Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
323154646
label
Clean Air Bill Signing 4/17/90 [OA 4422]
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
323154646
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
692d6dd201ddf466
ocrText
Originally Processed With FOIA(s): FOIA Number: S FOIA MARKER This is not a textual record. This is used as an administrative marker by the George Bush Presidential Library Staff. Record Group/Collection: George H.W. Bush Presidential Records Collection/Office of Origin: Speechwriting, White House Office of Series: Grant, Mary Kate, Files Subseries: Subject File, 1988-1991 OA/ID Number: 13878 Folder ID Number: 13878-018 Folder Title: Clean Air Bill Signing, 4/17/90 Stack: Row: Section: Shelf: Position: G 19 2 7 3 White House News Summary Friday, November 16, 1990 -- A-16 CONSUMERS SAY RECESSION IS ON, SURVEY FINDS ANN ARBOR, Mich. -- Consumer confidence fell more sharply between July and October than in any three-month period in at least 44 years, according to researchers at the University of Michigan, who said that U.S. consumers now think that the economy is in a recession. The university's Index of Consumer Sentiment has fallen 24.3 points since July, to land at 63.9 in October. The index's scale is based on a February 1966 survey equaling 100. The latest number remains well above the record low of 51.7 reached in May 1980. Nonetheless, "this is the largest three- month decline in the history of these surveys, easily outdistancing the prior record of 15 index points following the 1973 oil embargo," said Richard Curtin, survey director. (Gregory Patterson, Wall Street Journal, A2) BUSINESS INVENTORIES ROSE MODEST 0.5% IN SEPTEMBER, PLEASING SOME ANALYSTS Business inventories edged up [0.5 percent] in September as sales declined, the Commerce Department said. Analysts said the figures suggested inventories were still manageable even though demand is falling off "Normally, when the economy is slowing down as much as it has, we see very clear signs of inventory accumulating. This is not the case" this time, said Lyle Gramley, chief economist at the Mortgage Bankers Association. (Helaine Olen, Wall Street Journal, A2) BUSH SIGNS SWEEPING AIR POLLUTION CONTROLS INTO LAW Proclaiming a "new era for clean air, President Bush Thursday signed into law sweeping controls designed to sharply reduce pollution from cars and factories by early next century. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, signed at an East Room ceremony, impose new, costly technological requirements or health standards on virtually every industrial sector in hope of restoring the atmosphere's protective ozone shield and combating urban smog, acid rain and cancer-causing plant emissions. "This legislation isn't just the centerpiece of our environmental agenda," said Bush, fulfilling a campaign pledge as he signed the bill. "It is simply the most significant air pollution legislation in our nation's history." (Michael Weisskopf, Washington Post, A6) - White House News Summary Friday, November 16, 1990 -- A-15 Bush Says Efforts To Stem Recession Hurt By Gulf Crisis President Bush said Thursday that uncertainty in the U.S. oil market caused by the gulf crisis is holding the American economy hostage and hurting his efforts to head off a recession. "There's a slowdown, an economic slowdown. And it's a disproportionate increase in the price of oil that stems from what Saddam Hussein has done," Mr. Bush said in an interview with CNN. Mr. Bush, who has clashed publicly with protesters who claim the gulf build-up is to protect the West's oil interests, conceded for the first time Thursday that protecting American jobs and the U.S. economy is a top priority of the gulf mission. "I do think that the Iraqi solution has complicated and worsened our own economy and the economies of our neighbors and the economies of the rest of the world," Mr. Bush told CNN. "And it does mean jobs." After meeting Thursday with U.S. business leaders who painted a gloomy economic outlook for the nation, Mr. Bush said he hoped the recession would be held to six months. But "the oil question that comes from Saddam Hussein's taking over of Kuwait is a big question mark here," he said. (Paul Bedard, Washington Times, A3) PRESIDENT HEARS ECONOMIC GLOOM President Bush Thursday got a generally gloomy report on economic prospects from top business executives he had summoned to the White House to hear their views. One of them said later that most agreed the country is probably in a recession. "I think the majority of the people felt the economy was in a twilight zone, somewhere in the area between a little growth and a little decline," said John Medlin, president and CEO of First Wachovia Corp., a Winston-Salem, N.C., banking company. Meanwhile, a high official confirmed Thursday that the Administration is considering cuts in popular government benefit programs such as Social Security and Medicare as part of the budget it will submit to Congress in February. The official said the cuts being considered would reduce benefits for affluent recipients, with the savings used to provide tax cuts for the poor and middle class. Such an action "is clearly being contemplated very seriously," said the official, who also stressed that all planning for the new budget was in a very preliminary stage with final decisions a long way from being made. (Martin Crutsinger, Washington Times, C11) - White House News Summary Friday, November 16, 1990 -- A-17 Bush Signs Into Law Clean Air Act To Curb Emissions x President Bush, sealing a major environmental victory for New England, Thursday signed into law the first new clean air act in 13 years, including a crackdown on the Midwestern emissions that cause acid rain to fall in the Northeast. Bush, fulfilling a major campaign promise and reversing years of inaction by the Reagan Administration, called the act the "most significant air pollution legislation in our nation's history "We begin a new era for clean air," Bush said at a signing ceremony in the East Room that was attended by dozens of lobbyists for both environmental and business groups who had fought for years over the measure. Bush, telling the audience how he reveled in the crisp air of Camp David last weekend, said, "No American should have to drive out of town to have to breathe clean air. Every city in America should have clean air. And with this legislation, I firmly believe we will." (Michael Kranish, Boston Globe) RECORD ENVIRONMENTAL CASES FILED The Justice Department Thursday announced it had returned a record 134 indictments in fiscal 1990 against individuals and corporations accused of violating environmental laws. Attorney General Thornburgh said the department surpassed by 33 percent its indictment rate in 1989. The department prosecuted 95 percent of those cases and settled out of court the remainder. "During (1990) 78 percent of our indictments were against corporations and their top officers, Thornburgh said. "More than half of the individuals convicted for environmental crimes this year were given prison sentences and 84 percent of these are actually serving real jail time," he said in a statement "I am particularly pleased that the President's proposal for felony provisions under the Clean Air Act was approved by the 101st Congress, because criminal provisions put the teeth into environmental enforcement," he said. (UPI) PROBER LAYS OUT 'KEATING 5' CASE The Senate ethics committee opened an unprecedented public inquiry into the relations between five senators and S&L executive Charles Keating Thursday and heard charges that three of the five were far more deeply involved with Keating and his failing thrift than they have acknowledged. Two of the senators, Alan Cranston and Dennis DeConcini, were described by special counsel Robert Bennett as "important players" in Keating's "all-out war" with federal regulators. Moreover, Bennett told the committee a third senator, Donald Riegle, played "a much greater role than he now recalls" in attempting to help Keating in his dealings with the regulators. In making his case at the start of the tense, politically charged hearings, Bennett drew pointed connections in timing between Keating's contributions to the three senators and their efforts on his behalf. By contrast, the special counsel said, Sens. Glenn and McCain, who also received money from Keating and helped him to varying degrees, played lesser roles in the case. There is no substantial evidence of any connection between their intervention for Keating and the money he gave them, Bennett added. (Helen Dewar, Washington Post, A1) White House News Summary Friday, November 16, 1990 -- A-18 U.S. SUIT ALLEGES SWEEPING DREXEL CONSPIRACY NEW YORK -- A $6.8 billion court claim against the bankrupt Wall Street firm Drexel Burnham Lambert detailed an alleged conspiracy to "capture" S&L institutions and foist worthless "junk" bonds on them for huge illicit profits. The sweeping accusations made public Thursday were contained in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court claim filed by the FDIC and the RTC. (Brendan Murphy, UPI) SPACE SHUTTLE IS LAUNCHED ON FINAL SECRET MISSION CAPE CANAVERAL -- The space shuttle Atlantis, carrying five military astronauts and a Pentagon spy satellite, rocketed into orbit under a veil of secrecy Thursday night to kick off NASA's last fully classified shuttle mission. Carrying what some analysts say is a military satellite bound for duty over the Persian Gulf, Atlantis lifted off at 6:48 p.m. EST and headed due east over the Atlantic Ocean. (Catherine Smith, Washington Post, A4) BENNETT ADMONISHES NEW YORK AND CALIFORNIA Outgoing drug czar William Bennett Thursday praised the majority of the country for doing its part in the nation's war on drugs, but said the nation's two largest states must do more. "New York and California have passed a number of important anti-drug laws, but because they are key trafficking and consumption states, they must do more," said Mr. Bennett. "California needs tougher drug sentences, and as I told the New York Legislature in June, it needs tougher user sanctions." "They should be sending the clearest, the most emphatic messages," said Mr. Bennett. His comments came during a press conference to announce the release of a white paper on the status of state drug control efforts. It describes 18 laws and policies viewed useful by federal authorities to states in their efforts to combat rising drug use. (Jerry Seper, Washington Times, A7) HIGHER BEER, TOBACCO TAXES PROPOSED TO CURB YOUTHS' USE A panel established by Congress to study drug-free schools recommended higher taxes on beer and cigarettes Thursday as a way to curb students' use of alcohol and tobacco, which the panel described as "the most widely used drugs among young people today." In its final report, the National Commission on Drug-Free Schools (cochaired by Secretary Cavazos and outgoing national drug policy director Bennett) suggested that Congress consider using the additional tax revenue to fund an independent "counter-advertising campaign aimed at curbing alcohol and tobacco use by underage youth.' California has authorized increases in so-called sin taxes for similar prevention programs. (Kenneth Cooper, Washington Post, A15) - SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 :10-25-90 ; 5:33PM ; 2027752710- 2024566218;# 1 10/25/90 UMB LRD/RDI 002 15:27 Congressional Delay P5 the clean Air Act 90 OCT 25 90 OCT - President transmitted his proposal on July 24, 1989. - Senate enacted its bill 8 months later (4/2/90), and the House anacted its bill 10 months later. - Conference was delayed until mid-July 1990, and involved some 150 members of Congress. - conferees required over 3 months to produce a final bill. To ChrissWinston From Bernie Mart in Vid Bob Grady Photo by D.C. Lowe/AllStock Despite the devastation of a volcanic eruption in May 1980, bear grass starts to grow again a season later near Norway Pass in the Mount St. Helens National Volcanic Monument in Washington state. America repaying debt to damaged environment was both the culmination of much that had come collected refuse along a stretch of U.S. Route 54, By George Bush SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES before the beginning of a new and sustained effort. producing five piles along the roadside, each more Those who worry about our environment today than 10 feet high. In West Virginia, a five-mile span In the late 1960s, a polluted Amer- sometimes forget how far we've come not only as a of U.S. Route 50 yielded 5 tons of trash. About a year ican river literally caught fire, whole cities were blanketed in people but as a planet. later, on June 5, 1971, 3.5 million Americans worked clouds of industrial air pollution, The Earth Day tradition that began in 1970 has with the Boy Scouts and the Keep America Beauti- grown into a worldwide environmental movement, ful campaign to conduct what was probably the and raw sewage was discharged di- a movement born in the U.S.A., a movement nur- largest one-day litter cleanup project in history. rectly into our rivers. We were squandering our natural inheri- tured by two decades of American leadership. Today, America's roadways are vastly improved, Bush tance. But Native Americans have The change in attitude has been both fundamen- ranking among the most beautiful in the world. an old saying: "We don't inherit the tal and pervasive. In the late 1960s many otherwise True, government action helped spur this change. earth from our parents. We borrow it from our responsible citizens roared across the landscape, But the real change came about because of a new children." their cars pumping invisible toxics into the air, awareness, new environmental ethos. Twenty years ago today, Americans started call- carelessly littering country roads and city streets. ing in the debt. Earth Day was a phenomenon that On Earth Day 1970, students in Lake Ozark, Mo., see BUSH, page H10 forefront of opposition to the envi- advocating, then what they relative privilege. I have often felt such stories - Sierra Club and its The fact IS that our ronmental movement. By the early saying is, 'We've got enough for our- selves, but you stay down there.' that the conversion to environment- The realization that affluent peo- 70s, labor columnist Victor Reisel alism occurs shortly after an urban, ple can serve their own self-interest subsidiary organizations received with real problems - such as ill- The working-class, labor-union middle-class family finally pur- simply by preventing any more eco- $39 million in donations in 1988 and nesses and natural disasters - is was repeating the joke about God revolt against both environmental- the Natural Resources Defense provided by continued increases in telling Moses that before He parts chases its first suburban home in, let nomic growth has been one of the the Red Sea He is first going to have ism and the poor-oriented thrust of us say, Maple Grove Acres. The fam- most difficult to make. We ordinarily Council received $13 million in 1989. wealth and technological capability. These activist groups are sup- The ability is weakened as long as to get permission from the Environ- the Democratic liberal agenda fi- ily looks out the window at a beauti- think of people serving their self- interest by making more money ported by scientists whom the public public fear and outrage based on ex- mental Protection Agency. nally made up the major factor in Ronald Reagan's 1980 presidential ful field next door and exclaims, "At also considers to be selfless. Yet sci- aggerations of risk are the basis for The bumper sticker "If You're majority, particularly in the Western last, we're living in the country." Two themselves, not by preventing oth- ers from doing the same. entists, too, have incentives to exag- our environmental laws. Hungry and Out of Work, Eat an En- part of the country. This revolt has months later, however, a nearly hys- vironmentalist!" was originated by Working with the White House, Proposed a significant increase Renewing my call for every American to get involved, we have Overseas, America is offering the Senate has now passed a clean for the EPA. ca's technological and legislative technical assistance, such as air bill. This is a bill that was gridloc- Concluded a historic, interna- launched a program to encourage an BUSH leadership. Automobile emissions even greater degree of voluntary through the new, U.S.