANA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n440.1\n133.7\n14,964.2\nAgriculture crops\n187.4\n66.6\n14,857.2\nAgriculture - livestock\n252.6\n67.1\n100.2\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n6.8\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n0.0\n0.0\n137.6\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n5.4\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n0.0\n0.0\n132.2\nMANUFACTURING\n778.9\n2,120.9\n4,791.9\nFood Products\n14.6\n55.9\n1,898.9\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nApparel\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nLumber & Wood Products\n0.0\n39.4\n0.0\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n0.0\n14.0\nPaper Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nPrinting & Publishing\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nChemical Products\n96.6\n2.6\n51.1\nPetroleum Refining Products\n0.0\n234.4\n0.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n0.0\n0.0\n2.8\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n16.9\n44.8\n0.0\nPrimary Metal Industries\n4.2\n576.4\n1,309.2\nFabricated Metal Products\n6.1\n17.3\n99.5\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n21.4\n289.8\n922.7\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n8.9\n12.2\n168.8\nTransportation Equipment\n610.2\n817.5\n320.5\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n0.0\n0.0\n4.4\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n0.0\n30.6\n0.0\nOTHER\n0.0\n0.0\n53.9\nScrap & Waste\n0.0\n0.0\n25.8\nSecond Hand Goods\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n0.0\n0.0\n28.1\nMONTANA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n1,219.0\n2,254.6\n19,947.6\nMONTANA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n286,470.8\n398,087.7\n346,422.8\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF MONTANA'S EXPORTS\n0.4%\n0.6%\n5.8%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked FOURTH Among Montana's 69 Export Markets\n45\nNEBRASKA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nNebraska's Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n87 Percent of Nebraska's\n14 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n80\nNon-Manufacturing\nFood Products\nManufacturing\n$19.8\n60\n$52.3\n$50.6\n$44.5\nAgriculture-Crops\n$13.9\n40\nRubber &\nPlastic Prod.\n$4.0\nComputers &\nIndustrial Mach.\n$3.5\n20\nAgriculture-\nLivestock\n$2.7\n0\n1987\n0\n1988\n5\n1989\n10\n15\n20\n25\nNEBRASKA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n19,550.9\n15,436.9\n16,633.3\nAgriculture crops\n18,592.2\n13,695.7\n13,927.9\nAgriculture livestock\n958.7\n1,741.2\n2,705.4\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n2.9\n5.8\n5.3\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n2.9\n5.8\n5.3\nMANUFACTURING\n24,352.5\n36,545.9\n33,059.2\nFood Products\n15,362.0\n27,219.5\n19,842.7\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n0.0\n15.5\n39.1\nApparel\n31.3\n31.1\n30.7\nLumber & Wood Products\n32.8\n15.8\n19.1\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n6.8\n0.0\nPaper Products\n185.9\n246.2\n171.7\nPrinting & Publishing\n377.2\n61.5\n154.6\nChemical Products\n552.0\n458.0\n443.5\nPetroleum Refining Products\n0.0\n0.0\n43.5\nRubber & Plastic Products\n2,217.1\n3,558.8\n3,968.1\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n37.8\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n0.0\n4.8\n9.0\nPrimary Metal Industries\n337.0\n300.4\n707.8\nFabricated Metal Products\n222.1\n914.8\n1,344.7\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n980.6\n1,669.7\n3,501.0\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n2,233.5\n878.3\n1,719.7\nTransportation Equipment\n1,735.6\n787.3\n673.0\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n82.2\n374.6\n270.2\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n3.2\n2.6\n83.1\nOTHER\n640.2\n286.3\n883.6\nScrap & Waste\n27.2\n6.2\n167.4\nSecond Hand Goods\n610.8\n263.2\n71.7\nMilitary Equipment\n2.2\n17.0\n644.6\nNEBRASKA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n44,546.4\n52,274.8\n50,581.4\nNEBRASKA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n779,626.9\n916,421.3\n824,509.6\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF NEBRASKA'S EXPORTS\n5.7%\n5.7%\n6.1%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked FOURTH Among Nebraska's 119 Export Markets\n46\nNEVADA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nNevada's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n92 Percent of Nevada's\n721 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n30\nNon-Manufacturing\nTextile Mill\n$16.1\n$22.2\nProducts\nManufacturing\n20\nChemicals\n$2.1\nTransportation\n$1.4\nEquipment\n10\nPrinting &\n$5.5\n$0.5\nPublishing\n$2.7\nComputers &\n$0.4\nIndustrial Mach.\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n5\n10\n15\n20\nNEVADA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n0.0\n3.0\n84.4\nAgriculture - crops\n0.0\n3.0\n84.4\nAgriculture - livestock\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n0.0\n2.2\n16.6\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n9.5\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n2.2\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n0.0\n2.2\n5.0\nMANUFACTURING\n2,695.4\n5,450.6\n22,092.3\nFood Products\n31.7\n17.4\n173.3\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n112.0\n148.8\n105.9\nApparel\n0.0\n1,514.0\n16,132.1\nLumber & Wood Products\n5.8\n7.2\n17.5\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n11.8\n16.5\nPaper Products\n125.4\n42.6\n276.3\nPrinting & Publishing\n272.6\n688.0\n484.0\nChemical Products\n334.6\n1,388.0\n2,058.5\nPetroleum Refining Products\n0.0\n0.0\n28.5\nRubber & Plastic Products\n84.4\n15.2\n216.8\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n0.0\n0.0\n7.7\nPrimary Metal Industries\n0.0\n39.9\n175.5\nFabricated Metal Products\n48.1\n45.5\n34.6\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n361.6\n160.2\n364.4\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n78.7\n331.1\n189.8\nTransportation Equipment\n40.0\n8.9\n201.1\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n808.1\n868.1\n1,382.0\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n392.4\n164.1\n227.9\nOTHER\n10.5\n20.4\n13.3\nScrap & Waste\n0.0\n20.4\n2.0\nSecond Hand Goods\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n10.5\n0.0\n11.3\nNEVADA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n2,705.9\n5,476.2\n22,206.7\nNEVADA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n380,231.1\n248,264.7\n322,046.4\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF NEVADA'S EXPORTS\n0.7%\n2.2%\n6.9%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked FIFTH Among Nevada's 101 Export Markets\n47\nNEW HAMPSHIRE: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nNew Hampshire's Exports to Mexico Grew\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nby 87 Percent From 1987 to 1989\n73 Percent of New Hampshire's\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n24\nNon-Manufacturing\nComputers &\n20\nManufacturing\nIndustrial Mach.\n$5.9\n$18.3\nChemicals\n16\n$14.3\n$2.7\n12\nLeather Prod.\n$9.8\n$2.5\n8\nStone, Clay\n& Glass\n$1.3\n4\nScientific &\nMeasuring Inst.