Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
1525008
label
Canada - State Department Telegrams: To SECSTATE - EXDIS
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
1525008
contentType
document
title
Canada - State Department Telegrams: To SECSTATE - EXDIS
collections
Presidential Country Files for Europe and Canada (Ford Administration)
Europe and Canada Country Files
subjects
Great Britain
India
Cyprus
China
Turkey
Canada
Nuclear weapons
Nuclear energy
Law of the sea
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
1525008
coverageEndDate
logicalDate
1975-11-30
month
11
year
1975
coverageStartDate
logicalDate
1974-08-01
month
8
year
1974
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
87a4c7c842e49bf1
ocrText
The original documents are located in Box 3, folder "Canada - State Department Telegrams: To SECSTATE - EXDIS" of the National Security Advisor. Presidential Country Files for Europe and Canada, 1974-77 at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford. donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION Presidential Libraries Withdrawal Sheet WITHDRAWAL ID 014161 REASON FOR WITHDRAWAL National security restriction TYPE OF MATERIAL Telegram CREATOR'S NAME AMEMBASSY OTTAWA RECEIVER'S NAME SECSTATE WASHDC DESCRIPTION Re Cyprus CREATION DATE 08/15/1974 VOLUME 3 pages COLLECTION/SERIES/FOLDER ID 032500046 COLLECTION TITLE NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER. PRESIDENTIAL COUNTRY FILES FOR EUROPE AND CANADA BOX NUMBER 3 FOLDER TITLE Canada - State Department Telegrams: To SECSTATE - EXDIS DATE WITHDRAWN 10/17/2001 WITHDRAWING ARCHIVIST GG on STATE Department of State OF STATE AMERICA UNITED TELEGRAM SECRET 0380 PAGE 01 OTTAWA 01279 100520Z 10 ACTION SS=25 EXPIR INFO OCT-01 ISO-00 1026 W 067403 R 0916417 APR 75 FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA TO SECSTATE WASHDC 6089 RCRE T OTTAWA 1279 EXDIS FOR THE SECRETARY FROM AMBASSADOR E.O. 11652: GDS TAGS: PFOR, CA, NATO SUBJ: REF: USNATO 1909 :- WHILE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT HAS DISPLAYED RELUCTANCE TO AGREE TO EARLY SUMMIT CAROUND JUNE 1), BELIEVE TRUDEAU WOULD APPROVE PARTICIPATION MINISTER EXTERNAL AFFAIRS IN FOREIGN MINISTERS MEETING END OF MAY. IF LATTER GROUP APPROVES DATE FOR SUMMIT, TRUDEAU WOULD FIND IT POLITICALLY AWKWARD TO WITHHOLD CONCURRENCE. 