Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
12130679
label
Ford Press Releases, January - May 1965
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
12130679
sourceUrl
contentType
document
title
Ford Press Releases, January - May 1965
citationUrl
collections
Gerald R. Ford Congressional Papers
Press Releases Chronological Files
subjects
U.S. House of Representatives. 3/4/1789-
Republican Party (U.S. : 1854- )
Johnson, Lyndon B. (Lyndon Baines), 1908-1973
iiifBase
thumbnailUrl
largeImageUrl
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
12130679
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1965-05-31
month
5
year
1965
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1965-01-01
month
1
year
1965
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
url
mediaId
86bae92ba9a56299
ocrText
The original documents are located in Box D4, folder "Ford Press Releases, January - May
1965" of the Ford Congressional Papers: Press Secretary and Speech File at the Gerald R.
Ford Presidential Library.
Copyright Notice
The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of
photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. The Council donated to the United
States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections.
Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public
domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to
remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid
copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library.
Digitized from Box D4 of The Ford Congressional Papers: Press Secretary and Speech File at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library
January 4, 1965
For immediate release
Statement of Rep. Gerald R. Ford
on
"State of the Union Message"
The ultimate goals set forth in the President's message are
the goals of all Americans and have been the goals of America since its
beginning.
However there are honest questions on the implementation of
the programs to achieve these goals. I am confident the President does
not want our citizens or the Congress to accept blindly the programs until
there has been an opportunity to carefully examine them in detail.
In fact Mr. Johnson properly pointed out that there is room for
an honest difference of opinion on "what is right."
We expect to support him when we believe he is right and to
offer constructive alternatives when our conscience so demands.
January 4, 1965
For immediate release
Statement of Rep. Gerald R. Ford
on
"State of the Union Message"
The utlimate goals set forth in the President's message are
the goals of all Americans and have been the goals of America since its
beginning.
However there are honest questions on the implementation of
the programs to achieve these goals. I am confident the President does
not want our citizens or the Congress to accept blindly the programs until
there has been an opportunity to carefully examine them in detail.
In fact Mr. Johnson properly pointed out that there is room for
an honest difference of opinion on "what is right."
We expect to support him when we bel ieve he is right and to
offer constructive alternatives when our conscience so demands.
Jan. 12, 1965
The Republican Party includes all those who bel ieve in its
principles and we welcome those who want to work for their
implementation.
It will be strengthened by the indusion of all those who
bel feve in the party of Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt and Dwight D.
Eisenhower.
FORD LIBRARY 07V839
Jam 12
The Republican Party includes all those who believe in its principles
and want to work for their implementation.
It will be strengthened by the inclusion of all those who support
its platform.
RALO FORD LIBRARY
The Republican Party includes all those who believe in its principles
and we welcome those who want to work for their implementation.
It will be strengthened by the inclusion of all those who believe in
the party of Lincoln, Teddy Roesevelt and Dwight D. Eisenhower.
GERALD R.FORD LIBRARA
STATEMENT BY REP. GERALD R. FORD,
HOUSE MINORITY LEADER
January 12, 1965
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Dean Burch assumed the responsibilities of the chairmanship
at a crucial point. He worked faithfully and hard at the task.
The reasons which he gave for today's decision seem to be
sound and in a worthy spirit.
I trust that all Republicans will now support our new
chairman and move together vigorously and effectively toward those
common goals which we all cherish.
FORD is LIBRARY 076830
STATEMENT BY REP. GERALD R. FORD,
HOUSE MINORITY LEADER
January 12, 1965
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Dean Burch assumed the responsibilities of the chairmanship
at a crucial point. He worked faithfully and hard at the task.
The reasons which he gave for today's decision seem to be
sound and in a worthy spirit.
I trust that all Republicans will now support our new
chairman and move together vigorously and effectively toward those
common goals which we all cherish.
1-25-65
First Reactions DO une 1966-Dudget
know heard from a reading of the measage so I can't
betoo responsive until more opportanity is available terstady this budget.
Clearly, there is much in the budget that will require long and careful
study. The Congrago woll everying its responsibility
to determine 7. I just that tak hope the Congress dollars will are squarely predently meet its & effecture responsibilities spend and
stand on its own feet and decide what it thinks is best. Let us hope
the rubber stamps of the 1930's are not resurrected.
In the interest of a clear understanding, we ought to dispel the myth
about this budget being below $100 billion. The more accurate gauge is
the budget the President wants Congress to adopt this session--the
new obligational authority budget. That total is $106.4 billion, not
X
$99.7 billion. And on top of that, the President asks for $6.0 in
fiscal 1965 supplementals. So this budget is much more than $100 billion.
I expect the President's request for about 45,000 more employees in
civilian agencies will surprise a lot of people, especially since
the impression is rather prevalent that the President was really hammering
at the agencies to cut down on civilian employment. I commend his
efforts but I do wonder about this rather large upturn especially since
this would mean the addition of about 154,000 employees since President
Eisenhower left office.
When we adopted the tax cut bill last year the Democratic majority
inserted a pledge to give priority to balancing the budget and then to
reducing the debt. Today's budget doesn't seem to me to line up to that
in
promise-spending increases and tax cuts get most of the increased
revenues. The debt goes up another $5.6 billion.
GERALD LIBRARY GERALD R. FORD
The President indicates this budget takes us along the path to a
balanced budget. Its slow progress and a long path at the rate suggested
in today's budget.
in
Since President Eisenhower left office the government, in the fiscal
years 1962 through this budget for 1966, has, or will have gone $32.4
billion deeper in debt. A lot of people may well wonder whethe r this
is prudent and economical fiscal policy in times of affluence.
I think it best that all Members of Congress take a constructively
skeptical look at the major features and issues in this budget and then
do what he thinks best for America.
FORD LIBRARY
Statement of Rep. Gerald R. Ford
January 25, 1965
For immediate release
THE PRESIDENT'S 1966 BUDGET
Clearly, there is much in the budget that will require long and careful study.
The Congress will exercise its responsibilities to determine that tax dollars are
prudently and effectively spent.
In the interest of a clear understanding, we ought to dispel the myth about
this budget being below $100 billion. The more accurate gauge is the budget the
President wants Congress to adopt this session--the new obligational authority budget.
That total is $106.4 biblion, not $99.7 billion. And on top of that, the President
asks for $6.0 in fiscal 1965 supplementals. So this budget is much more than $100
billion.
I expect the President's request for about 45,000 more employees in civilian
agencies will surprise a lot of people, especially since the impression is rather
prevalent that the President was really hammering at the agencies to cut down on
civilian employment.
When we adopted the tax cut bill last year the Democratic majority inserted
a pledge to give priority to balancing the budget and then to reducing the debt.
Today's budget doesn't seem to me to line up to that promise--spending increases and
tax cuts get most of the increased revenues. The debt goes up another $5.6 billion.
The President indicates this budget takes us along the path to a balanced
budget. Its slow progress and a long path at the rate suggested in today's budget.
Since President Eisenhower left office the government, In the fiscal years
1962 through this budget for 1966, has or will have gone $32.4 billion deeper in
debt. A lot of people may well wonder whether this is prudent and economical fiscal
policy in times of affluence.
I think it best that all Members of Congress take a constructively skeptical
look at the major features and issues in this budget and then do what they think best
for America.
####
From the Office of:
Rep. William Brock (R.-Tenn.)
1441 House Office Building
Washington 25, D. C.
Friday, February 19, 1965
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Rep. William Brock (R. of Tenn.) today blasted "trap door spending" by the Ad-
ministration which obligated the U.S. to $750 million through the promises of Administration
officials on a visit to Panama last year.
Brock told the House: "In past years, we have heard much about back-door spend-
ing through the Treasury, without any Congressional check through the appropriations process.
Because a vast majority on both sides of the aisle here in the House saw back-door spending as
a means of circumventing Congress' Constitutional prerogatives, we did something about it.
"The bill before US today, the Inter-American Development Bank bill, goes far
further than mere back-door spending. At least back-door spending is done by Americans.
What we have before US today is what I prefer to call "trap-door" spending. Last April, at
a meeting in Panama, U.S. officials decided that Congress would authorize and appropriate an
additional $750 million to the IDB's Fund for Special Operations.
"At a meeting dominated by Latin American officials, it was decided how much, for
what purpose, and under what banking regulations the United States Congress would authorize
and appropriate $750 million.
"The trap in this trap-door financing is that advocates of the bill will tell you that
Congress must support this legislation, or stand accused of reneging on an international agree-
ment entered into by our Secretary of Treasury nearly a year ago.
"Two years from now -- without the knowledge of a single member of the House or
Senate Treasury officials may commit Congress to spending an additional billion or billion
and a half dollars for IDB, prior to a single day's hearings before the appropriate Congressional
committee."
:
####
GERALD R. FORD
MICHIGAN OFFICE:
FIFTH DISTRICT, MICHIGAN
425 CHERRY STREET SE.
GRAND RAPIDS
Congress of the United States
Office of the Minority Leader
house of Representatives
Washington, D.C.
March 1, 1965
FOR IMMEDIATE R ELEASE
The forceful, articulate and encompassing speech titled "Republican
Opportunity and Responsibility" made today by my able colleague and good
friend Mel Laird was a very proper statement by him as the 1964 Chairman
of the Republican Platform Committee.
A copy was given to me S everal days ago and I have read it.
Mr. Laird did not seek approval or disapproval by me or the
House Republican leadership as a whole.
The speech will be very helpful in presenting the Republican
case against the Administration. and the new positive Republican approach
to our Nation's problems.
