Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
6283052
label
FY 1977 - 09/18/75 - Budget Reduction Proposals (4)
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
6283052
sourceUrl
contentType
document
title
FY 1977 - 09/18/75 - Budget Reduction Proposals (4)
citationUrl
collections
White House Special Files Unit Files
Budget Review Decision Papers
subjects
Federal budget
Federal budget deficit
thumbnailUrl
largeImageUrl
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
6283052
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1975-09-30
month
9
year
1975
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1975-09-01
month
9
year
1975
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
d70af34585fe63b0
ocrText
The original documents are located in Box 9, folder "FY 1977 - 9/18/75, Budget Reduction
Proposals (4)" of the White House Special Files Unit Files at the Gerald R. Ford
Presidential Library.
Copyright Notice
The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of
photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United
States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections.
Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public
domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to
remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid
copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library.
from Box 9 of the White House Special Files Unit Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library
$
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
1977 OUTLAY REDUCTIONS
Revised
Planning
Current
Suggested
planning
Program
guidance
Adjustments
estimate
reductions
guidance
Research Project Support
395
--
395
--
395
National Research Centers
and Programs
172
--
172
--
172
Research Applied to
National Needs (RANN)
82
--
82
--
82
Science Education
in
69
---
69
-50
19
Graduate Student Support
Other
57
--
57
--
57
Total
775
--
775
-50
725
GERALD
R.
FORD
LIBRARY
Summary of Outlay Reductions (Part I)
National Science Foundation
(dollars in millions)
9/5/75
Effect on outlays in:
1976
1977
1978
A.
1977 planning guidance and related
1976 amount
XXX
775
XXXX
B.
Suggested program reductions in
Science Education and Training:
Current estimate
65
69
69
OMB recommendation
53
19
0
Suggested reduction
- -12
-50
-69
Total suggested reduction
- -12
- -50
- -69
Revised 1977 planning guidance and
related 1976 amount
708
725
XXXX
1977 Outiny Reductions (Part II)
NSF/Science Education and Training
(dollars in millions)
Date:
September 5, 1975
appropriation request
deferral action
other administrative action
rescission action
substantive legislation
other congressional action
1976
1977
1978
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
Amount:
Current estimate
65
65
69
69
XXX
69
OMB recommendation
40
53
0
19
XXX
0
Suggested reduction
-25
-12
-69
-50
XXX
-69
Actions required:
Eliminate support in NSF for science education programs and graduate student support through
fellowships. Because only about one-half of new budget authority is expended in the year of
obligation, a recission will be needed for part of the 1976 program in order to reduce outlays
by $50M in FY 1977.
Program impact:
Would eliminate program. However, of all NSF activities, science education is considered as
lowest priority on programmatic grounds. The only other option for reducing 1977 outlays
is a cut in research programs. Because only about 27% of new authority is expended in the
first year in these programs, BA in FY 1977 would have to be reduced by over $100M even with
rescission in FY 1976. Furthermore, NSF research support plays a pivotal role now that basic
research in mission agencies is more and more being squeezed by inflation. Despite criticism
from Senator Proxmire of some research projects supported by NSF that appear trivial from
their titles, research proposals must generally pass rigorous qualitative review before grants
are made. Less than 50% of proposals for support are funded by NSF.
2
Other consideration:
NSF would strongly oppose this reduction both because the Foundation believes it has a
responsibility in improving science education and because of the strong congressional
support for these programs. A reduction in the research program, however, would send a
strong! negative signal that the Administration is generally anti-science, because NSF
symbolizes Federal support of basic research in all fields of science to underpin future
economic growth and improvements in the quality of life.
RAILROAD RETIRE-
MENT BOARD
1977 Outlay Reductions (Part II)
RRB Railroad Retirement
(dollars in millions)
Date:
9/5/75
/
/
appropriation request
/
deferral action
/
/
other administration action
/
/
rescission action
/
X
/
substantive legislation
/
other congressional action
1976
1977
1978
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
Amount:
Current estimate
3,443
3,443
3,567
3,567
XXX
3,829
OMB recommendation
3,443
3,443
3,567
3,457
XXX
3,719
Suggested reduction
--
--
--
-110
XXX
-110
Actions required:
Limit cost-of-living increase to 60% of the increase in the applicable index.
Program impact:
1 million beneficiaries would receive less than the expected benefit increase.
Other consideration:
Enactment is extremely unlikely.
GERALD FURD ?
TVA ;
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
1977 Outlay Reductions
($ millions)
Revised
Planning
Current
Suggested
planning
Program
guidance
Adjustments
estimate
reductions
guidance
Power plant construction
program
725
XXX
725
22
703
Nonpower program
95
XXX
95
2
93
Employment reduction
1
-1
-
Total
820
XXX
820
25
795
CYROLOR 764817 FORD
SUMMARY OF OUTLAY REDUCTIONS
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
($ in millions)
Effect on outlays in
1976
1977
1978
A. 1977 planning guidance
XX
820
XX
Current estimate
781
820
XX
B. Suggested program reductions:
power
0
22
0
nonpower
0
2
0
C. Personnel reduction:
1
1
Total suggested reduction
0
25
1
Revised 1977 planning guidance
and related 1976 amount
781
795
XX
LIGHARY CERALD FROM
1977 Outlay Reductions (Part II)
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
(dollars in millions)
Date:
September 5, 1975
X
appropriation request
X
deferral action
X
other administration action
rescission action
substantive legislation
other congressional action
1976
1977
1978
Amount:
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
Current estimate
10,087.8 1/
781
94.1
820
XXX
961
OMB recommendation
10,087.8
781
81.4
796
XXX
961
Suggested reduction
0
0
12.7
24
XXX
0
1/ Assumes passage of $10 B bonding legislation
Actions Required:
Reduce construction outlays by delaying new starts on 3 new power plants and with
some slowdown on water program. TVA's past forecast for the demand for electri-
city exceeded the actual demand which enables the deferring of power construction.
Moreover, this reduction of outlays will assist in improving its financial position.
