Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
4520877
label
Protection - Presidential Candidates (1)
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
4520877
contentType
document
title
Protection - Presidential Candidates (1)
collections
Philip W. Buchen Files
Philip Buchen's General Subject Files
subjects
Department of Homeland Security. U.S. Secret Service. (2003 - )
First ladies
Vice-Presidents
Presidential campaign, 1976
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
4520877
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1976-09-01
month
9
year
1976
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1974-12-01
month
12
year
1974
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
a3e1e7583cb50e16
ocrText
The original documents are located in Box 57, folder "Protection - Presidential Candidates (1)" of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 57 of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library Tuesday 12/31/74 11:20 Dave Macdonald called to talk about two things: 1. Having volunteered to solicit for the Michigan Law School Fund, he came up with your name. If you're going to give, it might be a good idea to do it before the end of this year for income tax purposes. 2. Some time ago, he sent proposed guidelines for the protection of major candidates for the Presidency in 1976 for the staff to look over. Wondered if you had any comments from a legal standpoint. BERALD R. FORD END December 3, 1968 FOR: Philip W. Buchen FROM: Jay French SUBJECT: Secret Service Protection for Presidential Candidates Several weekends ago, Congressman Merris Udall (D - Aris.) formally announced his candidacy for the Democratic Presidential nomination. Although it is premature to do so at this time, I thought I would acquaint you with Public Law 90-331 which authorises the Secretary of the Treasury to provide Secret Service protection to major Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates. This law was the result of a Joint Resolution of the Congress which was passed and signed into law on June 6, 1968, as a result of the death of Robert Kennedy. A copy is attached for your information. It is important to note that the law does not define either who n major candidate is or when protection should commence. The pertinent language of the law authorises protection for major candidates as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury after consultation with the Advisory Committee. The Committee is composed of the Speaker and Minority Lender of the House, the Majority and Minority Leaders of the Senate, and one additional member elected by the others. Hearings were not held on this resolution because of the press of time, and debate on the floor of both houses was very brief. In the House, Congressman Gerald R. Ford recognized the difficulty of pinpointing and spelling out when a person becomes a "major" candidate. He said that the Advisory Committee was set up for this reason to consult with the Secretary of the Treasury. Vol. 114, Congressional Record, page 16270 (June 6, 1968, daily edition). During debate is the Senate, Senator Javite said that he believed a "sectional" candidate could be a major candidate. Senstor Monroney indicated that be was in accord with Senator Javits' position and he further indicated that a major candidate might be one who - TOME GERALD 2 has some degree of inter-state prominence as shown by opinion polls. Vol. 114 Congressional Record, page 16169 (June 6, 1968, daily edition). With regard to the commencement of protection, Senator Javite said that the law was meant to protest candidates before the party convention as well as after. Historically, protection was started in Jume of the 1968 campaign, a few days before passage of Public Law 90-331: and in the 1972 campaign, protection for approximately six to eight candidates was started in March. A third problem, raised by you, is how extensive should protection be for each candidate? I recommend no particular action on our part at this time since the statutory responsibility belongs tottheSecretary and historically pro- tection does not begin until the election year. Attachment LIBRARY GERALD P. FORD Tuesday 1/14/75 is 11:45 This/the memo fromDavid Macdonald you said Jay was supposed to remind me to give you. Also attached is Jay's December 3 memo re protection for Presidential candidates. FORDO & LIBRARY GERALD THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON AdvisoryCommittee approval of Treas, policy FORD j LIBRARY 938839 Wednesday 1/15/75 7:20 Jay said to let you know he's ready to discuss the David Macdonald memorandum whenever you're free to do so. Denald Me 1)16/75 FORD i DERALD LIBRARY Noted by W.E.S. Date: AUG 27 1974 MEMORANDUM FOR: SECRETARY SIMON David R. Macdonald From: Assistant Secretary (Enforcement, Operations, and Tariff Affairs) Subject: Advisory Committee Guidelines for Assignment of Secret Service Protection to Presidential Candidates Pursuant to P.L. 90-331 As you know, P.L. 90-331 places upon the Secretary of the Treasury the responsibility for determining those persons who are entitled to protection as major Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates. One of the FY '75 Presidential level MBO's is the drafting of guidelines under P.L. 90-331 to define those "Major Candidates" which are entitled to Secret Service protection in the 1976 election year. The Secretary of the Treasury consults, in making his determination, with an Advisory Committee consisting of the Majority and Minority Leaders of the Senate, and the Speaker and Minority Leader of the House, together with an additional member selected by those four persons. Attached to this memo are the suggested Advisory Com- mittee guidelines for identifying "Major Candidates." SUMMARY OF GUIDELINES The guidelines require all candidates to be declared candidates actively campaigning on a national scale. Con- sonant with the legislative history, the guidelines utilize national public opinion polls to determine who is a "Major Candidate." Briefly, with respect to the Republican and Democratic Parties, any candidate for the nomination who LIBRARY receives a ten percent party preference would receive pro- tection up to the time of the nomination. After the nomi- nation, of course, the Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates of the two major parties each receive protection. Protection will also be accorded to third party candidates who are favored with a ten percent preference in a national Ves, Sec Initiator Reviewer Reviewer Reviewer Reviewer D Surname MACDONALD WEBBER SCHMULTS BENNETT GARDNER ALBRECHT Initials DRM JH 8/28 byJA 8/28 Form 0S-3129 8/29 165/9/3 RAH 2348/29 8/29 Department of Treasury - 2 - poll which includes the leading candidate of the Republican and Democratic Parties. Protection commences on March 1, 1976, and once granted as to any candidate, will not be withdrawn no matter how that candidate subsequently fares in the public opinion polls. The guidelines are stated to be non-inclusive; that is, the Secretary can always make exceptions for unforeseen situations. Attachment DRM:mln 8/22/74 SUGGESTED ADVISORY COMMITTEE GUIDELINES FOR ASSIGNMENT OF SECRET SERVICE PROTECTION TO PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES PURSUANT TO P.L. 90-331 I. Introduction P.L. 90-331 - places upon the Secretary of the Treasury (the "Secretary") responsibility for determining from time to time, after consultation with an Advisory Committee (the "Committee"), those persons who qualify as a major Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidate ("Major Candidate") and thus should be furnished with Secret Service protection, unless declined. The Committee consists of the Majority Leader of the Senate, the Minority Leader of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives and one additional member to be selected by the members of such Committee. These guidelines will assist the Committee and the Secretary in determining who are the "major presidential or vice presidential candidates who should receive. protection " II. Guidelines Relating to Persons Who Are Major Candidates A. Candidates of the Democratic and Republican Parties 1. The nominees for President and Vice President of the Democratic and Republican National Conventions shall be deemed to be Major Candidates. BERALD FORD LIBRARY - 2 - 2. Prior to the National Conventions of the candidate's party, a candidate seeking the nomination of the Democratic or Republican Party for President or Vice President shall be deemed to be a Major Candidate when: (a) the candidate has publicly announced his or her candidacy; (b) the candidate receives at least a 10% party preference rating in any national Gallup or Harris public opinion poll (or other national poll designated by the Secretary, after consulta- tion with the Committee) completed at any time after thirty days prior to the Date of Commence- ment of Protection, as defined in Part III, which poll includes preference ratings with respect to substantially all candidates of the same political party for the office for which the person's candidacy has been announced; and (c) the candidate is seriously interested in, and actively campaigning on a national basis for, the office for which his or her candidacy has been announced. B. Candidates of Other Parties 1. A candidate for President or Vice President of a party other than the Democratic or Republican Party GERALD - 3 - shall be deemed to be a Major Candidate when: (a) the candidate has publicly announced his or her candidacy; (b) the candidate receives at least a 10% preference rating in any national Gallup or Harris public opinion poll (or other national poll designated by the Secretary, after consulta- tion with the Committee) completed at any time after thirty days prior to the Date of Commence- ment of Protection, as defined in Part III, which poll includes preference ratings for the candidate and for the leading candidate of the Republican and Democratic Parties for the office for which the person's candidacy has been announced; and (c) the candidate is seriously interested in, and is actively compaigning on a national basis for, the office for which the person's candidacy has been announced. III. Commencement and Duration of Protection of Major Candidates A. Commencement of Protection. No protection shall be furnished pursuant to P.L. 90-331 earlier than thirty days prior to the date of the first state primary election or March 1 of the Presidential election year, whichever is earlier. After such R. FORD GERALD LIBRARY - 4 - date, protection shall be commenced forthwith upon a determina- tion by the Secretary that a person is a Major Candidate. B. Duration of Protection. When a determination by the Secretary is made that protection is to be furnished a Major Candidate, protection shall not be withdrawn so long as the candidate remains seriously interested in, and is actively campaigning on a national basis for, the office for which the person's candidacy has been announced, unless the candidate specifically declines protection or unless the Secretary, after consultation with the Committee, specifically so determines. IV. General Nothing contained in these guidelines shall preclude a determination by the Secretary, after consultation with the Committee, that a person is a Major Candidate although the guidelines set forth herein are not satisfied. GERALD R. FORD THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON January 29, 1975 MEMORANDUM FOR: JERRY JONES FROM: PHILIP W. BUCHEN T.W.B. I have reviewed the attached materials concerning protection for major candidates. These guidelines are necessary and I urge their approval. Enclosure AMERGIT GERALD B. FORD THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON January 28, 1975 MEMORANDUM FOR: PHIL BUCHEN FROM: JERRY JONES SUBJECT: Simon Memo pe Secret Service Protection of Presidential Candidates (Attached) Don Rumsfeld would like your reactions to the attached memo as soon as possible, Please send your comments to the Office of the Staff Secretary. Thank you very much. road GERALD LIBRARY THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON 20220 DEC 241974 Dear Don: The Secretary of the Treasury has the responsi- bility for determining those persons who are entitled to Secret Service protection during the 1976 campaign as "major" Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates. Under P.L. 90-331, this determination is made after consulting with an Advisory Committee, consisting of the Majority and Minority Leaders of the Senate, the Speaker and Minority Leader of the House, and a fifth member selected by those four persons. The Treasury Department, with the help of the Secret Service, has developed guidelines for the use of the Secretary and the Advisory Committee for identifying major candidates. These guidelines are, to some extent, based upon the legislative history of the Act. Consonant with the legislative history, the guidelines utilize national public opinion polls to determine who is a "major candidate." Briefly, prior to the nominating conventions, any candidate for the Republican or Democratic nomination who receives a 10 percent party preference would receive protection up to the time of the nomination. After the nomination, of course, the Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates of the two major parties each receive protection. Protection will also be accorded to third party candidates who are favored with a 10 percent preference in a national poll which includes the leading candidate of the Republican and Democratic Parties. Protection commences thirty days prior to the first primary election (approximately February 8, 1976), and once granted as to any candidate, will not be withdrawn no matter how that candidate subsequently fares in public opinion polls. The guidelines are FORD GERALD - 2 - stated to be non-inclusive; that is, the Secretary (upon the recommendation of the Advisory Committee) can always make exceptions for unforeseen situations. Before we propose these guidelines to the Advisory Committee after the 94th Congress organizes itself in early 1975, we would appreciate any comments that you or the President might have regarding them. A copy of the proposed guidelines is therefore enclosed, together with the Report of the Senate Appropriations Committee and the floor debate relating to the defini- tion of the term "major candidate. 