Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
323154146
label
Provo, [UT] Rally 7/18/92 [OA 7575] [2]
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
323154146
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
58320d820f44076b
ocrText
Originally Processed With FOIA(s): FOIA Number: S S FOIA MARKER This is not a textual record. This is used as an administrative marker by the George Bush Presidential Library Staff. Record Group/Collection: George H.W. Bush Presidential Records Collection/Office of Origin: Speechwriting, White House Office of Series: Speech File Backup Files Subseries: Chron File, 1989-1993 OA/ID Number: 13821 Folder ID Number: 13821-008 Folder Title: Provo, [UT] Rally 7/18/92 [OA 7575] [2] Stack: Row: Section: Shelf: Position: G 26 22 6 4 KEVIN HART- 20th ann. of Sharmott Center Freedom Test on 4th July last yr. Provo-orem most (weark city in nation Mention TY DETMER Mentin Richard Harrinton - Suzanni Faulk Scenaise /dins (my- - 212-397-8018 Plattorm in NY ) 6510 POLITICAL ERIC HOLKALB PROVO, UTAH (HOSHAUG)HO- named after Sut Marriolt Center Marrott Cunges of Byu arroming ask 6B am - = 10-11 end 11:30 am Rex Lee pres. BYU former Splichr gin. under Reagan- good Republican Provo mayor Joe Jenkins (R) Salt Lake mayor Democrat 12-15, 500 people Richard Harrington Rep. Nomine for 3rd District Dem. Bill orton- consenatic Kpush him hope 2 pick this seating again state of Utah do very well named first in Co, in Financial world AAA bond rats me 02 -Matn most 1weath city Steve Meekam Gov's office Press sec. Chiy of 8tall Debbie Turner ) Norman Bangadver 801-538-1000 624-7704 \ first Rep. you in To yrs. Gen. Scowcroft vehing things. Sen. Jahe Garn - not mmc Coop Chm, (0)801- 254, 9340 Bruce Hough (Huts) (h) 254, 2658 Gop HQ 533-9777 (|_______________________ the dn- David Hansen 45 miles fame Salt lake to Pmo banks of Utah lake Mays office host Raelie Ireland- - crowd raising "Osmond group - in , -173 glue Mickan what do you mean by New Wold Order rapidly growing area - wordperfect Novel an headquartered Provo-oram in Provo - very proud of goftware ( software capital in the world) - recog as meg most Willable areas in the country in 1991 shoney Magagine best glace to live (congars) hotspot for so/tware; revalry Stwn, BYUS Uni. 11 Иth in Salt lake (Utes) maj Gen./Oqden Cov's E Cress secretary "Heather" Ty DETMER '91 Heisman Tophy winner Ppvo- the right move, the night place- the family place - most liveable city 3rd in nation in conguir softalare - beauth like valley- - it By-Who(3) By who(?) Byu - blu white Utes- - reds white U on mountainside Gumbell Bryant Mayor Tenkins: No local term "Provoan" not realy used # trade export 420 millin info. 7 computer computer inclusing sof tware koow electronics / technology $500 Unisys /Wodgerf. /Novel million 12,500 jobs in that incurtry defense electronics in the # 1990 most Prove best example recent figures planning people - don't describe the product give the industry 1mill exported 1 25 people employed Copper [steel by industry primary metals [ metallic ores (mined) copper 360 mill ion 7,500 jobs $200 million revenues 5, on jobs primary 500miun t Geneva Steel m Provo 12,500 jobs INFO FROM SPEVE MEEXAM Joe Cannon and for for iseat = UK 334millur, - Canala 290 1990 -Japan 200 m exports approximates Debbie turner Utah Utah State steals the paint the wheel ? Univ. of Utah paints the y red from time to time the must Rep. Couth in state (zethaps Nation Sodam and Gamoral M the Hudson] / week b4 Proneer day - AND need 10 mention State holiday Byoung 1847 fleim religin persumsion 24th July as important as Independence Day Osmond Family has a Freedom Day Celibration BACK IN 14 July 1992 - PROVO - - 1:40pm - VIDEO STORE IN DOWNTOWN PROVO NEAR- CANDMARK- WHERE Rich's Video on Freedom Blud - UTAH FIAVOR 1991-92 Money Mag - Gram am. most liveable City in Am. us. Conf. of Mayors most Greath city Ty Detmer Byll - Cougar fans - Close to their hearts former logo- "the family place" nr Provo the right move built on fam. values, 1g. families May 5 Chuidren 7 chuh, 10 children Utah Vally hosp. delivers Move babis than any Hospital in Am. City w/ youngest Orp. in courty paint Y - Uter paint lot farther to Salt lake than to miles consentive, straightfrrward things we chang 6 there "Nolunteer tethic Pocuts of light Provo Rever Parkway Tree City USA- - variety 5 abundam of trus dating back to heritage Urban forest - in Utah Valley- 20mins. Sun dance sking 10 min Boat Utah lake Trut Pmo River -Walleye Hin Provost explorer Fr. canuints region never want to be Simpsons updated Kevswin of Beaver Cleaves Sweetness, in there people quality of upe- 1 don't have lot 4 crime - some integrity 9 citizen 90, 000 Second lavgist full sevin Urban Centers ) Commitment to their familys family goes skiing - see all togther - Brigham young - Sports Byu- Congar Stadium - 65,000 Call Raeline back 3pm < 1 tx Rob Munario/dais/time? V 801-379-6100 tin homebyers] landloted Utah first time honabuyer tax Credit for THat from Our fall cherding what aug. juce of home in Urab - X worth of clean dum news an on seon way on mortgage sagments March as will Club Sab intonio family value M Chaluenger and Ferguson Kanny man 46 8 - Juetior after submit Jan antonio Marck 9 LEDEUEOFCATIES- LEAGUE OFCATIES maint magnmets my refan do away n/ rishs; an age is sin; not risks would burnt the chiny buchet symem; not penalyids to they the not take rentury strenghton the stropes small bis gool: Minisota ensures hairweaving small businesses @ mercy of states RNC healteme casts: water shipplid Alo incentive to fred no such through as gitt out of the system Presidential Remarks Bush-Quayle Rally Provo, Utah BYU FIGHT SONG ANDARE SHOUT OUT POPULATION AND " CHORUS ON to THE IS wait- GENERALLY TRAIL TO one 1/2 GLORY of or 50% ho of] 18 July 1992 Goad. Draft Student/ mbv.ot Gervia separdent assoc. 6181-586-4186 a GRIFFITH 4186 RISE * RISEARS V Total STUDENT have prep. to could get ints mak class a BYU join child coming Deve married to and to return missionamis to Byu "RMs" Good morning everybody. It's great to be out West to visit this outstanding university and be here where the come find back a wife Cougars have devoured so many victims. students from tried to to introduce myself 90 diff Countries to a cure girl but had to fightoff 20 RMS "The West is where we all go someday" a famous writer once wrote. "It's where we go when we hear there is 'gold in them thar hills. I Where we go to grow with the country. Where we chase our young dreams or spend our old age. " And today I can add with complete authority that the West also isn't all that bad a place to be when your personality is being pummelled your character questioned and your administration verbally assassinated 2,000 miles away. I spent the past couple days away from a television set up in Wyoming trout fishing with Secretary of State Jim Baker and our sons, Jamie and Jeb. But I am aware that something else was going on in America this week. Something real important. 1 This is the week when all across America crowds of panting, sweating people overran their neighborhood video stores. From Tallahassee to Tempe ... Americans turned on their TV and decided they'd rather rent "Action Jackson" than listen to: Well, never mind. (Seen) (see) other Now ... please don't get the idea that this is some kind of Racline Irelaml partisan attack. Stop by Rich's Video down on Freedom Boulevard (Rick Adams) and I'm sure Rich'll tell it to you straight. Sales aren't all that bad during the Republican Convention either. I know you have a lot on your minds beside politics. And I hate to poison the air with partisan talk. But let me respond just a little to what went on in Manhattan. If you're one of those who prefer video renting to politicians venting ... I'll put it simple. You can sum up all you need to know about the Manhattan meeting with the title of a 1965 Cliff Robertson comedy: "Masquerade." LARS From what I heard about the convention ... I wonder if the Democrats are donning a disguise. They're saying the right things. Pride in America's strength. Support for entrepreneurs. Respect for law and order. 2 FAO NYT In fact if it weren't for the $9,000 stuffed ponies at the toy store on the corner and the bullet proof vests being sold on street corners you could close your eyes and think they on were at this "home above the range" in Provo not the "home of the hockey Rangers" in New York City. Provo at foothils of the Wasstch a Mt. But you know I couldn't help but wonder do they really mean what they say? Or is this new costume something the Democrats plan on discarding maybe sometime right after Halloween? Think about it. If they celebrate the end of the Cold War how come they never supported the strength that won it? If they claim to be buddies with business people how come they want to load 'em down with new taxes? If they are really the party of new ideas and open ears why not allow just one speaker to talk about the rights of the unborn? GOV. CASEY OF PA. And if they start their convention with a prayer how come you can read all 10,000 words in their party platform and never run across three simple letters: G-O-D. ACCORDING TO LATEST PLATFORM AVAIL- FROM MENTIONED. 3 Now don't take my word that the Democrats may not be what they appear to be. I'm a little biased. Listen instead ... to a party elder. A guy named McGovern. NYT First name George. He called this year's Democratic Party a Juy 16,1992 Trojan Horse." He said ... and I quote "they're much more liberal underneath NYT July July 16,1992 16,1992 ... and will prove it when they're elected." I know I've never said this publicly. But that McGovern. He's an incredibly insightful man! Now let me be straight with you. This election isn't going to be decided on what we say about the other side ... or what they say about us ... for that matter. What matters ... is what we have to offer the American people. My view of America is a little different than what you may have heard this week. I'd like to explain it. 4 Byu Raeline Slogan Irehand = I know at BYU you like to say that the world is your campus. Let me say that campus has been through incredible change in four years. Because of our leadership because of your sacrifice and commitment millions of people breathe free today. That poses challenges and opportunities. The question is this can we compete now that so many other nations are playing our game? We need to understand something. If we can win this competition and we will to the victors will go bigger spoils than ever before in human history. Today far more people are eager for the fruit of our labors. That means more jobs more prosperity for our kids and their kids. Now that's the opportunity I see today. But how do we take advantage of it? Our first priority is to create and protect jobs. Listening to Madison Square Garden this week you probably got the impression that our economy was second rate second class. 5 But keep in mind a few facts. Davidwalkrusik chief Econ. We are still the world's largest and most vibrant Second to no one. the lot time generally economy. CEA] We've tamed inflation interest rates are at a 20-year-low. David Walters USTR chief Econ. stayee this low the Brady (1972) Bunch haven't Our factories produce a higher percentage of the world's manufactured goods than we did 20 years ago. stet David Walkrs USTR chinf Ean. an What a Japanese worker can produce in five days American can make in four. Today... We have emerged as the world's export champion. Porter Last year the Japanese government asked who leads the world you Hers in 143 critical technology industries. Japanese firms led in 33. Report The United States in 43. Philys Mayor's the Mayor Jenkins % Provo office they And I wouldn't be suprised to learn if that the report was put together on WordPerfect software made designed I ight here in ? Provo. WORDPerF OREM/ design ( NOVELL Phylhis PROVO networking stuff ) OREM IS BSS Smiles away. Our economy is growing today. But it has to grow faster. not fast crough. Joe 6 office Too many people have worked for a company for twenty years only to fear that the next mail run will bring a pink slip. And many of you young people are working your way through Brigham Young you deserve to be able to find a job on graduation day. I used to run a business meet a payroll. I learned the only way that government can create jobs is to support the people who create jobs. This is the creed Governor Norm Bangerter follows. He understands that the only surefire way to give people unlimited dreams ... is by limiting the size of government. We're going to bring some of Norm's attitude to Washington. Debbie Turner Wash. Utahoffie Like your Governor ... we need a line-item veto ... and I'm going to get it. Debbie Tumer Wash. utah office Like your Governor we need a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution and I'm going to get it. clerk's office It And despite 31 vetoes in three years cutting billions in proposed Congressional spending we need even more discipline on the Potomac. 7 Orrh Hatch and suke With the help of a new Congressman named Richard Harrington we're going to treat wasteful government spending the way Karl Pebbin Turner Malone will treat a European jump shot in Barcelona. We're going to swat it back into the front row! Dream Team to Here's my second priority. A moral revolution in America. Olympics Americans need to understand something you all know very well. other "NoVsuccess can compensate for failure in the home. " 14 TIMES Jan 11, 1987 David O. McKay said those words many years ago and they was pres.of harken back to a different age in America. Murch of latter day Saints - (in the 70's) Today we can fly from Paris to New York and arrive earlier than we left but do we too often leave behind the difference between right and wrong? We can explore a world beyond the stars but do we too often ignore a neighbor down the street? We can turn natural ingredients into miracle medicines but why do we feel the need to turn every argument into a lawsuit? America won't get better until we start suing each other less and serving each other more. 8 our (s) We learn these values in the living room and around our kitchen tables. But while families help keep our lives together government can help keep our families together. By giving parents the freedom to choose their kidsschools. By reforming welfare so that we reward work and families can stick together not fall apart. Only then can our nation find its way back to our foundation. My third priority. Quite simple. Restore respect for the law. Elderly women in this country watch the Berlin Wall fall on television but are afraid to walk to their neighborhood grocery store. There are kids in our cities who hear of the Russians reducing nuclear weapons but then have to walk through a metal detector at school every morning. What do you say to these Americans? You say enough is enough. Let's put an end to the lawlessness. Let's put an end to the illegal behavior. These are my principles the things in which I believe. I hope you agree because they are the key to our future. 9 at Those of you in the BYU summer school program are here to be prepared to "go forth to serve. " But you might be wondering where America is going forth. The question on your minds is one that's been asked for generations. Can I do better than my mom and dad? Will the dream still be alive for me and my kids. Well ... I've been around for a couple years. If you'll excuse some advice from an elder I really do believe America's best days are ahead. Yes we face challenges today ... but I've seen this nation climb much taller mountains. If we can topple the Berlin Wall we can build a strong economy. If we can lift the iron curtain ... we can bring the curtain down on immorality and indifference. If we can help people walk free in Eastern Europe ... we can take back the streets of America. This is our mission. Together we'll accomplish it. God bless you and God bless America. ### 10 To JEANNIE Date Time 8:31 WHILE YOU WERE OUT M GIG GRIFFITH of Phone 801 586 4186 Area Code Number Extension TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN X WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT RETURNED YOUR CALL Message Operator AMPAD EFFICIENCY@ 23-023 CARBONLESS A10 THE NEW YORK TIMES NATIONAL WEDNESDAY, JULY 15, 1992 UNDER THE BIG TOP "Women's right to choose hangs by a thread. - Kathy Taylor, Republican for Clinton Excerpts From the Platform: A 'New Covenant' With Americans Following are excerpts from the platform adopted by the Democratic National Conven- tion last night. PREAMBLE afford The last 12 years have been a nightmare of Republican Irresponsibility and neglect. America's leadership is indifferent at home and uncertain In the world. Republican mis- management has disarmed government as Health Care an Instrument to make our economy work and support the people's most basic values, needs and hopes. The Republicans brought Our Families our Fam America a false and fragile prosperity based Can Afford Care Can Af on borrowing, not income, and so will leave Health Care behind a mountain of public debt and a backbreaking annual burden in Interest. It is Health Care Families wrong to borrow to spend on ourselves, leav- ing our children to pay our debts. Clinton Families Health Care We hear the anguish and the anger of the Our Families American people. We know it is directed not just at the Republican administrations that have had power but at Government itself. Clinton Our Can Afford Health Care Can Afford Their anger is justified. We can no longer afford business as usual - neither the poli-1 Health Our Families cles of the last 12 years of tax breaks for the rich, mismanagement, lack of leadership and Our Fam Can Afford cuts in services for the middle class and the Can poor, nor the adoption of new programs and Affe new spending without new thinking. Therefore we call for A REVOLUTION IN GOVERNMENT - to take power away from entrenched bureaucracies and narrow inter- ests in Washington and put it back In the hands of ordinary people. To make this revolution, we seek a NEW COVENANT to repair the damaged bond between the American people and their gov- Monica Almeida/The New York Times ernment, that will expand OPPORTUNITY, Delegates at the Democratic National Convention showing their support yesterday for affordable health care, which has been incorporated into the party's platform. insist upon greater individual RESPONSI- BILITY in return, restore COMMUNITY and Insure NATIONAL SECURITY in a pro- WORKERS' RIGHTS We will act against require people who can work to go to work purchases of handguns, as well as assault foundly new era. within two years in available jobs either in part of a vibrant and expanding global econ- sexual harassment in the workplace. We will weapons controls to ban the possession, sale, omy. honor the work ethic - by expanding the the private sector or in community service to Importation and manufacture of the most earned-income tax credit. meet unmet needs. deadly assault weapons. We do not support TRADE Our Government must work to expand CHOICE Democrats stand behind the right of efforts to restrict weapons used for legiti- trade while insisting that the conduct of I. LIFELONG LEARNING We oppose the Bush mate hunting and sporting purposes. world trade is fair. This should include Administration's efforts to bankrupt the pub- every woman to choose, consistent with Roe OPPORTUNITY lic school system through private school V. Wade, regardless of ability to pay, and PURSUING ALL CRIME AGGRESSIVELY renewed_authority to use America's trading Demo- Our party's first priority is opportunity vouchers. We will expand child health and support a national law to protect that right. crats will redouble efforts to ferret out and leverage against the most sericus problems. broad-based, non Inflationary economic nutrition programs and extend Head Start to punish those who betray the public trust, rig financial markets, misuse their depositors' TRADE AGREEMENTS all eligible children, and guarantee all chil- Our Government growth and the opportunity that flows from it. Democrats in 1992 hold nothing more dren access to quality, affordable child