Ask the Scholar
Page 1 of 1
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
The original documents are located in Box 10, folder "10/18/74 S3979 Emergency Home
Purchase Assistance Act of 1974" of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case
Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library.
Copyright Notice
The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of
photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United
States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections.
Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public
domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to
remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid
copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library.
Exact duplicates within this folder were not digitized.
APPROVED OCT 18 1974
Digitized from the White House Records Office: Case Legislation Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library
ACTION
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
October 18, 1974
ceremony
MEMORANDUM FOR
THE PRESIDENT
FROM:
KEN COLE
To
ascheies
SUBJECT:
Enrolled Bill S. 3979
Emergency Home Purchase Assistance
10/18
Act of 1974
Attached for your consideration is Senate bill S. 3979
which increases the availability of reasonably priced
mortgage credit for housing.
We have checked with Secretary Lynn, Roy Ash, the
Counsel's office (Chapman), Bill Timmons and Paul Theis
who recommend approval of the bill and issuance of the
signing statement at Tab B.
RECOMMENDATION
That you sign Senate bill S. 3979 (Tab A)
That you approve the signing statement (Tab B)
FORD LIBRARY & GERALD
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503
NOV 18 1974
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT
Subject: Enrolled Bill S. 3979 - Emergency Home Purchase
Assistance Act of 1974
Sponsors - Sen. Cranston (D) California and
Sen. Brooke (R) Massachusetts
Last Day for Action
Approved on October 18, 1974; became Public Law 93-449,
Purpose
Authorizes a new, temporary program to assist the housing
industry through purchases of residential mortgages by the
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) ; contains
several riders amending other laws.
Agency Recommendations
Office of Management and Budget
Approval
Department of Housing and Urban
Development
Approval
Federal Home Loan Bank Board
Approval
Department of the Interior
Approval
Federal Reserve Board
Approval (informally)
Department of the Treasury
No objection to
approval
Veterans Administration
No objection to
approval
Council of Economic Advisers
No objection
Council on Wage and Price Stability
No objection to
Section 4 (e)
Council on Environmental Quality
Defers to other
agencies
GERALE FORD LIBRARY
2
Discussion
S. 3979 carries out, in substantial measure, a
recommendation in your economic message to the Congress
of October 8, 1974. You urged the Congress to enact
additional legislation to make most home mortgages
eligible for purchase by an agency of the Federal Govern-
ment. You indicated that as soon as such legislation was
sent to you, you would make at least $3 billion immediately
available for mortgage purchases, enough to finance about
100,000 homes.
S. 3979 was passed unanimously (77-0) by the Senate on
October 10, 1974, and by voice vote in the House on
October 15, 1974. You signed the bill on October 18, 1974,
and HUD is now implementing it.
S. 3979 consists essentially of two parts: (1) authoriza-
tion for a temporary "tandem plan" for conventional housing
and (2) a few amendments to other laws, including two which
correct technical errors in the recently-enacted Housing
and Community Development Act of 1974.
Mortgage Purchase Authority
In August 1971, the Government instituted a "tandem plan"
for federally insured mortgages to avoid raising the
interest rate ceiling on those mortgages while maintaining
housing production and sales. Under this plan, HUD (GNMA)
buys eligible mortgages at below-market interest rates and
resells them at the market price. The cost to the Govern-
ment is the subsidy involved, i.e. the loss realized by
GNMA if it sells the mortgage at less than its original
purchase price.
S. 3979 expands this program temporarily by giving HUD
authority for one year to direct GNMA to purchase, service,
sell, or otherwise deal in specified types of conventional
as well as federally insured mortgages when HUD determines
that economic conditions are so seriously adverse as to
require such action to achieve national housing goals. The
bill limits the total amount of purchases and commitments
to $7.75 billion outstanding at any one time.
3
Eligible mortgages include conventional and FHA or VA
insured and guaranteed mortgages covering single-family
homes (other than conventional condominium or cooperative
units), and FHA or VA mortgages covering rental projects,
condominiums, or cooperatives and their individual units.
Conventional mortgages can have a loan-to-value ratio
exceeding 80 percent only if they are privately insured,
The maximum mortgage amount is set at $42,000 per family
residence or dwelling unit ($55,000 in Alaska, Hawaii
and Guam).
Mortgages covering housing constructed more than 12 months
prior to enactment of S. 3979 may be purchased in areas
where HUD determines that there is a serious shortage of
mortgage credit to purchase such housing.
As introduced, the bill would have given HUD discretion
to set the interest rate on mortgages purchased by GNMA
without any maximum limits. It provided that such mortgages
involve "an interest rate not in excess of the rate
determined by the Secretary to be necessary to reimburse
the fund for its expenses under this section." (The
Secretary has such discretion under the earlier tandem plan
for federally-insured mortgages.)
As enacted, however, a floor amendment by Senator Proxmire
was included under which the maximum interest rates in
mortgages purchased by GNMA could not "exceed a rate equal
to the average yield during the month preceding the month
in which a commitment to purchase such mortgage was issued
on all marketable bonds of the United States maturing more
than six but less than twelve years from the date of such
commitment (exclusive of bonds with a coupon rate of less
than 6 percent) plus one-half of 1 percent, adjusted upward
to the nearest one-eighth of 1 percent."
A further provision would direct HUD in fixing interest
rates to take account of State usury limits, and would
provide for a limited override of certain State usury laws
to the extent they apply or have been interpreted so that
discounts or points are counted in calculating the allowable
maximum rate.
4
To provide funds for its mortgage purchases, GNMA could
issue its obligations to the Secretary of the Treasury.
The Secretary would determine the interest rate of the
obligations and GNMA would determine the maturity and
redemption conditions. GNMA would be authorized to
guarantee and issue securities based on pools of mortgages
purchased under the program, and could offer and sell
securities to the Federal Financing Bank and any Federal
Reserve Bank. Prices of mortgages sold by GNMA are
authorized to be at levels which, to the extent feasible,
make the operation fully self-supporting.
Agency comments
HUD, in its attached views letter on the enrolled bill,
notes that several important desirable changes were
incorporated in the enacted version of S. 3979, which were
urged by the Administration. HUD indicates, however, that
there are two undesirable aspects of the bill.
First, the exclusion of conventional mortgages covering
multi-family projects and individual condominium units
will limit substantially the degree of support that can
be given to lower-priced housing.
Second, the Proxmire amendment fixing mortgage interest
rates according to specified Treasury borrowing rates could,
in HUD!s view, "require payment of substantial differential
payments to the extent that mortgages cannot be purchased
and held pending a decline in general mortgage rates but
must be sold in the interim at below market rates. These
problems, moreover, may be accentuated in coming months if,
as seems most likely, the Treasury rates upon which mortgage
interest rates are made to depend decline more rapidly than
the market generally.
Nevertheless, HUD believes the difficulties of the interest
rate provision can be minimized if (1) the commitment
authority provided in the bill is used quickly, while the
formula interest rate is relatively high, (2) commitment
fees are used to offset some initial processing costs, and
(3) the bill is interpreted to permit mortgages to be
purchased at a discount, with certain safeguards, thereby
increasing the effective yield of mortgages to the
Government.
5
Treasury also considers the Proxmire amendment as undesirable
since, in its view, this provision would lead to excessive
points to provide an appropriate yield level and would
increase subsidies to mortgage borrowers when the need is
declining, since Treasury yields typically decline faster
than mortgage rates. Treasury believes this could lead to
greater demand under the earlier tandem plan in which HUD
has total discretion in setting the interest rate as well
as under the new purchase authority.
Miscellaneous Amendments to Other Laws
These include:
-- requiring the Council on Wage and Price Stability
to report through the President to the Congress on a quarterly
basis not later than 30 days after the close of each calendar
quarter concerning the Council's activities, findings and
recommendations with respect to inflation and the economy,
The Council states that this requirement will add to its
workload, but has no objection to this provision.
-- amending the National Housing Act to add provisions
agreed to in conference but inadvertently overlooked in
preparing the conference report on the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-383), including authorizing
the Secretary to make loans to finance the preservation of
historic structures and to insure under section 203 of the
National Housing Act the amount needed to finance the
purchase of shares in a cooperative.
-- amending the Federal Home Loan Bank Act to increase
from $40,000 to $55,000 the limit on a home mortgage
acceptable as collateral security for an advance by a
Federal Home Loan Bank, thereby conforming this Act to a
similar change in the Home Owners' Loan Act contained in
P.L. 93-383.
-- giving Federal savings and loan associations the
power to act as trustees for the new individual retirement
accounts authorized by the Pension Reform Act of 1974,
P.L. 93-406.
-- authorizing the Federal Reserve Board to make advances
to member banks on the security of residential mortgages,
bearing an interest rate equal to the lowest discount rate
in effect at the member bank.
6
*****
In your signing statement on S. 3979, you concluded,
"Like most emergency measures, this bill has some
minuses. Notwithstanding the increasing proportion
of American families that choose each year to live
in apartments or condominiums, the bill unfortunately
does not cover conventional mortgages for apartment
or condominium projects. Moreover, I had hoped that
this help for the housing industry could be delivered
with a minimum inflationary impact, and I know that
the Congress intended the program to be
self-supporting. However, the bill establishes a
rigid, illogical interest ceiling formula that fails
to relate interest income to actual borrowing costs
and to cover adequately administrative costs."
We believe the scope and operation of this program should
be carefully monitored.
Weefred H Rounnel
Assistant Director for
Legislative Reference
Enclosures
DEPARTMENT
OF
U.S.
HOUSING
*
*
THE GENERAL COUNSEL OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
AND
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20410
URBAN
October 17, 1974
Mr. Wilfred H. Rommel
Assistant Director
for Legislative Reference
Office of Management and Budget
Washington, D. C. 20503
Attention: Mrs. Garziglia
Dear Mr. Rommel:
Subject: S. 3979, 93d Congress
Enrolled Enactment
This is in response to your request for our views on the
enrolled enactment of S. 3979, the proposed "Emergency
Home Purchase Assistance Act of 1974.' "
S. 3979 consists essentially of two parts: authorization
for a new, temporary program to assist the housing industry
through the Government National Mortgage Association
purchases of residential mortgages; and a series of amend-
ments to other laws which are summarized in an attachment
to this report. Of the latter amendments, the first two
undertake to correct technical errors in the Housing and
Community Development Act of 1974. The other amendments
relate to laws administered by other agencies. All were
considered largely non-controversial by the initiating
Senate committee, and this Department has no objection to
any of the amendments. Our comments are, accordingly, con-
fined to the GNMA mortgage purchase program contemplated
by the bill.
This program would be initiated by the Secretary of Housing
and Urban Development when he makes a finding that inflation-
ary conditions and related governmental action are having a
"seriously" disproportionate effect on the housing industry
and that the resulting reduction in home acquisition or con-
struction threatens "seriously" to affect the economy and
delay orderly achievement of national housing goals. The
2
Secretary would then direct the Governmental National Mortgage
Association to begin purchasing mortgages and making commit-
ments to purchase mortgages. Eligible mortgages would include
conventional, FHA and VA mortgages covering single-family
homes (apparently other than conventional condominium or
cooperative units), and FHA or VA mortgages covering rental
projects, condominiums or cooperatives and their individual units.
Conventional mortgages could have a loan-to-value ratio ex-
ceeding 80 percent only if they were privately insured. The
maximum mortgage amount would be $42,000 per family residence
or dwelling unit (or $55,000 in Alaska, Hawaii and Guam).
Under the bill, maximum interest rates or yields in mortgages
purchased by GNMA would be established by the Secretary, but
interest rates could not exceed a rate calculated according
to a specified formula based on certain Treasury borrowing
costs. Under this formula, the maximum interest rate for any
mortgage would be fixed at the time of commitment to purchase
and could not exceed the yield during the preceding month on
marketable Treasury issues maturing in more than six but less
than twelve years from the date of commitment, plus one-half
of one percentum (adjusted upward to the nearest one-eighth
of one percent). A further provision would direct the
Secretary in fixing interest rates to take account of State
usury limits, and provides for a limited override of certain
State usury laws to the extent they apply or have been
interpreted so that discounts or points are counted in calcu-
lating the allowable maximum rate. In effect, this provision
contemplates that the face rate of the mortgage would not
exceed the usury rate, but the mortgage could be originated
with points and GNMA could purchase the mortgage at a discount
without impairing the legality of the transaction, regardless
of the way in which the State usury law had been applied to
such discounts.
S. 3979 would permit a program limited to the purchase of
mortgages covering newly constructed homes, although it would
also authorize the Secretary to make available a portion of
his authority for purchase of mortgages financing purchases
1386 LIBRARY QERALD
3
of existing housing in areas where he determines there is a
serious shortage of mortgage credit for such purchases.
Other provisions of S. 3979 would authorize GNMA to guarantee
and to issue, securities based on pools of mortgages pur-
chased under the program and would specifically authorize
the purchase of such guaranteed securities by the Federal
Financing Bank and any Federal Reserve Bank.
The total amount of mortgages and commitments under the
program could not exceed $7.75 billion outstanding at any
one time. The program would terminate one year after
enactment.
S. 3979 would, in substantial measure, carry out the
President's recommendation for additional legislation to
make most home mortgages eligible for purchase by GNMA.
The bill, in this respect, departs in a variety of ways
from earlier versions of the legislation so as to include
features which were urged by the Administration and which
we consider to be important. Among these features are the
following:
-- limits on individual mortgages that can be purchased
are based on mortgage amount, not home price, and
are subject to a realistic, easily administered,
$42,000 basic maximum;
-- there is no earmarking or mandating of authority
for mortgages covering existing housing, thus allow-
ing the program to be concentrated completely or to
whatever extent may be deemed appropriate on new
construction where problems have been most critical;
-- there is no provision prohibiting the sale of
mortgages at less than par, with the result that
program disposition activities may be undertaken
in advance of a decline in mortgage interest rates
and may be managed in a way that takes account of
current market conditions;
-- there are provisions that would facilitate funding
and disposition through expansion of GNMA authority
4
to guarantee mortgage backed securities, as well
as new authority for GNMA issues of such securities
which could be sold to the Federal Financing Bank
in a manner that could minimize the effect of
operations on the budget.
-- the program is authorized on a temporary, interim
basis only, with all authority to enter into new
commitments lapsing at the end of one year.
Despite the above features, there are several aspects of the
bill that are regrettable. One is the apparent exclusion of
conventional mortgages covering not only multifamily projects
but also -- more importantly -- individual condominium units.
This will substantially limit the degree of support that can
be given to the provision of housing within the lower price
ranges.
A second undesirable feature relates to the formula fixing
mortgage interest rates according to specified Treasury
borrowing rates. This provision was adopted on the Senate
floor. According to current Treasury calculations, it would
result in interest rates that are substantially above the
8-1/4 percent rate cited by proponents in the Senate floor
debate -- 9 percent for October commitments, and approxi-
mately 8-5/8 percent in November assuming that current yields
on the particular Treasury issues remain at their current
levels through the 20th of this month.
Nevertheless, even the higher rate would not fully compensate
the Government for potential administrative costs -- as much
as 100 basis points -- or for the risks necessarily involved
in a program of this kind. Further, the statutory rate could
require payment of substantial differential payments to the
extent that mortgages cannot be purchased and held pending a
decline in general mortgage interest rates but must be sold
in the interim at below market rates. These problems, more-
over, may be accentuated in coming months if, as seems most
likely, the Treasury rates upon which mortgage interest rates
are made to depend decline more rapidly than mortgage interest
rates in the market generally.
5
To some extent, the difficulties of the interest rate
provision can be minimized if the commitment authority
provided in the bill is used quickly -- especially this
month -- while the formula interest rate is still relatively
high. Some relief against the impact of the provision can
also be obtained through commitment fees offsetting some
initial processing costs. These fees will not cover other
costs -- such as those involved in establishing reserves
against loss, obtaining financing through the Federal
Financing Bank, and mortgage servicing. However, to the
extent that these other costs cannot be met through the
one-half of one percent allowance provided in the formula,
the effective yield of mortgages to the Government can be
increased by interpreting the bill to permit mortgages to
be purchased at a discount. Nothing in the legislation
prohibits purchases on this basis and in fact the usury
provision appears specifically to contemplate discounts.
We do not believe that purchases involving discounts would
be violative of any legislative intent of assisting home
buyers to receive lower interest rates so long as the
amount of the discount is held to what is needed to cover
costs and steps are taken to require that sellers pay
"points" represented by discount purchases in a manner
similar to the FHA program.
We believe that a balancing of the above considerations
points to early Presidential approval of the enrolled bill.
Given such approval, it would be possible to move quickly
to commit the authority the President has recommended for
assistance to the seriously depressed housing industry using
current maximum permissible mortgage interest rates under
the bill. Decisions on the future scope and operation of
the program, and on the possible desirability of recommending
amendments, could be made later in light of current market
conditions and any problems experienced or anticipated in
administration.
Sincerely,
Robert RElliott
Robert R. Elliott
Attachment
Miscellaneous Amendments to Other Laws Contained in the
Emergency Home Purchase Assistance Act of 1974
1. Section 4 (a) would authorize the Secretary to make loans
of up to $15,000 per unit and with a maximum maturity of
15 years and 32 days to finance the preservation of historic
structures. This provision, which was contained in the Senate
but not the House passed version of S. 3066, was agreed to in
conference but overlooked in the preparation of the reported
bill.
2. Section 4 (b) would authorize the Secretary to insure,
under section 203 of the National Housing Act, the amount
needed to finance the purchase of shares in a cooperative.
This provision, which was in both the Senate and House passed
versions of S. 3066, was inadvertently omitted from the bill
as reported by the Conferees.
3. Section 4 (c) of the bill would raise the limit on a home
mortgage acceptable as collateral security for an advance by
a Federal Home Loan Bank from $40,000 to $55,000. It would
also add language permitting this limit to be increased by
50% in Alaska, Guam and Hawaii. This conforms to change involving
the Home Owners' Loan Act made by HUD's 1974 law.
4. Section 4 (d) would give Federal Savings and Loan Associations
the power to act as trustees for the new individual retirement
accounts authorized by the Pension Reform Act of 1974.
5. Section 4 (e) would amend the new Council on Wage and Price
Stability Act to require the Council to report to the President
on its activities on a quarterly basis and not later than 30 days
after the close of each calendar year. Prior to amendment the
Council was required to report "from time to time."
6. Section 5 would authorize the Federal Reserve Board to make
advances to member banks on the security of residential mortgages.
At present banks offering mortgages as collateral for an advance
from a Federal Reserve Bank are charged a penalty of one-half of one
percent because such mortgages are not classified as eligible paper
and any advances made are limited to four months. The amendment
would remove both of these impediments.
HOME LOAN BANK
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20552
GREAT => GROUP
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK SYSTEM
101 INDIANA AVENUE, N.W.
FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN
INSURANCE CORPORATION
FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN SYSTEM
OFFICE OF THE
GENERAL COUNSEL
October 17, 1974
Mr. Wilfred H. Rommel
Assistant Director for
Legislative Reference
Office of Management and Budget
Washington, D.C. 20503
Dear Mr. Rommel:
HAND DELIVER
This is in response to your request for a report of the Board's
views on the enrolled bill, S. 3979, the "Emergency Home Purchase
Assistance Act of 1974. 11 The bill would authorize the Government
National Mortgage Association to purchase certain residential mort-
gage loans when the Secretary of HUD finds that conditions require
such special assistance. The bill was pending in the Senate when the
President delivered his economic message to Congress, and he referred
to it favorably.
Section 4 of the bill makes certain miscellaneous amendments,
including conforming amendments to the Federal Home Loan Bank Act
and the Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933 made necessary by provisions
of recently enacted legislation. The Housing and Community Develop-
ment Act of 1974 (P. L. 93-383 § 703) authorized Federal savings and
loan associations to make mortgage loans up to "$55, 000 (except that
with respect to dwellings in Alaska, Guam, and Hawaii the foregoing
limitation may, by regulation of the Board be increased by not to ex-
ceed 50%)". Section 4(c) of S. 3979 makes a parallel amendment to the
provision of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act setting the maximum
mortgage amount for purposes of determining whether a mortgage is
eligible as collateral for an advance (loan) from a Federal Home Loan
Bank to a member institution. The Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (P. L. 93-406 § 2002) provided for special tax
treatment of "individual retirement accounts" maintained in banks or
savings and loan associations. Section 4(d) of S. 3979 gives Federal
savings and loan associations the corporate power to offer such accounts.
The Board supports enactment of the bill.
Sincerely,
Charles E. Allen
for
General Counsel
OF THE INTERIOR
United States Department of the Interior
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
March
1849
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20240
OCT 18 1974
Dear Mr. Ash:
This responds to your request for our views on the enrolled bill
S. 3979, "To increase on an emergency basis the availability of
reasonably priced mortgage credit for housing."
We recommend that the President approve the enrolled bill.
S. 3979 would help supply mortgage credit through Government resources
by amending the charter act of the Government National Mortgage
Association (hereinafter the GNMA) to allow purchase of conventionally
financed mortages. If the Secretary of the Department of Housing and
Urban Development determines that a substantial number of families are
unable to obtain mortgage credit at reasonable rates and that such
circumstance is causing a substantial reduction in home construction
and acquisition, then he may direct the GNMA to purchase mortgages
under the conditions set forth in the bill. Money to finance the
purchase of mortgages would be obtained from a housing trust fund
to be established in GNMA. The trust fund would be financed by
borrowings of up to $10 billion dollars per year from the Secretary
of the Treasury.
The sections of S. 3979 that impact upon programs which are the re-
sponsibility of this Department are: 3(a), 4(a)(1) and (2), and 4(c).
Section 3(a) amends Title III of the National Housing Act and adds
a new Section entitled the "Housing Trust Fund" as section 313 of
that Act. It sets forth the conditions under which the GNMA may
make commitments to purchase and purchase mortgages, one of which
is that such mortgage must involve an original principal obligation
not to exceed $42,000 per family residence or dwelling unit, except
that the original principal obligation may not exceed $55,000 in
the case of properties in Alaska, Hawaii and Guam. The higher
ceiling for Guam, as well as for Hawaii and Alaska, takes into
account housing costs in these places which have always been higher
than on the mainland.
Sections (4)(a)(1)and (2) would authorize the Secretary of HUD to
make home improvement loans to finance the preservation of historic
structures.
CONSERVE
AMERICA'S
ENERGY
Save Energy and You Serve America!
For purposes of the bill, the term "historic structure" means
residential structures registered in the National Register of
Historic Places or certified by the Secretary of the Interior
to conform to National Register criteria. The term "preservation"
means restoration or rehabilitation undertaken for such purposes
as are approved by the Secretary of HUD in regulations issued by him,
after consulting with the Secretary of the Interior.
The terms of the loan for this preservation are: $15,000 maximum
per unit and a maturity not to exceed 15 years and 32 days.
Preservation of the nation's architectural and historic heritage
was one of the goals set forth in the President's 1971 Message on the
Environment. The President noted the continued loss of buildings
of historic value as recorded by the Historic American Building
Survey. One cause was the unwillingness of lending institutions
to loan funds for the restoration and rehabilitation of historic
buildings because of the age and often the location of such
buildings. One of the President's legislative proposals was
for Federal insurance of home improvement loans for historic
residential properties to a maximum of $15,000 per dwelling unit.
Sections (a) (1) and (2) will reduce the reliance upon Federal grants
for this type of preservation. A Federal grant may require as one
of its conditions that the property be open to the public. Many of
these historic sites are privately owned and residential, and, thus,
do not meet this condition. S. 3979 will resolve this problem
through its insured loan provision.
Section 4 (c) would make a change in the Federal Home Loan Bank Act
with respect to the maximum loan amount for eligible mortgages.
The maximum is raised to $55,000, except that with respect to
dwellings in Alaska, Hawaii and Guam, the limitation may be increased
to up to 50% of that figure. This recognizes the higher housing
costs: in these areas, and is similar to the higher ceiling in
Section 3(a).
Sincerely yours,
Assistant
Secretary of the Interior
Honorable Roy L. Ash
Director
Office of Management and Budget
Washington, D.C. 20503
2
OF
THE TREASURY THE
THE GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE TREASURY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20220
1789
OCT 21 1974
Director, Office of Management and Budget
Executive Office of the President
Washington, D. C. 20503
Attention: Assistant Director for Legislative
Reference
Sir:
Reference is made to your request for the views of this
Department on the enrolled enactment of S. 3979, "To increase
on an emergency basis the availability of reasonably priced
mortgage credit for housing."
The enrolled enactment would authorize GNMA to purchase up
to $7-3/4 billion, outstanding at any one time, of FHA, VA, and
conventional mortgages. The limitation on the amount is not
significant since sales would restore the authorization. The
Secretary of HUD, however, would have discretion with respect to
the rate at which new commitments would be made.
The bill was amended on the Senate floor (the so-called
Proxmire amendment) to establish the maximum rate on such mortgages
by adding 1/2 of 1 percent to the yield during the preceding month
on bonds of the United States maturing in more than 6 but less
than 12 years. We consider this an undesirable amendment, since
it would produce an unrealistic mortgage rate ceiling leading to
excessive "points" to provide an appropriate yield level. In
addition, it poses problems with respect to the regular Tandem Plan
under which the Secretary of HUD has total discretion in setting
the mortgage rate.
In addition, with declining rates of interest, since Treasury
yields typically decline faster than mortgage rates, the effect
would be to increase subsidies to mortgage borrowers as the need
for such subsidies declined. Thus the effect could be to lead to
greater demand under the present Tandem Plan as well as the new
purchase plan proposed in the bill.
-2-
The President has approved the enrolled enactment. In view
of the current conditions in the home building industry, and the
1 year expiration date of the proposed mortgage purchase program,
the Department has no objection to the approval of the legislation.
Sincerely yours,
General Counsel
1415 in FORD LIBRAR
NOMINTS AUOV
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20420
1030
October 18, 1974
The Honorable
Roy L. Ash
Director, Office of Management
and Budget
Washington, D. C. 20503
Dear Mr. Ash:
This will reply to the request of the Assistant
Director for Legislative Reference for comments on the
enrolled enactment of S. 3979, 93d Congress, the "Emergency
Home Purchase Assistance Act of 1974."
In general, the bill is intended to remedy the
Congressional finding of the unavailability of residential
mortgage credit and to provide an alternate source of such
credit at favorable interest rates geared to the yield on
Government securities.
Section 3 of the bill creates a new section 313
of The National Housing Act to provide the Government
National Mortgage Association with new authority to make
commitments and purchase mortgages. Whenever the Secretary
of Housing and Urban Development finds that inflationary
conditions and related government actions are having a
disproportionate adverse effect upon the housing industry
and therefore threaten the economy, the Secretary shall
direct GNMA to issue commitments and purchase mortgages
pursuant to the provisions of the bill.
Subsection (b) of the new section 3 provides that
the mortgages to be purchased by GNMA under this bill are
to include more than four-family residences (including
cooperatives and condominiums, and individual units therein)
as well as one-to four-family residences insured or guaranteed
under chapter 37 of title 38 of the United States Code.
To the extent that section 3 of the bill may make
available more money, at reasonable interest rates, for
veterans purchasing housing, we believe it is in their best
interest and we, therefore, support the bill, in principle.
