Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
415892582
label
200th Anniversary, Bill of Rights, Montpelier, Virginia, 12/16/91 [OA 8332] [3]
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
415892582
contentType
document
title
200th Anniversary, Bill of Rights, Montpelier, Virginia, 12/16/91 [OA 8332] [3]
identifierLocal
13786-013
collections
Records of the White House Office of Speechwriting (George H. W. Bush Administration)
Speech Backup Chronological Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
415892582
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
fe81d2fc321719c4
ocrText
Originally Processed With FOIA(s): FOIA Number: S S FOIA MARKER This is not a textual record. This is used as an administrative marker by the George Bush Presidential Library Staff. Record Group/Collection: George H.W. Bush Presidential Records Collection/Office of Origin: Speechwriting, White House Office of Series: Speech File Backup Files Subseries: Chron File, 1989-1993 OA/ID Number: 13786 Folder ID Number: 13786-013 Folder Title: 200th Anniversary, Bill of Rights, Montpelier, Virginia, 12/16/91 [OA 8332] [3] Stack: Row: Section: Shelf: Position: G 26 22 1 4 1791 III 1991 200TH ANNIVERSARY THE BILL OF RIGHTS BACKGROUND VIRGINIA'S ROLE IN THE FIGHT FOR OUR BILL OF RIGHTS From 1775 to 1791, many great patriots worked long and hard to establish the government of the United States of America-dedicated statesmen from all of the original states worked to form a democratic republic. But no state's influence surpassed Virginia's in developing and passing the Constitution and the first 10 amendments which comprise the Bill of Rights. In 1776, Virginia was the first state to protect fundamental liberties with a written document-the Virginia Declaration of Rights. It became the model used by other states which adopted similar bills of rights during and immediately after the Revolutionary War and for the Bill of Rights added to the U.S. Constitution in 1791. Author of the Virginia Declaration of Rights was George Mason, who as a delegate to the Constitutional Convention, refused to sign the new Constitution because it did not contain a bill of rights to protect individual freedoms. -more- PHILIP MORRIS COMPANIES INC. KRAFT GENERAL FOODS MILLER BREWING COMPANY PHILIP MORRIS USA 120 PARK AVENUE NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017 (212) 880-5000 Virginia's Role/Page 2 George Washington, leader of the Colonial forces during the Revolutionary War, president of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, and first president of the United States, urged Congress to pass a bill of rights in his first inaugural address. Thomas Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence, called for a bill of rights while serving as U.S. ambassador to France. But no national leader was more important in securing a bill of rights than James Madison. Madison, the "Father of the Constitution," drafted Washington's first inaugural address calling for a bill of rights. Madison, a member of the first House of Representatives, also wrote the congressional response to Washington's address, agreeing that a bill of rights should be added. Madison distilled the numerous suggestions made by state constitutional ratification conventions, strengthened the language, and introduced the articles which ultimately were ratified by the states as the Bill of Rights. Indeed, every provision in the Bill of Rights is based directly on Madison's original draft. After more than two years, on December 15, 1791-now known as "Bill of Rights Day"-Virginia was the 11th and final state needed to ratify the Bill of Rights-the first 10 amendments to our Constitution. -30- 1791 III 1991 200TH ANNIVERSARY THE BILL OF RIGHTS BILL OF RIGHTS FACTS 1. New Jersey was the first state to ratify the Bill of Rights. The state ratified Articles 1 and 3-12 on November 20, 1789. 2. The adoption of the Bill of Rights required the ratification of 11 states. On December 15, 1791, Virginia provided the margin of victory. 3. In a letter to his son, George Mason wrote that he "would sooner chop off his right hand than put it to the Constitution as it now stands," referring to the lack of a "bill of rights" as a part of the Constitution. 4. The federal copy of the Bill of Rights was stored at the State Department from 1814 until 1938, when it was transferred to the National Archives. The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were not housed in the Archives until 1952. 5. Only five states ratified all twelve amendments of the Bill of Rights. They were Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Vermont, and Virginia. 6. Articles 1 and 2 failed to receive the necessary approval for ratification. Article 1 would have required that there be at least one representative in Congress for every 50,000 people in the United States. That would give today's Congress about 5,000 members. Article 2 would have required that no salary raise for members of the House of Representatives and the Senate could take effect until after the next election for Congress. -more- PHILIP MORRIS COMPANIES INC. KRAFT GENERAL FOODS MILLER BREWING COMPANY PHILIP MORRIS USA 120 PARK AVENUE NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017 (212) 880-5000 Bill of Rights Facts/Page 2 7. In August of 1814, while the United States was again at war with Great Britain, Secretary of State James Monroe ordered an emergency removal of the Bill of Rights, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution as British forces approached Washington. The documents and other records were packed in linen bags and transported by wagon across the Potomac River to Virginia, where they were hidden overnight in an old gristmill. The next day, while the troops attacked the capital city, the Bill of Rights and other documents were carried thirty-five miles west to Leesburg, Virginia, and stored there for several weeks until after the British left Washington; the papers were then returned to the city. 8. Three states-Massachusetts, Connecticut and Georgia-did not ratify the Bill of Rights until the celebration of the sesquicentennial of the Constitution in 1939. 9. During World War II, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were stored at Ft. Knox in Kentucky to ensure their safety. The Bill of Rights, however, remained at the National Archives. 10. In 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt proclaimed December 15 as Bill of Rights Day. Administration of George Bush, 1991 / May 10 Defense for Nomination of Quincy Mellon Krosby So, how lovely today it is, though. And I e Pentagon, To Be United States Alternate view this degree as a very high honor from Ambassador Executive Director of the International an institution for which I have unlimited 9-1980, and Monetary Fund respect. It is a great privilege for Barbara nascus, Syria, May 9, 1991 and me to be up with you today. I hear the reau was a rites of spring over my shoulder out there, geria, 1973- The President today announced his inten- but it wouldn't be normal in my job if we capacities in tion to nominate Quincy Mellon Krosby, of didn't hear those rites chanting out there. nd Morocco. New York, to be U.S. Alternate Executive But I hope I bring peace and tranquility to the Foreign Director of the International Monetary your campus because you bring great joy to Fund for a term of 2 years. She would suc- our heart, my formerly fibrillating heart. uated from ceed Charles S. Warner. Thank you very much. d Harvard Dr. Krosby currently serves as Assistant as born July Secretary for Export Enforcement at the Note: The President spoke at 10:35 a.m. in erved in the Department of Commerce in Washington, the faculty room of Nassau Hall. He is mar- DC. Prior to this she was an economic offi- cer and energy attaché for the U.S. Embas- sy in London, England. Dr. Krosby graduated from the University Remarks at Dedication Ceremony of of Minnesota, receiving a bachelor of arts the Social Sciences Complex at degree and a master of arts degree, and the Princeton University in Princeton, New London School of Economics, receiving a Jersey doctoral degree in 1979. She was born May 10, 1991 e Sophos August 3, 1948, in New York, NY. She is ary of the married, has five children, and resides in Thank you all very much. Thank you. Washington, DC. Please be seated. It's a great pleasure to be here. President Shapiro, your words were so kind that my heart almost went back into I his inten- fibrillation. [Laughter] I salute you, sir, and Sophos, of I thank you for the honor bestowed on me. Remarks Upon Receiving an Honorary ecretary of To Governor Florio; and to the Members Degree From Princeton University in fairs. She of the United States Congress that are here Princeton, New Jersey Upon con- today; to Mrs. Shapiro, and the board of May 10, 1991 trustees; to Chairman Henderson; Dean to desig- Williamson; Associate Dean Morrow. And ry of the Thank you all very much. This is indeed I'd also like to salute Princeton's former for me an honor. And the last time, save Presidents Goheen and Bowen. And I'm de- S Deputy one, that I was on this campus, I was not lighted to help dedicate this impressive Affairs at treated quite so hospitably. [Laughter] It complex. Prior to was out at the baseball diamond, I think in Though I must say that I'm glad that this ent rela- 1948. Crowded along the first baseline-it is May and not the first snowfall. I don't own and was very hostile, the way it worked in think Barbara would let me take place in vas assist- Princeton-were a bunch of hyperventilat- your special brand of Olympics. [Laughter] nalyst for ing, celebrating alumni. Seriously, I'm honored to receive an hon- IS for the And I remember standing there at first orary degree from Princeton. Imagine: a d legisla- base, and a gigantic tiger-I think his name son of Yale getting a Princeton degree. e budget was Neil Zundel-came to the plate. He "Son of Yale"; you can snicker, but you m Loef- lofted an easy fly towards Yale's first base- ought to hear what they call me in Wash- man, me. And as I reached for the ball, the ington. [Laughter] guy just sheer bowled me over-[laugh- Governor Florio's comments brought zer Col- ter]-to the cheers of the Princeton alumni. back JFK's words when he said how lucky I 1976). [Laughter] was to have a Princeton degree, and I agree ard, CA. I was hurt, my pride was hurt. But p.s., with him. You remember what JFK said, on, DC. Yale won the ball game. [Laughter] and I'll paraphrase it: I have the best of all 589 May 10 / Administration of George Bush, 1991 worlds: a Princeton degree and a Yale edu- prefer to work cooperatively with it wher- cation. [Laughter] I knew that would not ever possible. Though I felt after studying thrill the band, but you did a great job on the question that I had the inherent power "Hail To The Chief," thank you. [Laughter] to commit our forces to battle after the Well, Princeton is a great place. You U.N. resolution, I solicited congressional know, Washington said, "No college has support before committing our forces to the turned out better scholars or more estima- Gulf war. So, while a President bears special ble characters." That includes, of course, foreign policy obligations, those obligations our last two Secretaries of State. Both have do not imply any liberty to keep Congress been outstanding public servants. Both love unnecessarily in the dark. this university. But only one has a tattoo to The President's view of the whole ground prove it. [Laughter] includes a second responsibility: shaping the I'll always remember the time that I saw Nation's domestic agenda. Presidents do the globe inside the Woodrow Wilson this by submitting annual budgets to Con- School lobby. Anywhere you touch it, you set off vibrations across the rest of its sur- gress, along with a comprehensive legisla- face. I can't think of a more appropriate tive program. symbol for this nation's role in the world. We've had our share of legislative suc- When we act, we do set off tremors across cesses. They include a budget agreement the globe. And Princeton is blessed with that reduces our borrowing requirements real expertise in the study of the Presiden- by nearly $500 billion over the next 5 years, a Clean Air Act that invokes the power of cy. And I salute Professor Fred Greenstein, the marketplace to help America breathe and it is with some temerity, therefore, that cleaner air, an Americans With Disabilities I give this talk that will touch on the Presi- Act-landmark civil rights legislation that dency. enhances the dignity of those with disabil- I'd like to talk today about an American ities, a child care bill that puts more power achievement that has inspired men and and choice in the hands of parents when it women worldwide, most recently, in East- comes to the care of their own children. ern Europe. I'm speaking of our Constitu- But Presidents may encourage change tion. In the interest of brevity, I will focus through means other than legislation. Our on the roles of the two branches of Govern- Points of Light campaign encourages the ment in which I have had the honor to traditional American virtue of private serv- serve, the legislative-Congress-and the ice. Our America 2000 Education Strate- executive departments. gy-which has been well-received across Consider the President's role. Thomas Jef- the land-involves dramatic reforms that ferson once noted that a President com- don't make dramatic new claims on taxpay- mands a view of the whole ground, while ers' earnings. It draws on people's common Congress necessarily adopts the views of its frustration with an educational system that constituents. The President and Vice Presi- simply must do better. It encourages people dent are the only officials elected to serve to use their common sense and good old the entire Nation. It is the President who is American ingenuity in creating better, rev- responsible for guiding and directing the olutionary new schools. It won't help build Nation's foreign policy. The executive a new office building in Washington, but it branch alone may conduct international ne- very well may inspire people to build a gotiations, appoint ambassadors, and con- better future for themselves and their chil- duct foreign policy. Our founders noted the dren, school by school, community by com- necessity of performing this duty with "se- munity. crecy