-led environ- ked through the 1980s. It's been 13 tional conference on climate change standards, pioneered here in the ment center in Budapest, Hungary. at the White House this week. tree planting nationwide, with a tar- early 1970s, will go into effect in the We've also embarked on a plan to years coming. But no American should have to wait another day for Worked to protect the ozone get of 1 billion trees planted a year. From page H1 European Community in 1992. And Europe is now re-tooling to copy the stop hazardous wastes from being layer by backing a worldwide phase- Trees are the oldest, cheapest, and And just as America's roadways indiscriminately exported to foreign clean air. The House should move countries and thrown U.S. support promptly to produce a bill consistent out of CFCs, which will help reduce most efficient air purifier on Earth. have improved, so have the oceans of technological innovations that gave greenhouse warming potential. They can help clean the air by air that float above them. Automo- America the world's cleanest cars. behind a U.N. convention to help with the principles I have stated are Outlawed virtually all uses of as- absorbing carbon dioxide, a gas that bile emission controls, first man- Unfortunately, American achieve this goal. And we've offered necessary for an environmentally contributes to possible greenhouse dated in 1970, have today resulted in breakthroughs, and the kind of envi- to host a landmark meeting designed strong and economically sound new bestos. Began developing policies to im- warming. Trees can reduce the heat a generation of new cars that emit ronmental progress we've seen in Western Europe, are far from wide- to bring about the framework for an Clean Air Act. plement our goal of "no-net-loss" of of a summer's day, quiet a highway's only 4 percent as much pollution as international agreement on re- The House also has been the bat- wetlands - a policy first for Amer- noise, feed the hungry, and provide the typical 1970 model. Over the past spread in the developing world, or in search and other efforts on climate tleground for our campagin to ele- shelter from the wind. And every two decades, America cut airborne the Eastern European environments vate the Environmental Protection ica - and for the world. particulates by 60 percent, airborne that were ravaged by decades of of- change. Back at home, America has con- Agency to the highest level of the Barred all African elephant tree planted is a compact between ivory imports to the U.S. generations. "carbon monoxide by about 40 per- ficial neglect. tinued to lead by example, federal government - the Cabinet Added three quarters of a billion About a year after the first Earth cent. Airborne lead has all but disap- During America's own develop- The clean air initiative we kicked level. The American people want this done. But they also want it done dollars this year alone to clean up Day, Dr. Seuss introduced America's peared from the American land- ment from an agrarian culture to an off in the Grand Tetons last summer right. They want it done responsibly. hazardous waste at federal facilities. kids to the fable of a lakeside forest scape. Factory smoke levels are industrialized country, the United is an ambitious, aggressive piece of Targeted the Superfund toward and the brave little man who defends down, as are emissions of sulfur and States suffered many decades of en- legislation. It will help bring into What the EPA needs is new clout faster cleanup and better enforce- it. "I am the Lorax," he says. "I speak some of the prime ingredients of ur- vironmental destruction, often unin- compliance 100 or more cities that - not a new bureaucracy loaded down with management directives ment at hazardous waste sites - an for the trees." ban smog. tentionally, often in ignorance. For have failed to meet national stan- But at the end of his story, no trees This nation has made solid head- instance, the DDT designed to pro- from the U.S. Congress. EPA de- effort now being copied in Italy and dards for carbon monoxide and ozone. It includes the first acid rain serves a seat at the table. Let's get it West Germany. remain. Gross ecological misman- way toward our goal of clean air for tect against pests nearly destroyed every American. But many tough our national symbol, the bald eagle. control program in the U.S. and pow- done without changing its mission. Programs like the Superfund, agement leaves the forest leveled, The campaign to protect the envi- aimed at cleaning up the problems the air unbreathable, the water challenges remain. The United As we have learned the hard way erful new incentives for burning of the past, are important. But choked with dying fish. And all that's States still produces too much waste in America, developing nations must cleaner fuel. Where once environ- ronment is a marathon, a race for and wastes too many material re- find a responsible balance between life for all Americans, a race in there's also an emerging new philos- left is a pile of barren rocks, and the mental forces were harnessed to ophy in fighting pollution - pollu- Lorax's one-word warning: "UN- sources. And as I said in Germany quality of life, a sound environment, boost the economy, today we are har- which the final triumph will ulti- last year, whether it's Chernobyl's and a sound economy. And in the de- tion prevention. Whereas Earth Day LESS." nessing economic forces to boost the mately belong to the long distance 1970 was devoted to cleaning up the Today the Earth Day kids have radioactive steam or the acid rain veloping world, "quality of life" of- environment. runner. that's killing Europe's Black Forest, And it's not only good for the envi- But it's needed a jump start. And mess, Earth Day 1990 is aimed at grown up. But the message of the ten means life itself. There's no more stopping it at the source. Lorax still rings true. Unless every "environmental destruction re- hostile environment than the one in ronment - it's also good for the during its first year in office, our But of course, it's not enough to business, every community, and ev- spects no boundaries." A global which people are without food, shel- ter, or jobs. Maintaining quality of economy. We should never lose sight administration has: problem demands global attention. Asked Congress for nearly half prevent environmental damage. Our ery family - in this nation and in of the benefits of environmental every nation - pauses to consider This can be done, however, with- life, which in the developing world cleanup benefits that range from a billion dollars to expand new land mission is not just to defend what's economic savings in health care for national forests, parks and wild- left but to take the offensive and im- what they can do to fight pollution, out going to the extreme - without often means life itself, requires throwing men and women out of maintaining a strong economy. Pov- life refuges, and other public lands. prove our environment. Nature has our dream of a reborn health, pro- costs and lost productivity to the op- erty does not allow the luxury of the portunity for increased enjoyment Launched an ambitious $1 bil- powerful rejuvenative forces, but we ductive global environment will re- work into wholesale unemployment. need to help them along. We need to main elusive. The race to protect the We must not let the extremes domi- long view. Yet we must make the in- of outdoor activity and the beauty of lion a year research program on cli- reforest this bountiful land. environment is not a spectator sport. nate the debate. vestments vital to maintaining our mate change. nature. Part of the solution lies in Ameri- beautiful planet. Enrolled Bill H.R. 5835 - omnibus Budget Reconciliation act of 1990 and Signing Statement STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT Today I an signing H.R. 5835, the "Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, 11 the centerpiece of the largest deficit reduction package in history and an important measure for ensuring America's long-term economic growth. This bill is the result of long, hard work by the Administration and Congress. No one got everything he or she wanted, but the end product is a compromise that merits enactment. H.R. 5835, and the discretionary spending caps associated with it, will achieve nearly $500 billion -- almost half a trillion dollars --- in deficit reduction over the next five years. Over 70% of that deficit-reduction derives from outlay reductions; less than 30% from revenue increases. In addition, the bill enacts significant budget process reforms to ensure that the agreement is fulfilled, and that budgetary discipline is extended and strengthened. Entitlement Reforms. The bill provides for the most comprehensive and substantial reform of mandatory "entitlement" programs ever about $100 billion in savings from restructuring and reforms in the following major programs: Farm programs; Federal housing programs; Student loan programs; Veterans programs; Postal subsidies; Federal employee benefits; and Medicare. Discretionary Program Caps. The bill establishes five-year caps on overall discretionary spending that will result in savings of over $180 billion. To keep domestic and international spending from growing any faster than inflation, the bill creates new automatic "mini-sequesters". The bill also provides for an orderly defense reduction without threatening national security. Energy Security. The bill provides incentives for energy conservation, and for exploration and development of domestic energy resources. Social Security. Social security is fully protected and taken off-budget. Enforcement and Process Reform. The bill contains the toughest enforcement system ever. The Gramm-Rudman-Hollings sequester process is extended and strengthened with caps, mini- sequesters, and a new "pay-as-you-go" system. Credit Reform. The bill implements a new Federal accounting and budgeting system to expose and limit previously hidden (and rapidly growing) liabilities. Tax Changes. The bill includes a tax rate cut from 33% to 31% for about 3.5 million middle and upper-middle income taxpayers and an overall decrease in taxes paid by those with incomes under $20,000. There are higher excise taxes on luxury items and limitations on itemized deductions and the personal exemption for higher income taxpayers. The total net tax changes comprise 28% of the deficit reduction package. This bill creates the conditions that should allow future interest rates to be lower than they would be otherwise. Lower interest rates can benefit the entire economy. They can mean more housing starts; more Americans driving new cars; reductions in mortgage payments for homeowners; more long-term investment; greater productivity; and increased numbers of jobs. In signing this landmark Act, I pledge the continuing best efforts of my Administration to maintain not only the letter, but the spirit of the new fiscal order for the Federal Government that is embodied in this agreement. H.R. 5835 also contains child care provisions, strongly supported by this Administration, that will enlarge the opportunities of parents to obtain the child care they desire, including care that is provided by sectarian institutions if the parents SO choose. The largest portion of this new child care program will come from tax credits to people as requested by the Administration. In addition, a Child Care and Development Block Grant program includes provisions for the issuance of child care certificates or vouchers that would enable parents to exercise their own judgment as to what type of child care best suits the particular needs of their own child. I note my understanding of these child care provisions and sign the bill based on that understanding, as follows: First, I understand that the definition of child care certificates in section 658P (2) ensures that states may not restrict parental choice by limiting the range of providers from whom parents may seek child care, using certificates as payment, and that such certificates shall not be considered to be grants or contracts. Second, section 658N (a) (1) (B) specifically permits sectarian organizations that are child care providers to require that all of their employees adhere to the religious tenets and teachings of the organization and comply with rules forbidding the use of drugs or alcohol. As I understand it, the term "sectarian organization" in this provision includes religious organizations generally. 