However, since the enactment more directly relates to activi-
ties and responsibilities of the Department of Housing and
Urban Development and the Treasury Department, we defer to
their views on the specific provisions of this section.
Other provisions of the enrolled enactment would
amend various laws administered by other agencies which have
no effect upon the Veterans Administration. We offer no
comment thereon.
The Veterans Administration has no objection to
approval of this measure by the President.
Sincerely,
ResCondebush RICHARD L. ROUDEBUSH
Administrator
2
THE CHAIRMAN OF THE
COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS
WASHINGTON
November 1, 1974
Dear Mr. Rommel:
This is in response to your request for the
views of the Council of Economic Advisers on S. 3979,
an Act "To increase on an emergency basis the avail-
ability of reasonably priced mortgage credit for
housing."
We favor the purpose of the temporary pro-
visions in this act to increase funds available for
mortgages during the current crisis.
There are provisions in the bill that we find
objectionable including the level of subsidy occasioned
by charging only 50 basis points above the applicable
Treasury bond rate and the provision permitting the
Federal Reserve Banks to loan money to banks using
mortgages as collateral at the lowest possible discount
rate.
Despite these reservations, however, the
alternatives are such that we have no objection to the
bill.
Sincerely yours,
Alan Greenspan
Mr. Wilfred H. Rommel
Assistant Director for Legislative Reference
Office of Management and Budget
Washington, D.C. 20503
ANERIICAN REVOLUTION WIDENTENNAY
GERALD FORD LIBRART
1776-1976
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
COUNCIL ON WAGE AND PRICE STABILITY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503
October 18, 1974
Mr. W. H. Rommel
Assistant Director for
Legislative Reference
Office of Management
and Budget
Washington, D. C. 20503
Dear Mr. Rommel:
This is in response to your request for our views and recommend-
ations with respect to the enrolled bill S.3979, the "Emergency Home
Purchase Assistance Act of 1974."
The primary purpose of S.3979 is to provide a new source of
residential mortgage credit on an emergency basis. We would defer to
the views and recommendations of the Secretary of Housing and Urban
Development and the Secretary of the Treasury with respect to the
provisions of S.3979 relating to this purpose.
S.3979, however, would also amend Public Law 92-387 which would
directly affect the Council on Wage and Price Stability. Section 4(e)
of S.3979 would amend section 5 of P. L. 93-387 to require that the
Council on Wage and Price Stability report to the President, and through
him to the Congress, on a quarterly basis concerning its "activities,
findings, and recommendations with respect to the containment of inflation
and the maintenance of a vigorous and prosperous peacetime economy."
These quarterly reports would have to be made not later than thirty days
after the close of each calendar quarter. P. L. 93-387 requires only
that the Council report to the President and the Congress from time to
time on its activities.
While the requirement to prepare quarterly reports will add to the
Council's workload, we do not believe it will create any serious problem.
Therefore, we have no objection to section 4(e) of S.3979.
Sincerely,
arbut Rees
Albert Rees
Director
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
722 JACKSON PLACE, N. W.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20006
October 25, 1974
MEMORANDUM FOR WILFRED H. ROMMEL, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
FOR LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
ATTENTION: Mrs. Garziglia
SUBJECT:
S. 3979 - Enrolled To increase on an
emergency basis the availability of
reasonably priced mortgage credit for
housing
This office will defer to the views of other agencies
more directly affected by this legislation.
Gary Gary L. Widman Widman
General Counsel
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503
NOV 18 1974
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT
Subject: Enrolled Bill S. 3979 - Emergency Home Purchase
Assistance Act of 1974
Sponsors - Sen. Cranston (D) California and
Sen. Brooke (R) Massachusetts
Last Day for Action
Approved on October 18, 1974, became Public Law 93-449.
Purpose
Authorizes a new, temporary program to assist the housing
industry through purchases of residential mortgages by the
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) , contains
several riders amending other laws.
Agency Recommendations
Office of Management and Budget
Approval
Department of Housing and Urban
Development
Approval
Federal Home Loan Bank Board
Approval
Department of the Interior
Approval
Federal Reserve Board
Approval (informally)
Department of the Treasury
No objection to
approval
Veterans Administration
No objection to
approval
Council of Economic Advisers
No objection
Council on Wage and Price Stability
No objection to
Section 4 (e)
Council on Environmental Quality
Defers to other
agencies
2
Discussion
S. 3979 carries out, in substantial measure, a
recommendation in your economic message to the Congress
of October 8, 1974. You urged the Congress to enact
additional legislation to make most home mortgages
eligible for purchase by an agency of the Federal Govern-
ment. You indicated that as soon as such legislation was
sent to you, you would make at least $3 billion immediately
available for mortgage purchases, enough to finance about
100,000 homes.
S. 3979 was passed unanimously (77-0) by the Senate on
October 10, 1974, and by voice vote in the House on
October 15, 1974. You signed the bill on October 18, 1974,
and HUD is now implementing it.
S. 3979 consists essentially of two parts: (1) authoriza-
tion for a temporary "tandem plan" for conventional housing
and (2) a few amendments to other laws, including two which
correct technical errors in the recently-enacted Housing
and Community Development Act of 1974.
Mortgage Purchase Authority
In August 1971, the Government instituted a "tandem plan"
for federally insured mortgages to avoid raising the
interest rate ceiling on those mortgages while maintaining
housing production and sales. Under this plan, HUD (GNMA)
buys eligible mortgages at below-market interest rates and
resells them at the market price. The cost to the Govern-
ment is the subsidy involved, 1.e. the loss realized by
GNMA if it sells the mortgage at less than its original
purchase price.
S. 3979 expands this program temporarily by giving HUD
authority for one year to direct GNMA to purchase, service,
sell, or otherwise deal in specified types of conventional
as well as federally insured mortgages when HUD determines
that economic conditions are so seriously adverse as to
require such action to achieve national housing goals. The
bill limits the total amount of purchases and commitments
to $7.75 billion outstanding at any one time.
3
Eligible mortgages include conventional and FHA or VA
insured and guaranteed mortgages covering single-family
homes (other than conventional condominium or cooperative
units), and FHA or VA mortgages covering rental projects,
condominiums, or cooperatives and their individual units.
Conventional mortgages can have a loan-to-value ratio
exceeding 80 percent only if they are privately insured.
The maximum mortgage amount is set at $42,000 per family
residence or dwelling unit ($55,000 in Alaska, Hawaii
and Guam).
Mortgages covering housing constructed more than 12 months
prior to enactment of S. 3979 may be purchased in areas
where HUD determines that there is a serious shortage of
mortgage credit to purchase such housing.
As introduced, the bill would have given HUD discretion
to set the interest rate on mortgages purchased by GNMA
without any maximum limits. It provided that such mortgages
involve "an interest rate not in excess of the rate
determined by the Secretary to be necessary to reimburse
the fund for its expenses under this section." (The
Secretary has such discretion under the earlier tandem plan
for federally-insured mortgages.)
As enacted, however, a floor amendment by Senator Proxmire
was included under which the maximum interest rates in
mortgages purchased by GNMA could not "exceed a rate equal
to the average yield during the month preceding the month
in which a commitment to purchase such mortgage was issued
on all marketable bonds of the United States maturing more
than six but less than twelve years from the date of such
commitment (exclusive of bonds with a coupon rate of less
than 6 percent) plus one-half of 1 percent, adjusted upward
to the nearest one-eighth of 1 percent."
A further provision would direct HUD in fixing interest
rates to take account of State usury limits, and would
provide for a limited override of certain State usury laws
to the extent they apply or have been interpreted so that
discounts or points are counted in calculating the allowable
maximum rate.
4
To provide funds for its mortgage purchases, GNMA could
issue its obligations to the Secretary of the Treasury.
The Secretary would determine the interest rate of the
obligations and GNMA would determine the maturity and
redemption conditions. GNMA would be authorized to
guarantee and issue securities based on pools of mortgages
purchased under the program, and could offer and sell
securities to the Federal Financing Bank and any Federal
Reserve Bank. Prices of mortgages sold by GNMA are
authorized to be at levels which, to the extent feasible,
make the operation fully self-supporting.
Agency comments
HUD, in its attached views letter on the enrolled bill,
notes that several important desirable changes were
incorporated in the enacted version of S. 3979, which were
urged by the Administration. HUD indicates, however, that
there are two undesirable aspects of the bill.
First, the exclusion of conventional mortgages covering
multi-family projects and individual condominium units
will limit substantially the degree of support that can
be given to lower-priced housing.
Second, the Proxmire amendment fixing mortgage interest
rates according to specified Treasury borrowing rates could,
in HUD's view, "require payment of substantial differential
payments to the extent that mortgages cannot be purchased
and held pending a decline in general mortgage rates but
must be sold in the interim at below market rates. These
problems, moreover, may be accentuated in coming months if,
as seems most likely, the Treasury rates upon which mortgage
interest rates are made to depend decline more rapidly than
the market generally."
Nevertheless, HUD believes the difficulties of the interest
rate provision can be minimized if (1) the commitment
authority provided in the bill is used quickly, while the
formula interest rate is relatively high, (2) commitment
fees are used to offset some initial processing costs, and
(3) the bill is interpreted to permit mortgages to be
purchased at a discount, with certain safeguards, thereby
increasing the effective yield of mortgages to the
Government.
5
Treasury also considers the Proxmire amendment as undesirable
since, in its view, this provision would lead to excessive
points to provide an appropriate yield level and would
increase subsidies to mortgage borrowers when the need is
declining, since Treasury yields typically decline faster
than mortgage rates. Treasury believes this could lead to
greater demand under the earlier tandem plan in which HUD
has total discretion in setting the interest rate as well
as under the new purchase authority.
Miscellaneous Amendments to Other Laws
These include:
-- requiring the Council on Wage and Price Stability
to report through the President to the Congress on a quarterly
basis not later than 30 days after the close of each calendar
quarter concerning the Council's activities, findings and
recommendations with respect to inflation and the economy.
The Council states that this requirement will add to its
workload, but has no objection to this provision.
-- amending the National Housing Act to add provisions
agreed to in conference but inadvertently overlooked in
preparing the conference report on the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-383), including authorizing
the Secretary to make loans to finance the preservation of
historic structures and to insure under section 203 of the
National Housing Act the amount needed to finance the
purchase of shares in a cooperative.
-- amending the Federal Home Loan Bank Act to increase
from $40,000 to $55,000 the limit on a home mortgage
acceptable as collateral security for an advance by a
Federal Home Loan Bank, thereby conforming this Act to a
similar change in the Home Owners' Loan Act contained in
P.L. 93-383.
-- giving Federal savings and loan associations the
power to act as trustees for the new individual retirement
accounts authorized by the Pension Reform Act of 1974,
P.L. 93-406.
-- authorizing the Federal Reserve Board to make advances
to member banks on the security of residential mortgages,
bearing an interest rate equal to the lowest discount rate
in effect at the member bank.
6
*****
In your signing statement on S. 3979, you concluded,
"Like most emergency measures, this bill has some
minuses. Notwithstanding the increasing proportion
of American families that choose each year to live
in apartments or condominiums, the bill unfortunately
does not cover conventional mortgages for apartment
or condominium projects. Moreover, I had hoped that
this help for the housing industry could be delivered
with a minimum inflationary impact, and I know that
the Congress intended the program to be
self-supporting. However, the bill establishes a
rigid, illogical interest ceiling formula that fails
to relate interest income to actual borrowing costs
and to cover adequately administrative costs."
We believe the scope and operation of this program should
be carefully monitored.
(signed) Wilfred H. Rounel
Assistant Director for
Legislative Reference
Enclosures
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503
NOV 18 1974
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT
Subject: Enrolled Bill S. 3979 - Emergency Home Purchase
Assistance Act of 1974
Sponsors - Sen. Cranston (D) California and
Sen. Brooke (R) Massachusetts
Last Day for Action
Approved on October 18, 1974, became Public Law 93-449.
Purpose
Authorizes a new, temporary program to assist the housing
industry through purchases of residential mortgages by the
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) ; contains
several riders amending other laws.
Agency Recommendations
Office of Management and Budget
Approval
Department of Housing and Urban
Development
Approval
Federal Home Loan Bank Board
Approval
Department of the Interior
Approval
Federal Reserve Board
Approval (informally)
Department of the Treasury
No objection to
approval
Veterans Administration
No objection to
approval
Council of Economic Advisers
No objection
Council on Wage and Price Stability
No objection to
Section 4 (e)
Council on Environmental Quality
Defers to other
agencies
2
Discussion
S. 3979 carries out, in substantial measure, a
recommendation in your economic message to the Congress
of October 8, 1974. You urged the Congress to enact
additional legislation to make most home mortgages
eligible for purchase by an agency of the Federal Govern-
ment. You indicated that as soon as such legislation was
sent to you, you would make at least $3 billion immediately
available for mortgage purchases, enough to finance about
100,000 homes.
S. 3979 was passed unanimously (77-0) by the Senate on
October 10, 1974, and by voice vote in the House on
October 15, 1974. You signed the bill on October 18, 1974,
and HUD is now implementing it.
S. 3979 consists essentially of two parts: (1) authoriza-
tion for a temporary "tandem plan" for conventional housing
and (2) a few amendments to other laws, including two which
correct technical errors in the recently-anacted Housing
and Community Development Act of 1974.
Mortgage Purchase Authority
In August 1971, the Government instituted a "tandem plan"
for federally insured mortgages to avoid raising the
interest rate ceiling on those mortgages while maintaining
housing production and sales. Under this plan, HUD (GNMA)
buys eligible mortgages at below-market interest rates and
resells them at the market price. The cost to the Govern-
ment is the subsidy involved, 1.e. the loss realized by
GNMA if it sells the mortgage at less than its original
purchase price.
S. 3979 expands this program temporarily by giving HUD
authority for one year to direct GNMA to purchase, service,
sell, or otherwise deal in specified types of conventional
as well as federally insured mortgages when HUD determines
that economic conditions are so seriously adverse as to
require such action to achieve national housing goals. The
bill limits the total amount of purchases and commitments
to $7.75 billion outstanding at any one time.
3
Eligible mortgages include conventional and FHA or VA
insured and guaranteed mortgages covering single-family
homes (other than conventional condominium or cooperative
units), and FHA or VA mortgages covering rental projects,
condominiums, or cooperatives and their individual units.
Conventional mortgages can have a loan-to-value ratio
exceeding 80 percent only if they are privately insured.
The maximum mortgage amount is set at $42,000 per family
residence or dwelling unit ($55,000 in Alaska, Hawaii
and Guam).
Mortgages covering housing constructed more than 12 months
prior to enactment of S. 3979 may be purchased in areas
where HUD determines that there is a serious shortage of
mortgage credit to purchase such housing.
As introduced, the bill would have given HUD discretion
to set the interest rate on mortgages purchased by GNMA
without any maximum limits. It provided that such mortgages
involve "an interest rate not in excess of the rate
determined by the Secretary to be necessary to reimburse
the fund for its expenses under this section." (The
Secretary has such discretion under the earlier tandem plan
for federally-insured mortgages.)
As enacted, however, a. floor amendment by Senator Proxmire
was included under which the maximum interest rates in
mortgages purchased by GNMA could not "exceed a rate equal
to the average yield during the month preceding the month
in which a commitment to purchase such mortgage was issued
on all marketable bonds of the United States maturing more
than six but less than twelve years from the date of such
commitment (exclusive of bonds with a coupon rate of less
than 6 percent) plus one-half of 1 percent, adjusted upward
to the nearest one-eighth of 1 percent."
A further provision would direct HUD in fixing interest
rates to take account of State usury limits, and would
provide for a limited override of certain State usury laws
to the extent they apply or have been interpreted so that
discounts or points are counted in calculating the allowable
maximum rate.
4
To provide funds for its mortgage purchases, GNMA could
issue its obligations to the Secretary of the Treasury.
The Secretary would determine the interest rate of the
obligations and GNMA would determine the maturity and
redemption conditions. GNMA would be authorized to
guarantee and issue securities based on pools of mortgages
purchased under the program, and could offer and sell
securities to the Federal Financing Bank and any Federal
Reserve Bank. Prices of mortgages sold by GNMA are
authorised to be at levels which, to the extent feasible,
make the operation fully self-supporting.
Agency comments
HUD, in its attached views letter on the enrolled bill,
notes that several important desirable changes were
incorporated in the enacted version of S. 3979, which were
urged by the Administration. HUD indicates, however, that
there are two undesirable aspects of the bill.
First, the exclusion of conventional mortgages covering
multi-family projects and individual condominium units
will limit substantially the degree of support that can
be given to lower-priced housing.
Second, the Proxmire amendment fixing mortgage interest
rates according to specified Treasury borrowing rates could,
in HUD;s view, "require payment of substantial differential
payments to the extent that mortgages cannot be purchased
and held pending a decline in general mortgage rates but
must be sold in the interim at below market rates. These
problems, moreover, may be accentuated in coming months if,
as seems most likely, the Treasury rates upon which mortgage
interest rates are made to depend decline more rapidly than
the market generally."
Nevertheless, HUD believes the difficulties of the interest
rate provision can be minimized if (1) the commitment
authority provided in the bill is used quickly, while the
formula interest rate is relatively high, (2) commitment
fees are used to offset some initial processing costs, and
(3) the bill is interpreted to permit mortgages to be
purchased at a discount, with certain safeguards, thereby
increasing the effective yield of mortgages to the
Government.
5
Treasury also considers the Proxmire amendment as undesirable
since, In its view, this provision would lead to excessive
points to provide an appropriate yield level and would
increase subsidies to mortgage borrowers when the need is
declining, since Treasury yields typically decline faster
than mortgage rates, Treasury believes this could lead to
greater demand under the earlier tandem plan in which HUD
has total discretion in setting the interest rate as well
as under the new purchase authority.
Miscellaneous Amendments to Other Laws
These include:
- requiring the Council on Wage and Price Stability
to report through the President to the Congress on a quarterly
basis not later than 30 days after the close of each calendar
quarter concerning the Council's activities, findings and
recommendations with respect to inflation and the economy.
The Council states that this requirement will add to its
workload, but has no objection to this provision.
- amending the National Housing Act to add provisions
agreed to in conference but inadvertently overlooked in
preparing the conference report on the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-383), including authorising
the Secretary to make loans to finance the preservation of
historic structures and to insure under section 203 of the
National Housing Act the amount needed to finance the
purchase of shares in a dooperative.
-- amending the Federal Home Loan Bank Act to increase
from $40,000 to $55,000 the limit on a home mortgage
acceptable as collateral security for an advance by a
Federal Home Loan Bank, thereby conforming this Act to a
similar change in the Home Owners' Loan Act contained in
P.L. 93-385.
-- giving Federal savings and loan associations the
power to act as trustees for the new individual retirement
accounts authorized by the Pension Reform Act of 1974,
P.L. 93-406.
- authorizing the Federal Reserve Board to make advances
to member banks on the security of residential mortgages,
hearing an interest rate equal to the lowest discount rate
in effect at the member bank.
6
*****
In your signing statement on S. 3979, you concluded,
"Like most emergency measures, this bill has some
minuses. Notwithstanding the increasing proportion
of American families that choose each year to live
in apartments or condominiums, the bill unfortunately
does not cover conventional mortgages for apartment
or condominium projects. Moreover, I had hoped that
this help for the housing industry could be delivered
with a minimum inflationary impact, and I know that
the Congress intended the program to be
self-supporting. However, the bill establishes a
rigid, illogical interest ceiling formula that fails
to relate interest income to actual borrowing costs
and to cover adequately administrative costs."
We believe the scope and operation of this program should
be carefully monitored.
(signed) Wilfred H. Ronmel
Assistant Director for
Legislative Reference
Enclosures
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503
NOV 18 1974
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT
Subject: Enrolled Bill S. 3979 - Emergency Home Purchase
Assistance Act of 1974
Sponsors - Sen. Cranston (D) California and
Sen. Brooke (R) Massachusetts
Last Day for Action
Approved on October 18, 1974, became Public Law 93-449.
Purpose
Authorizes a new, temporary program to assist the housing
industry through purchases of residential mortgages by the
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) contains
several riders amending other laws.
Agency Recommendations
Office of Management and Budget
Approval
Department of Housing and Urban
Development
Approval
Federal Home Loan Bank Board
Approval
Department of the Interior
Approval
Federal Reserve Board
Approval (informally)
Department of the Treasury
No objection to
approval
Veterans Administration
No objection to
approval
Council of Economic Advisers
No objection
Council on Wage and Price Stability
No objection to
Section 4 (e)
Council on Environmental Quality
Defers to other
agencies
2
Discussion
S. 3979 carries out, in substantial measure, a
recommendation in your economic message to the Congress
of October 8, 1974. You urged the Congress to enact
additional legislation to make most home mortgages
eligible for purchase by an agency of the Federal Govern-
ment. You indicated that as soon as such legislation was
sent to you, you would make at least $3 billion immediately
available for mortgage purchases, enough to finance about
100,000 homes.
S. 3979 was passed unanimously (77-0) by the Senate on
October 10, 1974, and by voice vote in the House on
October 15, 1974. You signed the bill on October 18, 1974,
and HUD is now implementing it.
S. 3979 consists essentially of two parts: (1) authoriza-
tion for a temporary "tandem plan" for conventional housing
and (2) a few amendments to other laws, including two which
correct technical errors in the recently-enacted Housing
and Community Development Act of 1974.
Mortgage Purchase Authority
In August 1971, the Government instituted a "tandem plan"
for federally insured mortgages to avoid raising the
interest rate ceiling on those mortgages while maintaining
housing production and sales. Under this plan, HUD (GNMA)
buys eligible mortgages at below-market interest rates and
resells them at the market price. The cost to the Govern-
ment is the subsidy involved, 1.e. the loss realized by
GNMA if it sells the mortgage at less than its original
purchase price.
S. 3979 expands this program temporarily by giving HUD
authority for one year to direct GNMA to purchase, service,
sell, or otherwise deal in specified types of conventional
as well as federally insured mortgages when HUD determines
that economic conditions are so seriously adverse as to
require such action to achieve national housing goals. The
bill limits the total amount of purchases and commitments
to $7.75 billion outstanding at any one time.
3
Eligible mortgages include conventional and FHA or VA
insured and guaranteed mortgages covering single-family
homes (other than conventional condominium or cooperative
units), and FHA or VA mortgages covering rental projects,
condominiums, or cooperatives and their individual units.
Conventional mortgages can have a lean-to-value ratio
exceeding 80 percent only if they are privately insured.
The maximum mortgage amount is set at $42,000 per family
residence or dwelling unit ($55,000 in Alaska, Hawaii
and Guam).
Mortgages covering housing constructed more than 12 months
prior to enactment of S. 3979 may be purchased in areas
where HUD determines that there is a serious shortage of
mortgage credit to purchase such housing.
As introduced, the bill would have given HUD discretion
to set the interest rate on mortgages purchased by GNMA
without any maximum limits. It provided that such mortgages
involve "an interest rate not in excess of the rate
determined by the Secretary to be necessary to reimburse
the fund for its expenses under this section." (The
Secretary has such discretion under the earlier tandem plan
for federally-insured mortgages.)
As enacted, however, a floor amendment by Senator Proxmire
was included under which the maximum interest rates in
mortgages purchased by GNMA could not "exceed a rate equal
to the average yield during the month preceding the month
in which a commitment to purchase such mortgage was issued
on all marketable bonds of the United States maturing more
than six but less than twelve years from the date of such
commitment (exclusive of bonds with a coupon rate of less
than 6 percent) plus one-half of 1 percent, adjusted upward
to the nearest one-eighth of 1 percent."
A further provision would direct HUD in fixing interest
rates to take account of State usury limits, and would
provide for a limited override of certain State usury laws
to the extent they apply or have been interpreted so that
discounts or points are counted in calculating the allowable
maximum rate,
4
To provide funds for its mortgage purchases, GNMA could
issue its obligations to the Secretary of the Treasury.
The Secretary would determine the interest rate of the
obligations and GNMA would determine the maturity and
redemption conditions. GNMA would be authorized to
guarantee and issue securities based on pools of mortgages
purchased under the program, and could offer and sell
securities to the Federal Financing Bank and any Federal
Reserve Bank. Prices of mortgages sold by GNMA are
authorised to be at levels which, to the extent feasible,
make the operation fully self-supporting.
Agency comments
HUD, in its attached views letter on the enrolled bill,
notes that several important desirable changes were
incorperated in the enacted version of S. 3979, which were
urged by the Administration. HUD indicates, however, that
there are two undesirable aspects of the bill.
First, the exclusion of conventional mortgages covering
multi-family projects and individual condominium units
will limit substantially the degree of support that can
be given to lower-priced housing.
Second, the Prommire amendment fixing mortgage interest
rates according to specified Treasury borrowing rates could,
in HVD's view, "require payment of substantial differential
payments to the extent that mortgages cannot be purchased
and held pending a decline in general mortgage rates but
must be sold in the interim at below market rates. These
problems, moreover, may be accentuated in coming months if,
as seems most likely, the Treasury rates upon which mortgage
interest rates are made to depend decline more rapidly than
the market generally."
Nevertheless, HUD believes the difficulties of the interest
rate provision can be minimised if (1) the commitment
authority provided in the bill is used quickly, while the
formula interest rate is relatively high, (2) commitment
fees are used to offset some initial processing costs, and
(3) the bill is interpreted to permit mortgages to be
purchased at a discount, with certain safeguards, thereby
increasing the effective yield of mortgages to the
Government.
5
Treasury also considers the Proxmire amendment as undesirable
since, In its view, this provision would lead to excessive
points to provide an appropriate yield level and would
increase subsidies to mortgage borrowers when the need is
declining, since Treasury yields typically decline faster
than mortgage rates. Treasury believes this could lead to
greater demand under the earlier tandem plan in which HUD
has total discretion in setting the interest rate as well
as under the new purchase authority.
Miscellaneous Amendments to Other Laws
These include:
-- requiring the Council on Wage and Price Stability
to report through the President to the Congress on a quarterly
basis not later than 30 days after the close of each calendar
quarter concerning the Council's activities, findings and
recommendations with respect to inflation and the economy.
The Council states that this requirement will add to its
workload, but has no objection to this provision.
-- amending the National Housing Act to add provisions
agreed to in conference but inadvertently overlooked in
preparing the conference report on the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-383), including authorising
the Secretary to make loans to finance the preservation of
historic structures and to insure under section 203 of the
National Housing Act the amount needed to finance the
purchase of shares in a cooperative.
--- amending the Federal Home Loan Bank Act to increase
from $40,000 to $55,000 the limit on a home mortgage
acceptable as collateral security for an advance by a
Federal Home Loan Bank, thereby conforming this Act to a
similar change in the Home Owners' Loan Act contained in
P.L. 93-383.
- giving Federal savings and loan associations the
power to act as trustees for the new individual retirement
accounts authorized by the Pension Reform Act of 1974,
P.L. 93-406.
-- authorizing the Federal Reserve Board to make advances
to member banks on the security of residential mortgages,
bearing an interest rate equal to the lowest discount rate
in effect at the member bank.