and dispatch," when necessary. The Elsewhere, we've proposed turning pro- President also serves as Commander in grams back to States and localities. This en- Chief of our armed forces, as it was my role ables people to craft the most appropriate to do in the Persian Gulf. solution for the problems that they confront This does not mean that the Executive in this diverse land of ours. may conduct foreign business in a vacuum. The point is simple: You don't always I have a great respect for Congress, and I need to propose a new program to pursue a 590 Administration of George Bush, 1991 / May 10 national goal. Often a President can lead by voted 500 man-years and over $50 million encouraging the values of service, by help- just to write reports responding to congres- ing foster a national spirit of commitment sional queries on such items as plans for and responsibility. manning tugboats and accounting for the For too long, pundits and special interests number of bands. have equated vision with bureaucracy. I Defense staff has to respond yearly to hope one of the hallmarks of our adminis- more than 750,000 congressional staff in- tration will be its ability to encourage not quiries. Other executive agencies exhaust just good government but also a good socie- their time and energy, often giving identi- ty, one that draws upon and encourages the cal testimony to a whole battery of subcom- best instincts and ambitions and values of mittees and committees. the American people. Oversight, when properly exercised, The common thread of commitment-in- helps keep the Executive accountable. But dividual commitment-runs through all suc- when it proliferates wildly, it can confuse cessful efforts to solve our most intractable the public and make it more difficult for problems. The individual who cares, who is Congress and the President to do their jobs determined to change things for the better, can make a difference. And all of us Ameri- properly. The Chief Executive also preserves, pro- cans ought to dedicate ourselves to making tects, and defends the Constitution through a difference. While a President must take on today's the use of the veto power. Six times in my problems and tomorrow's challenges, he Presidency, I have vetoed bills that would also has an obligation to "preserve, protect, have weakened Presidential powers. In one and defend" a 200-year-old system of con- case, for instance, Congress wanted to make stitutional government. The most common the President disclose a wide variety of sen- challenge to Presidential powers comes sitive diplomatic contacts and discussions— from a predictable source, represented here as well as private discussions with the exec- by several able Members of the United utive branch-and would have threatened States Congress. to impose criminal sanctions on a. wide Although our founders never envisioned a range of normal diplomatic activities. I Congress that would churn out hundreds of noted in my veto message that: "The result thousands of pages worth of reports and would be a dangerous timidity and disarray hearings and documents and laws every in the conduct of U.S. foreign policy. Such a year, they did understand that legislators result is wholly contrary to the allocation of would try to accumulate power. James powers under the Constitution." Madison, your son-Princeton's son- Elsewhere, Congress has also taken ag- warned that, "The legislative department is gressive action against specific Presidential everywhere extending the sphere of its ac- powers, including the power to appoint or tivity, and drawing all power into it impetu- remove employees who serve at the Presi- ous vortex." That was Mr. Madison speak- dent's pleasure. It sometimes tries to ing, not President Bush speaking. manage executive branch-micromanage Sometimes this sort of competition falls the executive branch-by writing too-spe- entirely within the bounds of the Constitu- cific directions for carrying out a particular tion. But consider the unnecessary requests law. And when this happens, the President and requirements that can waste the time has a constitutional obligation to protect his and energy of the Executive. Office and to veto the legislation. In addi- Thirty years ago, we devoted nearly 9.5 tion, on many occasions during my Presi- percent of our gross national product to de- dency, I have stated that statutory provi- fense expenditures. And today, defense sions that violate the Constitution have no spending accounts for only 5.3 percent of binding legal force. our GNP. But congressional oversight has But there's another, often overlooked side grown exponentially. One hundred and of the veto power. Often vetoes encourage seven committees and subcommittees- the Legislature to reconsider its actions. 107-oversee defense programs and spend- When I vetoed a minimum wage bill-and ing. For fiscal year 1989, the Pentagon de- it wasn't an easy thing to do-I sought to 591 May 10 / Administration of George Bush, 1991 persuade Congress that a slightly lower rate the great joy is that the President serves, public would best serve the public interest. And in not just as the unitary executive, but hope- local time Congress agreed. And when Congress fully as a unifying executive. with h bundles up a series of unrelated measures As President, I. feel honor-bound to cernec and calls it a single bill, it frustrates the strengthen the marvelous system of govern- ers pr President's constitutional role in resisting ment bequeathed to us so that we may dren t: the influence of special interests: It is often remain the freest, the most decent, the care. impractical to veto a tremendous bill, a most prosperous, caring nation in the histo- Adv: major bill, especially an appropriations bill ry of the world. enable because of unrelated riders that would Thank you, and may God bless each and substar never stand a chance on their own. every one of you. And thank you for the low bii Bills of this sort can pose as much of a honor you've bestowed on me. and ea threat to Congress as to the President. And fants. it has become an annual sport for reporters Note: The President spoke at 11:25 a.m. In abled 1 to pull peculiarities out of the vast spending his remarks, he referred to president of the bills, such as a Federal grant to study cow born p university Harold Shapiro and his wife, belches, or a Lawrence Welk Museum, and ous con Vivian; James Henderson, chairman of the ask Congress to defend them. Quite often effort t executive committee of the board of direc- because of the added riders and the com- women tors of the university; Joseph Williamson, plexity of the whole bill, Members don't mortali dean of the chapel; Sue Anne Steffey even know what they've voted for. They're within Morrow, associate dean of the chapel; and so complex; things are added in the dark of Fred I. Greenstein, professor of politics and campai the night. cludes director, research program in leadership I have sought, and will continue to seek, a studies. A tape was not available for verifi- project line-item veto to prevent such embarrass- thousan cation of the content of these remarks. ments and protect the American people helping from injudicious appropriation. Right now grams 43 Governors have such a power. It works. Each The President ought to have that power, and eve too. Some believe that I already have that Proclamation 6290-Infant Mortality On this power under the Constitution. Awareness Day, 1991 nation In closing, let me try to summarize my May 10, 1991 ica rece view of the Presidency. Presidents define beginni themselves through their exercise of Presi- By the President of the United States through dential power. They must use their special of America ers. authority to serve the whole Nation in mat- The ( A Proclamation ters of foreign and domestic policy. They 194, h: must set a tone for governance, at once In the past, this Nation's high rate of "Infant leading the people, yet following their de- infant mortality has stood in tragic contra- authoriz sires. They must preserve, protect, and diction to our enviably high standard of issue a defend the Constitution. And they must en- living and to our traditional reverence for day. courage deliberative behavior on the part human life. Fortunately, however, that un- Now, of Congress. conscionable trend is changing. According dent of But the real power of the Presidency lies to the Department of Health and Human hereby in a President's ability to frame, through Services, preliminary data indicate that the Mortalit action, through example, through encour- United States infant mortality rate in 1990. cans to agement, what we as a nation must do, was 9.1 deaths per 1,000 live births-the what is required of communities and insti- lowest ever recorded and a substantial re- program. In Wi tutions, large and small, in schools and fac- duction over the past decade. tories and the hundreds of daily acts of indi- The infant mortality rate is affected by a my han of our I viduals. number of different factors, including the failure of many pregnant women to obtain one, and The great joy and challenge of the Office States of I occupy-and believe me, I am honored adequate prenatal care. Although the gov- teenth. every single day I walk into that Oval ernment cannot fulfill the primary responsi- Office by the privilege of being President— bility of parents in caring for their children, 592 133. Address on Bill of Rights Anniversary force which has long menaced the world and which now has struck deliberately and directly at the safety of the United States. 133 "Having Taken Up Arms in the Defense of Liberty, We Will Not Lay Them Down Be- fore Liberty Is Once Again Secure" - Radio Address Commemorating the 150th Anniversary of the Ratification of the Bill of Rights. December 15, 1941 Free Americans: No DATE in the long history of freedom means more to liberty- loving men in all liberty-loving countries than the fifteenth day of December, 1791. On that day, 150 years ago, a new Nation, through an elected Congress, adopted a declaration of human rights which has influenced the thinking of all mankind from one end of the world to the other. There is not a single Republic of this hemisphere which has not adopted in its fundamental law the basic principles of free- dom of man and freedom of mind enacted in the American Bill of Rights. There is not a country, large or small, on this continent and in this world which has not felt the influence of that document, directly or indirectly. Indeed, prior to the year 1933, the essential validity of the American Bill of Rights was accepted everywhere at least in prin- ciple. Even today, with the exception of Germany, Italy, and Japan, the peoples of the whole world - in all probability four- fifths of them - support its principles, its teachings, and its glori- ous results. But, in the year 1933, there came to power in Germany a political clique which did not accept the declarations of the 554 133. Address on Bill of Rights Anniversary IS American bill of human rights as valid: a small clique of ambi- tious and unscrupulous politicians whose announced and ad- mitted platform was precisely the destruction of the rights that instrument declared. Indeed the entire program and goal of these e political and moral tigers was nothing more than the overthrow, throughout the earth, of the great revolution of human liberty of which our American Bill of Rights is the mother charter. The truths which were self-evident to Thomas Jefferson - which have been self-evident to the six generations of Americans who followed him were to these men hateful. The rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness which seemed to the Found- ers of the Republic, and which seem to us, inalienable, were, to Hitler and his fellows, empty words which they proposed to can- cel forever. The propositions they advanced to take the place of Jefferson's inalienable rights were these: That the individual human being has no rights whatsoever in himself and by virtue of his humanity; That the individual human being has no right to a soul of his own, or a mind of his own, or a tongue of his own, or a trade of his own; or even to live where he pleases or to marry the woman S he loves; That his only duty is the duty of obedience, not to his God, 1 not to his conscience, but to Adolf Hitler; and that his only value is his value, not as a man, but as a unit of the Nazi state. 