Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
7341754
label
Summary of Proposed Rescissions and Deferrals [Report]
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
Source extras
naId
7341754
levelOfDescription
item
productionDates
day
1
logicalDate
1975-12-01
month
12
year
1975
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
dfdfde145980908c
ocrText
[12-1-75] SUMMARY OF PROPOSED RESCISSIONS AND DEFERRALS (In thousands of dollars) Budget Rescission # Item Authority Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service R76-15 Agricultural research service (construction) 225 Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service R76-16 Water Bank Act Program 12,500 R76-17 Forestry Incentives Program 18,750 Farmers Home Administration R76-18 Rural water and waste disposal grants. 150,000 R76-19 Rural development grants 12,344 R76-20 Rural housing for domestic farm labor 9,375 R76-21 Mutual and self-help housing 12,287 R76-22 Self-help housing and development fund 1,493 R76-23 Rural housing insurance fund 10,000 R76-24 Rural community fire protection grants 4.375 Agricultural Marketing Service R76-25 Payments to States and possessions, Agricultural Marketing Service 2,000 Housing and Urban Development: Housing Production and Mortgage Credit R76-26 State housing finance and * development 600,000 Other Independent Agencies: Consumer Product Safety Commission R76-27 Salaries and expenses 5,225 Subtotal, rescissions 838,579 Deferral # Agriculture: D76-68 Agricultural Research Service 7,570 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service D76-69 Animal and plant health inspection service (construction-Fleming Key Animal Import Center) 6,314 Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service D76-70 Agricultural Conservation program 90,000 Digitized from Box 18 of the White House Press Releases at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library 2 Budget Deferral # Item Authority D76-71 Commodity Credit Corporation 2,787 Farmers Home Administration D76-72 Rural water and waste disposal grants 50,000 Soil Conservation Service D76-73 Watershed and flood prevention operations 22,500 D76-74 Resource conservation and development. 4,960 Commerce: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration D76-75 Fishermen's guaranty fund 152 Office of the Assistant Secretary for Science and Technology D76-76 Scientific and technical research and services 1,187 Health, Education, and Welfare: Assistant Secretary for Human Development D76-11B Research and training activities overseas (special foreign currency program) 4,252 Labor: Departmental Management D76-77 Working capital fund 977 D76-78 Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (1,431) Environmental Protection Agency: Research and Development D76-79 Research and development (air research and development) 2,000 D76-80 Research and development (water quality research) 4,600 Abatement and Control D76-81 Abatement and control (air control agency grants) 3,750 D76-82 Abatement and control (water quality control agency grants) 10,000 D76-83 Abatement and control (clean lakes grants) 15,000 3 Budget Deferral # Item Authority National Aeronautics and Space Administration: D76-84 Research and program management 2,900 State: Refugee and Migration Affairs D76-85 Special assistance to refugees from Cambodia and Vietnam 28,493 Subtotal, deferrals 257,442 Total, rescissions and deferrals 1,096,021 * Total new budget authority. For 1976, $15 million in contract authority and $15 million to liquidate that authority is proposed for rescission. ** The amount of this deferral is not counted in the total because the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation is excluded from the budget totals by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-406). SUMMARY OF SPECIAL MESSAGES FOR FY 1976 (Amounts in thousands of dollars) Rescissions Deferrals Eighth special message: New items 838,579 253,190 Changes to amounts pre- viously submitted --- -4,055 Effect of the eighth special message 838,579 249,135 Previous special messages 1,502,991 3,578,426 Total amount proposed in special messages to date 2,341,570 3,827,561 (in 27 res- (in 85 cission deferrals) proposals) NOTE: All amounts listed represent budget authority except for $87,689,681 consisting of two general revenue sharing deferrals (of outlays only) reported in the seventh 1976 special message. Rescission Proposal No: R76-15 PROPOSED RESCISSION OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1012 of P.L. 93-344 Agency U.S. Department of Agriculture New budget authority $ 10,395,000 Bureau (P.L. 94-122 ) Agriculture Research Service Other budgetary resources 8,667,500 Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources 19,062,500 Agriculture Research Service (Construction) 12X1400 Amount proposed for rescission $ 225,000 OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1012): 05-18-1400-0-1-352 Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes X No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual X Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) X No-year Other JUSTIFICATION Rescission is proposed of $225,000 provided in the FY 1976 Agriculture and Related Agencies Appropriation Act for planning an addition to the Human Nutrition Laboratory, Grand Forks, North Dakota, to house animals. Initial construction at Grand Forks was limited to laboratory facilities, but a developing need for animal studies has necessitated the use of present laboratory space to house limited numbers of animals. Several steps have been taken to relieve crowding, including initiation of construction of a second floor addition to house experimental animals and completion of additional clinical and laboratory space for research scientists. In light of these measures to relieve the current problems and of Department policy to fully utilize existing research facilities prior to authorization of new construc- tion projects, additional construction at Grand Forks is not necessary. ESTIMATED EFFECTS In addition to producing current outlay savings of $225,000, adoption of this rescission would forestall future construction costs in excess of $1,000,000 and, later, annual operating costs. Research will continue to be conducted in facilities either existing or undergoing expansion. Should the need for animal studies continue to increase, additional space may be required at some future date. R76-15 2 Outlay Effect (estimated in tenths of millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 budget: 1. Budget outlay estimated for 1976 $ 5.6 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimated 0 Current Outlay Estimate for 1976: 3. Without deferral 15.0 4. With deferral 14.8 5. Current Outlay Savings 0.2 Outlay Savings for the Transition Quarter 0 Outlay Savings for 1977 0 R76-15 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Research Service Appropriations provided under this head in the Agriculture and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1976, are rescinded in the amount of $225,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1976. Rescission Proposal no: R76-16 PROPOSED RESCISSION OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1012 of P.L. 93-344 Agency U.S. Department of Agriculture New budget authority (See Bureau Agricultural Stabilization and (P.L. ) Conservation Service Other budgetary resources Coverage Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources Water Bank Act Program - 1976 12X3320 Amount proposed for rescission section below.) OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1012): 05-60-3320-0-1-320 Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes X No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual X Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) X No-year Other Coverage Fiscal Year 1976 Transition Quarter Budgetary Proposed Budgetary Proposed Resources Rescission Resources Rescission $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 (P.L. 94-122) (P.L. 94-122) Justification The program was authorized by the Water Bank Act (P.L. 91-559). The Act authorized the Secretary of Agriculture to enter into long-term agreements with farmers and landowners to preserve and improve migratory waterfowl habitat. The overall objective of this program is the same as a similar program currently being conducted by the Department of the Interior. Since the program complement each other and since adquate preservation of wetlands can be maintained under existing agreements, the Water Bank Program could be discontinued without significant adverse impact on the Nation. R76-16 - 2 - Estimated Effects Since the program provides only limited conservation benefits, its termination is of minimal consequence. Payments under prior year agreements will continue to be made until these agreements are fully satisfied. These agreements will have annual outlays of about $3.0 million for the next 9 years. Outlay Effect (estimated in tenths of millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 2.0 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate --- Curent Outlay Estimates for 1976: 3. Without rescission 4.1 4. With rescission 3.8 5. Current outlay savings (line 3 - line 4) .3 Outlay Savings for the Transition Quarter --- Outlay Savings for 1977 1.6 R76-16' DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Water Bank Program Appropriations provided under this head in the Agriculture and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1976, are rescinded in the amount of $10,000,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1976, and in the amount of $2,500,000 for the period July 1, 1976, through September 30, 1976. Rescission Proposal No: R76-17 PROPOSED RESCISSION OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1012 of P.L. 93-344 Agency U.S. Department of Agriculture New budget authority Bureau Agricultural Stabilization and (P.L. ) Conservation Service Other budgetary resources (See Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources coverage Forestry Incentives Program-1976 Amount proposed for section 12X3336 rescission below) OMB identification code: Legal authority '(in addition to sec. 1012): 05-60-336-0-1-302 Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual X Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) X No-year Other Coverage Fiscal Year 1976 Transition Quarter Budgetary Proposed Budgetary Proposed Resources Rescission Resources Rescission New budget authority (P.L. 94-122) 15,000,000 3,750,000 Other budgetary resources 9,280,771 Total budgetary resources 24,280,771 15,000,000 3,750,000 3,750,000 Justification Rescission of the $15,000,000 FY 1976 appropriations and the $3,750,000 transition quarter appropriation would discontinue this program which was first authorized by Section 1009 of the Agriculture and