2 Grant/Cawley/Simon November 13, 1990 3:00 p.m. A: :CLEANAIR PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: CLEAN AIR BILL SIGNING CEREMONY THE EAST ROOM THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 1990 2:30 P.M. ( (Acknowledgements)) Although Thanksgiving is still a week away, today is truly a red-letter day for all Americans. Today, we add a long-awaited and long-needed chapter in America's environmental history -- and begin a new era for clean air. // This last weekend, I spent a few days in the Catoctin Mountains of Maryland, at Camp David. Saturday and Sunday were clear and crisp -- bright sunshine and fall colors. Great to get out in the woods, and go for a run. (( Pumped a little iron on the Arnold Schwarzenegger Memorial Leg Press. )) But no American should have to drive to the top of a mountain to breathe clean air. Every city in America should have air as clean as a mountaintop. And with this legislation, I'm hoping we will.// I first made a commitment to comprehensive clean air legislation as a Presidential candidate. Then, early in the Administration, I called together Republicans and Democrats, business executives and conservationists to make a point: it was time to break the logjam that hindered progress on clean air for thirteen years. It was time to enlist the innovation, energy and ingenuity of every American -- to create a national sense of commitment to conservation. 2 And so I told our best minds, assembled that morning a year and a half ago, this: "Every American expects and deserves to breathe clean air. And as President, it is my mission to guarantee it: for this generation, and for generations to come." Well, as we used to say in the Navy, "Mission defined. Mission accomplished. "// Today, I am proud to sign the Clean Air Act of 1990. // This landmark legislation will pull 56 billion pounds of pollution each year from the air -- that's 224 pounds for every man, woman and child in America. It will go after the three main causes of air pollution: acid rain, smog and toxic air pollutants. This bill will cut emissions that cause acid rain in half -- by 10 million tons -- and permanently cap them at these new levels. It will reduce pollutants that cause smog in our cities -- by 40 percent -- so that by the year 2000, over one hundred major American cities will have clean, healthy air. It will cut dangerous air toxics emissions by up to 90 percent using new technologies. And over the next decade, its alternative fuel provisions will reduce our dependence on foreign oil by at least 800,000 barrels of oil a day. // This bill means cleaner cars, cleaner power plants, cleaner factories and cleaner fuels -- this bill is good news for America. And the benefits of this Clean Air bill will affect virtually every person in every city and town in America. // THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release April 17, 1990 REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT IN THE OPENING ADDRESS TO THE WHITE HOUSE CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND ECONOMICS RESEARCH RELATED TO GLOBAL CHANGE The Grand Ballroom The J.W. Marriott Hotel Washington, D.C. 10:06 A.M. EDT THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. Please be seated, and welcome. Thank you very much for the welcome. I apologize for the slight delay in there. Thank you, Secretary Brady, and members of the U.S. delegation, members of my Cabinet and the cochairmen of this conference, Michael Boskin and Allan Bromley; Michael Deland. And I'm pleased to welcome this international field of distinguished high-level officials -- experts all on the environment, economics, science and energy. Welcome to the White House Conference on Global Change. Two months ago I had the honor of addressing the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. And let me recognize Bert Bolin who is here, IPCC Chairman, here with us this morning. I see this conference helping to accelerate the IPCC's agenda as it searches for understanding of some very critical questions, broadening the dialogue by exploring the link between scientific research and economic analysis in the study of global change. And of course, this conference is itself another sign of the growing importance of the environment on the international agenda. Here in the United States we've moyed one step closer to a great victory for the environment, strengthening our own clean air statutes, already the world's toughest, with a comprehensive package of new clean air initiatives. Ten months ago we renewed momentum lost in legislative stalemate for 12 years. Just this month, a clean air package cleared the United States Senate with House action hopefully possible in May. We're moving forward on clean air legislation because it is in America's interest. But like so many of the environmental issues that concern us, we aren't the only beneficiary of a better environment. When it comes to the environment, we are learning that local actions can have global consequences. Understanding the effects of our actions on our Earth system is the first step to a sound environment. And the subject that led me to invite all of you here is just exactly that. I want to speak just briefly this morning so you can get on about your work. But I want to speak about what we can do over the course of the next couple of days to advance our understanding of global change. This conference will help in three ways. First, it provides an opportunity to help sort out the science on this complex issue, to start with what we know about the Earth, and this home we share. About the factors, natural as well as man-made, that cause our environment to change, and to work from what we know toward answers to the many uncertainties that abound. Perhaps it's not surprising when the subject is global MORE - 2 - change that the debate often generates more heat than light. Some of you may have seen two sides -- on one of our talk shows on Sunday respected men debating global change. One scientist argued that if we keep burning fossil fuels at today's rate, and I quote, "By the end of the next century, Earth could be nine degrees Fahrenheit warmer than today." And the other scientist saw no evidence of rapid change and warned against a drastic reordering of our economy that could cause us, in his words, "to end up the impoverished nation awaiting a warming that never comes." Two scientists, two diametrically opposed points of view. Now, where does that leave us? What we need are facts, the stuff that science is made of. A better understanding of the basic processes at work in our whole world - better Earth system models that enable us to calculate the complex interaction between man and our environment. And that's why I've asked Congress, our Congress, to approve a 60 percent increase in our budget for the global change research program -- an aggressive research program for which we budgeted more than $1 billion in 1991 to reduce the uncertainties surrounding global change. To advance the scientific understanding we need if we are to make decisions to maximize benefits and minimize the unintended consequences. The second way this gathering can advance our understanding is to address the economic factor and environmental questions. We know that cleaning up our environment costs money -- a lot of money and we know it means changes in the way we work and live. Here, in the United States, we're already making those changes, moving forward on clean air, planting trees through our "America the Beautiful" initiative, and working with other nations to find ways to halt deforestation, phasing out the use of CFCs, encouraging conservation, exploring alternative sources of fuel and energy, and market-based incentives for pollution control. And yet, as we move forward, all of us must make certain we preserve our environmental well-being and our economic welfare. We know that these are not separate concerns. They are two sides of the same coin. Recognizing this fact is in the interest of every nation here today. It's in the interest of the developed world, and the developing world alike. Let me focus for just a moment on the developing world. In a climate of poverty or persistent economic struggle, protecting the environment becomes a far more difficult challenge. Cold statistics don't begin to capture the harsh realities that are at stake. Development doesn't mean just another point in the gross national product, the GNP; it's measured in human lives, an end to hunger, lower infant mortality, longer life expectancy. Not just quality of life, but life itself. Environmental policies that ignore the economic factor, the human factor, are destined to fail. But there's another reason to consider the economic factor when the issue is the environment. There is no better ally in service of our environment than strong economies. Economies that make possible the increased efficiencies that enable us to make environmental gains. Economies that generate the new technologies that help us arrest and reverse the damage that we've done to our environment. We need new economies that allow us to make vital investments in our common future. And that brings me to the third way this conference contributes to a net gain in knowledge. The fact that it provides us the opportunity to form a partnership between nations and across the many disciplines represented here. Few subjects offer a greater challenge to the understanding of man than global change. And yet, too often the different disciplines focusing on this question have worked in isolation with little interchange of ideas, analysis, information. This conference is a new departure because it brings MORE - 3 - together environmentalists and economists, experts on energy and science to search for common ground. To search the expertise each discipline can bring to this difficult and demanding concern. And this new partnership must bind nations as well. The fact of the matter is, no one nation acting alone can safeguard our Earth environment. Success requires a sense of global stewardship, an understanding that it is the Earth that endures, and that all of us are no more than tenants in temporary possession of a sacred trust. For the next two days, you, in essence, will be grappling with the questions, the fundamental questions of global stewardship; questions of global consequence. I know there's a debate raging out there, but I am confident that this approach that brings all of you experts together is the way to go. I thank you very much for joining us here. I will be over after digesting the product of your work tomorrow, to have a few more words to say. But from the bottom of my heart, I thank you for coming. There have been a lot of these environmenal conferences around the world, but this one, I think, approaches the fundamentals. And we are fortunate to have here in America you experts from all around the world. Thank you for coming. I look forward to hearing the results of your work. God bless you all. Thank you very much. (Applause.) END 10:17 A.M. EDT THEODORE ROOSEVELT CYCLOPEDIA EDITED BY ALBERT BUSHNELL HART AND HERBERT RONALD FERLEGER FOREWORD BY WILLIAM ALLEN WHITE REVISED SECOND EDITION NEW INTRODUCTION, BIBLIOGRAPHY, CHRONOLOGY, HISTORY OF THE THEODORE ROOSEVELT ASSOCIATION BY JOHN ALLEN GABLE THEODORE ROOSEVELT ASSOCIATION and MECKLER NATIONALISM NATURAL HISTORY strength must also be used to secure justice for NATIONALITY, DUAL. Surely it ought not others and must never be used to wrong others. to be necessary to say that the rights of every But unless we possess and prepare the strength, citizen in this land are as great and as sacred we can neither help ourselves nor others. as those of any other citizen. The United States (1918.) Mem. Ed. XXI, 350; Nat. Ed. XIX, cannot with self-respect permit its organic and 319. fundamental law to be overridden by the laws NATIONALISM AND INTERNATIONAL- of a foreign country. It cannot acknowledge ISM. Patriotism stands in national matters as any such theory as this of "a dual nationality"- love of family does in private life. Nationalism which, incidentally, is a self-evident absurdity. corresponds to the love a man bears for his (Metropolitan, June 1915.) Mem. Ed. XX, 438; Nat. Ed. XVIII, 375. wife and children. Internationalism corresponds to the feeling he has for his neighbors generally. NATIONALITY. See also ALLEGIANCE; CΓT- The sound nationalist is the only type of really IZENSHIP. helpful internationalist, precisely as in private relations it is the man who is most devoted to NATIONALS-PROTECTION OF. See IN- his own wife and children who is apt in the TERVENTION. long run to be the most satisfactory neighbor. To substitute internationalism for nationalism NATURAL GAS. See MINERAL FUELS. means to do away with patriotism, and is as vicious and as profoundly demoralizing as to NATURAL HISTORY. The time has passed put promiscuous devotion to all other persons when we can afford to accept as satisfactory a in the place of steadfast devotion to a man's science of animal life whose professors are own family. (Lafayette Day exercises, New either mere roaming field collectors or mere York City, September 6, 1918.) Mem. Ed. XXI, closet catalogue writers who examine and record 410; Nat. Ed. XIX, 372. minute differences in "specimens" precisely as I heartily favor true interna- philatelists examine and record minute differ- tionalism as an addition to, but never as sub- ences in postage-stamps-and with about the stitute for, a fervid and intensely patriotic na- same breadth of view and power of insight tionalism. I will gladly back any wise and into the essential. Little is to be gained by that honest effort to create a league of nations, but kind of "intensive" collecting and cataloguing only on condition that it is treated as an addi- which bears fruit only in innumerable little tion to, and not as a substitute for, the full pamphlets describing with meticulous care un- preparedness of our own strength for our own important new sub-species, or new "species" defense. (October I5, 1918.) Roosevelt in the hardly to be distinguished from those already Kansas City Star, 231. long known. (Introduction to Tropical Wild Life in British Guiana by William Beebe and NATIONALISM VERSUS PARTICULAR- others; dated December 10, 1916.) Mem. Ed. ISM. The minute that the spirit which finds its XIV, 521; Nat. Ed. XII, 386. healthy development in local self-government, and is the antidote to the dangers of an extreme