Program Impact:
Relatively minor program impact assuming TVA's power demand grows at or about pro-
jected demand rate. Staff analysis estimated the growth rate to be 5.5% in May
which is slightly lower than the rate used in June of 5.8% by Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
XYV9917
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
1977 OUTLAY REDUCTIONS
Revised
Planning
/
Current
Suggested
planning
Program
guidance
Adjustments
estimate
reductions
guidance
Functional Development Assistance
894
- 2
892
-22
870
International Organizations and
Programs
210
--
210
-15
195
Operating Expenses
209
--
209
- 2
207
Allowance for Foreign aid
requirements
--
+1294
1294
--
1294
Other AID
120
+57
177
--
177
Less Receipts
-390
--
-390
I
-390
Employment Reduction
- 4
- 4
Total
1043
1349
2392
-43
2349
a/ Approved by the President but not yet transmitted.
GERALD LIBRARY R. FORD
SUMMARY OF OUTLAY REDUCTIONS
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
(dollars in millions)
Effect on outlays in:
1976
1977
1978
A. 1977 Planning guidance
XXX
1043
XXX
Adjustments:
+ 55
Allowance for Foreign aid requirements
XXX
+1294
XXX
Current estimate
1014
2392
XXX
B. Suggested program reductions:
Functional Development Assistance
-22
-55
International Organizations and
Programs
-15
- 9
Operating Expenses
- 2
--
C. Employment Reduction
- 4
Total suggested reduction
- 43
- 68
Revised 1977 planning guidance and
related 1976 amount
1014
2349
XXX
1977 Outlays Reductions (Part II)
AID Functional Development Assistance
(dollars in millions)
Date:
9/6/75
/
/
appropriation request
/
/
deferral action
/
/
other administration action
/
/
rescission action
/
/
substantive legislation
/
/
other congressional action
1976
1977
1978
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
Amount:
Current estimate
858
820
1010
892
XXX
1040
OMB recommendation
858
820
863
870
XXX
985
Suggested reduction
147
22
55
Actions required
Holding appropriation request to 1976 level for functional accounts.
Program impact:
By adjusting among functional accounts, would permit modest increases in highest priority areas of food
production and population over 1976 request levels. It would necessitate a budget request for less than
we have already sought in the authorizing legislation.
Other consideration:
This would probably not be too inconsistent with Secretary Kissinger's UN speech, which did not stress
increasing bilateral aid.
BERALD
R.CORD
FORD
1977 Outlay Reductions (Part II)
International Organizations and Programs
(dollars in millions)
Date: 9/6/75
/
X
/
appropriation request
/
/
deferral action
/
/
other administration action
/
/
rescission action
/
/
substantive legislation
/
/
other congressional action
1976
1977
1978
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
Amount:
Current estimate
190
140
215
203
XXX
214
OMB recommendation
190
140
190
188
XXX
205
Suggested reduction
--
25
15
9
Actions required:
Hold appropriation request to 1976 level.
Program impact:
Probably very slight, since Congress can be expected to reduce the 1976 request substantially; so this
would still constitute an increase.
GUEALS
1977 Outlay Reductions (Part II)
AID Operating Expenses
(dollars in millions)
Date: 9/6/75
/
X/
appropriation request
/
/
deferral action
/
/
other administration action
/
/
rescission action
11
substantive legislation
/
/
other congressional action
1976
1977
1978
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
Amount:
Current estimate
205
191
208
209
XXX
208
OMB recommendation
205
191
205
207
XXX
208
Suggested reduction
--
--
3
2
--
Actions required:
Hold appropriation request to 1976 level.
Program impact:
Virtually none in this account.
Genner.
1977 Outlay Reductions
Defense
The attachment identifies potential outlay reductions of $5.8B from the
1977 Defense Military planning ceiling of $98.2B. This would reduce
Defense out-lays about S2B below the recommended 1976 level in real
terms. Since the Defense planning process is already $7B higher in
outlays than the $98.2B level, the recommended reductions would involve
total adjustments of about $12B from the internal DOD planning level.
In conducting this exercise a ground rule was established to protect
existing force levels. The identified reductions are concentrated
in the following areas:
Military/civilian pay - $3.1B, reflecting a 5% limit on the
October 1975 and October 1976 pay raises and identified budgetary
issues.
Military/civilian manpower reductions - $.7B. This includes a
30,000 man reduction in military end strength for transients and an
additional 50,000 reduction in Defense civilian personnel by end
FY 1977.
Defense operations - $.8B. This will require a tightening up in
non-readiness related areas such as travel and stock funds and includes
a 5% reduction in operational activity across the three services.
Investment programs - $1.2B. This would provide sharply lower
levels than now planned for Defense R&D and production in 1977 but
still permits a real growth of 6% over the 1976 level. Non-operational
construction would be sharply reduced in both 1976 and 1977.
About half of the proposed reductions - those concerned with military/
civilian pay - could be accomplished with no adverse effects on Defense
readiness and capabilities. The other half, however, would require
lower modernization levels and reduced Defense readiness and would be
vigorously opposed by Secretary Schlesinger.
The recommended reductions could be accomplished without seriously
degrading U.S. defense capability, but the resulting cut in real defense
resources could signal at home and abroad withdrawal of Administration
support for strengthened defense capabilities.
The reductions would have little overall effect on the economy, but
could impact on localities that depend upon defense employment and
contracts.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE - MILITARY
1977 OUTLAY REDUCTIONS
(dollars in billions)
Revised
Planning
Current
Suggested
planning
Program
guidance
Adjustments
estimate
reductions
guidance
Military and civilian personnel
37.2
37.2
1.2
36.0
.
Military and civilian pay increases
6.6
6.6
2.6
4.0
Retired pay
7.9
.6
8.5
.1
8.4
Operations, R&D, procurement,
construction
46.5
46.5
1.9
44.6
Total
98.2
.6
98.8
5.8
93.0*
*Current Defense planning levels imply about $105 billion for 1977.
GERALD
P.
FORD
LIERARY
SUMMARY OF OUT!
REDUCTIONS
Department of Defense - Military
(dollars in millions)
Effect on outlays in
1976
1977
1978
A.
1977 Planning guidance
98,200
Adjustments:
Retired pay CPIs
565
565
Current estimate
91,800
98,765
B.