11- Also enclosed is a chart indicating which of the Democratic candidates in 1972 would have been protected (by receiving a 10 percent preference rating) under the guidelines as proposed and when protection would have commenced as to each. On the Republican side, only former President Nixon would have been protected under the guidelines in 1972. In case you have any questions concerning the guidelines, or desire any additional material, Assistant Secretary David Macdonald should be able to help. Sincerely, Bill William E. Simon The Honorable Donald Rumsfeld Assistant to the President The White House Washington, D. C. 20500 Enclosures GERALD FORD LIBRANT DRM:mln 8/22/74 SUGGESTED ADVISORY COMMITTEE GUIDELINES FOR ASSIGNMENT OF SECRET SERVICE PROTECTION TO PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES PURSUANT TO P.L. 90-331 I. Introduction P.L. 90-331 places upon the Secretary of the Treasury (the "Secretary") responsibility for determining from time to time, after consultation with an Advisory Committee (the "Committee"), those persons who qualify as a major Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidate ("Major Candidate") and thus should be furnished with Secret Service protection, unless declined. The Committee consists of the Majority Leader of the Senate, the Minority Leader of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives and one additional member to be selected by the members of such Committee. These guidelines will assist the Committee and the Secretary in determining who are the "major presidential or vice presidential candidates who should receive. protection. " II. Guidelines Relating to Persons Who Are Major Candidates A. Candidates of the Democratic and Republican Parties 1. The nominees for President and Vice President of the Democratic and Republican National Conventions shall be deemed to be Major Candidates. BERALD LIBRA 08 - 2 - 2. Prior to the National Conventions of the candidate's party, a candidate seeking the nomination of the Democratic or Republican Party for President or Vice President shall be deemed to be a Major Candidate when: (a) the candidate has publicly announced his or her candidacy; (b) the candidate receives at least a 10% party preference rating in any national Gallup or Harris public opinion poll (or other national poll designated by the Secretary, after consulta- tion with the Committee) completed at any time after that date which is thirty days prior to the Date of Commencement of Protection, as defined in Part III, which poll includes preference ratings with respect to substantially all candidates of the same political party for the office for which the person's candidacy has been announced; and (c) the candidate is seriously interested in, and actively campaigning on a national basis for, the office for which his or her candidacy has been announced. B. Candidates of Other Parties FORD is FENALD LIBRAR 1. A candidate for President or Vice President of a party other than the Democratic or Republican Party - 3 - shall be deemed to be a Major Candidate when: (a) the candidate has publicly announced his or her candidacy; (b) the candidate receives at least a 10% preference rating in any national Gallup or Harris public opinion poll (or other national poll designated by the Secretary, after consulta- tion with the Committee) completed at any time after that date which is thirty days prior to the Date of Commencement of Protection, as defined in Part III, which poll includes preference ratings for the candidate and for the leading candidate of the Republican and Democratic Parties for the office for which the person's candidacy has been announced; and (c) the candidate is seriously interested in, and is actively campaigning on a national basis for, the office for which the person's candidacy has been announced. III. Commencement and Duration of Protection of Major Candidate: A. Commencement of Protection. No protection shall be furnished pursuant to P.L. 90-331 earlier than thirty days prior to the date of the first state primary election or March 1 of the Presidential election year, whichever is earlier. After such UERALD FORD LIBRAST - 4 - date, protection shall be commenced forthwith upon a determina- tion by the Secretary that a person is a Major Candidate. B. Duration of Protection. When a determination by the Secretary is made that protection is to be furnished a Major Candidate, protection shall not be withdrawn so long as the candidate remains seriously interested in, and is actively campaigning on a national basis for, the office for which the person's candidacy has been announced, unless the candidate specifically declines protection or unless the Secretary, after consultation with the Committee, specifically so determines. IV. General Nothing contained in these guidelines shall preclude a determination by the Secretary, after consultation with the Committee, that a person is a Major Candidate although the guidelines set forth herein are not satisfied. FORD & LIBRAR STV8 the light of the tragle vance routing which the Secret Service I notice the Senator used the word events of the week, we should realize always works out. So I thoroughly agree. "commission." That is what we have in that this is of greatest and utmost ur- Now, we had two problems in commit mind, although the legislation at page 6 gency, because it threatens the very key- tee. I believe we have déalt with them on line 19 uses the term "advisory com- stone of our governmental structure, and both decently, and I would not dream mittee." that is the proper selection, by dezio- of interrupting the Senator I am satisfied, considering the sensitiv- cratic means--and that means exposure Mr. MONRONEY. I am happy to yield, ity and solemnity of what is being done, to all the citizens of the United States. if because I desire to clear up this matter. and with this legislative history, that it possible-of the person of the candulate. I believe it is an important point in the will be administered as the Senator and These tragic events have shown that this discussion. I believe we have achieved I and the committee have in mind. is a hazardous undertaking today and an end and guarantee the methods Mr. MONRONEY. I am sure the Sen- we must not ignore our responsibilities sought to achieve that end by the distin- ator is correct. I am sure the language for the men who offer themselves for guished Senator from New York. on page 6, line 15 to line 19 where it these major positions. Mr. JAVITS. Two points arose that provides, "the protection of persons who The committee recommends that the have troubled us, Mr. President. The first are determined by the Secretary of the Secret Service be specifically authorized. point was already incorporated in the Treasury from time to time as being in addition to its other duties now pro- provision which Senator MONRONEY had major presidential or vice presidential vided by law, to protect major presiden- presented, and that was the question of candidates who should receive such pro- tial or vice-presidential candidates. No who is a major candidate and is he a tection-unless the candidate has de- words can express our shock at the tragic candidate before he is a nominee-thàt clined such protection consulta death of our colleague, Senator ROBERT is, designated by a convention. tion with an advisory committee" will F. KENNEDY. This senseless act of vio- The understanding of the legislative be applicable after consultation with an lence makes it clear to the committee- history should be clear that by the use advisory committee, and this shows the and to every American-that it is in the of the words "major presidential candi- intent of the law that they are to have public interest to protection to date" we mean one who has not yet been a great part in designating the persons major candidates who are daily exposed nominated by his party convention, and who will have protection. to the hazards and risks of national po- we mean one who the decider-in this Certainly, I feel they WIT lean on the litical campaigns. particular instance, as carried in the pro- side of security. Certainly, in the case May I say. as I read the newspapers vision-in consultation-and the consul- which the Senator mentioned. the former carefully with respect to this tragedy, tation is extremely important-with the Governor of Alabama Would be entitled that it might not have been prevented, leadership in the House and Senate, will to such protection. The other area was by but there would have been a great chance have decided that so-and-so is a-major polls, or publicity, or by general judge that this security would be enormously presidential candidate He might even be ment of people who have lived in the increased had the provisions of the bill a sectional candidate. field of presidential elections for a we are now considering provided Senatór We spoke of former Governor Wallace time. KENNFDY with the services not only of in that regard. He, too. could be within I believe we have done about as well the Secret Service but also, as the bill that definition of a major presidential as we could do. Time is neeting. We felt provides, the helping hand to the Secret candidate. this matter had to Deunderway,and-to Service of the narcotics agents, the FBI, Mr. MONRONEY. The Senator is cor- morrow is too late. Last week would have the immigration inspectors, and other rect. And there may be other major can- been most helpful but we did have time law-enforcement branches. didates before we move forward.with the to work out, after we had executive As I read the accounts, the tragedy final election, if they have some degree of hearings, the settlement of committee occurred in the exit going through the interstate prominence as shown is opin- jurisdiction which the distinguished haliway to the kitchen. I know the ion polls or in some other way- I would ator, who is a member of the Committee Secret Service and the FBI well enough feel certain they could have this on the Judiciary, knows is-a tremendous that if that was the planned exit for the protection. hurdle. After time in consultation we Senator, there would have been sur- I do not think we dare reach. down to cleared this matter with the:chairmen of veillance of that particular point. In people who run for publicity only, as in the Committee on the Judiciary of both many instances, with mob scenes, there the cases of some of those who have ap- Houses and their members. is no way in which that safety can be peared before various committees de- We cleared the matter in many other assured. but danger can be materially manding equal time on network pro- ways and we carefully considered the lessened by the presence on duty of these grams because major candidates were so testimony. men and, if necessary, the presence on provided. I hope it will be understood that we duty of military detachments: because This is not an unworkable problem nor did have executive sessions because the this lessens to a great degree-it will not is it an unsolvable problem. We have pro- publicity on lack of protection for these prevent. but will lessen-the exposure to tected the selection by guaranteeing that men who are not guarded by the Secret abnormal dangers that this week has there will be a nonpartisan commission Service caused in itself a tragedy. We shown that the men who campaign for of the highest level that could inake the have been working quietly and both the high office may be subject to. final decision after the recommendation minority and the majority side cooper- Mr. President, I am happy to yield to of the Secretary of the Treasury: who is ated in presenting this bill today. the distinguished Senator from New the titular head of the Secret Service. We have stricken out some things we York. (At this point, Mr. McGovern assumed would have liked to have in the measure. the chair.) Mr. JAVITS. First, Mr. President, let because the House of Representatives me say that I join with the distin- Mr. JAVITS. Mr. President, will the might have held it up and made it neces- guished Senator from Oklahoma [Mr. Senator yield further? sary to go to conference. We recognize MONRONE in his views. as he has ex- Mr. MONRONEY. I yield. the emergency and we feel, in striking the pressed them. as he expressed them in Mr. JAVITS. It is very important that amendment which the committee added, the committee. I believe this is a most this matter be made clear, because the we will have acceptance by the House. salutary provision, and It is just heart- language which is contained at page 6, thereby making It unnecessary to go breaking that we should not have line 15, and thereafter indicates rather through another period of delay. thought of it sooner. I thoroughly agree general language which would seem to I would like to see this bill passed by with the Senator because I. too, have give the complete determination of the the Senate today. agreed to by the House, some experience with these security pro- question to the Secretary of the Treas- and signed by the President this evening. ury. However. I am satisfied. having I know the President wants to get that cedures. having been attorney general locked the matter in with the legislative done, too. of my own State. history which the Senator from Okla- Mr. JAVITS. There was one other con- I thoroughly agree with the Senator homa and I are now making, and con- sideration in our minds which has not that it is inconceivable that Senator sidering the sensitivity and seriousness of been fully expressed. When candidate KENNEDY would even have been led the matter. that it will be administered is a Governor, generally, he has the pro- through such a passage, with the ad- in that way. tection of his State police organization. CXTV--1019-Part 12 CNGRESSONAL SENATE June 0, 1968 When he is not a Governor he does not 3. I suggested-and 'he committee ed this under a career civil service officer, have even that but depends on his private adopted-language relating to assistance to manage the protection of Presidents. resour and his own organization. by other agencies to the Secret Service Vice Presidents, and other persons en- So many of us thought that Senator which provides that the Director of the titled to protection and the candidates ROBERT KENNEDY. who suffered so tragi- Secret Service should have the power to for President and Vice President, so that cally, allowed himself to be exposed too obtain this assistance. "unless such au- no one could charge that one political much, but this is now tragic history and thority be revoked by the President of faith or another was receiving better pro- we are trying to prevent for the future the United States." It seems to me alto- tection. what the tragic history of the past has gether proper that the President should The Senator now comes in with an taught us. possess residual power to modify or re- amendment that gives us. shall we say, However, the candidate who is not a voke authority granted to the Director of the best of both worlds. We have civil Governor will have a form of saferuard the Secret Service. If there is good and service protection and we have opera- which is not only in his interest but also sufficient cause to do so. tion on a day-by-day scheduling. and in the national interest. However, I did not, and I do not intend the men needed. at times, when needed. I wish to ask the Senator if he would the language to have the effect of involv- But we provide against any excess abuse not agree with me, and it should be a ing the President of the United States in of power or. in that matter. an excessive part of the legislative history. that we the daily operating decisions of the Se- negligence of security. by permitting the do not loo!: with favor on the "daring do" cret Service in carrying out this particu- Chief Officer of the United States to re- of declining this protection. and we also lar authority. I realize that the assistance claim or restrain or advise when the fervently hope that every candidate will of other Federal departments and agen- overall picture is unsatisfactory. accept it as being in the national inter- cies should be on a continuous basis. I It would be unthinkable for us to put est If he aspires to be President of the know that emergency sítuations-such the President in the position of chief of United States. as the terrible tragedy we have just the FBI or chief of the Secret Service. Mr. MONRONEY. I could not agree had-require prompt action at the oper- I think we get the best of both worlds more. I would say, indeed so. The Sena- ating level. Under any circumstances. in this. I think it would be most effec- to: is absolutely right. the Director of the Secret Service should tive. I am grateful to the Senator from In my judgment, having participated not feel obligated to obtain advance New York and the Senator from Colorado in many presidential campaigns by pres- clearance from the President before re- for their great contribution in this mat- idential candidates, those who would not questing assistance. He should protect ter. accept ction, or vice-presidential those persons for whom the Secret Serv- Mr. JAVITS. Let me say in that regard candidates who would not accept pro- ice has protective responsibility with the that when I broached the idea to the tection would be questioned on their full cooperation of other agencies of the Senator from Colorado tMr. ALLOTT], he udgment to occupy the highest office in Government immediately saw the point and Worked the world. The purpose of my language which is out the language which is here con- For that reason, I think it would be a incorporated in the bill-with full co- tained. He found the same receptivity matter that would be accepted by his operation and the desire of the Senator from the Senator from New Hampshire party; and if he were an independent, from Oklahoma, because there is no ad- [Mr. COTTON], my colleague on the com- by thore men who advise him, and per- versary attitude here at all-is to provide mittee, and from the Senator from Okla- haps some men who might want this a means for periodic review by the Pres- homa [Mr. MONRONEY] himself, who "daring-do" spirit which the Senator ident of the manner in which this all- went to great pains to help us. surgested, might be unduly expos- thority has been exercised to guard this could brook no delay and we had to Ing themselves when they do not have against any abuse or usurpation of re- work it out. I thank my colleague from to. sponsibility. The decisions themselves Colorado very deeply for his graciousness Mr. JAVITS I thought it