FORD BRAND
Statement by REP. GERALD R. FORD
March 1, 1965
BIR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
The foreeful, articulate and encompassing speech titled
"Republican Opportunity and Responsibility" made today by my able colleague
and good friend Mal Laird was a very proper statement by him as the
1964 Chairman of the Republican Flatform Committee.
A copy was given to me several days ago and I have read it.
Mr. Laird did not seek approval or disappreval by me or the
House Republican leadership.
The speech will be very helpful in presenting the Republican
case against the Administration and the now positive Republican spproach
to our Nation's problems.
#
#
#
QERALD FORD VIBRARY
Statement by REP. GERALD R. FORD
March 1, 1965
FOR IMMEDIATE R ELEASE
The forceful, articulate and encompassing speech titled
"Republican Opportunity and Responsibility" made today by my able
colleg ue and goodfriend Mel Laird was a very proper statement by him
as the 1964 Chairman of the Republican Platform Committee.
A copy was given to me several days age I have read it.
Mr. Laird did not seek approval or disapproval by me or the
House Republican leadership.
The speech will be very helpful in presenting the Republican
case against the Administration and the new positive Republican
approach to our Nation's problems.
#
FORD in LIBRARY 07V830
From the office of Rep. Gerald R. Ford
Statement on the President's Message on Cities
March 2, 1965
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
The goals in the President's message on cities are both lofty and
humanitarian. He has painted a verbal dramatic picture of community problems
that do exist in many parts of the Nation.
However, the message to Congress emphasizes the Administration's
strong desire to create far more federal centralization of power, which is
already in too many instances throttling metropolitan initiative and local
responsibility.
The federal government has no business telling cities how to think
and plan, as the President would have a new Department of Housing and Urban
Development do under his recommendations.
In the message there are many dangerous indications that the
President is urging the establishment of more encompassing bureaucratic control
of cities.
The Republican housing proposal, which was outlined several weeks
ago, will help cities to help themselves without putting the lives of citizens
in the hands of federal planners. In addition, the Republicans suggested a new
program for veterans under FHA which would include sound benefits to those who
served in war and peacetime.
While the President would create another federal agency, the
Republican legislative proposal calls for combining the Urban Renewal
Administration and the Public Housing Administration to eliminate duplication.
The Republican proposal, which is a constructive alternative to the
Administration bill, calls for a humanized housing program that would have a
positive impact on the problems of urban America without clutching cities in
the grip of federal centralized power.
######
GERALD R. FORD
MICHIGAN OFFICE:
425 CHERRY STREET SE.
FIFTH DISTRICT, MICHIGAN
GRAND RAPIDS
Congress of the United States
Office of the Minority Leader
house of Representatives
Washington, D.C.
Statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford
regarding House vote on Appalachia Bill
March 3, 1965
In passing the Administration's Appalachia Bill today, Democrats in the
House played politics with poverty and ignored distressed areas in many
parts of the Nation.
The Republican alternative pinpointed areas in need of federal
assistance where the pRoblems cannot be solved by local resources alone.
The Nation should be aware that the Administration's Appalachia
Bill gives aid to nearly one-fourth of 360 counties that are rich enough
to be disqualified for federal aid under either the Accelerated Public
Works program or the Area Redevelopment project.
Democrats in voting for the Administration's bill today agreed
to take money from their own counties, many in need of assistance, and
give it to a relatively small pocket in the Appalachia region.
The Republican proposal would have provided a helping hand to
1,407 areas in the United States which are suffering economic distress.
-more
GERALD R. FORD
MICHIGAN OFFICE:
425 CHERRY STREET SE.
FIFTH DISTRICT, MICHIGAN
GRAND RAPIDS
Congress of the United States
Office of the Minority Leader
house of Representatives
Washington, D.C.
Statement on Appalachia Bill
March 3, 1965
-2-
Today's action emphasizes the need for a strong two-party system
than would insure strong checks and balances and would protect the
American people against super-government with too much heavy-handed,
iron-fist control in Washington.
# # # #
GERALD R. FORD
MICHIGAN OFFICE:
425 CHERRY STREET SE.
FIFTH DISTRICT, MICHIGAN
GRAND RAPIDS
Congress of the United States
Office of the Alinority Leader
house of Representatives
Washington, D.C.
Statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford
For immediate r elease
regarding the President's Message
on Law Enforcement
March 8, 1965
No one will disagree that the Nation's crime rate is on the increase
and the "trend toward lawlessness," as the President describes it, must
be reversed.
The President may be duplicating unnecessarily the fine work of the
FBI when he appoints a new Commission to study the "origins and nature of
crime in modern America.'
There are strong indications that the Message has many earmarks of
seeking to create more centralized government and more federal control
over states and cities.
Basically, law enforcement is a local problem, except in those areas
where the federal government has a specific responsibility.
The government can and should give leadership in meeting the menace
of lawlessness, but should not encroach on those responsibilities that
are rightfully in the hands of responsible local officials.
#
#
#
A statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford (R-Mich)
regarding the President's Message on Voting Rights
March 15, 1965
FOR RELEASE AFTER DELIVERY OF THE PRESIDENT'S
MESSAGE, March 15, 1965
I strongly believe effective federal voting legislation is needed @0 that
all qualified citizens wherever they live can vote by 1966. Republicans in
the House under the leadership of Rep. William McCulloch have been and are
working on such legislation with its many complex issues and different
approaches, Republicans in the House will support legislation to achieve
maximum registration and voting by the target date of 1966. I am pleased that
we now have the President's recommendations in this critical area.
From what I have seen and heard the President's proposal is deficient in
that it may penalize certain states where there is no discrimination and it
may fail to resolve the problem in some areas where eligible voters are not
permitted to register.
I am also concerned with the establishment of a huge, new bureaucracy
of voting examiners which could be perpetuated even though the problem of
voter registration is resolved.
[April 1965?]
OUTLINE OF REPUBLICAN VOTING RIGHTS BILL
1. Certification by the Attorney General
If the Attorney General certifies that, in any county or similar subdivision
of a State, he has received complaints to the effect that 25 or more persons have been
denied or deprived of the right to register or to vote on account of race or color, an
examiner who is a resident of the State shall be appointed by the Civil Service Com-
mission.
2. Duties of the Examiner
(a) The examiner shall determine whether, in fact, these 25 or more persons
have been denied or deprived of the right to register or to vote and whether they are
qualified to vote under State law.
(b) The examiner shall find that a person has been denied or deprived of the
right to register or to vote, if, within 90 days preceding thereto, the person (i)
has been unable to make an application with a local registrar within 2 days after making
a good faith effort to do so, (ii) has been found not qualified to vote by a local regis-
trar, or (iii) has not been notified of the results of his application within 7 days
after making application therefor.
(c) The examiner shall apply voting qualifications established by State law
to these 25 or more persons, except that he shall not apply (i) any literacy tests to
persons possessing a sixth grade education, (ii) any requirement of "good moral char-
acter", or (iii) any requirement that qualifications must be proved by the voucher of
registered voters or members of any other class.
(d) Those persons found qualified to vote by the examiner shall be placed on a
list of eligible voters and shall be issued registration certificates.
(e) The list of eligible voters, together with a report evidencing their quali-
fication, shall be sent to the State Attorney General and to the appropriate local
election officials.
(f) Persons placed on the list of eligible voters shall have the right to
vote without restriction in any subsequent election, unless challenged according to the
provisions detailed in paragraph 3. If challenged, they shall hav e the right to vote
provisionally, with their ballots being impounded until the challenge has been deter-
mined by the hearing officer and the court.
3. Challenges to Findings of the Examiner
(a) The State Attorney General and any appropriate election official within
the county shall have 10 days from receipt of the examiner's list and report to chal-
lenge findings of the examiner.
- 2 -
(b) Challenges shall be made to a hearing officer appointed by the Civil
Service Commission.
(c) The hearing officer shall pass upon the challenges within 7 days.
(d) An appeal from the determination of the hearing officer must be made
within 15 days thereafter to the Court of Appeals of the Circuit within which the
persons challenged so reside.
4. Establishment of a Pattern or Practice
(a) Upon determination of the hearing officer that 25 or more of those
persons whom the Attorney General certified, are qualified to vote, such determina-
tion shall establish a pattern or practice of denial of the right to register or vote
on account of race or color.
5. Appointment of Additional Examiners
(a) Upon the establishment of a pattern or practice, as described in sec-
tion 4, the Civil Service Commission shall appoint additional examiners as may be
necessary to determine whether persons within the county are qualified to vote.
(b) The examiners shall apply the same procedures and be subject to the
same conditions as the initial examiner was, as described in section 2 (c) through
(f), and a person shall not be required to first make application with a local regis-
trar if he states, under oath, that to make such application would be futile or would
subject him or his family to physical or economic intimidation or harm.
(c) As in section 2, those persons found qualified shall have the right to
vote without restriction if not challenged. If challenged, they shall have the right
to vote provisionally until the challenge is determined, with their ballots being
impounded.
(d) Also, as in section 3, the State shall have 10 days to challenge the
examiner's findings before a hearing officer and the hearing officer must make his
determination within 7 days thereafter.
(e) Persons, found qualified to vote pursuant to this Act, shall be entitled
to vote unless the examiner determines that (1) he has not voted or attempted to vote
once during 4 consecutive years or during such longer period as allowed by state regis-
tration laws, or (2) he has otherwise lost his eligibility to vote.
6. Denial of the Right to Vote.
Whenever a person alleges to an examiner within 24 hours after an election
that he has been denied the right to vote, although found qualified by an examiner,
- 3 -
the examiner shall notify the local U.S. Attorney. The U.S. Attorney is authorized
to seek an order of contempt against the election officials in the U.S. district
court. Also, any State or local official who denies such a person the right to
vote, or to count such person's vote, or otherwise intimidates, threatens or
coerces such person for the purpose of preventing such person from voting shall be
fined up to $5,000 and imprisoned up to five years.