1 To Hitler the ideal of the people, as we conceive it - the free, self-governing, and responsible people - is incomprehensible. The people, to Hitler, are "the masses" and the highest human idealism is, in his own words, that a man should wish to become "a dust particle" of the order "of force" which is to shape the universe. To Hitler, the government, as we conceive it, is an impossible conception. The government to him is not the servant and the instrument of the people but their absolute master and the dicta- tor of their every act. To Hitler the church, as we conceive it, is a monstrosity to be 555 133. Address on Bill of Rights Anniversary destroyed by every means at his command. The Nazi church is to be the "National Church," a pagan church, "absolutely and exclusively in the service of but one doctrine, one race, one Nation." To Hitler, the freedom of men to think as they please and speak as they please and worship as they please is, of all things imaginable, most hateful and most desperately to be feared. The issue of our time, the issue of the war in which we are en- gaged, is the issue forced upon the decent, self-respecting peoples of the earth by the aggressive dogmas of this attempted revival of barbarism; this proposed return to tyranny; this effort to im- pose again upon the peoples of the world doctrines of absolute obedience, of dictatorial rule, of the suppression of truth, of the oppression of conscience, which the free Nations of the earth have long ago rejected. What we face is nothing more nor less than an attempt to over- throw and to cancel out the great upsurge of human liberty of which the American Bill of Rights is the fundamental docu- ment: to force the peoples of the earth, and among them the peoples of this continent and this Nation, to accept again the ab- solute authority and despotic rule from which the courage and the resolution and the sacrifices of their ancestors liberated them many, many years ago. It is an attempt which could succéed only if those who have inherited the gift of liberty had lost the manhood to preserve it. But we Americans know that the determination of this genera- tion of our people to preserve liberty is as fixed and certain as the determination of that early generation of Americans to win it. We will not, under any threat, or in the face of any danger, surrender the guarantees of liberty our forefathers framed for us in our Bill of Rights. We hold with all the passion of our hearts and minds to those commitments of the human spirit. We are solemnly determined that no power or combination of powers of this earth shall shake our hold upon them. 5 5 6 134. "To the President of the United States in 1956" We covenant with each other before all the world, that having taken up arms in the defense of liberty, we will not lay them down before liberty is once again secure in the world we live in. For that security we pray; for that security we act - now and evermore. NOTE: See Item 118, this volume, designating December 15, 1941 as for the President's proclamation Bill of Rights Day. 134 "To the President of the United States in 1956" - The President Writes About Colin P. Kelly, III. December 17, 1941 To the President of the United States in 1956: I AM WRITING this letter as an act of faith in the destiny of our country. I desire to make a request which I make in full con- fidence that we shall achieve a glorious victory in the war we now are waging to preserve our democratic way of life. My request is that you consider the merits of a young Ameri- can youth of goodly heritage - Colin P. Kelly, III - for appoint- ment as a Cadet in the United States Military Academy at West Point. I make this appeal in behalf of this youth as a token of the Nation's appreciation of the heroic services of his father, who met death in line of duty at the very outset of the struggle which was thrust upon us by the perfidy of a professed friend. In the conviction that the service and example of Captain Colin P. Kelly, Jr., will be long remembered, I ask for this con- sideration in behalf of Colin P. Kelly, III. 557 DEC- 9-91 MON 22:37 P.01 POWELL TATE 91 DEC 10 A7:19 A Cassidy Company TO: ROBERT SIMON FROM: CUAUDIA PETERS DATE: 12-9-91 FAX #: 202-456-6218 # OF PAGES: 1 torfollow RE: CONFIRMED CENTRAL/GASTERN ENROPEANS FOR WUNCHEAN 12/16 Bab- helpful. Thought this might be FYI: Also, Possion USSR ambessador to U.S. of press ator attache are attending (Komplektov + Oganov) Georgy If you any have don't problems knowly or questions regarding this this fax, please is contact eseful at (202) 347-6633, FAX (202) 347-8713. but - 2 'll send trabits as 2 learn them. I Prosperity Conference Travel P.02 P. Participant Title City Republic Yeghiazarian, Armen Member of the State Economic Cinte. Armenia Stepanian, Vahe Minister of Justice Annenia Ludchnikov, Svetoslav Minister of Justice Sofia Bulgaria Shentov, Ognian Rector, Ctr. for Study of Democracy Bulgaria Christov, Lubomir Bulgaria Tantchev, Eugene Dean, Sofia U. School of Law Bulgaria Kamlach, Milan Dir., Leg. Dept., Minister of Justice Czech Kamenicka, Jana Deputy to the Minister of Justice Czech Kocamik, Ivan Deputy Minister of Finance Czech/Slovak Palecka, Peter Czechoslovakia Miller, Rein Minister of Finance Tallinn Estonia Raidla, Juni Minister of Justice Tallinn Estonia Bokros, Lajos Chairman and CEO, Budapest Bank Budapest Hungary Bogdan, Tibor Deputy Minister of Justice Budapest Hungary Oros, Paulina interpreter for Dr. Bogdan Budapest Hungary Erzanov, Galichan Minister of Justice Alma-Ata Kazakhastan Juknevicius, Zenonas First Deputy Minister of Justice Lithuania Chirca, Sergiu Professor, Doctor in Economics Chisinau Moldova Barbinjagra, Aleksel Minister of Justice Chisinau Moldova Dabrowski, Marek Head of Privatization Commission Poland Lewandowski, Janusz Minister of Ownership Changes Poland Glapinski, Adam Minister of Construction Poland Danco, Jozef Minister of Finance Bratislava Slovak Bachar, Vladislav Bratislava Slovak Posluch, Marian Minister of Justice Bratislava Slovak Stiffel, Harald Deputy to the Minister of Justice Bratislava Slovak Tarras-Wahiberg, Bjom Pres. Swedish Taxpayers Assn. Stockholm Sweden Palm, Elisabeth Justice of the European Court of Human Rights Stockholm Sweden Savchenko, Oleksandr Vice Pres., Ukrainian Nat1 Bank Kiev Ukraine DEC- 9-91 MON 22:37 Administration of Ronald Reagan, 1987 / July 3 -1985. United States to observe these days with [Filed with the Office of the Federal Regis- om the Universi- appropriate ceremonies and activities. ter, 3:19 p.m., July 2, 1987] He served in the In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this first day of July, in the year of Note: The proclamation was released by the [r. Cannon was our Lord nineteen hundred and eighty- Office of the Press Secretary on July 2. n Sylacaga, AL. Iren, and resides seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and eleventh. RONALD REAGAN e ation Proclamation 5675-National Literacy Day, 1987 July 2, 1987 to Gov. Lamar By the President of the United States The Congress, by Senate Joint Resolution of America 117, has designated July 2, 1987, as "Nation- Middle Tennes- A Proclamation al Literacy Day" and has authorized and 971) and North- requested the President to issue a procla- 975). He served The ability to read and write is a true mation in observance of this occasion. 967-1973. Mr. blessing and treasure. It enables us not only Now, Therefore, I, Ronald Reagan, Presi- , 1948, in Nash- to discover and learn from the rich legacy dent of the United States of America, do of recorded human experience but also to IS two children, hereby proclaim July 2, 1987, as National understand and take full part in basic activi- Literacy Day. I invite the Governors of ties essential to daily life. Those who do not every State, local officials, and all Ameri- have these skills must forego many of life's cans to observe this day with appropriate possibilities, and society loses many of the ceremonies and activities to increase aware- contributions these people could otherwise ness about illiteracy and to encourage par- and make. Every American can be truly grateful ticipation in programs to eliminate this to the dedicated citizens among us who problem. give others the beautiful and lasting gift of In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set literacy. my hand this second day of July, in the year In the years since I created the Adult of our Lord nineteen hundred and eighty- ur special rela- Literacy Initiative, more and more Ameri- seven, and of the Independence of the cans have decided to help foster reading United States of America the two hundred es Canada Day and writing skills. Volunteers and private- and eleventh. tates celebrates public partnerships do a great deal of good. Nevertheless, studies show that more needs RONALD REAGAN , the two inter- opriate time to to be done before "functional illiteracy" is a ? between our thing of the past, so we must continue our [Filed with the Office of the Federal Regis- efforts to reach all who lack literacy. ter, 10:55 a.m., July 6, 1987] ited States, by signated July 2. s-Canada Days and authorized Remarks Announcing America's Economic Bill of Rights to issue a proc- July 3, 1987 $ event. Reagan, Presi- f America, do If you would excuse me for a moment, I President and distinguished guests, mem- d 3, 1987, as see that the uniform of the day has already bers of the administration and members of of Peace and been decided on. [At this point, the Presi- the team, before starting, I would like to people of the dent removed his jacket.] Well, the Vice thank Ollie delChamps, chairman of the 739 July 3 / Administration of Ronald Reagan, 1987 U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and the rest of deriving their just powers from the consent you from the chamber for all your help on of the governed,-that whenever any Form this event and all the help you've been over of Government becomes destructive of the years. these ends, it is the Right of the People to In 1776 John Adams predicted in a letter alter or abolish it. " These inspired to his wife that every year the people of the ideals are written on the walls of this me- United States would joyously celebrate their morial. nation's independence with pomp and It was this revolutionary concept of rep- parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, resentative government and individual bells, bonfires, and illuminations, from one rights, as well as the cause of national inde- end of the continent, he said, to the other. pendence, to which the Declaration's sign- Well, tomorrow on the Fourth, it is easy to ers pledged their lives, fortunes, and sacred predict that the festivities and merriment honor. Each generation has done the same, that Adams foresaw, will be apparent and tomorrow we'll make that pledge throughout the width and breadth of our again. Let no one charge, however, that country. Many of you may look back, as I ours is blind nationalism. We do not hide do, on the fond memory of last year when our shortcomings. Yes, we have our imper- together we rededicated our beautiful lady, fections, but there are no people on this standing there with torch held high in New planet who have more reason to hold their York Harbor. One of the opportunities this heads high than do the citizens of the job affords me, and one for which I am United States of America. most grateful, is representing you, my fellow countrymen, at such ceremonial Our countrymen have the courage of events as the rededication of the Statute of conviction and an uncommon commitment Liberty, the marking of the D-day landings to truth and justice; we as a people will not in Normandy, and now, this year, the com- bow before dictator or king, but we kneel memoration of the 200th anniversary of the in prayer and gratefully acknowledge, as Constitution of the United States-remem- Jefferson so eloquently stated, that the God brances that have a special place in the who gave us life also gave us liberty. Our hearts of all who love liberty. society reflects decent and humane values It is this love of liberty, at the heart of that were passed to us by the settlers of a our national identity, that celebrates our new land; Americans can be counted on to separation [separates our celebration] of in- be generous-it's our way. We know these dependence from those of most other na- things, and we also know the United States tions. It's what made the struggle of our of America remains the greatest force for forefathers, a little over 200 years ago, dif- human freedom on this planet, and we're ferent from any conflict that has ever hap- darn proud of it. pened before. Down through history, there We're still Jefferson's children, still believ- have been many revolutions, but virtually ers that freedom is the unalienable right of all of them only exchanged one set of rulers all of God's children. It's so precious, yet for another set of rulers. Ours was the only freedom is not something that can be truly philosophical revolution. It declared touched, heard, seen, or smelled. It sur- that government would have only those rounds us, and if it were not present, as powers granted to it by the people. accustomed to it as we are, we would be It was a 33-year-old Thomas Jefferson alarmed, overwhelmed by outrage, or per- who penned the words and constructed the haps struck by a sense of being smothered. phrases that captured the essence of it all. The air we breathe is also invisible and He wrote: "We hold these truths to be self- taken for granted, yet if it is denied even evident, that all men are created equal; that for a few seconds, we realize instantly how they are endowed by their Creator with much it means to us. Well, so, too, with certain unalienable Rights, that among freedom. these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Freedom is not created by government, Happiness.-That to secure these rights, nor is it a gift from those in political power. Governments are instituted among Men, It is, in fact, secured, more than anything 740 Administration of Ronald Reagan, 1987 / July 3 else, by those limitations I mentioned that desires. I recently heard a statement by a are placed on those in government. It is eminent scholar in our land who visited the absence of the government censor in our Soviet Union recently. He is fluent in the newspapers and broadcast stations and uni- Russian language. But on his way to the versities. It is the lack of fear by those who airport here, he recognized the youth of the gather in religious services. It is the absence cabdriver and got into conversation, found of official abuse of those who speak up out he was working his way through col- against the policies of their government. lege, and he asked him what he intended to I'm a collector of stories that I can estab- be. And the young man said, "I haven't lish are told in the Soviet Union among decided yet." Well, by coincidence, when their own people, showing something of he got to the Soviet Union and got in a cab, their feeling about their situation. And one he had an equally young cabdriver. And of these that I heard recently was an argu- speaking Russian, he got in conversation ment between an American and a Soviet with him and asked the same question, fi- citizen. And the American had said how he nally, about the young man, what did he could stand down on a corner and shout intend to be? And the young man said, right out to everybody his criticism of the "They haven't told me yet." [Laughter] Government. And the Soviet citizen said, "I Well, second of those freedoms is the can do that, too." He said, "The only differ- freedom to enjoy the fruits of one's labor- ence between us is you will still be free to keep for oneself and one's family the after you've done it." [Laughter] profit or gain earned by honest effort. Jefferson so fervently believed that limit- Third is the freedom to own and control ed government was vital to the preserva- one's property-to trade or exchange it and tion of liberty that he used his influence to not to have it taken through threat or coer- see to it that the Constitution included a cion. Bill of Rights, 10 amendments that spelled out specific governmental limitations. "Con- Fourth is the freedom to participate in a gress shall make no law," the first amend- free market-to contract freely