6
*****
In your signing statement on S. 3979, you concluded,
"Like most emergency measures, this bill has some
minuses. Notwithstanding the increasing proportion
of American families that choose each year to live
in apartments or condominiums, the bill unfortunately
does not cover conventional mortgages for apartment
or condominium projects. Moreover, I had hoped that
this help for the housing industry could be delivered
with a minimum inflationary impact, and I know that
the Congress intended the program to be
self-supporting. However, the bill establishes a
rigid, illogical interest ceiling formula that fails
to relate interest income to actual horrowing costs
and to cover adequately administrative costs."
We believe the scope and operation of this program should
be carefully monitored.
(signed) Wilfred H. Romanol
Assistant Director for
Legislative Reference
Enclosures
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE
NOT RUN
UNTIL 10:30 A.M., EDT
Embargoed for Release Until
OCTOBER 18, 1974
Office of the White House Press Secretary
THE WHITE HOUSE
STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
It is with great pleasure today that I am signing into law S. 3979,
the Emergency Home Purchase Assistance Act of 19742.
In my remarks to the Joint Session of the Congress on October 8, I
urged the Congress to enact, before recess, additional legislation
to make most home mortgages eligible for purchase by an agency of
the Federal Government. I also remarked that I remembered how
much Congress can get done when it wants to.
I am most pleased that exactly one week after my remarks, the Congress
responded with passage of the Emergency Home Purchase/ Act of 1974.
Assistance
This bill authorizes the Government National Mortgage Association in
the Department of Housing and Urban Development to make commitments
at predetermined interest rates to purchase mortgages, both on new
and existing homes, which are not Federal Housing Administration
insured or Veterans Administration guaranteed - - the so-called
"conventional" mortgages which comprise about 80% of all mortgages.
The advantage of the plan is that with the GNMA commitment, the
homebuyer, builder and lender have an assured source of financing
at a known, favorable interest rate. The cost to the Government
is limited to the loss which GNMA realizes if its selling price for
a mortgage is less than its original purchase price.
Like most emergency measures, this bill has some minuses.
Notwithstanding the increasing proportion of American families that
choose each year to live in apartments or condominiums, the bill
unfortunately does not cover conventional mortgages for apartment
or condominium projects. Moreover, I had hoped that this help for
the housing industry could be delivered with a minimum inflationary
impact, and I know that the Congress intended the program to be
self-supporting. However, the bill establishes a rigid, illogical
interest ceiling formula that fails to relate interest income to
actual borrowing costs and to cover adequately administrative
costs.
###
October 18, 1974
EMBARGOEFOR RELEASE
UNTIL 10:30 AM, EDT
Office of the White House Press Secretary
THE WHITE HOUSE
STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
It is with great pleasure today that I am signing into law S. 3979, the
Emergency Home Purchase Assistance Act of 1974.
In my remarks to the Joint Session of the Congress on October 8, I
urged the Congress to enact, before recess, additional legislation
to make most home mortgages eligible for purchase by an agency of
the Federal Government. I also remarked that I remembered how
much Congress can get done when it wants to.
I am most pleased that examily one week after my remarks, the Congress
responded with passage of the Emergency Home Purchase Act of 1974.
This bill authorizes the Government National Mortgage Association in
the Department of Housing and Urban Development to make commitments
at predetermined interest rates to purchase mortgages, both on new
and existing homes, which are not Federal Housing Administration
insured for Veterans Administration guaranteed -- the so-called
"conventional" mortgages which comprise about 80% of all mortgages.
The advantage of the plan is that with the GNMA commitment, the
homebuyer, builder and lender have an assured source of financing
at a known, favorable interest rate. The cost to the Government is
limited to the loss which GNMA readizes if its selling price for
a mortgage is less than its original purchase price.
Like most emergency measures, this bill has some minuses.
Notwithstanding the increasing proportion of American families that
choose each year to live in apartments or condominiums, the bill
unfortunately does not cover conventional mortgages for apartment
br condominium projects. Moreover, I had hoped that this help for
the housing industry could be delivered with a minimum inflationary
impact, and I know that the Congress intended the program to be
self-supporting, However, the bill establishes a rigid, illogical
interest celing formula that fails to relate interest income to'
actual borrowing costs and to cover adequately administrative
costs.
October 18, 1974
Office of the White House Press Secretary
THE WHITE HOUSE
that he has appointed Clyde S. DuPont of
The President today announced he has appointed Clyde S. DuPont of
Alexandria, Virginia, to be a Commissioner of the Postal Rate
Commission. He will succeed Rod Kreger, who resigned effective
January 7, 1974.
Since 1969, Mr. DuPont has been Minority Counsel for the Post
Office and Civil Service Committee after having served as a
Professional Staff Member of the Judiciary Committee from
1967 to 1968, From 1964 to 1967, he was Legislative Assistant
to Senator Hiram Fong, after having served as his Research
Assistant and File Clerk since 1960.
He was born on December 28, 1933, in Waialua, Hawaii. He
received his B.S. degree from Brigham Young University in
1959 and his J.D. degree from George Washington University
Law School in February, 1963, He served as a Staffr Sergeant
in the United States Air Force from 1952 to 1956. He is a member
of the District of Columbia Bar Association,
He is married to the former Joan Kimball and they have three
children, They reside in Alexandria, Virginia.
Embargoed for Release Until
October
/ 1974
DRAFT
Office of the White House Press Secretary
THE WHITE HOUSE
STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
It is with great pleasure today that I am signing into law S. 3979,
the "Emergency Home Purchase Assistance Act of 1974".
In my remarks to the Joint Session of the Congress on October 8, I
urged the Congress to enact, before recess, additional legislation
to make most home mortgages eligible for purchase by an agency of
the Federal Government. I also remarked that I remembered how
much Congress can get done when it wants to.
I am most pleased that exactly one week after my remarks, the Congress
responded with passage of the Emergency Home Purchase Assistance Act
of 1974.
This bill authorizes the Government National Mortgage Association in
the Department of Housing and Urban Development to make commitments
at predetermined interest rates to purchase mortgages, both on new
and existing homes, which are not Federal Housing Administration
insured or Veterans Administration guaranteed -- the so-called
"conventional" mortgages which comprise about 80% of all mortgages.
The advantage of the plan is that with the GNMA commitment, the
homebuyer, builder and lender have an assured source of financing
at a known, favorable interest rate. The cost to the Government
is limited to the loss which GNMA realizes if its selling price for
a mortgage is less than its original purchase price.
Like most emergency measures, this bill has some minuses.
Notwithstanding the increasing proportion of American families that
choose each year to live in apartments or condominiums, the bill
unfortunately does not cover conventional mortgages for apartment
or condominium projects. Moreover, I had hoped that this help for
the housing industry could be delivered with a minimum inflationary
impact, and I know that the Congress intended the program to be
self-supporting. However, the bill establishes a rigid, illogical
interest ceiling formula that fails to relate interest income to
actual borrowing costs and to cover adequately administrative
costs.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE
OCTOBER 18, 1974
UNTIL 10:30 AM, EDT
Office of the White House Press Secretary
THE WHITE HOUSE
THE EMERGENCY HOME PURCHASE ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1974 (S. 3974)
FACT SHEET
President Ford today signed into law the Emergency Home Purchase
Assistance Act of 1974. The President had urged enactment of similar
legislation in his address to a Joint Session of Congress on October 8th.
The Act extends, on a temporary basis, the advantages offered by the
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA or Ginnie Mae) to
mortgages which are not Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insured
or Veterans Administration (VA) guaranteed 80 called "conventional"
mortgages. Three billion dollars an amount sufficient to finance
about 100, 000 new homes would be available. The proposed program
will be in addition to the $9. 9 billion FHA/VA tandem programs announced
in January and May and the $3 billion Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (FHLMC) commentional mortgage purchase program announced
in May
GNMA has aided in creating a supply of credit for mortgages on new homes
insured by FHA or guaranteed by VA by
-- assuring, through commitments in advance, purchase of
mortgages at a pre-determined price.
-- having agreed to a lower-than-market interest rate on the
mortgage at the time such commitment to purchase is made,
subsidizing market interest rates in the event market interest
rates do not fall by the time GNMA purchases the mortgage
pursuant to its commitment.
-- guaranteeing, on a "full faith and credit basis," obligations
secured by such mortgages.
BACKGROUND - HOUS ING INDUSTRY SITUATION CRITICAL
Over the past 23 months
-- housing starts have dropped from 2. 51 million units to 1.12
million units.
-- unemployment in the construction industry is 12. percent
and climbing, with over a half million construction workers
now unemployed.
-- many homebuilders are in severe financial difficulty.
FEATURES OF THE EMERGENCY HOME PURCHASE ASSISTANCE ACT
OF 1974
By making conventional mortgages eligible for purchase by GNMA, builders
and homebuyers will be assisted where home mortgage credit is scarce or
non-existent.
MORE
-2-
1. Level of Commitments. Aggregate amount of commitments and mort-
gages which GNMA could hold at any time, i.e. have purchased and not
resold, could not exceed $7.75 billion. Initial programs aggregating
$3 billion of mortgage commitments, or enough to finance about 100, 000
new homes, is contemplated. Any additional programs will be activated
as circumstances require.
2. Mortgage Amounts, Interest Rates, Fees and Downpayment Require-
ments. The program would provide for a maximum mortgage amount of
$42,000. Under the formula provided by the law, the mortgage interest
rate will be determined on the basis of yields on six to twelve year Treasury
issues for the month preceeding the month in which the GNMA commitments
is made plus one-half of one percent (50 basis points). Under this formula,
the mortgage rate for commitments made in October would be somewhat
above, the rate offered on GNMA tandem programs for FHA/VA mortgages --
presently 8-3/4%. Twenty percent downpayments would be required with
an exception for down to 5% downpayments if the additional mortgage
amount is covered by a qualified private mortgage insurance contract so
as to minimize cost of mortgagor defaults. There will also be a com-
mitment fee and other fees to cover reserves for losses and certain
financing costs.
3. GNMA Disposition of Conventional Mortgages. Following the precedent
of existing law, GNMA could, depending upon market or other factors, sell
mortgages to the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) or
FHLMC, s&ll mortgages with a provision for pooling by FNMA or FHLMC
or other approved issuers and sale by such issuers of GNMA-guaranteed
"pass through" securities or bond type securities on the market or to the
Federal Financing Bank; or issue its own mortgage backed securities for
sale to the Federal Financing Bank.
4. Cost and Budget Implications. Any resulting subsidy would be paid
out of corporate funds and ultimately from Treasury borrowing. Dollar
amount of mortgages purchased would not be excluded from budget outlays,
but would appear as outlays in any fiscal year only to the extent they are
not offset by sales that year. However, any losses on resale -- which
can result if market yields at the time of resale are less than the yield
at which GNMA bought the mortgage, will appear as outlays.
#
#
#
Embargoed for Release until 10:30 am. EDT
October 18, 1974
Coulsen
Office of the White House Press Secretary
THE WHITE HOUSE
THE EMERGENCY HOME PURCHASE ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1974 (5.3979)
FACT SHEET
President Ford today signed into law the Emergency Home Purchase Assistance
Act of 1974. The President had urged enactment of similar legislation in
his address to a Joint Session of Congress on October 8th.
The Act extends, on a temporary basis, the advantages offered by the
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA or Ginnie Mae) to mortgages
which are not Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insured or Veterans
Administration (VA) guaranteed -- so called "conventional" mortgages.
Three billion dollars -- an amount sufficient to finance about 100, 000 new
homes -- would be available. The proposed program will be in addition to
the $9. 9 billion FHA/VA tandem programs announced in January and May
and the $3 billion Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC)
conventional mortgage purchase program announced in May.
GNMA has aided in creating a supply of credit for mortgages on new homes
insured by FHA or guaranteed by VA by
-- assuring, through commitments in advance, purchase of
mortgages at a pre-determined price.
having agreed to a lower-than-market interest rate on the
mortgage at the time such commitment to purchase is
made, subsidizing market interest rates in the event
market interest rates do not fall by the time GNMA purchases
the mortgage pursuant to its commitment.
(cops)
guaranteeing, on a "full faith and credit basis, obligations
secured by such mortgages.
BACKEROUND
Housing Industry Situation Critical.
Over the past 23 months
-- housing starts have dropped from 2. 51 million units to
1. 12 million units.
unemployment in the construction industry is 12. 4 percent
and climbing, with over a half million construction
workers now unemployed.
many homebuilders are in severe financial difficulty.
FEATURES
-OR
The Emergency Home Purchase Assistance Act of 1974
By making conventional mortgages eligible for purchase by GNMA,
builders and homebuyers will be assisted where home mortgage credit is
scarce or non-existent.
1.
Level of Commitments. Aggregate amount of commitments and mortgages
which GNMA could hold at any time, i.e. have purchased and not resold, could
not exceed $7. 75 billion. Initial programs aggregating $3 billion of mortgage
more
2
commitments, or enough to finance about 100, 000 new homes, is contemplated.
Any additional programs will be activated as circumstances require.
2.
Mortgage Amounts, Interest Rates, Fees and Downpayment Requirements.
The program would provide for a maximum mortgage amount of $42, 000.
Under the formula provided by the law, the mortgage interest rate will be
determined on the basis of yields on six to twelve year Treasury issues for the
month preceding the month in which the GNMA commitment is made plus
one-half of one percent (50 basis points). Under this formula, the mortgage
rate for commitments made in October would be somewhat above the rate
offered on GNMA tandem programs for FHA/VA mortgages -- presently
8-3/4%. Twenty percent downpayments would be required with an exception
for down to 5% downpayments if the additional mortgage amount is covered
by a qualified private mortgage insurance contract so as to minimize cost
of mortgagor defaults. There will also be a commitment fee and other fees
to cover reserves for losses and certain financing costs.
3.
GNMA Disposition of Conventional Mortgages. Following the precedent
of existing law, GNMA could, depending upon market or other factors, sell
mortgages to the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) or FHLMC,
sell mortgages with a provision for pooling by FNMA or FHLMC or other approved
issuers and sale by such issuers of GNMA-guaranteed "pass through"
securities or bond type securities on the market or to the Federal Financing
Bank; or issue its own mortgage backed securities for sale to the Federal
Financing Bank.
4.
Cost and Budget Implications. Any resulting subsidy would be paid out
of corporate funds and ultimately from Treasury borrowing. Dollar amount of
mortgages purchased would not be excluded from budget outlays, but would
appear as outlays in any fiscal year only to the extent they are not offset by
sales that year. However, any losses on resale -- which can result if
market yields at the time of resale are less than the yield at which GNMA
bought the mortgage, will appear as outlays.
Calendar No. 1164
93D CONGRESS
SENATE
REPORT
2d Session
No. 93-1223
HOME PURCHASE ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1974
OCTOBER 3, 1974.-Ordered to be printed
Mr. PROXMIRE, from the Committee on Banking, Housing and
Urban Affairs, submitted the following
REPORT
together with
MINORITY VIEWS
[To accompany S. 3979]
The Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, to which
was referred the bill (S. 3979) to increase the availability of reason-
ably priced mortgage credit for home purchases, having considered the
same, reports favorably thereon with amendments and recommends
that the bill as amended do pass.
COMMITTEE DELIBERATIONS
The bill, S. 3979, was introduced by Senators Cranston and Brooke
on September 10, 1974, and was referred to the Committee on Bank-
ing, Housing and Urban Affairs. The bill was a consolidation of two
bills-S. 3436, introduced by Senator Brooke on May 2, 1974, and
S. 3456, introduced by Senator Cranston on May 8, 1974-both of
which were referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing and
Urban Affairs. The Committee held hearings on the two bills on Au-
gust 6 and 7, 1974.
On September 24, 1974, the Committee on Banking, Housing and
Urban Affairs met in open executive session and ordered S. 3979, as
amended, to be reported to the Senate.
BACKGROUND
S. 3979 responds to a mortgage credit crisis which has crippled the
residential real estate industry in the United States. Housing ac-
tivity in the Nation is severely depressed. In August 1974, housing
starts dropped to an annualized rate of 1.13 million, and 1974 produc-
38-008
2
tion is not expected to exceed 1.4 million units. This compares with
2.06 million starts in 1973 and 2.38 million in 1972. Building permits
issued in August at an annual rate of 912,000, a 71/2-year low.
This sharp reduction in housing production has been especially hard
on the 1.5 million new households formed each year mostly by younger
persons who are experiencing increasing difficulty finding a place to
live at a price they can afford. New housing construction in the United
States is failing to offset the estimated 700,000 units of housing that
are removed from the housing stock each year due to public and pri-
vate construction, natural disasters, and physical deterioration. As a
result, rental vacancy rates have fallen in many metropolitan areas,
and housing supply is likely to become even more tight in the months
ahead.
The decline in housing production has had adverse effects not only
on consumer, but also on construction workers and homebuilding firms.
In August 1974, almost 500,000 construction workers, or 11.1 percent
of the working force in these trades, were unemployed. The waste of
these valuable human resources, the drain on the public treasury for
increased payments of unemployment compensation, and the personal
hardships created by this high rate of unemployment are all matters
of serious concern to the Committee.
Bankruptcies and business closings in the homebuilding industry are
expected to reach record levels in 1974 according to trade association
officials. Further, the slowdown in housing construction is beginning to
be felt in the appliance and home furnishing industries, as reflected
by worker layoffs in those sectors.
The current shortage of funds to finance housing transactions began
in the middle of 1973. Home borrowers must compete in the market-
place with other users of capital, including business firms and Federal,
State, and local governments. Borrowings by business corporations rose
substantially in 1973 in order to finance increases in inventories and
capital plant and equipment. The prime rate charged by commercial
banks to their most credit-worthy customers rose sharply in the latter
half of 1973. The Federal Reserve Board, in an effort to slow the
growth of private borrowing and dampen rising prices, raised its dis-
count rate and took other measures to tighten up on credit.
The effect of these actions on the home mortgage market, which
is particularly vulnerable to sharp, upward swings in the price of
money, was dramatic. Interest rates moved from the level of 7.5 per-
cent to 10 percent or more in many areas. The price of mortgage money
rose above the ceilings imposed by State usury laws, bringing mort-
gage lending to a halt in some parts of the country. Downpayment
requirements for home purchases have been increased in those areas
where mortgage credit is available.
Sales of existing homes have also fallen sharply in some areas as
potential buyers were turned down by lenders or have encountered
prohibitive interest rates and terms. Families transferred from one
city to another are left in the difficult position of being unable to sell
their old homes or to buy new ones.
EXPLANATION OF LEGISLATION
S. 3979 would provide emergency relief to the credit-starved resi-
dential mortgage market. Under the bill whenever the Secretary of
S.R. 1223
3
Housing and Urban Development determines (1) that a substantial
number of families are unable to obtain mortgage credit at reasonable
rates and (2) that the inability to obtain such credit is causing a sub-
stantial reduction in the volume of home construction and acquisition
and is delaying the orderly achievement of the national housing goals,
he is to direct the Government National Mortgage Association
(GNMA) to make commitments to purchase and to purchase mort-
gages under the conditions set forth in the bill.
Money to finance the purchase of mortgages would be obtained from
a housing trust fund to be established in the Government National
Mortgage Association (GNMA), the secondary mortgage market
component of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
This trust fund would be financed by borrowings of up to $10 billion
dollars per year from the Secretary of the Treasury. All funds bor-
rowed from the Treasury would be repayable with interest. Receipts
and disbursements of the fund would not be included in the totals of
the Budget of the United States Government and would be exempt
from any annual expenditure or net lending limitations imposed on
the budget of the United States Government. As security on its loans
the Government will hold mortgages which involve substantial down-
payments (20%), or are insured by FHA or an approved private in-
surer, or are guaranteed by the Veterans' Administration or the Farm-
ers Home Administration.
Because commitments to purchase mortgages will be met by GNMA
over a period of many months, the Secretary of the Treasury will not
be called upon to borrow all of the funds authorized under this bill
at any one time. However, adding another $10 billion to total demand
for capital funds will put some pressure on interest rates generally.
The actual rise in interest costs will depend upon the state of the
economy and fiscal and monetary policies being pursued at the time
the Treasury goes into the money markets. It should be noted that as
the economy grows, the capacity to generate loanable funds also grows.
The housing industry, presently the most depressed sector in the econ-
omy, is a high-priority claimant for some of this expected increment
in capital funds due to normal growth.
GNMA may sell mortgages acquired under the bill at any time
at a price not less than the unpaid principal at the time of sale.
Not less than 50% nor more than 55% of the funds made available
under the bill could be used to finance the purchase of newly con-
structed homes and the remainder of the funds could finance the pur-
chase of existing homes. All of the homes purchased with mortgages
financed under the provisions of the bill must be the principal resi-
dence of the buyer.
The bill imposes a limit of $30,000 on the purchase price of homes
purchased with mortgages financed by the housing trust fund. How-
ever, that limit may be raised up to $45,000 in high cost areas. It is
not the intention of the Committee that the Secretary of HUD set a
maximum ceiling of $45,000 in all areas of the country by making a
finding that in all areas cost levels require a higher ceiling. The
Committee expects the Secretary to set area by area ceilings ranging
up to $45,000 taking into account differences in housing supply and
cost of production which exist in different areas of the country. The
Committee expects the Secretary to be realistic in his determination
S.R. 1223
4
of high cost areas, giving full consideration to past and expected cost
increases.
Mortgages originated under the program set forth in S. 3979 will
bear an interest rate sufficient to reimburse GNMA for the cost of
borrowing funds from the Secretary of the Treasury plus adminis-
trative costs. No points, discounts, or similar charges would be assessed
against either the buyer or the seller. Mortgages could be purchased
by GNMA at a price not in excess of 101 percent of the unpaid princi-
pal at the time of purchase.
The Committee is concerned that only about $4 billion out of a
potential $9.9 billion in mortgage credit which has been made avail-
able through GNMA over the last year has been used to make commit-
ments to purchase or purchase mortgages. A principal impediment, it
is reported, is that builders and sellers are required to pay as much as
four points for the loans, which translates into $1,200 on a $30,000
mortgage. S. 3979 would profit the assessment of points, discounts, or
similar charges against buyers or sellers in connection with.mortgages
financed through the housing trust fund.
While the Committee has included FHA and VA mortgages under
S. 3979, the Committee expects that GNMA will continue to imple-
ment the present tandem plans which finance the purchase of homes
with FHA and VA mortgages at the same time as it. implements
S. 3979.
SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS
The Committee bill is divided into three sections.
Section 1 cites the bill as the "Home Purchase Assistance Act of
1974".
Section 2 establishes findings of Congress that: (1) in many parts
of the Nation, residential mortgage credit is likely soon to become
prohibitively expensive or unavailable at any price; (2) the unavail-
ability of mortgage credit severely restricts housing production, causes
hardship for those who wish to purchase or sell existing housing and
delays the orderly achievement of the national goal of a decent home
for every American family; and (3) there is an urgent need to provide
an alternate source of residential mortgage credit on an emergency
basis.
Section 3 amends Title III of the National Housing Act and adds
a new section entitled the "Housing Trust Fund" as section 313.
Section 313 (a) (1) creates a National Housing Trust Fund from
which the Secretary of HUD could make direct loans whenever the
Secretary determines that a substantial number of families are unable
to obtain mortgage credit at reasonable rates due to high interest rates
or reduced availability of mortgage credit and that the inability to
obtain such credit is causing or threatening to cause a substantial re-
duction in the volume of home construction or acquisition and is delay-
ing the orderly achievement of the national housing goals contained
in title XVI of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968.
The housing goals contained in the 1968 Act call for the construction of
an average of 26 million housing units a year over à ten year period;
six million of these for low and moderate income families. The 1968
act also reaffirms the national housing goal of a decent home and suit-
able living environment for every American family.
S.R. 1223
5
When the above situation exists it is mandatory that the Govern-
ment National Mortgage Association make commitments to purchase
and to purchase mortgages in accordance with the provisions of sec.
313.
Section 313 (a) (2) provides that the Secretary of HUD may direct
the GNMA to terminate its activities under this section whenever he
determines that the conditions which gave rise to his determination
under section 313 (1) are no longer present.
Section 313(a) (3) provides that the Secretary of HUD shall issue
regulations to carry out the provisions of this bill not later than 60
days after enactment and that such regulations shall be published
in the Federal Register.
Section 313 (b) provides that the Government National Mortgage
Association shall make commitments to purchase and purchase mort-
gages which are FHA insured, VA guaranteed, privately insured,
or noninsured if they have a loan-to-value ratio of less than 80 per-
cent. Mortgages may be purchased under this section only if: (1)
such mortgage is to finance the acquisition of the T100 principal residence
of the mortgagor; (2) such mortgage involves the acquisition or con-
struction of a residential dwelling whose purchase price does not exceed
$30,000 and up to $45,000 in high cost areas as determined by the
Secretary; (3) the interest rate is not to exceed that necessary to
reimburse the fund for its expenses; (4) no points, discounts or similar
charges are to be assessed against the prospective buyer or seller in
connection with the mortgage.
Section 313 (c) provides that the Government National Mortgage
Association may borrow funds from the Treasury to finance the
activities of the Trust Fund and pay the Treasury an interest rate
based on the rates on outstanding long-term marketable U.S. obli-
gations. The GNMA would repay the Treasury at the cost of money
to the government under this section.
Section 313 (d) provides that the Housing Trust Fund cannot com-
mit to purchase more than $10 billion dollars in mortgages in any
single fiscal year.
Section 313 (e) provides that not less than 50% or more than 55
percent of the homes purchased under this act shall involve resi-
dences upon which construction has been completed within the twelve
months preceding the date of purchase, all other housing purchases
under this act shall be existing housing.
Section 313 (f) authorizes the Government National Mortgage As-
sociation to: (1) establish and charge a fee for making commitments
to purchase; (2) purchase mortgages at a price not greater than 101
per cent; (3) contract with mortgagees or other persons to service
mortgages under this section (4) sell such mortgages at any time at
a price not less than the unpaid principal at the time of sale; (5)
deposit proceeds from the sale of mortgages into the Trust Fund; and
(6) invest any excess amounts in the fund in obligations of the United
States.
Section 313 (g) provides that loan disbursements and repayments
under this section would be excluded from the federal budget since
all loans are fully repayable to the Treasury at the rate of cost to
the government of borrowing the money.
S.R. 1223
6
Section 313 (h) requires the Secretary to transmit to the Congress
not later than March 15 of each year a report on his activities under
this section.
COST OF CARRYING OUT THE BILL
In compliances with Section 252 of the Legislative Reorganization
Aot, the Committee reports that it is not feasible to estimate with pre-
cision the cost of carrying out the provisions of this bill. The com-
mittee believes, however, that it is unlikely there will be a net cost
to the U.S. Treasury over the life of the program after taking into
consideration the additional tax revenues generated from the increase
in residential construction activity stimulated by the legislation.
CORDON RULE
In the opinion of the Committee, it is necessary to dispense with
the requirements of subsection 4 of Rule XXIX of the Standing Rules
of the Senate in order to expedite the business of the Senate in con-
nection with the report.
S.R. 1223
MINORITY VIEWS OF MESSRS. TOWER, BENNETT, AND
BROCK
There is no doubt but that the housing industry is in a depressed
state. All. industries are short of capital, including State and local
governments, but it is true that housing is proportionately worse off
than the others.