7. Termination of a Pattern or Practice
(a) The provisions of this Act shall continue in force and effect until
within a 12 month period less than 25 persons within the county have been placed on
lists of eligible voters by examiners.
8. Qualification of Examiners
(a) Examiners shall be existing Federal officers or employees who are
residents of the State in which the Attorney General has issued his certification.
For ROLL CALL
[Apr. 1965?]
By Rep. Gerald R. Ford
Minority Leader, House of Representatives
Often at banquets, the master of ceremonies goes to great lengths
in introducing the speaker to the audience.
I recall one particular instance when the person in charge of the
program traced by history from high school days, covering the ground with
great thoroughness. His introduction was liberally sprinkled with
flattering adjectives.
In his words, I was more than just a member of the University of
Michigan football teams. To him, I was another Tom Harmon, which I wasn't.
He hit the highspots of my political career, obviously after a lot of
research, and embellished some of the facts with what bordered on fiction.
Winding up his introduction, the man told the audience that I was one
of the "great, great statesmen" in Congress.
I made my speech, probably falling short of the expectations built up
by the introduction.
While walking to our car in a parking lot a couple of blocks away, my
wife and I discussed the program and the events of the evening.
I asked her how many grest, great statesmen she thought were in Congress.
Before answering, Betty walked in silence for a few moments. Then she
stopped, turned and with a smile tapped me on the shoulder with her
finger and said, "One less than you think."
# # #
BERALD FORD LIBRARY
Statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford
FOR RELEASE APRIL 7, 1965 AFTER
on President's Viet-Nam Message
DELIVERY OF THE PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE
The President is to be commended for his insistence on no retreat
in Viet-Nam. But, there is a strong hint in his message dealing with
Communist aggression in Southeast Asia and thefate of 15 million people
of South Viet-Nam that he wants to buy peace. History proves that
friendship, security and solid international relationships cannot be bought
and sold with dollars in the geo-political market place when the Communists are
involved.
The President's contention that the United States is ready for
"unconditional discussions" sounds much like "negotiations," which must
be carried on only from a position of strength. Until we prove to the
Communists that we mean business, it would be sheer folly to attempt a
negotiated settlement.
I hope that the President, who has been given staunch support by
Republican leadership in the past when he ordered stepped-up military
operations against aggressor supply lines, realizes that the United States
will end up in second place if we retreat under pressure or a meaningless
settlement.
We all hope that peace will return soon in troubled and war-torn
Viet-Nam, but peace with justice and security cannot be purchased with a
billion American tax dollars.
Whether the conflict spreads depends upon the power-hungry Communist
aggressors. If we use our military strength wisely and effectively, and if
we get growing support from our Southeast Asia allies, the war in Viet-Nam
can end without the loss of freedom for our allies or a retreat by the
United States to Pearl Harbor.
If we are right in principle, which we are, use the power we have
and persevere, freedom and security will prevail.
################
Excerpts from the remarks by Rep. Gerald R. Ford
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 8, 1965
Mr. Chairman,
I conclude with these observations. The House Republican Policy
Committee and the House Republican Conference have endorsed H.R. 7057,
the Byrnes bill, as the motion to recommit. H.R. 7057 was unanimously
endorsed by all of the Republican members of the Committee on Ways and
Means. I commend the Republicans on the Committee for their hard and
constructive work. I especially commend Congressman John Byrnes for his
leadership in drafting H.R. 7057 which is constructive legislation, far
preferable to the Committee proposal.
As far as final passage is concerned, if the motion to recommit fails,
neither the House Republican Policy Committee nor the House Republican
Conference have recommended any guidelines. This is quite understandable.
The Committee bill, H.R. 6675, is to a substantial degree Republican
legislation, except that part which incorporates the Administration's
King-Anderson proposal for hospital care financed by a payroll tax.
Many of my Republican colleagues, in weighing the Republican portions
of H.R. 6675 against the Administration's part of the same bill, with
understandable logic will vote for the bill on final passage. On the
other hand some of us, including myself, have strongly and consistently
opposed the regressive payroll tax method of financing hospital care for
the aged.
In my judgment that portion of H.R. 6675 which is unsound, outweighs
the good. In the final analysis it is one's own conscience, not a
Republican policy position, that will determine how Republicans will vote
on final passage.
I conclude, however, by re-emphasizing that the Republican motion to
recommit is sound. It is our policy as a party. I urge that my colleagues
support the Byrnes substitute, H.R. 7057.
Sharon Bartlett, 21, who will represent Michigan in the
National Cherry Blossom Festival April 10-17 in Washington, D.C.
receives a gift from Congressman Gerald R. Ford, House
Republican Leader. A University of Michigan senior, Miss
Bartlett was chosen by the Michigan State Society in Washington
to compete for the title of # Cherry Blossom Princess. The
book she received from Ford is a compilation of art displayed
in the U.S. Capitol. She is the daughter of Iynn Bartlett,
former Superintendent of the "epartment of Public Instruction
in Michigan.
FORD LIBRARY
Fronthe office Rug. Gerall R. Ford
H-230 The capital
3
For Ribase
Offenil 13, 1965
Rep. Gerald Ford (R-Mich.), House Republican Minority Leader, today
warned a visiting group of Brazilian editors that If unless current trends are
checked, we are heading for an outbreak of Viet Nam-type guerilla wars in
Latin America. "
Ford said that " a vacillating hemispheric policy regarding the flow
of subversive weapons and propaganda has set the stage for Communist guerilla
aggression, under the guise of so-called 'National Liberation Fronts', through-
out the Western Hemisphere.
" Cuba and Viet Nam have furnished the models for Communist guerilla
aggression aimed at overthrowing existing pro-Western governments," Ford de-
clared. II And as our experience in these two countries has proven so painfully,
economic aid by itself is not suffieient to check a subversive Communist campaign,
financed and supplied from outside. If
The House Minority Leader told the Brazilians, in Washington for the
Fortaleze, Brazil
Journalists Project
, that current U.S. and hemispheric policy toward
Castro Cuba " seems to be one of letting sleeping Communist wolves lie. "
" But we ought to know that the Communist wolf in Havana is veryxac-
tive, " Ford said. " If the Red plan to create Viet Nam-type wars in Latin Ameri-
ca takes hold, Havana would serve as the Hanoi of the entire operation. It is
today the capital of Communist subversion in the heartland of the Free World. "
Ford expressed hope that = Brazil will continue the progress it has
made in recent months toward a return to stable and sound government. =
#####
RAR,
From the Office of Rep. Gerald R. Ford
H-230 The Capitol
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 13, 1965
Rep. Gerald Ford (R-Mich.), House Republican Minority Leader, today
warned a visiting group of Brazilian editors that "unless current trends are
checked, we are heading for an outbreak of Viet Nam-type guerilla wars in
Latin America."
Ford said that " a vacillating hemispheric policy regarding the flow
of subversive weapons and propaganda has set the stage for Communist guerilla
aggression, under the guise of so-called 'National Liberation Fronts', throughout
the Western Hemisphere.
" Cuba and Viet Nam have furnished the models for Communist guerilla
aggression aimed at overthrowing existing pro-Western governments," Ford declared.
" And as our experience in these two countries has proven so painfully,
economic aid by itself is not sufficient to check a subversive Communist campaign,
financed and supplied from outside. "
The House Minority Leader told the Brazilians, in Washington for the
Fortalezo, Brazil Journalists Project, that current U.S. and hemispheric policy
toward Castro Cuba " seems to be one of letting sleeping Communist wolves lie. "
" But we ought to know that the Communist wolf in Havana is very active,"
Ford said. " If the Red plan to create Viet Nam-type wars in Latin America
takes hold, Havana would serve as the Hanoi of the entire operation. It is
today the capital of Communist subversion in the heartland of the Free World."
Ford expressed hope that 1: Brazil will continue the progress it has
made in recent months toward a return to stable and sound government."
BIOGRAPHICAL OUTLINE
Frank Mitchell, newly-appointed House Page
April 14, 1965
Frank Mitchell, 15, of 1421 Fifteenth St., Springfield, Ill. is the
first Negro to serve as a Page in the House of Representatives.
His foster parents are Mr. and Mrs, Henry VenBuren of the same address.
Frank is an outstanding student in the Sophomore Class of Feitshans
High School in Springfield, where he is room president of his class and
a chess champion.
His father is a custodian at the Iles School in Springfield,
The appointee will have the personal guidance of Mrs. Eulalia O, Corbin
while he is in Washington. Mrs. Corbin, of Springfield, is executive secretary
to Rep. Robert McClory (R-Ill) of Lake Bluff, Ill,
#
#
#
A statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford
on the appointment of a New House Page
April 14, 1965
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
This marks an historic moment in the history of the House of Representatives.
The appointment of Frank Mitchell of Springfield, Illinois, as a Page in the
House is a milestone of importance. He will be the first Negro to serve as a
Page in the House.
It is a pleasure to join with Rep. Leslie Arends in endorsing this appoint-
ment, which was recommended by Rep. Paul Findley of the Illinois 20th District.
I congratulate allinois State Rep. J, David Jones, Precinct Committeeman
Victor Bartoletti of Springfield, and the committee of Springfield educators
and others who have played roles in sponsoring this fine young man.
With other members of the House, I welcome Frank Mitchell to The Capitol
with a wish that he finds his experience here to be an interesting, educational
and inspiring one.
