Ask the Scholar
Page 6 of 9
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
1937
A "Yes Man" for Senate Leader.
In the election of Senator Barkley of Ken-
JULY July 22 1937 22
tucky, "My Dear Alben," as Democratic leader
of the senate to succeed Senator Robinson,
THE KANSAS CITY TIMES,
President Roosevelt has been SO unfortunate
as to obtain a "yes man" to handle his pro-
SEEK COURT PEACE
Barkley Able to Speak for
posed legislation. The President has been un-
Hours.
fortunate, because he needs the counsel of a
man of independent character to help protect
(By the Associated Press.)
WASHINGTON, July 21.-Persua-
him from such mistakes as the one involved
Vice-President Officially Concedes
sion is the forte of, the new leader
in the proposal to pack the Supreme court.
of the Democratic majority in the
Mr. Roosevelt has shown himself to be a
Defeat of the President's
senate.
restless leader, full of ideas, some of them
Judiciary Proposal.
Senator Alben W. Barkley of
good, some bad. For his own good and for
Kentucky, chosen today to fill the
the good of the country, he needs strong men
SETTLEMENT UP TO FOES
post of the late Joseph T. Robin-
around him who will stand up and argue
son of Arkansas, adheres to a
things out.
theory that soft argument brings
His overwhelming victory last November
White House Is Willing for Wheel-
success.
had the very natural result of increasing the
er and Followers to Dictate
But when quiet discussion fails,
President's self assurance. He believed the
the tall and powerfully built
Compromise.
country would follow wherever he chose to
Kentuckian can hurl thundering
lead. So he put forward his court plan with-
words at the opposition-for hours
out consulting his party leaders. The adverse
LOOK TO OTHER MEASURES
and hours.
reaction from the people disconcerted and
His friends recall his reputation
angered him, as was clearly shown in his letter
for making a dozen long campaign
to Senator Barkley last week.
Roosevelt Hopes a Beginning Can
speeches a day. He was the key-
But apparently Mr. Roosevelt has failed to
Be Made on Wages and Hours
note speaker at the last two Dem-
ocratic conventions.
profit by experience. He has got a senate
and Farm Bill.
leader who, as a Washington dispatch says,
since the November election indicate
will "accept legislative recommendations from
WASHINGTON BUREAU
the President now has an opposition
the White House with enthusiasm." In the
THE KANSAS CITY STAR
610 ALBEE BUILDING
party in Congress. No one in the
long run this will not prove helpful. The
(By a Member of The Star's Staff.)
senate would dispute Harrison's per-
country and Congress are not disposed to go
WASHINGTON, July 21.-The surren-
sonal popularity. Yet the influence
along with such leadership.
der of the President on the disputed
of the White House and James A.
sections of the Supreme court bill was
Farley could not be denied. When
Protect the Lower Courts, Too.
made official today when Vice-Presi-
the seven Democrats yesterday went
The latest development in the senate is the
to tell Garner they could no longer
dent Garner informed opponents of
"go along" on the court, they ex-
prospect of a compromise involving only the
the court bill that they had won their
pressed a willingness to give Mr.
lower courts and a possible settlement of the
Roosevelt anything else he desired,
whole court issue on that basis. It is indicated
fight.
including the leadership. Senator
by Senator Wheeler that the lower court plan
The first move after the adminis-
Dieterich of Illinois, who had been
committed to Harrison, switched to
will be worked out by opponents of the Su-
tration captured the senate leadership
Barkley yesterday after being urged
preme court proposal and submitted to the ad-
by the margin of one vote came when
to do SO by Mayor Kelley of Chicago
ministration.
Garner conferred with Senator Bur-
and Pat Nash, Democratic boss, both
Under such conditions it might be assumed
close personal and political friends of
ton K. Wheeler of Montana, leader of
Farley.
that any compromise arrangement affecting
the court foes, and said the White
Although the vote on leadership
the circuit and district courts and judges would
House was willing for Wheeler and
was by secret ballot, the votes being
be free from the dangerous features of the Su-
taken from a hat and called out one
his followers "to write their own
preme court program. But if it actually is to
at a time, a tabulation of the vote
ticket."
was obtained from supporters of the
be so, then fundamental changes in the orig-
Garner made it plain that the ad-
candidates. It follows:
inal proposal as it touched the lower courts
ministration was looking for a grace-
For Barkley:
must be made.
ful way out of the controversy. He
Andrews, Florida; Ashurst, Arizona;
In brief, two of the original provisions with
Barkley, Kentucky; Berry, Tennes-
was soliciting the aid of all party
respect to the lower tribunals could be accepted,
see; Bilbo, Mississippi; Black, Ala-
members to ease the blow to the
bama; Bone, Washington; Brown, New
while two others would have to be rejected
President's prestige.