for goods ment begins. And thus, the basic law of our and services and to achieve one's full poten- land was meticulously constructed to limit tial without government limits on opportu- government and, in doing so, secure the nity, economic independence, and growth. political rights of the freedom [people]. Just as Jefferson understood that our polit- Inextricably linked to these political free- ical freedoms needed protection by and doms are protections for the economic free- from government, our economic freedoms doms envisioned by those Americans who need similar recognition and protection. went before us. While the Constitution sets Those who attain political power must our political freedoms in greater detail, know that there are limits beyond which these economic freedoms are part and they will not be permitted to go, because parcel of it. During this bicentennial year, beyond that point their intrusion is destruc- we have the opportunity to recognize anew tive of the economic freedom of the people. the economic freedoms of our people and, We must insist, for example, that there be a with the Founding Fathers, declare them as limit to the level of taxation, not only be- sacred and sacrosanct as the political free- cause excessive taxation undermines the doms of speech, press, religion, and assem- strength of the economy but because tax- bly. There are four essential economic free- ation beyond a certain level becomes servi- doms. They are what links life inseparably tude. And in America, it is the Government to liberty, what enables an individual to that works for the people and not the other control his own destiny, what makes self- way around. government and personal independence Now, in the same vein, regulation of an part of the American experience. individual's business or property can reach First is the freedom to work-to pursue a degree when ownership is nullified and one's livelihood in one's own way, to choose the value is taken. Our administration has where one will locate and what one will do argued in the courts that if the Government to sustain individual and family needs and takes private property through regulation, 741 July 3 / Administration of Ronald Reagan, 1987 the "just compensation" clause of the Con- that tax increases must be passed by both stitution requires that the owner must be Houses of Congress by more than a mere duly paid. There's nothing more encourag- majority of their Members. ing to those who believe in economic free- Our forefathers fought for personal and dom than last month's Supreme Court deci- national independence, yet 200 years later, sions which reaffirm this fundamental guar- our own overly centralized government antee. Property rights are central to liberty poses a threat to our liberty far beyond any- and should never be trampled upon. thing imagined by the patriots of old. We The working people need to know their offer two approaches to turning the situa- jobs, take-home pay, homes, and pensions tion around, both encompassed in our pro- are not vulnerable to the threat of a grandi- posals. One is to reduce the size and scope ose, inefficient, and overbearing govern- of the Federal Government. This is an on- ment-something Jefferson warned us going battle. We will be relentless in stead- about 200 years ago. It's time to finish the ily reducing spending until a balanced job Jefferson began and to protect our budget is achieved. people and their livelihoods with restric- But also, as part of our initiative, we pro- tions on government that will ensure the pose to prune judiciously from the Govern- fundamental economic freedom of the ment that which goes beyond the proper people-the equivalent of an Economic Bill realm of the state. I will, by Executive of Rights. I'm certain if Thomas Jefferson order, establish a bipartisan Presidential were here, he'd be one of the most articu- commission on privatization to determine late and aggressive champions of this cause. what Federal assets and activities can and The reason I'm certain is that in 1798 he should be returned to the citizenry. At the wrote: "I wish it were possible to obtain a same time, I will order the executive single amendment to our Constitution. I branch to find additional ways for contract- would be willing to depend on that alone for the reduction of the administration of ing outside of government to perform those our government to the genuine principles tasks that belong in the private economy. of its Constitution; I mean an additional ar- We must also reexamine existing Federal ticle taking from the Federal Government policies to ensure that they help, not the power of borrowing." hinder, all Americans to participate fully in The centerpiece of the Economic Bill of the opportunities of our free economy. We Rights, the policy initiative we launch need to replace a welfare system that de- today, is a long-overdue constitutional stroys economic independence and the amendment to require the Federal Govern- family with one that creates incentives for ment to do what every family in America recipients to move up and out of dependen- must do, and that is live within its means cy. and balance its budget. I will again ask Con- Now, the second thrust is structural and gress to submit a balanced budget amend- procedural reform. We propose changes ment to the States. And if the Congress will that will ensure truth in spending by re- not act, I'll have no choice but to take my quiring every new program to meet this case directly to the States. test: If congressional passage of a new pro- The package of fundamental reforms we gram will require increased spending, it propose will go a long way to secure the must be paid for at the same time, either blessings of liberty. Taxation, for example, is with offsetting reductions in other programs more than mathematical calculations. It is or new revenues. Citizens of this country, the harnessing of free people; it is forced as well as State and local governments, also labor; and if it goes beyond reasonable have a right to be fully informed as to what bounds, it is a yoke of oppression. Raising Federal legislation will do to them, what taxes, then, should be serious business. It costs will be required for fulfilling the will should not be done without a broad nation- of Congress. Full disclosure of such costs up al consensus. We propose that every Ameri- front may well temper the desire to over- can's paycheck be protected-as part of a regulate and overlegislate. balanced budget amendment-by requiring Reform must go to the heart of the prob- 742 Administration of Ronald Reagan, 1987 / July 3 lem. The integrity of the decisionmaking What we begin today is not a maneuver process as envisioned by our Founding Fa- or an attempt to achieve short-term goals thers has broken down and is in drastic with lofty pronouncements. Our proposals need of repair. The veto power of the Presi- are consistent with what we've been doing; dent, for example, is no longer the potent in fact, they'll help secure the progress that force for fiscal responsibility as set down in we've made. They're basic to the philoso- the Constitution. This was clear last year phy that brought me into public life, and when all government appropriations were for the rest of my public life, I'll pursue the thrown into one gigantic, catchall resolu- goals we've set forth in this Economic Bill tion. And for me, it was a take-it-or-leave-it, of Rights. all-or-nothing choice-doing damage to Our specific proposals, 10 in all, will go a long-respected constitutional checks and long way toward putting economic freedom balances. The first step in reestablishing under the protection of the law. And even these checks and balances is giving the if we achieve what we've set out to do in President the authority to cut out the fat, bits and pieces, rather than in one fell yet leave the meat, of legislation that gets swoop-as happened with the Bill of Rights to his desk. And the President deserves the to the Constitution-each victory will make same tool for budgetary responsibility that freedom more secure. Ours is a vision of is now in the hands of 43 Governors, a tool limited government and unlimited opportu- I used effectively as Governor of Califor- nity, of growth and progress beyond what nia-the line-item veto. any can see today. A saying in colonial Today we begin a drive to protect eco- times suggested there are two ways to get nomic freedom in the United States. We to the top of an oak tree, where the view is commit ourselves to do our utmost to bring much better. One is to climb; the other is to about fundamental reform, reform that will find an acorn and sit on it. [Laughter] Well, ensure the liberty we hold so dear. Standing I didn't come to Washington to sit on here, with Jefferson looking over my shoul- der, looking out at the Lincoln and the acorns. [Laughter] It's time to roll up our Washington Memorials and the White sleeves and start climbing. House straight ahead and, in the distance, I see many familiar faces here, and I want the Capitol, one can't but appreciate that to thank you all for all you've done in these all freedom is mutually reinforcing. Perhaps last 6½ years. Together, we've climbed a more specific delineation of economic some mighty oaks. We've worked, sweated, freedom was always needed, but today it's and strained to carry our cause to new imperative. Our citizens were always skep- heights, helping each other along the way, tical of government. Jefferson looked at ever faithful to our principles. I'll always Congress and noted that no one should remember and be grateful to you. have expected 150 lawyers to do business In the early days of the American Revolu- anyway. [Laughter] My apologies to lawyers tion, no two individuals worked more dili- present. But the Federal Government's role gently together than did Thomas Jefferson was severely limited; the future was in the and John Adams. Yet once our country at- hands of the people, not the Government. tained its independence and once partisan And that's the way our forebears wanted it. politics set in-and it set in early-they Jefferson, in his first inaugural, spoke for drifted apart; in fact, they became bitter his countrymen when he said: "A wise and political enemies. Last Fourth of July, I re- frugal government, which shall restrain lated the story of how those two old gentle- men from injuring one another, which shall men, heroes both, rekindled their friend- leave them otherwise free to regulate their ship in their twilight years, corresponding own pursuits of industry and improvement, regularly, writing affectionately of the many shall not take from the mouth of labor the memories they shared, and, yes, discussing bread it has earned. This," he said, "is the their beliefs and values. Both of these men, sum of good government." Well, that vision giants to us but mortal to be sure, died of America still guides our thinking, still within hours of each other. It was July 4th, represents our ideals. exactly 50 years from the date of the Decla- 743 July 3 / Administration of Ronald Reagan, 1987 ration of Independence. It's reported that to ensure that this country remains a bas- John Adams' last words were, "Thomas Jef- tion of freedom, the last best hope for man- ferson survives." History tells us, however, kind. As long as a love of liberty is embla- that Jefferson had died shortly before John zoned on our hearts, Jefferson lives. Adams passed away. Thank you all. God bless you all. But Adams was right. All of us stand in tribute to the truth of those words. We pro- Note: The President spoke at 10:06 a.m. at claim it again and again with our dedication to keeping this a land of liberty and justice an Independence Day celebration at the Jef- for all, and through our deeds and actions, ferson Memorial. America's Economic Bill of Rights July 3, 1987 Preamble petition with private citizens, I will estab- The Founding Fathers of our country lish a bipartisan Presidential Commission on knew that without economic freedom there Privatization to identify government pro- can be no political freedom. Their rallying grams and activities that can be accom- cry of "No taxation without representation" plished more effectively in the private reflects that fundamental precept. They sector. I will also instruct the executive knew that the right to earn your own keep branch to find additional ways for contract- and keep what you earn is central to Ameri- ing outside the government to perform ca's understanding of what it means to be those tasks that belong in the private sector. free. This country was built by people seek- As to those activities that should properly ing to support themselves and their families remain in the government, I have asked the by their own labor, people who treasured President's Council on Management Im- the right to work and dispose of their earn- provement to accelerate its productivity im- ings as they saw fit, people who were will- provement program by 1 year and to adopt ing to take economic risks. private sector practices where they would Over the past 40 years, however, the promote efficiency. growth of government has left our citizens 2. To reduce the burden of government with less control over their economic lives. regulation, I have reconstituted the Task What America needs now is an Economic Force on Regulatory Relief, chaired by the Bill of Rights that guarantees four funda- mental freedoms: Vice President, to root out unnecessary re- strictions on the individual's pursuit of a The freedom to work. livelihood. The freedom to enjoy the fruits of one's labor. The Freedom to Enjoy the Fruits of Your The freedom to own and control one's Labor: You have the right to keep what you property. earn, free from excessive government The freedom to participate in a free taxing, spending, and borrowing. market. 3. To protect you from overborrowing by To secure these freedoms, I propose the the government, I will ask the Congress to following initiatives: adopt a balanced budget amendment, a line item veto, and legislative changes that will The Freedom to Work: You have the right to restore integrity to the congressional pursue your livelihood in your own way, budget process. free from excessive government regulation and subsidized government competition. 