Suggested program reductions:
Cap Military and classified pay increases
2400
Cap Wage Board pay increases
145
Cap Military retired cost of living
increases
100
Reduce leave, overtime and
pay related costs
500
Reduce Military Manpower
20
200
Reduce Civilian Manpower
60
460
10
Reduce tempo of Operations
215
830
80
GERALD
Slow pace of R&D and procurement
400
760
Freeze non-urgent construction
160
avoi
540
170
LIBRATY
Reduce intelligence-related
procurement and construction
50
190
85
Total suggested reduction
505
5765
1105
Revised 1977 planning guidance and
related 1976 amount
91,295
93,000
1977 Outlay Reductions
DOD Military and Classified Civilian Pay Increases
(dollars in millions)
Date:
August 19, 1975
X
Substantive legislation
1976
1977
1978
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
Amount:
Current estimate
2,108
2,100
5,560
5,550
XXX
0
OMB recommendation
2,108
2,100
3,160
3,150
XXX
0
Suggested reduction
--
-
2,400
2,400
XXX
0
Actions required:
Limit comparability increases for military and classified civilian pay to 5% on 10/1/75 and 10/1/76.
BEFALD
FORD
revant
1977 Outlay Reductions
DOD Wage Board Pay Increases
(dollars in millions)
Date: August 19, 1975
X
substantive legislation
1976
1977
1978
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
Amount:
Current estimate
--
--
1010
1010
XX
0
OMB recommendation
--
--
865
865
XX
0
Suggested reduction
--
--
145
145
XX
0
Actions required:
Limit comparability increases for wage board pay to 5% in 1977.
1977 Outlay Reductions
DOD Retired Pay
(dollars in millions)
Date: August 19, 1975
X
substantive legislation
1976
1977
1978
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
Amount:
Current estimate
(12/1/76 CPI @ 4.91%)
8,478
8,478
XXX
0
OMB recommendation
(12/1/76 CPI @ 3.41%)
3,378
8,378
XXX
0
Suggested reduction
-100
-100
XXX
0
Actions required:
Enact a cost-of-living cap that will reduce the 12/1/76 CPI by 1.5%.
CERRED
0203
48V8917
1977 Outla eductions
Leave, Overtime and Pay-related Costs
(dollars in millions)
Date: September 5, 1975
X
appropriation request
X
other Administration action
substantive legislation
1976
1977
1978
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
Amount:
Current estimate*
37,200
37,200
37,200
37,200
xx
0
OMB recommendation
37,200
37,200
36,700
36,700
xx
0
Suggested reduction
-
-
500
500
XX
0
Actions required: Congressional approval of the requested change in military reenlistment
leave entitlements ($75 million). Administrative action to reduce military travel costs
by increasing tour lengths and reducing personnel turbulence ($275 million). A 50% reduction
in civilian overtime or a Congressional approval of changes in the Federal
Wage System that are likely to be proposed by the President's Panel on Federal Compensation
($150 million).
Program impact: The reduction in overtime will be difficult to achieve at the same time
as a personnel reduction and will result in temporary backlogs.
*Military @ $22.7 B + civilian @ $14.5 B = 37,200
1977 Outlay Reductions
Military Manpower
(dollars in millions)
Date: September 5, 1975
/X/
reduced 1977 appropriation request
/X/
rescission
1976
1977
1978
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
Amount:
Current estimate
22,732
22,277
22,700
22,700
XXX
0
OMB recommendation
22,707
22,257
22,500
22,500
XXX
0
Suggested reduction
25
20
200
200
XXX
0
Actions required: Reduce total military end strength by 10,000 in 1976 and 30,000 in 1977. The 1976
action could be accomplished through a budget amendment before the appropriations bill is acted on.
Program impact: The reduction would be 1.4% of the January Agency plan for 1977. The reduction could
be spread evenly across the services and across programs with minimal impact, or it could be totally
applied against the transient account, which totals 88,000 in 1977. In the latter case, the reduction
would have some impact on readiness, to the extent that-permanent change of station travel and leave
would have to be accomplished without providing additional manpower authorizations to compensate for
personnel in route to the next duty assignments. In wartime, however, travel and leave would be
curtailed, and many of the personnel in that status would be called back to their units, thereby
bringing these units up to strength.
Other Consideration: Congress appears ready to cut at least 9,000 end strength in FY 1976.
GENALD FORD
TOTAL MILITARY END STRENGTH
(thousands)
Year
President's Budget
Director's Preview
OMB Recommendation
1976
2,100
2,100
2,090
1977
2,127
2,127
2,097
1977 Outlay Reductions
Civilian Manpower
(dollars in millions)
Date: September 5, 1975
appropriation request
1976
1977
1978
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
Outlays
Amount:
Current estimate
14,700
14,400
14,880
14,500
300
OMB recommendation
14,640
14,340
14,410
14,040
290
Suggested reduction
60
60
470
460
10
Actions required: In addition to the Director's Preview cut of 22,000 in 1976 and 1977,
reduce total civilian end strength by 18,000 in 1976 and 50,000 in 1977. The 1976 action
could be accomplished through a budget amendment before the appropriations bill is acted
on.
Program impact: The 1977 reduction, including the Director's Preview cut, would be
7.2% of the January agency plan for 1977. If applied evenly across the board to
services and programs, the largest impact would be on logistics, primarily depot
maintenance, and secondly on base operations. The reduction over the 2-year period
would be about 75,000 from current actual employment levels and would require
productivity improvements of about double the current goals. Base closings would be
desirable to permit achieving such improved productivity with minimal disruptions on
readiness.
TOTAL DIRECT HIRE CIVILIAN END STRENGTH
(thousands)
Year
President's Budget
Director's Preview
POM
OMB Recommendation
1976
985
963
985
945
1977
994
972
1,012
922
0301
1977 Outlay Reductions
Operations and Maintenance
(dollars in millions)
Date:
September 5, 1975
appropriation request
X
recission action
1976
1977
1978
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
Amount:
Current estimate*
14,600
13,100
14,700
12,100
XXX
OMB recommendation
14,340
12,885
14,010
11,270
XXX
Suggested reduction.
260
215
690
830
80
* non-pay O&M, prior to Congressional action.
Actions Required: Reduce consumable supplies, material and minor equipment purchases (except food and
fuel) by 5%; defer about 10% of total DOD real property maintenance, mainly the portion which is per-
formed contractually; reduce flying and steaming hours by 5%; and, reduce temporary duty travel by 10%.
Outlay savings exceed budget authority savings due to draw-down of stocks.
Program Impact: These reductions could result in slightly reduced training levels, but can be accomplished
without significant impact on Defense readiness. The reductions in real property maintenance
might face Congressional resistance.
GERALD
P.