Hampshire; Bulkley, Ohio; Dieterich,
outright.
Seek a Way Out.
Illinois; Donahey, Ohio; Duffy, Wis-
It had been proposed, for example, that the
consin; Ellender, Louisiana; Gillette,
Garner's conference with Wheeler
government should be made a party to any
Iowa; Green, Rhode Island; Guffey,
was followed by another with Sena-
Pennsylvania; Hitchcock, South Da-
suit in which the constitutionality of a federal
tor Alben W. Barkley, newly elected
kota; Hughes, Delaware; Johnson,
statute had been challenged in a district court.
leader. An effort will be made
Colorado; Lee, Oklahoma; Lewis, Illi-
That is fair enough. The government, through
to permit the court bill to be sent
nois; Logan, Kentucky; McAdoo,
the department of justice, ought to have this
California; McGill, Kansas; McKellar,
back to committee with as little fan-
Tennessee; Minton, Indiana; Murray,
opportunity in the initial test of legality as a
fare as possible. One suggestion was
Montana; Overton, Louisiana; Pitt-
protection to the public interest.
made that it be laid aside by unani-
man, Nevada; Pope, Idaho; Reynolds,
Again, it had been proposed that, to avoid
mous consent, without a recorded
North Carolina; Schwartz, Wyoming;
delay and possible injustice, appeals in such
vote.
Schwellenbach, Washington; Shep-
pard, Texas; Smathers, New Jersey;
cases of constitutionality be taken direct from
Other developments which grew out
Thomas, Oklahoma; Thomas, Utah,
the district court to the Supreme tribunal. As
of conferences with the President and
and Wagner, New York.
a means of expediting procedure, that would
the Garner meetings were these:
For Harrison:
be in order.
1. The possibility that the court
Adams, Colorado; Bailey, North
bill will not be mentioned in the
Carolina; Bankhead, Alabama;
But two other original suggestions, if car-
Brown, Michigan; Bulow, South Da-
gied out, would mean a packing of the lower
senate until Monday, by which
kota; Burke, Nebraska; Byrd, Vir-
courts just as certainly would the proposals
time some sort of compromise for
ginia; Byrnes, South Carolina; Cara-
velating to the high court. In the first place,
reform of lower court procedure
way, Arkansas; Chavez, New Mexico;
the lower courts were to he subjected to the
Page data
- Page
- 6
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 13d9ea17047b81a0
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 467318855
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "467318855",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/467318855",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letter from Mary Jane Truman to Harry S. Truman with Attached Newspaper Clippings",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/467318855",
"collections": [
"Bess W. Truman Papers",
"Family Correspondence Files"
],
"subjects": [
"Pendergast, Tom, 1870-1945",
"Swoyer, Martha Ann, 1919-2008",
"Barkley, Alben William, 1877-1956",
"Romine, Mary Colgan, 1885-1977",
"Harrison, Pat, 1881-1941",
"Truman, Martha Ellen, 1852-1947",
"Aylward, James P. (James Patrick), 1885-1982",
"Truman, J. Vivian (John Vivian), 1886-1965"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-bwt/6171940/6283342/6283342-06-001.tif",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-bwt/6171940/6283342/6283342-06-001.tif",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-bwt/6171940/6283342/6283342-06-001.tif",
"imageCount": 9,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "467318855",
"label": "Letter from Mary Jane Truman to Harry S. Truman with Attached Newspaper Clippings",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/467318855"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "467318855",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/467318855",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letter from Mary Jane Truman to Harry S. Truman with Attached Newspaper Clippings",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/467318855",
"collections": [
"Bess W. Truman Papers",
"Family Correspondence Files"
],
"subjects": [
"Pendergast, Tom, 1870-1945",
"Swoyer, Martha Ann, 1919-2008",
"Barkley, Alben William, 1877-1956",
"Romine, Mary Colgan, 1885-1977",