Consumer Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-86). The program provides cost-sharing to landowners for the purpose of stimulating long-term sawtimber production on private nonindustrial lands. There is serious doubt as to whether the national benefits derived from investments in this kind of program justify the expenditure of scarce national resources for its funding. Moreover, it is not clear that landowners would not invest their own capital if Federal cost-sharing R76-17 2 were not available. The program would be far more justifiable if there were a mechanism through which the Federal Government could regain its investment at the time the timber products were marketed just as the landowner regains his. In this case, however, the landowner not only realizes a profit on his invest- ment; but he also realizes a profit on the government's portion of the investment. Estimated Effects The Forestry Incentives Program can be terminated with little, if any, adverse impact on the Nation's capability to produce forestry products. Even without cost-sharing, technical assistance and advice would still be available to owners of such lands who wished to carry out tree planting, stand improvement, etc., at their own expense based on their assessment that such an under- taking is a sound economic investment. Outlay Effect (estimated in tenths of millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 0.0 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate 0.0 Current Outlay Estimates for 1976: 3. Without rescission 20.3 4. With rescission 10.9 5. Current outlay savings (line 3 - line 4) 9.4 Outlay Savings for the Transition Quarter 1.3 Outlay Savings for 1977 3.0 R76-17 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Forestry Incentives Program Appropriations provided under this head in the Agriculture and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1976, are rescinded in the amount of $15,000,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1976, and in the amount of $3,750,000 for the period July 1, 1976, through September 30, 1976. Rescission Proposal no: R76-18' PROPOSED RESCISSION OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1012 of P.L. 93-344 Agency U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE New budget authority Bureau Farmers Home Administration (P.L. ) Other budgetary resources (See Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources coverage Rural Water and Waste Disposal Grants 12X2066 Amount proposed for section rescission below) OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1012): 05-75-2066-0-1-451 Antideficiency Act Grant program X Yes No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual X Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) X No-year Other Coverage Fiscal Year 1976 Transition Quarter Budgetary Proposed Budgetary Proposed Resources Rescission Resources Rescission $250,000,000 $125,000,000 $37,500,000 $25,000,000 (P.L. 94-122 (P.L. 94-122) and 41) Justification A program level of $75 million for fiscal year 1976 and $12.5 million for the transition quarter is proposed. Of the $287.5 million appropriated by P.L. 94-122 and 94-41 for rural water and waste disposal grants over 15 months, $150 million is proposed for rescission and $50 million is to be deferred until fiscal year 1977. This program provides water and waste disposal development grants that are made to public or quasi-public agencies for the development, storage, treat- ment, purification, and distribution of domestic water or the collection, treatment, or disposal of waste in rural areas. Grants may not exceed 50 percent of the development cost of the projects. The $75 million proposed funding level is considered sufficient to meet the needs of this program, at this time, for the fol- lowing reasons: R76-18 2 1. The program level proposed is sufficient to fund the most urgent grant applications on hand which are ready for funding this fiscal year. 2. The grant program level proposed, including transfers from other agencies, is the appropriate amount to complement the loan authority of $470 million provided for water and sewer facility loans (Rural Development Insurance Fund) in the FY 1976 Agriculture and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, based on revised estimates of the proper balance between loans and grants. 3. Grant funds for this type program are also available from the Economic Development Administration, the Department of Commerce; the Department of the Army; and the Appalachian Regional Commission to assist in funding water and waste disposal projects in rural areas. Estimated Effects The estimated effects of this rescission are minimal. The funding level recommended by the President together with fund transfers from other agencies is considered sufficient to fund this program this fiscal year. Outlay Effect (Estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 66.0 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate --- Current outlay estimates for 1976: 3. Without rescission 71.8 4. With rescission 62.0 5. Current outlay savings (line 3 - 4) 9.8 Outlay savings for the transition quarter 2.3 Outlay savings for 1977 31.4 The total outlay effect of the proposed rescissions of $125 million in FY 1976 and $25 million in the transition quarter, as well as the deferral of $50 million would be as follows: FY 1976 -14.8 million TQ -4.3 million FY 1977 -41.4 million R76-18 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Farmers Home Administration Rural Water and Waste Disposal Grants Appropriations provided under this head in the Agriculture and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1976, are rescinded in the amount of $100,000,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1976, and in the amount of $25,000,000 for the period July 1, 1976, through September 30, 1976. Appropriations provided in the twelfth unnumbered paragraph of section 101 (e) of Public Law 94-41 for activities under the heading Rural Water and Waste Disposal Grants pursuant to sections 306 (a) (2) and 306 (a) (6) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1926) are rescinded in the amount of $25,000,000. Rescission Propo No: R76-19 PROPOSED RESCISSION OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1012 of P.L. 93-344 Agency U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE New budget authority Bureau Farmers Home Administration (P.L ) Other budgetary resources Appropriation title & symbol (See coverage Total budgetary resources section below) Rural Development Grants Amount proposed for 1262065 rescission OMB identification code: 05-75-2065-0-1-452 Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1012): Antideficiency Act Grant program X Yes No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: X Annual X Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) No-year Other Coverage Fiscal Year 1976 Transition Quarter Budgetary Proposed Budgetary Proposed Resources Rescission Resources Rescission $11,875,000 $9,375,000 $2,969,000 $2,969,000 (P.L. 94-122) (P.1.. 94-122) JUSTIFICATION This program supplements business and industrial loans made in rural areas for the purpose of improving, developing, or financing business, industry, and employment and improving the economic and environmental climate in rural communities. Loan funds are available for these same purposes at reasonable interest rates and terms through the community facilities loan program of the Department of Agriculture. To avoid duplication of programs and the costs associated with such duplication, the rescission of $12,344,000 in 1976 and the transition quarter is proposed. Estimated Effects The elimination of this program will have a minimum effect on the rural economy since funds are available from the community facilities loan program and from other sources to fund necessary projects. R76-19' 2 Outlay Effect (estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 10.0 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate -- Current outlay estimates for 1976: 3. Without rescission 10.0 4. With rescission 9.3 5. Current outlay savings (line 3 - line 4) .7 Outlay savings for the transition quarter .4 Outlay savings for 1977 6.0 R76-19 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Farmers Home Administration Rural Development Grants Appropriations provided under this head in the Agriculture and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1976, are rescinded in the amount of $9,375,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1976, and in the amount of $2,969,000 for the period July 1, 1976, through September 30, 1976. Rescission Proposa R76-20 0: PROPOSED RESCISSION OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1012 of P.L. 93-344 Agency Department of Agriculture New budget authority (See Bureau (P.L ) Farmers Home Administration Other budgetary resources Coverage Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources Rural Housing for Domestic Farm Labor 12X2004 Amount proposed for section rescission below.) OMB identification code: Legal authority '(in addition to sec. 1012): 05-75-2004-0-1-401 Antideficiency Act Grant program X Yes No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual X Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) X No-year Other Coverage: Fiscal Year 1976 Transition Quarter Budgetary Proposed Budgetary Proposed Resources Rescission Resources Rescission $7,500,000 $7,500,000 $1,875,000 $1,875,000 (P.L. 94-122) (P.L. 94-122) Justification: Termination of this program is proposed because other programs can more effectively provide housing for farm workers. Many farm workers are settling out of the migratory stream and becoming homeowners under the home ownership loan program (Rural Housing Insurance Fund). This program can provide a loan covering the full cost of the house, repayable over 33 years, at interest rates as low as 1 percent. This kind of housing assistance has much greater social, community, and economic benefits than can be provided by the farm labor housing program which generally provides housing for families on a temporary basis. In addition, the Sec. 515 (Housing Act of 1949) rental housing program is providing an increased supply of moderate-cost rental housing in rural areas. This program, which provides a 1 percent, 33-year loan and up to 90 percent grant, results in a very high Federal outlay relative to the number of persons benefited. In view of this fact and the other programs available to meet housing needs of domestic farm laborers, the program is proposed for termination. R76-20 2 Estimated Effects: The Labor Housing Loans and Grants represent a very small percentage of total funding of FmHA housing programs. The discontinuance of these grants would have a minimal effect on the supply of housing in rural areas. Outlay Effect (Estimated in Millions of Dollars): Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 