\n$1.0\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\nNEW HAMPSHIRE'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n0.0\n2.5\n2.7\nAgriculture - crops\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nAgriculture livestock\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nForestry\n0.0\n2.5\n2.7\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n0.0\n5.7\n43.8\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n8.2\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n0.0\n5.7\n35.6\nMANUFACTURING\n9,739.9\n14,102.3\n18,261.2\nFood Products\n0.0\n140.3\n16.4\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n57.7\n66.0\n566.8\nApparel\n3.5\n7.5\n97.0\nLumber & Wood Products\n0.0\n126.0\n888.4\nFurniture & Fixtures\n6.3\n0.0\n9.7\nPaper Products\n871.9\n1,109.6\n975.2\nPrinting & Publishing\n45.7\n49.2\n15.8\nChemical Products\n2,350.4\n1,976.0\n2,689.3\nPetroleum Refining Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n286.3\n1,042.3\n441.8\nLeather Products\n406.2\n2,104.5\n2,482.6\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n163.8\n446.8\n1,348.6\nPrimary Metal Industries\n62.9\n112.4\n246.8\nFabricated Metal Products\n54.4\n234.6\n572.4\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n3,484.2\n4,278.0\n5,911.9\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n971.0\n315.5\n468.2\nTransportation Equipment\n2.3\n2.4\n295.8\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n951.8\n1,394.1\n978.1\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n21.5\n697.1\n256.5\nOTHER\n50.4\n169.6\n8.5\nScrap & Waste\n0.0\n0.0\n7.0\nSecond Hand Goods\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n50.4\n169.6\n1.5\nNEW HAMPSHIRE'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n9,790.4\n14,280.0\n18,316.1\nNEW HAMPSHIRE'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n885,399.8\n1,025,288.1\n1,106,079.2\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE'S EXPORTS\n1.1%\n1.4%\n1.7%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked 15TH Among New Hampshire's 114 Export Markets\n48\nNEW JERSEY: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nNew Jersey's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n75 Percent of New Jersey's\n107 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n500\nNon-Manufacturing\nManufacturing\n$390.8\nChemicals\n$112.1\n400\nComputers &\nIndustrial Mach.\n$67.8\n300\n$266.7\nElectric &\n$67.0\n$189.0\nElectronic Eqp.\n200\nFood Products\n$27.4\n100\nScientific &\n$18.2\nMeasuring Instru.\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n20\n40\n60\n80\n100\n120\n140\nNEW JERSEY'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n1,198.2\n1,890.5\n2,432.9\nAgriculture crops\n549.8\n1,111.7\n1,139.4\nAgriculture - livestock\n0.0\n5.0\n1.6\nForestry\n648.4\n761.8\n1,281.8\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n12.0\n10.2\nMINING\n4,541.3\n3,841.4\n16,599.2\nMetal Mining\n3,444.2\n2,733.0\n14,379.5\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n9.8\n4.6\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n1.6\n12.6\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n1,097.1\n1,096.9\n2,202.4\nMANUFACTURING\n180,239.7\n237,737.1\n367,870.2\nFood Products\n947.9\n2,290.0\n27,441.8\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n1,206.8\n2,388.5\n2,327.2\nApparel\n642.9\n2,284.4\n7,364.1\nLumber & Wood Products\n1,074.3\n1,037.5\n404.5\nFurniture & Fixtures\n867.4\n1,181.3\n5,053.3\nPaper Products\n3,587.0\n4,149.8\n6,902.3\nPrinting & Publishing\n2,071.2\n1,739.7\n4,186.8\nChemical Products\n71,801.0\n84,261.9\n112,140.5\nPetroleum Refining Products\n479.1\n315.5\n1,028.8\nRubber & Plastic Products\n5,571.6\n7,048.0\n9,466.0\nLeather Products\n743.3\n611.3\n1,110.7\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n2,280.4\n2,753.3\n6,880.7\nPrimary Metal Industries\n9,354.5\n11,844.0\n10,414.2\nFabricated Metal Products\n4,817.5\n13,313.2\n10,977.8\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n33,014.0\n48,793.7\n67,778.8\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n26,754.1\n36,919.4\n67,035.7\nTransportation Equipment\n1,758.8\n3,125.5\n3,741.7\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n11,566.8\n9,995.1\n18,150.4\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n1,701.2\n3,685.0\n5,464.8\nOTHER\n3,038.4\n23,280.2\n3,914.6\nScrap & Waste\n2,222.4\n19,272.5\n1,149.6\nSecond Hand Goods\n634.3\n327.9\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n181.7\n3,679.8\n2,765.0\nNEW JERSEY'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n189,017.5\n266,749.1\n390,816.9\nNEW JERSEY'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n6,783,159.4\n8,308,991.7\n8,642,913.6\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF NEW JERSEY'S EXPORTS\n2.8%\n3.2%\n4.5%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked FIFTH Among New Jersey's 184 Export Markets\n49\nNEW MEXICO: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nNew Mexico's Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n71 Percent of New Mexico's\n60 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n28\nNon-Manufacturing\nChemicals\n$3.3\n24\nManufacturing\nPetroleum\n20\n$16.0\nProducts\n$2.4\n16\n$14.5\nComputers &\nIndustrial Mach.\n$1.7\n12\n$9.1\nLumber &\n8\nWood Prod.\n$1.4\n4\nAgriculture-Crops\n$1.4\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n1\n2.\n3\n4\nNEW MEXICO'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n511.9\n2,176.4\n2,027.0\nAgriculture - crops\n146.4\n334.1\n1,379.6\nAgriculture - livestock\n365.5\n1,842.4\n647.4\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n407.6\n180.2\n501.2\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n496.6\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n407.6\n180.2\n4.7\nMANUFACTURING\n7,512.6\n12,855.5\n11,315.4\nFood Products\n44.4\n1,266.5\n650.5\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n17.0\n50.2\n5.4\nApparel\n10.2\n10.3\n0.0\nLumber & Wood Products\n5.0\n695.3\n1,413.8\nFurniture & Fixtures\n8.4\n90.0\n14.2\nPaper Products\n45.6\n63.1\n143.1\nPrinting & Publishing\n42.7\n0.0\n0.0\nChemical Products\n3,869.0\n7,079.7\n3,290.9\nPetroleum Refining Products\n1,384.4\n11.1\n2,437.8\nRubber & Plastic Products\n175.0\n197.3\n189.2\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n32.6\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n0.0\n0.0\n219.8\nPrimary Metal Industries\n64.8\n181.1\n304.1\nFabricated Metal Products\n112.7\n234.6\n67.4\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n1,246.9\n2,274.3\n1,733.7\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n99.3\n156.7\n152.4\nTransportation Equipment\n105.8\n268.3\n440.5\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n281.5\n180.3\n169.6\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n0.0\n96.7\n50.5\nOTHER\n625.6\n755.8\n635.6\nScrap & Waste\n366.5\n231.9\n395.2\nSecond Hand Goods\n259.1\n506.4\n237.3\nMilitary Equipment\n0.0\n17.5\n3.0\nNEW MEXICO'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n9,057.7\n15,967.9\n14,479.2\nNEW MEXICO'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n166,972.1\n193,327.4\n213,660.2\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF NEW MEXICO'S EXPORTS\n5.4%\n8.3%\n6.8%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked SIXTH Among New Mexico's 77 Export Markets\n50\nNEW YORK: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nNew York's Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n64 Percent of New York's\n63 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n1200\nNon-Manufacturing\nScientific &\n$152.3\n1000\nManufact.\nMeasuring Instru.\n$827.9\n$834.3\nComputers &\n800\nIndustrial Mach.