However, a vote for this bill is a vote for continued inflation. Con-
gress, however, has not been deaf to the problems of the housing in-
dustry. In fact, we have provided several avenues of assistance to the
housing industry in the past several months. In addition to the $1.22
billion provided for public housing for lower income families in the
recently signed Housing and Community Development Act of 1974,
since January 28, 1974, the Administration has made a total of $16.9
billion available to the mortgage market at subsidized rates. This
means that over $18 billion worth of mortgages (or $20 billion of
housing construction) has been made available since the start of this
year. This bill would add another $10 billion to make a total approach-
ing $30 billion-these figures do not even include the vast sums of non-
subsidized mortgages provided by FNMA, FHLMC, and GNMA.
Providing an additional $10 billion-or whatever lesser amount-
for housing will simply increase the Federal deficit by that amount.
From an economic point of view, it does not make any difference
whether we specify that the additional $10 billion should be in or out
of the budget. As far as the economy is concerned, and as far as other
borrowers on the market are concerned, the effect is the same. For
every dollar in this bill, we will be increasing the "Federal deficit"
for this year by a like amount.
Although some form of additional assistance may be necessary for
the housing market, we must keep in mind that buying a mortgage has
the same effect as buying any other commodity by the government.
One simply cannot distinguish from an inflationary or a budget deficit
point of view the difference between the government's buying a private
individual's house (represented by a mortgage) or the government's
purchase of military bases, agricultural stockpiles, commodities stock-
piles or hospitals.
The government this year will usurp roughly one-half our Nation's
capital market either by direct Treasury borrowings, agency borrow-
ings or guarantees. If we do not stop this government encroachment
of our private capital markets, we will soon witness the day when the
government will simply borrow all the money created by our free
enterprise system and will allocate it by government fiat rather than
by free market system.
(7)
S.R. 1223
8
Certainly housing needs to be helped to some degree, and perhaps
even more assistance needs to be provided in addition to the massive
efforts already undertaken. However, a $10 billion purchase of mort-
gages each and very year in perpetuity is not the way to help housing
nor stop inflation.
If we are to provide a quick "shot in the arm" to the housing in-
dustry, there are administratively more efficient and less cumbersome
methods to utilize. If we are to initiate a permanent program to pro-
vide a continued flow of mortgage funds at a reasonable interest rate,
approval of this proposal would be a step backwards.
A vote for this bill is a vote for continued inflation, higher interest
rates, and higher housing costs.
JOHN TOWER.
WALLACE F. BENNETT.
BILL BROCK.
S.R. 1223
S. 3979
Ainety-third Congress of the United States of America
AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, the twenty-first day of January,
one thousand nine hundred and seventy-four
An Art
To increase on an emergency basis the availability of reasonably priced mortgage
credit for housing.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SHORT TITLE
SECTION 1. This Act may be cited as the "Emergency Home Purchase
Assistance Act of 1974".
FINDINGS
SEC. 2. The Congress finds and declares that-
(1) in many parts of the Nation, residential mortgage credit is
or is likely soon to become prohibitively expensive or unavailable
at any price;
(2) the unavailability of mortgage credit severely restricts
housing production, causes hardship for those who wish to pur-
chase or sell new and existing housing, and delays the achieve-
ment of the national goal of a decent home for every American
family; and
(3) there is an urgent need to provide an alternate source of
residential mortgage credit on an emergency basis.
INTERIM AUTHORITY
SEC. 3. (a) Title III of the National Housing Act is amended by
adding at the end thereof the following new section:
"INTERIM AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE CERTAIN MORTGAGES
"SEC. 313. (a) (1) Whenever the Secretary finds inflationary condi-
tions and related governmental actions are having a severely dispro-
portionate effect on the housing industry and the resulting reduction
in the volume of home construction or acquisition threatens seriously
to affect the economy and to delay the orderly achievement of the
national housing goals contained in title XVI of the Housing and
Urban Development Act of 1968, the Secretary shall direct the Asso-
ciation to begin making commitments to purchase and to purchase
mortgages in accordance with the provisions of this section.
"(2) The Secretary may direct the Association to terminate its activ-
ities under this section whenever he determines that the conditions
which gave rise to his determination under paragraph (1) are no
longer present.
(b) Whenever the Secretary issues a directive under subsection (a)
(1), the Association shall make commitments to purchase and pur-
chase, and may service, sell (with or without recourse), or otherwise
deal in, mortgages (1) which cover more than four-family residences
(including cooperatives and condominiums and the individual units
therein) and which are insured under the National Housing Act and
chapter 37 of title 38 of the United States Code, or (2) which cover one-
to four-family residences and which are insured under the National
Housing Act or guaranteed under chapter 37 of title 38 of the United
States Code or by qualified private insurers as determined by the Asso-
ciation or the outstanding principal balances of which do not exceed 80
CORRECTE
S. 3979-2
per centum of the value of the property securing the mortgages. A
mortgage may be purchased under this section only if-
(A) such mortgage was executed to finance the acquisition of a
one- to four-family residence which will be the principal residence
of the mortgagor or to finance the purchase of a more than four-
family residence and is subject to a mortgage insured under the
National Housing Act;
((B) such mortgage involves an original principal obligation
not to exceed $42,000 per family residence or dwelling unit, and
except that the original principal obligation may not exceed
$55,000 in the case of properties in Alaska, Hawaii, and Guam;
"(C) such mortgage involves an interest rate or yield not in
excess of that which the Secretary may prescribe, taking into
account the cost of funds and administrative costs under this sec-
tion, the importance of making mortgage credit available on rea-
sonable terms, and current conditions in the mortgage market,
but in no event shall such rate exceed a rate equal to the average
yield during the month preceding the month in which a com-
mitment to purchase such mortgage was issued on all marketable
bonds of the United States maturing in more than six but less than
twelve years from the date of such commitment (exclusive of
bonds with a coupon rate of less than 6 per centum) plus one-half
of 1 per centum, adjusted upward to the nearest one-eighth of 1
per centum and taking into account the need to assure that the
funds are available in all States pursuant to any maximum mort-
gage interest rate permitted under the laws or constitutions of the
various States and, notwithstanding any State law or constitu-
tion to the contrary, discount points and other charges collected
in connection with mortgage transactions under this section and
recognized by the Association shall not be considered in deter-
mining whether the interest rate on any. such mortgage exceeds
any State usury ceiling.
"(c) The Association may issue to the Secretary of the Treasury
its obligations in an amount outstanding at any one time sufficient
to enable the Association to carry out its functions under this section.
Each such obligation shall mature at such time and be redeemable at
the option of the Association in such manner as may be determined by
the Association, and shall bear interest at a rate determined by the Sec-
retary of the Treasury, taking into consideration the current average
yield on outstanding marketable obligations of the United States of
comparable maturities during the month preceding the issuance of
the obligation of the Association. The Secretary of the Treasury is
authorized and directed to purchase any obligations of the Association
issued under this section, and for such purposes the Secretary of the
Treasury is authorized to use as a public debt transaction the proceeds
from the sale of any securities issued under the Second Liberty Bond
Act, as now or hereafter in force, and the purposes for which securities
may be issued under the Second Liberty Bond Act, as now or hereafter
in force, are extended to include any purchase of the Association's
obligations hereunder.
(d) (1) The Association is authorized to guarantee securities based
on pools or trusts of the mortgages purchased by the Association under
this section as provided in section 306(g) of this Act with respect to
federally insured or guaranteed mortgages and to act as issuer of such
S. 3979-3
guaranteed securities. The Association shall possess with respect to
securities under this section all the powers it possesses with respect to
securities guaranteed under such section 306 (g), and the provisions of
such section shall apply to guarantees under this section, except that
such section shall not be deemed to prohibit the Secretary from
guaranteeing payment of only a part of the principal and interest on
securities issued under the provisions of this section.
"(2) The Association may offer and sell any securities guaranteed
under this subsection to the Federal Financing Bank, and such Bank
is authorized to purchase any securities SO offered. The Association
may also offer and sell any securities guaranteed under this subsection
to any Federal Reserve bank. The proceeds from the sale of such
securities when issued by the Association shall be treated in the
accounts in the same manner as if such proceeds were from the sale of
the underlying mortgages.
"(e) The Secretary may make available a portion of his authority
under this section to purchase mortgages covering housing which has
been constructed more than twelve months prior to enactment of this
section in areas where he determines that there is a serious shortage
of mortgage credit to purchase such housing.
"(f) The Association is authorized to-
"(1) sell mortgages purchased under this section of prices
which it determines will help promote the objective of assuring
that operations under this section are; to the extent feasible, fully
self-supporting;
"(2) pay for services performed in carrying out its functions
under this section without regard to any limitation on adminis-
trative expenses heretofore enacted.
"(g) The total amount of purchases and commitments authorized
by the Secretary to be made pursuant to this section shall not exceed
$7,750,000,000 outstanding at any one time.".
(b) The amendment made by subsection (a) becomes effective upon
the date of enactment of this Act and shall remain in effect for a
period of one year following such date of enactment, except that it
shall remain in effect after the expiration of such period to the extent
necessary (1) to honor commitments to purchase mortgages issued
prior to the expiration of such period, and (2) to provide for the
liquidation of assets and discharge of liabilities acquired or incurred
prior to the expiration of such period.
AMENDMENTS TO OTHER LAWS
SEC. 4. (a) The National Housing Act is amended as follows:
(1) The first sentence of section 2(a) of such Act is amended by
inserting before the period at the end thereof the following: "; and
for the purpose of financing the preservation of historic structures,
and, as used in this section, the term 'historic structures' means resi-
dential structures which are registered in the National Register of
Historic Places or which are certified by the Secretary of the Interior
to conform to National Register criteria; and the term 'preservation'
means restoration or rehabilitation undertaken for such purposes as
are approved by the Secretary in regulations issued by him, after con-
sulting with the Secretary of the Interior".
(2) Section 2(b) of such Act is amended by adding at the end
thereof the following new paragraph:
CORRECTED
S. 3979-4
"A loan financing the preservation of a historic structure shall-
"(1) involve an amount not exceeding $15,000 per family unit;
and
"(2) have a maturity not exceeding fifteen years and thirty-two
days.".
(b) Section 203 of the National Housing Act is amended by adding
at the end thereof the following:
"(n) (1) The Secretary is authorized to insure under this section
any mortgage meeting the requirements of subsection (b) of this
section, except as modified by this subsection. To be eligible, the mort-
gage shall involve a dwelling unit in a cooperative housing project
which is covered by a blanket mortgage insured under this Act. The
mortgage amount as determined under the other provisions of sub-
section (b) of this section shall be reduced by an amount equal to
the portion of the unpaid balance of the blanket mortgage covering
the project which is attributable (as of the date the mortgage is
accepted for insurance) to such unit.
(2) For the purpose of this subsection-
"(A) The terms 'home mortgage' and 'mortgage' include a
first lien given (in accordance with the laws of the State where
the property is located and accompanied by such security and
other undertakings as may be required under regulations of the
Secretary) to secure a loan made to finance the purchase of stock
or membership in an nonprofit cooperative ownership housing
corporation the permanent occupancy of the dwelling units of
which is restricted to members of such corporation, where the
purchase of such stock or membership will entitle the purchaser
to the permanent occupancy of one of such units.
"(B) The terms 'appraised value of the property', 'value of
the property', and 'value' include the appraised value of a dwell-
ing unit in a cooperative housing project of the type described in
subparagraph (A) where the purchase of the stock or member-
ship involved will entitle the purchaser to the permanent occu-
pancy of that unit; and the term 'property' includes a dwelling
unit in such a cooperative project.
"(C) The term 'mortgagor' includes a person or persons giv-
ing a first lien (of the type describe in subparagraph (A)) to
secure a loan to finance the purchase of stock or membership in a
cooperative housing corporation."
(c) Section 10(b) of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act (12 U.S.C.
1430(b)), as amended, is amended by striking the dollar figure
"$40,000" and inserting in lieu thereof "$55,000 (except that with
respect to dwellings in Alaska, Guam, and Hawaii the foregoing
limitation may, by regulation of the Board, be increased by not to
exceed 50 per centum) "
(d) Section 5(c) of the Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933 (12 U.S.C.
1464 as amended, is amended by adding in the nineteenth para-
graph thereof after the phrase "section 401 (d) the following phrase:
"or section 408(a)".
(e) Section 5 of Public Law 93-387 is amended to read "The Coun-
cil shall report to the President, and through him to the Congress, on a
quarterly basis and not later than thirty days after the close of each
calendar quarter, concerning its activities, findings, and recommenda-
tions with respect to the containment of inflation and the maintenance
of a vigorous and prosperous peacetime economy.".
S. 3979-5
FEDERAL RESERVE ACT AMENDMENT
SEC. 5. Section 10(b) of the Federal Reserve Act is amended by add-
ing the following at the end thereof:
"Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Federal Reserve bank, under
rules and regulations prescribed by the Board of Governors of the Fed-
eral Reserve System, may make advances to any member bank on its
time notes having such maturities as the Board may prescribe and
which are secured by mortgage loans covering a one-to-four family
residence. Such advances shall bear interest at a rate equal to the lowest
discount rate in effect at such Federal Reserve bank on the date of such
note.".
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE
OCTOBER 18, 1974
UNTIL 10:30 AM, EDT
Office of the White House Press Secretary
THE WHITE HOUSE
THE EMERGENCY HOME PURCHASE ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1974 (S. 3979)
FACT SHEET
President Ford today signed into law the Emergency Home Purchase
Assistance Act of 1974. The President had urged enactment of similar
legislation in his address to a Joint Session of Congress on October 8th.
The Act extends, on a temporary basis, the advantages offered by the
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA or Ginnie Mae) to
mortgages which are not Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insured
or Veterans Administration (VA) guaranteed -- so called "conventional"
mortgages. Three billion dollars an amount sufficient to finance
about 100, 000 new homes -- would be available. The proposed program
will be in addition to the $9. 9 billion FHA/VA tandem programs announced
in January and May and the $3 billion Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (FHLMC) conventional mortgage purchase program announced
in May.
GNMA has aided in creating a supply of credit for mortgages on new homes
insured by FHA or guaranteed by VA by
-- assuring, through commitments in advance, purchase of
mortgages at a pre-determined price.
-- having agreed to a lower-than-market interest rate on the
mortgage at the time such commitment to purchase is made,
subsidizing market interest rates in the event market interest
rates do not fall by the time GNMA purchases the mortgage
pursuant to its commitment.
guaranteeing, on a "full faith and credit basis, obligations
secured by such mortgages.
BACKGROUND - HOUS ING INDUSTRY SITUATION CRITICAL
Over the past 23 months
-- housing starts have dropped from 2. 51 million units to 1. 12
million units.
unemployment in the construction industry is 12. 4 percent
and climbing, with over a half million construction workers
now unemployed.
-- many homebuilders are in severe financial difficulty.
FEATURES OF THE EMERGENCY HOME PUR CHASE ASSISTANCE ACT
OF 1974
By making conventional mortgages eligible for purchase by GNMA, builders
and homebuyers will be assisted where home mortgage credit is scarce or
non-existent.
MORE
-2-
1. Level of Commitments. Aggregate amount of commitments and mort-
gages which GNMA could hold at any time, i.e. have purchased and not
resold, could not exceed $7. 75 billion. Initial programs aggregating
$3 billion of mortgage commitments, or enough to finance about 100, 000
new homes, is contemplated. Any additional programs will be activated
as circumstances require.
2. Mortgage Amounts, Interest Rates, Fees and Downpayment Require-
ments. The program would provide for a maximum mortgage amount of
$42,000. Under the formula provided by the law, the mortgage interest
rate will be determined on the basis of yields on six to twelve year Treasury
issues for the monthpreceeding the month in which the GNMA commitments
is made plus one-half of one percent (50 basis points). Under this formula,
the mortgage rate for commitments made in October would be somewhat
above, the rate offered on GNMA tandem programs for FHA/VA mortgages -
presently 8-3/4%. Twenty percent downpayments would be required with
an exception for down to 5% downpayments if the additional mortgage
amount is covered by a qualified private mortgage insurance contract so
as to minimize cost of mortgagor defaults. There will also be a com-
mitment fee and other fees to cover reserves for losses and certain
financing costs.
3. GNMA Disposition of Conventional Mortgages. Following the precedent
of existing law, GNMA could, depending upon market or other factors, sell
mortgages to the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) or
FHLMC, sell mortgages with a provision for pooling by FNMA or FHLMC
or other approved issuers and sale by such issuers of GNMA-guaranteed
"pass through" securities or bond type securities on the market or to the
Federal Financing Bank; or issue its own mortgage backed securities for
sale to the Federal Financing Bank.
4. Cost and Budget Implications. Any resulting subsidy would be paid
out of corporate funds and ultimately from Treasury borrowing. Dollar
amount of mortgages purchased would not be excluded from budget outlays,
but would appear as outlays in any fiscal year only to the extent they are
not offset by sales that year. However, any losses on resale -- which
can result if market yields at the time of resale are less than the yield
at which GNMA bought the mortgage, will appear as outlays.
#
#
#
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
OCTOBER 18, 1974
OFFICE OF THE WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY
THE WHITE HOUSE
REMARKS OF THE PRESIDENT
AT THE
SIGNING OF S. 3979
THE EMERGENCY HOME PURCHASE
ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1974
THE CABINET ROOM
10:36 A.M. EDT
Let me at the outset express my appreciation
to the Congress for responding so quickly, and I think
basically so well, in passing this housing legislation,
which is needed for an industry that is in serious
trouble.
We cannot tolerate a building program at the
present rate for home building. And this legislation,
which the Congress has passed, will materially help,
in my judgment, in turning the corner as far as the
housing industry is concerned.
It is not new, and other things have to be
done, but it will provide a shot in the arm for the
housing industry. I regret, of course, that it didn't
include condominiums and apartments, but be that as
it may, it is good legislation. We will make it work.
I wish there was a little more flexibility in
one or two of the provisions, but nevertheless,
considering the time factor, I compliment the Congress
for moving so quickly and particularly Senator Cranston
and Senator Brooke, who were instrumental in the first
instance, but I think the credit goes to the Congress
as a whole in moving ahead so rapidly at a time when
the housing industry needed help.
So, it is a privilege and a pleasure for me to
sign this bill in the presence of a number of Members
who had a very major factor in making this possible.
I do thank you all very, very much. As I said,
we are going to move ahead, I hope, in some other
areas, and we will get a lot more homes built.
Thank you all for being here.
MORE
Page 2
I should have said the Secretary is going to
start implementing, I think, this next Tuesday. I do
want to compliment the Secretary, who I think worked
with the Congress and did a fine job in moving with
the Congress and getting it through, and now he is
going to make it work.
Thank you.
END
(AT 10:40 A.M. EDT)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 18, 1974
Office of the White House Press Secretary
THE WHITE HOUSE
STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT
It is with great pleasure today that I am signing into law S. 3979, the
Emergency Home Purchase Assistance Act of 1974.
In my remarks to the Joint Session of the Congress on October 8, I
urged the Congress to enact, before recess, additional legislation
to make most home mortgages eligible for purchase by an agency of
the Federal Government. I also remarked that I remembered how
much Congress can get done when it wants to.
I am most pleased that exactly one week after my remarks, the Congress
responded with passage of the Emergency Home Purchase Assistance Act of 1974.
This bill authorizes the Government National Mortgage Association in
the Department of Housing and Urban Development to make commitments
at predetermined interest rates to purchase mortgages, both on new
and existing homes, which are not Federal Housing Administration
insured or Veterans Administration guaranteed -- the so-called
"conventional" mortgages which comprise about 80% of all mortgages.
The advantage of the plan is that with the GNMA commitment, the
homebuyer, builder and lender have an assured source of financing
at a known, favorable interest rate. The cost to the Government is
limited to the loss which GNMA realizes if its selling price for
a mortgage is less than its original purchase price.
Like most emergency measures, this bill has some minuses.
Notwithstanding the increasing proportion of American families that
choose each year to live in apartments or condominiums, the bill
unfortunately does not cover conventional mortgages for apartment
or condominium projects. Moreover, I had hoped that this help for
the housing industry could be delivered with a minimum inflationary
impact, and I know that the Congress intended the program to be
self-supporting. However, the bill establishes a rigid, illogical
interest ceiling formula that fails to relate interest income to
actual borrowing costs and to cover adequately administrative
costs.
#
#
#
October 17, 1974
Dear Mr. Director:
The following bills were received at the White House on
October 17th:
S.J. Res. 236
S. 2840
H.R. 7768
H.R. 14225
S.J. Res. 250
S. 3007
H.R. 7780
H.R. 14597
S.J. Res. 251
S. 3234
H.R. 11221
H.R. 15148
S. 355
S. 3473
H.R. 11251
H.R. 15427
S. 605
S. 3698
H.R. 11452
H.R. 15540
S. 628
S. 3792
H.R. 11830
H.R. 15643
S. 1411
S. 3838
H.R. 12035
H.R. 16857
S. 1412
S. 3979
H.R. 12281
H.R. 17027
S. 1769
H.R. 6624
H.R. 13561
S. 2348
H.R. 6642
H.R. 13631
Please let the President have reports and recommendations
as to the approval of these bills as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
Robert D. Linder
Chief Executive Clerk
The Honorable Roy L. Ash
Director
Office of Management and Budget
Washington, D. C.