"Harrison, Pat, 1881-1941",
"Truman, Martha Ellen, 1852-1947",
"Aylward, James P. (James Patrick), 1885-1982",
"Truman, J. Vivian (John Vivian), 1886-1965"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-bwt/6171940/6283342/6283342-06-001.tif",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-bwt/6171940/6283342/6283342-06-001.tif",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-bwt/6171940/6283342/6283342-06-001.tif",
"imageCount": 9,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/467318855",
"naId": 467318855,
"levelOfDescription": "item",
"productionDates": [
{
"day": 22,
"logicalDate": "1937-07-22",
"month": 7,
"year": 1937
}
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 6,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/presidential-libraries/truman/hst-bwt/6171940/6283342/6283342-06-006.tif",
"mediaId": "13d9ea17047b81a0",
"ocrText": "1937\nA \"Yes Man\" for Senate Leader.\nIn the election of Senator Barkley of Ken-\nJULY July 22 1937 22\ntucky, \"My Dear Alben,\" as Democratic leader\nof the senate to succeed Senator Robinson,\nTHE KANSAS CITY TIMES,\nPresident Roosevelt has been SO unfortunate\nas to obtain a \"yes man\" to handle his pro-\nSEEK COURT PEACE\nBarkley Able to Speak for\nposed legislation. The President has been un-\nHours.\nfortunate, because he needs the counsel of a\nman of independent character to help protect\n(By the Associated Press.)\nWASHINGTON, July 21.-Persua-\nhim from such mistakes as the one involved\nVice-President Officially Concedes\nsion is the forte of, the new leader\nin the proposal to pack the Supreme court.\nof the Democratic majority in the\nMr. Roosevelt has shown himself to be a\nDefeat of the President's\nsenate.\nrestless leader, full of ideas, some of them\nJudiciary Proposal.\nSenator Alben W. Barkley of\ngood, some bad. For his own good and for\nKentucky, chosen today to fill the\nthe good of the country, he needs strong men\nSETTLEMENT UP TO FOES\npost of the late Joseph T. Robin-\naround him who will stand up and argue\nson of Arkansas, adheres to a\nthings out.\ntheory that soft argument brings\nHis overwhelming victory last November\nWhite House Is Willing for Wheel-\nsuccess.\nhad the very natural result of increasing the\ner and Followers to Dictate\nBut when quiet discussion fails,\nPresident's self assurance. He believed the\nthe tall and powerfully built\nCompromise.\ncountry would follow wherever he chose to\nKentuckian can hurl thundering\nlead. So he put forward his court plan with-\nwords at the opposition-for hours\nout consulting his party leaders. The adverse\nLOOK TO OTHER MEASURES\nand hours.\nreaction from the people disconcerted and\nHis friends recall his reputation\nangered him, as was clearly shown in his letter\nfor making a dozen long campaign\nto Senator Barkley last week.\nRoosevelt Hopes a Beginning Can\nspeeches a day. He was the key-\nBut apparently Mr. Roosevelt has failed to\nBe Made on Wages and Hours\nnote speaker at the last two Dem-\nocratic conventions.\nprofit by experience. He has got a senate\nand Farm Bill.\nleader who, as a Washington dispatch says,\nsince the November election indicate\nwill \"accept legislative recommendations from\nWASHINGTON BUREAU\nthe President now has an opposition\nthe White House with enthusiasm.\" In the\nTHE KANSAS CITY STAR\n610 ALBEE BUILDING\nparty in Congress. No one in the\nlong run this will not prove helpful. The\n(By a Member of The Star's Staff.)\nsenate would dispute Harrison's per-\ncountry and Congress are not disposed to go\nWASHINGTON, July 21.-The surren-\nsonal popularity. Yet the influence\nalong with such leadership.\nder of the President on the disputed\nof the White House and James A.\nsections of the Supreme court bill was\nFarley could not be denied. When\nProtect the Lower Courts, Too.\nmade official today when Vice-Presi-\nthe seven Democrats yesterday went\nThe latest development in the senate is the\nto tell Garner they could no longer\ndent Garner informed opponents of\n\"go along\" on the court, they ex-\nprospect of a compromise involving only the\nthe court bill that they had won their\npressed a willingness to give Mr.