2. IF END OF MAY MEETING OF FOREIGN MINISTERS IS AGREED, SUGGEST YOU CONSIDER MAKING STOP IN OTTAWA EN ROUTE TO EUROPE. SUCH STOP COULD BE ALONG LINES OF MACEACHEN'S RECENT LUNCHEON VISIT TO WASHINGTON, OR COULD BE OVERNIGHT AS YOU DESIRE. IT MIGHT ALSO AFFORD YOU OPPORTUNITY TO OFFER MACEACHEN A LIFT TO EUROPE. WHILE HE PROBABLY WOULD NOT ACCEPT (FOR ARRIVAL PROTOCOL AND OTHER REASONS), SUCH GESTURE BY YOU WOULD BE APPRECIATED BY CANADIAN PUBLIC. FORD PORTER a NOTE: EXDIS CAPTION ADDED PER MR. SHANKLE (S/S-0) GERALD LEGRARY NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT TRECAOTHORIZATION OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY GG 10/15/01 on STATE Department of State of SENTES AMERICA UNITED TELEGRAM CONFIDENTIAL 2022 PAGE 01 OTTAWA 01891 2023142 10 ACTION SS-25 INFO OCT-01 ISO-00 /026 W 112669 R 2022317 MAY 75 FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA TO SECSTATE WASHDC 6498 INFO AMEMBASSY LONDON AMEMBASSY OSLO AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO MISSION GENEVA 722 USMISSION NATO USMISSION UN C. 0 N F I D E N T I A to OTTAWA 1891 EXDIS E.O. 11652: GDS TAGS: PLOS, CA SUBJ: CANADIAN LOS POSITION REF: GENEVA 3409; OTTAWA 1844 1. EMBOFFS DISCUSSED GENEVA CONFERENCE MAY 15 WITH PAUL LAPOINTE, EXTAFF COORDINATOR FOR LOS. IN GENERAL, LAPOINTE SEEMED TO REFLECT SATISFIED ATTITUDE OF CANADIANS RE LOS CONFERENCE. FINAL UNIFIED TEXT IS ONE WHICH THEY APPARENTLY ARE NOT UNHAPPY ABOUT, AND THEY ARE POSSIBLY PREPARED TO LIVE WITH MOST GENERAL PROVISIONS OF TEXT. WHEN ASKED IF THAT INCLUDED SUCH THINGSS AS LANGUAGE ON STRAITS, HE INDICATED THE AFFIRMATIVE, LAPOINTE VOLUNTEERED THAT THERE HAD BEEN DIFFERENCES WITH THE US ON THE SUBJECT, BUT GHOUGHT THAT THESE HAD BEEN WORKED OUT SATISFACTORILY. IT WAS EVIDENT THAT CANADIANS ARE WORRIED ABOUT HEAD HARBOR PASSAGE, AND ARE NOT HAPPY THAT LANGUAGE IN UNIFIED TEXT MAY NOT BE GOOD FOR THEIR POSITION ON THAT WATERWAY, BUT HE ALSO INDICATED THAT PERHAPS CANADIANS WOULD PREFER, IF US FOHD AGREES, TO DEAL WITH THE MATTER AS A BILATERAL ISSUE & AND NOT PRESS IT AT LOS. AT THE HEART OF THEIR PROBLEM WITH HEAD HARBOR PASSAGE, HE SAID, IS "THAT WE SIMPLY DO GERALD LIBRARY CONFIDENTIAL NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY GG 10/15/01 FORM DE-1652 of STATE Department of State UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TELEGRAM CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 02 OTTAWA 01891 202314Z NOT WANT SUPERTANKERS ENTERING THOSE INTERNAL WATERS, 2. REFERRING TO NORTHWEST PASSAGE, LAPOINTE IMPLIED THAT PERHAPS THERE HAD BEEN A MISUNDERSTANDING RE DEFINITIONS, AND THAT CANADIANS HAD THOUGHT TEXT SUBMITTED BY BRITISH WAS NOT CONSISTENT WITH LANGUAGE THEY THOUGHT US WOULD SUPPORT AS RESULT OF MEETING IN OTTAWA. HOWEVER, HE ALSO INDICATED THAT HE THOUGHT SOLUTION PROPOSED BY AMBASSADOR MOORE CPARA 7, GENEVA REFTEL) PROVIDED A WAY OUT OF PROBLEM. IN ANY EVENT, EMBOFFS HAD IMPRESSION THAT CANADIANS, HAVING MADE THEIR POINTS, MIGHT BE WILLING TO DROP OPPOSITION TO STRAITS LANGUAGE IN UNIFIED TEXT. COMMENT: THIS SUGGESTS THAT ANY ACTION AT THIS POINT MIGHT BE COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE AND THAT PERHAPS NEXT EVENSEN GROUP MEETING MIGHT BE TIME TO GAUGE WHETHER ANY FURTHER ACTION IS NECESSARY. IT IS OBVIOUS CANADIANS ARE IN PROCESS DIGESTING TEXT AND PERHAPS PRESSURE AT THIS TIME MAY RAISE HACKLES UNNECESSSARILY. 