care. money or swindle their customers. must assure that our legitimate concerns important for America than an economy that We will adopt a national apprenticeship- LABOR-MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES If about environmental, health and safety, and a company wants to overpay its executives labor standards are included. Those Ameri- offers growth and jobs for all. style program to ease the transition from school to work for noncollege-bound students, and underinvest in the future or transfer jobs MPOWERING THE POOR AND EXPANDING THE can workers whose jobs are affected must so they can acquire skills that lead to high- overseas, it shouldn't get special treatment MIDDLE CLASS We advocate slower phas- have the benefit of effective adjustment as- We reject both the do-nothing government wage jobs. and tax breaks Workers must also accept Ing out of Medicaid and other benefits to sistance. of the last 12 years and the big government added responsibilities in the new economy. In A DOMESTIC G.I. BILL encourage work, special savings accounts to A Domestic G.I. Bill theory that says we can hamstring business return for an increased voice and a greater help low-income families build assets, fair Promoting Democracy will enable all Americans to borrow money and tax and spend our way to prosperity. stake in the success of their enterprises, for college, so long as they are willing to pay lending, an indexed minimum wage, an ex- An American foreign policy of engage- Instead we offer a third way. Just as we have workers should be prepared to join in co- panded Job Corps and an end to welfare rules it back as a percentage of their Income over ment for democracy must effectively ad- always viewed working men and women as operative efforts to increase productivity, that encourage family breakup and penalize dress: time or through national service addressing the bedrock of our economy, we honor busi- flexibility and quality. individual Initiative. unmet community needs. EMERGING DEMOCRACIES Helping to lead an ness as a noble endeavor and vow to create a RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT We AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE All Americans International effort to assist the emerging far better climate for firms and independent will protect our old-growth forests, preserve contractors of all sizes that empower their should have universal access to quality, af- critical habitats, provide a genuine "no net HOUSING We must also confront homeless- democracies in Eastern Europe and the for- fordable health care - not as a privilege but mer Soviet Union, workers, revolutionize their work places, re- loss" policy on wetlands, conserve the critl- ness by renovating, preserving and expand- spect the environment and serve their com- as a right. We must be united in declaring cal resources of soll, water and air, oppose Ing the stock of affordable low-Income hous- munities well. war on AIDS and H.I.V. disease, new offshore oil drilling and mineral explora- Ing. SOUTH AFRICA Maintenance of state and local FAIRNESS We will relieve the tax burden tion and production in our nation's many sanctions against South Africa until there on middle-class Americans by forcing the environmentally critical areas and address INVESTING IN AMERICA The only way to lay the rich to pay their fair share. We will provide ocean pollution by reducing oil and toxic THE ARTS We believe in a National Endow- is an irreversible, full and fair accommoda- foundation for renewed American prosperity long-overdue tax relief to families with chil- waste spills at sea. We believe America's ment for the Arts that is free from political tion with the black majority to create a dren. youth can serve their country well through a manipulation democratic government with full rights for is to spur both public and private investment. all its citizens. ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVEL- civilian conservation corps. To begin making our economy grow, the IV. MIDDLE EAST PEACE Support for the peace OPMENT We will push for revenue- RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT Rather than President and Congress should agree that neutral incentives that reward conservation, throwing money at obsolete programs, we PRESERVING OUR process now under way in the Middle East. savings from defense must be reinvested Jerusalem is the capital of the state of prevent pollution and encourage recycling. will eliminate unnecessary layers of man- NATIONAL SECURITY productively at home, including research, Israel and should remain an undivided city CIVIL AND EQUAL RIGHTS Democrats will agement, cut administrative costs, give peo- education and training, and other productive Under President Bush, crises have been accessible to people of all faiths. continue to lead the fight to insure that no ple more choices in the service they get and investments. We will create a "future budg- empower them to make those choices. managed rather than prevented; dictators school to work for noncollege-bound students, so they can acquire skills that lead to high- overseas, it shouldn't get special treatment MIDDLE CLASS We advocate slower phas- have the benefit of effective adjustment as- wage jobs. and tax breaks We reject both the do-nothing government Workers must also accept ing out of Medicaid and other benefits to sistance. of the last 1% years and the big government added responsibilities in the new economy. In A DOMESTIC G.I. BILL A Domestic G.I. Bill encourage work, special savings accounts to theory that says we can hamstring business return for an Increased voice and a greater help low-income families build assets, fair Promoting Democracy will enable all Americans to borrow money and tax and spend our way to prosperity. stake in the success of their enterprises, for college, so long as they are willing to pay lending, an indexed minimum wage, an ex- An American foreign policy of engage- Instead we offer a third way. Just as we have workers should be prepared to join in co- panded Job Corps and an end to welfare rules it back as a percentage of their income over ment for democracy must effectively ad- always viewed working men and women as operative efforts to increase productivity, time or through national service addressing that encourage family breakup and penalize dress: the bedrock of our economy, we honor busi- flexibility and quality. individual initiative unmet community needs. EMERGING DEMOCRACIES Helping to lead an ness as a noble endeavor and vow to create a RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT We far better climate for firms and independent AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE All Americans international effort to assist the emerging will protect our old-growth forests, preserve contractors of all sizes that empower their should have universal access to quality, af- critical habitats, provide a genuine "no net HOUSING We must also confront homeless- democracies in Eastern Europe and the for- workers, revolutionize their work places, re- fordable health care - not as a privilege but mer Soviet Union. loss" policy on wetlands, conserve the criti- ness by renovating, preserving and expand- spect the environment and serve their com- as a right. We must be united in declaring cal resources of soil, water and air, oppose ing the stock of affordable low-income hous- munities well. war on AIDS and H.I.V. disease. new offshore oil drilling and mineral explora- ing SOUTH AFRICA Maintenance of state and local FAIRNESS We will relieve the tax burden tion and production in our nation's many sanctions against South Africa until there on middle-class Americans by forcing the environmentally critical areas and address INVESTING IN AMERICA The only way to lay the rich to pay their fair share. We will provide THE ARTS We believe in a National Endow- is an irreversible, full and fair accommoda- ocean pollution by reducing oil and toxic foundation for renewed American prosperity long-overdue tax relief to families with chil- waste spills at sea. We believe America's ment for the Arts that is free from political tion with the black majority to create a is to spur both public and private investment. dren youth can serve their country well through a manipulation. democratic government with full rights for M all its citizens. ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVEL- civilian conservation corps. To begin making our economy grow, the IV. MIDDLE EAST PEACE Support for the peace OPMENT We will push for revenue- RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT Rather than President and Congress should agree that neutral incentives that reward conservation, throwing money at obsolete programs, we PRESERVING OUR process now under way in the Middle East. savings from defense must be reinvested Jerusalem is the capital of the state of prevent pollution and encourage recycling. will eliminate unnecessary layers of man- NATIONAL SECURITY productively at home, including research, Israel and should remain an undivided city education and training, and other productive CIVIL AND EQUAL RIGHTS Democrats, will agement, cut administrative costs, give peo- ple more choices in the service they get and Under President Bush, crises have been accessible to people of all faiths. Investments. We will create a "future budg- continue to lead the fight to insure that no empower them to make those choices managed rather than prevented; dictators et" for investments that make us richer, to Americans suffer discrimination or depriva- like Saddam Hussein have been wooed rather tion of rights on the basis of race, gender, RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS We be kept separate from those parts of the must limit than deterred; aggression by the Serbian Preserving budget that pay for the past and present. For language, national origin, religion, age, dis- overall campaign spending and limit the the private sector, Instead of a sweeping disproportionate and excessive role of regime against its neighbors in what was The Global Environment ability, sexual orientation or other character- Yugoslavia has been met by American timid- capital gains windfall to the wealthy and istics irrelevant to ability. We support ratifi- PAC's. We need new voter registration laws that expand the electorate, such as universal ity rather than toughness; human rights those who speculate, we will create an invest- cation of the Equal Rights Amendment, abusers have been rewarded, not challenged; civil rights protection for gay men and lesbi- same-day registration. ADDRESSING GLOBAL WARMING The United ment tax credit and a capital gains reduction the environment has been neglected, not pro- ans and an end to Defense Department dis- States must become a leader, not an impedi- for patient investors in emerging technol- tected, and America's competitive edge in ogies and new business. crimination. III. ment, in the fight against global warming. the global economy has been dulled, not We should join our European allies in agree- RESTORING COMMUNITY honed. ing to limit carbon dioxide emissions to 1990 Once again, we must define a compelling levels by the year 2000. vision for global leadership at the dawn of a THE DEFICIT Addressing the deficit requires II. new era. OZONE DEPLETION The United States must be fair and shared sacrifice of all Americans for Republican leaders have urged Americans a world leader in finding replacements for the good. We must also tackle RESPONSIBILITY to turn inward, to pursue private Interests common without regard to public responsibilities. By Restructuring CFC's and other ozone-depleting substances. spending by putting everything on the table, playing racial, ethnic and gender-based poll- Our Military Forces BIODIVERSITY We must work actively to pro- eliminate nonproductive programs, achieve tics, they have divided us against each other. tect the planet's biodiversity and preserve its defense savings, reform entitlement pro- We offer a new social contract based nei- What the United States needs is a forests. grams to control soaring health-care costs, ther on callous, do-nothing Republican neg- comprehensive restructuring of the Ameri- cut Federal administrative costs by 3 per- lect nor on an outdated faith in programs as can military enterprise to meet the threats cent annually for four years, limit increases the solution to every problem. We favor a We take special pride in our country's that remain. POPULATION GROWTH Explosive population in the "present budget" to the rate of growth third way beyond the old approaches - to put emergence as the world's largest and most MILITARY STRENGTH America is the world's growth must be controlled by working close- in the average American's paycheck, apply a government back on the side of citizens who successful multiethnic, multiracial republic. strongest military power, and we must re- ly with other industrialized and developing strict "pay as you go" rule to new noninvest- play by the rules. We condemn anti-Semitism, racism, homo- main so. A post-cold war restructuring of nations and private organizations to fund ment spending and make the rich pay their STRENGTHENING THE FAMILY Children phobia, bigotry and negative stereotyping of American forces will produce substantial greater family-planning efforts. fair share in taxes. These choices will be should not have children. We need a national all kinds. savings beyond those promised by the Bush made while protecting senior citizens and crackdown on deadbeat parents Family Administration, but that restructuring must without further victimizing the poor. and medical leave will insure that workers be achieved without undermining our ability We believe in the American people. We will THE CITIES A national public works invest- don't have to choose between family and COMBATING CRIME AND DRUGS Crime is a to meet future threats to our security challenge all Americans to give something ment and infrastructure program will pro- work. We favor insuring quality and af- relentless danger in our communities. back to their country. And they will be en- USE OF FORCE The United States must be riched in return, for when individuals assume vide jobs and strengthen our cities We fordable child-care opportunities for working prepared to use military force decisively responsibility, they acquire dignity. When will encourage the flow of investment to parents. The simplest and most direct way to re- when necessary to defend our vital interests. people go to work, they rediscover a pride inner-city development and housing through WELFARE REFORM Welfare should be a second store order in our cities is to put more police The burdens of collective security in a new that was lost. When absent parents pay child targeted enterprise zones and incentives for chance, not a way of life. We want to break on the streets. We will create a Police era must be shared fairly support, they restore a connection they and private and public pension funds to invest in the cycle of welfare by adhering to two Corps, in which participants will receive col- their children need. When students work urban and rural projects. simple principles: no one who is able to work lege aid in return for several years of service harder, they discover they can learn as well AGRICULTURE AND THE RURAL COMMUNITY All can stay on welfare forever, and no one who after graduation in a state or local police works should live in poverty. We'll invest Restoring America's as any on earth. When corporate managers Americans, producers and consumers alike, department. We will expand drug counsel- benefit when our food and fiber are produced in education and job training, and provide the Economic Leadership put their workers and long-term success ing and treatment for those who need it. ahead of short-term gain, their companies do by hundreds of thousands of family farmers child care and health care they need to go to Restoring America's global economic well and so do they. When the leaders we receiving a fair price for their products. work and achieve long-term self-sufficiency. leadership must become a central element of elect-assume responsibility for America's We will give them the help they need to make FIREARMS We support a reasonable wait- our national security policies. problems, we will do what is right to move the transition from welfare to work, and ing period to permit background checks for We cannot be strong at home unless we are America forward together. The Democratic Platform: Liberal Stands Clothed in Business Suits and prayer in schools. All that Is anath- ema to Democrats. " CONVENTION TRIVIA And here is a sentence from the Democrats that would be unimagin- 25 Continued From Page Al ma in Madison Square Garden last ceiling on campaign donations, did not Unlike the situation in parliamenta- able in a Republican platform: "Peo- night. ry democracies, party platforms in the ple should share in society's common walk-through metal have sufficient support to put their By prior agreement with the Clinton cases before the convention. Neither United States bind no one, least of all costs according to their ability to pay.' detectors that the liberal notions of the past were camp, the supporters of former Sena- did opponents of abortion like Gov. the President. For example, Franklin The platform also serves the purpose 25 stricken as it is that more moderate tor Paul E. Tsongas were permitted to Robert P. Casey of Pennsylvania. D. Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan were of painting the image the party wants hand-held metal planks were piled on. This year's plat- offer minority planks dealing with a Strong Abortion Stand elected on platforms that advocated to convey on television to the public. balanced budgets, but they abandoned On the convention floor, Erik Silver, detectors form, at about 10,000 words, is about lower capital gains tax, a higher tax on twice the length of the 1988 Democratic At a news conference this afternoon, gasoline, a spending freeze and opposi- that goal, in deed If not in words, on a Clinton delegate from California, un- platform. tion to Governor Clinton's advocacy of Governor Casey called the platform taking office. derstood that principle well. "Our rep- "self-defeating because It excludes not Over the years, Democratic plat- lower taxes for families with children. But platforms are important here to utation," he said, "is that of a bunch of only pro-life voters but also those who form debates have led to walkouts, The first three were rejected on are ambivalent but believe the number the extent that they distinguish the wasteful spenders. We're trying to even riots, when emotional issues were of abortions ought to be reduced." principles of one party from another. change that image." voice votes, and the last one was de- addressed ranging from free silver at feated by a margin of nearly five to two The Republican platform to be adopted On abortion, the platform states, the turn of the century to civil rights in on this convention's first roll call vote. in Houston next month will doubtless "Democrats stand behind the right of the 1940's, 50's and 60's and the Viet- The supporters of former Gov. Ed- every woman to choose, consistent oppose abortion, emphasize develop- Company News: nam War in the late 1960's and early mund G. Brown Jr. of California, who with Roe V. Wade, regardless of ability ment over environmental protection, Tuesday through Saturday, 70's. favor such measures as a term limit to pay, and support a national law to stress business interests and private protect that right." schools and favor capital punishment Business Day There was none of that kind of dra- for members of Congress and a $100 Illustration by Stuart Goldenberg PAGE 1 LEVEL 1 - - 1 OF 3 STORIES Copyright 1992 The New York Times Company The New York Times July 14, 1992, Tuesday, Late Edition - Final SECTION: Section A; Page 9; Column 3; National Desk; The Convention LENGTH: 855 words HEADLINE: DEMOCRATS IN NEW YORK -- NEW DIRECTION; Democratic Platform Shows Shift in Party's Focus BYLINE: By DAVID E. ROSENBAUM BODY: Once organized labor and civil rights groups were the fulcrum of the Democratic Party, and the Democratic candidates, men like Hubert H. Humphrey and Walter F. Mondale, campaigned for poor people and workers and higher taxes to pay for Government programs that could solve the problems of the country. But the views that dominated the party for 50 long, what was once proudly called liberal, are hardly in evidence in Madison Square Garden this week. The party platform the delegates plan to adopt tonight has whole sections that would have been hooted down not too many years ago. For some, the passage is a sad one. "Of course I'm disappointed the spectrum of my party has moved so far to the right," said Joseph L. Rauh Jr., the 81-year-old lawyer who helped found Americans for Democratic Action, the liberal lobby, and who devoted his life to working for civil rights laws and union democracy and against McCarthyism and the war in Vietnam. A Changed Nation But Mr. Mondale, who in 1984 was the last down-the-line liberal to win the Democratic Presidential nominationand who lost 49 states to Ronald Reagan in November, said he was resigned to the change. "It's a different nation now with different issues," said the former Vice President, who is here as a delegate but is not scheduled to address the convention. The reason for the change in direction is no secret. The party was playing a losing hand, routed in five of the last six elections. "Losing has a way of focusing the attention of politicians," said Al From, executive director of the Democratic Leadership Council, the organization of moderate and conservative Democrats that has seen its stands adopted as party policy. "Liberalism," Mr. From added, "lost favor when we quit being a party of prosperity and growth." Gov. Bill Clinton and the man he has chosen to be his Democratic running mate, Senator Al Gore, Leadership Council members and moderates to the core, are trying to distance themselves somewhat from labor unions, blacks and traditional liberal causes. TM TM TM LEXIS:NEXIS® LEXIS-NEXIS® LEXIS·NEXIS® Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. Recyclable PAGE 2 The New York Times, July 14, 1992 Mr. Clinton jumped at the chance last month to criticize a rap performer and take on the Rev. Jesse Jackson, and he was almost ostentatious when he went before the United Automobile Workers last spring and supported a free-trade agreement with Mexico that the union is opposing with all its might. No one would mistake the Democrats' platform for that of the Republicans. It endorses a legal right to abortion, civil rights for gay men and lesbians, expanded child care programs and higher taxes on the wealthy. But the party's policy makers of the Roosevelt, Truman and Johnson days, liberals like Senator Paul H. Douglas of Illinois and Walter P. Reuther, who ran the automobile workers' union, would have been stunned by many parts of the platform. Criticism of 'Big Government' At one point, the document says Americans are justifiably angry, not just at Republicans but at "government itself." Another plank criticizes "the big-government theory that says we can hamstring business and tax and spend our way to prosperity." Still another section says labor must join business "in cooperative efforts to increase productivity, flexibility and quality." Much of the change is the result of demography. The electorate is dominated nowadays by voters from the suburbs and small towns instead of those from cities and farms. Only 16 percent of workers belong to labor unions, less than half the proportion right after World War II, and many of today's union members are teachers and government employees rather than factory workers. The unions, "are quite subdued," said George McGovern, the former South Dakota Senator who was the Democratic Presidential nominee in 1972. "They know how much clout they've lost." But part of the change also arose from something that happened to the Democrats in the 1970's and 1980's, beginning with the McGovern campaign: the party's basic constituencies fragmented. Before, there had been a few big groups under the Democratic tent: workers, farmers, intellectuals, blacks. But with the Vietnam War and the violent protests accompanied it, many union leaders and academicians turned conservative. At the same time, many farmers became indistinguishable from from small-business people, and blacks split between those favoring integration and those who thought blacks had to fend for themselves. New groups -- homosexuals, abortion rights advocates, supporters of Israel and countless others -- demanded the ear of the party and refused to be satisfied with compromise. A Trojan Horse Is Seen Finally, the main bearers of the liberal message, Jesse Jackson and Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, were disliked by a large segment of the TM LEXIS:NEXIS® LEXIS-NEXIS® LEXIS-NEXIS Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. Recyclable PAGE 3 The New York Times, July 14, 1992 population, and that detracted from the liberal cause. Mr. McGovern thinks the Clinton-Gore approach is a Trojan horse. "I have a hunch," he said, "that they're much more liberal underneath and will prove it when they're elected." But Mr. Mondale said he was under no illusions that the party had not changed. "We kind of used up the old agenda," he said. GRAPHIC: Photo: George McGovern at a party in his honor last night at Tatou. (Star Black for The New York Times) SUBJECT: PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF 1992; ELECTION ISSUES; CONVENTIONS, NATIONAL (US) ORGANIZATION: DEMOCRATIC PARTY NAME: ROSENBAUM, DAVID E; RAUH, JOSEPH L JR; MONDALE, WALTER F TM TM TM LEXIS:NEXIS® LEXIS-NEXIS® LEXIS·NEXIS® Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. Recyclable PAGE 13 LEVEL 1 - 3 OF 3 STORIES The New Republic Copyright (c) 1988 Information Access Company; Copyright (c) The New Republic, Inc. 1986 May 12, 1986 SECTION: Vol. 194; Pg. 15 LENGTH: 2853 words HEADLINE: The myth of Scoop Jackson: big spender, big hawk, and big loser BYLINE: Alter, JonathanThe New Republic BODY: THE MYTH OF SCOOP JACKSON AS RONALD REAGAN began his final rhetorical windup in his speech urging aid to the contras a few weeks ago, he let fly with that name again: Henry "Scoop" Jackson. Scoop would have wanted contra aid. Win one for the Scooper, the president seemed to be saying. The longtime Democratic senator from Washington state, who died in September 1983, has been mentioned in more of Reagan's speeches than Ford, Nixon, Eisenhower, Hoover, and every other Republican president (except Lincoln) combined. In presidential name-dropping, Scoop's up there with John Winthrop and his "city on a hill." And last year he posthumously received the Presidential Medal of Freedom. It used to be that a statesman was a politician who had been dead for 15 years. Today it takes about 15 minutes. The Trident submarine named after Jackson in 1984 was only for starters. When the Kissinger Commission on Central America issued its report in 1984, it was dedicated to him. When columnists like George Will want to underline a point (usually about the disorientation of the Democrats), they haul out Jackson, whose picture hangs in Will's study. When an aide to Tip O'Neill last year dared to question publicly the notion of Jackson as a centrist, he was immediately rebuked by Democrats as if he had attacked FDR, JFK, or the Social Security system. To keep the flame pure, there's even a Scoop Lobby-the Coalition for a Democratic Majority--which hands out the Henry M. Jackson Friend of Freedom Award to Democrats like Les Aspin, Charles Robb, and even Claude Pepper, who are more than happy to bask in the association. The Communists, in their own way, remember Jackson too. At the Geneva summit last year, a Vietnamese reporter rushed up to a group of American correspondents. How could Gorbachev stand to meet with that man, that Jackson? he asked with agitation. It didn't make sense to him after everything nasty that Jackson had said over the years about the Soviet Union. Aside from confusing Henry with Jesse, the analysis was accurate enough. Scoop will live on in the demonology of the Soviet bloc. It's the American canonization that's harder to figure. The most obvious explanation is that Jackson is one of the only politicians of his generation to bequeath his name to a part of his party. "Scoop Jackson Democrat"--you can hang your hat on it. Jackson was strong on defense, particularly when it came to decrying the Soviet threat; unswervingly sro-labor; unswervingly pro-Israel; an environmentalist chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee (a less well-known characteristc); and generally supportive of just TM TM TM LEXIS:NEXIS LEXIS-NEXIS® LEXIS-NEXIS® Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. Recyclable PAGE 14 The New Republic (c) 1988 IAC about any kind of expanded federal program, from legal services for the poor to the Freedom of Information Act. But because Jackson was the quintessential guns-and-butter man, it's a little peculiar that he would be seen as an ideal for today's Washington. A Gramm-Rudman Democrat he was not. When the Reagan administration tried to pursue only half of his ambitious agenda (the guns part), it still created a historic deficit. Even liberals would agree that his support in the Senate for programs such as food stamps for strikers and a new federal consumer protection agency is now anachronistic. The truth is that from now until the end of the century Jackson's urge to increase both domestic and military spending is a pipe dream-the extreme view, as Jackson himself used to say about George McGovern's program in the early 1970s. If you forget the liberal domestic-spending component of Jackson's record, and stress only defense--as many of the current hagiographers do--you've distorted his career. Jackson was never the "centrist" he is now made out to be. He was right of center on foreign policy and left of center on domestic policy. So if = McGovern Democrats" and "Rockefeller Republicans" are long gone, why the Jackson legacy? The answer has less to do with Jackson himself than with the political objectives of those who would employ his name. Recall the treatment of George Orwell in 1984 (the year, not the book). Liberals and socialists tended to argue that Orwell would be a liberal or a socialist today. Conservatives and neoconservatives tended to insist that he would be a conservative or neoconservative. Whatever the genuflections to his abilities, Orwell's bones were used mainly to prop up political arguments. For those who invoke Jackson, the goal is more ambitious: to prop up political parties. Scoop is the Republicans' perfect Democrat--a Trojan horse with which to enter the Democratic gates. The details of Jackson's domestic record are swept under the carpet for the purposes of this exercise. The conservative Heritage Foundation, for instance, is dedicated to slashing the size of government--the antithesis of Scoop Jackson's whole career. But by invoking his name, as clever conservative writers such as Policy Review editor Dinesh D'Souza and others have done, they can try to isolate liberal Democrats outside the borders of party respectability that they (the conservatives) have drawn. This is a critical element of the Republicans' electoral strategy for the future, the old "the party didn't leave them, they left the party" line of argument. It is intended to make anyone to the left of the Republican Party look dangerously pink. Imagine if instead of urging Democrats to adhere more to the traditions of Scoop Jackson, the Reagan and George Will crowd worshipfully invoked Hubert Humphrey. That would sound ridiculous. Everyone knows that the Heritage Foundation and Ronald Reagan have nothing in common with Humphrey. But even a cursory look at the record suggests that Humphrey and Jackson represented many of the same things. Indeed, in the late 1960s and early 1970s a "Jackson Democrat" was a sort of poor man's "Humphrey Democrat." In the late 1970s the creature now called a "Jackson Democrat" was most often called a "Humphrey - Jackson" Democrat. Both men stood for unashamed old-style liberalism. Not only has Hubert's name gone down the memory hole, so too has Scoop's support for federally funded abortions and his role in creating the Environmental Protection Agency. When Reagan invokes Jackson, he never seems to mention that the senator's AFL-CIO rating was 94 percent at the time of his death. TM LEXIS:NEXIS® LEXIS-NEXIS® LEXIS'NEXIS® Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. Recyclable PAGE 15 The New Republic (c) 1988 IAC If the Republican ruse is simple politics, the Democratic deification seems more a case of a misreading of public opinion and political history. By almost any standard, the old faith that Humphrey and Jackson nourished is patently out of date. Mondale, Humphrey's protege, was crushed at the polls, but the Jackson agenda hasn't done much better. The two most important votes in Congress in the past year suggest that the mainstream of the party and of the public believes in exactly the opposite of the Jackson approach--that is, in fiscal conservatism (i.e., passage of Gramm-Rudman) combined with limited interventionism abroad (i.e., no aid for the contras). Polls show that voters want a strong defense, but not at the expense of arms control. Who inside the Reagan administration has done more to block arms control than any other official? Richard Perle, Jackson's protege and current literary aspirant. One can argue about the rightness or wrongness of Perle's approach, but it is unquestionably out of step with a majority of the country, not to mention the Democratic Party. And that's what's at issue here--political appeal. Because the argument for a Jacksonian restoration as spelled out in speeches and columns rests less on the merits of his views (which are presumed by his boosters) than on the assumption that the liberals' presidential losing streak requires the Democrats to go the Scoop route or face--here's the boiler-plate--"mi nority-party status well into the 21st century.' The question of who's the real dinosaur isn't hard to resolve. For 40 years Jackson was a sort of "Concrete Democrat" in the Grand Coulee tradition. Until the very end of his life, when he supported some Reagan administration budget cuts, it was as if no problem--foreign or domestic--had ever been invented that could not be handled with a simple injection of large sums of taxpayer money. His consistency on this point has often been held up as a virtue, but it had a plodding, unreflective quality to it. Jackson's idee fixe was born not in Munich but in Norway. As a young congressman in 1945, he traveled to the land of his parents and saw two things he said changed him forever: a nation as vulnerable to the Soviet Union as it had been to Nazi Germany, and a national health-care system that saved his life when he caught pneumonia during the trip. The cast of mind established there and represented by the word "liberalism" was allowed to harden as the world changed. Even Scoop himself realized that he was a little slow to shed the baggage--or at least the nomenclature-- of the past. Daniel Patrick Moynihan tells a story from 1976, when he and Jackson campaigned together in the Midwest. One night they sat with their feet propped up, and watched Democratic presidential candidate Morris Udall labeling himself a "progressive," not rd liberal. Jackson turned to Moynihan and said, "I may not be a liberal, but at least I call myself one." That's probably the funniest thing Scoop Jackson ever said. He was a warm, loyal friend, but the list of uproarious anecdotes about him isn't lengthy. Even among those trapped in the same ideological amber, Scoop doesn't measure up. He had little of Humphrey's zest or even of Lane Kirkland's urbane intellect. And as a public speaker, he was a snore. "When Scoop Jackson gives a fireside chat," the old saw had it, "the fire goes out." The gibe is a reminder that Jackson never won much national popularity. The man now glued together and mounted as the model Middle American Democrat couldn't make any headway in Democratic presidential primaries, the only test we have--however imperfect--of true national support. His 1972 and 1976 TM LEXIS:NEXIS® LEXIS-NEXIS® LEXIS·NEXIS® Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. Recyclable PAGE 16 The New Republic (c) 1988 IAC campaigns were both disasters. In the key Florida primary in 1972, he lost badly to George Wallace. His only electoral victories ever outside Washington state came in crowded fields in Massachusetts and New York in 1976. In Massachusetts he won 23 percent of the vote, mostly by pandering to the antibusing vote. In New York, where he spent a fortune and was expected to win a majority, he won a disappointing 38 percent of the vote, largely on the strength of his pro-Israel record. Soon after, he was easily driven out of the race by Jimmy Carter in Pennsylvania, exactly the type of blue-collar labor state where he should have done extremely well. Even as a shell for all of the party's neoconservative elements--his essential role that year and in 1972 and 1980 as well--Jackson failed. In national politics it seemed that practically every Jackson supporter was either actually working for him--like columnist Ben Wattenberg--or simply interested in him as a poor second choice to Humphrey. "Jacks on has a serious problem which has plagued his national campaigns," wrote Peter Ognibene in a 1975 biography. "He attracts relatively few campaign workers." About the only journalists who ever considered him a first-tier candidate were Rowland Evans and Robert Novak. A friend of Jackson from Seattle told Jules Witcover in 1976 that Jackson's charisma problem resembled the troubles of a well-known dog food manufacturer. The chairman of the dog food company assembled his staff and told them, "We make the best dog food. We use the best ingredients. We have the best container. We have the most attractive label. Why doesn't it sell?" After a few minutes, a solitary voice spoke up from the far end of the table: "Dogs don't like it." SO SCOOP JACKSON didn't embody his party emotionally, his supporters may respond. He did politically. Back in the glorious days of muscular liberalism, we're now told, Jackson represented the Democratic center on foreign policy and defense issues. That would still be the center, the analysis continues, had it not been for the onset of the rabble-rousing McGovernite forces, who steered the party to the left of its traditional roots. The truth is that even in the old days Jackson was on the right side of the foreign policy mainstream, even among Democrats. In making the case that he was a liberal in the 1950s, Jackson often pointed to his opposition to Joe McCarthy. But in fact his public criticism of McCarthy didn't come until the Army-McCarthy hearings of 1954, when it was quite safe to speak out. In 1960 Jackson was among those who convinced John F. Kennedy to use the "missile gap" issue in his campaign for president. In later years he admitted that no gap had existed. (Jackson argued that the Democrats that year simply used information leaked to them by Eisenhower administration officials.) After being passed over for vice president by JFK, Jackson campaigned faithfully as chairman of the Democratic National Committee-an entry on his resume often mentioned as a way of cementing his place in the old Democratic center. But he held the post for only a few months during the 1960 campaign, and later did little to help when Southern conservatives blocked the Kennedy legislative agenda on Capitol Hill. Jackson voted for the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, one of Kennedy's proudest accomplishments, with extreme reluctance. AND OF COURSE he supported the Vietnam War from beginning to end, bitterly breaking with fellow Democrats on issues like the Cooper-Church Amendment to cut off funding for the extension of the war into Cambodia. Was Scoop right on those issues in retrospect? That is not to ask who was right on the true nature of the Vietcong, or the Vietnamese communists, or the boat people, or communism in general. The fact that Jackson may have been more prescient on those