NATURAL HISTORY - ROOSEVELT'S centralization, develops into mere particularism, INTEREST IN. I can no more explain why into inability to combine effectively for achieve- I like "natural history" than why I like Cali- ment of a common end, then it is hopeless to fornia canned peaches; nor why I do not care expect great results. Poland and certain repub- for that enormous brand of natural history which lics of the Western Hemisphere are the stand- deals with invertebrates any more than why I ard examples of failure of this kind; and the do not care for brandied peaches. All I can say United States would have ranked with them, is that almost as soon as I began to read at all I and her name would have become a byword began to like to read about the natural history of derision, if the forces of union had not of beasts and birds and the more formidable or triumphed in the Civil War. (At Oxford Uni- interesting reptiles and fishes. (American Mu- versity, England, June 7, 1910.) Mem. Ed. seum Journal, May 1918.) Mem. Ed. VI, 443; XIV, 86; Nat. Ed. XII, 42. Nat. Ed. V, 384. NATIONALISM. See. also ALLEGIANCE; NATURAL HISTORY-TEACHING OF. AMERICAN PEOPLE; AMERICANISM; BIG STICK; I don't believe for a minute that some of these CITIZENSHIP; INDEPENDENCE SPIRIT; INTER- men who are writing nature stories and putting NATIONALISM; LOYALTY; NEW NATIONALISM; the word "truth" prominently in their prefaces PATRIOTISM; STATES' RIGHTS. know the heart of the wild things. Neither do 368] HISTORY NATURAL HISTORY NATURALISTS ought not of every I believe that certain men who, while they may intelligence with which our natural resources are as sacred say nothing specifically about truth, do claim used. It is equally clear that these resources are States attention as realists because of their animal the final basis of national power and perpetuity. and stories, have succeeded in learning the real se- Finally, it is ominously evident that these re- the laws crets of the life of the wilderness. They don't sources are in the course of rapid exhaustion. knowledge know, or if they do know, they indulge in the (At Conference on the Conservation of Natural wildest exaggeration under the mistaken notion Resources, Washington, May I3, 1908.) Mem. absurdity. that they are strengthening their stories. Ed. XVIII, 162; Nat. Ed. XVI, 123. Ed. XX, As for the matter of giving these books to the children for the purpose of teaching them the NATURAL RESOURCES. See also CON- facts of natural history-why, it's an outrage. SERVATION; FOREST; GAME; INLAND WATER- CIT- If these stories were written as fables, published WAYS; IRRIGATION; PUBLIC LANDS; RECLAMA- as fables, and put into the children's hands as TION; SOIL CONSERVATION; WATER POWER; fables, all well and good. As it is, they are WILD LIFE. See IN- read and believed because the writer not only says they are true, but lays stress upon his NATURAL SELECTION. See PROGRESS. pledge. There is no more reason why the chil- dren of the country should be taught a false NATURALISTS. Nowadays the field natural- natural history than why they should be taught ist-who is usually at all points superior to the a false physical geography. (Everybody's Maga- mere closet naturalist-follows a profession as passed full of hazard and interest as that of the ex- sfactory a zine, June 1907.) Mem. Ed. VI, 424; Nat. Ed. V, 367. plorer or of the big-game hunter in the remote are wilderness. He penetrates to all the out-of-the- or mere record NATURAL HISTORY. See also, NATURAL- way nooks and corners of the earth; he is nd ISTS; NATURE STUDY; SCIENCE. schooled to the performance of very hard work, recisely as to the endurance of fatigue and hardship, to differ- about the NATURAL RESOURCES If in a given com- encountering all kinds of risks, and to grappling insight munity unchecked popular rule means unlimited with every conceivable emergency. In conse- by that waste and destruction of the natural resources- quence he is exceedingly competent, resourceful taloguing soil, fertility, water-power, forests, game, wild and self-reliant, and the man of all others to little life generally-which by right belong as much trust in a tight place. (1910.) Mem. Ed. V, un- to subsequent generations as to the present gen- 402; Nat. Ed. IV, 346. care "species" eration, then it is sure proof that the present The outdoor naturalist, the already generation is not yet really fit for self-control; faunal naturalist, who devotes himself primarily Wild that it is not yet really fit to exercise the high to a study of the habits and of the life histories Beebe and and responsible privilege of a rule which shall of birds, beasts, fish, and reptiles, and who can Mem. Ed. be both by the people and for the people. The portray truthfully and vividly what he has seen, term "for the people" must always include the could do work of more usefulness than any people unborn as well as the people now alive, mere collector, in this upper Paraguay country. or the democratic ideal is not realized. (1916.) The work of the collector is indispensable; but why Mem. Ed. IV, 228; Nat. Ed. III, 378. it is only a small part of the work that ought to Cali- be done; and after collecting has reached a cer- not care The steadily increasing drain tain point the work of the field observer with on which natural resources has promoted to an the gift for recording what he has seen becomes why I extraordinary degree the complexity of our in- of far more importance. (1914.) Mem. Ed. VI, I dustrial and social life. Moreover, this unex- can say 7I; Nat. Ed. V, 60. at all I ampled development has had a determining ef- history fect upon the character and opinions of our Specialization, like every other or people. The demand for efficiency in the great good thing, can be carried to excess; and no Mu- task has given us vigor, effectiveness, decision, forms of specialization are less desirable than VI, and power, and a capacity for achievement which those which make of the outdoor naturalist a 443; in its own lines has never yet been matched. So mere collector of "specimens," and of the in- great and so rapid has been our material growth door naturalist a mere laborious cataloguer and OF. that there has been a tendency to lag behind in describer of these specimens when collected. of these spiritual and moral growth; but that is not the The outdoor naturalist ought to be able to do all putting subject upon which I speak to you to-day. Dis- the indoor work too; and he ought to have the prefaces regarding for the moment the question of moral power to see and to portray the life histories of do purpose, it is safe to say that the prosperity of the shy creatures of the far-off wilderness. our people depends directly on the energy and But it is well if he can go even beyond this. [369] NATURALISTS NATURE STORIES No man leads a hardier or more adventurous NATURE-JOY IN. The lack of power to life than the collecting naturalist whose quest take joy in outdoor nature is as real a misfortune takes him to the uttermost parts of the earth. as the lack of power to take joy in books. Out- He works in the wildest lands, and on the shift- look, September 23, 1911, P. 162. ing borders where the raw outskirts of civiliza- tion merge into savagery. He works with the NATURE. See also ADVENTURE; BOOK-LOV- wild men of the forest and the desert, and with ERS; OUTDOOR LIFE; WILD LIFE; WILDERNESS. the men only one degree less wild who do the most primitive work of civilization on the NATURE FAKERS. The modern "nature- borders of the forest and the desert. If he has faker" is of course an object of derision to every eyes to see he will have many a tale to tell; and scientist worthy of the name, to every real lover if he can tell it aright the tale becomes an addi- of the wilderness, to every faunal naturalist, to tion to that shelf of true stories of adventure every true hunter or nature-lover. But it is evi- in strange lands which is so fascinating a part dent that he completely deceives many good of the great library of worth-while literature. people who are wholly ignorant of wild life. (American Museum Journal, December 1918.) Sometimes he draws on his own imagination Mem. Ed. XIV, 525; Nat. Ed. XII, 389. for his fictions; sometimes he gets them second- hand from irresponsible guides or trappers or NATURALISTS. See also BEEBE, WILLIAM; Indians. (Everybody's Magazine, September BURROUGHS, JOHN; MUIR, JOHN; NATURE 1907.) Mem. Ed. VI, 435; Nat. Ed. V, 377. FAKERS; SCIENCE; SELOUS, F. C.; SOUTH AMERICA. I wish to express my hearty appreciation of your warfare against the sham NATURE. It is an incalculable added pleasure nature-writers-those whom you have called to any one's sum of happiness if he or she grows "the yellow journalists of the woods." From the to know, even slightly and imperfectly, how to days of Aesop to the days of Reinecke Fuchs, read and enjoy the wonder-book of nature. and from the days of Reinecke Fuchs to the (1905.) Mem. Ed. III, 313; Nat. Ed. III, 124. present time, there has been a distinct and at- tractive place in literature for those who write NATURE - HARSHNESS OF. The very avowed fiction in which the heroes are animals pathetic myth of "beneficent nature" could not with human or semihuman attributes. This fic- deceive even the least wise being if he once saw tion serves a useful purpose in many ways, even for himself the iron cruelty of life in the tropics. in the way of encouraging people to take the Of course "nature"- common parlance a right view of outdoor creatures; but it is un- wholly inaccurate term, by the way, especially pardonable for any observer of nature to write when used as if to express a single entity-is fiction and then publish it as truth, and he who entirely ruthless, no less so as regards types than exposes and wars against such action is entitled as regards individuals, and entirely indifferent to respect and support. (To John Burroughs, to good or evil, and works out her ends or no October 2, 1905. Preface to Outdoor Pastimes ends with utter disregard of pain and woe. of an American Hunter.) Mem. Ed. III, xxix; (1914.) Mem. Ed. VI, 142; Nat. Ed. V, I2I. Nat. Ed. II, 390. Death by violence, death by Once more let me say that cold, death by starvation-these are the normal if the fairy-tale mark were put on the stories endings of the stately and beautiful creatures of of these writers, criticism would pass. Appar- the wilderness. The sentimentalists who prattle ently, however, they wish to be known as teach- about the peaceful life of nature do not realize ers, or possibly they have a feeling of pride that its utter mercilessness; although all they would springs from the belief that their readers will have to do would be to look at the birds in the think of them as of those who have tramped the winter woods, or even at the insects on a cold wilds and met nature in its gentleness and in its morning or cold evening. Life is hard and cruel fierceness face to face. (Everybody's Magazine, for all the lower creatures, and for man also in June 1907.) Mem. Ed. VI, 430; Nat. Ed. V, what the sentimentalists call a "state of nature." 372. The savage of today shows us what the fancied age of gold of our ancestors was really like; it NATURE STORIES. The preservation of the was an age when hunger, cold violence, and useful and beautiful animal and bird life of the iron cruelty were the ordinary accompaniments country depends largely upon creating in the of life. (1910.) Mem. Ed. V, 196; Nat. Ed. IV, young an interest in the life of the woods and 169. fields. If the child mind is fed with stories [ 370 ] STORIES NATURE STUDY NAVAL ARMAMENTS of power to that are false to nature, the children will go to invent them. (Everybody's Magazine, September a misfortune the haunts of the animal only to meet with dis- 1907.) Mem. Ed. VI, 434-435; Nat. Ed. V, books. Out- appointment. The result will be disbelief, and 376. the death of interest. The men who misinter- pret nature and replace facts with fiction, undo NATURE STUDY AND PHOTOGRAPHY. Book-Lov- the work of those who in the love of nature The photographer plays an exceedingly valua- WILDERNESS. interpret it aright. (Everybody's Magazine, June able part in nature study, but our appreciation 1907.) Mem. Ed. VI, 432; Nat. Ed. V, 374. of the great value of this part must never lead "nature- us into forgetting that as a rule even the best to every NATURE STUDY. The great book of nature photograph renders its highest service when real lover contains many pages which are hard to read, treated as material for the best picture, instead naturalist, to and at times conscientious students may well of as a substitute for the best picture; and that But it is evi- draw different interpretations of the obscure the picture itself, important though it is, comes many good and least-known texts. It may not be that either entirely secondary to the text in any book worthy of wild life. observer is at fault, but what is true of an ani- of serious consideration either from the stand- imagination mal in one locality may not be true of the same point of science or the standpoint of literature. them second- animal in another, and even in the same local- Of course this does not mean any failure to trappers or ity two individuals of the same species may appreciate the absolute importance of photo- September differ widely in their traits and habits. (1905.) graphs; what I desire is merely that we V, 377. Mem. Ed. III, I22; Nat. Ed. II, 495. ,keep in mind, when books are treated seriously, the relative values of the photograph, the pic- my hearty The ordinary naturalist, if he ture, and the text. (1910; Appendix of African the sham goes into the haunts of the big game, is apt to Game Trails.) Mem. Ed. VI, 375-376; Nat. have called find numerous small animals of interest, and Ed. V, 323-324. From the he naturally devotes an altogether disproportion- einecke Fuchs, ate share of his time to these. Yet such time is NATURE STUDY. See also NATURAL HIS- Fuchs to the almost wasted; for the little animals, and es- TORY; SCIENCE. and at- pecially the insects and small birds, remain in who write NAVAL ACADEMY. See ANNAPOLIS; WEST the land long after the big game has vanished, are animals POINT. and can then be studied at leisure by hosts of This fic- observers. The observation of the great beasts NAVAL ARMAMENTS. I don't want this ways, even of the marsh and the mountain, the desert and to take the country to lead the race for big ships, but it the forest, must be made by those