Ask the Scholar

Page 1 of 1
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 1

OCR

Digitized from Box 3 of the White House Press Releases at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library WATERGATE SPECIAL PROSECUTION FORCE United States Department of Justice 1425 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 September 4, 1974 Philip W. Buchen, Esq. Counsel to the President The White House Washington, D. C. Dear Mr. Buchen: You have inquired as to my opinion regard- ing the length of delay that would follow, in the event of an indictment of former President Richard M. Nixon, before a trial could reasonably be had by a fair and impartial jury as guaranteed by the Consti- tution. The factual situation regarding a trial of Richard M. Nixon within constitutional bounds, is unprecedented. IL is especially unique in view of the recent House Judiciary Committee inquiry on impeachment, resulting in a unanimous adverse finding to Richard M. Nixon on the Article involving obstruc- tion of justice. The massive publicity given the hearings and the findings that ensued, the reversal of judgment of a number of the members of the Republican Party following release of the June 23 tape recording, and their statements carried nation- wide, and finally, the resignation of Richard M. Nixon, require a delay, before selection of a jury is begun, of a period from nine months to a year, and perhaps even longer. This judgment is predicated on a review of the decisions of United States Courts involving prejudicial pre-trial publicity. The Government's decision to pursue impeachment proceedings and the tremendous volume of television, radio and newspaper - 2 - coverage given thereto, are factors emphasized by the Courts in weighing the time a trial can be had. The complexities involved in the process of selecting a jury and the time it will take to complete the process, I find difficult to estimate at this time. The situation involving Richard M. Nixon is readily distinguishable from the facts involved in the case of United States V. Mitchell, et al, set for trial on September 30th. The defendants in the Mitchell case were indicted by a grand jury operating in secret session. They will be called to trial, unlike Richard M. Nixon, if indicted, without any previous adverse finding by an investigatory body holding public hearings on its conclusions. It is precisely the condemnation of Richard M. Nixon already made in the impeachment process, that would make it unfair to the defendants in the case of United States V. Mitchell, et al, for Richard M. Nixon now to be joined as a co-conspirator, should it be concluded that an indictment of him was proper. The United States V. Mitchell, et al, trial will within itself generate new publicity, some undoubtodly prejudicial to Richard M. Nixon. I bear this in mind when I estimate the earliest time of trial of Richard M. Nixon under his constitutional guarantees, in the event of indictment, to be as indicated above. If further information is desired, please advise me. Sincerely, LEON JANORSKI Special Prosecutor

Page data

Page
1
Source index
0
Type
document
Media ID
81db27ba5a499d75
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
7336606
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "7336606",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7336606",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letter of Leon Jaworski, Special Prosecutor, Watergate Special Prosecution Office, US Department of Justice, to Philip W. Buchen, Counsel to the President, concerning hypothetical Nixon trial",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7336606",
    "collections": [
        "White House Press Releases (Ford Administration)",
        "Press Releases"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/6/3366/7336606/content/library/document/0248/whpr19741017-011.pdf",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/6/3366/7336606/content/library/document/0248/whpr19741017-011.pdf",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/6/3366/7336606/content/library/document/0248/whpr19741017-011.pdf",
    "imageCount": 1,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "7336606",
    "label": "Letter of Leon Jaworski, Special Prosecutor, Watergate Special Prosecution Office, US Department of Justice, to Philip W. Buchen, Counsel to the President, concerning hypothetical Nixon trial",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7336606"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "7336606",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7336606",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letter of Leon Jaworski, Special Prosecutor, Watergate Special Prosecution Office, US Department of Justice, to Philip W. Buchen, Counsel to the President, concerning hypothetical Nixon trial",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7336606",
    "collections": [
        "White House Press Releases (Ford Administration)",
        "Press Releases"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/6/3366/7336606/content/library/document/0248/whpr19741017-011.pdf",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/6/3366/7336606/content/library/document/0248/whpr19741017-011.pdf",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/6/3366/7336606/content/library/document/0248/whpr19741017-011.pdf",
    "imageCount": 1,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7336606",
    "naId": 7336606,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "day": 4,
            "logicalDate": "1974-09-04",
            "month": 9,
            "year": 1974
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 1,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "document",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/6/3366/7336606/content/library/document/0248/whpr19741017-011.pdf",
    "mediaId": "81db27ba5a499d75",
    "ocrText": "Digitized from Box 3 of the White House Press Releases at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library\nWATERGATE SPECIAL PROSECUTION FORCE\nUnited States Department of Justice\n1425 K Street, N.W.\nWashington, D.C. 20005\nSeptember 4, 1974\nPhilip W. Buchen, Esq.\nCounsel to the President\nThe White House\nWashington, D. C.\nDear Mr. Buchen:\nYou have inquired as to my opinion regard-\ning the length of delay that would follow, in the\nevent of an indictment of former President Richard M.\nNixon, before a trial could reasonably be had by a\nfair and impartial jury as guaranteed by the Consti-\ntution.\nThe factual situation regarding a trial of\nRichard M. Nixon within constitutional bounds, is\nunprecedented. IL is especially unique in view of\nthe recent House Judiciary Committee inquiry on\nimpeachment, resulting in a unanimous adverse finding\nto Richard M. Nixon on the Article involving obstruc-\ntion of justice. The massive publicity given the\nhearings and the findings that ensued, the reversal\nof judgment of a number of the members of the\nRepublican Party following release of the June 23\ntape recording, and their statements carried nation-\nwide, and finally, the resignation of Richard M. Nixon,\nrequire a delay, before selection of a jury is begun,\nof a period from nine months to a year, and perhaps\neven longer. This judgment is predicated on a review\nof the decisions of United States Courts involving\nprejudicial pre-trial publicity. The Government's\ndecision to pursue impeachment proceedings and the\ntremendous volume of television, radio and newspaper\n- 2 -\ncoverage given thereto, are factors emphasized by\nthe Courts in weighing the time a trial can be had.\nThe complexities involved in the process of selecting\na jury and the time it will take to complete the\nprocess, I find difficult to estimate at this time.\nThe situation involving Richard M. Nixon is\nreadily distinguishable from the facts involved in\nthe case of United States V. Mitchell, et al, set\nfor trial on September 30th. The defendants in the\nMitchell case were indicted by a grand jury operating\nin secret session. They will be called to trial,\nunlike Richard M. Nixon, if indicted, without any\nprevious adverse finding by an investigatory body\nholding public hearings on its conclusions. It is\nprecisely the condemnation of Richard M. Nixon\nalready made in the impeachment process, that would\nmake it unfair to the defendants in the case of\nUnited States V. Mitchell, et al, for Richard M. Nixon\nnow to be joined as a co-conspirator, should it be\nconcluded that an indictment of him was proper.\nThe United States V. Mitchell, et al, trial\nwill within itself generate new publicity, some\nundoubtodly prejudicial to Richard M. Nixon. I bear\nthis in mind when I estimate the earliest time of trial\nof Richard M. Nixon under his constitutional guarantees,\nin the event of indictment, to be as indicated above.\nIf further information is desired, please\nadvise me.\nSincerely,\nLEON JANORSKI\nSpecial Prosecutor"
}