\n$108.9\nPrimary Metal\n600\n$512.4\n$104.7\nIndustries\n400\nChemicals\n$97.8\n200\nPaper Products\n$69.7\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n50\n100\n150\n200\nNEW YORK'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n2,709.6\n5,508.8\n3,496.1\nAgriculture crops\n755.8\n3,805.2\n1,853.9\nAgriculture - livestock\n188.0\n178.3\n111.5\nForestry\n1,765.8\n1,525.3\n1,503.7\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n27.0\nMINING\n4,107.7\n2,944.2\n4,292.9\nMetal Mining\n3,395.0\n2,098.5\n1,895.9\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n166.2\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n712.7\n845.7\n2,230.8\nMANUFACTURING\n493,615.7\n802,632.9\n810,460.2\nFood Products\n12,494.5\n36,509.7\n34,821.0\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n4,118.1\n8,107.1\n15,270.6\nApparel\n1,531.1\n6,182.9\n15,552.1\nLumber & Wood Products\n288.4\n632.1\n910.8\nFurniture & Fixtures\n280.9\n357.6\n630.9\nPaper Products\n44,770.2\n64,818.9\n69,696.0\nPrinting & Publishing\n2,160.7\n2,081.8\n4,534.5\nChemical Products\n65,154.2\n92,673.5\n97,821.7\nPetroleum Refining Products\n1,766.0\n985.3\n4,377.6\nRubber & Plastic Products\n18,064.0\n25,271.7\n27,918.2\nLeather Products\n599.1\n3,540.3\n3,310.1\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n7,733.9\n11,994.9\n7,572.7\nPrimary Metal Industries\n34,770.1\n27,700.1\n104,743.3\nFabricated Metal Products\n49,859.8\n76,883.2\n14,493.0\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n68,260.1\n99,334.1\n108,892.8\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n44,879.9\n71,105.8\n65,190.0\nTransportation Equipment\n78,821.1\n173,558.4\n40,749.3\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n54,869.9\n93,570.4\n152,266.6\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n3,193.7\n7,325.2\n41,709.3\nOTHER\n11,935.1\n16,845.4\n16,034.5\nScrap & Waste\n6,558.2\n12,134.9\n11,584.5\nSecond Hand Goods\n211.4\n1,171.5\n38.2\nMilitary Equipment\n5,165.6\n3,539.0\n4,411.8\nNEW YORK'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n512,368.1\n827,931.2\n834,283.7\nNEW YORK'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n19,873,716.1\n26,961,338.8\n26,789,951:9\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF NEW YORK'S EXPORTS\n2.6%\n3.1%\n3.1%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked EIGHTH Among New York's 188 Export Markets\n51\nNORTH CAROLINA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nNorth Carolina's Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n75 Percent of North Carolina's\n101 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n240\nNon-Manufacturing\nComputers &\n$49.5\nManufacturing\nIndustrial Mach.\n200\n$190.2\nChemicals\n$28.0\n160\n$137.1\n120\nPaper Products\n$26.0\n$94.7\nElectric &\n80\nElectronic Eqp.\n$22.2\n40\nTextile Mill\nProducts\n$17.4\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n10\n20\n30\n40\n50\n60\nNORTH CAROLINA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n734.3\n1,020.1\n836.5\nAgriculture - crops\n65.4\n0.0\n93.4\nAgriculture - livestock\n659.8\n1,014.9\n735.0\nForestry\n9.1\n5.2\n8.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n188.7\n163.6\n665.2\nMetal Mining\n42.9\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n4.4\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n145.8\n163.6\n660.7\nMANUFACTURING\n93,312.1\n134,675.6\n187,850.4\nFood Products\n623.1\n2,190.2\n2,462.2\nTobacco Products\n291.0\n449.4\n500.7\nTextile Mill Products\n3,115.2\n9,495.7\n17,372.1\nApparel\n7,600.5\n6,884.9\n7,575.0\nLumber & Wood Products\n32.6\n351.4\n416.8\nFurniture & Fixtures\n69.8\n927.1\n1,525.9\nPaper Products\n17,869.3\n19,328.7\n25,953.5\nPrinting & Publishing\n918.9\n1,343.6\n1,624.4\nChemical Products\n16,922.9\n24,812.7\n27,982.2\nPetroleum Refining Products\n125.1\n0.0\n165.1\nRubber & Plastic Products\n6,142.5\n7,916.6\n11,582.5\nLeather Products\n917.0\n363.2\n75.1\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n1,300.9\n2,008.7\n2,557.9\nPrimary Metal Industries\n1,566.2\n2,197.2\n6,785.5\nFabricated Metal Products\n557.2\n2,612.3\n3,029.9\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n24,371.0\n35,938.4\n49,514.2\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n6,849.3\n11,332.6\n22,197.2\nTransportation Equipment\n1,152.6\n1,681.1\n2,399.4\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n2,696.8\n4,525.2\n3,054.5\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n190.2\n316.6\n1,076.2\nOTHER\n435.4\n1,250.6\n832.0\nScrap & Waste\n117.7\n637.9\n804.9\nSecond Hand Goods\n210.8\n398.3\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n107.0\n214.5\n27.1\nNORTH CAROLINA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n94,670.5\n137,109.9\n190,184.1\nNORTH CAROLINA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n5,890,715.4\n6,786,576.8\n8,161,936.2\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF NORTH CAROLINA'S EXPORTS\n1.6%\n2.0%\n2.3%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked 14TH Among North Carolina's 165 Export Markets\n52\nNORTH DAKOTA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 3 Exports Accounted for\nNorth Dakota's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n99 Percent of North Dakota's\n30 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n70\n60\nNon-Manufacturing\nManufacturing\n$51.7\nAgriculture-Crops\n$34.6\n50\n$39.9\n$37.5\n40\nFood Products\n$15.9\n30\n20\nComputers &\n$0.9\n10\nIndustrial Mach.\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n10\n20\n30\n40\n50\nNORTH DAKOTA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n23,033.2\n20,143.7\n34,601.4\nAgriculture crops\n23,033.2\n20,143.7\n34,584.0\nAgriculture livestock\n0.0\n0.0\n17.4\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n0.0\n11.6\n7.0\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n11.6\n7.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMANUFACTURING\n16,650.1\n17,328.1\n17,042.6\nFood Products\n15,433.1\n16,490.0\n15,941.0\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nApparel\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nLumber & Wood Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nPaper Products\n0.0\n0.0\n17.5\nPrinting & Publishing\n0.0\n0.0\n6.3\nChemical Products\n3.0\n0.0\n12.6\nPetroleum Refining Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n0.0\n6.9\n11.3\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n0.0\n3.5\n0.0\nPrimary Metal Industries\n0.0\n0.0\n4.8\nFabricated Metal Products\n227.6\n213.0\n50.5\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n915.6\n604.9\n929.4\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n24.7\n1.5\n6.8\nTransportation Equipment\n44.4\n8.3\n62.4\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n1.7\n0.0\n0.0\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOTHER\n202.4\n0.0\n0.0\nScrap & Waste\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nSecond Hand Goods\n202.4\n0.0\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNORTH DAKOTA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n39,885.7\n37,483.4\n51,651.0\nNORTH DAKOTA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n297,567.6\n279,972.6\n382,900.4\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF NORTH DAKOTA'S EXPORTS\n13.4%\n13.4%\n13.5%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked SECOND Among North Dakota's 71 Export Markets\n53\nOHIO: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nOhio's Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n78 Percent of Ohio's\n89 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n600\nNon-Manufacturing\nComputers &\n500\nManufacturing\n$464.0\nIndustrial Mach.\n$110.9\n$381.3\nPrimary Metal\n400\nIndustries\n$84.5\n300\n$245.2\nChemicals\n$84.4\n200\nRubber &\nPlastic Prod.