6.3 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate | Current outlay estimates for 1976: 3. Without rescission 6.0 4. With rescission 5.5 5. Current outlay savings (line 3 - line 4) .5 Outlay savings for the transition quarter .1 Outlay savings for 1977 2.2 R76-20 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Farmers Home Administration Rural Housing for Domestic Farm Labor Grants Appropriations provided under this head in the Agriculture and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1976, are rescinded in the amount of $7,500,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1976, and in the amount of $1,875,000 for the period July 1, 1976, through September 30, 1976. Rescission Prope 1. No: R76-21 PROPOSED RESCISSION OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1012 of P.L. 93-344 Agency U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE New budget authority Bureau (P.L. ) (See FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION Other budgetary resources Coverage Appropriation title & symbol section Total budgetary resources below.) Mutual and Self-Help Housing Amount proposed for 12X2006 rescission OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1012): 05-75-2006-0-1-401 Antideficiency Act Grant program X Yes No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual X Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) X No-year Other Coverage Fiscal Year 1976 Transition Quarter Budgetary Proposed Budgetary Proposed Resources Rescission Resources Rescission New budget authority (P.L.94-122) $9,000,000 $9,000,000 $2,250,000 $2,250,000 Other budgetary resources 1,036,529 1,036,529 -- Total budgetary resources $10,036,529 $10,036,529 $2,250,000 $2,250,000 Justification Grants are used to provide technical and supervisory assistance to groups of families who build their homes by mutually exchanging labor. Owing to the relatively low number of families that have taken advantage of this program and the greater effectiveness of other programs in meeting overall housing needs, the rescission of these budgetary resources is proposed. R76-21 2 Estimated Effects Although a significant effort was made by the field staffs, the Farmers Home Administration had difficulty granting the funds available in 1975. There was a scarcity both of eligible applicants and of applicants who showed evidence of being able to perform satisfactorily enough to be awarded grants. The same scarcities are expected in 1976. Therefore, terminating this program will deny benefits to very few families. Outlay Effects (Estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's in 1976 budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for FY 1976 $ .7 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the outlay estimate | Current outlay estimates for 1976: 3. Without rescission 6.0 4. With rescission 5.0 5. Current outlay savings (line 3 - line 4) 1.0 Outlay savings for transition quarter .2 Outlay savings for 1977 4.0 R76-21 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Farmers Home Administration Mutual and Self-Help Housing Appropriations provided under this head in the Agriculture and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1976, are rescinded in the amount of $9,000,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1976, and in the amount of $2,250,000 for the period July 1, 1976, through September 30, 1976. Unobligated balances of appropriations made available under this head in Appropriation Acts for prior years are rescinded. Rescission Proposal 0: R76-22 PROPOSED RESCISSION OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1012 of P.L. 93-344 Agency U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE New budget authority $ Bureau (P.L. ) Farmers Home Administration 1,498,032 Other budgetary resources Appropriation title & symbol 1,498,032 Total budgetary resources Self-Help Housing Land Development Fund 12X4222 Amount proposed for rescission $ 1,498,032 OMB identification code: 05-75-4222-0-3-401 Legal authority '(in addition to sec. 1012): Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) No-year Other Justification The fund was authorized by section 1005 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, to make loans at three percent interest for two years to acquire and develop sites. These sites are then subdivided and sold to eligible families, nonprofit organizations, and cooperatives. This program operates in conjunction with the Mutual and self-help housing program (see R76-21) that provides grants to groups of families who build their homes--sometimes, on sites developed through use of the fund--by mutually exchanging labor. Both programs are proposed for termination because relatively few groups have made use of the programs and because other programs are more effective in meeting overall housing needs. R76-22 2 Estimated Effects Of the $900,000 in loan funds available for this program in FY 1975, $234,000 was obligated. Since the demand for funds under this program has been very limited, insignificant effects would result from the proposed rescission. Outlay Effects (Estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 .2 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate - Current outlay estimates for 1976: 3. Without rescission .8 4. With rescission .2 5. Current outlay savings (line 3 - line 4) .6 Outlay savings for the transition quarter .2 Outlay savings for 1977 .6 R76-22 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Self-Help Housing Land Development Fund Unobligated balances of appropriations provided for direct loans pursuant to section 523 (b) (1) (B) of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 USC 1471-1490C) and related advances in the Department of Agriculture and Related Agencies Appropriation Acts of 1970 and 1971, and the Supplemental Appropriation Act, 1969, are rescinded. Rescission Propo: No: R76-23 PROPOSED RESCISSION OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1012 of P.L. 93-344 Agency U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE New budget authority $ 2,716,000,000 Bureau (P.L. 94-122 ) Farmers Home Administration Other budgetary resources Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources 2,716,000,000 Rural Housing Insurance Fund 12X4141 Amount proposed for (Farm Labor Housing Loans) rescission $ 10,000,000 OMB identification code: Legal authority '(in addition to sec. 1012): 05-75-4141-0-3-401 Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes X No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: X Annual Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) No-year X Other Loan Authority Justification Loans for farm labor housing -- one of several loan programs encompassed by the Rural Housing Insurance Fund -- are made to farm owners, to public or private nonprofit organizations, or to nonprofit, State-imcorporated organizations of farmworkers. In recent years, most of the loans have been made to public organizations and nonprofit associations at a 1% interest rate. The loans may be used to provide living quarters, household furnishings, and related facilities for domestic farm labor. In comparison to other housing programs of the Farmers Home Administration, these loans have made insignificant contributions to meeting housing needs in rural areas. From the inception of the program in fiscal year 1962 through June 30, 1975, a total of 460 initial and subsequent loans have been made, obligating a total of $49 million. Further, loans to qualified farmworkers for similar housing purposes are available through two other programs operated under the Rural Housing Insurance Fund -- rural rental housing loans and homeownership loans. Estimated Effects The estimated effects of rescinding this program are considered negligible, since it represents a very small percentage of the loan authority available for housing programs and since housing assistance for farmworkers can be provided through the homeownership and rural rental housing loan programs. R76-23 2 Outlay Effect (estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 162.0 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate --- Current Outlay Estimates for 1976: 3. Without rescission 267.5 4. With rescission 267.5 5. Current outlay savings (line 3 - line 4) ---- Outlay savings for transition quarter --- Outlay savings for 1977 0.4 R76-23 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Farmers Home Administration Rural Housing Insurance Fund The amounts made available for insured loans and for subsidized interest loans to low income borrowers under this head in the Agriculture and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1976, are rescinded in the amount of $10,000,000. Rescission Proposal 0: R76-24 PROPOSED RESCISSION OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1012 of P.L. 93-344 Agency DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE New budget authority Bureau (P.L. ) Farmers Home Administration (See Other budgetary resources Coverage Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources section below.) Rural Community Fire Protection Grants 1262067 Amount proposed for rescission OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1012): 05-75-2067-0-1-452 Antideficiency Act Grant program X Yes No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: XX Annual X Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) No-year Other Coverage Fiscal Year 1976 Transition Quarter Budgetary Proposed Budgetary Proposed Resources Rescission Resources Rescission $3,500,000 $3,500,000 $875,000 $875,000 (P.L. 94-122) (P.L. 94-122) Justification This program, authorized under the Rural Development Act of 1972, would provide funds for fire fighting equipment and for organizing and training personnel in rural communities to assist in fire control. This program, which has a high cost per person served, is proposed for termination. Adequate credit assistance to provide this equipment is available at reasonable interest rates and terms through the community facilities loan program. Estimated Effects: The estimated effects of the proposed rescission are negligible for the following reasons: first, community facilities loans are available at reasonable interest rates and terms; and, second, the Forest Service makes surplus fire fighting equipment available to rural communities. R76-24 2 Outlay Effect (estimated in tenths of millions of dollars): Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for FY 1976 0 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate 0 Current Outlay Estimate for 1976: 3. Without rescission 2.8 4. With rescission 0 5. Current outlay savings (line 3 - line 4) 2.8 Outlay Savings for the Transition Quarter .7 Outlay Savings for 1977 .9 R76-24 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Farmers Home Administration Rural