#
#
#
From the office of
Representative Paul Findley (R. I11.)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 14, 1965
Rep. Paul Findley (R.-I11.), in commenting upon the appointment of
Frank V. Mitchell, aged 15, Springfield, Illinois, as the first Negro
page to serve in the U. S. House of Representatives, said:
"The appointment of Frank Mitchell, the first member of
his race to serve as a page in the U. S. House of Representatives, is
very appropriate at this time, for it comes on the eve of the 100th
anniversary of the death of Abraham Lincoln.
"Frank shares the distinction of coming from the same
home town as Mr. Lincoln, that of Springfield, Illinois, which I am
proud to say is included in the Congressional District I represent.
I am happy to have had the opportunity to sponsor Frank Mitchell for
this significant appointment."
In response to the confirmation of his appointment,
Frank Mitchell said:
"I appreciate this honor very much. I will do
everything in my power to be a credit to the Congress, the Republican
Party, my parents, and my community in return for the confidence they
have shown in me by giving me this wonderful opportunity."
GERALD FORD (IDRAB)
Statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford
requested by United Press International
April 15, 1965
The House of Representatives since January 4th has been the victim of
political karate and Presidential arm-twisting.
Outnumbered 2 to 1---with a majority of Democrate echoing the
President's wishes like political parrots--Republicans refused to rubber-stamp
Administration-spawned legislation.
Republicans presented constructive alternatives that offered more to
the American people, yet were based on sound, fiscal principles.
There are strong indications that Republicans===united in the House--will
win support throughout the country.
The record we establish will assure victories in 1966, when we predict
the American electorate will discover that most of the voters cannot afford
membership in the Great Society without fracturing their bank accounts
and wallets and going deeper into debt.
#
310
you
jb
FORD is LIBRARY DERALD
Statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford
for Republican Congressional Committee
one-minute tape April 15, 1965
10:30
in office
The House of Representatives since January 4th has been the victim
of political karate and Presidential arm-twisting
Outnumbered 2 to 1---with a majority of Democrate echoing the President's
wishes like political parrots---- Republicans refused to rubber-stamp
Administration-spawned legislation.
Republicans presented constructive alternatives that offered more
to the American people, yet were based on sound, fiscal principles.
There are strong indications that Republicans-- united in the House
will win support throughout the c untry.
The record we establish will assure victories in 1966, when we
predict the American electorate will discover that most of the voters
cannot afford membership in the Creat Society-=-without without fracturing their
bank accounts and wallets and going deeper into dobt.
QERALD FORD RAR
Statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford (R-Mich)
on President's remarks at a News Conference April 27, 1965
The President's restatement that the United States intends to stay
in Viet-Nam to help halt aggression by Communist attackers should be
applauded.
I support the President's renewed pledge that we must stand firm
in Viet-Nam to guarantee an eventual lasting peace. Congressional
Republican leadership has supported the Administration's policy in that
war-torn country while too many Democrats have openly attacked the
President for his position.
It is gratifying to know that the President is critical of his
critics, many of them in his own political empire.
The President has confirmed our earlier position that perhaps
military action against aggressors in Viet-Nam was tardy. Unfortunately,
our restraint was viewed as a weakness by the enemy. It is somewhat
shameful that this strong country waited for more murders, more savage
attacks against the peaceful citizenry of South Viet-Nam until we took
an active part in beating down aggressors by attacking their supply lines
and military installations.
Certainly, as the President said, we should seek to achieve a
lasting peace in Viet-Nam, but not to the extent of buying it with a
billion dollars in foreign aid under a program the Administration
recommended earlier.
From the office of Rep. Gerald R. Ford (R-Mich)
The Capitol, Washington, D. C.
FOR RELEASE APRIL 28, 1965
A scholarship for a summer educational program in American politics and
government is offered to women college students of the Fifth District of Michigan
by Mount Vernon Junior College in Washington, D. Co₂ Rep. Gerald R. Ford (R-Mich)
announced today.
Lecture and seminar courses offering up to six hours of credit in American
government, domestic politics, foreign relations, history and culture are included
in the scholarship, which covers tuition, room and board.
Women students, who have legal residence in the Fifth District and attend
accredited two-year or four-year colleges in the United States, are eligible for
the scholarship, Ford said.
The winner, to be chosen by Mount Vernon Junior College, will pay only
transportation to and from Washington, laundry and personal expenses.
The six-week session from June 21 through July 30 will utilize the resources
of the Nation's Capitol, combining academic study in small classes and field work
to introduce students to the Congress, the Executive branch, the Courts, various
governmental agencies, and major private organizations located in Washington.
Ford emphasized that interested students are to immediately write to Otis
L. Graham, Administrative Assistant to the President, Mount Vernon Junior College,
2100 Foxhall Road, Washington, D, C. 20007.
The scholarship is being offered to the Fifth District as the result of Ford
being appointed by the College to the Advisory Committee for the summer educational
program.
Ford described the summer session as a program aimed at "achieving more
understanding of the American political system among college students, creating a
better-informed citizenry, and encouraging those interested in public service
careers."
Located in the northwest section of Washington, Mount Vernon Junior College
is on a 26-acre wooded campus. Recreational facilities include tennis courts, a
swimming pool, gymnasium, and athletic field.
#
#
#
#
Statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford (R-Michs)
May 3, 1965
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Our Nation's fight against Communism in the Dominican Republic and Southeast
Asia virtually demands that the President immediately come to Congress for a
supplement to the military budget submitted to the House and Senate in January
before the United States became involved in conflict in two hemisperes.
If we are to bolster our effort in fighting Communism in two hemisperes,
it may require a revision of certain legislative programs, including a new look
at the President's recommendations on overall fiscal policy and tax reduction.
I also urge that the United States recognize that the cause of the current
strife and trouble in Latin America is Fidel Castro,
Latin America, in fact the Western Hemispere, will not be free of Communism's
dangerous threat until the arsonist Fidel Castro is eradicated. He is the "fire-
starter" in the Dominican Republic.
At the same I suggest that President Johnson sarry out the original four-
point program which John F. Kennedy demanded in fighting Communism.
During the 1960 presidential campaign and at the time of the Cuban missile
risis, the late President insisted on: inspection of missile sites in Cuba,
removal of all Soviet forces from Cuba, support of free Cuban forces both inside
and outside of that country, and blocking the export of Communism in this hemispere
"rom Castro's bastion.
It makes no sense to fight Communism 6,000 miles away in Viet Nam or to
protect American lives in the Dominican Republic against aggression unless we
take care of the generator of turbulence almost within sight of our country.
#####
Statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford (R-Mich)
May 3, 1965
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Our Nat ion's fight against Communism in the Dominican Republic and
Southeast Asia virtually demands that the President immediately come
to Congress for a an supplement increase in to the military budget submitted to the Comples
in January before The U.S. J. became involved in conflict in Two bemogheres
If we are to bolster our effort in fighting Communism in two
hemispheres, it may require a revision of certain Legislative programs,
including a new look at the President's recommendations on overall fiscal
policy and tax reductions.
I also urge that the United States cause of the current
the to
strife and trouble in Latin America, which is on the island of Cuba just
90 miles from our shore.
Latin- America, in fact the Western "emisphere, will not be free
of Communisim's dangerous threat until the arsonist Fidel Castro is
"
eradicated. He is the fire-starter in the Dominican "epublic.
cany Cammies out
At the same time I suggestthat President Johnson
four
The late
the original Times point program which John F. "ennedy demanded in
Dering the 1960 The late presidential President compaign insisted r at ontinspection the time fther of missile Culan missile sites in insis
fighting Communism
1
Cuba
Cuba, removal of all Soviet forces from that island, support of free
Cuban forces both inside and outside of that country, and blocking
the export of Communism in this Communism hemisphere from Castr's baston.
It makes nd sense to fight 6,000 miles away in Viet Nam
Dominican
or to protect American lives in the and Republic against Communist
aggression unless we take care of the EXPIREX generator of
almost within sight of our country.
turbulence
#
#
#
GERALD FORD LIBRARY
Statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford (R-Mich)
May 3, 1965
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Our Nation's fight against Communism in the Dominican Republic and
Southeast Asia virtually demands that the President immediately comes
to Congress for a supplement to the military budget submitted to the
House and Senate in January before the United States became involved in
conflict in two hemispheres.
If we are to bolster our effort in fighting Communism in two hemispheres,
it may require a revision of certain legislative programs, including a new
look at the President's recommendations on overall fiscal policy and tax
reduction.
I also urge that the United States goes to the cause of the current
strife and trouble in Latin America, which is on the island of Cuba just
90 miles from our shore.
Latin America, in fact the Western Hemisphere, will not be free of
Communism's dangerous threat until the arsonist Fidel Castrol is eradicated.
He is the "fire-starter" in the Dominican "epublic.
At the same time I suggest that President Johnson carries out the
original four-point program which John F. Kennedy demanded in fighting
Communism.
During the 1960 presidential campaign and at the time of the Cuban
missije crisis, the late President insisted on: inspection of missile sites
in Cuba, removal of all Soviet forces from Cuba, support of free Cuban
forces both inside and outside of that country, and blocking export of
Communism in this hemisphere from Castro's bastion.
It makes no sense to fight Communism 6,000 miles away in Viet Name or
to protect American lives in the Dominican Republic against aggression unless
we take care of the generator of turbulence almost within sight of our
country.
LIBRARI
Statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford
for 01ds Manor "Open House"-Grand Rapids, May 8. 1965
(TAPE TO BE - MADE BY APRIL 28)
Olds Manor, where you are gathered today, is a tribute to the Michigan
Baptist Convention and others who have given of themselves and their resources
to make the autmn years of life a time of new meaning and new friendships.
This is a place of inspiration where senior citizens are finding
spiritual, mental and physical satisfaction to give added depth to their
later years.