FORD
1977 Outlay Reductions
Defense R&D and Procurement
(dollars in millions)
Date: September 5, 1975
/X/
appropriation request
1976*
1977,
1978
BA
Outlay
BA
Outlay
BA
Outlay
Amount:
Current estimate
31,000
26,400
36,200
30,400
XXX
OMB recommendation
31,000
26,400
34,800
30,000
XXX
Suggested reduction
--
--
1,400
400
XXX
760
Actions required: Hold the level of Defense R&D and Procurement to a real dollar increase of 6% above
the 1976 level after anticipated Congressional action. This involves a reduction of about $6B in
BA below the Defense FY 1977 planning level and would defer several ship construction programs, and
reduce production and development rates of tactical aircraft, missiles, ammunition and communications
and electronics equipment. Illustrative program reductions are provided in the attachment.
Program impact: Reduces rate of general purpose force modernization mainly by stretching out planned
procurements. While stretch-outs allow reductions in annual expenditures, they may add to total
systems procurement costs. Strategic forces modernization proceeds according to Defense plans.
Other consideration: Reduced level still consistent with President's decision to allow real growth in
Defense modernization, in addition to allowances for inflation.
* reflects 1976 authorization and anticipated appropriations reductions.
GERALD
FOND
Illustrative R&D and Procurement Reductions
(BA in $ billions)
Program
1977
1977
1976 Spring Planning OMB Recommendation
Comments
Ship Construction
Build 1 vs 2 Trident boats in 1977
.6
1.4
1.0
-.4
Reflected in tentative Defense plans. Would
help relieve ship yard backlog.
Cancel Patrol Hydrofoil Ship after 1976 buy
.1
.4
--
-.4
Cancellation desirable on cost effectiveness
grounds. Probably acceptable to Defense.
Slip new carrier construction by 2 years
--
.4
--
-.4
Defense would object to more than a 1 year slip.
Build 2 vs 3 Nuclear Attack Submarines in 1977
.5
.9
.6
-.3
Little program impact; would also relieve,
shipyard backlogs.
Tactical Aircraft Stretchouts
Procure A-10's at 10 vs 20 per month
.4
.9
.5
-.4
Production rate likely to decline because of
cost escalation.
Procure F-15's at 6 vs 9 per month
1.6
1.4
.9
-.5
Reduce level of F-4 and other aircraft
modifications
1.3
1.7
1.5
-.2
Tactical Missiles and Munitions Deferrals
Stretchout procurement of air launched
missiles
1.5
1.7
1.5
-.2
Would delay achievement of War Reserve Material
Slow increase in ammunition procurement
requirements.
rate and defer munition plant modernization
.8
1.2
1.0
-.2
Communications, Electronics and Support Equipment
Miscellaneous reductions in communications &
electronics equipment allowing 4% real dollar
increase above 1976
1.7
2.2
1.9
-.3
Reduce support vehicle procurement deferring
purchases of trucks and passenger vehicles
.4
.7
.6
-.1
Research and Development
Miscellaneous reductions allowing 6% real
dollar increase above 1976
9.5
11.0
10.7
-.3
TOTAL
-3.7
1977 Outlay Reductions
Military Construction
(dollars in millions)
Date: September 5, 1975
X
appropriation request
X
other administration action
X
recission action
1976
1977
1978
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
Amount:
Current estimate
4,261
3,000
XXX
OMB recommendation
2,553
2,500
XXX
Suggested reduction.
-1,708
160
-500
540
XXX
-670
Actions Required: Invoke a military construction "freeze" of all authorized projects not directly related
to the acquisition of new weapons systems, urgent training, safety of personnel, or facilities otherwise
urgently required for national security. Request waiver of Congressional mandate so that appropriated
funds may be impounded, as indicated above. Major 1976 rescission package will be required to implement
this proposal.
Program Impact: This recommendation would delete several specific projects: Aeronautical Systems Test
Facility, the NSA administration building, and a large portion of the aircraft shelter program, remove all
but critical construction of military family housing projects, uniform services University of Health
Sciences and reduce construction of excess hospital beds at NNMC Bethesda. In addition, this
recommendation would defer modernization and improvement projects to family housing.
Agency may be expected to request about $4.5 B.
1977 Outlay ductions
Intelligence Activities: Department of Defense
(dollars in millions)
September 4, 1975
Rescission Action/Disapproval of Budget Submission
1976
197T
1977
1978
BA
Outlays
BA Outlays
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
Amount:
Current estimate
190
55
40
35
195
190
XX
90
OMB recommendation
0
0
0
0
0
0
XX
0
Suggested reduction
190
55
40
35
195
190
XX
90
Actions required: Prepare a rescission action for the portion of these projects
funded in 1976 and 197T and disapprove the expected budget submission for 1977.
Program impact: The three projects that are affected are: (1) the Defense Intelli-
gence Agency Headquarters building ($86M BA in 1976 with $34M in 1977 outlays) which
is now being considered by both Armed Services Committees. A rescission of this re-
quest would allow a cost-effective alternative to be found to consolidate DIA head-
quarters and would entail the continuation of a modest courier service and some incon-
venience to DIA; (2) the modernization of high frequency intelligence collection ($45M
BA per year 1976-1977 with $37M in 1977 outlays) This proposal, which is to begin in
1976, would automate the collection activities now performed by large numbers of mili-
tary personnel overseas. Capability would not be increased. The predicted personnel
reductions which were planned to offset this investment do not appear possible now.
As a consequence, return on investment will take more than 20 years - with little im-
provement in the quality of intelligence; (3) a technical collection system ($60M BA
in 1976 and $150M BA in 1977 with $118M in 1977 outlays). This system is designed to
replace (in the early 1980's) a collection system now in operation. Because of the
changing character of the target, however, serious doubts about the value of this sys-
tem have been raised. Disapproval would have no immediate impact on U. S. intelligence
capability.
Other considerations: The congressional committees have indicated some displeasure
with all three projects; reductions in funding are anticipated. The Secretary of
Defense is also considering cancellation of the technical collection system at this
time.
ASSISTANCE
'Military Assistance Accounts
1977 OUTLAY REDUCTIONS
Revised
Program
Planning
Adjustments
Current
Suggested
planning
guidance
estimate
reductions
guidance
Grant Military Assistance
809
16.0
825
-33
792
Foreign Military Sales
410
2.0
412
+ 7
419
Allowance for Middle East
requirements
-
890
890
I
890
FMS Trust Fund
-
-200
-200
-
-200
All other
-219
-219
-
-219
Total
1000
708
1,708
-26
1,682
September 5, 1975
GERALD
?
