Ask the Scholar

Page 1 of 2
I can add historical knowledge about this page.

Page image

Page 1

OCR

Refer in reply to the following: Departmeut of the Interior, OFFICE OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, WASHINGTON, January 29, 1902. The Honorable The Secretary of the Interior. Sir:- I have the honor to acknowledge receipt informally of a communica- tion to the President from Mr. Charles F. Lummis of Los Angeles, Cal., protesting against the abolishment of the Indian Agency in Southern California. Charges have been filed in this Office on several occasions, against the present incumbent, stating that he was selling liquor to Indians from his drugestore at San Jacinto, Cal., and that he was neglecting his duties as Agent and devoting practically his entire time to the management of his store. The matter has been investigated on several occasions and the reports have been somewhat conflicting. However, that has nothing to do with the continuance or discontinuance of the Agency. As will be seen from the memoranda submitted by Mr. .Lummis, the reservations of the Mission Agency are 34 in number and are very much scattered in the southern portion of the State - one of them as far as 320 miles from the Agency. It will be readily seen that it would be a physical impossibility for the Agent to visit these reservations even once a year, which ought to be done in order that the Indians may derive any benefit from an agency. As a matter of fact, he does

Document source description

This item is a letter regarding the protest against the abolishment of the Indian Agency in Southern California.

Page data

Page
1
Source index
0
Type
photo
Media ID
8fbd5e34a52a85cb
Size
unknown

Document data

ID
7268931
Core
doc
Type
document
DTO data
{
    "id": "7268931",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7268931",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letter to the Secretary of the Interior",
    "description": "This item is a letter regarding the protest against the abolishment of the Indian Agency in Southern California.",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7268931",
    "collections": [
        "Papers of Ethan Allen Hitchcock",
        "Communications with the Executive Department"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/31/2689/7268931/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/HITCH/ud-8300-b/Box-3/6850599/HD1-94599050_2010_001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/31/2689/7268931/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/HITCH/ud-8300-b/Box-3/6850599/HD1-94599050_2010_001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/31/2689/7268931/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/HITCH/ud-8300-b/Box-3/6850599/HD1-94599050_2010_001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 2,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}

Context sent to Scholar

Document identity
{
    "localId": "7268931",
    "label": "Letter to the Secretary of the Interior",
    "core": "doc",
    "dtoType": "document",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7268931"
}
Document source metadata
{
    "id": "7268931",
    "sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7268931",
    "contentType": "document",
    "title": "Letter to the Secretary of the Interior",
    "description": "This item is a letter regarding the protest against the abolishment of the Indian Agency in Southern California.",
    "citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7268931",
    "collections": [
        "Papers of Ethan Allen Hitchcock",
        "Communications with the Executive Department"
    ],
    "iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/31/2689/7268931/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/HITCH/ud-8300-b/Box-3/6850599/HD1-94599050_2010_001.jpg",
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/31/2689/7268931/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/HITCH/ud-8300-b/Box-3/6850599/HD1-94599050_2010_001.jpg",
    "largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/31/2689/7268931/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/HITCH/ud-8300-b/Box-3/6850599/HD1-94599050_2010_001.jpg",
    "imageCount": 2,
    "hasImages": true,
    "source": "import",
    "hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
    "url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7268931",
    "naId": 7268931,
    "levelOfDescription": "item",
    "productionDates": [
        {
            "day": 29,
            "logicalDate": "1902-01-29",
            "month": 1,
            "year": 1902
        }
    ],
    "recordType": "description",
    "ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
    "seq": 1,
    "pageIndex": 0,
    "type": "photo",
    "url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/31/2689/7268931/content/arcmedia/dc-metro/HITCH/ud-8300-b/Box-3/6850599/HD1-94599050_2010_001.jpg",
    "mediaId": "8fbd5e34a52a85cb",
    "ocrText": "Refer in reply to the following:\nDepartmeut of the Interior,\nOFFICE OF INDIAN AFFAIRS,\nWASHINGTON, January 29, 1902.\nThe Honorable\nThe Secretary of the Interior.\nSir:-\nI have the honor to acknowledge receipt informally of a communica-\ntion to the President from Mr. Charles F. Lummis of Los Angeles, Cal.,\nprotesting against the abolishment of the Indian Agency in Southern\nCalifornia.\nCharges have been filed in this Office on several occasions,\nagainst the present incumbent, stating that he was selling liquor to\nIndians from his drugestore at San Jacinto, Cal., and that he was\nneglecting his duties as Agent and devoting practically his entire time\nto the management of his store.\nThe matter has been investigated on several occasions and\nthe reports have been somewhat conflicting. However, that has nothing\nto do with the continuance or discontinuance of the Agency.\nAs will be seen from the memoranda submitted by Mr. .Lummis, the\nreservations of the Mission Agency are 34 in number and are very much\nscattered in the southern portion of the State - one of them as far as\n320 miles from the Agency. It will be readily seen that it would be\na physical impossibility for the Agent to visit these reservations\neven once a year, which ought to be done in order that the Indians\nmay derive any benefit from an agency. As a matter of fact, he does"
}