Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
1553244
label
September 26, 1975 - Ford, Kissinger
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
1553244
contentType
document
title
September 26, 1975 - Ford, Kissinger
collections
Memoranda of Conversations (Nixon and Ford Administrations)
Ford Administration Memoranda of Conversations
subjects
Egypt
Arms transfers
Sinai Accord between Egypt and Israel, 1975
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
1553244
coverageEndDate
day
26
logicalDate
1975-09-26
month
9
year
1975
coverageStartDate
day
26
logicalDate
1975-09-26
month
9
year
1975
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
e3f4a6a895da0c23
ocrText
File scanned from the National Security Adviser's Memoranda of Conversation Collection at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON SEGRET/NODIS/XGDS MEMORANDUM OF CONVERSATION PARTICIPANTS: President Ford Dr. Henry A. Kissinger, Secretary of State and Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs Lt. General Brent Scowcroft, Deputy Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs DATE AND TIME: Friday, September 26, 1975 10:56 - 11:34 a. m. PLACE: The Oval Office Kissinger: We have three different problems with these groups: a deliberate attempt to destroy Executive authority, to destroy our foreign policy, and to knock down every strong man around you. What they are doing to the Sinai agreement is unbelievable. It is the greatest achievement since the opening to China and all that is happening is they are pissing all over it. I am so overburdened that mistakes are made. They asked Sisco GUIDELINES State 3/11/04 if these were Executive agreements. Sisco is energetic but has no judgment. He got the Legal Advisor to say they are legally binding Executive agreements. We are now facing a coalition of the pro-Israelis, who want to freeze these papers into concrete agreements ... NARA, DATE 6/3/04 The President: I am disturbed about your comment that I am not tough enough in foreign policy. Kissinger: No, I didn't mean you. I meant the impression of those around DECLASSIFIED E.O. 12958, SEC. 3.5 you. We are dominant in the world and at home we are impotent. Don't misunderstand me, it is not you. But Buchen -- let me say the manner in which they talk to the Congress does not inspire respect. Why he has to say we would never withhold a whole document ... CLASSIFIED BY Henry A. Kissinger EXEMPT FROM GENERAL DECLASSIFICATION SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 11652 EXEMPTION CATEGORY 5(b)(3) SEGRET/NODIS/XGDS AUTOMATICALLY DECLASSIFIED ON Imp. to Det. SECRET/NODIS/XGDS 2 The President: I didn't say that. Kissinger: No, youare just fine. There is not an iota of difference between us. But we shouldn't promise sweeping things like this -- we don't know what will do. [He reads from agreement to show that the language leaves an escape clause and there is no binding language. ] If I have to testify on these though, I will have to say either it means nothing or it does mean something. Either one is a disaster. The President: Both Committees have this? Kissinger: Completely. And it has been leaked to the New York Times. But to publish it officially would create a massive problem with the Arabs. The President: Were you tough with the Committees? Kissinger: I did not yield, but they are now using delaying tactics. They want Schlesinger to testify and he will be asked about your statement that we will give military assistance to Egypt. He will convey the impression he has been out of it. The President: I was strong on the Pershing. Kissinger: Brent told me you were great. Schlesinger knew about the Pershing. He didn't know about the slip of paper. But he has given away all the easy things now -- F-16, tank lasers, accelerating the F-15 -- leaving you with the sticky issues. The President: How do we get the Sinai thing through? Kissinger: They are responding to pressure from home like with Vietnam. And the Jews are trying to knock you off. They want a new guy in the White House in '77. The President: Should I demand immediate action? I have told them Kissinger: I would write Sparkman and Morgan that peace in the Middle East requires action by the end of the week. SECRET/NODIS/XGDS SECRET/NODIS/XGDS 3 The President: I would add Scott, Mansfield, Albert and Rhodes. Kissinger: It's not much help in the Committee. But I am not sure that if we don't win it in a week you maybe should yield. The President: On my letters? Kissinger: No. Those are safe. You are a victim of Watergate. The President: Never before has so much been given to the Congress. I mentioned to Brent the DOD budget cuts. Kissinger: If you were at the UN, you would be proud. You are as strong after Vietnam as Nixon -- except domestically. Vladivostok was a real triumph -- which is being pissed on now. And the DOD budget cuts are another manifestation. Can we meet for 15 minutes tomorrow on SALT? We won't get an agreement, I don't think. SEGRET/NODIS/XGDS 2 10:56-11:34 PIK 26 Syt75 10:45 a,m, 10:45 a,m, K We have 3 dif problems w/ there group a delih to distry yve anthority, to distory am FP, and & brinch by story man and you what they the din & Simin againment is It is geratet a haven ind 9dmg To of China X all that is buffering is they and pising allower it I an to over handwrited that mistales chl made. They adjul cioso if these were Inc differents. Sind is energeter but has no forelyment. He got hegulation to say they are briting aprc dycliments, we an nmr frima evacture fe who want a freeze these papers into connect agreem P I about your writtent I not tough imp in FP. K no I didn't mum your I memt c injustment of those from We are dominant in - world & at have are ans inpotent Don't mainduration me - it wt you But Burcher let me 70g the in which ohing talk tic Criy dvernot inspire respect. Coday he has to try are and never car/holder while document P I di bit yy that K no, you and just fine Then is unt an in of dif. but us. But ink shouldn't provise thing line this - me don't how allow will do. & DECLASSIFIED NSC MEMO, 11/24/98, STATE DEPT. GUIDELINES state leview3/11/04 E.O. 12958, SEC. 3.5 GERALD BY folor HARA, DATE 6/3/04 R (Reads from applicant t thom that the lunguage have am excape lurne + these is. VY linding langurged, If & have to Cartific chn these the I will have to tery inter it hurms withing or it does, E ether is a chairtn P Brth crates have this? K Crangetely, and it has have ligher to KIY But to priblish it official would wath a massive purt w/c Child. P were you tough w/c Centr K Ideal not yild, but they one how using delaying to tris. They amt Schho of testing + health he word about your statement are will give mil direct GE His carill crivey he has hom ant of X P I was strong on Purshing K bunt Old the you were great. Schles hear about Pushing, Hedint hnow about c His Dyyn. But he has given away all easy thing eme- F-16, tank lasers, awl. f F-15 1 leing you w/c c sticky issues. P Honr du weget the Since they then K They and responsibing 80 pressure pown have a la VN. and C pro I bruck Jems are typing to Known you To They want 2 him give in c WA in 77. P Should I drivered universal action? I have tahl them K I write Spartma & Wangan than pena in ME Upines a in by end creek. " GERALD Gst letter drafter are liming Cent analysis of DOD bonlyet cuts, P I wail lald Sctt monsfield, allower K not such helpin c emth. But 2 urt miny me don't win it in a with you maybe should gield P on my letters? K no. Three one hafe- you are a vitim of water gate. P I pmentmed 100 Burt the Do D bondget hear hype bome has some crts been givin You Cry. K Legan chere at c UN you must be promode you are as Hing efter UN as Wither expt dranstically. Flad. was 6 unl trings - which is Loring prosed on now. and Ch DOD bridget unts is another + X Com are concert for IT minto Trumson a EAW? we want get one agreement ddon't think. GERALD