FORD
LIBRARY
SUMMARY OF OUTLAY REDUCTIONS
Military Assistance Accounts
(dollars in millions)
Effect on outlays in
1976
1977
1978
A.
1977 Planning guidance
XXX
1000
XXX
Adjustments:
Presidential decisions on MAP & FMS
levels
18
Reestimate of Trust Fund outlays
XXX
-200
XXX
Allowance for Middle East
requirements
XXX
890
XXX
Current estimate
1038
1708
XXX
6.
Accelerated shift from MAP to
FMS credit in 1977
Total suggested reduction
-26
-33
Revised 1977 planning guidance
and related 1976 amount
1038
1682
XXX
GERALD
:
FORD
LIBRARY
1977 Outlay Redu Lons (Part II)
Military Assistance Accounts
(dollars in millions)
X
appropriation request
deferral action
other administrative action
rescission action
substantive legislation
other congressional action
1976
1977
1978
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
Amount:
Suggested reduction
---
-16
-26
XXX
-33
Action required:
A decision by the President to offer foreign military sales credits to selected
countries for procurement of defense articles and services that would be given
on a grant basis under current plans.
Program impact:
The affected countries would have to borrow, albeit at preferred rates, rather
than receive the items with no obligation. To the extent that this were necessary,
bilateral relations with these countries would be affected.
Other consideration:
A reduction in grant military assistance is in accordance with expressed Congressional
desire.
BERALD : med
OTHER
CHANGES
1977 Outlay Reductions
Executive Branch Personnel Reductions
(dollars in millions)
Date: 9/5/75
/X/
appropriation request
11
deferral action
/X/
other administrative action
11
rescission action
11
substantive legislation
II
other congressional action
No. of FTP posi-
tions to be
1976
1977
reduced by end of
BA
0
BA
0
1977
Agriculture
---
---
20
20
1,000
Commerce
---
---
1
1
80
Corps of Engineers
3.6
3.6
7.2
7.2
425
Health, Education, &
Welfare
---
---
33
33
1,950
Interior
---
---
14.5
14.5
850
Justice
---
---
19
18
960
Labor
---
---
3
3
150
State
0.5
0.5
4
4
340
Transportation
---
---
5
5
400
FORD i GERALD LIBRARY
Treasury
---
---
52
51
2,709
Agency for Inter-
national Development
---
---
4
4
400
Environmental Pro-
tection Agency
---
....
1
2.5
2.5
150
General Services
Administration
---
---
....
3
3
300
National Aeronautics
and Space Admin
---
--
10
10
500
Tennessee Valley
Authority
0.4
0.4
0.8
0.8
50
United States Informa-
tion Agency
0.2
0.2
2
2
164
Veterans Admin
....
53
53
3,400
Total
4.7
5.7
234.0
232.0
13,828
Purpose: These proposed reductions are aimed at reducing
end-of-year 1977 civilian personnel in the civilian agencies
by 13, 828 positions below the levels that would otherwise
exist. In addition, proposed reductions in the Department
of Defense amount to $460M in 1977 outlays and 50,000
positions for FY 1977. These Department of Defense
amounts are reflected in the Department of Defense
package displayed elsewhere.
Actions required: Insure that 1977 personnel ceilings
reflect the dollar and personnel reductions.
Program impact: Some of the personnel reductions will have
programmatic impact and may slow down or delay affected
programs.
FORD & LIBRARY
1977 Outlay Reductions
Allowance for Pay Adjustment
(dollars in millions)
X
Administrative action
1976
1977
1978
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
BA
Outlays
Amounts:
Current estimate
550
550
2,600
2,600
XXX
XXX
OMB recommendation
550
550
1,550
1,550
XXX
XXX
Suggested reductions
1,050
1,050
--
Action required:
Limit cost-of-living increases in Federal salaries to 5% in 1976 and 1977.
Program Impact:
None
Estimates of savings are consistent with the President's expected announcement regarding
the October 1976 pay raise; the 1977 estimate represents the savings from a 5% pay limit
in place of a "catch-up" cost-of-living increase.
GENALD
P.
FORD
LIBRARY
Receipt Increases
SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN RECEIPTS
(fiscal years; in billions of dollars)
FORD is LIBRARY 038870
1976
1977
1978
A. 1977 Planning guidance
298.4
364.1
XXX
Adjustments:
Reestimates and changes in economic assumptions
1
+3.4
+4.7
XXX
Tax cut extension (to maintain current
withholding rates)
-5.9
-16.1
XXX
Revision of Administration energy proposals
-4.9
+0.6
XXX
Other changes
2
+1.3
-1.9
XXX
Current base estimate
292.3
351.4
XXX
B. Suggested receipt changes:
Some reductions or elimination of tax
expenditures
+6.4
+6.4
Tax simplification
-4.0
-4.0
Tax social security benefits (in lieu of 60%
limit on indexed programs)
(2.4)
(2.4)
Total suggested increases
2.4
2.4
C. Offsetting economic effects of all proposals
-4.0
-4.0
Revised receipt estimate
292.3
349.8
XXX
MEMORANDUM
Other possible receipt changes:
Delay for one year the proposed transfer of
1¢/gallon of gasoline tax receipts to States
+1.0
Increase freight transportation charges
+1.0
+1.0
1
The staff currently estimates the upward revisions to be twice these
magnitudes, but the more conservative estimates are used here pending further
review.
2
Includes revised accounting for the earned income credit in 1976 and
capital formation tax proposals and transfer of gasoline tax receipts to
States in 1977.
September 18, 1975
1977 OUTLAY
JCTIONS
(in millions 01 dollars)
Tax Expenditures and Tax Simplification
[ ] Appropriation request
[X]
Substantive legislation
[ ]
Rescission action
[ ]
Other Administration action
[ ] Deferral action
[ ] Other congressional action
Amount:
1976
1977
1978
Receipts
Receipts
Receipts
Current estimate
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
OMB recommendation
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
Suggested receipt increase
0
2,4251
2,425 1
1
To be selected from the alternatives presented in Attachment I.
Action required:
Attachment I lists tax expenditures that could be eliminated or reduced to increase receipts. Most
of them are based on "proposals for Consideration in First Phase of Tax Reform, " recently released by
the Ways and Means Committee. The Committee will, of course, be considering many proposals that would
result in revenue losses. The $2,425 million increase in receipts shown above is net of a $4,000 million
receipts loss due to tax simplification. Some additional items have been listed by OMB staff. Also attached
are some Treasury data showing 1974 estimates of the distribution of tax expenditures by AGI class (Attachment II).
