Ask the Scholar
Document scope · 1 page
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory.
For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.
Scholar Source Context
Document identity
localId
157688099
label
Line Item Veto
core
doc
dtoType
document
citationUrl
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
157688099
contentType
document
title
Line Item Veto
citationUrl
collections
Records of the Office of Legislative Affairs (George W. Bush Administration)
Candida (Candi) Wolff's Files
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
157688099
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
95e1f76ee09d4170
ocrText
2017-0029-F
[
]
Thursday, May 30, 2019
FOIA Marker
This is not a textual record. This FOIA Marker indicates that material has been removed
during FOIA processing by George W. Bush Presidential Library staff.
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
Location or
NARA Number:
FRC ID:
OA Number:
Stack: Row: Sect.: Shelf: Pos.:
Hollinger ID:
W
23
9
10
2
6247
19182
7893
7992
Folder Title:
Line Item Veto
Withdrawn/Redacted Material
The George W. Bush Library
DOCUMENT FORM
SUBJECT/TITLE
PAGES
DATE
RESTRICTION(S)
NO.
001
Memorandum
Phone Calls to Various Senators on Line-Item Veto - To:
7
07/17/2006
P5;
Rob Portman - From: Jon Gans
002
Email
Re: G-8 Meeting - To: Candida Wolff, et al. - From:
1
07/18/2006 P5;
Michael Allen
003
Email
Re: Heads Up -- Lebanon Situation - To: Peter Rowan, et
1
07/18/2006 P5;
al. - From: Alexander Mistri
004
Report
General Background
3
N.D.
P5;
005
Report
Legislative Line Item Veto
1
N.D.
P5;
006
Memorandum
Likely Positive Achievements of the Pension Legislation -
1
06/27/2006
P5;
To: AH - From: Chuck
COLLECTION TITLE:
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
SERIES:
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
FOLDER TITLE:
Line Item Veto
FRC ID:
6247
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
PI National Security Classified Information [(a)(I) of the PRA]
b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]
an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
2201(3).
financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
Deed of Gift Restrictions
concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
A. Closed by Executive Order 13526 governing access to national
Records Not Subject to FOIA
security information.
B. Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document.
Court Sealed - The document is withheld under a court seal and is not subject to
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
the Freedom of Information Act.
of gift.
Page 1 of 3
2017-0029-F
This document was prepared on Friday, May 31, 2019
Withdrawn/Redacted Material
The George W. Bush Library
DOCUMENT FORM
SUBJECT/TITLE
PAGES
DATE
RESTRICTION(S)
NO.
007
Briefing
Meeting with Members of the Senate [and Handwritten
4
06/27/2006
P5;
Notes]
008
Talking Points
Talking Points for Meeting with Members [and
2
N.D.
P5;
Handwritten Notes]
009
Email
RE: Line Item Veto - To: Candida Wolff, et al. - From:
5
02/17/2006
P5;
Peter Rowan
010
Handwritten Note [Handwritten Notes]
2
N.D.
P5;
011
Briefing
Line Item Veto: Background and Options
5
02/16/2006
P5;
012
Briefing
Line Item Veto Legislation
2
N.D.
P5;
COLLECTION TITLE:
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
SERIES:
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
FOLDER TITLE:
Line Item Veto
FRC ID:
6247
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]
b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]
an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
2201(3).
financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
Deed of Gift Restrictions
concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
A. Closed by Executive Order 13526 governing access to national
Records Not Subject to FOIA
security information.
B. Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document.
Court Sealed - The document is withheld under a court seal and is not subject to
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
the Freedom of Information Act.
of gift.
2017-0029-F
Page 2 of 3
This document was prepared on Friday, May 31, 2019
Withdrawn/Redacted Material
The George W. Bush Library
DOCUMENT FORM
SUBJECT/TITLE
PAGES
DATE
RESTRICTION(S)
NO.
013
Email
Line Item Veto (NOTE: We May Discuss This During -
1
02/01/2006
P5;
To: Candida Wolff, et al. - From: William Badger
014
Briefing
Line Item Veto Legislation
2
N.D.
P5;
015
Chart
Line Item Veto Whip Check
1
07/25/2006
P5;
COLLECTION TITLE:
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
SERIES:
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
FOLDER TITLE:
Line Item Veto
FRC ID:
6247
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]
b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]
an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
2201(3).
financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
Deed of Gift Restrictions
concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
A. Closed by Executive Order 13526 governing access to national
Records Not Subject to FOIA
security information.
B. Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document.
Court Sealed - The document is withheld under a court seal and is not subject to
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
the Freedom of Information Act.
of gift.
2017-0029-F
Page 3 of 3
This document was prepared on Friday, May 31, 2019
Comparison of Line Item Veto Proposals
Provision
President
House 1992 (Carper)
House (Ryan -- HR 4890)
Senate (Gregg Title I of S 3521)
Number of
Unlimited.
1 for each Appropriations
5 per law (10 per omnibus
1 with President's budget (3 other
rescission bills
Subcommittee affected.
law).
messages during the year).
Timing of
At any time.
Within 3 calendar days of
Within 45 calendar days of
Within one year of enactment of the
Rescissions
enactment.
enactment.
spending/tax benefit.
Withholding/
180 calendar days.
Funds withheld from
45 calendar days.
45 calendar days.
deferral of
obligation until either House
funds
votes down the proposed
rescission bill.
Scope
Appropriations,
Appropriations only. If a
Same for appropriations
Same for appropriations and new
new mandatory
program is authorized by
and new mandatory
mandatory spending. Expands
spending, targeted
law, then rescission may
spending. Limits
definition of targeted tax benefit to
tax benefits (a
only propose a reduction for
definition of a targeted tax
include provisions that provide more
provision benefiting
that program of up to 25%.
benefits to a provision
favorable treatment to a single
100 or fewer
No limit if the program is not
benefiting a single
taxpayer or group of taxpayers when
taxpayers).
authorized.
beneficiary.
compared to similarly situated
taxpayers.
Legislative
> Introduced within
> Introduced within 2 days
>Introduced within 5 days
Same as President.
Procedures
2 days of session.
of session.
of session.
> Reported within 5
> Referred to committee for
>Referred to committee for
days of session.
up to 7 legislative days.
up to 7 legislative days.
> Voted on within
> Voted on within 10 days of
>Speaker has 2 legislative
10 days of session.
session.
days to schedule
> No amendments.
> No amendments.
consideration.
> No amendments.
Effective date/
Effective on date of
Effective for 103d Congress
Effective on date of
Effective on 9/1/2006 and sunsets on
Sunset date
enactment. No
only. (Bill passed House in
enactment. Sunsets on
12/31/2010 (2 years for President
sunset date.
102d Congress, 2d Session)
10/1/2012.
Bush and 2 years for the next
President).
Withdrawal Marker
The George W. Bush Library
FORM
SUBJECT/TITLE
PAGES
DATE
RESTRICTION(S)
Memorandum
Phone Calls to Various Senators on Line-Item Veto - To: Rob Portman -
7
07/17/2006
P5;
From: Jon Gans
This marker identifies the original location of the withdrawn item listed above.
For a complete list of items withdrawn from this folder, see the
Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet at the front of the folder.
COLLECTION:
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
SERIES:
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
FOLDER TITLE:
Line Item Veto
FRC ID:
FOIA IDs and Segments:
6247
2017-0029-F
OA Num.:
7992
NARA Num.:
7893
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]
b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]
an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
2201(3).
financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
Deed of Gift Restrictions
concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
A. Closed by Executive Order 13526 governing access to national
Records Not Subject to FOIA
security information.
B. Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document.
Court Sealed - The document is withheld under a court seal and is not subject to
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
the Freedom of Information Act.
of gift.
This Document was withdrawn on 5/31/2019 by erg
Withdrawal Marker
The George W. Bush Library
FORM
SUBJECT/TITLE
PAGES
DATE
RESTRICTION(S)
Email
Re: G-8 Meeting - To: Candida Wolff, et al. - From: Michael Allen
1
07/18/2006
P5;
This marker identifies the original location of the withdrawn item listed above.
For a complete list of items withdrawn from this folder, see the
Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet at the front of the folder.
COLLECTION:
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
SERIES:
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
FOLDER TITLE:
Line Item Veto
FRC ID:
FOIA IDs and Segments:
6247
2017-0029-F
OA Num.:
7992
NARA Num.:
7893
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]
b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]
an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
2201(3).
financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
Deed of Gift Restrictions
concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
A. Closed by Executive Order 13526 governing access to national
Records Not Subject to FOIA
security information.
B. Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document.
Court Sealed - The document is withheld under a court seal and is not subject to
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
the Freedom of Information Act.
of gift.
This Document was withdrawn on 5/31/2019 by erg
Withdrawal Marker
The George W. Bush Library
FORM
SUBJECT/TITLE
PAGES
DATE
RESTRICTION(S)
Email
Re: Heads Up -- Lebanon Situation - To: Peter Rowan, et al. - From:
1
07/18/2006
P5;
Alexander Mistri
This marker identifies the original location of the withdrawn item listed above.
For a complete list of items withdrawn from this folder, see the
Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet at the front of the folder.
COLLECTION:
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
SERIES:
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
FOLDER TITLE:
Line Item Veto
FRC ID:
FOIA IDs and Segments:
6247
2017-0029-F
OA Num.:
7992
NARA Num.:
7893
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]
b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]
an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
2201(3).
financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
Deed of Gift Restrictions
concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
A. Closed by Executive Order 13526 governing access to national
Records Not Subject to FOIA
security information.
B. Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document.
Court Sealed - The document is withheld under a court seal and is not subject to
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
the Freedom of Information Act.
of gift.
This Document was withdrawn on 5/31/2019 by erg
Withdrawal Marker
The George W. Bush Library
FORM
SUBJECT/TITLE
PAGES
DATE
RESTRICTION(S)
Report
General Background
3
N.D.
P5;
This marker identifies the original location of the withdrawn item listed above.
For a complete list of items withdrawn from this folder, see the
Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet at the front of the folder.
COLLECTION:
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
SERIES:
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
FOLDER TITLE:
Line Item Veto
FRC ID:
FOIA IDs and Segments:
6247
OA Num.:
2017-0029-F
7992
NARA Num.:
7893
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act- [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]
b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]
an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
2201(3).
financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
Deed of Gift Restrictions
concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
A. Closed by Executive Order 13526 governing access to national
Records Not Subject to FOIA
security information.
B. Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document.
Court Sealed The document is withheld under a court seal and is not subject to
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
the Freedom of Information Act.
of gift.
This Document was withdrawn on 5/31/2019 by erg
Withdrawal Marker
The George W. Bush Library
FORM
SUBJECT/TITLE
PAGES
DATE
RESTRICTION(S)
Report
Legislative Line Item Veto
1
N.D.
P5;
This marker identifies the original location of the withdrawn item listed above.
For a complete list of items withdrawn from this folder, see the
Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet at the front of the folder.
COLLECTION:
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
SERIES:
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
FOLDER TITLE:
Line Item Veto
FRC ID:
FOIA IDs and Segments:
6247
OA Num.:
2017-0029-F
7992
NARA Num.:
7893
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]
b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]
an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRAJ
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
2201(3).
financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
Deed of Gift Restrictions
concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
A. Closed by Executive Order 13526 governing access to national
Records Not Subject to FOIA
security information.
B. Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document.
Court Sealed - The document is withheld under a court seal and is not subject to
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
the Freedom of Information Act.
of gift.
This Document was withdrawn on 5/31/2019 by erg
Senate Line Item Veto Vote History
H.R. 2164,
Cosponsor
Expedited
of S. 2183,
S. 4, Line
H.R. 2, Line
In Cycle--
Recission,
GWB Bill/
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Former
Member, (A) =
Item Veto Act
Item Veto Act
Former
Up for
(10/3/92),
* =
of S. 4,
of H.R. 2,
of HR 2164,
Lt.
Appropriator
(3/27/96),
(2/6/95),
Governor
Reelection
House
Cosponsor
1995
1995
1992
Governor
Senate Vote
House Vote
in 2006
vote,
of Gregg
Carper Bill
Bill
Ds w/ Past Support
Baucus
aye
Biden
aye
Carper
aye
Sponsor
yes
yes
Dorgan (A)
aye
aye
yes
Feinstein (A)
aye
yes
yes
Feingold
aye
Harkin
aye
Johnson (A)
aye
aye
yes
Kennedy
aye
yes
Kerry
aye
yes
yes
Kohl (A)
aye
yes
Lieberman
aye
yes
Menendez
aye
Schumer
aye
aye
Wyden
aye
aye
yes
Reasonable Ds
Bayh
yes
Cantwell
yes
Clinton
yes
Landrieu
Nelson (NE)
yes
yes
Nelson (FL))
yes
Obama
Pryor
H.R. 2164,
Cosponsor
Expedited
of S. 2183,
S.4,Line
H.R. 2, Line
Recission,
GWB Bill/
In Cycle--
Cosponsor
Item Veto Act
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Former
Member, (A) =
Item Veto Act
Former
Up for
(10/3/92),
* =
of S. 4,
of H.R. 2,
of HR 2164,
Lt.