4. To protect you from overtaxing by the Government, I will propose as part of the 1. To reduce subsidized government com- balanced budget amendment submitted to 744 Administration of Ronald Reagan, 1987 / July 3 Congress, a requirement for a supermajor- tion to Americans who create new ideas ity vote by Congress before your taxes can and invent new goods and services. be raised. This reform will help make per- manent our recent progress in lowering Freedom to Participate in a Free Market: your tax rates, broadening the tax base to You have the right to contract freely for ensure fairness, and indexing rates so that goods and services and to achieve your full inflation cannot push taxes back up. potential without government limits on op- 5. To protect you from excess spending portunity, economic independence, and by the Federal Government, I will propose growth. Truth in Federal Spending legislation that 8. To reform the present welfare system will: that promotes dependency and destroys A. Require that every new program es- families and communities, I have proposed tablished by legislation increasing Federal a welfare reform initiative that will lift the spending be deficit-neutral by including least fortunate among us up from depend- equal amounts of offsets. ency by creating incentives for recipients to B. Require that every piece of legislation become independent of welfare as full par- mandating an increase in private sector ticipants in the American economy. costs or imposing new regulations include a 9. To prepare our youth for participation financial impact statement detailing: in today's economy, I will ask the Congress -The impact on private costs; and the States to enact proposals that will -The impact on prices for the consumer; protect the rights of parents to guide their -The effect on employment; children and select from a broad array of -The impact on the ability of U.S. indus- educational options that emphasize excel- tries to compete internationally. lence, character, and values. I will also pro- C. Require that every piece of legislation mote programs to assist problem students to forcing increased expenditures by State and local governments include an assessment of complete their education and to encourage dropouts to return to school. the spending impact, the likely source of 10. To arm American workers and busi- funding, and the ability of these govern- ments to fulfill the mandates of the legisla- nessmen for full participation in an increas- tion. ingly complex world economy, I will press for the Congress to act on my trade, em- The Freedom to Own and Control Your ployment, and productivity proposals to: Property: You have the right to keep and -Increase job retraining and other initia- use your property, free from government tives which improve opportunity for control through coercive or confiscatory reg- the American worker. ulation. -Encourage science and technology by 6. To protect your right to own and use increasing support for basic research your property, my administration will and development. pursue our successful efforts in the courts to -Enact antitrust, product liability, for- restore your constitutional rights when the eign corrupt practices, and other regu- government at any level attempts to take latory reforms that place American en- your property through regulation or other terprise on a level playing field with means. foreign competitors. 7. To protect intellectual property and to -Improve America's ability to secure encourage creativity, I will urge that the free and fair trade without resorting to Congress act on my proposals to provide protectionist measures that destroy jobs adequate domestic and international protec- and harm the consumer. 745 From : SABREFAX (617)868 7916 FROM AUSPITZ (617)628 6228 P01 SABRE FOUNDATION, INC. Josiah Lee Auspitz, Secretary telephone 617/868-3510 P.O. Box 483 fax 617/868-7916 Somerville, MA 02144 telex 415187 est ud November 26, 1991 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION from: LEE AUSPITZ to: GENE SCHAERR at: C/O BOYDEN GRAY 202/456-7929 no of pages (including this one) : 2 message: As promised a description of the plans in train for Madison's Montpelier for use and background as speech material. I have asked Jim Davison and David Keating of the National Taxpayer's Foundation (543-1300) to send you a program schedule for the conference of Eastern European ministers and constitution-writers that will precede the President's visit, and also other speech materials under the head of "Prosperity and the Rule of Law". Jack Walter's office (673-4105) at the National Trust for Historic Preservation should have now sent you a memorandum adopted by the Trust, "Mr. Madison's Decade" that includes some material on Madison's intellectual heritage. From : SABREFAX (617)868 7916 FROM AUSPITZ (617)628 6228 P02 TO: GENE SCHAERR FROM: LEE AUSPITZ RE: PLANS FOR MADISON'S MONTPELIER Background: The National Trust for Historic Preservation has launched a coordinated plan to make Montpelier, the James Madison estate, a central focus of its efforts during the coming ten years. The property will be treated in a way unusual for house museums and presidential homesteads. In addition to physical renovation and public visitation programs, the National Trust will found at the property an intellectual center to continue a "Madisonian tradition" of constitutional and related studies. A Living Constitutional Mission: Montpelier will thus have an intellectual mission unique in the treatment of presidential residences-- a mission especially appropriate to the contribution of James Madison to America's constitutional heritage. Montpelier will house a living intellectual center devoted not merely to studies about Madison but to contemporary work in a Madisonian tradition, as exemplified in his seminal essays in The Federalist, his Notes on the Constitutional Convention, his central role in the development and ratification of the Bill of Rights, and his tenure as President and Secretary of State. The center will draw international fellows as well as American practitioners to Montpelier to discuss and reflect upon the future of free institutions. A program of long- and short-term resident fellows, conferences, colloquia and publication will give continuing force to America's constitutional traditions. Presidential Visit: The announcement of this program will occur during the Presidential visit to Montpelier in commemoration of the bicentennial of the Bill of Rights on December 16, 1991. The president's address at a luncheon will also be the closing Jim session of a conference of Cabinet ministers and constitution- Writers from 14 Eastern European countries and Soviet republics. Myra Their presence illustrates the continuing vitality of the Lend America's constitutional heritage. At the same time a comprehensive $30 million physical renovation of the Madison mansion, the surrounding 2700-acre estate and more than 130 out- buildings and residences will be announced by the Secretary of the Interior in a partnership involving the Foundation for James Madison's Montpelier and the National Park Service. Relation to Bush Administration Programs: The Montpelier opportunity enables the President's to underline his constitutional philosophy of strong but limited government, identify himself with the "Father of the Constitution", and also underline his work in "Preserving America's Heritage", a category in this year's and last year's budget. DRAFT 12/2/91 Suggested Outline Of Montpelier Speech As we celebrate the 200th anniversary of the Bill of Rights, it is important to remember the structural and philosophical foundations that guarantee and give meaning to the various freedoms -- such as free speech, free exercise of religion, and the right to a fair trial -- that are expressly protected by the Bill of Rights. - Most constitutions -- including those of the communist regimes that, until recently, ruled most of Eastern Europe -- purport to provide most of the individual freedoms protected by our own Bill of Rights. What is different about the American Constitution is that it also implemented a structure and a philosophy that have so far protected these freedoms effectively. - Three of these foundations, however, are under attack in Washington. Their demise would undermine, if not destroy, the basic freedoms that we celebrate today. Limited Government. One of the foundations of the entire 1n 5' Constitution was the idea that the national government was to have limited responsibilities and powers. Obviously, the fewer responsibilities and powers any government has, the not less of a threat it poses to individual liberty. - Madison and most of the other Founders believed that the federal government would have such a limited reach that a bill of rights was not even needed. [Madison quotes from 1787 convention, Virginia ratifying convention] - Today, most of our national leaders in Washington seem to have replaced the Founders' vision of limited government with a vision of pervasive government. Most Washington politicians would like the federal government to regulate everything from child care facilities to the price of corn in Iowa. Such a vision poses an obvious threat to individual liberty. - It also threatens the economic well-being of our Nation. In 1800, the federal budget was percent of our gross national product. Today that figure is over 25 percent. And this does not even count the enormous indirect costs imposed by the government, such as the cost of complying with government regulations. Parity of Economic and Intellectual Freedom. Another foundation of our constitutional system was the related idea that economic liberty and prosperity are as important to "the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness" as intellectual freedom. Government, as Madison put it, should give "free scope to industry." - One of the principal purposes of the original Constitutional Convention of 1787 was to create a political order more conducive to economic prosperity than the Articles of Confederation had been. The original Constitution promoted economic prosperity by, among other things, abolishing trade barriers and other obstacles to economic growth; by providing for the protection of patents and copyrights; and by setting up a legal system for the efficient resolution of disputes among citizens of different states. The Bill of Rights contained additional measures -- the takings and due process clauses of the Fifth Amendment that were designed to promote economic prosperity by protecting property rights. - Today, all three branches of the federal government make every effort to protect intellectual freedom, as well they should. However, Congress in particular seems to have lost the Founders' vision of the importance of economic liberty and economic prosperity. Instead, Congress all too often: (1) attempts to erect or maintain trade barriers; (2) passes statutes that drain from the economy billions of dollars a year in legal expenses, either by adding new legal causes of action or by clouse have keep bucking difficult policy issues to the courts; (3) burdens the economy with unnecessary regulation; and us your n and r states (4) refuses to remove one of the most serious obstacles to economic growth, namely, high taxes on capital gains. Equal Application of the Laws. Yet another foundation of our constitutional system was the Founders' assumption that members of Congress would be fully subject to any laws they passed, and would therefore have a powerful incentive to ensure that the federal government did not trample on individual rights. Fachons - In Federalist 57, Madison invoked this assumption to rebut the charge that Congress would sacrifice the interests of the many "to the aggrandizement of the Speen 23rl. 07 law few. " A ruler's subjecting itself to the same rules as it imposes on the public, in Madison's words, had "always been deemed one of the strongest bonds by which human policy can connect the rulers and the people together," creating between them "that communion of interests and sympathy of sentiments without which every government degenerates into tyranny." - Today, however, Congress frequently exempts itself from laws that it imposes on private citizens and the Executive branch. Examples include laws against discrimination based on race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, and age; the independent counsel law; and most parts of the Privacy Act. No practice poses a greater threat to the freedom of ordinary citizens. I hope that those of you who are now writing constitutions for the nations of Eastern Europe will remember these structural and philosophical foundations as you complete your work. And I hope that we in the United States will remember -- and return to -- the foundations that have so far made the Bill of Rights a reality rather than an empty promise. P.01 DEC- 9-91 MON 19:47 POWELL TATE A Cassidy Company TO: ROBERT SMON Telephone: 202.347.6633 FROM: CUAUDIA PETERS WASHINGTON, DC 20005 655 FIFTEENTH STREET, NW, SUITE 1100 CLAUDIA B. PETERS a Cassidy Company POWELL TATE DATE: 12-9-91 Fax: 202.347.8713 FAX #: 202-456-6218 # OF PAGES: 26 w/cover sheet- RE: BACKGROUND INfoR MATION - MONTPELIER, JAMES MADISON, THE BILL of RIGHTS. Box Deres The information imprised let are know of 2 can get you If you have any problems or questions regarding this fax, please contact Claudea anything else. at (202) 347-6633, FAX (202) 347-8713. DEC- 9-91 MON 19:47 P. 02 MONTPELIER, PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE by Frank E. Sanchis With Montpelier as our guide, the National Trust is engaged in an ongoing "Search for James Madison." Yet the opposite is also true. With Madison as our guide, we are engaged in a search for Montpelier. Actually, three guides are helping us in this search. James Madison Sr., who built the original house in 1755, is one. President Madison, who twice expanded it, is another. And William duPont, whose turn-of-the-century additions turned a colonial home into a country estate, is the third. Montpelier today incorporates the homes of all three men. To be sure, deciding how to interpret and present three distinctly different homes-in-one is an unusual challenge, one we are meeting step by step. Step one, for example, was to make the building safe so the public could witness our "search" for Madison. Fortunately, our date for opening Montpelier coincided with the bicentennial of the Constitution, Given