LEXIS:NEXIS® LEXIS-NEXIS® LEXIS·NEXIS® Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. Recyclable PAGE 17 The New Republic (c) 1988 IAC issues than left-wingers says nothing about the basic question of U.S. involvement in Vietnam, which looks much the same with the benefit of hindsight. It's hard to believe that any more than a tiny minority of Democrats still believe Jackson was right about the war. That matters in any evaluation of what a future Democratic foreign policy should look like. Other old issues also resonate in the present. After turning down Richard Nixon's offer to be secretary of defense in 1969, Jackson championed the administration's fight for the antiballistic missile, an early version of "Star Wars." He pushed hard for a Supersonic Transport as a national security goal that would also help his aerospace constituents. Jacks on lost on that, and Britain and France built the Concorde. Had he won, the United States also would have been able to boast of wasting billions of dollars on a plane to get businessmen home a bit earlier for dinner. But how about his constant call to arm against a growing Soviet threat? He warned that the Soviets were embarking on a huge military buildup, and in fact they were doing approximatel y what he said, a major point that today's liberals are often reluctant to concede. But conservatives are similarly reluctant to concede that the Scoop Jackson approach for dealing with that threat has been a failure. The much-debated 1974 Jackson-Vanik Amendment, which restricted trade with the Soviet Union until it loosened up on Jewish emigration, was criticized at the time by Henry Kissinger and others as an assault on detente. But the amendment's real problem was that it didn't work. Jewish emigration from the Soviet Union did rise from 13,229 people in 1975 to a high of 51, 294 in 1979, but in the 1980s emigration declined again to new lows. In 1985 the Soviets let out only 141 Jews. Meanwhile, Jackson's preferred military response to the Soviet buildup--fixed percentage increases in overall Pentagon spending--did not cause the Soviets to back off. Nor did it improve American military preparedness as much as it should have. For all of his hawkishness, Jackson didn't show much interest in whether or not all the weapons he wanted to buy really worked. Some old friends believe that had Jackson lived longer, he would have found himself alongside Barry Goldwater questioning the Pentagon for the first time in his life. "I detected no enthusiasm on his part for the way things were moving. None. He didn't think they [Reaganites] were very subtle or well informed," says Moynihan, who notes that he ran for the Senate in 1976 in part as a way of continuing the Jackson campaign. John Lindsay, a Newsweek correspondent who covered Jackson for years, says that today's mythology is misleading. "I'm not sure Scoop Jackson would have been, quote, 'Scoop Jackson. He was for a strong defense, all right, but not for spraying the world with weaponry." Who can know for sure? Jackson's real legacy may well take the full 15 years to probate. In the meantime, the Democratic effort to find new approaches is deemed heretical by avatars of the old thinking. Scoop as plaster saint keeps getting in the way. GRAPHIC: Illustration; Cartoon TYPE: Biography SUBJECT: Conservatism, personalities; Defense spending, political aspects; Democratic Party, philosophy; Republican Party, philosophy TM TM TM LEXIS:NEXIS® LEXIS-NEXIS® LEXIS·NEXIS® Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. Recyclable PAGE 18 The New Republic (c) 1988 IAC 04239259 LOAD-DATE-MDC: February 27, 1989 TM TM TM LEXIS:NEXIS® LEXIS-NEXIS® LEXIS·NEXIS® Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. Recyclable PAGE 4 LEVEL 1 - 2 OF 3 STORIES National Review Copyright (c) 1988 Information Access Company; Copyright (c) National Review Inc. 1986 June 6, 1986 SECTION: Vol. 38; Pg. 40 LENGTH: 5117 words HEADLINE: The great debate; Tax reform; HR-3838 BYLINE: Roberts, Paul Craig; Gilder, George BODY: THE GREAT DEBATE TAX REFORM THE TURN taken in the Senate Finance Committee away from the house tax bill (HR-3838) improves the prospects for real reform. This turn of events makes it more imperative than ever for supply-siders to dissociate themselves from the bad tax policy of the House bill. That bill is proof that reductions in tax rates do not guarantee better economic performance regardless of other changes in the tax code. Some people talk as if repealing investment deductions (such as the investment tax credit) woudl automatically help the economy. Such a position is nonsensical. Repealing such deductions can help the economy only if tax rates are cut enough to offset their loss. To know how much tax rates have to be cut, you have to be able to measure the economic effects of tax rates and the lost deductions. If these measurements are not made, it is possible to lose more than is gained. The House bill, by cutting the top marginal tax rate from 50 per cent to 38 per cent, seems on the surface to be a supply-side victory. However, other provisions in the bill more than offset the favorable economic effects of lower tax rates. On balance, the House bill would damage the economy. It would particularly weaken new investment in machinery and equipment and harm exports and non-corporate businesses. In my view, the essential goals now for those interested in real tax reform are to make the defects of the House proposal crystal clear, to keep similar problems out of the Senate bill, and to make sure that the House/Senate-conference version lowers marginal tax rates enough to offset the loss of savings incentives and investment-relate d deductions. I definitely do not agree with those reformers who are willing to accept a greater tax bias against saving if they can in exchange get the lower marginal rates to which they attribute virtually magical powers. The surest way to buy a pig in a poke is to support a tax-reform bill without analyzing its economic impact. After the rhetorical debacles supply-siders have suffered in the past few years, the last thing the supply side needs is more mysticism on the part of those of its supporters who assert the primacy of psychology over economic analysis. The small cadre of journalists and newsletter writers who have set themselves up as the high-priest interpreters of supply-side economics make it difficult for economists who are held to professional standards to be associated with the movement. Somehow a school of economic thought that has no economists in it seems unpromising. Euphoria over a prospective second cut in marginal tax rates is blinding some people to the realities of HR-3838. Conservat ives, and certainly TM TM LEXIS:NEXIS® LEXIS-NEXIS® LEXIS·NEXIS® Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. Recyclable PAGE 5 National Review (c) 1988 IAC supply-siders, should note well the enthusiasm the stridently anti-supply-side Washington Post and New York Times expressed for the House bill. The Post heralded it as "a tax bill that reaffirmed the historic principles of the Democratic Party. # According to the Post, the bill "would take millions of poor people off the income-tax rolls, shift the burden from individuals to corporations, and reaffirm the principle of progressivity." In other words, it is an income-redistribution bill sugar-coated with lower personal tax rates. The Institute for Political Economy, of which I am chairman, has examined the effect of HR-3838 on personal-income-tax rates, the costs of labor and capital, investment, productivity, income growth, and the competitiveness of U.S. products. We found that the net effect of the bill would be to make the U.S. a poorer country. HR-3838 would reduce marginal tax rates on personal income for everyone except the lower middle class (i.e., those in the second quintile of income distribution). Marginal tax rates for those taxpayers would rise. Moreover, except for the reduction in the top rate, the reduction in marginal tax rates is due mainly to the expansion of the personal exemption and standard deduction--an expensive way to cut tax rates, because it lowers marginal rates less for each dollar in tax cuts than do direct cuts in marginal rates. (Increasing the exemption merely raises the threshold at which a given marginal rate applies). This expensive approach to personal-tax-rate reduction increases the taxes that must be placed on business investment to maintain the Presiden't commitment to keep the bill revenue-neutral. This approach also minimizes the advantage of lower rates. Instead of maximizing incentives that would lead to greater income gains and reduce the number of families in poverty, the bill drops poor families from the tax rolls by expanding the personal exemption. It is amazing that many conservatives have been convinced that this traditional Democratic approach to tax cutting is a novel, populist, pro-family approach that will realign the political parties. Despite the inefficient way in which personal-income-tax rates are cut in the House bill, the effect of these rate cuts taken alone would be positive for the economy. Lower tax rates reduce the cost of labor and, as a result of lower marginal tax rates on dividend and interest income, also reduce the cost of capital. The reduction in corporate tax rates and the 10 per cent dividend deduction that would be phased in over ten years would also work to lower the cost of capital and to make the U.S. a more competitive producer. The difficulty is that the goal of revenue neutrality (figured statically: that is, assuming no new revenue is produced by any tax cut) requires these good provisions to be paid for with offsetting tax increases. The House bill would raise taxes on new investment by repealing the investment tax credit and cutting back depreciation allowances. Under the House plan the main beneficiaries of lower tax rates are owners of existing investments (including land) who receive a windfall gain on profits from investments already in place. The main burden of the reduction in depreciation allowances and repeal of the investment tax credit falls on investments not yet made. The tax-rate reductions do work to encourage new investment, but the incentive is more than offset by the loss of investment-related deductions. We find that the business- and personal-tax-rate reductions would reduce the cost of corporate capital by 13.4 per cent, but the loss of investment-related deductions would raise the cost of corporate capital by 17.5 per cent. The net effect on the non-corporate business sector is even more severe. TM LEXIS:NEXIS® LEXIS-NEXIS® LEXIS·NEXIS® Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. Recyclable PAGE 6 National Review (c) 1988 IAC The combination of an inefficient approach to peronal-income-tax reduction with an inefficient approach to business-income-tax reduction leaves the economy with a higher cost of capital than under current law. Consequently, some currently profitable investments would be made unprofitable. In vestment would decline, and the U.S. would become a more labor-intensive producer. Labor productivity would fall, causing a drop in pre-tax wages. This drop in real wages would partially offset the benefit to individuals of lower tax rates. Taking into account the range of possible responses, real GNP would be 0.4 to 1.4 per cent lower than under current law. Some people argue that although HR-3838 itself was not worthy of passage it was appropriate to support "the process" in order to keep tax reform alive 50 it could be fixed in the Senate. That approach may seem to have been vindicated. However, supporting the process instead of principle is always dangerous. Such an attitude exposes one to being co-opted, and it also underestimates the importance of details. Using the process to "fix" the House bill is going to be difficult because to truly fix it would require either taking a fundamentally different approach or finding more revenue without further damaging the economy. Finding more revenue would be difficult because, by our calculations, the bill begins as a revenue loser in both static and dynamic terms. In other words, though the bill is actually a tax cut, it is such an inefficient tax cut that it would hurt rather than help the economy. Despite the progress made by the Senate Finance Committee toward a different approach, the Senate will not automatically prevail in conference. Despite the House bill's adverse economic impact, some advocates defend it on the grounds that shifting the tax burden from individuals to businesses is an improvement in equity or fairness. This is an absurd idea. Business taxes are paid by suppliers of labor and capital and by customers who buy the products. These taxes raise the cost of production and reduce the growth of jobs and wages. Businesses cannot be taxed without individuals paying the cost in one way or another. The effort to shift the tax burden to business can result in a person's receiving a tax cut in a way that reduces his future income growth or throws him out of work. Despite the facts, even some reputed supply-siders seem to think that business taxes don't matter because only individuals pay taxes. But that is precisely why business taxes do matter. A tax reform that claims to shift the burden to business is a good example of how politicians swindle voters. HR-3838 has other bad effects. By curtailing private pensions, the bill would reduce capital formation and the financial independence of retirees. Changes in accounting rules would place a retroactive tax on inventories. The foreign tax provisions, together with a substantially higher tax burden on machinery and equipment, would worsen the competitive position of U.S. producers at home and abroad and would increase protectionist pressures. The last thing we need is a tax-reform bill that strains the Western alliance by forcing us to close our markets. It is extraordinary that President Reagan invested 50 much political capital in a bil1--HR-3838--with 50 little promise. How do we account for the remarkable transformation in the Reagan Administration's approach to tax policy? I blame it on David Stockman's statement in The Atlantic in December 1981 that the Reagan tax cut was a If Trojan horse" --a trick to cut tax rates for the rich. If Stockman had been fired, the President's policy might have survived the accusation. Instead, Stockman was protected by chief of staff Jim Baker, LEXIS:NEXIS® LEXIS-NEXIS® LEXIS·NEXIS® Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. Recyclable PAGE 7 National Review (c) 1988 IAC who saw Stockman as an effective foil against the political success of Jack Kemp. Stockman' S broadside sent almost everyone who had supported the 1981 tax cut running for cover. Republicans especially wanted to prove that they were for fairness in taxation. The immediate response was the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982. Sponsored by the Reagan Administration, it rolled back, in the middle of a serious recession, most of the previous year's tax cut for investment in machinery and equipment. Once "fairness" crowded out economic growth as the main tax issue, the Treasury bureaucracy seized control of the agenda and pulled off the shelf the tax reform left by Stanley Surrey a quarter-century ago. It was sprinkled with lower rates to give it a supply-side appearance and presented to Reagan, who signed on, thinking he had the real McCoy. The Administration should have become wary when George McGovern, Ralph Nader, and the Brookings crowd were the first to endorse its "tax reform." But by then PR had taken over policy, and the image-makers relied on pretense as a substitute for substance. To keep "the process" moving, Baker, who by that time had been named Treasury Secretary, ignored Kemp and the House Republicans and turned the tax-reform bill over to Tip O'Neill and Dan Rostenkowski. It is vital that we neither overlook the faults of HR-3838 nor repeat them in the Senate or the conference-committee version of the tax-reform bill. It would be a strategic mistake for supply-siders to claim as a victory a bill that would not materially improve the economy. The credibility of the tax-cut movement is at stake. The 1981 Reagan tax cut was an eventual economic success, but--draped as it was in Laffer-curve hyperbole--it was an immediate political debacle. The tax cut coincided with the largest deficits in our history. True, the deficits were caused by the sudden and unexpected disinflation, not by the tax cut as Reagan's opponents claimed. But those opponents, aided by David Stockman, won the rhetorical battle, and the deficits forced Reagan on the defensive and caused him to lose control over the budget. Should the next tax reform truly produce adverse economic effects, or simply fail to have enough goods effects to justify all the bloodletting, opponents would once again proclaim a failure of supplyside economics. Supply-siders would be unlikely to survive two political fiascos. We cannot afford a tax bill that would be an albatross to supply-siders and a danger to the economy. A TRIUMPH OF POLITICS WITH THE PASSAGE of the Senate Finance Committee tax plan, the Reagan Revolution is poised for its greatest victory. It is a triumph of politics--unadulterated by David Stockman's grim brand of irony--won through inspired leadership in the Senate and the House by such improbable allies as Robert Packwood, who emerged as something of a legislative magician, Daniel Rostenkowski, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Bob Dole, and Bill Bradley. In fact, a key source of the Finance Committee's 20 to 0 vote was probably a 1978 campaign in New Jersey, during which would-be-senator Jeff Bell taught about-to-be-senator Bill Bradley suppley-side economics. Finance Committee member Bradley has become the Senate's most knowledgeable and articulate advocate of lower tax rates. The vote was also a vindication of Jack Kemp's insistence that if the Republican Party first pursues its opportunities for tax-rate reductions, its deficit problems will be much more easily solved. Provided that Paul Volcker and his associates lower real interest rates and end the continuing world TM TM LEXIS:NEXIS® LEXIS-NEXIS® LEXIS·NEXIS® Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. Recyclable PAGE 8 National Review (c) 1988 IAC deflation, the Senate bill would drastically reduce the deficit as a percentage of GNP. An emancipation proclamation for U.S. workers and entrepreneurs--liberating them from serfdom to tax lawyers and accountants--the tax reform will unleash enormous energy and creativity in American enterprise and summon investors and entrepreneurs from around the world. Congress has become an unexpected asset of American competitiveness. A triumph of politics, a triumph of the U.S. economy, and a triumph for Ronald Reagan, the entire tax-reform process is nonetheless being treated by some conservative economists, including even some key supply-siders, as an all but unacceptable risk, or even a bitter defeat. Norman Ornstein of AEI rushed onto ABC's Nightline to condemn the Finance Committee bill; lobbyists galore are mobilizing against it. Mario Cuomo is in a bitter funk and is lashing out at Moynihan. Everywhere special interests are gathering to force the Senate to raise marginal rates in exchange for dubious gains for particular industries. Some supply-siders are already fretting about the impact of the Senate bill on the so-called "cost of capital.' Others are less worried about the Senate bill in this regard, but terrified that the final conference-committee version will retain the provisions of the House bill they regard an anti-business (again, because they supposedly raise the cost of capital.) At the root of this mixed reaction is a fundamental disagreement among supply-siders, and conservative economists generally, over the sources of economic growth. The future of the U.S. economy hinges, in part, upon how that disagreement is resolved. Put as simply as possible, one side--led by Norman Ture and Paul Craig Roberts and including most GOP congressmen and corporate lobbyists--believes that business investment is the driving force of economic growth