essential should be made by the career official in every way in working out the language, that we nt least indicate our feeling on having this responsibility-that is, the and even in yielding to me to propose the subject. Secret Service Director. It is much more the basic language which he had him- The final question which concerned preferable that this authority-in which self been instrumental in working out. me, and which proved to be of concern to all Americans of all parties have a Mr. BYRD of Virginia. Mr. President, other Members also, is the rather broad stake-be exercised at the operating level will the Senator from Oklahoma yield? grant of authority to the Director of the rather than by the President or by a Mr. MONRONEY. I yield. Secret Service. presidentially appointed official. Mr. BYRD of Virginia. May I ask the It will be noted at page 7, lines 1 On this basis, I feel my language will Senator from Oklahoma if my under- through 6, that the Director of the Secret in no way inhibit the Secret Service and standing is correct that a vice-presiden- Service has the authority, and the word other Federal agenciés from the effective tial candidate, as used in this legisla- used is "shall" to require other Federal performance of these critical duties. tion, means one who has been nominated departments and agencies, which would I would most respectfully ask the Sen- for the position of Vice President? naturally include the national defense ator from Oklahoma whether he concurs Mr. MONRONEY. This protects both forces of the United States, to "assist the with this understanding and interpreta- the candidate who has been nominated, Secret Service in the performance of its tion. and before the nomination. If he is an protective duties." Mr. MONRONEY. Mr. President. I am announced vice-presidential candidate of While we recognize the protective happy to concur with the distinguished stature of more than local interest, he duties are limited to protect major pres- senior Senator from New York [Mr. would be entitled to request it. If found Idential candidates chosen by a combined JAVITSL. and with the distinguished sen- to be a major candidate by the Secretary foun of authority which the Senator ior Senator from Colorado IMr. ALLOTT). of the Treasury and this committee. he from Oklahoma has described, we did who participated in helping to make would be entitled to have the same degree realize. when dealing with such a sensi- this paragraph effective yet safe in its of protection. If he is not campaigning, I tive matter-and this is a vast grant of purposes. would say he would have little chance power-the Director of the Secret Service The reason the original draft of the of getting it because who knows. we could technically justify an enormous bill turned over to the Director of the might have 100 vice-presidential candi- control over the Armed Forces and other Secret Service the right to invoke aid dates in this Chamber and one never sensitive agencies and departments of from other Government law-enforce- knows when the lightning might strike, the United States. ment agencies. including the military. but this would not be a burden at all On the other hand, we wanted to be was to relieve the President of any re- unless they were accepted the same as a very careful that there was the assistance sponsibility or liability for too much, presidential candidate scriously inter- which these other agencies and depart- too little. or no protection at all of presi- ested and actively campaigning for that ments could bring. dential or vice-presidential candidates particular office-there are only two of- The Senator from Oklahoma has prop- of other parties. We all know the scur- fices, of course, President and Vice Prest- erly described that, so that. as a result, rilous attacks which have been made in dent. we are including the words "unless such the past. oftentimes on events that were Mr. BYRD of Virginia. If an individual authority be revoked by the President of inevitable. which sought to blame the is an active candidate for the post- the United States"-that is in lines 2 and President of the United States We want. non of Vice President. 110 would come under the terms of this legislation; Service in the exercise of its protective II is that duties. The Warren Commission concluded Mr. MONRONEY. If he were a major The personnel and facilities of Fed- that there had been inadequate linison candidate, yes. The committee would try eral departments and agency are made between the Secret Service and other to rule out the insignificant. He does not available as requested by the Secret Serv- Government agencies in the performance have to be active but he would have to be ice. However, no legislative basis exists of protective duties. an announced candidate and he would for the provision of this assistance. This The Warren Commission conducted have to be recognized by the Secretary lack of specific statutory authority has the most exhaustive investigation in our of the Treasury and the bipartisan coni- been an impediment to the making of history on the problenis of presidential mittee which we have set up as being a more formal arrangements with various protection. One of its primary missions májor vice-presidential candidate. departments for continuing and perma- was to determine any means by which Mr. BYRD of Virginia. The Senator's nent assistance. the quality of that protection could be reply clarifies the point I was interested This omission has become of such con- improved. in. As I see it, then, a major candidate cern to me that I asked my staff to study The Commission left no doubt as to its for Vice President, seeking the nomina- this problem and give me background views. At page 459 of its report, we find tion, would be covered under this legisla- information on the need for better gov- this conclusion: tion the same as a major candidate seek- ernmentwide coordination. Let me give The protectión of the President Is In a real Ing the presidential nomination? you the results of that study. sense a Government-wide responsibility Mr. MONRONEY. That is correct. I which must necessarily be assumed by the Mr. BYRD of Virginia. I thank the Department of State, the FBI. the CIA, and Protective functions for our Presidents Senator. the military intelligence agencies as well as have grown increasingly difficult through Mr. MONRONEY. Mr. President, in the Secret Service the years so that many agencies must The Commission is convinced of the neces- this connection, I commend the Presi- provide assistance to the Secret Service. sity of better coordination and direction of dent of the United States for his prompt We live in a shrinking globe of rapidly the activities of all existing agencies of got- action early Wednesday morning in di- expanding travel by those who serve and ernment which are in position to, and do. recting that a protective U.S: Secret have served us as Presidents of our coun- furnish information and Services related to Service detail be placed with each presi- try: The job of protecting. them has be- the security of the President dential candidate and his family and come far more difficult. The Warren Commission felt so that the FBI assist with supplying man- The Warren Commission summarized strongly about the Government-wide na- power if necessary to supplement the the problem in this language: ture of protective duties that it proposed Secret Service details. While there was no specific authorization for this action, Whatever their purpose, Presidential four- a more formal coordinating mechanism this was no time to ponder legalities. It neys have greatly enlarged and complicated Thus, the Commission's recommenda- the task of protecting the President The tions included the following: is. however, exceedingly important that Secret Service and Federal, State, and local 1. A committee of Cabinet members in- the Congress support the President's ac- law enforcement agencies which cooperate cluding the Secretary of the Treasury and tion by providing a legal foundation for with it, have been confronted in recent years the Attorney General, or the National Secu- this continuing protection. with Increasingly-difficult problems, created rity Council, should be assigned the respon- The bill provides authority for protec- by the greater exposure of the President dur- sibility of reviewing and overseeing the pro- tion of persons who are determined by ing his travels and the greater diversity of the tective activities of the Secret Service and the Secretary of the Treasury as being audiences he must face in a world torn by the other Federal agencies that ass!st in safe- conflicting ideologies. (p. 427) (Emphasis major presidential and vice-presidential guarding the President. Once given this re- added.) candidates after consultation with an sponsibility, such a committee would Insure advisory committee consisting of the. Clearly. the frequency of presidential that the marimum resources of the Federal travel will not abate. And turmofl-both Comment wit juiily engagen ... the iusn jur majority icader of the Senate, the. mi- protecting the President, and would provide nority leader of the Senate, the Speak- abroad and at home-will place maxi- guidance In defining the general-nature of er of the House of Representatives, the mum demands on protective and security domestic and foreign dängers to Presidential minority leader of the House of Repre- forces. security. sentatives and one additional member Moreover, the number of persons to be selected by the members of such com- protected has also increased. 8. Even with an Increase in Secret Service mittees. It is contemplated that pro- Congress has provided specific statu- personnel, the protection of the President tection will be provided for. all major tory authority to the Secret Service to will continue to require the rescurces and candidates for President until after the protect the President and his family, the cooperation of many Federal agencies. The selection of nominees at the major politi- President-elect, and the Vice President Commission recommends that these agen- cal conventions. The major nominees for at his request. cies, specifically the FBI, continue the prac- tice as it has developed. particularly since the President and Vice President will then Congress has extended protection to assassination, of assisting the Secret Service be protected until election of the suc- others next in line of succession to the upon request by providing personnel or other cessful candidates for the office of Presi- Presidency, the Vice-President-elcct, and aid. and that there be.a closer association dent and Vice President. a former President for a reasonable pe- and Ilalson between the Secret Service and This bill also gives us the opportunity riod after he leaves office. all Federal agencies. Congress has extended the protection III to remedy a serious deficiency in exist- ing law. It provides that, when requested to include a former President and his The President's Committee on the by the Director of the Secret Service, wife during his lifetime, and the widow Warren Report determined that there other Federal departments and agencies and minor children of a former Presi- must be continuing assistance to the shall assist the Secret Service in the per- dent for a period of 4 years after he Secret Service in its performance of pro- formance of its statutory protective leaves or dies in office. tective duties. duties and those additional duties estab- Congress has extended the period of On September 27, 1964, President lished by this bill. protection for Mrs. John F. Kennedy and Johnson designated the Secretary of the The protection of the President of the her children through 1969. Treasury, Douglas Dillon, the Attorney United States and the other persons en- Now this bill extends needed protec- General, Nicholas deB. Katzenbach, the titled to protection is a governmentwide tion to major presidential and vice-presi- Director of the CIA, John McCone, and responsibility. While primary responsi- dential candidates during the presiden- the President's Special Assistant for bility rests with the U.S. Secret Serv- tial campaign. National Security Affairs, McGeorge ice, the personnel and facilities of every Of course. we want to provide adequate Bundy. to act as a committee to study agency must be available. protection to our Presidents and those the Warren Commission Report and The Government became painfully other persons whose contribution to this make recommendations concerning aware of the need for improving this Nation has been so substantial. But it Presidential protective functions coordination after the assassination of has become increasingly clear that the When the Committee reported, it ex- President Kennedy. The Warren Com- increasing complexities of providing this pressed this view: mission stressed the absolute necessity protection requires the resources of many Because our country is so large and com- of continuous assistance to the Secret acencles. plex, no one organization can, by itself, hope Calendar No. 1153 90TH CONGRESS - SENATE REPORT 2d Session No. 1165 TREASURY, POST OFFICE, AND EXECUTIVE OFFICE APPROPRIATION BILL, 1969 JUNE 5, 1968.-Ordered to be printed Filed under authority of the order of the Senate of March 16, 1967 Mr. MONRONEY, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the following REPORT [To accompany H.R. 16489] C The Committee on Appropriations, to which was referred the bill (H,R. 164S9) making appropriations for the Treasury and Post Office Departments, the Executive Office of the President, and certain independent agencies for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1969, and for other purposes, report the same to the Senate with various amend- ments and present herewith information relative to the changes made: 85-010-63-1 LIBRARY GERALD FORD 10 COMPLIANCE Appropriation, 1968 1 $496, 700, 000 Budget estimate, 1969 547, 551, 000 House allowance 541,500,000 Committee recommendation 541, 500, 000 Bill compared with- 1968 appropriation 44, 710, 000 Estimate, 1969 6, 051, 000 House allowance 1 Includes $1,900,000 proposed supplemental (H. Doc. 274). The committee recommends an appropriation of $541,500,000 for compliance activities of the Service. The amount allowed is $44.7 million over 1968, $6,051,000 under the estimate for 1969, and the same as the House allowance. This appropriation provides (1) for assistance to taxpayers in understanding and complying with the tax laws, and (2) for detecting and correcting instances of noncompliance. The increase allowed is essential to maintain compliance program levels on income tax returns that are estimated to rise from 109 million in 1968 to 112 million in 1969. Additional funds have also been provided to fund 1,200 of the 2,284 new positions requested in the fiscal 1969 budget. These additional employees will help to reduce the delinquent return investigation inventory and the delinquent account inventory. OFFICE OF THE TREASURER SALARIES AND EXPENSES Appropriation, 1968 $6, 588, 000 Budget estimate, 1969 6,878,000 House allowance 6,878,000 Committee recommendation 6,878,000 Bill compared with- 1968 appropriation +290,000 Estimate, 1969 House allowance The committee recommends $6,878,000, the budget estimate and House allowance, for salaries and expenses of the Office of the Treasurer. This Office (a) receives, keeps, and disburses the moneys of the United States; (b) processes claims for the proceeds of Government checks; (c) issues and redeems currency and Government securities; (d) maintains fiscal accounts; and (e) prepares financial statements and reports. The amount allowed provides for and includes the full-year cost of the salary increase and a net increase of 11 additional positions to cope with the increased workload. U.S. SECRET SERVICE SALARIES AND EXPENSES Appropriation, 1908 $17,030,000 Budget estimate, 1969 19,871,000 House allowance 19,300,000 Committee recommendation 21,300,000 Bill compared with- 1968 appropriation +4,250,000 Estimate, 1969 +1,429,000 House allowance +2,000,000 $ Includes $200,000 proposed supplemental for civilian Pay Act Increases. R.FORD GERALD LIBRARY The committee recommends an appropriation of $21,300,000 for salaries and expenses of the U.S. Secret Service. This amount is $1,- 250,000 over the 1968 appropriation and an increase of $1,429,000 over the estimate and $2 million over the House allowance. The committee has also proposed a language amendment, the