Community Fire Protection Grants Appropriations provided under this head in the Agriculture and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1976, are rescinded in the amount of $3,500,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1976, and in the amount of $875,000 for the period July 1, 1976, through September 30, 1976. R76-25 Rescission Proposal No: PROPOSED RESCISSION OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1012 of P.L. 93-344 Agency U.S. Department of Agriculture New budget authority (See - Bureau (P.L. ) Agricultural Marketing Service Other budgetary resources Coverage Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources = Payments to States and Possessions, Agricultural Marketing Service, 1976 (1262501) Amount proposed for rescission section below. ) OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1012): 05-81-2501--5-1-352 Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual X Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) No-year Other Coverage Fiscal Year 1976 Transition Quarter Budgetary Proposed Budgetary Proposed Resources Rescission Resources Rescission $1,600,000 $1,600,000 $400,000 $400,000 (P.L. 94-122) (P.L. 94-122) Justification Since 1948, Federal matching funds have been provided under the program to assist State Departments of Agriculture to conduct pilot marketing service projects geared to developing ongoing State capabilities and services. The policy to restrict funds to pilot activities was developed in cooperation with States and has had consistent State support. During the 27 years, most States have been able to obtain State funding for productive activities initiated on a pilot basis under the program. As a result, the majority of State Departments of Agriculture have, in recent years, conducted the bulk of their marketing work outside this program. For example, many States are now using State resources to carry out their portion of Federal-State market news programs and agricultural statistical services that were initially funded by the Federal Government. Ongoing State domestic promotional and informational programs are fully State-funded. The costs of State livestock grading programs has been taken over by the States or supported through user fees. A number of export marketing projects started under this program just a few years ago have been shifted to other sources of funding. R76- 25 2 Over the years, as ongoing State marketing services and other responsibilities increased, the importance of this program to the States has diminished. State activities funded by this program have received less interest and attention by State leaders, resulting in fewer innovative marketing service proposals being submitted by the States to the Agricultural Marketing Service for funding consideration and generally leaving AMS with the choice of supporting activities well past the pilot stage, approving mediocre work, or turning a good share of the funds back to the Federal Treasury. The diminishing State interest in the program is substantiated by the fact that one-third of the 1974 participants did not request program funds for fiscal year 1975. Of the 30 States submitting proposals for 1975, 16 were not able to develop projects that met the major considerations for approving work. A major stumbling block was that many States were unable or not inclined to come up with State matching funds for developing new State marketing services beyond those services already provided or those that had previously been pilot-tested. Estimated Effects Rescinding the 1976 and transition quarter appropriations will have little impact on the marketing projects carried out by the States. As illustrated above, States have assumed funding of marketing service activities and have recently shown little interest in the pilot programs financing available through this program. Outlay Effect (estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate Current outlay estimate for 1976: 3. Without rescission $1.6 4. With rescission -- 5. Current outlay savings $1.6 Outlay savings for the Transition Quarter .4 Outlay savings for 1977 -- R76- 25 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service Payments to States and Possessions Appropriations provided under this head in the Agriculture and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1976, are rescinded in the amount of $1,600,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1976, and in the amount of $400,000 for the period July 1, 1976, through September 30, 1976. R76- 26 Rescission Proposal No: PROPOSED RESCISSION OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1012 of P.L. 93-344 Agency DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT New budget authority $ 600,000,000 Bureau Housing Production and Mortgage Credit (P.L. 94-116 ) Other budgetary resources Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources 600,000,000 State Housing Finance and Development Agencies Amount proposed for rescission-total 86x4240 new budget authority $ 600,000,000 (for 1976, $15 million in contract authority and $15 million to liquidate that contract authority) OMB identification code: Legal authority '(in addition to sec. 1012): 25-02-4240-5-1-451 Antideficiency Act Grant program X Yes No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual Appropriation X Multiple-year fiscal year 2116 X Contract authority (expiration date) No-year Other Justification Section 802 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-383) authorizes interest subsidy grants to, and Federal guarantees of obligations issued by, State housing finance and development agencies. The HUD-Independent Agencies Appropriation Act, 1976 (P.L. 94-116) provided $15 million in annual contract authority for interest subsidies and $15 million in appropriations to liquidate that contract authority in 1976. This appropriation is the first made under the authority of Section 802. Annual contracts up to $15 million may now be made for a term of up to 40 years, which means the available contract authority translates into $600 million of budget authority ($15 million X 40 years = $600 million.) If used, the interest subsidy grants would subsidize up to one-third of the interest cost of taxable obligations issued by State agencies. Whether or not these subsidies would result in lower borrowing costs to the recipient agencies would depend on the interest rate on taxable securities relative to the current market rates for tax-exempt issues. In some cases, the tax-exempt rate would be more favorable than the subsidized, taxable rate -- resulting in no advantage to the agencies. In other cases, the subsidized taxable rate would be lower, reducing borrowing costs to the agency. Federal interest subsidies as provided under Section 802 are not the only available means for lowering agency borrowing costs. A number of State agencies have indicated a preference for FHA insurance or a coinsurance program as authorized under Section 244 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. A number of States are already requiring Federal mortgage insurance on agency projects ,and the Department is currently examining the relative benefits and costs of implementing Section 244. R76- 26 2 Also, State governments could lower the borrowing costs of their State housing finance and development agencies more than Section 802 assistance would by pledging their "full faith and credit" to the borrowing of the agencies. It can be demonstrated that the issuance of such a pledge is equal to, and in some cases superior to, the interest subsidy provisions of Section 802. Thus, the interest subsidies are not needed. Estimated Effects Since State backing for securities issued by housing and development agencies could reduce borrowing costs by more than the interest subsidies, this rescission need not affect the activity level of these agencies. Outlay Effect (estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 0 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate 0 Current Outlay Estimates for 1976: 3. Without rescission 0 4. With rescission 0 5. Current outlay savings (line 3 - line 4) 0 0 Outlay savings for the Transition Quarter 0 Outlay savings for 1977 0 Outlay savings for 1978 15.0 Outlay savings for 1979 15.0 R76- 26 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOUSING PROGRAMS STATE HOUSING FINANCE AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES Appropriations and contract authority provided for in the Housing and Urban Development-Independent Agencies Appropriation Act, 1976, for interest grant payments pursuant to Section 802 (c) (2) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 722) are rescinded. R76-27 Recission Proposal No: PROPOSED RESCISSION OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1012 of P.L. 93-344 Agency Consumer Product Safety Commission New budget authority & 41,820,000 Bureau (P.L. 94-116 ) Other budgetary resources 10,000 Appropriation title & symbol 41,830,000 Total budgetary resources Salaries and Expenses - 6150100 Amount proposed for rescission $ 5,225,000 OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1012): 30-40-0100-0-1-553 Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes X No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: X Annual X Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) No-year Other Justification: The proposed rescission would maintain the President's 1976 requested level of $36,595,000 for the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). The 1976 appropriation exceeds the President's request by the $5,225,000 proposed for rescission. The resulting level would allow maintenance of all CPSC programs at the 1975 level, which is more than 20% above the 1974 level. A $37 million funding level should provide ample resources for CPSC to demonstrate its effectiveness in reducing consumer product injuries, to address program priorities, and to accomplish essential objectives. Estimated Effects: The rescission would not result in personnel reductions, and all CPSC programs could be maintained at the 1975 level. No continuing grants or contracts would have to be cancelled for lack of funding. The appropriation level of $41,820,000 would result in an average 14% expansion over 1975 in all program areas--including regulatory development, information and education, compliance, and administration. R76-27 Outlay Effect: (estimated in tenths of millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 43.4 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate -0- Current Outlay Estimates for 1976: 3. Without rescission 47.4 4. With rescission 43.4 5. Current outlay savings (line 3 - line 4) 4.0 Outlay savings for the Transition Quarter .2 Outlay savings for 1977 1.0 R76- - 27 CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION Salaries and Expenses Appropriations provided