Program impact:
The impact will vary depending upon which tax expenditure items are selected.
GERALD
ages
ANNUSIT
Attachment I
TAX REFORM PROPOSALS
(in millions of dollars)
Items in 1974
Items on
Ways & Means bill
Recommended
Ways & Means
and generally
Affects
1977
for
current
agreed to by the
individuals
Revenue
consideration
agenda
Administration
only
gain
by OMB staff
Real estate tax shelters
X
X
$ 250
X
(Application of limitation on artificial
accounting losses (LAL) would apply only
prospectively with some phase-in
provisions.)
Agricultural tax shelters
X
X
---
200
X
(Application of LAL)
Minimum tax for individuals
X
X
X
500
X
(The 1974 bill followed Treasury's recom-
mended substitution of a tax on minimum
taxable income (MTI) for the present
minimum tax provisions. Ullman now recom-
mends a stiffening of the current
minimum tax.)
Allocation of deductions*
X
X
400
X
(Ullman has proposed a provision that was
in a 1969 House bill that would require
itemized deductions to be prorated to
non-taxable income above $10,000 -- an
indirect means of taxing income from
tax-exempt bonds.)
Business use of homes
X
X
X
150
X
(Tightens rules for deduction of expenses)
GERALD
*
Indicates item that is relatively less acceptable.
FORD
TIBRARY
Items in 1974
Items on
Ways & Means bill
Recommended
Ways & Means
and generally
Affects
1977
for
current
agreed to by the
individuals
Revenue
consideration
agenda
Administration
only
gain
by OMB staff
Vacation home rentals
X
X
X
$ 50
X
(Tightens rules for deduction of expenses)
Sick pay exclusion
X
X
X
200
X
(Repeal exclusion of temporary but not
permanent sick pay.)
Dividend exclusion
X
X
X
360
(Repeal. Related to capital formation
proposals and should be held for a
capital formation package)
Deductibility of State and local gasoline
taxes*
X
X
X
850
X
(Repeal is consistent with energy policy.)
Casualty losses
X
X
X
150
X
(A 3% of AGI floor would be imposed.)
Employee business expenses
X
X
X
400
----
(A $200 floor would be imposed for
miscellaneous expenses. The floor is less
justifiable without the simplification
deduction.)
Medical expenses
X
X
X
1,500
X
(A 5% floor would be imposed.)
*
Indicates item that is relatively less acceptable.
Items in 1974
Items on
Ways & Means bill
Recommended
Ways & Means
and generally
Affects
1977
for
current
agreed to by the
individuals
Revenue
consideration
agenda
Administration
only
gain
by OMB staff
Interest deductions
X
X
$ 300
x¹
(Ullman has proposed a $9,000 limit on
itemized interest deductions.)
Limitations on foreign tax credit
X
X
100
X
(Includes requirement that dividends from
LDC corporations be "grossed up" in
computing foreign tax credit.)
Deferral of income of controlled foreign
corporations
X
200
X
(The provisions of the 1974 bill were
enacted in the 1975 Act. Ullman now
proposed that one-half of income of
controlled foreign corporations be taxed
currently.)
Exclusion of income earned abroad
X
X
X
25
X
(Exclusion to be phased out over 4-year
period. Would also make allowances paid
to government employees working abroad
taxable.)
Western hemisphere trade corporations
X
X
10
X
(Repeal phased over 5 years.)
Domestic international sales corporations*
X
---
1,300
X
1. If investment interest (such as interest on funds borrowed to invest in stocks and bonds) is not included.
* Indicates item that is relatively less acceptable
GERALD
LIBRARY
Items in 1974
Items on
Ways & Means bill
Recommended
Ways & Means
and generally
Affects
1977
for
current
agreed to by the
individuals
Revenue
consideration
agenda
Administration
only
gain
by OMB staff
Increase capital gains holding period
to one year
X
X
$ 100
X
(Phased in over 3 years.)
Alternative tax
X
X
X
300
(Repeal 25% alternative capital gains tax
rate for the first $50,000 of capital
gains. Related to capital formation
package.)
Allocation of expenses by financial
institutions*
2,000
X
(Would require financial institutions to
allocate a portion of their expenses to
their tax-exempt income from State and
local government securities.)
Restrictions on pollution control industrial
revenue bonds
30
X
(Proposed in Secretary Simon's Ways and
Means testimony.)
Capital gains at death*
X
2,500
X
(Assumes constructive realization of
capital gains at death and adjusts for
reduced estate tax liabilities. Ways and
Means has this item on its agenda for a
anos
subsequent phase of tax reform. There are
problems with respect to family farms and
LIBRARY
small businesses.)
*
Indicates item that is relatively less acceptable.
Items in 1974
Items on
Ways & Means bill
Recommended
Ways & Means
and generally
Affects
1977
for
current
agreed to by the
individuals
Revenue
consideration
agenda
Administration
only
gain
by OMB staff
Unemployment compensation*
X
$3,000
X
(Would treat payments as taxable income;
estimate depends on level of unemployment.
Extension of the 1975 tax cuts would
reduce estimate by $200.)
Workmen's compensation*
X
670
X
(Would treat payments as taxable income.
Extension of 1975 tax cuts would reduce
estimate by $100.)
Excess of percentage over cost depletions*
1,300
X
(Repeal provision for all minerals. Ways
and Means has this item on its agenda for
a subsequent phase of tax reform.)
Subtotal
18,445
Less, items that are relatively less desirable (*)
12,020
Subtotal
6,425
Less, offsetting cost of tax simplification.
4,000
Total
2,425
*
Indicates items that are relatively less desirable.
FORD
9/5/75
LIBRAP
Estimated Distribution of Tax Expenditures of Individuals by Adjusted Gross Income Class
Fiscal Year 1974
Key to list.