explanation for which follows: It is the desire of the committee that the major condidates for President and Vice President receive Secret Service protection as authorized by this language. Therefore, funds, authority, and per- sonnel beyond that requested by the President are provided the Secret Service in the bill for that purpose. The excitement, tension, and turbulence of a presidential campaign year create hazards and risks for presidential and vice-presidential candidates substantially beyond those of other political candidacy. In these circumstances, the com- mittee considers it appropriate and in the national interest to provide Secret Service protection to the candidates under the provision set forth in the amendment proposed by the committee and set forth hereinafter. The additional funds in the amount of $2 million above the House bill are recommended to carry out the added protective responsibilities of the Secret Service provided by this bill and are based on the expecta- tion that in the immediate period following its enactment six or seven candidates will require such protection. However, during the period C immediately preceding the major conventions and during the conven- tions themselves the number requiring protection may increase and the persons to be protected may change. After the major conventions the expectation would be that not more than six nominees would require such protection. Existing law provides for the protection of the President-elect and the Vice President-elect until inauguration. The committee suggests that. in recommending to the Secretary of the Treasury persons to whom protection is to be authorized, the Advisory Committee provided for by this bill consider among other factors the report of results of nationally recognized opinion polls, and the extent to which any particular candidate is conducting his campaign throughout the Nation. Moreover, it must be recognized that protection can be afforded only to the extent that the candidate accepts the advice of Secret Service as to what may be acceptable or unacceptable risks. It is estimated that the costs of this added protection will beapprox- imately $1.5 million from early June until election day. However, the committee has provided S2 million. The additional $500,000 is in the nature of a contingency amount, to be used only if the original esti- mate of $1.5 million should fall short of meeting the needs. There- fore, if it is not used for the protection of the candidates, it should remain unused by the Secret Service. The language also makes avail- able $400.000 which could be used for the balance of the fiscal year 1968 for the candidates' protection. The proposed language will provide specific authorization of a long- established practice of utilizing other Federal departments in the pro- tective assignments. This assistance may include, but is not limited to, the provision of personnel and facilities for intelligence gathering, medical. transportation. and communications purposes. It eliminates any doubt of the legal basis for such practice and assures Treasury direction of the protective functions. FORD GERALD 12 The language as proposed by the committee reads as follows: For necessary expenses for the operation of the United States Secret Service, including purchase (not to exceed one hundred and serenty-one for policé-type use which may esceed by $300 each the general purchase price limitation for the current fiscal year, of which one hundred and twenty-nine are for replacement only), and hire of passenger motor rehicles. hire of aircraft. services as authorized by title 5, United States Code, section 3109, purchase, repair, and cleaning of uniforms, and, in addition, to other duties now provided by law, the protection of persons who are determined by the Secretary of the Treasury from time to time as being major presidential or rice presidential candidates who should receire such protection (unless the candidate has declined such protection), after consultation with an advisory committee consisting of the majority leader of the Senate, the minority leader of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the minority leader of the House of Representatives, and one additional member selected by the members of such committee; $21,300,000, of which $400,000 shall be immediately arailable. Hereafter, when requested by the Director of the Secret Service, Federal departments and agencies, unless such authority be revoked by the President, shall assist the Secret Service in the performance of its protective duties sunder title 18, United States Code, section 3056 and the preceding paragraph. This service is responsible for investigation of counterfeiting of currency, specie, and securities; forgery and conversion of Government checks and bonds; and for the protection of the President, his imme- diate family, and others as stipulated by law. The permanent White House Police Force, funded by this appro- priation, protects the Executive Mansion and Grounds in the District of Columbia, and any building in which White House offices are located. The Treasury guard force also funded from this appropriation is responsible for safeguarding paper currency and other Government securities and also provides protection for the main Treasury Building and its Annex. CONSTRUCTION OF SECRET SERVICE TRAINING FACILITIES Appropriation, 1968 (1) Budget estimate, 1969 $1,000,000 House allowance 1,000,000 Committee recommendation 800,000 Bill compared with- 1968 appropriation +800,000 Estimate, 1969 -200,000 House allowance -200,000 1 No request. The committee recommends $800.000. for construction of modern outdoor firearms ranges at Beltsville, Md., on Government-owned property. The need for expanded and improved training facilities has been previously demonstrated and documented. The Service is presently GERALD 13 using a site at the National Arboretum which is inadequate and not capable of accommodating the necessary firearms ranges. The proposed ranges will facilitate the development of improved basic, refresher, and specialized training for Secret Service agents, the White House Police, the Treasury guard force, and other law enforcement personnel. TITLE II-POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT Appropriations totaling $7,128,000,000 are recommended for the regular annual requirements of the Post Office Department for fiscal year 1969. This is a decrease of $169,710,000 in the estimates and an increase of $1,000,000 compared with the House bill amount of $7,127,000,000. The amount recommended is $524,902,000 over the 1968 appropriation of $6,603,098,000 to date. ADMINISTRATION AND REGIONAL OPERATION Appropriation, fiscal year 1968 (to date) $103,450,000 Proposed supplemental 4,011,000 Total obligational authority, fiscal year 1968 (estimate) 107,461,000 Budget estimate, fiscal year 1969 123,802,000 House allowance 119,000,000 Committee recommendation 119,000,000 Bill compared with- Total obligational authority, fiseal year 196S (estimated) +11,530,000 Estimate, fiscal year 1969 4, 802, 000 House allowance C 1 Pending. The committee recommends an appropriation of $119,000,000. The amount recommended is $11,539,000 over the estimated 1968 appropriation, $4,802,000 under the estimate and the same as the House allowance. This limitation (appropriation) provides for the executive direction, control, and administration of the Postal Establishment; for the postal inspection and internal audit services; and for the direction and administration of postal field activities under authority delegated by Washington headquarters to the 15 regional administration offices and six postal data centers. The amount recommended will fund 521 of the 964 additional positions requested. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND ENGINEERING Appropriation, fiscal year 1968 (to date) $23,148,000 Proposed supplemental 1 210,000 Total obligational authority, fiscal year 1968 (estimate) 23,338,000 Budget estimate, fiscal year 1969 36,380,000 House allowance 34,000,000 Committee recommendation 35,000,000 Bill compared with- 1968 appropriation +11,642,000 Estimate, 1969 -1,386,000 House allowance +1,000,000 1 Pending. The committee recommends an appropriation of $35 million for activities under this head. The amount recommended is $11,642,000 over the 1968 appropriation, including proposed supplementals. FORD GERALD LIBRARY Protection GALLUP HARRIS Commenced 3/72 4/72 6/72 2/72 2/72 5/72 5/72 U KENNEDY (March, Fall) - - - 15 - 20 - D MUSKIE (March) 23 11 6 23 28 6 7 D HUMPHREY (March) 31 35 27 18 21 20 28 D WALLACE (March) 15 18 25 11 12 19 21 D LINDSAY 7 - - 6 8 - - A D McCARTHY 5 3 2 4 5 3 4 D McGOVERN (March) 6 20 30 5 6 21 26 0 D CHISHOLM (May) 2 3 3 5 6 2 3 D JACKSON (March) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 A D YORTY under 1 - under 1 1 1 - - D HARTKE 1 - - 1 1 - - I 0 MILLS - . - (May) 2 2 1 - D SANFORD - - - - - A - 0 1 D SPOCK (Fall) - - - - - - e @ 0 D SCHMITZ (Fall) - - a - - - - democratic voters democratic democratic and voters independent voters E GERALD A FORDS LIBRARY January 29, 1975 Jay rom: Phil Buchen would like your comments the attached please. FORD :- LIBRARY DERALD THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON January 29, 1975 MEMORANDUM FOR: PHILIP W. BUCHEN FROM: JAY FRENCH Day SUBJECT: GUIDELINES FOR PROTECTION OF MAJOR PRESIDENTIAL AND VICE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES I have reviewed the attached materials. In light of our earlier discussion, I have no further comment except that I believe these guidelines are necessary and will make the process of directing protection for major candidates a great deal easier and more uniform. Attached is a separate memo for Jerry Jones. Enclosure FORD is GERALD LIBERRY ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES AND REGULATIONS FOR CERTAIN PROTECTIVE SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE LIBRARY U.S. SECRET SERVICE FORD GERALD MARCH 20, 1975.-Ordered to be printed Mr. FLOWERS, from the Committee on the Judiciary, submitted the following REPORT [To accompany H.R. 1214 which on January 14, 1975 was referred jointly to the Committee on Government Operations and the Committee on the Judiciary] The Committee on the Judiciary, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 1244) to establish procedures and regulations for certain pro- tective services provided by the United States Secret Service, having considered the same, report favorably thereon with amendments and recommend that the bill as amended do pass. The amendments are as follows: Page 2, lines 4 and 5, strike "(1) providing, with reimbursement, personnel, equipment, or facilities on a temporary basis;" and insert: (1) providing with reimbursement, services, equipment, or facilities on a temporary basis except that the Department of Defense and the Coast Guard may provide such services, equipment, or facilities on a temporary basis without reim- bursement when assisting the United States Secret Service in its duties directly related to the protection of the Presi- dent or Vice President of the United States; Page 4, lines 21 through 24, and page 5, lines 1 and 2, strike: If improvements or other items are not removed, the owner of the property at the time of determination shall compen- sate the Government for such improvements or other items to the extent they have increased the fair market value of the property as of the date of transfer or termination. and insert: If improvements or other items are not removed, the owner of the property at the time of termination shall compensate the Government for the original cost of such improvements 38-000 or other items or the amount they have increased the fair market value of the property as of the date of transfer or (3) upon advance written request of the Director of the termination whichever is less. U.S. Secret Service or his authorized representative and simi- Page 5, line 24, after "Appropriations" insert ", Committees on larly conditioned upon reimbursement by the Secret Service of those expenditures exempted in section 2(1).' of actual costs, the facilities, equipment, and services, re- Page 5, line 14, after "Secret Service" insert ", Department of De- quired by the U.S. Secret Service to secure any other prop- fense and Coast Guard". erty not in Government ownership or control to the extent Page 5, line 16, after "Appropriations" insert: ", Committees on that such expenditures do not cumulatively exceed $10,000 the Judiciary". at any one property owned, leased, occupied, or otherwise Page 5 , line 24, after "Appropriations" insert ", Committees on utilized by persons entitled to protection under sections 3056 the Judiciary". of Title 18, and section one of Public Law 90-331, unless approved by the Committees on Appropriations of the House PURPOSE and Senate. The purpose of the proposed legislation, as amended, is to provide Section 3. This section limits expenditures by the U.S. Secret Service limitations and set requirements for the implementation of the respon- for maintaining a permanent guard detail and for permanent installa- sibility of the Secret Service under section 3056 of Title 18, United tions, facilities, and equipment to secure non-Government property States Code, concerning protection of the President and other persons, owned, leased, occupied, or otherwise utilized by persons entitled to and under section 1 of Public Law 90-331 concerning protection of protection under section 3056 of title 18 and section 1 of Public Law major Presidential or Vice Presidential candidates. 90-331, to properties described in section 2(2) of the bill. Section 4. This section provides that all purchases and contracts SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS concerning facilities, equipment, and services furnished by other Fed- Section 1. This section provides that the Act may be cited as the eral Departments and agencies under section 2 (2) and 2(3) are to be "Presidential Protection Assistance Act of 1975". made in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949. Section 2. This section provides that in assisting the Secret Service in performing its duties in connection with the protection of the Section 5. This section would bar payments made pursuant to the President and others under section 3056 of Title 18, and in connection provisions of the bill for services, equipment, or facilities ordered, purchased, leased, or otherwise procured by persons other than officers with the protection of major Presidential or Vice Presidential candi- dates under section 1 of Public Law 90-331, Federal Departments and or employees of the Federal Government who were duly authorized by the Director of the United States Secret Service to make such agencies shall provide the following: procurements. (1) services, equipment, or facilties with reimbursement, Section 6. This section provides that all improvements and other on a temporary basis except that such services, equipment or items acquired pursuant to provisions of the bill are to remain the facilities may be provided by the Department of Defense property of the Federal Government and shall be removed at the ter- and the Coast Guard on a temporary basis without reimburse- mination of the protective responsibility of the United States Secret ment in assisting the Secret Service in its duties directly re- Service unless it is determined by the United States Secret Service lated to the protection of the President or Vice President; that it is economically unfeasible to do SO. Should the President. Pres- (2) upon advance written request of the Director of the ident-elect, former President, or other person subsequently designate U.S. Secret Service or his authorized representative and con- a different property to be SO secured, or should there be an end of ditioned upon reimbursement by the United States Secret entitlement to protection and the improvements or other items are not Service of actual costs, the facilities, equipment, and services removed, the owner would be required to compensate the Government required by the U.S. Secret Service to provide full time secu- for all expenditures made under this section with regard to the desig- rity for each protectee at no more than one property not in nated property for the original cost or the amount they have increased Government ownership or control, when the property has the fair market value as of the date of transfer or termination, which- been designated by a President, President