under this head in the Department of Housing and Urban Development - Independent Agencies Appropriation Act, 1976, are rescinded in the amount of $5,225,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1976. Deferral No: D76-68 DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency U.S. Department of Agriculture New budget authority $ 10,395,000 Bureau (P.L. 94-122 ) Agricultural Research Service 8,667,500 Other budgetary resources Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources 19,062,500 Agricultural Research Service (Construction) 12X1400 Amount to be deferred: Part of year $ Entire year 7,570,000 OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) : 05-18-1400-0-1-352 Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes X No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) No-year Other Justification: Currently, the research facilities of the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) are not fully utilized. Although the Department of Agriculture, with the support of the Congress, is continuing its efforts to improve utilization by further sharing resources with other Federal agencies, facilities are currently in excess of staff using them. A recent review indicated that ARS laboratories are staffed at 88 percent of their capacity in terms of scientific man-years, 79 percent with ARS personnel and 9 percent with non-ARS personnel. To optimize use of the scientific staff, programs are under constant review; priority research efforts are being identified, projects reaching completion are being terminated, and efforts are being made to relocate and consolidate similar lines of work at the various locations. In view of these excess research facilities and no immediate prospects for substantially more scientific staff to use them, $7,570,000 appropriated in fiscal year 1976 for construction of the Northeastern Appalachian Region Fruit Crop Laboratory, Kearneysville, West Virginia, are proposed for deferral through June 30, 1976, or, if appropriate legislation is enacted, through September 30, 1976. Estimated Effects Fruit research in support of regional fruit industries will continue at other locations, primarily Beltsville, Maryland. Savings in Federal expenditures are estimated at $1.0 million in fiscal year 1976, and total $5.0 million by end of fiscal year 1977 if deferral is continued until then. D76-68 2 Outlay Effect (estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 5.6 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate 0 Current Outlay Estimate for 1976: 3. Without deferral 15.0 4. With deferral 14.0 5. Current Outlay Savings 1.0 Outlay Savings for the Transition Quarter 0.5 Outlay Savings for 1977 3.0 Deferral No: D76-69 DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency U. S. Department of Agriculture New budget authority $ Bureau Animal and Plant Health Inspection (P.L. ) Service Other budgetary resources 17,555,928 Appropriation title & symbol 12X1600 Animal and Plant Health Total budgetary resources 17,555,928 Inspection Service (Construction-Fleming Key Animal Import Center) Amount to be deferred: Part of year $ 6,314,000 Entire year OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) : 05-21-1600-0-1-999 Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual X Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) X No-year Other Justification The Fleming Key Animal Import Center would provide quarantine facilities for cattle imported directly into the United States from countries known to be infected or to have been infected with foot and mouth disease. Currently, exotic breeding stock can be brought into the United States through the facilities of other countries where USDA approved safeguards are exercised. Since some desired exotic cattle breeds are currently available through facilities operated by other countries, the construction funds for the Fleming Key Animal Import Center are being deferred through June 30, 1976, or, if appropriate legislation is enacted, through September 30, 1976. Estimated Effects The purpose of the construction of the Fleming Key facility is to expand the import of--by partially reducing the cost of import--exotic cattle breeds to improve the production of U.S. cattle and dairy herds. Deferral of these amounts would not markedly affect the progress toward this goal. Some desired cattle are now available through other channels. D76-69 2 Outlay Effects (Estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 $4.0 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate -- Current outlay estimates for 1976: 3. Without deferral 1.3 4. With deferral .5 5. Current outlay savings (line 3-line 4) .8 Outlay savings for the transition quarter 1.0 Outlay savings for 1977 3.3 D76-70 Deferral No: DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency U.S. Department of Agriculture New budget authority $ 175,000,000 Bureau Agricultural Stabilization and (P.L. 94-122 ) Conservation Service Other budgetary resources Appropriation title & symbol 175,000,000 Agricultural Conservation Program, 1976 Total budgetary resources 126/83315 Amount to be deferred: Part of year $ 90,000,000 Entire year OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) Antideficiency Act 05-60-3315-0-1-302 Grant program Yes No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual Appropriation 12/31/76 X X Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) Other No-year Justification This action would defer $90,000,000 of contract authority for the 1976 Agricultural Conservation Program (ACP), authorized in the 1976 Agriculture and Related Agencies Appropriation Act until June 30, 1976, or, if appropriate legislation is enacted, through September 30, 1976. A level of $85 million will provide all the funding that can be effectively used to provide cost-sharing for additional conservation above that which farmers are willing and able to perform with their own resources. Estimated Effects The proposed deferral would leave $85,000,000 available for FY 1976. This amount will be sufficient for cost-sharing assistance to farmers. There would be no outlay savings in FY 1976 because funds are not appropriated in the current year to liquidate the 1976 contract authority. D76-70 2 Outlay Effect (estimated in tenths of millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 170.0 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate 0 Current Outlay Estimates for 1976: 3. Without deferral 170.0 4. With deferral 170.0 5. Current outlay savings (line 3 - line 4) 0 Outlay Savings for the Transition Quarter 5.5 Outlay Savings for 1977 76.0 D76-71 Deferral No: DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency U. S. Department of Agriculture New budget authority $ Bureau Agricultural Stabilization and (P.L. ) Conservation Service Other budgetary resources $ 39,400,000 Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources $ 39,400,000 Commodity Credit Corporation Administrative Expenses, 1976- Amount to be deferred: 1264336 Part of year $ 2,787,000 Entire year OMB identification code: / Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) : 05-66-4336-0-3-999 XX Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes X No XX Other P.L. 94-122 Type cf account or fund: Type of budget authority: X Annual X Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) No-year Other Justification The Agriculture Appropriation Act (Commodity Credit Corporation, Limitation on Administrative Expenses) provides that no less than 7 percent of the total authorization for administrative expenses of the CCC shall be placed in reserve and used only in such manner and at such time as may be necessary to carry out program operations. Estimated Effects This deferral will have no programmatic impact and its economic and budgetary impact will be negligible. D76-71 - 2 - Outlay Effect (estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 $39.4 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate 0 Current outlay estimates for 1976 3. Without deferral 39.4 4. With deferral 39.4 5. Current outlay savings 0 Outlay savings for the transition quarter 0 Outlay savings for 1977 0 D76-72 Deferral No: DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE New budget authority $ 250,000,000 Bureau Farmers Home Administration (P.L. ) 1,053,205 Other budgetary resources Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources 251,053,205 Amount to be deferred: Rural Water and Waste Disposal Grants Part of year $ 12X2066 50,000,000 Entire year OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) : 05-75-2066-01-1-451 Antideficiency Act Grant program X Yes No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual X Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) X No-year Other Justification A $75 million program level for fiscal year 1976 is proposed. Of the $250 million appropriated by P.L. 94-122 and 94-41 for rural water and waste disposal grants in 1976, $125 million is proposed for rescission and $50 million is planned for deferral until fiscal year 1977. This program provides water and waste disposal development grants that are made to public or quasi-public agencies for the development, storage, treatment, purification, and distribution of domestic water; and for the treatment or disposal of waste in rural areas. Grants may not exceed 50 percent of the development cost of the projects. These funds are proposed for deferral through June 30, 1976, or, if appropriate legislation is enacted, through September 30, 1976. The $75 million proposed funding level is considered sufficient to meet the needs of this program in FY 1976 for the following reasons: 1. The program level proposed is sufficient to fund the most urgent grant applications on hand which are ready for funding this fiscal year. D76-72 2 2. The grant program level proposed, including transfers from other agencies, is the appropriate amount to complement the loan authority of $470 million provided for water and facility loans (Rural Development Insurance Fund) in the FY 1976 Agriculture and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, based on revised estimates of the proper balance between loans and grants. 