Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Source Description

Records pertain to the Middle East Peace Process.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
285342017
label
CO074 Case Number 275273CU Scanned
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
285342017
contentType
document
title
CO074 Case Number 275273CU Scanned
description
Records pertain to the Middle East Peace Process.
collections
Records of the White House Office of Records Management (George H.W. Bush Administration)
Subject Files on Israel
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
285342017
generalNotes
Title terms were applied by White House staff.
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
37b7c63fbb275216
ocrText
CS ID # 275213 CU WHITE HOUSE C0074 CORRESPONDENCE TRACKING WORKSHEET O OUTGOING H INTERNAL I - INCOMING Date Correspondence Received (YY/MM/DD) / / Name of Correspondent: Brian R. Jenkins MI Mail Report User Codes: (A) (B) (C) Subject: u.s. hean Guarantees to Israel ROUTE TO: ACTION DISPOSITION Tracking Type Action Date of Completions Date Office/Agency (Staff Name) Code YY/MM/DD Response Code YY/MM/DE Cuofe ORIGINATOR 91,100 C91,11,04 CS Cuat 14 Referral Note: ADM 10,02 DJ 091,19,04 Referral Note: See comments / / / / Referral Note: / / / / - Referral Note: / / / / Referral Note: ACTION CODES: DISPOSITION CODES: A Appropriate Action I Info Copy Only/No Action Necessary A Answered C Completed C Comment/Recommendation R Direct Reply w/Copy B - Non-Special Referral S Suspended D Draft Response S For Signature F Furnish Fact Sheet X Interim Reply to be used as Enclosure FOR OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE: Type of Response = Initials of Signer Code = "A" Completion Date = Date of Outgoing Comments: CINDY- PLEASE REFER TO NSC CS Keep this worksheet attached to the original incoming letter. Send all routing updates to Central Reference (Room 75, OEOB). Richard Hanss should handle. Transfer ToNSC for reply - Always Refer questions return completed about the correspondence correspondence record tracking to Central system Files. to Central Reference, ext. 2590. SR 11/4/91 5/81 RECORDS MANAGEMENT ONLY CLASSIFICATION SECTION No. of Additional Correspondents: Media: Individual Codes: Prime Secondary Subject Code: Subject Codes: - - - - - - PRESIDENTIAL REPLY Code Date Comment Form C Time: P- DSP Time: Media: SIGNATURE CODES: MEDIA CODES: CPn - Presidential Correspondence B Box/package n 0 Unknown C Copy n - 1 George Herbert Walker Bush D Official document n-2 George Bush G Message H Handcarried n 3 George L Letter M Mailgram CLn First Lady's Correspondence O Memo n 1 Barbara Bush P Photo n-2 Barbara R Report S Sealed n - 3 Bar T Telegram n - 4 - Mrs. Barbara Bush V Telephone X Miscellaneous CBn - Presidential & First Lady's Correspondence Y Study n - 1 - Barbara & George Bush n-2 - Barbara & George 16 0378K prof C.bayden 2200 Main Street, #650 Wailuku, HI. 96793 September 19, 1991 The President THE WHITE HOUSE Washington, D.C. 20500 Re: U.S. Loan Guarantees to Israel Dear Mr. President: I am writing this letter on behalf of my client, William R. Burt, to urge the government of the United States of America to refuse to guarantee loans to Israel that will favor the settlement of Soviet Jews in the occupied Arab territories. The reason why the United States should refuse to guarantee the loans is that such governmental action would violate the "Establishment Clause" of the First Amendment to the Constitution. On September 8, 1991, Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir stated at a meeting of activists from his conservative Likud block that "[a]ll the territories of Eretz Israel must be settled by Jews, more and more " Eretz Israel refers to the biblical land of Israel which includes the occupied Gaza Strip and the West Bank of the Jordan River. As such, the sought-after loan guarantees are to further a particular religious goal of the conservative party of Israel. The issue is not whether the religious objective of recreating Eretz Israel is a worthy goal; the issue is whether the government of the United States of America is able to take official action which will further any religious goal including the one sought by Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir. Israel is occupied by persons of many different religions besides members of the Jewish faith, including Moslems and Christians of many different sects. For the United States to guarantee loans that would further the religious goals of one of these religions, would be preferential treatment of one religion over another. The President September 19, 1991 Page 2 The phrase in the 1802 letter from President Thomas Jefferson to a group of Baptists in Dansbury, Connecticut wherein President Jefferson stated that the purpose of the First Amendment was to build "a wall of separation between Church and State," was referred to by Chief Justice Waite of the United States Supreme Court in Reynolds V. United States, 98 U.S. 145, (1879) as "almost an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the [First] amendment." Id. at 164. See, L. JAYSON, J. KILLIAN, S. BECKEY, T. DURBIN, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Cong. Research Service 1973) The United States Supreme Court has established three tests to analyze government actions with regard to the Establishment Clause, the first two standards are part of the same formulation: "The test may be stated as follows: what are the purpose and the primary effect of the enactment? If either is the advancement or inhibition of religion then the enactment exceeds the scope of legislative power as circumscribed by the Constitution. That is to say that to withstand the strictures of the Establishment Clause there must be a secular legislative purpose and a primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion. Abington School District V. Schempp, 377 U.S. 203, 222 (1963) (emphasis added) The third test is whether the governmental program results in "an excessive government entanglement with religion. The test is inescapably one of degree [T]he questions are whether the involvement is excessive, and whether it is a continuing one calling for official and continuing surveillance leading to an impermissible degree of entanglement." Waltz V. Tax Comm. of City of New York, 397 U.S. 664, 674-75 (1975). In this case, the proposed loan guarantees fail all of the tests. The purpose for which Israel needs the loan guarantees is to further the religious goal of establishing Eretz Israel. This is in sharp contrast to providing U.S. assistance to further the secular goals of the Country of Israel. The President September 19, 1991 Page 3 Furthermore, the United States would be called upon to supervise the loan guarantees over a long period of time. There is a large body of U.S. Supreme Court case law that has applied the tests to various factual situations. For example, it was deemed permissible for the government to provide a grant towards the construction of a hospital owned and operated by a Roman Catholic order as there was a secular purpose. Bradfield V. Roberts, 175 U.S. 291 (1899). Likewise a state program can loan textbooks to a parochial school. Cochran V. Board of Education, 281 U.S. 370 (1931). However, funds may not be given to an institution which would help defray the cost of building or maintaining chapels or classrooms in which religion is taught. Com. for Public Education & Religious Liberty V. Nyquist, 413 U.S. 756, 774-780 (1973). These cases, I believe emphasize that the involvement of the United States in guaranteeing loans to Israel which will further the religious purpose of establishing Eretz Israel would be in clear violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. In closing, I again urge you to do all in your power to keep the United States of America from involvement in the religious goals of the conservative party in Israel. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, Biron R.J. BRIAN R. JENKINS Attorney for William R. Burt BRJ:kla CC: William R. Burt