3. RE UNILATERAL ACTION, LAPOINTE WAS OFNCIEW THAT us WOULD BE LEADERSI IF us ACTS UNILATERALLY, CANADA WOULD HAVE TO FOLLOW SUIT. HE PERSONALLY MUCH OPPOSED TO UNILATERAL ACTION. STATING THAT IN HISTORY OF FISHERIES DISPUTES, UNILATERAL ACTION AND USE OF FORCE HAS NEVER SUCCEEDED WELL. "WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO, BLAST A SOVIET VESSEL OUT OF THE WATER FOR HAVING A FEW EXTRA FISH IN ITS HOLD?" HE ASKED. (HE ALSO CITED STORY THAT LAST CHECK OF FISHING VESSELS OFF CANADIAN COAST REVEALED NO SOVIET VIOLATION. TWU SPANISH VIOLATIONS, AND 22 CANADIAN VIOLATIONS). COOPERATION WAS ESSENTIAL AND AS A RESULT HE WAS ANCIOUS TO SEE WHAT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN AT JUNE ICNAF MEETING. EVEN MORE PROBLEMATIC, HE SAID, WAS THE POSSIBILITY OF UNILATERAL ACTION ON DEEP SEABEDS WHICH SHOULD DEFINITELY BE AVOIDED. AT LEAST, HE HOPED THAT US, CANADA AND MEXICO MIGHT PERHAPS PRODUCE A JOINT DECLARATION ON FISHERIES SO THAT AT LEAST THESE THREE COUNTRIES MIGHT WORK TOGETHER. 4. COMMENT: IN REFERENCE TO BOTH HEAD HARBOR AND FORD & NORTHWEST PASSAGES, LAPOINTE SUGGESTED THAT PERHAPS BEST WAY TO PROCEED IS TO ACCEPT STRAITS LANGUAGE OF GERALD IDENTIAL NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY FORM GRANTMENT or STATE Department of State OF AMERICA PAINT TELEGRAM CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 03 OTTAWA 01891 202314Z UNIFIED TEXT OF PURPOSE OF CONCLUDING LOS, AND THEN DEAL WITH US/CANADIAN DIFFERENCES THROUGH BILATERAL NEGOTIATIONS. THIS SUGGESTION COULD STEM FROM CANADIAN FEELING THAT THEY MORE LIKELY SECURE CONCESSIONS FROM US EXATS BILATERALLY SINCE, INTER ALIA, BILATERAL CONTEXT WOULD PROVIDE GREATER SCOPE FOR US DOMESTIC ELEMENTS FAVORABLE TO CANADIAN POSITIONS TO BRING PRESSURE TO BEAR (E.G., ENVIRONMENTALISTS). CANADIANS MAY ADDITIONALLY OR ALTERNATIVELY FEEL THAT US MIGHT BE MORE WILLING MAKE BILATERAL CONCESSIONS TO CANADA OUTSIDE LOS FORUM ON ASSUUMPTION THAT SUCH EXTRA-LOS AGREEMENT WOULD NOT ESTABLISH LEGAL PRECEDENTS APPLICABLE TO DETRIMENT us INTERESTS IN OTHER WORLD STRAITS. IN EITHER CASE, GOC WOULD BE LIKELY TO CONTEND THAT US AGREEMENT NOT TO RAISE BILATERAL CONSIDERATIONS IN LOS NEGOTIATIONS IN EXCHANGE FOR GOC AGREEMENT TO UNIFIED TEXT STRAITS LANGUAGE CARRED RECIPROCAL OBLIGATION ON US NOT TOINVOKE LOS