Appropriator
(3/27/96),
(2/6/95),
Governor
Reelection
House
Cosponsor
1995
1995
1992
Governor
Senate Vote
House Vote
in 2006
vote,
of Gregg
Carper Bill
Bill
Salazar
Ds with no History
yes/not
Dayton
running
Stabenow
yes
GOP Moderates
Chafee
yes
yes
Coleman
Collins
Grassley
aye
Hagel
Murkowski
Smith
Snowe
aye
aye
yes
yes
yes
GOP Appropriators
Cochran
aye
Allard (A)
aye
aye
yes
yes
yes
Bennett (A)
aye
Bond (A)
aye
yes
yes
Brownback (A)
aye
yes*
yes
Burns (A)
aye
yes
yes
Gregg (A)
aye
yes
yes
yes
Craig (A)
aye
yes
DeWine (A)
aye
yes
yes
yes
Domenici (A)
aye
H.R. 2164,
Cosponsor
Expedited
of S. 2183,
S. 4, Line
H.R. 2, Line
GWB Bill/
In Cycle--
Recission,
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Former
Member, (A) =
Item Veto Act
Item Veto Act
Former
Up for
(10/3/92),
* =
of S. 4,
of H.R. 2,
of HR 2164,
Lt.
Appropriator
(3/27/96),
(2/6/95),
Governor
Reelection
House
Cosponsor
1995
1995
1992
Governor
Senate Vote
House Vote
in 2006
vote,
of Gregg
Carper Bill
Bill
Hutchison (A)
aye
yes
McConnell (A)
aye
yes'
yes
Shelby (A)
aye
yes
Specter (A)
aye
Stevens (A)
aye
Solid GOP Yes
Alexander
yes*
yes
Allen
aye
yes
yes
yes
yes
Bunning
aye
aye
yes*
yes
yes
Burr
aye
yes
yes
Chambliss
aye
yes*
Coburn
aye
yes
Cornyn
*
Crapo
aye
yes*
DeMint
yes*
Dole
yes
Ensign
*
aye
yes
yes
Enzi
yes*
yes/not
Frist
aye
yes*
running
Graham
aye
yes*
Hatch
aye
yes
yes
Inhofe
*
aye
aye
yes
Isakson
yes*
Kyl
aye
aye
yes*
yes
yes
yes
Lott
aye
yes
yes
Lugar
aye
yes
Martinez
yes
H.R. 2164,
Cosponsor
Expedited
of S. 2183,
S. 4, Line
H.R. 2, Line
GWB Bill/
In Cycle--
Recission,
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Former
Member, (A) =
Item Veto Act
Item Veto Act
Former
Up for
(10/3/92),
* =
of S. 4,
of H.R. 2,
of HR 2164,
Lt.
Appropriator
(3/27/96),
(2/6/95),
Governor
Reelection
House
Cosponsor
1995
1995
1992
Governor
Senate Vote
House Vote
in 2006
vote,
of Gregg
Carper Bill
Bill
McCain
aye
yes*
yes
Roberts
aye
Santorum
aye
aye
yes*
yes
yes
yes
Sessions
yes*
Sununu
yes*
Talent
aye
yes
yes
yes
Thomas
aye
aye
yes*
yes
yes
yes
Thune
yes*
Vitter
yes*
Voinovich
yes
Warner
aye
yes
Solid D No
Akaka
no
yes
Bingaman
no
yes
Boxer
no
Byrd (A)
no
yes
Conrad
no
yes
Dodd
no
Durbin
no
Jeffords
no
Inouye (A)
no
Lautenberg
no
Leahy (A)
no
Levin
no
Lincoln
no
Mikulski (A)
no
Murray (A)
no
H.R. 2164,
Cosponsor
Expedited
of S. 2183,
S. 4, Line
H.R. 2, Line
GWB Bill/
In Cycle--
Recission,
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Former
Member, (A) =
Item Veto Act
Item Veto Act
Former
Up for
(10/3/92),
* =
of S. 4,
of H.R. 2,
of HR 2164,
Lt.
Appropriator
(3/27/96),
(2/6/95),
Governor
Reelection
House
Cosponsor
1995
1995
1992
Governor
Senate Vote
House Vote
in 2006
vote,
of Gregg
Carper Bill
Bill
Reed
no
Reid (A)
no
yes
Rockefeller
no
yes
yes/not
no
Sarbanes
running
Senate Line Item Veto Vote History
H.R. 2164,
Cosponsor
Expedited
of 5. 2183,
S.4, Line
H.R. 2, Line
Recission,
GWB Bill/
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Former
Member, (A) =
Item Veto Act
Item Veto Act
Former
(10/3/92),
thi II
of S.4,
of H.R. 2,
of HR 2164,
Lt.
in cycle
Appropriator
(3/27/96),
(2/6/95),
Governor
House
Cosponsor
1995
1995
1992
Governor
Senate Vote
House Vote
vote,
of Gregg
Carper Bill
Bill
(15)
Ds w/ Past Support
Baucus
aye
Biden
aye
Carper
aye
Sponsor
yes
yes
Dorgan (A)
aye
aye
yes
Feinstein (A)
aye
yes
yes
Feingold
aye
Harkin (A)
aye
Johnson (A)
aye
aye
yes
Kennedy
aye
yes
Kerry
-
aye
yes
yes
Kohl (A)
aye
yes
Lieberman
aye
yes
Menendez
aye
Schumer
aye
aye
Wyden
aye
aye
yes
(a)
Reasonable Ds
Bayh
yes
Cantwell
yes
Clinton
yes
Landrieu
Nelson (NE)
yes
yes
Nelson (FL))
yes
Obama
Pryor
H.R. 2164,
Cosponsor
Expedited
of S. 2183,
S.4, Line
H.R. 2, Line
Recission,
GWB Bill/
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Former
Member, (A) =
Item Veto Act
Item Veto Act
Former
(10/3/92),
* =
of S.4,
of H.R. 2,
of HR 2164,
Lt.
In cycle
Appropriator
(3/27/96).
(2/6/95),
Governor
House
Cosponsor
1995
1995
1992
Governor
Senate Vote
House Vote
vote,
of Gregg
Carper Bill
Bill
Salazer
Ds with no History
yes/not
Dayton
running
Stabenow
yes
GOP Moderates
Chafee
yes
yes
Coleman
Collins
Grassley
Hagel
Murkowski
Smith
Snowe
aye
aye
yes
yes
yes
GOP Appropriators
Cochran
aye
Allard (A)
aye
ave
yes
yes
yes
Bennett (A)
aye
Bond M
aye
you
yes
Brownback (A)
aye
yes'
yes
Burns (A)
eye
yes
yes
Gregg (A)
aye
yes
yes
yes
Craig (A)
eye
yes
DeWine (A)
aye
yes
yes
yes
Domenici (A)
aye
H.R. 2164,
Cosponsor
Expedited
of S. 2183,
S.4, Line
H.R. 2, Line
Recission,
GWB Bill/
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Former
Member, (A) =
Item Veto Act
Item Veto Act
Former
(10/3/92),
* =
of S.4,
of H.R. 2,
of HR 2164,
Lt.
In cycle
Appropriator
(3/27/96),
(2/6/95),
Governor
House
Cosponsor
1995
1995
1992
Governor
Senate Vote
House Vote
vote,
of Gregg
Carper Bill
Bill
Hutchison (A)
aye
yes
McConnell (A)
aye
yes*
yes
Shelby (A)
aye
yes
Specter (A)
aye
Stevens (A)
aye
Solid GOP Yes
Alexander
yes'
yes
Allen
aye
yes
yes
yes
Bunning
aye
aye
yes*
yes
yes
Burr
aye
yes
yes
Chambliss
aye
yes'
Cobum
aye
yes
Cornyn
Crapo
aye
yes*
DeMint
yes*
Dole
yes
Ensign
IN
aye
your
yes
Enzi
yes'
yes/not
aye
yes*
Frist
running
Graham
eye
yes"
Hatch
aye
yes
yes
Inhofe
*
aye
aye
yes
Isakson
yes*
Kyl
aye
aye
yes'
yes
yes
yes
Lott
aye
yes
yes
Lugar
aye
yes
Martinez
yes
In cycle
yes
san
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Former
77
Governor
Former
Governor
IN
yes
Cosponsor
of HR 2164,
1992
yes
yes
Cosponsor
of H.R. 2,
1995
said
Cosponsor
of S. 4.
1995
yes
yes
yes
yes
Cosponsor
of S. 2183,
GWB Bill/
* II
Cosponsor
of Gregg
Hi
Bill
yes'
yes'
yes'
yes"
yes
yes*
yes'
yes
H.R. 2164,
Expedited
Recission,
(10/3/92),
House
vote,
Carper Bill
aye
aye
H.R. 2, Line
Item Veto Act
(2/6/95),
House Vote
aye
aye
aye
no
no
S 4. Line
Item Veto Act
(3/27/96),
Senate Vote
aye
aye
aye
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
no
ou
no
no
no
no
Member, (A) =
Appropriator
McCain
Roberts
Santorum
Sessions
Sununu
Talent
Thomas
Thune
Vitter
Voinovich
Warner
Solid D No
Akaka
Bingaman
Boxer
Byrd (A)
Conrad
Dodd
Durbin
Jeffords
Inouye (A)
Lautenberg
Leahy (A)
Levin
INSURED (
3
Lindoin
In cycle
yesinot
running
Former
Lt.
Governor
san
Former
Governor
saí
Cosponsor
of HR 2164,
1992
Cosponsor
of H.R. 2,
1995
Cosponsor
of S. 4.
1995
Cosponsor
of S. 2183,
GWB Bill/
# II
Cosponsor
of Gregg
Bill
H.R. 2164,
Expedited
Recission,
(10/3/92),
House
vote,
Carper Bill
H.R. 2, Line
Item Veto Act
(2/9/99)
House Vote
no
S. 4, Line
Item Veto Act
(3/27/96),
Senate Vote
no
no
no
Member, (A) =
Appropriator
Reed
Reid (A)
Rockefeller
Sarbanes
U.S. Senate: Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote
Page 1 of 3
Find Your Senato
Search
UNITED
STATES
SENATORS COMMITTEES LEGISLATION & RECORDS I ART & HISTORY VISITORS
SENATE
Home > Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote
Find Votes
U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 104th Congress 2ⁿᵈ Session
Votes
as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of
Find out about C
> Nominations
the Secretary of the Senate
voting with this I
Vote Summary
Calendars & Schedules
Question: On the Conference Report (conference report re: S. 4)
Find Bills
Congressional Record
Vote Number: 56
Vote Date:
March 27, 1996, 07:03 PM
Use this guide to
Treaties
Required For
Vote Result:
1/2
Conference Report Agreed to
full text of recent
Majority:
resolutions on th
Bills & Resolutions
Measure
S.4 (Line Item Veto Act)
them from the S
Number:
Document Roon
Appropriations Bills
Measure Title: An act to give the President line item veto authority with
them in a library
respect to appropriations, new direct spending, and limited tax
Lobbying Disclosure
benefits.
Find Bills in 1
Legislative Process
Vote
YEAs
69
Counts:
You can access
Active Legislation
NAYs
31
information, by t
Vote Summary
By Senator Name
By Vote Position
By Home State
words, from the
site. Information
back to the 93rd
is available on T
Alphabetical by Senator Name
Abraham (R-MI), Yea
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Mack (R-FL), Yea
Akaka (D-HI), Nay
Ford (D-KY), Nay
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
Ashcroft (R-MO), Yea
Frist (R-TN), Yea
McConnell (R-KY), Yea
Virtual Refer
Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Glenn (D-OH), Nay
Mikulski (D-MD), Nay
Bennett (R-UT), Yea
Gorton (R-WA), Yea
Moseley-Braun (D-IL),
The Votes page
Reference Desk
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Graham (D-FL), Yea
Nay
Bingaman (D-NM), Nay
Gramm (R-TX), Yea
Moynihan (D-NY), Nay
procedure inform
Bond (R-MO), Yea
Grams (R-MN), Yea
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
guides, and ess:
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Nay
votes.
Bradley (D-NJ), Yea
Gregg (R-NH), Yea
Nickles (R-OK), Yea
Breaux (D-LA), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Nunn (D-GA), Nay
Brown (R-CO), Yea
Hatch (R-UT), Yea
Pell (D-RI), Nay
Vote Statistic
Bryan (D-NV), Nay
Hatfield (R-OR), Nay
Pressler (R-SD), Yea
The Votes categ
Bumpers (D-AR), Nay
Heflin (D-AL), Nay
Pryor (D-AR), Nay
Burns (R-MT), Yea
Helms (R-NC), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Nay
Statistics page f.
Byrd (D-WV), Nay
Hollings (D-SC), Nay
Robb (D-VA), Yea
figures about vo
Campbell (R-CO), Yea
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
Senators.
Chafee (R-RI), Yea
Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
Roth (R-DE), Yea
Coats (R-IN), Yea
Inouye (D-HI), Nay
Santorum (R-PA), Yea
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Jeffords (R-VT), Nay
Sarbanes (D-MD), Nay
Cohen (R-ME), Nay
Johnston (D-LA), Nay
Shelby (R-AL), Yea
Conrad (D-ND), Nay
Kassebaum (R-KS), Yea
Simon (D-IL), Yea
Coverdell (R-GA), Yea
Kempthorne (R-ID), Yea
Simpson (R-WY), Yea
Craig (R-ID), Yea
Kennedy (D-MA), Yea
Smith (R-NH), Yea
D'Amato (R-NY), Yea
Kerrey (D-NE), Nay
Snowe (R-ME), Yea
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Specter (R-PA), Yea
DeWine (R-OH), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Stevens (R-AK), Yea
Dodd (D-CT), Nay
Kyl (R-AZ), Yea
Thomas (R-WY), Yea
Dole (R-KS), Yea
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay
Thompson (R-TN), Yea
Domenici (R-NM), Yea
Leahy (D-VT), Nay
Thurmond (R-SC), Yea
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Levin (D-MI), Nay
Warner (R-VA), Yea
Exon (D-NE), Yea
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Wellstone (D-MN), Yea
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/rol_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfn?congress10.