Olds Manor---one of the finest facilities of its tarpe in "ichigan---
provides gracious living in the heart of a city long known for its warm,
human qualities.
It is particularly significant that Olds Manor is located in the center
of a massive, exciting redevelopment of the downtown area in Grand Rsp ids,
which hasa widely-known reputation as one of America's most friendly cities.
In the best tradition of a free Nation, this haven for 8 enior citizens
is established on the foundation of brotherhood and compassion.
Private enterprise and individual effort have made possible this aplentix
splendid facility. It is refreshing in this era of growing federal government
control of our lives to see this kind of local teamwork achieve an important
goal.
This city is a much better place because of Olds Manor. Grand Rapids,
I know, must take pride in being the site of this friendly haven where the
years can be spent in dignity, in comfort, and in an atmosphere of neighborliness
FORD VIBRARY
Statement for Olds Mandr Open House
Page 2
The ministry of the Michigan Baptist Convention and those supporting
the growth and development of Olds Manor have met a challenging opportunity
with wishdom and foresight.
To those who have joined the Olds Manor I family, I have a
special personal wish----- I hope you have many years of happiness and
pleasure, comfort and Joy----- and, I am looking forward to visiting
with you in the near future when I return to Michigan.
# # #
GERALD FORD LIBRARY
Statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford
May 10, 1965
It is particularly significant in this turbulent time of aggression
against freedom in many parts of the world that we pay tribute to the
spirit and courage of the Rumanian people.
This Tenth of May traditional national holiday celebration is a
living symbol of perseverance in seeking freedom while facing tremendous
obstacles.
The free world takes a monumental pause today to honor the history
of Rumania where its people can no longer commemorate this date behind
the Iron Curtain.
Although tragic circumstances silence the people in Rumania, we in
the free world send them assurance that a time of independence must
ultimately be achieved.
We join with Rumanians, who are captive in their homeland and
must celebrate today in their hearts, in hoping for the dawn of a
new time when freedom will return to their country.
#
GERALD
Statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford
May 10, 1965
Commemorating National Holiday of the Rumanian People
It is particularly significant in this turbulent time of aggression
against freedom in many parts of the world that we pay tribute to the
spirit and courage of the Rumanian people.
This traditional national holiday celebration is a living symbol
of perseverance in seeking freedom while facing tremendous obstacles.
The free world takes a monumental pause today to honor the history
of Rumania where its people can no longer commemorate this date behind
the Iron Curtain.
"lthough tragic circumstances silence the people in Rumania, we
in the free world send them assurance that a time of independence must
ultimately be achieved.
We join with Rumanians,who are captive in their homeland and must
celebrate today in their hearts, in hoping for the dawn of a new time
when freedom will return to their country.
#
GLRALD FORD LIBRARY
Radio-tape statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford
announcing appointment of Rep. John W. Wydler to Committee on Govt. Opns.
( 1-minute ) May 17, 1965
The appointment of Nassau's senior Congressman John W. Wydler to
the highly important Committee on Government Operations is of major
significance not only to the citizens of his district but to the entire
Nation.
This committee is a prime factor in seeking more streamlined and
more efficient government at all levels, including the present powerful
Executive arm. John Wydler comes to the committee with a highly-regarded
reputation for his work in seeking to eliminate duplication and waste
in government.
It is extremely fortunate that a man of Congremsian 'Wydler's ability
is available for this most important position in Washington.
This is his second major committee assignment in Congress. John also
serves as a member of the Science and Astronautics Committee, which has
charge of our Nation's vital national space program.
#
GERAAD FORD VIBRARY
Congress of the United States
Douse of Representatives
Room 417, @ld Name (Office Fuilding
Mashington, D.C.
May 13, 1965
Memorandum
Dear Mr. Meyer:
Attached is the release Mr. Wydler had
planned to ask Mr. Ford to make con-
cerning his election to the Government
Operations Committee. He has instead
made a personal release similar to the
attached, as he felt it would be timely
to make the announcement yesterday.
Mr. Wydler hopes Mr. Ford will make a
one minute tape announcing the appoint-
ment. Mr. Wydler will have additional
copies made and distribute them to the
radio stations in his district. For
this purpose, Mr. Wydler thought the
first part of this release might be
helpful.
Mr. Wydler would appreciate if this could
be expedicted. FROM: John W. Wydler
Bette Hoppel
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
FORD NAMES WYDLER TO COMMITTEE
ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
House Minority Leader Jerry Ford (R-Michigan) today announced
that Nassau's Senior Congressman John W. Wydler (R.-Garden City) has
been appointed to the highly important Committee on Government Operations.
This is Congressman Wydler's second major committee assignment. He
also serves on the Science and Astronautics Committee, which has charge
of our national space program.
"The Committee on Government Operations is responsible for a wide
range of Federal government activities and it is extremely fortunate
that a man of Congressman Wydler's ability is available for this position",
the Minority Leader said. "Congressman Wydler is one of the most active
supporters of establishing a new 'Hoover Commission' and has introduced
legislation calling for a new study of the procedures of the Executive
Branch of the Federal government to eliminate duplication and waste."
The ranking Member of the Committee on Government Operations,
Clarence Brown (R.-Ohio), called Wydler's appointment a "real plus
which will add a strong voice to the minority members of this committee
who have been pushing for a hard look at the administration of the
Executive Branch of Government."
Ford concluded "Congressman Wydler's appointment to a second major
committee is further indication of the high regard and esteem in which
he is held by the members of the House, on both sides of the aisle."
Wydler commented, "My appointment to this important committee will
give me an added opportunity to pursue my fight to eliminate waste in
government. On my very first day as a Congressman, I introduced legis-
lation to establish a new "Hoover Commission". My appointment to this
committee will give me a chance to push this legislation toward passage.
It is absolutely essential if we are to have a streamlined, efficient
government, and it is my intention to fight with all the force at my
command to accomplish this."
A statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford (R-Mich)
to the University of Michigan Young Republican Club
May 13, 1965
As House Minority Leader in Congress in the so-called age of consensus,
I have serious personal convictions in the matter of differences of opinion
and dissent in 1965 America.
Difference of opinion creates debate and argument. But for a Republic
to survive, something greater is required of its citizens. Our need is for
responsible dissent.
In the Nation's Capital, we of the Republican Party recognise the
necessity of informed and responsible opposition to the Johnson Administration
programs. We mean to fulfill our function as the Party of opposition in a
constructive and responsible manner.
We must all recognize a growing threat posed to our society and to the
country by irresponsible expressions of dissent in this time of national crisis,
specifically regarding Southeast Asia and the Dominican Republic.
It should be sufficient that our Nation's enemies know that the
overwhelming majority of Republicans in Congress loyal opposition-
though opposed to many of the President's domestic programs, support him
in the matter of standing firm against aggression. In fact, it is worth
commenting that President Johnson might wish for an equal amount of support
for his Viet Nam and Dominican Republic stand from members of his own
Democratic Party.
I consider it incredible that & source of such irresponsible modern-day
"know-nothing" dissent, based on emotional disregard for the morality and
facts of the case, should spring from a very few of our university campuses.
And I consider it appalling that much of the leadership for picketing
with anti-American slogans in what at times amounts to irresponsible mob action
comes from a very small minority of university professors purporting to
carry forward the banner of free academic inquiry.
Indeed, a central purpose of universities of free inquiry in our society
is to prepare succeeding generations for the assumption of responsibilities as
citizens. Whenever our educational institutions fail to inculcate this sense
of responsibility in their students, serious trouble for the Republic lies ahead.
-more-
GERALD 1843013
Rep. Gerald R. Ford statement to
U of M Young RepublicansClub
&
This has been the case throughout history. This century offers tragic
proof of the penalties which societies and nations pay for not meeting
this fundamental requirement for existence.
During week-end demonstrations in Washington this Spring some Meards
placards read: "Why Die for Viet Nam?"
How many of us remember the similar question raised by irresponsible
voices in Chamberlain's Britain, little over a century ago: "Why die for
the Sudentanland?" and "Why die for Danzig?"
We know now, and many of us knew then, that these pacifist voices were
serving the purposes of Nazi aggressione The pleard-bearers cried for
peace while the seeds for Buchenwald and Belsen were taking root.
Today, our so-called "teach-ins" and "peace" demonstrations cry for
peace=st=any=price while the seeds of Communist atrocity take root. And
yet the appeasers speak for morality.
Others are concerned with the physical uncleanliness of these
irresponsible protesters, I am not so much concerned with their personal
hygiene as with their moral sterility. For, if we conderm public apathy
toward victims of street crimes, what can we Bay of apathy and disinterest
regarding victims of Communist aggression?
It is, of course, an apathy and disinterest shown only by a small,
small minority of American professors and students. The so-called teach-ins,
which I regret may have begun at my own University of Michigan, are not
truly representative of the Nation's university campuses.
However, it remains for responsible leaders of American higher education
to make this fact unmistakably clear to our people.
The well-intentioned but unrealistic placard-carrying marchers, who bear
no public responsibilities, cannot alter this country's policy in Viet
Nam or the Dominican Republic. But a danger exists that they will bring about
a damaging loss of confidence in the aims and operation of the country's
educational system. Also, their words and actions may lead to a dangercus
miscalculation by the enemy of our Nation's course of present and future
action. Such miscalculation by the Communists in Peiping and elsewhere could
have dire consequences for all mankind.
-more-
GERALD LIBRAR
Rep. Gerald R. Ford statement to
U of M Young Republican Club
Certainly, there must always be a place for responsible dissent and
free inquiry on our university and college campuses. But the respect of
faculty and students for authority and law is essential to the d evelopment
of good citizenship.