3. Grant funds for this program have been or are in the process of transfer from the Economic Development Administration, Department of Commerce; Department of the Army; and the Appalachian Regional Commission to assist in funding water and waste disposal projects in rural areas. Estimated Effects The estimated effects of this deferral are minimal. The funding level recommended by the President, together with fund transfers from other agencies, is considered sufficient to fund this program this fiscal year. Outlay Effect (Estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 66.0 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate Current outlay estimates for 1976: 3. Without deferral 71.8 4. With deferral 66.8 5. Current outlay savings (line 3 - line 4) 5.0 Outlay savings for the transition quarter 2.0 Outlay savings for 1977 10.0 The total outlay effect of this deferral of $50 million and the proposed rescission of $125 million in FY 1976, and $25 million in the transition quarter, would be as follows: FY 1976 -14.8 million TQ -4.3 million FY 1977 -41.4 million D76-73 Deferral No: DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency U.S. Department of Agriculture New budget authority $ 172,986,000 Bureau (P.L. 94-122 ) 25,052,000 Soil Conservation Service Other budgetary resources Appropriation title & symbol 198,038,000 Total budgetary resources Watershed and Flood Prevention Operations 12X1072 Amount to be deferred: Part of year $ 22,500,000 Entire year OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) : Antideficiency Act 05-78-1072-0-1-301 Grant program X Yes X No (Both) Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual X Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) No-year Other Justification Of the total amount being deferred, $12,500,000 is for emergency work (e.g., runoff retardation and soil erosion prevention). In 1976, only the spring construction season remains. All funds available for emergency work will not be used then due to several factors including unavailability of equipment, the time necessary to obtain permits, and the unpredictability of spring weather. The funds being deferred are expected to be made available for later construction seasons, including the next summer and fall construction seasons. The other $10,000,000 being deferred is for new construction starts. If additional new starts are made, future funding will either have to be spread over more projects in progress, resulting in a slow-down of completion of projects currently under way or future funding levels will have to be increased, since the funds provided this year are sufficient only to start the new projects. Estimated Effects Emergency work necessary to relieve the hazardous conditions most critical to the protection of life and property will be undertaken in FY 1976. The FY 1976 construction level will be nearly that for 1975. Less urgently needed work--correction of damage that does not pose a near-term threat to life or property--will be completed after FY 1976. Twenty new construction starts will be delayed. D76-73 2 Outlay Effect (estimates in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 137.9 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget 0 outlay estimate Current Outlay Estimates for 1976 185.8 3. Without deferral 170.0 4. With deferral 5. Current outlay savings (line 3 - line 4) 15.8 -10.0 Outlay Savings for the Transition Quarter -8.8 Outlay Savings for 1977 D76- 74 Deferral No: DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency U.S. Department of Agriculture New budget authority $ 29,972,000 Bureau (P.L. 94-122 ) Soil Conservation Service Other budgetary resources 2,337,000 Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources 32,309,000 Resource Conservation and Development, 12X1010 Amount to be deferred: Part of year $ Entire year 4,960,000 OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) : 05-78-1010-0-1-302 Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual XX Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) X2 No-year Other Justification The purpose of this program is to assist qualified local sponsoring organizations in developing and improving the economic use of natural resources. The program aids local sponsoring organizations in developing natural resource project plans and provides technical assistance in the field, as the plans are implemented. The projects aided typically are of more than one year's duration SO that a consistent and moderate level of funding is most desirable for the overall program. The amount being deferred was to have initiated 15 new projects. If these new projects are started, future funding will either have to be spread over more projects in progress, resulting in a slow-down of completion of projects currently under way or future funding levels will have to be increased, since the funds provided this year are sufficient only to start the projects. These funds are proposed for deferral through June 30, 1976, or, if appropriate legis- lation is enacted, through September 30, 1976. Estimated Effects The program level that includes the effect of the deferral would provide for for project planning to be initiated in 10 new areas and completed in 35 areas during 1976. The number of areas authorized for operations is expected to reach 169 by June 30, 1976. D76-74 Deferring the 15 new starts will help assure orderly completion, in future years, of projects now underway. Outlay Effect (estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 25.7 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate 0 Current Outlay Estimates for 1976: 3. Without deferral 28.5 4. With deferral 25.3 5. Current outlay savings (line 3 - line 4) 3.2 Outlay Savings for the Transition Quarter .5 Outlay Savings for 1977 1.3 D76- 75 Deferral No: DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency Department of Commerce New budget 94-12 authority $ 61,000 Bureau National Oceanic and Atmospheric (P.L. ) 811,834 Administration Other budgetary resources Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources 872,834 Fishermen's Guaranty Fund 13X4318 Amount to be deferred: Part of year $ 151,834 Entire year OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) : 06-48-4318-0-3-403 Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes X No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual 58 Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) X No-year Other Justification This fund, established pursuant to the Fishermen's Protective Act of 1967, as amended, provides compensation to vessel owners and crews for financial losses resulting from the seizure of United States fishing vessels by foreign governments on the high seas on the basis of rights or claims to territorial waters not recognized by the United States. Losses payable are generally limited to the market value of fish caught before seizure which were spoiled or confiscated and up to 50% of gross income lost as a direct result of such seizures. Capital for this fund is derived from fees paid by vessel owners at rates established by the Secretary of Commerce and appropriations from the general fund. Between January 25 and February 1, 1975, Ecuador seized seven United States fishing vessels. Claims resulting from these seizures have totaled $2,247,987, of which, $1,553,690 was paid in FY 1975 with the remaining $694,297 to be paid in FY 1976. The current program will finance the administrative expenses of this fund and payment of all outstanding claims. Since no seizures of United States fishing vessels have occurred since February 1, 1975, $151,834 is being placed in reserve pending future seizures and resulting claims. D76-75 2 Estimated Effects: Deferral of these funds will have no effect on the Fishermen's Guaranty Fund as currently planned for FY 1976. Outlay Effect: (estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 .1 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate -0- Current outlay estimates for 1976: 3. Without deferral 1.8 4. With deferral 1.8 5. Current outlay savings -0- Outlay savings for the Transition Quarter -0- Outlay savings for 1977 -0- D76- 76 Deferral No: DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE New budget authority $ 60,919,000 Bureau Office of the Assistant Secretary (P.L. 94-121 ) 10,067,419 for Science and Technology Other budgetary resources Appropriation title & symbol 70,986,419 Total budgetary resources Scientific and Technical Research and Services Amount to be deferred: Part of year $ 13X0500 1,187,000 Entire year OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) : 06-52-0500-0-1-403 Antideficiency Act Yes No Other Grant program Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual Appropriation Contract authority Multiple-year (expiration date) Other No-year Justification This appropriation funds the activities of the National Bureau of Standards, the National Technical Information Service (NTIS) and the Office of Telecommunications (OT). This deferral is for funds available for the Experimental Technology Incentives Program (ETIP) of the National Bureau of Standards. The objective of the ETIP program is to find ways to stimulate the application of science and technology to attain national goals, such as increased productivity. Contracts are let with industry and universities and interagency cooperative efforts are organized to work toward the objective. Appropriate projects that will contribute toward accomplishing the program objective have developed at a slower rate than available funding. Projects eligible for funding are of a very specialized nature and require substantial time to develop and review. In FY 1975, the program had actual obligations of $1,654,000 less than planned. Of this amount, $467,000 will be used in FY 1976 to fund projects. Additional projects that would warrant use of the $1,187,000 being deferred are not expected before FY 1977. These funds are proposed for deferral through June 30, 1976, or, if appropriate legislation is enacted, through September 30, 1976. D76 - 76 2 Estimated Effects: The deferral will have no impact on the conduct of the Experimental Technology Incentives Program. Outlay Effect: (estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 61.6 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate 0 Current Outlay Estimates for 1976: 3. Without deferral 60.1 4. With deferral 60.1 5. Current outlay savings 0 Outlay Savings for the Transition Quarter 0 Outlay Savings for 1977 .3 D76-11B SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT Report Pursuant to Sec. 1014 (c) of P.L. 93-344 This supplementary report modifies Deferral No. D76-11A transmitted in the special message of July 25, 1975, and printed as House Document No. 94-225. The amount deferred for research and training activities overseas of the HEW Assistant Secretary for Human Development has been reduced from $8,306,986 to $4,251,885 as a result of final FY 1976 financial plans for approved projects and the issuance of some valid reservation certificates by Treasury. This action also reflects the planned use of $3,806,986 in FY 1977, rather than in FY 1976, as was reported in Deferral No. D76-11A. D76-11B Deferral No: DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency Department of Health, Education and Welfare New budget authority $ Bureau Assistant Secretary for (P.L. ) 8,306,986 Human Development Other budgetary resources Appropriation title & symbol 8,306,986 Total budgetary resources Research and Training Activities Overseas (Special Foreign Currency