\nlower courts and a possible settlement of the\nRoosevelt anything else he desired,\nwhole court issue on that basis. It is indicated\nfight.\nincluding the leadership. Senator\nby Senator Wheeler that the lower court plan\nThe first move after the adminis-\nDieterich of Illinois, who had been\ncommitted to Harrison, switched to\nwill be worked out by opponents of the Su-\ntration captured the senate leadership\nBarkley yesterday after being urged\npreme court proposal and submitted to the ad-\nby the margin of one vote came when\nto do SO by Mayor Kelley of Chicago\nministration.\nGarner conferred with Senator Bur-\nand Pat Nash, Democratic boss, both\nUnder such conditions it might be assumed\nclose personal and political friends of\nton K. Wheeler of Montana, leader of\nFarley.\nthat any compromise arrangement affecting\nthe court foes, and said the White\nAlthough the vote on leadership\nthe circuit and district courts and judges would\nHouse was willing for Wheeler and\nwas by secret ballot, the votes being\nbe free from the dangerous features of the Su-\ntaken from a hat and called out one\nhis followers \"to write their own\npreme court program. But if it actually is to\nat a time, a tabulation of the vote\nticket.\"\nwas obtained from supporters of the\nbe so, then fundamental changes in the orig-\nGarner made it plain that the ad-\ncandidates. It follows:\ninal proposal as it touched the lower courts\nministration was looking for a grace-\nFor Barkley:\nmust be made.\nful way out of the controversy. He\nAndrews, Florida; Ashurst, Arizona;\nIn brief, two of the original provisions with\nBarkley, Kentucky; Berry, Tennes-\nwas soliciting the aid of all party\nrespect to the lower tribunals could be accepted,\nsee; Bilbo, Mississippi; Black, Ala-\nmembers to ease the blow to the\nbama; Bone, Washington; Brown, New\nwhile two others would have to be rejected\nPresident's prestige.\nHampshire; Bulkley, Ohio; Dieterich,\noutright.\nSeek a Way Out.\nIllinois; Donahey, Ohio; Duffy, Wis-\nIt had been proposed, for example, that the\nconsin; Ellender, Louisiana; Gillette,\nGarner's conference with Wheeler\ngovernment should be made a party to any\nIowa; Green, Rhode Island; Guffey,\nwas followed by another with Sena-\nPennsylvania; Hitchcock, South Da-\nsuit in which the constitutionality of a federal\ntor Alben W. Barkley, newly elected\nkota; Hughes, Delaware; Johnson,\nstatute had been challenged in a district court.\nleader. An effort will be made\nColorado; Lee, Oklahoma; Lewis, Illi-\nThat is fair enough. The government, through\nto permit the court bill to be sent\nnois; Logan, Kentucky; McAdoo,\nthe department of justice, ought to have this\nCalifornia; McGill, Kansas; McKellar,\nback to committee with as little fan-\nTennessee; Minton, Indiana; Murray,\nopportunity in the initial test of legality as a\nfare as possible. One suggestion was\nMontana; Overton, Louisiana; Pitt-\nprotection to the public interest.\nmade that it be laid aside by unani-\nman, Nevada; Pope, Idaho; Reynolds,\nAgain, it had been proposed that, to avoid\nmous consent, without a recorded\nNorth Carolina; Schwartz, Wyoming;\ndelay and possible injustice, appeals in such\nvote.\nSchwellenbach, Washington; Shep-\npard, Texas; Smathers, New Jersey;\ncases of constitutionality be taken direct from\nOther developments which grew out\nThomas, Oklahoma; Thomas, Utah,\nthe district court to the Supreme tribunal. As\nof conferences with the President and\nand Wagner, New York.\na means of expediting procedure, that would\nthe Garner meetings were these:\nFor Harrison:\nbe in order.\n1. The possibility that the court\nAdams, Colorado; Bailey, North\nbill will not be mentioned in the\nCarolina; Bankhead, Alabama;\nBut two other original suggestions, if car-\nBrown, Michigan; Bulow, South Da-\ngied out, would mean a packing of the lower\nsenate until Monday, by which\nkota; Burke, Nebraska; Byrd, Vir-\ncourts just as certainly would the proposals\ntime some sort of compromise for\nginia; Byrnes, South Carolina; Cara-\nvelating to the high court. In the first place,\nreform of lower court procedure\nway, Arkansas; Chavez, New Mexico;\nthe lower courts were to he subjected to the"
}