6/20/2006
U.S. Senate: Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote
Page 2 of 3
Faircloth (R-NC), Yea
Lott (R-MS), Yea
Wyden (D-OR), Yea
Feingold (D-WI), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
Vote Summary
By Senator Name
By Vote Position
By Home State
Grouped By Vote Position
YEAs ---69
H
28
Abraham (R-MI)
Faireloth (R-NC)
Lugar (R-IN)
Ashcroft (R-MO)
Feingold (D-WI)
Mack (R-FL)
Baucus (D-MT)
Feinstein (D-CA)
McCain (R-AZ)
19
Bennett (R-UT)
Frist (R-TN)
McConnell (R-KY)
Biden (D-DE)
Gorton (R-WA)
Murkowski (R-AK)
-
Bond (R-MO)
Graham (D-FL)
Nickles (R-OK)
Bradley (D-NJ)
Gramm (R-TX)
Pressier (R-SD)
Breaux (D-LA)
Grams (R-MN)
Robb (D-VA)
Brown (R-CO)
Grassley (R-IA)
Reth (R-DE) (R
Burns (R-MT)
Gregg (R-NH)
Santorum (R-PA)
Campbell (R-CO)
Harkin (D-IA)
Shelby (R-AL)
Chafee (R-RI) (Dad)
Hatch (R-UT)
Simon (D-IL)
Goats (R-IN)
Helms (R-NC)
Simpson (R-WY)
Cochran (R-MS)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Smith (R-NH)
Goverdell (R-GA)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Snowe (R-ME)
Craig (R-ID)
Kassebaum (R-KS)
Specter (R-PA)
D'Amato (R-NY)
Kempthorne (R-ID)
Stevens (R-AK)
Daschle (D-SD)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Thomas (R-WY)
DeWine (R-OH)
Kerry (D-MA)
Thompson (R-TN)
Dole (R-KS)
Kohl (D-WI)
Thurmond (R-SC)
Domenici (R-NM)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Warner (R-VA)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Wellstone (D-MN)
Exon (D NE)
Lott (R-MS)
Wyden (D-OR)
NAYs ---31
Akaka (D-HI)
Hatfield (R-OR)
Moseley-Braun (D-IL)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Heflin (D-AL)
Moynihan (D-NY)
Boxer (D-CA)
Hollings (D-SC)
Murray (D-WA)
Bryan (D-NV)
Inouye (D-HI)
Nunn (D-GA)
Bumpers (D-AR)
Jeffords (R-VT)
Pell (D-RI)
Byrd (D-WV)
Johnston (D-LA)
Pryor (D-AR)
Cohen (R-ME)
Kerrey (D-NE)
Reid (D-NV)
Conrad (D-ND)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Dodd (D-CT)
Leahy (D-VT)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Ford (D-KY)
Levin (D-MI)
Glenn (D-OH)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Vote Summary
By Senator Name
By Vote Position
By Home State
Grouped by Home State
Alabama:
Heflin (D-AL), Nay
Shelby (R-AL), Yea
Alaska:
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Stevens (R-AK), Yea
Arizona:
Kyl (R-AZ), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
Arkansas:
Bumpers (D-AR), Nay
Pryor (D-AR), Nay
California:
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Colorado:
Brown (R-CO), Yea
Campbell (R-CO), Yea
Connecticut:
Dodd (D-CT), Nay
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Delaware:
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Roth (R-DE), Yea
Florida:
Graham (D-FL), Yea
Mack (R-FL), Yea
Georgia:
Coverdell (R-GA), Yea
Nunn (D-GA), Nay
Hawaii:
Akaka (D-HI), Nay
Inouye (D-HI), Nay
Idaho:
Craig (R-ID), Yea
Kempthorne (R-ID), Yea
Illinois:
Moseley-Braun (D-IL),
Simon (D-IL), Yea
Nay
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/rolL_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfin?congress10.
6/20/2006
U.S. Senate: Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote
Page 3 of 3
Indiana:
Coats (R-IN), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
lowa:
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Kansas:
Dole (R-KS), Yea
Kassebaum (R-KS), Yea
Kentucky:
Ford (D-KY), Nay
McConnell (R-KY), Yea
Louisiana:
Breaux (D-LA), Yea
Johnston (D-LA), Nay
Maine:
Cohen (R-ME), Nay
Snowe (R-ME), Yea
Maryland:
Mikulski (D-MD), Nay
Sarbanes (D-MD), Nay
Massachusetts:
Kennedy (D-MA), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Michigan:
Abraham (R-MI), Yea
Levin (D-MI), Nay
Minnesota:
Grams (R-MN), Yea
Wellstone (D-MN), Yea
Mississippi:
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Lott (R-MS), Yea
Missouri:
Ashcroft (R-MO), Yea
Bond (R-MO), Yea
Montana:
Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Burns (R-MT), Yea
Nebraska:
Exon (D-NE), Yea
Kerrey (D-NE), Nay
Nevada:
Bryan (D-NV), Nay
Reid (D-NV), Nay
New Hampshire:
Gregg (R-NH), Yea
Smith (R-NH), Yea
New Jersey:
Bradley (D-NJ), Yea
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay
New Mexico:
Bingaman (D-NM), Nay
Domenici (R-NM), Yea
New York:
D'Amato (R-NY), Yea
Moynihan (D-NY), Nay
North Carolina:
Faircloth (R-NC), Yea
Helms (R-NC), Yea
North Dakota:
Conrad (D-ND), Nay
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Ohio:
DeWine (R-OH), Yea
Glenn (D-OH), Nay
Oklahoma:
Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
Nickles (R-OK), Yea
Oregon:
Hatfield (R-OR), Nay
Wyden (D-OR), Yea
Pennsylvania:
Santorum (R-PA), Yea
Specter (R-PA), Yea
Rhode Island:
Chafee (R-RI), Yea
Pell (D-RI), Nay
South Carolina:
Hollings (D-SC), Nay
Thurmond (R-SC), Yea
South Dakota:
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
Pressler (R-SD), Yea
Tennessee:
Frist (R-TN), Yea
Thompson (R-TN), Yea
Texas:
Gramm (R-TX), Yea
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Utah:
Bennett (R-UT), Yea
Hatch (R-UT), Yea
Vermont:
Jeffords (R-VT), Nay
Leahy (D-VT), Nay
Virginia:
Robb (D-VA), Yea
Warner (R-VA), Yea
Washington:
Gorton (R-WA), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Nay
West Virginia:
Byrd (D-WV), Nay
Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
Wisconsin:
Feingold (D-WI), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Wyoming:
Simpson (R-WY), Yea
Thomas (R-WY), Yea
Vote Summary By Senator Name By Vote Position By Home State
SENATORS COMMITTEES LEGISLATION & RECORDS ART & HISTORY VISITORS REFERENCE
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/rolL_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfim?congress10. 6/20/2006
Page 1 of 1
Wolff, Candida P.
From: Soderstrom, Sharon (Frist) [[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 6:32 PM
To:
Wolff, Candida P.
U: Bond, Craig, Domenici, Hagel, Lott, Voinovich
LN: Collins, KBH, Murkowski
6/21/2006
STOP
S.O.S.:
STOP
STOP OVER-SPENDING ACT OF 2006
SPENDING RESTRAINT
-
DEFICIT REDUCTION
BUDGET ENFORCEMENT
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY
THE PROBL EM:
SPENDING IS OUT OF CONTROL
The Budget System Is Broken and Ineffective
The Budget Enforcement Act (which included statutory caps on discretionary spending)
expired in 2002 and has not been renewed.
Congress has failed to pass a final Budget Resolution for three of the past five years.
Last year's reconciliation bill saved $39 billion, compared to the last reconciliation bill
we did 7 years ago that saved $118 billion in constant 2005 dollars over five years.
There are no consequences if Congress does not adhere to recommended budget
constraints.
There are no consequences if Congress increases deficit spending.
There are no provisions in place to get us to a balanced budget.
Essentially, Congress and the Administration operate under a "free pass" to spend.
Budgetary Gimmicks and a Lack Of Financial Discipline Contribute
To Unrestrained Spending
In recent years, nearly 20% of all discretionary spending has been designated as
emergency and is outside the caps.
Emergency spending is not offset - it is pure deficit spending and has led to "shadow"
budgets.
The President and Congress have used the emergency spending process to pay for items
that should be in the normal budget process.
Congress uses the reconciliation process (a process designed to save money) to expand or
launch new mandatory spending programs.
Current Spending Levels Are Unsustainable; The Resulting Debt
Threatens Our Economic Stability And That Of Our Children And
Grandchildren
Our nation is facing significant short-term deficits assumed at $360B in FY07.
In two short years, the Baby Boom generation will begin to retire, which will lead to
skyrocketing costs in Social Security and Medicare.
In fact, the Medicare program is expected to be insolvent within the next 7 years.
Long-term entitlement obligations will overwhelm federal resources when Baby Boomers
retire. Within the next 75 years, federal obligations will cost U.S. taxpayers $46.4 trillion.
To put that in perspective, our nation has collected $40 trillion in taxes over the last 217
years combined.
THE SOS SOLUTION;
A "BIG BANG" APPROACH TO SPENDING RESTRAINT
Reduces the Deficit and Effectively Balances the Budget
The SOS Act establishes a new and more comprehensive Gramm-Rudmanesque
deficit reduction mechanism. Unlike the 1985 version, the Gregg mechanism
addresses entitlement spending - the largest share of the budget.
Defines deficit reduction targets, as a share of the U.S. economy (GDP).
Puts us on a path to an essentially balanced budget (0.5% of GDP) by 2012.
Brings Back Budget Discipline And Eliminates Gimmicks
The SOS Act reinstates statutory discretionary caps - caps that both the President and
Congress would be required to abide by.
The SOS Act builds in emergency funding assumptions within those caps. No longer
will emergency spending be "off the books" deficit spending. Embedded in those
assumptions is that within 3 years the emergency funding levels return to historical levels
(approximately $30 billion).
The sos Act prevents reconciliation from being used as a mechanism to
dramatically expand mandatory spending.
Establishes Consequences To Overspending
The SOS Act establishes across-the-board reductions in discretionary spending if
Congress fails to adhere to the statutory caps.
The SOS Act requires Congress, if deficit reduction targets are not met, to reduce
the rate of growth of mandatory spending, either through an automatic, expedited
reconciliation process, or if Congress fails to act, through an across-the-board reduction
in mandatory spending.
The sos Act creates a new point of order against mandatory spending, if the
Medicare program (the first of the three major entitlement programs expected to reach
insolvency thresholds) is on track to insolvency within the next 7 years.
Eliminates Wasteful Spending
The SOS Act establishes a Line Item Veto/Expedited Rescission process to quickly
and effectively eliminate wasteful spending.
The sos Act establishes a Commission on Accountability and Review of Federal
Agencies to look for fraud, waste, abuse, and duplication across federal agencies and
programs and requires Congress to act on the recommendations of the Commission
regarding programs that should be eliminated or realigned.
Addresses Long-Term Entitlement Insolvency Issue
The SOS Act creates an Entitlement Solvency Commission and requires the
Commission to make legislative recommendations to save the entitlement programs from
financial ruin and requires Congress to act upon those recommendations under expedited
fast track procedures.
Streamlines Budget Process
The SOS Act includes biennial budgeting, converts annual budget, appropriations, and
authorizing budget process into a two year cycle. The first year would be reserved for the
Budget and Appropriations process. During the second year, Congress would conduct
oversight and authorize legislation.
The SOS Act makes it easier for Congress to pass reconciliation bills -legislation that
statutorily saves money.
STOP
S.O.S.:
STOP
STOP OVER-SPENDING ACT OF 2006
SPENDING RESTRAINT - DEFICIT REDUCTION - BUDGET ENTORCEMENT - FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY
Statutory Limits On Discretionary Spending
From 1991-2002, Congress and the President operated under statutory caps on discretionary
spending. When statutory caps were put into place, Congress included an exception for
emergencies to allow Congress to provide funding for unforeseen disasters. Unfortunately,
a mechanism that was intended to be a safety valve for unexpected funding has become a fire
hose for spending.
Today, "emergency" spending
has allowed Congress to
FEDERAL "EMERGENCY" SPENDING
operate a "shadow budget," as
180
emergency spending is not
160
offset, and is considered "off
140
the books."
120
Billions of Dollars
100
The Stop Over-Spending Act of
80
2006 works to fix the broken
budget process and put in place
60
new, meaningful restraints with
40
realistic enforcement
20
mechanisms that will ensure
0
that we hand our children, and
our children's children, a
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
Source: Senate Budget Committee Republican Staff
government they can afford.
The SOS Act reinstates statutory caps -- last used in 2002 for discretionary spending and
includes in that regimen caps an adjustment for a reasonable amount for emergency
spending, if needed. The new caps would be enforced by sequestration (automatic, across-
the-board spending reductions.)