AGREED PRINCIPLES WHEN DEALING WITH BILATERAL MATTERS. THIS, OF COURSE, WOULD REPRESENT WAIVER BY US OF STRONGEST POINT IN OUR FAVOR WITH RESPECT TO HEAD HABOR PASSAGE. QUESTION SEEMS TO BE WHETHER WE PREPARED TO PAY THAT PRICE FOR CANADIAN SUPPORT ON STRAITS LANGUAGE IN LOS. PORTER NOTE BY OC/T: EXDIS CAPTION ADDED PER S/S-O, MR. JOHNSON. FORD & BERALD LIGHARY CONF IDENTIAL NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY OF 4 STATE * * Department of State OF SENTE AMERICA UNITED TELEGRAM SECRET 4838 DECLASSIFIED E.O. 12958 (as amended) SEC 3.3 PAGE 01 OTTAWA 03119 202013Z MR # 09-63,141 60 state dept ltr 2/4/10 ACTION SS=25 By dal NARA, Date 3/16/10 INFO OCT-01 ISO-00 /026 W 004876 R 202000Z AUG 75 FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA TO SECSTATE WASHDC 7300 INFO AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI STATE DEPT. DECLASSIFICATION REVIEW AMCONSUL BOMBAY x Retain Class'n Change to USMISSION IAEA VIENNA Declassify in part and exclse as shown EO 12958, 25X( ) )( ) SECRET OTTAWA 3119 Declassify After With concurrence (not)(obtained) EXDIS IPS by Jach Julsu Date 8/1/00 E.O. 116521 XGDS-3 TAGS: PARM, TECH, IN SUBJECT: INDIAN NUCLEAR POLICY EXE REFS: (A) BOMBAY 19071 (B) STATE 19405 1. I DISCUSSED WITH DEPUTY MINISTER ROBINSON TODAY CANADIAN ATTITUDES TOWARD INDIA IN LIGHT OF REFTELS, WITH PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO ALLEGED INDIAN WILLINGNESS TO MAKE "UNILATERAL DECLARATION" MENTIONED PARA 9 REFTEL A, ROBINSON MADE IT CLEAR THAT CANADIANS ARE MAINTAINING VERY RETICENT ATTITUDE TOWARD INDIANS IN LIGHT OF UNSATISFACTORY RESPONSES AND EXCHANGES WITH REGARD TO SAFEGUARDS, AND ESPECIALLY BECAUSE OF CURRENT INDICATIONS THAT INDIANS MAY BE MOVING TOWARD ANOTHER EXPLOSION. 2, ROBINSON, WHO HAD JUST RETURNED FROM LEAVE DAY OR TWO AGO, WAS NOT AWARE OF ANY INDIAN OFFER TO MAKE "UNILATERAL DECLARATION, BUT SAID HE WOULD LOOK INTO IT AND PROVIDE us WITH COMMENT. HE SAID THAT ON THE FACE OF IT AND IN LIGHT OF INDIAN ATTITUDES AND INDICATIONS MENTIONED ABOVE, SUCH A DECLARATION WOULD NOT APPEAR TO BE VERY CONVINCING. 3, WE WILL REPORT FURTHER WHEN ROBINSON CONTACTS US. PORTER GERALD, R.FORD LIBRA SECRET NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY OF STATE * of AMERICA UNITED imple Department of State TELEGRAM i SECRET 5060 DECLASSIFIED E.O. 12958 (as amended) SEC 3.3 PAGE 01 OTTAWA 03126 202218Z MR # 09-63,#2 state dept ltr 2/4/10 60 ACTION SS=25 By dal NARA, Date 3/17/10 INFO OCT-01 ISO-00 /026 W 006532 R 202128Z AUG 75 FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA TO SECSTATE WASHDC 7307 INFO AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI AMCONSUL BOMBAY TATE