and that the "cost of capital" is the key to business investment. The other side--led by Arthur Laffer and Jude Wanniski and represented by the President--believes that individual effort and creativity are the key to economic growth and that marginal tax rates on income, particularly the top rates that apply to all major economic success, are the dominant influence. Thus in political terms, when the horse trading starts, the cost-of-capitalists will resist accepting what they regard as penalties on business investment (e.g., the loss of investment tax credits) as the price of lower rates. By contrast, the Laffer faction--let's call them the entrepreneurialists--will be more willing to "pay" for cuts in marginal rates with alleged penalties on investment. In practice, the Finance Committee bill is likely to pass the full Senate in roughly its current form. The real conflict will thus come when House and Senate conferees negotiate a final bill. At that point the cost-of-capitalists will insist that the House yield on most of its allegedly anti-business provisions, and may even be willing to compromise on rates in order to get the House of agree. The entrepreneurialists, by contrast, will be more willing to accept the House provisions the cost-of-capitalists oppose, if by doing so they can keep marginal rates low. For that matter, most of the entrepreneurialist S would have accepted the House bill, if that were absolutely the best that could be gotten, because they regard its slashing of the top tax rate from 50 to 38 per cent as a victory for economic growth. NORMAN TURE'S econometric model, similar to the one used by Roberts to evaluate the House tax-reform bill, is the paramount analytical tool of the cost-of-capitalists. I n this model, the cost of capital is the gross return needed to pay taxes, depreciation, interest, and the normal expected rate of TM LEXIS:NEXIS® LEXIS-NEXIS® LEXIS·NEXIS® Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. Recyclable PAGE 9 National Review (c) 1988 IAC profit on a new investment. When taxes rise, this hurdle rate of return also rises, and fewer investment projects can pass the test. The result is less investmen t and thus less growth and productivity. The Ture model assumes that economic growth is increased by any program that reduces the cost of plant and equipment, including the necessary payout of profits from its yield. To some extent, investment tax credits, rapid writeoffs, lower interest costs, lower corporate rates, lower rates on dividends, and lower personal rates, which all affect the willingness and ability of companies to expand their capital outlays, are included in the model. What is the matter with this approach? Nothing, as far as it goes. As an explanation of aggregate investment at any particular time, it offers a roughly accurate guide. But it is a closed system, envisioning a limited pool of funds divided among different uses: chiefly consumption and capital spending. The economy, in this picture, grows through the accumulation of capital. But in the real economy, the value of any pool of funds or aggregate of capital is entirely dependent on the ideas and ambitions of workers and entrepreneurs. What matters is not the allocation of resources but the generation of new ideas and companies. The amount of capital, and how it is shared between consumption and investment at any particular time, is a trivial issue compared to the incentives and conditions for creativity and entrepreneurship. From the entrepreneurial point of view, investment "incentives" are often counterproductive. Capital spending is desirable only if it is combined with the best labor and management pursuing the best available opportunities. Investment tax credits and other benefits focus on the purchase of capital equipment rather than on its use in productive and profitable applications. Many investment incentives favor tax shelters, corporate limousines, and plush company headquarters over the aggressive pursuit of risky but potentially profitable opportunities. Most investment credits favor established companies, with an existing flow of taxable income, over new companies without taxable profits to be sheltered. Thus the Laffer side believes that the cost-of-capital theory errs in treating all factors in the formula equally. For promoting growth, marginal rates of taxation on additional income and profits are decisively more important than anything else, including the rate of allowable depreciation, investment tax credits, and average tax rates. The Ture model has the great polemical advantage of rigorous theory and mathematics. Not only did Ture and Roberts provide the most elegant and coherent model--a vital contribution--they also offer the most detailed mathematical projections. Like his Keynesian rivals, Roberts thinks he can tell you exactly how m uch any particular tax change will affect the cost of capital and the rate of capital formation and hence the rate of economic growth. Critics of the Ture model, such as Laffer, Wanniski, and Alan Reynolds, do nto offer the mathematical apparatus that the cost-of-capital theorists can provide. Nonetheless, the Laffer approach has the advantage of dealing with the real economy. Laffer points to the immense amount of disguised consumption and waste, the tax sheltering and shifting that masquerades as capital investment. By changing the focus of the entrepreneur from the cost of capital to the rewards of enterprise, lower marginal rates tend to improve the quality of effort across the whole system. By shifting the focus from incentives for TM LEXIS:NEXIS® LEXIS-NEXIS® LEXIS·NEXIS® Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. Recyclable PAGE 10 National Review (c) 1988 IAC "capital formation" (in which the Soviet economy excels) to incentives for business creation and profits, Laffer is precisely on target. A preoccupation with the cost of machines--a willingness to forgo reductions in the taxation of human capital in order to spur spending on physical capital--betrays a basic misunderstanding of the sources of growth. Capital does not grow or accumulate. People create and destroy capital by generating new entrepreneurial ideas. Because the most extraordinary additional efforts, with the largest benefits to the economy, tend to be taxed at the top rates, the Laffer side tends to stress the top rates and their thresholds rather than the so-called "average marginal rates" stressed by Ture and Roberts. The average-marginal-r ate approach regards a rise in one of the lower brackets as comparable in importance to a rise in the top rate. This averaging of all marginal rates, rather than concentratin g on the top tax rates, is a crucial flaw of the Ture-Roberts model. In the lower brackets, the disincentives are far less powerful than in the top bracket, where the very horizons of the economy are defined. Under combined federal and state rates of 50 per cent and above, common in most American states, the earner has a larger incentive to hide a dollar of existing income than to earn an additional dollar. In fact, presuming money is easier to hide than to earn, the incentive to find shelter overwhelms the incentive to exploit opportunity. This single most important problem of Western economies-the stifling impact of high top rates hitting at low income thresholds--is almost totally absent from the cost-of-capital models. COMPROMISE ON these issues is made difficult by the mandate for revenue neutrality under which the debate is proceeding. The insistence that revenue must be measured statically--that every apparent dollar in rate reductions loses a full dollar in revenue, with no paybacks for greater work effort, for more productive investment, or even for luring income out of tax shelters--excludes some of the most important insights shared by all supply-siders. Basing congressional negotiations on static revenue neutrality is called "playing it safe," but it is actually playing it stupid. Any tax cut or tax reform designed to produce economic growth should yield large increases in revenues. If lower rates do not bring higher revenues, it means the tax structure was not a major obstacle to econ omic growth in the first place and did not need to be reformed. Any economist or politican who denies the destructive impact of the tax code, however, lives in a dream world. He is deliberately blinding him self to the incredible energies and bizarre financial contortions devoted to tax avoidance by capitalists in every country. If the tax rate is more than 30 per cent or 50, it simply does not pay to investinmostrisky(i.e.,economitallysignificant)projects.Th a t is why the lower capital-gains tax rate has been so important to entreprenurship, why venture capital collapsed when that rate rose during the 1970s, and why innovation soared after the rate was again reduced in 1978 and 1981. The capital-gains tax has been the only rate that can accommodate real innovation and enterprise. These facts elude many economists. But they are inescapable at any small-business board meeting or investment conference. Listen in on such TM LEXIS·NEXIS® LEXIS·NEXIS® LEXIS:NEXIS® Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. Recyclable PAGE 11 National Review (c) 1988 IAC meetings and you will discover that the question of tax credits arises chiefly with regard to capital spending that is unnecessary and thus actually a form of disguised consumption. The company buys an extra Mercedes because the financial officer can show that with an investment tax credit, rapid writeoff, and high resale value, the car comes essentially free. Or a firm builds a new company headquarters to take advantage of the tax benefits of real estate. To the extent that companies buy machinery because of its short-run tax consequences, excess equipment is purchased. Its price then tends to rise because of the extra demand, and the yield drops. Reynolds cites the recent emergence, spurred by the rapid writeoffs and investment tax credits so dear to Roberts and Ture, of many car-leasing and -rental firms that persist, wasting capital, only because of the tax benefits. Moreover, the tax benefits for equipment purchases are as perverse as they are inefficient. While cars that last eight years can be written off in three, semiconductor and other high-technology production gear that obsolesces in three years must be depreciated over five. The entire idea of targeted investment aid misconceives the real life of business. Investment in machinery actually required to carry out the company's mission is driven less by the tax code than by the imperativesof survival. In a competitive environment, the very existence of the company is at stake. The decision to buy a truly crucial piece of productive equipment is determined less by narrow computations of the ost of capital than by the general strategy and prospects of the firm, the condition of its markets, the spirit of its entrepreneurs and workers. Marginal income-tax rates paid by investors, customers, and workers, as well as the firm itself, have far more impact on these crucial conditions than any targeted investment benefits. A FURTHER PROBLEM in the Ture-Roberts cost-of-capital model is the stress on measurements of national savings rates rather than on the actual disposable personal savings that finance nearly all bu siness start-ups. This approach, for example, would condemn the Finance Committee's proposal to shut down most future IRAs. In fact the Senate approach would liberate currently paralyzed investment capital. With exorbitant penalties and increasing paperwork, a retirement device that could have become a good vehicle for disposable personal funds is becoming instead just another casket for money lying in state. To the extent that savings are incarcerated in government-regulated pens, from which to be channeled chiefly into government securities, IRAs are more of a tax than a tax break. One of the prime flaws of the Ture model is that it makes conservatives indulgent toward new government impositions in the name of higher national savings rates. And so it could go for pages of qualms and objections, reservations and quibbles. The key question remains: Does the tax reform reduce the top marginal rates on productive and entrepreneurial activity? If the answer is yes, and official revenue neutrality is maintained, the presumption favors the reform. So far, the Rostenkowski bill, for all its problems, easily passes the test. The Finance Committee bill does even better, though the Senate will need help in resisting the various special interests besieging it. The House, Senate, and Administration are all seriously considering tax plans that would lower the top rate to 38 per cent or lower. This achievement is worthy of a celebration. Sup ply-siders of all kinds should stop fighting and join in the effort to remove the kinks and pass the bill. As REynolds writes: TM TM LEXIS:NEXIS® LEXIS-NEXIS® LEXIS·NEXIS® Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. Recyclable PAGE 12 National Review (c) 1988 IAC "Tax reform raises the return on capital, including human capital. Tax reform lowers the cost of operating (as opposed to just buying) profitable plant and equipment, lowers the relative purchase price of currently tax-favored capital equipment, lowers interest rates, lowers labor costs, and lowers the relative purchase price of currently tax-favored capital equipment, lowers interest rates, lowers labor costs, and lowers the cost of equity financing. Nothing on that list--not one thing--is included in the usual estimates of 'the cost of capital.' Compromise should be possible because each side recognizes some truth in the arguments of its opponents. But a final obstacle remains: namely, contrary views on the good sense and compentence of the politicians. Roberts, for example, is skeptical of the ability of Senate negotiators to prevail in conference committee. Roberts and his associates fear that somewhere in the process liberals will render reductions in marginal rates merely cosmetic and use reform to substantially increase the progressivity of the code and its bias against saving and investment. Cynicism about the possibilities of political change, however, ill befits Paul Craig Roberts, who, working with Jack Kemp nearly a decade ago, transformed the attitudes of Congress toward the supply side of the economy. To give up at the very moment that both Houses, one controlled by the GOP, together with a Republican Administration, are attempting a major breakthrough is simply perverse. Moreover, the revenue-neutrality provision, though conceptually obtuse, does restrict the damage that is likely to be done even if somehow the liberals manage to outmaneuver everyone else. Packwood, Dole, and Rostenkowski may not be NATIONAL REVIEW'S favorite politicians, or mine. But God bless them. Few developments in American politicas are so inspring as these three congressional leaders, one a big-city machine Democrat, one a liberal Republican, and one--well, words fail me in defining Bob Dole--all willing to join in an effort to drastically reduce the tax rates and irregularit ies that afflict the U.S. economy. They need help, not additional choruses of "The Cost of Capital Blues." SUBJECT: Tax reform, law and legislation; United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Finance, economic policy; Taxation, analysis NAME: Ture, Norman B., economic policy; Laffer, Arthur B., economic policy; Wanniski, Jude, economic policy 04270406 LOAD-DATE-MDC: March 30, 1988 TM TM LEXIS:NEXIS® LEXIS·NEXIS® LEXIS-NEXIS® Services of Mead Data Central, Inc. Recyclable 16 July 1992 MEMO FOR STEVE PROVO 0/CHRISTINA MARTIN FROM: J. BUNTON SUBJECT: PROVO ANECDOTE/ ACKS./ OPENING GRAPH INFO DAIS AT THIS TIME: Sen. Orrin Hatch, Sen. Jake Garn; Gov. Norm Bangerter, Prove Mayor Joe Jenkins; misc. candidates and elected officials Utah Valley somewhat in the foothills at the base of the Wasatch Mtns. AUDIENCE: from the "Entire Utah Valley", 10,000 BYU summer students; about 20,000 attending BYU school mottos: "Enter to learn -- go forth to serve" [POTUS drives right by this sing and may actually see it], "The world is our campus" POTUS INTRO -- Pres. Lee, Pres. BYU EVENT SITE: indoor, Marriott Center [as in hotel family] -- where slogan] BYU Cougars play basketball [working on fight/cheer/student Band: Timp View Orchestra will play, no invocation, American flags everywhere NO B/Q Campaign stuff according to Craig Ray. MARIE OSMOND may be there --- won't know for sure until last minute. Will fax supplemental info as avail to you in Sr. Staff office on the road FACT CHANGE- - PROVO RALLY; P. 6; last graph "wordPerfect software designed in Orem. [Delete made right here] [Dekte Provo]. Wordperf is designed in Orem; Novell in Provo- Novell does networking hardware; WordPert Software. Stay funed, R MISS you 2 45628831 WNOC.C 16 July 1992 MEMO FOR STEVE PROVO FROM: J. BUNTON SUBJECT: PROVO ANECDOTE/ ACKS./ OPENING GRAPH INFO DAIS AT THIS TIME: Sen. Orrin Hatch, Sen. Jake Garn; Gov. Norm Bangerter, Provo Mayor Joe Jenkins; misc. candidates and elected officials Utah Valley somewhat in the foothills ... at the base of the Wasatch Mtns. AUDIENCE: from the "Entire Utah Valley", 10,000 BYU summer students; about 20,000 attending BYU school mottos: "Enter to learn -- go forth to serve" [POTUS drives right by this sing and may actually see it], "The world is our campus" POTUS INTRO -- Pres. Lee, Pres. BYU EVENT SITE: indoor, Marriott Center [as in hotel family] -- where BYU Cougars play basketball [working on fight/cheer/student slogan] Band: Timp View Orchestra will play, no invocation, American flags everywhere NO B/Q Campaign stuff according to Craig Ray. MARIE OSMOND may be there -- won't know for sure until last minute. Will fax supplemental info as avail to you in Sr. Staff office on the road OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET FAX COVER SHEET Number of pages (excluding cover sheet): / Date: 7-16-92 TO: JEAN BUNTON Fax Number: Telephone: FROM: NELSON ROCKEFEllER Fax Number: Telephone: Time: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: THE FOLLOWING PAGE PROVIDES THE INFORMATION you REQUESTED. "Despite a sluggish world economy, American companies' exports created 2.7 million new jobs over the past 5 years. 1.3 million new jobs have been created over the past 3 years. " 15 July 1992: TO DO TODAY Fact Check Boys Nation -- Washington quote not Jefferson etc. - joke about Gore/Clinton and Alexander Cheney - add graph on family values Average price of Utah home: Average mortgage payment in Utah: translated into first-time homebuyer tax credit Called UTAH GOP exec. dir. J.D. Foster, Chief Economist - CEA: According to the Bush Record [accomplishments] -- the frist-time homebuyer tax credit would have benefitted just over 1 million first-time homebuyers. [Based on Treasury estimate of $5 billion for credit issued in $5,000 allotments equals just over 1 million recipients]. Utah - Gov. Bangerter has line-item-veto power; state has had BBA - since founding in 1893 Will Sec. Cheney be in Wyoming? Wendy in scheduling No 16 Jun'92 C:\WORK\WP50\DO Doc 1 Pg 1 Ln 2.67" Pos 1" Karl Mallone are 401 bath John Stockton popularen Prog? Grady Nelson 4844 Rocketelled on jobs (3492) for 3 3 years not 5 - Grady island m vacation on an Itah hosputal - babies / 10th youngt Figulations # vehics 31 / 44 saved from congressonal spending In vetoer Utah staff basic - MarrisH Center indor Rbvey challenge 2 find W/O Grady here - tryo to / do all can 13 JULY 1992 MEMO FOR STEVE PROVOST FROM: J. BUNTON SUBJECT: PROVO B/Q RALLY Political -- Eric Hoghaugh, in Utah said this is what's doing: Saturday, July 18, around 10-11 am [time tentative] Event to be held at the Marriott Center [until I speak with Advance -- don't know exactly what Marriott Center is], on the campus of BYU --Ask GB will be that morning before the rally; Rex Lee, former solicitor Gen. under Pres. Reagan -- a "good Republican" is the President of BYU Gen. Scowcroft is from Utah, Roger Porter is from Provo audience of 12-15,000 people [Mayor Joe Jenkins, mayor of Provo, is gathering the crowd -- waiting on feedback from them Richard Harrington, Republican nominee for the third District -- one of the most Republican in the nation, up against Democrat Bill Orton -- we hope to pick up this seat. Utah is doing very well -- see attached memo from Gov. 