The statutory caps for the next three years are as follows:
-
$872.8 billion in 2007
-
$895.8 billion in 2008
-
$919.5 billion in 2009
The following levels for emergency spending are assumed:
-
$90 billion in 2007
-
$50 billion in 2008
-
$30 billion in 2009 - $30 billion represents historical average for annual
emergency spending.
If Congress fails to adhere to statutory caps, as adjusted for emergency spending, then the
Office of Management and Budget would be required to implement an across-the-board
sequester in discretionary spending in order to ensure that spending does not exceed the
spending caps prescribed in law.
STOP
S.O.S.:
STOP
STOP OVER-SPENDING ACT OF 2006
SPENDING RESTRAINT
-
DEFICIT REDUCTION
-
BUDGET ENFORCEMENT
-
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY
Gregg Mechanism for Automatic Deficit Reduction
Getting entitlement spending under
control and reducing the federal
MAJOR COMPONENTS OF THE BUDGET
deficit is critical to ensuring the
4.5
long-term health of our nation's
4.09
finances. Congress dipped its toe
4.0
3.29
in the water of the entitlement
3.5
Entitlements and Mandatories
Defense Discretionary
problem last year, passing the
Non Defense Discretionary
($ billions)
3.0
Net Interest
2.60
64%
Deficit Reduction Act, slowing the
2.5
rate of growth of entitlements by
1.87
59%
2.0
$39 billion over the next five years.
1.60
56%
1.31
1.5
It was a good start, but more needs
55%
0.99
51%
15%
16%
1.0
48%
to be done. Entitlement spending,
19%
0.21
0.35
0.62
45%
17%
16%
16%
14%
excluding interest on the debt, now
23%
0.5
25%
17%
17%
18%
15%
represents 56 percent of all federal
14%
15%
12%
7%
9%
7%
0.0
spending. Left unchecked, that will
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
Source: CBO Percentages may not add to 100% due to relarding
grow to more than 62 percent in 10
Total spending. assumes the CBQ inflated baseline.
years.
Similar to the Gramm-Rudman
Mandatory Spending Grows Higher
legislation in 1985, the Automatic
Than One Fourth of the Economy
Deficit Reduction Mechanism in
30%
the Stop Over-Spending Act is
25%
Avg. Post-War
stronger and updated for current
Spending = 20% of GDP
budget realities. It targets budget
20%
deficits and entitlement spending
Actual Federal Spending
that threaten to overwhelm the
GDP
15%
as a % GDP
nation's fiscal resources once the
10%
Baby Boom Generation begins to
retire. The SOS sharply reduces
5%
Social Security, Medicare &
Medicaid Spending as a % of GDP
the federal deficit as a percentage
of our economy as measured
0%
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
through the Gross Domestic
Source: CBO
Product (GDP) through
reconciliation or sequestration if
necessary.
The bill requires Congress to produce entitlement spending reductions commensurate
with capping the deficit at 2.75% ($379 billion) of GDP in 2007, declining to .5 in 2012.
In 2006, the deficit is currently forecast to or 2.3% of GDP. Highlights include:
The Act establishes a deficit limit based on a percentage of GDP. The deficit
triggers are as follows:
- 2.75% of GDP in 2007
- 2.25% of GDP in 2008
- 1.75% of GDP in 2009
- 1.25% of GDP in 2010
- .75% of GDP in 2011
-
.5% of GDP in 2012 and beyond
S.O.S DEFICIT REDUCTION
3.0%
Deficit as a Percentage of GDP
2.5%
2.75%
2.25%
2.0%
1.75%
1.5%
1.25%
1.0%
0.75%
0.5%
0.50%
0.0%
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Source: Senate Budget Committee Republican Staff
If the limit is breached in any one year; "automatic reconciliation" goes into
effect. The mandatory reconciliation procedure would be similar to the normal
reconciliation procedure except:
Each Authorizing Committee would be required to report legislation that achieves
savings equal to the amount instructed by the Budget Committee. If a Committee
fails to report legislation sufficient to meet its instruction the Budget Committee
has the authority to include the necessary legislative language to meet the deficit
reduction amount.
If Congress fails to enact a Reconciliation bill with savings that meet the deficit
target, automatic across the board reductions ("sequestration") of mandatory
spending would automatically go into effect.
The proposal exempts Social Security, net interest, funds obligated by law, other
obligations backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, and
existing legal contracts.
STOP
S.O.S.:
STOP®
STOP OVER-SPENDING ACT OF 2006
SPENDING RESTRAINT
-
DEFICIT REDUCTION
BUDGET ENFORCEMENT
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY
Line-Item Veto Authority
The Stop Over-Spending Act gives the President the opportunity to veto wasteful
spending, including both discretionary spending and new mandatory spending, where all
savings must be used for deficit reduction. This provision, a stronger version than
President Bush's recent proposal (S. 2381), is not as far-reaching as what was enacted
during the Clinton presidency. Unlike the Line-Item Veto the Republican Congress
provided President Clinton in 1996, which had cancellations go into effect automatically,
this version of Line-Item Veto requires Congressional affirmation for any rescission
proposed by the President.
The bill gives the President line-item veto authority to rescind discretionary and
mandatory funding items, as well as certain tax provisions. However, Congress must
approve the President's requested rescissions under a "fast-track" procedure. Highlights
of the proposal are as follows:
Rescission savings must be used for deficit reduction.
Rescissions may include any discretionary funding or any new mandatory
spending.
Rescissions may include specific tax provisions, generally those targeted to
benefit a small number of beneficiaries. Under the Act, the Joint Committee on
Taxation would identify targeted tax benefits that would be eligible for rescission.
President may only submit four rescission packages a year (once with the
submissions of the President's Budget and three other times at the President's
discretion.)
The President may resubmit only once a specific rescission that was in an earlier
package of rescissions rejected by Congress. Note: This is to address the issue
that while Congress may have rejected the President's entire package of
rescissions, they may in fact be supportive of certain rescissions that were
included in the larger package of rescissions. It should also be noted that the
President is restricted to resubmitting a rescission only once under both the new
Line Item Veto authority and as well as existing authority the President has under
Part B or the Impoundment Control Act.
Upon submission of the President's rescission package, if a Member of Congress
introduces the President's package, the matter will be considered on the floor of
the respective Member's House within eight days of the President's submission.
The rescission package is not amendable.
Both the House and Senate must pass the President's rescission for the rescission
to become law.
From the time Congress receives the President's rescissión package, the President
is permitted to suspend funds for his recommended rescission only for 45 days. If
Congress rejects his rescission prior to the expiration of the 45 days, the President
may release the funds earlier.
The authority to rescind spending or certain tax items, would apply to any
discretionary or mandatory spending bill or tax bills enacted on or after
September 1, 2006.
The Line Item Veto authority expires in four years. Note: This is to allow
Congress to revaluate the merits of Line Item Veto after two Presidents (President
Bush and his successor) have had the opportunity to utilize it for two years each.
CHAIRMAN'S MARK-- S. 2381 LEGISLATIVE LINE ITEM VETO ACT OF 2006
(Consideration in the Senate)
Appropriation/Direct
Spending/Tax bill
enacted
Executive Action
Congressional Action
President may submit (4) special
messages/year: 1 with President's Budget &3
Committee Action
times at his discretion
President may only submit rescission proposals
Chairman's Mark Changes
President sends Special
within one year of the date of enactment of
Message to Congress
legislation covered by this Act
(Rescission(s) Proposal)
President may submit the same item of
rescission twice under Part B or Part C or
Impoundment Control Act of 1974
President Authorized to withhold spending or
suspend benefits up to 45 Calendar Days upon
receipt by Congress of special message
Leader (or any Member on the
Measure fails
3rd day) may introduce
President's Rescission Proposal
President may continue to withhold
within 3 days of session from
funds for remainder of 45 day
receipt of the Presidential
period, or President may release at
Message
his discretion
Referred to relevant
committee(s)
Measure.nasses
Within 5 days of session after.
Vote on Senate bill deemed a vote
Send to
President for
introduction:
Non-debatable motion to proceed
on House bill, if House completes
Committee reports with a
action on its bill after Senate votes
signature
favorable, unfavorable or no
on Senate bill
Shall proceed to House bill if House has
recommendation; or freferred to
completed action
multiple committees, then the
Budget Committee reports with
10 Hour limition debate
Rescissions take effect
favorable, unfavorable or no
upon enactment
recommendation and the
No amendments
recommendations given to Budget
from any other committee to which
Must vote on measure no later than 10
the bill was referred
sessions days from date of introduction
(No amendments)
Budget Committees
OR
adjust appropriate
committee 302(a)
Bill is automatically discharged
allocations within 5 days
Source Senate Budget committee Republican Staff
Stop Over Spending Act of 2006 Side-By-Side
S. 2381 As
Provision
Chairman's Mark
Introduced
Number and Timing of Special
No limit on number or
President may submit 4 special messages per year:
Messages
timing.
1 with the President's budget proposal (first Monday in February); and
3 other special messages at a time of his choosing.
The Special Message may include rescission proposals within one year of the
date of enactment of such legislation covered by this Act.
President Authorized to withhold spending or suspend benefits up to 45
Withholding Period for Funds
180 day withholding
Calendar Days.
in Requested Rescission
for funds proposed for
rescission.
The President may not withhold/suspend any dollar amount until the special
message is transmitted and received by Congress (to encourage Presidential
action as quickly as possible upon enactment of spending or tax legislation.)
The President may make funds available earlier if he concludes withholding or
suspension of funds would not further the purposes of this Act.
Re-Submission of Rescission
No limit on number of
President may resubmit some or all of the amounts of rescission proposal in no
Request
times an item can be
more than one additional special message under Part B or Part C of the
submitted.
Impoundment Control Act of 1974.
S. 2381 As
Provision
Chairman's Mark
Introduced
Sunset Line Item Veto
No sunset. Permanent
Sunset in 4 years. (Includes 2 years under Bush, and 2 yrs for President elected
Authority
law.
in '08)
The Chairman's mark includes references to "targeted tax benefit" (TTB)
Tax Application
Applies to all targeted
throughout Part C to allow for consideration of repeal of TTB's under the same
tax benefits.
procedure as those for discretionary spending and direct spending.
JCT identifies targeted tax benefits and allows the President to only rescind
those TTB's on the JCT list.
Mandatory Spending
Allows President to
Does NOT allow the President "to modify" direct spending items or targeted
Rescissions
modify mandatory
tax benefits.
spending policies.
If a bill contains provisions in the jurisdiction of more than one committee the
Referral and Reporting-
Does not specify
bill shall be jointly referred to the committees of jurisdiction and the Committee
MULTIPLE COMMITTEES
referral procedure for a
on the Budget.
special message
containing provisions
Requires Budget Committee to collect multiple committee recommendations on
from multiple
whether to report favorably, unfavorably or without recommendation the
committees
measure five days from introduction without substantive revision.
Failure to meet the specified deadline would result in the bill being
automatically discharged and placed on the appropriate calendar.
STOP
S.O.S.:
STOP
STOP OVER-SPENDING ACT OF 2006
SPENDING RESTRAINT - DEFICIT REDUCTION - BUDGET ENFORCEMENT - FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY
Pro-Growth Economic Policies Have Resulted in
Dramatic Increases In Tax Revenue
Fiscal Year 2005 tax revenues increased $274 billion (adjusted for inflation) over FY
2004, representing the largest increase on record in real terms.
Fiscal YTD (through April 2006) tax receipts are up $137 billion (11.2%) over a year
ago.
Fiscal YTD (through April 2006) individual income tax receipts are up 10.2% over the
same period a year ago; corporate tax receipts are up 29.5% over the same period a year
ago.
The most recent data suggests this trend has continued through May. The daily Treasury
statements indicate that tax receipts in May 2006 are up $35.5 billion over May 2005, to
$166.2 billion.
CBO expects the 2006 deficit will be significantly less than $350 billion and perhaps as
low as $300 billion. CBO forecast assumes enactment of the supplemental and tax bill
this year. (Senate-passed FY07 Budget Resolution assumed 2006 deficit of $372 billion)
CBO attributes much of that improvement to revenue growth.