DEPT. DECLASSIFICATION REVIEW USMISSION IAEA VIENNA X Retain Class'n Change to Declassify in part and excise as shown & E CRET OTTAWA 3126 EO 12958, 25X( ) Declassify After EXDIS With concurrence by fach Subser Date (not)(obtained) 8/1/00 E.O. 11652: XGDS-3 TAGS: PARM, TECH, IN SUBJ: INDIAN NUCLEAR POLICY REF: OTTAWA 3119 1. FURTHER TO REFTEL CONCERNING INDIAN AND CANADIAN ATTITUDES RE "UNILATERAL DECLARATION," DEPUTY MINISTER ROBINSON PHONED AMBASSADOR TO SAY CANADIANS HAD NOT RECEIVED RECENTLY ANY INDIAN EXPRESSIONS OF WILLINGNESS TO MAKE SUCH "UNILATERAL DECLARATION." ROBINSON SAID INDIANS HAD MADE REFERENCE IN EARLIER STAGE OF CAN/INDIAN EXCHANGES SEVERAL MONTHS AGO TO INDIAN WILLINGNESS TO MAKE STATEMENT BEARING ON THEIR ROLE AS SUPPLIERS OF NUCLEAR EQUIPMENT, BUT NOT RELATED TO SAFEGUARDS. 2. I CONCUR WITH DEPARTMENT CONCERNS THAT GOI MAY ATTEMPT TO PRESSURE us AND CANADA. IN VIEW OF OUR INDICATIONS THAT CANADA INTENDS TO STAND FIRMLY BEHIND PRINCIPLE OF ADEQUATE SAFEGUARDS, IT IS IMPORTANT IN MY JUDGMENT THAT WE MAINTAIN CLOSEST POSSIBLE CONTACTS WITH GOC AS SITUATION DEVELOPS. PORTER LIBRARY GERALD SECRET NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT % STATE Department of State AMERICA UNITED TELEGRAM STATES OF CONFIDENTIAL 8352 DECLASSIFIED E.O. 12958 (as amended) SEC 3.3 PAGE 01 OTTAWA 03618 242209Z MR # 09-63, #3 state dept ltr 2/4/10 17 By dal NARA, Date 3/17/10 ACTION EUR-08 INFO OCT-01 SS=14 ISO-00 EA-06 CIAE-00 DODE-00 NSC-05 NSCE-00 INR-05 L-01 PM-03 H-01 PA-01 PRS-01 USIA-01 OMB-01 SP-02 SAM-01 SAJ-01 ACDA-10 EB-03 1065 W 107217 R 242136Z SEP 75 FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA TO SECSTATE WASHDC 7605 DATE DEPT. DECLASSIFICATION REVIEW INFO AMEMBASSY LONDON X Retain Class'n Change to AMEMBASSY MOSCOW Declassify in part and excise as shown USLO PEKING EO 12958, 25X 4 )( ) AMEMBASSY SEOUL Declassify After AMEMBASSY TAIPEI With concurrence (not)(obtained) AMCONSUL HONG KONG by Jack Sulser Date 8/1/00 CONFIDENTTALOTTAWA 3618 LIMDIS EO 11652 GDS TAGS OTRA CH UK KS UR TW OVIP SUBJ HEATH VISIT TO PRC FOLLOWING IS TEXT OF REPORT FROM CANADIAN EMBASSY PEKING ON RECENT HEATH VISIT TO PRC. REPORT WAS PROVIDED TO POL COUNS ON CONFIDENTIAL BASIS BY PM TRUDEAUS FOREIGN AFFAIRS ASSISTANT IVAN HEAD (PROTECT): BEGIN TEXT: FORMER BRIT PM EDWARD HEATH VISITED PEKIN SEPT 19-21 IN COURSE OF TOUR THROUGH EAST ASIA. HE RECEIVED ACCOLADE OF AN HOUR'S VISIT WITH CHAIRMAN MAO AND MET TENG HSIAO-PING. WHEN Y CALLED THIS MORNING ON BRIT. AMBASSADOR YOUDE CWHO ACCOMPANIED HEATH ON BOTH CALLS, ATTENDED TENG'S BANQUET AND GAVE DINNER AT WHICH CHIEF GUEST WAS VICE FOREIGN MINISTER HAN NIEN-LUNG) HE SAID CHINESE HAD TOLD HEATH PREMIER CHOU EN-LAI