Program) Amount to be deferred: Part of year $ 444,899* 75X0138 3,806,986* Entire year OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) : X Antideficiency Act 09-80-0505-0-1-506 Grant program Yes No Other X Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual X Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) X No-year Other Justification * The amount proposed for deferral has been placed in reserve pursuant to the Antideficiency Act (31 USC 665 et seq.) Excess foreign currencies are used in this appropriation to fund foreign research and training activities. The amount of $444,899 is being deferred pending the receipt of Treasury valid reservation certificates later in FY 1976. It is anticipated that financial plans for the utilization of the remaining $3,806,986 will not be final until FY 1977. Estimated Effects * This action has no programmatic or financial impact. Also, because grants are restricted in this program to countries where the United States owns excess local currencies, expenditures in this account do not take monies out of the U.S. *Revised from initial message. D76-11B 2 Outlay Effect (estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 3.0 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate 0 Current Outlay Estimates for 1976: 3. Without deferral 3.0 4. With deferral 3.0 5. Current outlay savings 0 (line 3 - line 4) Outlay Savings for the Transition Quarter 0 Outlay Savings for 1977 0 D76- 77 Deferral No: DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency Department of Labor New budget authority $ Bureau (P.L. ) Departmental Management 38,379,851 Other budgetary resources Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources 38,379,851 Working Capital Fund 16X4601 Amount to be deferred: Part of year $ 977,000 Entire year OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) : 12-25-4601-0-4-505 Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes KX No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) X No-year X Other 29 USC 563 Justification The Antideficiency Act requires (31 U.S.C. 665 (c) (1) ) that appropriations or funds not limited to a definite period of time. all shall be so apportioned as to achieve the most effective and economical use thereof." Accordingly, funds for expansion and modernization of automatic data processing support for this fund will be apportioned when the Department of Labor's plans for this support have been reviewed funds. and approved as proposing "the most effective and economical" use of Estimated Effects Deferral may delay the ordering of new computer equipment, but will permit review of the Department's plan in order to achieve the most effective and economical use of available funds. Outlay Effect No effect on FY 1976 or TQ outlays is anticipated. D76- 78 Deferral No: DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency Department of Labor New budget authority $ Bureau Pension Benefit Guaranty (P.L. ) Corporation Other budgetary resources $ 164,690,722 Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources 164,690,722 Pension Guaranty Fund 16X2404 Amount to be deferred: -0- Part of year $ 1,431,000 Entire year OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) : 55-35-4204-0-3-601 Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes * No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) X No-year X Other Borrowing Authority Justification The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-406) authorized the establishment of this revolving fund in the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC). The authorization included authority to spend public debt receipts in an aggregate amount not to exceed $100,000,000. The authorization also provided that this revolving fund would be credited with premium payments, receipts, and other budgetary resources for operation of the Corporation. The budgetary resources of the Corporation are available without regard to fiscal year limitation. The Antideficiency Act requires (31 U.S.C. 665 (c) (1)) that "...all appropriations or funds not limited to a definite period of time shall be SO apportioned as to achieve the most effective and economical use thereof." Accordingly, funds for automated data systems will be apportioned when it has been shown that the systems proposed will meet actual needs for such processing. The full amount requested for additional personnel has not been approved, however, PBGC will be able to carry out its primary workload during FY 1976 within approved personnel funding. Funds are proposed for deferral through June 30, 1976, or, if appropriate legislation is enacted, through September 30, 1976. D76-78 2 Estimated Effects The deferral will result in keeping down the Corporation's administrative expenses. This will have the effect of conserving premium receipts for benefit payments to workers in failing pension plans. Also, the need to increase premium payments or to use Treasury borrowings will be reduced. Leaving staffing at present levels will avoid the need for reductions in 1977 when a downturn in workload is expected. This deferral will delay development of the Corporation's data information program. However, it will have no effect on the payments of benefits. Outlay Effect This deferral will not affect budgetary outlays because PBGC is an off-budget agency. However, it will result in reducing Treasury financing need by $1,431,000 for FY 1976. D76- 79 Deferral No: DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency Environmental Protection Agency New budget authority $166,456,000 Bureau (P.L. 94-116 ) Other budgetary resources 24,290,000 Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources 190,746,000 Research and Development 68X0107 (Air Research and Development) Amount to be deferred: Part of year $ Entire year 2,000,000 OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) : 20-00-0107-0-1-304 Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes X No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) No-year Other Justification: Budget authority of $3M was added to the President's Budget for the purposes of (1) health effects research on emissions from catalyst-equipped vehicles and (2) research on pollutant- carcinogen relationships. The deferral of $2M for research on pollutant-carcinogen relationships will give EPA the time needed to coordinate its cancer-related research program with similar efforts of the National Cancer Institute and other Government agencies and to determine which types of research would be most appropriate for EPA to undertake in the area of carcinogen effects. This problem must be fully resolved before additional funds are committed. The budget authority is proposed for deferral through June 30, 1976, or, if appropriate legislation is enacted, through September 30, 1976, at which time it shall be made available for obligation. Estimated Effect: This deferral will give the agency time to develop an effective plan for undertaking carcinogen-pollutant effects research. However, it will not terminate or reduce any of EPA's ongoing research programs, including those for FY 1976 in this area. D76-79 2 Outlay Effects (estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 167.0 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate 0 Current Outlay Estimate for FY 1976 3. Without deferral 176.2 4. With deferral 174.8 5. Current outlay savings 1.4 Outlay Savings for the Transition Quarter .6 Outlay Savings for 1977 -2.0 D76-80 Deferral No: DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency Environmental Protection Agency New budget authority $166,465,000 Bureau (P.L. 94-116 ) Office of Research & Development Other budgetary resources 24,290,000 Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources 190,755,000 Research and Development 68X0107 (Water Quality Research) Amount to be deferred: Part of year $ Entire year 4,600,000 OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) 20-00-0107-0-1-304 Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual X Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) XX No-year Other Justification: $4.6M of funds added by the Congress to the President's 1976 Budget request has been made available for obligation. However, $4.6M of 1976 budget authority originally included in the President's budget is now proposed for deferral through June 30, 1976, or if appro- priate legislation is enacted, through September 30, 1976, in order to maintain the total program level at the President's request. The additional funds appropriated by the Congress were directed for the following purposes: ocean disposal research, wastewater disinfection, sludge disposal processes, and interdisciplinary research. Because of the high priority nature of the items added by the Congress, they will be included in the EPA FY 1976 program plan. However, in order to maintain the total Water Quality R&D program at the level of the President's Budget, a comparable amount of specific research tasks in areas which represent the Agency's lowest program priorities will be deferred or stretched out into FY 1977, at which time the de- ferred funds shall be made available for obligation. Estimated Effects: The impact of this deferral will be to delay the start of some less important projects or stretch out the completion of some on-going research projects for up to 11 months. D76-80 2 Outlay Effects (estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 167.0 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate 0 Current outlay estimate for 1976 3. Without deferral 176.2 4. With deferral 174.2 5. Current outlay savings 2.0 Outlay Savings for Transition Quarter .3 Outlay Savings for 1977 .3 D76-31 Deferral No: DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency Environmental Protection Agency New budget authority $ 374,788,000 Bureau (P.L. 94-116 ) Other budgetary resources 58,933,000 Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources 433,721,000 Abatement and Control Amount to be deferred: 68X010X (Air Control Agency Grants) Part of year $ Entire year 3,750,000 OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) Antideficiency Act 20-00-0108-0-1-304 Grant program X Yes No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) No-year Other Justification: Budget authority of $3.75 million for grants to State and local air pollution control agencies under Section 105 of the Clean Air Act is proposed for deferral. The purpose of the funds is to support State and local agency programs which implement Clean Air Act requirements. With the deferral, the program level will be $51.5 million in FY 1976, the same as the program level in FY 1975. In FY 1975, State and local control agencies finalized the development and implementation of basic State Implementation Plans, including the establishment of air quality monitoring networks. Maintenance of the $51.5 million