elect, former ever is less. It is further provided that improvements or other items president, or any other person entitled to such protection, as are to be removed and the property restored regardless of the economic the one property to be secured under this paragraph. Para- feasibility determination if the owner requests removal. Thus, if the graph (2) further provides that where more than one family owner exercises his option of having the improvements or other items member is eligible for protection, only one designation of removed and the property restored, there would be no cost or increase property is allowed per family, but this would not apply requiring compensation under this provision. when family members do not permanently reside with the Section 7. This section provides that, with the exception of those President. expenditures exempted in section 2(1), expenditures under the provi- sions of the proposed Act shall be from funds specifically appropriated to the U.S. Secret Service for carrying out those provisions. The sec- tion bars the use of public funds not SO appropriated for the purpose of securing any nongovernmentally owned property owned, leased, of the bill are intended to provide the basis for control and account- occupied, or otherwise utilized by persons entitled to protection under ability, as well as public disclosure, of Federal funds spent at private section 3056 of title 18 and the first section of Public Law 90-331. residences for persons entitled to protection under those statutory pro- Section 8. This section provides that a detailed report of expendi- visions which include the President, the Vice President, former Presi- tures made pursuant to the provisions of this proposed Act shall be dents and others. The need for this sort of statutory definition was made on April 30 and September 30 of each year by Secret Service, demonstrated in the course of hearings in 1973 before the Government the Department of Defense, and Coast Guard to the Committees on Activities Subcommittee of the House Committee on Government Op- Appropriations, Committees on the Judiciary and Committees on erations concerning the expenditure of Federal funds in support of Government Operations of the House of Representatives and Senate. Presidential properties and the investigation conducted by the staff Section 9. Section 9 makes expenditures under the Act subject to of that subcommittee on that subject.1 The Subcommittee on Govern- General Accounting Office audit with right to access to relevant ment Activities, at that time was chaired by the Honorable Jack records. The Comptroller General would transmit reports of any such Brooks, who is the sponsor of the bill H.R. 1244. The findings and andits to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations, Com- conclusions of that subcommittee are embodied in the Government mittees on the Judiciary and Government Operations, Operations Committee report which was transmitted to the Speaker Section 10. This section repeals Section 2 of the act entitled "An act on May 20, 1974.2 to authorize the United States Secret Service to furnish protection to In addition, the Comptroller General of the United States on De- major presidential and vice presidential candidates" (Public Law 90- cember 18, 1973, submitted a report to the Congress entitled Protec- 331, § 2, June 6, 1968, 82 Stat. 170), which is as follows: tion of the President at Key Biscayne and San Clemente (With Infor- SEC. 2. Hereafter, when requested by the Director of the mation on Protection of Past Presidents). This committee has had United States Secret Service, Federal Departments and the advantage of studying these reports and hearings in the course agencies, unless such authority is revoked by the President, of its consideration of the bill H.R. 1244, and its earlier consideration shall assist the Secret Service in the performance of its pro- of the bills H.R. 11499 and the revised bill H.R. 17311, and they have tective duties under section 3056 of title 18 of the United proven to be of great assistance to the committee. States Code and the first section of this joint resolution, The questions raised over expenditures at the former President's residences at San Clemente and Key Biscayne, and to a lesser extent. at STATEMENT other locations necessitated the studies and investigation referred to above. There was concern over the amount of the total reported ex- The bill H.R. 1244 is a bill which is similar to the bill H.R. 17311 of penditures, and the expenditures relating to specific work, and also the 93rd Congress which was favorably reported by the Committee on the relation of the work to the protective function authorized under the Judiciary on December 4, 1974 and passed the House on Decem- applicable law. The conclusion of the Government Operations Com- ber 16, 1974. In that Congress, the bill H.R. 17311 was a revised bill mittee report expressed a serious concern about the trend of practices which was introduced after subcommittee consideration and hearings reviewed in its investigation. It is noted that in order to provide dis- on the bill H.R. 11499. A hearing on the current bill, H.R. 1244, was cretion to the Secret Service in the exercise of its responsibility to pro- held on February 6, 1975. tect national leaders, the Congress had "imposed few retraints" upon The bill H.R. 1244 has been carefully drafted and contains provi- that service. It was concluded that the manner in which the Secret sions which were considered by the Judiciary Committee during the Service and agencies acting in conjunction with it had operated previous Congress and again in the present session. The purpose of amounted in several instances to an abuse of discretion. It was found the bill is not to restrict the level of protection extended to a President, that there had been instances where public funds had been used to pro- nor to interfere with the Secret Service's ability to carry out its legiti- cure nonsecurity items. It was found that the procedures followed per- mate activities. The provisions of the bill are intended to give force to mitted non-Government personnel to commit Federal funds. In partic- the principle that fiscal accountability for public expenditures should ular, the report criticized the manner in which authorization was given reside in the agency having the authority to obligate those expendi- for certain work in instances the Subcommittee reviewed and the in- tures. formal or apparently casual nature of the procedures followed. The The bill H.R. 1244 provides the specific statutory basis and defini- Government Operations Committee pointed out also that there had tion of the circumstances under which protection may be furnished to been a large increase of expenditures for protection in recent years. the President and other persons entitled to protection under 18 U.S.C, The General Accounting Office advised the Committee that in the 3056, and under the first section of Public Law 90-331 providing for course of its investigation it reviewed the matters with reference to the protection of major presidential or vice presidential candidates, protection in terms of budgeting, accounting, and auditing with a view particularly with respect to security expenditures on property which is not owned by the Government. It would also require a change in the Pronerties, ernment Operations October 10. on 11. the 12, Expenditure and 15. 1973. of Federal Funds in Support of Presidential on 1 Hearings of the Government Activities Subcommittee of the Committee Gov- manner in which protective work on private property by the Federal departments and agencies is funded. In this connection the provisions tional 2 Fifteenth and Report by the Committee on Government Operations, together with Addr- Pronerties" Supplemental (H. Rent. No. Views 93-1052. "Expenditure 93d Cong.. 2d of sess. Federal Funds in Support of Presidential 8 United States General Accounting Office No. B-155950. to identifying what had been done or still needed to be done to provide basis" in this connection therefore covers the utilization of assistance for rèsponsible supervision and control over these areas, and to also provided to the Secret Service by other Federal departments or agen- provide for oversight by Congress along with understanding by the cies which are other than services, equipment or facilities provided in public. As will be further discussed in this report, the recommenda- connection with designated properties under the provisions of sub- tions of the General Accounting Office form the basis for much of this paragraphs (2) and (3) of section 2, or otherwise of a permanent or bill, and those provisions are intended to provide for better controls continuing nature. over expenditures for protection. The second recommendation of the General Accounting Office on the The General Accounting Office found that after the enactment of basis of its study was that the accounting system of the Secret Service Public Law 90-331 of June 6, 1968, the Secret Service began to draw should require that expenditures at private residences for protective heavily on GSA appropriations in order to carry out Secret Service purposes be authorized by the Director or Deputy Director of the protection functions. The General Accounting Office concluded that Service. H.R. 1244 provides that advance written request of the Di- this had the weakness that GSA funds were not directly associated rector or his authorized representative is required to obtain assistance with Secret Service protection activities during the budget preparation in making secure property not in Government ownership (Section 2, and review process. It was also indicated that this apparently fostered (2) (3)) a casual attitude in authorizing work because many requests were ver- Third, the General Accounting Office recommended that the Secret bal and it became difficult subsequently to determine who made specific Service should make an annual public report to the Congress showing requests or precisely what had been requested. In some cases the gen- in as much detail as security will allow expenditures made on private eral or vague nature of the request made it difficult to limit the scope residences for protective purposes. H.R. 1244 provides that every of the work. department and agency, making expenditures under its provisions At the hearings on August 21, 1974, and again on February 6, 1975 shall transmit a detailed report of such expenditures to the Committees before this Committee's Subcommittee on Administrative Law and on Appropriations and Committees on Government Operations on Governmental Relations, the General Accounting Office witness de- April 30 and September 30 of each year. (Section 8). scribed the Comptroller General's recommendations following its Fourth, the General Accounting Office recommended that the report study. First, the General Accounting Office recommended that appro- made by the Secret Service should be subject to audit by GAO and priations for expenditures at private residences for protective purposes GAO should be given complete access to all records, files, and docu- should be made to the Secret Service and no other funds should be ments supporting expenditures made by the Service. H.R. 1244 pro- available for that purpose. In this connection, it is noted that both the vides for this in Section 9 of the bill. GSA and the Secret Service indicated in testimony before the com- Fifth, the General Accounting Office recommended that appropria- mittee that changes made in the financing of GSA public building tions for expenditures at private residences of the President, not of a activities under the Public Building Act Amendments of 1972 now protective nature, should be made to the White House. The GAO took require GSA to charge the Secret Service for services or facilities the position that the White House should account for any such ex- provided in protecting the security of a President or other person penditures and make an annual report to the Congress subject to audit entitled to protection. Such provision is not sufficient, however, to by GAO in the same manner suggested for expenditures by the Secret cover all potential expenditures that may be made by or on behalf of Service for protective purposes. This is a matter outside the scope of the Secret Service in connection with their protective responsibilities. H.R. 1244, which is intended to deal with the subject of protection. At For one. services or facilities utilized by the Secret Service may not be the hearing, the GAO witness recognized this and stated that his be under GSA's control. In addition, the Public Building Act Amend- agency felt that consideration should be given to this recommendation ments of 1972 authorize the Administrator of GSA to exempt anyone by the appropriate committees. from the charges if such would be "infeasible or impractical.' The bill, In addition, the General Accounting Office suggested that Congress II.R. 1214, addresses this problem by providing that expenditures for might wish to consider limiting the number of private residences at securing any nongovernmentally owned property shall only be from which permanent protective facilities will be provided for a President funds specifically appropriated to the Secret Service (Section 7). This and that consideration should be given to the desirability of a Govern- principle, with the exemption provided for in the committee amend- ment owned residence in Washington for the Vice President. Public ment as to the President and Vice President, also is embodied in the Law 93-346, enacted July 12, 1974 implemented the latter suggestion provisions of subparagraph (1) of section 2 concerning temporary when it designated the premises then occupied by the Chief of Naval assistance given the Secret Service by Federal departments and Operations as the official residence of the Vice President. Section 1(2) agencies. The earlier bill in the 93rd Congress stated in subparagraph of H.R. 1244 deals with the limit on the number of residences at which (1) of section 2 that assistance could be provided by Federal depart- permanent protection facilities will be provided for a President. and ments and agencies "on a temporary basis for a period not to exceed others entitled to protection. In essence it would provide a President two weeks". This was changed in the revised 93rd Congress bill, H.R. with full time protection at no more than one privately owned property 17311, to read "on a temporary basis" just as in the present bill, H.R. at a time. 1244. The two week restriction was deleted to provide for a practical At the 1974 hearing. the General Accounting Office witness pointed flexibility in the use of this authority. The use of the term "temporary out that the earlier bill, H.R. 11499, in Section 2(2) allowed any person 9 designated under 18 U.S.C. 3056 or under the Act of June 6, 1968, to therefore concluded that this amendment provides a practical solution designate one non-Government property to be secured by the Secret of problems which might arise in such situations. The Department of Service. It was observed that since the President and his immediate Defense and the Coast Guard would still have to report the amounts family are all entitled to protection under 18 U.S.C. 3056, a President of expenditures for protective activities pursuant to section 8 of the and his wife could under the bill each designate a separate property bill as amended by the committee. not in Government ownership or control to be protected at public The committee feels that the reimbursement requirements of this expense. This is covered in H.R. 1244 by providing that in such a case bill provide for fiscal responsibility in a manner which is practical there shall be only one such designated property per family. Where and consistent with current government accounting practice. At the members of the immediate family do not permanently reside with the hearing, questions were raised concerning the manner in which the President, this limitation would not apply. departments and agencies would fix the cost of assistance given the In the present bill, H.R. 1244, another suggestion of the General Secret Service in the discharge of its protective functions. Particu- Accounting Office has been included. At the 1974 hearing, it was lar reference was made to the Department of Defense in this connec- pointed out that section 6 of H.R. 11499 provided for removal of se- tion. Therefore, additional