Page data
- Page
- 1
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- document
- Media ID
- ccbf587e4bc5d404
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 1668728
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "1668728",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/1668728",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "1974/10/18 S3979 Emergency Home Purchase Assistance Act of 1974",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/1668728",
"collections": [
"White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files",
"Legislation Case Files"
],
"subjects": [
"Federal aid",
"Housing",
"Legislation"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/28/6687/1668728/content/library/document/0055/1668728.pdf",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/28/6687/1668728/content/library/document/0055/1668728.pdf",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/28/6687/1668728/content/library/document/0055/1668728.pdf",
"imageCount": 1,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "1668728",
"label": "1974/10/18 S3979 Emergency Home Purchase Assistance Act of 1974",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/1668728"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "1668728",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/1668728",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "1974/10/18 S3979 Emergency Home Purchase Assistance Act of 1974",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/1668728",
"collections": [
"White House Records Office: Legislation Case Files",
"Legislation Case Files"
],
"subjects": [
"Federal aid",
"Housing",
"Legislation"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/28/6687/1668728/content/library/document/0055/1668728.pdf",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/28/6687/1668728/content/library/document/0055/1668728.pdf",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/28/6687/1668728/content/library/document/0055/1668728.pdf",
"imageCount": 1,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/1668728",
"naId": 1668728,
"coverageEndDate": {
"logicalDate": "1974-10-31",
"month": 10,
"year": 1974
},
"coverageStartDate": {
"logicalDate": "1974-10-01",
"month": 10,
"year": 1974
},
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 1,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "document",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/28/6687/1668728/content/library/document/0055/1668728.pdf",
"mediaId": "ccbf587e4bc5d404",
"ocrText": "The original documents are located in Box 10, folder \"10/18/74 S3979 Emergency Home\nPurchase Assistance Act of 1974\" of the White House Records Office: Legislation Case\nFiles at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library.\nCopyright Notice\nThe copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of\nphotocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United\nStates of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections.\nWorks prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public\ndomain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to\nremain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid\ncopyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library.\nExact duplicates within this folder were not digitized.\nAPPROVED OCT 18 1974\nDigitized from the White House Records Office: Case Legislation Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library\nACTION\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nWASHINGTON\nOctober 18, 1974\nceremony\nMEMORANDUM FOR\nTHE PRESIDENT\nFROM:\nKEN COLE\nTo\nascheies\nSUBJECT:\nEnrolled Bill S. 3979\nEmergency Home Purchase Assistance\n10/18\nAct of 1974\nAttached for your consideration is Senate bill S. 3979\nwhich increases the availability of reasonably priced\nmortgage credit for housing.\nWe have checked with Secretary Lynn, Roy Ash, the\nCounsel's office (Chapman), Bill Timmons and Paul Theis\nwho recommend approval of the bill and issuance of the\nsigning statement at Tab B.\nRECOMMENDATION\nThat you sign Senate bill S. 3979 (Tab A)\nThat you approve the signing statement (Tab B)\nFORD LIBRARY & GERALD\nEXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT\nOFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20503\nNOV 18 1974\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT\nSubject: Enrolled Bill S. 3979 - Emergency Home Purchase\nAssistance Act of 1974\nSponsors - Sen. Cranston (D) California and\nSen. Brooke (R) Massachusetts\nLast Day for Action\nApproved on October 18, 1974; became Public Law 93-449,\nPurpose\nAuthorizes a new, temporary program to assist the housing\nindustry through purchases of residential mortgages by the\nGovernment National Mortgage Association (GNMA) ; contains\nseveral riders amending other laws.\nAgency Recommendations\nOffice of Management and Budget\nApproval\nDepartment of Housing and Urban\nDevelopment\nApproval\nFederal Home Loan Bank Board\nApproval\nDepartment of the Interior\nApproval\nFederal Reserve Board\nApproval (informally)\nDepartment of the Treasury\nNo objection to\napproval\nVeterans Administration\nNo objection to\napproval\nCouncil of Economic Advisers\nNo objection\nCouncil on Wage and Price Stability\nNo objection to\nSection 4 (e)\nCouncil on Environmental Quality\nDefers to other\nagencies\nGERALE FORD LIBRARY\n2\nDiscussion\nS. 3979 carries out, in substantial measure, a\nrecommendation in your economic message to the Congress\nof October 8, 1974. You urged the Congress to enact\nadditional legislation to make most home mortgages\neligible for purchase by an agency of the Federal Govern-\nment. You indicated that as soon as such legislation was\nsent to you, you would make at least $3 billion immediately\navailable for mortgage purchases, enough to finance about\n100,000 homes.\nS. 3979 was passed unanimously (77-0) by the Senate on\nOctober 10, 1974, and by voice vote in the House on\nOctober 15, 1974. You signed the bill on October 18, 1974,\nand HUD is now implementing it.\nS. 3979 consists essentially of two parts: (1) authoriza-\ntion for a temporary \"tandem plan\" for conventional housing\nand (2) a few amendments to other laws, including two which\ncorrect technical errors in the recently-enacted Housing\nand Community Development Act of 1974.\nMortgage Purchase Authority\nIn August 1971, the Government instituted a \"tandem plan\"\nfor federally insured mortgages to avoid raising the\ninterest rate ceiling on those mortgages while maintaining\nhousing production and sales. Under this plan, HUD (GNMA)\nbuys eligible mortgages at below-market interest rates and\nresells them at the market price. The cost to the Govern-\nment is the subsidy involved, i.e. the loss realized by\nGNMA if it sells the mortgage at less than its original\npurchase price.\nS. 3979 expands this program temporarily by giving HUD\nauthority for one year to direct GNMA to purchase, service,\nsell, or otherwise deal in specified types of conventional\nas well as federally insured mortgages when HUD determines\nthat economic conditions are so seriously adverse as to\nrequire such action to achieve national housing goals. The\nbill limits the total amount of purchases and commitments\nto $7.75 billion outstanding at any one time.\n3\nEligible mortgages include conventional and FHA or VA\ninsured and guaranteed mortgages covering single-family\nhomes (other than conventional condominium or cooperative\nunits), and FHA or VA mortgages covering rental projects,\ncondominiums, or cooperatives and their individual units.\nConventional mortgages can have a loan-to-value ratio\nexceeding 80 percent only if they are privately insured,\nThe maximum mortgage amount is set at $42,000 per family\nresidence or dwelling unit ($55,000 in Alaska, Hawaii\nand Guam).\nMortgages covering housing constructed more than 12 months\nprior to enactment of S. 3979 may be purchased in areas\nwhere HUD determines that there is a serious shortage of\nmortgage credit to purchase such housing.\nAs introduced, the bill would have given HUD discretion\nto set the interest rate on mortgages purchased by GNMA\nwithout any maximum limits. It provided that such mortgages\ninvolve \"an interest rate not in excess of the rate\ndetermined by the Secretary to be necessary to reimburse\nthe fund for its expenses under this section.\" (The\nSecretary has such discretion under the earlier tandem plan\nfor federally-insured mortgages.)\nAs enacted, however, a floor amendment by Senator Proxmire\nwas included under which the maximum interest rates in\nmortgages purchased by GNMA could not \"exceed a rate equal\nto the average yield during the month preceding the month\nin which a commitment to purchase such mortgage was issued\non all marketable bonds of the United States maturing more\nthan six but less than twelve years from the date of such\ncommitment (exclusive of bonds with a coupon rate of less\nthan 6 percent) plus one-half of 1 percent, adjusted upward\nto the nearest one-eighth of 1 percent.\"\nA further provision would direct HUD in fixing interest\nrates to take account of State usury limits, and would\nprovide for a limited override of certain State usury laws\nto the extent they apply or have been interpreted so that\ndiscounts or points are counted in calculating the allowable\nmaximum rate.\n4\nTo provide funds for its mortgage purchases, GNMA could\nissue its obligations to the Secretary of the Treasury.\nThe Secretary would determine the interest rate of the\nobligations and GNMA would determine the maturity and\nredemption conditions. GNMA would be authorized to\nguarantee and issue securities based on pools of mortgages\npurchased under the program, and could offer and sell\nsecurities to the Federal Financing Bank and any Federal\nReserve Bank. Prices of mortgages sold by GNMA are\nauthorized to be at levels which, to the extent feasible,\nmake the operation fully self-supporting.\nAgency comments\nHUD, in its attached views letter on the enrolled bill,\nnotes that several important desirable changes were\nincorporated in the enacted version of S. 3979, which were\nurged by the Administration. HUD indicates, however, that\nthere are two undesirable aspects of the bill.\nFirst, the exclusion of conventional mortgages covering\nmulti-family projects and individual condominium units\nwill limit substantially the degree of support that can\nbe given to lower-priced housing.\nSecond, the Proxmire amendment fixing mortgage interest\nrates according to specified Treasury borrowing rates could,\nin HUD!s view, \"require payment of substantial differential\npayments to the extent that mortgages cannot be purchased\nand held pending a decline in general mortgage rates but\nmust be sold in the interim at below market rates. These\nproblems, moreover, may be accentuated in coming months if,\nas seems most likely, the Treasury rates upon which mortgage\ninterest rates are made to depend decline more rapidly than\nthe market generally.\nNevertheless, HUD believes the difficulties of the interest\nrate provision can be minimized if (1) the commitment\nauthority provided in the bill is used quickly, while the\nformula interest rate is relatively high, (2) commitment\nfees are used to offset some initial processing costs, and\n(3) the bill is interpreted to permit mortgages to be\npurchased at a discount, with certain safeguards, thereby\nincreasing the effective yield of mortgages to the\nGovernment.\n5\nTreasury also considers the Proxmire amendment as undesirable\nsince, in its view, this provision would lead to excessive\npoints to provide an appropriate yield level and would\nincrease subsidies to mortgage borrowers when the need is\ndeclining, since Treasury yields typically decline faster\nthan mortgage rates. Treasury believes this could lead to\ngreater demand under the earlier tandem plan in which HUD\nhas total discretion in setting the interest rate as well\nas under the new purchase authority.\nMiscellaneous Amendments to Other Laws\nThese include:\n-- requiring the Council on Wage and Price Stability\nto report through the President to the Congress on a quarterly\nbasis not later than 30 days after the close of each calendar\nquarter concerning the Council's activities, findings and\nrecommendations with respect to inflation and the economy,\nThe Council states that this requirement will add to its\nworkload, but has no objection to this provision.\n-- amending the National Housing Act to add provisions\nagreed to in conference but inadvertently overlooked in\npreparing the conference report on the Housing and Community\nDevelopment Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-383), including authorizing\nthe Secretary to make loans to finance the preservation of\nhistoric structures and to insure under section 203 of the\nNational Housing Act the amount needed to finance the\npurchase of shares in a cooperative.\n-- amending the Federal Home Loan Bank Act to increase\nfrom $40,000 to $55,000 the limit on a home mortgage\nacceptable as collateral security for an advance by a\nFederal Home Loan Bank, thereby conforming this Act to a\nsimilar change in the Home Owners' Loan Act contained in\nP.L. 93-383.\n-- giving Federal savings and loan associations the\npower to act as trustees for the new individual retirement\naccounts authorized by the Pension Reform Act of 1974,\nP.L. 93-406.\n-- authorizing the Federal Reserve Board to make advances\nto member banks on the security of residential mortgages,\nbearing an interest rate equal to the lowest discount rate\nin effect at the member bank.\n6\n*****\nIn your signing statement on S. 3979, you concluded,\n\"Like most emergency measures, this bill has some\nminuses. Notwithstanding the increasing proportion\nof American families that choose each year to live\nin apartments or condominiums, the bill unfortunately\ndoes not cover conventional mortgages for apartment\nor condominium projects. Moreover, I had hoped that\nthis help for the housing industry could be delivered\nwith a minimum inflationary impact, and I know that\nthe Congress intended the program to be\nself-supporting. However, the bill establishes a\nrigid, illogical interest ceiling formula that fails\nto relate interest income to actual borrowing costs\nand to cover adequately administrative costs.\"\nWe believe the scope and operation of this program should\nbe carefully monitored.\nWeefred H Rounnel\nAssistant Director for\nLegislative Reference\nEnclosures\nDEPARTMENT\nOF\nU.S.\nHOUSING\n*\n*\nTHE GENERAL COUNSEL OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT\nAND\nWASHINGTON, D. C. 20410\nURBAN\nOctober 17, 1974\nMr. Wilfred H. Rommel\nAssistant Director\nfor Legislative Reference\nOffice of Management and Budget\nWashington, D. C. 20503\nAttention: Mrs. Garziglia\nDear Mr. Rommel:\nSubject: S. 3979, 93d Congress\nEnrolled Enactment\nThis is in response to your request for our views on the\nenrolled enactment of S. 3979, the proposed \"Emergency\nHome Purchase Assistance Act of 1974.' \"\nS. 3979 consists essentially of two parts: authorization\nfor a new, temporary program to assist the housing industry\nthrough the Government National Mortgage Association\npurchases of residential mortgages; and a series of amend-\nments to other laws which are summarized in an attachment\nto this report. Of the latter amendments, the first two\nundertake to correct technical errors in the Housing and\nCommunity Development Act of 1974. The other amendments\nrelate to laws administered by other agencies. All were\nconsidered largely non-controversial by the initiating\nSenate committee, and this Department has no objection to\nany of the amendments. Our comments are, accordingly, con-\nfined to the GNMA mortgage purchase program contemplated\nby the bill.\nThis program would be initiated by the Secretary of Housing\nand Urban Development when he makes a finding that inflation-\nary conditions and related governmental action are having a\n\"seriously\" disproportionate effect on the housing industry\nand that the resulting reduction in home acquisition or con-\nstruction threatens \"seriously\" to affect the economy and\ndelay orderly achievement of national housing goals. The\n2\nSecretary would then direct the Governmental National Mortgage\nAssociation to begin purchasing mortgages and making commit-\nments to purchase mortgages. Eligible mortgages would include\nconventional, FHA and VA mortgages covering single-family\nhomes (apparently other than conventional condominium or\ncooperative units), and FHA or VA mortgages covering rental\nprojects, condominiums or cooperatives and their individual units.\nConventional mortgages could have a loan-to-value ratio ex-\nceeding 80 percent only if they were privately insured. The\nmaximum mortgage amount would be $42,000 per family residence\nor dwelling unit (or $55,000 in Alaska, Hawaii and Guam).\nUnder the bill, maximum interest rates or yields in mortgages\npurchased by GNMA would be established by the Secretary, but\ninterest rates could not exceed a rate calculated according\nto a specified formula based on certain Treasury borrowing\ncosts. Under this formula, the maximum interest rate for any\nmortgage would be fixed at the time of commitment to purchase\nand could not exceed the yield during the preceding month on\nmarketable Treasury issues maturing in more than six but less\nthan twelve years from the date of commitment, plus one-half\nof one percentum (adjusted upward to the nearest one-eighth\nof one percent). A further provision would direct the\nSecretary in fixing interest rates to take account of State\nusury limits, and provides for a limited override of certain\nState usury laws to the extent they apply or have been\ninterpreted so that discounts or points are counted in calcu-\nlating the allowable maximum rate. In effect, this provision\ncontemplates that the face rate of the mortgage would not\nexceed the usury rate, but the mortgage could be originated\nwith points and GNMA could purchase the mortgage at a discount\nwithout impairing the legality of the transaction, regardless\nof the way in which the State usury law had been applied to\nsuch discounts.\nS. 3979 would permit a program limited to the purchase of\nmortgages covering newly constructed homes, although it would\nalso authorize the Secretary to make available a portion of\nhis authority for purchase of mortgages financing purchases\n1386 LIBRARY QERALD\n3\nof existing housing in areas where he determines there is a\nserious shortage of mortgage credit for such purchases.\nOther provisions of S. 3979 would authorize GNMA to guarantee\nand to issue, securities based on pools of mortgages pur-\nchased under the program and would specifically authorize\nthe purchase of such guaranteed securities by the Federal\nFinancing Bank and any Federal Reserve Bank.\nThe total amount of mortgages and commitments under the\nprogram could not exceed $7.75 billion outstanding at any\none time. The program would terminate one year after\nenactment.\nS. 3979 would, in substantial measure, carry out the\nPresident's recommendation for additional legislation to\nmake most home mortgages eligible for purchase by GNMA.\nThe bill, in this respect, departs in a variety of ways\nfrom earlier versions of the legislation so as to include\nfeatures which were urged by the Administration and which\nwe consider to be important. Among these features are the\nfollowing:\n-- limits on individual mortgages that can be purchased\nare based on mortgage amount, not home price, and\nare subject to a realistic, easily administered,\n$42,000 basic maximum;\n-- there is no earmarking or mandating of authority\nfor mortgages covering existing housing, thus allow-\ning the program to be concentrated completely or to\nwhatever extent may be deemed appropriate on new\nconstruction where problems have been most critical;\n-- there is no provision prohibiting the sale of\nmortgages at less than par, with the result that\nprogram disposition activities may be undertaken\nin advance of a decline in mortgage interest rates\nand may be managed in a way that takes account of\ncurrent market conditions;\n-- there are provisions that would facilitate funding\nand disposition through expansion of GNMA authority\n4\nto guarantee mortgage backed securities, as well\nas new authority for GNMA issues of such securities\nwhich could be sold to the Federal Financing Bank\nin a manner that could minimize the effect of\noperations on the budget.\n-- the program is authorized on a temporary, interim\nbasis only, with all authority to enter into new\ncommitments lapsing at the end of one year.\nDespite the above features, there are several aspects of the\nbill that are regrettable. One is the apparent exclusion of\nconventional mortgages covering not only multifamily projects\nbut also -- more importantly -- individual condominium units.\nThis will substantially limit the degree of support that can\nbe given to the provision of housing within the lower price\nranges.\nA second undesirable feature relates to the formula fixing\nmortgage interest rates according to specified Treasury\nborrowing rates. This provision was adopted on the Senate\nfloor. According to current Treasury calculations, it would\nresult in interest rates that are substantially above the\n8-1/4 percent rate cited by proponents in the Senate floor\ndebate -- 9 percent for October commitments, and approxi-\nmately 8-5/8 percent in November assuming that current yields\non the particular Treasury issues remain at their current\nlevels through the 20th of this month.\nNevertheless, even the higher rate would not fully compensate\nthe Government for potential administrative costs -- as much\nas 100 basis points -- or for the risks necessarily involved\nin a program of this kind. Further, the statutory rate could\nrequire payment of substantial differential payments to the\nextent that mortgages cannot be purchased and held pending a\ndecline in general mortgage interest rates but must be sold\nin the interim at below market rates. These problems, more-\nover, may be accentuated in coming months if, as seems most\nlikely, the Treasury rates upon which mortgage interest rates\nare made to depend decline more rapidly than mortgage interest\nrates in the market generally.\n5\nTo some extent, the difficulties of the interest rate\nprovision can be minimized if the commitment authority\nprovided in the bill is used quickly -- especially this\nmonth -- while the formula interest rate is still relatively\nhigh. Some relief against the impact of the provision can\nalso be obtained through commitment fees offsetting some\ninitial processing costs. These fees will not cover other\ncosts -- such as those involved in establishing reserves\nagainst loss, obtaining financing through the Federal\nFinancing Bank, and mortgage servicing. However, to the\nextent that these other costs cannot be met through the\none-half of one percent allowance provided in the formula,\nthe effective yield of mortgages to the Government can be\nincreased by interpreting the bill to permit mortgages to\nbe purchased at a discount. Nothing in the legislation\nprohibits purchases on this basis and in fact the usury\nprovision appears specifically to contemplate discounts.\nWe do not believe that purchases involving discounts would\nbe violative of any legislative intent of assisting home\nbuyers to receive lower interest rates so long as the\namount of the discount is held to what is needed to cover\ncosts and steps are taken to require that sellers pay\n\"points\" represented by discount purchases in a manner\nsimilar to the FHA program.\nWe believe that a balancing of the above considerations\npoints to early Presidential approval of the enrolled bill.\nGiven such approval, it would be possible to move quickly\nto commit the authority the President has recommended for\nassistance to the seriously depressed housing industry using\ncurrent maximum permissible mortgage interest rates under\nthe bill. Decisions on the future scope and operation of\nthe program, and on the possible desirability of recommending\namendments, could be made later in light of current market\nconditions and any problems experienced or anticipated in\nadministration.\nSincerely,\nRobert RElliott\nRobert R. Elliott\nAttachment\nMiscellaneous Amendments to Other Laws Contained in the\nEmergency Home Purchase Assistance Act of 1974\n1. Section 4 (a) would authorize the Secretary to make loans\nof up to $15,000 per unit and with a maximum maturity of\n15 years and 32 days to finance the preservation of historic\nstructures. This provision, which was contained in the Senate\nbut not the House passed version of S. 3066, was agreed to in\nconference but overlooked in the preparation of the reported\nbill.\n2. Section 4 (b) would authorize the Secretary to insure,\nunder section 203 of the National Housing Act, the amount\nneeded to finance the purchase of shares in a cooperative.\nThis provision, which was in both the Senate and House passed\nversions of S. 3066, was inadvertently omitted from the bill\nas reported by the Conferees.\n3. Section 4 (c) of the bill would raise the limit on a home\nmortgage acceptable as collateral security for an advance by\na Federal Home Loan Bank from $40,000 to $55,000. It would\nalso add language permitting this limit to be increased by\n50% in Alaska, Guam and Hawaii. This conforms to change involving\nthe Home Owners' Loan Act made by HUD's 1974 law.\n4. Section 4 (d) would give Federal Savings and Loan Associations\nthe power to act as trustees for the new individual retirement\naccounts authorized by the Pension Reform Act of 1974.\n5. Section 4 (e) would amend the new Council on Wage and Price\nStability Act to require the Council to report to the President\non its activities on a quarterly basis and not later than 30 days\nafter the close of each calendar year. Prior to amendment the\nCouncil was required to report \"from time to time.\"\n6. Section 5 would authorize the Federal Reserve Board to make\nadvances to member banks on the security of residential mortgages.\nAt present banks offering mortgages as collateral for an advance\nfrom a Federal Reserve Bank are charged a penalty of one-half of one\npercent because such mortgages are not classified as eligible paper\nand any advances made are limited to four months. The amendment\nwould remove both of these impediments.\nHOME LOAN BANK\nFEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20552\nGREAT => GROUP\nFEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK SYSTEM\n101 INDIANA AVENUE, N.W.\nFEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN\nINSURANCE CORPORATION\nFEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN SYSTEM\nOFFICE OF THE\nGENERAL COUNSEL\nOctober 17, 1974\nMr. Wilfred H. Rommel\nAssistant Director for\nLegislative Reference\nOffice of Management and Budget\nWashington, D.C. 20503\nDear Mr. Rommel:\nHAND DELIVER\nThis is in response to your request for a report of the Board's\nviews on the enrolled bill, S. 3979, the \"Emergency Home Purchase\nAssistance Act of 1974. 11 The bill would authorize the Government\nNational Mortgage Association to purchase certain residential mort-\ngage loans when the Secretary of HUD finds that conditions require\nsuch special assistance. The bill was pending in the Senate when the\nPresident delivered his economic message to Congress, and he referred\nto it favorably.\nSection 4 of the bill makes certain miscellaneous amendments,\nincluding conforming amendments to the Federal Home Loan Bank Act\nand the Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933 made necessary by provisions\nof recently enacted legislation. The Housing and Community Develop-\nment Act of 1974 (P. L. 93-383 § 703) authorized Federal savings and\nloan associations to make mortgage loans up to \"$55, 000 (except that\nwith respect to dwellings in Alaska, Guam, and Hawaii the foregoing\nlimitation may, by regulation of the Board be increased by not to ex-\nceed 50%)\". Section 4(c) of S. 3979 makes a parallel amendment to the\nprovision of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act setting the maximum\nmortgage amount for purposes of determining whether a mortgage is\neligible as collateral for an advance (loan) from a Federal Home Loan\nBank to a member institution. The Employee Retirement Income\nSecurity Act of 1974 (P. L. 93-406 § 2002) provided for special tax\ntreatment of \"individual retirement accounts\" maintained in banks or\nsavings and loan associations. Section 4(d) of S. 3979 gives Federal\nsavings and loan associations the corporate power to offer such accounts.\nThe Board supports enactment of the bill.\nSincerely,\nCharles E. Allen\nfor\nGeneral Counsel\nOF THE INTERIOR\nUnited States Department of the Interior\nOFFICE OF THE SECRETARY\nMarch\n1849\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20240\nOCT 18 1974\nDear Mr. Ash:\nThis responds to your request for our views on the enrolled bill\nS. 3979, \"To increase on an emergency basis the availability of\nreasonably priced mortgage credit for housing.\"\nWe recommend that the President approve the enrolled bill.\nS. 3979 would help supply mortgage credit through Government resources\nby amending the charter act of the Government National Mortgage\nAssociation (hereinafter the GNMA) to allow purchase of conventionally\nfinanced mortages. If the Secretary of the Department of Housing and\nUrban Development determines that a substantial number of families are\nunable to obtain mortgage credit at reasonable rates and that such\ncircumstance is causing a substantial reduction in home construction\nand acquisition, then he may direct the GNMA to purchase mortgages\nunder the conditions set forth in the bill. Money to finance the\npurchase of mortgages would be obtained from a housing trust fund\nto be established in GNMA. The trust fund would be financed by\nborrowings of up to $10 billion dollars per year from the Secretary\nof the Treasury.\nThe sections of S. 3979 that impact upon programs which are the re-\nsponsibility of this Department are: 3(a), 4(a)(1) and (2), and 4(c).\nSection 3(a) amends Title III of the National Housing Act and adds\na new Section entitled the \"Housing Trust Fund\" as section 313 of\nthat Act. It sets forth the conditions under which the GNMA may\nmake commitments to purchase and purchase mortgages, one of which\nis that such mortgage must involve an original principal obligation\nnot to exceed $42,000 per family residence or dwelling unit, except\nthat the original principal obligation may not exceed $55,000 in\nthe case of properties in Alaska, Hawaii and Guam. The higher\nceiling for Guam, as well as for Hawaii and Alaska, takes into\naccount housing costs in these places which have always been higher\nthan on the mainland.\nSections (4)(a)(1)and (2) would authorize the Secretary of HUD to\nmake home improvement loans to finance the preservation of historic\nstructures.\nCONSERVE\nAMERICA'S\nENERGY\nSave Energy and You Serve America!\nFor purposes of the bill, the term \"historic structure\" means\nresidential structures registered in the National Register of\nHistoric Places or certified by the Secretary of the Interior\nto conform to National Register criteria. The term \"preservation\"\nmeans restoration or rehabilitation undertaken for such purposes\nas are approved by the Secretary of HUD in regulations issued by him,\nafter consulting with the Secretary of the Interior.\nThe terms of the loan for this preservation are: $15,000 maximum\nper unit and a maturity not to exceed 15 years and 32 days.\nPreservation of the nation's architectural and historic heritage\nwas one of the goals set forth in the President's 1971 Message on the\nEnvironment. The President noted the continued loss of buildings\nof historic value as recorded by the Historic American Building\nSurvey. One cause was the unwillingness of lending institutions\nto loan funds for the restoration and rehabilitation of historic\nbuildings because of the age and often the location of such\nbuildings. One of the President's legislative proposals was\nfor Federal insurance of home improvement loans for historic\nresidential properties to a maximum of $15,000 per dwelling unit.\nSections (a) (1) and (2) will reduce the reliance upon Federal grants\nfor this type of preservation. A Federal grant may require as one\nof its conditions that the property be open to the public. Many of\nthese historic sites are privately owned and residential, and, thus,\ndo not meet this condition. S. 3979 will resolve this problem\nthrough its insured loan provision.\nSection 4 (c) would make a change in the Federal Home Loan Bank Act\nwith respect to the maximum loan amount for eligible mortgages.\nThe maximum is raised to $55,000, except that with respect to\ndwellings in Alaska, Hawaii and Guam, the limitation may be increased\nto up to 50% of that figure. This recognizes the higher housing\ncosts: in these areas, and is similar to the higher ceiling in\nSection 3(a).