16
2
2
26
($ llions)
:
(1)
:
(2)
:
(3)
:
(4)
:
(5)
:
(6)
:
(7)
:
(8)
:
(9)
:
:
: Exclusion :
:
:
:
:
:
Adjusted
: Exclusion
: Exclusion:
of
: Expensing : Capital : Expensing : Excess of : Capital : Deductic
gross
: of benefits :
of
: certain : of certain : gains : of explora- : percent-: gains : of non-
income
: and allow- : military : income : agriculture: treatment : tion and : age over: treatment : business
class
: ances to :disability: earned : capital : of certain:development: cost :of certain: state
: Armed Forces: pensions : abroad by : outlays : agriculture: costs : depletion: timber : gasolin
: personnel :
: US citizens:
: income
:
:
: income : taxes
($000)
0 -
3
10
1
15
10
10
*
1
*
]
3 -
5
135
13
13
35
30
1
5
2
5
5 -
7
160
16
7
60
55
1
4
2
22
7 - 10
125
13
9
90
80
2
11
3
81
10 - 15
110
11
7
115
105
10
19
4
198
15 - 20
55
6
7
70
60
8
21
3
215
20 - 50
50
5
24
125
115
19
76
10
307
50 - 100
4
*
6
40
35
13
62
9
28
100 and over
1
*
2
35
30
26
106
22
w
Total
650
65
90
580
520
80
305
55
865
GERALL
FORD
LIBRARY
- 2 -
12
($ millions)
:
(10)
:
(11)
:
(12)
:
(13)
:
(14)
:
(15)
:
(16)
:
(17)
:
:
:
: Parental :
:
: Exclusion :
:
:
Adjusted
:
Housing : Exclusion : personal : Deduction : Deduction : of employer :
Exclusion Exclusi
gross
: rehabilita- of scholar-texemptions:of contri-
: of child : contributions: Deduction:of social :of soci
income
: tion 5-year: ships and :
for
:butions to : and depend-: to medical : of medical:security :securit
class
: amortiza-
:
fellow-
: student
: educational
:
ent
care
: insurance
: expenses :disability: CASI
:
tion
:
ships
: age 19
: institutions: expenses
: premiums and :
: insurance benefit
:
:
: and over :
:
medical care :
: benefits :for age
($000)
0 -
3
2
6
*
*
26
4
44
470
3 -
5
*
39
8
*
1
73
38
43
460
5 -
7
*
48
38
1
7
131
112
35
380
7 - 10
*
41
100
2
31
285
264
44
470
10 - 15
2
31
212
3
85
662
481
31
330
15 - 20
2
19
129
20
92
655
376
13
140
20 - 50
6
11
74
64
14
827
634
20
215
50 - 100
14
*
73
65
0
193
145
4
45
100 and over
24
*
21
200
0
88
71
1.
20
Total
50
195
655
355
230
2,940
2,125
235
2,530
GERALD
?
FORD
LIBRARY
3 -
7
24
25
($ millions)
:
(19)
:
(20)
:
(21)
:
(22)
:
(23)
:
(24)
:
(25)
:
(25)
: Exclusion :
:
:
:
:
:
Net exclusion of pension
Adjusted
: of social : Exclusion
:
:
Exclusion
:
Exclusion
: Exclusion:
contributions and earnings
gross
: security : of rail-
: Exclusion:of unemploy- :
of work-
: of public:
:
income
: benefits : road retire- : of sick : ment insur- :
men's
: assist- :
Employer
:
Plans for
class
: for depend- ment system :
pay
:
ance
:
compensa-
:
ance
:
plans
:
self-
: ents and : benefits
:
:
benefits
: tion benefits : benefits
:
:
employed
: survivors :
:
:
:
:
:
:
and others
($000)
0 -
3
80
30
10
50
25
30
15
3 -
5
75
29
16
80
40
25
50
5 -
7
60
24
17
100
50
15
110
1
7
-
10
75
30
24
160
80
5
290
2
10 -
15
55
21
66
250
120
*
790
6
15
-
20
20
9
60
150
75
*
990
11
20 - 50
35
13
57
200
100
*
1,740
107
50 - 100
5
3
4
50
25
*
545
87
100 and over
5
1
1
10
5
*
260
16
Total
410
160
255
1,050
520
75
4,790
230
0000
LIBRARY
- 4 -
($ millions)
:
(27)
:
(28)
:
(29)
:
(30)
:
(31)
:
(32)
:
(33)
:
(34)
:
(35)
:
: Exclusion : Exclusion :
:
: Excess of
:
:
:
Adjusted
:
Exclusion:
of
:
of
: Exclusion : Exclusion : percentage
: Additional: Additional:
gross
: of : premiums on : privately : of employer: of capital : standard : exemption: exemption: Fecire-
income : premiums accident and: financed : furnished : gain on : deduction : for the : for age 65: ment
class
: on group : accidental : supplementary : meals and : house sales:over minimum: blind : or over : income
: term life: death unemployment : lodging : if age 65 : standard :
:
:
credit
: insurance: insurance : benefits
:
: or over
: deduction :
:
:
($000)
0 - 3
5
*
*
1
1
--
*
7
1
3 - 5
15
1
*
4
*
1
1
95
18
5 - 7
30
2
1
8
*
13
3
185
22
7 - 10
65
4
1
17
1
64
3
268
20
10 - - 15
155
9
2
39
1
645
3
196
19
15 - 20
155
9
1
39
1
352
2
106
9
20 - 50
190
11
*
50
2
178
2
211
10
50 - 100
45
3
*
12
2
6
1
56
1
100 and over
20
1
*
5
2
1
*
26
*
Total
680
40
5
175
10
1,260
15
1,150
100
?
FORD
LIBRARY
- 5 -
22
($ millions)
4
1
:
(36)
:
(37)
:
(38)
:
(39)
:
(40)
:
(41)
:
(42)
:
(43)
:
:
:
:
:
:
: Deduction of
:
Depreciation
Adjusted
:
:
:
:
: Exclusion : Exclusion : nonbusiness
:
on
gross
: Exclusion : Exclusion: Exclusion: Credits and : of interest: of income : state and local: :
rental
income
:
of
: of : of GI : deduction : on state : earned in : taxes (other
:
housing
class
: veterans : veterans: Bill : for political: : and local :
US
:
than on
:
in excess
: disability : pensions : benefits : contributions:
debt
: possessions: owner-occupied :
of
: compensation:
:
:
:
:
:
homes and
:
straight
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
gasoline)
:
line
($000)
0 -
3
61
17
34
*
*
*
1
2.