WISHED TO SEE HIM BUT HIS DOCTORS HAD RULED AGAINST IT. HE ALSO MISSED CONFIDENTIAL LERRAY GERALD FORD 4 STATE Department of State UNITED , TELEGRAM STATES OF CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 02 OTTAWA 03618 242209Z CHIAO KUAN-HUA WHO HAD DEPARTED FOR UNGA BUT WAS REPRESENTED DURING VISIT BY VICE FOREIGN MINISTER HAN NIEN-LUNG. YOUDE COMMENTED LATTER GAVE EVERY APPEARANCE OF BEING SENIOR AMONG CHIAO'S DEPUTIES AND THIS BORNE OUT BY HIS INCREASED VISIBILITY RECENTLY DURING VIP VISITS, 2, YOUDE DECLINED TO COMMENT ON HEATHIS CONVERSATION WITH MAO SAYING IT HAD BEEN AGREED HEATH WOULD HIMSELF DECIDE ON WHAT SHOULD BE MADE PUBLIC. HE DID, HOWEVER, REVEAL THAT MTG WAS IN CHUNG NAN HAI (THOUGH CLEARLY NOT/NOT IN LIBRARY WHERE MOST VISITS IN PAST OCCURRED) AND THAT MAO, WHILE PHYSICALLY FRAIL, WAS APPARENTLY ALERT AND FULLY AWARE OF WHAT WAS GOING ON. YOUDE SPEAKS CHINESE WELL AND HE WAS CONVINCED MAD'S COMMENTS MADE SENSE EVEN THOUGH THEY REQUIRED DOUBLE TRANSLATION VIA WANG HAI-JUNG AND NANCY TANG. HE SUFFERS FROM SPEECH IMPEDIMENT WHICH, COMBINED WITH HUNANESE ACCENT, REQUIRES HIS HUNANESE NIECE FIRST TO DECYPHER COMMENTS AND CONVEY THEM IN CHINESE TO NANCY TANG FOR TRANSLATION INTO ENGLISH. LATTER HOWEVER REPEATED TO MAD FOR HIS APPROVAL WHAT SHE GOT VIA WANG BEFORE PUTTING IT INTO ENGLISH. 3. BEYOND THESE ATMOSPHERICS YOUDE WOULD NOT/NOT GO. HOWEVER, LDN DAILY TELEGRAPH CORRESPONDENT, CLARE HOLLINGWORTH, SPENT CONSIDERABLE TIME WITH HEATH AND CONFIDED LATTER HAD SAID MAO WAS EXTREMELY CRITICAL OF PM WILSON AND BRIT LABOUR PARTY, ESPECIALLY ITS LEFT WING, THIS, OF COURSE, IS PART OF EXPLANATION OF EXTRAORDINARY ATTENTION PAID BY CHINESE LEADERS TO A ORIT CONSERVATIVE EX-PREMIER EX-PARTY LEADER. WHEN I ASKED YOUDE HIS VIEW ON THIS HE SAID IT WAS CLEAR CHINESE HAD HIGH REGARD FOR HEATH FOR FOLLOWING REASONS: (A) HE WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR NORMAL- IZING RELATIONS WITH CHINA AND WITHDRAWAL OF BRIT CONGEN FROM TAIWANK (B) HE WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR TAKING UK INTO EEC) HE WAS TOUGH ON RUSSIANS. CONTRAST OF CHINESE TREATMENT OF HEATH AND STRAUSS CWHO SAW ONLY TENG HSIAO-PING), BOTH HERE AT APPROX SAME TIME AND BOTH ON SECOND VISIT, WAS DUE TO CHINESE AWARENESS THAT A SECOND MAO RECEPTION FOR STRAUSS WOULD HAVE UPSET SCHMIDT AGAIN AND LIKELY PUT HIS OCT 31 VISIT IN JEOPARDY ONCE MORE. 4, REGARDING HEATH'S TALKS WITH TENG HSIAO-PING, YOUDE SAID HEATH HAD AGREED HE COULD BRIEF OLD COMWEL AMBASSADORS AND FOLLOWING IS SUBSTANCE OF CONVERSATIONS WITH TENG. CONFIDENTIAL LERARY GERALD R. OF STATE Department of State OF SENT AMERICA UNITED TELEGRAM CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 