hardy adven- seems to me well nigh criminal for us to fall but it is un- turers, who, unless explorers by profession, are behind. I think the ship provided for last year to write almost certainly men to whom the chase itself and he who and the ship to be provided for this year, two is a dominant attraction. (Foreword to F. C. entitled in all, should be at least eighteen thousand tons is Selous' African Nature Notes and Reminis- apiece. Japan's new battleship, the Satsuma, is Burroughs, cences; dated May 23, 1907.) Mem. Ed. XIV, of this size, which is the Dreadnaught size. I do Pastimes 485; Nat. Ed. XII, 356. Ed. not think we can afford to take any chances III, xxix; with our navy. (To Congressman Foss, Decem- Undoubtedly wild creatures ber 19, 1906.) Thomas A. Bailey, Theodore sometimes show very unexpected traits, and in- that Roosevelt and the Japanese-American Crisis. me say dividuals among them sometimes perform fairly on the stories (Stanford University Press, 1934), P. 120. startling feats or exhibit totally unlooked-for pass. Appar- sides of their characters in their relations with I should like to see the British hown as teach- one another and with man. We much need a full Navy kept at its present size but only on condi- of pride that study and observation of all these animals, un- tion that the Continental and Japanese Navies readers will dertaken by observers capable of seeing, under- are not built up. I do not wish to see it relatively tramped the standing, and recording what goes on in the weaker to them than is now the case. As regards and in its wilderness; and such study and observation our own Navy, I believe in number of units it Magazine, cannot be made by men of dull mind and is now as large as it need be, and I should Nat. Ed. V, limited power of appreciation. The highest type advocate merely the substitution of efficient for of student of nature should be able to see keenly inefficient units. This would mean allowing for and write interestingly and should have an about one new battleship a year, and of course ervation of the imagination that will enable him to interpret now and then for a cruiser, collier, or a few life of the the facts. But he is not a student of nature at all torpedo-boat destroyers. (To Reid, August 7, reating in the who sees not keenly but falsely, who writes 1906.) Royal Cortissoz, The Life of Whitelaw the woods and interestingly and untruthfully, and whose imag- Reid. (Charles Scribner's Sons, N. Y., 1921), with stories ination is used not to interpret facts but to II, 343. [37±] Grant/Cawley November 13, 1990 8:00 a.m. A:CLEANAIR PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: CLEAN AIR BILL SIGNING CEREMONY THE ROSE GARDEN? East room THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 1990 TIME? 2:30 30 ( (Acknowledgements) ) Although the Thanksgiving holiday is still a week away, today is truly a red-letter day for this Administratives tration and add a long awarted and long meeded for all Americans. For today we sign Landmark legislation in chapter America's environmental history -- and begin a new era for clean air. /// I first made a commitment to comprehensive clean air legislation as a Presidential candidate. Then, early in the Administration, I called together Republicans and Democrats, business executives and conservationists X to make a point: it was time to break the logjam that has hindered progress on clean air for thirteen years. We decided that to get a solution, we needed to apply more It was time to enlist than just federal leverage We must take advantage of the innovation, energy and ingenuity of every American -- to create a national sense of commitment to conservation. And so I told our best minds, assembled that morning a year and a half ago, this: "Every American expects and deserves to breathe clean air. And as President, it is my mission to guarantee it: for this generation, and for generations to come.' " ) the 1000m 2 Well, as we used to say in the Navy, "Mission defined. Mission accomplished. "// Today, I am proud to sign andmone This legislation will pull 56 billion pounds of pollution each year from the air -- that's 224 pounds for every man, woman and child in America. It will go after the three main causes of air pollution: acid rain, smog and toxic air pollutants. This bill will cut emissions that cause acid rain in half -- by 10 million tons -- and permanently cap them at these new levels. It will reduce pollutants that cause smog in our cities -- by 40 percent -- so that by the year 2000, over one hundred major American cities will have clean, healthy air. It will cut dangerous air toxics emissions by up to 90 percent using new technologies. And over the next decade, its alternative fuel provisions will reduce our dependence on foreign oil by at least 800,000 barrels of oil a day. // This bill means cleaner cars, cleaner power plants, cleaner news for Averica. factories and cleaner fuels for generations to come. And the benefits of this Clean Air bill will affect virtually every person in every city and town in America. / / This legislation isn't just the biggest environmental bill of our Administration. This is simply the most significant air pollution legislation in our nation's history. // My hope is that 1990 will be known as a milestone year for the environment. I also hope that it will be known as an important year for environmental cooperation. ((I heard that the 3 fact that such sweeping change was decided outside of the courts was a big disappointment to several D.C. law firms.) ) mony Wething, Paler, There was one man who led the way, through thick and thin, seeing that this bill got to my desk: EPA Director William Reilly. What a great job he did. // Rog. And I'd also like to thank the Congressmen and Senators, na from both sides of the aisle; the Governors and the local governments who were all so instrumental in building bipartisan support for this legislation. We've met with business leaders, who saw stewardship to the environment as a key to long-term economic growth; and we've met with academics and innovative problem-solvers from every side, who have built the foundation for this approach. Let me also commend Project '88, and groups like the ? Environmental Defense Fund ( (and others)) for bringing creativity help to the table to end the stalemate. We all had to make tough choices. And while some said we went too far -- others said not far enough. But despite our differences, we all care about clean air. And we all agreed: it was time to take a new approach. And so, the bill is as ambitious in its goals as it is innovative in its methods. For the first time, we've moved away from the red- tape bureaucratic approach of the past -- not with over- regulation but with better regulation. These standards are tough ones, but they employ market-oriented strategies -- using industry to the advantage of the environment -- to enact 4 efficient, effective legislation. Now we know: we can establish a new kind of environmentalism, one where a sound ecology and a strong economy go hand in hand. // This bill is balanced. it seeks major pollution reductions, Dicks where we most need them, first. The approach is comprehensive, cost-effective, and most of all, it will work. For example the legislation sets reasonable deadlines for but those who must comply, and once the deadlines pass, penalties are S.B. severe It offers incentives, choice and flexibility for industry to find the best solutions -- all in the context of continued economic growth. This bill contains an emissions trading plan in order to allow reduction targets to be met at a fraction of the cost it would have been otherwise. In short, it taps the power of the marketplace and the community -- better But class more than any other environmental bill in history / And so there is a new breeze blowing -- a new current of concern for the environment. We see it in community efforts and school involvement across America. And we're seeing it in the innovative response of private industry. Take a look at the Arco, Marathon and Exxon stations offering cleaner fuels. Earlier this month Amoco opened a new alternative fuels service station right down Pennsylvania Avenue here in Washington. We're seeing compressed natural gas vehicles from GM, as well as flexible fueled vehicles from GM and Ford, and we look forward to Ford's electric vehicles in the near future. These companies understand: We must pioneer new technology, find new solutions, 5 to and envision new horizons if we are build a bright future and a better America for our children. We must -- and we will. // I've said many times, when talking âbout other issues like fighting the flow of drugs or stopping the menace of crime, that the most fundamental obligation of the government is to protect the people -- their health, their safety, and their ideals and values. One of the greatest conservationists of this century and perhaps my favorite President, Theodore Roosevelt, understood this. He called our lands and wildlife "the property of unborn generations." This clean air bill will mark a new chapter in the tradition of protecting future generations. That's where you come in. Everyone with us today has made a commitment to a cleaner and safer world for our children. For that, I thank each and every one of you -- for your expertise, your dedication and for your sacrifice over the many months that went into the passage of this legislation. With that said, I am now honored to sign this Clean Air bill into law. Thank you and God bless you all. ((Sign bill.)) # # # Asides Greens Dump on Bush 'F,' so he's moving up a little bit." It's getting harder by the day to The president of the Wilderness Soci- take the environmental establishment ety: This is his one and only signifi- seriously. Yesterday President Bush cant environmental achievement and signed the expensive and expansive he certainly is not entitled to take sole Clean Air Bill. Here's the president of credit for it. A Greenpeace spokes- Friends of the Earth: "If I had to man says Mr. Bush 'delivered less of grade him, I'd have to give him a low the goods than any President:' Envi 'D.' A year ago, I'd have given him an ronmentalists to Bush: Drop Dead. & OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET 90 OCT 14 P4: 00 FAX COVER SHEET Number of pages (excluding cover sheet): Date: TO: Cicconi, WINSTON, PORTER, ROGER Fax Number: manykaye Crant, Stave Hart, Barry McBee Telephone: FROM: BoB GRADY Fax Number: Telephone: Time: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: FYI SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 111-14-90 DRAFT REILLY PRESS STATEMENT The following statement was issued by EPA Administrator William K. Reilly today following the President's signing of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990: "During his 1988 campaign, the President vowed to amend the Nation's clean air laws, saying that "every American expects and deserves to breathe clean air. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, signed into law today, triumphantly fulfill that pledge. Through his leadership, the President broke the 13-year clean air stalemate by submitting an innovative, market-based bill which will achieve the Nation's environmental goals in the most effective manner. "The benefits of this bill are enormous. Acid rain emissions will be cut almost in half; 30 million tons of toxic chemicals will be prevented from fouling the air every year; and all areas of the country will finally have the means to attain air quality standards on a realistic schedule. As a result, air toxics risk will be slashed by three-quarters, and health problems will be reduced significantly, including cancer risk, respiratory disease, heart ailments, and reproductive disorders. Damage to lakes, streams, parks, and forests, as well as harm to buildings, monuments, and other structures, will also be slowed or stopped. One of the most dramatic effects will be an increase in visibility: people will be able to see farther from Maine to Georgia, where sulfates are responsible for half the haze. As a final bonus, oil imports will be reduced significatly, enhancing our energy security. "These sorely needed benefits will, of course, not be achieved for free. Significant costs are involved, and these costs highlight the importance of the innovative, market-based features the President proposed, and which the Congress accepted in the final bill signed today. These features assure that the bill's benefits will be achieved at the lowest possible cost to the Nation. They include the acid rain allowance trading program, which fosters least-cost pollution reductions; the clean-fuel credit trading and emissions trading programs, which allow refiners and automakers to meet requirements at least cost; fees on smog- causing emissions which promote efficiency and pollution prevention; and incentives for early reductions which will accelerate the achievement of environmental benefits. It was the attractiveness of these innovative features that helped the President break the clean air logjam, and it is these features that will allow us the achieve the environmental goals of this bill in a way the country can live with economically. "As the sheer size of the final printed bill indicates, this highly complex legislation was hammered out over many months -- indeed, many years -- and is the culmination of hard and dedicated work by many people both in and outside the government. I commend all who played a part in making this bill a reality. The SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 President's pathbreaking initiative was coordinated by the White House working group under the direction of Roger Porter, Assistant to the President for Economic and Domestic Policy; key participants included Boyden Gray, legal counsel to the President; Richard Schmallensee, of the President's Council of Economic Advisors; Robert Grady, of the Office of Management and Budget; John Schmidt, legal counsel; Linda Stuntz, Department of Energy; and Teresa Gorman, Special Assistant to the President for Policy Development. "Special thanks go to William G. Rosenberg for managing EPA's role. Many of the ideas behind the President's original proposal stem from over five years of planning by EPA, including staff from the Office of Air and Radiation, the Office of General Counsel, the Office of Congressional Affairs, the Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, and the