level will allow the funded State and local control agencies to proceed with high priority State Implementation Plan revisions and to continue adopting new source enforcement activities from EPA. Thus, with the maintenance of a $51.5 million in FY 1976 funded agencies will proceed with their highest priority objectives. The $3.75 million in budget authority is proposed for deferral through June 30, 1976, or, if appropriate legislation is enacted, through September 30, 1976, at which time it shall be made available for obligation. Estimated Effects Continuation of the FY 1975 obligational level in FY 1976 will not cause the reduction or the termination of any control agency grants, and the deferral of $3.75 million will have limited impact on the FY 1976 program level relative to that in FY 1975. Without this deferral, grantees would receive about a 7 percent increase over the FY 1975 program levels, or about a $14,000 increase on an average grant of $200,000. D76- - 81 Outlay Effect (estimated in millions of dollars) 2 Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 352.0 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate 0.0 Current Outlay Estimate for FY 1976 3. Without deferral 395.6 4. With deferral 394.5 5. Current outlay savings 1.1 Outlay savings for the Transition Quarter .5 Outlay Savings for 1977 .6 D76-32 Deferral No: DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency Environmental Protection Agency New budget authority $ 374,788,000 Bureau (P.L. 94-116 ) Office of Water Planning & Standards 58,933,000 Other budgetary resources Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources 433,721,000 Abatement and Control C8X0108 (Water Quality Control Agency Amount to be deferred: Grants) Part of year $ Entire year 10,000,000 OMB identification code: / Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) : 20-00-0108-0-1-304 Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes No Other XX Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual X Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) No-year Other Justification: Budget Authority of $10 M for grants to State and interstate water pollution control agencies under Section 106 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (P.L. 92-500) is proposed for deferral through June 30, 1976, or, if appropriate legislation is enacted, through September 30, 1976, at which time it shall be made available for obligation. The deferral will maintain a program level of $40 M in FY 1976, the same as FY 1975. EPA estimates that the FY 75 program level of $40 M has resulted in the following accomplishments: State issuance of 11,000 NPDES1/ permits, completion of initial statewide water quality management planning for point sources of pollution, and increased capacity of State agencies to manage the construction of municipal facilities. Maintaining a $40 million program level in FY 1976 will allow State agencies to place increased emphasis on compliance monitoring and enforcement while permit issuance activities decline, initiate statewide water quality management planning for non-point- sources of pollution as point source planning is completed, and maintain effective management of the Construction Grants program. Estimated Effects: The deferral of $10 M will maintain the FY 1976 program at the same level as FY 1975. Because obligational levels in FY 1976 would remain constant, no agency grants would be terminated or reduced. 1/ National Pollution Discharge Elimination System 2/ pollution discharged from a pipe, ditch, conduit, etc. 3/ pollution that is not discharged from a pipe, ditch, conduit, etc. D76- 82 2 This deferral will provide for a level program in FY 1976 in lieu of a 25 percent increase over 1975. Based on past experience, it is estimated that 62 grants will be affected, resulting in maintaining an average grant of $645 thousand instead of $806 thousand. Outlay Effect (estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 352.0 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate 0.0 Current Outlay Estimate for 1976 3. Without deferral 395.6 4. With deferral 393.6 5. Current outlay savings 2.0 Outlay Savings for the Transition Quarter 1.0 Outlay Savings for 1977 5.0 D76-83 Deferral No: DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency Environmental Protection Agency New budget authority $ 374,788,000 Bureau (P.L. 94-116 ) Office of Water Planning & Standards Other budgetary resources 58,933,000 Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources 433,721,000 Abatement and Control 68X0108 (Clean Lakes Grants) Amount to be deferred: Part of year $ Entire year 15,000,000 OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) : 20-00-0108-0-1-304 Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) No-year Other Justification: Budget authority of $15,000,000 for clean lakes grants under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (P.L. 92-500) is proposed for deferral. The purpose of the funds is to provide assistance to States in order to carry out methods and procedures for lake restoration approved by the EPA Administrator, consisting of land management practices to control the discharge of non-point sources y of pollution to lakes and techniques for the in-lake restoration of water quality. The funds are proposed for deferral through June 30, 1976, or, if appropriate legislation is enacted, through September 30, 1976. The funds are proposed for deferral for two reasons: 1. Because a national classification of lakes according to eutrophic condition has not yet been completed, and because of gaps in scientific knowledge of lake restoration, EPA has thus far focused the clean lakes program on developing and demonstrating cost-effective innovative techniques for lake restoration. Congress appropriated $4 M for this purpose in FY 1975. To date, EPA has received grant applications for approximately $2 M but has not yet awarded any grants. The additional $15 million cannot be utilized in an effective manner until the initial demonstrations are underway and their effectiveness evaluated. 2. The development of land management practices to control non-point sources of pollution is assigned primarily to the Section 208 areawide and statewide planning processes. Comprehensive plans for non-point source control will not be completed until 1977 or 1978. Thus, it is not known at this time how clean lakes grants can 1/ pollution that is not discharged through a pipe, ditch, conduit, etc. D76-83 2 best be utilized in supporting comprehensive non-point source pollution abatement to restore and maintain the quality of freshwater lakes. Estimated Effect: It is estimated that the deferral will have no programmatic effects, because: (1) $4 M has been available for this program for almost a year with grant applications thus far for only $2 M and no funds obligated, and (2) there are no estimated FY 1976 outlays from the $15M if it were made available for obligation at this time. Outlay Effect (estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 352.0 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate 0.0 Current Outlay Estimate for 1976 3. Without deferral 395.6 4. With deferral 395.6 5. Current outlay savings 0 Outlay Savings for the Transition Quarter 0.5 Outlay Savings for 1977 7.5 Deferral No: D76-84 DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration New budget authority 775,512,000 Bureau (P.L. 94-116 ) --- Other budgetary resources Appropriation title & symbol Research and Program Management Total budgetary resources 775,512,000 8060103 Amount to be deferred: Part of year $ 2,900,000 Entire year OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) 27-00-0103-0-1-999 Antideficiency Act Grant program Yes X No Other Type of account or fund: X Type of budget authority: Annual X Appropriation Multiple-year Contract authority (expiration date) No-year Other JUSTIFICATION Purchase of an administrative aircraft provided for in NASA's fiscal year 1976 appropriation will be deferred pending review of the need for this aircraft, its economic justification, and any relevent alternatives available to the Government (e.g., lease VS. buy and the possibility of otherwise obtaining the needed transportation from commercial sources). ESTIMATED EFFECTS This deferral is not expected to affect NASA's ability to effectively manage its programs. OUTLAY EFFECT None anticipated because this is a part-year deferral. Deferral No: D76-85 DEFERRAL OF BUDGET AUTHORITY Report Pursuant to Section 1013 of P.L. 93-344 Agency Department of State New budget authority $ 305,000,000 Bureau (P.L. 94-24 ) Refugee and Migration Affairs -0- Other budgetary resources Appropriation title & symbol Total budgetary resources 305,000,000 Special Assistance to Refugees from Cambodia and Vietnam Amount to be deferred: Part of year $ 28,492,695 -0- Entire year OMB identification code: Legal authority (in addition to sec. 1013) : Antideficiency Act 14-25-1144-0-1-604 Grant program Yes No Other Type of account or fund: Type of budget authority: Annual Appropriation Multiple-year June 30, 1976 X Contract authority (expiration date) No-year Other Justification Public Law 94-23, approved May 23, 1975, authorized appropriations to relocate and resettle refugees from Cambodia and Vietnam in the United States and other countries. Public Law 94-24, approved the same date, appropriated $ 305,000,000 to the Department of State for these purposes. This appropriation, together with certain foreign assistance funds, financed the evacuation of refugees from Cambodia and Vietnam; the establishment, outfitting and staffing refugee staging centers in the Pacific and reception centers in the United States; and contracts with voluntary agencies to recruit sponsors and to provide initial financial aid in settling refugees. Current plans anticipate that most, if not all, refugees will have left reception centers by December 30, 1975. Certain resettlement activities will, however, continue through June, 1976, by which time the State Department program must be completed as required by P.L. 94-23. The State Department has prepared a financial plan which, at this time, identifies $276,507,305 of requirements against this appropriation. The Department proposes to maintain $28,492,695 in reserve for possible contingencies. This amount has been apportioned as a reserve for contingencies under authority of the Antideficiency Act. D76- 85 2 Estimated Effects: No savings result from this deferral. Outlay Effect: (estimated in millions of dollars) Comparison with President's 1976 Budget: 1. Budget outlay estimate for 1976 -0- 2. Outlay savings, if any, included in the budget outlay estimate -0- Current outlay estimates for 1976: 3. Without deferral 271.4 4. With deferral 271.4 5. Current outlay savings -0- Outlay savings for the Transition Quarter -0- Outlay savings for 1977 -0-