\n$45.8\n100\nTransportation\nEquipment\n$36.0\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n20\n40\n60\n80\n100\n120\n140\nOHIO'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n478.9\n506.6\n741.8\nAgriculture - crops\n0.0\n43.7\n13.6\nAgriculture - livestock\n104.7\n48.9\n145.3\nForestry\n374.2\n414.0\n582.9\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n691.7\n1,802.2\n925.1\nMetal Mining\n175.9\n1,053.4\n11.6\nCoal Mining\n172.1\n6.6\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n343.7\n742.2\n913.6\nMANUFACTURING\n242,514.3\n376,036.2\n459,231.4\nFood Products\n2,743.1\n4,195.2\n3,836.8\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n1,333.4\n1,747.3\n1,058.1\nApparel\n59.2\n432.8\n310.8\nLumber & Wood Products\n286.5\n403.3\n214.7\nFurniture & Fixtures\n98.7\n3,416.4\n2,907.1\nPaper Products\n1,733.3\n2,432.7\n2,827.4\nPrinting & Publishing\n373.1\n278.4\n1,076.0\nChemical Products\n59,929.3\n80,079.8\n84,365.5\nPetroleum Refining Products\n714.5\n465.9\n7,342.5\nRubber & Plastic Products\n13,572.8\n34,399.3\n45,842.9\nLeather Products\n0.0\n291.1\n6,885.4\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n9,360.1\n12,950.9\n11,389.6\nPrimary Metal Industries\n12,273.1\n62,977.4\n84,498.5\nFabricated Metal Products\n12,198.5\n12,461.3\n15,321.5\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n68,981.1\n85,850.2\n110,884.9\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n31,684.7\n28,420.5\n29,826.0\nTransportation Equipment\n20,328.7\n31,136.6\n36,020.5\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n6,614.1\n12,987.2\n12,381.4\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n230.2\n1,110.0\n2,241.7\nOTHER\n1,547.3\n2,985.5\n3,136.0\nScrap & Waste\n981.9\n1,820.7\n2,639.7\nSecond Hand Goods\n64.7\n247.9\n148.7\nMilitary Equipment\n500.7\n917.0\n347.6\nOHIO'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n245,232.1\n381,330.6\n464,034.3\nOHIO'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n10,018,676.3\n12,276,607.5\n13,322,751.1\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF OHIO'S EXPORTS\n2.4%\n3.1%\n3.5%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked SIXTH Among Ohio's 169 Export Markets\n54\nOKLAHOMA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nOklahoma's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n59 Percent of Oklahoma's\n41 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n140\nNon-Manufacturing\nFood Products\n$15.0\n120\nManufacturing\n100\n$97.8\nComputers &\n$11.3\nIndustrial Mach.\n80\n$62.4\nChemicals\n$4.9\n60\n$44.2\nStone, Clay &\n40\n$2.8\nGlass Products\n20\nTransportation\n$2.7\nEquipment\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n5\n10\n15\n20\nOKLAHOMA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n6,693.4\n26,078.2\n12,426.2\nAgriculture crops\n6,519.0\n25,700.2\n11,557.9\nAgriculture livestock\n174.4\n369.8\n823.3\nForestry\n0.0\n8.2\n45.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n345.5\n246.9\n389.1\nMetal Mining\n5.8\n7.9\n4.4\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n339.7\n239.0\n384.7\nMANUFACTURING\n36,688.2\n70,793.2\n48,455.2\nFood Products\n2,694.6\n1,264.7\n14,980.1\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n0.0\n18.3\n4.0\nApparel\n9.4\n8.0\n25.2\nLumber & Wood Products\n26.5\n0.0\n11.4\nFurniture & Fixtures\n9.9\n26.0\n104.7\nPaper Products\n10.3\n250.4\n366.7\nPrinting & Publishing\n2.1\n14.6\n7.8\nChemical Products\n4,807.3\n6,757.6\n4,877.2\nPetroleum Refining Products\n3,480.8\n104.2\n590.7\nRubber & Plastic Products\n6,361.4\n8,180.2\n1,418.6\nLeather Products\n293.7\n1,215.6\n482.2\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n1,463.9\n2,404.8\n2,764.7\nPrimary Metal Industries\n728.8\n853.2\n2,101.2\nFabricated Metal Products\n1,507.6\n2,412.3\n2,443.7\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n9,594.6\n31,607.9\n11,260.8\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n2,094.6\n1,285.3\n2,108.5\nTransportation Equipment\n670.5\n1,812.9\n2,674.3\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n2,925.6\n12,556.7\n2,147.3\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n6.7\n20.8\n86.1\nOTHER\n520.5\n651.0\n1,098.6\nScrap & Waste\n412.6\n302.8\n819.4\nSecond Hand Goods\n79.0\n290.2\n238.5\nMilitary Equipment\n28.9\n58.1\n40.7\nOKLAHOMA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n44,247.7\n97,769.3\n62,369.1\nOKLAHOMA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n1,077,954.3\n1,541,158.5\n1,637,515.7\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF OKLAHOMA'S EXPORTS\n4.1%\n6.3%\n3.8%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked SEVENTH Among Oklahoma's 139 Export Markets\n55\nOREGON: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nOregon's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n79 Percent of Oregon's\n95 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n50\nNon-Manufacturing\nComputers &\nIndustrial Mach.\n$17.4\n40\nManufacturing\n$38.1\nAgriculture-Crops\n$6.6\n30\n$23.5\nScientific &\n$19.5\nMeasuring Instru.\n$2.3\n20\nTransportation\nEquipment\n$2.1\n10\nPrimary Metal\nIndustries\n$1.8\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n5\n10\n15\n20\n25\nOREGON'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n484.4\n562.8\n6,625.6\nAgriculture crops\n484.4\n539.4\n6,613.2\nAgriculture - livestock\n0.0\n23.4\n1.7\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n10.7\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n24.9\n4.5\n0.0\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n24.9\n4.5\n0.0\nMANUFACTURING\n18,473.4\n20,768.0\n31,428.3\nFood Products\n1,237.4\n214.0\n493.9\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n0.0\n301.6\n10.0\nApparel\n3.4\n37.9\n150.1\nLumber & Wood Products\n411.5\n718.1\n382.3\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n0.0\n14.5\nPaper Products\n1,892.6\n247.4\n458.6\nPrinting & Publishing\n16.3\n0.0\n4.7\nChemical Products\n3,208.4\n452.9\n471.4\nPetroleum Refining Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n45.0\n121.5\n577.4\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n956.1\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n15.4\n2.7\n1,608.0\nPrimary Metal Industries\n333.4\n358.2\n1,833.1\nFabricated Metal Products\n219.7\n621.2\n936.9\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n7,207.1\n12,773.3\n17,415.0\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n2,377.8\n2,467.3\n1,095.1\nTransportation Equipment\n343.7\n585.7\n2,112.1\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n1,138.7\n1,689.9\n2,279.6\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n23.2\n176.2\n629.2\nOTHER\n494.5\n2,117.9\n13.0\nScrap & Waste\n391.2\n1.7\n2.3\nSecond Hand Goods\n55.8\n0.0\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n47.5\n2,116.2\n10.7\nOREGON'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n19,477.3\n23,453.1\n38,066.8\nOREGON'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n3,051,517.6\n4,522,818.7\n5,090,612.8\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF OREGON'S EXPORTS\n0.6%\n0.5%\n0.7%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked 20TH Among Oregon's 166 Export Markets\n56\nPENNSYLVANIA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nPennsylvania's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n74 Percent of Pennsylvania's\n162 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n600\nNon-Manufacturing\nComputers &\n500\n$474.7\nIndustrial Mach.\n$97.5\nManufacturing\nElectric &\n400\n$337.4\nElectronic Eqp.\n$85.8\n300\nPrimary Metal\n$71.7\nIndustries\n$181.1\n200\nChemicals\n$68.7\n100\nFood Products\n$25.3\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n20\n40\n60\n80\n100\n120\nPENNSYLVANIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n804.2\n903.6\n1,706.6\nAgriculture crops\n340.7\n168.9\n410.7\nAgriculture - livestock\n461.8\n729.6\n352.4\nForestry\n1.7\n5.0\n943.5\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n1,059.5\n1,605.6\n3,819.2\nMetal Mining\n366.4\n681.7\n381.9\nCoal Mining\n214.7\n58.6\n1,092.4\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n16.