Ask the Scholar
Page 59 of 121
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
-8-
This may annoy the administration at times but it also can.
increase public confidence in public policy, and this is important indeed.
I suppose you could look at the situation of us Republicans and
just say "what's the use?"
The administration does have us overwhelmed numerically in Congress.
The Democratic Party has been grosaly unfair in allocation of congressional
committee staff members on many committees -- running as high as 53 staff
members of one committee responsible to the Democratic chairman to only
three staff members responsible to the ranking minority members.
And of course the administration has the whole apparatus of the
Executive Branch to support its push for enactment of ite programs.
But we Republicans are coming up with ideas and some of them are
being listened to - even though the Denocrats can ignore us whenever they
want to insofar as actual votes available are concerned.
We are coming up with ideas on substantive issues and vo are coning
up with fresh thought on the functioning of Congress itself.
One idea we are discussing right now is that of requiring when both
the executive and legislative branches are controlled by the same party that
the Committees on Government Operations of the House and Senate be under
control of the minority party.
Here would be a genuine vehicle for assuring that the voice of
the minority would be heard, that the majority would be constantly on notice
that its actions were subject to effective and critical review, and that the
public would know that any cover-up of wrong-doing would be improbable if
not impossible.
Page data
- Page
- 59
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 8737c461b571b97f
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 4525825
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "4525825",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/4525825",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "National Press Club, March 25, 1965",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/4525825",
"collections": [
"Gerald R. Ford Congressional Papers",
"Speeches"
],
"subjects": [
"Supreme Court of the United States. (02/02/1790 - )",
"U.S. House of Representatives. (03/04/1789 - )",
"Republican National Committee (U.S.)",
"Executive-Legislative relations",
"Intergovernmental relations"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/ford/grf-0054/642080/4525825/4525825_Page_001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/ford/grf-0054/642080/4525825/4525825_Page_001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/ford/grf-0054/642080/4525825/4525825_Page_001.jpg",
"imageCount": 121,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "4525825",
"label": "National Press Club, March 25, 1965",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/4525825"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "4525825",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/4525825",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "National Press Club, March 25, 1965",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/4525825",
"collections": [
"Gerald R. Ford Congressional Papers",
"Speeches"
],
"subjects": [
"Supreme Court of the United States. (02/02/1790 - )",
"U.S. House of Representatives. (03/04/1789 - )",
"Republican National Committee (U.S.)",
"Executive-Legislative relations",
"Intergovernmental relations"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/ford/grf-0054/642080/4525825/4525825_Page_001.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/ford/grf-0054/642080/4525825/4525825_Page_001.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/ford/grf-0054/642080/4525825/4525825_Page_001.jpg",
"imageCount": 121,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/4525825",
"naId": 4525825,
"coverageEndDate": {
"logicalDate": "1965-03-01",
"month": 3,
"year": 1965
},
"coverageStartDate": {
"logicalDate": "1965-03-01",
"month": 3,
"year": 1965
},
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 59,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/ford/grf-0054/642080/4525825/4525825_Page_060.jpg",
"mediaId": "8737c461b571b97f",
"ocrText": "-8-\nThis may annoy the administration at times but it also can.\nincrease public confidence in public policy, and this is important indeed.\nI suppose you could look at the situation of us Republicans and\njust say \"what's the use?\"\nThe administration does have us overwhelmed numerically in Congress.\nThe Democratic Party has been grosaly unfair in allocation of congressional\ncommittee staff members on many committees -- running as high as 53 staff\nmembers of one committee responsible to the Democratic chairman to only\nthree staff members responsible to the ranking minority members.\nAnd of course the administration has the whole apparatus of the\nExecutive Branch to support its push for enactment of ite programs.\nBut we Republicans are coming up with ideas and some of them are\nbeing listened to - even though the Denocrats can ignore us whenever they\nwant to insofar as actual votes available are concerned.\nWe are coming up with ideas on substantive issues and vo are coning\nup with fresh thought on the functioning of Congress itself.\nOne idea we are discussing right now is that of requiring when both\nthe executive and legislative branches are controlled by the same party that\nthe Committees on Government Operations of the House and Senate be under\ncontrol of the minority party.\nHere would be a genuine vehicle for assuring that the voice of\nthe minority would be heard, that the majority would be constantly on notice\nthat its actions were subject to effective and critical review, and that the\npublic would know that any cover-up of wrong-doing would be improbable if\nnot impossible."
}