Office of Enforcement. Ideas also came from other agencies, including the Department of Justice and the Department of Energy, as well as from outside groups, notably including the Clean Air Coalition and the Environmental Defense Fund. The President's initiative reflects the EPA staff experience in working with these new ideas; the result, which is preserved largely intact in the bill signed today, is a tribute to the willingness of these experienced staff to adapt to the President's innovative, market-based policy direction, and to use the new ideas to craft a dramatic advance in the course of environmental regulation. "Turning the President's initiative into finished legislation was an enormous task, and was achieved only through the hard work of the Congress, ably led by Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell and Senate Minority Leader Bob Dole, and by Speaker of the House Tom Foley and Congressman Bob Michel, House Minority Leader. Without the extraordinary efforts of the key members -- Senators Burdick, Baucus, Chafee, and Simpson, and Congressmen Dingell, Lent, Waxman and Madigan -- and their staffs, working literally thousands of hours during conference committee alone -- the impossible task of reconciling the various interests could not have been achieved. The final result is a law which will undoubtedly serve as a model for regulatory reform across the board, leading to the widespread use of market approaches here and abroad. "we now begin the big job of achieving the goals mandated by this landmark legislation. As we move toward full implementation, we can be proud to know we are working to fulfill the President's pledge: that every American shall breathe clean air. WHITE HOUSE STAFFING REQUEST Subject: Presidential Ceremony Remarks: Clean Air Bill Signing Date/Time Received: RESPONSE DUE: Wed. 11/14 11/13 5:30 P.M. 11:00 A.M. Response due to Director's Office Support Group, Room 254, Ext. 3060. Please respond to every staffing request, even if you have no comment. Distribution Within OMB Action FYI Action FYI Director Hodsoll, F. Deputy Director Howard, R. Legis. Affairs Al-Samarrie, A. Lieberman, S. Anderson, B. MacRae, J. Burman, A. Martin, B. Dale, E. Murr, J. Damus, R. Scully, T. Grady, R. Hale, J. Other Comments: Copies to : Murr Cicconi Chriss Winston in ASAP PR 00 Mugkate Grant FINAL ACTION TAKEN: pl DATE: Document No. 190403 WHITE HOUSE STAFFING MEMORANDUM 11/13/90 11/14/90 DATE: ACTION/CONCURRENCE/COMMENT DUE BY: PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: CLEAN AIR BILL SIGNING CEREMONY SUBJECT: (11/13 3:00 p.m. draft) ACTION FYI ACTION FYI VICE PRESIDENT MCCLURE SUNUNU NEWMAN SCOWCROFT PORTER DARMAN ROGICH CARD UNTERMEYER CICCONI > ROGERS DEMAREST PINKERTON FITZWATER DELAND GRAY WINSTON HAGIN FIRESTONE HOLIDAY REMARKS: Please provide any comments/recommendations directly to Chriss Winston by NOON on Wednesday, 11/14, with a copy to my office. Thanks/ RESPONSE: James W. Cicconi Assistant to the President and Deputy to the Chief of Staff Ext. 2702 Sound bites 'Grant/Cawley/Simon November 13, 1990 3:00 p.m. 90 NOV 13 Pil 4: 01 A:CLEANAIR PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: CLEAN AIR BILL SIGNING CEREMONY THE EAST ROOM THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 1990 2:30 P.M. ((Acknowledgements)) Ambassador Although Thanksgiving is still a week away, today is truly a red-letter day for all Americans. Today, we add a long-awaited and long-needed chapter in America's environmental history -- and begin a new era for clean air. // This last weekend, I spent a few days in the Catoctin Mountains of Maryland, at Camp David. Saturday and Sunday were clear and crisp -- bright sunshine and fall colors. Great to get out in the woods, and go for a run. " Pumped a little iron on the Arnold Schwarzenegger Memorial Leg Press. " But no American should have to drive to the top of a mountain to breathe clean air. Every city in America should have air as clean as a, step toward we are taking the decisive mountaintop. And with this legislation, I'm hoping we will.// clean air for all Americans. I first made a commitment to comprehensive clean air legislation as a Presidential candidate. Then, early in the Administration, I called together Republicans and Democrats, business executives and conservationists to make a point: it was time to break the logjam that hindered progress on clean air for thirteen years. It was time to enlist the innovation, energy and ingenuity of every American -- to create a national sense of commitment to conservation. 2 And so I told our best minds, assembled that morning a year and a half ago, this: "Every American expects and deserves to breathe clean air. And as President, it is my mission to guarantee it: for this generation, and for generations to come." Well, as we used to say in the Navy, "Mission defined. Mission accomplished. Today, I am proud to sign the Clean Air Encellent' Act of 1990. 11 This landmark legislation will pull 56 billion pounds of pollution each year from the air -- that's 224 pounds for every man, woman and child in America. It will go after the three main causes of air pollution: acid rain, smog and toxic air pollutants. This bill will cut emissions that cause acid rain in half -- by 10 million tons -- and permanently cap them at these new levels. It will reduce pollutants that cause smog in our cities -- by 40 percent -- so that by the year 2000, over one hundred major American cities will have clean, healthy air. It will cut dangerous air toxics emissions by up to 90 percent using new technologies. And over the next decade, its alternative fuel provisions will reduce our dependence on foreign oil. by at least 800,000 barrels of oil a day. // This bill means cleaner cars, cleaner power plants, cleaner factories and cleaner fuels -- this bill is good news for America. And the benefits of this Clean Air bill will affect virtually every person in every city and town in America. 11 It restores America's place as the global leader in environmental protection with this bill, we will have the cleanest cars, the cleanest tuels, deanest power plants, and cleanest factor ies in the world- 3 This legislation isn't just the biggest environmental bill environmental of our Administration. This is simply the most significant air protection/ pollution legislation in our nation's history. 11 My hope is that 1990 will be known as a milestone year for the environment. I also hope that it will be known as an important year for environmental cooperation. There were several members of my Administration who who saw to it, through thick and thin, that this bill got to my desk: EPA Director William Reilly, Energy Secretary Watkins, and my domestic policy advisor, Roger Porter What a great job they did. // BK: Boyden S BiH Rosenberg fromsPA. Mitchell Dingell And I'd also like to thank the Congressmen and Senators, Dole Laut from both sides of the aisle ((names?) As well as the Bancys Shorp charles Waxman Governors and the local governments who were all so instrumental Madigas ster Bundlick + in building bipartisan support for this legislation. We ve met so with business leaders, who saw stewardship to the environment as many others a key to long-term economic growth; and we've met with academics and their and innovative problem-solvers from every side, who have built Clean Air Condition No Env.Def Fund -URDC Fred Krupp7 NO fine staffs. BK: garoups the foundation for this approach Let me also commend environments for bringing creativity to the table to end the stalemate. we we'de We all had to make tough choices. And while some said we mer went too far -- others said not far enough. But despite our with we agreed the goal: clean are for aM Americans- We agreed du the means: a new Chan differences, we all care about clean air Air Act. Al we agreed on the result 6:41 that ends the stalemate and creates the solution. And We all agreed: it was time to take a new approach. And that so, the bill is as ambitious in its goals as it is innovative in 4 its methods. For the first time, we've moved away from the red- tape bureaucratic approach of the past -- not with over- regulation but with better regulation. These standards are tough ones, but they employ market-oriented strategies, using The acid rain trading industry system heRalds to the a new advantage era in environmental of the environment one That to havness enact the power of the marketplace in the savice of the environment. efficient, effective legislation. Now we know: we can establish a new kind of environmentalism, one where a sound ecology and a strong economy go hand in hand. // The approach is comprehensive, cost-effective, and most of all, it will work. It seeks major pollution reductions, where we most need them, first. It offers incentives, choice and flexibility for industry to find the best solutions -- all in the context of continued economic growth. This bill contains an emissions trading plan in order to allow reduction targets to be met at a fraction of the cost it would have been otherwise. In short, it taps the power of the marketplace and the community -- better than any other The bill is balanced it will stimulate the VX of environmental bill in history // natural gas from the welk of Texas to Louisiana fuels made from the farms of Iowa, Illinois, the great Midnest, and cleaner low But it does more. The legislation sets reasonable deadlines sulfur coal from for those who must comply, but once the deadlines pass, penalties The (15air) destroy it; hills of are severe. Because America is too precious for us to turn our America's future IV for bright for vs to cloud it. Wert Viginia backs on those who think otherwise. Polluters must pay. // to the And so there is a new breeze blowing -- a new current of Rody. Movetain concern for the environment. We see it in community efforts and states. school involvement across America. And we're seeing it in the This bill can make the innovative response of private industry. Take a look at the America global leader in developing a new generation of environmental technologies to which the world is now turning. 5 Arco, Marathon and Exxon stations offering cleaner fuels. Earlier this month Amoco opened a new alternative fuels service station right dewn Pennsylvania Avenue here in Washington. We're seeing compressed natural gas vehicles from GM, as well as flexible fueled vehicles from GM and Ford, and we look forward to Ford's electric vehicles in the near future. These companies understand: We must pioneer new technology, find new solutions, and envision new horizons if we are to build a bright future and a better America for our children. We must -- and we will. // I've said many times, when talking about other issues like everthing from dwas to crime to our national security fighting the flow of drugs or stopping the menace of crime, that the most fundamental obligation of the government is to protect the people -- their health, their safety, and their ideals and values. One of the greatest conservationists of this century and perhaps my favorite President, Theodore Roosevelt, understood this. He called our lands and wildlife "the property of unborn generations." This clean air bill will mark a new chapter in the tradition of protecting future generations. That's where you come in. Everyone with us today has made a commitment to a cleaner and safer world for our children. For that, I thank each and every one of you -- for your expertise, your dedication and for your sacrifice over the many months that went into the passage of this legislation. With that said, I am now honored to sign this Clean Air bill into law. Thank you and God bless you all. # # # 5 It offers incentives, choice and flexibility for industry to find the best solutions -- all in the context of continued economic growth. The bill is balanced -- it will stimulate the use of natural gas from the wells of Texas and Louisiana, fuels made from the farms of Iowa, Illinois and the great Midwest, and cleaner, low-sulfur coal from the hills of West Virginia to the Rocky Mountain states. This bill can make America the global leader in developing a new generation of environmental technologies to which the world is now turning. But it does more. The legislation sets reasonable deadlines for those who must comply, but once the deadlines pass, penalties are severe. America's heritage is precious. We will not turn our backs or look the other way. That means polluters must pay.