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n478.4\n865.4\n2,329.0\nMANUFACTURING\n177,361.7\n331,079.9\n460,397.5\nFood Products\n2,323.0\n8,280.5\n25,335.8\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n860.5\n1,017.5\n6,400.4\nApparel\n154.4\n799.8\n589.8\nLumber & Wood Products\n1,327.5\n134.8\n92.6\nFurniture & Fixtures\n22.3\n325.5\n1,158.9\nPaper Products\n9,394.0\n7,479.3\n13,491.2\nPrinting & Publishing\n2,739.5\n222.5\n1,055.2\nChemical Products\n42,751.8\n70,847.8\n68,683.5\nPetroleum Refining Products\n4,177.0\n1,156.3\n8,369.1\nRubber & Plastic Products\n4,303.5\n8,851.0\n4,504.7\nLeather Products\n70.0\n178.2\n392.9\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n3,750.0\n6,401.0\n18,920.3\nPrimary Metal Industries\n18,987.9\n53,717.9\n71,699.3\nFabricated Metal Products\n4,373.6\n10,352.9\n21,037.2\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n44,905.2\n81,379.2\n97,477.4\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n18,434.8\n54,454.3\n85,766.3\nTransportation Equipment\n6,686.0\n5,513.4\n14,434.2\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n8,381.2\n19,038.7\n18,275.9\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n3,719.6\n929.4\n2,713.0\nOTHER\n1,900.5\n3,803.6\n8,763.9\nScrap & Waste\n963.9\n2,428.1\n7,095.0\nSecond Hand Goods\n256.0\n57.7\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n680.6\n1,317.8\n1,668.9\nPENNSYLVANIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n181,126.0\n337,392.6\n474,687.3\nPENNSYLVANIA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n6,131,822.9\n7,801,506.9\n8,576,020.3\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF PENNSYLVANIA'S EXPORTS\n3.0%\n4.3%\n5.5%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked FIFTH Among Pennsylvania's 177 Export Markets\n57\nRHODE ISLAND: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nRhode Island's Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n83 Percent of Rhode Island's\n119 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n35\nNon-Manufacturing\n$32.1\nComputers &\n30\nManufacturing\nIndustrial Mach.\n$10.7\n25\n$23.9\nPrimary Metal\nIndustries\n$6.5\n20\n$14.7\nChemicals\n$4.3\n15\nElectric &\n10\n$3.5\nElectronic Eqp.\n5\nMiscellaneous Eqp.\n$1.5\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n2\n4\n6\n8\n10\n12\n14\nRHODE ISLAND'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n136.5\n0.0\n0.0\nAgriculture - crops\n44.8\n0.0\n0.0\nAgriculture - livestock\n91.6\n0.0\n0.0\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n3.2\n14.8\n0.0\nMetal Mining\n3.2\n6.9\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n0.0\n7.9\n0.0\nMANUFACTURING\n14,365.9\n23,841.0\n32,078.2\nFood Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n12.1\n231.2\n89.1\nApparel\n27.5\n190.4\n407.3\nLumber & Wood Products\n0.0\n16.0\n0.0\nFurniture & Fixtures\n4.7\n241.1\n19.5\nPaper Products\n220.2\n363.1\n1,098.1\nPrinting & Publishing\n25.1\n60.9\n0.0\nChemical Products\n1,409.8\n3,187.9\n4,310.2\nPetroleum Refining Products\n1.9\n2.2\n0.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n1,853.9\n2,073.0\n638.0\nLeather Products\n6.9\n547.6\n7.2\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n109.5\n10.2\n166.9\nPrimary Metal Industries\n1,583.6\n5,775.0\n6,533.4\nFabricated Metal Products\n179.1\n1,153.7\n1,170.7\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n5,924.5\n6,883.6\n10,746.2\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n1,979.7\n1,296.0\n3,456.7\nTransportation Equipment\n370.3\n599.5\n1,062.6\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n101.1\n251.5\n840.9\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n555.9\n958.0\n1,531.5\nOTHER\n158.2\n85.0\n29.6\nScrap & Waste\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nSecond Hand Goods\n131.9\n85.0\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n26.3\n0.0\n29.6\nRHODE ISLAND'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n14,663.7\n23,940.8\n32,107.8\nRHODE ISLAND'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n509,304.4\n559,849.5\n649,675.5\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF RHODE ISLAND'S EXPORTS\n2.9%\n4.3%\n4.9%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked FIFTH Among Rhode Island's 110 Export Markets\n58\nSOUTH CAROLINA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nSouth Carolina's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n81 Percent of South Carolina's\n85 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n70\nNon-Manufacturing\n$59.8\nComputers &\n$21.7\n60\nManufacturing $54.9\nIndustrial Mach.\n50\nChemicals\n$11.3\n40\n$32.3\nRubber &\nPlastic Prod.\n$7.0\n30\nTextile Mill\n20\n$5.0\nProducts\n10\nPaper Products\n$3.3\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n5\n10\n15\n20\n25\n30\nSOUTH CAROLINA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n20.8\n50.5\n94.3\nAgriculture crops\n12.8\n48.1\n47.9\nAgriculture - livestock\n8.0\n2.4\n41.5\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n4.8\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n136.4\n70.0\n128.4\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n27.6\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n136.4\n70.0\n100.8\nMANUFACTURING\n31,326.4\n54,186.2\n58,630.6\nFood Products\n255.8\n223.3\n1,855.6\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n1,763.1\n5,537.5\n5,027.5\nApparel\n6.9\n689.1\n505.4\nLumber & Wood Products\n18.1\n62.5\n45.9\nFurniture & Fixtures\n30.9\n0.0\n55.7\nPaper Products\n2,020.4\n927.8\n3,315.2\nPrinting & Publishing\n0.0\n26.4\n99.0\nChemical Products\n7,381.8\n15,341.7\n11,295.5\nPetroleum Refining Products\n35.1\n6.0\n4.8\nRubber & Plastic Products\n7,003.4\n5,052.5\n6,983.6\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n2.0\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n365.8\n232.0\n655.7\nPrimary Metal Industries\n317.6\n1,390.7\n1,301.7\nFabricated Metal Products\n291.5\n491.2\n1,306.8\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n10,123.3\n21,375.3\n21,711.9\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n802.7\n1,774.1\n2,396.1\nTransportation Equipment\n605.2\n369.1\n1,184.0\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n122.3\n442.6\n671.0\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n182.7\n244.5\n213.2\nOTHER\n866.3\n546.2\n898.0\nScrap & Waste\n360.2\n292.3\n532.1\nSecond Hand Goods\n345.5\n26.0\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n160.6\n227.9\n365.9\nSOUTH CAROLINA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n32,349.8\n54,852.9\n59,751.2\nSOUTH CAROLINA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n2,279,508.3\n2,997,912.2\n3,531,116.2\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF SOUTH CAROLINA'S EXPORTS\n1.4%\n1.8%\n1.7%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked 15TH Among South Carolina's 148 Export Markets\n59\nSOUTH DAKOTA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 3 Exports Accounted for\nSouth Dakota's Exports to Mexico Fell by\n90 Percent of South Dakota's\n2 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n8\n7\nNon-Manufacturing\nManufacturing\nFood Products\n6\n$2.1\n$5.4\n$5.3\n5\n$4.8\n4\nComputers &\nIndustrial Mach.\n$1.4\n3\n2\nTextile Mill\n1\nProducts\n$1.2\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n0.5\n1\n1.5\n2\n2.5\nSOUTH DAKOTA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n142.2\n563.3\n202.7\nAgriculture - crops\n142.2\n563.3\n0.0\nAgriculture - livestock\n0.0\n0.0\n202.7\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n184.1\n2.7\n54.3\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n184.1\n2.7\n54.3\nMANUFACTURING\n5,012.3\n4,186.4\n4,978.9\nFood Products\n3,673.6\n3,743.8\n2,053.4\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n695.8\n0.0\n1,241.8\nApparel\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nLumber & Wood Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nPaper Products\n0.0\n0.0\n3.1\nPrinting & Publishing\n0.0\n0.0\n4.6\nChemical Products\n0.0\n0.0\n2.9\nPetroleum Refining Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n16.1\n7.5\n22.5\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n2.6\n155.7\n0.0\nPrimary Metal Industries\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFabricated Metal Products\n1.6\n1.9\n0.0\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n596.1\n240.2\n1,412.3\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n15.6\n35.2\n88.4\nTransportation