03 OTTAWA 03618 242209Z 5. SOVIET UNION-MUCH OF DISCUSSION IMPINGED IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER ON SINO-SOVIET RELATIONS. TENG HAD SAID THERE HAD NOT/ NOT BEEN "AN INCH OF PROGRESS. UNTIL NOW THERE HAD BEEN NO/NO RECONCILIATION BETWEEN THEM AND, AS LONG AS SOCIAL IMPERIALISM PREVAILED IN SOVIET UNION, HE EXPECTED NONE IN FUTURE. HE WAS EXTREMELY CRITICAL OF HSNKI CONFERENCE AND SKEPTICAL ABOUT ITS RESULTS. UNDER "SMOKESCREEN OF HSNKI DETENTE, "TENG SAID RUSSIANS WOULD NOW PEDDLE THEIR ASIAN SECURITY SYSTEM AS A MEANS OF OUSTING AMERICANS AND SPLITTING ASIAN NATIONS. THEIR AIM WAS TO DIVIDE AND RULE AND IN THE PROCESS TO ENCIRCLE CHINA, HE ADDED THEY WOULD NEVER SUCCEED. 6. TENG INDICATED CONCERN ABOUT RUSSIAN EFFORTS AROUND WORLD AND EMPHASIZED IMPORTANCE OF UNITY OF EUROPE. HE ALSO STRESSED NEED FOR USA TO RECOGNIZE SIGNIFICANCE OF STRONG AND UNITED EUROPE BECAUSE FOCUS OF SOVIET POLICY WAS EUROPE. WESTERN POWERS SHOULD RECOGNIZE THIS AND NOT/NOT BE DISTRACTED BY SOVIET ACTIONS ELSEWHERE. TENG REITERATED FAMILIAR CHINESE LINE THAT GROWING SUPER-POWER CONTENTION WAS INCREASING DANGER OF WAR AND THAT CONTINUING ARMS EXPANSION WAS EVIDENCE OF THIS FACT. 7. TAIWAN-TENG EXPRESSED NO/NO NEW THOUGHTS ON THIS SUBJECT. HE SAID, GIVEN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, SINO-USA RELATIONS WERE AS MIGHT BE EXPECTED. ISSUE BETWEEN THEM REMAINED TAIWAN AND NORMAL- IZATION OF RELATIONS DEPENDED ON AMERICAN BREAK WITH IT, ONLY SOLUTION THAT COULD BE ENVISAGED WAS JAPANESE SOLUTION. HOW- EVER, CHINESE WERE A PATIENT PEOPLE AND COULD WAIT A LONG TIME. 8. KOREA - TENG ADVISED HEATH NOT/NOT TO BELIEVE STOREIS SUGGESTING SLIKELIHOOD OF NORTH KOREAN ATTACK ON SOUTH, IN CHINESE VIEW THE MAN TO WATCH IN THIS CONNECTION WAS PARK CHUNG-LEE, NOT/NOT KIM IL SUGN. CHINA SUPPORTED KIMIS FIVE POINTS, INCLUDING REMOVAL OF USA TROOPS FROM SOUTH. HOWEVER, TENG SET NO/NO TIMETABLE FOR WITHDRAWAL AND GAVE IMPRESSION THIS WAS A LONG-TERM PROBLEM. 9. VIETNAM - TENG'S LINE HERE WAS THAT RUSSIANS WERE SEEKING BASES IN VIETNAM BUT THAT AFTER FIGHTING 30 YEARS FOR INDEPENDENCE, VIETNAMESE WERE NOT/NOT ABOUT TO SURRENDER ANY SOVEREIGNTY IN THIS WAY. HE INDICATED HOWEVER THAT THE SOVIET CONFIDENTIAL GENERAL FORD DEPARTMENT OF STATE Department of State / TELEGRAM OF CONFIDENTIAL PAGE 04 OTTAWA 03618 2422097 SEARCH FOR INFLUENCE IN INDOCHINA WAS A MAJOR PROBLEM, THE 10. ON DOMESTIC SIDE TENG DREW HEATH'S ATTENTION TO IMPORTANCE OF AGRICULTURE TO NEW 5-YEAR PLAN, MENTIONING TA CHAI MTGS HE HAD JUST ATTENDED COURLET 721 SEP 19), HE HAD ADDED THAT, DUE TO THIS YEAR'S BUMPER CROP, CHINA WOULD NOT/NOT BE LOOKING TO INNATL MARKET FOR WHEAT IN NEAR FUTURE. (THIS PRESUMABLY WAS TO EMPHASIZE CONTRAST WITH RECENT SOVIET PRODUCTION DIFFICULTIES AND HEAVY IMPORTS OF GRAIN.) 