information was requested by the Com- curity facilities upon termination of protective responsibility unless mittee as to how this cost would be ascertained. The committee was removal is "economically unfeasible." It was suggested that because advised that the Department of Defense would consider the provision some security facilities can detract from the value of the property for reimbursement to include only incremental costs, that is, these in the eyes of the owner it would seem reasonable to make provision costs over and above the cost to the Department for maintaining a for removal at his request whether such removal is economically fea- given capability in support of its military mission. The committee was misemental sible or not. H.R. 1244 includes this language in section 6. informally advised that the Department would not ask to be paid for The bill provides for the repeal of Section 2 of the Act entitled "An salaries. purchase of airplanes or any other costs that are normally act to authorize the U.S. Secret Service to furnish protection to major incurred in the operations of the Military Departments. It did indi- Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates". As has been noted, this cate it would seek reimbursement for the expenses related to pro- section now provides: tective activity incurred in the operation and maintenance of planes and other equipment and the use of ordnance bomb disposal and other Mother ther understand SEC. 2. Hereafter, when requested by the Director of the specialized personnel. The information given the committee indicates United States Secret Service, Federal Departments and that since the chargeable costs are incremental, they are in most cases agencies, unless such authority is revoked by the President, clearly identifiable. They would include items such as per diem, rental shall assist the Secret Service in the performance of its pro- cars, and aircraft support for a non-military mission. Should there tective duties under section 3056 of title 18 of the United be some doubt as to the proper division of costs, the agencies con- States Code and the first section of this joint resolution. cerned would be required to work out the matter. The Department of It is apparent from the foregoing discussion, the provisions would be Defense has indicated that its experience in fixing the amount for superseded by the provisions of this bill. Accordingly, the bill provides reimbursement in other situations has shown that any such questions for this repeal. can be resolved on a practical basis. As has already been noted in connection with the discussion of the The committee therefore concluded that the provisions of the bill recommendations of the General Accounting Office, the committee concerning reimbursement are consistent with normal interagency amendment would make an exception in paragraph (1) of section 2 Federal practice. This requirement of reimbursement as contained in relating to the President and Vice President. That paragraph of sec- the bill together with the required reports will provide Congress tion 2, of the bill as originally introduced, required reimbursement by with the facts concerning the costs of providing protection now pro- the Secret Service for assistance given it by other departments or agen- vided for by Federal law. cies of the Government under the authority of the section. The com- mittee amendment would preserve this basic principle while providing COMMITTEE VOTE an exception that services, equipment, or facilities may be provided on a temporary basis without reimbursement by the Department of On Tuesday, March 11, 1975, the full committee on the Judiciary approved the bill H.R. 1244 by voice vote. Defense and the Coast Guard to assist the Secret Service in its duties directly related to the protection of the President and Vice President. COST This amendment assures a degree of flexibility in connection with as- sistance rendered on a temporary basis relating to the President or The bill provides limitations and sets requirements for the imple- Vice President. It is understood that the Department of Defense and mentation of the protective responsibilities of the Secret Service, and the Coast Guard provide support to the President and Vice President to provide for control and responsibility in carrying out those func- which is separate and distinct from the protective functions referred tions. It is not possible to predict what impact or change these pro- to in this bill. However, there may be instances when given activity visions will have in terms of cost to the Government, but is possible to may involve both supportive and protective aspects. The committee has state that the aim is to adequately control and account for such costs. II. Rept. 94-105 CONCLUSION proper fulfillment of such responsibilities often requires the support and cooperation of other Federal agencies. The purpose of Public The committee has concluded that the facts presented to the com- Law 90-331 was to eliminate any doubt as to the legal basis for such mittee in connection with this legislation provide the basis for the assistance and to assure that the Secret Service would be dominant in approval of the amended bill. It is recommended that the amended directing all protective functions. bill be considered favorably. GSA has no objection to assisting the Secret Service on a reimburs- able basis as H.R. 11499 provides, but in view of the above defers to TEXT OF STATUTE TO BE REPEALED the Secret Service and to the Congress as to whether the bill is the proper vehicle for accomplishing this objective, and as to the merits of In compliance with paragraph 3, clause 1 of Rule XIII of the other provisions of the bill which relate directly to the protective Rules of the House of Representatives, the text of the portion of the functions of the Secret Service. statute proposed to be repealed is as follows: However, to be as helpful as possible to the Committee, we offer the (Section 2 of the Act entitled "An Act to authorize the United following suggestions for amendments which we believe, if adopted, States Secret Service to furnish protection to major presidential and would improve the bill. vice presidential candidates" (Public Law 90-331, § 2, June 6, 1968, Paragraphs (2) and (3) in section 2 provide that security at full 82 Stat. 170.) Government expense be on private property at no more than one SEC. 2. Hereafter. when requested by the Director of the location designated by the person to be protected: and with respect to United States Secret Service, Federal Departments and agen- other locations involving private property the Government's obliga- cies, unless such authority is revoked by the President, shall tion would be limited to $5,000. However, the $5,000 limitation ap- assist the Secret Service in the performance of its protective pears to apply only to reimbursable work and not to work performed duties under section 3056 of title 18 of the United States by contract. If paragraph (3) is to remain in the bill, we recommend Code and the first section of this joint resolution. that it be clarified in this report. Since purchases and contracts for the protection functions of the GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, Secret Service are already subject to the Federal Property and Ad- Washington, D.C., August 21, 1974. ministrative Services Act of 1949, as amended, we suggest that sec- Hon. PETER W. RODINO, Jr., tion 4 be deleted as unnecessary. Section 5 also is unnecessary as we do Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary, not believe that existing law permits a Federal official to delegate his House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. contracting authority to one who is not a Federal employee. DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: This is in reply to your letter of January 28, We suggest that section 6 either be deleted or alternatively be 1974, requesting an expression of the views of the General Services amended to reflect the current law with respect to disposal of improve- Administration on H.R. 11499, a bill to establish procedures and ments and other items acquired for security purposes. Section 6 as regulations for certain protective services provided by the United presently drafted infers that such property shall remain the property States Secret Service. of the Federal government under circumstances where removal is eco- The bill would repeal section 2 of the Act of June 6, 1968 (Public nomically unfeasible which we do not believe is intended. The section Law 90-331; 82 Stat. 170) which requires all Federal agencies to as- also does not provide for restoration of property to the condition sist the Secret Service in the performance of its protective duties which existed prior to the making of the improvement when and if the under section 3056 of title 18 of the United States Code. Insofar as improvement is removed. In a memorandum of November 21, 1973, we are aware, section 2 has not been interpreted to require the Secret prepared within the Department of Justice, concerning title to im- Service to reimburse or transfer to agencies the cost of rendering such provements made on private property for security purposes. it was assistance. H.R. 11499, if enacted, would continue to permit other concluded that if items placed on the property are removed. the Fed- Federal agencies to assist the Secret Service but, except in temporary eral government is under a duty to return the premises to the owner in assistance, only upon reimbursement of actual costs. as good a condition as when the alterations were made. Accordingly, In addition to the above. the bill proposes with one exception to we recommend that upon termination of the responsibility to secure limit the Secret Service to providing full security at Government the property, or if such property is determined no longer needed for expense at no more than one property not in Government control as security purposes, the bill provide that the property be disposed of or may be designated by the person entitled to protection. The excep- transferred to another Federal agency in accordance with the Federal tion stated in paragraph (3) of section 2 apparently is intended to Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended. limit expenditures on other private property to an amount which Finally, we recommend that paragraph 8 be amended to require that cumulatively does not exceed $5,000. federal agencies submit reports only on non-reimbursable expendi- The primary responsibility for the protection of the President and tures. With respect to reimbursable expenditures, the Secret Service others designated by law as requiring personal protection rests with will have complete and detailed information making it unnecessary the Secret Service. It has long been recognized, however, that the for other agencies to submit reports thereon. ALLAN G. KAUPINEN. 12 13 COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE NITED STATES. One effect of section 2 is to take from the Secret Service a measure Washington, D.C., May 10, 1974. of its management discretion as to whether protection at a given loca- Hon. PETER W. RODINO. Jr., tion will be provided by use of permanently installed facilities or, as Chairman. Committee on the Judiciary, an alternative, by temporary facilities and added Secret Service man- House of Representatives, Washington D.C. power-a decision which normally would take into consideration secu- DEAR MR. CILAIRMAN: This refers to your request for our views on rity effectiveness and cost. II.R. 11499, 93d Congress, a bill which if enacted would be cited as the Also, under section 2, the Secret Service can call upon other depart- "Presidential Protection Assistance Act of 1973," and which is in- ments and agencies, on a reimbursable basis, to do permanent work on tended to establish procedures and regulations for certain protective private property which is to be protected. This authority is a con- services provided by the United States Secret Service. tinuation of present practice, which we consider reasonable, whereby This Office has prepared a report dealing with the problems which the Secret Service has chosen to call on other agencies for such assist- this bill is intended to meet, entitled "Protection of the President at ance, rather than developing the capability to do permanent work Key Biscayne and San Clemente (With Information on Protection of itself. Past Presidents), B-155950, December 18, 1973, copy enclosed. H.R. Section 6 provides for removal of security facilities upon termina- 11499 is generally consistent with the recommendations in our report. tion of protective responsibility unless removal is "economically un- We note, however, that although the bill provides for annual reports feasible." Because some security facilities can detract from the value (to be made to the Committees on Appropriations and the Committees of the property in the eyes of the owner it would seem reasonable to on Government Operations) on expenditures by the Secret Service for make provision for removal at his request whether such removal is. protective services on private property (section 8), it does not provide economically feasible or not. specifically, as we suggested. that such expenditures be subject to audit Sincerely yours, by this Office, and that for that purpose we be given complete access to ROBERT F. KELLER, all records, files, and documents supporting reported expenditures. See Acting Comptroller General pp. 78-79 of the enclosed report. of the United States. With respect to specific provisions of the bill. WC offer the following comments. Section (1) would limit nonreimbursable assistance to the Secret Service by Federal departments and agencies to "a period not to exceed two weeks at any one location in any one year." We suggest that the bill specify whether "one year" means a calendar year, a fiscal year, or any twelve-month period. Also, it is not clear whether the two-week limit at any one location applies separately to each person entitled to protection under 18 U.S.C. 3056 or under the act of June 6, 1968, nor whether a "location" is a city or a residence. These questions might arise if, for example, there were visits in the same year to the same city by various candidates for President and Vice President as well as by the incumbent President and Vice President. Section 2(2) allows any person designated under 18 U.S.C. 3056 or under the act of June 6, 1968. to designate a non-Government property to be secured by the Secret Service. Since a President and his immedi- ate family are entitled to protection under 18 U.S.C. 3056, a Presi- dent. his wife, and each of his children could under the bill each designate a property not in Government ownership or control to be protected at public expense. The language of section 2(2) should perhaps be modified with re- speet to reimbursement of certain costs where military equipment and men are used. Protection of the President may, for example, involve the use of Coast Guard vessels. It would not seem necessary or desir- able that the Secret Service be required to reimburse the Coast Guard for crew and operating expenses, including depreciation, of the Coast Guard vessel. We take such a position on page 74 of the enclosed report. STATEMENTS UNDER CLAUSE 2(1) (3) OF RULE XI OF THE RULES OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES A OVERSIGHT STATEMENT This report embodies the findings and recommendations of the Sub- committee on Administrative Law and Governmental Relations pur- suant to its oversight responsibility over protective functions of the Secret Service and related activities of the other Federal departments and agencies under Rule VI(b) of the Rules of the Committee on the Judiciary. They are: (1) That Federal departments and agencies, in assisting the Secret Service in protective functions under section 3056 of Title 18 and under section 1 of Public Law 90-331 shall provide: (a) Services, equipment and facilities with reimbursement on a temporary basis except that the Departments of Defense and Coast Guard may provide such assistance without reimbursement when directly related to the protection of the President or Vice President of the United States; (b) Upon advance written request of the Director of the Secret Service and upon reimbursement by the Secret Service of actual costs, the facilities, equipment and services required to provide full time security at no more than one property not in Govern- ment ownership or control designated by a person entitled to protection: (c) Upon advance written request of the Director of the Secret Service and conditioned on reimbursement, facilities, equipment and services on any other nongovernmental property utilized by a person entitled to protection, to the extent that the expenditures do not exceed $10,000, unless otherwise authorized by law. (2) A Secret Service permanent guard detail and permanent instal- lations. facilities, and equipment relating to nongovernment property utilized by persons entitled to protection under law should be limited to a single non-government owned property designated by a protectee in accordance with law. (3) Facilities, equipment and services referred to above should be purchased and contracted for under the provisions of the Federal Prop- erty and Administrative Services Act of 1949, and can only be pro- cured by officers or employees of the Federal Government duly author- ized by the Director of the Secret Service. (4) All improvements or other items acquired pursuant to the fore- going requirements shall remain the property of the United States and be disposed of only in connection with applicable law. (15) 16 and without written requests for periods of no more than 2 (5) Except as otherwise provided by law, expenditures for protec- weeks at any one location in one year. tive functions by the Secret Service shall be from funds specifically 4. Provide that upon the transfer of private property when appropriated to the Secret Service for that purpose. Government expenditures have been made, or upon the term- (6) Expenditures for protective functions should be the subject of ination of entitlement to Secret Service protection, the Fed- reports to the relevant committees of the Congress and such expendi- eral Government shall be entitled to reimbursement in an tures shall be subject to General Accounting Office audit. amount by which such expenditures, if not otherwise recov- erable, have increased the fair market value of the property B as of the date of such transfer or termination. 