Equipment\n5.0\n2.0\n142.4\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n3.3\n0.0\n3.0\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n2.6\n0.0\n4.5\nOTHER\n19.6\n8.0\n15.2\nScrap & Waste\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nSecond Hand Goods\n19.6\n8.0\n15.2\nMilitary Equipment\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nSOUTH DAKOTA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n5,358.3\n4,760.4\n5,251.0\nSOUTH DAKOTA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n66,092.7\n91,868.0\n158,445.6\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF SOUTH DAKOTA'S EXPORTS\n8.1%\n5.2%\n3.3%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked SEVENTH Among South Dakota's 71 Export Markets\n60\nTENNESSEE: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nTennessee's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n59 Percent of Tennessee's\n142 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n300\nNon-Manufacturing\n$244.2\nTransportation\n$33.1\nManufacturing\nEquipment\n200\nPaper Products\n$32.5\n$141.2\nChemicals\n$30.2\n$100.9\n100\nElectric &\n$25.4\nElectronic Eqp.\nMilitary Eqpmt.\n$22.1\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n10\n20\n30\n40\nTENNESSEE'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n18,282.3\n2,700.1\n6,206.2\nAgriculture crops\n18,194.1\n2,270.7\n5,172.0\nAgriculture - livestock\n61.0\n409.4\n1,004.5\nForestry\n27.2\n19.9\n0.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n29.7\nMINING\n2,016.2\n1,894.3\n4,166.2\nMetal Mining\n385.0\n23.2\n2,361.9\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n1,631.3\n1,871.1\n1,804.3\nMANUFACTURING\n80,046.1\n133,933.5\n207,327.5\nFood Products\n4,672.3\n10,812.0\n10,407.4\nTobacco Products\n10.2\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n2,592.2\n1,519.4\n6,803.6\nApparel\n1,689.3\n134.5\n650.1\nLumber & Wood Products\n23.5\n550.9\n745.5\nFurniture & Fixtures\n172.8\n1,372.4\n452.6\nPaper Products\n4,697.0\n12,642.9\n32,544.7\nPrinting & Publishing\n110.4\n203.0\n267.4\nChemical Products\n19,856.3\n24,124.5\n30,150.2\nPetroleum Refining Products\n661.1\n56.6\n349.4\nRubber & Plastic Products\n5,127.9\n9,946.7\n4,186.0\nLeather Products\n21.9\n425.7\n11,517.6\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n676.3\n880.9\n2,311.2\nPrimary Metal Industries\n10,840.0\n12,331.5\n15,606.2\nFabricated Metal Products\n2,971.8\n6,950.4\n9,802.8\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n9,666.7\n14,112.1\n19,629.6\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n7,711.1\n16,873.6\n25,377.5\nTransportation Equipment\n4,917.7\n12,801.7\n33,125.2\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n3,294.8\n7,860.2\n2,782.5\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n332.8\n334.5\n617.8\nOTHER\n593.1\n2,649.5\n26,536.8\nScrap & Waste\n490.2\n2,392.5\n4,435.6\nSecond Hand Goods\n93.4\n49.7\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n9.6\n207.3\n22,101.2\nTENNESSEE'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n100,937.8\n141,177.4\n244,236.6\nTENNESSEE'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n2,506,246.2\n2,995,308.7\n3,622,501.5\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF TENNESSEE'S EXPORTS\n4.0%\n4.7%\n6.7%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked THIRD Among Tennessee's 156 Export Markets\n61\nTEXAS: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nTexas' Exports to Mexico Grew by\n62 Percent of Texas'\n70 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nBillion $\nBillion $\nNon-Manufacturing\nElectric &\n12\n$11.0\nElectronic Eqp.\n$3.2\nManufacturing\n$9.3\nComputers &\n9\n$1.2\nIndustrial Mach.\n$6.5\nTransportation\n$1.1\n6\nEquipment\nChemicals\n$0.8\n3\nFood Products\n$0.5\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n1\n2\n3\n4\nTEXAS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n258,447.9\n562,642.0\n545,037.3\nAgriculture - crops\n224,560.9\n377,328.4\n451,006.4\nAgriculture - livestock\n25,768.2\n174,760.0\n63,455.7\nForestry\n8,118.8\n10,551.9\n9,506.4\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n1.7\n21,068.7\nMINING\n24,618.4\n24,677.7\n26,686.5\nMetal Mining\n5,582.3\n7,121.4\n6,326.0\nCoal Mining\n1,331.2\n2,042.0\n494.0\nOil & Gas\n8.0\n1,103.0\n928.8\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n17,696.9\n14,411.3\n18,937.8\nMANUFACTURING\n6,007,613.7\n8,483,698.1\n10,232,764.9\nFood Products\n187,115.1\n392,577.4\n496,052.8\nTobacco Products\n351.6\n539.6\n1,142.2\nTextile Mill Products\n158,599.2\n179,504.8\n199,713.7\nApparel\n137,495.6\n173,905.0\n251,094.3\nLumber & Wood Products\n21,784.6\n40,818.0\n55,067.9\nFurniture & Fixtures\n65,049.2\n80,434.5\n122,797.6\nPaper Products\n249,669.7\n330,424.5\n397,184.1\nPrinting & Publishing\n10,007.6\n17,056.8\n25,556.8\nChemical Products\n502,844.9\n796,864.9\n810,356.7\nPetroleum Refining Products\n216,853.9\n75,142.3\n318,674.3\nRubber & Plastic Products\n232,291.7\n413,257.3\n363,799.4\nLeather Products\n32,864.3\n54,941.4\n69,683.8\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n57,150.4\n85,385.3\n54,780.1\nPrimary Metal Industries\n214,159.9\n350,246.1\n398,181.4\nFabricated Metal Products\n284,390.9\n326,399.4\n489,337.8\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n832,132.7\n1,094,858.6\n1,193,520.1\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n2,113,228.7\n2,946,481.8\n3,233,488.3\nTransportation Equipment\n483,629.7\n646,473.5\n1,132,881.6\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n146,519.2\n363,910.0\n474,312.7\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n61,474.8\n114,476.8\n145,139.3\nOTHER\n174,442.7\n263,011.5\n206,138.4\nScrap & Waste\n112,490.0\n161,682.3\n163,581.9\nSecond Hand Goods\n39,312.6\n56,454.3\n8,397.5\nMilitary Equipment\n22,640.1\n44,874.9\n34,159.0\nTEXAS' EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n6,465,122.7\n9,334,029.2\n11,010,627.0\nTEXAS' EXPORTS TO WORLD\n25,323,676.0\n34,578,455.2\n38,093,254.4\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF TEXAS' EXPORTS\n25.5%\n27.0%\n28.9%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked FIRST Among Texas' 190 Export Markets\n62\nUTAH: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nUtah's Exports to Mexico Fell by\n87 Percent of Utah's\n14 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n70\nNon-Manufacturing\nScientific &\n60\n$13.8\nManufacturing\n$51.0\nMeasuring Instru.\n50\nPaper Products\n$5.5\n40\n$37.1\n$31.8\nRubber &\n$4.8\n30\nPlastic Prod.\nComputers &\n20\nIndustrial Mach.\n$2.2\n10\nFood Products\n$1.5\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n5\n10\n15\n20\nUTAH'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n0.0\n9.1\n88.5\nAgriculture - crops\n0.0\n7.0\n0.0\nAgriculture - livestock\n0.0\n2.1\n88.5\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n183.3\n136.1\n63.0\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n183.3\n136.1\n63.0\nMANUFACTURING\n36,904.5\n49,883.0\n31,559.5\nFood Products\n148.5\n1,420.2\n1,517.4\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n790.1\n601.7\n59.2\nApparel\n7,018.0\n6,988.6\n159.0\nLumber & Wood Products\n5.0\n0.0\n3.0\nFurniture & Fixtures\n5.1\n13.6\n0.0\nPaper Products\n5,972.5\n9,019.9\n5,490.2\nPrinting & Publishing\n380.5\n1,667.1\n481.8\nChemical Products\n206.9\n821.1\n543.2\nPetroleum Refining Products\n22.3\n0.0\n5.7\nRubber & Plastic Products\n8,491.7\n12,358.4\n4,777.9\nLeather Products\n0.0\n5.8\n2.8\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n585.2\n241.3\n28.0\nPrimary Metal Industries\n388.0\n701.6\n585.3\nFabricated Metal Products\n375.8\n239.0\n414.2\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n2,397.4\n2,101.7\n2,208.8\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n9,136.3\n1,767.7\n869.5\nTransportation Equipment\n123.7\n121.0\n300.1\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n320.8\n10,853.7\n13,766.2\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n536.6\n960.5\n347.2\nOTHER\n0.0\n957.0\n47.4\nScrap & Waste\n0.0\n936.2\n0.0\nSecond Hand Goods\n0.0\n0.0\n6.5\nMilitary Equipment\n0.0\n20.8\n40.9\nUTAH'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n37,087.8\n50,985.2\n31,758.3\nUTAH'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n806,060.1\n943,319.8\n1,244,000.6\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF UTAH'S EXPORTS\n4.6%\n5.4%\n2.6%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked 12TH Among Utah's 123 Export Markets\n63\nVERMONT: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nVermont's Exports to Mexico Rose by\nThe Top 3 Exports Accounted for\n80 Percent of Vermont's\n350 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n24\nNon-Manufacturing\nElectric &\nManufacturing\n$7.5\n20\nElectronic Eqp.