\nSincerely yours,\nAssistant\nSecretary of the Interior\nHonorable Roy L. Ash\nDirector\nOffice of Management and Budget\nWashington, D.C. 20503\n2\nOF\nTHE TREASURY THE\nTHE GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE TREASURY\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20220\n1789\nOCT 21 1974\nDirector, Office of Management and Budget\nExecutive Office of the President\nWashington, D. C. 20503\nAttention: Assistant Director for Legislative\nReference\nSir:\nReference is made to your request for the views of this\nDepartment on the enrolled enactment of S. 3979, \"To increase\non an emergency basis the availability of reasonably priced\nmortgage credit for housing.\"\nThe enrolled enactment would authorize GNMA to purchase up\nto $7-3/4 billion, outstanding at any one time, of FHA, VA, and\nconventional mortgages. The limitation on the amount is not\nsignificant since sales would restore the authorization. The\nSecretary of HUD, however, would have discretion with respect to\nthe rate at which new commitments would be made.\nThe bill was amended on the Senate floor (the so-called\nProxmire amendment) to establish the maximum rate on such mortgages\nby adding 1/2 of 1 percent to the yield during the preceding month\non bonds of the United States maturing in more than 6 but less\nthan 12 years. We consider this an undesirable amendment, since\nit would produce an unrealistic mortgage rate ceiling leading to\nexcessive \"points\" to provide an appropriate yield level. In\naddition, it poses problems with respect to the regular Tandem Plan\nunder which the Secretary of HUD has total discretion in setting\nthe mortgage rate.\nIn addition, with declining rates of interest, since Treasury\nyields typically decline faster than mortgage rates, the effect\nwould be to increase subsidies to mortgage borrowers as the need\nfor such subsidies declined. Thus the effect could be to lead to\ngreater demand under the present Tandem Plan as well as the new\npurchase plan proposed in the bill.\n-2-\nThe President has approved the enrolled enactment. In view\nof the current conditions in the home building industry, and the\n1 year expiration date of the proposed mortgage purchase program,\nthe Department has no objection to the approval of the legislation.\nSincerely yours,\nGeneral Counsel\n1415 in FORD LIBRAR\nNOMINTS AUOV\nVETERANS ADMINISTRATION\nOFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS AFFAIRS\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20420\n1030\nOctober 18, 1974\nThe Honorable\nRoy L. Ash\nDirector, Office of Management\nand Budget\nWashington, D. C. 20503\nDear Mr. Ash:\nThis will reply to the request of the Assistant\nDirector for Legislative Reference for comments on the\nenrolled enactment of S. 3979, 93d Congress, the \"Emergency\nHome Purchase Assistance Act of 1974.\"\nIn general, the bill is intended to remedy the\nCongressional finding of the unavailability of residential\nmortgage credit and to provide an alternate source of such\ncredit at favorable interest rates geared to the yield on\nGovernment securities.\nSection 3 of the bill creates a new section 313\nof The National Housing Act to provide the Government\nNational Mortgage Association with new authority to make\ncommitments and purchase mortgages. Whenever the Secretary\nof Housing and Urban Development finds that inflationary\nconditions and related government actions are having a\ndisproportionate adverse effect upon the housing industry\nand therefore threaten the economy, the Secretary shall\ndirect GNMA to issue commitments and purchase mortgages\npursuant to the provisions of the bill.\nSubsection (b) of the new section 3 provides that\nthe mortgages to be purchased by GNMA under this bill are\nto include more than four-family residences (including\ncooperatives and condominiums, and individual units therein)\nas well as one-to four-family residences insured or guaranteed\nunder chapter 37 of title 38 of the United States Code.\nTo the extent that section 3 of the bill may make\navailable more money, at reasonable interest rates, for\nveterans purchasing housing, we believe it is in their best\ninterest and we, therefore, support the bill, in principle.\nHowever, since the enactment more directly relates to activi-\nties and responsibilities of the Department of Housing and\nUrban Development and the Treasury Department, we defer to\ntheir views on the specific provisions of this section.\nOther provisions of the enrolled enactment would\namend various laws administered by other agencies which have\nno effect upon the Veterans Administration. We offer no\ncomment thereon.\nThe Veterans Administration has no objection to\napproval of this measure by the President.\nSincerely,\nResCondebush RICHARD L. ROUDEBUSH\nAdministrator\n2\nTHE CHAIRMAN OF THE\nCOUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS\nWASHINGTON\nNovember 1, 1974\nDear Mr. Rommel:\nThis is in response to your request for the\nviews of the Council of Economic Advisers on S. 3979,\nan Act \"To increase on an emergency basis the avail-\nability of reasonably priced mortgage credit for\nhousing.\"\nWe favor the purpose of the temporary pro-\nvisions in this act to increase funds available for\nmortgages during the current crisis.\nThere are provisions in the bill that we find\nobjectionable including the level of subsidy occasioned\nby charging only 50 basis points above the applicable\nTreasury bond rate and the provision permitting the\nFederal Reserve Banks to loan money to banks using\nmortgages as collateral at the lowest possible discount\nrate.\nDespite these reservations, however, the\nalternatives are such that we have no objection to the\nbill.\nSincerely yours,\nAlan Greenspan\nMr. Wilfred H. Rommel\nAssistant Director for Legislative Reference\nOffice of Management and Budget\nWashington, D.C. 20503\nANERIICAN REVOLUTION WIDENTENNAY\nGERALD FORD LIBRART\n1776-1976\nEXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT\nCOUNCIL ON WAGE AND PRICE STABILITY\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20503\nOctober 18, 1974\nMr. W. H. Rommel\nAssistant Director for\nLegislative Reference\nOffice of Management\nand Budget\nWashington, D. C. 20503\nDear Mr. Rommel:\nThis is in response to your request for our views and recommend-\nations with respect to the enrolled bill S.3979, the \"Emergency Home\nPurchase Assistance Act of 1974.\"\nThe primary purpose of S.3979 is to provide a new source of\nresidential mortgage credit on an emergency basis. We would defer to\nthe views and recommendations of the Secretary of Housing and Urban\nDevelopment and the Secretary of the Treasury with respect to the\nprovisions of S.3979 relating to this purpose.\nS.3979, however, would also amend Public Law 92-387 which would\ndirectly affect the Council on Wage and Price Stability. Section 4(e)\nof S.3979 would amend section 5 of P. L. 93-387 to require that the\nCouncil on Wage and Price Stability report to the President, and through\nhim to the Congress, on a quarterly basis concerning its \"activities,\nfindings, and recommendations with respect to the containment of inflation\nand the maintenance of a vigorous and prosperous peacetime economy.\"\nThese quarterly reports would have to be made not later than thirty days\nafter the close of each calendar quarter. P. L. 93-387 requires only\nthat the Council report to the President and the Congress from time to\ntime on its activities.\nWhile the requirement to prepare quarterly reports will add to the\nCouncil's workload, we do not believe it will create any serious problem.\nTherefore, we have no objection to section 4(e) of S.3979.\nSincerely,\narbut Rees\nAlbert Rees\nDirector\nEXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT\nCOUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY\n722 JACKSON PLACE, N. W.\nWASHINGTON, D. C. 20006\nOctober 25, 1974\nMEMORANDUM FOR WILFRED H. ROMMEL, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR\nFOR LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE\nOFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET\nATTENTION: Mrs. Garziglia\nSUBJECT:\nS. 3979 - Enrolled To increase on an\nemergency basis the availability of\nreasonably priced mortgage credit for\nhousing\nThis office will defer to the views of other agencies\nmore directly affected by this legislation.\nGary Gary L. Widman Widman\nGeneral Counsel\nEXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT\nOFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20503\nNOV 18 1974\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT\nSubject: Enrolled Bill S. 3979 - Emergency Home Purchase\nAssistance Act of 1974\nSponsors - Sen. Cranston (D) California and\nSen. Brooke (R) Massachusetts\nLast Day for Action\nApproved on October 18, 1974, became Public Law 93-449.\nPurpose\nAuthorizes a new, temporary program to assist the housing\nindustry through purchases of residential mortgages by the\nGovernment National Mortgage Association (GNMA) , contains\nseveral riders amending other laws.\nAgency Recommendations\nOffice of Management and Budget\nApproval\nDepartment of Housing and Urban\nDevelopment\nApproval\nFederal Home Loan Bank Board\nApproval\nDepartment of the Interior\nApproval\nFederal Reserve Board\nApproval (informally)\nDepartment of the Treasury\nNo objection to\napproval\nVeterans Administration\nNo objection to\napproval\nCouncil of Economic Advisers\nNo objection\nCouncil on Wage and Price Stability\nNo objection to\nSection 4 (e)\nCouncil on Environmental Quality\nDefers to other\nagencies\n2\nDiscussion\nS. 3979 carries out, in substantial measure, a\nrecommendation in your economic message to the Congress\nof October 8, 1974. You urged the Congress to enact\nadditional legislation to make most home mortgages\neligible for purchase by an agency of the Federal Govern-\nment. You indicated that as soon as such legislation was\nsent to you, you would make at least $3 billion immediately\navailable for mortgage purchases, enough to finance about\n100,000 homes.\nS. 3979 was passed unanimously (77-0) by the Senate on\nOctober 10, 1974, and by voice vote in the House on\nOctober 15, 1974. You signed the bill on October 18, 1974,\nand HUD is now implementing it.\nS. 3979 consists essentially of two parts: (1) authoriza-\ntion for a temporary \"tandem plan\" for conventional housing\nand (2) a few amendments to other laws, including two which\ncorrect technical errors in the recently-enacted Housing\nand Community Development Act of 1974.\nMortgage Purchase Authority\nIn August 1971, the Government instituted a \"tandem plan\"\nfor federally insured mortgages to avoid raising the\ninterest rate ceiling on those mortgages while maintaining\nhousing production and sales. Under this plan, HUD (GNMA)\nbuys eligible mortgages at below-market interest rates and\nresells them at the market price. The cost to the Govern-\nment is the subsidy involved, 1.e. the loss realized by\nGNMA if it sells the mortgage at less than its original\npurchase price.\nS. 3979 expands this program temporarily by giving HUD\nauthority for one year to direct GNMA to purchase, service,\nsell, or otherwise deal in specified types of conventional\nas well as federally insured mortgages when HUD determines\nthat economic conditions are so seriously adverse as to\nrequire such action to achieve national housing goals. The\nbill limits the total amount of purchases and commitments\nto $7.75 billion outstanding at any one time.\n3\nEligible mortgages include conventional and FHA or VA\ninsured and guaranteed mortgages covering single-family\nhomes (other than conventional condominium or cooperative\nunits), and FHA or VA mortgages covering rental projects,\ncondominiums, or cooperatives and their individual units.\nConventional mortgages can have a loan-to-value ratio\nexceeding 80 percent only if they are privately insured.\nThe maximum mortgage amount is set at $42,000 per family\nresidence or dwelling unit ($55,000 in Alaska, Hawaii\nand Guam).\nMortgages covering housing constructed more than 12 months\nprior to enactment of S. 3979 may be purchased in areas\nwhere HUD determines that there is a serious shortage of\nmortgage credit to purchase such housing.\nAs introduced, the bill would have given HUD discretion\nto set the interest rate on mortgages purchased by GNMA\nwithout any maximum limits. It provided that such mortgages\ninvolve \"an interest rate not in excess of the rate\ndetermined by the Secretary to be necessary to reimburse\nthe fund for its expenses under this section.\" (The\nSecretary has such discretion under the earlier tandem plan\nfor federally-insured mortgages.)\nAs enacted, however, a floor amendment by Senator Proxmire\nwas included under which the maximum interest rates in\nmortgages purchased by GNMA could not \"exceed a rate equal\nto the average yield during the month preceding the month\nin which a commitment to purchase such mortgage was issued\non all marketable bonds of the United States maturing more\nthan six but less than twelve years from the date of such\ncommitment (exclusive of bonds with a coupon rate of less\nthan 6 percent) plus one-half of 1 percent, adjusted upward\nto the nearest one-eighth of 1 percent.\"\nA further provision would direct HUD in fixing interest\nrates to take account of State usury limits, and would\nprovide for a limited override of certain State usury laws\nto the extent they apply or have been interpreted so that\ndiscounts or points are counted in calculating the allowable\nmaximum rate.\n4\nTo provide funds for its mortgage purchases, GNMA could\nissue its obligations to the Secretary of the Treasury.\nThe Secretary would determine the interest rate of the\nobligations and GNMA would determine the maturity and\nredemption conditions. GNMA would be authorized to\nguarantee and issue securities based on pools of mortgages\npurchased under the program, and could offer and sell\nsecurities to the Federal Financing Bank and any Federal\nReserve Bank. Prices of mortgages sold by GNMA are\nauthorized to be at levels which, to the extent feasible,\nmake the operation fully self-supporting.\nAgency comments\nHUD, in its attached views letter on the enrolled bill,\nnotes that several important desirable changes were\nincorporated in the enacted version of S. 3979, which were\nurged by the Administration. HUD indicates, however, that\nthere are two undesirable aspects of the bill.\nFirst, the exclusion of conventional mortgages covering\nmulti-family projects and individual condominium units\nwill limit substantially the degree of support that can\nbe given to lower-priced housing.\nSecond, the Proxmire amendment fixing mortgage interest\nrates according to specified Treasury borrowing rates could,\nin HUD's view, \"require payment of substantial differential\npayments to the extent that mortgages cannot be purchased\nand held pending a decline in general mortgage rates but\nmust be sold in the interim at below market rates. These\nproblems, moreover, may be accentuated in coming months if,\nas seems most likely, the Treasury rates upon which mortgage\ninterest rates are made to depend decline more rapidly than\nthe market generally.\"\nNevertheless, HUD believes the difficulties of the interest\nrate provision can be minimized if (1) the commitment\nauthority provided in the bill is used quickly, while the\nformula interest rate is relatively high, (2) commitment\nfees are used to offset some initial processing costs, and\n(3) the bill is interpreted to permit mortgages to be\npurchased at a discount, with certain safeguards, thereby\nincreasing the effective yield of mortgages to the\nGovernment.\n5\nTreasury also considers the Proxmire amendment as undesirable\nsince, in its view, this provision would lead to excessive\npoints to provide an appropriate yield level and would\nincrease subsidies to mortgage borrowers when the need is\ndeclining, since Treasury yields typically decline faster\nthan mortgage rates. Treasury believes this could lead to\ngreater demand under the earlier tandem plan in which HUD\nhas total discretion in setting the interest rate as well\nas under the new purchase authority.\nMiscellaneous Amendments to Other Laws\nThese include:\n-- requiring the Council on Wage and Price Stability\nto report through the President to the Congress on a quarterly\nbasis not later than 30 days after the close of each calendar\nquarter concerning the Council's activities, findings and\nrecommendations with respect to inflation and the economy.\nThe Council states that this requirement will add to its\nworkload, but has no objection to this provision.\n-- amending the National Housing Act to add provisions\nagreed to in conference but inadvertently overlooked in\npreparing the conference report on the Housing and Community\nDevelopment Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-383), including authorizing\nthe Secretary to make loans to finance the preservation of\nhistoric structures and to insure under section 203 of the\nNational Housing Act the amount needed to finance the\npurchase of shares in a cooperative.\n-- amending the Federal Home Loan Bank Act to increase\nfrom $40,000 to $55,000 the limit on a home mortgage\nacceptable as collateral security for an advance by a\nFederal Home Loan Bank, thereby conforming this Act to a\nsimilar change in the Home Owners' Loan Act contained in\nP.L. 93-383.\n-- giving Federal savings and loan associations the\npower to act as trustees for the new individual retirement\naccounts authorized by the Pension Reform Act of 1974,\nP.L. 93-406.\n-- authorizing the Federal Reserve Board to make advances\nto member banks on the security of residential mortgages,\nbearing an interest rate equal to the lowest discount rate\nin effect at the member bank.\n6\n*****\nIn your signing statement on S. 3979, you concluded,\n\"Like most emergency measures, this bill has some\nminuses. Notwithstanding the increasing proportion\nof American families that choose each year to live\nin apartments or condominiums, the bill unfortunately\ndoes not cover conventional mortgages for apartment\nor condominium projects. Moreover, I had hoped that\nthis help for the housing industry could be delivered\nwith a minimum inflationary impact, and I know that\nthe Congress intended the program to be\nself-supporting. However, the bill establishes a\nrigid, illogical interest ceiling formula that fails\nto relate interest income to actual borrowing costs\nand to cover adequately administrative costs.\"\nWe believe the scope and operation of this program should\nbe carefully monitored.\n(signed) Wilfred H. Rounel\nAssistant Director for\nLegislative Reference\nEnclosures\nEXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT\nOFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20503\nNOV 18 1974\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT\nSubject: Enrolled Bill S. 3979 - Emergency Home Purchase\nAssistance Act of 1974\nSponsors - Sen. Cranston (D) California and\nSen. Brooke (R) Massachusetts\nLast Day for Action\nApproved on October 18, 1974, became Public Law 93-449.\nPurpose\nAuthorizes a new, temporary program to assist the housing\nindustry through purchases of residential mortgages by the\nGovernment National Mortgage Association (GNMA) ; contains\nseveral riders amending other laws.\nAgency Recommendations\nOffice of Management and Budget\nApproval\nDepartment of Housing and Urban\nDevelopment\nApproval\nFederal Home Loan Bank Board\nApproval\nDepartment of the Interior\nApproval\nFederal Reserve Board\nApproval (informally)\nDepartment of the Treasury\nNo objection to\napproval\nVeterans Administration\nNo objection to\napproval\nCouncil of Economic Advisers\nNo objection\nCouncil on Wage and Price Stability\nNo objection to\nSection 4 (e)\nCouncil on Environmental Quality\nDefers to other\nagencies\n2\nDiscussion\nS. 3979 carries out, in substantial measure, a\nrecommendation in your economic message to the Congress\nof October 8, 1974. You urged the Congress to enact\nadditional legislation to make most home mortgages\neligible for purchase by an agency of the Federal Govern-\nment. You indicated that as soon as such legislation was\nsent to you, you would make at least $3 billion immediately\navailable for mortgage purchases, enough to finance about\n100,000 homes.\nS. 3979 was passed unanimously (77-0) by the Senate on\nOctober 10, 1974, and by voice vote in the House on\nOctober 15, 1974. You signed the bill on October 18, 1974,\nand HUD is now implementing it.\nS. 3979 consists essentially of two parts: (1) authoriza-\ntion for a temporary \"tandem plan\" for conventional housing\nand (2) a few amendments to other laws, including two which\ncorrect technical errors in the recently-anacted Housing\nand Community Development Act of 1974.\nMortgage Purchase Authority\nIn August 1971, the Government instituted a \"tandem plan\"\nfor federally insured mortgages to avoid raising the\ninterest rate ceiling on those mortgages while maintaining\nhousing production and sales. Under this plan, HUD (GNMA)\nbuys eligible mortgages at below-market interest rates and\nresells them at the market price. The cost to the Govern-\nment is the subsidy involved, 1.e. the loss realized by\nGNMA if it sells the mortgage at less than its original\npurchase price.\nS. 3979 expands this program temporarily by giving HUD\nauthority for one year to direct GNMA to purchase, service,\nsell, or otherwise deal in specified types of conventional\nas well as federally insured mortgages when HUD determines\nthat economic conditions are so seriously adverse as to\nrequire such action to achieve national housing goals. The\nbill limits the total amount of purchases and commitments\nto $7.75 billion outstanding at any one time.\n3\nEligible mortgages include conventional and FHA or VA\ninsured and guaranteed mortgages covering single-family\nhomes (other than conventional condominium or cooperative\nunits), and FHA or VA mortgages covering rental projects,\ncondominiums, or cooperatives and their individual units.\nConventional mortgages can have a loan-to-value ratio\nexceeding 80 percent only if they are privately insured.\nThe maximum mortgage amount is set at $42,000 per family\nresidence or dwelling unit ($55,000 in Alaska, Hawaii\nand Guam).\nMortgages covering housing constructed more than 12 months\nprior to enactment of S. 3979 may be purchased in areas\nwhere HUD determines that there is a serious shortage of\nmortgage credit to purchase such housing.\nAs introduced, the bill would have given HUD discretion\nto set the interest rate on mortgages purchased by GNMA\nwithout any maximum limits. It provided that such mortgages\ninvolve \"an interest rate not in excess of the rate\ndetermined by the Secretary to be necessary to reimburse\nthe fund for its expenses under this section.\" (The\nSecretary has such discretion under the earlier tandem plan\nfor federally-insured mortgages.)\nAs enacted, however, a. floor amendment by Senator Proxmire\nwas included under which the maximum interest rates in\nmortgages purchased by GNMA could not \"exceed a rate equal\nto the average yield during the month preceding the month\nin which a commitment to purchase such mortgage was issued\non all marketable bonds of the United States maturing more\nthan six but less than twelve years from the date of such\ncommitment (exclusive of bonds with a coupon rate of less\nthan 6 percent) plus one-half of 1 percent, adjusted upward\nto the nearest one-eighth of 1 percent.\"\nA further provision would direct HUD in fixing interest\nrates to take account of State usury limits, and would\nprovide for a limited override of certain State usury laws\nto the extent they apply or have been interpreted so that\ndiscounts or points are counted in calculating the allowable\nmaximum rate.\n4\nTo provide funds for its mortgage purchases, GNMA could\nissue its obligations to the Secretary of the Treasury.\nThe Secretary would determine the interest rate of the\nobligations and GNMA would determine the maturity and\nredemption conditions. GNMA would be authorized to\nguarantee and issue securities based on pools of mortgages\npurchased under the program, and could offer and sell\nsecurities to the Federal Financing Bank and any Federal\nReserve Bank. Prices of mortgages sold by GNMA are\nauthorised to be at levels which, to the extent feasible,\nmake the operation fully self-supporting.\nAgency comments\nHUD, in its attached views letter on the enrolled bill,\nnotes that several important desirable changes were\nincorporated in the enacted version of S. 3979, which were\nurged by the Administration. HUD indicates, however, that\nthere are two undesirable aspects of the bill.\nFirst, the exclusion of conventional mortgages covering\nmulti-family projects and individual condominium units\nwill limit substantially the degree of support that can\nbe given to lower-priced housing.\nSecond, the Proxmire amendment fixing mortgage interest\nrates according to specified Treasury borrowing rates could,\nin HUD;s view, \"require payment of substantial differential\npayments to the extent that mortgages cannot be purchased\nand held pending a decline in general mortgage rates but\nmust be sold in the interim at below market rates. These\nproblems, moreover, may be accentuated in coming months if,\nas seems most likely, the Treasury rates upon which mortgage\ninterest rates are made to depend decline more rapidly than\nthe market generally.\"\nNevertheless, HUD believes the difficulties of the interest\nrate provision can be minimized if (1) the commitment\nauthority provided in the bill is used quickly, while the\nformula interest rate is relatively high, (2) commitment\nfees are used to offset some initial processing costs, and\n(3) the bill is interpreted to permit mortgages to be\npurchased at a discount, with certain safeguards, thereby\nincreasing the effective yield of mortgages to the\nGovernment.\n5\nTreasury also considers the Proxmire amendment as undesirable\nsince, In its view, this provision would lead to excessive\npoints to provide an appropriate yield level and would\nincrease subsidies to mortgage borrowers when the need is\ndeclining, since Treasury yields typically decline faster\nthan mortgage rates, Treasury believes this could lead to\ngreater demand under the earlier tandem plan in which HUD\nhas total discretion in setting the interest rate as well\nas under the new purchase authority.\nMiscellaneous Amendments to Other Laws\nThese include:\n- requiring the Council on Wage and Price Stability\nto report through the President to the Congress on a quarterly\nbasis not later than 30 days after the close of each calendar\nquarter concerning the Council's activities, findings and\nrecommendations with respect to inflation and the economy.\nThe Council states that this requirement will add to its\nworkload, but has no objection to this provision.\n- amending the National Housing Act to add provisions\nagreed to in conference but inadvertently overlooked in\npreparing the conference report on the Housing and Community\nDevelopment Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-383), including authorising\nthe Secretary to make loans to finance the preservation of\nhistoric structures and to insure under section 203 of the\nNational Housing Act the amount needed to finance the\npurchase of shares in a dooperative.\n-- amending the Federal Home Loan Bank Act to increase\nfrom $40,000 to $55,000 the limit on a home mortgage\nacceptable as collateral security for an advance by a\nFederal Home Loan Bank, thereby conforming this Act to a\nsimilar change in the Home Owners' Loan Act contained in\nP.L. 93-385.\n-- giving Federal savings and loan associations the\npower to act as trustees for the new individual retirement\naccounts authorized by the Pension Reform Act of 1974,\nP.L. 93-406.\n- authorizing the Federal Reserve Board to make advances\nto member banks on the security of residential mortgages,\nhearing an interest rate equal to the lowest discount rate\nin effect at the member bank.\n6\n*****\nIn your signing statement on S. 3979, you concluded,\n\"Like most emergency measures, this bill has some\nminuses. Notwithstanding the increasing proportion\nof American families that choose each year to live\nin apartments or condominiums, the bill unfortunately\ndoes not cover conventional mortgages for apartment\nor condominium projects. Moreover, I had hoped that\nthis help for the housing industry could be delivered\nwith a minimum inflationary impact, and I know that\nthe Congress intended the program to be\nself-supporting. However, the bill establishes a\nrigid, illogical interest ceiling formula that fails\nto relate interest income to actual borrowing costs\nand to cover adequately administrative costs.\"\nWe believe the scope and operation of this program should\nbe carefully monitored.\n(signed) Wilfred H. Ronmel\nAssistant Director for\nLegislative Reference\nEnclosures\nEXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT\nOFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20503\nNOV 18 1974\nMEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT\nSubject: Enrolled Bill S. 3979 - Emergency Home Purchase\nAssistance Act of 1974\nSponsors - Sen. Cranston (D) California and\nSen. Brooke (R) Massachusetts\nLast Day for Action\nApproved on October 18, 1974, became Public Law 93-449.\nPurpose\nAuthorizes a new, temporary program to assist the housing\nindustry through purchases of residential mortgages by the\nGovernment National Mortgage Association (GNMA) contains\nseveral riders amending other laws.\nAgency Recommendations\nOffice of Management and Budget\nApproval\nDepartment of Housing and Urban\nDevelopment\nApproval\nFederal Home Loan Bank Board\nApproval\nDepartment of the Interior\nApproval\nFederal Reserve Board\nApproval (informally)\nDepartment of the Treasury\nNo objection to\napproval\nVeterans Administration\nNo objection to\napproval\nCouncil of Economic Advisers\nNo objection\nCouncil on Wage and Price Stability\nNo objection to\nSection 4 (e)\nCouncil on Environmental Quality\nDefers to other\nagencies\n2\nDiscussion\nS. 3979 carries out, in substantial measure, a\nrecommendation in your economic message to the Congress\nof October 8, 1974. You urged the Congress to enact\nadditional legislation to make most home mortgages\neligible for purchase by an agency of the Federal Govern-\nment. You indicated that as soon as such legislation was\nsent to you, you would make at least $3 billion immediately\navailable for mortgage purchases, enough to finance about\n100,000 homes.\nS. 3979 was passed unanimously (77-0) by the Senate on\nOctober 10, 1974, and by voice vote in the House on\nOctober 15, 1974. You signed the bill on October 18, 1974,\nand HUD is now implementing it.\nS. 3979 consists essentially of two parts: (1) authoriza-\ntion for a temporary \"tandem plan\" for conventional housing\nand (2) a few amendments to other laws, including two which\ncorrect technical errors in the recently-enacted Housing\nand Community Development Act of 1974.\nMortgage Purchase Authority\nIn August 1971, the Government instituted a \"tandem plan\"\nfor federally insured mortgages to avoid raising the\ninterest rate ceiling on those mortgages while maintaining\nhousing production and sales. Under this plan, HUD (GNMA)\nbuys eligible mortgages at below-market interest rates and\nresells them at the market price. The cost to the Govern-\nment is the subsidy involved, 1.e. the loss realized by\nGNMA if it sells the mortgage at less than its original\npurchase price.\nS. 3979 expands this program temporarily by giving HUD\nauthority for one year to direct GNMA to purchase, service,\nsell, or otherwise deal in specified types of conventional\nas well as federally insured mortgages when HUD determines\nthat economic conditions are so seriously adverse as to\nrequire such action to achieve national housing goals. The\nbill limits the total amount of purchases and commitments\nto $7.75 billion outstanding at any one time.\n3\nEligible mortgages include conventional and FHA or VA\ninsured and guaranteed mortgages covering single-family\nhomes (other than conventional condominium or cooperative\nunits), and FHA or VA mortgages covering rental projects,\ncondominiums, or cooperatives and their individual units.\nConventional mortgages can have a lean-to-value ratio\nexceeding 80 percent only if they are privately insured.\nThe maximum mortgage amount is set at $42,000 per family\nresidence or dwelling unit ($55,000 in Alaska, Hawaii\nand Guam).\nMortgages covering housing constructed more than 12 months\nprior to enactment of S. 3979 may be purchased in areas\nwhere HUD determines that there is a serious shortage of\nmortgage credit to purchase such housing.\nAs introduced, the bill would have given HUD discretion\nto set the interest rate on mortgages purchased by GNMA\nwithout any maximum limits. It provided that such mortgages\ninvolve \"an interest rate not in excess of the rate\ndetermined by the Secretary to be necessary to reimburse\nthe fund for its expenses under this section.