Madison's contribution to that document, we were awarded a $1 million grant by the Bicentennial Commission and a comparable grant from the Commonwealth of Virginia. This money enabled us to improve access for the disabled, as well as overhaul the fire detection, sprinkler, electrical and sewage systems. This made Montpelier safe, if not entirely sound. A new roof is our next priority and will require more than half a million dollars. In addition, the house is in poor condition cosmetically, partly because of our decision to use scarce funds for safety measures, but mostly because we decided against restoring the house until we clearly understood its architectural - 1 DEC- 9-91 MON 19:48 P. 03 history. This challenge has gone through several phases. With grant money from various foundations, we began a detailed analysis of Montpelier's interior surface, as well as an investigation of the building's physical structure. This taught us a great deal about how the building evolved from one period to another as each new owner put his personal stamp on it. One way we use this knowledge is by "recreating" with cut-out drawings the places where the doors, windows and walls of Madison's dining room were once located. We are also doing extensive archeological work on the grounds. Today, we are in the process of deciding how, and to what extent, we will present Montpelier as the home of both the Madison family and the duPont families. Essentially, we aim to present to the public a Montpelier that is primarily Madisonian on the inside, while preserving the exterior grounds, gardens and other structures as the duPonts left them. Because Montpelier is not a conventional museum property, we are not interpreting it in a conventional way. How fortunate we are, and how fitting it is, that Madison's genius for fashioning a government that incorporates the many facets of human nature guides us in our approach to the interpretation and presentation of a many-faceted historic place. Frank E, Sanchis is the Vice President of Stewardship of Historic Properties of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, -2- DEC- 9-91 MON 19:48 P.04 VIRGINIA RATIFIES BILL OF RIGHTS: TEN AMENDMENTS TO CONSTITUTION BAR ABUSES BY NATIONAL GOVERNMENT RICHMOND, Va., Dec. 15, 1791 -- The United States has a Bill of Rights today after the Virginia State Assembly made the Old Dominion the 11th state to ratify a package of ten Constitutional amendments designed to prevent abuses of power by the national government. Approval by at least three-fourths of the 14 states was required to add the amendments to the two-and-one-half-year-old U.S. Constitution. The amendments say Congress may not interfere with freedom of speech or freedom of the press, or establish an official religion. They guarantee the right to a speedy trial by jury, as well as the right to hear and question opposing witnesses. They also bar prosecution for the same crime twice. Government authorities are prohibited from "unreasonable searches and seizures" of citizens and their homes and must show "probable cause" in order to obtain a legal permission for a search. The quartering of soldiers in private homes and "cruel and unusual punishment" are also forbidden. Noting the need for states to maintain militia, the second amendment says "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." In addition to these specific guarantees, which were modeled on the Declaration of Rights in the Virginia Constitution, the ninth amendment says the failure to explicitly list certain rights "shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." The tenth amendment adds that powers not expressly granted to the national government by the Constitution remain with the states. Virginia, home state of President Washington, was among several jurisdictions that virtually demanded adoption of a Bill of Rights in return for ratification of the Constitution in -3- DEC- 9-91 MON 19:49 P. 05 1788. Patrick Henry, the leader of Virginia's Anti-Federalist party that opposed the Constitution, said at that time that "the rights of conscience, trial by jury, liberty of the press, all your communities and franchises, all pretensions to human rights and privileges are rendered insecure, if not lost" because of the proposed Constitution. Virginia's adoption of the Bill of Rights was a huge personal triumph for U.S. Representative James Madison of Orange, Va., who assembled the amendments and guided them through Congress. Madison, regarded as the principal author of the Constitution, has been a sound and consistent advocate of strong central government. He was instrumental in convening the Constitutional Convention that discarded the Articles of Confederation, faced down Henry and the Anti-Federalists in Virginia, and joined Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton in leading the national campaign for the new Constitution. Madison said adoption of the Bill of Rights should calm the fears of those who believe the national government could become the tool of despots and trample the rights of the states and their citizens. He said explicitly listing Americans' rights in the Constitution "may be one means to control the majority from those (tyrannical) acts which they might be otherwise inclined." Madison initially opposed a Bill of Rights, but reversed himself in order to win ratification of the Constitution. Political leaders in many states including Madison's home state agreed to support the Constitution only in exchange for pledges to add a Bill of Rights. Convinced that success of the new government required the widest possible public support, Madison told Congress that a Bill of Rights should be adopted "if we can make the Constitution better in the opinion of those who are opposed to it, without weakening its frame, or abridging its usefulness." Under his prodding, the national legislature produced a set of 12 -4- DEC- 9-91 MON 19:50 P.06 amendments and submitted them to the states for approval in September 1789. With Virginia's vote, ten of the amendments are now part of the Constitution. The amendments were previously ratified by New Jersey, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, New Hampshire, Delaware, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Connecticut, Georgia and Massachusetts have not acted. 5 DEC- 9-91 MON 19:50 P.07 CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: THE MADISONIAN MOMENT by A.E. Dick Howard The advent of constitutional democracy in Central and Eastern Europe demonstrates the power of ideas. Nearly a half-century of alien domination did not insulate Poles, Hungarians, Czechs, Slovaks and others in the region from yearning to live in freedom and human dignity - - an aspiration that knows no national boundaries. As drafters in Central and Eastern Europe turn to the making of constitutions and bills of rights, they join in a process with an ancient ancestry. Hungary's Golden Bull of 1222, like England's Magna Carta only seven years before, is an early example of a search for ways to restrain the abuses of power. Poland's great constitution of May 3, 1791, was another landmark on the road to constitutionalism. Modern notions about constitutional government owe much to the work of the American founders. The great experiment that produced the Constitution of the United States and the Bill of Rights for Virginia generated intense interest across the Atlantic. George Mason's 1776 Declaration of Rights for Virginia influenced not only the other American states but also the 1789 French Declaration of Rights of Man and the Citizen. When the Swiss, more than a half century later, drafted their 1848 Constitution, they drew heavily upon the insights that James Madison and his colleagues built into the U.S. Constitution. The American drafters owed a great debt, of course, to European thinkers and ideas. From the British Constitution, Americans derived the concept of due process of law. John DEC- 9-91 MON 19:51 P. 08 Locke's writings nurtured the idea of a constitution as a social compact. In shaping the separation of powers, Americans drew upon the inspiration of Montesquieu - the "great oracle," as Madison called him. As Americans celebrate the bicentennial of their Constitution and Bill of Rights, the peoples of Central and Eastern Europe are having their own Madisonian moment. Drafters in Prague, Warsaw and other capitals debate issues of constitutional government that would be familiar to any student of American history. The constitutional drafter must decide what principles are sufficiently fundamental to be included in a constitution. A constitution is not a code of laws, as the Philadelphia framers understood. Yet the architects of a constitution will find themselves under pressure to write a document that looks like a political party's platform. What should a constitution say about executive power? About the legislative process? What rights should be proclaimed? How is the constitution to be enforced? These are the kinds of questions that tested the skills of the framers of 1787, and they are the questions that surface two hundred years later. Constitutional democracy however, requires more than a good constitution. Making reality of consent of the governed requires a multi-party system and fair and free elections. The open society depends upon robust debate and a free press. The army, the police, and other organs and officials of government must accept restraints that respect human dignity and individual freedom. Ultimately, the success of constitutionalism in Central and Eastern Europe turns -- as it does in the United States - on a mature civic spirit. Leaders with the moral authority of a Václav Havel or an Arpad Goncz can play their part. But the vitality of constitutional -7- DEC- 9-91 MON 19:51 P. 09 government rests, above all, on how well the people themselves understand its premises and challenges. A nation neglects civil education at its peril. "What spectacle," asked Madison, "can be more edifying, or more seasonable, than that of Liberty and Learning, each leaning on the other for their mutual and surest support?" As the nations of Central and Eastern Europe work with the bricks and mortar of constitutionalism, they remind free people everywhere of the never- ending commitment that liberty entails. A.E. Dick Howard is the White Burkett Miller Professor of Law and Public Affairs at the University of Virginia. He has consulted with drafters of constitutions in Hungary, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Bulgaria and Albania. - 8 DEC- 9-91 MON 19:52 P. 10 (Letter from Jack Walter to be prominently placed) MONTPELIER: THE SEARCH FOR JAMES MADISON by J. Jackson Walter Thank you for joining us on this excursion to James Madison's Montpelier. It is the culmination of a journey of celebration that began in 1987 when we opened Montpelier to the public. On that occasion, the bicentennial of the Constitution allowed us to showcase the home of the man who was chiefly responsible for its creation. Today, the bicentennial of the Bill of Rights has afforded us the same opportunity. We are proud that Montpelier has been a focal point of the four-year nationwide observance of the birth of our government. Yet the question has been asked, "Why the need to travel to Montpelier in Orange, Virginia? Couldn't we commemorate this event almost anywhere?" We might as well put that question to Madison himself. "Why, Jemmy, the need to continually travel back to Montpelier? Couldn't that extraordinary mind and graceful pen do their work almost anywhere?" "No," he would have answered. "For I am a product of Montpelier just as it is a product of me. You cannot separate us." Indeed you cannot. Our environment plays a vital part in shaping our character, and more than any place on earth, Montpelier was Madison's environment. In order to understand him, we must know the forces that shaped him. Chief among them was his home. This is why preserving and restoring Montpelier is SO important. It is the key to - 9 DEC- 9-91 MON 19:52 P. 11 understanding the life and times and contributions of one of our nation's most influential thinkers. And this is also why we at the National Trust for Historic Preservation seek to preserve Montpelier not as a static museum, but as an inspirational setting for all who share Madison's conviction that in shaping the course of human events, knowledge is our only true guide. We want everyone from scholars to school children to come to Montpelier and join what we call "The Search for James Madison." There are practical reasons to restore Montpelier as well. As a heritage tourism site, Montpelier's economic as well as cultural impact on the surrounding Orange County community will be significant. Few other excursions are as educational and rewarding as a visit to a historically significant place. Today, few are as popular. But in the end, preserving and restoring Montpelier is important because it has a positive effect on the quality of our lives. Montpelier keeps us in touch with a past that saw the creation of our Constitution and our Bill of Rights. It provides us with the direction for the future as well. And so, even though one journey ends at Montpelier today with this celebration of our Bill of Rights, another journey continues. It is the search for James Madison, a search that at once will also take us back into the past and forward into the future. It is a journey that will never end, especially as more of the world's emerging democracies join the search for Madison, inspired by his vision and their hope for a better future. It all begins at Montpelier. For that reason, we must and we can preserve it. J. Jackson Walter is the President of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. 