\n$16.4\n16\n$11.6\n12\nPaper Products\n$1.2\n8\n4\n$2.6\nPrimary Metal\n$0.5\nIndustries\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n2\n4\n6\n8\n10\nVERMONT'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nAgriculture crops\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nAgriculture - livestock\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n31.1\n11.7\n119.8\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n31.1\n11.7\n119.8\nMANUFACTURING\n2,536.8\n16,283.9\n11,270.1\nFood Products\n943.8\n621.4\n196.0\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n8.4\n66.8\n79.8\nApparel\n0.0\n0.0\n350.9\nLumber & Wood Products\n0.0\n39.7\n62.0\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n0.0\n26.7\nPaper Products\n553.2\n1,735.6\n1,192.9\nPrinting & Publishing\n2.2\n30.1\n0.0\nChemical Products\n164.0\n96.1\n71.5\nPetroleum Refining Products\n0.0\n10.0\n0.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n61.1\n46.8\n218.5\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n20.4\n342.1\n225.1\nPrimary Metal Industries\n88.0\n194.4\n510.6\nFabricated Metal Products\n22.4\n113.5\n7.0\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n295.1\n2,732.5\n436.3\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n315.1\n10,032.4\n7,504.4\nTransportation Equipment\n0.0\n7.4\n4.7\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n63.0\n215.1\n383.9\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOTHER\n1.8\n55.9\n160.0\nScrap & Waste\n1.8\n12.0\n155.8\nSecond Hand Goods\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n0.0\n43.8\n4.3\nVERMONT'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n2,569.6\n16,351.5\n11,549.9\nVERMONT'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n731,106.1\n1,172,521.0\n1,683,531.0\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF VERMONT'S EXPORTS\n0.4%\n1.4%\n0.7%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked SEVENTH Among Vermont's 96 Export Markets\n64\nVIRGINIA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\nVirginia's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n77 Percent of Virginia's\n109 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n100\nNon-Manufacturing\n$85.7\nElectric &\n$26.0\n80\nManufacturing\nElectronic Eqp.\n$63.5\nChemicals\n$11.8\n60\nTransportation\n$41.1\n$10.9\nEquipment\n40\nComputers &\nIndustrial Mach.\n$9.8\n20\nPrimary Metal\n$7.2\nIndustries\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n5\n10\n15\n20\n25\n30\n35\nVIRGINIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n3,844.5\n265.8\n433.2\nAgriculture crops\n3,710.9\n24.0\n408.2\nAgriculture - livestock\n79.6\n43.3\n25.0\nForestry\n54.1\n198.6\n0.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n767.4\n910.9\n1,808.5\nMetal Mining\n73.5\n1.7\n15.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n693.9\n909.3\n1,793.5\nMANUFACTURING\n36,111.3\n60,395.6\n81,692.5\nFood Products\n1,142.4\n1,926.1\n1,400.8\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n4.8\nTextile Mill Products\n322.7\n558.4\n722.2\nApparel\n97.6\n202.3\n151.5\nLumber & Wood Products\n109.4\n66.7\n164.7\nFurniture & Fixtures\n59.3\n732.8\n2,319.8\nPaper Products\n112.7\n455.7\n1,488.9\nPrinting & Publishing\n23.3\n39.9\n825.0\nChemical Products\n10,282.3\n18,039.2\n11,773.6\nPetroleum Refining Products\n26.5\n5.8\n0.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n475.1\n744.8\n1,217.3\nLeather Products\n0.0\n9.2\n43.2\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n2,003.1\n1,572.1\n1,938.2\nPrimary Metal Industries\n3,808.8\n3,365.7\n7,234.5\nFabricated Metal Products\n1,949.4\n1,564.3\n3,289.5\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n6,401.8\n11,821.5\n9,833.6\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n6,133.1\n12,851.8\n26,029.0\nTransportation Equipment\n1,606.1\n3,528.5\n10,880.4\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n1,508.8\n2,654.3\n1,754.6\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n48.7\n256.6\n621.0\nOTHER\n333.0\n1,940.6\n1,809.0\nScrap & Waste\n279.8\n1,114.6\n1,505.3\nSecond Hand Goods\n50.3\n235.4\n21.9\nMilitary Equipment\n3.0\n590.6\n281.8\nVIRGINIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n41,056.3\n63,513.1\n85,743.2\nVIRGINIA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n6,704,789.1\n7,887,757.3\n8,717,771.5\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF VIRGINIA'S EXPORTS\n0.6%\n0.8%\n1.0%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked 20TH Among Virginia's 171 Export Markets\n65\nWASHINGTON: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nWashington's Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n78 Percent of Washington's\n43 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n150\nNon-Manufacturing\n$119.3\nFood Products\nManufacturing\n100\n$91.0\nPaper Products\n$44.5\n$18.8\n$83.4\nAgriculture-Crops\n$14.6\n50\nComputers &\nIndustrial Mach.\n$11.3\nFabricated\nMetal Prod.\n$4.0\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n10\n20\n30\n40\n50\nWASHINGTON'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n1,324.6\n16,535.6\n16,916.8\nAgriculture - crops\n1,278.0\n16,531.9\n14,609.4\nAgriculture - livestock\n46.6\n3.7\n516.6\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n1,790.8\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMANUFACTURING\n81,532.5\n73,550.5\n99,425.3\nFood Products\n8,953.0\n33,372.6\n44,518.9\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n199.1\n953.3\n149.0\nApparel\n27.2\n6.8\n27.2\nLumber & Wood Products\n0.0\n6.9\n176.2\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n38.5\n90.2\nPaper Products\n9,412.6\n21,894.9\n18,838.8\nPrinting & Publishing\n412.3\n1,111.1\n1,854.6\nChemical Products\n1,169.5\n1,636.3\n1,331.3\nPetroleum Refining Products\n3,501.9\n2.9\n2,554.2\nRubber & Plastic Products\n6.1\n248.5\n799.4\nLeather Products\n0.0\n20.4\n18.2\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n6.7\n130.8\n117.5\nPrimary Metal Industries\n1,768.7\n1,059.2\n1,432.5\nFabricated Metal Products\n401.3\n436.2\n3,990.9\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n2,468.1\n3,790.4\n11,334.6\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n1,759.8\n2,632.8\n2,515.4\nTransportation Equipment\n50,290.5\n4,354.6\n3,061.6\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n1,098.6\n1,690.8\n2,971.1\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n57.3\n163.4\n3,643.8\nOTHER\n524.5\n903.9\n2,928.3\nScrap & Waste\n351.6\n668.5\n130.4\nSecond Hand Goods\n121.0\n10.7\n90.0\nMilitary Equipment\n51.9\n224.7\n2,707.9\nWASHINGTON'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n83,381.5\n90,990.0\n119,270.5\nWASHINGTON'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n13,056,390.5\n17,865,012.2\n23,964,772.3\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF WASHINGTON'S EXPORTS\n0.6%\n0.5%\n0.5%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked 29TH Among Washington's 174 Export Markets\n66\nWEST VIRGINIA: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 3 Exports Accounted for\nWest Virginia's Exports to Mexico Fell by\n94 Percent of West Virginia's\n40 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n80\nNon-Manufacturing\nChemicals\n$19.8\nManufacturing\n60\n$44.0\nPrimary Metal\n40\n$4.4\nIndustries\n$26.3\n$18.6\n20\nComputers &\n$0.5\nIndustrial Mach.