Economic Growth Propels Revenues
$3,300
$3,100
4.0%
$2,900
5.3%
Internet bubble bursts
5.2%
$2,700
6.7%
9/11 Attacks
$2,500
5.4%
Billions
War Begins
Tax Cuts
$2,300
11.2%
Enacted
$2,100
14.6%
10.8%
-6.9%
-1.7%
-3.8%
$1,900
5.5%
$1,700
$1,500
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Source: CBO
Capital Gains Tax Receipts Higher than
Tax Receipts Up 11%, Surpassing 2001 Peak
Previously Projected
$1,400
$90
$81
$1,300
January 2004 Baseline
$80
January 2006 Baseline
$75
$1,200
$70
$60
$60
$ Billions
$54
Billions of Dollars
$1,100
$1,000
$49
$50
$44
$900
$40
$800
$30
$700
$20
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Source: CBO
2004
2005
2006
Source: OMB
Note: data for fiscal year to date
Corporate Tax Revenue Has Tripled
RECORD TAX REVENUES
$190
$250
$170
$200
Largest Increase of Tax Revenue Ever
$150
$150
$100
Billions of Dollars
$130
Real 2004 Dollars
$50
$0
$110
-$50
$90
-$100
$70
-$150
-$200
$50
1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005
Source:
OMB 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Source: cBo, American Shareholders Association
Note: data for fiscal year to date
JUDD GREGG, NEW HAMPSHIRE, CHAIRMAN
PETE V. DOMENICI. NEW MEXICO
KENT CONRAD, NORTH DAKOTA
CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, IOWA
PAUL S. SARBANES. MARYLAND
WAYNE ALLARD, COLORADO
PATTY MURRAY, WASHINGTON
MICHAEL ENZI, WYOMING
RON WYDEN, OREGON
JEFF SESSIONS, ALABAMA
RUSSLE D. FEINGOLD, WISCONSIN
JIM BUNNING, KENTUCKY
TIM JOHNSON, SOUTH DAKOTA
United States Senate
MIKE CRAPO. IDAHO
ROBERT C. BYRD, WEST VIRGINIA
JOHN ENSIGN. NEVADA
BILL NELSON. FLORIDA
COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET
JOHN CORNYN, TEXAS
DEBBIE STABENOW MICHIGAN
LAMAR ALEXANDER, TENNESSEE
ROBERT MENENDEZ. NEW JERSEY
LINDSAY 0. GRAHAM, SOUTH CAROLINA
WASHINGTON, DC 20510-6100
SCOTT B. GUDES, MAJORITY STAFF DIRECTOR
MARY ANN NAYLOR. STAFF DIRECTOR
http://budget.senate.gov
June 13, 2006
Dear Republican Colleague:
On Thursday, I plan to introduce the Stop Over-Spending (SOS) Act, a comprehensive plan to rein in spending,
reduce the deficit and regain control of the federal budget process. Despite dramatic increases in tax revenue
triggered by Republican pro-growth economic policies, out-of-control spending on both the discretionary and
mandatory sides of the ledger threatens our economic well-being and that of our children and grandchildren.
My bill, which builds on the President's Line-Item Veto proposal, offers solutions to restore fiscal discipline to
the Congress and dramatically reduce the deficit, as well as find long-term solutions to the problem of
unfunded obligations.
I think we can all agree that the budget process is broken. There are too many gimmicks and too much wasteful
spending, and we are leaving the bill to be paid by future generations. Many of the budget enforcement tools
used by our predecessors have lapsed, and the explosion of "emergency" spending has allowed for billions of
dollars to be spent above the discretionary caps. We must regain control of this runaway train. My bill will
ensure that when Congress spends the taxpayer's money, it is done in a straightforward, transparent, and
disciplined way. And most importantly, without mortgaging our children's future.
The Stop Over-Spending Act provides commonsense and responsible solutions to this problem.
It creates a line-item veto tool that allows a President to target wasteful spending, ask that it be rescinded,
and send it up to Congress for expedited consideration.
It creates a new and improved Gramm-Rudmanesque mechanism to essentially balance the budget by
2012 - procedures to automatically slow the rate of growth for mandatory programs if Congress fails to
meet deficit reduction targets.
It reinstates statutory caps on discretionary spending (and the use of all-too-convenient and burgeoning
"emergency" spending), enforceable by an across the board sequester, if Congress fails to adhere to the
caps.
It creates a point of order against direct spending that is triggered when the Medicare program is projected
to become insolvent in 7 years or less. Due to skyrocketing health care costs and an aging population,
Medicare is projected to be the first of the large entitlement programs to become insolvent.
It creates two new bi-partisan commissions: one to study the accountability and efficiency of government
programs (in a manner similar to the BRAC Commission), and the other to examine and provide solutions
to the impending entitlement crisis.
I hope you will join me in supporting this important effort. If you have any questions regarding the information
in this packet or would like to be a cosponsor, please contact my Deputy Staff Director Denzel McGuire, at
228-5846.
Sincerely,
Jidd
Judd Gregg
Chairman
Page 1 of 2
Wolff, Candida P.
From:
Noyes, Joel P.
Sent:
Tuesday, June 27, 2006 11:28 AM
To:
Wolff, Candida P.; Conklin, Brian C.; O'Hollaren, Sean B.; Rowan, Peter M.
Subject:
LIV D's
Attachments: Line Item Veto by State.doc
Below, and attached, is a list of the D's that voted in favor of LIV, grouped by State (24 States, 35 Members):
Arkansas
Mike Ross (AR-04)
California
Dennis Cardoza (CA-18)
Jim Costa (CA-20)
Adam Schiff (CA-29)
Colorado
Mark Udall (CO-02)
Florida
Allen Boyd (FL-02)
Georgia
Jim Marshall (GA-03)
John Barrow (GA-12)
Hawaii
Ed Case (HI-02)
Illinois
Melissa Bean (IL-08)
Kentucky
Ben Chandler (KY-06)
Louisiana
Charlie Melancon (LA-03)
Maryland
Albert Wynn (MD-04)
Massachusetts
Bill Delahunt (MA-10)
Mississippi
Gene Taylor (MS-04)
New Jersey
Rob Andrews (NJ-01)
New York
Carolyn Maloney (NY-14)
North Carolina
Mike McIntyre (NC-07)
6/27/2006
Page 2 of 2
Ohio
Ted Strickland (OH-06)
Sherrod Brown (OH-13)
Oklahoma
Dan Boren (OK-02)
Oregon
Peter DeFazio (OR-04)
Darlene Hooley (OR-05)
Rhode Island
James Langevin (RI-02)
South Dakota
Stephanie Herseth (SD-AL)
Tennessee
Lincoln Davis (TN-04)
Jim Cooper (TN-05)
Bart Gordon (TN-06)
John Tanner (TN-08)
Harold Ford (TN-09)
Texas
Chet Edwards (TX-17)
Henry Cuellar (TX-28)
Utah
Jim Matheson (UT-02)
Washington
Jay Inslee (WA-01)
Adam Smith (WA-09)
6/27/2006
Final
Band
LOTT
Craig
Voinavich
Domenici
Hagel
LN: Collins
KBH
Murkawski-
Senate Line Item Veto Vote History
H.R. 2164,
Cosponsor
Expedited
of S. 2183,
S. 4, Line
H.R. 2, Line
In Cycle--
Recission,
GWB Bill/
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Former
Member, (A) =
Item Veto Act
Item Veto Act
Former
Up for
(10/3/92),
* =
of S. 4,
of H.R. 2,
of HR 2164,
Lt.
Appropriator
(3/27/96),
(2/6/95),
Governor
Reelection
House
Cosponsor
1995
1995
1992
Governor
Senate Vote
House Vote
in 2006
vote,
of Gregg
Carper Bill
Bill
Ds w/ Past Support
Baucus
aye
Biden
aye
Carper
aye
Sponsor
yes
yes
Dorgan (A)
aye
aye
yes
Feinstein (A)
aye
yes
yes
Feingold
aye
Harkin
aye
Johnson (A)
aye
aye
yes
Kennedy
aye
yes
Kerry
aye
yes
yes
Kohl (A)
aye
yes
Lieberman
aye
yes
Menendez
aye
Schumer
aye
aye
Wyden
aye
aye
yes
Reasonable Ds
Bayh
yes
Cantwell
yes
Clinton
yes
Landrieu
Nelson (NE)
yes
yes
Nelson (FL))
yes
Obama
Pryor
H.R. 2164,
Cosponsor
Expedited
of S. 2183,
S. 4, Line
H.R. 2, Line
Recission,
GWB Bill/
In Cycle--
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Former
Member, (A) =
Item Veto Act
Item Veto Act
Former
* =
Up for
(10/3/92),
of S.4,
of H.R. 2,
of HR 2164,
Lt.
Appropriator
(3/27/96),
(2/6/95),
Governor
Reelection
House
Cosponsor
1995
1995
1992
Governor
Senate Vote
House Vote
in 2006
vote,
of Gregg
Carper Bill
Bill
Salazar
Ds with no History
yes/not
Dayton
running
Stabenow
yes
GOP Moderates
Chafee
yes
yes
Coleman
Collins
Grassley
aye
Hagel
Murkowski
Smith
Snowe
aye
aye
yes
yes
yes
GOP Appropriators
Cochran
aye
Allard (A)
aye
aye
yes
yes
yes
Bennett (A)
aye
Bond (A)
aye
yes
yes
Brownback (A)
aye
yes*
yes
Burns (A)
aye
yes
yes
Gregg (A)
aye
yes
yes
yes
Craig (A)
aye
yes
DeWine (A)
aye
yes
yes
yes
Domenici (A)
aye
H.R. 2164,
Cosponsor
Expedited
of S. 2183,
S. 4, Line
H.R. 2, Line
In Cycle--
Recission,
GWB Bill/
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Former
Member, (A) =
Item Veto Act
Item Veto Act
Former
* =
Up for
(10/3/92),
of S. 4,
of H.R. 2,
of HR 2164,
Lt.
Appropriator
(3/27/96),
(2/6/95),
Governor
Reelection
House
Cosponsor
1995
1995
1992
Governor
Senate Vote
House Vote
in 2006
vote,
of Gregg
Carper Bill
Bill
Hutchison (A)
aye
yes
McConnell (A)
aye
yes'
yes
Shelby (A)
aye
yes
Specter (A)
aye
Stevens (A)
aye
Solid GOP Yes
Alexander
yes*
yes
Allen
aye
yes
yes
yes
yes
Bunning
aye
aye
yes*
yes
yes
Burr
aye
yes
yes
Chambliss
aye
yes*
Coburn
aye
yes
Cornyn
*
Crapo
aye
yes*
DeMint
yes*
Dole
yes
Ensign
*
aye
yes
yes
Enzi
yes*
yes/not
Frist
aye
yes*
running
Graham
aye
yes*
Hatch
aye
yes
yes
Inhofe
*
aye
aye
yes
Isakson
yes*
Kyl
aye
aye
yes*
yes
yes
yes
Lott
aye
yes
yes
Lugar
aye
yes
Martinez
yes
H.R. 2164,
Cosponsor
Expedited
of S. 2183,
S. 4, Line
H.R. 2, Line
Recission,
GWB Bill/
Item Veto Act
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
In Cycle--
Cosponsor
Former
Member, (A) =
Item Veto Act
Former
(10/3/92),
* =
of S. 4,
of H.R. 2,
Up for
of HR 2164,
Lt.
Appropriator
(3/27/96),
(2/6/95),
Governor
Reelection
House
Cosponsor
1995
1995
1992
Governor
Senate Vote
House Vote
in 2006
vote,
of Gregg
Carper Bill
Bill
McCain
aye
yes*
yes
Roberts
aye
Santorum
aye
aye
yes*
yes
yes
yes
Sessions
yes*
Sununu
yes*
Talent
aye
yes
yes
yes
Thomas
aye
aye
yes*
yes
yes
yes
Thune
yes*
Vitter
yes*
Voinovich
yes
Warner
aye
yes
Solid D No
Akaka
no
yes
Bingaman
no
yes
Boxer
no
Byrd (A)
no
yes
Conrad
no
yes
Dodd
no
Durbin
no
Jeffords
no
Inouye (A)
no
Lautenberg
no
Leahy (A)
no
Levin
no
Lincoln
no
Mikulski (A)
no
Murray (A)
no
H.R. 2164,
Cosponsor
Expedited
of S. 2183,
S. 4, Line
H.R. 2, Line
In Cycle--
Recission,
GWB Bill/
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Cosponsor
Former
Member, (A) =
Item Veto Act
Item Veto Act
Former
Up for
(10/3/92),
* =
of S. 4,
of H.R. 2,
of HR 2164,
Lt.
Appropriator
(3/27/96),
(2/6/95),
Governor
Reelection
House
Cosponsor
1995
1995
1992
Governor
Senate Vote
House Vote
in 2006
vote,
of Gregg
Carper Bill
Bill
Reed
no
Reid (A)
no
yes
Rockefeller
no
yes
yes/not
no
Sarbanes
running
Message
Page 1 of 1
Wolff, Candida P.
From:
Goeglein, Tim
Sent:
Tuesday, June 27, 2006 10:15 AM
To:
Rove, Karl C.; Wolff, Candida P.
Cc:
Keenum, Rhonda N.; Taylor, Sara M.; Hughes, Taylor A.; Sinatra, Nicholas A.
Subject: FW: American Values Agenda
Karl and Candi
The House leadership plans to roll out THE AMERICAN VALUES AGENDA this afternoon.
The Values Action Team (VAT) groups are putting out various statements today regarding the agenda.
Here is the list of issues:
American Values Agenda
Pledge Protection Act (HR 2389; Akin)
Freedom to Display the American Flag Act (HR 42; Bartlett)
The Public Expression of Religion Act (HR 2679; Hostettler)
Marriage Amendment (HJRes 88; Musgrave)
Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act (HR 356; C. Smith)
Internet Gambling Prohibition (Leach/Goodlatte):
Human Cloning Prohibition Act (HR 1357; D. Weldon)
Family Tax Permanency
Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act (HR 5013; Jindal)
BATFE Reform (HR 5092; Coble)
tsg
6/27/2006
Withdrawal Marker
The George W. Bush Library
FORM
SUBJECT/TITLE
PAGES
DATE
RESTRICTION(S)
Memorandum
Likely Positive Achievements of the Pension Legislation - To: AH -
1
06/27/2006
P5;
From: Chuck
This marker identifies the original location of the withdrawn item listed above.
For a complete list of items withdrawn from this folder, see the
Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet at the front of the folder.
COLLECTION:
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
SERIES:
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
FOLDER TITLE:
Line Item Veto
FRC ID:
FOIA IDs and Segments:
6247
2017-0029-F
OA Num.:
7992
NARA Num.:
7893
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]
b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]
an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
2201(3).
financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
Deed of Gift Restrictions
concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
A. Closed by Executive Order 13526 governing access to national
Records Not Subject to FOIA
security information.
B. Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document.
Court Sealed - The document is withheld under a court seal and is not subject to
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
the Freedom of Information Act.
of gift.
This Document was withdrawn on 5/31/2019 by erg
United States Senate
WASHINGTON, DC 20510
June 29, 2006
President George W. Bush
The White House
Washington, DC 20500
Dear Mr. President:
Like all Americans, we want to see progress and success in Iraq. We believe this goal
can best be accomplished by having Iraqis take responsibility for their own security and
governance so we can transform the U.S. mission and begin the phased redeployment of
U.S. forces this year. But we also recognize that troop redeployments must be part of a
larger political, regional and international strategy designed to stabilize Iraq and give the
Iraqi people the best chance to achieve a peaceful and democratic future.
The Iraq plan we recently placed before the U.S. Senate reflected these beliefs. And we
were pleased to note that shortly after the Senate acted on our plan, General Casey told a
press conference at the Pentagon that he thought he could make substantial reductions in
U.S. troops this year, as he had stated last year, with further troop reductions in 2007.
Last week, we also learned from Iraq's national security adviser Mowaffak al-Rubaie
that there was an unofficial "road map" to foreign troop reductions; that the removal of
foreign troops will help the Iraqis, who see foreign troops as occupiers rather than the
liberators they were meant to be; that the removal of foreign troops will legitimize the
Iraqi government in the eyes of its people; and that open-ended commitments by foreign
governments will only serve to make the Iraqi government a weaker one and eventually
lead to a culture of dependency.
Regrettably, neither your Administration nor congressional Republicans chose to put
forward an alternative to the Democratic plan. After three and one half years of combat,
our troops - and the Iraqi people - are entitled to a debate and a strategy for success.
Staying the course and maintaining an open-ended commitment in Iraq is not in the U.S.
national security interest, nor is it the best way to maximize Iraq's chances for success.
Therefore we believe it is important for you at this critical time to clarify your views on
the best way forward in Iraq. For example, do you agree with General Casey that
substantial reductions can be achieved this year, given the current conditions in Iraq? Do
you agree with Senate Democrats and our military commanders who have stated that in
order to defeat the insurgency and prevent sectarian violence, our military strategy must
be coupled with a comprehensive political and diplomatic strategy that gives Iraq's major
groups the confidence to pursue their interests peacefully and Iraq's neighbors and the
international community a greater role in stabilizing Iraq?
We hope you will join with us, Mr. President, in answering these important questions and
providing the direction that the American public seeks and that our troops deserve.
Sincerely,
Harry Rid
Carl Revin
/08 Bider
Bibe
Ken Salayar
Dehlie Statenew Phonk R. Lantenberg
Chuck Scheme
Nun Fingred
Babes a. Mchushe'
Josh Bard
9.Kg Jom Carge
Hillary Rodham Clinton Barban Byn
RWz
Churc DaM
lekes
Patnes Lealy
Jeff Bin
Jim Jeffords
Patty Munary
Zom Hark
Day
En Byl
MakDaytan
Hab Kohl
Withdrawal Marker
The George W. Bush Library
FORM
SUBJECT/TITLE
PAGES
DATE
RESTRICTION(S)
Briefing
Meeting with Members of the Senate [and Handwritten Notes]
4
06/27/2006
P5;
This marker identifies the original location of the withdrawn item listed above.
For a complete list of items withdrawn from this folder, see the
Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet at the front of the folder.
COLLECTION:
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
SERIES:
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
FOLDER TITLE:
Line Item Veto
FRC ID:
FOIA IDs and Segments:
6247
2017-0029-F
OA Num.:
7992
NARA Num.:
7893
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]
b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]
an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
2201(3).
financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
Deed of Gift Restrictions
concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
A. Closed by Executive Order 13526 governing access to national
Records Not Subject to FOIA
security information.
B. Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document.
Court Sealed - The document is withheld under a court seal and is not subject to
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
the Freedom of Information Act.
of gift.
This Document was withdrawn on 5/31/2019 by erg
Withdrawal Marker
The George W. Bush Library
FORM
SUBJECT/TITLE
PAGES
DATE
RESTRICTION(S)
Talking Points
Talking Points for Meeting with Members. [and Handwritten Notes]
2
N.D.
P5;
This marker identifies the original location of the withdrawn item listed above.
For a complete list of items withdrawn from this folder, see the
Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet at the front of the folder.
COLLECTION:
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
SERIES:
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
FOLDER TITLE:
Line Item Veto
FRC ID:
FOIA IDs and Segments:
6247
2017-0029-F
OA Num.:
7992
NARA Num.:
7893
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]
b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]
an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
2201(3).
financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
Deed of Gift Restrictions
concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
A. Closed by Executive Order I3526 governing access to national
Records Not Subject to FOIA
security information.
B. Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document.
Court Sealed - The document is withheld under a court seal and is not subject to
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
the Freedom of Information Act.
of gift.
This Document was withdrawn on 5/31/2019 by erg
Withdrawal Marker
The George W. Bush Library
FORM
SUBJECT/TITLE
PAGES
DATE
RESTRICTION(S)
Email
RE: Line Item Veto - To: Candida Wolff, et al. - From: Peter Rowan
5
02/17/2006
P5;
This marker identifies the original location of the withdrawn item listed above.
For a complete list of items withdrawn from this folder, see the
Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet at the front of the folder.
COLLECTION:
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
SERIES:
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
FOLDER TITLE:
Line Item Veto
FRC ID:
FOIA IDs and Segments:
6247
OA Num.:
2017-0029-F
7992
NARA Num.:
7893
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]
b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]
an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
2201(3).
financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
Deed of Gift Restrictions
concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
A. Closed by Executive Order 13526 governing access to national
Records Not Subject to FOIA
security information.
B. Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document.
Court Sealed - The document is withheld under a court seal and is not subject to
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
the Freedom of Information Act.
of gift.
This Document was withdrawn on 5/31/2019 by erg
Page 1 of 2
Rles
Wolff, Candida P.
From:
White House Communications [[email protected])
Sent:
Monday, March 06, 2006 5:46 PM
To:
Wolff, Candida P.
Subject:
FACT SHEET: President Submits Line Item Veto Legislation To Congress
Attachments: 3.6.06 Line-Item Veto Legislation.pdf
President Submits Line Item Veto Legislation to Congress
"Today, I'm sending Congress legislation that will meet standards and give me the authority to strip special
spending and earmarks out of a bill, and then send them back to Congress for an up or down vote. By
passing this version of the line item veto, the administration will work with the Congress to reduce wasteful
spending, reduce the budget deficit, and ensure that taxpayer dollars are spent wisely," President Bush,
March 6, 2006.
Today's Presidential Action:
Today, President Bush sent to Congress line item veto legislation that is designed to rein in wasteful
spending, reduce the budget deficit, and improve accountability. The proposed legislation is also
consistent with the Constitution.
Legislative Line Item Veto Act: Special, fast-track procedures would be created to guarantee an up-or-down
vote by simple majority in Congress on a proposal by the President to rescind specific spending or tax
legislation that has been passed. Leaders from both the Republican and Democratic parties, in the House and
the Senate, have supported this approach in the past.
The Legislative Line Item Veto Will Help Reduce Earmarks. Giving the President enhanced authority to seek
rescission of new spending will help ensure that taxpayer dollars are not wasted on unjustified earmarks that are
not national priorities. Since the Supreme Court struck down the Line Item Veto Act in 1998, the number of
earmarks has significantly increased.
The Line Item Veto Has A Long History of Bipartisan Support. At least 11 presidents from both parties have
called for the authority to address individual spending items wrapped into larger bills: Ulysses Grant, Rutherford
Hayes, Chester Arthur, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Ronald
Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton. The governors of 43 of the 50 states already have this authority.
The President's Proposal Is Fully Consistent with the Constitution. In its 1998 ruling striking down the Line
Item Veto Act of 1996, the Supreme Court concluded that the Act "g[ave] the President the unilateral power to
change the text of duly enacted statutes." The Legislative Line Item Veto Act does not raise those constitutional
issues because the President's rescission proposals must be enacted by both houses of Congress and signed into
law.
/6/2006
Withdrawal Marker
The George W. Bush Library
FORM
SUBJECT/TITLE
PAGES
DATE
RESTRICTION(S)
Handwritten Note [Handwritten Notes]
2
N.D.
P5;
This marker identifies the original location of the withdrawn item listed above.
For a complete list of items withdrawn from this folder, see the
Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet at the front of the folder.
COLLECTION:
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
SERIES:
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
FOLDER TITLE:
Line Item Veto
FRC ID:
FOIA IDs and Segments:
6247
OA Num.:
2017-0029-F
7992
NARA Num.:
7893
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]
b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]
an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
2201(3).
financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
Deed of Gift Restrictions
concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
A. Closed by Executive Order 13526 governing access to national
Records Not Subject to FOIA
security information.
B. Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document.
Court Sealed - The document is withheld under a court seal and is not subject to
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
the Freedom of Information Act.
of gift.
This Document was withdrawn on 5/31/2019 by erg
Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress)
Page 1 of 1
The Library of Congress > THOMAS Home > Bills, Resolutions > Search Results
NEW SEARCH I HOME I HELP
I
S.4
Title: A bill to grant the power to the President to reduce budget authority.
Sponsor: Sen Dole, Robert J. [KS] (introduced 1/4/1995) Cosponsors
(29)
Related Bills: H.RES.147, H.RES.391, H.R.2, H.R.27, H.R.3136
Latest Major Action: Became Public Law No: 104-130 [GPO: Text, PDF]
Senate Reports: 104-9, 104-13; Latest Conference Report: 104-491
MAJOR ACTIONS:
1/4/1995 Introduced/originated in Senate
2/27/1995 Committee on Budget. Reported to Senate by Senator Domenici without
recommendation with amendments. With written report No. 104-9.
Additional and minority views filed.
3/7/1995 Committee on Governmental Affairs. Reported to Senate by Senator Roth
without recommendation without amendment. With written report No. 104-
13. Additional views filed.
3/23/1995 Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay
Vote. 69-29. Record Vote No: 115.
5/17/1995 Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed without objection.
3/21/1996 Conference report H. Rept. 104-491 filed.
3/27/1996 Conference report agreed to in Senate: Senate agreed to conference report
by Yea-Nay Vote. 69-31. Record Vote No: 56.
3/28/1996 Conference report agreed to in House: House agreed to conference report
pursuant to H. Res. 391.
3/28/1996 Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report
Agreed to without objection.
4/9/1996
Signed by President.
4/9/1996 Became Public Law No: 104-130 [Text, PDF]
THOMAS Home I Contact Accessibility I Legal I FirstGov
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d104:SN00004:@@@R
2/17/2006
U.S. Senate: Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote
Page 1 of 3
Find Your Senato
Search
UNITED
STATES
SENATORS
COMMITTEES
LEGISLATION & RECORDS
ART & HISTORY
VISITORS
SENATE
Home > Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote
U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 104th Congress - 2nd Session
Find Votes
Votes
as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of
Find out about C
Nominations
the Secretary of the Senate
voting with this 1
Vote Summary
Calendars & Schedules
Question: On the Conference Report (conference report re: S. 4)
Find Bills
Congressional Record
Vote Number: 56
Vote Date:
March 27, 1996, 07:03 PM
Use this guide to
Treaties
Required For
Vote Result:
1/2
Conference Report Agreed to
full text of recen
Majority:
resolutions on th
Bills & Resolutions
Measure
S.4 (Line Item Veto Act)
them from the S
Number:
Document Roon
Appropriations Bills
Measure Title: An act to give the President line item veto authority with
them in a library
respect to appropriations, new direct spending, and limited tax
Lobbying Disclosure
benefits.
Find Bills in 1
Legislative Process
Vote
YEAs
69
Counts:
You can access
Active Legislation
NAYs
31
information, by k
Vote Summary
By Senator Name
By Vote Position
By Home State
words, from the
site. Information
back to the 93rd
is available on T
Alphabetical by Senator Name
Abraham (R-MI), Yea
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Mack (R-FL), Yea
Akaka (D-HI), Nay
Ford (D-KY), Nay
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
Ashcroft (R-MO), Yea
Frist (R-TN), Yea
McConnell (R-KY), Yea
Virtual Refer
Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Glenn (D-OH), Nay
Mikulski (D-MD), Nay
Bennett (R-UT), Yea
Gorton (R-WA), Yea
Moseley-Braun (D-IL),
The Votes page
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Graham (D-FL), Yea
Reference Desk
Nay
Bingaman (D-NM), Nay
Gramm (R-TX), Yea
Moynihan (D-NY), Nay
procedure inforn
Bond (R-MO), Yea
Grams (R-MN), Yea
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
guides, and ess;
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Nay
votes.
Bradley (D-NJ), Yea
Gregg (R-NH), Yea
Nickles (R-OK), Yea
Breaux (D-LA), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Nunn (D-GA), Nay
Brown (R-CO), Yea
Hatch (R-UT), Yea
Pell (D-RI), Nay
Vote Statistic
Bryan (D-NV), Nay
Hatfield (R-OR), Nay
Pressler (R-SD), Yea
Bumpers (D-AR), Nay
The Votes categ
Heflin (D-AL), Nay
Pryor (D-AR), Nay
Burns (R-MT), Yea
Helms (R-NC), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Nay
Statistics page f
Byrd (D-WV), Nay
Hollings (D-SC), Nay
Robb (D-VA), Yea
figures about vo
Campbell (R-CO), Yea
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
Senators.