1 DEC- 9-91 MON 19:53 P. 12 Man in the News JAMES MADISON JR. ORANGE, Va., Dec. 15, 1791 --- James Madison Jr., author of the Constitution and driving force behind the Bill of Rights, is an intellectual and idealist - a quiet, unassuming man unduly overshadowed in politics by his imposing contemporaries. One of the great thinkers of these early days of the republic, this constitutional scholar is also known as an accomplished ghost writer and skilled political strategist. Madison, whom Thomas Jefferson calls his "pillar of support," is generally acknowledged as one of the country's most eloquent statesmen and shrewdest politicians. In fact, Madison is all of these - and more. A farmer gentleman with a passion for science, a taste for the arts and a voracious appetite for the classics. He is a complex man: a blend of intelligence and skill, housed in a slight, 5-foot-6 frame. Physical appearance, however, belies his historical stature. Unlike some other men of our time, Madison has made his mark not on the battlefield of war, but in the battle of ideas. He is, as much as anyone, a "child of the revolution," taken with the principles that lit the torch of liberty in the colonies. The son of Virginia gentry, he was born March 16, 1751, Growing up here on the family plantation, Montpelier, he was bookish and often sickly as a youth. Low-key and soft-spoken, what he lacks in dynamism or charm, Madison makes up for in intellect. After racing through Princeton in two years and doing a term of graduate work, deep religious and philosophical convictions drew him into a spiral of debate that would shape the nation. As a delegate to the Continental Congress, he began to see the inadequacy of states' - 11- DEC- 9-91 MON 19:54 P. 13 rights, a conversation that would catapult him to the fore of the crusade for federalism. Somewhat disillusioned by the fits and starts of the Congress, he went into seclusion in 1785. Over the next two years he thought about designing a new form of government, and together with Virginia's young governor, Edmund Randolph, drew up the Virginia Plan. Although this plan was intended as a rough draft, or "mere sketch" as Madison called it, it envisioned a powerful central government that would be divided into separate but equal branches, with the states a further counterbalance to its power. It was this plan that awaited the founders in May 1787, when they arrived in Philadelphia to draft a Constitution and argue the future of their young nation. The country was in need of direction. The weak government offered by the Articles of Confederation had led to years of drift. With the Virginia Plan as their blueprint, they debated rights, powers and structure: how authority would be divided between the center and independent-minded states. Madison spoke more than 200 times and took copious notes as its unofficial recorder. Behind the scenes he skillfully guided its progress, finding compromise where no one else could. He argued for a republic structured in such a way that checks and balances on the various sources of power would "enable the government to control itself." With SO many competing interests, no single one could rule supreme. "Nothing has excited more admiration in the world than the manner in which free governments have been established in America," Madison said months later. "For it was the first instance from the creation of the world to the American revolution that the free inhabitants have been seen deliberating on a form of government and selecting much of their citizens as possessed their confidence. But why has this excited so much wonder and applause? Because -12- DEC- 9-91 MON 19:54 P. 14 it is of so much magnitude and because it is liable to be frustrated by SO many accidents." Madison deftly maneuvered around the boundaries of the convention's restrictive mandate. He couched his own ideas in the more moderate politics of his ally, Governor Randolph, to improve the odds for their adoption. And when he needed a powerful endorsement for the convention's work, he all but tricked President Washington into attending. Once the Constitution was signed, the challenge was selling it to the states. Madison the polemicist became Madison the propagandist. He joined with Alexander Hamilton and John Jay to make the case for the new Constitution in the essays known as the Federalist Papers. Madison wrote 29 of the 85 papers. In 1789 at the age of 38, Madison, beating James Monroe in a landslide election, took his seat as member of the House of Representatives in the first Congress. Madison quickly became the House's most important member. He has also been one of President Washington's most trusted advisors, giving him a position of influence over the young government that few others could claim. For some it has not been easy to abandon the old ways of their European ancestry. In wrestling with how the newly elected president should be addressed, for example, the Senate opted in the name of dignity, for "His Highness, the President of the United States of America, and Protector of the Rights of the Same." Madison, however, found that too regal, too pretentious. He persuaded his colleagues to resist cloaking a symbol of democracy in aristocratic airs and instead proposed a simple form of address: "The President of the United States." At the time of the Constitutional Convention, Madison and others saw no need for a bill of rights. With the power of the government limited by law, they saw no danger that the rights 13- DEC- 9-91 MON 19:55 P. 15 of citizens would or could be abridged. "Why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?" Hamilton wrote in Federalist 84. Yet Madison quickly realized that the American public did not share that view, and that if his Constitution was to be ratified, specific limits on federal power would have to be spelled out. Thus he warmed to the idea of the bill of rights that would "extinguish from the bosom of every member of the community any apprehensions" that the government could, at some point, trample the basic liberties "for which they valiantly fought and honorably bled." "As a man is said to have a right to his property," he said, "he may be equally said to have property in his rights." With a proviso that any rights unspecified by the Constitution be left to the people or the states, Madison made the Bill of Rights a major order of congressional business. He worked and reworked 210 amendments proposed by the states, narrowing them down to a dozen. In the end, ten were ratified. Though considered by many to be the author of the Constitution, the modest Madison dismisses the sobriquet as "a credit to which I have no claim." "This was not, like the fabled Goddess of Wisdom, the offspring of a single brain," he asserts. "It ought to be regarded as a work of many hands and many heads." - 14- DEC- 9-91 MON 19:55 P. 16 (Guest Column) THE PEOPLE'S BILL OF RIGHTS by James MacGregor Burns The framing and passage of the Bill of Rights was a supreme moral achievement. These ten amendments, finally added to the Constitution by the Virginia legislature on December 15, 1791, stand as a beacon of freedom two hundred years later - for Americans and especially for people seeking to build freedom and democracy around the globe. But the Bill of Rights was also a highly political act -- framed by politicians, argued over by politicians, adopted by politicians and from start to finish demanded by the populace. We all remember that the Framers "left out" a bill of rights from the Constitution they drafted in the summer of 1787. Anti-Federalists used this omission to help rally people against the new charter. Politicians at the state ratifying conventions worked out a masterly compromise: doubtful convention delegates -- many of them from the hinterland -- would vote on the new charter if the Federalist leaders who would promise to add bill of rights amendments as soon as the new government was established. These leaders honored that promise. Politicians produced the draft amendments and pushed them through the Congress by two-thirds votes and then through the legislatures. Liberty-loving Americans had feared above all that a powerful federal government might threaten their individual liberties. In the late 1790s their nightmare turned into reality. Through the Alien and Sedition Acts, the government under President John Adams jailed people for IS DEC- 9-91 MON 19:56 P. 17 simply speaking out against the administration. Jefferson and Madison stopped this after winning the election of 1800. Once more it was the people -- or at least the male whites who voted - who came to the defense of liberty. Truly, the Bill of Rights is a people's charter. James MacGregor Burns is a professor of government emeritus at Williams College and a senior scholar at the Jepson School of Leadership at the University of Richmond. Mr. Burns is co-author with Stewart Burns of A People's Charter: The Pursuit of Rights in America, published December 15 by Knopf. - 16- DEC- 9-91 MON 19:56 P. 18 DOLLEY MADISON Influential First Lady Dolley Madison has been called the nation's first great political hostess and was certainly one of its most beloved. She was a fun-loving woman with a weakness for the latest Parisian fashions, and was known at times to unabashedly rouge her cheeks "like a jolly jezebel." Dolley Payne Todd (her first husband died in a yellow fever epidemic, leaving her with a young son) married James Madison in 1794 after a brief courtship. The two were introduced by Madison's good friend, Aaron Burr, White House Hostess Before her husband's election as president in 1808, Dolley served as unofficial first lady to Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson, a widower, would often ask her to be his hostess on those occasions when women were among the expected guests. During these eight years, James Madison served as Jefferson's secretary of state. Dolley became known in her own right for the hospitality she provided at her informal Wednesday evening gatherings, where movers and shakers of the day would come for entertainment and conversation. An invitation to her salon was among the most coveted social prizes of the day. The guest list often included Republicans as well as Federalists, British as well as French and virtually anyone with a letter of introduction to the Madisons. - 17- DEC- 9-91 MON 19:57 P. 19 "Everybody loves Mrs. Madison.' Dolley's gregarious manner was in sharp contrast to her husband's reserved, even shy, demeanor. As he spent evenings engrossed in private conversation, she would perk up parlor games with low-stakes wagering and add pep to her parties by spiking the punch with rum and brandy. Henry Clay, a Wednesday evening regular, once remarked, "Everybody loves Mrs. Madison." Fashion Plate Dolley was also famous for fashion. Raised as a Quaker, she was later disowned by the Society of Friends for marrying outside the faith. Once freed from religious taboos, she indulged herself in the opulent fashions of the times by wearing bright gowns and colorful turbans adorned with feathers. Dolley became a trend-setter. Her influence was so great that if she emphasized a certain color or wore a particular style or dress, other women would quickly follow her example, both in the United States and Europe. But Dolley did not dress to impress others. "I care not for newness for its own sake," she once said. "I use only that which is pleasing to me." White House Renovation Not all of Dolley's activities were frivolous. As a new tenant of the White House, she was appalled at the poor condition of its interior. She invited several influential Members of - 18- DEC- 9-91 MON 19:58 P.20 Congress to see for themselves how run down it had become. Shortly afterward, Congress appropriated money for rebuilding and refurnishing the executive mansion. Dolley worked closely with Benjamin Latrobe, the original architect, in its reconstruction. "The British Are Coming" Most Americans know Dolley for her bravery during the burning of Washington in the War of 1812. In late August 1814, James Madison learned that the British had landed in Maryland and were heading toward Washington. He immediately left to inspect preparations for the defense of the capital and urged his wife to leave for the safety of Virginia; she refused until certain he was safe. As the British troops approached, Dolley commandeered a large wagon and several servants to help save documents, silver, and china from the White house, along with a large portrait of George Washington, painted by Gilbert Stuart. The Madison's Retirement - "happiest and most true life" When Madison left the presidency in 1817, he and Dolley retired to his family's Virginia estate, Montpelier, where they continued to entertain on a grand scale. In a letter to her sister in the summer of 1820, Dolley described the delight and pleasure she received from welcoming a great number of guests to Montpelier: "I am less worried here with an hundred visitors than with twenty-five in Washington -- this summer especially. I wish, dearest, you had just such a country home as this. I truly believe it is the happiest and most true life. " - 19- DEC- 9-91 MON 19:58 P.21 Tragically, Dolley was forced to sell the sprawling plantation after Madison's death to settle the heavy gambling debts of her son, John Payne Todd. In an act of generosity, Congress set up a trust for Dolley Madison, which provided her a modest income until her death in 1849. Dolley Madison is buried next to her husband in the Madison family cemetery on the Montpelier grounds. 20- DEC- 9-91 MON 19:59 P.22 (An Editorial) THE NINETIES: MR. MADISON'S DECADE Historical events and figures often seem irrelevant to modern life, but the struggle to establish democracy in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union has kindled new appreciation for the genius of America's Founding Fathers and the success of their experiment in republican government. Renewed interest in the American form of government as a model for the world's fledgling democracies should also mean some overdue appreciation for James Madison, the philosophical father of the American experiment. Long overshadowed by such legendary contemporaries as Washington and Jefferson, Madison is a man for the 1990s. The final years of the 20th century may well be Madison's decade as political leaders in Eastern Europe and the erstwhile Soviet Union search his writings for guidance on the path to democracy. The struggle to balance the rush to independence by the Soviet Republics with the need for some effective central authority and the demands for autonomy by Eastern Europe's ethnic minorities have parallels in the efforts of Madison and his contemporaries to divide federal and state perogatives. Guided by Madison, America's founders turned conventional wisdom on its head. Political sophisticates of the 18th century believed republican government could succeed only in small communities. These theorists assumed that as a republic grew, competing factions' pursuit of parochial interests would undermine the common goals needed to sustain a unified republic. 