// And so there is a new breeze blowing -- a new current of concern for the environment. Today marks a great victory for the environment, a day when we have strengthened our clean air statutes -- already the world's toughest. This legislation is not only in America's interest; like so many of the environmental issues that we are working on, this bill is in the interest of people all over the world. And the new environmental ethos is growing. We see it in community efforts and school involvement across America. And we're seeing it in the innovative response of private industry - - in alternative fuel service stations and electric vehicles. These companies understand: We must pioneer new technology, find Nov. 15 / Administration of George Bush, 1990 rector of the Governor's commission for Thanksgiving is still a week away, but I new techi women in Austin, TX. Prior to this, she has believe this really is a true red-letter da its altern. participated in many civic and political ac- for all Americans. Today we add a long by educe ou tivities in Austin, TX, including cochairman awaited and long-needed chapter in our en- bill mean of Family Community Leadership, commu- vironmental history, and we begin a new plants, cle nity adviser for the Austin Junior League, era for clean air. and it me member of the Task Forces on Displaced This last weekend, I spent some pleasant every pers Homemakers and Childsave, and adviser for hours up at Camp David. Saturday and will enjoy j the Governor's committee for disabled per- Sunday really were fantastic-clear and This legi sons, 1987. crisp and beautiful, bright sunshine and of our env Ms. Wallace attended the University of those magnificent fall colors. And it was the most si Texas at Austin. She was born March 1, great to get out in the woods. But no Amer- in our natic 1926, in Okmulgee, OK. Ms. Wallace re- ican should have to drive out of town to ica's place sides in Austin, TX. breath clean air. Every city in America mental prot should have clean air. And with this legisla- Nineteen tion, I firmly believe we will. for the envi I first made a commitment to compre- be rememl hensive clean air legislation when I was environmen Remarks on Signing the Bill Amending running for this job, and soon after coming several mer the Clean Air Act into office, we developed a comprehensive saw to it, tl November 15, 1990 clean air proposal. I think we did have con- bill got to Administrat sultation in the best spirit with the Demo- Thank you all very much. Thank you so cratic leadership and with the Republican of Energy. I much for being here. I would first like to Staff worked leadership in the Congress, with environ- welcome the Ambassador from Canada, our Porter did a mentalists and with representatives of in- friend, Derek Burney, who represents, I dustry, because I believed, and I think we in and day think, by being here, his countrymen's con- all felt, that it was time for a new approach gress. Boyde cern for our common environment. It was time to break the logjam that hi Grady and S It is a pleasure to have several of our great job on dered progress on clean air for 13 years And I also Cabinet here today: of course, Secretary And so, I told our best minds, assembled Senators and Lujan here, Interior; and Jim Watkins; as that morning a year and a half ago, every both sides of well as Bill Reilly, the Administrator of EPA American expects and deserves to breathe us today, and [Environmental Protection Agency]. Susan clean air. And as President, it is my mission couldn't be Engeleiter is here. Also, Madeleine, I want to guarantee it for this generation and for cause of lack to welcome you-Governor Kunin, the the generations to come. many are SC: Governor of Vermont, is with us today who Well, as we used to say in the Navy: Mis- list is too lons has a big stake in all of this, and welcome. sion defined, mission accomplished. Today I the Hill that I also want to welcome the leaders from am very proud on behalf of everyone here just want to the Senate side: the majority leader, Sena- to sign this clean air bill-Clean Air Act of and the other tor Mitchell, who has always had a keen 1990. your commits interest in this, and of course, Bob Dole, This landmark legislation will reduce air as the Gover Republican leader-both with us today. And pollution each year by 56 billion pounds- experts from of course, if I get singling out all the Mem- that's 224 pounds for every man, woman, also instrument bers who are here of Congress, I'll be here and child in America. It will go after the support for th all day. And I'm just glad you all are here. three main types of air pollution: acid rain, We met WI The Speaker and others, unfortunately, smog, and toxic air pollutants. This bill will stewardship " couldn't be here-majority and minority cut emissions that cause acid rain in half long-term ect leader. But we have many of the committee and permanently cap them at these new with academi leaders that worked the hardest here. I'll levels. It will reduce pollutants that cause solvers from get in trouble, but I see John Dingell, and I smog in our cities by 40 percent, so that by build the found want to thank him and so many others. the year 2000, over 100 major American I want to Please let's stop there. Let me just welcome cities with poor air quality will have safe groups that We the Members of Congress who have done so healthier air. And it will cut dangerous a onmental Del much on all of this. toxics emissions by over 75 percent, using ship of Fred h 1822 Administration of George Bush, 1990 / Nov. 15 new technologies. And by the next decade, to the table to end what could have been a its alternative fuel provisions will help hopeless stalemate. educe our dependence on foreign oil. This We all had tough choices to make. Some bill means cleaner cars, cleaner power said we went too far; others said we didn't plants, cleaner factories, and cleaner fuels; go far enough. But despite our differences, and it means a cleaner America. Virtually we all agreed on the goal: clean air for all every person in every city and every town Americans. We agreed on the means: a new will enjoy its benefits. Clean Air Act. This legislation isn't just the centerpiece And we all agreed it was time to take a of our environmental agenda. It is simply new approach. This bill is both ambitious in the most significant air pollution legislation its goals and innovative in its methods. For in our nation's history, and it restores Amer- the first time, we've moved away from the ica's place as the global leader in environ- mental protection. redtape bureaucratic approach of the past. The old tradition of command and control Nineteen ninety is now a milestone year for the environment. I also hope that it will regulation is not the answer. By relying on be remembered as an important year for the marketplace, we can achieve the ambi- environmental cooperation. There were tious environmental goals we have as a several members of my administration who country in the most efficient and cost-effec- saw to it, through thick and thin, that this tive way possible. We'll have to take advan- bill got to my desk: Bill Reilly, the EPA tage of the innovation, energy, and ingenui- Administrator; Jim Watkins, the Secretary ty of every American, drawing local com- of Energy. From my own staff, our Chief of munities and the private sector into the Staff worked tirelessly-John Sununu. Roger cause. It's time for a new kind of environ- Porter did an outstanding job, working day mentalism, driven by the knowledge that a in and day out with the Members of Con- sound ecology and a strong economy can gress. Boyden Gray-the same thing. Bob coexist. Grady and so many others. And they did a The approach in this bill balances eco- treat job on this. nomic growth and environmental protec- And I also want to thank once again the tion. The approach is comprehensive, cost- Senators and Members of Congress from effective; and most of all, it will work. The both sides of the aisle. Many of you are with first major pollution reductions are where us today, and as I mentioned earlier, others we need them most. It offers incentives, couldn't be with us today. But it isn't be- choice, and flexibility for industry to find cause of lack of interest. Congress is out; the best solutions, all in the context of con- many are scattered to the winds. But the tinued economic growth. The bill is bal- list is too long to single out everybody from anced: It will stimulate the use of natural the Hill that worked on this. But again, I gas from the wells of Texas and Louisiana; just want to thank you that are here today and fuels made from the farms of Iowa, and the others who couldn't be with us for Illinois, the great Midwest; and cleaner, your commitment and dedication-as well low-sulfur coal from the hills of West Vir- as the Governors, the Governors and the ginia to the Rocky Mountain States. This bill experts from local governments who were can make America the global leader in de- also instrumental in building true bipartisan veloping a new generation of environmen- support for this legislation. tal technologies to which the world is now We met with business leaders who saw turning. stewardship to the environment as a key to But it does more. The legislation sets rea- long-term economic growth. And we met sonable deadlines for those who must with academics and innovative problem- comply; but once deadlines go by, once solvers from every side who have helped they pass, the penalties are severe. Ameri- build the foundation for this approach. can heritage is precious. We will not turn I want to commend the environmental our backs or look the other way. That groups that we've met with, like the Envi- means polluters must pay. And so, there is a onmental Defense Fund, under the leader- new breeze blowing, a new current of con- ship of Fred Krupp, for bringing creativity cern for the environment. Today marks a 1823 Nov. 15 / Administration of George Bush, 1990 great victory for the environment, a day ral Resources, Energy and Science at the when we have strengthened our clean air Office of Management and Budget. S. 1630 W. The inno statutes, already the world's toughest. This approved November 15, was assigned in the bill I' legislation is not only in America's interest; Public Law No. 101-549. dipage in ou like so many of the environmental issues problems in that we are working on, this bill is in the lowance tra interest of people all over the world. large-scale re And the new environmental ethos is tives and is growing. We see it in community efforts Statement on Signing the Bill for regulato and in school involvement across America, Amending the Clean Air Act abroad. The and we're seeing it in the innovative re- November 15, 1990 some simple sponse of private industry-in alternative tough standa) fuel service stations, electric vehicles. These Today I am signing S. 1630, a bill to how to meet companies understand we must pioneer amend the Clean Air Act. I take great markets help new technology, find new solutions, envi- pleasure in signing S. 1630 as a demonstra- ciently. sion new horizons if we're to build a bright tion to the American people of my determi- By employi future and a better America for our chil- nation that each and every American shall most environ dren. breathe clean air. dollar spent, There's an old saying: "We don't inherit In July of 1989, I sent to the Congress a groundwork I the Earth from our parents. We borrow it proposal to amend the Clean Air Act of ernment regu from our children." We have succeeded 1970. My proposal was designed to improve patible with today because of a common sense of global our ability to control urban smog and only the comi stewardship, a sense that it is the Earth that reduce automobile and air toxic emissions, of the past. endures and that all of us are simply hold- and to provide the enforcement authority flexibility incl ing a sacred trust left for future genera- necessary to make the law work. It also pro- for emissions tions. For the sake of future generations, I posed new initiatives to cut acid rain in half standards for again thank each and every one of you for and to promote cleaner automotive fuels. ternative fuel your commitment to our precious environ- As a result of that proposal, the 13-year path-breaking ment. I am now honored to sign this clean legislative logjam has now been broken. S. Ament the legis! air bill into law. 1630 contains all of the essential features of my environme Thank you all who have worked so hard cost. The resul my original proposal and will lead to the for this day to become possible. Thank you, achievement of the goals I originally set new era in regi and God bless all of you. on the market 1 out. The bill I am signing today will perma- and the econon [At this point, the President signed the bill.] nently reduce sulfur dioxide emissions by 10 million tons below 1980 levels. It will cut To address th Maybe we could have the symbolism-I NO, emissions by two million tons from the cost of thi don't think there's any protocol, but if I projected year 2000 levels and reduce air Bill Reilly, Adi could just invite the front row here to come toxic emissions by over 75 percent. mental Protect up with Members of Congress, we'd at least this bill in the show that this is an across-the-board-[ap- The bill will allow the Nation finally to possible. This plause}— meet air quality standards in every city; can continue " Please, go in peace. This symbolism- and, in total, almost 30 million tons per netting to the " we've omitted some real fine movers and year of dangerous chemicals and noxious law; that the shakers there, but again, my thanks to all of pollutants will be prevented from fouling policy on WEP you. Thank you all for being with us. the air. extent allowed b. The result of this new Clean Air Act will and that the per Note: The President spoke at 2:32 p.m. in be that cancer risk, respiratory disease, over time in the East Room at the White House. In his heart ailments, and reproductive disorders manner. This remarks, he referred to Susan S. Engeleiter, will be reduced; damage to lakes, streams, Administrator of the Small Business Ad- parks, crops, and forests will greatly be less- pursue the use of ened; and visibility will be notably im- when estimating ministration; Representative John D. Din- gell; Roger B. Porter, Assistant to the Presi- proved. As an added benefit, energy securi- tion strategies 11 dent for Economic and Domestic Policy; C. ty will on balance be enhanced as utilities costs and job los Boyden Gray, Counsel to the President; and and automobiles switch to cleaner burning the achievement Robert Grady, Associate Director for Natu- alternative fuels. of this bill in the sible. 1824 CLEAN AIR BILL SIGNING CEREMONY \ THE EAST ROOM THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 1990 \ 2:30 P.M. THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH. I'D LIKE TO WELCOME THE AMBASSADOR FROM CANADA, DEREK BURNEY, WHO REPRESENTS HIS COUNTRYMEN'S CONCERN FOR OUR COMMON ENVIRONMENT. IT'S A PLEASURE TO HAVE TWO OF MY CABINET MEMBERS HERE TODAY: SECRETARIES LUJAN AND WATKINS; AS WELL AS ADMINISTRATORS REILLY AND ENGELEITER. ALSO, I SEE GOVERNOR MADELEINE KUNIN OF VERMONT IS HERE. - 1A - I'D LIKE TO WELCOME MAJORITY LEADER MITCHELL AND REPUBLICAN LEADER DOLE, AS WELL AS THE LEADERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEES THAT WORKED so HARD ON THIS LEGISLATION. - 2 - ALTHOUGH THANKSGIVING IS STILL A WEEK AWAY, TODAY IS TRULY A RED-LETTER DAY FOR ALL AMERICANS. TODAY, WE ADD A LONG-AWAITED AND LONG-NEEDED CHAPTER IN AMERICA'S ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY -- AND BEGIN A NEW ERA FOR CLEAN AIR. // THIS LAST WEEKEND, I SPENT SOME PLEASANT HOURS IN THE CATOCTIN MOUNTAINS OF MARYLAND, AT CAMP DAVID. SATURDAY AND SUNDAY WERE CLEAR AND CRISP -- BRIGHT SUNSHINE AND FALL COLORS. CLEAN AIR BILL SIGNING CEREMONY \ THE EAST ROOM THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 1990 \ 2:30 P.M. THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH. I'D LIKE TO WELCOME THE AMBASSADOR FROM CANADA, DEREK BURNEY, WHO REPRESENTS HIS COUNTRYMEN'S CONCERN FOR OUR COMMON ENVIRONMENT AND THEIR PLEASURE THAT AMERICA HAS ENACTED THIS HISTORIC AGREEMENT INTO LAW. IT'S A PLEASURE TO HAVE SEVERAL MEMBERS OF THE CABINET HERE: SECRETARIES LUJAN AND WATKINS; AS WELL AS ADMINISTRATORS REILLY AND ENGELEITER. ALSO, I SEE GOVERNOR MADELEINE KUNIN OF VERMONT IS HERE. - 2 - AGAIN, WELCOME. ALTHOUGH THANKSGIVING IS STILL A WEEK AWAY, TODAY IS TRULY A RED-LETTER DAY FOR ALL AMERICANS. TODAY, WE ADD A LONG-AWAITED AND LONG- NEEDED CHAPTER IN AMERICA'S ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY -- AND BEGIN A NEW ERA FOR CLEAN AIR. // THIS LAST WEEKEND, I SPENT SOME PLEASANT HOURS IN THE CATOCTIN MOUNTAINS OF MARYLAND, AT CAMP DAVID. SATURDAY AND SUNDAY WERE CLEAR AND CRISP -- BRIGHT SUNSHINE AND FALL COLORS. - 3 - GREAT TO GET OUT IN THE WOODS, AND GO FOR A RUN. (( PUMPED A LITTLE IRON ON THE ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER MEMORIAL LEG PRESS. )) BUT NO AMERICAN SHOULD HAVE TO DRIVE OUT OF TOWN TO BREATHE CLEAN AIR. EVERY CITY IN AMERICA SHOULD HAVE CLEAN AIR. AND WITH THIS LEGISLATION, WE WILL.