5. Require procurements to be made in accordance with BUDGET STATEMENT appropriate procurement statutes and regulations. Clause 2(1) (3) (B) of Rule XI is not yet applicable bccause there 6. Prohibit the commitment of Government funds by non- is as yet no Congressional Budget Resolution. Government personnel. 7. Require that all improvements be removed upon ter- C mination of the protection requirement, if economically feas- ible. No estimate or comparison from the Director of the Congressional 8. Upon adoption of the above recommendations, repeal Budget Office was received. section 2 of Public Law 90-331, which has been interpreted D by GSA as leaving it open to unlimited expenditures, and by the Secret Service as giving that agency unlimited authority Under Clause 2(1) (3) (D) of Rule XI, the findings and recommen- to obligate the funds of other agencies. dations of the Committee on Government Operations in its 1974 re- port "Expenditure of Federal Funds in Support of Presidential Properties",1 are as follows: B. RECOMMENDATIONS REQUIRING LEGISLATION Congress should consider adopting legislation that more explicitly sets forth the conditions under which the Secret Service can expend public funds on private property and the terms under which it can seek the assistance of other Federal agencies. This legislation should: 1. Provide for the installation and maintenance of perma- nent security and administrative support facilities at no more than one principal property at a time, such property to be designated by the person being protected. Control over the expenditures would be achieved by: (a) Requiring advance written requests by the Secret Service for these expenditures except in emergencies. (b) Requiring the Secret Service to fund all such ex- penditures and to reimburse other agencies for services and equipment they provide. (c) Requiring reports to Congress every 6 months of such expenditures. 2. Strictly limit expenditures for permanent security in- stallations at any location other than the designated principal property. 3. Permit the Secret Service to borrow equipment, person- nel, and facilities from other agencies without reimbursement 1 Fifteenth Report by the Committee on Government Operations "Expenditure of Fed- eral Funds in Support of Presidential Properties." (H. Rept. No. 93-1052, 93 Coug. 2d Sess.) page 6. STATEMENT UNDER CLAUSE 2(1) (4) OF RULE XI OF THE RULES OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CON- CERNING ANY INFLATIONARY IMPACT IN PRICES AND COSTS IN THE OPERATION OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY This bill would not have an inflationary effect on the national econ- omy because it does not authorize additional expenditures. As has been explained under the explanation relating to cost, the bill provides limitations and sets requirements relating to the protective functions of the Secret Service. The purpose of the bill is to provide for specific fiscal control and responsibility in the Secret Service which now is charged by law to provide the protective functions referred to in the bill. The bill would require adequate control and accounting for ex- penditures now authorized by law. (19) 94TH CONGRESS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REPORT 94- 1st Session 105 PART 2 PRESIDENTIAL PROTECTION ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1975 APRIL 22, 1975.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. BROOKS, from the Committee on Government Operations, submitted the following REPORT [To accompany H.R. 1244] The Committee on Government Operations, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 1244) to establish procedures and regulations for certain protective services provided by the United States Secret Service, having considered the same, reports favorably thereon with an amend- ment and recommends that the bill as amended do pass. The amendment strikes out all after the enacting clause and inserts in lieu thereof a substitute text which appears in boldface roman in the reported bill. EXPLANATION OF AMENDMENT Inasmuch as the amendment is a substitute for the entire bill, the sections of the report which follow provide its explanation. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE H.R. 1244 is designed to correct certain deficiencies in existing law and procedure relating to the security and protection of the President, Vice President, their families and other persons whom the Secret Service is directed to protect. A detailed investigation by the Government Activities Subcom- mittee of this committee in the 93d Congress of recent practices of the Secret Service in providing protection at privately owned properties showed that excesses and abuses have occurred in the expenditures of funds which in part could be attributed to the indefiniteness of existing laws governing such expenditures. Those laws contain no effective controls or limitations. H.R. 1244 would give a statutory basis for many of the recommendations which resulted from the investigation 38-006 and were adopted by this committee in its detailed report on the the office complexes established in connection with those lo- subject.1 cations. Of this, approximately $9.4 million has been for In brief summary, the bill will do the following: capital improvements, communications, maintenance, and Centralize responsibility for the expenditure of funds for administrative support, with the remaining $7.6 million for protection in one agency-the U.S. Secret Service; permanently assigned personnel. Enable the Secret Service to obtain assistance from other B. GSA paid for items allegedly for security that were not departments and agencies but the Secret Service must reimburse requested by the Secret Service and that served no security the assisting agencies. (An exception is provided, however, for the function. Department of Defense and the Coast Guard in temporarily C. Secret Service agreed to seek GSA payment for items assisting in the protection of the President, Vice President, procured by private persons not authorized to commit the or the next in succession); Government and for which the Secret Service had not ini- Limit full-time security to only one privately owned property tiated a request. each which may be designated by the President and-other pro- D. GSA procured items which cost far in excess of what tectees; and was required to meet security requests. Place a limitation of $10,000 on expenditures on any other E. GSA officials authorized Federal Government pay- property not in Government ownership or control unless a ment for goods and services ordered by non-Government resolution of approval is adopted by the Committees on Appro- personnel. priations of the House and Senate, respectively. F. Location of obligational authority and accounting re- The bill also will- sponsibility in separate agencies has resulted in a loss of Require that all expenditures for protective purposes under fiscal responsibility. this Act be made by one agency, the Secret Service, in accordance G. Secret Service used the assistance provisions of Public with the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act and Law 90-331 to shift many routine agency expenditures to with payments made only for procurements by authorized officers the budgets of other agencies. or employees of the Federal Government; H. Secret Service failed to develop fundamental managerial Cause all improvements made to property or other items controls over expenditures of Federal funds in providing furnished to continue to be the property of the Government and security at private properties. with certain exceptions, after termination of protection, to be I. Secret Service and GSA developed no procedures for removed; and handling requests from the Secret Service for expenditures Require semiannual reports of expenditures be made to certain by GSA. congressional committees and to authorize the Comptroller Gen- J. Undue haste to complete improvements at San Clemente eral to audit such expenditures. within 1 month resulted in grossly increased costs. K. GSA constructed and equipped a $720,000 single BACKGROUND-OVERSIGHT purpose office complex on Coast Guard property adjacent to the San Clemente estate. This legislation grew out of an oversight investigation conducted L. Excessive numbers of Government personnel are by the Government Activities Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, in the 93d Congress into the expenditure of permanently assigned to the San Clemente and Key Biscayne locations. Federal funds in support of Presidential properties. The subcommittee had received information concerning Government expenditures on M. Inadequate consideration has been given to apportion- the private properties of then President Nixon at San Clemente, ing costs on private property between the Federal Govern- Calif., and Key Biscayne, Fla., going far beyond the legitimate needs ment and the property owner. N. There has been no limitation on the number of homes of Presidential protection. In its report2 on the investigation, the owned by a President which can be made secure. committee's findings and recommendations requiring legislation were stated as follows: RECOMMENDATIONS REQUIRING LEGISLATION FINDINGS Congress should consider adopting legislation that more A. The White House, the Secret Service, White House explicitly sets forth the conditions under which the Secret Communications Agency, Department of Transportation, Service can expend public funds on private property and the Department of Defense, and General Services Administra- terms under which it can seek the assistance of other Federal tion have spent $17 million in public funds in connection with agencies. This legislation should: President Nixon's three privately owned properties and at 1. Provide for the installation and maintenance of perma- Expenditure of Federal Funds in Support of Presidential Properties." Fifteenth Report nent security and administrative support facilities at no by the Committee on Government Operations, 93d Cong., 2d sess, H. Rept. No. 93-1052. = H. Rept. No. 93-1052, 93d Cong., 2d sess., dated May 20, 1974. more than one principal property at a time, such property H.R. 103 H.R. 103 5 to be designated by the person being protected. Control over the expenditures would be achieved by: COMMITTEE VOTE a. Requiring advance written requests by the Secret Service for these expenditures except in emergencies. At a meeting of the full Committee on Government Operations- b. Requiring the Secret Service to fund all such on April 17, 1975, a quorum being present, H.R. 1244 as amended was. expenditures and to reimburse other agencies for approved by a vote of 35 ayes and nays. services and equipment they provide. c. Requiring reports to Congress every 6 months of HEARINGS such expenditures. 2. Strictly limit expenditures for permanent security Hearings on H.R. 1244 were held by the Subcommittee on Legis- installations at any location other than the designated lation and National Security on April 10, 1975, at which time testimony principal property. was heard from representatives of the General Accounting Office, 3. Permit the Secret Service to borrow equipment, person- the U.S. Secret Service, and the Department of Defense. The GAO nel, and facilities from other agencies without reimbursement and the Defense Department strongly supported the legislation. The and without written requests for periods of no more than 2 Secret Service reported that passage of the legislation would have no weeks at any one location in 1 year. detrimental effect on its protective functions. 4. Provide that upon the transfer of private property when Government expenditures have been made, or upon the GENERAL STATEMENT termination of entitlement to Secret Service protection, the Federal Government shall be entitled to reimbursement in This committee is well aware of the necessity of providing adequate. an amount by which such expenditures, if not otherwise protection to the President, Vice President, and others whom the recoverable, have increased the fair market value of the Congress has designated as protectees. There is no attempt nor any property as of the date of such transfer or termination. intention to limit the security to which they are entitled and which 5. Require procurements to be made in accordance with they need. appropriate procurement statutes and regulations. Under the law (18 U.S.C. 3056) the U.S. Secret Service of the 6. Prohibit the commitment of Government funds by non- Treasury Department is the Federal agency responsible for such Government personnel. protection. Over the years, it has performed its duties well and such 7. Require that all improvements be removed upon tragedies or near tragedies as have occurred did not result from any termination of the protection requirement, if economically known deficiencies on its part. feasible. In the wake of the murder of Senator Robert F. Kennedy in 1968, S. Upon adoption of the above recommendations, repeal and with the memory of the assassination of President John F. section 2 of Public Law 90-331, which has been interpreted Kennedy still fresh, the authority of the Secret Service was enlarged by GSA as leaving it open to unlimited expenditures, and by to protect Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates as well as. the Secret Service as giving that agency unlimited authority the occupants of those high offices.3 The same resolution required to obligate the funds of other agencies. Federal departments and agencies, when requested by the Secret Service, to assist the Service in the performance of its duties. No Following the issuance of the committee's report by a vote of limits nor guidelines were imposed on the assistance and no provision 36 ayes, 0 nays, and 2 present, Chairman Brooks introduced H.R. for reimbursement was made. Thus, as the committee's investigation 11499 to carry out the recommendations of the committee. This bill revealed, a number of agencies were called upon to expend funds for was referred to the Judiciary Committee, which reported favorably protection with no centralized accounting or responsibility for the a clean bill (H.R. 17311), and it passed the House on December 16, resulting outlays. 