21- DEC- 9-91 MON 19:59 P.23 But Madison held that the competition of factions would, in fact, promote the common good and protect the republic against majority tyranny. Factions would be checked by one another. As it became clear that no single group could dominate, the notion of a common interest would gain credence, Madison believed a "compound republic" could cope with the problems of diversity and scale by using the organs of government itself to perform a restraining function. He argued that the small republics of ancient times failed precisely because their small size enabled single factions to tyrannize minorities. Moreover, their small scale exposed these communities to external threats from larger states. In Madison's view, the failure of America's initial form of government -- flowing from the Articles of Confederation - demonstrated that trying to meet external threats through loose confederations of small republics would not work, Madison believed the key to republicanism was a system of "checks and balances" that, in effect, institutionalized factions. He persuaded the young nation's political leadership to balance the organs of government on three levels: Jurisdiction was divided between a national government and the states, a separation of powers was established among the national government's three branches, and a written constitution served as a limiting authority on the federal system. Madison's model, embodied in the U.S. Constitution, expressly enumerated the powers of each branch of government. Terms of office were limited and elections were staggered to provide protection against a government that responded too eagerly to short-term popular fevers. Each branch and level of government had its own integrity and a sphere of competence to guard against encroachment. But no branch would be its own final judge and each would have incentives to complement the others and exercise self restraint. DEC- 9-91 MON 20:00 P.24 These principles have unique resonance in the 1990s as an unprecedented number of nation states seek to implant democratic government, in many cases without any national experience with democratic values. Replicating the American model may not be appropriate, but a study of Madisonian philosophy and its modification to fit local circumstances can assist the world's newest democracies as their people begin to govern themselves. The editors express their gratitude to Lee Auspitz whose research and analysis are the basis for this editorial. DEC- 9-91 MON 20:00 P.25 Briefing for President George Bush's Visit to Montpelier/Orange County, Virginia. December 16, 1991 ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION 22,000 * Formed in 1734. Orange County was named after Prince William IV of Orange. *Orange County has about 355 acres located between Fredricksburg to the East and Charlottesville to the West. *Farming, Cattle raising, wineries and tourism are principal businesses of Orange County. *Alexander Spotswood was an early settler of Orange County as well as numerous German families who came to work the iron mines in the early 1700's. *Prior to the European and English settlers the area was in- habited by tribes of Manohoac, Iroquis, and Sapony American Indians. *President Zachary Taylor's ancestors owned property in Orange County including the household at Bloomsbury near the Orange County Airport. *Route 20 that runs through the county and in front of the Orange County airport was designated as "The Constitution Highway" by the Virginia General Assembly. "In 1723 4675 acres were patented to Ambrose Madison. This tract is the present site of Montpelier, built by James Madison ,Sr., improved on by President James Madison, and William duPont Sr. and is now the property of The Na- tional Trust. President Madison and several family members rest on the slopes of the rolling hills of Montpelier, DEC- 9-91 MON 20:01 P.28 Town of Orange Population 2600 # Originally called The Village of Orange Courthouse in the early 1750's, it was formed as the Town of Orange in 1872. * In colonial days the area was visited by such famous people as the General Marquis de Lafayette and Patrick Henry. During the Civil War Orange was used as a staging area for the battles that took place close to town at Cedar Mountain, Wilderness and Chancellorsville. General Lee took time out to worship at the Saint Thomas Episcopal Church in Orange. The Town of Gordonsville Population 1500 * Formed in the late 1780's it played a key role in the Civil War, transporting troops and supplies for General Lee's Army of Northern Virginia. Gordonsville's Exchange Hotel was con- verted to a hospital to care for thousands of wounded soldiers from both sides. Montpelier. * The home of James and Dolley Madison is used for many events in addition to tours by visitors from all over the world. The Orange County Fair is held there as well as a num- ber of, wine festivals, craft shows, the Montpelier Races, and educational seminars. A group of European constitutional re- searchers as well as the President of Hungary were also hosted at Montpclier. The property consists of about 2700 acres , 200 out build- ings,a race track, and steeplechase course. This information provided by the Orange County Visitor Bureau. Additional details may be obtained from Pamela Humbert Director of Tourism, Orange County or Ray Lonick President Orange County Visitor Bureau. 703-672-1653 Orange County Visitor Office 703-672-0731 Pamela Humbert (home) 703-672-3625 Ray Lonick (home) Fax 703-672-5029 +2025462086. NAT TAXPAYER'S UNION F-104 T-990 P-001/005 DEC 10 '91 09:43 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION SHEET NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION SHEET 325 Pennsylvania Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20003 (202) 543-1300 Date: Time Written: Ref./P.O. No.: PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING PAGES TO: JOE Duggan Company Name: Department/Address: Telefax number: 456 - 6218 TOTAL # OF PAGES: PLEASE INFORM US IMMEDIATELY (including transmission sheet) 5 IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE FACSIMILE IN FULL FROM: DAVID KEATING Telefax number: (202) 546-2086 Telephone number: (202) 543-1300 COMMENTS: FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION SHEET FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION SHEET +2025462086 NAT TAXPAYER'S UNION F-104 T-990 P-002/005 DEC 10 '91 09:43 Prosperity and the Rule of Law A Conference on Constitutions and Laws for Central and Eastern Europe Washington, DC and Orange, VA, USA December 13-16, 1991 The countries emerging from communism in Central and Eastern Europe each desperately need to raise living standards. Prosperity provides both a decent standard of living and the stability to protect new found freedoms. A potentially historic conference, Prosperity and the Rule of Law, will assemble some of the world's leading experts to discuss how to create an environment to foster economic growth and freedom. A small and influential group of decision makers from the new republics who are charged with either writing new constitutions and laws or guiding economic policy will be invited to the conference, which will be held at the estate of James Madison, father of the U.S. Constitution. Even before invitations were officially extended, the Ministers of Justice of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania countries. said that they were eager to attend and assemble delegations from their President George Bush will speak at the conference on December 16 to commemorate the 200th anniversary of the ratification of the Bill of Rights. Topics for discussion at the conference include: America's Bill of Rights and the History of Limits on Government. James Madison, Father of the U.S. Constitution. How Private Property Rights Protect Human Rights and Create Prosperity. A Sound Currency, Its Role in a Healthy Economy. The Link Between Tax Policy and Economic Growth. Commercial Law: Encouraging Business Development, Minimizing Bureaucracy and Protecting Investment and Consumers. The Economic History of Prosperity and The Rule of Law. Enforcing The Rule of Law. Invited and confirmed speakers include: Nobel Laureate James Buchanan; Mancur Olson; Richard Epstein; Steve Hanke; and James MacGregor Burns. The Virginia, which is a short trip from Washington, DC. group will meet in Washington and at James Madison's Montpelier in Orange, The conference is sponsored by the Swedish Taxpayers Association, National Taxpayers Union Foundation and Sabre Foundation in cooperation with the Foundation for James Madison's Montpelier. dk33:40 +2025462086 NAT TAXPAYER'S UNION F-104 T-990 P-003/005 DEC 10 '91 09:44 Participant Title Republic Avanessian, Vahram Advisor to the State Economic Cmte. for Economic Reform Armenia Malkhasian, Kevork Director, Legal Affairs Dept., Ministry of Justice Armenia Stepanian, Vahe Minister of Justice Armenia Radkevich, Vladimir Chairman, State Cmte. for Foreign Economic Relations Belarus Vikentjevitch, Sadovskiy Petr Chairman, Commission on Internat'l. Affairs & Foreign Economic Relations Belarus Erzhanov, Galichan Minister of Justice Kazakhastan Barbinjagra, Aleksel Minister of Justice Moldova Moshanu, Alexandru President, Parliament of Moldova Moldova Chirca, Sergiu Professor, Doctor in Economics Moldova Ambarsamov, Yevgeni Arshakovich Member, Foreign Affairs Committee Russia Bogomolov, Oleg Director, Institute of Internat'l. Economic & Political Studies Russia Klyamkin, lgor Professor, Institute of Internat". Economic & Political Studies Russia Mikhilovich Shakhrai, Sergei Member, Russian Peoples' Assembly Russia Tolstoy, Mikhail Member, Russian Peoples' Assembly Russia Zolotuhin, Boris Andrevich Member, Laws Committee Russia Savchenko, Oleksandr Vice Pres., Ukrainian Nat'l Bank Ukraine Dabrowski, Marek Head of Privatization Commission Poland Kamenicka, Jana Deputy to the Minister of Justice Czech Kamlach, Milan Dir., Leg. Dept., Minister of Justice Czech Kocarnik, Ivan Deputy Minister of Finance Czech/Slovak Macek, Miroslav Civic Democratic Party Czechoslovakia Bogdan, Tibor Deputy Minister of Justice Hungary Oros, Paulina Interpreter for Dr. Bogdan Hungary Glapinski, Adam Minister of Construction Poland Lewandowski, Janusz Minister of Ownership Changes Poland Bachar, Viadislav Slovak Danco, Jozef Minister of Finance Slovak Kohut, Sergej Vice Minister of Justice Slovak Stiffel, Harald Deputy to the Minister of Justice Slovak Miller, Rein Minister of Finance Estonia Raidla, Juri Minister of Justice Estonia Juknevicius, Zenonas First Deputy Minister of Justice Lithuania Palm, Elisabeth Justice of the European Court of Human Rights Sweden Palm, Goran Spouse Sweden Stego, Cecilia Spouse Sweden Tarras-Wahlberg, Bjorn Pres. Swedish Taxpayers Assn. Sweden Tantchev, Eugene Dean, Sofia U. School of Law Bulgaria Paczolai, Peter Chief Counselor, Hungarian Constitutional Court Hungary Christov, Lubomir Bulgaria Ludchnikov, Svetoslav Minister of Justice Bulgaria Shentov, Ognian Rector, Ctr. for Study of Democracy Bulgaria +2025462086 NAT TAXPAYER'S UNION F-104 T-990 P-004/005 DEC 10 '91 09:44 "Prosperity and the Rule of Law" Conference Subjects All conference sessions will leave plenty of time for questions and answers to promote understanding of the subjects of discussion. Conference speakers will use English and be interpreted into Russian. Interpreters will also be available to allow conference attendees to meet informally with speakers between conference sessions, during meals and after the daily sessions. I. The Bill of Rights -- The conference will begin by reviewing the Bill of Rights, placing it in the context of the history of limits on government power that reach back to the Magna Carta. We will discuss James Madison's role as father of the U.S. Constitution. The European Convention on Human Rights will be reviewed. Speakers: James MacGregor Burns, Professor of History, University of Virginia; Elisabeth Palm, Justice of the European Court of Human Rights. II. The importance of private property rights - We will examine the role of property rights in creating prosperity and protecting freedom. Speakers: Richard A. Epstein, James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor of Law, the University of Chicago Law School. III. Sound monetary policy - The most important element for economic rebirth is a sound currency. The conference will explore options for instituting a sound currency. Speaker: Steve H. Hanke, Professor of Applied Economics, The Johns Hopkins University. IV. Taxes and a prudent fiscal policy --- We will examine how to write a tax code to attract desperately needed international investment. The link between tax policy and economic growth and the role of constitutional limits on taxes and spending will be reviewed. Speakers: Alvin Rabushka, Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University; James M. Buchanan, Chairman, Center for the Study of Public Choice, George Mason University; Gordon Tullock, Professor of Economics, University of Arizona. V. Commercial code - There will be a session to review the role of a commercial code in attracting investment, minimizing the barriers to establishing new businesses, limiting bureaucracy and protecting consumers. Speakers to be announced. VI. The Economic History of Prosperity and the Rule of Law - We will review contemporary examples of how a change to the rule of law can bring prosperity to the average citizen. Speakers: Alvin Rabushka, Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University; Mancur Olson, Professor of Economics, University of Maryland. +2025462086 NAT TAXPAYER'S UNION F-104 T-990 P-005/005 DEC 10 '91 09:45 - 2 - VII. Problems of Enforcement - It is relatively easy to write paper limits. limitations on government. The conference will explore options to enforce these Speakers: Vernon Palmer, author of draft constitutions for the Congo and Lesotho and Professor of Law, Tulane Law School; Bernard H. Siegan, Director of Law and Economics Studies, University of San Diego Law School. VIII. Public Goods and the Rule of Law - How privatization and property rights enforcement can reduce the cost of development. Speakers to be announced. IX. Celebrating the 200th anniversary of the Bill of Rights. Speaker: President George Bush. dk34:7