// I FIRST MADE A COMMITMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE CLEAN AIR LEGISLATION AS A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE. SOON AFTER COMING INTO OFFICE, WE DEVELOPED A COMPREHENSIVE CLEAN AIR PROPOSAL. - 4 - WE CONSULTED WITH REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS IN THE CONGRESS, WITH ENVIRONMENTALISTS AND WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF INDUSTRY, BECAUSE I BELIEVED IT WAS TIME FOR A NEW APPROACH. AND IT WAS TIME TO BREAK THE LOGJAM THAT HINDERED PROGRESS ON CLEAN AIR FOR THIRTEEN YEARS. - 5 - AND so I TOLD OUR BEST MINDS, ASSEMBLED THAT MORNING A YEAR AND A HALF AGO: "EVERY AMERICAN EXPECTS AND DESERVES TO BREATHE CLEAN AIR. AND AS PRESIDENT, IT IS MY MISSION TO GUARANTEE IT: FOR THIS GENERATION, AND FOR GENERATIONS TO COME." WELL, AS WE USED TO SAY IN THE NAVY, "MISSION DEFINED. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. "// TODAY, I AM PROUD TO SIGN THE CLEAN AIR AcT OF 1990. // - 6 - THIS LANDMARK LEGISLATION WILL REDUCE AIR POLLUTION EACH YEAR BY 56 BILLION POUNDS -- THAT'S 224 POUNDS FOR EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD IN AMERICA. IT WILL GO AFTER THE THREE MAIN TYPES OF AIR POLLUTION: ACID RAIN, SMOG, AND TOXIC AIR POLLUTANTS. THIS BILL WILL CUT EMISSIONS THAT CAUSE ACID RAIN IN HALF -- AND PERMANENTLY CAP THEM AT THESE NEW LEVELS. - 7 - IT WILL REDUCE POLLUTANTS THAT CAUSE SMOG IN OUR CITIES -- BY 40 PERCENT -- so THAT BY THE YEAR 2000, OVER ONE HUNDRED MAJOR AMERICAN CITIES WITH POOR AIR QUALITY WILL HAVE SAFER, HEALTHIER AIR. AND IT WILL CUT DANGEROUS AIR TOXICS EMISSIONS BY OVER 75 PERCENT USING NEW TECHNOLOGIES. AND BY THE NEXT DECADE, ITS ALTERNATIVE FUEL PROVISIONS WILL HELP REDUCE OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN OIL. - 8 - THIS BILL MEANS CLEANER CARS, CLEANER POWER PLANTS, CLEANER FACTORIES AND CLEANER FUELS -- THIS BILL MEANS A CLEANER AMERICA. VIRTUALLY EVERY PERSON IN EVERY CITY AND EVERY TOWN WILL ENJOY ITS BENEFITS. // THIS LEGISLATION ISN'T JUST THE CENTERPIECE OF OUR ENVIRONMENTAL AGENDA. IT IS SIMPLY THE MOST SIGNIFICANT AIR POLLUTION LEGISLATION IN OUR NATION'S HISTORY -- AND IT RESTORES AMERICA'S PLACE AS THE GLOBAL LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. - 9 - 1990 IS NOW A MILESTONE YEAR FOR THE ENVIRONMENT. I ALSO HOPE THAT IT WILL BE REMEMBERED AS AN IMPORTANT YEAR FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION. THERE WERE SEVERAL MEMBERS OF MY ADMINISTRATION WHO SAW TO IT, THROUGH THICK AND THIN, THAT THIS BILL GOT TO MY DESK: EPA ADMINISTRATOR WILLIAM REILLY, ENERGY SECRETARY WATKINS, AND FROM MY STAFF, ROGER PORTER AND BOYDEN GRAY. WHAT A GREAT JOB THEY DID. // Bob grady John Summu - 10 - I ALSO WANT TO THANK THE MANY SENATORS AND MEMBERS OF CONGRESS FROM BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE -- MANY OF YOU ARE HERE TODAY, OTHERS COULDN'T BE WITH US -- BUT THE LIST IS TOO LONG TO RECOGNIZE EACH OF YOU PERSONALLY. So AGAIN, THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMITMENT AND DEDICATION -- AS WELL AS THE GOVERNORS AND THE EXPERTS FROM LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WHO WERE ALL so INSTRUMENTAL IN BUILDING BIPARTISAN SUPPORT FOR THIS LEGISLATION. - 11 - WE'VE MET WITH BUSINESS LEADERS, WHO SAW STEWARDSHIP TO THE ENVIRONMENT AS A KEY TO LONG-TERM ECONOMIC GROWTH; AND WE'VE MET WITH ACADEMICS AND INNOVATIVE PROBLEM- SOLVERS FROM EVERY SIDE, WHO HAVE BUILT THE FOUNDATION FOR THIS APPROACH. LET ME ALSO COMMEND THE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS WE'VE MET WITH -- LIKE THE ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF FRED KRUPP -- FOR BRINGING CREATIVITY TO THE TABLE TO END THE STALEMATE. - 12 - WE ALL HAD TO MAKE TOUGH CHOICES. SOME SAID WE WENT TOO FAR -- OTHERS SAID NOT FAR ENOUGH. BUT DESPITE OUR DIFFERENCES, WE ALL AGREED ON THE GOAL: CLEAN AIR FOR ALL AMERICANS. WE AGREED ON THE MEANS: A NEW CLEAN AIR AcT. AND WE ALL AGREED: IT WAS TIME TO TAKE A NEW APPROACH. THIS BILL IS BOTH AMBITIOUS IN ITS GOALS AND INNOVATIVE IN ITS METHODS. - 13 - FOR THE FIRST TIME, WE'VE MOVED AWAY FROM THE RED-TAPE BUREAUCRATIC APPROACH OF THE PAST. THE OLD TRADITION OF COMMAND AND CONTROL REGULATION ISN'T THE ANSWER. BY RELYING ON THE MARKETPLACE WE CAN ACHIEVE THE AMBITIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS WE HAVE AS A COUNTRY IN THE MOST EFFICIENT, COST-EFFECTIVE WAY POSSIBLE. WE WILL HAVE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE INNOVATION, ENERGY, AND INGENUITY OF EVERY AMERICAN -- DRAWING LOCAL COMMUNITIES AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR INTO THE CAUSE. - 14 - IT IS TIME FOR A NEW KIND OF ENVIRONMENTALISM -- DRIVEN BY THE KNOWLEDGE THAT A SOUND ECOLOGY AND A STRONG ECONOMY CAN COEXIST. THE APPROACH IN THIS BILL BALANCES ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. THE APPROACH IS COMPREHENSIVE, COST-EFFECTIVE, AND MOST OF ALL, IT WILL WORK. THE FIRST MAJOR POLLUTION REDUCTIONS ARE WHERE WE NEED THEM MOST. - 15 - IT OFFERS INCENTIVES, CHOICE AND FLEXIBILITY FOR INDUSTRY TO FIND THE BEST SOLUTIONS -- ALL IN THE CONTEXT OF CONTINUED ECONOMIC GROWTH. THE BILL IS BALANCED -- IT WILL STIMULATE THE USE OF NATURAL GAS FROM THE WELLS OF TEXAS AND LOUISIANA, FUELS MADE FROM THE FARMS OF IOWA, ILLINOIS AND THE GREAT MIDWEST, AND CLEANER, LOW-SULFUR COAL FROM THE HILLS OF WEST VIRGINIA TO THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN STATES. - 16 - THIS BILL CAN MAKE AMERICA THE GLOBAL LEADER IN DEVELOPING A NEW GENERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES TO WHICH THE WORLD IS NOW TURNING. BUT IT DOES MORE. THE LEGISLATION SETS REASONABLE DEADLINES FOR THOSE WHO MUST COMPLY, BUT ONCE THE DEADLINES PASS, PENALTIES ARE SEVERE. AMERICA'S HERITAGE IS PRECIOUS. WE WILL NOT TURN OUR BACKS OR LOOK THE OTHER WAY. THAT MEANS POLLUTERS MUST PAY.// - 17 - AND SO THERE IS A NEW BREEZE BLOWING -- A NEW CURRENT OF CONCERN FOR THE ENVIRONMENT. TODAY MARKS A GREAT VICTORY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, A DAY WHEN WE HAVE STRENGTHENED OUR CLEAN AIR STATUTES -- ALREADY THE WORLD'S TOUGHEST. THIS LEGISLATION IS NOT ONLY IN AMERICA'S INTEREST; LIKE so MANY OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES THAT WE ARE WORKING ON, THIS BILL IS IN THE INTEREST OF PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD. - 18 - AND THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL ETHOS IS GROWING. WE SEE IT IN COMMUNITY EFFORTS AND SCHOOL INVOLVEMENT ACROSS AMERICA. AND WE'RE SEEING IT IN THE INNOVATIVE RESPONSE OF PRIVATE INDUSTRY -- IN ALTERNATIVE FUEL SERVICE STATIONS AND ELECTRIC VEHICLES. THESE COMPANIES UNDERSTAND: WE MUST PIONEER NEW TECHNOLOGY, FIND NEW SOLUTIONS, AND ENVISION NEW HORIZONS IF WE ARE TO BUILD A BRIGHT FUTURE AND A BETTER AMERICA FOR OUR CHILDREN. - 19 - THERE'S AN OLD SAYING: "WE DON'T INHERIT THE EARTH FROM OUR PARENTS. WE BORROW IT FROM OUR CHILDREN." WE HAVE SUCCEEDED TODAY BECAUSE OF A SENSE OF GLOBAL STEWARDSHIP, A SENSE THAT IT IS THE EARTH THAT ENDURES. AND THAT ALL OF US ARE SIMPLY HOLDING A SACRED TRUST LEFT FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS. Chat Seattic - 20 - FOR THE SAKE OF FUTURE GENERATIONS, I THANK EACH AND EVERY ONE OF YOUR FOR YOUR COMMITMENT TO THE ENVIRONMENT. I AM NOW HONORED TO SIGN THIS CLEAN AIR BILL INTO LAW. THANK YOU AND GOD BLESS YOU ALL. # # # Grant/Cawley/Simon November 14, 1990 9:00 p.m. A:CLEANAIR PRESIDENTIAL REMARKS: CLEAN AIR BILL SIGNING CEREMONY THE EAST ROOM THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 1990 2:30 P.M. Thank you all very much. I'd like to welcome the Ambassador from Canada, Derek Burney, who represents his countrymen's concern for our common environment and their pleasure that America has enacted this historic agreement into law. It's a pleasure to have several members of the Cabinet here: Secretaries Lujan and Watkins; as well as Administrators Reilly and Engeleiter. Also, I see Governor Madeleine Kunin of Vermont is here. Again, welcome. Although Thanksgiving is still a week away, today is truly a red-letter day for all Americans. Today, we add a long-awaited and long-needed chapter in America's environmental history -- and begin a new era for clean air. // This last weekend, I spent some pleasant hours in the Catoctin Mountains of Maryland, at Camp David. Saturday and Sunday were clear and crisp -- bright sunshine and fall colors. Great to get out in the woods, and go for a run. (( Pumped a little iron on the Arnold Schwarzenegger Memorial Leg Press. )) But no American should have to drive out of town to breathe clean air. Every city in America should have clean air. And with this legislation, we will. 11 I first made a commitment to comprehensive clean air legislation as a Presidential candidate. Soon after coming into office, we developed a comprehensive clean air proposal. We 2 consulted with Republicans and Democrats in the Congress, with environmentalists and with representatives of industry, because I believed it was time for a new approach. And it was time to break the logjam that hindered progress on clean air for thirteen years. And so I told our best minds, assembled that morning a year and a half ago: "Every American expects and deserves to breathe clean air. And as President, it is my mission to guarantee it: for this generation, and for generations to come." Well, as we used to say in the Navy, "Mission defined. Mission accomplished. // Today, I am proud to sign the Clean Air Act of 1990. // This landmark legislation will reduce air pollution each year by 56 billion pounds -- that's 224 pounds for every man, woman and child in America. It will go after the three main types of air pollution: acid rain, smog, and toxic air pollutants. This bill will cut emissions that cause acid rain in half -- and permanently cap them at these new levels. It will reduce pollutants that cause smog in our cities -- by 40 percent -- so that by the year 2000, over one hundred major American cities with poor air quality will have safer, healthier air. And it will cut dangerous air toxics emissions by over 75 percent using new technologies. And by the next decade, its alternative fuel provisions will help reduce our dependence on foreign oil. 3 This bill means cleaner cars, cleaner power plants, cleaner factories and cleaner fuels -- this bill means a cleaner America. Virtually every person in every city and every town will enjoy its benefits. // This legislation isn't just the centerpiece of our environmental agenda. It is simply the most significant air pollution legislation in our nation's history -- and it restores America's place as the global leader in environmental protection. 1990 is now a milestone year for the environment. I also hope that it will be remembered as an important year for environmental cooperation. There were several members of my Administration who saw to it, through thick and thin, that this bill got to my desk: EPA Administrator William Reilly, Energy Secretary Watkins, and from my staff, Roger Porter and Boyden Gray. What a great job they did. // I also want to thank the many Senators and Members of Congress from both sides of the aisle -- many of you are here today, others couldn't be with us -- but the list is too long to recognize each of you personally. So again, thank you for your commitment and dedication -- as well as the Governors and the experts from local governments who were all so instrumental in building bipartisan support for this legislation. We've met with business leaders, who saw stewardship to the environment as a key to long-term economic growth; and we've met with academics and 4 innovative problem-solvers from every side, who have built the foundation for this approach. Let me also commend the environmental groups we've met with -- like the Environmental Defense Fund, under the leadership of Fred Krupp -- for bringing creativity to the table to end the stalemate. We all had to make tough choices. Some said we went too far -- others said not far enough. But despite our differences, we all agreed on the goal: clean air for all Americans. We agreed on the means: a new Clean Air Act. And we all agreed: it was time to take a new approach. This bill is both ambitious in its goals and innovative in its methods. For the first time, we've moved away from the red-tape bureaucratic approach of the past. The old tradition of command and control regulation isn't the answer. By relying on the marketplace we can achieve the ambitious environmental goals we have as a country in the most efficient, cost-effective way possible. We will have to take advantage of the innovation, energy, and ingenuity of every American -- drawing local communities and the private sector into the cause. It is time for a new kind of environmentalism -- driven by the knowledge that a sound ecology and a strong economy can coexist. The approach in this bill balances economic growth and environmental protection. The approach is comprehensive, cost- effective, and most of all, it will work. The first major pollution reductions are where we need them most. 6 new solutions, and envision new horizons if we are to build a bright future and a better America for our children. There's an old saying: "We don't inherit the Earth from our parents. We borrow it from our children." We have succeeded today because of a sense of global stewardship, a sense that it is the Earth that endures. And that all of us are simply holding a sacred trust left for future generations. For the sake of future generations, I thank each and every one of your for your commitment to the environment. I am now honored to sign this Clean Air bill into law. Thank you and God bless you all. # # #