It is not too much to expect university students to understand that
along with free academic inquiry goes responsibility to country and society.
And it is certainly not too much to expect their professors to know and
teach that the prime master of £ ree inquiry in Western society did not walk
the streets of Athens carrying a placard asking "Why Die for Marathon?" when his
community was threatened.
Indeed, Socrates knew the answer. He was prepared to do battle, and if
necessary, die to preserve the freedom of others.
As a member of the Joint Senate-House Republican Leadership, I reassert
support of the President's pledge that our Nation will stand firm to
guarantee an evntual lasting peace.
So long as there is Communist-promoted infiltration of South Viet Nam
or anywhere in the society of free world nations, there can be no negotiations.
And, I urge the President to makesthis unmistakably clear to the world.
Agreements can only fail when the Communists negotiate only for domination
and we negotiate only for peace.
Gerald R. Ford, M.C.
LIBRARY
A statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford (R-Mich)
to the University of Michigan Young Republican Club
May 17, 1965
As House Minority Leader in Congress in the so-called age of
consensus, I have serious personal convictions in the matter of differences
of opinion and dissent in 1965 America.
Difference of opinion creates debate and argument. But for a Republic
to survive, something greater is required of its citizens. Our need is
for responsible dissent.
We must all recognize a growing threat posed to our society and to
the country by
expressions of dissent in this time of national
crisis, specifically regarding Southeast Asia.
I consider it incredible that a source of
day
dissent, based on emotional disregard for the morality and
facts of the case should spring from a very few of our university campuses.
And, I consider it appalling that much of the leadership for picketing
with anti-American slogans in what at times amounts to brazen and
disobedient mob action comes from a very small minority of university
professors purporting to carry forward the banner of free academic inquiry.
Indeed, universities of free inquiry in our society have a central
purpose of preparing succeeding generations for the assumption of
responsibilities as citizens. Whenever our educational institutions fail to
inculcate this sense of responsibility in their students, serious trouble
for the Republic lies ahead.
This has been the case throughout history. The twentieth century offers
tragic proof of the penalties which societies and nations pay for failing
to meet this fundamental requirement for existence.
come at a time
Today, our so-called "teach-ins" and "peace" demonstrations
when
while the seeds of Communist atrocity take root.cn
of It is, of and
woll to threates freedom. Viet nam, Cuba and
course, an apathy disinterest shown only by a small, small
minority of American professors and students and are not truly representative
of the Nation's university campuses. However, it remains for responsible
leaders of American higher education to make this fact unmistakably clear
to our people.
-more-
FORD LIBRARY
A statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford (R-Mich)
to the University of Michigan Young Republican Club
May 17, 1965
As House Minority Leader in Congress in the so-called age of consensus,
I have serious personal convictions in the matter of differences of opinion
and dissent in 1965 Americas
Differences of opinion creates debate and argument. But for a Republic
to survive, something greater is required of its citizens. Our need is for
responsible dissent.
We must all recognize a growing threat posed to our society and to the
country by unfounded respessions of dissent in this time of national crisis,
specifically regarding Southeast Asiae
I consider it incredible that a source of dissent based on emotional
disregard for the morality and facts of the case should spring from a very
few of our university campuses.
And, I consider it appalling that much of the leadership for picketing
with anti-American slogans in what at times amounts to brazen and disobedient
mob action comes from a very small minority of university professors purporting
to carry forward the banner of free academic inquiry.
Indeed, universities of free inquiry in our society have a central purpose
of preparing succeeding generations for the assumption of responsibilities as
citizens. Whenever our educational institutions fail to inculcate this sense
of responsibility in their students, serious trouble for the Republic
lies ahead.
This has been the case throughout history. The 20th century offers tragic
proof of penalities which societies and nations pay for failing to meet this
fundamental requirement for existence.
Today our so-called "teach-ins" and "peace" demonstrations come at a time
when the seeds of Communist atrocity take root in Viet Nam, Cuba and other parts
of the world to threaten freedom.
The dissent is shown by only a small, small minority of American professors
and students. It 18 not truly representative of the Nation's university campuses.
However, it remains for responsible leaders of American higher emisation to
make this fact unmistakably clear to our people.
-more-
LIBRARY
Statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford (R-Mich)
on proposed reduction of excise taxes
May 17, 1965
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Republicans favor a reduction of excise taxes which were initially
levied as a wartime emergency measure.
If we are to have this reduction in revenue, we must also find a way
to reduce non-defense spending to a comparable amount in order to maintain
fiscal responsibility.
It must be kept in mind that the United States is committed militarily
in two theaters of conflict 6,000 miles apart. And, there are indicat ions
that Communist aggression may break out elsewhere in the world.
Our Nation must remain strong and ready to meet any emergency in the
battle against Communism. Therefore, we must maintain a fiscal position which
will be the foundation for a measured, meaningful military effort at amost
any moment.
The
Congress should carefully weigh the need for a $4 billion excise tax
at a time
reduction without a cutback in non-defense spending 1 when the
Nation is taking a carefully calculated military stand against the forces
of Communist aggression in two hemispheres.
#
#
#
QERALD FORD LIBRARY
of
Statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford (R-Mich.)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
on proposed reduction of excise taxes.
May 17, 1965
Republicans favor a reduction of excise taxes which were initially
levied as E wartime emergency measure.
If we are to have this reduction in revenue, we must also find a way
to reduce non-defense spending to a comparable amount in order to maintain
fiscal responsibility.
It must be kept in mind that the United States is committed militarily
in two theaters of conflict, 6000 miles apart. And, there are indications
that Communist aggression may break out elsewhere in the world.
Our Nation must remain strong and ready to meet any emergency in the
battle against Communism. Therefore, we must maintain a fiscal position
which will be the foundation for a measured, meaningful military effort at
almost any moment.
Congress should carefully weigh the need for a $4 billion excise tax
reduction without a cutback in non-defense spending at a time when the
Nation is taking a carefully calculated military stand against the forces
of Communist aggression in two hemispheres.
# # #
Radio-tape statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford
announcing sppointment of Rep. John W. Wydler to Committee on Govt. Opns.
( 1-minute ) May 17, 1965
as Minaty leoler d was pleased to endorse
the to appointment of Nassau's senior Congressman , John W. Wydler to
His afforiatment
the highly important Committee on Government Operations i is of major
significance not only to the citizens of his district but to the entire
Nation.
This committee is a prime factor in seeking more streamlined and
more efficient government at all levels, including the present powerful
Executive arm. John Wydler comes to the committee with a highly-regarded
reputation for his work in seeking to eliminate duplication and waste
in government.
It is extremely fortunate that a man of Congresman 'Wydler's ability
is available for this most important position in Washington.
This is his second major committee assignment in Congress. John also
serves as a member of the Science and Astronautics Committee, which has
charge of our Nation's vital national space program.
#
#
#
FORD VIBRAST
Statement by Rep. Gerald R. Ford (R-Mich)
May 18, 1965
on President's labor-management message to Congress
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Congress must not rubber-stamp President Johnson's far-reaching
proposals in his labor-management message. Full Congressional hearings must
be held because of the serious issues involved such as the President's
proposed repeal of Section 14(b) of the Taft-Hartley Act.
The President's proposals for extending the minimum wage need careful
analysis as to their impact on inflation, unemployment, poverty, and small
business.
I have serious doubts about the workability of selected application of
double pay for overtime, as does both labor and industry.
Obviously, Republicans will support, or offer as alternatives to, any
proposals that will legitimately strengthen our economy and assist workers who
need a minimum protection of government.
We shall oppose impositions by the federal government that injure our
economy, indirectly hurt our laboring people, or nullify proper responsibili-
ties of the 50 states.
Also, it is regrettable that the President ignored the problems of agri-
cultural labor in his message to Congress. The need for farm laborers in
many parts of our country is acute. The Administration could help alleviate
this situation if it chose.
###
Telephone statement for radio station WGTO Winter Haven, Florida
(293-4103)
May 20, 1965
This week the President boldly ignored the problems of adequate
agricultural worker supply in his labor-management to Congress. At that time
I emphasized that he had dodgel doged the problems facing growers in many states.
While Florida growers gorwers alone have suffered an estimated four million dollar
loss so far this year because of ashortage of harvesters, the Johnson Administration
continues to ignore the situation.
Secretary of Labor Wirtz is delinquent in his duty by stubbornly refusing
to accept a sensible solution to the tragic lack of skilled labor for harvesting.
While thousands of workers are available in Mexico, the Secretary of Labor
blandly refuses to perform his duty not only to the American consumers but
to the growers and the free enterprise system.
Republican Congressman Edward Gurney of Florida has introduced a bill that
would take away the present iron-fisted and dictatorial power of the Labor
Secretary. The bill would permit states to handle the manpower-shortage
problem in cooperation with growers and farmers. Ed's proposed law demands
immediate approval by the Congress.
Meanwhile, the President, his Democrat Administration and Secretary Wirtz
continue to ignore this tragic situation in which citrus and many other crops
are going to waste because skilled, avilable workers are prohibited from
harvesting them.
-more-
GERALD FORD LIBRARY
WGTO RADIO FLORIDA STATEMENT
-2-
Today's problems are especially regrettable in view of action taken
by the Democrat-controlled Congress which abolished the "bracero" law
this provided that Mexican nationals be admitted temporarily to the United
States to perform a valuable service.
In killing the law, the Democrat-controlled Congress placed almost
unlimited dictatorial powers in the hands of the Administration and the
Secretary of Labor.
It is a travesty on justice, a violation of responsibility and a
shame that the Administration refuses to remedy the present tragic situation
in Florida, California, Michigan and other tates the American people
and the growers deserve better treatment.