\n0\n1987\n1989\n0\n5\n10\n15\n20\n25\n1988\nWEST VIRGINIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n0.0\n0.0\n19.6\nAgriculture crops\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nAgriculture - livestock\n0.0\n0.0\n19.6\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n275.9\n321.8\n85.7\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n275.9\n321.8\n85.7\nMANUFACTURING\n43,573.5\n18,133.8\n26,167.9\nFood Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n0.0\n25.8\n2.1\nApparel\n1.9\n0.0\n0.0\nLumber & Wood Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nPaper Products\n94.8\n262.0\n88.9\nPrinting & Publishing\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nChemical Products\n15,826.2\n14,614.3\n19,815.3\nPetroleum Refining Products\n3,245.7\n41.7\n0.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n239.0\n326.3\n74.8\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n102.3\n114.9\n274.8\nPrimary Metal Industries\n632.7\n1,724.9\n4,374.9\nFabricated Metal Products\n6,276.6\n362.8\n296.1\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n16,635.9\n246.8\n518.6\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n189.5\n63.2\n194.6\nTransportation Equipment\n307.4\n153.4\n154.4\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n21.5\n197.7\n348.7\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n0.0\n0.0\n24.6\nOTHER\n138.9\n111.7\n0.0\nScrap & Waste\n0.0\n17.3\n0.0\nSecond Hand Goods\n138.9\n0.0\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n0.0\n94.4\n0.0\nWEST VIRGINIA'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n43,988.4\n18,567.4\n26,273.2\nWEST VIRGINIA'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n1,224,336.3\n1,349,556.3\n1,413,217.8\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF WEST VIRGINIA'S EXPORTS\n3.6%\n1.4%\n1.9%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked 13TH Among West Virginia's 99 Export Markets\n67\nWISCONSIN: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nWisconsin's Exports to Mexico Grew by\nThe Top 5 Exports Accounted for\n78 Percent of Wisconsin's\n75 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n150\n$135.2\nNon-Manufacturing\nComputers &\nIndustrial Mach.\n$51.4\nManufacturing\n100\nFood Products\n$30.9\n$77.3\n$83.2\nScientific &\n$9.1\nMeasuring Instru.\n50\nTransportation\n$7.3\nEquipment\nElectric &\n$6.6\nElectronic Eqp.\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n10\n20\n30\n40\n50\n60\nWISCONSIN'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n8,536.9\n8,690.8\n5,621.9\nAgriculture - crops\n7,559.9\n5,487.5\n952.7\nAgriculture - livestock\n977.1\n3,198.1\n4,647.0\nForestry\n0.0\n5.3\n22.2\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n49.1\n60.1\n173.4\nMetal Mining\n7.2\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n41.8\n60.1\n173.4\nMANUFACTURING\n68,532.5\n73,776.6\n128,672.0\nFood Products\n8,182.3\n2,739.3\n30,884.2\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n0.0\n247.1\n216.0\nApparel\n486.7\n12.1\n11.7\nLumber & Wood Products\n51.6\n239.9\n508.8\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n186.4\n760.9\nPaper Products\n791.0\n3,001.3\n4,399.4\nPrinting & Publishing\n143.5\n189.4\n291.2\nChemical Products\n1,827.4\n2,184.2\n2,555.8\nPetroleum Refining Products\n122.3\n198.2\n52.7\nRubber & Plastic Products\n2,283.8\n4,340.3\n3,038.4\nLeather Products\n468.0\n449.0\n431.6\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n516.0\n353.0\n468.5\nPrimary Metal Industries\n1,132.4\n1,670.9\n2,613.4\nFabricated Metal Products\n1,220.6\n2,958.5\n6,376.1\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n39,935.5\n33,681.4\n51,442.4\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n4,438.0\n4,325.6\n6,635.3\nTransportation Equipment\n3,774.7\n4,652.6\n7,341.2\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n2,069.5\n11,654.3\n9,091.2\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n1,089.5\n693.2\n1,553.3\nOTHER\n203.8\n660.5\n750.2\nScrap & Waste\n121.6\n267.5\n560.7\nSecond Hand Goods\n10.5\n86.4\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n71.7\n306.6\n189.5\nWISCONSIN'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n77,322.2\n83,188.0\n135,217.4\nWISCONSIN'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n3,951,481.9\n4,724,810.3\n5,002,882.6\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF WISCONSIN'S EXPORTS\n2.0%\n1.8%\n2.7%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked TENTH Among Wisconsin's 174 Export Markets\n68\nWYOMING: EXPORTS TO MEXICO, 1987-89\nThe Top 3 Exports Accounted for\nWyoming's Exports to Mexico Grew by\n96 Percent of Wyoming's\n13 Percent From 1987 to 1989\nTotal Exports to Mexico in 1989\nMillion $\nMillion $\n7\nNon-Manufacturing\n6\nChemicals\n$1.9\nManufacturing\n5\n4\n$3.8\n$3.4\n$3.1\nComputers &\n$1.2\n3\nIndustrial Mach.\n2\nAgriculture-Crops\n$0.6\n1\n0\n1987\n1988\n1989\n0\n0.5\n1\n1.5\n2\n2.5\nWYOMING'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO, BY INDUSTRY SECTOR\n(Thousands of Dollars)\n1987\n1988\n1989\nAGRICULTURE, FORESTRY & FISHERIES\n0.0\n0.0\n628.1\nAgriculture crops\n0.0\n0.0\n592.7\nAgriculture livestock\n0.0\n0.0\n35.4\nForestry\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFishing, Hunting\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMINING\n0.0\n0.0\n6.3\nMetal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nCoal Mining\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOil & Gas\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nNon-Metallic Minerals\n0.0\n0.0\n6.3\nMANUFACTURING\n3,374.3\n3,054.9\n3,189.1\nFood Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTobacco Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nTextile Mill Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nApparel\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nLumber & Wood Products\n0.0\n0:0\n0.0\nFurniture & Fixtures\n0.0\n1.7\n0.0\nPaper Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nPrinting & Publishing\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nChemical Products\n3,284.6\n2,340.9\n1,926.1\nPetroleum Refining Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nRubber & Plastic Products\n19.9\n31.0\n64.1\nLeather Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nStone, Clay & Glass Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nPrimary Metal Industries\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nFabricated Metal Products\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nComputers & Industrial Machinery\n69.9\n675.1\n1,162.5\nElectric & Electronic Equipment\n0.0\n2.1\n36.3\nTransportation Equipment\n0.0\n4.0\n0.0\nScientific & Measuring Instruments\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMiscellaneous Equipment\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nOTHER\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nScrap & Waste\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nSecond Hand Goods\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nMilitary Equipment\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nWYOMING'S EXPORTS TO MEXICO\n3,374.3\n3,054.9\n3,823.5\nWYOMING'S EXPORTS TO WORLD\n237,979.8\n235,145.1\n247,181.6\nMEXICO'S SHARE OF WYOMING'S EXPORTS\n1.4%\n1.3%\n1.5%\nMexico in 1989 Ranked 15TH Among Wyoming's 53 Export Markets\n69"
}