's office. I am in touch with Gov. Bangerter's office -- have calls in to GOP Chair -- Bruce Hough and Exec. dir. David Hansen for homebuyer tax credit example. MORE: 15 JULY 1992 J.D. Foster, Chief Economist - CEA: According to the Bush Record [accomplishments] -- the frist-time homebuyer tax credit would have benefitted just over 1 million first-time homebuyers. [Based on Treasury estimate of $5 billion for credit issued in $5,000 allotments equals just over 1 million recipients]. Utah - Gov. Bangerter has line-item-veto power; state has had BBA - since founding in 1893 Hans Kuttner in OPD working on getting # of children attending Church sponsored day care; Hans said number attending as result of child care act is not available b/c don't require states to report it -- basically don't keep track. According to Rae Nelson on OPD: In 1991, 37 states had choice legislation pending in one form or another; Since 1989, 10 states have enacted major school choice legislation; [Since I took office --- 10 states have passed major school choice legislation and another 37 states are considering choice legislation in one form or another] to date 45 states have adopted America 2000 PROVO TRIVIA!! Info from Raeline Ireland in Mayor's Office Local Provo video store -- Rich's Video -- located on Freedom Blvd. [this is so great] Provo-Oram was 1991-92 Money Magazine most liveable city in America; US Conf. of Mayors also voted a most liveable city in America Ty Detmer still popular -- anything about BYU Cougars big time popular, Cougar stadium holds 65,000 people for football games former Provo logo was "The family place", new logo is "Provo the right move" Community built on fmaily values, large families, the mayor has five kids, some families are as large as 10 kids Utah Valley Hospital delivers more babies than any hospital in America City with the youngest population in America conservatve, straightforward people, high volunteer ethic, points of light recipients in Provo -- for Provo River Parkway Tree City USA for variety and abundance of trees -- dating back to heritage -- heirloom trees, urban forest, town located in the Utah Valley; 20 mins form Sundace Skiiing, 10 mins. from boating in Utah lake and Trout and Walleye fishing in the Provo River Etienne Provost a french explorer is the father of the town these people are an updated version of the Cleavers [Ward, June, the Beave, Wally] want nothing to do with Marge and Homer Simpson; sweatness in the people, quality of life don't have a lot of crime, pop. of 90,000 second largest city in Utah committed to theri families -- see families out inthe boat skiing with children going to BYU sporting events etc. From Debbie Turner -- Washington Gov. Utah office: time to time, Univ. of Utah paints BYU's "Y" red -- up on the side of the hill more to come on this one Utah County is the most Republican county in the state, perhaps nation; POTUS will be in Utah one week prior to "Pioneer Day" [July 24] - - this is a state holiday -- right up there with Fourth of July celebrations-- really important state holiday, commemorates Brigham Young and the Mormons fleeing religious persecution [POTUS fleeing Democratic persecution], trying to find out other happening events Rep. Jim Hansen [R] Utah has enough frequent flyer miles to fly 25 constiutents from Ophir, Utah to Washington, D.C. -- twice according to the Salt Lake Tribune John Stockton and Carl Malone [Utah Jazz] are members of the "Dream Team" -- going to Barcelona. After b-ball career Malone plans to start trucking firm has an 18 wheeler equipped witrh microwave, fax machine, TV to haul potatoes HOT ISSUE: Utah one of two states has absolutely no gambling -- pressure to start paramutual betting -- Mormon Church opposed, some staunch members of legislature actually support it HOT ISSUE: Balance Budget Amendment, Bangerter supports strongly -- Utah constitution requires a balanced budget [been in constitution since 1896 -- when made a state] will draw big applause; no line item veto though -- wish they did. Gov. was ready to call a special session to ratify if Congress passed the BBA. According to Gov. Bangerter's Chief of Staff: Steve Meekam #1 trade/export in Utah is the electronics/information technology industry [for example Word Perfect and Novel headquartered in Provo] which together is worth about $500 million and 12,500 jobs SENT BY:UTAH WASH DC OFFICE ; 7-14-92 4:21PM ; 2026247707 2024566218:# 1 OF GREAT IDEAL OF SEAL THE STATES UTAH OF for 624-7707 THE 1895 STATE OF UTAH DEBORAH TURNER WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DIRECTOR NORMAN H. BANGERTER 444 NORTH CAPITOL STREET. SUITE 204 GOVERNOR WASHINGTON. D.C., 20001 (202) $24-7704 6 TELECOPY TO Jeannie Buton FROM Debbie Turner DATE 7-14-92 SUBJECT Utah info o WE WILL BE TRANSMITTING 9 PAGES (Including this cover sheet) o IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL (202) 624-7704 REMARKS: Jeannie: Hope these things help! d was Utah's constitution item does wrong - give the Governorn line veto authority- SENT BY:UTAH WASH DC OFFICE ; 7-14-92 4:22PM ; 2026247707-> 2024566218:# 2 EDITORIAL COLUMN BY GOVERNOR NORMAN H. BANGERTER "CONGRESS MUST PASS A BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT" SENT BY:UTAH WASH DC OFFICE ; 7-14-92 4:22PM ; 2026247707-> 2024566218:# 3 JL.11 President Bush is right. We must have a Balanced Budget Amendment. Congress has a golden opportunity this week to take a tip from Utah -- by adding a Balanced Budget Amendment to the constitution. A vote in the U. S. House of Representatives is scheduled for today. If Congress passes a Balanced Budget Amendment, 1 will immediately call the Utah Legislature into Special Session to ratify the amendment. Congress must not be allowed to continue the endless taxing and spending that are driving our nation toward financial calamity. The federal government must be bound by the same restrictions faced by every American family, to live within their means with a balanced budget. For too long, Congress has spent the public's money without exhibiting the slightest discipline that would be required by a Balanced Budget Amendment. Interest payments now represent nearly 15 percent of the federal budget -- an average of $65,000 for a family of four. The deficit is projected to gobble up 6.8 percent of our gross domestic product, almost two and a half times the level many economists deem harmful to economic growth. The money spent on interest could be better used by families to save, and by businesses to Invest in research and to create jobs. Every year we delay taking steps to control federal spending, the deeper the national debt becomes. The Texas-based Institute for Policy Innovation recently projected that the growth of federal spending, if It continues at the present rate, will be 30 percent of our national income by the start of the new century. I acknowledge the short-term, difficult challenges that a balanced budget amendment will create. However, the longer we delay, the more difficult those challenges become. In Utah, there is no "passing the buck" when it comes to budgeting. The requirement to balance our budget forces us to distinguish between our real needs and our wants. There are no "blank checks." Sometimes we must say no to good ideas that are not within our means. SENT BY:UTAH WASH DC OFFICE ; 7-14-92 4:23PM ; 2026247707 2024566218:# 4 When I visited President Salinas of Mexico last fall we discussed two crucial points: first, in public finance there must be restraint; and second, expenditures must be tied to revenues. If Congress would ascribe to these simple principles -- there would be no budget deficit. In Utah, we understand this philosophy and it has made Utah number one in fiscal responsibility. Furthermore, as Utah's Governor, 1 have another tool that helps me meet my responsibility to control spending -- the line-item veto. This permits me to cut expenditures Utah simply cannot afford. The President needs the line-item veto. The accountability we have in Utah is missing on the federal level. Congress has been pork-barreling budgets with projects to please special interest groups, which has pushed the national debt to reach $4 trillion. Congress now has a chance to stop the spending spree and start playing by the same rules as Governors and state legislators across America. Congress must support President Bush and pass a Balanced Budget Amendment, NOW. SENT BY:UTAH WASH DC OFFICE 7-14-92 4:24PM 20262477074 455 2024566218:# 5 454 ge as provided by law. The Governor and other State and Judicial officers, The Legislature shall not authorise the State, or except justices of the peace, shall be liable to im- any county, city, town, township, district or other po- 1982 peachment for high crimes, miademeanors, or malfen- litical subdivision of the State to lend its credit or 0 be judge of election, sance in office; but judgment in such cases shall ex. subscribe to stock or bonds in aid of any railroad, ions of its members - tend only to removal from office and disqualification telegraph or other private individual or corporate en- to hold any office of honor, trust or profit in the State. terprise or undertaking. 1979 judge of the election and The party, whether convicted or acquitted, shall, nev- Sec. 30. [Continuity in government.) ers, and may punish them ertholess, be liable to prosecution. trial and punish- 1896 (1) Notwithstanding any general or special provi- 1 with the concurrence of ment according to law. sions of the Constitution, in order to insure continu- sers elected, expel a mem- 1898 Sec. 20. [Service of articles of impanchment.] ity of state and local government operations when No person shall be tried on impeachment, unless he such operations are seriously disrupted as a result of quorum - Attendance shall have been served with a copy of the articles natural or man-made disaster or disaster caused by thereof, at least ten days before the trial, and after enemy attack, the Legislature may: TO of each house shall con- such service he shall not exercise the duties of 1898 his (a) provide for prompt and temporary succes- ict business, but B smaller office until he shall have been acquitted. sion to the powers and duties of any elected or day to day, and may com. appointed public office, the incumbents of which nt members in such man- Sec. 21. [Removal of officers.] may become unavailable for carrying on the ies as each house may pre. All officers not liable to impaachment shall be re- powers and duties of such offices; and 180g moved for any of the offenses specified in this article, 1600 (b) adopt measures necessary and proper for in such manner as may be provided by law. insuring the continuity of governmental opera- oning officers and em. tions including, but not limited to, the financing Sec. 22. [Reading of bills - Bill to contain only thereof. ine the rules of its proceed. one subject - Bills passed by major- (2) Subsection (1) does not permit these temporary icers and employees. 1806 ity.] public officers to act or these temporary measures to Every bill shall be read by title three separate be contrary to the Constitution and applicable law. be filled.) times in each house except in cases where two-thirds 1990 our in either house of the of the house where such bill is pending suspend this in such manner as may be requirement. Except general appropriation bills and See. 31. [Additional compensation of legisla- 1530 bills for the codification and general revision of laws, tors.] no bill shall be passed containing more than one sub- For attendance at meetings of interim committees Year and nays.) ject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title. The established by law to function between legislative 1 journal of its proceedings, vote upon the final passage of all bills shall be by sessions, members of the Legislature shall receive ad- inscutive sessions, shall be year and nays and entered upon the respective jour- ditional per diem compensation and mileage at a rate ad nays on any question, at rais of the house in which the vote occurs. No bill or not to exceed that provided in this Constitution for ert of such house, shall be joint resolution shall be passed except with the assent regular legislative sessions. 1973 1008 of the majority of all the members elected to each house of the Legislature. 1972 Sec. S2. [Appointment of additional om. be public - Adjours- ployeas.) Sec. 23. [Repealed.] INSE The Legislature may appoint temporary or perma- slature, except those of the nent nonmember employees for work during and be- executive session, shall be Sec. 34. [Presiding officers to sign bills.] tween sessions, including independent legal counsel without the consent of the The presiding officer of each house, not later than which shall provide and control all legal services for ore than three days, nor to five days following adjournment, shall sign all bills the Legislature except as the Legislature by law shall in which it may be holding and joint resolutions passed by the Legislature, certi- authorize performance thereof by the attorney gen- 1000 lying to their accuracy and authenticity as enacted by eral. 1973 the Legislature. 1973 sessions.] Sec. 83. [Legislative auditor appointed.] sion of the legislature shall See. 35. (Publication of note - Effective dates The Legislature shall appoint a legislative auditor except in casse of imposch- of ante.] to serve at its pleasure. The legislative auditor shall hall exceed so calendar All acts shall be officially published. and no act have authority to conduct audits of any funds, func- achment. When any Not- shall take effect until sixty days after the adjourn- tions, and accounts in any branch, department, to cases of impeachment ment of the session at which it passed, unless the agency OF political subdivision of this state and shall .t may remain in secaion Legislature by a vote of two-thirds of all the members perform such other related duties as may be pre- 10 members shall receive sisuted to each house, shall otherwise direct. 1975 scribed by the Legislature. He shall report to and be ses and mileage for those answerable only to the Legislature. 1972 Sea. 26. (Private Invo forbidden.) 1804 No private or special law shall be enacted where a 14 by House.] general law can be applicable. 1872 ARTICLE VII statives shall have the role Bes. 27. [Lotterias not authorized.) EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT ut in order to impeach, two- elected must vote therefor. The Legislature shall not authorize any game of 1996 dates, lottery or gift enterprise under any pretense Section - be any purpose. 1. (Executive department - Terms, residence, and 1973 duties of officers.] eachment by Senate.) 1 be tried by the Senate. and the 28. [Special privileges forbidden.] 2. [Election - Tie, Legislature to elect - Governor or that purpose, shall take The Legislature shall not delegate to any special and Lisutenant Governor elected Ti to do justice according to exemission, private corporation or association, any jointly.] e. When the Governor is all Imme to make, supervise or interfere with any mu- 3. (Qualifications of Governor, Lisutenant Gover- of the Supreme Court shall medical improvement, money, proporty OF effects, nor, Attorney General and other exec- be convicted without the entr was whesher held in trust or otherwise, to levy taxes, to utive offices.] the senators elected. a 1 8 capitol alta, or to perform any municipal func- 4. [Governor commander-in-chief.) 1972 5. [Executive power vested in Governor - Duties.] - / 6. [Convening of extra secsions of Legislature.) [Leading public credit forbidden.) 7. [Adjournment of Legislature by Governor.) - SENT BY:UTAH WASH DC OFFICE 7-14-92 4:25PM 2026247707-> 2024566218; 6 457 Art. VII, # 1 CONSTITUTION OF UTAH 456 Governor may disapprov. Section The Governor shall be Commander-in-Chief of the contained in any bill whi 8. [Bills presented to Governor Veto Appropri- military forces of the State, except when they shall be of the bill; and in such ( ation bills Recenvening of Legisla- called into the service of the United States. The Gov- pend to the bill at the tir ture to consider vetood bills.) ernor shall have power to call out the militia to exe- of the item or items whic 9. [Governor may fill certain vacancies.] cute the laws, to suppress insurrection, or to repel with the reasons theref 10. [Governor's appointive power - Vacancies.] invasion. 1979 shall not take effect unl 11. (Vacancy in office of Governor - Determination nor's objections as provide of disability.) Sec. 5. [Executive power vested in Governor ernor disapproves any b 12. [Board of Pardons Respites and reprieves.] Duties] after the adjournment si 13. [Board of Examiners.] The executive power of the State shall be vested in 14. [Duties of Lieutenant Governor.] the Governor, who shall see that the laws are faith- Legislature, the presidin 15. [Duties of State Auditor and State Treasurer.] fully executed. The Governor shall transact all execu- poll the members of that convening the Legislatur 16. [Duties of Attorney General.] tive business with the officers of the government, civil and military, and may require information in here of each house are i 17. [Repealed.] writing from the officers of the Executive Depart- Legislature shall be con' 18. [Compensation of state and district officers.) ceed five calendar da 19. (Grants and commissions.] ment, and from the officers and managers of State 20. (The Great Seal.) Institutions upon any subject relating to the condi- the presiding officer tion, management, and expenses of their respective pose of reconsidering 21. [United States' officials ineligible to hold state office.] offices and institutions, and at any time when the disapproved. If upon Legislature is not in session, may, if deamed naces- of appropriation agai 22, 23. [Transferred.] 24. [Repealed.] sary, appoint a committee to investigate and report to islature by a yea an the Governor upon the condition of any executive of- members elected to e Section 1. (Executive department - Terms, fice or State Institution. The Governor shall com- law or the item of app residence, and duties of officers.] municate by message the condition of the State to the The elective constitutional officers of the Executive Legislature at every regular session, and recommend Sec. 9. [Governor me Department shall consist of Governor, Lieutenant such measures as may be deemed expedient. 1079 When any State or di Governor, State Auditor, State Treasurer, and Attor- cant, and no mode is prov ney General, each of whom shall hold office for four Sec. 6. [Convening of extra sessions of Legisla. laws for filling such vace years, beginning on the first Monday of January next ture.) the power to fill the san after election. The officers of the Executive Depart- On extraordinary occasions, the Governor may con- which shall expire at 1 ment, during their terms of office, shall reside within vene the Legislature by proclamation, in which shall qualification of the perso the State and shall keep the public records, books and be stated the purpose for which the Legislature is to papers as provided by law. They shall perform such be convened, and it shall transact no legislative busi- Sec. 10. [Governor's duties as are prescribed by this Constitution and as ness except that for which it was especially convened, cancies.] provided by law. 1079 or such other legislative business as the Governor The Governor shall no may call to its attention while in session. The Legis- sent of the Senate, appo Sec. 2. [Election - Tie, Legislature to elect - lature, however, may provide for the expenses of the cers whose offices are € Governor and Lieutenant Governor session and other matters incidental thereto. The tion, or which may be C1 elected jointly.] Governor may also by proclamation convens the Sen- pointment or election is The officers provided for in Section one of this arti- ate in extraordinary session for the transaction of ex- during the recess of the cle shall be elected by the qualified voters of the State ecutive business. 