Chafee (R-RI), Yea
Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
Roth (R-DE), Yea
Coats (R-IN), Yea
Inouye (D-HI), Nay
Santorum (R-PA), Yea
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Jeffords (R-VT), Nay
Sarbanes (D-MD), Nay
Cohen (R-ME), Nay
Johnston (D-LA), Nay
Shelby (R-AL), Yea
Conrad (D-ND), Nay
Kassebaum (R-KS), Yea
Simon (D-IL), Yea
Coverdell (R-GA), Yea
Kempthorne (R-ID), Yea
Simpson (R-WY), Yea
Craig (R-ID), Yea
Kennedy (D-MA), Yea
Smith (R-NH), Yea
D'Amato (R-NY), Yea
Kerrey (D-NE), Nay
Snowe (R-ME), Yea
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Specter (R-PA), Yea
DeWine (R-OH), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Stevens (R-AK), Yea
Dodd (D-CT), Nay
Kyl (R-AZ), Yea
Thomas (R-WY), Yea
Dole (R-KS), Yea
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay
Thompson (R-TN), Yea
Domenici (R-NM), Yea
Leahy (D-VT), Nay
Thurmond (R-SC), Yea
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Levin (D-MI), Nay
Warner (R-VA), Yea
Exon (D-NE), Yea
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Wellstone (D-MN), Yea
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfrm.cfm?congres=10.. 2/17/2006
U:S. Senate: Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote
Page 2 of 3
Faircloth (R-NC), Yea
Lott (R-MS), Yea
Wyden (D-OR), Yea
Feingold (D-WI), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
Vote Summary
By Senator Name
By Vote Position
By Home State
Grouped By Vote Position
YEAs ---69
Abraham (R-MI)
Faircloth (R-NC)
Lugar (R-IN)
Ashcroft (R-MO)
Feingold (D-WI)
Mack (R-FL)
Baucus (D-MT)
Feinstein (D-CA)
McCain (R-AZ)
Bennett (R-UT)
Frist (R-TN)
McConnell (R-KY)
Biden (D-DE)
Gorton (R-WA)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Bond (R-MO)
Graham (D-FL)
Nickles (R-OK)
Bradley (D-NJ)
Gramm (R-TX)
Pressler (R-SD)
Breaux (D-LA)
Grams (R-MN)
Robb (D-VA)
Brown (R-CO)
Grassley (R-IA)
Roth (R-DE)
Burns (R-MT)
Gregg (R-NH)
Santorum (R-PA)
Campbell (R-CO)
Harkin (D-IA)
Shelby (R-AL)
Chafee (R-RI)
Hatch (R-UT)
Simon (D-IL)
Coats (R-IN)
Helms (R-NC)
Simpson (R-WY)
Cochran (R-MS)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Smith (R-NH)
Coverdell (R-GA)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Snowe (R-ME)
Craig (R-ID)
Kassebaum (R-KS)
Specter (R-PA)
D'Amato (R-NY)
Kempthorne (R-ID)
Stevens (R-AK)
Daschle (D-SD)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Thomas (R-WY)
DeWine (R-OH)
Kerry (D-MA)
Thompson (R-TN)
Dole (R-KS)
Kohl (D-WI)
Thurmond (R-SC)
Domenici (R-NM)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Warner (R-VA)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Wellstone (D-MN)
Exon (D-NE)
Lott (R-MS)
Wyden (D-OR)
NAYs ---31
Akaka (D-HI)
Hatfield (R-OR)
Moseley-Braun (D-IL)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Heflin (D-AL)
Moynihan (D-NY)
Boxer (D-CA)
Hollings (D-SC)
Murray (D-WA)
Bryan (D-NV)
Inouye (D-HI)
Nunn (D-GA)
Bumpers (D-AR)
Jeffords (R-VT)
Pell (D-RI)
Byrd (D-WV)
Johnston (D-LA)
Pryor (D-AR)
Cohen (R-ME)
Kerrey (D-NE)
Reid (D-NV)
Conrad (D-ND)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Dodd (D-CT)
Leahy (D-VT)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Ford (D-KY)
Levin (D-MI)
Glenn (D-OH)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Vote Summary
By Senator Name
By Vote Position
By Home State
Grouped by Home State
Alabama:
Heflin (D-AL), Nay
Shelby (R-AL), Yea
Alaska:
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Stevens (R-AK), Yea
Arizona:
Kyl (R-AZ), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
Arkansas:
Bumpers (D-AR), Nay
Pryor (D-AR), Nay
California:
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Colorado:
Brown (R-CO), Yea
Campbell (R-CO), Yea
Connecticut:
Dodd (D-CT), Nay
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Delaware:
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Roth (R-DE), Yea
Florida:
Graham (D-FL), Yea
Mack (R-FL), Yea
Georgia:
Coverdell (R-GA), Yea
Nunn (D-GA), Nay
Hawaii:
Akaka (D-HI), Nay
Inouye (D-HI), Nay
Idaho:
Craig (R-ID), Yea
Kempthorne (R-ID), Yea
Illinois:
Moseley-Braun (D-IL),
Simon (D-IL), Yea
Nay
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfn.cfm?congress=10. 2/17/2006
U:S. Senate: Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote
Page 3 of 3
Indiana:
Coats (R-IN), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
lowa:
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Kansas:
Dole (R-KS), Yea
Kassebaum (R-KS), Yea
Kentucky:
Ford (D-KY), Nay
McConnell (R-KY), Yea
Louisiana:
Breaux (D-LA), Yea
Johnston (D-LA), Nay
Maine:
Cohen (R-ME), Nay
Snowe (R-ME), Yea
Maryland:
Mikulski (D-MD), Nay
Sarbanes (D-MD), Nay
Massachusetts:
Kennedy (D-MA), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Michigan:
Abraham (R-MI), Yea
Levin (D-MI), Nay
Minnesota:
Grams (R-MN), Yea
Wellstone (D-MN), Yea
Mississippi:
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Lott (R-MS), Yea
Missouri:
Ashcroft (R-MO), Yea
Bond (R-MO), Yea
Montana:
Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Burns (R-MT), Yea
Nebraska:
Exon (D-NE), Yea
Kerrey (D-NE), Nay
Nevada:
Bryan (D-NV), Nay
Reid (D-NV), Nay
New Hampshire:
Gregg (R-NH), Yea
Smith (R-NH), Yea
New Jersey:
Bradley (D-NJ), Yea
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay
New Mexico:
Bingaman (D-NM), Nay
Domenici (R-NM), Yea
New York:
D'Amato (R-NY), Yea
Moynihan (D-NY), Nay
North Carolina:
Faircloth (R-NC), Yea
Helms (R-NC), Yea
North Dakota:
Conrad (D-ND), Nay
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Ohio:
DeWine (R-OH), Yea
Glenn (D-OH), Nay
Oklahoma:
Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
Nickles (R-OK), Yea
Oregon:
Hatfield (R-OR), Nay
Wyden (D-OR), Yea
Pennsylvania:
Santorum (R-PA), Yea
Specter (R-PA), Yea
Rhode Island:
Chafee (R-RI), Yea
Pell (D-RI), Nay
South Carolina:
Hollings (D-SC), Nay
Thurmond (R-SC), Yea
South Dakota:
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
Pressler (R-SD), Yea
Tennessee:
Frist (R-TN), Yea
Thompson (R-TN), Yea
Texas:
Gramm (R-TX), Yea
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Utah:
Bennett (R-UT), Yea
Hatch (R-UT), Yea
Vermont:
Jeffords (R-VT), Nay
Leahy (D-VT), Nay
Virginia:
Robb (.D-VA), Yea
Warner (R-VA), Yea
Washington:
Gorton (R-WA), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Nay
West Virginia:
Byrd (D-WV), Nay
Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
Wisconsin:
Feingold (D-WI), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Wyoming:
Simpson (R-WY), Yea
Thomas (R-WY), Yea
Vote Summary By Senator Name By Vote Position By Home State
SENATORS COMMITTEES LEGISLATION & RECORDS ART & HISTORY VISITORS REFERENCE
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_cal_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfim?congres-10. 2/17/2006
U.S. Senate: Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote
Page 1 of 3
Find Your. Senato
Search
UNITED
STATES
SENATORS
COMMITTEES
LEGISLATION & RECORDS
ART & HISTORY
VISITORS
SENATE
Home > Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote
U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 104th Congress - 1st Session
Find Votes
Votes
as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of
Find out about C
Nominations
the Secretary of the Senate
voting with this t
Vote Summary
Calendars & Schedules
Question: On Passage of the Bill (s.4, as amended)
Find Bills
Congressional Record
Vote Number: 115
Vote Date:
March 23, 1995, 09:08 PM
Use this guide to
Treaties
Required For
Vote Result:
Bill Passed
1/2
full text of recen
Majority:
resolutions on th
Bills & Resolutions
Measure
S.4 (Line Item Veto Act)
them from the S
Number:
Document Roon
Appropriations Bills
Measure Title: An act to give the President line item veto authority with
them in a library
respect to appropriations, new direct spending, and limited tax
Lobbying Disclosure
benefits.
Find Bills in 1
Legislative Process
Vote
YEAs
69
Counts:
You can access
Active
NAYs
29
information, by t
Not Voting
2
words, from the
site. Information
Vote Summary
By Senator Name
By Vote Position
By Home State
back to the 93rd
is available on T
Alphabetical by Senator Name
Abraham (R-MI), Yea
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Mack (R-FL), Yea
Virtual Refer
Akaka (D-HI), Nay
Ford (D-KY), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
Ashcroft (R-MO), Yea
Frist (R-TN), Yea
McConnell (R-KY), Yea
The Votes page
Baucus (D-MT); Nay
Glenn (D-OH), Nay
Mikulski (D-MD), Nay
Reference Desk
Bennett (R-UT), Yea
Gorton (R-WA), Yea
Moseley-Braun (D-IL),
procedure inforn
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Graham (D-FL), Yea
Nay
guides, and ess:
Bingaman (D-NM), Nay
Gramm (R-TX), Not
Moynihan (D-NY), Nay
votes.
Bond (R-MO), Yea
Voting
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Grams (R-MN), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Nay
Bradley (D-NJ), Yea
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Nickles (R-OK), Yea
Vote Statistic
Breaux (D-LA), Yea
Gregg (R-NH), Yea
Nunn (D-GA), Nay
Brown (R-CO), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Packwood (R-OR), Yea
The Votes categ
Bryan (D-NV), Nay
Hatch (R-UT), Yea
Pell (D-RI), Nay
Statistics page f
Bumpers (D-AR), Nay
Hatfield (R-OR), Nay
Pressler (R-SD), Yea
figures about vo
Burns (R-MT), Yea
Heflin (D-AL), Yea
Pryor (D-AR), Nay
Senators.