# # #
FORD is LIBRARY GERALD
Telephone statement for radio station WGTO Winter Haven, Florida
(293-4103)
May 20, 1965
This week the President boldly ignored the problems of adequate
agricultural worker supply in his labor-management to Congress. At that time
I emphasised that he had doged the problems facing growers in many states.
While Florida gApwers alone have suffered an estimated four million dollar
loss so far this year because of ashertage of harvesterz, the Johnson Administrati
continues to ignore the situation.
Secretary of Labor Wirts is delinquent in his duty by stubbornly refusing
to accept a sensible solution to the tragic lack of skilled labor for harvesting.
While thousands of workers are available in Mexico, the Secretary of Labor
blandly refuses to perform his duty not only to the American consumers but
to the growers and the free enterprise system.
Republican Congressman Edward Gurney of Florida has introduced a bill that
would take away the present iron-fisted and dictatorial power of the Labor
Secretary. The bill would permit states to bandle the manpower-shortage
problem in cooperation with growers and farmers. Ed's proposed law demands
immediate approval by the Congress.
Meanwhile, the President, his Democrat Administration and Secretary Wirts
continue to ignore this tragic situation in which citrus and many other crops
are going to waste because skilled, avilable workers are prohibited from
harvesting them.
-more-
LIBRARY
wor RADIO FLORIDA STATEMENT
&
Today's problems are especially regrettable in view of action taken
by the Democrat-controlled Congress which abolished the "bracero" MW......
this provided that Mexican nationals be admitted temporarily to the United
States to perform a valuable service.
In killing the law, the Democrat-controlled Congress placed almost
unlimited dictatorial powers in the hands of the Administration and the
Secretary of Labor.
It is a travesty on justice, a violation of responsibility and a
shame that the Administration refuses to remady the present tragic situation
in Florida, California, Michigan and other states.....the American people
and the growers deserve better treatment.
# # #
LIBRARY
May 20, 1965
The Record of House Republicans 1965
Working together with a spirit of optimism, House Republicans have
battled overwhelming 2 to 1 odds in voting strength while at the same time
becoming a united, articulate, creative, hard-working, and dynamic team in
Congress.
Since the election of Rep. Grald R. Ford of Michigan as House Minority
Leader January 4 this year, Republicans have organized and distributed their
strength, created meaningful proposed legislation, won national attention for
their efforts, brought a strong new sense of responsibility to Congress, and
given the Party a victory outlook.
The Republican team is operating on the philosophy of Ford, who detailed
the guidelines shortly after his election saying: "We cannot accept the idea
that the duty of the opposition party is simply to oppose. This is too narrow
and too negative a formulation of responsibility."
Ford also said: "We must do more than respond to the initiatives of the
Administration. We must offer alternative measures to cope with national problems.
We must press for action to deal with the problems to which the Administration
is blind or indifferent.
"Our duty, as we conceive 1t, is to exert whatever influence we can to
guide the Nation toward the goals of freedom, security, peace, and well-being
with fiscal responsibility."
Major accomplishments includes
1. Establishment of the Republican Coordinating Committee with the goals
of broadening the a dvisory base of national party policy, setting up task forces
to study and make recommendations for dealing with the problems facing the nation,
and to stimulate communication among members of the party and others.
2. Formation of the Planning and Research Committee, a major innovation
to mobilise constructive Republican activity in developing long-term solutions to
national problems.
House GOP Record
&
3. Organisation of a Task Force operation with a special staff to
conduct research in depth in many areas, including foreign policy,
economic affairs, agriculture, congressional reform and implementation
of the 1964 party platform.
4. Reshaping the Policy Committee to handle the day=to=day job
of formulating decisions on current legislative proposals facing House decisions
5. Broadening the base of operations and strategically deploying
strength, ability and wisdom by providing that no Republican member can
serve as the ranking representative on two committees at the same time.
6. Strengthening the Whip organization.
7. Bettering the organization of employees and adding experienced
specialists in many fields.
8. Formulating legislstive proposals that offer more fiscally-
responsible plans fort assisting economically distressed areas, providing
health care for senior citizens, aid-to-education, providing a comprehensive
and effective remedy in the area of voting rights, offering foreign aid on
an "earn and deserve" basis.
9. Support of the Administration's foreign policy in Southeast Asia
and the Dominican Republic---and in 80 doing placed the national interest
shead of partisan politics while the President's own Democrat spokesmen
violently oppose hime
Republican growing unity in the House is highlighted in many ways.
Two prime examples are voting records on important national issues.
In the first roll*call of the 89th Congress, Republicans were
unanimous in voting against selling surplus food to Col Nasser of the Arab
Republic.
Republicans, with only 10 dissenting, stood together in voting to
substitute the Byrnes Bill for the Administration's medicare scheme.
While working as a constructive, unitedy creative team, House
Republicans have given much more of themselves than they receive, traveling
the country strengthening the ranks of the Party in preparation for a victory
effort in the 1966 elections.
Although a Democrat-controlled Congress under the iron fist of the
President has rammed through legislation that is long on quantity and short
on quality, Republicans serve the American electorate by providing objective,
responsible pportion in the form of constudes, alternative legislative
proposals
House GOP Record 1965
-3-
Although a Democrat-controlled Congress under the iron-fist of
the President has remusthrough legislation that is long on quantity and
short on quality, Republicans serve the American
electorate by providing objective, responsible
opposition in the form of constructive alternative legislative proposals.
Republicans in the House are working--- earning the respect
of voters in all 50 states.
# # #
LIBRARY
Rep. Gerald R. Ford (R-Mich.), House Minority Leader, will
testify at a Judiciary subcommittee hearing Wednesday, May 26,
in Room 2141 Rayburn Building on proposed legislation that would
make the assassination, or attempted assassination, of the Pres-
ident and Vice President a federal crime,
Ford is scheduled to begin his testimony at approximately
10:15 a.m.
STATEMENT OF REPRESENTATIVE GERALD R FORD
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
Re: Legislation to make the
assassination of the President
a Federal crime
May 26, 1965
Mr. Chairman,
The President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy,
on which the previous witness, my good friend Representative Hale Boggs,
and I were privileged to serve, found that "there was no Federal criminal
jurisdiction over the assassination of President Kernedy." (Report, p. 454.)
This fact was dramatically demonstrated to the Commission when we
heard testimony concerning activities at the hospital following the President's
death. When it was proposed to transfer his body to Washington, local
officials insisted that certain papers be filled out and that an autopsy
be performed within the State in which the death occurred.
This would have meant a delay of hours or possibly days at a time
when the Presidential party was trying to return as quickly as possible
to Washington, both for the safety of President Johnson and for the
comfort of Mrs. Kennedy.
Presidential staff members who were present decided that they would
proceed to remove the body from the hospital without permission of local
or State officials. We were told that as the casket was being wheeled
through the hall one of the local officials shouted very loudly, "You
can't do that; you can't leave here now." Notwithstanding this insistence,
the casket was hurried into an ambulance and driven to the airfield.
This embarrassing and disagreeable scene could have been avoided had
the legislation which we are considering today been in effect. It seems to
me that this is one, but only one, of the reasons why the assassination, or
the attempted assassination, of the President should be made a Federal crime.
In the course of my participation and the extensive investigation by
the Warren Commission into the assassination of President Kennedy, it became
clear that such legislation was long overdue and would produce several
significant advantages.
PRESENT LAW
Under present law, it is a Federal offense to deposit in the mails any
letter or other document containing a threat, or otherwise to make any
threat, against the President, the Vice-President, or other officer next
-2-
in order of succession to the office of the President, the President-elect,
or the Vice-President-elect. (18 U.S.C. 871.) It is also a Federal crime
to conspire to injure any Federal officer, on account of, or while he is
engaged in, the lawful discharge of the duties of his office. (18 U.S.C. 372.)
In addition, to advocate the overthrow of the Government by the assassination
of its officers is a Federal offense. (18 U.S.C. 2385.) But a direct attack
upon the President, or even his murder, has never been as such a crime under
Federal law. That is to say, unless there has been a conspiracy, or
an advocacy of the overthrow of the Government, there is no Federal
jurisdiction, so that, as the Warren Report concluded, 11 once it
became reasonably clear that the killing was the act of a single person,
the State of Texas had exclusive jurisdiction." (Report, p. 454.)
The murder of numerous other Federal officials has long been a
Federal crime. Section 1114 of Title 18 of the United States Code makes
it a Federal offense to kill Federal Judges, U.S. Attorneys and Marshals,
and many other specifically designated officials, while engaged in, or on
account of, the performance of their official duties.
It should be noted that in all these cases, there is a Federal offense
only if the official has been killed while engaged in, or on account of,
the performance of his official duties. This "line of duty" requirement is
probably necessary for the exercise of Federal jurisdiction as to such
officials, but the courts have been fairly liberal in interpreting what
conduct falls within this provision of the statute. There have also been
several cases under this and a parallel statue, holding that it is not
even necessary for the offender to know that the victim was a Federal
officer engaged in the performance of his official duties, but the
majority rule and the sounder view, seems to be that such knowledge is
essential to show a Federal offense.
BASIS FOR FEDERAL JURISDICTION
The basic reason for making the assassination of the President a
Federal crime is that essentially it is an offense against the United States
Government, in two important respects. First, grave injury is done to the
functioning of the Government, which may threaten the welfare of the
entire country. As Senator George F.Hoar put it over 60 years ago in
Congressional debate on a similar bill:
"
What this bill means to punish is the crime of interruption
of the Government of the United States and the destruction of its
-3-
security by striking down the life of the person who is actually in
the exercise of the executive power, or of such persons as have been
constitutionally and lawfully provided to succeed thereto in case of
a vacancy. It is important to this country that the interruption
shall not take place for an hour " (35 Cong. Rec. 2431 (1902),
quoted in Report, pp. 455-56.)