1979 any State or district of at the time and place of voting for members of the point some qualified pe Legislature, and the persons respectively having the Sec. 7. [Adjournment of Legislature by Gover. thereof until the next 1 highest number of votes cast for the office voted for nor.] the Governor shall nom shall be elected; but if two or more shall have an In case of B disagreement between the two houses office. If the office of Lit equal and the highest number of votes for any one of of the Legislature at any special session, with respect ditor, State Treasurer 01 said offices, the two houses of the Legislature, at its to the time of adjournment, the Governor shall have by death, resignation next session, shall elect forthwith by joint ballot one power to adjourn the Legislature to such time as the duty of the Governor to of such persons for said office. Governor may think proper if it is not beyond the from the same political In the election, the names of the candidates for time fixed for the convening of the next Legislature. and the appointee shall Governor and Lieutenant Governor for each political party shall appear together on the ballot, and the line item 1979 shall be elected and qua votes cast for a candidate for Governor shall be con- Sec. 8. [Bills presented to Governor - Veto - sidered as also cast for the candidate for Lieutenant Appropriation bills Reconvening of Sec. 11. (Vacancy in Governor. 1979 Legislature to consider vetood bills.) termination Every bill passed by the Legislature, before it be- In case of the death o Sec. S. [Qualifications of Governor, Lieutenant comes a law, shall be presented to the Governor; if removal from office. TEI Governor, Attorney General and other approved, the Governor shall sign it, and thereupon it charge the duties of the executive offices.] shall become a law; but if disapproved, the bill shall nor-elect who fails to ti To be eligible for the office of Governor or Lieuten- be returned with the Governor's objections to the ties of the Governor sh ant Governor a person shall have attained the age of house in which it originated, which house shall enter ant Governor until the thirty years at the time of election. To be eligible for the objections at large upon its journal and proceed to next general election. the office of Attorney General a person shall, at the reconsider the bill. If upon reconsideration the bill filled by election. If, du time of election, have attained the age of twenty-five again passes both houses by a yea and nay vote of Governor, the Lieuters years, be admitted to practice before the Supreme two-thirds of the members elected to each house, it removed, or becomes in Court of the State of Utah and be in good standing at shall become a law. If any bill is not returned by the ties of the office, the Pr the bar. No person shall be eligible to any of the of- Governor within ten days after it has been presented as Governor until the fices provided for in Section 1 of this article, unless at to the Governor, Sunday and the day it was received ceases. If in this case t the time of election that person is a qualified voter excepted. it shall become a law without a signature; signs, dies. is removed and shall have been A resident citizen of the State for but if legislative adjournment prevents return of the forming the duties of five years next preceding election. 1970 bill, it shall become A law unless the Governor within House shall act as G twenty days after adjournment files the objections Sec. 4. [Governor commander-in-chief] filled or disability cest thereto with such officers as provided by law. The SENT BY:UTAH WASH DC OFFICE 7-14-92 4:26PM 2026247707-> 2024566218:# 7 An 400 Governor may disapprove any item of appropriation nine ties of the Governor as provided in this section nor shall be Commander-in-Chief of the contained in any bill while approving other portions Lieutenant Governor. the President of the Sena es of the State, except when they shall be of the bill; and in such case the Governor shall ap- the Speaker of the House, as the case may be, sh. he service of the United States. The Gov- pend to the bill at the time of signing it a statement entitled to the salary and emoluments of the G have power to call out the militia to exe- of the item or items which are disapproved, together nor, except in cases of temporary disability. vs, to suppress insurrection, or to repel with the reasons therefor, and such item or items The disability of the Governor or person acti 1979 shall not take effect unless passed over the Gover- Governor shall be determined by either a written nor's objections as provided in this section. If the Gov- laration transmitted to the Supreme Court b recutive power vested in Governor ernor disapproves any bill or item of appropriation Governor stating an inability to discharge the P uties.) after the adjournment sine die of any session of the and duties of the office or by a majority of th tive power of the State shall be vested in Legislature, the presiding officer of each house shall preme Court on joint request of the President ", who shall see that the laws are faith- poll the members of that house on the matter of re- Senate and the Speaker of the House of Repres d. The Governor shall transact all execu- convening the Legislature. If two-thirds of the mem- tives. Such determination shall be final and or a with the officers of the government, bers of each house are in favor of reconvening, the sive. Thereafter, when the Governor transmits litary, and may require information in Legislature shall be convened in a session not to ex- Supreme Court a written declaration that no di 1 the officers of the Executive Depart- ceed five calandar days and at a time set jointly by ity exists, the Governor shall resume the power 'om the officers and managers of State upon any subject relating to the condi- the presiding officer of each house, solely for the pur- duties of the office unless the Supreme Court, ment, and expenses of their respective pose of reconsidering the bill or item of appropriation joint request of the President of the Senate ar disapproved. If upon reconsideration, the bill or item Speaker of the House of Representatives, or up natitutions, and at any time when the of appropriation again passes both houses of the Leg- own initiative, determines that the Governor a not in session, may, if deemed neces- islature by a yes and may vote of two-thirds of the able to discharge the powers and duties of the a committee to investigate and report to members elected to each house, the bill shall become The Lieutenant Governor shall then continue upon the condition of any executive of- law or the item of appropriation shall take effect. charge these powers and duties as acting Gov Institution. The Governor shall com- 1979 The Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction message the condition of the State to the termine all questions arising under this section. t every regular session, and recommend Sec. 9. [Governor may fill certain vacancies.] 18 as may be deemed expedient. 1979 When any State or district office shall become ve- cant, and no mode is provided by the Constitution and avening of extra sessions of Legisla- laws for filling such vacancy, the Governor shall have Sec. 12. [Board of Pardons - Respites as re.] the power to fill the same by granting a commission, dinary occasions, the Governor may con. which shall expire at the next election, and upon Until otherwise prieves.] provided by law. the Gov siature by proclamation, in which shall qualification of the person elected to such office. 1895 Justices of the Supreme Court and Attorney G purpose for which the Legislature is to shall constitute a Board of Pardons. a major and it shall transact no legislative busi- Sec. 10. [Governor's appointive power - Va- whom, including the Governor, upon such cont iat for which it was especially convened, cancies.) as may be setablished by the Legislature. may " legislative business as the Governor The Governor shall nominate, and by and with con- fines and forfeitures, commute punishments $ attention while in session. The Legis- sent of the Senate, appoint all State and district offi- grant pardons after convictions, in all cases 'er, may provide for the expenses of the cers whose offices are established by this Constitu- treason and impeachments. subject to such I other matters incidental thereto. The tion, or which may be created by law, and whose ap- tions as may be provided by law, relative to the , also by proclamation convene the Sen- pointment or election is not otherwise provided for. If, ner of applying for pardons; but no fine or for dinary session for the transaction of ex- during the recess of the Senate, a vacancy occurs in shall be remitted, and no commutation or 355. 1979 any State or district office, the Governor shall ap- granted, except after . full hearing before the point some qualified person to discharge the duties in open session. after previous notice of the tir journment of Legislature by Gover- thereof until the next meeting of the Senate, when place of such hearing has been given. The p: r.] the Governor shall nominate some person to fill such ings and decisions of the Board, with the To disagreement between the two houses office. If the office of Lieutenant Governor, State Au- therefor in each case, together with the dissent ture at any special session, with respect ditor, State Treasurer or Attorney General be vacated member who may disagree, shall be reduced t adjournment, the Governor shall have by death, resignation or otherwise, it shall be the ing. and filed with all papers used upon the he irn the Legislature to such time as the duty of the Governor to fill the same by appointment, in the office of such officer as provided by 1 y think proper if it is not beyond the from the same political party of the removed person; The Governor shall have power to grant rest the convening of the next Legislature. and the appointee shall hold office until a successor reprieves in all cases of convictions for c 1970 shall be elected and qualified, as provided by law. 1979 against the State, except treason or conviction resented to Governor - Veto - peachment: but such respites or reprievez sh priation bills - Reconvening of Sec. 11. [Vacancy in office of Governor - De- extend beyond the next session of the Board sture to consider vetood bills.] termination of disability.) dons; and such Board, at such session, shall et ed by the Legislature, before it be- in case of the death of the Governor, impeachment, or determine such respite or reprieve, or the Il be presented to the Governor; if removal from office, resignation, or disability to dis- commute the punishment, or pardon the offi ernor shall sign it, and thereupon it charge the duties of the office, or in case of a Gover- herein provided. In case of conviction for treas 1 law; but if disapproved, the bill shall nor-elect who fails to take office. the powers and du- Governor shall have the power to suspend ex with the Governor's objections to the ties of the Governor shall devolve upon the Lieuten- of the sentence, until the case shall be reporte 1 it originated, which house shall enter ant Governor until the disability casses or until the Legislature at its next regular session, when t at large upon its journal and proceed to next general election, when the vacancy shall be islature shall either pardon. or commute t bill. If upon reconsideration the bill filled by election. If, during a vacancy in the office of tence, or direct its execution; and the Govern both houses by a yes and nay vote of Governor, the Lieutenant Governor resigns, dies, is communicate to the Legislature at each regu :he members elected to each house, it removed, or becomes incapable of performing the du- sion, each case of remission of fine or forfeit law. If any bill is not returned by the ties of the office, the President of the Senate shall act prieve, commutation or pardon granted aince in ten days after it has been presented as Governor until the vacancy is filled or disability previous report, stating the name of the con' IF, Sunday and the day it was received ceases. If in this case the President of the Senate 10- crime for which convicted, the sentence and all become a law without a signature; signs, dies, is removed, or becomes incapable of per- the date of remission. commutation, pardor ve adjournment prevents return of the forming the duties of the office, the Speaker of the prieve, with the reasons for granting the $8 come a law unless the Governor within House shall act as Governor until the vacancy is the objections, if any, of any member of th fter adjournment files the objections filled or disability ceases. While performing the du- made thereto. uch officers as provided by law. The SENT BY:UTAH WASH DC OFFICE 7-14-92 4:27PM 2026247707-> 2024566218:# 8 Art. XII, # 20 CONSTITUTION OF UTAH 464 465 Sec. 20. [Trusts and combinations prohibited.] political subdivision of the state located outside to defray the estima Any combination by individuals, corporations, or of its geographic boundaries as defined by law for each fiscal year associations, having for its object or effect the control- may be subject to the ad valorem property tax; state debt, if any th ling of the price of any products of the soil, or of any (c) Property owned by a nonprofit entity which vide for levying a to article of manufacture or commerce, or the cost of is used exclusively for religious, charitable or ed- annual interest and exchange or transportation, is prohibited, and hereby usational purposes; within twenty years declared unlawful, and against public policy. The (d) Places of burial not held or used for private creating the debt. Legislature shall pasa laws for the enforcement of or corporate benefit; and this section by adequate penalties, and in case of in- (e) Farm equipment and farm machinery as Bac. 8. [Assessm corporated companies, if necessary for that purpose, it defined by statute. This exemption shall be im- property may declare & forfeiture of their franchise. 1886 plemented over a period of time as provided by agricult statute. (1) The Legislatu ARTICLE XIII (3) Tangible personal property present in Utah on and equal rate of as January 1, m., which is hald for sale or processing in the state, accord REVENUE AND TAXATION and which is shipped to final destination outside this as otherwise pro state within twelve months may be deemed by law to Legislature shell Section have aequired no situs in Utah for purposes of ad shall secure a ju 1. [Fiscal year.] valorem property taxation and may be exempted by arty, so that ave 2. [Tangible property to be taxed - Value ascer- law from such taxation, whether manufactured, pro- tax in proportion tained - Exemptions - Remittance cessed or produced or otherwise originating within or ble property, pr or abatement of taxes of poor - Intan- without the state. termine the ma gible property - Legislature to pro- (4) Tangible personal property present in Utah on (2) Land used vide annual tax for state.] January 1, m., held for sale in the ordinary course of Legislature prescri 3. [Assessment and taxation of tangible property - business and which constitutes the inventory of any value for agricultur Livestock - Land used for agricul- retailer, or wholesaler or manufacturer or farmer, or it may have for othe tural purposes.] livestock raiser may be deemed for purposes of ad 4. [Mines and claims to be assessed - Basis and valorem property taxation to be exempted. Bec. 4. [Mines SN multiple - What to be assessed as (5) Water rights, ditches, canale, reservoirs, power sie and tangible property.] plants, pumping plants. transmission lines, pipes and as tang 5. [Local authorities to levy local taxes - Sharing flumes owned and used by individuals or corporations All metalliferou tax and revenues by political subdivi- for irrigating land within the state owned by such placer and rock in 1 zions.) individuals or corporations, or the individual mem- islature shall provi 6. [Annual statement to be published.] born thereof, shall be exempted from taxation to the used in determinin 7. [Repealed.] extent that they shall be owned and used for such for taxation purpo 8. [Officer not to make profit out of public moneys.] value of $5.00 per 9. (State expenditure to be kept within revenues.] purposes. (6) Power plants, power transmission lines and before January 1, 10. [All property taxable where situated.] other property used for generating and delivering wise provided by 11. [Creation of State Tax Commission - Member- claims and other VE electrical power, a portion of which is used for fur- ship - Governor to appoint - Terms nishing power for pumping water for irrigation pur- lands containing C - Duties - County boards - Duties.] poses on lands in the state of Utah, may be exempted chinery used in m 12. (Stamp, income, occupation, license or franchise from taxation to the extent that such property is used improvements upo tax permissible - Reference to United for such purposes. These exemptions shall accrue to ing claims, and the States laws in imposition of income the benefit of the users of water 80 pumped under mining claims, or taxes - Income or intangible property such regulations as the Legislature may prescribe. mining purposes, $ taxes allocated to public school eye- (7) The taxes of the poor may be remitted or absted property. tem.] at such times and in such manner as may be provided 13. [Revenue from highway user and motor fuel Sec. 5. [Local a by law. taxes to be used for highway pur- Sharing (8) The Legislature may provide by law for the ex- poses.] subdivi emption from taxation: of not to exceed 45% of the 14. [Tangible personal property tax exemption.] fair market value of residential property as defined The Legislature Section 1. [Fiscal year.] by law; and all household furnishings, furniture, and pose of any county The fiscal year shall begin on the first day of Janu- equipment used exclusively by the owner thereof at poration, but may his place of abode in maintaining & home for himself thorities thereof, ary, unless changed by the Legislature. 1894 and collect taxes fi and family. (9) Property owned by disabled persons who served Notwithstanding E Sec. 2. [Tangible property to be taxed - Value in this Constitutio ascertained - Exemptions - Remit- in any war in the military service of the United their tax and other tance or abatement of taxes of poor - States or of the state of Utah and by the unmarried divisions as provid Intengible property - Legislature to widows and minor orphans of such disabled persons provide annual tax for state.) or of persons who while serving in the military ser Sec. 6. [Annual (1) All tangible property in the state, not exempt vice of the United States or the state of Utah were An accurate stat under the laws of the United States, or under this killed in action or died as a result of such service may tures of the public Constitution, shall be taxed at a uniform and equal be exempted as the Legislature may provide. ally in such manne rate in proportion to its value, to be ascertained as (10) Intangible property may be exempted from provided by law. taxation as property or it may be taxed as property in (2) The following are property tax exemptions: such manner and to such extent as the Legislature Sec. 7. [Repeal (a) The property of the state, school districts, may provide, but if taxed as property the income and public libraries; therefrom shall not also be taxed. Provided that if Sec. 8. [Officer (b) The property of counties, cities, towns, ape- intengible property is taxed as property the rate of cial districts, and all other political subdivisions thereof shall not exceed five mills on each dollar The making money of of the state, except that to the extent and in the valuation. the same for any manner provided by the Legislature the property (11) The Legislature shall provide by law for as of a county, city, town, special district or other be punished as pro any public officer, annual tax sufficient, with other courses of revenue, 64 465 REVENUE AND TAXATION Art. XIII, 9 12 to defray the estimated ordinary expenses of the state ishment shall disqualification to hold public office. 