1974, on the Suspension Calendar. The Senate, however, did not have The intent of this bill is to tighten loose procedures and to centralize time to act before adjournment. accounting and responsibility. In the 94th Congress, Chairman Brooks introduced H.R. 1244 First, the assistance to be rendered by other Federal departments which, under the new rules of the House, was referred to both the and agencies must be at the request of the Director of the Secret Judiciary Committee and the Committee on Government Operations. Service or his authorized representative. This will avoid any repetition In the Judiciary Committee, the bill was assigned to the Subcom- of incidents where other Government agencies have made procure- mittee on Administrative Law and Governmental Relations which ments or rendered service to protectees at the request of other officials held hearings; and was reported favorably by the full Judiciary of the Government, often on an ad hoc basis and sometimes at the Committee with amendments on March 20, 1975 (H. Rept. No. request of private persons not part of the Government at all. 94-105). The Secret Service is required to reimburse the assisting agencies. In the Government Operations Committee, the bill was assigned from the Service's own appropriated funds for the services, equipment, to the Subcommittee on Legislation and National Security, which and facilities which the assisting agencies supply. This will provide held hearings and unanimously reported the bill to the full committee. a substantial control on expenditures and provide the centralized H.R. 105 Public Law 90-331, approved June 0, 1968. H.R. 103 6 responsibility that is needed. Government agencies routinely reim- if it is uneconomical to do SO. The General Accounting Office, with its burse each other for the use of facilities or personnel, and this provision expertness in this field, is designated to determine the increase in the places no special burden on the Secret Service. No difficulty should fair market value of the improvements or items not removed SO that be found in reducing any form of assistance to dollars and cents SO the Government can be fairly compensated for them. Title would that the monetary basis of the assistance can be ascertained. Nor then pass to the owner of the property as in a negotiated disposal of should there be any special problem in projecting the amount of surplus Government property. assistance needed in any fiscal year for budgetary purposes as such With the exception of the Defense Department and Coast Guard projections are made by most Federal agencies. The Secret Service expenditures noted above, the bill states the policy that all expendi- also has its experience in operating under existing law since 1968 which tures for protection under the act shall be from funds appropriated to ABRARY it may rely upon. the Secret Service. This should remedy the serious condition found The committee recognized that there were some occasions in which during the committee's investigation where it was almost impossible reimbursement may be impractical and exempted the Secret Service to determine the extent of the outlays and, in many cases, who had from having to reimburse the Defense Department and the Coast authorized them. Guard for such facilities, services, and equipment as they may provide The reporting requirements contained in the bill will assure proper in the protection of the President, Vice President, and the officer next congressional oversight of the bill's provisions. in order of Presidential succession. The agencies provide services and Obviously these expenditures should not be excepted from auditing protection for the Commander in Chief as part of their regular duties by the Comptroller General, and the bill directs such an audit with and such expenditures are a part of their operating budgets. full access by the Comptroller to all records relating to such expendi- It seems reasonable that only one private property designated by tures. each protectee be given full-time protection at any one time. This will CONCLUSION avoid an uneconomical use of manpower and equipment with long interim periods of idleness in anticipation of a visit. It will also reduce For the reasons stated above, the committee favors enactment of the likelihood of personal enrichment by the Government's attention this measure. It is exceedingly timely in that we are in the early stages to and supervision of a series of private properties owned by any one of a new Presidential administration and appropriations for protective protectee. purposes for fiscal year 1977 have not yet been enacted as of the report- Federal agencies may only provide cumulative expenditures for full- ing of this bill. time security at private properties, other than the one designated by each protectee, up to $10,000 for each property, unless both the SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS OF H.R. 1244 WITH SUBCOMMITTEE Committees on Appropriations of the House and Senate approve. This AMENDMENTS ceiling will provide a rational fiscal control without unduly hampering the Service in obtaining needed protection at these other private SECTION 1 properties. The committee saw no reason why the Secret Service and the The short title of the bill is "Presidential Protection Assistance Act assisting Federal agencies should not make their purchases and enter of 1975." into contracts in accordance with the policies and procedures Congress SECTION 2 has laid down in the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act, and we so provide. The Property Act applies already to the Federal departments and agencies are directed to assist the United Secret Service but its provisions sometimes were not heeded in the States Secret Service in the performance of its protective duties as past, so this requirement was included in this bill to resolve any doubts follows: about coverage. We were not informed of any special reasons why (1) Providing, at the request of the Secret Service, services, equip- protective services and procurements should be handled differently. ment, and facilities on a temporary basis with reimbursement therefor Likewise, the requirement that procurements be made only by offi- from the Secret Service. The Secret Service will not be required to cers or employees authorized by the Director of the Secret Service to reimburse the Department of Defense and the Const Guard, however, make them is designed to prevent persons other than designated when temporarily assisting in Secret Service duties directly related to Government officials from committing the Federal Government to the protection of the President, Vice President of the United States, or other officer next in order of succession to the office of Président. expenditures, as the investigations of the committee noted had occurred in connection with Presidential properties. (2) Providing, upon written request of the Secret Service and on R reimbursable basis, such facilities, equipment, and services as the To avoid any possible misunderstanding, the bill directs that im- Service needs to provide full-time security for each person the Service provements and other items acquired for protective purposes shall continue to be the property of the Federal Government and not, by is required to protect, but at no more than one property at a time which is not in Government ownership or control, and such property having default of action or otherwise, become the property of the owner of the been designated by a President, President-elect, former President, or private property where placed. A procedure is devised calling for the any other person entitled to protection as the one property to be removal of the improvements or items upon termination of protection secured. Where more than one family member is eligible for protection, or designation of a different property, with alternative arrangements only one such designated property is allowed per family. However, H.R. 105 H.R. 103 SECTION 7 this limitation shall not be construed to apply to members of the immediate family who do not permanently reside with the person The expenditures made under this Act are required to be from funds entitled to protection. specifically appropriated to the Secret Service for carrying out the (3) Providing, upon written request and on a reimbursable basis provisions of the Act, except that the expenditures of the Depart- therefor, facilities, equipment, and services as are required by the ment of Defense and the Coast Guard, which are exempted from being Secret Service to provide full-time security at a property not designated reimbursed to the Secret Service in section 2(1), may be from funds under the previous section and not in Government ownership or appropriated to the Department of Defense and the Coast Guard. control to the extent that such expenditures therefore do not altogether Any public funds not appropriated as specified above shall not be used exceed $10,000 at any one property owned, leased, occupied, or to secure any non-Government-owned property utilized by persons otherwise utilized by persons entitled to protection unless such ex- entitled to protection under the specified laws. penditures are approved by resolutions adopted by the Committees on Appropriations of the House and Senate, respectiv ely. SECTION 8 The Director of the Secret Service, the Secretary of Defense, and the SECTION 3 Commandant of the Coast Guard are required to transmit a detailed The expenditures by the Secret Service for maintaining a perma- report of expenditures made under this act to the Committees on Ap- nent guard detail and for permanent facilities, equipment, and serv- propriations, Judiciary, and Government Operations of the House and ices needed to secure non-Government property of those entitled to the Senate on March 31 and September 30 of each year. protection shall be limited to the properties designated as the property to be secured under section 2(2) or such other property covered by SECTION 9 section 2(3) above. Expenditures under this act shall be subject to audit by the Comp- SECTION 4 troller General. who shall have access to all records relating to such This section restates, for emphasis, current law that purchases and expenditures. He is required to transmit a report of the results of any contracts entered into pursuant to sections 2(2), 2(3), and 3 above shall audit that he makes to the committees listed in the previous section. be made in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 471 et seq.). SECTION 10 SECTION 5 The language in section 2 of Public Law 90-331, which directs Federal departments and agencies to assist the Secret Service unless Payments are forbidden for services, equipment, or facilities such authority is revoked by the President, is repealed. That language ordered, purchased, leased, or otherwise procured by persons who are contained no limits on the assistance the departments and agencies not officers or employees of the Federal Government duly authorized were required to provide nor did it require the Secret Service to reim- by the Director of the Secret Service to make such procurements. burse them for such assistance. The provisions of H.R. 1244 continue the authority of the Secret Service to obtain assistance from other SECTION 6 departments and agencies, but with appropriate limits and fiscal controls. All improvements made to property and other items acquired under COST ESTIMATE this Act shall be the property of the Federal Government. When a person is no longer entitled to protection or designates a different This bill places limitations on expenditures authorized by law and, property to be secured, all improvements or other items shall be of itself, should not create any additional costs except those that may removed from the original property unless the Secret Service deter- be associated with the preparation of reports and the transfer of funds mines that it is economically unfeasible to do SO. However, the between agencies. These costs should be minimal. improvements and other items shall be removed and the property restored to its original state, regardless of the determination of eco- REVIEW OF EXISTING LAW nomic unfeasibility, if the owner of the property at the time of the termination of protection requests removal. If the improvements or In compliance with subdivision (A) of clause 2(1)(3) of House Rule other items are not removed and are to remain a part of the private XI, the Subcommittee on Legislation and National Security of this property, the owner of the property at the time protection is termi- committee reviewed the application and administration of the laws nated for the property shall compensate the Government for the relating to the protection of the President, the Vice President, and original cost of such improvements or other items, or the amount certain other persons, and the organization and operation of Federal which they have increased the fair market value of the property as agencies responsible for such protection, and the committee deter- determined by the General Accounting Office as of the date of transfer mined that legislation should be enacted in the manner set forth in of protection to another property or termination of protection by the the bill. Secret Service, whichever is less. H.R. 103 H.R. 105 ESTIMATES OF THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE With respect to subdivision (C) of clause 2(1)(3) of House Rule XI, the committee advises that no estimate or comparison has been pre- pared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office relative to any of the provisions of H.R. 1244, INFLATIONARY IMPACT In compliance with clause 2(1) (4) of House Rule XI, this legislation will have no inflationary impact on prices and costs in the operation of the national economy. CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED In compliance with clause 3 of Rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, changes in existing law made by the bill, as reported, are shown as follows (existing law proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in roman): JOINT RESOLUTION OF JUNE 6, 1968 JOINT RESOLUTION To authorize the United States Sccret Service to furnish protection to major presidential or vice presidential candidates Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) the United States Secret Service, in addition to other duties now provided by law, is authorized to furnish protection to persons who are determined from time to time by the Secretary of the Treasury, after consultation with the advisory committee, as being major presidential or vice presidential candidates who should receive such protection (unless the candidate has declined such protection). (b) The advisory committee referred to in subsection (a) shall consist of the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the minority. leader of the House of Representatives, the majority leader of the Senate. the minority leader of the Senate and one additional member selected by the other members of the committee. [SEC. 2. Hereafter, when requested by the Director of the United States Secret Service, Federal Departments and agencies, unless such authority is revoked by the President, shall assist the Secret Service in the performance of its protective duties under section 3056 of title 18 of the United States Code and the first section of this joint resolution. SEC. 3. For necessary expenses of carrying out the provisions of this resolution, there is hereby appropriated out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1968, the sum of $400,000. H.R. 103 OF DEPARTMENT THE 1789 TREASURY THE THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220 ASSISTANT SECRETARY May 20, 1975 MEMORANDUM FOR: The Honorable Philip W. Buchen Counsel to the President FROM: David R. Macdonald /s/David R. Macdonald Assistant Secretary (Enforcement, Operations, and Tariff Affairs) SUBJECT: Revised Presidential Candidate Protection Guidelines As a result of a suggestion from Donald Rumsfeld, we have revised our Presidential candidate protection guidelines to base them upon the Campaign Reform Act of 1974, rather than upon the results of national preference polls. It was thought that this touch- stone would be less subject to partisan misuse. I enclose a copy of the revised guidelines, therefore, as well as a memorandum of explanation. We have now received inquiries concerning protec- tion from Senators Fred Harris and Henry Jackson. It does appear that the pressure is beginning to build for the formation of the Advisory Committee and the consid- eration of protective guidelines. Attachments