Byrd (D-WV), Nay
Helms (R-NC), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Nay
Campbell (R-CO), Yea
Hollings (D-SC), Yea
Robb (D-VA), Yea
Chafee (R-RI), Yea
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
Coats (R-IN), Yea
Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
Roth (R-DE), Yea
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Inouye (D-HI), Nay
Santorum (R-PA), Yea
Cohen (R-ME), Yea
Jeffords (R-VT), Nay
Sarbanes (D-MD), Nay
Conrad (D-ND), Nay
Johnston (D-LA), Nay
Shelby (R-AL), Yea
Coverdell (R-GA), Yea
Kassebaum (R-KS), Yea
Simon (D-IL), Nay
Craig (R-ID), Yea
Kempthorne (R-ID), Yea
Simpson (R-WY), Yea
D'Amato (R-NY), Yea
Kennedy (D-MA), Yea
Smith (R-NH), Yea
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
Kerrey (D-NE), Nay
Snowe (R-ME), Yea
DeWine (R-OH), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Specter (R-PA), Yea
Dodd (D-CT), Nay
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Stevens (R-AK), Not
Dole (R-KS), Yea
Kyl (R-AZ), Yea
Voting
Domenici (R-NM), Yea
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay
Thomas (R-WY), Yea
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Leahy (D-VT), Nay
Thompson (R-TN), Yea
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfn?congres=10.. 2/17/2006
U.S. Senate: Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote
Page 2 of 3
Exon (D-NE), Yea
Levin (D-MI), Nay
Thurmond (R-SC), Yea
Faircloth (R-NC), Yea
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Warner (R-VA), Yea
Feingold (D-WI), Yea
Lott (R-MS), Yea
Wellstone (D-MN), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
Vote Summary
By Senator Name
By
Vote
Position
By Home State
Grouped By Vote Position
YEAs ---69
Abraham (R-MI)
Faircloth (R-NC)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Ashcroft (R-MO)
Feingold (D-WI)
Lott (R-MS)
Bennett (R-UT)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Lugar (R-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Ford (D-KY)
Mack (R-FL)
Bond (R-MO)
Frist (R-TN)
McCain (R-AZ)
Bradley (D-NJ)
Gorton (R-WA)
McConnell (R-KY)
Breaux (D-LA)
Graham (D-FL)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Brown (R-CO)
Grams (R-MN)
Nickles (R-OK)
Burns (R-MT)
Grassley (R-IA)
Packwood (R-OR)
Campbell (R-CO)
Gregg (R-NH)
Pressler (R-SD)
Chafee (R-RI)
Harkin (D-IA)
Robb (D-VA)
Coats (R-IN)
Hatch (R-UT)
Roth (R-DE)
Cochran (R-MS)
Heflin (D-AL)
Santorum (R-PA)
Cohen (R-ME)
Helms (R-NC)
Shelby (R-AL)
Coverdell (R-GA)
Hollings (D-SC)
Simpson (R-WY)
Craig (R-ID)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Smith (R-NH)
D'Amato (R-NY)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Snowe (R-ME)
Daschle (D-SD)
Kassebaum (R-KS)
Specter (R-PA)
DeWine (R-OH)
Kempthorne (R-ID)
Thomas (R-WY)
Dole (R-KS)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Thompson (R-TN)
Domenici (R-NM)
Kerry (D-MA)
Thurmond (R-SC)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Kohl (D-WI)
Warner (R-VA)
Exon (D-NE)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Wellstone (D-MN)
NAYs ---29
Akaka (D-HI)
Hatfield (R-OR)
Moynihan (D-NY)
Baucus (D-MT)
Inouye (D-HI)
Murray (D-WA)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Jeffords (R-VT)
Nunn (D-GA)
Boxer (D-CA)
Johnston (D-LA)
Pell (D-RI)
Bryan (D-NV)
Kerrey (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Bumpers (D-AR)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Reid (D-NV)
Byrd (D-WV)
Leahy (D-VT)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Conrad (D-ND)
Levin (D-MI)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Dodd (D-CT)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Simon (D-IL)
Glenn (D-OH)
Moseley-Braun (D-IL)
Not Voting - 2
Gramm (R-TX)
Stevens (R-AK)
Vote Summary
By Senator Name
By Vote Position
By Home State
Grouped by Home State
Alabama:
Heflin (D-AL), Yea
Shelby (R-AL), Yea
Alaska:
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Stevens (R-AK), Not
Voting
Arizona:
Kyl (R-AZ), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Yea
Arkansas:
Bumpers (D-AR), Nay
Pryor (D-AR), Nay
California:
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Colorado:
Brown (R-CO), Yea
Campbell (R-CO), Yea
Connecticut:
Dodd (D-CT), Nay
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Delaware:
Biden (D-DE), Yea
Roth (R-DE), Yea
Florida:
Graham (D-FL), Yea
Mack (R-FL), Yea
Georgia:
Coverdell (R-GA), Yea
Nunn (D-GA), Nay
Hawaii:
Akaka (D-HI), Nay
Inouye (D-HI), Nay
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfn?congress=10. 2/17/2006
U.S. Senate: Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote
Page 3 of 3
Idaho:
Craig (R-ID), Yea
Kempthorne (R-ID), Yea
Illinois:
Moseley-Braun (D-IL),
Simon (D-IL), Nay
Nay
Indiana:
Coats (R-IN), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
Iowa:
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Kansas:
Dole (R-KS), Yea
Kassebaum (R-KS), Yea
Kentucky:
Ford (D-KY), Yea
McConnell (R-KY), Yea
Louisiana:
Breaux (D-LA), Yea
Johnston (D-LA), Nay
Maine:
Cohen (R-ME), Yea
Snowe (R-ME), Yea
Maryland:
Mikulski (D-MD), Nay
Sarbanes (D-MD), Nay
Massachusetts:
Kennedy (D-MA), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Michigan:
Abraham (R-MI), Yea
Levin (D-MI), Nay
Minnesota:
Grams (R-MN), Yea
Wellstone (D-MN), Yea
Mississippi:
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Lott (R-MS), Yea
Missouri:
Ashcroft (R-MO), Yea
Bond (R-MO), Yea
Montana:
Baucus (D-MT), Nay
Burns (R-MT), Yea
Nebraska:
Exon (D-NE), Yea
Kerrey (D-NE), Nay
Nevada:
Bryan (D-NV), Nay
Reid (D-NV), Nay
New Hampshire:
Gregg (R-NH), Yea
Smith (R-NH), Yea
New Jersey:
Bradley (D-NJ), Yea
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay
New Mexico:
Bingaman (D-NM), Nay
Domenici (R-NM), Yea
New York:
D'Amato (R-NY), Yea
Moynihan (D-NY), Nay
North Carolina:
Faircloth (R-NC), Yea
Helms (R-NC), Yea
North Dakota:
Conrad (D-ND), Nay
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Ohio:
DeWine (R-OH), Yea
Glenn (D-OH), Nay
Oklahoma:
Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
Nickles (R-OK), Yea
Oregon:
Hatfield (R-OR), Nay
Packwood (R-OR), Yea
Pennsylvania:
Santorum (R-PA), Yea
Specter (R-PA), Yea
Rhode Island:
Chafee (R-RI), Yea
Pell (D-RI), Nay
South Carolina:
Hollings (D-SC), Yea
Thurmond (R-SC), Yea
South Dakota:
Daschle (D-SD), Yea
Pressler (R-SD), Yea
Tennessee:
Frist (R-TN), Yea
Thompson (R-TN), Yea
Texas:
Gramm (R-TX), Not
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Voting
Utah:
Bennett (R-UT), Yea
Hatch (R-UT), Yea
Vermont:
Jeffords (R-VT), Nay
Leahy (D-VT), Nay
Virginia:
Robb (D-VA), Yea
Warner (R-VA), Yea
Washington:
Gorton (R-WA), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Nay
West Virginia:
Byrd (D-WV), Nay
Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
Wisconsin:
Feingold (D-WI), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Wyoming:
Simpson (R-WY), Yea
Thomas (R-WY), Yea
Vote Summary By Senator Name By Vote Position By Home State
SENATORS COMMITTEES LEGISLATION & RECORDS ART & HISTORY VISITORS REFERENCE
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfn?congress=10.. 2/17/2006
Withdrawal Marker
The George W. Bush Library
FORM
SUBJECT/TITLE
PAGES
DATE
RESTRICTION(S)
Briefing
Line Item Veto: Background and Options
5
02/16/2006
P5;
This marker identifies the original location of the withdrawn item listed above.
For a complete list of items withdrawn from this folder, see the
Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet at the front of the folder.
COLLECTION:
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
SERIES:
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
FOLDER TITLE:
Line Item Veto
FRC ID:
FOIA IDs and Segments:
6247
2017-0029-F
OA Num.:
7992
NARA Num.:
7893
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]
b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]
an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA)
financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
2201(3).
financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
Deed of Gift Restrictions
concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
A. Closed by Executive Order 13526 governing access to national
Records Not Subject to FOIA
security information.
B. Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document.
Court Sealed - The document is withheld under a court seal and is not subject to
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
the Freedom of Information Act.
of gift.
This Document was withdrawn on 5/31/2019 by erg
Withdrawal Marker
The George W. Bush Library
FORM
SUBJECT/TITLE
PAGES
DATE
RESTRICTION(S)
Briefing
Line Item Veto Legislation
2
N.D.
P5;
This marker identifies the original location of the withdrawn item listed above.
For a complete list of items withdrawn from this folder, see the
Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet at the front of the folder.
COLLECTION:
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
SERIES:
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
FOLDER TITLE:
Line Item Veto
FRC ID:
FOIA IDs and Segments:
6247
OA Num.:
2017-0029-F
7992
NARA Num.:
7893
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]
b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]
an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
2201(3).
financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
Deed of Gift Restrictions
concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
A. Closed by Executive Order 13526 governing access to national
Records Not Subject to FOIA
security information.
B. Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document.
Court Sealed - The document is withheld under a court seal and is not subject to
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
the Freedom of Information Act.
of gift.
This Document was withdrawn on 5/31/2019 by erg
Withdrawal Marker
The George W. Bush Library
FORM
SUBJECT/TITLE
PAGES
DATE
RESTRICTION(S)
Email
Line Item Veto (NOTE: We May Discuss This During - To: Candida
1
02/01/2006
P5;
Wolff, et al. - From: William Badger
This marker identifies the original location of the withdrawn item listed above.
For a complete list of items withdrawn from this folder, see the
Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet at the front of the folder.
COLLECTION:
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
SERIES:
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
FOLDER TITLE:
Line Item Veto
FRC ID:
FOIA IDs and Segments:
6247
2017-0029-F
OA Num.:
7992
NARA Num.:
7893
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]
b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]
an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
2201(3).
financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
Deed of Gift Restrictions
concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
A. Closed by Executive Order 13526 governing access to national
Records Not Subject to FOIA
security information.
B. Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document.
Court Sealed - The document is withheld under a court seal and is not subject to
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
the Freedom of Information Act.
of gift.
This Document was withdrawn on 5/31/2019 by erg
Withdrawal Marker
The George W. Bush Library
FORM
SUBJECT/TITLE
PAGES
DATE
RESTRICTION(S)
Briefing
Line Item Veto Legislation
2
N.D.
P5;
This marker identifies the original location of the withdrawn item listed above.
For a complete list of items withdrawn from this folder, see the
Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet at the front of the folder.
COLLECTION:
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
SERIES:
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
FOLDER TITLE:
Line Item Veto
FRC ID:
FOIA IDs and Segments:
6247
2017-0029-F
OA Num.:
7992
NARA Num.:
7893
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]
b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]
an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
2201(3).
financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
Deed of Gift Restrictions
concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
A. Closed by Executive Order 13526 governing access to national
Records Not Subject to FOIA
security information.
B. Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document.
Court Sealed - The document is withheld under a court seal and is not subject to
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
the Freedom of Information Act.
of gift.
This Document was withdrawn on 5/31/2019 by erg
Administration
Domenici Bill
RSC Bill
Udall (D-NM)
Stenholm Blue
House-passed
Proposal (2006)
(1995)
(2004)
Bill (2005)
Dog Bill (1999)
Bill (1992)
Time limit for
None
20 days
None
3 days
10 days
3 days
Presidential Action
How Many
No limit
1
1 per relevant
1 per relevant
1 per relevant
1 per relevant
different bills can
Appropriations
Appropriations
Appropriations
Appropriations
subcommittee
subcommittee
subcommittee
subcommittee
be submitted
What types of
Discretionary
Discretionary
Discretionary
Discretionary
All BA in
All BA in
spending are
appropriations;
appropriations;
appropriations;
appropriations;
appropriations
appropriations
direct spending;
targeted tax
Direct spending in
covered
Direct spending in
bills; Targeted tax
bills; No more than
targeted tax
benefits affecting
an appropriations
an appropriations
benefits affecting
25% of a program,
benefits affecting
100 or fewer
bill
bill
fewer than 100
activity or account
100 or fewer
beneficiaries;
people
can be proposed
beneficiaries
excludes direct
spending
Amendment
None
Motion to Strike
None
None
Motion to Strike
None
permitted; Must be
permitted; Must be
supported by 49
supported by 49
other House
other House
members or 11
members or 14
other Senators; if
other Senators
the conferees fail
to agree, any
member may
resubmit the
President's
proposal with no
motion to strike in
order
Administration
Domenici Bill
RSC Bill
Udall (D-NM)
Stenholm Blue
House-passed
Proposal (2006)
(1995)
(2004)
Bill (2005)
Dog Bill (1999)
Bill (1992)
How long to
120 days
No longer than 45
Until either the
Until either the
Until the either the
Until either the
withhold BA in
days
Senate or House
Senate or House
Senate or House
Senate or House
rejects bill by vote
rejects bill by vote
rejects bill by vote
rejects bill by vote
anticipation of
Congressional
Action
Withdrawal Marker
The George W. Bush Library
FORM
SUBJECT/TITLE
PAGES
DATE
RESTRICTION(S)
Chart
Line Item Veto Whip Check
1
07/25/2006
P5;
This marker identifies the original location of the withdrawn item listed above.
For a complete list of items withdrawn from this folder, see the
Withdrawal/Redaction Sheet at the front of the folder.
COLLECTION:
Legislative Affairs, White House Office of
SERIES:
Wolff, Candida (Candi) - Subject Files
FOLDER TITLE:
Line Item Veto
FRC ID:
FOIA IDs and Segments:
6247
2017-0029-F
OA Num.:
7992
NARA Num.:
7893
RESTRICTION CODES
Presidential Records Act - [44 U.S.C. 2204(a)]
Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)]
P1 National Security Classified Information [(a)(1) of the PRA]
b(1) National security classified information [(b)(1) of the FOIA]
P2 Relating to the appointment to Federal office [(a)(2) of the PRA]
b(2) Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of
P3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(a)(3) of the PRA]
an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA]
P4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or
b(3) Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA]
financial information [(a)(4) of the PRA]
b(4) Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial
P5 Release would disclose confidential advice between the President
information [(b)(4) of the FOIA]
and his advisors, or between such advisors [a)(5) of the PRA]
b(6) Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
P6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA]
personal privacy [(a)(6) of the PRA]
b(7) Release would disclose information compiled for law enforcement
purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA]
PRM. Personal record misfile defined in accordance with 44 U.S.C.
b(8) Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of
2201(3).
financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA]
b(9) Release would disclose geological or geophysical information
Deed of Gift Restrictions
concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA]
A. Closed by Executive Order 13526 governing access to national
Records Not Subject to FOIA
security information.
B. Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the document.
Court Sealed - The document is withheld under a court seal and is not subject to
C. Closed in accordance with restrictions contained in donor's deed
the Freedom of Information Act.
of gift.
This Document was withdrawn on 5/31/2019 by erg