That such interruption may cause grave anxiety is amply demonstrated by
the tense hours the nation experienced in November of 1963, and also by
the concern over the health of President Johnson and Speaker McCormack
until the office of Vice-President was filled again.
Secondly, in most cases, the reason for such attacks is anger at the
manner in which the President performs his official functions, or hostility
toward the office of President or the United States Government or the
American system of democracy. It is certainly the concern of the Federal
Government to try to prevent, to guard against, and to punish criminal conduct
performed out of such motivation.
ADVANTAGES
The change in the present law that would be affected by the proposed
legislation would produce several significant advantages.
Primary responsibility and final authority for the investigation
and prosecution of any attacks on the life of the President would be
placed in the hands of Federal authorities. The actual investigation of
offenses covered by the statute would be conducted by Federal law enforcement
officials; particularly the FBI, with the assistance of the Secret Service.
Where the assistance of State or local agencies proved necessary or
desirable, it would be under the direction of the Federal agencies involved.
This would ensure that resources and facilities of the Federal agencies
would be immediately available for a complete and thorough investigation.
"At present, Federal agencies participate only upon the sufference of the
local authorities." (Report, p. 456.) In addition, clear Federal jurisdiction
would minimize the possibility of embarrassment or conflict in dealing with
local authorities, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover testified before the Warren
Commission that, at the time of President Kennedy's assassination, " the
failure to have jurisdiction was extremely embarrassing," (V Hearings, 115)
and lead to confusion in the subsequent investigation by Federal and
local authorities. (Report, P. 546.) In addition, the Commission
itself experienced some difficulty in its work, for example, the
-4-
unauthorized and premature release of documents and information, which
might have been prevented, had Federal authorities been in control.
The threat to the national security of the United States, when the
President has been assassinated, may be very serious. The careful
assessment of this danger, and taking of whatever steps may be necessary,
will be greatly facilitated by allowing the Federal Government to
supervise all stages of the investigation and handling of the case.
In particular, as Secret Service Chief James J. Rowley pointed out (Comm.
Ex. 1030; vol. XVIII, PP. 830-31), the possibility of a conspiracy and
any further threat to the President should be explored and eliminated as
quickly as possible. This is the particular concern of the Federal
agencies which have general responsibility for the President's protection.
If it should ever become necessary, the Federal Government could
exercise exclusive jurisdiction over the entire investigation, so that
information obtained could be kept confidential until its reliability
and significance could be fully determined, thus preventing unfcunded
rumors and unnecessary public confusion.
The detention and protection of any suspects would, under the proposed
legislation, be the responsibility of Federal law enforcement officers.
Mr. Hoover testified before the Commission that "If we had had jurisdiction,
we would have taken custody of him (Oswald) and I do not believe he would
have been killed by Rubenstein." (V Hearings, 115.) As he stated,
"
the killing of Oswald has created a great fog of speculation that will
go on for years, because of the things that Oswald might have been able
to tell which would have been of assistance in pinning down various
phases of this matter." As one of our most capable law enforcement agencies,
the FBI could do much to ensure the safety of possible defendants.
Furthermore, the fact of Federal custody would ensure that the
questioning of the suspect would be under the direction of Federal
authorities. In Dallas, FBI and Secret Service agents did not have
control over the questioning of Oswald, and at times were merely observers;
they were not even present when the interrogation of Oswald began. As
Chief Curry admitted, the conditions in the Dallas jail were hardly
conducive to effective questioning. (Report, p. 200.) In addition,
J. Edgar Hoover pointed out that if some of the evidence had been kept
secret and Oswald had been confronted with it in his intermogation, he
might have broken and confessed. (V Hearings, 116.) Finally, the
-5-
facilities of the FBI would have made it more likely that recordings or
transcripts of the interrogation sessions would have been made.
The procedures and practice of the Federal agencies would also be
well calculated to protect the legal rights of any suspect. It is the
practice of the FBI, Mr. Hoover testified, to inform every prisoner of
his right to remain silent and to have an attorney; he is also examined
by a reputable local physician both before and after his questioning.
(V Hearings, 116.) Federal law requires that when a person is arrested
he be brought before a commissioner promptly; in a case like Oswald's,
(this) would probably have been done within 4 or 5 hours." (V Hearings, 116.)
In addition, it is highly unlikely under Federal procedures that a suspect's
right to a fair trial would be prejudiced by the release of incorrect or
inadmissible information. Last April, the Attorney General issued a
statement of policy concerning the release of information by personnel
of the Department of Justice relating to criminal proceedings. (28 C.F.R. 50.2.)
Under the guidelines there established, much of the information which might
have unfairly prejudiced a jury against Oswald would never have been released.
As it was, much unreliable and actually false information was announced
by local officials in frequent press conferences. Mr. Hoover testified that
he was so concerned that he asked his agent in charge in Dallas to personally
go to Chief Curry and insist that he not go on the air any more until
the case was resolved. (V Hearings, 115.) As he explained, "We have
always adopted the policy in the Bureau of no comment until we have the
warrant and make the arrest. Then a release is prepared briefly stating
what the facts are, what the written complaint says
and that ends it."
(Ibid.) Finally, the Federal courts may take measures to protect the
defendant from undue publicity. Under Rule 21 (a) of the Federal Rules
of Criminal Procedure, "if the court is satisfied that there exists in
the district or division where the prosecution is pending so great a
prejudice against the defendant that he cannot obtain a fair and impartial
trial in that district or division," the court must transfer the proceeding
to another district or division. The court is also empowered, within its
discretion, to grant a continuance of the trial or to impanel a new set of
jurors.
SUPPORT FOR THE LEGISLATION
The Report of the President's Commission on the Assassination of
President Kennedy recommended that Congress adopt legislation which would
-6-
make the assassination of the President, the Vice-President or other person
next in order of succession, the President-elect, or the Vice-President-elect,
a Federal crime. (Report, P. 26; cf. p. 455.) The Director of the FBI,
J. Edgar Hoover, strongly supports such legislation. (Report, p.456;
V Hearings 115; Comm. Ex. 866, vol. XVII, p. 860.) The Chief of the
Secret Service, James J. Rowley, equally favors this recommendation.
(V Hearings, p. 483; Comm. Ex. 1030, vol. XVIII, P. 830.)
FORM OF THE LEGISLATION
Without going into the particular provisions of the bills before the
committee, I would like to indicate the areas I think the legislation
should cover. The precise form of the final bill will depend on the extent
to which these purposes require modification of the existing laws.
The bill should cover the President, Vice-President or other person
next in order of succession, the President-elect, the Vice-President-elect,
and any person lawfully acting as President. This would eliminate the
need for any "line of duty" restriction, since "the activities of the
victim at the time an assassination occurs and the motive for the assassination
bear no relationship to the injury to the United States which follows
from the act." (Report, p. 455.) (In the Senate-House conference on
the 1902 bill, which was not passed, it was agreed no such restriction was
needed for the President or Vice-President. (36 Cong. Rec. 2407 (1902),
cited in Report, P. 852, n. 222.) The same reasoning should eliminate
any requirement that the offender know that his victim is one of the
officers within the bill: the harm to the United States is the same;
also, it may be impossible to tell for some time whether the attacker
knew the identity of his victim, and Federal jurisdiction should not be
questioned because of this uncertainty.
The legislation should cover not only premeditated murder, but
also any killing or assault or kidnaping, or any attempt or conspiracy
to commit any of these acts, since they also present serious danger to
the functioning of the Government and the welfare of the country.
The punishment provided for offenses under this statute should be
modeled on the general Federal murder and manslaughter penalties (18 U.S.C.
1111, 1112), which are also applicable to the present statute protecting
Federal officers (18 U.S.C. 1114). For kidnaping, it would be desirable
to provide an optional death penalty if the victim is not returned alive.
For assault, of course, the penalty need not be so severe; it could be
-7-
modeled on the general statute against assault on Federal officers (13 U.S.C.
111), and should provide a more serious penalty for the use of a dangerous
weapon, as does that statute.
There is already a general provision whereby the Attorney General may
grant rewards of up to $25,000 for information leading to the arrest or
conviction (or death in course of apprehension) of persons violating
the laws of the United States or any State. (18 U.S.C. 3059.) The
committee may wish to authorize larger rewards for the present legislation,
but it seems unnecessary to make the Attorney General's discretion in
this matter unreviewable. It may also be advisable to make local, State
and Federal officers and employees eligible for such rewards, so that
they may be compensated in appropriate cases.
The legislation should also provide authority for the Federal Government
to exercise exclusive jurisdiction for offenses under this statute, wherever
it decides this is advisable, at the discretion of the President or his
successor, or the Attorney General.
##########
"Press Release" Press Release"
Statement issued by Mr. Reedy
May 27, 1965
(Reedy, George)
situation
The President met with bi-partisan Congressional leaders at
10:15 a.m. to review with them the international situation on a
far-ranging scale. It was one of his periodic meetings to keep
Congress informed of all developments affecting the polici (es) of
this government.
Secretary Rusk and Secretary McNamara briefed the leaders on
the world situation. The two Secretaries covered the political
and military situation in Southeast Asia, including Viet-Nam, in
Europe, in Africa and in Latin America, including the Dominican
Republic. Mr. Bundy reviewed for the leaders his trip to the
Dominican Republican and the conclusions drawn therefrom. The
members of Congress were given a full opportunity to question the
officials who had briefed them and to make suggestions. The floor
leaders left at 11:45 to open the session and the others remained
for a further question and answer session.
FORD 3 LIBRARY