11. YOUDE SAID TENG HSIAO-PING LOOKED VERY FIT AND RADIATED CONFIDENCE. HE GAVE EVERY APPEARANCE OF BEING ON TOP OF HIS BRIEF AND FULLY IN CHARGE. SMALL END TEXT. JOHNSON LISRANY GERALD FORD CONFIDENTIAL 1 or STATE 1 OF STATE CELINA ink AMERICA Department of State TELEGRAM SECRET 0417 PAGE 01 OTTAWA 04210 102056Z 64 ACTION SS-25 INFO OCT-01 ISO-00 SSO-00 NSCE-00 ( BOOK-490, ) W 094033 0 1020452 NOV 75 FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA TO SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 8012 F R E OTTAWA 4210 EXDIS F.O 11652 GDS TAGS OVIP CA (FORD, GERALD R.) SUBJ PRESIDENTIAL LETTER TO PM TRUDEAU REF STATE 265536 la LETTER CONTAINED REFTEL DELIVERED BY POLCOUNS TO PM ADVISER TVAN HEAD AT 1230 NOVEMBER 10. AFTER READING LETTER, HEAD SAID HE WAS IMPRESSED, AND KNEW PM WOULD BE TOO, AT THE WARMTH AND CANDOR OF THE MESSAGE. HE WAS FULLY AWARE THAT us HAD DONE EVERYTHING THAT COULD BE DONE TO HAVE CANADA ADDED TO PARTICI- PANTS. HE WAS ESPECIALLY GRATIFIED BY PRESIDENT'S STATEMENT THAT HE WILL INSIST THAT CANADA BE INVOLVED IN ANY FOLLOW-UP EFFORTS FLOWING FROM CONFERENCE. THIS WAS PRECISELY THE TACTIC GOC NOW INTENDED PURSUE, DESIGNED TO MAKE IT CLEAR TO FRANCE THAT THE RESTRAINT GOC HAD SHOWN WITH REGARD TO ATTENDANCE AT SUMMIT WOULD NOT BE EXTENDED TO FURTHER WORK OF THIS NATURE. 2. REFERRING TO PRESS REPORTS THAT EXTAFF SECSTATE MACEACHEN HAD TOLD REPORTERS THAT CANADA'S EXCLUSION FROM CONFERENCE "IS BOUND TO AFFECT RELATIONS" BETWEEN CANADA AND FRANCE "AND IT WON'T BE A FAVORABLE EFFECT", FORD POLCOUNS INQUIRED IF GOC CONTEMPLATED ANYTHING SPECIFIC. ? HEAD REPLIED IN NEGATIVE, INDICATING THAT MACEACHEN HAD SOMEWHAT EXCEEDED GOC POLICY. AFTER LABORIOUS AND LENGTHY EFFORTS TO BRING CANADIAN-FRENCH RELATIONS BACK TO THE BERALD LIGHANY NORMALCY REPRESENTED BY RECENT NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT. AUTHORIZATION OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY GG 10/15/01 FORM 1 or STATE * EXE™S UNITED AMERICA Department of State TELEGRAM STATES OF SECRET PAGE 02 OTTAWA 04210 102056Z PONIATOWSKI VISIT TO CANADA AND LAST YEAR'S TRUDEAU VISIT TO PARIS, GOC WISHED AVOID PUBLIC DISPUTES. HOWEVER, GOC WAS ANNOYED WITH FRANCE FOR ARROGATING TO ITSELF FOR SECOND TIME IN A YEAR (FIRST BEING PRODUCER-CONSUMER CON- FERENCE) THE RIGHT TO INSIST THAT IT ALONE IS COMPETENT TO DECIDE WHO SHOULD AND SHOULD NOT BE INVOLVED IN SUCH GATHERINGS. JOHNSON A FORD GERALD AHYWRIT SECRET NOT TO BE REPRODUCED ITHOUT THE AUTHORIZATION C THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY FORM