\" (The\nSecretary has such discretion under the earlier tandem plan\nfor federally-insured mortgages.)\nAs enacted, however, a floor amendment by Senator Proxmire\nwas included under which the maximum interest rates in\nmortgages purchased by GNMA could not \"exceed a rate equal\nto the average yield during the month preceding the month\nin which a commitment to purchase such mortgage was issued\non all marketable bonds of the United States maturing more\nthan six but less than twelve years from the date of such\ncommitment (exclusive of bonds with a coupon rate of less\nthan 6 percent) plus one-half of 1 percent, adjusted upward\nto the nearest one-eighth of 1 percent.\"\nA further provision would direct HUD in fixing interest\nrates to take account of State usury limits, and would\nprovide for a limited override of certain State usury laws\nto the extent they apply or have been interpreted so that\ndiscounts or points are counted in calculating the allowable\nmaximum rate,\n4\nTo provide funds for its mortgage purchases, GNMA could\nissue its obligations to the Secretary of the Treasury.\nThe Secretary would determine the interest rate of the\nobligations and GNMA would determine the maturity and\nredemption conditions. GNMA would be authorized to\nguarantee and issue securities based on pools of mortgages\npurchased under the program, and could offer and sell\nsecurities to the Federal Financing Bank and any Federal\nReserve Bank. Prices of mortgages sold by GNMA are\nauthorised to be at levels which, to the extent feasible,\nmake the operation fully self-supporting.\nAgency comments\nHUD, in its attached views letter on the enrolled bill,\nnotes that several important desirable changes were\nincorperated in the enacted version of S. 3979, which were\nurged by the Administration. HUD indicates, however, that\nthere are two undesirable aspects of the bill.\nFirst, the exclusion of conventional mortgages covering\nmulti-family projects and individual condominium units\nwill limit substantially the degree of support that can\nbe given to lower-priced housing.\nSecond, the Prommire amendment fixing mortgage interest\nrates according to specified Treasury borrowing rates could,\nin HVD's view, \"require payment of substantial differential\npayments to the extent that mortgages cannot be purchased\nand held pending a decline in general mortgage rates but\nmust be sold in the interim at below market rates. These\nproblems, moreover, may be accentuated in coming months if,\nas seems most likely, the Treasury rates upon which mortgage\ninterest rates are made to depend decline more rapidly than\nthe market generally.\"\nNevertheless, HUD believes the difficulties of the interest\nrate provision can be minimised if (1) the commitment\nauthority provided in the bill is used quickly, while the\nformula interest rate is relatively high, (2) commitment\nfees are used to offset some initial processing costs, and\n(3) the bill is interpreted to permit mortgages to be\npurchased at a discount, with certain safeguards, thereby\nincreasing the effective yield of mortgages to the\nGovernment.\n5\nTreasury also considers the Proxmire amendment as undesirable\nsince, In its view, this provision would lead to excessive\npoints to provide an appropriate yield level and would\nincrease subsidies to mortgage borrowers when the need is\ndeclining, since Treasury yields typically decline faster\nthan mortgage rates. Treasury believes this could lead to\ngreater demand under the earlier tandem plan in which HUD\nhas total discretion in setting the interest rate as well\nas under the new purchase authority.\nMiscellaneous Amendments to Other Laws\nThese include:\n-- requiring the Council on Wage and Price Stability\nto report through the President to the Congress on a quarterly\nbasis not later than 30 days after the close of each calendar\nquarter concerning the Council's activities, findings and\nrecommendations with respect to inflation and the economy.\nThe Council states that this requirement will add to its\nworkload, but has no objection to this provision.\n-- amending the National Housing Act to add provisions\nagreed to in conference but inadvertently overlooked in\npreparing the conference report on the Housing and Community\nDevelopment Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-383), including authorising\nthe Secretary to make loans to finance the preservation of\nhistoric structures and to insure under section 203 of the\nNational Housing Act the amount needed to finance the\npurchase of shares in a cooperative.\n--- amending the Federal Home Loan Bank Act to increase\nfrom $40,000 to $55,000 the limit on a home mortgage\nacceptable as collateral security for an advance by a\nFederal Home Loan Bank, thereby conforming this Act to a\nsimilar change in the Home Owners' Loan Act contained in\nP.L. 93-383.\n- giving Federal savings and loan associations the\npower to act as trustees for the new individual retirement\naccounts authorized by the Pension Reform Act of 1974,\nP.L. 93-406.\n-- authorizing the Federal Reserve Board to make advances\nto member banks on the security of residential mortgages,\nbearing an interest rate equal to the lowest discount rate\nin effect at the member bank.\n6\n*****\nIn your signing statement on S. 3979, you concluded,\n\"Like most emergency measures, this bill has some\nminuses. Notwithstanding the increasing proportion\nof American families that choose each year to live\nin apartments or condominiums, the bill unfortunately\ndoes not cover conventional mortgages for apartment\nor condominium projects. Moreover, I had hoped that\nthis help for the housing industry could be delivered\nwith a minimum inflationary impact, and I know that\nthe Congress intended the program to be\nself-supporting. However, the bill establishes a\nrigid, illogical interest ceiling formula that fails\nto relate interest income to actual horrowing costs\nand to cover adequately administrative costs.\"\nWe believe the scope and operation of this program should\nbe carefully monitored.\n(signed) Wilfred H. Romanol\nAssistant Director for\nLegislative Reference\nEnclosures\nEMBARGOED FOR RELEASE\nNOT RUN\nUNTIL 10:30 A.M., EDT\nEmbargoed for Release Until\nOCTOBER 18, 1974\nOffice of the White House Press Secretary\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nSTATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT\nIt is with great pleasure today that I am signing into law S. 3979,\nthe Emergency Home Purchase Assistance Act of 19742.\nIn my remarks to the Joint Session of the Congress on October 8, I\nurged the Congress to enact, before recess, additional legislation\nto make most home mortgages eligible for purchase by an agency of\nthe Federal Government. I also remarked that I remembered how\nmuch Congress can get done when it wants to.\nI am most pleased that exactly one week after my remarks, the Congress\nresponded with passage of the Emergency Home Purchase/ Act of 1974.\nAssistance\nThis bill authorizes the Government National Mortgage Association in\nthe Department of Housing and Urban Development to make commitments\nat predetermined interest rates to purchase mortgages, both on new\nand existing homes, which are not Federal Housing Administration\ninsured or Veterans Administration guaranteed - - the so-called\n\"conventional\" mortgages which comprise about 80% of all mortgages.\nThe advantage of the plan is that with the GNMA commitment, the\nhomebuyer, builder and lender have an assured source of financing\nat a known, favorable interest rate. The cost to the Government\nis limited to the loss which GNMA realizes if its selling price for\na mortgage is less than its original purchase price.\nLike most emergency measures, this bill has some minuses.\nNotwithstanding the increasing proportion of American families that\nchoose each year to live in apartments or condominiums, the bill\nunfortunately does not cover conventional mortgages for apartment\nor condominium projects. Moreover, I had hoped that this help for\nthe housing industry could be delivered with a minimum inflationary\nimpact, and I know that the Congress intended the program to be\nself-supporting. However, the bill establishes a rigid, illogical\ninterest ceiling formula that fails to relate interest income to\nactual borrowing costs and to cover adequately administrative\ncosts.\n###\nOctober 18, 1974\nEMBARGOEFOR RELEASE\nUNTIL 10:30 AM, EDT\nOffice of the White House Press Secretary\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nSTATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT\nIt is with great pleasure today that I am signing into law S. 3979, the\nEmergency Home Purchase Assistance Act of 1974.\nIn my remarks to the Joint Session of the Congress on October 8, I\nurged the Congress to enact, before recess, additional legislation\nto make most home mortgages eligible for purchase by an agency of\nthe Federal Government. I also remarked that I remembered how\nmuch Congress can get done when it wants to.\nI am most pleased that examily one week after my remarks, the Congress\nresponded with passage of the Emergency Home Purchase Act of 1974.\nThis bill authorizes the Government National Mortgage Association in\nthe Department of Housing and Urban Development to make commitments\nat predetermined interest rates to purchase mortgages, both on new\nand existing homes, which are not Federal Housing Administration\ninsured for Veterans Administration guaranteed -- the so-called\n\"conventional\" mortgages which comprise about 80% of all mortgages.\nThe advantage of the plan is that with the GNMA commitment, the\nhomebuyer, builder and lender have an assured source of financing\nat a known, favorable interest rate. The cost to the Government is\nlimited to the loss which GNMA readizes if its selling price for\na mortgage is less than its original purchase price.\nLike most emergency measures, this bill has some minuses.\nNotwithstanding the increasing proportion of American families that\nchoose each year to live in apartments or condominiums, the bill\nunfortunately does not cover conventional mortgages for apartment\nbr condominium projects. Moreover, I had hoped that this help for\nthe housing industry could be delivered with a minimum inflationary\nimpact, and I know that the Congress intended the program to be\nself-supporting, However, the bill establishes a rigid, illogical\ninterest celing formula that fails to relate interest income to'\nactual borrowing costs and to cover adequately administrative\ncosts.\nOctober 18, 1974\nOffice of the White House Press Secretary\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nthat he has appointed Clyde S. DuPont of\nThe President today announced he has appointed Clyde S. DuPont of\nAlexandria, Virginia, to be a Commissioner of the Postal Rate\nCommission. He will succeed Rod Kreger, who resigned effective\nJanuary 7, 1974.\nSince 1969, Mr. DuPont has been Minority Counsel for the Post\nOffice and Civil Service Committee after having served as a\nProfessional Staff Member of the Judiciary Committee from\n1967 to 1968, From 1964 to 1967, he was Legislative Assistant\nto Senator Hiram Fong, after having served as his Research\nAssistant and File Clerk since 1960.\nHe was born on December 28, 1933, in Waialua, Hawaii. He\nreceived his B.S. degree from Brigham Young University in\n1959 and his J.D. degree from George Washington University\nLaw School in February, 1963, He served as a Staffr Sergeant\nin the United States Air Force from 1952 to 1956. He is a member\nof the District of Columbia Bar Association,\nHe is married to the former Joan Kimball and they have three\nchildren, They reside in Alexandria, Virginia.\nEmbargoed for Release Until\nOctober\n/ 1974\nDRAFT\nOffice of the White House Press Secretary\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nSTATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT\nIt is with great pleasure today that I am signing into law S. 3979,\nthe \"Emergency Home Purchase Assistance Act of 1974\".\nIn my remarks to the Joint Session of the Congress on October 8, I\nurged the Congress to enact, before recess, additional legislation\nto make most home mortgages eligible for purchase by an agency of\nthe Federal Government. I also remarked that I remembered how\nmuch Congress can get done when it wants to.\nI am most pleased that exactly one week after my remarks, the Congress\nresponded with passage of the Emergency Home Purchase Assistance Act\nof 1974.\nThis bill authorizes the Government National Mortgage Association in\nthe Department of Housing and Urban Development to make commitments\nat predetermined interest rates to purchase mortgages, both on new\nand existing homes, which are not Federal Housing Administration\ninsured or Veterans Administration guaranteed -- the so-called\n\"conventional\" mortgages which comprise about 80% of all mortgages.\nThe advantage of the plan is that with the GNMA commitment, the\nhomebuyer, builder and lender have an assured source of financing\nat a known, favorable interest rate. The cost to the Government\nis limited to the loss which GNMA realizes if its selling price for\na mortgage is less than its original purchase price.\nLike most emergency measures, this bill has some minuses.\nNotwithstanding the increasing proportion of American families that\nchoose each year to live in apartments or condominiums, the bill\nunfortunately does not cover conventional mortgages for apartment\nor condominium projects. Moreover, I had hoped that this help for\nthe housing industry could be delivered with a minimum inflationary\nimpact, and I know that the Congress intended the program to be\nself-supporting. However, the bill establishes a rigid, illogical\ninterest ceiling formula that fails to relate interest income to\nactual borrowing costs and to cover adequately administrative\ncosts.\nEMBARGOED FOR RELEASE\nOCTOBER 18, 1974\nUNTIL 10:30 AM, EDT\nOffice of the White House Press Secretary\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nTHE EMERGENCY HOME PURCHASE ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1974 (S. 3974)\nFACT SHEET\nPresident Ford today signed into law the Emergency Home Purchase\nAssistance Act of 1974. The President had urged enactment of similar\nlegislation in his address to a Joint Session of Congress on October 8th.\nThe Act extends, on a temporary basis, the advantages offered by the\nGovernment National Mortgage Association (GNMA or Ginnie Mae) to\nmortgages which are not Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insured\nor Veterans Administration (VA) guaranteed 80 called \"conventional\"\nmortgages. Three billion dollars an amount sufficient to finance\nabout 100, 000 new homes would be available. The proposed program\nwill be in addition to the $9. 9 billion FHA/VA tandem programs announced\nin January and May and the $3 billion Federal Home Loan Mortgage\nCorporation (FHLMC) commentional mortgage purchase program announced\nin May\nGNMA has aided in creating a supply of credit for mortgages on new homes\ninsured by FHA or guaranteed by VA by\n-- assuring, through commitments in advance, purchase of\nmortgages at a pre-determined price.\n-- having agreed to a lower-than-market interest rate on the\nmortgage at the time such commitment to purchase is made,\nsubsidizing market interest rates in the event market interest\nrates do not fall by the time GNMA purchases the mortgage\npursuant to its commitment.\n-- guaranteeing, on a \"full faith and credit basis,\" obligations\nsecured by such mortgages.\nBACKGROUND - HOUS ING INDUSTRY SITUATION CRITICAL\nOver the past 23 months\n-- housing starts have dropped from 2. 51 million units to 1.12\nmillion units.\n-- unemployment in the construction industry is 12. percent\nand climbing, with over a half million construction workers\nnow unemployed.\n-- many homebuilders are in severe financial difficulty.\nFEATURES OF THE EMERGENCY HOME PURCHASE ASSISTANCE ACT\nOF 1974\nBy making conventional mortgages eligible for purchase by GNMA, builders\nand homebuyers will be assisted where home mortgage credit is scarce or\nnon-existent.\nMORE\n-2-\n1. Level of Commitments. Aggregate amount of commitments and mort-\ngages which GNMA could hold at any time, i.e. have purchased and not\nresold, could not exceed $7.75 billion. Initial programs aggregating\n$3 billion of mortgage commitments, or enough to finance about 100, 000\nnew homes, is contemplated. Any additional programs will be activated\nas circumstances require.\n2. Mortgage Amounts, Interest Rates, Fees and Downpayment Require-\nments. The program would provide for a maximum mortgage amount of\n$42,000. Under the formula provided by the law, the mortgage interest\nrate will be determined on the basis of yields on six to twelve year Treasury\nissues for the month preceeding the month in which the GNMA commitments\nis made plus one-half of one percent (50 basis points). Under this formula,\nthe mortgage rate for commitments made in October would be somewhat\nabove, the rate offered on GNMA tandem programs for FHA/VA mortgages --\npresently 8-3/4%. Twenty percent downpayments would be required with\nan exception for down to 5% downpayments if the additional mortgage\namount is covered by a qualified private mortgage insurance contract so\nas to minimize cost of mortgagor defaults. There will also be a com-\nmitment fee and other fees to cover reserves for losses and certain\nfinancing costs.\n3. GNMA Disposition of Conventional Mortgages. Following the precedent\nof existing law, GNMA could, depending upon market or other factors, sell\nmortgages to the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) or\nFHLMC, s&ll mortgages with a provision for pooling by FNMA or FHLMC\nor other approved issuers and sale by such issuers of GNMA-guaranteed\n\"pass through\" securities or bond type securities on the market or to the\nFederal Financing Bank; or issue its own mortgage backed securities for\nsale to the Federal Financing Bank.\n4. Cost and Budget Implications. Any resulting subsidy would be paid\nout of corporate funds and ultimately from Treasury borrowing. Dollar\namount of mortgages purchased would not be excluded from budget outlays,\nbut would appear as outlays in any fiscal year only to the extent they are\nnot offset by sales that year. However, any losses on resale -- which\ncan result if market yields at the time of resale are less than the yield\nat which GNMA bought the mortgage, will appear as outlays.\n#\n#\n#\nEmbargoed for Release until 10:30 am. EDT\nOctober 18, 1974\nCoulsen\nOffice of the White House Press Secretary\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nTHE EMERGENCY HOME PURCHASE ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1974 (5.3979)\nFACT SHEET\nPresident Ford today signed into law the Emergency Home Purchase Assistance\nAct of 1974. The President had urged enactment of similar legislation in\nhis address to a Joint Session of Congress on October 8th.\nThe Act extends, on a temporary basis, the advantages offered by the\nGovernment National Mortgage Association (GNMA or Ginnie Mae) to mortgages\nwhich are not Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insured or Veterans\nAdministration (VA) guaranteed -- so called \"conventional\" mortgages.\nThree billion dollars -- an amount sufficient to finance about 100, 000 new\nhomes -- would be available. The proposed program will be in addition to\nthe $9. 9 billion FHA/VA tandem programs announced in January and May\nand the $3 billion Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC)\nconventional mortgage purchase program announced in May.\nGNMA has aided in creating a supply of credit for mortgages on new homes\ninsured by FHA or guaranteed by VA by\n-- assuring, through commitments in advance, purchase of\nmortgages at a pre-determined price.\nhaving agreed to a lower-than-market interest rate on the\nmortgage at the time such commitment to purchase is\nmade, subsidizing market interest rates in the event\nmarket interest rates do not fall by the time GNMA purchases\nthe mortgage pursuant to its commitment.\n(cops)\nguaranteeing, on a \"full faith and credit basis, obligations\nsecured by such mortgages.\nBACKEROUND\nHousing Industry Situation Critical.\nOver the past 23 months\n-- housing starts have dropped from 2. 51 million units to\n1. 12 million units.\nunemployment in the construction industry is 12. 4 percent\nand climbing, with over a half million construction\nworkers now unemployed.\nmany homebuilders are in severe financial difficulty.\nFEATURES\n-OR\nThe Emergency Home Purchase Assistance Act of 1974\nBy making conventional mortgages eligible for purchase by GNMA,\nbuilders and homebuyers will be assisted where home mortgage credit is\nscarce or non-existent.\n1.\nLevel of Commitments. Aggregate amount of commitments and mortgages\nwhich GNMA could hold at any time, i.e. have purchased and not resold, could\nnot exceed $7. 75 billion. Initial programs aggregating $3 billion of mortgage\nmore\n2\ncommitments, or enough to finance about 100, 000 new homes, is contemplated.\nAny additional programs will be activated as circumstances require.\n2.\nMortgage Amounts, Interest Rates, Fees and Downpayment Requirements.\nThe program would provide for a maximum mortgage amount of $42, 000.\nUnder the formula provided by the law, the mortgage interest rate will be\ndetermined on the basis of yields on six to twelve year Treasury issues for the\nmonth preceding the month in which the GNMA commitment is made plus\none-half of one percent (50 basis points). Under this formula, the mortgage\nrate for commitments made in October would be somewhat above the rate\noffered on GNMA tandem programs for FHA/VA mortgages -- presently\n8-3/4%. Twenty percent downpayments would be required with an exception\nfor down to 5% downpayments if the additional mortgage amount is covered\nby a qualified private mortgage insurance contract so as to minimize cost\nof mortgagor defaults. There will also be a commitment fee and other fees\nto cover reserves for losses and certain financing costs.\n3.\nGNMA Disposition of Conventional Mortgages. Following the precedent\nof existing law, GNMA could, depending upon market or other factors, sell\nmortgages to the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) or FHLMC,\nsell mortgages with a provision for pooling by FNMA or FHLMC or other approved\nissuers and sale by such issuers of GNMA-guaranteed \"pass through\"\nsecurities or bond type securities on the market or to the Federal Financing\nBank; or issue its own mortgage backed securities for sale to the Federal\nFinancing Bank.\n4.\nCost and Budget Implications. Any resulting subsidy would be paid out\nof corporate funds and ultimately from Treasury borrowing. Dollar amount of\nmortgages purchased would not be excluded from budget outlays, but would\nappear as outlays in any fiscal year only to the extent they are not offset by\nsales that year. However, any losses on resale -- which can result if\nmarket yields at the time of resale are less than the yield at which GNMA\nbought the mortgage, will appear as outlays.\nCalendar No. 1164\n93D CONGRESS\nSENATE\nREPORT\n2d Session\nNo. 93-1223\nHOME PURCHASE ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1974\nOCTOBER 3, 1974.-Ordered to be printed\nMr. PROXMIRE, from the Committee on Banking, Housing and\nUrban Affairs, submitted the following\nREPORT\ntogether with\nMINORITY VIEWS\n[To accompany S. 3979]\nThe Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, to which\nwas referred the bill (S. 3979) to increase the availability of reason-\nably priced mortgage credit for home purchases, having considered the\nsame, reports favorably thereon with amendments and recommends\nthat the bill as amended do pass.\nCOMMITTEE DELIBERATIONS\nThe bill, S. 3979, was introduced by Senators Cranston and Brooke\non September 10, 1974, and was referred to the Committee on Bank-\ning, Housing and Urban Affairs. The bill was a consolidation of two\nbills-S. 3436, introduced by Senator Brooke on May 2, 1974, and\nS. 3456, introduced by Senator Cranston on May 8, 1974-both of\nwhich were referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing and\nUrban Affairs. The Committee held hearings on the two bills on Au-\ngust 6 and 7, 1974.\nOn September 24, 1974, the Committee on Banking, Housing and\nUrban Affairs met in open executive session and ordered S. 3979, as\namended, to be reported to the Senate.\nBACKGROUND\nS. 3979 responds to a mortgage credit crisis which has crippled the\nresidential real estate industry in the United States. Housing ac-\ntivity in the Nation is severely depressed. In August 1974, housing\nstarts dropped to an annualized rate of 1.13 million, and 1974 produc-\n38-008\n2\ntion is not expected to exceed 1.4 million units. This compares with\n2.06 million starts in 1973 and 2.38 million in 1972. Building permits\nissued in August at an annual rate of 912,000, a 71/2-year low.\nThis sharp reduction in housing production has been especially hard\non the 1.5 million new households formed each year mostly by younger\npersons who are experiencing increasing difficulty finding a place to\nlive at a price they can afford. New housing construction in the United\nStates is failing to offset the estimated 700,000 units of housing that\nare removed from the housing stock each year due to public and pri-\nvate construction, natural disasters, and physical deterioration. As a\nresult, rental vacancy rates have fallen in many metropolitan areas,\nand housing supply is likely to become even more tight in the months\nahead.\nThe decline in housing production has had adverse effects not only\non consumer, but also on construction workers and homebuilding firms.\nIn August 1974, almost 500,000 construction workers, or 11.1 percent\nof the working force in these trades, were unemployed. The waste of\nthese valuable human resources, the drain on the public treasury for\nincreased payments of unemployment compensation, and the personal\nhardships created by this high rate of unemployment are all matters\nof serious concern to the Committee.\nBankruptcies and business closings in the homebuilding industry are\nexpected to reach record levels in 1974 according to trade association\nofficials. Further, the slowdown in housing construction is beginning to\nbe felt in the appliance and home furnishing industries, as reflected\nby worker layoffs in those sectors.\nThe current shortage of funds to finance housing transactions began\nin the middle of 1973. Home borrowers must compete in the market-\nplace with other users of capital, including business firms and Federal,\nState, and local governments. Borrowings by business corporations rose\nsubstantially in 1973 in order to finance increases in inventories and\ncapital plant and equipment. The prime rate charged by commercial\nbanks to their most credit-worthy customers rose sharply in the latter\nhalf of 1973. The Federal Reserve Board, in an effort to slow the\ngrowth of private borrowing and dampen rising prices, raised its dis-\ncount rate and took other measures to tighten up on credit.\nThe effect of these actions on the home mortgage market, which\nis particularly vulnerable to sharp, upward swings in the price of\nmoney, was dramatic. Interest rates moved from the level of 7.5 per-\ncent to 10 percent or more in many areas. The price of mortgage money\nrose above the ceilings imposed by State usury laws, bringing mort-\ngage lending to a halt in some parts of the country. Downpayment\nrequirements for home purchases have been increased in those areas\nwhere mortgage credit is available.\nSales of existing homes have also fallen sharply in some areas as\npotential buyers were turned down by lenders or have encountered\nprohibitive interest rates and terms. Families transferred from one\ncity to another are left in the difficult position of being unable to sell\ntheir old homes or to buy new ones.\nEXPLANATION OF LEGISLATION\nS. 3979 would provide emergency relief to the credit-starved resi-\ndential mortgage market. Under the bill whenever the Secretary of\nS.R. 1223\n3\nHousing and Urban Development determines (1) that a substantial\nnumber of families are unable to obtain mortgage credit at reasonable\nrates and (2) that the inability to obtain such credit is causing a sub-\nstantial reduction in the volume of home construction and acquisition\nand is delaying the orderly achievement of the national housing goals,\nhe is to direct the Government National Mortgage Association\n(GNMA) to make commitments to purchase and to purchase mort-\ngages under the conditions set forth in the bill.\nMoney to finance the purchase of mortgages would be obtained from\na housing trust fund to be established in the Government National\nMortgage Association (GNMA), the secondary mortgage market\ncomponent of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.\nThis trust fund would be financed by borrowings of up to $10 billion\ndollars per year from the Secretary of the Treasury. All funds bor-\nrowed from the Treasury would be repayable with interest. Receipts\nand disbursements of the fund would not be included in the totals of\nthe Budget of the United States Government and would be exempt\nfrom any annual expenditure or net lending limitations imposed on\nthe budget of the United States Government. As security on its loans\nthe Government will hold mortgages which involve substantial down-\npayments (20%), or are insured by FHA or an approved private in-\nsurer, or are guaranteed by the Veterans' Administration or the Farm-\ners Home Administration.\nBecause commitments to purchase mortgages will be met by GNMA\nover a period of many months, the Secretary of the Treasury will not\nbe called upon to borrow all of the funds authorized under this bill\nat any one time. However, adding another $10 billion to total demand\nfor capital funds will put some pressure on interest rates generally.\nThe actual rise in interest costs will depend upon the state of the\neconomy and fiscal and monetary policies being pursued at the time\nthe Treasury goes into the money markets. It should be noted that as\nthe economy grows, the capacity to generate loanable funds also grows.\nThe housing industry, presently the most depressed sector in the econ-\nomy, is a high-priority claimant for some of this expected increment\nin capital funds due to normal growth.\nGNMA may sell mortgages acquired under the bill at any time\nat a price not less than the unpaid principal at the time of sale.\nNot less than 50% nor more than 55% of the funds made available\nunder the bill could be used to finance the purchase of newly con-\nstructed homes and the remainder of the funds could finance the pur-\nchase of existing homes. All of the homes purchased with mortgages\nfinanced under the provisions of the bill must be the principal resi-\ndence of the buyer.\nThe bill imposes a limit of $30,000 on the purchase price of homes\npurchased with mortgages financed by the housing trust fund. How-\never, that limit may be raised up to $45,000 in high cost areas. It is\nnot the intention of the Committee that the Secretary of HUD set a\nmaximum ceiling of $45,000 in all areas of the country by making a\nfinding that in all areas cost levels require a higher ceiling. The\nCommittee expects the Secretary to set area by area ceilings ranging\nup to $45,000 taking into account differences in housing supply and\ncost of production which exist in different areas of the country. The\nCommittee expects the Secretary to be realistic in his determination\nS.R. 1223\n4\nof high cost areas, giving full consideration to past and expected cost\nincreases.\nMortgages originated under the program set forth in S. 3979 will\nbear an interest rate sufficient to reimburse GNMA for the cost of\nborrowing funds from the Secretary of the Treasury plus adminis-\ntrative costs. No points, discounts, or similar charges would be assessed\nagainst either the buyer or the seller. Mortgages could be purchased\nby GNMA at a price not in excess of 101 percent of the unpaid princi-\npal at the time of purchase.\nThe Committee is concerned that only about $4 billion out of a\npotential $9.9 billion in mortgage credit which has been made avail-\nable through GNMA over the last year has been used to make commit-\nments to purchase or purchase mortgages. A principal impediment, it\nis reported, is that builders and sellers are required to pay as much as\nfour points for the loans, which translates into $1,200 on a $30,000\nmortgage. S. 3979 would profit the assessment of points, discounts, or\nsimilar charges against buyers or sellers in connection with.mortgages\nfinanced through the housing trust fund.