1596 aw for each fiscal year. For the purpose of paying the state debt, if any there be, the Legislature shall pro- ch vide for levying a tax annually, sufficient to pay the Sec. @ [State expenditure to be kept within ed- ennual interest and to pay the principal of such debt, revenues.] within twenty years from the final passage of the law No appropriation shall be made, or any expenditure ate authorized by the Legislature, whereby the expendi- creating the debt. 1998 ture of the State, during any fiscal year, shall exceed Bee. 3. [Asessment and taxation of tangible the total tax than provided for by law, and applicable as property - Livestock Land used for for such appropriation or expenditure, unless the Leg- by agricultural purposes.) islature making such appropriation. shall provide for (1) The Legislature shall provide by law a uniform levying a sufficient tax, not exceeding the rates al- on and equal rate of assessment on all tangible property lowed in section seven of this article, to pay such ap- in the state, according to its value in money, except propriation or expenditure within such fiscal year. his as otherwise provided in Section 2 of this Article. The This provision shall not apply to appropriations or to Legislature shall prescribe by law such provisions as expenditures to suppress insurrections, defend the ad shall secure A just valuation for taxation of such prop- State, or assist in defending the United States in time of war. 1880 by crty. so that every person and corporation shall pay a tax in proportion to the value of his, her. or its tangi- Sec. 10. [All property taxable where situated.] or ble property, provided that the Legislature may de- All corporations OP persons in this State, or doing termine the manner and extent of taxing livestock. business herein, shall be subject to texation for State, on (2) Land used for agricultural purposes may, as the County, School, Municipal or other purposes, on the of Legislature prescribes, be assessed according to its real and personal property owned or used by them ny value for agricultural use without regard to the value within the Territorial limits of the authority levying or it may have for other purposes. 1963 the tax. 1896 ad Sec. 4. [Mines and claims to be assessed - Ba- Sec. 11. [Creation of State Tax Commission - /or ado and multiple What to be assessed Membership Governor to appoint- nd as tangible property.] Terms - Duties - County boards - NEW All metalliferous mines or mining claims, both Duties.) ch placer and rock in place, shall be assessed as the Leg- There shall be a State Tax Commission consisting me islature shall provide: but the basis and multiple now of four members, not more than two of whom shall he used in determining the value of metalliferous mines ch for taxation purposes and the additional assessed belong to the same political party. The members of the Commission shall be appointed by the Governor, value of $5.00 per acre thereof shall not be changed before January 1, 1935, nor thereafter until other- by and with the consent of the Senate, for such terms nd of office as may be provided by law. The State Tax ng wine provided by law. All other mines or mining Commission shall administer and supervise the tax 11th claims and other valuable mineral deposits, including laws of the State. It shall assess mines and public 11th lands containing coal or hydrocarbons and all ma- utilities and adjust and equalize the valuation and ed chinery used in mining and all property or surface improvements upon or appurtenent to mines or min- assessment of property among the several counties. It ed to ing claims, and the value of any surface use made of shall have such other powers of original assessment ier mining claims, or mining property for other than as the Legislature may provide. Under such regula- tions in such cases and within such limitations as the 38. mining purposes, shall be assessed as other tangible property. Legislature may prescribe, it shall review proposed ed 1969 bond issues, revise the tax levies of local governmen- led See. 5. [Local authorities to lovy local taxes - tal units, and equalize the assessment and valuation Sharing tax and revenues by political of property within the counties. The duties imposed 3%- he subsivisions.] upon the State Board of Equalization by the Constitu- led The Legislature shall not impose taxes for the pur. tion and Laws of this State shall be performed by the nd pose of any county, city, town or other municipal cor- State Tax Commission. at Doration, but may, by law, vest in the corporate au- In each county of this State there shall be a County therities thereof, respectively, the power to assess Board of Equalization consisting of the Board of elf and collect taxes for all purposes of such corporation. County Commissioners of said county. The County ed Netwithstanding anything to the contrary contained Boards of Equalization shall adjust and equalize the ed in this Constitution, political subdivisions may share valuation and assessment of the real and personal led their tax and other revenues with other political sub- property within their respective counties, subject to ne divisions as provided by statute. such regulation and control by the State Tax Com- 1083 mission as may be prescribed by law. The State Tax or- are Sec. 8. [Annual statement to be published.) Commission and the County Boards of Equalization ay An accurate statement of the receipts and expendi- shall each have such other powers as may be pre- tares of the public moneys, shall be published annu- scribed by the Legislature. 1957 om ally in such manner as the Legislature may provide. 1890 Sec. 12. [Stamp, income, occupation, license or in franchise tax permissible - Reference IF# Sec. 7. [Repealed.] 1986 to United States laws in imposition of me if See. 3. (Officer not to make profit out of public income taxes - Income OF intengible property taxes allocated to public ate of The making monoys.) of profit out of public moneys, or using school system.] the serve for any purpose not authorized by law, by (1) Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed an be any public officer, shall be deemed a felony. and shall to prevent the Legiclature from providing a stamp tax, or a tax based on income, occupation, licenses, 10, punished as provided by law, but part of such pun- franchises, or other tax provided by law. The Legisla- SENT BY:UTAH WASH DC OFFICE 7-14-92 4:29PM ; 2026247707-> 2024566218:#10 He said Mr. Schiller's First by world-famous architect Ju- Amendment rights have been vio- lia Morgan. Some $250,000 lated through repeated harass- has been spent renovating it. ment by Ms. Moore since she be- came superintendent of the HEARING RUMBLINGS of district three years ago. Ms. Moore and her attorney. dissatisfaction from the Sandy Brinton Burbidge, declined to Police Department, the City comment on the suit. Council surveyed members on Attorneys for both sides met in morale and effectiveness of a closed grievance hearing their chief, Gary Leonard. Wednesday and Thursday at the Leonard won't like the re- district's McPolin Elementary sults. His lone good rating School. came from animal-control em- Despite demands for a public ployees. Which just goes to show how fast survey results hearing, independent mediator Gene Jacobsen chose Wednesday can go to the dogs. to listen to arguments behind YOU'RE A GRAND closed doors. Just in time for a patriotic Fourth MEANWHILE, Salt Lake Mr. Jacobsen will give his rec- City police are venting their ommendation to the Park City Utah's largest American flags - 301 Board of Education and Mr. Schil- - was up and flying Thursday at Fr gripes via Gunsmoke, an un- derground newspaper that's ler. That recommendation may or ley City corporate offices. The huge causing administrators grief. may not be accepted by both par- bol of freedom. constructed by Co ties, but a decision must be made Lake City, Is supported by a 120-fo The paper, which mysteri- ously lands in mailboxes ev. by the board in a public meeting. ery two months or so, reveals such dark secrets as turmoil in the traffic division, which recently "received six griev- ances against management." UTAH 1ST DISTRICT Con- gressman Jim Hansen just hit 2 million miles on his Delta Airlines Frequent Flyer card: Hansen has shuttled between Utah and Washington almost every weekend for the past 10 years. The question to whether the House Ethics Committee will force him to surrender free trips from ac. cumulated frequent-flier miles when he retires. Officials have devised two plans for a skating oval on Block 49 At as free round-trip ticket for each 40,000 miles flown, Hansen has enough free rides to take 25 constituents in Mayor Hopes Revised C Ophir to Washington twice. By Chris Jorgensen other contenders for the Olym WHOOPS. A member of THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE When the city presented its the environmental group Salt Lake City officials say. their new month, some authority men "Clean Up Congress" had the wind taken out of his sales Olympic speed-skating over plan will be tioned the mayor's parking enough to please the Utah Sports Author- mates. Others wanted to know pitch when a woman wearing ity. pay to operate and maintain 1 a "Cannon for Senate" T-shirt City officials were sent home from the where the money would come { answered the door of a home last Utah Sports Authority meeting after the oval into a giant sports COI where he was distributing anti-Joe Cannon literature. serious questions arose about their plan for In a new report to the Sport a skating oval on downtown's Block 49 at the mayor outlines two prop "He fled without giving me B chance to tell the other side 300 West and 400 South. skating oval on Block 49 - on of the story." said Mary Kay Salt Lake Mayer Deedee Corradini Olympics come, another if the Lazarus, press coordinator hopes the revisions earn the-city the Sports Both plans include a skati: votes " weeds Julv 8 to best two units of housing, some retail 8 MEMO FOR STEVE PROVO FROM: J. BUNTON Jo SUBJECT: PROVO/UTAH TRIVIA!! Info from Raeline Ireland in Mayor's Office Local Provo video store -- Rich's Video -- located on Freedom Blvd. [this is so great] Provo-Oram was 1991-92 Money Magazine most liveable city in America; US Conf. of Mayors also voted a most liveable city in America Ty Detmer still popular -- anything about BYU Cougars big time popular, Cougar stadium holds 65,000 people for football games former Provo logo was "The family place", new logo is "Provo the right move" Community built on fmaily values, large families, the mayor has five kids, some families are as large as 10 kids Utah Valley Hospital delivers more babies than any hospital in America City with the youngest population in America conservatve, straightforward people, high volunteer ethic, points of light recipients in Provo -- for Provo River Parkway Tree City USA for variety and abundance of trees -- dating back to heritage -- heirloom trees, urban forest, town located in the Utah Valley; 20 mins form Sundace Skiiing, 10 mins. from boating in Utah lake and Trout and Walleye fishing in the Provo River Etienne Provost a french explorer is the father of the town these people are an updated version of the Cleavers [Ward, June, the Beave, Wally] want nothing to do with Marge and Homer Simpson; sweatness in the people, quality of life don't have a lot of crime, pop. of 90,000 second largest city in Utah committed to theri families -- see families out inthe boat skiing with children going to BYU sporting events etc. From Debbie Turner -- Washington Gov. Utah office: time to time, Univ. of Utah paints BYU's "Y" red -- up on the side of the hill more to come onthis one Utah County is the most Republican county in the state, perhaps nation; POTUS will be in Utah one week prior to "Pioneer Day" [July 24] - - this is a state holiday -- right up there with Fourth of July celebrations-- really important state holiday, commemorates Brigham Young and the Mormons fleeing religious persecution [POTUs fleeing Democratic persecution], trying to find out oterh happening events According to Gov. Bangerter's Chief of Staff: Steve Meekam #1 trade/export in Utah is the electronics/information technology industry [for example Word Perfect and Novel headquartered in Provo] which together is worth about $500 million and 12,500 jobs Jun or Jung Jun or Spots Ill Dream Team Provost Meeting 2x wk hitys. 15July 92 Mon. pm- 40 cities rally - 5 mins speaking; 20 QAA Themes of the wich- Mot week family values ] verines econ opp. (economy hope stump speech 1 take out part blow - it up family values : Boys station Potentive future darls community step in- - when fabler's assent = Captive Nations breakdown of Am. -- acceptance sparch -Mo Mulai family = to all Policy announcemts up faith in family tread water underginings moral truth gamerational/tradition bing 1 back home) I ed mill signing Weds or thus. (Beth) Dury Adwison, Counin Nsls. / Thus. no went arlington, Va Were is Seed Powlma - definite Briday T welfare - Monday - This Pres. between series F/o. Hyman Weds Thurs kt: A3 Fn 2 California Fuday AM (Radio Addressesses) stump spuch meeds facts; anceptes underpinning defining aneciotes SENT BY:UTAH WASH DC OFFICE ; 7-13-92 12:35PM ; 2026247707- 2024562380; 2 DEPARTMENT THE STATE 8 THE STATE III STATE OF UTAH WASHINGTON OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DEBORAH TURNER NORMAN H. BANGERTER 400 NORTH CAPITOL STREET, SUITE 370 DIRECTOR GOVERNOR WASHINGTON D.C., 20001 (202) 624-7704 July 13, 1992 TO: Cliff Alderman FROM: Debbie Turner RE: Briefing Materials for President Bush on Utah Issues Here are some of the issues that are important to Utah both from a legislative and administrative standpoint. In addition. we have suggested a site that the President may want to visit during his short stay in our state. Thanks for the opportunity to provide this information. Economic Development and the Budget Though Congress narrowly defeated a balanced budget amendment, Governor Bangerter continues to favor such an amendment. A critical component of Governor Bangerter's 8 years in office has been a strong economic development program. His efforts have resulted in Utah reaching and maintaining an unqualified AAA bond rating (one of two states in the nation) and in 1991 Utah was named first in the country in financial management by Financial World. He has worked to create an environment that fosters business and attracts jobs. But as the Governor stated in his 1992 State of the State address, "If Congress does not take corrective action and continues its reckless course of spending more than it has, this nation faces grave danger. Utah. not withstanding our great success. cannot endure prolonged national economic stagnation and irresponsibility. SENT BY:UTAH WASH DC OFFICE ; 7-13-92 12:36PM ; 2026247707 2024562380; 3 Cliff Alderman July 13, 1992 Page 2 Governor Bangerter has repeatedly expressed his objections regarding federal mandates and the devastating effect these unfunded federal intrusions have on state budgets. Lastly, both local and state government. and businesses have been preparing for the scaling down of Utah's defense industry. The effects of national reductions in defense spending are being felt by our defense industries and the subsequent ripple will have an impact on the state's economy as the public and private sector adjust to those reductions. EDUCATION Utah's economic picture unlike many states, is a good one. But while our economic outlook may be good, the public demands on the state's budget continue to grow dramatically, particularly in regards to public education. The percentage of funding for public education from state funds has increased from 42% in 1985 to nearly 49% in 1993. Utah devotes a higher percentage of our state funds to education than virtually any other state. But unlike many other states, Utah's public school enrollment continues to grow. In the 80's public school enrollment increased by more than 30%. Utah has undertaken many new efforts in education to meet these growing needs such as statewide education strategic planning, year- round and extended-day schools, concurrent enrollment in high schools and universities, and Utah's own "Custom Fit" training to specifically prepare workers for available employment. But even with all of this effort our needs are still expanding and demand that Utah look to resources that have provided important support in the past, but must now pick-up and keep pace with current revenue streams. The resources we refer to are those retained and invested from lands referred to as state school trust lands, given to Utah at statehood expressly for the support of our public schools. But subsequent Congressional action to draw boundaries of federal parks and forests have locked away many of the valuable resources these properties offer. Utah values the national parks and forests within our boundaries and now seeks to return state properties within these national reserves. SENT BY:UTAH WASH DC OFFICE ; 7-13-92 12:37PM ; 2026247707- 2024562380; # 4 Cliff Alderman July 13, 1992 Page 3 This goal would be accomplished through legislation to exchange state school trust lands for other federal properties of equal value. Such legislation has been introduced (H.R. 4769 and S. 2577) by Utah's Congressional delegation and has been approved by the Department of Interior. Passage and signing of this legislation is a critical key to hel Utah's schools continue to prepare Utah students to be tomorrow's workers. Note: We would like to suggest that the President consider a visit to a selected site in the Wasatch National Forest. The purpose would be for the Governor to explain the Utah land exchange to the President. A photo-op showing the President and the Governor walking in the forest discussing how the Utah proposal offers a unique blend of preserving our nation's forests while providing a continued funding source for Utah's school kids. Environmental and Education President all in one shot. I am sure such a short diversion could quickly and safely be arranged. The Wasatch National Forest is within 45 minutes driving distance from Salt Lake International and a much shorter flying distance from Hill Air Force Base If he chose to take an Air Force helicopter. Welfare Reform Utah's commitment to a strong work ethic has helped to place it in the favorable economic picture it currently enjoys. It is this commitment and a deep concern for those who need assistance to join the ranks of the employed, that provide the backdrop for a major demonstration project the State is undertaking through the Utah Department of Human Services. In response to the President's State of the Union address were he committed to use the states as laboratories for reform, Utah has developed a "Single Parent Employment Demonstration Program." that will be presented to the Administration in one week for review and approval. SENT BY:UTAH WASH DC OFFICE ; 7-13-92 12:37PM ; 2026247707 2024562380;# 5 Cliff Alderman July 13, 1992 Page 4 Utah has been a leader in such reforms and will be working closely with the White House domestic policy office to gain the interdepartmental approvals necessary for such a demonstration to go forward. Issues that the President may face either from Bush/Ouavie meetings or the Press: 1. Utah's response to the recent Supreme Court ruling on abortion: The recent Court ruling on the Pennsylvania case will have a great impact on Utah's abortion law which is currently being tested in the federal courts. The President may be asked as to his feelings regarding the votes of Judge Souter and others regarding this issue. 2. Utah's response to the Rhode Island case of school graduation pravers and other public prayers: Again, how will the President respond to Bush appointees of the court who have voted against prayer in schools. (Note: this is particularly an issue in Utah because the Utah constitution is more prohibitive on the specific issue of praying in public meetings than the federal constitution. This has caused a recent Utah court decision to prevent prayer by city councils before public meetings.)