3 -
5
39
8
124
*
*
*
13
6
5 -
7
44
*
60
1
*
*
55
10
7 -- 10
67
*
35
1
1
*
239
21
10 - 15
102
--
16
2
4
1
661
42
15 - 20
72
--
10
2
22
2
1,016
38
20 - 50
87
--
9
3
98
2
2,968
123
50 - 1CO
10
--
2
1
389
*
1,063
80
100 and over
3
--
*
*
546
*
939
48
Total
485
25
290
10
1,060
5
6,955
375
FORD
-
19
20
1
8
13
$ millions)
:
(44)
:
(45)
:
(46)
:
(47)
:
(48)
:
(49)
:
(50)
:
(51)
Adjusted
: Depreciation
:
:
:
:
:
: Deduction :
Deduction
gross
: on buildings
:
:
:
Capital
: Exclusion : Deferral of :of mortgage:
of property
income
: (other than
: Investment : Dividend:
gain
:
of interest: capital gain:interest on:
taxes on
class
: rental housing) : credit : exclusion: (other than: on life :on home sales: owner-
:
owner
: in excess of :
:
: farming and: insurance :
: occupied
:
occupied
: straight line :
:
: timber ) : savings :
: homes
:
homes
($000)
0 - 3
2
1
3
76
10
1
*
1
3 -
5
3
12
8
34
60
7
13
24
5 -
7
6
32
11
81
90
9
52
66
7 - 10
13
71
26
158
120
19
265
221
10 - 15
25
149
42
304
200
42
886
583
15 - 20
22
135
46
282
170
47
1,133
771
20 - 50
75
300
134
1,137
420
98
2,078
1,774
50 - 100
47
108
37
969
195
21
348
407
100 and over
27
72
13
3,109
155
11
95
213
Total
220
880
320
6,150
1,420
255
4,870
4,060
FORD
LIBRAR
7
13
10
23
($ millions)
15
:
(52)
:
(53)
:
(54)
:
(55)
:
(56)
:
(57)
Adjusted
:
:
Deduction
:
:
Additional items for Senator Mondale
gross
:
Deduction
:
of charitable
:
Deduction
:
Untaxed
:
Deferral of
:
income
:
of
: contributions
:
of interest
:
capital
:
income of
:
Asset
class
:
casualty
:
(other than
:
on consumer
:
gains
:
controlled
:
depreciation
:
losses
:
for
:
credit
:
at
:
foreign
:
range
:
:
education)
death
1/
:
:
:
corporations
:
($000)
0 -
3
*
3
*
18
*
*
3 -
5
3
18
7
8
*
*
5 -
7
4
67
26
18
*
5
7
-
10
13
190
133
36
9
10 -
15
54
445
443
70
1
10
15 - 20
42
548
567
64
2
10
20 - 50
74
1,251
1,039
194
7
36
50 - 100
34
506
174
112
7
25
100 and over
26
792
45
180
13
10
Total
255
3,820
2,435
700
30
105
Office of the Secretary of the Treasury
Office of Tax Analysis
CVOH
May 5, 1975
1/ Carryover of basis to heirs. (Effect after 10 years. Assumes heirs have lower marginal rates.)
1977 OUTLAY
JCTIONS
(in millions dollars)
Tax Social Security Benefits (in lieu of 40% "cap")
[ ] Appropriation request
[X] Substantive legislation
[ ]
Rescission action
[ ] Other Administration action
[ ] Deferral action
[ ] Other congressional action
Amount:
1976
1977
1978
Receipts
Receipts
Receipts
Current estimate
0
0
0
OMB recommendation
0
2,400
2,400
Suggested receipt increase
0
2,400
2,400
Action required:
Would treat social security and railroad retirement benefits in excess of contributions as taxable
income and repeal retirement income credit.
Program impact:
Would reduce the disposable income of social security recipients, but in a more equitable way
than an across-the-board reduction in benefit payments.
1977 Outlay Reductions
Department of Transportation/Highway Trust Fund
(dollars in millions)
/
/
appropriation request
/
/
deferral action
/
/
other administration action
/
/
rescission action
/x/
substantive legislation
/
/
other congressional action
1976
1977
1978
Receipts
Receipts
Receipts
Amount:
Current estimate
5,839
4,900
5,000
OMB recommendation
5,839
5,900
5,000
Suggested receipt increase
0
1,000
0
Action required:
Assuming enactment of new highway legislation permitting State preemption of 1¢ of Federal gas tax ($1 billion
annually), enactment of highway legislation to postpone the effective date of the preemption provision from
October 1, 1976 to October 1, 1977. (If new highway legislation is not enacted prior to January, 1976, the
Administration's proposal would be amended to reflect this shift).
Program impact:
The amendment would delay implementation of an Administration proposal that would provide substantial additional
flexibility to the states by permitting them to increase their revenues by $1 billion without increasing net
taxes. Since a large portion of these funds will be used for highways, it would delay some highway constructions.
Other considerations: It may appear as if the Administration has reneged on one of its most
substantial highway reform proposals. The change is attractive, however, because of the immediate 100%
impact on receipts (even if we eliminated the entire $5.6 Billion Federal assistance program for 1977, we
would save less than $1 billion in 1977 outlays). Although in the short term it is not supportive of the
thrust of our highway proposals, it does not effect in the longer term (1978 and beyond) our reform proposals.
1977 L. ay Reductions
Department of Transportation/Freight Transportation Fees
(dollars in millions)
Date: August 19, 1975
/
appropriation request
/
/
deferral action
/
/
other administration action
/
/
rescission action
/
substantive legislation
/
/
other congressional action
1976
1977
1978
Receipts
Receipts
Receipts
Amount:
Current estimate*
0
0
0
OMB recommendation
0
1,000
1,000
Suggested Revenue Increase
0
1,000
1,000
*does not reflect existing marine tonnage and highway taxes
Actions required:
Legislation to increase Freight Transportation Charges
Trucks--increase diesel fuel tax (a 4c per gallon increase would provide $400 million annually)
Rail institute new 2% freight waybill tax (about $350 million)
combination of new lockage-segment fees on inland waterways, domestic petroleum tax (3c), and
increases in foreign tonnage taxes (in combination about $250 million)
Program impact: New fees would substantially reduce the indirect subsidy presently provided to large trucks
and marine interests, and establish the principle that rail freight users will have to pay for massive
Federal rail capital assistance efforts. The new marine taxes, in particular, would serve to provide a more
rational allocation of freight movement by increasing the artificially low inland marine rates (inducing
more rail movements) and in the longer term would reduce pressure for Federal investment in costly, inefficient
waterway projects.
Other considerations: This package of fees is exemplary--additional analysis is required to assure proper
balancing to achieve reasonable cost allocations and better redistribution of freight. Packages with lower
or higher total revenues could also be prepared. All users will strongly resist tax increases. Substantial
additional analysis of impact of rail increases is also necessary.