\nWhile the Committee has included FHA and VA mortgages under\nS. 3979, the Committee expects that GNMA will continue to imple-\nment the present tandem plans which finance the purchase of homes\nwith FHA and VA mortgages at the same time as it. implements\nS. 3979.\nSECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS\nThe Committee bill is divided into three sections.\nSection 1 cites the bill as the \"Home Purchase Assistance Act of\n1974\".\nSection 2 establishes findings of Congress that: (1) in many parts\nof the Nation, residential mortgage credit is likely soon to become\nprohibitively expensive or unavailable at any price; (2) the unavail-\nability of mortgage credit severely restricts housing production, causes\nhardship for those who wish to purchase or sell existing housing and\ndelays the orderly achievement of the national goal of a decent home\nfor every American family; and (3) there is an urgent need to provide\nan alternate source of residential mortgage credit on an emergency\nbasis.\nSection 3 amends Title III of the National Housing Act and adds\na new section entitled the \"Housing Trust Fund\" as section 313.\nSection 313 (a) (1) creates a National Housing Trust Fund from\nwhich the Secretary of HUD could make direct loans whenever the\nSecretary determines that a substantial number of families are unable\nto obtain mortgage credit at reasonable rates due to high interest rates\nor reduced availability of mortgage credit and that the inability to\nobtain such credit is causing or threatening to cause a substantial re-\nduction in the volume of home construction or acquisition and is delay-\ning the orderly achievement of the national housing goals contained\nin title XVI of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968.\nThe housing goals contained in the 1968 Act call for the construction of\nan average of 26 million housing units a year over à ten year period;\nsix million of these for low and moderate income families. The 1968\nact also reaffirms the national housing goal of a decent home and suit-\nable living environment for every American family.\nS.R. 1223\n5\nWhen the above situation exists it is mandatory that the Govern-\nment National Mortgage Association make commitments to purchase\nand to purchase mortgages in accordance with the provisions of sec.\n313.\nSection 313 (a) (2) provides that the Secretary of HUD may direct\nthe GNMA to terminate its activities under this section whenever he\ndetermines that the conditions which gave rise to his determination\nunder section 313 (1) are no longer present.\nSection 313(a) (3) provides that the Secretary of HUD shall issue\nregulations to carry out the provisions of this bill not later than 60\ndays after enactment and that such regulations shall be published\nin the Federal Register.\nSection 313 (b) provides that the Government National Mortgage\nAssociation shall make commitments to purchase and purchase mort-\ngages which are FHA insured, VA guaranteed, privately insured,\nor noninsured if they have a loan-to-value ratio of less than 80 per-\ncent. Mortgages may be purchased under this section only if: (1)\nsuch mortgage is to finance the acquisition of the T100 principal residence\nof the mortgagor; (2) such mortgage involves the acquisition or con-\nstruction of a residential dwelling whose purchase price does not exceed\n$30,000 and up to $45,000 in high cost areas as determined by the\nSecretary; (3) the interest rate is not to exceed that necessary to\nreimburse the fund for its expenses; (4) no points, discounts or similar\ncharges are to be assessed against the prospective buyer or seller in\nconnection with the mortgage.\nSection 313 (c) provides that the Government National Mortgage\nAssociation may borrow funds from the Treasury to finance the\nactivities of the Trust Fund and pay the Treasury an interest rate\nbased on the rates on outstanding long-term marketable U.S. obli-\ngations. The GNMA would repay the Treasury at the cost of money\nto the government under this section.\nSection 313 (d) provides that the Housing Trust Fund cannot com-\nmit to purchase more than $10 billion dollars in mortgages in any\nsingle fiscal year.\nSection 313 (e) provides that not less than 50% or more than 55\npercent of the homes purchased under this act shall involve resi-\ndences upon which construction has been completed within the twelve\nmonths preceding the date of purchase, all other housing purchases\nunder this act shall be existing housing.\nSection 313 (f) authorizes the Government National Mortgage As-\nsociation to: (1) establish and charge a fee for making commitments\nto purchase; (2) purchase mortgages at a price not greater than 101\nper cent; (3) contract with mortgagees or other persons to service\nmortgages under this section (4) sell such mortgages at any time at\na price not less than the unpaid principal at the time of sale; (5)\ndeposit proceeds from the sale of mortgages into the Trust Fund; and\n(6) invest any excess amounts in the fund in obligations of the United\nStates.\nSection 313 (g) provides that loan disbursements and repayments\nunder this section would be excluded from the federal budget since\nall loans are fully repayable to the Treasury at the rate of cost to\nthe government of borrowing the money.\nS.R. 1223\n6\nSection 313 (h) requires the Secretary to transmit to the Congress\nnot later than March 15 of each year a report on his activities under\nthis section.\nCOST OF CARRYING OUT THE BILL\nIn compliances with Section 252 of the Legislative Reorganization\nAot, the Committee reports that it is not feasible to estimate with pre-\ncision the cost of carrying out the provisions of this bill. The com-\nmittee believes, however, that it is unlikely there will be a net cost\nto the U.S. Treasury over the life of the program after taking into\nconsideration the additional tax revenues generated from the increase\nin residential construction activity stimulated by the legislation.\nCORDON RULE\nIn the opinion of the Committee, it is necessary to dispense with\nthe requirements of subsection 4 of Rule XXIX of the Standing Rules\nof the Senate in order to expedite the business of the Senate in con-\nnection with the report.\nS.R. 1223\nMINORITY VIEWS OF MESSRS. TOWER, BENNETT, AND\nBROCK\nThere is no doubt but that the housing industry is in a depressed\nstate. All. industries are short of capital, including State and local\ngovernments, but it is true that housing is proportionately worse off\nthan the others.\nHowever, a vote for this bill is a vote for continued inflation. Con-\ngress, however, has not been deaf to the problems of the housing in-\ndustry. In fact, we have provided several avenues of assistance to the\nhousing industry in the past several months. In addition to the $1.22\nbillion provided for public housing for lower income families in the\nrecently signed Housing and Community Development Act of 1974,\nsince January 28, 1974, the Administration has made a total of $16.9\nbillion available to the mortgage market at subsidized rates. This\nmeans that over $18 billion worth of mortgages (or $20 billion of\nhousing construction) has been made available since the start of this\nyear. This bill would add another $10 billion to make a total approach-\ning $30 billion-these figures do not even include the vast sums of non-\nsubsidized mortgages provided by FNMA, FHLMC, and GNMA.\nProviding an additional $10 billion-or whatever lesser amount-\nfor housing will simply increase the Federal deficit by that amount.\nFrom an economic point of view, it does not make any difference\nwhether we specify that the additional $10 billion should be in or out\nof the budget. As far as the economy is concerned, and as far as other\nborrowers on the market are concerned, the effect is the same. For\nevery dollar in this bill, we will be increasing the \"Federal deficit\"\nfor this year by a like amount.\nAlthough some form of additional assistance may be necessary for\nthe housing market, we must keep in mind that buying a mortgage has\nthe same effect as buying any other commodity by the government.\nOne simply cannot distinguish from an inflationary or a budget deficit\npoint of view the difference between the government's buying a private\nindividual's house (represented by a mortgage) or the government's\npurchase of military bases, agricultural stockpiles, commodities stock-\npiles or hospitals.\nThe government this year will usurp roughly one-half our Nation's\ncapital market either by direct Treasury borrowings, agency borrow-\nings or guarantees. If we do not stop this government encroachment\nof our private capital markets, we will soon witness the day when the\ngovernment will simply borrow all the money created by our free\nenterprise system and will allocate it by government fiat rather than\nby free market system.\n(7)\nS.R. 1223\n8\nCertainly housing needs to be helped to some degree, and perhaps\neven more assistance needs to be provided in addition to the massive\nefforts already undertaken. However, a $10 billion purchase of mort-\ngages each and very year in perpetuity is not the way to help housing\nnor stop inflation.\nIf we are to provide a quick \"shot in the arm\" to the housing in-\ndustry, there are administratively more efficient and less cumbersome\nmethods to utilize. If we are to initiate a permanent program to pro-\nvide a continued flow of mortgage funds at a reasonable interest rate,\napproval of this proposal would be a step backwards.\nA vote for this bill is a vote for continued inflation, higher interest\nrates, and higher housing costs.\nJOHN TOWER.\nWALLACE F. BENNETT.\nBILL BROCK.\nS.R. 1223\nS. 3979\nAinety-third Congress of the United States of America\nAT THE SECOND SESSION\nBegun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, the twenty-first day of January,\none thousand nine hundred and seventy-four\nAn Art\nTo increase on an emergency basis the availability of reasonably priced mortgage\ncredit for housing.\nBe it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the\nUnited States of America in Congress assembled,\nSHORT TITLE\nSECTION 1. This Act may be cited as the \"Emergency Home Purchase\nAssistance Act of 1974\".\nFINDINGS\nSEC. 2. The Congress finds and declares that-\n(1) in many parts of the Nation, residential mortgage credit is\nor is likely soon to become prohibitively expensive or unavailable\nat any price;\n(2) the unavailability of mortgage credit severely restricts\nhousing production, causes hardship for those who wish to pur-\nchase or sell new and existing housing, and delays the achieve-\nment of the national goal of a decent home for every American\nfamily; and\n(3) there is an urgent need to provide an alternate source of\nresidential mortgage credit on an emergency basis.\nINTERIM AUTHORITY\nSEC. 3. (a) Title III of the National Housing Act is amended by\nadding at the end thereof the following new section:\n\"INTERIM AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE CERTAIN MORTGAGES\n\"SEC. 313. (a) (1) Whenever the Secretary finds inflationary condi-\ntions and related governmental actions are having a severely dispro-\nportionate effect on the housing industry and the resulting reduction\nin the volume of home construction or acquisition threatens seriously\nto affect the economy and to delay the orderly achievement of the\nnational housing goals contained in title XVI of the Housing and\nUrban Development Act of 1968, the Secretary shall direct the Asso-\nciation to begin making commitments to purchase and to purchase\nmortgages in accordance with the provisions of this section.\n\"(2) The Secretary may direct the Association to terminate its activ-\nities under this section whenever he determines that the conditions\nwhich gave rise to his determination under paragraph (1) are no\nlonger present.\n(b) Whenever the Secretary issues a directive under subsection (a)\n(1), the Association shall make commitments to purchase and pur-\nchase, and may service, sell (with or without recourse), or otherwise\ndeal in, mortgages (1) which cover more than four-family residences\n(including cooperatives and condominiums and the individual units\ntherein) and which are insured under the National Housing Act and\nchapter 37 of title 38 of the United States Code, or (2) which cover one-\nto four-family residences and which are insured under the National\nHousing Act or guaranteed under chapter 37 of title 38 of the United\nStates Code or by qualified private insurers as determined by the Asso-\nciation or the outstanding principal balances of which do not exceed 80\nCORRECTE\nS. 3979-2\nper centum of the value of the property securing the mortgages. A\nmortgage may be purchased under this section only if-\n(A) such mortgage was executed to finance the acquisition of a\none- to four-family residence which will be the principal residence\nof the mortgagor or to finance the purchase of a more than four-\nfamily residence and is subject to a mortgage insured under the\nNational Housing Act;\n((B) such mortgage involves an original principal obligation\nnot to exceed $42,000 per family residence or dwelling unit, and\nexcept that the original principal obligation may not exceed\n$55,000 in the case of properties in Alaska, Hawaii, and Guam;\n\"(C) such mortgage involves an interest rate or yield not in\nexcess of that which the Secretary may prescribe, taking into\naccount the cost of funds and administrative costs under this sec-\ntion, the importance of making mortgage credit available on rea-\nsonable terms, and current conditions in the mortgage market,\nbut in no event shall such rate exceed a rate equal to the average\nyield during the month preceding the month in which a com-\nmitment to purchase such mortgage was issued on all marketable\nbonds of the United States maturing in more than six but less than\ntwelve years from the date of such commitment (exclusive of\nbonds with a coupon rate of less than 6 per centum) plus one-half\nof 1 per centum, adjusted upward to the nearest one-eighth of 1\nper centum and taking into account the need to assure that the\nfunds are available in all States pursuant to any maximum mort-\ngage interest rate permitted under the laws or constitutions of the\nvarious States and, notwithstanding any State law or constitu-\ntion to the contrary, discount points and other charges collected\nin connection with mortgage transactions under this section and\nrecognized by the Association shall not be considered in deter-\nmining whether the interest rate on any. such mortgage exceeds\nany State usury ceiling.\n\"(c) The Association may issue to the Secretary of the Treasury\nits obligations in an amount outstanding at any one time sufficient\nto enable the Association to carry out its functions under this section.\nEach such obligation shall mature at such time and be redeemable at\nthe option of the Association in such manner as may be determined by\nthe Association, and shall bear interest at a rate determined by the Sec-\nretary of the Treasury, taking into consideration the current average\nyield on outstanding marketable obligations of the United States of\ncomparable maturities during the month preceding the issuance of\nthe obligation of the Association. The Secretary of the Treasury is\nauthorized and directed to purchase any obligations of the Association\nissued under this section, and for such purposes the Secretary of the\nTreasury is authorized to use as a public debt transaction the proceeds\nfrom the sale of any securities issued under the Second Liberty Bond\nAct, as now or hereafter in force, and the purposes for which securities\nmay be issued under the Second Liberty Bond Act, as now or hereafter\nin force, are extended to include any purchase of the Association's\nobligations hereunder.\n(d) (1) The Association is authorized to guarantee securities based\non pools or trusts of the mortgages purchased by the Association under\nthis section as provided in section 306(g) of this Act with respect to\nfederally insured or guaranteed mortgages and to act as issuer of such\nS. 3979-3\nguaranteed securities. The Association shall possess with respect to\nsecurities under this section all the powers it possesses with respect to\nsecurities guaranteed under such section 306 (g), and the provisions of\nsuch section shall apply to guarantees under this section, except that\nsuch section shall not be deemed to prohibit the Secretary from\nguaranteeing payment of only a part of the principal and interest on\nsecurities issued under the provisions of this section.\n\"(2) The Association may offer and sell any securities guaranteed\nunder this subsection to the Federal Financing Bank, and such Bank\nis authorized to purchase any securities SO offered. The Association\nmay also offer and sell any securities guaranteed under this subsection\nto any Federal Reserve bank. The proceeds from the sale of such\nsecurities when issued by the Association shall be treated in the\naccounts in the same manner as if such proceeds were from the sale of\nthe underlying mortgages.\n\"(e) The Secretary may make available a portion of his authority\nunder this section to purchase mortgages covering housing which has\nbeen constructed more than twelve months prior to enactment of this\nsection in areas where he determines that there is a serious shortage\nof mortgage credit to purchase such housing.\n\"(f) The Association is authorized to-\n\"(1) sell mortgages purchased under this section of prices\nwhich it determines will help promote the objective of assuring\nthat operations under this section are; to the extent feasible, fully\nself-supporting;\n\"(2) pay for services performed in carrying out its functions\nunder this section without regard to any limitation on adminis-\ntrative expenses heretofore enacted.\n\"(g) The total amount of purchases and commitments authorized\nby the Secretary to be made pursuant to this section shall not exceed\n$7,750,000,000 outstanding at any one time.\".\n(b) The amendment made by subsection (a) becomes effective upon\nthe date of enactment of this Act and shall remain in effect for a\nperiod of one year following such date of enactment, except that it\nshall remain in effect after the expiration of such period to the extent\nnecessary (1) to honor commitments to purchase mortgages issued\nprior to the expiration of such period, and (2) to provide for the\nliquidation of assets and discharge of liabilities acquired or incurred\nprior to the expiration of such period.\nAMENDMENTS TO OTHER LAWS\nSEC. 4. (a) The National Housing Act is amended as follows:\n(1) The first sentence of section 2(a) of such Act is amended by\ninserting before the period at the end thereof the following: \"; and\nfor the purpose of financing the preservation of historic structures,\nand, as used in this section, the term 'historic structures' means resi-\ndential structures which are registered in the National Register of\nHistoric Places or which are certified by the Secretary of the Interior\nto conform to National Register criteria; and the term 'preservation'\nmeans restoration or rehabilitation undertaken for such purposes as\nare approved by the Secretary in regulations issued by him, after con-\nsulting with the Secretary of the Interior\".\n(2) Section 2(b) of such Act is amended by adding at the end\nthereof the following new paragraph:\nCORRECTED\nS. 3979-4\n\"A loan financing the preservation of a historic structure shall-\n\"(1) involve an amount not exceeding $15,000 per family unit;\nand\n\"(2) have a maturity not exceeding fifteen years and thirty-two\ndays.\".\n(b) Section 203 of the National Housing Act is amended by adding\nat the end thereof the following:\n\"(n) (1) The Secretary is authorized to insure under this section\nany mortgage meeting the requirements of subsection (b) of this\nsection, except as modified by this subsection. To be eligible, the mort-\ngage shall involve a dwelling unit in a cooperative housing project\nwhich is covered by a blanket mortgage insured under this Act. The\nmortgage amount as determined under the other provisions of sub-\nsection (b) of this section shall be reduced by an amount equal to\nthe portion of the unpaid balance of the blanket mortgage covering\nthe project which is attributable (as of the date the mortgage is\naccepted for insurance) to such unit.\n(2) For the purpose of this subsection-\n\"(A) The terms 'home mortgage' and 'mortgage' include a\nfirst lien given (in accordance with the laws of the State where\nthe property is located and accompanied by such security and\nother undertakings as may be required under regulations of the\nSecretary) to secure a loan made to finance the purchase of stock\nor membership in an nonprofit cooperative ownership housing\ncorporation the permanent occupancy of the dwelling units of\nwhich is restricted to members of such corporation, where the\npurchase of such stock or membership will entitle the purchaser\nto the permanent occupancy of one of such units.\n\"(B) The terms 'appraised value of the property', 'value of\nthe property', and 'value' include the appraised value of a dwell-\ning unit in a cooperative housing project of the type described in\nsubparagraph (A) where the purchase of the stock or member-\nship involved will entitle the purchaser to the permanent occu-\npancy of that unit; and the term 'property' includes a dwelling\nunit in such a cooperative project.\n\"(C) The term 'mortgagor' includes a person or persons giv-\ning a first lien (of the type describe in subparagraph (A)) to\nsecure a loan to finance the purchase of stock or membership in a\ncooperative housing corporation.\"\n(c) Section 10(b) of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act (12 U.S.C.\n1430(b)), as amended, is amended by striking the dollar figure\n\"$40,000\" and inserting in lieu thereof \"$55,000 (except that with\nrespect to dwellings in Alaska, Guam, and Hawaii the foregoing\nlimitation may, by regulation of the Board, be increased by not to\nexceed 50 per centum) \"\n(d) Section 5(c) of the Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933 (12 U.S.C.\n1464 as amended, is amended by adding in the nineteenth para-\ngraph thereof after the phrase \"section 401 (d) the following phrase:\n\"or section 408(a)\".\n(e) Section 5 of Public Law 93-387 is amended to read \"The Coun-\ncil shall report to the President, and through him to the Congress, on a\nquarterly basis and not later than thirty days after the close of each\ncalendar quarter, concerning its activities, findings, and recommenda-\ntions with respect to the containment of inflation and the maintenance\nof a vigorous and prosperous peacetime economy.\".\nS. 3979-5\nFEDERAL RESERVE ACT AMENDMENT\nSEC. 5. Section 10(b) of the Federal Reserve Act is amended by add-\ning the following at the end thereof:\n\"Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Federal Reserve bank, under\nrules and regulations prescribed by the Board of Governors of the Fed-\neral Reserve System, may make advances to any member bank on its\ntime notes having such maturities as the Board may prescribe and\nwhich are secured by mortgage loans covering a one-to-four family\nresidence. Such advances shall bear interest at a rate equal to the lowest\ndiscount rate in effect at such Federal Reserve bank on the date of such\nnote.\".\nSpeaker of the House of Representatives.\nVice President of the United States and\nPresident of the Senate.\nEMBARGOED FOR RELEASE\nOCTOBER 18, 1974\nUNTIL 10:30 AM, EDT\nOffice of the White House Press Secretary\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nTHE EMERGENCY HOME PURCHASE ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1974 (S. 3979)\nFACT SHEET\nPresident Ford today signed into law the Emergency Home Purchase\nAssistance Act of 1974. The President had urged enactment of similar\nlegislation in his address to a Joint Session of Congress on October 8th.\nThe Act extends, on a temporary basis, the advantages offered by the\nGovernment National Mortgage Association (GNMA or Ginnie Mae) to\nmortgages which are not Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insured\nor Veterans Administration (VA) guaranteed -- so called \"conventional\"\nmortgages. Three billion dollars an amount sufficient to finance\nabout 100, 000 new homes -- would be available. The proposed program\nwill be in addition to the $9. 9 billion FHA/VA tandem programs announced\nin January and May and the $3 billion Federal Home Loan Mortgage\nCorporation (FHLMC) conventional mortgage purchase program announced\nin May.\nGNMA has aided in creating a supply of credit for mortgages on new homes\ninsured by FHA or guaranteed by VA by\n-- assuring, through commitments in advance, purchase of\nmortgages at a pre-determined price.\n-- having agreed to a lower-than-market interest rate on the\nmortgage at the time such commitment to purchase is made,\nsubsidizing market interest rates in the event market interest\nrates do not fall by the time GNMA purchases the mortgage\npursuant to its commitment.\nguaranteeing, on a \"full faith and credit basis, obligations\nsecured by such mortgages.\nBACKGROUND - HOUS ING INDUSTRY SITUATION CRITICAL\nOver the past 23 months\n-- housing starts have dropped from 2. 51 million units to 1. 12\nmillion units.\nunemployment in the construction industry is 12. 4 percent\nand climbing, with over a half million construction workers\nnow unemployed.\n-- many homebuilders are in severe financial difficulty.\nFEATURES OF THE EMERGENCY HOME PUR CHASE ASSISTANCE ACT\nOF 1974\nBy making conventional mortgages eligible for purchase by GNMA, builders\nand homebuyers will be assisted where home mortgage credit is scarce or\nnon-existent.\nMORE\n-2-\n1. Level of Commitments. Aggregate amount of commitments and mort-\ngages which GNMA could hold at any time, i.e. have purchased and not\nresold, could not exceed $7. 75 billion. Initial programs aggregating\n$3 billion of mortgage commitments, or enough to finance about 100, 000\nnew homes, is contemplated. Any additional programs will be activated\nas circumstances require.\n2. Mortgage Amounts, Interest Rates, Fees and Downpayment Require-\nments. The program would provide for a maximum mortgage amount of\n$42,000. Under the formula provided by the law, the mortgage interest\nrate will be determined on the basis of yields on six to twelve year Treasury\nissues for the monthpreceeding the month in which the GNMA commitments\nis made plus one-half of one percent (50 basis points). Under this formula,\nthe mortgage rate for commitments made in October would be somewhat\nabove, the rate offered on GNMA tandem programs for FHA/VA mortgages -\npresently 8-3/4%. Twenty percent downpayments would be required with\nan exception for down to 5% downpayments if the additional mortgage\namount is covered by a qualified private mortgage insurance contract so\nas to minimize cost of mortgagor defaults. There will also be a com-\nmitment fee and other fees to cover reserves for losses and certain\nfinancing costs.\n3. GNMA Disposition of Conventional Mortgages. Following the precedent\nof existing law, GNMA could, depending upon market or other factors, sell\nmortgages to the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) or\nFHLMC, sell mortgages with a provision for pooling by FNMA or FHLMC\nor other approved issuers and sale by such issuers of GNMA-guaranteed\n\"pass through\" securities or bond type securities on the market or to the\nFederal Financing Bank; or issue its own mortgage backed securities for\nsale to the Federal Financing Bank.\n4. Cost and Budget Implications. Any resulting subsidy would be paid\nout of corporate funds and ultimately from Treasury borrowing. Dollar\namount of mortgages purchased would not be excluded from budget outlays,\nbut would appear as outlays in any fiscal year only to the extent they are\nnot offset by sales that year. However, any losses on resale -- which\ncan result if market yields at the time of resale are less than the yield\nat which GNMA bought the mortgage, will appear as outlays.\n#\n#\n#\nFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE\nOCTOBER 18, 1974\nOFFICE OF THE WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nREMARKS OF THE PRESIDENT\nAT THE\nSIGNING OF S. 3979\nTHE EMERGENCY HOME PURCHASE\nASSISTANCE ACT OF 1974\nTHE CABINET ROOM\n10:36 A.M. EDT\nLet me at the outset express my appreciation\nto the Congress for responding so quickly, and I think\nbasically so well, in passing this housing legislation,\nwhich is needed for an industry that is in serious\ntrouble.\nWe cannot tolerate a building program at the\npresent rate for home building. And this legislation,\nwhich the Congress has passed, will materially help,\nin my judgment, in turning the corner as far as the\nhousing industry is concerned.\nIt is not new, and other things have to be\ndone, but it will provide a shot in the arm for the\nhousing industry. I regret, of course, that it didn't\ninclude condominiums and apartments, but be that as\nit may, it is good legislation. We will make it work.\nI wish there was a little more flexibility in\none or two of the provisions, but nevertheless,\nconsidering the time factor, I compliment the Congress\nfor moving so quickly and particularly Senator Cranston\nand Senator Brooke, who were instrumental in the first\ninstance, but I think the credit goes to the Congress\nas a whole in moving ahead so rapidly at a time when\nthe housing industry needed help.\nSo, it is a privilege and a pleasure for me to\nsign this bill in the presence of a number of Members\nwho had a very major factor in making this possible.\nI do thank you all very, very much. As I said,\nwe are going to move ahead, I hope, in some other\nareas, and we will get a lot more homes built.\nThank you all for being here.\nMORE\nPage 2\nI should have said the Secretary is going to\nstart implementing, I think, this next Tuesday. I do\nwant to compliment the Secretary, who I think worked\nwith the Congress and did a fine job in moving with\nthe Congress and getting it through, and now he is\ngoing to make it work.\nThank you.\nEND\n(AT 10:40 A.M. EDT)\nFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE\nOctober 18, 1974\nOffice of the White House Press Secretary\nTHE WHITE HOUSE\nSTATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT\nIt is with great pleasure today that I am signing into law S. 3979, the\nEmergency Home Purchase Assistance Act of 1974.\nIn my remarks to the Joint Session of the Congress on October 8, I\nurged the Congress to enact, before recess, additional legislation\nto make most home mortgages eligible for purchase by an agency of\nthe Federal Government. I also remarked that I remembered how\nmuch Congress can get done when it wants to.\nI am most pleased that exactly one week after my remarks, the Congress\nresponded with passage of the Emergency Home Purchase Assistance Act of 1974.\nThis bill authorizes the Government National Mortgage Association in\nthe Department of Housing and Urban Development to make commitments\nat predetermined interest rates to purchase mortgages, both on new\nand existing homes, which are not Federal Housing Administration\ninsured or Veterans Administration guaranteed -- the so-called\n\"conventional\" mortgages which comprise about 80% of all mortgages.\nThe advantage of the plan is that with the GNMA commitment, the\nhomebuyer, builder and lender have an assured source of financing\nat a known, favorable interest rate. The cost to the Government is\nlimited to the loss which GNMA realizes if its selling price for\na mortgage is less than its original purchase price.\nLike most emergency measures, this bill has some minuses.\nNotwithstanding the increasing proportion of American families that\nchoose each year to live in apartments or condominiums, the bill\nunfortunately does not cover conventional mortgages for apartment\nor condominium projects. Moreover, I had hoped that this help for\nthe housing industry could be delivered with a minimum inflationary\nimpact, and I know that the Congress intended the program to be\nself-supporting. However, the bill establishes a rigid, illogical\ninterest ceiling formula that fails to relate interest income to\nactual borrowing costs and to cover adequately administrative\ncosts.\n#\n#\n#\nOctober 17, 1974\nDear Mr. Director:\nThe following bills were received at the White House on\nOctober 17th:\nS.J. Res. 236\nS. 2840\nH.R. 7768\nH.R. 14225\nS.J. Res. 250\nS. 3007\nH.R. 7780\nH.R. 14597\nS.J. Res. 251\nS. 3234\nH.R. 11221\nH.R. 15148\nS. 355\nS. 3473\nH.R. 11251\nH.R. 15427\nS. 605\nS. 3698\nH.R. 11452\nH.R. 15540\nS. 628\nS. 3792\nH.R. 11830\nH.R. 15643\nS. 1411\nS. 3838\nH.R. 12035\nH.R. 16857\nS. 1412\nS. 3979\nH.R. 12281\nH.R. 17027\nS. 1769\nH.R. 6624\nH.R. 13561\nS. 2348\nH.R. 6642\nH.R. 13631\nPlease let the President have reports and recommendations\nas to the approval of these bills as soon as possible.\nSincerely,\nRobert D. Linder\nChief Executive Clerk\nThe Honorable Roy L. Ash\nDirector\nOffice of Management and Budget\nWashington, D. C."
}